UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No. )
 |
Filed by the
Registrant |
 |
Filed by a
Party other than the Registrant |
Check the
appropriate box: |
 |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
 |
Confidential, for Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14A-6(E)(2)) |
 |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
 |
Definitive
Additional Materials |
 |
Soliciting
Material under §240.14a-12 |
CATERPILLAR INC

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all
boxes that apply): |
 |
No fee required. |
 |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
 |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per
Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
“Caterpillar’s Values in Action guide our business conduct with
our customers, partners and one another as we fulfill our purpose
of helping our customers build a better, more sustainable
world.”
D. James Umpleby III
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
We are sending you these proxy materials in connection with
Caterpillar’s solicitation of proxies, on behalf of its board of
directors, for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Annual
Meeting). Distribution of these materials is scheduled to begin on
May 5, 2023. Please submit your vote or proxy by telephone, mobile
device, internet or, if you received your materials by mail, you
can complete and return your proxy or voting instruction form by
mail.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 3
Back to
Contents
Back to
Contents

DEAR FELLOW
SHAREHOLDERS,

D. JAMES UMPLEBY III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
“OUR VALUES IN ACTION – INTEGRITY,
EXCELLENCE, TEAMWORK, COMMITMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY – ARE THE
FOUNDATION OF OUR STRATEGY FOR LONG-TERM PROFITABLE GROWTH. THEY
ALIGN OUR FOCUS ON WINNING THE RIGHT WAY AND UPHOLDING OUR SHARED
COMMITMENT TO THE HIGHEST ETHICAL STANDARDS.”
On behalf of the board of directors and our entire company, I
cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
on June 14, 2023, at 8 a.m. Central Time. This year’s meeting will
be held virtually.
In addition to an update on the company’s performance, we ask for
your vote on several items related to our business. Please refer to
page 90 for information on participating in this year’s shareholder
meeting.
Please review this proxy statement to learn more about your board
of directors, our governance practices, compensation programs and
philosophy, and other key items. Your vote is important. We
encourage you to vote your shares by virtually attending the annual
meeting, by voting online separately, via your mobile phone, by
telephone, or by mail.
I would like to recognize Ed Rust, who has served as a director
since 2003. The board of directors extends our sincere appreciation
for his many years of dedicated service to our company.
We also welcome our newest board members, Judy Marks, Chair, CEO
and President of Otis Worldwide Corporation, and Jim Fish, Jr.,
President and CEO of Waste Management. They joined the board March
1, 2023.
Thank you for your ongoing investment and support of Caterpillar as
we continue to execute our enterprise strategy for long-term
profitable growth and create shareholder value.
Sincerely,
D. James Umpleby III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 5
Back to
Contents
PROXY
SUMMARY
This summary does not contain all of the information you should
consider when casting your vote. You should read the complete proxy
statement before voting.
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
TIME & DATE
|
PLACE
|
RECORD DATE
|
ADMISSION
|
8 a.m. Central Time
June 14, 2023
|
Virtual Meeting
www.meetnow.global/MCP5W5Q
|
The close of business
on April 17, 2023
|
To attend and to register for the Virtual Meeting, please follow
instructions on page 90
|
SHAREHOLDER VOTING MATTERS
Proposal
|
Board’s Voting
Recommendation
|
Page
Reference
|
1
|
Election of 11 Directors Named in this Proxy Statement
|
FOR Each Nominee
|
10
|
2
|
Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
FOR
|
36
|
3
|
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
|
FOR
|
39
|
4
|
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Executive Compensation Votes
|
ONE YEAR
|
40
|
5
|
Approval of Caterpillar Inc. 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
FOR
|
68
|
6
|
Shareholder Proposal - Report on Corporate Climate Lobbying in Line
with Paris Agreement
|
AGAINST
|
75
|
7
|
Shareholder Proposal - Lobbying Disclosure
|
AGAINST
|
78
|
8
|
Shareholder Proposal - Report on Activities in Conflict-Affected
Areas
|
AGAINST
|
81
|
9
|
Shareholder Proposal - Civil Rights, Non-Discrimination and Returns
to Merit Audit
|
AGAINST
|
84
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 6
Back to
Contents
OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Nominee and Principal Occupation
|
Independent
|
Age
|
Director
Since
|
Other Public Company Boards
|
Caterpillar Committees
|
AC
|
CHRC
|
SPPC
|
NGC
|
EC
|
Kelly A. Ayotte
Former U.S. Senator representing New Hampshire
|
Yes
|
54
|
2017
|
Blackstone Inc.
Boston Properties, Inc.
News Corporation
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
David L. Calhoun
President and CEO of The Boeing Company
|
Yes
|
65
|
2011
|
The Boeing Company
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Daniel M. Dickinson
Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners
|
Yes
|
61
|
2006
|
None
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
James C. Fish, Jr.
President and CEO of Waste Management, Inc.
|
Yes
|
60
|
2023
|
Waste Management, Inc.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gerald Johnson
Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing and
Sustainability of General Motors Company
|
Yes
|
60
|
2021
|
None
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
David W. MacLennan
Executive Chair of the Board of Cargill, Inc.
|
Yes
|
63
|
2021
|
Ecolab Inc.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Judith F. Marks
Chair, CEO and President of Otis Worldwide Corporation
|
Yes
|
59
|
2023
|
Otis Worldwide Corporation
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Debra L. Reed-Klages
Presiding Director of Caterpillar Inc. Former Chairman and CEO
of Sempra Energy
|
Yes
|
66
|
2015
|
Chevron Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Susan C. Schwab
Professor Emerita at the University of Maryland School of Public
Policy and Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP; former United
States Trade Representative
|
Yes
|
68
|
2009
|
FedEx Corporation
Marriott International, Inc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
D. James Umpleby III
Chairman and CEO of Caterpillar Inc.
|
No
|
65
|
2017
|
Chevron Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
Former CEO of Diversified Businesses at AT&T Inc.
|
Yes
|
71
|
2017
|
Morgan Stanley
Valero Energy Corporation
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
AC: Audit Committee
CHRC: Compensation and Human Resources Committee
SPPC: Sustainability and other Public Policy Committee
NGC: Nominating and Governance Committee
EC: Executive Committee
|
 |
Chair
|
 |
Member
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 7
Back to
Contents
GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Our commitment to good corporate governance stems from our belief
that a strong governance framework creates long-term value for our
shareholders, strengthens board and management accountability, and
builds trust in the Company and its brand. Our governance framework
includes, but is not limited to, the following highlights:
Board and Governance Information*
|
|
Board and Governance Information
|
|
Size of the Board
|
11
|
Code of Conduct for Directors, Officers and Employees
|
Yes
|
Number of Independent Directors
|
10
|
Supermajority Voting Threshold for Mergers
|
No
|
Average Age of Directors
|
63
|
Proxy Access
|
Yes
|
Average Director Tenure (in years)
|
6.6
|
Shareholder Action by Written Consent
|
No
|
Annual Election of Directors
|
Yes
|
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings
|
Yes
|
Mandatory Retirement Age
|
74
|
Poison Pill
|
No
|
Women
|
36%
|
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers
|
Yes
|
Ethnic/Racial Diversity
|
18%
|
Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policies
|
Yes
|
Majority Voting in Director Elections
|
Yes
|
Clawback Policy
|
Yes
|
Independent Presiding Director
|
Yes
|
|
|
*
The information in this table reflects only the director nominees
standing for re-election.
|
2022 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
PROFIT MARGIN
|
PROFIT
PER SHARE
|
OPERATING
CASH FLOW
|
STRONG
BALANCE SHEET
|
13.3%
|
$12.64
|
$7.8 billion
|
$6.7 billion
|
Delivered operating profit margin of 13.3% and adjusted
operating profit margin(1)
of 15.4%.
|
Profit per share was $12.64 in 2022, compared with $11.83 in 2021.
Adjusted profit per share(2) was
$13.84 in 2022, compared with $10.81 in 2021.
|
ME&T free cash flow(3) was
$5.8 billion in 2022, which was in line with the Company’s
full-year target of $4 billion to $8 billion annually. We
continue to expect to return substantially all ME&T free cash
flow(3) to shareholders over
time.
|
Returned $6.7 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and
dividends. The enterprise cash balance at the end of 2022 was $7.0
billion.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Adjusted operating profit margin is a non-GAAP measure, and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is
included on page 89.
(2)
Adjusted Profit Per Share is a non-GAAP measure, and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is
included on page 89.
(3)
ME&T free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure, and a reconciliation
to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is included on page
89.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 8
Back to
Contents

5205 N. O’Connor Boulevard, Suite 100
Irving, TX 75039
Phone (972) 891-7700
www.caterpillar.com
NOTICE OF ANNUAL
MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
The board of directors, after careful consideration, has decided to
hold this year’s Annual Meeting exclusively online. If you plan to
participate in the virtual meeting, please see the information
below as well as the attendance and registration instructions on
page 90. There will be no physical location for the Annual Meeting
this year.
MEETING INFORMATION
JUNE 14, 2023
8 a.m. Central Time
Website: www.meetnow.global/MCP5W5Q
MEETING AGENDA
1.
Elect 11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement
2.
Ratify our independent registered public accounting firm for
2023
3.
Approve, by non-binding vote, executive compensation
4.
Approve, by non-binding vote, the frequency of executive
compensation votes
5.
Approval of Caterpillar Inc. 2023 Long-Term Incentive
Plan
6.
Vote on shareholder proposals
7.
Address any other business that properly comes before the
meeting
RECORD DATE
April 17, 2023
By Order of the Board of Directors
Nicole M. Puza
Corporate Secretary
May 5, 2023
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES:
|
We encourage shareholders to vote promptly, as this will save the
expense of additional proxy solicitation.
You may vote in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
BY INTERNET
|
BY MOBILE DEVICE
|
BY TELEPHONE
|
BY MAIL
|
vote online at
www.caterpillar.com/proxymaterials
|
scan this QR code to vote with
your mobile device
|
call the number included on
your proxy card or notice
|
mail your signed proxy or voting
instruction form
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Annual Shareholder meeting to be held on June 14,
2023.
This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2022
Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at
www.investorvote.com/CAT.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 9
Back to
Contents
DIRECTORS &
GOVERNANCE
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
 |
What am I voting on?
|
Shareholders are being asked to elect the 11 director nominees
named in this Proxy Statement for a one-year term.
|
Board Voting Recommendation:
|
FOR the
election of each of the board’s director nominees.
|
OVERVIEW OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 10
Back to
Contents
BOARD ATTENDANCE - 2022
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Board
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
100%
Attendance
for incumbent directors
for 2022
|
Audit
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
|
5(1)
|
|
Compensation and Human Resources
|
5
|
|
|
3(1)
|
3(1)
|
|
2(2)
|
3(1)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Public Policy and Governance (3)
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
Sustainability and other Public Policy (3)
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Nominating and Governance (3)
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Executive (3)
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
(1)
Mr. Dickinson, Mr. Johnson and Mr.
Rust were appointed to the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee on June 8, 2022, and attended all of the Compensation and
Human Resources Committee meetings held thereafter; Mr. Wilkins was
appointed to the Audit Committee on June 8, 2022, and attended all
of the Audit Committee meetings held thereafter.
(2)
Ms. Reed-Klages left the CHRC
committee on June 8, 2022, when she assumed the Presiding Director
role.
(3)
Beginning June 2022, a new Executive
Committee was established, and the Public Policy and Governance
Committee was restructured to form the Sustainability and other
Public Policy Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee. Each director attended all of the meetings of their
respective committees and of the board held in 2022.
|
The board’s policy is to encourage and expect that all directors
attend each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All then-serving
directors attended the 2022 Annual Meeting. The independent
directors generally meet in an executive session as part of each
regularly scheduled board meeting. The board’s independent
Presiding Director presided over the board’s executive sessions in
2022.
BOARD EVOLUTION SINCE 2016
■
Seven new directors elected
■
Rotation of board committee chairs
■
Restructured committees by creating the Sustainability and other
Public Policy Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee
■
Presiding Director rotation
■
Expanded qualifications and diversity represented on board
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 11
Back to
Contents
DIVERSITY OF SKILLS AND EXPERTISE
The following skills matrix displays the most significant skills
and qualifications that each director nominee possesses. The board
does not assign a specific weight to any particular skill. Rather,
the NGC regularly reviews the composition of the board as a whole
to ensure that the board maintains a balance of knowledge and
experience and to assess the skills and characteristics that the
board may find valuable in the future in light of strategic plans
and operating requirements of the Company and the best interests of
shareholders.
SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR NOMINEE SKILLS, CORE COMPETENCIES
AND ATTRIBUTES
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Caterpillar Board
Tenure (Years)
|
6
|
12
|
17
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
8
|
14
|
6
|
6
|
6.6 years
Average Tenure
|
 |
Board of Directors Experience
(other boards)
Directors with experience on other boards and board committees
understand the function of a board, corporate governance best
practices, agenda setting, succession planning and relations
between the board, the CEO and senior management.
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
91%
|
 |
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Experience as an Audit Committee Financial Expert is important
given our use of financial targets as measures of performance and
the importance of accurate financial reporting and robust internal
auditing.
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
100% of
AC Members
|
 |
CEO
Directors with experience in a CEO role enhance the board’s
ability to evaluate and advise our CEO on leading a large, complex,
multinational corporation, as well as oversee strategic planning,
values, and environmental, social and governance issues.
|
|
•
|
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
|
55%
|
 |
Leadership
Directors with significant leadership experience enhance the
board’s ability to oversee strategic planning, values, and
environmental, social and governance issues.
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
100%
|
 |
Business Development
and Strategy
Directors with a background in business development provide
insight into developing and implementing strategies for growing our
business, including the opportunities represented by the energy
transition.
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
91%
|
 |
Government/Regulatory Affairs
Directors with experience in government or regulatory affairs
provide experience and insights that help us understand
opportunities across global markets and address regulatory issues,
government affairs and present-day issues affecting
business.
|
•
|
•
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
55%
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 12
Back to
Contents
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Customer and Product Support Services
Expertise in customer and product support services greatly
increases a director’s understanding of our complex business
operations and our focus to grow services to better support our
customers.
|
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
64%
|
 |
Finance & Accounting
Knowledge of finance and accounting assists our directors in
understanding, advising on and monitoring the Company’s capital
structure, financing and investing activities, as well as our
financial reporting and internal controls.
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
73%
|
 |
Risk Management
Directors with experience in risk management, including with
respect to environmental, social and cybersecurity matters, enhance
oversight of the evaluation, assessment and mitigation of the most
significant risks facing the Company.
