ITEM
1. BUSINESS
General
GulfSlope
Energy, Inc. is an independent crude oil and natural gas exploration and production company whose interests are concentrated in
the United States Gulf of Mexico federal waters. We are a technically driven company, and we use our licensed 2.2 million acres
of advanced three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data to identify, evaluate, and acquire assets with attractive economic profiles.
GulfSlope Energy commenced commercial operations in March 2013. GulfSlope Energy was originally organized as a Utah corporation
in 2004 and became a Delaware corporation in 2012.
We
have focused our operations in the Gulf of Mexico because we believe this area provides us with favorable geologic and economic
conditions, including multiple reservoir formations, comprehensive geologic databases, extensive infrastructure, relatively favorable
royalty regime, and an attractive acquisition market and because our management and technical teams have significant experience
and technical expertise in this geologic province. Additionally, we licensed 2.2 million acres of advanced 3-D seismic data, a
significant portion of which has been enhanced by new, state-of-the-art reprocessing and noise attenuation techniques including
reverse time migration depth imaging. We have used our broad regional seismic database and our reprocessing efforts to generate
and high-grade oil and natural gas prospects. The use of our extensive seismic database, coupled with our ability, knowledge,
and expertise to effectively reprocess this seismic data, allows us to further optimize our operations and to effectively evaluate
acquisition and joint venture opportunities. We consistently assess opportunities for drilling and producing property acquisitions
in order to deploy capital as efficiently as possible. We have given preference to areas with water depths of 450 feet or less
where production infrastructure already exists, which will allow for any discoveries to be developed rapidly and cost effectively
with the goal to reduce economic risk while increasing returns.
Competitive
Advantages
Experienced
management. Our management team has a track record of finding, developing and producing oil and natural gas in various
hydrocarbon producing basins including the U. S. Gulf of Mexico. Our team has significant experience in acquiring and operating
oil and natural gas producing assets worldwide with particular emphasis on conventional reservoirs. We deployed a technical team
with over 150 years of combined industry experience finding and developing oil and natural gas in the development and execution
of our technical strategy. We believe the application of advanced geophysical techniques on a specific geographic area with unique
geologic features such as conventional reservoirs whose trapping configurations have been obscured by overlying salt layers provides
us with a competitive advantage.
Advanced
seismic image processing. Commercial improvements in 3-D seismic data imaging and the development of advanced processing
algorithms, including pre-stack depth, beam, and reverse time migration have allowed the industry to better distinguish hydrocarbon
traps and identify previously unknown prospects. Specifically, advanced processing techniques improve the definition of the seismic
data from a scale of time to a scale of depth, thus locating the images in three dimensions. The Company has invested significant
technical person hours in the reprocessing and interpretation of seismic data. We believe the proprietary reprocessing and interpretation
and the contiguous nature of our licensed 3-D seismic data gives us an advantage over other exploration and production companies
operating in our core area.
Industry
leading position in our core area. We have licensed 2.2 million acres of 3-D seismic data which covers over 440 Outer
Continental Shelf (“OCS”) Federal lease blocks on the highly prolific Louisiana outer shelf, offshore Gulf of Mexico.
We believe the proprietary and state-of-the-art reprocessing of our licensed 3-D seismic data, along with our proprietary and
leading-edge geologic depositional and petroleum trapping models, gives us an advantage in identifying and high grading drilling
and acquisition opportunities in our core area.
Technical
Strategy
We
believe that a major obstacle to identifying potential hydrocarbon accumulations globally has been the inability of seismic technology
to accurately image deeper geologic formations because of overlying massive, extensive, and complex salt bodies. Large and thick
laterally extensive subsurface salt layers highly distort the seismic ray paths traveling through them, which often has led to
misinterpretation of the underlying geology and the potential major accumulations of oil and gas. We believe the opportunity exists
for a technology-driven company to extensively apply advanced seismic acquisition and processing technologies, with the goal of
achieving attractive commercial discovery rates for exploratory wells, and their subsequent appraisal and development, potentially
having a very positive impact on returns on invested capital. These tools and techniques have been proven to be effective in deepwater
exploration and production worldwide, and we are using them to identify and drill targets below the salt bodies in an area of
the shallower waters of the Gulf of Mexico where industry activity has largely been absent for over 20 years. GulfSlope management
led the early industry teams in their successful efforts to discover and develop five new fields below the extensive salt bodies
in our core area during the 1990’s, which have produced over 125 million barrels of oil equivalent.
Our
technical approach to exploration and development has utilized highly experienced geo-scientists who have extensive understanding
of the geology and geophysics of the petroleum system within our core area, thereby decreasing the traditional timing and execution
risks of advancing up a learning curve. For data licensing, re-processing and interpretation, the Company has historically prioritized
specific geographic areas within our 2.2 million acres of seismic coverage, with the goal to optimize capital outlays.
Modern
3-D seismic datasets with acquisition parameters that are optimal for improved imaging at multiple depths are readily available
in many of these sub-basins across our core area and can be licensed on commercially reasonable terms. The application of state-of-the-art
seismic imaging technology is necessary to optimize delineation of prospective structures and to detect the presence of hydrocarbon-charged
reservoirs below many complex salt bodies. An example of such a seismic technology is reverse time migration, which we believe
to be the most accurate, fastest, and yet affordable, seismic imaging technology for critical depth imaging available today.
Lease
and Partner Strategy
Our
prospect identification and analytical strategy is based on a thorough understanding of the geologic trends within our core area.
Exploration efforts have been focused in areas where lease acquisition opportunities are readily available. We entered into two
master 3-D license agreements, together covering approximately 2.2 million acres and we have completed advanced processing on
select areas within this licensed seismic area exceeding one million acres. We can expand this coverage and perform further advanced
processing, both with currently licensed seismic data and seismic data to be acquired. We have sought to acquire and reprocess
the highest resolution data available in the potential prospect’s direct vicinity. This includes advanced imaging information
to further our understanding of a particular reservoir’s characteristics, including both trapping mechanics and fluid migration
patterns. Reprocessing is accomplished through a series of model building steps that incorporate the geometry of the geology to
optimize the final image. Our integration of existing geologic understanding and enhanced seismic processing and interpretation
provides us with unique insights and perspectives on existing producing areas and especially underexplored formations below and
adjacent to salt bodies that are highly prospective for hydrocarbon production.
We
currently hold one lease and have identified multiple prospects that require the acquisition of additional leases in our core
area. Our lease has a five-year primary term and was granted a three-year additional term and expires on October 31, 2025. BOEM’s
regulatory framework provides multiple options for leaseholders to apply to receive extensions of lease terms under specified
conditions. Additional prospective acreage can be obtained through lease sales, farm-in, or purchase. As is consistent with a
prudent and successful exploration approach, we believe that additional seismic licensing, acquisition, processing, and/or interpretation
may become highly advantageous, in order to more precisely define the most optimal drillable location(s), particularly for development
of discoveries.
Our
plan has been to partner with other entities which could include oil and gas companies and/or financial investors. Our goal is
to diversify risk and minimize capital exposure to drilling costs. We expect a portion of our drilling costs to be paid by our
partners through these transactions, in return for our previous investment in prospect generation and delivery of an identified
prospect on acreage we control. Such arrangements are a commonly accepted industry method of proportionately recouping pre-drill
cost outlays for seismic, lease costs, and associated interpretation expenses. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be
able to enter into any such arrangements on satisfactory terms.
Merger
and Acquisition Strategy
We
believe there is an opportunity to consolidate oil and gas assets located in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. Multiple oil and gas
companies have explicitly stated their intentions to exit the Gulf of Mexico and we believe that GulfSlope is well positioned
to take advantage of these opportunities due to our highly specialized subsurface and engineering capabilities, relevant operational
experience, and regional knowledge and expertise. We have developed a significant pipeline of potential acquisition opportunities
with the following characteristics: (i) strong cash flow, (ii) inventory of low-risk capital projects, and (iii) manageable plugging
and abandonment liabilities. In addition to asset acquisitions, we are also evaluating the combination of GulfSlope with other
GOM oil and gas companies. Any merger or acquisition is likely to be financed through the issuance of debt and equity securities.
Oil
and Natural Gas Industry
The
oil and natural gas industry is a complex, multi-disciplinary sector that varies greatly across geographies. As a heavily regulated
industry, operating conditions are subject to political regimes and changing legislation. Governments can either induce or deter
investment in exploration and production, depending on legal requirements, fiscal and royalty structures and regulation. Beyond
political considerations, exploration and production for hydrocarbons is an extremely risky business with multiple failure modes.
