PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
ADVISERS
A. Directors and Senior Management
Not applicable
B. Advisers
Not applicable
C. Auditors
Not applicable
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED
TIMETABLE
Not applicable
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data of the Company as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was extracted from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. The information contained in the selected financial data is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 18 - Financial Statements, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and with the
information appearing in Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. The selected financial data of the Company as at December 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was extracted from the
audited financial statements of the Company not included in this Annual Report.
Under International Financial Reporting Standards (in Canadian dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Position Data
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
(as at period end)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
31,364,000
|
|
|
|
89,587,000
|
|
|
|
114,558,882
|
|
|
|
55,211,748
|
|
|
|
17,448,554
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
1,282,000
|
|
|
|
316,000
|
|
|
|
221,622
|
|
|
|
10,300,639
|
|
|
|
230,162
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
9,599,000
|
|
|
|
1,705,000
|
|
|
|
1,756,300
|
|
|
|
100,864,817
|
|
|
|
1,411,992
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47,485,572
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
12,153,000
|
|
|
|
12,394,881
|
|
|
|
862,891
|
|
|
|
2,166,170
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
42,284,000
|
|
|
|
103,761,000
|
|
|
|
128,931,685
|
|
|
|
214,725,667
|
|
|
|
21,256,878
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
11,662,000
|
|
|
|
16,931,000
|
|
|
|
43,673,908
|
|
|
|
61,560,600
|
|
|
|
10,352,462
|
|
Non-current Liabilities
|
|
|
3,680,000
|
|
|
|
3,236,000
|
|
|
|
4,548,617
|
|
|
|
114,881,163
|
|
|
|
6,442,865
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
15,342,000
|
|
|
|
20,167,868
|
|
|
|
48,222,525
|
|
|
|
176,441,763
|
|
|
|
16,795,327
|
|
Net Assets / (Deficiency)
|
|
|
26,942,000
|
|
|
|
83,594,000
|
|
|
|
80,709,160
|
|
|
|
36,193,904
|
|
|
|
4,461,551
|
|
Capital Stock, Warrants and Contributed Surplus
|
|
|
95,341,000
|
|
|
|
132,464,000
|
|
|
|
134,579,798
|
|
|
|
133,476,698
|
|
|
|
128,304,590
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
(5,751,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,268,000
|
|
|
|
673,264
|
|
|
|
681,992
|
|
|
|
1,071,735
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(62,648,000
|
)
|
|
|
(50,138,000
|
)
|
|
|
(54,543,902
|
)
|
|
|
(97,964,786
|
)
|
|
|
(124,947,427
|
)
|
Non-controlling Interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,090,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Statement of Net (Loss) Income
(for the fiscal year ended on)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
20,173,000
|
|
|
|
29,109,000
|
|
|
|
27,133,000
|
|
|
|
29,304,800
|
|
|
|
22,083,128
|
|
Loss on Settlement of Debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(60,595
|
)
|
Net (Loss) Income for the Period from continuing operations
|
|
|
(19,786,000
|
)
|
|
|
3,926,000
|
|
|
|
11,497,000
|
|
|
|
3,624,323
|
|
|
|
1,668,429
|
|
Net income for the Period from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,924,000
|
|
|
|
23,358,318
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Period
|
|
|
(26,805,000
|
)
|
|
|
4,521,000
|
|
|
|
43,412,000
|
|
|
|
26,560,245
|
|
|
|
2,474,488
|
|
(Loss) Income Per Share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
15,791,396
|
|
|
|
15,636,853
|
|
|
|
15,002,005
|
|
|
|
13,461,609
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
16,563,663
|
|
|
|
18,138,080
|
|
|
|
17,316,401
|
|
|
|
15,765,570
|
|
Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
15,791,396
|
|
|
|
15,636,853
|
|
|
|
15,002,005
|
|
|
|
13,461,609
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
16,563,663
|
|
|
|
18,138,080
|
|
|
|
17,316,401
|
|
|
|
15,765,570
|
|
Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
15,791,396
|
|
|
|
15,636,853
|
|
|
|
15,002,005
|
|
|
|
13,461,609
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
14,998,540
|
|
|
|
16,563,663
|
|
|
|
18,138,080
|
|
|
|
17,316,401
|
|
|
|
15,765,570
|
|
Dividends
No cash dividends have been declared nor are any intended to be declared in the
foreseeable future. The Company is not subject to legal restrictions respecting the payment of dividends except that they may not be paid if the Company is, or would after the payment be, insolvent. Dividend policy will be based on the
Company’s cash resources and needs and it is anticipated that all available cash will be required to further the Company’s research and development activities for the foreseeable future.
Exchange Rates
Unless otherwise indicated, all reference to dollar amounts are to Canadian dollars. On
April 14, 2020, the rate of exchange of the Canadian dollar, based on the daily exchange rate in Canada as published by the Bank of Canada, was US$1.00 = Canadian $1.3904. The exchange rates published by the Bank of Canada and made available on its
website, www.bankofcanada.ca, are nominal quotations — not buying or selling rates — and are intended for statistical or analytical purposes.
The following tables set out the exchange rates, based on the daily noon rates in
Canada as published by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian Dollars into U.S. Dollars, for the periods indicated:
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period End
|
|
|
1.2988
|
|
|
|
1.3642
|
|
|
|
1.2545
|
|
|
|
1.3427
|
|
|
|
1.3840
|
|
Average for the Period*
|
|
|
1.3269
|
|
|
|
1.2957
|
|
|
|
1.2986
|
|
|
|
1.3248
|
|
|
|
1.2787
|
|
High for the Period
|
|
|
1.3600
|
|
|
|
1.3642
|
|
|
|
1.3743
|
|
|
|
1.4590
|
|
|
|
1.4004
|
|
Low for the Period
|
|
|
1.2988
|
|
|
|
1.2288
|
|
|
|
1.2128
|
|
|
|
1.2544
|
|
|
|
1.1680
|
|
|
*
|
The average rate for each period is the average of the daily closing rates on the last day of each month during the period.
|
Month
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
March 2020
|
|
|
|
1.4496
|
|
|
|
1.3421
|
|
February 2020
|
|
|
|
1.3429
|
|
|
|
1.3224
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
|
1.3233
|
|
|
|
1.2970
|
|
December 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3302
|
|
|
|
1.2988
|
|
November 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3307
|
|
|
|
1.3148
|
|
October 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3330
|
|
|
|
1.3056
|
|
September 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3343
|
|
|
|
1.3153
|
|
August 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3325
|
|
|
|
1.3217
|
|
July 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3182
|
|
|
|
1.3038
|
|
June 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3527
|
|
|
|
1.3087
|
|
May 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3527
|
|
|
|
1.3410
|
|
April 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3493
|
|
|
|
1.3316
|
|
March 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3438
|
|
|
|
1.3260
|
|
February 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3298
|
|
|
|
1.3095
|
|
January 2019
|
|
|
|
1.3600
|
|
|
|
1.3144
|
|
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
D. Risk Factors
An investment in the Company’s common
shares is highly speculative and subject to a number of risks. Only those persons who can bear the risk of the entire loss of their investment should participate. An investor should carefully consider the risks described below and the other
information that the Company furnishes to, or files with, the Securities and Exchange Commission and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in the Company’s common shares.
Uncertainties and risks include, but are not limited to, the risk that the Company may
face with respect to importing raw materials, increased competition, acquisitions, contract manufacturing arrangements, delays or failure in obtaining product approvals from the FDA, general business and economic conditions, market trends, product
development, regulatory, and other approvals and marketing.
The following are significant factors known to us that could materially harm our
business, financial position, or operating results or could cause our actual results to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statement made in this report. The risks
described are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, also may adversely affect our business, financial position, and operating results. If any of these
risks actually occur, our business, financial position, and operating results could suffer significantly. As a result, the market price of our common stock could decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment.
Disease outbreaks may negatively impact the performance of the
Company
A local, regional, national or international outbreak of a contagious disease,
including the COVID 19 coronavirus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, H1N1 influenza virus, avian flu or any other similar illness, could interrupt supplies and other services from third parties upon which the
Company relies (including contract manufacturers, marketing and transportation and logistics providers), decrease demand for our products, decrease the general willingness of the general population to travel, cause staff shortages, reduced customer
demand, and increased government regulation, all of which may materially and negatively impact the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In particular, if the current outbreak of the COVID 19 coronavirus continues
or increases in severity, the Company could experience difficulty in executing it strategic plans and the marketing, sales, production, logistics and distribution of its products could be severely disrupted. These events could materially and
adversely affect the Company’s business and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and its financial results.
The fact that the Company currently derives nearly all of its revenue from a single product, AGGRASTAT®, exposes the Company to the risks inherent in the
establishment and maintenance of a developing business enterprise, such as those related to product acceptance, competition and viable operations management, and the long-term profitability of the Company remains uncertain.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had AGGRASTAT®,
ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM, and SNP available for sale commercially, but 96% of the Company’s revenues were derived from AGGRASTAT®. The remainder of the Company’s commercial products are in the development
stage and accordingly, its business operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment and maintenance of a developing business enterprise, such as those related to product acceptance, competition and viable operations
management.
The long-term profitability of the Company’s operations is uncertain, and any
profitability may not be sustained. The Company’s long-term profitability will depend in significant part on its ability to maintain or expand sales of AGGRASTAT®, increase sales of ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM, and
SNP and to acquire and/or develop other commercially viable drug products. This in turn depends on numerous factors which remain uncertain, including the following:
|
(a)
|
the success of the Company’s research and development activities;
|
|
(b)
|
obtaining regulatory approvals to market any of its development products;
|
|
(c)
|
the ability to contract for the manufacture of the Company’s products according to schedule and within budget, given the Company’s
limited experience and lack of internal capabilities for manufacturing;
|
|
(d)
|
the ability to develop, implement and maintain appropriate systems and structures to market and operate within applicable regulatory, industry
and legal guidelines;
|
|
(e)
|
the ability to identify, negotiate and complete business development transactions (e.g. the sale, purchase, or license of pharmaceutical
products or services) with third parties;
|
|
(f)
|
the ability to maintain current or higher pricing and margins for the Company’s products;
|
|
(g)
|
the ability to successfully prosecute and defend its patents and other intellectual property; and
|
|
(h)
|
the ability to successfully market the Company’s products, including AGGRASTAT®, given that it has limited
resources.
|
Further, if the Company does achieve sustained profitability, it may not be able to
increase profitability in the future.
There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in growing the sales of
ZYPITAMAGTM in the United States and its territories, and its failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
On September 30, 2019 the Company announced that through its subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., it has acquired the ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM from Zydus for U.S. and Canadian markets. Under terms of the agreement, Zydus will receive an upfront payment of U.S. $5.0 million and
U.S. $2.0 million in deferred payments to be made over the next four years, as well as contingent payments on achievement of milestones and royalties related to net sales. With this acquisition Medicure obtained full control of marketing and pricing
negotiations for the product.
Previously, on December 14, 2017, the Company acquired from Zydus, an exclusive license
to sell and market ZYPITAMAGTM (pitavastatin magnesium), a branded cardiovascular drug, in the United States and its territories for a term of seven years with extensions to the term available. ZYPITAMAGTM is used for the
treatment of patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia and was approved in July 2017 by the FDA for sale and marketing in the United States. On May 1, 2018 ZYPITAMAGTM became commercially available in retail pharmacies
throughout the United States. The Company’s product launch utilized its existing commercial infrastructure and while not an in-hospital product like AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM added to the Company’s cardiovascular
portfolio and expanded the Company’s reach to new patients. ZYPITAMAGTM contributed revenue of $183,000 to Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $652,000 of revenue to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018.
ZYPITAMAGTM is still in the early stages of its commercialization and the Company continues to work towards growing the ZYPITAMAGTM brand, usage of the product and revenues from ZYPITAMAGTM. The 2018 revenues were
higher than those earned in 2019 due to the initial ordering by wholesaler customers of the product.
ZYPITAMAG competes in a highly competitive class of products and to date, the rate of
uptake of ZYPITAMAGTM has been slow resulting in low sales of ZYPITAMAGTM recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in growing the sales of ZYPITAMAGTM
in 2020 and beyond as there is no assurance that a viable market for ZYPITAMAGTM will develop. The failure of the Company to grow sales of ZYPITAMAGTM, or to establish a viable market for the product, could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in launching SNP and
growing its revenues in the United States and its territories, and its failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
On August 13, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA approved its ANDA for SNP. SNP
is indicated for the immediate reduction of blood pressure for adult and pediatric patients in hypertensive crisis. The product is also indicated for producing controlled hypotension in order to reduce bleeding during surgery and for the treatment
of acute congestive heart failure. The filing of the ANDA was previously announced by the Company on December 13, 2016. Medicure’s SNP has recently become available in the United States with the initial sales from SNP being recorded subsequent
to December 31, 2019 in January of 2020.
SNP was launched into a genericized market with several competitors already selling
generic versions of the product and as such there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in growing its sales of SNP in 2020 and beyond. The failure of the Company to successfully launch and grow sales of SNP, or to establish a viable
market for the Company’s version of the product, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in marketing
ReDSTM and growing sales from the product in the United States and its territories, and its failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
On January 28, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement
with Sensible Medical Innovations Inc. (“Sensible”) to become the exclusive marketing partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDS™ is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and
absolute measurement of lung fluid which is important in the management of congestive heart failure. ReDS™ was already being marketed to United States hospitals by Sensible and the Company has begun marketing ReDS™ immediately using its
existing commercial organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure will receive a percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual sales quotas.
At the time of the signing of the marketing agreement, ReDSTM was available
commercially in the United States, however, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in its marketing efforts regarding ReDSTM and achieve significant sales growth in 2020 and beyond as planned, or at all. Further, there
is no assurance that a viable market for ReDSTM will develop in 2020 and beyond. The failure of the Company to successfully market and grow sales of ReDSTM, or to establish a viable market for the product, could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
The Company has considered indicators of impairment as at December 31, 2019 and
recorded a write-down of intangible assets related to the ReDSTM license during the year ended December 31, 2019 totaling $6.3 million as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the
sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. Additionally, a loss of $6.3
million was recorded within other comprehensive loss from the revaluation of the investment in Sensible made during the year ended December 31, 2019. Despite recording this impairment on the license over ReDSTM and the investment in
Sensible Medical, the Company continues to market ReDS™ PRO and continues to work to safeguard or monetize the Company’s investment.