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
91%
|
 |
Technology
Directors with expertise in technology fields offer insights on
technology innovations, product development, digital solutions,
innovative business models, data analytics, eCommerce applications
and cybersecurity risks, and understand the importance of investing
in new technologies for future growth.
|
•
|
•
|
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
82%
|
 |
Global Experience
Directors with experience conducting business or operations
outside of the United States provide political, economic and
cultural perspectives and insights that are valuable to our global
Company and help us better understand opportunities and challenges
across global markets.
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
91%
|
 |
Manufacturing/Logistics
Relevant experience in manufacturing provides a valuable
perspective and is important in understanding the business
operations and capital needs of the Company.
|
|
•
|
•
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
|
•
|
|
55%
|
Women
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
|
36%
|
Racial/Ethnic Diversity
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
18%
|
Age
|
54
|
65
|
61
|
60
|
60
|
63
|
59
|
66
|
68
|
65
|
71
|
63 years
Average Age
|
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 13
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR CONTINUOUS EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company places high importance on the continuous development of
its board.
Directors benefit from access to various governance and
directorship organizations and publications to which Caterpillar
subscribes. They also have ongoing education and development
opportunities through participation in meetings and attendance at
activities and professional development training offered by
associations such as the National Association of Corporate
Directors and Lead Director Network. They also receive a weekly
digest of news articles related to Caterpillar.
Directors receive specialized presentations from experts in the
Company’s various businesses in the course of their service. Since
the last annual shareholder meeting, these presentations have
included:
■
updates on technology and digital
■
retail customer aftermarket
■
strategic focus areas and regular updates concerning the operations
of certain businesses within our operating segments
■
the Cat® dealer network
Directors are also given development and education opportunities
through facility visits, product demonstrations and speaking or
meeting directly with members of management and other employees.
For example, since the last annual shareholder meeting, the
directors visited the Tucson, Arizona, facility and observed new
products designed to help our customers achieve their
climate-related goals. The directors had the opportunity to observe
and operate products such as the battery electric,
zero-exhaust-emissions mini excavator. Directors also speak with
Company dealers and customers to better understand the Company’s
operations and business, and also attend industry trade shows such
as CONEXPO.
These opportunities allow directors to be well-informed and to
expand their knowledge of trends and issues relevant to their
role.
BOARD’S ROLE IN COMPANY STRATEGY
The board has an active role in overseeing the Company’s strategy.
The board regularly reviews management’s progress in executing the
strategy. In 2022, the board initiated annual strategic reviews
that included individual strategy reviews with members of the
Executive Office. These reviews included discussions of the key
geopolitical policies, economic, technological, environmental,
talent and competitive challenges and opportunities of the
Company’s business. The board plans to continue this practice going
forward.
BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
The board has oversight for risk management with a focus on the
most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic,
operational, financial and legal compliance risks. The board’s risk
oversight process builds upon management’s risk assessment and
mitigation processes, which include an enterprise risk management
program, regular internal management disclosure compliance
committee meetings, a Code of Conduct that applies to all
employees, executives and directors, quality standards and
processes, an ethics and compliance program, and comprehensive
internal audit processes. The board’s risk oversight role also
includes the selection and oversight of the independent auditors.
The board implements its risk oversight function both as a board
and through delegation to board committees, which meet regularly
and report back to the board. The board has delegated the oversight
of specific risks to board committees that align with their
functional responsibilities.
The Audit Committee (AC) assists the board in overseeing the
enterprise risk management program and evaluates and monitors risks
related to the Company’s financial reporting requirements, system
of internal controls, the internal audit program, the independent
auditor, the compliance program and the information security
program. The AC assesses cybersecurity and information technology
risks and the controls implemented to monitor and mitigate these
risks. The Chief Information Officer attends all bimonthly AC
meetings and provides cybersecurity updates to the AC and
board.
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC) monitors and
assesses risks associated with the Company’s employment and
compensation policies and practices.
The Nominating and Governance Committee (NGC) oversees various
governance matters and the Sustainability and other Public Policy
Committee (SPPC) oversees risks related to sustainability and other
public policy issues that affect the Company, including health and
safety, lobbying and political contributions, and human rights.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 14
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND EVALUATIONS
PROCESS FOR NOMINATING AND EVALUATING DIRECTORS
The Nominating and Governance Committee (NGC) solicits and receives
recommendations for potential director candidates from
shareholders, management, directors, professional search firms and
other sources. In its assessment of each potential candidate, the
NGC considers each candidate’s professional experience, integrity,
honesty, judgment, independence, accountability, willingness to
express independent thought, understanding of the Company’s
business and other factors that the NGC determines are pertinent in
light of the current needs of the board. Candidates must have
successful leadership experience and stature in their primary
fields, with a background that demonstrates an understanding of
business affairs as well as the complexities of a large, publicly
held company. In addition, candidates must have demonstrated an
ability to think strategically and make decisions with a
forward-looking focus and the ability to assimilate relevant
information on a broad range of complex topics. In evaluating
director candidates, the NGC also considers key skills and
experience related to the Company’s strategy for long-term
profitable growth, which identifies services, expanded offerings,
operational excellence and sustainability as primary focus areas.
Moreover, candidates must have the ability to devote the time
necessary to meet a director’s responsibilities and serve on no
more than four public company boards in addition to
Caterpillar.
The board values diversity of talents, skills, abilities and
experiences and believes that board diversity of all types enhances
the performance of the board and provides significant benefits to
the Company. Accordingly, the NGC takes into account the diversity
of the board in selecting new director candidates.
DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT PROCESS
CANDIDATE
RECOMMENDATIONS
|
 |
NGC
|
 |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
 |
SHAREHOLDERS
|
from Shareholders, Management, Directors, professional search firms
and other sources
|
|
Discusses & Reviews
Qualifications and Expertise
Enterprise Strategy
Board Needs
Diversity
Interviews
Recommends Nominees
|
|
Discusses NGC Recommendations
Analyzes Independence
Selects Nominees
|
|
Vote on Nominees at Annual Meeting
|
The following table summarizes certain key characteristics of the
Company’s businesses and the associated qualifications, skills and
experience that the NGC believes should be represented on the
board.
BUSINESS CHARACTERISTICS
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
|
■
The Company is a global manufacturer with products sold around the
world.
|
|
■
Manufacturing or logistics operations experience
■
Broad international exposure
|
■
Technology and customer and product support services are
important.
|
|
■
Customer and product support experience
|
■
The Company’s businesses undertake numerous transactions in many
countries and in many currencies.
|
|
■
Diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, cultural background or
professional experience
■
High level of financial literacy
■
Mergers and acquisitions experience
|
■
Demand for many of the Company’s products is tied to conditions in
the global commodity, energy, construction and transportation
markets.
|
|
■
Experience in the evaluation of global economic conditions
■
Knowledge of commodity, energy, construction or transportation
markets
|
■
The Company’s businesses are impacted by regulatory requirements
and policies of various governmental entities around the world.
|
|
■
Governmental and international trade experience
|
■
The board’s responsibilities include understanding and overseeing
the various risks facing the Company and ensuring that appropriate
policies and procedures are in place to effectively manage
risk.
|
|
■
Risk oversight/management expertise
■
Relevant executive and leadership experience
■
Cybersecurity experience
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 15
Back to
Contents
NOMINATIONS FROM SHAREHOLDERS
The NGC considers unsolicited inquiries and director nominees
recommended by shareholders in the same manner as nominees from all
other sources. Recommendations should be sent to the Corporate
Secretary, 5205 N. O’Connor Boulevard, Suite 100, Irving, TX
75039. Shareholders may nominate a director candidate to serve
on the board by following the procedures described in our bylaws.
Deadlines for shareholder nominations for Caterpillar’s 2024 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are included in the “Shareholder Proposals
and Director Nominations for the 2024 Annual Meeting” section on
page 86.
The number of persons comprising the Caterpillar board of directors
is currently established as 12. All of the board’s nominees have
consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if
elected. If all nominees are elected, the number of persons
comprising the board will be 11 following the Annual Meeting. If
any of the board’s nominees should become unavailable to serve as a
Director prior to the Annual Meeting, the size of the board and
number of board nominees will be reduced accordingly.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 16
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR CANDIDATE BIOGRAPHIES AND QUALIFICATIONS
Directors have been in their current positions for the past five
years unless otherwise noted. Information is as of April 1, 2023.
The board has nominated the following individuals to stand for
election for a one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders in 2024.
The experiences and qualifications of each of the director nominees
enable each of them to provide meaningful input and guidance to the
board.
|
 |
|
KELLY A. AYOTTE
Former U.S. Senator representing New Hampshire
Age: 54
Director since: 2017
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
■
Boston Properties, Inc.
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy, Chair
■
Nominating and Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
■
Bloom Energy Corporation
|
|
Experience
■
U.S. Senator representing the State of New Hampshire
(2011–2016)
■
Attorney General (2004–2009), Deputy Attorney General (2003–2004),
State of New Hampshire
|
Qualifications
■
Leadership, Government/Regulatory Affairs and Global
Experience – obtained from her service as Attorney General,
Deputy Attorney General and Chief of the Homicide Prosecution Unit
for New Hampshire and as a U.S. Senator. As a U.S. Senator, she
gained especially valuable insights on important public policy
issues from serving on the Senate Commerce, Science and
Transportation Committee and the Senate Budget Committee. She
championed policies for cleaner energy production, preservation of
outdoor spaces and advocated for the U.S. to be a world leader in
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As New Hampshire’s Attorney
General, she worked to preserve and strengthen the Clean Air Act
and other important environmental regulations. She also served as a
Senior Advisor to Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards), Risk Management
and Technology – gained while serving on the boards of multiple
public companies, including as Lead Independent Director of Boston
Properties, as well as currently serving on two private boards,
including as Chair of BAE Systems, Inc., and three nonprofit boards
that focus on human rights and other global issues.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 17
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
DAVID L. CALHOUN
President and CEO of The Boeing Company (aviation and defense)
Age: 65
Director since: 2011
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy
■
Nominating and Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
■
Gates Industrial Corporation plc
|
|
Experience
■
President and CEO (2020–present), The Boeing Company
■
Senior Managing Director and Head of Portfolio Operations
(2014–2020), The Blackstone Group (now Blackstone Inc.)
■
Executive Chairman (2014–2016), Chief Executive Officer
(2006–2013), Nielsen Holdings
■
Vice Chairman (2005–2006), President and Chief Executive Officer,
GE Infrastructure (2005–2006), held numerous operating, finance and
marketing roles and led multiple business units including GE
Transportation, GE Aircraft Engines, GE Employers Reinsurance
Corporation, GE Lighting and GE Transportation Systems, joined the
company in 1981, The General Electric Company (GE)
|
Qualifications
■
CEO, Leadership, and Business Development and Strategy –
gained from his almost 30 years in leadership positions at Boeing,
where as CEO, he oversees more than 140,000 people worldwide and
operations involving a wide variety of strategic, business, safety
and regulatory matters; Blackstone, where he was the Senior
Managing Director and Head of Portfolio Operations; Nielsen, where
as CEO, he led the company’s transformation into a leading global
information and measurement firm listed on the New York Stock
Exchange; and GE, where he rose to Vice Chairman of the company and
President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Infrastructure, its
largest business unit, that included Aviation, Rail, Energy and
Water. In his leadership roles at Boeing, he oversaw significant
environmental initiatives, such as, the company maintaining
net-zero emissions for Scope 1 and 2 in both 2020 and 2021;
launching a five-year ecoDemonstrator program partnership with NASA
to collect and analyze data on sustainable aviation fuel emissions
in an effort to enable the transition to carbon neutral aerospace;
and becoming a founding member of MIT Climate and Sustainability
Consortium and of First Movers Coalition to accelerate new
technology development to reduce emissions.
■
Government/Regulatory Affairs, Customer and Product Support
Services, Risk Management and Global Experience – developed
over his more than 40-year career in global positions that involved
navigating complex situations including government regulation,
client support and management of risk.
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert and Finance &
Accounting – gained while serving as Senior Managing Director
and Head of Portfolio Operations at Blackstone, where he focused on
creating and driving added-value initiatives with Blackstone’s
portfolio company CEOs, which allows him to bring a unique
perspective to the board. In addition, during his tenure at GE, he
led GE’s audit staff.
■
Technology and Manufacturing/Logistics – obtained from his
current role as CEO of Boeing, the world’s leading aerospace
company and largest manufacturer of commercial and military
aircraft, his experience at Nielsen and his 26-year tenure at GE.
At Boeing, he is responsible for managing one of the largest, most
sophisticated global industrial supply chains in the world. At
Nielsen, he led one of the largest consumer data analytics platform
in the world and at GE Aviation he led a sophisticated data
collection and analytics platform.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving on numerous public company boards, including Gates
Industrial, where he served as Chairman; Nielsen, where he served
as Executive Chairman; and Refinitiv, where he served as
Chairman.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 18
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
DANIEL M. DICKINSON
Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners (private equity firm)
Age: 61
Director since: 2006
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Compensation and Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
Co-Founder and Managing Partner (2001–present), HCI Equity
Partners
■
Held roles including Co-Head of Global M&A, Head of European
M&A and Head of Global Manufacturing and Services M&A
(1993–2001), Merrill Lynch
■
Vice President, M&A Group (1987–1993), The First Boston
Corporation (now Credit Suisse)
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, Leadership, Business
Development and Strategy, Finance & Accounting, Risk Management
and Business Development and Strategy – obtained during his
over 35-year career in mergers and acquisitions, private equity
business and investment banking, both in the U.S. and
internationally, at HCI Equity Partners, where he founded and led
the firm to become a leading lower middle market private equity
firm; as Co-Head of Global M&A at Merrill Lynch; and as Vice
President, M&A at First Boston, which allows him to provide
insights for evaluating investment opportunities and contributes to
the board’s understanding and analysis of complex issues. He also
serves as Chairman of five of HCI’s portfolio companies and drives
metric-based environmental stewardship, diversity, equity and
inclusion and governance initiatives at these companies. He has
also led environmental, social and governance-related
transformations at many of the firm’s investments. He also serves
as a board member of Right to Dream, a global organization
developing schools and sports academies to provide educational and
athletic opportunities for children from underdeveloped areas of
Africa.
■
Customer and Product Support Services and
Manufacturing/Logistics – gained while serving as Head of
Global Manufacturing and Services M&A at Merrill Lynch.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving on various public company boards, including on the board of
Mistras Group and Progressive Waste Solutions (now known as Waste
Connections).
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 19
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
JAMES C. FISH, JR.