Exploration and production wells require substantial investment and are long-term projects, sometimes exceeding twenty years.
Regardless of the effort spent on an exploration or production prospect, success is difficult to attain. Even though modern equipment,
including seismic equipment and advanced software has helped geologists find producing structures and map reservoirs, they do
not guarantee any outcome. Drilling is the only method to ultimately determine whether a prospect will be productive, and even
then, many complications can arise during drilling (e.g., those relating to drilling depths, pressure, porosity, weather conditions,
permeability of the formation and rock hardness, among others).
Typically,
there is a significant chance that exploratory wells will result in non-producing dry holes, leaving investors with the cost of
seismic data and a dry well, which can total millions of dollars. Even if oil or gas is produced from a particular well, there
is always the possibility that treatment, at additional cost, may be required to make production commercially viable. Further,
production profiles decline over time. In summary, oil and gas exploration and production is an industry with high risks and high
entry barriers.
Oil
and natural gas prices can have a significant impact on the commercial feasibility of a project. Certain projects may become feasible
with higher prices or, conversely, may falter with lower prices. Volatility in the price of oil, natural gas and other commodities
has increased and is likely to continue in the future. This volatility complicates the assessment of the commercial viability
of many oil and gas projects. Most governments have enforced strict regulations to uphold high standards of environmental awareness;
thus, holding companies to a high degree of responsibility vis-a-vis protecting the environment. At this time, the Company does
not have any production or proved oil or natural gas reserves.
Competition
We
operate in a highly competitive environment for generating, evaluating and drilling prospects and for acquiring properties. Many
of our competitors are major or large independent oil and natural gas companies that possess and employ financial resources well
in excess of the Company’s resources. We believe that we may have to compete with other companies when acquiring leases
or oil and gas properties. These additional resources can be particularly important in reviewing prospects and purchasing properties.
Competitors may be able to evaluate and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or personnel
resources permit. Competitors may also be able to pay more for properties and prospects than we are able or willing to pay. Further,
our competitors may be able to expend greater resources on the existing and changing technologies that we believe will impact
attaining success in the industry. If we are unable to compete successfully in these areas in the future, our future growth may
be diminished or restricted. Furthermore, these companies may also be better able to withstand the financial pressures of unsuccessful
drill attempts, delays, sustained periods of volatility in financial or commodity markets and generally adverse global and industry-wide
economic conditions and may be better able to absorb the burdens resulting from changes in relevant laws and regulations, which
would adversely affect our operations.
Governmental
Regulation
Our
oil and natural gas operations are subject to various federal, state, and local governmental regulations. Matters subject to regulation
include discharge permits for drilling operations, drilling and abandonment bonds, reports concerning operations, the spacing
of wells, pooling of properties, occupational health and safety, and taxation. From time to time, regulatory agencies have imposed
price controls and limitations on production by restricting the rate of flow of oil and natural gas wells below actual production
capacity in order to conserve supplies of oil and natural gas. The production, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal
of oil and gas, by-products thereof, and other substances and materials produced or used in connection with oil and gas operations
are also subject to regulation under federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating primarily to the protection of human
health and the environment. State and local laws and regulations may affect the prices at which royalty owners are paid for their
leases by requiring more stringent disclosure and certification requirements, adjusting interest rates for late payments, raising
legal and administrative costs and imposing more costly default contractual terms. The requirements imposed by such laws and regulations
are frequently changed and subject to interpretation, and we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these
requirements or their effect on our operations. Although the regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases our
cost of doing business and, consequently, affects our profitability, these burdens generally do not affect us any differently
or to any greater or lesser extent than they affect others in our industry with similar business models.
Our
operations on federal oil and natural gas leases in the United States Gulf of Mexico are subject to regulation by the Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”), the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the
Office of Natural Resources Revenue (“ONRR”), which are all agencies of the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”).
These leases contain relatively standardized terms and require compliance with detailed BSEE and BOEM regulations and orders issued
pursuant to various federal laws, including the federal Outer Continental Shelf Lands Acts (“OCSLA”). These laws and
regulations are subject to change, and many new requirements, including those related to safety, permitting and performance, have
been imposed by BSEE and BOEM subsequent to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon incident. For offshore operations, lessees must obtain
BOEM approval for exploration, development and production plans prior to the commencement of such operations. In addition to permits
required from other agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), lessees must obtain a permit
from BSEE prior to the commencement of drilling and comply with regulations governing, among other things, engineering and construction
specifications for production facilities, safety procedures, plugging and abandonment (“P&A”) of wells on the
OCS, calculation of royalty payments and the valuation of production for this purpose, and removal of facilities.
The
trend in the United States over the past decade has been for these governmental agencies to continue to evaluate and as necessary
develop and implement new, more restrictive requirements. President Biden has made tackling climate change, including the restriction
or elimination of future greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), a priority in his administration. The Biden Administration has
already adopted several executive orders and is expected to pursue additional orders and pursue legislation, regulations or other
regulatory initiatives in support of this regulatory agenda. Notably, President Biden issued an executive order in January 2021
suspending new leasing activities for oil and gas exploration and production on federal lands and offshore waters pending review
and reconsideration of federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices. The suspension of these federal leasing activities
prompted legal action by several states against the Biden Administration, resulting in issuance of a nationwide preliminary injunction
by a federal district court in June 2021, effectively halting implementation of the leasing suspension. Subsequent federal litigation,
however, has impeded the most recent federal oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico requiring the DOI to conduct a new environmental
analysis that takes into consideration such climate effects before holding another sale. In November 2021, the DOI released its
report on federal oil and gas leasing and permitting practices. The report includes recommendations in respect to offshore sector,
including adjusting royalty rates to ensure that the full value of the tracts being leased are captured, strengthening financial
assurance coverage amounts that are required by operators, establishing a “fitness to operate” criteria that companies
would need to meet in respect of safety, environmental and financial responsibilities in order to operate on the OCS. Several
of the report recommendations require action by the Congress and cannot be implemented unilaterally by the Biden Administration.
Uncertainty on future Biden Administration actions with regard to offshore oil and gas activities on the OCS together with the
issuance of any future executive orders or adoption and implementation of laws, rules or initiatives that further restrict, delay
or result in cancellation of existing oil and gas activities on the OCS could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operations.
Compliance
with these regulatory actions, or any new laws, regulations or other legal initiatives could result in significant costs, including
increased capital expenditures and operating costs, and could adversely impact our business. In addition, under certain circumstances,
BSEE may require our operations on federal leases to be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension or termination could adversely
affect our financial condition and operations.
Hurricanes
in the Gulf of Mexico can have a significant impact on oil and gas operations on the OCS. The effects from past hurricanes have
included structural damage to fixed production facilities, semi-submersibles and jack-up drilling rigs. The BOEM and the BSEE
continue to be concerned about the loss of these facilities and rigs as well as the potential for catastrophic damage to key infrastructure
and the resultant pollution from future storms. In an effort to reduce the potential for future damage, the BOEM and the BSEE
have periodically issued guidance aimed at improving platform survivability by taking into account environmental and oceanic conditions
in the design of platforms and related structures.
Environmental
Regulation
The
operation of our future oil and natural gas properties will be subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Applicable U.S. federal
environmental laws include, but are not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(“CERCLA”), the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). These laws and regulations
govern environmental cleanup standards, require permits for air, water, underground injection, waste disposal and set environmental
compliance criteria. In addition, state and local laws and regulations set forth specific standards for drilling wells, the maintenance
of bonding requirements in order to drill or operate wells, the spacing and location of wells, the method of drilling and casing
wells, the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled, the plugging and abandoning of wells, and the
prevention and cleanup of pollutants and other matters. Typically, operators maintain insurance against costs of clean-up operations,
but are not fully insured against all such risks. Additionally, U.S. Congress and federal and state agencies frequently revise
the environmental laws and regulations, and any changes that result in delay or more stringent and costly permitting, waste handling,
disposal and clean-up requirements for the oil and gas industry could have a significant impact on our operating costs. There
can be no assurance that future developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws or enforcement thereof, will not
cause us to incur material environmental liabilities or costs.
Failure
to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal fines and penalties
and the imposition of injunctive relief. Accidental releases or spills may occur in the course of the operations of our properties,
and we cannot assure you that we will not incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of such releases or spills, including
any third-party claims for damage to property, natural resources or persons.