The commercial launch and marketing of PREXXARTAN® (valsartan) oral
solution has been placed on hold by the Company and the Company may not commercially launch the product.
On October 31, 2017, the Company announced that it had acquired an exclusive license to
sell and market PREXXARTAN®, which treats hypertension, in the U.S. and its territories from Carmel for a seven-year term with extensions to the term available. Medicure acquired the license rights for an upfront payment of
U.S.$100,000, with an additional U.S.$400,000 payable on final FDA approval. Carmel would also be entitled to receive royalties and milestone payments from the net revenues of PREXXARTAN®. PREXXARTAN® had been granted
tentative approval by the FDA and the tentative approval was converted to final approval on December 19, 2017.
As announced on March 19, 2018 and up-dated on March 28, 2018, all PREXXARTAN®
related activities were placed on hold by the Company pending the resolution of a dispute that Medicure became aware of between the owner of the New Drug Application (“NDA”), Carmel and the third-party manufacturer of the
product. The Company was also named in a civil claim in Florida between the third-party manufacturer and Carmel. The claim disputed the rights granted to Medicure by Carmel in regards to PREXXARTAN®. More recently the claim against
the Company has been withdrawn, however the dispute between Carmel and the third-party manufacturer continues.
Medicure had intended to launch PREXXARTAN® during the first half of
2018 and to date, only an up-front payment of U.S.$100,000, has been made to Carmel in regards to PREXXARTAN® and the Company has reserved all of its rights under the license agreement with Carmel for
PREXXARTAN®.
As a result of the uncertainty surrounding the marketing rights for
PREXXARTAN®, marketing activities remain on hold in regards to the product. There can be no assurances that the Company launches the product commercially in 2020 or future years. Further, there is no assurance that the Company will be
successful in its launching PREXXARTAN® and achieve sales results as planned, or at all. Further, there is no assurance that a viable market for PREXXARTAN® will develop if the marketing efforts begin.
The Company may never receive
regulatory approval in the United States, Canada or abroad for any of its products in development. Therefore, the Company may not be able to sell any therapeutic products currently under development.
The Company’s failure to maintain or obtain necessary regulatory approvals to fully market its current and future development stage products in one or more significant markets
may adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. The process involved in obtaining regulatory approval from the competent authorities to market therapeutic products is long and costly and may delay product
development. The approval to market a product may be applicable to a limited extent only or it may be refused entirely.
While the Company’s approved product portfolio has grown during 2019 to
AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM, PREXXARTAN®, which is currently on hold, ReDSTM and SNP, the Company still has products that are currently in the research and development stages. The Company may never
develop another commercially viable drug product approved for marketing. To obtain regulatory approvals for its products and to achieve commercial success, human clinical trials must demonstrate that the new chemical entities are safe for human use
and that they show efficacy, and generic drug products under development need to show analytical equivalence and /or bioequivalence to the referenced product on the market. Unsatisfactory results obtained from a particular study or clinical trial
relating to one or more of the Company’s products may cause the Company to reduce or abandon its commitment to that program.
If the Company fails to successfully complete its development projects, it will not
obtain approval from the FDA and other international regulatory agencies, to market its these products. Regulatory approvals also may be subject to conditions that could limit the market its products can be sold in or make either products more
difficult or expensive to sell than anticipated. Also, regulatory approvals may be revoked at any time for various reasons, including for failure to comply with regulatory requirements or poor performance of its products in terms of safety and
effectiveness.
The Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations are likely
to be adversely affected if it fails to maintain or obtain regulatory approvals in the United States, Canada and abroad to market and sell its current or future drug products, including any limitations imposed on the marketing of such
products.
If the Company fails to acquire
and develop additional product candidates or approved products, it will impair the Company’s ability to grow its business and to increase value for shareholders.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company generated its commercial product
revenue from AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM and ReDSTM with initial revenue from SNP being earned beginning in 2020. A component of the Company’s plan to generate additional revenue is its intention to develop
and/or to acquire or license, and then develop and/or market, additional product candidates or approved products. The success of this growth strategy depends upon the Company’s ability to identify, select and then to develop, acquire or
license products that meet the criteria it has established. Due to the fact the Company has limited financial capacity, and limited value in its equity, relative to other companies in the industry, it has a limited number of product opportunities to
choose from. Moreover, the Company’s ability to research and develop its own, or other acquired/licensed products, is limited by the extent of its internal scientific research capabilities. In addition, proposing, negotiating and implementing
an economically viable acquisition or license is a lengthy and complex process. Other companies, including those with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with the Company for the acquisition or license of
product candidates and approved products. The Company may not be able to acquire or license the rights to additional product candidates and approved products on terms that it finds acceptable, or at all. Moreover, the Company may not have the human,
technical, financial, manufacturing and/or clinical resources to successfully develop additional products.
The Company may not receive regulatory approval in the United States to further
expand or otherwise improve the approved indications and/or dosing information contained within AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing information. Therefore, the Company may not be able to continue to materially increase sales of
AGGRASTAT®.
In fiscal 2014 the Company was able to obtain revisions to
AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing information and these revisions have had a positive, material impact on sales of AGGRASTAT®. The Company believes that further revisions to AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing
information will put the Company in a better position to maximize the revenue potential for AGGRASTAT®. To make such changes, the Company may need to conduct appropriate clinical trials, obtain positive results from those trials, or
otherwise provide support in order to obtain regulatory approval for the proposed indications and dosing regimens. The Company’s failure to obtain additional regulatory approvals from the FDA to expand or otherwise improve the approved
indications and/or dosing information contained within AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing information may adversely affect the Company’s ability to materially increase sales. The process involved in obtaining such regulatory
approval is long and costly and may require additional investments that may not be reasonably achievable by the Company. The regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application. Varying
interpretations of the data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval of a new indication for a product. Furthermore, the approval to modify the prescribing information may be applicable to a
limited extent only or it may be refused entirely.
The current approved prescribing
information for AGGRASTAT® does not include all of the dosing information and therapeutic indications for which a physician may wish to use the product. Although health care professionals may utilize a product at doses and for
indications outside of the approved prescribing information, the Company is prohibited from promoting such uses.
To obtain regulatory approvals to modify the prescribing information, the Company must
supply sufficient information supporting the safety and efficacy of such uses to the FDA, which in turn must review and deem this information to be sufficient to modify the label in the agreed upon fashion. Unsatisfactory or insufficient results
obtained from any particular study or clinical trial relating to the Company’s products may cause the Company to reduce or abandon its efforts to expand or otherwise improve the approved indications and/or dosing information contained within
AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing information.
If the Company
does not comply with federal, state and foreign laws and regulations relating to the health care business, it could face substantial penalties.
The Company and its customers are subject to extensive regulation by the United States
federal government, and the governments of the states in which the business is conducted. In the United States, the laws that directly or indirectly affect the Company’s ability to operate its business include the following:
|
•
|
the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, which prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration,
directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce either the referral of an individual or furnishing or arranging for a good or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs such as Medicare and
Medicaid;
|
|
•
|
other Medicare laws and regulations that prescribe the requirements for coverage and payment for services performed by the Company’s
customers, including the amount of such payment;
|
|
•
|
the Federal False Claims Act, which imposes civil and criminal liability on individuals and entities who submit, or cause to be submitted,
false or fraudulent claims for payment to the government;
|
|
•
|
the Federal False Statements Act, which prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any
materially false statement in connection with delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services; and
|
|
•
|
various state laws that impose similar requirements and liability with respect to state healthcare reimbursement and other
programs.
|
If the Company’s
operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws and regulations described above or any other law or governmental regulation to which the Company or its customers are or will be subject, the Company may be subject to civil and criminal
penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of its operations. Similarly, if the Company’s customers are found to be non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject
to sanctions, which could also have a negative impact on the Company. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment or restructuring of the Company’s operations would adversely affect its ability to operate its business and financial results. Any
action against the Company for violation of these laws, even if the Company is able to successfully defend against it, could cause it to incur significant legal expenses, divert management’s attention from the operation of the business and
damage the Company’s reputation.
Due to the fact that a material amount of the use of AGGRASTAT® is
outside of the FDA approved indications contained within AGGRASTAT®’s prescribing information, the Company may be at a greater risk than would be the case if the product was almost exclusively used within the approved
prescribing information.
AGGRASTAT® must compete with a variety of existing drugs, including
generic versions of those existing drugs, and may in the future have to compete with new drugs, which may limit the use of AGGRASTAT® and adversely affect the Company’s revenue.
Due to the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases, the market for
anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies is large and competition is intense. There are a number of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs recently approved, currently on the market, awaiting regulatory approval or in development.
AGGRASTAT® must compete with these drugs, and may in the future have to compete with new drugs, to the extent that AGGRASTAT® and such drugs are approved for the same or similar indications.
AGGRASTAT® competes primarily with other platelet inhibitors, in
particular the other GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, ReoPro® (abciximab) (sold by Eli Lilly and Company) and Integrilin® (eptifibatide) (a branded drug sold by Merck & Co., Inc.), in addition to generic eptifibatide sold by
other companies. It also competes with a number of oral platelet inhibitors, which can be used alone or in conjunction with anticoagulants, most notably with heparin (sold generically by a number of companies), and with a recently approved
injectable platelet inhibitor, Kengreal® (cangrelor) (sold by Chiesi Farmaceutics S.p.A. Inc.). In addition, some alternative methods of treatment, such as the use of Angiomax® (bivalirudin) (sold by The Medicines
Company, Inc.), also compete with AGGRASTAT®. These competing products are all marketed by large pharmaceutical companies with significantly more resources and experience than the Company.
There still remains many hospitals in the United States where AGGRASTAT®
is not available on the hospital formulary, and it can be very difficult and time consuming to have AGGRASTAT® added to formulary for use by health care professionals. In many cases, competing treatment approaches may have FDA
approval for dosing regimens and/or therapeutic indications that are outside of AGGRASTAT®’s approved prescribing information. The risk of bleeding associated with AGGRASTAT® may cause physicians to choose an
alternative therapy. Although AGGRASTAT® is positioned as a relatively low-cost therapy, in certain circumstances other treatment approaches are lower cost and may for this reason be preferred by health care professionals - in
particular where oral antiplatelet agents are deemed suitable.
ZYPITAMAGTM competes with a variety of existing drugs and may compete
against other new drugs, which may limit the use of ZYPITAMAGTM and potentially affect the Company’s revenue.
Due to the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases, the market for
antihyperlipidemics is large and competition is intense. There are a number of approved antihyperlipidemic drugs approved, currently on the market, awaiting regulatory approval or in development. ZYPITAMAGTM will compete with these drugs
to the extent ZYPITAMAGTM and any of these drugs are approved for the same or similar indications.
Although ZYPITAMAGTM is positioned as a relatively low-cost therapy, in
certain circumstances, other treatment approaches are lower cost and may for this reason be preferred by health care professionals.
The development of generic treatment options may decrease or eliminate the cost advantage that AGGRASTAT® currently enjoys, which could negatively impact the
Company’s sales.
AGGRASTAT® is a branded pharmaceutical product for which there is
currently no generic alternative available in the Company’s market. AGGRASTAT®’s reduced cost relative to other products was one of the advantages being used by the Company to promote and increase sales of
AGGRASTAT®. Distributors of generic products typically price products significantly below the branded alternative, and these distributors are always seeking to introduce these generic alternatives of pharmaceuticals. There is a risk
that new generic products will be introduced that compete with AGGRASTAT® and that their low pricing would reduce AGGRASTAT®’s relative cost advantage, and therefore negatively impact the maintenance and growth of
sales by the Company. As at December 31, 2019, there are generic versions of a competing product, eptifibatide, that are commercially available and are now competing directly against AGGRASTAT®. Additional generic competitors are
expected to enter the market in the months and years ahead, and it is anticipated that these will result in further reductions to the price of eptifibatide.
Moreover, due to the previously seen growth in sales of AGGRASTAT®,
there is increased probability that generic companies will attempt to enter the U.S. market before the last AGGRASTAT® patent expires. If this occurs, the Company will have to defend its patent position and market exclusivity for
AGGRASTAT® against larger, better funded and more experienced generic companies. The entry of a generic version of AGGRASTAT® into the market would have a major negative effect on both the volume and profitability of
the Company’s AGGRASTAT® sales.
Further to this, as announced on November 16, 2018, the Company filed a patent
infringement action against Gland Pharma Ltd. (“Gland”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,770,660 (“the ‘660 patent”).
The patent infringement action was in response to Gland’s filing of an ANDA
seeking approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® before the expiration of the ‘660 patent. The ‘660 patent is listed in FDA’s Orange Book for AGGRASTAT®. Medicure vigorously
defend the ‘660 patent and pursued the patent infringement action against Gland and all other legal options available to protect its patent rights.
On August 21, 2019 the Company announced that its subsidiary, Medicure International
Inc., settled its ongoing patent infringement action against Gland. As part of the settlement, Gland has acknowledged that the ‘660 patent is valid, enforceable and infringed. The settlement resulted in the Company entering into a license
agreement with Gland with an anticipated launch date for Gland’s generic product of March 1, 2023. The remaining terms of the settlement are confidential.
Additionally, the Company announced it had filed a patent infringement action against
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Nexus”) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of the ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement action is in response to Nexus’ filing of an ANDA seeking
approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® (tirofiban hydrochloride) injection before the expiration of the ‘660 patent. Medicure will vigorously defend the ‘660 patent and will pursue the patent
infringement action against Nexus and all other legal options available to protect its product.
The Company may not be able to hire or retain the qualified scientific, technical and management personnel it requires.
The Company’s business prospects and operations depend on the continued
contributions of certain of the Company’s executive officers and other key management and technical personnel, certain of whom would be difficult to replace.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure International, Inc., contracts with third
parties to perform a significant amount of its research and development activities. Because of the specialized scientific nature of the Company’s business, the loss of services of any one or more of these parties may require the Company to
attract and retain replacement qualified scientific, technical and management personnel. Competition in the biotechnology industry for such personnel is intense and the Company may not be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified
personnel, which may compromise the viability, pace and success of its research and development activities.
Also, certain of the Company’s management personnel are officers and/or directors
of other companies and organizations, some publicly-traded, and will only devote part of their time to the Company. Although the Company has key person insurance for Dr. Albert Friesen, Chief Executive Officer, the Company does not have key person
insurance in effect in the event of a loss of any other management, scientific or other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of the Company’s current executive officers or key personnel or the inability to continue to attract
qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business prospects, financial results and financial condition.