President and CEO of Waste Management, Inc. (waste and
environmental services)
Age: 60
Director since: 2023
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fish was brought to the attention of the board through a
professional search firm.
|
Experience
■
President and Chief Executive Officer (2016–present), Chief
Financial Officer (2012–2016), Executive Vice President
(2012–2016), Senior Vice President – Eastern Group (2011–2012),
Vice President – PA/WV Area (2009–2011), Vice President – Pricing
(2003–2006), Director – Financial Planning (2001–2003), Waste
Management, Inc.
■
Vice President – Finance (1999–2001), Westex
■
Vice President – Revenue Management (1995–1999), Trans World
Airlines, Inc.
■
Director of Yield Management (1986–1995), America West Airlines,
Inc.
|
Qualifications
■
CEO, Leadership, Business Development and Strategy, and Risk
Management – obtained while serving in leadership roles,
including CEO, of Waste Management, North America’s largest
comprehensive waste management environmental solutions provider. As
President and CEO of Waste Management, he has shifted the company’s
sustainability strategy to focus on minimizing its environmental
impact by reducing carbon emissions, investing in differentiated,
innovative technologies and automation, and expanding recycling and
renewable energy infrastructure to help Waste Management’s
customers achieve their sustainability goals. As CEO of a heavily
regulated business, he leads a large government affairs team that
interacts with all levels of government.
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert and Finance &
Accounting – obtained while serving as CFO of Waste Management
where he gained valuable expertise in accounting and external
reporting.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving as a director of Waste Management.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 20
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
GERALD JOHNSON
Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing and Sustainability
of General Motors Company (manufacturing)
Age: 60
Director since: 2021
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Compensation and Human Resources
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing and Sustainability
(2019–present), Vice President North America Manufacturing and
Labor Relations (2017–2019), Vice President Global Operational
Excellence (2014–2017), joined in the company 1980, General
Motors Company (GM)
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, Leadership, Business
Development and Strategy, Customer and Product Support Services,
Technology, Global Experience and Manufacturing/Logistics –
obtained during his over 40-year career at GM, including his
current role, where he is responsible for the quality and safety
performance for 103,000 employees, representing more than 129
manufacturing facilities in 16 countries on five continents, which
allows him to provide valuable insight and perspective to the Board
on strategic and business matters. He leads global manufacturing
and sustainability at GM where he is responsible for GM’s
achievement of its climate commitments. He has also led GM’s Global
Manufacturing, Sustainability, Manufacturing Engineering and Labor
Relations organizations. He was a founding member of GM’s Inclusion
Advisory Board, created to foster and grow an inclusive internal
culture while ensuring continuous improvement in diversity and
equity. He is an active member of General Motors African Ancestry
Network, the mission of which is to attract, develop and retain
employees of African ancestry. He has also served as a member of
the GM Political Action Committee Board and Steering Committee
since 2020.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 21
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
DAVID W. MACLENNAN
Executive Chair of the Board of Cargill, Inc. (food and
agriculture)
Age: 63
Director since: 2021
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
Executive Chair (2023–present), Chair (2015–2022), Chief Executive
Officer (2013–2022), Chief Operating Officer (2011–2013), Chief
Financial Officer (2008–2011), joined the company in 1991,
Cargill, Inc.
|
Qualifications
■
CEO, Leadership, Business Development and Strategy,
Government/Regulatory Affairs, Risk Management, Technology, Global
Experience and Manufacturing/Logistics – obtained while serving
in leadership roles at and as former CEO of Cargill, a large
multinational corporation, where he helped develop a business model
and culture to position Cargill for long-term success. He oversaw
Cargill’s building of expertise in alternative proteins and
development of technologies and digital solutions to transform
farming, supply chains and food delivery, and undertook several
large acquisitions during his tenure. As CEO of Cargill, he worked
to address climate change and water risks by investing in renewable
diesel; decarbonize maritime shipping by developing new wind
propulsion technology that aimed to reduce shipping carbon dioxide
emissions by as much as 30% and strengthen the food system by
training over five million farmers globally on regenerative
agriculture practices that sequester carbon, improve soil health
and increase crop yields. He also directed numerous diversity,
equity and inclusion initiatives including establishing specific
time bound goals for gender and ethnic representation in senior
management and helped establish the most diverse top leadership
team in Cargill’s history. He created a particular focus on safety
and reduction of injuries in Cargill’s facilities. His CEO
responsibilities also included frequent interaction with government
officials throughout the world and he also served on Cargill’s
Business Conduct Committee.
■
Finance & Accounting and Audit Committee Financial
Expert – developed while serving as CFO of Cargill, where he
was responsible for all financial aspects of the business,
including financing, internal controls and reporting, capital
investments and budgeting.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving as a director on the board of Ecolab since 2016 where he is
a member of the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee and
where he will serve as Lead Director beginning on May 4, 2023. He
also serves as Chairman of the Board at Cargill.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 22
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
JUDITH F. MARKS
Chair, CEO and President of Otis Worldwide Corporation (elevator
and escalator manufacturing, installation and service)
Age: 59
Director since: 2023
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
■
Otis Worldwide Corporation
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Compensation and Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Marks was brought to the attention of the board through a
professional search firm.
|
Experience
■
Chair of the Board (2022–present), Chief Executive Officer
(2019–present), President (2017–present), Otis Worldwide
Corporation
■
Chief Executive Officer (2017), Executive Vice President of New
Equipment Solutions (2016–2017), Executive Vice President of Global
Solutions (2015–2016), Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.
■
Chief Executive Officer (2017), Siemens USA, President and
Chief Executive Officer (2011–2015), Siemens Government
Technologies, Inc.
■
Vice President of Strategy & Business Development, Electronic
Systems (2009–2011), President of Transportation & Security
Solutions (2005–2009), President of Information Systems &
Global Services (2005–2009), Executive Vice President of
Transportation and Security Solutions (2005), President of
Distribution Technologies Division (2001–2005), Lockheed Martin
Corporation
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, CEO, Leadership, Business
Development and Strategy, Customer and Product Support Services,
Finance & Accounting, Risk Management, Technology, Global
Experience and Manufacturing/Logistics – gained from her
experience in executive positions at Otis Worldwide Corporation,
the world’s leading provider and maintainer of elevators,
escalators and moving walkways; as Executive Vice President of New
Equipment Solutions and Executive Vice President of Global
Solutions of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.; as President and CEO of
Siemens USA and Siemens Government Technologies, Inc.; and in
various senior leadership positions at Lockheed Martin
Corporation.During her current tenure at Otis, she led the
successful spin-off of Otis to an independent publicly traded
company, and prioritized and advanced Otis’ sustainability program
by embedding it into the company strategy as a key element to drive
added value for all stakeholders; oversaw the company announcing
that 100% of global factories achieved ISO certification four years
ahead of the company goal and launching the Otis Gen360 connected
elevator designed to offer higher energy efficiency and a light
carbon footprint comparable Gen2 configurations. She also sponsored
Made to Move Communities, Otis’ signature corporate social
responsibility program that focuses on advancing youth STEM
education and inclusive mobility solutions and serves as Chair of
Otis’ Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Advisory Group. In her role
as CEO of Siemens USA, she led a $24B global organization in the
areas of electrification, automation and digitalization with 50,000
employees and 60 manufacturing locations.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving as a director and Chair of the Board of Otis Worldwide
Corporation. She also previously served as a director on the boards
of AdvanceCT, Hubbell Incorporated and Siemens Government
Technologies, Inc.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 23
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
DEBRA L. REED-KLAGES
Former Chairman and CEO of Sempra Energy (energy infrastructure and
utilities)
Age: 66
Director since: 2015
INDEPENDENT
Presiding Director
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
■
Lockheed Martin Corporation
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Nominating and Governance, Chair
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
■
Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
|
|
Experience
■
Chairman of the Board (2012–2018), Chief Executive Officer
(2011–2018), Executive Vice President (2010–2011), President and
Chief Executive Officer, San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern
California Gas Co., joined the company in 1978, Sempra
Energy
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, CEO, Leadership, Business
Development and Strategy, Customer and Product Support Services,
Finance & Accounting, Risk Management, Technology and Global
Experience – gained over her three decades of experience in
senior management and executive positions, including as former CEO
at Sempra, an energy infrastructure and utilities company, which
also conducts business in Mexico and South America. While leading
Sempra, she oversaw significant growth in the use of renewable
generation, allowing her to provide valuable insights into trends
in the power, oil and gas industries, which are key end-user
markets for Caterpillar products. As Chair and CEO of Sempra
Energy, she led the transformation of San Diego Gas & Electric
from all fossil fuel generation to become one of the utilities with
the highest percentage of renewables in its portfolio and oversaw
initiatives such as developing infrastructure in Mexico. Sempra
Energy led renewable development, building wind and solar projects
in the U.S. and Mexico to provide clean energy to customers. She
also led diversity and inclusion and supplier diversity at Sempra.
In her role as Vice President of Human Resources at Southern
California Gas Co., she led diversity and inclusion and succession
planning and development efforts and oversaw labor relations and
union negotiations. Additionally, she also led compliance efforts
enacting the corporate ethics policy at Sempra and ensuring proper
governance and compliance frameworks were in place.
■
Government/Regulatory Affairs – gained while in leadership
roles at Sempra while serving four years on the National Petroleum
Council, an advisory committee to the United States Secretary of
Energy to study energy policy. In her leadership roles at Sempra,
she led highly regulated energy businesses in numerous states and
internationally and worked extensively with a wide array of
government entities and regulators.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
a director of other large, publicly traded corporations such as
Chevron, Lockheed Martin and Halliburton. She previously chaired
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at Haliburton and
currently serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee at Lockheed Martin and chairs the Audit Committee at
Chevron.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 24
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
SUSAN C. SCHWAB
Professor Emerita at the University of Maryland School of Public
Policy and Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP (global law
firm)
Age: 68
Director since: 2009
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
■
Marriott International, Inc.
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Sustainability and other Public Policy
■
Nominating and Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
Board Chair (2022–present), National Foreign Trade
Council
■
Professor Emerita (2019–present), Professor (2009–2019),
University of Maryland School of Public Policy
■
Strategic Advisor (2010–present), Mayer Brown LLP
■
U.S. Trade Representative (2006–2009), Deputy U.S. Trade
Representative (2005–2006), United States Government
■
President and Chief Executive Officer (2004–2005), University
System of Maryland Foundation
■
Consultant (2003), U.S. Department of Treasury
■
Dean (1995–2003), University of Maryland School of Public
Policy
■
Director of Corporate Business Development (1993–1995),
Motorola, Inc.
■
Assistant Secretary of Commerce (1989–1993), U.S. and Foreign
Commercial Service
|
Qualifications
■
Leadership, Business Development and Strategy, Risk Management
and Global Experience – obtained over her 30-year career in
international trade, commerce and public policy education, which
allows her to provide important insights for the Company’s global
business model and long-standing support of open trade, as well as
meaningful input and guidance to the board on strategy and the
evaluation of global economic conditions. As Dean of the University
of Maryland School of Public Policy, she led a strategic
realignment of the school’s curriculum that introduced a new
specialization in philanthropy and non-profit management and also
co-founded a non-profit to encourage education and fund students of
color to benefit from graduate programs and consider careers in
public policy and international affairs. While working as a U.S.
Trade Representative, she worked to eliminate tariff barriers to
environmental goods, such as clean energy technologies, worked with
key non-governmental organizations to help champion negotiations to
eliminate subsidization of industrial fishing fleets that
contribute to overfishing of the oceans, and helped build
enforceable environmental and labor provisions into U.S. trade
agreements for the first time.
■
Government/Regulatory Affairs – gained as U.S. Trade
Representative and Director-General of the U.S. and Foreign
Commercial Service, the export promotion arm of the U.S.
government. As Director General of U.S. and Foreign Commercial
Service, she was responsible for over 200 field offices in the U.S.
and 70 countries, with supervisory responsibility for American and
international employees in multiple employment systems. She also
introduced the agency’s first training curriculum with diversity,
equity and inclusion components.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) and Technology
– gained while serving as a director of other large, publicly
traded multinational corporations, including FedEx, Marriott and
Boeing.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 25
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
D. JAMES UMPLEBY III
Chairman and CEO of Caterpillar Inc.
Age: 65
Director since: 2017
MANAGEMENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
Chairman (2018–present), Chief Executive Officer (2017–present),
Group President, Energy & Transportation segment (2013–2016),
Vice President and President of Solar Turbines (2010–2012), joined
a company subsidiary in 1980, Caterpillar Inc.
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, CEO, Leadership, Business
Development and Strategy, Finance & Accounting and Risk
Management – obtained during his more than three decades of
experience in senior management and executive positions and more
than a decade of financial responsibility and experience at
Caterpillar. This includes oversight of all aspects of
Caterpillar’s environmental and sustainability policies and
strategies, such as the introduction of new products and services
that contribute to sustainability efforts by reducing waste and
fuel consumption and increasing safety and operator ease of use. He
also formerly served as a director of the World Resources
Institute, which works to secure a sustainable future. Additionally
he oversees all aspects of Caterpillar’s diversity and inclusion
policies and strategies, including the introduction of
Caterpillar’s five pillar diversity and inclusion framework.
■
Customer and Product Support Services, Technology, Global
Experience and Manufacturing/Logistics – developed during his
long career at Caterpillar, the world’s leading manufacturer of
construction and mining equipment, off-highway diesel and natural
gas engines, industrial gas turbines and diesel-electric
locomotives with extensive international operations.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
serving as a director Chevron Corporation, where he is a member of
the Board Nominating and Governance Committee and the Public Policy
and Sustainability Committee.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 26
Back to
Contents
|
 |
|
RAYFORD WILKINS, JR.
Former CEO of Diversified Businesses at AT&T Inc.
(telecommunications)
Age: 71
Director since: 2017
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
■
Valero Energy Corporation
|
CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEES:
■
Compensation and Human Resources, Chair
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Experience
■
CEO of Diversified Businesses (2007–2012), held other leadership
roles including Group President of Marketing and Sales, SBC
Communications, President and CEO, SBC and Pacific Bell, and
President and CEO Southwestern Bell Telephone, joined in 1974,
AT&T Inc.
|
Qualifications
■
Audit Committee Financial Expert, Leadership, Business
Development & Strategy, Government/Regulatory Affairs, Customer
and Product Support Services, Finance & Accounting, Risk
Management, Technology and Global Experience – gained while in
leadership roles at AT&T, where he was responsible for
international investments, AT&T Interactive, AT&T
Advertising Solutions, customer information services and the
consumer wireless initiative in India; his service on the Advisory
Council of the McCombs School of Business at the University of
Texas at Austin and his service as a director at Valero Energy
Corporation and Morgan Stanley. As chair of Valero’s Human
Resources and Compensation Committee, he was integral to Valero’s
progress in linking pay with HSE (health, safety and environmental)
and ESG performance. He also served on the Institute for Inclusion
Advisory Board at Morgan Stanley, which aims to develop and
accelerate an integrated and transparent diversity, equity and
inclusion strategy.