Among
the environmental laws and regulations that could have a material impact on the oil and natural gas exploration and production
industry, and our business are the following:
Waste
Discharges. The CWA and analogous state laws impose restrictions and strict controls with respect to the discharge of pollutants,
including spills and leaks of oil and other substances, into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated
waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA
and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit the discharge of dredge and fill material into regulated waters, including
jurisdictional wetlands, unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. Spill prevention, control and countermeasure requirements
of federal laws mandate preparation of detailed plans that address spill response, including appropriate containment berms and
similar structures to help prevent the contamination of navigable waters by a petroleum hydrocarbon tank spill, rupture or leak.
In addition, the CWA and analogous state laws require individual permits or coverage under general permits for discharges of storm
water runoff from certain types of facilities. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal
penalties as well as other enforcement mechanisms for noncompliance with discharge permits or other requirements of the CWA and
analogous state laws and regulations.
Air
Emissions —The CAA and comparable state statutes restrict the emission of air pollutants and affect both onshore
and offshore oil and natural gas operations. New facilities may be required to obtain separate construction and operating permits
before construction work can begin or operations may start, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in
order to remain in compliance. Also, the EPA has developed, and continues to develop, more stringent regulations governing emissions
of toxic air pollutants, and is considering the regulation of additional air pollutants and air pollutant parameters. For example,
in 2015, the EPA lowered the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”) for ozone from 75 to 70 parts per billion.
State implementation of the revised NAAQS could result in stricter permitting requirements, delays or prohibit our ability to
obtain such permits, and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant.
Climate
Change — The threat of climate change continues to attract considerable public, governmental and scientific attention
in the United States and in foreign countries. As a result, numerous proposals have been made at the international, national,
regional and state levels of government to monitor and limit existing emissions of GHG as well as to restrict or eliminate such
future emissions. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking
programs and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. In the United States, no comprehensive climate
change legislation has been implemented at the federal level. Under the Biden Administration, however, the EPA has adopted regulations
under the existing CAA that, among other things, impose preconstruction and operating permit requirements on certain large stationary
sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas system sources, and
implement New Source Performance Standards directing the reduction of methane from certain new, modified or reconstructed facilities
in the oil and natural gas sector. Compliance with these rules or other similar rules implemented in the future could result in
increased compliance costs on our operations. In November 2021, the EPA also issued a proposed rule that would more stringently
regulate methane emissions from crude oil and natural gas sources. The EPA plans to issue a supplemental proposal enhancing this
proposed rulemaking in 2022 with the goal of issuing a final rule by the end of 2022. Additionally, state implementation of revised
air emission standards could result in stricter permitting requirements, delaying, limiting or prohibiting our ability to obtain
such permits and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant.
At
the international level, there exists numerous conventions and non-binding commitments of participating nations with goals of
limiting their GHG emissions and fossil fuel subsidies. These include the United Nations-sponsored “Paris Agreement,”
to which President Biden recommitted the Unites States, thereby requiring the United States to determine its emissions reduction
goals every five years after 2020. The international community also gathered in Glasgow in November 2021 at the 26th Conference
of the Parties (“COP26”), at which the United States and European Union jointly announced the launch of a Global Methane
Pledge, an initiative which over 100 counties joined, committing to a collective goal of reducing global methane emissions by
at least 30 percent from 2020 levels by 2030, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The impacts
of these orders, pledges, agreements and any legislation or regulation promulgated to fulfill the United States’ commitments
under the Paris Agreement, COP26, or other international conventions cannot be predicted at this time.
Governmental,
scientific and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing federal
political risk regarding climate change. Litigation risks are also increasing, as a number of cities, local governments and other
plaintiffs have sought to bring suit against oil and natural gas companies in state or federal court, alleging, among other things,
that such companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to global warming effects, such as rising sea
levels and therefore are responsible for roadway and infrastructure damages as a result, or alleging that the companies have been
aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately
disclose those impacts. We are not currently a defendant in any of these lawsuits but could be named in actions making similar
allegations.
Additionally,
our access to capital may be impacted by climate change policies. Stockholders and bondholders currently invested in fossil fuel
energy companies such as ours but concerned about the potential effects of climate change may elect in the future to shift some
or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors. Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil-fuel
energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices that favor “clean” power sources,
such as wind and solar, making those sources more attractive, and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel
energy companies. Many of the largest U.S. banks have made “net zero” carbon emission commitments and have announced
that they will be assessing financed emissions across their portfolios and are taking steps to quantify and reduce those emissions.
These and other developments in the financial sector could lead to some lenders and investors restricting access to capital for
or divesting from certain industries or companies, including the oil and natural gas sector, or requiring that borrowers take
additional steps to reduce their GHG emissions. Additionally, there is the possibility that financial institutions will be pressured
or required to adopt policies that limit funding for fossil fuel energy companies.
The
OCSLA authorized the DOI to regulate activities authorized by the BOEM in the Central and Western Gulf of Mexico. The EPA has
air quality jurisdiction over all other parts of the OCS. Under the OCSLA, DOI is limited to regulating offshore emissions of
criteria and their precursor – pollutants to the extent they significantly affect the air quality of any state. BSEE conducts
field inspections of emission sources installed on offshore platforms that have the potential to emit regulated air pollutants.
The agency also reviews BOEM mandated monitoring and reporting of air emission sources for compliance with approved plan emission
limits. BSEE may initiate measures to control and bring into compliance those operations determined to be in violation of applicable
regulations or plan conditions by issuing Incidents of Noncompliance (“INC”) or recommending further enforcement action
against potential violators.
Oil
Pollution Act. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and regulations thereunder impose a variety of requirements
on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills
in United States waters. A “responsible party” includes the owner or operator of an onshore facility, pipeline or
vessel, or the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore facility is located. OPA assigns liability to each responsible
party for oil cleanup costs and a variety of public and private damages. While liability limits apply in some circumstances, a
party cannot take advantage of liability limits if the spill was caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct or resulted
from violation of a federal safety, construction or operating regulation. If the party fails to report a spill or to cooperate
fully in the cleanup, liability limits likewise do not apply. Few defenses exist to the liability imposed by OPA. OPA imposes
ongoing requirements on a responsible party, including the preparation of oil spill response plans and proof of financial responsibility
to cover environmental cleanup and restoration costs that could be incurred in connection with an oil spill.
National
Environmental Policy Act. Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities on federal lands are subject to the National
Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). NEPA requires federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Interior, to evaluate
major agency actions having the potential to significantly impact the environment. The process involves the preparation of either
an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement depending on whether the specific circumstances surrounding the
proposed federal action will have a significant impact on the human environment. The NEPA process involves public input through
comments, which can alter the nature of a proposed project either by limiting the scope of the project or requiring resource-specific
mitigation. NEPA decisions can be appealed through the court system, by process participants. This process may result in delaying
the permitting and development of projects, increase the costs of permitting and developing some facilities and could result in
certain instances in the cancellation of existing leases.
Worker
Safety. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSH Act”) and comparable state statutes regulate the protection
of the health and safety of workers. The OSH Act’s hazard communication standard requires maintenance of information about
hazardous materials used or produced in operations and provision of such information to employees. Other OSH Act standards regulate
specific worker safety aspects of our operations. Failure to comply with OSH Act requirements can lead to the imposition of penalties.
Safe
Drinking Water Act. The Safe Drinking Water Act and comparable state statutes may restrict the disposal, treatment or release
of water produced or used during oil and gas development. Subsurface emplacement of fluids (including disposal wells or enhanced
oil recovery) is governed by federal or state regulatory authorities that in some cases, includes the state oil and gas regulatory
authority or the state’s environmental authority. These regulations may increase the costs of compliance.
Offshore
Drilling. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Interior issued new rules designed to improve drilling and workplace safety in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and various congressional committees began pursuing legislation to regulate drilling activities and increase
liability. The BOEM, BSEE and Office of National Resources Revenue are expected to continue to issue new safety and environmental
guidelines or regulations for drilling in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and other regulatory agencies could potentially issue new safety
and environmental guidelines or regulations in other geographic regions, and may take other steps that could increase the costs
of exploration and production, reduce the area of operations and result in permitting delays. We are monitoring legislation and
regulatory developments; however, it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of any new guidelines, regulations or legislation.
A prolonged suspension of drilling activity or permitting delays in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and new regulations and increased
liability for companies operating in this sector, whether or not caused by a new incident in the region, could adversely affect
the business and planned operations of oil and gas companies.