The Company faces substantial technological competition from many biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies with much greater resources, and it may not be able to effectively compete.
Technological and scientific competition in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industry is intense. The Company competes with other companies in Canada, the United States and abroad to develop products designed to treat similar conditions. Most of these other companies have substantially greater financial, technical and
scientific research and development resources, manufacturing and production and sales and marketing capabilities than the Company. Smaller companies may also prove to be significant competitors, whether acting independently or through collaborative
arrangements with large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Developments by other companies may adversely affect the competitiveness of the Company’s products or technologies or the commitment of its research and marketing
collaborators to its programs or even render its products obsolete.
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry is characterized by extensive drug
discovery and drug research efforts and rapid technological and scientific change. Competition can be expected to increase as technological advances are made and commercial applications for biopharmaceutical products increase. The Company’s
competitors may use different technologies or approaches to develop products similar to the products which it is developing, or may develop new or enhanced products or processes that may be more effective, less expensive, safer or more readily
available before or after the Company obtains approval of its products. The Company may not be able to successfully compete with its competitors or their products and, if it is unable to do so, the Company’s business, financial condition and
results of operations may suffer.
The Company may be unable to establish collaborative and commercial relationships
with third parties, in which case the Company’s business, financial position and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
The Company’s success may depend to some extent on its ability to enter into and
to maintain various arrangements with corporate partners, licensors, licensees and others for the research, development, clinical trials, manufacturing, marketing, sales and commercialization of its products. These relationships are crucial to the
Company’s intention to license to or contract with other pharmaceutical companies for the manufacturing, marketing, sales and/or distribution of any its current or future products. There can be no assurance that any licensing or other
agreements will be established on favourable terms, if at all. The failure to establish successful collaborative arrangements may negatively impact the Company’s ability to develop and commercialize its products, and may adversely affect its
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is currently dependent on third parties for the production of
AGGRASTAT®, and the loss of or other disruption to such third-party relationships could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and operating results.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure International, Inc., has a supply contract for
raw materials (active pharmaceutical ingredient) used in the manufacture of AGGRASTAT® with a contract manufacturer which was approved by the FDA as the approved source of the raw material for AGGRASTAT®.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc., has both vial and bag
manufacturers of final product that are approved by the FDA.
If either the supply of raw material or the final product manufacturing agreement for
AGGRASTAT® is terminated or interrupted, or if, in the event of termination, the Company and its subsidiaries are unable to find a replacement raw material supplier or manufacturer, or obtain regulatory approval for commercial use of
product made by a new raw material supplier or a new finished product manufacturer, the Company’s business, financial position and operating results could be materially adversely affected. It is also important to note that the establishment of
new manufacturing sources of pharmaceutical raw materials or finished products takes a prolonged period of time.
The Company is currently dependent on a third-party manufacturer for the supply of
ZYPITAMAGTM, and the loss or other disruption to the supply arrangement could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and operating results.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc., has entered into a supply
arrangement with a third-party manufacturer of ZYPITAMAGTM which will expire on September 19, 2029.
If the supply arrangement is interrupted, or if the Company and Medicure Pharma, Inc.
are unable to renew or replace the supply arrangement, or if the Company and Medicure Pharma, Inc. are unable to obtain regulatory approval for commercial use of product made by a new supplier, the Company’s business, financial position and
operating results could be materially adversely affected. It is also important to note that the establishment of new manufacturing sources of pharmaceutical raw materials or finished products takes a prolonged period of time.
The Company is currently dependent on third parties for the production of SNP, and
the loss of or other disruption to such third-party relationships could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and operating results.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure International, Inc., has a supply contract for
raw materials (active pharmaceutical ingredient) used in the manufacture of SNP with a contract manufacturer which was approved by the FDA as the approved source of the raw material for SNP.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc., has a contracted manufacturer of
final product that is approved by the FDA.
If either the supply of raw material or the final product manufacturing agreement for
SNP is terminated or interrupted, or if, in the event of termination, the Company and its subsidiaries are unable to find a replacement raw material supplier or manufacturer, or obtain regulatory approval for commercial use of product made by a new
raw material supplier or a new finished product manufacturer, the Company’s business, financial position and operating results could be materially adversely affected. It is also important to note that the establishment of new manufacturing
sources of pharmaceutical raw materials or finished products takes a prolonged period of time.
ReDSTM will be manufactured by Sensible, the Company’s partner in
regards to the technology and as a result the Company is dependent on their manufacturing for the supply of ReDSTM devices and the loss or other disruption to this supply could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial position and operating results.
The Company’s subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc., has entered into a marketing
agreement regarding the sale of ReDSTM in the United States.
If the supply of product is interrupted, or if the Company and Sensible, are unable to
find replacement suppliers, the Company’s business, financial position and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Loss of product inventory could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial results and financial condition.
If the Company’s existing inventories of AGGRASTAT® and/or
ZYPITAMAGTM are contaminated, exhausted due to stock-out, or otherwise lost, the Company’s financial results and financial condition could be adversely affected, particularly if the third-party suppliers of raw materials or final
product are unable to meet any additional demands that may be placed on them by the Company in its efforts to make up depleted inventory.
Consolidation and the formation of strategic partnerships among and between
wholesale distributors, chain drug stores, and group purchasing organizations has resulted in a smaller number of companies, each controlling a larger share of pharmaceutical distribution channels.
Drug wholesalers and retail pharmacy chains, which represent an essential part of the
distribution chain for generic pharmaceutical products, have undergone, and are continuing to undergo, significant consolidation. This consolidation may result in declines in the Company’s sales volumes if a customer is consolidated into
another company that purchases products from a competitor. In addition, the consolidation of drug wholesalers and retail pharmacy chains could result in these groups gaining additional purchasing leverage and consequently increasing the product
pricing pressures facing the Company’s business and enabling those groups to charge the Company increased fees. Additionally, the emergence of large buying groups representing independent retail pharmacies and the prevalence and influence of
managed care organizations and similar institutions potentially enable those groups to extract price discounts on the Company’s products. The result of these developments may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
financial position, and operating results.
The use of legal, regulatory, and legislative strategies by competitors, both
branded and generic, including “authorized generics,” citizen’s petitions, and legislative proposals, may increase the costs to develop and market the Company’s generic products, could delay or prevent new product
introductions, and could reduce significantly the Company’s profit potential. These factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and operating results.
The Company’s competitors, both branded and generic, often pursue legal,
regulatory, and/or legislative strategies to prevent or delay competition from generic alternatives to branded products. These strategies include, but are not limited to:
|
•
|
entering into agreements whereby other generic companies will begin to market an authorized generic, a generic equivalent of a branded product,
at the same time generic competition initially enters the market;
|
|
•
|
launching a generic version of their own branded product at the same time generic competition initially enters the
market;
|
|
•
|
filing citizen petitions with the FDA or other regulatory bodies, including timing the filings so as to thwart generic competition by causing
delays of generic product approvals;
|
|
•
|
seeking to establish regulatory and legal obstacles that would make it more difficult to demonstrate bioequivalence or meet other approval
requirements;
|
|
•
|
initiating legislative and regulatory efforts to limit the substitution of generic versions of branded
pharmaceuticals;
|
|
•
|
filing suits for patent infringement that may delay regulatory approval of generic products;
|
|
•
|
introducing “next-generation” products prior to the expiration of market exclusivity for the reference product, which often
materially reduces the demand for the first generic product;
|
|
•
|
obtaining extensions of market exclusivity by conducting clinical trials of branded drugs in pediatric populations or by other potential
methods;
|
|
•
|
persuading regulatory bodies to withdraw the approval of branded name drugs for which the patents are about to expire, thus allowing the
branded company to obtain new patented products serving as substitutes for the products withdrawn; and
|
|
•
|
seeking to obtain new patents on drugs for which patent protection is about to expire.
|
If the Company cannot compete with such strategies, its business, financial position, and operating results could be adversely impacted.
The pharmaceutical industry is subject to regulation by various federal authorities, including the FDA and the DEA, and state governmental authorities. Failure to comply with
applicable legal and regulatory requirements can lead to sanctions which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and operating results.
Federal and state statutes and regulations govern or influence the testing,
manufacturing, packing, labeling, storage, record keeping, safety, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, and distribution of the Company’s products. Noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements can trigger action by
various federal authorities, including the FDA and the DEA, as well as state governmental authorities. This can lead to a broad range of consequences which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and
operating results. The potential sanctions include warning letters, fines, seizure of products, product recalls, total or partial suspension of production and distribution, refusal to approve NDAs/ANDAs or other applications or revocation of
approvals previously granted, withdrawal of product from marketing, injunctions, withdrawal of licenses or registrations necessary to conduct business, disqualification from supply contracts with the government, civil penalties, debarment, and
criminal prosecution.
The Company’s research, product development, and manufacturing activities
involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, and it may incur significant costs in complying with numerous laws and regulations.
The Company is subject to laws and regulations enforced by the FDA and the DEA, and
other regulatory statutes including the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”), the Environmental Protection Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and other current and potential
federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, and disposal of its products, materials used to develop and manufacture such products, and resulting waste products.
The Company cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury, by
accident or as the result of intentional acts, from these materials. In the event of an accident, the Company could be held liable for any damages that result, and any resulting liability could exceed its resources. The Company may also incur
significant costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations in the future. The Company is also subject to laws generally applicable to businesses, including but not limited to, federal, state, and local regulations relating to wage and
hour matters, employee classification, mandatory healthcare benefits, unlawful workplace discrimination, and whistle-blowing. Any actual or alleged failure to comply with any regulation applicable to our business or any whistle-blowing claim, even
if without merit, could result in costly litigation, regulatory action or otherwise harm our business, financial position, and operating results.
The Company relies on third parties to assist with its research and development
projects and clinical studies. If these third parties do not perform as required or expected, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize the subject products.
The Company relies on third parties to assist with its clinical studies. If these third
parties do not perform as required or expected, or if they are not in compliance with FDA rules and regulations, our clinical studies may be extended, delayed or terminated, or may need to be repeated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory
approval for or commercialize the products being tested in such studies. Further, we may be required to audit or redo previously completed trials or recall already-approved commercial products.
The Company may fail to obtain acceptable prices or appropriate reimbursement for
its products and its ability to successfully commercialize its products may be impaired as a result.
Government and insurance reimbursements for healthcare expenditures play an important
role for all healthcare providers, including physicians, medical device companies, pharmaceutical companies, medical supply companies, and companies, such as the Company, that offer or plan to offer various products in the United States and other
countries. The Company’s ability to earn sufficient returns on its products will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of such products, related therapies and related treatments will be available from government
health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers, managed care organizations, and other organizations. In the United States, the Company’s ability to have its products and related treatments and therapies eligible for
Medicare or private insurance reimbursement is and will remain an important factor in determining the ultimate success of its products. If, for any reason, Medicare or the insurance companies decline to provide reimbursement for the Company’s
products and related treatments, the Company’s ability to commercialize its products would be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that the Company’s products and related treatments will be eligible for reimbursement.
There has been a trend
toward declining government and private insurance expenditures for many healthcare items. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging the price of medical products and services.
If purchasers or users of the Company’s products and related treatments are not
able to obtain appropriate reimbursement for the cost of using such products and related treatments, they may forgo or reduce such use. Even if the Company’s products and related treatments are approved for reimbursement by Medicare and
private insurers, as is the case with AGGRASTAT®, the amount of reimbursement may be reduced at times, or even eliminated. This would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved
healthcare products, and there can be no assurance that adequate third-party coverage will be available for new products developed or acquired by the Company.
The Company does not have significant manufacturing
experience and has limited marketing resources and may never be able to successfully manufacture or market certain of its products.
The Company has limited experience in commercial manufacturing and has limited
resources for marketing or selling its products. The Company may never be able to successfully manufacture and market certain of its development products. If any other of its development products are approved for sale, the Company intends to
contract with and rely on third parties to manufacture, and possibly also to market and sell its products. Accordingly, the quality, timing and commercial success of such products may be outside of the Company’s control. Failure of, or delays
by, a third-party manufacturer to comply with good manufacturing practices or similar quality control regulations or satisfy regulatory inspections may have a material adverse effect on the Company and its products. Failure of, or delays by, a third
party in the marketing or selling of the Company’s products or failure of the Company to successfully market and sell such products likewise may have a material adverse effect on the Company and its products.
The Company has limited product liability insurance and may not be able to obtain
adequate product liability insurance in the future.
The sale and use of the Company’s commercial and development products, and the
conduct of clinical studies involving human subjects, entails product and professional liability risks that are inherent in the testing, production, marketing and sale of pharmaceuticals to humans. While the Company has taken, and intends to
continue to take, what it believes are appropriate precautions, there can be no assurance that it will avoid significant liability exposure. Although the Company currently carries product liability insurance, there can be no assurance that it has
sufficient coverage, or can in the future obtain sufficient coverage at a reasonable cost. An inability to obtain insurance on economically feasible terms or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could inhibit or prevent
the commercialization of products developed by the Company. The obligation to pay any product liability claim or recall for a product may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and future prospects. In addition, even if
a product liability claim is not successful, adverse publicity and the time and expense of defending such a claim may significantly impact the Company’s business.
If the Company is unable
to successfully protect its intellectual proprietary rights, its competitive position will be adversely affected.
The patent positions of pharmaceutical companies are generally uncertain and involve complex legal, scientific and factual issues. The Company’s success depends significantly
on its ability to:
|
a)
|
obtain and maintain U.S. and foreign patents, including defending those patents against adverse claims;
|
|
b)
|
secure patent term extensions for the patents covering its approved products;
|
|
c)
|
protect trade secrets;
|
|
d)
|
operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others; and
|
|
e)
|
prevent others from infringing its proprietary rights.
|
The Company’s success will depend to a significant degree on its ability to
obtain and protect its patents and protect its proprietary rights in unpatented trade secrets.
The Company owns or jointly owns numerous patents from the United States Patent Office
and other jurisdictions. The Company has additional pending United States patent applications along with applications pending in other jurisdictions. The Company’s pending and any future patent applications may not be accepted by the United
States Patent and Trademark Office or any other jurisdiction in which applications may be filed. Also, processes or products that may be developed by the Company in the future may not be patentable. Errors or ill-advised decisions by Company staff
and/or contracted patent agents may also affect the Company’s ability to obtain or maintain valid patent protection.