■
Board of Directors Experience (other boards) – gained while
a director and committee chair of other large, publicly traded
corporations, including as chair of the Governance and
Sustainability Committee at Morgan Stanley and chair of the Human
Resources and Compensation Committee and the newly established
Sustainability and Public Policy Committee at Valero Energy
Corporation.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 27
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information concerning the
compensation for our non-employee directors during the year ended
December 31, 2022. Mr. Umpleby, who served as Chairman and CEO
during 2022, did not receive separate compensation for his service
on the board.
Annual compensation for non-employee directors for 2022 was
comprised of the following components:
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units (1 Year Vesting)
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Cash Retainer
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Cash Stipends:
|
|
|
|
Presiding Director (Executive Committee Chair)
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Audit Committee Chair
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
Compensation and Human Resources Committee Chair
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
|
$
|
20,000
|
1
|
Sustainability and other Public Policy Committee Chair
|
$
|
20,000
|
1
|
(1)
Cash Stipend Effective June 8, 2022
|
|
|
|
Directors are required to own Caterpillar common stock equal to
five times their annual cash retainer. Directors have a five-year
period from the date of their election or appointment to meet the
target ownership guidelines. All directors are in compliance with
these guidelines. Under the Company’s Directors’ Deferred
Compensation Plan, directors may defer 50% or more of their annual
cash retainer and stipend into an interest-bearing account or an
account representing phantom shares of Caterpillar stock. Directors
may also defer 50% or more of any stock-based compensation
(effective for grants other than options and stock appreciation
rights made on or after January 1, 2019) upon vesting into an
account representing phantom shares of Caterpillar stock. Directors
that joined the board prior to April 1, 2008, also are able to
participate in a Charitable Award Program. A donation of up to
$500,000 will be made by the Company in the director’s name to
charitable organizations selected by the director and a donation of
up to $500,000 also will be made by the Company in the director’s
name to the Caterpillar Foundation. Directors derive no financial
benefit from the Charitable Award Program.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 28
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2022
Director
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units(1) (2)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
Kelly A. Ayotte
|
$
|
161,209
|
(4)
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
348,726
|
David L. Calhoun
|
$
|
185,000
|
(4)
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
$
|
377,517
|
Daniel M. Dickinson
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
20,656
|
|
$
|
388,173
|
Gerald Johnson
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
337,517
|
David W. MacLennan
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
337,517
|
Debra L. Reed-Klages
|
$
|
201,731
|
(4)
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
389,248
|
Edward B. Rust, Jr.
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
25,574
|
|
$
|
363,091
|
Susan C. Schwab
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
337,517
|
Miles D. White
|
$
|
65,934
|
(5)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
$
|
76,934
|
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
|
$
|
164,011
|
(4)
|
$
|
187,517
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
$
|
356,528
|
(1)
Restricted stock units awarded in 2022 include a one-time
adjustment to reflect the change in annual grant date from March to
June that was implemented in 2022.
(2)
As of December 31, 2022, the number of RSUs (including accrued
dividend equivalent units) and Phantom Shares held by those serving
as non-employee directors during 2022 were: Ms. Ayotte: 3,256
(which consists of 825 RSUs and 2,431 Phantom Shares); Mr. Calhoun:
24,347 (which consists of 825 RSUs and 23,522 Phantom Shares); Mr.
Dickinson: 30,762 (which consists of 825 RSUs and 29,937 Phantom
Shares); Mr. Johnson: 825 RSUs; Mr. MacLennan: 1,069 (which
consists of 825 RSUs and 244 Phantom Shares); Ms. Reed-Klages:
11,629 (which consists of 825 RSUs and 10,804 Phantom Shares); Mr.
Rust: 40,239 (which consists of 825 RSUs and 39,414 Phantom
Shares); Ms. Schwab: 21,489 (which consists of 825 RSUs and 20,664
Phantom Shares); Mr. White: 12,909 Phantom Shares; and Mr. Wilkins:
825 RSUs.
Mr. Calhoun and Ms. Schwab elected to defer 100% of their 2022 Cash
Retainer and Cash Stipend (as applicable) into Phantom Shares of
Caterpillar stock in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.
These deferrals, plus the accumulated value of previous retainer
deferrals for each of Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Dickinson, Ms. Reed-Klages,
Mr. Rust and Mr. White, are included in the Phantom Shares totals
above. Mr. Johnson elected to defer 100% of his 2022 Cash Retainer
into the Interest Fund in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation
Plan.
Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Calhoun, Mr. MacLennan, Ms. Reed-Klages and Ms.
Schwab elected to defer a portion of their equity award that vested
on March 1, 2022, into the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.
These deferrals, plus the accumulated deferrals of previous equity
awards, are also included in the Phantom Share totals above. Ms.
Ayotte and Mr. MacLennan elected to defer 50%, and Mr. Calhoun, Ms.
Reed-Klages and Ms. Schwab elected to defer 100% of the equity
award granted on June 8, 2022.
(3)
All Other Compensation represents amounts paid in connection with
the Directors’ Charitable Award Program, Caterpillar Foundation’s
Matching Gifts Program and the Caterpillar Political Action
Committee Charitable Matching Program (CATPAC’s PACMATCH
program).
For directors eligible to participate in the Directors Charitable
Award Program, the amounts listed include the insurance premium and
administrative fees as follows: Mr. Dickinson $20,656 and Mr. Rust
$20,574.
In 2022, the Caterpillar Foundation matched contributions to
eligible 501(c)(3) nonprofits and accredited U.S. public/private
preK-12 schools or school districts to which contributions are
tax-deductible, up to a maximum match of $10,000 per participant
per calendar year. Additionally in 2022, the Caterpillar Foundation
also provided a 2:1 match program for a period of time in support
of the Foundation’s 70th Anniversary and Giving Tuesday that
allowed participants to donate up to $500 to be matched at a 2:1
ratio. The amounts listed include Charitable Foundation matching
gifts as follows: Mr. White $11,000.
As part of CATPAC’s PACMATCH program, Caterpillar Inc. will
contribute to up to four charities on behalf of eligible members
who contribute at the suggested giving level. The annual CATPAC
contribution limit is $5,000. Mr. Calhoun, Mr. Rust and Mr. Wilkins
had contributions matched.
(4)
Total fees earned or paid in 2022 include pro-rated Cash Retainer
and/or Cash Stipends for directors who ceased board service or
transitioned between committee chair positions over the course of
the year. The cash compensation for Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Calhoun, Ms.
Reed-Klages and Mr. Wilkins reflect pro-ration of chair stipends
for the transition of roles on June 8, 2022.
(5)
Mr. White did not stand for re-election, thereby concluding his
board service June 8, 2022. His cash compensation includes
pro-ration to the date his board service ceased.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 29
Back to
Contents
BOARD ELECTION AND LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
Directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve for a
one-year term. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a
majority of the votes cast for such directorship. If an incumbent
director does not receive a greater number of “for” votes than
“against” votes, such director must tender his or her resignation
to the board. In contested elections, directors are elected by a
plurality vote.
The mandatory retirement age for directors is 74. Each director who
will have reached the age of 74, on or before the date of the next
shareholders’ meeting, shall not stand for re-election at that
annual meeting of the shareholders without an express waiver by the
board.
Under Caterpillar’s bylaws, the directors annually elect a
Chairman. The board has no fixed policy on whether to have an
executive or non-executive chairman and believes this determination
should be made based on the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders in light of the circumstances at the time. As
previously disclosed, the board determined to appoint Ms.
Reed-Klages as its Presiding Director, effective June 8, 2022.
In the role of Presiding Director, Ms. Reed-Klages has provided
strong independent oversight of management and served as a liaison
between the independent directors and the Chairman and CEO, as
further described below. Ms. Reed-Klages also led the board’s
annual evaluation of Mr. Umpleby, and the independent members of
the board set Mr. Umpleby’s compensation annually based on the
recommendation of the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PRESIDING DIRECTOR
■
Preside at all meetings of the board at which the Chairman &
CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent
directors.
■
Serve as a liaison between the Chairman & CEO and the
independent directors.
■
Approve the type of information sent to the board.
■
Provide input and approve meeting agendas for the board.
■
Approve meeting schedules, in consultation with the Chairman &
CEO and the independent directors, to assure that there is
sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items.
■
Has the authority to call meetings of the independent
directors.
■
If requested by major shareholders, is available, when appropriate,
for consultation and direct communication.
■
Provide the Chairman & CEO with the results of his/her annual
performance review in conjunction with the chairman of the
Compensation and Human Resources Committee.
The board believes it is important to maintain flexibility as to
the board’s leadership structure. The board will continue to
regularly review its leadership structure and exercise its
discretion in adopting an appropriate and effective framework to
ensure effective governance and accountability, taking into
consideration the needs of the board and the Company.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND CODE OF CONDUCT
Our board has adopted Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues
(Corporate Governance Guidelines), which are available on our
website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. The guidelines
reflect the board’s commitment to oversee the effectiveness of
policy and decision-making both at the board and management level,
with a view to enhance shareholder value over the long term.
Caterpillar’s Code of Conduct is called Our Values in Action.
Integrity, Excellence, Teamwork, Commitment and Sustainability are
the core values identified in the code. Our Values in Action apply
to all members of the board and to management and employees
worldwide. These values embody the high ethical standards that
Caterpillar has upheld since its formation in 1925. Our Values in
Action are available on our website at
www.caterpillar.com/code.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 30
Back to
Contents
BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS
The board conducts an annual self-evaluation to determine whether
the board and its committees are functioning effectively. In 2022,
the Chair of the NGC interviewed each board member to solicit their
feedback. The NGC Chair then led a discussion during the board’s
executive session. Each of the committees of the board followed a
similar process and reported to the board on the outcome of their
self-evaluations. The self-evaluation provides the board with
actionable feedback to enhance its performance and
effectiveness.
Starting in 2022, the board enhanced its self-evaluation process
through the addition of individual director assessments. Pursuant
to this part of the process, each director sends a confidential
performance evaluation with respect to each other individual
director to outside counsel retained by the Company at the request
of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Outside counsel reviews
and compiles the results and provides summaries of each director’s
performance evaluation to the Presiding Director, other than her
own review, which summary is instead provided to the Chair of the
Audit Committee. The Presiding Director then has an individual
conversation with each director, reviewing the results and feedback
received as well as providing recommendations for improvement, if
any (with the Chair of the Audit Committee undertaking such review
with the Presiding Director). The Nominating and Governance
Committee also reviews the collective results and makes any further
recommendations or improvements. In concert with the broader annual
board self-evaluation, the board believes it has proper processes
in place to evaluate the board, its committees and each individual
director’s effectiveness and potential areas of improvement.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The board currently has five standing committees: Audit,
Compensation and Human Resources, Sustainability and other Public
Policy, Nominating and Governance, and Executive. Each committee
meets regularly throughout the year, reports its actions and
recommendations to the board, receives reports from management,
annually evaluates its performance and has the authority to retain
outside advisors at its discretion. The current primary
responsibilities of each committee are summarized below and set
forth in more detail in each committee’s written charter, which can
be found on Caterpillar’s website at
www.caterpillar.com/governance. All committee members are
independent under Company, NYSE and SEC standards applicable to
board and committee service, and the board has determined that each
member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” and an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Daniel M. Dickinson, Chair
James C. Fish, Jr.
David W. MacLennan
Judith F. Marks
Edward B. Rust, Jr.
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
Number of Meetings in 2022: 10
|
COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
■
Selects and oversees independent auditors, including annual
evaluation of the lead audit partner.
|
■
Oversees our financial reporting activities, including our
financial statements, annual report and accounting standards and
principles.
|
■
Reviews with management the Company’s risk assessment and risk
management framework.
■
Approves audit and non-audit services provided by the independent
auditors.
■
Reviews the organization, scope and effectiveness of the Company’s
internal audit function, disclosures and internal controls.
■
Sets parameters for and monitors the Company’s hedging and
derivatives practices.
■
Provides oversight for the Company’s compliance program and Code of
Conduct.
■
Monitors any significant litigation, regulatory and tax compliance
matters.
■
Oversees information technology systems and related security.
■
Reviews with management cybersecurity risks and strategy to
mitigate these risks.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 31
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Rayford Wilkins, Jr., Chair
Daniel M. Dickinson
Gerald Johnson
Judith F. Marks
Edward B. Rust, Jr.
Number of Meetings in 2022: 5
|
COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
■
Recommends the CEO’s compensation to the board and establishes the
compensation of other executive officers.
|
■
Establishes, approves and oversees the Company’s equity
compensation and employee benefit plans.
|
■
Reviews incentive compensation arrangements to ensure that
incentive pay does not encourage unnecessary risk-taking, and
reviews and discusses the relationship between risk management
policies and practices, corporate strategy and executive
compensation.
|
■
Recommends to the board the compensation of independent
directors.
■
Provides general oversight of the Company’s approach to talent
management, succession planning and diversity and inclusion for
senior leaders.
■
Furnishes an annual Committee Report on executive compensation and
approves the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in the
Company’s proxy statement.
|
SUSTAINABILITY AND OTHER PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Kelly A. Ayotte, Chair
David L. Calhoun
James C. Fish, Jr.
Gerald Johnson
David W. MacLennan
Susan C. Schwab
Number of Meetings in 2022: 3
|
COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
■
Identifies, evaluates and monitors sustainability issues that
affect the Company’s operations and performance, including those
related to environmental issues and climate change.
|
■
Monitors the development and implementation of the goals
established by the Company for its performance with respect to its
sustainability framework and initiatives.
|
■
Reviews and evaluates risks that may arise in connection with the
sustainability and other public policy aspects of the Company’s
operations.
|
■
Provides general oversight over social issues, including those
related to human rights, that affect the Company’s operations and
performance.
■
Provides general oversight over health and safety activities,
including the Company’s initiatives to produce products and
services that support sustainable development of global
resources.
■
Reviews/advises on matters of domestic and international public
policy affecting the Company’s business, such as trade policy and
international trade negotiations and major global legislative and
regulatory developments.