Hazardous
Substances and Wastes. CERCLA, also known as the “Superfund law,” imposes liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that are considered to be responsible for the release of a
“hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the disposal site or sites
where the release occurred and companies that transported or disposed or arranged for the transport or disposal of the hazardous
substances found at the site. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of hazardous substances under CERCLA may be subject
to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment
and for damages to natural resources, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file corresponding
common law claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment.
Protected
and Endangered Species. The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) restricts activities that may affect federally identified
endangered and threatened species or their habitats. Additionally, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) implements
various treaties and conventions between the United States and certain other nations for the protection of migratory birds. Under
the MBTA, the taking, killing or possessing of migratory birds is unlawful without a permit. The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(“MMPA”) similarly prohibits the taking of marine mammals without authorization. Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (“FWS”) may make determinations on the listing of species as threatened or endangered under the ESA and litigation
with respect to the listing or non-listing of certain species may result in more fulsome protections for non-protected or lesser-protected
species. We conduct operations on oil and natural gas leases in areas where certain species that are protected by the ESA, MBTA
and MMPA are known to exist and where other species that could potentially be protected under these statutes are known to exist.
The FWS or the National Marine Fisheries Service may designate critical habitat that it believes is necessary for survival of
a threatened or endangered species. A critical habitat designation could result in further material restrictions to federal land
use and may materially delay or prohibit access to protected areas for oil and natural gas development. These statutes may result
in operating restrictions or a temporary, seasonal or permanent ban in affected areas.
Employees
We
currently have six employees. We utilize consultants and contractors, as needed, to perform strategic, technical, operational
and administrative functions, and as advisors.
Additional
Information
We
file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, other reports and amendments to
those reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our reports filed with the SEC are available
free of charge to the general public through our website at www.gulfslope.com. These reports are accessible on our website
as soon as reasonably practicable after being filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. This Form 10-K and our other filings can also
be obtained through the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. Information on our website is not a part of this Form 10-K.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Certain
factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. You should consider
carefully, the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to other information contained in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, including our financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones
we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become
important factors that adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our
common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all, of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Financial Condition
Our
business plan requires substantial additional capital, which we may be unable to raise on acceptable terms, if at all, in the
future, which may in turn limit our ability to execute our business strategy.
We
expect our capital outlays and operating expenditures to increase substantially over at least the next several years as we expand
our operations. Lease and property acquisition costs, as well as drilling operations, are very expensive, and we will need to
raise substantial additional capital, through equity offerings, strategic transactions or debt financings in 2023, for capital
expenditures and also for the acquisition of producing properties.
Our
future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
|
● |
the
number, location, terms, and pricing of our anticipated lease acquisitions; |
|
● |
our
financing of the lease acquisitions and associated bonding; |
|
● |
our
ability to enter into partnerships, and farm-outs with other oil and gas exploration and production companies and/or financial
investors on satisfactory terms; |
|
● |
location
of any drilling activities, whether onshore or offshore, as well as the depth of any wells to be drilled; |
|
● |
cost
of additional seismic data to license as well as the reprocessing cost; |
|
● |
the
scope, rate of progress and cost of any exploration and production activities; |
|
● |
oil
and natural gas prices; |
|
● |
our
ability to locate and acquire oil and gas reserves; |
|
● |
our
ability to produce those oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
● |
access
to oil and gas services and existing pipeline infrastructure; |
|
● |
the
terms and timing of any drilling and other production-related arrangements that we may enter into; |
|
● |
the
cost and timing of governmental approvals and/or concessions; |
|
● |
the
cost, number, and access to qualified industry professionals we employ; and |
|
● |
the
effects of competition by larger companies operating in the oil and gas industry. |
We
have planned operating and capital expenditures through December 2023 of approximately $10 million, which includes capital expenditures
and general and administrative expenses. We will need to raise funds to cover these planned operating expenditures.
To
the extent we are able to raise capital through equity financings, this may be dilutive to our stockholders. Alternative forms
of future financings may include preferred stock with preferences or rights superior to our common stock. Debt financings may
involve a pledge of assets and will rank senior to our common stock. We have historically financed our operations through best
efforts private equity and debt financings. We do not have any credit or equity facilities available with financial institutions,
stockholders, or third-d party investors, and will continue to rely on best efforts financings. There is no assurance that we
can raise the capital necessary to fund our business plan. Failure to raise the required capital to fund operations, on favorable
terms or at all, will have a material adverse effect on our operations, resulting in impairments of our oil and gas properties
and could cause us to curtail or cease operations.
Our
fiscal 2022 financial statements express substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, raising questions
as to our continued existence.
We
have incurred losses since our inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of approximately $68.9 million and negative working
capital totaling approximately $13.8 million at September 30, 2022. Further losses are anticipated as we continue to develop
our business. To continue as a going concern, we estimate that we will need approximately $10 million to meet our obligations
and planned operating expenditures through December 2023. These expenditures include prospect development and pursuit of acquisition
costs, lease rentals to the BOEM, general and administrative expenses, and costs associated with IT and seismic acquisition and
processing. In addition, we plan to extend the agreements associated with our loans from related parties, the accrued interest
payable on these loans, as well as the Company’s accrued liabilities. We plan to finance our operations through equity and/or
debt financings, and strategic transactions to include farm-outs, asset sales or mergers. There are no assurances that financing
will be available with acceptable terms, if at all. If we are not successful in obtaining financing, our operations would need
to be curtailed or ceased or the Company would need to sell assets or consider alternative plans up to and including restructuring.
We
have no proved reserves and areas that we decide to drill may not yield oil and natural gas in commercial quantities or quality,
or at all.
We
have no proved reserves. We have identified prospects based on available seismic and geological information that indicates the
potential presence of oil and natural gas. However, the areas we decide to drill may not yield oil and natural gas in commercial
quantities or quality, or at all. Most of our current prospects are in various stages of evaluation that will require substantial
additional seismic data reprocessing and interpretation. Even when properly used and interpreted, 3-D seismic data and visualization
techniques are only tools used to assist geoscientists in identifying subsurface structures and hydrocarbon indicators and do
not enable the interpreter to know whether hydrocarbons are, in fact, present in those structures. We do not know if our prospects
will contain oil and natural gas in sufficient quantities or quality to recover drilling and completion costs or to be economically
viable. Even if oil and natural gas is found on our prospects in commercial quantities, construction costs of pipelines and other
transportation costs may prevent such prospects from being economically viable. If one or more of our prospects do not prove to
be successful, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.
The
seismic data we use are subject to non-exclusive license arrangements and may be licensed to our competitors, which could adversely
affect the execution of our acquisition strategy and business plan.
Our
3-D seismic license agreements are non-exclusive, industry-standard agreements. Accordingly, the licensor of such seismic data
has the right to license the same data that we acquired to our competitors, which could adversely affect our acquisition strategy
and the execution of our business plan. We are not authorized to assign any of our rights under our license agreements, including
a transaction with a potential joint venture partner or acquirer, without complying with the terms of the license agreements and
a payment to the licensor (by us or the acquirer in the event of a change of control transaction or our partner in a joint venture
transaction). However, our interpretation of this seismic data and importantly, reprocessing and the modeling of certain seismic
data utilized to identify and technically support oil and gas prospects, is unique and proprietary to the Company.
3-D
seismic interpretation does not guarantee that hydrocarbons are present or if present, produce in economic quantities.
We
rely on 3-D seismic studies to assist us with assessing prospective drilling opportunities on our properties, as well as on properties
that we may acquire. Such seismic studies are merely an interpretive tool and do not necessarily guarantee that hydrocarbons are
present or, if present, produce in economic quantities, and seismic indications of hydrocarbon saturation are generally not reliable
indicators of productive reservoir rock. These limitations of 3-D seismic data may impact our drilling and operational results,
and consequently our financial condition.
Our
lease may be terminated if we are unable to make future lease payments or if we do not drill in a timely manner.
The
failure to timely affect all lease related payments could cause the lease to be terminated by the BOEM. Net lease rental obligations
on our existing prospect are expected to be approximately $0.02 million in fiscal year 2023. Our lease has a five-year primary
term and was granted a three-year additional term and expires on October 31, 2025. Our lease may be extended, by drilling a well
capable of producing hydrocarbons and submitting a Plan of Production approved by the regulatory authorities. In addition, the
terms of our lease may also be extended by the granting of a Subsalt Lease Term Extension, should we elect to apply and qualify
for said extension on any lease(s). If we are not successful in raising additional capital, we may be unable to successfully exploit
our properties, and we may lose the rights to develop these properties upon the expiration of our lease. If not successful in
securing extensions, our lease will be subject to the competitive bid process in the semi-annual BOEM OCS Lease Sales.