The patent protection afforded to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies is uncertain and involves many complex legal, scientific and factual questions. There is no clear law or
policy involving the degree of protection afforded under patents. As a result, the scope of patents issued to the Company may not successfully prevent third parties from developing similar or competitive products. Competitors may develop similar or
competitive products that do not conflict with the Company’s patents. Litigation may be commenced by the Company to prevent infringement of its patents. Litigation may also commence against the Company to challenge its patents that, if
successful, may result in the narrowing or invalidating of such patents. It is not possible to predict how any patent litigation will affect the Company’s efforts to develop, manufacture or market its products. However, the cost of litigation
to prevent infringement or uphold the validity of any patents issued to the Company may be significant, in which case its business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer. Patents provide protection for only a limited period of
time, and much of such time can occur well before commercialization commences.
The U.S. Congress is considering patent reform legislation. In addition, the U.S.
Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has
created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained, and the Company’s ability to obtain patents in the future. Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken the Company’s ability to obtain new patents or to enforce its existing patents and patents that it might obtain in the future.
Disclosure and use of the Company’s proprietary rights in unpatented trade
secrets not otherwise protected by patents are generally controlled by written agreements. However, such agreements will not provide the Company with adequate protection if they are not honoured, others independently develop an equivalent
technology, disputes arise concerning the ownership of intellectual property, or its trade secrets are disclosed improperly. To the extent that consultants or other research collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in their work with
the Company, disputes may also arise as to the rights to related or resulting know-how or inventions.
Others could claim that the Company infringes on their proprietary rights, which may result in costly, complex and time-consuming litigation.
The Company’s success will depend partly on its ability to operate without
infringing upon the patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. The Company is not currently aware that any of its products or processes infringes the proprietary rights of third parties. However, despite its best efforts, the Company may
be sued for infringing on the patent or other proprietary rights of third parties at any time in the future.
Such litigation, with or without merit, is time-consuming and costly and may significantly impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, even if it
prevails. If the Company does not prevail, it may be required to stop the infringing activity or enter into a royalty or licensing agreement, in addition to any damages it may have to pay. The Company may not be able to obtain such a license or the
terms of the royalty or license may be burdensome for it, which may significantly impair the Company’s ability to market its products and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is subject to stringent governmental regulation, in the future may
become subject to additional regulations and if it is unable to comply, its business may be materially harmed.
Pharmaceutical companies operate in a high-risk regulatory environment. The FDA and
other national health agencies can be very slow to approve a product and can also withhold product approvals. In addition, these health agencies also oversee many other aspects of the Company’s operations, such as research and development,
manufacturing, and testing and safety regulation of products. As a result, regulatory risk is normally higher than in other industry sectors.
The Company is or may become subject to various federal, provincial, state and local
laws, regulations and recommendations. The Company and third parties providing manufacturing, research and/or development services to the Company is subject to various laws and regulations, relating to product emissions, use and disposal of
hazardous or toxic chemicals or potentially hazardous substances, infectious disease agents and other materials, and laboratory and manufacturing practices used in connection with the activities. If the Company, or its contracted third party, fails
to comply with these regulations, the Company may be fined or suffer other consequences that could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
The pharmaceutical sales and marketing industry within which the Company operates is a
complex legal and regulatory environment. The failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations may result in civil and criminal legal proceedings. As those rules and regulations change or as governmental interpretation of those rules
and regulations evolve, prior conduct may be called into question. The Company may become subject of federal and/or state governmental investigations into pricing, marketing, and reimbursement of its prescription drug product. Any such investigation
could result in related restitution or civil litigation on behalf of the federal or state governments, as well as related proceedings initiated against the Company by or on behalf of consumers and private payers. Such proceedings may result in
trebling of damages awarded or fines in respect of each violation of law. Criminal proceedings may also be initiated against the Company. Any of these consequences could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial
results.
The Company is unable to predict the extent of future government regulations or
industry standards; however, it should be assumed that government regulations or standards will increase in the future. New regulations or standards may result in increased costs, including costs for obtaining permits, delays or fines resulting from
loss of permits or failure to comply with regulations.
The Company’s products may not gain market acceptance, and as a
result it may be unable to generate significant revenues.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company has several products in development which do not
have the required manufacturing approvals or capabilities, clinical data and regulatory approvals necessary to be marketed in any jurisdiction; future clinical or preclinical results may be negative or insufficient to allow the Company to
successfully market any of its products under development; and obtaining needed data and results may take longer than planned, and may not be obtained at all.
Even if the Company’s products under development are approved for sale, they may
not be successful in the marketplace. Market acceptance of any of the Company’s products will depend on a number of factors, including: demonstration of clinical effectiveness and safety; the potential advantages of its products over
alternative treatments; the availability of acceptable pricing and adequate third-party reimbursement; and the effectiveness of marketing and distribution methods for the products. Providers, payors or patients may not accept the Company’s
products, even if they prove to be safe and effective and are approved for marketing by the FDA and other national regulatory authorities. The Company’s initial development product, SNP, became commercially available during the third quarter
of 2019 in the United States with initial sales beginning in early 2020. If the Company’s products do not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, and others in the medical community, its ability to generate significant revenues from
its products would be limited.
The Company may not achieve its projected development and commercial goals in the
time frames it announces and expects.
The Company sets goals for and may from time to time make public statements regarding
timing of the accomplishment of objectives related to AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM ReDSTM, SNP and/or its products under development, that are material to the Company’s success, such as the commencement and
completion of clinical trials, anticipated regulatory approval dates, and timing of product launches. The actual timing of these events can vary dramatically due to factors such as delays or failures in the Company’s clinical trials, the
uncertainties inherent in the regulatory approval process, and delays in achieving product development, manufacturing or marketing milestones. There can be no assurance that the Company’s clinical trials will be completed, that it will make
regulatory submissions or receive regulatory approvals as planned, or that it will be able to adhere to its current schedule for the scale-up of manufacturing and launch of any of its products. If the Company fails to achieve one or more of these
milestones as planned, that could materially affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company’s business involves the use of hazardous material, which requires
it to comply with environmental regulations.
The Company’s research and development processes and commercial activities may
involve the controlled storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous biological materials. The Company and the third-party service providers conducting manufacturing, research and development for the Company, are subject to laws
and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, and disposal of such materials and certain waste products. Although the Company believes that its safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials comply with the
standards prescribed by such laws and regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident, the Company could be held liable for any damages that result,
and any such liability could exceed its resources. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be required to incur significant costs to comply with current or future environmental laws and regulations, or that its business, financial
condition, and results of operations will not be materially or adversely affected by current or future environmental laws or regulations.
The Company’s insurance may not provide adequate coverage with respect to
environmental matters.
Environmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on the results of the
Company’s operations and its financial position.
The Company is subject to a broad range of environmental regulations imposed by
federal, state, provincial, and local governmental authorities. Such environmental regulation relates to, among other things, the handling and storage of hazardous materials, the disposal of waste, and the discharge of contaminants into the
environment. Although the Company believes that it is in material compliance with applicable environmental regulation, as a result of the potential existence of unknown environmental issues and frequent changes to environmental regulation and the
interpretation and enforcement thereof, there can be no assurance that compliance with environmental regulation or obligations imposed thereunder will not have a material adverse effect on the Company in the future.
The Company operates in an industry that is more susceptible to legal proceedings.
The Company may become involved in litigation.
The Company operates in an industry consisting of firms that are more susceptible to
legal proceedings than firms in other industries. This susceptibility is due to several factors, including but not limited to, the fact that the Company’s shares and those of its competitors are publicly traded, and the uncertainty and complex
regulatory environment involved in the development and sale of pharmaceuticals. The Company intends to vigorously defend such actions if and when they arise. Defense and prosecution of legal claims can be expensive and time consuming, may adversely
affect the Company regardless of the outcome due to the diversion of financial, management and other resources away from the Company’s primary operations, and could impact the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the
longer term. In addition, a negative judgment against the Company, even if the Company is planning to appeal such a decision, or even a settlement in a case, could negatively affect the cash reserves of the Company, and could have a material
negative effect on the development and sale of its products.
Indemnification obligations to the Company’s directors and senior management
may adversely affect its financial condition.
The Company has entered into agreements pursuant to which it will indemnify the
directors and senior management in respect of certain claims made against them while acting in their capacity as such. If the Company is called upon to perform its indemnity obligations, the Company’s financial condition will be adversely
affected. The Company is not currently aware of any matters pending or under consideration that may result in indemnification payments to any of its present or former directors or senior management.
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange movements since all of its sales are
denominated in U.S. currency.
The majority of the Company’s sales revenues and a substantial portion of its
selling, general and administrative expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. The Company does not utilize derivatives, such as foreign currency forward contracts and futures contracts, to manage its exposure to currency risk and as a result a
change in the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar could have a negative impact on the Company’s business prospects, financial results and financial condition. In the future, the Company may begin to utilize foreign exchange
rate mitigation and management strategies, however any such efforts, if they are not based on accurate predictions of future fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, may actually have a negative impact on the Company.
The Company may need to raise additional capital through the sale of its securities,
resulting in dilution to its existing shareholders. Such funds may not be available, or may not be available on reasonable terms, adversely affecting the Company’s operations.
To meet future cash needs or product acquisition requirements the Company may need to
rely on the taking on of debt and/or the sale of such securities for future financing, resulting in dilution to its existing shareholders. The Company’s long-term capital requirements may be significant and will depend on many factors,
including revenue and revenue growth, continued scientific progress in its product discovery and development program, progress in the maintenance and expansion of its sales and marketing capabilities, progress in its pre-clinical and clinical
evaluation of products and product candidates, time and expense associated with filing, prosecuting and enforcing its patent claims and costs associated with obtaining regulatory approvals. In order to meet such capital requirements, the Company
will consider contract fees, collaborative research and development arrangements, debt financing, public financing or additional private financing (including the issuance of additional equity securities) to fund all or a part of particular
programs.
The Company is exposed to risks given its significant dependence on revenue from the
sale of AGGRASTAT®.
The Company is largely dependent upon revenue from the sale of
AGGRASTAT®. If revenue from the sale of AGGRASTAT® is not maintained, the Company may have to reduce substantially or eliminate expenditures for research and development, testing, production and marketing of its
proposed products, or obtain funds through arrangements with corporate partners that require it to relinquish rights to certain of its technologies, assets or products.
The Company’s effective tax rates could increase.
The Company has operations in various countries that have differing tax laws and rates.
The Company’s tax reporting is supported by current domestic tax laws in the countries in which the Company operates and the application of tax treaties between the various countries in which the Company operates. The Company’s income
tax reporting is subject to audit by domestic and foreign authorities. The effective tax rate of the Company may change from year to year based on changes in the mix of activities and income earned among the different jurisdictions in which the
Company operates, changes in tax laws in these jurisdictions, changes in the tax treaties between various countries in which the Company operates, changes in the Company’s eligibility for benefits under those tax treaties and changes in the
estimated values of tax provisions and deferred tax assets. Tax laws, regulations and administrative practices in various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change, with or without notice, due to economic, political and other conditions,
and significant judgment is required in evaluating and estimating our provision and accruals for these taxes. Such changes could result in a substantial increase in the effective tax rate on all or a portion of the Company’s income.
The Company’s provision for income taxes is based on certain estimates and
assumptions made by management. The Company’s consolidated income tax rate is affected by the amount of pre-tax income earned in our various operating jurisdictions, the availability of benefits under tax treaties, and the rates of taxes
payable in respect of that income. The Company enters into many transactions and arrangements in the ordinary course of business in respect of which the tax treatment is not entirely certain. The Company therefore makes estimates and judgements
based on knowledge and understanding of the applicable tax laws and tax treaties and the application of those tax laws and tax treaties to the Company’s business, in determining the Company’s consolidated tax provision. For example,
certain countries could seek to tax a greater share of income than the Company will allocate to the business in such countries. The final outcome of any audits by taxation authorities may differ from the estimates and assumptions that the Company
may use in determining our consolidated tax provisions and accruals. This could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated income tax provision, financial condition and the net income for the period in which such
determinations are made.
The Company’s provision for tax liabilities, deferred tax assets and any related
valuation allowances are effect by events and transactions arising in the ordinary course of business, acquisitions of assets and businesses and non recurring items. The assessment of the appropriate amount of valuation allowance against the
deferred tax assets is dependent upon several factors, including estimates of the realization of deferred income tax assets, which realization will be primarily based on future taxable income, including the reversal of existing taxable temporary
differences. Significant judgement is applied to determine the appropriate amount of valuation allowance to record. Changes in the amount of any valuation allowance required could materially increase or decrease our provision for income taxes in a
given period.
Future issuance of the Company’s common shares will result in dilution to its
existing shareholders. Additionally, future sales of the Company’s common shares into the public market may lower the market price which may result in losses to its shareholders.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 10,804,013 common shares issued and
outstanding. A further 1,428,408 common shares are issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options (of which 1,059,308 were exercisable at December 31, 2019) and another 900,000 common shares are issuable upon exercise of share purchase
warrants, all of which may be exercised in the future resulting in dilution to the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s stock option plan allowed for the issuance of stock options to purchase up to a maximum of 20% of the outstanding
common shares at the time of the approval of the stock option plan, which resulted in a fixed number of stock options allowed to be granted totaling 2,934,403.
By Articles of Amendment filed by the Company under the Canada Business Corporations
Act on November 1, 2012, a consolidation of shares was completed to reduce the total number of outstanding shares.
On May 16, 2018, the Company announced that the TSX-V accepted the Company’s
notice of its intention to make a normal course issuer bid (the “2018 NCIB”). Under the terms of the 2018 NCIB, the Company could have acquired up to an aggregate of 794,088 common shares, representing five percent of the common shares
outstanding at the time of the application, over the twelve-month period that the 2018 NCIB was in place. The 2018 NCIB commenced on May 28, 2018 and ended on May 27, 2019. During the twelve months of the 2018 NCIB, the Company purchased and
cancelled 771,900 common shares for a total cost of $5.1 million. The prices that the Company paid for the common shares purchased was the market price of the shares at the time of purchase.