■
Annually reviews the Company’s charitable contributions to the
Caterpillar Foundation and political contributions and policies,
including lobbying activities.
■
Oversees investor, customer, community and government
relations.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 32
Back to
Contents
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Debra L. Reed-Klages, Chair
Kelly A. Ayotte
David L. Calhoun
Susan C. Schwab
Number of Meetings in 2022: 3
|
COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
■
Makes recommendations to the board regarding the size and
composition of the board and its committees and the criteria to be
used for the selection of candidates to serve on the board.
|
■
Discusses and evaluates the qualifications of potential and
incumbent directors and recommends the director candidates to be
nominated for election at the Annual Meeting.
|
■
Leads the board in its annual self-evaluation process.
|
■
Oversees the Company’s corporate governance.
■
Oversees the Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues adopted by
the board and annually reviews the guidelines and recommends
changes to the board as appropriate.
■
Reviews related person transactions and annually reviews the
relationships between directors, the Company and members of
management and recommends to the board whether each director is
independent.
■
Reviews directorships in other public companies held by or offered
to directors and senior officers of the Company.
■
Recommends candidates for Company officer positions.
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Debra L. Reed-Klages, Chair
Kelly A. Ayotte
Daniel M. Dickinson
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
Number of Meetings in 2022: 1
|
COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
■
Acts with the authority of the board between regularly scheduled
meetings.
|
■
Has the authority to approve dividends, authorize share repurchases
and authorize long-term debt issuances in excess of $1 billion.
|
■
Oversees the succession management processes for Chairman of the
board and Chief Executive Officer.
|
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS
The Company’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues establish
that no more than two non-independent directors may serve on the
board at any point in time. A director is “independent” if he or
she has no direct or indirect material relationship with the
Company or with senior management of the Company and their
respective affiliates. Annually, the board makes an affirmative
determination regarding the independence of each director based
upon the recommendation of the NGC and in accordance with the
standards in the Company’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance
Issues, which are available on our website at
www.caterpillar.com/governance.
Applying these standards, the board determined that each of the
director nominees, and all other directors who served during 2022,
met the independence standards except Mr. Umpleby, who is a
current employee of the Company.
COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD
Shareholders, employees and all other interested parties may
communicate with any of our directors individually, our board as a
group, our independent directors as a group or any board committee
as a group by email or regular mail:
|
|
 |
 |
BY EMAIL
|
BY MAIL
|
send an email to directors@cat.com
|
mail to Caterpillar Inc.
c/o Corporate Secretary
5205 N. O’Connor Boulevard, Suite 100
Irving, TX 75039
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 33
Back to
Contents
CONTACTING CATERPILLAR
While the board oversees management, it does not participate in
day-to-day management functions or business operations. If you wish
to submit questions or comments relating to these matters, please
use the Contact Us form on our website at
www.caterpillar.com/contact, which will help direct your
message to the appropriate area of our Company.
All communications regarding personal grievances, administrative
matters, the conduct of the Company’s ordinary business operations,
billing issues, product or service-related inquiries, order
requests and similar issues will be directed to the appropriate
individual within the Company. The Chairman of the board has
instructed the Corporate Secretary to consult with him if she is
unsure who should receive the communication.
INVESTOR OUTREACH
We conduct an annual governance review and shareholder outreach
throughout the year to ensure management and the board understand
and consider the issues that matter most to our shareholders and
reflect the insights and perspectives of our many stakeholders. We
greatly value our relationships with our shareholders and hearing
their feedback directly. The governance engagements summarized
below are in addition to the regular discussions that our senior
leadership and Investor Relations teams have with many
institutional and retail shareholders which may also include
governance, sustainability and similar matters.
In 2022, we met with
shareholders representing
approximately
42% of total
outstanding shares
|
|
INTEGRATED ENGAGEMENT TEAM
|
|
TYPES OF ENGAGEMENT
|
|
|
|
One-on-One Meetings
Investor Conferences
Earnings Calls
Investor and Analyst
Calls
|
In response to shareholder feedback we received, we have taken
various actions, including:
KEY AREAS OF FOCUS
|
|
TAKING ACTIONS INFORMED BY
SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK
|
Lobbying and other public policy matters
|
|
We prepared our
inaugural annual lobbying report (published in February 2023).
The 2022 reporting
threshold for our contributions to U.S. trade and industry
associations was decreased from $50,000 or more per year to $25,000
or more per year. Beginning in the second half of 2023, we will
report all U.S. trade and industry association memberships
regardless of level of contribution.
|
Sustainability matters such as the energy transition and
climate change
|
|
We released our
estimated Scope 3 GHG emissions data in our 2022 Sustainability
Report (published in April 2023).
We released our
first-ever report aligned with certain recommendations of the Task
Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
|
Human capital, including diversity
|
|
We
prepared an annual diversity and inclusion report that contains
links to our EEO-1 reports.
|
Company strategy
|
|
We
updated our enterprise strategy to include sustainability as a
strategic focus area, together with operational excellence,
expanded offerings and services to highlight our work helping our
customers build a better, more sustainable world.
|
Executive compensation
|
|
We
incorporated ESG into the 2022 incentive plan for executive
officers.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 34
Back to
Contents
KEY AREAS OF FOCUS
|
|
TAKING ACTIONS INFORMED BY
SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK
|
Board oversight and governance
|
|
We restructured certain
committees of the board by creating the Sustainability and other
Public Policy Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee.
We enhanced the director
skills matrix to provide a description of each skill to help
shareholders understand how each skill helps contribute to
effective oversight.
We enhanced biographies
of director nominees to correspond directly to the skills matrix
and include specific ESG-related experience.
|
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOBBYING
As a responsible corporate citizen, Caterpillar participates in the
public policy process, advocating for a broad range of issues that
advance our strategy and purpose while providing value to
shareholders and other stakeholders. Our commitment to transparency
and disclosure in our advocacy activities has long been
recognized.
The Company provides disclosure relating to our advocacy efforts;
political engagements; political contribution activities, including
the Caterpillar Inc. Political Action Committee (CATPAC); and
global issues of importance to the Company, including detailed
information on the Company’s position with respect to such issues.
This information is disclosed in our inaugural 2022 Lobbying
Report: The Purpose of Engagement, and on our website at
www.caterpillar.com/politicalengagement. The website also
includes an itemized list of organizations and individuals that
received political contributions from Caterpillar or the
CATPAC.
Our Lobbying Report and website also provide a summary of some of
the public policy areas that are driven by our enterprise strategy
for profitable growth and where we see positive value in our
engagement and the ability to make an impact.
Caterpillar’s state, federal and international activities on
legislative and regulatory priorities significant to the company’s
business are managed by the Senior Vice President, Global
Government & Corporate Affairs, who coordinates and reviews
with senior management.
Our board of directors has direct oversight of political
contributions and lobbying activities. To ensure appropriate
oversight of political engagement activities, including lobbying,
the Sustainability and other Public Policy Committee reviews the
Company’s political spending policy and its political activities at
least annually, including corporate political contributions,
CATPAC’s political contribution activities, U.S. trade and industry
association participation and alignment with Caterpillar’s Values
and policy objectives, and Caterpillar’s significant lobbying
priorities.
Additional information, including more details on U.S. trade and
industry association memberships, our lobbying priorities, our
management governance and board oversight of these activities, and
our approach to any misalignments between Caterpillar’s priorities
and trade associations’ positions can be found in our Lobbying
Report.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Caterpillar has a written policy governing the approval of
transactions with the Company that are expected to exceed $120,000
in any calendar year in which any director, executive officer or
their immediate family members will have a direct or indirect
material interest. Under the policy, all such transactions must be
approved in advance by the NGC.
The director or officer must submit the details of the transaction
to the Company’s Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel and the
Corporate Secretary, including whether the related person or his or
her immediate family member has or will have a direct or indirect
interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a
less than 10% beneficial owner of an entity involved in the
transaction). The Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel and the
Corporate Secretary will then submit the matter to the NGC for its
consideration.
From time to time, related persons of Caterpillar may purchase
products or services of the Company and its subsidiaries. In
connection with these purchases, Caterpillar may provide marketing
support directly or indirectly through independent dealers,
consistent with sales under similar circumstances to unaffiliated
third parties.
Mr. Joseph Creed’s brother-in-law is employed by the Company as a
Production Supply Network Engineer and, consistent with the
Company’s compensation policies applicable to other employees of
similar title and responsibility, earned aggregate annual
compensation of approximately $187,000 for fiscal 2022.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 35
Back to
Contents
AUDIT
PROPOSAL 2 –
RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
|
What am I voting on?
|
Shareholders are being asked to approve the ratification of the
Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)
as the Company’s independent auditor for 2023.
|
Board Voting Recommendation:
|
FOR the
ratification of our independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
The Audit Committee (AC) is directly responsible for the
appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s
independent auditor. PwC has been Caterpillar’s independent auditor
since 1925. Through its extensive experience with the Company, PwC
has gained institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of the
Company’s operations and business, accounting policies and
practices and internal control over financial reporting. The AC
believes that the retention of PwC to serve as the Company’s
independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders. If the appointment of PwC is not approved by the
shareholders, the AC will consider whether it is appropriate to
select another independent auditor. Even if the appointment of PwC
is ratified, the AC, in its discretion, may direct the appointment
of a different independent auditor at any time during the year if
it determines that such a change would be in the Company’s best
interests.
Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting and
will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do
so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
AUDIT FEES AND APPROVAL PROCESS
The AC pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be
performed by the independent auditors in compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
rules regarding auditor independence. The policies and procedures
are detailed as to the particular service and do not delegate the
AC’s responsibility to management. The policies and procedures
address any service provided by the independent auditors and any
audit or audit-related services to be provided by any other audit
service provider. The pre-approval process includes an annual and
interim component.
Annually, not later than February of each year, management and the
independent auditors jointly submit a service matrix of the types
of audit and non-audit services that management may wish to have
the independent auditor perform for the current year. The service
matrix categorizes the types of services by audit, audit-related,
tax and all other services. Management and the independent auditors
jointly submit an annual pre-approval limits request. The request
lists aggregate pre-approval limits by service category. The
request also lists known or anticipated services and associated
fees. The AC approves or rejects the pre-approval limits and each
of the listed services on the service matrix.
During the course of the year, the Chair of the AC has the
authority to pre-approve requests for services that were not
approved in the annual pre-approval process. However, all services,
regardless of fee amounts, are subject to restrictions on the
services allowable under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC rules
regarding auditor independence. In addition, all fees are subject
to ongoing monitoring by the AC.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 36
Back to
Contents
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEE
INFORMATION
Fees for professional services provided by our independent auditor
included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
2022
|
2021
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
33.3
|
|
32.5
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
0.8
|
Tax Compliance Fees(3)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
Tax Planning and Consulting Fees(4)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
All Other Fees(5)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
34.6
|
|
33.6
|
(1)
“Audit Fees” principally includes
audit and review of financial statements (including internal
control over financial reporting), statutory and subsidiary audits,
SEC registration statements, comfort letters and
consents.
(2)
“Audit-Related Fees” principally
includes attestation services requested by management, accounting
consultations, pre- or post-implementation reviews of processes or
systems and audits of employee benefit plan financial statements.
Total fees paid directly by the benefit plans, and not by the
Company, were $0.2 million in 2022 and $0.2 million in 2021 and are
not included in the amounts shown above.
(3)
“Tax Compliance Fees” includes, among
other things, statutory tax return preparation and review and
advice on the impact of changes in local tax laws.
(4)
“Tax Planning and Consulting Fees”
includes, among other things, tax planning and advice and
assistance with respect to transfer pricing issues.
(5)
“All Other Fees” consists principally
of license-based services for statutory audit monitoring and
accounting and reporting literature research.
|
ANONYMOUS REPORTING OF ACCOUNTING AND OTHER CONCERNS
The AC has established a means for the anonymous and other
reporting (where permitted by law) of (i) suspected or actual
violations of the Code of Conduct, our enterprise policies or
applicable laws, including those related to accounting practices,
internal controls or auditing matters and procedures; (ii) theft or
fraud of any amount; (iii) insider trading; (iv) issues with
respect to the performance and execution of contracts;
(v) conflicts of interest; (vi) violations of securities and
antitrust laws; (vii) violations of prohibited harassment policy;
and (viii) violations of any applicable anti-bribery law.
Any employee, supplier, customer, shareholder or other interested
party can submit a report via the following methods:
■
Toll-free Helpline (US, Canada, and US Virgin Islands):
1-800-300-7898
■
Call Collect Helpline: 770-582-5275 (language translation
available)
■
Email: BusinessPractices@cat.com
■
Internet: www.caterpillar.com/obp
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 37
Back to
Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The AC operates under a written charter adopted by the board of
Directors, and each of its members meets the independence and
financial literacy standards contained in the NYSE Listed Company
rules, SEC rules and Caterpillar’s Guidelines on Corporate
Governance Issues. The board has determined that each member of the
AC qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules
and has accounting or related financial management expertise.
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and
the financial reporting process. PwC, acting as independent
auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting in accordance with standards established
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
The AC has discussed with the Company’s independent auditor the
overall scope and execution of the independent audit and has
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with
management. The AC also discussed with the independent auditors
other matters required by PCAOB auditing standards and SEC
rules.
The independent auditors provided to the AC the written
communications required by applicable standards of the PCAOB
regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the AC
concerning independence, and the AC discussed the independent
auditors’ independence with management and the auditors. The AC
also considered whether the provision of other non-audit services
by the Company’s independent auditors to the Company is compatible
with maintaining independence.
The AC concluded that the independent auditors’ independence had
not been impaired.
Based on the reviews and discussion referred to above, the AC
recommended to the board that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2022.
By the members of the Audit Committee:
Daniel M. Dickinson, Chairman
James C. Fish, Jr.
David W. MacLennan
Judith F. Marks
Edward B. Rust, Jr.
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 38
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL 3 – ADVISORY
VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
|
What am I voting on?
|
Shareholders are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy
statement.
|
Board Voting Recommendation:
|
FOR approval
of executive compensation.
|
On an annual basis, and in compliance with Section 14A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shareholders are being asked to
vote on the following advisory resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation of Caterpillar’s named executive
officers as described under ‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’
the compensation tables and the narrative discussion associated
with the compensation tables in Caterpillar’s proxy statement for
its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is hereby APPROVED.”