We
may not be able to develop oil and natural gas reserves on an economically viable basis.
To
the extent that we succeed in discovering oil and/or natural gas reserves, we cannot assure that these reserves will be capable
of production levels we project or in sufficient quantities to be commercially viable. On a long-term basis, our viability depends
on our ability to find, develop and commercially produce oil and gas reserves, assuming we acquire leases or drilling rights.
Our future reserves, if any, will depend not only on our ability to develop then-existing properties, but also on our ability
to identify and acquire additional suitable producing properties or prospects, to find markets for the oil and natural gas we
develop and to effectively distribute our production into markets.
Future
oil and gas exploration may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but from wells that are productive but do not
produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. Completion of a well does not assure
a profit on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion, and operating costs. In addition, drilling hazards or environmental
damage could greatly increase the cost of operations and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the production
from successful wells. These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, the shutdown of wells
resulting from extreme weather conditions, problems in storage and distribution and adverse geological and mechanical conditions.
While we will endeavor to effectively manage these conditions, we cannot be assured of doing so optimally, and we will not be
able to eliminate them completely in any case. Therefore, these conditions could adversely impact our operations.
We
are substantially dependent on certain members of our management and technical team.
Investors
in our common stock must rely upon the ability, expertise, judgment and discretion of our management and the success of our technical
team in identifying and acquiring leases and producing properties, as well as discovering and developing any oil and gas reserves.
Our performance and success are dependent, in part, upon key members of our management and technical team, and their loss or departure
could be detrimental to our future success. In making a decision to invest in our common stock, you must be willing to rely to
a significant extent on our management’s discretion and judgment. The loss of any of our management and technical team members
could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition, as well as on the
market price of our common stock. We may not be able to find replacement personnel with comparable skills. If we are unable to
attract and retain key personnel, our business may be adversely affected. We do not currently maintain key-man insurance on any
member of the management team.
We
are an oil and natural gas exploration and production company with limited operating history, and there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in executing our business plan. We may never attain profitability.
We
commenced our business activity in March 2013, when we entered into 3-D license agreements covering approximately 2.2 million
acres and have entered into additional 3-D license agreements with seismic companies to acquire additional data and reprocess
seismic data. While we intend to engage in the acquisition, drilling, development, and production of oil and natural gas in the
future, we currently have no reserves or production. As we are a relatively new business, we are subject to all the risks and
uncertainties, which are characteristic of a new business enterprise, including the substantial problems, expenses and other difficulties
typically encountered in the course of its business, in addition to normal business risks, as well as those risks that are specific
to the oil and gas industry. Investors should evaluate us in light of the delays, expenses, problems and uncertainties frequently
encountered by companies developing markets for new products, services and technologies. We may never overcome these obstacles.
We
may be unable to access the capital markets to obtain additional capital that we will require to implement our business plan,
which would restrict our ability to grow.
Our
current capital on hand is insufficient to enable us to fully execute our business strategy in 2023. Because we are a company
with limited resources, we may not be able to compete in the capital markets with much larger, established companies that have
ready access to capital. Our ability to obtain needed financing may be impaired by conditions and instability in the capital markets
(both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular), our status as a early-stage enterprise without a demonstrated
operating history, the location of our lease and prices of oil and natural gas on the commodities markets (which will impact the
amount of financing available to us), and/or the loss of key consultants and management. Further, if oil and/or natural gas prices
decrease, then potential revenues, if any, will decrease, which may increase our requirements for capital. Some of the future
contractual arrangements governing our operations may require us to maintain minimum capital (both from a legal and practical
perspective), and we may lose our contractual rights if we do not have the required minimum capital. If the amount of capital
we can raise is not sufficient, we may be required to curtail or cease our operations.
We
have a limited operating history with significant losses and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.
We
have incurred annual operating losses since our inception. As a result, at September 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $68.9 million. We had no revenues in 2022 and do not anticipate generating revenues in fiscal 2023, or in subsequent
periods unless we are successful in discovering or acquiring economically recoverable oil or gas reserves. We expect continued
losses in the foreseeable future until we are successful in discovering or acquiring economically recoverable oil or gas reserves.
The
majority of our existing debt outstanding is payable on demand. If we are unable to repay our existing or future debt as it becomes
due, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.
As
of September 30, 2022, we owed John Seitz, our chief executive officer, a total of $8.7 million in notes, payable on demand and
bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum. Unpaid interest associated with these notes was $3.4 million as of September 30,
2022. In addition, approximately 16% of our outstanding common stock is controlled by Mr. Seitz. If demand for immediate payment
of some or all notes were to occur, it will threaten our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our
lack of diversification increases the risk of an investment in our common stock.
Our
business will focus on the oil and gas industry in commercially advantageous offshore areas of the United States. Larger companies
have the ability to manage their risk by diversification. However, we lack diversification, in terms of both the nature and geographic
scope of our business. As a result, factors affecting our industry, or the regions in which we operate, will likely impact us
more acutely than if our business were diversified.
Strategic
relationships upon which we rely are subject to change, which may diminish our ability to conduct our operations.
Our
ability to successfully bid on and acquire properties, to discover resources, to participate in drilling opportunities and to
identify and enter into commercial arrangements with customers and partners, depends on developing and maintaining close working
relationships with industry participants and on our ability to select and evaluate suitable properties. Further, we must consummate
transactions in a highly competitive environment. These realities are subject to change and may impair our ability to grow.
To
develop our business, we will endeavor to use the relationships of our management and to enter into strategic relationships, which
may take the form of joint ventures with other private parties or with local government bodies or contractual arrangements with
other oil and gas companies, including those that supply equipment and other resources that we will use in our business. We may
not be able to establish these strategic relationships, or if established, we may not be able to maintain them. In addition, the
dynamics of our relationships with strategic partners may require that we incur expenses or undertake activities we would not
otherwise incur or undertake in order to fulfill our obligations to these partners or maintain our relationships. If our strategic
relationships are not established or maintained, our business prospects may be limited, which could diminish our ability to conduct
our operations.
We
may not be able to effectively manage our growth, which may harm our profitability.
Our
strategy envisions building and expanding our business. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our financial results will
be adversely affected. Growth may place a strain on our management systems and resources. We must continue to refine and expand
our business development capabilities, our systems, processes, and our access to financing sources. As we grow, we must continue
to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:
|
● |
expand
our systems effectively or efficiently or in a timely manner; |
|
● |
optimally allocate
our human resources; or |
|
● |
identify and hire
qualified employees or retain valued employees. |
If
we are unable to manage our growth and our operations, our financial results could be adversely affected, which could prevent
us from ever attaining profitability.
We
may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from our future acquisitions, and we may be unable to successfully integrate future
acquisitions.
Our
growth strategy will, in part, rely on acquisitions. We have to plan and manage acquisitions effectively to achieve revenue growth
and maintain profitability in our evolving market. We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from our future acquisitions,
such as increased earnings, cost savings and revenue enhancements, for various reasons, including difficulties integrating operations
and personnel, higher than expected acquisition and operating costs or other difficulties, inexperience with operating in
new geographic regions, unknown liabilities, inaccurate reserve estimates and fluctuations in market prices.
In
addition, integrating acquired businesses and properties involves a number of special risks and unforeseen difficulties can arise
in integrating operations and systems and in retaining and assimilating employees. These difficulties include, among other things:
|
● |
operating
a larger organization; |
|
● |
coordinating geographically
disparate organizations, systems and facilities; |
|
● |
integrating corporate,
technological and administrative functions; |
|
● |
diverting management’s
attention from regular business concerns; |
|
● |
diverting financial
resources away from existing operations; |
|
● |
increasing our
indebtedness; and |
|
● |
incurring potential
environmental or regulatory liabilities and title problems. |
Any
of these or other similar risks could lead to potential adverse short-term or long-term effects on our operating results. The
process of integrating our operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our business.
Members of our management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which decreases
the time they have to manage our business. If our management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if
any business activities are interrupted as a result of the integration process, our business could suffer.
Our
future acquisitions could expose us to potentially significant liabilities, including P&A liabilities.
We
expect that future acquisitions will contribute to our growth. In connection with potential future acquisitions, we may only be
able to perform limited due diligence.