On May 30, 2019, the Company announced that the TSX-V accepted the Company’s
notice of intention to make an additional normal course issuer bid (the “2019 NCIB”). Under the terms of the 2019 NCIB, the Company may acquire up to an aggregate of 761,141 common shares, representing five percent of the common shares
outstanding at the time of the application, over the twelve-month period that the 2019 NCIB is in place. The 2019 NCIB commenced on May 30, 2019 and will end on May 29, 2020, or on such earlier date as the Company may complete its maximum purchases
allowed under the 2019 NCIB. From the commencement of the 2019 NCIB, the Company purchased and cancelled 421,300 common shares for a total cost of $2.1 million. The prices that the Company paid or will pay for common shares purchased was or will be
the market price of the shares at the time of purchase.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased and cancelled 751,800
(2018 – 441,400), common shares as a result of the 2018 NCIB and 2019 NCIB. The aggregate price paid for these common shares totaled $4.1 million (2018 - $3.0 million). During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company recorded $1.8 million
(2018 - $480,000) directly in its retained deficit representing the difference between the aggregate price paid for these common shares and a reduction of the Company’s share capital totaling $6.0 million (2018 - $3.5 million).
On December 20, 2019, the Company completed a Substantial Issuer Bid
(“SIB”) pursuant to which the Company purchased 4,000,000 of its common shares for cancellation at a set purchase price of $6.50 per common share for a total purchase price of $26.0 million in cash. The Company incurred an additional
$139,000 on transaction costs related to the SIB for a total aggregate purchase price paid of $26.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $5.5 million directly in its deficit representing the difference between the
aggregate price paid for these common shares and a reduction of the Company’s share capital totaling $31.6 million.
However, as described above, the Company may from time to time be required to finance
its operations through the sale of equity securities. In addition, it may be required to issue equity securities as consideration for services or asset acquisition transactions. Sales of substantial amounts of the Company’s common shares into
the public market, or even the perception by the market that such sales may occur, may lower the market price of its common shares.
The Company’s common shares may experience extreme price and volume volatility
which may result in losses to its shareholders.
The Company’s common shares historically have been subject to extreme
price and volume volatility. For example, during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, the high and low closing trading prices of the Company’s common shares on the TSX-V were CDN$6.85 and CDN$3.05 respectively, with a total
trading volume of 1,979,700 shares. Daily trading volume on the TSX-V of the Company’s common shares for the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has fluctuated, with a high of 323,400 shares and a low of no shares traded,
averaging approximately 7,887 shares per trading day.
The Company expects that the trading price of its common shares will continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors including announcement of material events by the Company, such as the dependence of revenue on a single product, the status of required regulatory approvals for its products,
competition by new products or new innovations, fluctuations in its operating results, general and industry-specific economic conditions and developments pertaining to patent and proprietary rights. The trading price of the Company’s common
shares may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors and/or announcements concerning such factors, including:
|
•
|
actual or anticipated period-to-period fluctuations in financial results;
|
|
•
|
litigation or threat of litigation;
|
|
•
|
failure to achieve, or changes in, financial estimates of individual investors and/or by securities analysts;
|
|
•
|
new or existing products or generic equivalents to products or services or technological innovations by the Company or its
competitors;
|
|
•
|
comments or opinions by securities analysts or major shareholders;
|
|
•
|
conditions or trends in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and life science industries;
|
|
•
|
significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
•
|
results of, and developments in, the Company’s manufacturing, research and development efforts, including results and adequacy of, and
developments in, its manufacturing activities, development activities, clinical trials and applications for regulatory approval;
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
•
|
sales of the Company’s common shares, including by holders of the notes on conversion or repayment by the Company in common
shares;
|
|
•
|
economic and other external factors or disasters or crises;
|
|
•
|
limited daily trading volume; and
|
|
•
|
developments regarding the Company’s patents or other intellectual property or that of its competitors.
|
In addition, the securities markets in the United States and Canada have recently
experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of pharmaceutical companies have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying
asset values or prospects of such companies.
There may not be an active, liquid market for the Company’s common
shares.
There is no guarantee that an active trading market for the Company’s common
shares will be maintained on the TSX-V. Investors may not be able to sell their shares quickly or at the latest market price if trading in its common shares is not active.
If there are substantial sales of the Company’s common shares, the market
price of its common shares could decline.
Sales of substantial numbers of the Company’s common shares could cause a decline
in the market price of its common shares. The Company has two significant shareholders that each own more than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company as of December 31, 2019. Any sales by existing shareholders or holders of options or
warrants may have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to raise capital and may adversely affect the market price of its common shares.
The Company has no history of paying dividends, does not intend to pay dividends in
the foreseeable future and may never pay dividends.
Since incorporation, the Company has not paid any cash or other dividends on its common
shares and does not expect to pay such dividends in the foreseeable future as all available funds will be invested to finance the growth of its business. The Company will need to achieve significant and prolonged profitability prior to any dividends
being declared, which may never happen.
If the Company is classified as a “passive foreign investment company”
for United States federal income tax purposes, it could have significant and adverse tax consequences to United States holders of its common shares.
The Company believes it was a “passive foreign investment company”
(“PFIC”) in one or more previous taxable years, but does not believe that it was a PFIC for the taxable years ended December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018, and does not expect that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending
December 31, 2020. (See more detailed discussion in Item 10E – Taxation). However, there can be no assurance that the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not challenge the determination made by the
Company concerning its PFIC status or that the Company will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. U.S. Holders who own common shares of the Company while it is a PFIC could have significant and adverse tax
consequences.
Risks associated with material weaknesses within the Company’s financial
reporting and review process
In connection with its review of the Company’s Internal Control over Financial
Reporting, the Company has identified material weaknesses with the Company’s financial reporting and review process, involving the accounting and reporting for complex transactions, due to limited staff not allowing for appropriate reviews of
such transactions. Any failure to remediate the material weaknesses, to implement the required new or improved control, or difficulties encountered in the implementation, could cause the Company to fail to meet its reporting obligations on a timely
basis or result in material misstatements in the annual or interim financial statements. Inadequate internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, which
could cause the Company’s stock price to decline.
New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for the Company’s
management to predict all risks. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are made only as of the date of this document. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of
new information, future events, or otherwise.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the Company
On December 22, 1999, the Company was formed by the amalgamation of Medicure Inc. with
Lariat Capital Inc. pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). The Company was continued from Alberta to the federal jurisdiction by Certificate of Continuance issued pursuant to the provisions of the Canada
Business Corporations Act on February 23, 2000.
The Company’s current legal and commercial name is Medicure Inc. and its current
registered office and head office is 2-1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 6C6.
In August 2006, the Company acquired the U.S. rights to its first commercial product,
AGGRASTAT® Injection (tirofiban hydrochloride) in the United States and its territories (Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands and Guam) for U.S. $19.0 million.
In September 2007, the Company monetized a percentage of its current and potential
future commercial revenues by entering into a debt financing agreement with Birmingham Associates Ltd. (“Birmingham”), an affiliate of Elliott Associates, L.P. (“Elliott”) for proceeds of US$25 million. This
debt was subsequently settled in July 2011 for consideration that included a royalty payable by the Company to Birmingham based on future commercial AGGRASTAT® sales until 2023. The royalty is based on four percent of the first $2.0
million of quarterly AGGRASTAT® sales, six percent on the portion of quarterly sales between $2.0 million and $4.0 million and eight percent on the portion of quarterly sales exceeding $4.0 million payable within 60 days of the end of
the preceding quarter.
In February 2008, the Company announced that its pivotal Phase III MEND-CABG II
clinical trials with MC-1 did not meet the primary endpoint and as a result was not sufficient to support the filings. As a result, the Company announced a restructuring plan that resulted in the organization reducing its head count by approximately
50 employees and full-time consultants. The restructuring and downsizing in March 2008 conserved capital for ongoing operations.
Since March 2008, the Company has continued to focus on the sale and marketing of
AGGRASTAT®. The Company has also explored and implemented a number of cost savings measures and has further downsized its operations. All these measures were initiated due to the restructuring plan announced towards the end of fiscal
2008. These activities assisted in further reducing the Company’s use of capital, in particular its investment in research and development programs, but have moved forward certain programs on a limited and focused fashion such as the
development and implementation of a new clinical, product and regulatory strategy for AGGRASTAT® and the development of additional generic cardiovascular products.
During calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016, as a part of its effort to expand sales of
AGGRASTAT®, the Company began to significantly increase the number of employees and otherwise increase expenses related to sales and marketing of AGGRASTAT®, and related to General and Administrative costs of the
Company.
On December 14, 2017 and subsequently up-dated on March 7, 2018, the Company announced
it had acquired, from Zydus Cadila (“Zydus”), an exclusive license to sell and market a branded cardiovascular drug, ZYPITAMAGTM (pitavastatin magnesium) in the United States and its territories for a term of seven
years with extensions to the term available. ZYPITAMAGTM is used for the treatment of patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia and was approved earlier in 2017 by the FDA for sale and marketing in the United States. The
Company launched the product using its existing commercial infrastructure during May 2018.
On January 28, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with Sensible Medical Innovations Inc. (“Sensible”) to become the exclusive marketing
partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDS™ is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid which is important in the management of congestive heart failure.
ReDS™ was already being marketed to United States hospitals by Sensible and the Company has begun marketing ReDS™ immediately using its existing commercial organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure will receive a
percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual sales quotas.
The Company received approval in August of 2018 from the FDA for its first ANDA for SNP
and Medicure’s product became available during the third quarter of 2019 in the United States with initial sales beginning in early 2020. As well, the Company is focused on the development of additional cardiovascular generic drugs which is
expected to transform the Company’s commercial suite of products to more than five approved products in 2021.
In 2020, the Company plans to further maintain selling, general and administrative
expenditure levels as it continues to focus on the sale of AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM, and SNP and the development of additional generic cardiovascular products.
The Company’s future
operations are dependent upon its ability to maintain sales of AGGRASTAT®, to increase sales of ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM and SNP and the development and/or acquisition of new products and/or secure additional capital,
which may not be available under favorable terms or at all.
If the Company is unable to maintain sales of AGGRASTAT®, grow sales of
ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM and SNP and develop and/or acquire new products, and/or raise additional capital, management will consider other strategies including cost curtailments, delays of research and development activities, asset
divestures and/or monetization of certain intangible assets.
On July 18, 2011, the Company borrowed $5,000,000 from the Government of Manitoba,
under the Manitoba Industrial Opportunities Program (“MIOP”), to assist with settling the Company’s debt to Birmingham. Effective August 1, 2013, the Company renegotiated this debt and received an additional two-year
deferral of principal repayments. Under the renegotiated terms, the loan continued to be interest only until August 1, 2015, when blended payments of principal and interest commenced, and the loan maturity date was extended to July 1, 2018. On
November 6, 2017, the Company repaid the MIOP loan from funds on hand from the proceeds of the Apicore Sale Transaction.
On July 3, 2014, the Company and its newly formed and wholly owned subsidiary, Medicure
U.S.A. Inc. (“Medicure USA”), entered into an arrangement whereby they acquired a minority interest in a pharmaceutical manufacturing business known as Apicore, along with an option to acquire all of the remaining issued shares
within the next three years. Specifically, the Company and Medicure USA acquired a 6.09% equity interest (5.33% on a fully-diluted basis) in two newly formed holding companies of which Apicore LLC and Apicore US LLC were to be wholly-owned operating
subsidiaries. The Company’s equity interest and certain other rights, including the option rights were obtained by the Company for services provided in its lead role in structuring a US$22.5 million majority interest purchase and financing of
Apicore. There was no cash outflow in connection with the acquisition of the minority interest in Apicore. The business and operations of Apicore were distinct from the Company, and the Company’s primary operating focus continued to remain on
the sale and marketing of AGGRASTAT®.
On November 17, 2016, in connection with the exercise of the
Company’s acquisition of the controlling ownership in Apicore, the Company received a term loan (the “Term Loan”) from Crown Capital Fund IV LP, an investment fund managed by Crown Capital Partners Inc.
(“Crown”) (TSX: CRN) for $60.0 million of which $30.0 million was syndicated to the Ontario Pension Board (“OPB”) a limited partner in Crown’s funds. Under the terms of the loan agreement with Crown, the
loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 9.5% per annum, compounded monthly and payable on an interest only basis, maturing in 48 months, and is repayable in full upon maturity. On November 17, 2017, the Company repaid the Crown loan from funds
on hand from the proceeds of the Apicore Sale Transaction. Additionally, the Company incurred an early prepayment penalty of $2.4 million relating to the early repayment of the Term Loan.
The Term Loan was used by the Company, acting through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Medicure Mauritius Limited, to exercise the Company’s option rights to purchase interests in Apicore, Inc. and Apicore LLC. The 2016 Apicore Transaction was closed on December 1, 2016. Apicore, Inc. and Apicore LLC are affiliated entities that
together operate the Apicore pharmaceutical business and are referred to together as “Apicore”. Apicore is a process research and development and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“APIs”) manufacturing service
provider for the worldwide pharmaceutical industry. The acquisition brought the Company’s indirect ownership interests in Apicore, Inc. to 64% (or approximately 59% on a fully diluted basis), and the Company’s indirect ownership in
Apicore LLC. to 64% (basic and fully-diluted). Five percent of Medicure’s ownership in Apicore LLC was then held by Apigen Investments Limited (“Apigen”), a Company which owned 100 percent of Apicore LLC, before the
Acquisition.
Medicure continued to have additional option rights until July 3, 2017 to acquire
additional shares in Apicore, Inc. and Apicore LLC at predetermined prices consistent with the value reflected in the 2016 Apicore Transaction. On July 3, 2017, the Company announced that its option to acquire additional shares in Apicore, which
otherwise would have expired, had been extended. The option covered an additional minority interest in Apicore (the “Minority Interest”) representing approximately 32% of the fully diluted shares of Apicore.
On July 10, 2017, the Company, acting through Medicure Mauritius Limited, exercised the
Company’s option rights to acquire the Minority Interest in Apicore Inc. and Apicore LLC from Apicore’s founding shareholders. The 2017 Apicore Transaction closed on July 12, 2017 and allowed for the acquisition of all of the shares of
Apicore Inc. and Apicore LLC held by the founding shareholders (representing approximately 32% of the fully diluted ownership of Apicore) for US$24.5 million, being the price provided for under the option. This acquisition brought Medicure’s
ownership in Apicore Inc. to approximately 98% (94% on a fully diluted basis).