At the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, our
shareholders indicated their preference to hold the non-binding
shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive
officers each year. This year, we will again ask shareholders to
vote on the frequency of advisory votes to approve executive
compensation. This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on
Caterpillar, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC)
or the board. The board and the CHRC value the opinion of
Caterpillar’s shareholders, and to the extent there is any
significant vote against Caterpillar’s named executive officer
compensation, the board will consider the reasons for such a vote,
and the CHRC will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to
address those concerns.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 39
Back to
Contents
PROPOSAL 4 –
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
VOTES

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
|
What am I voting on?
|
Shareholders are being asked to indicate whether they prefer an
advisory vote on executive compensation every one, two or three
years.
|
Board Voting Recommendation:
|
FOR one
year.
|
The Dodd-Frank Act requires Caterpillar shareholders to vote, on an
advisory or non-binding basis, on how frequently they would like to
cast an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named
executive officers. By voting on this proposal, shareholders may
indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named
executive officer compensation once every one, two or three
years.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 40
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GOVERNANCE AND PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC) believes the
executive compensation program at Caterpillar should be structured
to align the interests of executives with those of our
shareholders. These interests are aligned in rewarding value
creation at all stages of the business cycle and providing an
increasing percentage of performance-based compensation at higher
levels of executive responsibility. This performance-based
compensation should be both market competitive and internally
equitable.
Changes made over the years to further align pay with performance
have received favorable feedback from our shareholders, and support
for our 2022 “say on pay” vote of 94 percent reflects this positive
response.
In 2022, we continued our shareholder outreach on environmental,
social and governance (including sustainability, climate and
diversity & inclusion), and executive compensation topics, with
holders of approximately 42 percent of our outstanding shares. In
these meetings, our shareholders generally expressed a continued
positive view with respect to our executive compensation program
and our diversity & inclusion disclosure.
SAY ON PAY SUPPORT
|
94%
|
94%
|
93%
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
After considering feedback received from our shareholders through
our outreach efforts and the 2022 “say on pay” results, the CHRC
determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophy,
compensation objectives and compensation elements continued to be
appropriate. As previously communicated, the board incorporated ESG
into the annual incentive plan in 2022 for executive officers, see
pages 51-52 for details.
The CHRC conducts an ongoing review of the Company’s executive
compensation program to evaluate whether the program supports the
Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives and to monitor the
program’s alignment with its strategic business objectives. In
connection with this ongoing review, and based on feedback received
through our shareholder outreach, the CHRC continues to implement
and maintain what it believes are best practices for executive
compensation and governance. Below is a summary of those
practices:
WHAT WE DO
|
|
WHAT WE DON’T DO
|
 |
Robust stock ownership requirements
|
|
 |
No individual change-in-control agreements
|
 |
Thorough annual benchmarking process
|
|
 |
No tax gross-ups on change-in-control benefits
|
 |
Rigorous CHRC oversight of incentive metrics, goals and
pay/performance relationship
|
|
 |
No backdating, repricing or granting of option awards
retroactively
|
 |
Clawback Policy
|
|
|
|
 |
Limited executive perquisites
|
|
|
|
 |
Strict anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies
|
|
|
|
 |
Independent compensation consultant
|
|
|
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 41
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION PROGRAM STRUCTURE
We are committed to developing and implementing an executive
compensation program that directly aligns the interests of our
Named Executive Officers (NEOs) with the long-term interests of
shareholders. To that end, the objectives of the Company’s
executive compensation program are to attract, motivate and retain
talented executive officers who will improve the Company’s
performance and provide long-term strategic leadership. The
majority of targeted total compensation for our NEOs is
equity-based, vests over multiple years and is tied directly to
long-term value creation for shareholders. NEO compensation is
composed of three primary components:
BASE SALARY
|
 |
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN (AIP)
|
 |
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
|
Competitive pay to attract and retain talented
executives
|
|
An opportunity to earn an annual cash award based on the
Company’s financial performance and strategic business
objectives
|
|
A mix of performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs)
and stock options to align management’s interests with
long-term shareholders’ interests
|
Approximately 91 percent of our CEO’s 2022 total targeted
compensation was variable and/or at-risk compensation,
including 50 percent of long-term incentives delivered in
the form of performance-based PRSUs with a Return on Equity (ROE)
performance metric and the other 50 percent delivered in the
form of stock options.
2022 CEO COMPENSATION ELEMENTS
*
50% of long-term incentives have performance-based vesting
conditions.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 42
Back to
Contents
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS
In 2022, Caterpillar achieved one of the best years in our
nearly 100-year history, including full-year adjusted profit per
share(1) of $13.84. Despite supply
chain challenges, Caterpillar achieved double-digit top-line growth
of 17% and generated strong Machinery, Energy & Transportation
(ME&T) free cash flow(2).
We remained committed to serving our customers, executing our
strategy and investing for long-term profitable growth. In 2022, we
achieved an operating profit margin of 13.3% and an adjusted
operating profit margin(3) of
15.4%. We also generated strong operating cash flow and were able
to return $6.7 billion to shareholders through dividends and share
repurchases, which represented 115% of ME&T free cash
flow(2). Our total cumulative
shareholder return for the five-year period ended December 31,
2022, outperformed the S&P 500 and related indexes. We also
increased our dividend in 2022 and paid dividends of $2.4 billion,
continuing our status as a Dividend Aristocrat.
Our key financial and business results for 2022 included the
following:
(1)
Adjusted Profit Per Share is a non-GAAP measure, and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is
included on page 89.
(2)
ME&T free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure, and a reconciliation
to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is included on page
89.
(3)
Adjusted Operating Profit Margin is a non-GAAP measure, and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is
included on page 89.
(4)
Enterprise Operating Profit was used in determining performance
under our Annual Incentive Plan for 2022.
STRONG BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOW
 |
Operating Cash Flow $7.8
billion
|
 |
Year-end enterprise cash
balance $7.0 billion
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
This graph shows the cumulative shareholder return assuming an
investment of $100 on Dec. 31, 2017, and reinvestment of dividends
issued thereafter.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 43
Back to
Contents
PAY OUTCOMES DEMONSTRATE ALIGNMENT WITH COMPANY
PERFORMANCE
Consistent with the CHRC’s pay-for-performance philosophy, business
results were reflected in the resulting pay decisions made for our
CEO and the other NEOs in 2022. Compensation outcomes for 2022
included the following items:
BASE SALARY
|
■
Named Executive Officers (other than the CEO) received an average
base salary adjustment of 4.75%.
|
ANNUAL
INCENTIVE
|
■
Annual incentive awards for 2022 paid out, on average, at 155% of
target.
|
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE
|
■
Based on the Company’s 1-, 3- and 5-year relative Total Shareholder
Return (TSR) at the end of 2021, the 2022 equity grant to the CEO
was set slightly above the 50th percentile of the
compensation peer group and between 50th and 65th percentile for the other
NEOs.(1)
|
(1)
Long-Term Incentive Grant Sizing detail is provided on page 53.
CEO COMPENSATION
In 2022, the CHRC and the board approved the following compensation
for the CEO:
■
Base salary. 3% increase to Mr. Umpleby’s base salary. This
increase was in recognition of Mr. Umpleby’s operational, financial
and safety performance and his continued focus on services growth,
despite the unprecedented supply chain challenges and the
persistence of the global pandemic throughout 2021, and to align
his base salary with the peer group median.
■
Annual incentive award. Annual incentive target award was
set at 175% of Mr. Umpleby’s base salary, which reflects the peer
group median. For 2022, Mr. Umpleby received an annual incentive
award equal to 1.56 times his target annual incentive. This payout
reflects the Company’s strong results in 2022 against
pre-determined annual performance goals.
■
Long-term incentive award. An annual long-term incentive
award with a value equal to $13.5 million, slightly above peer
group median. This size of award reflects the Company’s overall TSR
results and performance achievements in 2021.
*
Target Value Includes: Salary of $1,700,000; annual incentive of
$2,953,425 and LTI grant of $13,050,000. Total Target Value:
$17,703,425
**
Actual Value Includes: Salary of $1,687,500 (due to proration);
annual incentive of $4,614,800 and LTI grant of $13,500,000. Total
Actual Value: $19,802,300
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 44
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
THE COMPENSATION PROCESS
THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (CHRC)
The CHRC is responsible for the executive compensation program
design and decision-making process for NEO compensation. The CHRC
conducts regular reviews of the Company’s executive compensation
practices, including the methodologies for setting NEO total
compensation, the goals of the program and the underlying
compensation philosophy. The independent compensation consultant
provides recommendations and market data that the CHRC considers
when making decisions, as appropriate, regarding NEO compensation
based on the assessment of performance and achievement of Company
goals. The CHRC also exercises its judgment in setting NEO
compensation as to what is in the best interests of the Company and
its shareholders.
COMPENSATION CONSIDERATIONS
The CHRC, with the support of its independent compensation
consultant and management, considers many aspects of the Company’s
financial and operational performance and other factors when making
executive compensation decisions including, but not limited to:
■
Long-term shareholder value creation
■
The cyclical nature of the business
■
Performance relative to financial guidance provided throughout the
year
■
Enterprise and Business Unit operational performance
■
Performance relative to peers and competitors
■
Historic absolute and relative performance
■
Key areas management can influence over the short- and
long-term
■
Development and retention of diverse top talent
■
Skills, experience and tenure of executive incumbents
■
Market values for comparably situated executives among our peer
group as well as internal equity
■
Environmental, social & governance considerations
INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
The CHRC retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”)
as its independent compensation consultant during 2022. Meridian
provides executive and director compensation consulting services,
including advice regarding the design and implementation of
compensation programs, market information, regulatory updates and
analyses, and trends on executive compensation and benefits.
Interactions between Meridian and management are generally limited
to discussions on behalf of the CHRC or as required to fulfill
requests at the CHRC’s direction. During 2022, Meridian did not
provide any other services to the Company. Based on these factors,
the CHRC’s evaluation of Meridian’s independence pursuant to the
requirements approved and adopted by the SEC and NYSE, and
information provided by Meridian, the CHRC determined that the work
performed by Meridian did not raise any conflicts of interest.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 45
Back to
Contents
BENCHMARKING COMPENSATION TO PEERS
2022 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP
The CHRC regularly assesses the market competitiveness of the
Company’s executive compensation programs based on peer group data.
The 2022 Compensation Peer Group was established based on the
following criteria and remained unchanged from the prior year:
■
Total sales and revenues and market capitalization of the peer
companies relative to Caterpillar;
■
Competitors and industry segment;
■
Potential sources for top talent;
■
Global presence with a significant portion of revenues coming from
non-U.S. operations; and
2022 Compensation Peer Group
|
3M Company
|
Ford Motor Company
|
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
|
General Electric Company
|
The Boeing Company
|
Halliburton Company
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Cummins Inc.
|
Intel Corporation
|
Deere & Company
|
Johnson Controls International plc
|
Emerson Electric Co.
|
PACCAR Inc.
|
FedEx Corporation
|
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
|
|
BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGY
To account for differences in the size of the compensation peer
group companies, market data is statistically adjusted allowing for
a comparison of the compensation levels to similarly-sized
companies. Market data provided by the independent consultant is
sourced from the Aon Total Compensation Measurement Database, and
size-adjusted to Caterpillar’s three-year average revenues using
regression analysis. Each element of our NEOs’ compensation is then
targeted to the median of the peer group and adjusted above or
below based on performance. To the extent an NEO’s total actual
compensation exceeds the peer group median, it is due to
outstanding performance, critical skills and notable experience. If
an NEO’s compensation is below the median, it is generally due to
underperformance against relevant metrics or reflective of an
individual who is newer in his or her role.
2022 COMPETITOR PEER GROUP
For 2022, the CHRC also assessed the Company’s business performance
against a group of competitors that it deems to compete directly
with the Company. Although the Company’s peer group described above
is an appropriate benchmark for executive compensation at other
similarly-sized companies, the peer group data does not always
provide useful comparisons to other companies that might be
experiencing similar business conditions. To that end, and
consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the
Company’s business performance is compared to its competitors by
establishing a “Competitor Peer Group.”
The CHRC uses the Competitor Peer Group (along with the
Compensation Peer Group and S&P 500 Industrials) to assess
relative performance using TSR when awarding long-term incentive
awards. However, the Competitor Peer Group is not used to benchmark
compensation. The 2022 Competitor Peer Group was established based
on the following criteria:
■
Compete in the same markets as the Company;
■
Offer similar products and services as the Company; or
■
Serve the same, or similar, industries and end users as the
Company.
2022 Competitor Peer Group
|
|
Cummins Inc.
|
Siemens Energy
|
Deere & Company
|
Volvo AB
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
Wabtec Corporation
|
Komatsu Ltd.
|
|
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 46
Back to
Contents
CEO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION
The board, excluding the CEO, all of whom are independent
directors, annually conducts the CEO’s performance evaluation.
Prior to the board’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance and its
approval of CEO compensation, the CHRC makes a preliminary
compensation recommendation to the board based on its initial
evaluation and performance review of the CEO. The board then makes
its final determination for CEO compensation.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Each year, the CHRC assesses the Company’s risk profile relative to
the executive compensation program and confirms that its
compensation programs and policies do not create or encourage
excessive risks that are reasonably likely to have a material
adverse impact on the Company. Also, the CHRC has concluded that
the total compensation structure for senior leadership does not
inappropriately emphasize short-term stock price performance at the
expense of longer-term value creation. In particular, long-term
incentive awards, as a significant portion of total compensation,
and target stock ownership guidelines which NEOs are required to
maintain are structured to align management’s compensation with the
principles of risk management by maintaining a focus on the
long-term performance of the Company.
TARGET STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
The target stock ownership guideline for the CEO is six times base
salary and three times base salary for each of the other NEOs. NEOs
have a five-year period from their first grant date after
appointment to meet the target stock ownership guidelines. NEOs are
required to maintain their target stock ownership for a
post-employment period. All NEOs are in compliance with these
guidelines.
COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
NEOs receive a mix of fixed and variable compensation with a focus
on long-term and performance-based components:
BASE SALARY
Base salary is the only fixed component of NEO compensation. The
CHRC targets base salaries at the size-adjusted median level of the
peer group. Each NEO’s base salary is determined by the
individual’s level of responsibility and historic performance with
reference to the market median. Base salary increases, if any, are
based on achievement of individual and Company objectives,
contributions to Caterpillar’s performance and culture, leadership
accomplishments and a comparison to those in comparable positions
at peer companies.
In 2022, Mr. Umpleby’s salary was increased from $1.65 million to
$1.7 million in recognition of his performance and to align his
target compensation with the peer group median.
Salary adjustments for all NEOs were made effective April 1,
2022.