Successful
acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties require an assessment of a number of factors, including estimates of recoverable
reserves, the timing of recovering reserves, exploration potential, future oil and natural gas prices, operating costs and potential
environmental, regulatory and other liabilities, including P&A liabilities. Such assessments are inexact and may not disclose
all material issues or liabilities. In connection with our assessments, we perform a review of the acquired properties. However,
such a review may not reveal all existing or potential problems. In addition, our review may not permit us to become sufficiently
familiar with the properties to fully assess their deficiencies and capabilities.
There
may be threatened, contemplated, asserted or other claims against the acquired assets related to environmental, title, regulatory,
tax, contract litigation or other matters of which we are unaware, which could materially and adversely affect our production,
revenues and results of operations. We may be successful in obtaining contractual indemnification for preclosing liabilities,
including environmental liabilities, but we expect that we will generally acquire interests in properties on an “as is”
basis with limited remedies for breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, even if we are able to obtain such indemnification
from the sellers, these indemnification obligations usually expire over time and could potentially expose us to liabilities that
are not indemnified, which could materially adversely affect our production, revenues and results of operations.
We
may be dependent upon third party operators of any oil and natural gas properties we may acquire.
Third
parties may act as the operators of our oil and natural gas wells and control the drilling and operating activities to be conducted
on our properties, if and when such assets are acquired. Therefore, we may have limited control over certain decisions related
to activities on our properties relating to the timing, costs, procedure, and location of drilling or production activities, which
could affect the Company’s results.
We
may not be able to obtain drilling rigs and other equipment and geophysical service crews necessary to exploit any oil and natural
gas resources we may acquire.
We
may not be able to procure the necessary drilling rigs, and related services and equipment or the cost of such items may be prohibitive.
Our ability to comply with future license obligations or otherwise generate revenues from the production of operating oil and
natural gas wells could be hampered, as a result of this, and our business could suffer.
Risks
Related to Our Industry in Which We Intend to Compete
An
extended decline in oil prices and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, affecting the commercial
viability of our projects and negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.
The
commercial viability of our projects is highly dependent on the price of oil and natural gas. Prices also affect our ability to
borrow money or raise additional capital. We will need to obtain additional financing to fund our activities. Our ability to do
so may be adversely affected by an extended decline in oil prices. If we are unable to obtain such financing when needed, on commercially
reasonable terms, we may be required to cease our operations, which could have a materially adverse impact on the market price
of our stock. An extended decline in oil prices may have a material adverse effect on our planned operations, financial condition,
and level of expenditures that we may ultimately have to make for the development of any oil and natural gas reserves we may acquire.
The
oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural
gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty
and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. In addition, the prices we receive for any future production
and the levels of any future production and reserves will depend on numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include,
but are not limited to, the following:
|
● |
changes
in global supply and demand for oil and natural gas by both refineries and end users; |
|
● |
the
ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production
controls; |
|
● |
the
price and volume of imports of foreign oil and natural gas; |
|
● |
political
and economic conditions, including embargoes, in oil-producing countries or affecting other oil-producing activity; |
|
● |
the
level of global oil and gas exploration and production activity; |
|
● |
the
level of global oil and gas inventories; |
|
● |
weather
conditions; |
|
● |
government
policies to discourage use of fuels that emit GHGs and encourage use of alternative energy; |
|
● |
technological
advances affecting energy consumption; |
|
● |
domestic
and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; |
|
● |
proximity
and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and other transportation facilities; |
|
● |
the
price and availability of competitors’ supplies of oil and gas in captive market areas; |
|
● |
the
introduction, price and availability of alternative forms of fuel to replace or compete with oil and natural gas; |
|
● |
import
and export regulations for LNG (“liquified natural gas”) and/or refined products derived from oil and gas production
from the US; |
|
● |
speculation
in the price of commodities in the commodity futures market; |
|
● |
technological
advances affecting energy consumption; |
|
● |
the
availability of drilling rigs and completion equipment; and |
|
● |
the
overall economic environment. |
Further,
oil and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate in direct relationship to each other. The price of oil has been extremely
volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue for the foreseeable future. The volatility of the energy markets makes it
difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with any certainty.
Exploration
for oil and natural gas is risky and may not be commercially successful, impairing our ability to generate revenues.
Oil
and natural gas exploration involves a high degree of risk. These risks are more acute in the early stages of exploration. We
may not discover oil or natural gas in commercially viable quantities. It is difficult to project the costs of implementing an
exploratory drilling program due to the inherent uncertainties of drilling in unknown formations, the costs associated with encountering
various drilling conditions, such as over pressured zones (which may lead to blowouts, fires, and explosions) and tools lost in
the hole, and changes in drilling plans, locations as a result of prior exploratory wells or additional seismic data and interpretations
thereof, and final commercial terms negotiated with partners. Developing exploratory oil and gas properties requires significant
capital expenditures and involves a high degree of financial risk. The budgeted costs of drilling, completing, and operating exploratory
wells are often exceeded and can increase significantly when drilling costs rise. Drilling may be unsuccessful for many reasons,
including title problems, adverse weather conditions (which may be more frequent as climate changes), cost overruns, equipment
shortages, mechanical difficulties, and environmental hazards (including spills and toxic gas releases). There is no assurance
that we will successfully complete any wells or if successful, that the wells would be economically successful. Moreover, the
successful drilling or completion of any oil or gas well does not ensure a profit on investment. Exploratory wells bear a much
greater risk of loss than development wells. We cannot assure you that our exploration activities will result in profitable operations,
the result of which will materially adversely affect our business.
Competition
within our industry may adversely affect our operations.
Competition
within our industry is intense, particularly with respect to the acquisition of producing properties and undeveloped acreage.
We compete with major oil and gas companies and other independent producers of varying sizes, all of which are engaged in the
acquisition of properties and the exploration and development of such properties. Many of our competitors have financial resources
and exploration and development budgets that are substantially greater than our budget, which may adversely affect our ability
to compete. If other companies relocate to the Gulf of Mexico region, levels of competition may increase, and our business could
be adversely affected. In the exploration and production business, some of the larger integrated companies may be better able
than we are to respond to industry changes including price fluctuations, oil and gas demand, political change and government regulations.
We
actively compete with other companies when acquiring new leases or oil and gas properties. For example, new leases acquired from
BOEM are acquired through a “sealed bid” process and are generally awarded to the highest bidder. These additional
resources can be particularly important in reviewing prospects and purchasing properties. The competitors may also have a greater
ability to continue drilling activities during periods of low oil and gas prices, such as the current decline in oil prices, and
to absorb the burden of current and future governmental regulations and taxation. Competitors may be able to evaluate, bid for
and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or personnel resources permit. Competitors may also
be able to pay more for productive oil and gas properties and exploratory prospects than we are able or willing to pay. Further,
our competitors may be able to expend greater resources on the existing and changing technologies that we believe impacts
attaining success in the industry. If we are unable to compete successfully in these areas in the future, our future revenues
and growth may be diminished or restricted.
The
Biden Administration may pursue significant regulatory and political actions that could adversely af ect our results of operations,
and our ability to implement our business strategy.
President
Biden has made addressing the threat of climate change from GHG emissions a priority under his Administration. Regulatory agencies
under the Biden Administration have issued proposed rulemakings and may issue new or amended rulemakings in support of President
Biden’s regulatory and political agenda, which include reducing dependence on, and use of, fossil fuels and curtailment
of hydraulic fracturing on federal lands. Our operations in the Gulf of Mexico require permits from federal and state governmental
agencies for drilling and completion activities and to conduct other regulated activities and the Biden Administration may continue
pursuing actions that delay or refuse approval of new leases for hydrocarbon exploration and development on federal lands and
waters or delay or fail to grant approvals required for development of existing leases on such lands and waters. To the extent
that our operations in federal waters are restricted, delayed for varying lengths of time or cancelled, such developments could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, our ability to replace reserves and the ability to implement our
business strategy.
Additional
deepwater drilling laws, regulations and other restrictions, delays and other offshore-related developments in the Gulf of Mexico,
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. In January 2021, President
Biden suspended new oil and natural gas leases on federal lands and waters, including the OCS pending review and reconsideration
of federal oil and gas leasing and permitting practices. While this suspension was challenged and enjoined in June 2021 by a federal
district court, the Biden Administration is appealing the court decision. Additionally, regulatory agencies under the Biden Administration
may issue new or amended rulemakings regarding deepwater leasing, permitting, or drilling that could result in more stringent
or costly restrictions, delays or cancellations to our operations as well as those of similarly situated offshore energy companies
on the OCS. The BSEE and the BOEM have over the past decade, primarily under the Obama Administration, imposed more stringent
permitting procedures and regulatory safety and performance requirements with respect to new wells drilled in federal deepwater.