On July 10, 2017, the Company announced that Apicore repaid the U.S.$9.8 million
secured loan previously provided to Apicore by Medicure. Additionally, Apicore provided a U.S.$14.8 million loan to Medicure bearing interest at 12% per annum with a term of three years. These funds were obtained from Apicore’s current
business which includes API sales, ANDA development partnership payments, and royalty and upfront payments from ANDA commercial partnerships. The loan proceeds were used by Medicure to help satisfy the purchase price of the 2017 Apicore
Transaction.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, employees and former directors of Apicore
exercised 292,500 stock options to acquire 292,500 Class E common shares of Apicore for gross proceeds to the company of U.S.$280,000. These shares, as well as 112,500 Class E common shares previously issued for gross proceeds of U.S.$48,000 were
then purchased by the Company upon the employees and former directors exercising their put right to the Company. This resulted in the Company acquiring 405,000 Class E common shares of Apicore for a total cost of U.S.$2.0 million during 2017. As a
result of the employees and former directors exercising their put right to the Company, the liability to repurchase Apicore Class E common shares on the statement of financial position in the Company’s consolidated financial statements was
reduced.
On October 3, 2017, the Company announced that it sold its interests in Apicore (the
“Sales Transaction”) to an arm’s length, pharmaceutical company (the “Buyer”). Under the Apicore Sale Transaction, the Company would receive net proceeds of approximately U.S.$105.0 million of which
approximately U.S.$55.0 million was received on October 3, 2017, with the remainder to be received in early 2018. These funds received and to be received by the Company were after payment of all transaction costs, the cashing in of Apicore’s
employee stock options, the redemption of the remaining shares of Apicore not owned by Medicure and other adjustments. Over the 18 months following the close of the transaction, additional payments could have become payable under the Apicore Sale
Transaction, in the form of contingent payments, including an earn out payment based on the achievement of certain financial results by Apicore following closing and other customary adjustments.
On February 1, 2018, the Company announced that it had
received the deferred purchase price proceeds of approximately U.S.$50.0 million from the Buyer as a result of the Apicore Sale Transaction. The U.S.$50.0 million was included in the total net proceeds of U.S.$105.0 million described earlier. The
Company did not receive any contingent payments based on an earn out formula as certain financial results within the Apicore business were not met following the Apicore Sale Transaction.
On February 13, 2019, the Company announced that it had received notice from the
purchaser of Medicure’s interests in Apicore of potential claims against funds held back in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore sale agreement. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed information to enable
Medicure to assess the merits of the claims with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback receivable. The Company continued to proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them with
a view to having the holdback funds released. In conjunction with the sale of Medicure’s interests in Apicore, representation and warranty insurance was obtained by the purchaser that could result in mitigation of the potential
claims.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement
with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was reached under which Medicure will receive a net payment of U.S. $5.1 million in relation
to the holdback.
The funds received from the Apicore sales transaction will be invested and used for
business and product development purposes and to fund operations as needed as well as funding the purchase of common shares under the Company’s recently completed substantial issuer bid.
Plan of Operation
Medicure is a pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization
of therapies for the United States cardiovascular market. The Company’s present focus is the sale and marketing of its cardiovascular products, AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM and SNP and the sale and marketing of the ReDS™ PRO medical device. The products are distributed in the United States and its territories through the Company’s U.S. subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc. The Company’s registered office and
head office is located at 2-1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 6C6.
On September 30, 2019 the Company announced that through its subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., it has acquired the ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM from Zydus for U.S. and Canadian markets. Under terms of the agreement, Zydus will receive an upfront payment of U.S. $5.0 million and
U.S. $2.0 million in deferred payments to be made over the next four years, as well as contingent payments on achievement of milestones and royalties related to net sales. With this acquisition Medicure obtained full control of marketing and pricing
negotiations for the product.
Previously, on December 14, 2017, the Company acquired from Zydus, an exclusive license
to sell and market ZYPITAMAGTM, a branded cardiovascular drug, in the United States and its territories for a term of seven years with extensions to the term available. ZYPITAMAGTM is used for the treatment of patients with
primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia and was approved in July 2017 by the FDA for sale and marketing in the United States. On May 1, 2018 ZYPITAMAGTM became commercially available in retail pharmacies throughout the United States.
The Company’s product launch utilized its existing commercial infrastructure and while not an in-hospital product like AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM added to the Company’s cardiovascular portfolio and expanded the
Company’s reach to new patients. ZYPITAMAGTM contributed revenue of $183,000 to Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $652,000 of revenue to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018. ZYPITAMAGTM is
still in the early stages of its commercialization and the Company continues to work towards growing the ZYPITAMAGTM brand, usage of the product and revenues from ZYPITAMAGTM. The 2018 revenues were higher than those earned in
2019 due to the initial ordering by wholesaler customers of the product.
The Company received approval in August of 2019 from the FDA for its first ANDA for SNP
and Medicure’s product became available during the third quarter of 2019 in the United States with initial sales beginning in early 2020.
On January 28, 2019 the Company announced it had entered into an agreement with
Sensible to become the exclusive marketing partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDSTM is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid which is important
in the management of congestive heart failure. The lung fluid measurements are used in guiding treatment and monitoring a heart failure patient’s condition and may lead to a significant decrease in readmissions and hospital costs. Clinical
studies have shown an 87% reduction in heart failure readmission rates for patients using the ReDS™ system at home for three months post-discharge versus those who were treated with usual care
alone. ReDS™ was already being marketed to U.S. hospitals by Sensible and Medicure began marketing ReDS™ immediately using its existing commercial
organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure receives a percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual sales quotas.
In addition, Medicure invested U.S. $10 million in Sensible for a 7.71% equity stake on
a fully diluted basis and in connection with this investment the Company acquired the license for ReDS™ in the United States. In connection with the investment, Medicure’s Chief Executive
Officer, Dr. Albert Friesen, was appointed to the Board of Directors of Sensible.
The Company has considered indicators of impairment as at December 31, 2019 and recorded a write-down of intangible assets related to the ReDSTM license
during the year ended December 31, 2019 totaling $6.3 million as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the
Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. Additionally, a loss of $6.3 million was recorded within other comprehensive loss from the
revaluation of the investment in Sensible made during the year ended December 31, 2019. Despite recording this impairment on the license over ReDSTM and the investment in Sensible Medical, the Company continues to market ReDS™ PRO and continues to work to safeguard or monetize the Company’s investment.
The Company’s research and development program is focused on making selective
research and development investments in certain additional acute cardiovascular generic and reformulation product opportunities, as well as continuing the development and implementation of its regulatory, brand and life cycle management strategy for
AGGRASTAT®. The Company is also continuing to explore neurological treatment applications of its legacy product P5P (MC-1, TARDOXALTM). The Company is focused on the development of additional cardiovascular generic drugs
which is expected to transform the Company’s commercial suite of products to five or more approved products in 2021.
The increased sales of AGGRASTAT® that was experienced over recent years
and the staged acquisition and subsequent sale of the Apicore business completed in 2016 and 2017 dramatically improved the Company’s financial position compared to previous years. The Company completed a SIB in December of 2019 where it
purchased and cancelled 4.0 million common shares at a set purchase price of $6.50 per common share resulting in the payment $26.0 million. After the closing of the transaction and despite lower cash balances and working capital levels, the
Company’s financial position remains strong..
The ongoing focus of the Company includes the sale of AGGRASTAT®,
ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDS™ PRO and SNP and the development of additional cardiovascular products. In parallel with the Company’s ongoing commitment to support AGGRASTAT®, its
valued customers and the continuing efforts of the commercial organization, the Company is in the process of developing and further implementing its regulatory, brand and life cycle management strategy for AGGRASTAT®. The objective of
this effort is to further expand AGGRASTAT®’s share of the glycoprotein GP IIb/IIIa (“GPI”) inhibitor market in the United States. GPIs are injectable platelet inhibitors used in the treatment of patients with
acute coronary syndrome (“ACS”). The marketing and sales of ZYPITAMAGTM became a key focus of the Company during 2018 and throughout 2019 and the marketing and sales of ReDSTM became a key focus of the
Company during the first quarter of 2019.
The Company has historically financed its operations principally through the net
revenue received from the sale of AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM and ReDSTM, the sale of its equity securities, the issuance and subsequent exercises of warrants and stock options, interest on excess funds held and the
issuance of debt. As announced on October 3, 2017, the Company sold the Apicore business for net proceeds to Medicure of approximately U.S. $105.0 million, as well as additional contingent payments. The funds generated from the sale of Apicore were
partially used to repay the Company’s long-term debt, fund the recently completed SIB and the remaining funds will continue to be used to finance the Company’s operations, development and growth moving forward.
Recent Developments
COVID-19
Subsequent to December 31, 2019, the outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus,
specifically identified as COVID-19, has resulted in governments worldwide enacting emergency measures to combat the spread of the virus. These measures, which include the implementation of travel bans, self-imposed quarantine periods and social
distancing, have caused material disruption to businesses globally resulting in an economic slowdown. Global equity markets have experienced significant volatility and weakness. Governments and central banks have reacted with significant monetary
and fiscal interventions designed to stabilize economic conditions. The duration and impact of the COVID-19 outbreak is unknown at this time, as is the efficacy of the government and central bank interventions. It is not possible to reliably
estimate the length and severity of these developments and the impact on the liquidity, financial results and condition of the Company and its operating subsidiaries in future periods.
Substantial issuer bid
On November 4, 2019 the Company announced its intention to commence a SIB (the
“Offer”) pursuant to which the Company offered to purchase up to 4.0 million of its common shares (the “Common Shares”) for cancellation at a set purchase price of $6.50 per Common Share for a total purchase price of up to
$26.0 million in cash. The Offer commenced on November 13, 2019 and expired at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on December 19, 2019.
A
total of 10,154,952 Common Shares were properly deposited under the Offer and not withdrawn. As the Offer was oversubscribed, the Company purchased Common Shares deposited on a pro rata basis following the determination of the final results of the
Offer. Tendering shareholders had approximately 39.4% of their tendered Common Shares purchased by the Company under the Offer. The Common Shares that were purchased under the Offer represented approximately 27.0% of the outstanding Common Shares as
at the time that the Offer was commenced. After giving effect to the Offer, the Company had 10,804,013 Common Shares outstanding.
The Offer was funded from the Company’s existing cash on hand. The Company
believed Medicure’s underlying value and its long-term growth prospects were not reflected in the trading price of its Common Shares prior to the announcement of the SIB. As such, Medicure believes that the purchase of Common Shares under the
Offer represented a reasonable use of a portion of its significant cash resources resulting from the Company’s successful purchase and subsequent sale of the Apicore business.
During the ten months ended October 31, 2019, the closing prices of the Common Shares
on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) ranged from a low of $3.00 to a high of $6.85. The closing price of the Common Shares on the TSXV on November 1, 2019 (the last full trading day before the announcement of the SIB) was $3.22. The
purchase price of $6.50 per Common Share represented a 101.9% premium over the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSXV on November 1, 2019.
The Offer was optional for all shareholders, who were free to choose whether to
participate and how many Common Shares to tender. Shareholders who did not deposit their Common Shares (or whose Common Shares were not purchased under the Offer) realized a proportionate increase in their equity interest in the Company.
As more than 4.0 million Common Shares were
properly tendered to the Offer, Medicure took-up and paid for the tendered Common Shares on a pro-rata basis according to the number of Common Shares tendered (with adjustments to avoid the purchase of fractional Common Shares). The Offer was not conditional upon any minimum number of Common Shares being tendered but was subject to various other conditions disclosed in the Offer Documents.
Neither the Company nor its board of directors made any recommendation to any
shareholder whether to tender or refrain from tendering Common Shares. Shareholders were strongly urged to read and carefully evaluate all information in the Offer Documents and to consult their own broker or other financial and tax advisors prior
to making any decision with respect to the Offer.
The Company suspended its existing normal course
issuer bid (“NCIB”) in connection with the commencement of the Offer and no subsequent purchases were completed under such NCIB prior to completion of the Offer.
The Company had engaged Computershare Trust Company of Canada
to act as the depositary (the “Depository”) for the Offer. Any Common Shares deposited under the Offer but not purchased, including any Common Shares invalidly deposited, were returned to the depositing shareholders by the
Depositary.
The full details of the Offer were described in the
Company’s offer to purchase and issuer bid circular dated November 1, 2019, as well as the related letter of transmittal and notice of guaranteed delivery, copies of which are available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.com.
Completion of SAVI-PCI study
On December 17, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the Shortened
AGGRASTAT® (tirofiban hydrochloride) injection versus Integrilin® (eptifibatide) in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SAVI-PCI) Clinical Trial.
SAVI-PCI was a randomized, multicenter, open-label study enrolling 535 patients at
thirteen sites in the United States, which compared tirofiban high-dose bolus injection followed by a maintenance infusion for 1-2 hours post-PCI to label-dosing eptifibatide (double bolus followed by 12-18 hour maintenance infusion). Comparisons to
a long-infusion tirofiban arm (high-dose bolus injection followed by 12-18 hour maintenance infusion post-PCI) were also performed. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess whether the short infusion tirofiban regimen in patients undergoing
PCI was non-inferior to the aforementioned eptifibatide regimen. The primary endpoint was a composite rate of death, periprocedural myonecrosis, urgent target vessel revascularization (uTVR) or in-hospital, non-CABG related major bleeding within 48
hours following PCI or hospital discharge, whichever comes first, quantified according to REPLACE-2 criteria. This study was sponsored by Medicure.
Topline results of the SAVI-PCI trial will be communicated in 2020.
Completion of enrolment of the FABOLUS-FASTER trial
On December 12, 2019, the Company
announced the completion of the FABOLUS-FASTER Phase 4 trial, a randomized, open-label, multi-center trial assessing different
regimens of intravenous platelet inhibitors, notably tirofiban and cangrelor (an IV P2Y12 inhibitor) in the early phase of primary PCI. The study enrolled 120 patients. The Company expects to release top-line data in 2020.
FABOLUS-FASTER was funded by a grant
from the Company. This study does not imply comparable efficacy, safety, or product interchangeability. Please note that the use of AGGRASTAT® in STEMI
patients has not been approved by the FDA. As of this time, neither AGGRASTAT® nor any of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are indicated for the use in STEMI patients. AGGRASTAT® is approved for use in NSTE-ACS
patients.
Topline results of the FABOLUS-FASTER Phase 4
trial will be communicated in 2020.