NEO Base Salary
Name
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2021
|
Umpleby
|
$1,700,000
|
$1,650,000
|
Bonfield
|
$890,100
|
$860,000
|
Johnson
|
$884,900
|
$855,000
|
De Lange
|
$830,800
|
$795,000
|
Creed
|
$714,900
|
$665,000
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 47
Back to
Contents
ANNUAL INCENTIVE
2022 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN
The Company’s Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) is designed to provide
each NEO with the opportunity to earn an annual cash payout based
on the short-term performance of the Company and each NEO’s
respective business. The AIP places a significant percentage of
each NEO’s annual cash compensation at risk and aligns the
interests of executives and shareholders.
The AIP design continues to closely align pay outcomes with
business performance by annually comparing the Company’s forecasted
Enterprise Operating Profit to the prior year’s actual Enterprise
Operating Profit. The comparison is conducted to determine whether
the current year will be an “up year” (improved performance) or
“down year” (weaker performance) versus the prior year’s actual
Enterprise Operating Profit results.
The 2022 AIP design also includes two strategic objectives
modifiers, including Services Growth, which was also utilized
similarly in the 2021 AIP for the NEOs. The Services Growth
modifier focuses on the execution of services revenue growth plans
across the enterprise working with our independent dealer
network.
As previously communicated, we incorporated ESG as an element of
incentive compensation in 2022. The CHRC determined that ESG
Strategy would serve as the second of two strategic objectives
modifiers in 2022 AIP. This modifier prioritizes focus on
climate-related objectives as an important element of how
Caterpillar is strategically addressing evolving customer demand
and stakeholder expectations for a range of ESG considerations.
More information about the modifiers and the assessed performance
levels can be found in the section entitled Strategic
Objectives Modifiers found on pages 51-52.
The AIP performance measures and weightings, as well as the
strategic objectives modifiers, were communicated to the NEOs at
the beginning of the performance period. All NEOs participated in
AIP in 2022.
2022 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN
Step 1: Determine “Up/Down Year”
Step 2: AIP Calculation
2022 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND RESULTS
For 2022, the CHRC approved the following annual incentive
performance measures (1) Enterprise Operating Profit (2)
Operating Profit After Capital Charge (OPACC) and (3)
Services Revenues, and the Strategic Objectives
Modifiers, described on page 51-52. Consistent with this design
process, after reviewing the Company’s 2022 business plan, the CHRC
determined that 2022 would be an “up year,” as Enterprise Operating
Profit was forecasted to be above 2021. As a result, there were no
adjustments to the target annual incentive opportunity for
NEOs.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 48
Back to
Contents
The largest portion of financial measures (ranging from 50 percent
to 70 percent) of each NEO’s 2022 annual incentive opportunity was
based on Enterprise Operating Profit and the OPACC for their
respective business, where applicable. The remaining portion of
each NEO’s annual incentive award opportunity was determined by the
Services Revenues metric for the enterprise or their respective
businesses. Consistent with the Operating & Execution model,
Services Revenues align the Company’s emphasis on the services
growth strategy with variable incentive opportunity.
When establishing the performance targets for 2022, the CHRC
reviewed the Company’s business plan, historical performance,
management recommendations and feedback provided by the independent
compensation consultant. Targets were set for each of the
performance measures at levels that were designed to be reasonably
achievable with strong management performance. Maximum performance
levels were designed to be difficult to achieve in light of
historical performance and the Company’s business forecast at the
time the measures were approved. The business forecast includes
consideration of market, economic and geopolitical factors. The
performance measures were also weighted according to the Company’s
business priorities and the responsibilities of each NEO.
The charts below and the text that follows summarize the
performance measures, weightings, strategic objectives modifiers,
and results that the CHRC reviewed and approved for the 2022 annual
incentive for each NEO.
DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES
|
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
|
DEFINITION
|
RATIONALE
|
 |
ENTERPRISE OPERATING PROFIT
|
Enterprise Operating Profit measures the overall profitability of
all of Caterpillar’s operations (including Machine, Energy &
Transportation (ME&T) and Financial Products) before taxes,
interest and other non-operating items. For AIP purposes, the
Enterprise Operating Profit metric will be calculated as
Caterpillar Consolidated Operating Profit excluding restructuring
costs and a goodwill impairment charge.
|
The CHRC approved Enterprise Operating Profit as a performance
measure to incentivize management to enhance the overall
profitability of the Company. The CHRC believes that Enterprise
Operating Profit is an important corporate metric for shareholders
to be able to assess the financial health of the Company.
|
ENTERPRISE OPERATING PROFIT AFTER CAPITAL CHARGE (OPACC)
|
Enterprise Operating Profit After Capital Charge (OPACC) measures
how productively and efficiently Caterpillar is utilizing assets to
generate shareholder value. For AIP purposes, Enterprise OPACC is
calculated as ME&T adjusted operating profit excluding
restructuring costs and a goodwill impairment charge less the
capital charge.
For Enterprise OPACC, the capital charge equals average quarterly
ME&T net assets multiplied by a pre-tax capital charge rate of
13 percent.
|
OPACC is designed to measure how productively and efficiently the
Company’s assets are being utilized by examining the relationship
between the value of the Company’s assets and the operating profit
that those assets generate. An increase in OPACC means that the
Company’s management is utilizing assets more efficiently to
generate shareholder value, which the CHRC views as key to
Caterpillar’s long-term success.
|
SEGMENT OPERATING PROFIT AFTER CAPITAL CHARGE (OPACC)
|
For each segment, OPACC is calculated as segment profit less the
capital charge. The capital charge is calculated as the average
monthly net accountable assets multiplied by a pre-tax capital
charge rate of 13 percent.
|
OPACC is designed to measure how productively and efficiently the
Company’s assets are being utilized by examining the relationship
between the value of the Company’s assets and the operating profit
that those assets generate. An increase in OPACC means that the
Company’s management is utilizing assets more efficiently to
generate shareholder value, which the CHRC views as key to
Caterpillar’s long-term success.
|
SERVICES REVENUES
|
ME&T Services Revenues include, but are not limited to,
aftermarket parts and other service-related revenues and exclude
most Financial Products’ revenues, discontinued products and
captive dealer services. Price realization above target has been
excluded, given extraordinary inflation. Due to the competitively
sensitive nature of this measure, the threshold, target and result
levels have all been indexed and reported as such.
|
The CHRC approved Services Revenues as an important measure
intended to further strengthen profitability realized by growth in
aftermarket parts and services.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 49
Back to
Contents
2022 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND RESULTS
*
Adjusted for approved items
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 50
Back to
Contents
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES MODIFIERS
In addition to the financial performance measures included in the
AIP, the CHRC identified certain objectives to further focus
management’s efforts on the Company’s services growth and ESG
strategy. These elements of AIP, called Strategic Objectives, were
included as modifiers in 2022. While these modifiers utilize a
qualitative assessment by the CHRC to determine the actual impact
on annual incentive payments, both strategic objectives are
designed with pre-defined quantitative and qualitative elements as
the basis of performance assessment, resulting in a maximum
adjustment of plus or minus 10% for each modifier
(maximum aggregate adjustment of plus or minus 20%).
SERVICES GROWTH
Caterpillar’s enterprise strategy for long-term profitable growth
is directly linked to value creation for our shareholders. An
important element of our strategy is the growth of ME&T
Services Revenues. Services growth is intended to further
strengthen profitability realized by growth in aftermarket parts
and services for Caterpillar and its global network of dealers. In
addition, our services focus is intended to reduce cyclicality of
the Company’s sales and revenues while increasing customer
value.
In evaluating 2022 Services growth, the CHRC considered
quantitative and qualitative elements of performance,
including:
■
Overall ME&T Services revenues grew 17% to $22 billion,
contributing to the Company’s double-digit top-line growth in 2022
to $59 billion.
■
Caterpillar now has more than 1.4 million connected assets, an
increase of 14% from 1.2 million in 2021, and we delivered over 60%
of new equipment with a Customer Value Agreement.
■
We saw significant increases in eCommerce sales to users, and we
launched our new Cat® Central app,
which will help drive even more eCommerce growth with retail
customers.
■
Our Company demonstrated its highest level of parts availability in
our history and Cat Reman now has more than 470 new product
offerings.
■
Caterpillar communicated an aspirational growth goal to double
Services Revenues between 2016 and 2026 and, based in part on
actions taken by management in 2022, our confidence continues to
increase that we’ll achieve our $28 billion Services Revenues goal
in 2026.
Based on the foregoing evaluation, the CHRC determined the Services
growth modifier percentage allocated to each NEO. The CHRC’s
determinations are included in the 2022 Incentive Payments chart
found on page 52.
ESG STRATEGY
Caterpillar believes the energy transition represents a significant
opportunity for long-term profitable growth, leading our Company to
add sustainability as a focus area of our enterprise strategy. To
further strengthen the alignment of NEO compensation with
shareholder interests and to continue demonstrating responsiveness
to stakeholder feedback, the Company’s board of Directors elected
to incorporate ESG considerations into incentive compensation for
its NEOs in 2022.
In its first year of inclusion, the ESG Strategy modifier was
designed to support certain elements of the Company’s enterprise
strategy and to drive executive leadership accountability for
climate-related elements that reflect Caterpillar’s ongoing focus
on both short- and long-term ESG considerations, which are also of
importance to our shareholders.
As part of its oversight, the board’s Sustainability and other
Public Policy Committee (SPPC) reviews and monitors the development
and implementation of sustainability goals established by the
Company, and also reviews and monitors performance and
progress against sustainability objectives and initiatives. In
2022, the SPPC provided a qualitative and quantitative assessment
of performance against pre-defined objectives to the CHRC. The CHRC
then evaluated the individualized contributions and determined
the ESG modifier percentages allocated to each NEO.
The CHRC’s determinations are included in the 2022 Incentive
Payments chart found on page 52.
In evaluating 2022 ESG Strategy, the CHRC considered quantitative
and qualitative elements of performance, including:
■
Five of six quantitative objectives measured for progress toward
Caterpillar’s 2030 sustainability goals were assessed as on target,
including continued reduction of Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions from our own operations (three of six quantitative
goals are subject to limited assurance, as described below).
■
Employee health and safety was assessed at less than target
performance based on quantitative and qualitative expectations.
■
Five of five qualitative elements were assessed as meeting
expectations, with the achievement of product development
milestones highlighted as exceeding expectations.
■
Each of Caterpillar’s three segments contributed notable
sustainability-related progress in their operating focus,
highlighted by the demonstration of the prototype battery electric
793 large mining truck operated at rated specifications, a battery
electric machine launched in China and four battery electric
machine prototypes displayed at bauma 2022.
■
Other qualitative elements included completing the comprehensive
field work and preparation needed to fulfill our Company’s
commitment to disclose estimated Scope 3 GHG emissions data for the
first time in 2023, as well as the extensive project work completed
in preparation for disclosing Caterpillar’s first-ever report
aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures (TCFD) framework in 2023.
■
Our Company continued to help our customers achieve their
climate-related objectives throughout 2022, demonstrated through a
number of projects involving
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 51
Back to
Contents
Caterpillar, Cat dealers and with our customers, which will help
contribute to a lower-carbon future.
For more information about our Company’s performance and progress
toward our 2030 sustainability goals, or for further information
highlighting how we are helping our customers build a better, more
sustainable world, please refer to Caterpillar’s annual
Sustainability Report.
Caterpillar’s quantitative environmental (emissions and water) and
safety data undergoes independent, third-party limited assurance by
ERM Certification and Verification Services, Inc. (ERMCVS) and the
resulting assurance statement is included in our Company’s annual
Sustainability Report.
The information in our Sustainability Report is not incorporated by
reference into, and does not form part of, this proxy
statement.
2022 INCENTIVE PAYMENTS
In early 2023, the results for each performance measure noted above
were converted into a performance factor, which was then multiplied
by the respective weightings and base salary to determine the
amount before any adjustment for each NEO.
Then, the CHRC, with input from the Sustainability and other Public
Policy Committee (for ESG), assessed the individual contributions
for each NEO against the two strategic objectives and applied
a maximum adjustment of plus or minus 10% for each modifier
(aggregate maximum adjustment of plus or minus 20%).
The CHRC’s modifier decisions were then applied to determine
the AIP payouts for each NEO.
The following are the 2022 cash incentive payments made to the
NEOs:
|
Strategic Modifiers
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary(1)
|
|
Target
Opportunity
|
|
Performance
Factor
|
|
Result
|
Services
Growth
Adj. %
|
ESG
Strategy
Adj. %
|
Total
Adj.%
|
$ Value
Adj.
|
|
AIP
Payment(2)
|
|
Umpleby
|
$
|
1,687,671
|
X
|
175%
|
X
|
1.38
|
=
|
$4,083,810
|
8%
|
5%
|
13%
|
$530,895
|
=
|
$4,614,800
|
|
Bonfield
|
$
|
882,678
|
X
|
115%
|
X
|
1.38
|
=
|
$1,403,588
|
4%
|
3%
|
7%
|
$ 98,251
|
=
|
$1,501,900
|
|
Johnson
|
$
|
877,527
|
X
|
115%
|
X
|
1.32
|
=
|
$1,331,723
|
8%
|
8%
|
16%
|
$213,076
|
=
|
$1,544,800
|
|
De Lange
|
$
|
821,973
|
X
|
115%
|
X
|
1.34
|
=
|
$1,263,600
|
10%
|
4%
|
14%
|
$176,904
|
=
|
$1,440,600
|
|
Creed
|
$
|
702,596
|
X
|
115%
|
X
|
1.42
|
=
|
$1,148,572
|
10%
|
5%
|
15%
|
$172,286
|
=
|
$1,320,900
|
|
(1)
All payments were calculated using a daily weighted average
salary.
(2)
Payments were rounded up to the nearest hundred; may not
recalculate exactly due to rounding.
|
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
2022 DESIGN
In 2022, the CHRC granted one-half of each NEO’s total long-term
incentive (LTI) value in Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
(PRSUs), and one-half in non-qualified stock options (stock
options). The stock options vest equally in one-third increments
beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire
after ten years from grant. The PRSUs fully vest if the 3-year
performance hurdle established by the CHRC is met or exceeded. If
the performance hurdle is not attained, the PRSU awards do not
vest. Dividend Equivalent Units (DEUs) accrue on unvested PRSUs,
but are settled only if the vesting requirements are met. The DEUs
will settle in additional shares, rounded to the nearest whole
unit.
For the 2022 PRSU grants, the CHRC selected Return on Equity (ROE)
as the performance measure because it aligns the interests of the
NEOs with those of our shareholders by measuring and rewarding
profitability relative to shareholders’ investment in the business.