While actions by BSEE or BOEM under the former Trump Administration sought to mitigate or delay certain of those more rigorous
standards, the Biden Administration could reconsider rules and regulatory initiatives implemented under the Trump Administration
and replace them with new, more stringent requirements and also provide more rigorous enforcement of existing regulatory requirements.
Compliance with any added or more stringent Biden Administration regulatory requirements or enforcement initiatives and existing
environmental and spill regulations, together with uncertainties or inconsistencies in decisions and rulings by governmental agencies
and delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits and exploration, development, oil spill response and decommissioning
plans and possible additional regulatory initiatives could result in difficult and more costly actions and adversely affect or
delay new drilling and ongoing development efforts. Moreover, governmental agencies under the Biden Administration.
The
BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable
financial assurances to ensure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities on the OCS. As of the filing
date of this Form 10-K, we are in compliance with our financial assurance obligations to the BOEM, and have no outstanding BOEM
orders, requests or financial assurance obligations. The BOEM under the Obama and Trump Administrations had sought to implement
varying levels of stringent and costly standards under the existing federal financial assurance requirements, either through issuance
and implementation of NTL #2016-N01 as was the case under the Obama Administration or proposing rulemaking to revise the decommissioning
and related financial assurance regulations as was the case under the Trump Administration. However, BOEM under the Biden Administration
is expected to propose new financial assurance requirements that, if adopted as proposed, could increase our operating costs.
Additionally, the BOEM could in the future make new demands for additional financial assurances covering our obligations under
our properties, which could exceed the Company’s capabilities to provide. If we fail to comply with such future orders,
the BOEM could commence enforcement proceedings or take other remedial action, including assessing civil penalties, suspending
operations or production, or initiating procedures to cancel leases, which, if upheld, would have a material adverse effect on
our business, properties, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
operations may incur substantial liabilities to comply with environmental laws and regulations as well as legal requirements applicable
to marine mammals and endangered and threatened species.
Our
oil and natural gas operations are subject to stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the
release or disposal of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.
These
laws and regulations:
|
● |
require
the acquisition of a permit or other approval before drilling or other regulated activity commences; |
|
● |
restrict
the types, quantities and concentration of substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling
and production activities; |
|
● |
limit
or prohibit exploration or drilling activities on certain lands lying within protected areas or that may affect certain marine
species and endangered and threatened species; and |
|
● |
impose
substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations. |
Failure
to comply with these laws and regulations may result in:
|
● |
the
assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties; |
|
● |
loss
of our lease; |
|
● |
incurrence
of investigatory, remedial or corrective obligations; and |
|
● |
the
imposition of injunctive relief, which could prohibit, limit or restrict our operations in a particular area. |
Changes
in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that result in more stringent or costly waste handling,
storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements could require us to make significant expenditures to attain and maintain
compliance and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on our industry in general and on our own results of operations, competitive
position or financial condition. Under these environmental laws and regulations, we could incur strict joint and several liability
for the removal or remediation of previously released materials or contamination, regardless of whether we were responsible for
the release or contamination and regardless of whether our operations met previous standards in the industry at the time they
were conducted. Our permits require that we report any incidents that cause or could cause environmental damages.
New
laws and regulations, amendment of existing laws and regulations, reinterpretation of legal requirements or increased governmental
enforcement could significantly increase our capital expenditures and operating costs or could result in delays, limitations or
cancelations to our exploration and production activities, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
Our
operations are subject to numerous risks of oil and natural gas drilling and production activities.
Oil
and gas drilling and production activities are subject to numerous risks, including the risk that no commercially productive oil
or natural gas reserves are found. The cost of drilling and completing wells is often uncertain. To the extent we drill additional
wells in the Gulf of Mexico, our drilling activities increase capital cost. In addition, the geological complexity of the areas
in which we have oil and natural gas operations make it more difficult for us to sustain the historical rates of drilling success.
Oil and natural gas drilling and production activities may be shortened, delayed or cancelled as a result of a variety of factors,
many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
|
● |
unexpected
drilling conditions; |
|
● |
pressure
or irregularities in formations; |
|
● |
equipment
failures or accidents; |
|
● |
hurricanes
and other adverse weather conditions; |
|
● |
shortages
in experienced labor; and |
|
● |
shortages
or delays in the delivery of equipment. |
The
prevailing prices of oil and natural gas also affect the cost of and the demand for drilling rigs, production equipment and related
services. We cannot assure you that the wells we drill will be productive or that we will recover all or any portion of our investment.
Drilling for oil and natural gas may be unprofitable. Drilling activities can result in dry holes and wells that are productive
but do not produce sufficient cash flows to recoup drilling costs.
Any
insurance that we may acquire will likely be inadequate to cover liabilities we may incur.
Our
involvement in the exploration for, and development of, oil and natural gas properties may result in our becoming subject to liability
for pollution, blow-outs, property damage, personal injury or other hazards. Although we intend to obtain insurance in accordance
with industry standards to address such risks, such insurance has limitations and so will be unlikely to cover the full extent
of such liabilities. In addition, such risks may not, in all circumstances be insurable or, in certain circumstances, we may choose
not to obtain insurance to protect against specific risks due to the high premiums associated with such insurance or for other
reasons. The payment of such uninsured liabilities would reduce the funds available to us. If we suffer a significant event that
is not fully insured or if the insurer of such event is not solvent or denies coverage, we could be required to divert funds from
capital investment or other uses towards covering our liability for such events.
Events
outside of our control, including an epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, such as the COVID-19, may materially adversely
affect our business.
We
face risks related to epidemics, outbreaks or other public health events that are outside of our control, and could significantly
disrupt our operations and adversely affect our financial condition. The global or national outbreak of an illness or other communicable
disease, or any other public health crisis, such as COVID-19, may cause disruptions to our business and operational plans, which
may include (i) shortages of employees, (ii) unavailability of contractors or subcontractors, (iii) interruption of supplies from
third parties upon which we rely, (iv) recommendations of, or restrictions imposed by government and health authorities, including
quarantines, to address an outbreak and (v) restrictions that we and our contractors, subcontractors and our customers impose,
including facility shutdowns, to ensure the safety of employees. For example, in response to COVID-19, we have reduced third party
expenses and reduced capital expenditures. In addition, the effects of COVID-19 and concerns regarding its global spread could
negatively impact the domestic and international demand for crude oil and natural gas, which could contribute to price volatility,
impact the price we receive for oil and natural gas and materially and adversely affect the demand for and marketability of our
production. The potential impact from COVID-19, both now and in the future, is difficult to predict, and the extent to which it
may negatively affect our operating results or the duration of any potential business disruption is uncertain. Any potential impact
will depend on future developments and new information that may emerge regarding the COVID-19 infection rate or the efficacy and
distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, and the actions taken by authorities to contain it or treat its impact, all of which are beyond
our control. These potential impacts, while uncertain, could adversely affect our operating results.
Lower
oil and natural gas prices and other factors in the future may result in ceiling test write-downs and other impairments of our
asset carrying values.
We
use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas operations. Accordingly, we capitalize the costs to acquire, explore
for and develop oil and gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, we compare, at the end of each financial reporting
period for each cost center, the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, to the net capitalized
costs of proved oil and gas properties, net of related deferred taxes. We refer to this comparison as a ceiling test. If the net
capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties exceed the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves,
we are required to write down the value of our oil and gas properties to the value of the estimated discounted future net cash
flows. A write-down of oil and gas properties does not impact cash flows from operating activities but does reduce net income.
The risk that we are required to write-down the carrying value of oil and gas properties increases when oil and natural gas prices
are low or volatile. In addition, write-downs may occur if we experience substantial downward adjustments to our estimated undeveloped
property values, or if estimated future development costs increase. Volatility in commodity prices, poor conditions in the global
economic markets and other factors could cause us to record additional write-downs of our oil and natural gas properties and other
assets in the future and incur additional charges against future earnings. Any required write-downs or impairments could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
New
technologies may cause our current exploration and drilling methods to become obsolete, and we may not be able to keep pace with
technological developments in our industry.