Settlement of holdback receivable
On February 13, 2019, the Company announced that it had received notice from the
purchaser of Medicure’s interests in Apicore of potential claims against funds held back in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore sale agreement. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed information to enable
Medicure to assess the merits of the claims with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback receivable. The Company continued to proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them with
a view to having the holdback funds released. In conjunction with the sale of Medicure’s interests in Apicore, representation and warranty insurance was obtained by the purchaser that could result in mitigation of the potential
claims.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement
with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was reached under which Medicure received a net payment of U.S. $5.1 million in relation to
the holdback receivable.
Patent infringement filing
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced it had filed a patent infringement action
against Nexus in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement action is in response to Nexus’ filing of an ANDA seeking
approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® (tirofiban hydrochloride) injection before the expiration of the ‘660 patent.
The ‘660 patent is listed in FDA’s Orange Book for
AGGRASTAT®. Medicure will vigorously defend the ‘660 patent and will pursue the patent infringement action against Nexus and all other legal options available to protect its product.
SMILE™-HF study demonstrates use of ReDSTM results in
reductions in hospital readmission rates
On October 15, 2019 the Company announced the primary results
of the late-breaking SMILETM-Heart Failure (“SMILE-HF”) Clinical Trial which was presented at the Heart Failure Society of America (“HFSA”) conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania by Dr. William T.
Abraham, the SMILE-HF national principal investigator.
The SMILE-HF trial demonstrated that when used as intended, ReDS™ treatment
guided heart failure management prevented 58% of heart failure readmission(s). Data was collected from 268 patients by 43 centers across the United States, constituting the largest randomized control trial to date on the impact of ReDS™ on
managing heart failure. Patients were recruited for the study during hospitalization and followed for up to nine months at home. Daily measurements were taken using ReDS™ with the goal of keeping lung fluid content within the normal range of
20-35%. Data aggregated in the cloud was sent to physicians to monitor and adjust medication with the goal to keep each patient’s fluid status balanced and avoid hospital readmission.
Preferred pricing agreement for ZYPITAMAGTM with the ADAP Crisis Task
Force
On October 3, 2019, the Company announced that it reached a preferred pricing agreement
with the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (“ADAP”) Crisis Task Force for ZYPITAMAGTM. The agreement will open access to ZYPITAMAGTM tablets to low income, underinsured and uninsured Americans who qualify for ADAP
coverage in states where ZYPITAMAGTM has been adopted onto the ADAP formulary.
The ADAP Crisis Task Force negotiates reduced drug prices for all ADAP formularies. ADAP formularies provide HIV treatment to low income, uninsured, and
underinsured individuals living with HIV/AIDS in all 50 states and the US territories. The ADAP Crisis Task Force was formed in 2002, and is currently comprised of representatives from Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York,
North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington state HIV/AIDS divisions.
Acquisition of full US ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM
On September 30, 2019 the Company announced that through its subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., it acquired the ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM from Cadila Healthcare Ltd., India (“Zydus”) for the U.S. and Canadian markets. Under terms of the agreement, Zydus will receive
an upfront payment of U.S. $5.0 million and U.S. $2.0 million in deferred payments to be made over the next four years, as well as contingent payments on the achievement of milestones and royalties related to net sales.
Medicure previously had acquired U.S. marketing rights with a profit-sharing
arrangement. With this acquisition Medicure obtained full control of marketing and pricing negotiations for the product.
Launch of ReDSTM PRO
On September 17, 2019 the Company announced the
launch of the ReDSTM PRO (“ReDSTM PRO”) system, the next generation of lung fluid management technology for heart failure. The debut of the new system took place at the HFSA conference in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. ReDSTM PRO is optimized for the point-of-care market, designed for use in hospitals and sub-acute facilities. ReDSTM PRO utilizes non-invasive low energy radio frequency technology that produces reliable fluid
volume readings after only 45 seconds of measurement. The ReDSTM PRO can be utilized across the continuum of hospital care, from the emergency department to discharge and subacute rehabilitation.
Medicure previously announced, on January 28, 2019, that it had entered an agreement
with Sensible to become the exclusive marketing partner for the ReDS™ point of care system in the United States, a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid which is
important in the management of congestive heart failure. The ReDSTM PRO represents the next generation of this device.
An impairment on the license over ReDSTM and the Company’s investment
in Sensible was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019, as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the
Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. The Company is continuing to market the ReDS™ PRO for the
clinical management of congestive heart failure and working to safeguard or monetize the investment in Sensible.
Settlement of Patent Infringement Action
On August 21, 2019 the Company announced that its subsidiary, Medicure International
Inc., settled its ongoing patent infringement action against Gland in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, which alleged infringement of the ‘660 patent. As part of the settlement, Gland has acknowledged that the ‘660
patent is valid, enforceable and infringed. The settlement resulted in the Company entering into a license agreement with Gland with an anticipated launch date for Gland’s generic product of March 1, 2023. The remaining terms of the settlement
are confidential.
The Company had filed the patent infringement action against Gland alleging
infringement of the ‘660 patent. The patent infringement action was in response to Gland’s filing of an ANDA seeking approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® before the expiration of the ‘660
patent. The ‘660 patent is listed in the FDA’s orange book with an expiry date of May 1, 2023.
Grant of Stock Options
On June 26, 2019, the Company announced that the Board of Directors approved the grant
of an aggregate of 262,000 stock options to certain directors, officers, employees and management company employees of the Company pursuant to its stock option plan. These options, which were subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange, are
set to expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and were issued at an exercise price of $4.95 per share.
Appointment of President and Chief Operating Officer
On June 26, 2019, the Company announced that Dr. Neil Owens has been appointed
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective July 1, 2019. In this capacity, Dr. Owens will be responsible for implementing the Company’s strategic plans, and overseeing day-to-day operations, including the advancement and
management of new and existing pharmaceutical products. Dr. Albert Friesen had served as the Company’s President since May of 2016 and will continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Chair of its Board of
Directors.
Normal Course Issuer Bid
On May 30, 2019, the Company announced that the TSXV has accepted the Company’s
notice of intention to make a NCIB (the “2019 NCIB”).
Under the terms of the 2019 NCIB, Medicure could acquire up to an aggregate of 761,141
common shares. In the opinion of the Company, its common shares had been trading at prices that did not reflect its underlying value. Accordingly, Medicure believed that purchasing its common shares for cancellation, at the then present pricing,
represented an opportunity to enhance value for its shareholders.
As of May 29, 2019, the Company had 15,222,813 common shares outstanding, of which
6,758,666 common shares represented the public float of Medicure. Under TSXV policies, Medicure was entitled to purchase up to the maximum of 761,141 common shares, representing 5% of the then common shares outstanding, over the 12-month period that
the 2019 NCIB is in place.
The 2019 NCIB commenced on May 30, 2019 and will end on May 29, 2020, or on such
earlier date as Medicure may complete its maximum purchases under the 2019 NCIB. The actual number of common shares which will be purchased, if any, and the timing of such purchases will be determined by the Company. All common shares purchased by
the Company will be purchased on the open market through the facilities of TSXV by PI Financial Corp. (“PI”) acting on behalf of the Company in accordance with the policies of the TSXV and will be surrendered by the Company to its
transfer agent for cancellation. The prices that the Company paid or will pay for common shares purchased will be the market price of the shares at the time of purchase.
The Company also announced that it had entered into an automatic share purchase plan
with PI (the “Plan”) in order to facilitate repurchases of its common shares under the 2019 NCIB. Under the Plan, PI may purchase common shares under the 2019 NCIB at times when the Company would ordinarily not be permitted to do
so, due to regulatory restrictions or self-imposed blackout periods.
Purchases under the Plan will be made by PI based upon parameters prescribed by the
TSXV, applicable Canadian securities laws and terms of the Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased and cancelled 421,300 of
its common shares between May 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019 for a total cost to the Company of $2.1 million under the 2019 NCIB.
The Company suspended the 2019 NCIB in connection with its commencement of the SIB and no subsequent purchases were completed under the 2019
NCIB for the remainder of 2019.
Under the Company’s previous NCIB, which expired on May 27, 2019, the Company
purchased and cancelled 771,900 of its common shares between May 28, 2018 and May 27, 2019 for a total cost to the Company of $5.1 million.
Appointment of Ms. Manon Harvey to the Company’s Board of
Directors
On May 15, 2019, the Company announced the appointment of Manon Harvey CPA, CA, to the
Board of Directors. Ms. Harvey is a CPA, CA, and holds a Bachelor of Commerce (summa cum laude) from the University of Ottawa. Additionally, Ms. Harvey has her ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors. In January 2019, she
joined the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan Campus as Director, Integrated Planning and Chief Budget Officer where she is responsible for supporting the University’s mission through long range financial planning, financial
advice and effective resource allocation strategies. For the prior 21 years as Vice-President, Finance and Corporate Services for the Canada Foundation for Innovation (“CFI”), Ms. Harvey was responsible for the finance function,
human resources, information technology, and administrative services. She was an Officer of the CFI Board of Directors, and served as the Secretary and Treasurer. For over 10 years, until June 2014, she was both a member of the Board of Directors,
as well as Chair of the Audit Committee, for Hydro Ottawa. She is an external member of the Departmental Audit Committee of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Agreement to Market ReDS™
Device
On January 28, 2019 the Company announced it had entered into an agreement with
Sensible to become the exclusive marketing partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDSTM is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid which is important
in the management of congestive heart failure. The lung fluid measurements are used in guiding treatment and monitoring a heart failure patient’s condition and may lead to a significant decrease in readmissions and hospital costs. Clinical
studies have shown an 87% reduction in heart failure readmission rates for patients using the ReDS™ system at home for three months post-discharge versus those who were treated with usual care
alone. ReDS™ was already being marketed to U.S. hospitals by Sensible and Medicure began marketing ReDS™ immediately using its existing commercial
organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure receives a percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual sales quotas.
In addition, Medicure invested U.S. $10.0 million in Sensible for a 7.71% equity stake
on a fully diluted basis and in connection with this investment the Company acquired the license for ReDS™ in the United States. In connection with the investment, Medicure’s Chief Executive
Officer, Dr. Albert Friesen, was appointed to the Board of Directors of Sensible.
An impairment on the license over ReDSTM and the Company’s investment
in Sensible was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019, as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the
Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. The Company is continuing to market the ReDS™ PRO for the
clinical management of congestive heart failure and working to safeguard or monetize the investment in Sensible.
Commercial:
In fiscal 2007, the Company through its wholly owned Barbadian subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., acquired the U.S. rights to its first commercial product, AGGRASTAT®, in the United States and its territories (Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Guam). AGGRASTAT®, a GPI, is used for the treatment of
ACS, including UA, which is characterized by chest pain when one is at rest, and non Q wave MI. AGGRASTAT® is indicated to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events (combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or
refractory ischemia/repeat cardiac procedure) in patients with non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (“NSTE ACS”). Under a contract with Medicure International Inc., the Company’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Medicure
Pharma Inc., continues to support, market and distribute the product.
Net AGGRASTAT® product sales for year ended December 31, 2019 were $19.4
million compared to $28.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company currently sells finished AGGRASTAT® to drug wholesalers.
These wholesalers subsequently sell AGGRASTAT® to hospitals where health care providers administer the drug to patients. Wholesaler management decisions to increase or decrease their inventory of AGGRASTAT® may result
in sales of AGGRASTAT® to wholesalers that do not track directly with demand for the product at hospitals.
Hospital demand for AGGRASTAT® was lower during 2019 than the prior year
however the number of new hospital customers using AGGRASTAT® continued to increase leading to patient market share held by the product increasing to approximately 67% as at December 31, 2019. The Company’s commercial team
continues to work on expanding its customer base, however this continued increase in the customer base for AGGRASTAT® has not directly resulted in corresponding revenue increases as the Company continues to face increased competition
resulting from further genericizing of the Integrilin market which has created pricing pressures on AGGRASTAT® combined with lower hospital demand for the product. The Company continues to expect strong performance from the
AGGRASTAT® brand, due primarily to its patient market share, however diversifying revenues away from a single product became increasingly important to the Company.
The number of new customers reviewing and implementing AGGRASTAT®
increased sharply since October 11, 2013 as a result of FDA approval of the High Dose Bolus (“HDB”) regimen for AGGRASTAT® and due to the increased marketing and promotional efforts of the Company.
As all of the Company’s sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar
improved in value against the Canadian dollar when comparing the year ended December 31, 2019 with the year ended December 31, 2018, this led to increased AGGRASTAT® revenues, however this was offset by the increasing price pressures
facing AGGRASTAT® when comparing the two periods as well as decreases in demand.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced it had filed a patent infringement action
against Nexus in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of the ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement action is in response to Nexus’ filing of an ANDA seeking
approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® before the expiration of the ‘660 patent.
The ‘660 patent is listed in the FDA’s orange book with an expiry date of
May 1, 2023. Medicure will vigorously defend the ‘660 patent and will pursue the patent infringement action against Nexus and all other legal options available to protect its product.
Previously, on November 16, 2018, the Company filed a patent infringement action
against Gland in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of the ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement actions were in response to Gland’s filing of an ANDA
seeking approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® before the expiration of the ‘660 patent.
On August 21, 2019 the Company announced that its subsidiary, Medicure International
Inc., has settled this ongoing patent infringement action. As part of the settlement, Gland has acknowledged that the ‘660 patent is valid, enforceable and infringed. The settlement resulted in the Company entering into a license agreement
with Gland with an anticipated launch date for Gland’s generic product of March 1, 2023. The remaining terms of the settlement are confidential.
On September 30, 2019 the Company announced that through its subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., it has acquired the ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM from Zydus for U.S. and Canadian markets. Under terms of the agreement, Zydus will receive an upfront payment of U.S. $5.0 million and
U.S. $2.0 million in deferred payments to be made over the next four years, as well as contingent payments on achievement of milestones and royalties related to net sales. With this acquisition Medicure obtained full control of marketing and pricing
negotiations for the product.
Previously, on December 14, 2017, the Company acquired from Zydus, an exclusive license
to sell and market ZYPITAMAGTM, a branded cardiovascular drug, in the United States and its territories for a term of seven years with extensions to the term available. ZYPITAMAGTM is used for the treatment of patients with
primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia and was approved in July 2017 by the FDA for sale and marketing in the United States. On May 1, 2018 ZYPITAMAGTM became commercially available in retail pharmacies throughout the United States.