The use of the ROE metric and the determination of the performance
hurdle for each performance cycle are calibrated with historical
performance of the compensation and competitor peer groups (as well
as S&P 500 Industrials more broadly) and are intended to reward
for the achievement of sustained, long-term returns throughout the
cycles in the Company’s business. The ROE performance hurdle was
designed to be reasonably achievable with strong management
performance. The CHRC believes that a strong focus on ROE
reinforces effective capital management along with the need to
deliver returns above the cost of capital even in a highly cyclical
and often challenging macro-economic operating environment, thus
aligning leadership priorities with long-term shareholder
interests. The Company’s ROE performance is annually reviewed
including any one-time, non-operational or other special items that
might impact the ROE result. Although certain items may
significantly impact the Company’s reported financial results, they
are not always indicative of the underlying operational performance
of the Company or its management. To that end, in its evaluation of
the Company’s ROE results, the CHRC may use its discretion to make
adjustments to ROE to align compensation outcomes with the
operating performance of the Company.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 52
Back to
Contents
2022 GRANT SIZING
The CHRC follows a consistent process for sizing and awarding LTI
grant values for NEOs, which is described and illustrated
below:
1
|
Benchmark the median LTI value for the Company’s Compensation Peer
Group
|
2
|
Review and consider financial results: 1-, 3- and 5-year TSR
(vs. the Compensation Peer Group and Competitor Peer Group and the
S&P 500 Industrials); operational performance; market
conditions; and strategy execution
|
3
|
Adjust award values to reflect individual performance,
including consistency of performance against goals, leadership
contributions, time in role and other relevant factors
|
In determining grant sizing for 2022, the Committee was consistent
with the methodology used in previous years and its pay for
performance philosophy; and assessed the 1-, 3- and 5-year
relative TSR performance for the period ending December 31,
2021, as well as operating performance and strategy execution
during these periods. Based on this process, the CHRC set the 2022
LTI award for the CEO at slightly above the 50th percentile of the benchmarked LTI values
of the Company’s compensation peer group and at the 50th - 65th
percentile for the other NEOs.
RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE (PERCENTILE RANKING VS. PEERS)
Performance Period
|
Compensation
Peer Group
|
Competitor
Peer Group
|
S&P 500
Industrials
|
1-Year
|
50th
|
43rd
|
35th
|
3-Year
|
81st
|
67th
|
43rd
|
5-Year
|
94th
|
83rd
|
59th
|
Grant Sizing
|
50th - 65th Percentile
|
2020 – 2022 PERFORMANCE RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS (PRSUs)
For the 2020 – 2022 performance period, adjustments were made to
the ROE to exclude the impact of restructuring costs, pension and
other post-employment benefits (OPEB) mark-to-market gains/losses
resulting from plan remeasurements and a goodwill impairment
charge. In each case, the CHRC determined that these adjustments
were an appropriate use of its discretion and in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders.
For the 2020 grant, the PRSUs cliff vested based on a three-year
average adjusted ROE result of 35.5 percent, which exceeded the
goal of 18 percent. The chart below describes the Company’s ROE
performance and results for the 2020 – 2022 performance period:
2020-2022 PRSUs
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 53
Back to
Contents
OTHER COMPENSATION, BENEFITS AND CONSIDERATIONS
POST-TERMINATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS
Except for customary provisions in employee benefit plans and as
required by applicable law, the NEOs do not have any pre-existing
executive severance packages or contracts; however, the CHRC will
consider the particular facts and circumstances of an NEO’s
separation to determine whether payment of any severance or other
benefit to such NEO is appropriate. Change in control benefits are
provided under the Company’s long-term and annual incentive plans
and represent customary provisions for these types of plans and
have no direct correlation with other compensation decisions. There
is no cash severance or other benefits for a termination related to
change in control beyond what is provided under the long-term and
annual incentive plans.
The Company’s change in control provisions are subject to a “double
trigger” and, when both a change in control and involuntary
termination of employment without cause occur, provide accelerated
vesting and target payouts under the incentive plans, as described
further below.
In the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a
change in control, target payouts are provided under the incentive
plans.
■
All unvested stock options, performance-based restricted stock
units and restricted stock units vest immediately.
■
Stock options remain exercisable over the normal life of the
grant.
The annual incentive plan allows for the target award opportunity,
prorated based on the individual’s time of employment from the
beginning of the performance period through the latter of: (1) the
change in control or (2) termination of employment.
Additional information is disclosed in the “Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy
statement.
RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFITS
In addition to the annual and long-term components of compensation,
NEOs participate in health and welfare benefit plans generally
available to U.S.-based management and salaried employees to
provide competitive benefits.
The defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans
available to the NEOs are also available to many U.S.-based
management and salaried employees. Under the defined benefit
pension plans, the benefit is calculated based on years of service
and final average monthly earnings. All NEOs participate in one or
more of the U.S. retirement plans described below:
Plan Type
|
Title
|
Description
|
 |
RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN (RIP)
|
Defined benefit pension plan under which benefit amounts are
calculated based on years of service and final average monthly
earnings and offer annuity payments. On December 31, 2014, the
Solar Turbines Incorporated Retirement Plan merged with and into
RIP and is a supplement to RIP as of January 1, 2015. As a result,
all references herein to “Solar RP” shall refer to benefits accrued
under the Solar Turbines Incorporated Retirement Plan supplement to
RIP. Solar RP and RIP were closed to new entrants effective January
1, 2011. Benefits were frozen for most participants at that time;
however, a group of “Sunset” participants accrued benefits until
the earlier of their separation from service or December 31, 2019.
Sunset participants were hired prior to January 1, 2003, and were
age 40 or more as of December 31, 2010. Mr. Umpleby earned benefits
under Solar RP through December 31, 2019; Mr. Creed earned benefits
under RIP through December 31, 2010.
|
SOLAR MANAGERIAL RETIREMENT OBJECTIVE PLAN (MRO)
|
Non-qualified defined benefit pension plan that works in tandem
with the Solar RP supplement to RIP. MRO pays an additional benefit
that would otherwise have been paid under Solar RP if cash
incentive awards were taken into account under Solar RP. MRO also
provides additional pension benefits if the Solar RP benefit is
limited due to certain compensation and annual benefit limits
imposed on RIP by the tax code. Mr. Umpleby earned benefits under
MRO through December 31, 2019.
|
 |
CATERPILLAR 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN
(401(k) PLAN)
|
All NEOs participate in the 401(k) Plan under which the Company
matches 100 percent of the first six percent of eligible pay
contributed by the participant, and the Company makes an annual
non-elective contribution equal to three, four or five percent of
eligible pay based on the employee’s age and years of service with
the Company.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (SDCP)
|
All NEOs also participate in SDCP, which provides the opportunity
to make deferrals of base salary in excess of the limits imposed on
the 401(k) Plan by the Internal Revenue Code and to elect deferrals
from the AIP. Under the terms of SDCP, participants are eligible to
earn matching contributions and annual non-elective contributions
based on formulas applicable to them in the 401(k) Plan.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL (SEIP) AND DEFERRED (DEIP) EMPLOYEES’ INVESTMENT
PLAN
|
NEOs meeting eligibility requirements prior to March 25, 2007, were
previously eligible to participate in SEIP and DEIP. These plans
were closed in March 2007. Compensation deferred into SEIP and DEIP
prior to January 1, 2005, remains in these plans. Mr. Umpleby
maintains balances in these plans.
|
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 54
Back to
Contents
LIMITED PERQUISITES
The Company provides NEOs a limited number of perquisites that the
CHRC believes are reasonable and consistent with the overall
compensation program and those commonly provided in the
marketplace. These perquisites are intended to provide for the
security and safety of our executives as well as to allow
additional time to devote to Caterpillar business. Perquisites
include executive physicals, financial planning, home and personal
security, and limited personal use of company aircraft and ground
transportation. The costs associated with these perquisites are
included in the “2022 All Other Compensation Table.”
Additionally, in connection with the Company’s relocation of its
global headquarters to Irving, Texas, all of the NEOs, except Mr.
Creed, relocated to the Irving area and received benefits in 2022
pursuant to the Company’s corporate relocation program for
management-level employees. Mr. Creed, who relocated to the Irving
area prior to the global headquarters move, also received benefits
in 2022 pursuant to the policy. These relocation benefits were
determined to be important in retaining our NEOs.
CLAWBACK PROVISION
Under the Company’s compensation clawback provision, the board may
require reimbursement of any bonus or incentive compensation
awarded to an officer or cancel unvested restricted or deferred
stock awards previously granted to the officer if all the following
apply:
■
The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award was
calculated based on the achievement of certain financial results
that were subsequently the subject of a restatement.
■
The officer engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or
partially caused the need for the restatement.
■
The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award that
would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results
been properly reported would have been lower than the amount
actually awarded.
The SEC recently adopted final rulemaking with respect to issuer
recoupment policies subject to further rulemaking by the NYSE. The
Company intends to revisit its clawback policy when NYSE rulemaking
regarding recoupment policies becomes effective.
NO HEDGING OR PLEDGING
The Company’s insider trading policy prohibits directors, officers
and employees from engaging in hedging transactions, holding
Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging
Company securities.
TAX IMPLICATIONS: DEDUCTIBILITY OF NEO COMPENSATION
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, generally NEO
compensation over $1 million for any year is not deductible for
United States income tax purposes. Historically, there was an
exemption from this $1 million deduction limit for compensation
payments that qualified as “performance-based” under applicable IRS
regulations. With the enactment of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,
the performance-based compensation exemption was eliminated under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, except with respect to
certain grandfathered arrangements. The CHRC believes that it must
maintain flexibility in its approach to executive compensation in
order to structure a program that it considers to be the most
effective in attracting, motivating and retaining the Company’s key
executives, and therefore, the deductibility of compensation is one
of several factors considered when making executive compensation
decisions.
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC) has reviewed
and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A)
included in this proxy statement with management and is satisfied
that the CD&A fairly and completely represents the philosophy,
intent and actions of the CHRC with regard to executive
compensation. Based on such review and discussion, we recommend to
the board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the
SEC.
By the members of the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee:
Rayford Wilkins, Jr., Chair
Daniel M. Dickinson
Gerald Johnson
Judith F. Marks
Edward B. Rust, Jr.
2023
PROXY
STATEMENT 55
Back to
Contents
2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Stock
Awards(1)
|
|
Option
Awards(2)
|
Non-equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
|
All Other
Compensation(5)
|
|
Total
Compensation
|
Total
Without
Change in
Pension
Value(6)
|
D. James Umpleby III
Chairman & CEO
|
2022
|
$
|
1,687,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
6,749,957
|
$
|
6,749,994
|
$
|
4,614,800
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
805,349
|
$
|
20,607,600
|
$
|
20,607,600
|
2021
|
$
|
1,637,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
8,749,964
|
$
|
8,750,028
|
$
|
4,792,980
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
367,560
|
$
|
24,298,032
|
$
|
24,298,032
|
2020
|
$
|
1,600,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
5,899,969
|
$
|
5,900,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
276,582
|
$
|
13,676,551
|
$
|
13,676,551
|
Andrew R. J. Bonfield
CFO
|
2022
|
$
|
882,575
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,200,090
|
$
|
2,199,994
|
$
|
1,501,900
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
438,984
|
$
|
7,223,543
|
$
|
7,223,543
|
2021
|
$
|
853,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,599,981
|
$
|
2,599,993
|
$
|
1,524,600
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
118,062
|
$
|
7,695,636
|
$
|
7,695,636
|
2020
|
$
|
832,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,800,053
|
$
|
1,800,009
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
152,520
|
$
|
4,584,582
|
$
|
4,584,582
|
Denise C. Johnson
Group President
|
2022
|
$
|
877,425
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,849,964
|
$
|
1,849,982
|
$
|
1,544,800
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
464,372
|
$
|
6,586,543
|
$
|
6,586,543
|
2021
|
$
|
846,375
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,550,095
|
$
|
2,549,997
|
$
|
1,771,100
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
138,799
|
$
|
7,856,366
|
$
|
7,856,366
|
2020
|
$
|
820,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,849,945
|
$
|
1,849,993
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
222,421
|
$
|
4,742,859
|
$
|
4,742,859
|
Bob De Lange
Group President
|
2022
|
$
|
821,850
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,849,964
|
$
|
1,849,982
|
$
|
1,440,600
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
689,900
|
$
|
6,652,296
|
$
|
6,652,296
|
2021
|
$
|
788,100
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,499,990
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
$
|
1,772,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
146,620
|
$
|
7,706,710
|
$
|
7,706,710
|
2020
|
$
|
767,400
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,849,945
|
$
|
1,849,993
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
213,557
|
$
|
4,680,895
|
$
|
4,680,895
|
Joseph E. Creed
Group President
|
2022
|
$
|
702,425
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,849,964
|
$
|
1,849,982
|
$
|
1,320,900
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
257,654
|
$
|
5,980,925
|
$
|
5,980,925
|
2021
|
$
|
665,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,499,990
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
$
|
1,227,300
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
289,991
|
$
|
7,182,281
|
$
|
7,182,281
|
(1)
The amounts reported in this column represent PRSUs granted in 2022
under the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and
are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming the highest level of
performance is achieved for the PRSUs, which at the time of grant
reflected the probable level of achievement. Assumptions made in
the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 3
“Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, included in
the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 15,
2023.
|
(2)
The amounts reported in this column represent non-qualified stock
options granted under the LTIP that are valued based on the
aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 718. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts
are included in Note 3 “Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2022, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on February 15, 2023.
|
(3)
The amounts in this column reflect the AIP payments for 2022, paid
in 2023, for all NEOs.
|
(4)
No NEO receives preferential or above market earnings on
nonqualified deferred compensation. Amounts above reflect the
actuarial present value of the NEO’s change in accrued benefit
under all defined benefit pension plans year over year using the
pension plan measurement dates for financial statement reporting
purposes. See Retirement and Other Benefits on page 54 for
descriptions of the pension plans, and the 2022 Pension Benefits
table and related footnotes on page 60 for the present value of
each NEO’s accumulated pension benefits and information regarding
actuarial assumptions used.
|
(5)
All Other Compensation detail for 2022 is shown in a separate table
appearing on the next page.
|
(6)
To demonstrate how year-over-year changes in pension value impact
total compensation, as determined under SEC rules, we have included
this column to show total compensation without pension value
changes. The amounts reported in this column are calculated by
subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in
Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
column, from the amounts reported in the Total Compensation c |