The
oil and natural gas industry is subject to rapid and significant advancements in technology, including the introduction of new
products and services using new technologies. As competitors use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive
disadvantage, and competitive pressures may force us to implement new technologies at a substantial cost. In addition, competitors
may have greater financial, technical, and personnel resources that allow them to enjoy technological advantages and that may
in the future allow them to implement new technologies before we can. We rely heavily on the use of seismic technology to identify
opportunities and to reduce our geological risk. Seismic technology or other technologies that we may implement in the future
may become obsolete. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement technologies on a timely basis or at a cost that is
acceptable to us. If we are unable to maintain technological advancements consistent with industry standards, our business, results
of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Our
operations are subject to various risks that could result in increased operating costs, limit the areas in which oil and natural
gas production may occur, and reduced demand for the crude oil and natural gas that we produce.
Climate
change continues to attract considerable public, governmental and scientific attention. As a result, numerous proposals have been
made and could continue to be made at the international, national, regional and state levels of government to monitor and limit
emissions of GHG. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking
programs and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. At the federal level, the U.S. Congress has from
time to time considered climate change legislation, but no comprehensive climate change legislation has been adopted. The EPA,
however, has adopted regulations under the existing CAA to restrict emissions of GHG. For example, the EPA imposes preconstruction
and operating permit requirements on certain large stationary sources that are already potential sources of certain other significant
pollutant emissions. The EPA also adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions on an annual basis from
specified large GHG emission sources in the United States, including onshore and offshore oil and natural gas production facilities.
Federal agencies have also begun directly regulating emissions of methane, a GHG, from oil and natural gas operations as described
above. Compliance with these rules or other could result in increased compliance costs on our operations.
There
are also increasing financial risks for fossil fuel producers as stockholders and bondholders currently invested in fossil fuel
energy companies concerned about the potential effects of climate change may elect in the future to shift some or all of their
investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors. Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil-fuel energy companies
also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices, and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil
fuel energy companies. Additionally, the lending practices of institutional lenders have been the subject of intensive lobbying
efforts in recent years, oftentimes public in nature, by environmental activists, proponents of the international Paris Agreement
and foreign citizenry concerned about climate change not to provide funding for fossil fuel producers. Limitation of investments
in and financings for fossil fuel energy companies could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling programs
or development or production activities.
The
adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce or eliminate future emissions of GHG could require us to incur increased
operating costs, such as costs to purchase and operate emissions control systems, to acquire emissions allowances or comply with
new regulatory or reporting requirements. Any such legislation or regulatory programs could also increase the cost of consuming,
and thereby reduce demand for, the oil and natural gas we produce. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce
or eliminate future emissions of GHG could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, political, financial and litigation risks may result in our restricting or canceling production activities, incurring liability
for infrastructure damages as a result of climatic changes or impairing the ability to continue to operate in an economic manner.
Finally,
some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHG in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes
that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic
events. Our offshore operations are particularly at risk from severe climatic events. If any such effects of climate changes were
to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We
are subject to cyber security risks. A cyber incident could occur and result in information theft, data corruption, operational
disruption or financial loss.
The
oil and natural gas industry has become increasingly dependent on digital technologies to conduct certain exploration, development,
production, processing, and distribution activities. For example, we depend on digital technologies to interpret seismic data,
conduct reservoir modeling, and record financial and other data. Our industry faces various security threats, including cyber-security
threats. Cyber-security attacks, in particular are increasing and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts
to gain unauthorized access to data, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems,
unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. Although to date we have not experienced
any material losses related to cyber-security attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. Moreover, the various procedures
and controls we use to monitor and protect against these threats and to mitigate our exposure to such threats may not be sufficient
in preventing security threats from materializing. If any of these events were to materialize, they could lead to losses of intellectual
property and other sensitive information essential to our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
reputation, and financial position.
Negative
publicity may adversely impact us.
Media
coverage and public statements that insinuate improper actions by us, regardless of their factual accuracy or truthfulness, may
result in negative publicity, litigation, or governmental investigations by regulators. Addressing negative publicity and any
resulting litigation or investigations may distract management, increase costs, and divert resources. Negative publicity may have
an adverse impact on our reputation and the morale of our employees, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial
position, results of operations, cash flows, growth prospects and stock price.
Risks
Related to Investment in our Securities
There
is a limited trading market for our shares. You may not be able to sell your shares if you need money.
Our
common stock is traded on the OTC Markets (Pink Marketplace Tier), an inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities.
During the three calendar months preceding filing of this report, the average daily trading volume of our common stock was approximately
0.2 million shares. As of December 27, 2022, we had approximately 190 record holders of our common stock (not including an indeterminate
number of stockholders whose shares are held by brokers in “street name”). There has been limited trading activity
in our stock, and when it has traded, the price has fluctuated widely. We consider our common stock to be “thinly traded”
and any last reported sale prices may not be a true market-based valuation of the common stock. Stockholders may experience difficulty
selling their shares if they choose to do so, because of the illiquid market and limited public float for our common stock. This
situation is attributable to a number of factors including, but not limited to:
|
● |
we
are a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stockbrokers, institutional investors, and others in the
investment community that generate or influence sales volume; and |
|
● |
stock
analysts, stockbrokers and institutional investors may be risk-averse and reluctant to follow a company such as ours that
faces substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern or to purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares
until such time as we become more viable. |
As
a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of our common stock.
Accordingly, investors must assume they may have to bear the economic risk of an investment in our common stock for an indefinite
period of time and may lose their entire investment. There can be no assurance that a more active market for our common stock
will develop, or if one should develop, there is no assurance that it will be sustained. This severely limits the liquidity of
our common stock and would likely have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and on our ability
to raise additional capital.
We
may issue preferred stock.
Our
Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 50 million shares of “blank check” preferred stock with
designations, rights and preferences determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, our Board of Directors
is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other
rights, which could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the common stock. In the event of issuance,
the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying, or preventing a change
in control of the Company. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of its authorized preferred stock, there
can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.
Future
sales of our common stock could lower our stock price.
We
will likely sell additional shares of common stock to fund working capital obligations in future periods. We cannot predict the
size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of our common stock
will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such
sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock. Moreover, sales of our common stock by
existing shareholders could also depress the price of our common stock.
Our
common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and FINRA, which makes transactions in our common stock
cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in the stock.
The
SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as
any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share,
subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
|
● |
that
a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and |
|
● |
the
broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity
of the penny stock to be purchased. |
In
order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
|
● |
obtain
financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person; and |
|
● |
make
a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient
knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. |
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating
to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth:
|
● |
the
basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and |
|
● |
that
the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. |
Generally,
brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make
it more difficult for investors to dispose of common stock and cause a decline in the market value of stock.
Disclosure
also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the
rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to
be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny
stocks.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the SEC, FINRA has adopted rules that require a broker-dealer to
have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment is suitable for a customer when recommending the investment to that customer.
Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable
efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information.
Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will
not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their
customers buy our common stock, which may limit investors’ ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect
on the market for our shares.
The
price of our common stock will remain volatile, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.
The
trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to factors such as:
| ● | actual
or anticipated variations in our operating results including but not limited to leasing, drilling, and discovery of oil and gas; |
| ● | the
price of oil and gas; |
| ● | announcements
of developments by us, our strategic partners or our competitors; |
| ● | announcements
by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
| ● | adoption
of new accounting standards affecting our Company’s industry; |
| ● | additions
or departures of key personnel; |
| ● | sales
of our common stock or other securities in the open market; |
| ● | our
ability to acquire seismic data and other intellectual property on commercially reasonable terms and to defend such intellectual
property from third party claims; |
| ● | the
effects of government regulation, permitting and other legal requirements, including new legislation or regulation; |
| ● | other
events or factors, many of which are beyond our control. |
The
stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market
price of companies’ securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against those companies. Litigation
initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention
and resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.
We
do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock.
Cash
dividends have never been declared or paid on our common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the
foreseeable future. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can
we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment in the Company.
Any
of the risk factors discussed herein could have a significant material adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
financial condition, or liquidity. Readers of this Report should not consider any descriptions of these risk factors to be a complete
set of all potential risks that could affect GulfSlope. These factors should be carefully considered together with the other information
contained in this Report and the other reports and materials filed by us with the SEC. Further, any of these risks are interrelated
and could occur under similar business and economic conditions, and the occurrence of certain of them may in turn cause the emergence
or exacerbate the effect of others. Such a combination could materially increase the severity of the impact of these risks on
our business, results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.