The Company’s product launch utilized its existing commercial infrastructure and while not an in-hospital product like AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM added to the Company’s cardiovascular portfolio and expanded the
Company’s reach to new patients. ZYPITAMAGTM contributed revenue of $183,000 to Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $652,000 of revenue to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018. ZYPITAMAGTM is
still in the early stages of its commercialization and the Company continues to work towards growing the ZYPITAMAGTM brand, usage of the product and revenues from ZYPITAMAGTM. The 2018 revenues were higher than those earned in
2019 due to the initial ordering by wholesaler customers of the product.
On October 3, 2019, the Company announced that it has reached a preferred pricing
agreement with the ADAP Crisis Task Force for ZYPITAMAGTM. The agreement will open access to ZYPITAMAGTM tablets to low income, underinsured and uninsured Americans who qualify for ADAP coverage in states where
ZYPITAMAGTM has been adopted onto the ADAP formulary.
The ADAP Crisis Task Force negotiates reduced drug prices for
all ADAP formularies. ADAP formularies provide HIV treatment to low income, uninsured, and underinsured individuals living with HIV/AIDS in all 50 states and the US territories. The ADAP Crisis Task Force was formed in 2002, and is currently
comprised of representatives from Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington state HIV/AIDS divisions.
On January 28, 2019 the Company entered into an agreement with Sensible to become the
exclusive marketing partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDS™ is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate, actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid
which is important in the management of congestive heart failure. The lung fluid measurements are used in guiding treatment and monitoring a heart failure patient’s condition and may lead to a significant decrease in readmissions and hospital
costs. Clinical studies have shown an 87% reduction in heart failure readmission rates for patients using the ReDS™ system at home for three months post-discharge versus those who were treated with
usual care alone. ReDS™ is already marketed to U.S. hospitals by Sensible and Medicure expects to begin marketing ReDS™ immediately using its
existing commercial organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure will receive a percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual sales quotas.
On September 17, 2019 the Company announced the
launch of the ReDSTM PRO system, the next generation of lung fluid management technology for heart failure. The debut of the new system took place at the HFSA conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ReDSTM PRO is optimized
for the point-of-care market, designed for use in hospitals and sub-acute facilities. ReDSTM PRO utilizes non-invasive low energy radio frequency technology that produces reliable fluid volume readings after only 45 seconds of
measurement. The ReDSTM PRO can be utilized across the continuum of hospital care, from the emergency department to discharge and subacute rehabilitation. The ReDSTM PRO represents the next generation of
ReDSTM.
On October 15, 2019 the Company announced the primary results
of the late-breaking SMILE-HF Clinical Trial which was presented at the HFSA conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania by Dr. William T. Abraham, the SMILE-HF national principal investigator.
The SMILE-HF trial demonstrated that when used as intended, ReDS™ treatment
guided heart failure management prevented 58% of heart failure readmission(s). Data was collected from 268 patients by 43 centers across the United States, constituting the largest randomized control trial to date on the impact of ReDS™ on
managing heart failure. Patients were recruited for the study during hospitalization and followed for up to nine months at home. Daily measurements were taken using ReDS™ with the goal of keeping lung fluid content within the normal range of
20-35%. Data aggregated in the cloud was sent to physicians to monitor and adjust medication with the goal to keep each patient’s fluid status balanced and avoid hospital readmission.
The Company has considered indicators of impairment as at December 31, 2019 and
recorded a write-down of intangible assets related to the ReDSTM license during the year ended December 31, 2019 totaling $6.3 million as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the
sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. Additionally, a loss of $6,336
was recorded within other comprehensive loss from the revaluation of the investment in Sensible made during the year ended December 31, 2019. Despite recording the impairment on the license over ReDSTM and the investment in Sensible
Medical, the Company continues to market ReDS™ PRO and continues to work to safeguard or monetize the Company’s investment.
On August 13, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA has approved its ANDA for SNP.
SNP is indicated for the immediate reduction of blood pressure for adult and pediatric patients in hypertensive crisis. The product is also indicated for producing controlled hypotension in order to reduce bleeding during surgery and for the
treatment of acute congestive heart failure. The filing of the ANDA was previously announced by the Company on December 13, 2016. Medicure’s SNP has recently become available in the United States with the initial sales from SNP being recorded
subsequent to December 31, 2019 in January of 2020.
On October 31, 2017, the Company acquired an exclusive license to sell and market
PREXXARTAN®, which treats hypertension, in the U.S. and its territories from Carmel for a seven-year term with extensions to the term available. Medicure acquired the license rights for an upfront payment of U.S.$100,000, with an
additional U.S.$400,000 payable on final FDA approval. Carmel would also be entitled to receive royalties and milestone payments from the net revenues of PREXXARTAN®. PREXXARTAN® had been granted tentative approval by
the FDA and the tentative approval was converted to final approval on December 19, 2017.
As announced on March 19, 2018 and up-dated on March 28, 2018, all PREXXARTAN®
related activities were placed on hold by the Company pending the resolution of a dispute that Medicure became aware of between the owner of the New Drug Application (“NDA”), Carmel and the third-party manufacturer of the
product. The Company was also named in a civil claim in Florida between the third-party manufacturer and Carmel. The claim disputed the rights granted to Medicure by Carmel in regards to PREXXARTAN®. More recently the claim against
the Company was withdrawn, however the dispute between Carmel and the third-party manufacturer continues.
Medicure had intended to launch PREXXARTAN® during the first half of
2018. To date, only an up-front payment of U.S.$100,000, has been made to Carmel in regards to PREXXARTAN® and the Company has reserved all of its rights under the license agreement with Carmel for
PREXXARTAN®.
Going forward and contingent on sufficient finances being available, the Company
intends to further expand revenue through marketing and promotional activities, strategic investments related to AGGRASTAT® and ZYPITAMAGTM, the sales and marketing of ReDSTM and SNP, as well as the licensing,
acquisition and/or development of other cardiovascular products that fit the commercial organization.
Research and Development:
The Company’s research and development activities are predominantly conducted by
its wholly-owned Barbadian subsidiary, Medicure International Inc.
AGGRASTAT®
One of the primary ongoing research and development activities is the continued
development and further implementation of a new regulatory, brand and life cycle management strategy for AGGRASTAT®. The extent to which the Company is able to invest in this plan is dependent upon the availability of sufficient
finances and the expected returns from those investments.
An important aspect of the AGGRASTAT® strategy was the revision of its
approved prescribing information. On October 11, 2013, the Company announced that the FDA approved the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen, as requested under Medicure’s sNDA. The AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen (25 mcg/kg within 5
minutes, followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min) has become the recommended dosing for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with NSTE ACS.
The Company believes that further expanded indications and dosing regimens could
provide added value to further maximize the revenue potential for AGGRASTAT®. The Company is currently exploring the potential to make such changes, and the Company may need to conduct appropriate clinical trials, obtain positive
results from those trials, or otherwise provide support in order to obtain regulatory approval for such proposed indications and dosing regimens.
On April 23, 2015, the Company announced that the FDA approved a revision to the
duration of the bolus delivery for the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen. The dosing change and label modification was requested by the Company to help health care professionals more efficiently meet patient-specific administration needs and to
optimize the implementation of AGGRASTAT® at new hospitals. The newly approved labeling supplement now allows the delivery duration of the AGGRASTAT® HDB (25 mcg/kg) to occur anytime within 5 minutes, instead of the
previously specified duration of 3 minutes. This change was part of the Company’s ongoing regulatory strategy to expand the applications for AGGRASTAT®.
On September 10, 2015, the Company announced that it submitted a sNDA to the FDA to
expand the label for AGGRASTAT® to include the treatment of patients presenting with STEMI. If approved for STEMI, AGGRASTAT® would be the first in its class of GPIs to receive such a label in the United
States.
In previous communication with the Company, the FDA’s Division of Cardiovascular
and Renal Drug Products indicated its willingness to review and evaluate this label change request based substantially on data from the On-TIME 2 study, with additional support from published studies and other data pertinent to the use of the
AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen in the treatment of STEMI. The efficacy and safety of the HDB regimen in STEMI has been evaluated in more than 20 clinical studies involving over 11,000 patients and is currently recommended by the ACCF/AHA
Guideline for the Management of STEMI.
On July 7, 2016, the Company received a Complete Response Letter
(“CRL”) from the FDA for its sNDA requesting an expanded indication for patients presenting with STEMI. The FDA issued the CRL to communicate that its initial review of the application was completed; however, it could not approve
the application in its present form and requested additional information. The Company continues to work directly with the FDA to address these comments and explore other options available.
The sNDA filing was accompanied by a mandatory U.S. $1.2 million user fee paid by
Medicure International Inc. to the FDA. In December 2016, the Company received a waiver and full refund of the user fee which had been paid and expensed during fiscal 2015.
On September 1, 2016, the Company announced that it had received approval from the FDA
for its bolus vial product format for AGGRASTAT®.
This product format is a concentrated, 15 ml vial containing sufficient drug to
administer the FDA approved, HDB of 25 mcg/kg given at the beginning of treatment. AGGRASTAT® is also sold in two other sizes, a 100 ml vial and a 250 ml bag. The existing, pre-mixed products continue to be available, providing a
convenient concentration for administering the post-HDB maintenance infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/min. (Approved Dosing: Administer intravenously 25 mcg/kg within 5 minutes and then 0.15 mcg/kg/min for up to 18 hours). Commercial launch of the bolus vial
occurred during the fourth quarter of 2016 and the Company continues to believe this product format will have a positive impact on hospital utilization of AGGRASTAT®.
Another aspect of the AGGRASTAT® strategy is to advance studies related
to the contemporary use and future regulatory positioning of the product. On May 10, 2012, the Company announced the commencement of enrolment in a clinical trial of AGGRASTAT® entitled SAVI-PCI. SAVI-PCI is a randomized, open-label
study enrolling patients undergoing PCI at sites across the United States. The study was designed to evaluate whether patients receiving the HDB regimen of AGGRASTAT® (25 mcg/kg bolus over 3 minutes) followed by an infusion of 0.15
mcg/kg/min for a shortened duration of 1 to 2 hours will have outcomes that are similar, or “non-inferior,” to patients receiving a 12 to 18-hour infusion of Integrilin® (eptifibatide) (Merck & Co., Inc.) at its FDA approved
dosing regimen.
The primary objective of SAVI-PCI is to demonstrate AGGRASTAT® is
non-inferior to Integrilin with respect to the composite endpoint of death, PCI-related myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, or major bleeding within 48 hours following PCI or hospital discharge. The secondary objectives of
this study include the assessment of safety as measured by the incidence of major bleeding.
The first patient was enrolled in June 2012. Enrolment was completed during the fourth
quarter of 2018 and on December 17, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the Shortened AGGRASTAT® (tirofiban hydrochloride) injection versus Integrilin® (eptifibatide) in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
(SAVI-PCI) Clinical Trial. Topline results of the SAVI-PCI trial will be communicated in 2020.
The Company is also providing funding for a number of investigator sponsored research
projects targeting contemporary utilization of AGGRASTAT® relative to its competitors. On December 12, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the FABOLUS-FASTER Phase 4 trial, a randomized,
open-label, multi-center trial assessing different regimens of intravenous platelet inhibitors, notably tirofiban and cangrelor (an IV P2Y12 inhibitor) in the early phase of primary PCI. The study
enrolled 120 patients. The Company expects to release top-line data in 2020.
FABOLUS-FASTER was funded by a grant
from the Company. This study does not imply comparable efficacy, safety, or product interchangeability. Please note that the use of AGGRASTAT® in STEMI
patients has not been approved by the FDA. As of this time, neither AGGRASTAT® nor any of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are indicated for the use in STEMI patients. AGGRASTAT® is approved for use in NSTE-ACS
patients.
Cardiovascular Generic and Reformulation Products
Through an ongoing research and development investment, the Company is exploring new
product opportunities in the interest of developing future sources of revenue and growth.
On August 13, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA has approved its ANDA for SNP.
SNP is indicated for the immediate reduction of blood pressure for adult and pediatric patients in hypertensive crisis. The product is also indicated for producing controlled hypotension in order to reduce bleeding during surgery and for the
treatment of acute congestive heart failure. The filing of the ANDA was previously announced by the Company on December 13, 2016. Medicure’s SNP has recently become available in the United States with the initial sales from SNP being recorded
subsequent to December 31, 2019 in January of 2020.
The Company is focused on the development of two additional cardiovascular generic
drugs. When combined with the ANDA described above and the acquisition of ZYPITAMAGTM and the marketing partnership for ReDSTM, the Company expects to transform its commercial suite of products to at least five approved
products in 2021.
The Company had been devoting a modest amount of resources to its research and
development programs, including, but not limited to the development of TARDOXALTM (pyridoxal 5 phosphate (“P5P”) formerly known as MC-1) for neurological conditions such as Tardive Dyskinesia. This work included, but
was not limited to, working with the FDA to better understand and refine the next steps in development of the product. The advancement of TARDOXALTM is currently on hold. The Company changed its focus from TARDOXALTM to other
uses of P5P and continues to devote time and resources to the advancement of P5P development.
The following table summarizes the Company’s research and development programs,
their therapeutic focus and their stage of development.
Product Candidate
|
Therapeutic
focus
|
Stage of
Development
|
AGGRASTAT®
|
Acute Cardiology
|
Approved/Marketed – Additional studies
underway
|
ZYPITAMAGTM
|
Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia
|
Approved/Marketed
|
ReDSTM
|
Heart Failure – Medical Device
|
Approved/Marketed
|
PREXXARTAN®
|
Hypertension
|
Approved – Commercial launch on
hold
|
SNP
|
Acute Cardiology
|
ANDA approved/Marketed
|
Generic ANDA 2
|
Acute Cardiology
|
ANDA filed
|
Generic ANDA 3
|
Acute Cardiology
|
Formulation development underway
|
TARDOXALTM/P5P
|
TD/Neurological indications
|
TARDOXAL
TM – On hold
P5P - Regulatory and clinical planning
underway
|
Other Products
The Company is investing in the research and development of other new product development opportunities. The Company is also exploring opportunities to grow the business through
acquisition. The Company has evaluated and continues to evaluate the acquisition or license of other approved commercial products with the objective of further broadening its product portfolio and generating additional revenue.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had numerous
issued United States patents (see Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc. below).
Competitors’ Current Products
AGGRASTAT®, is owned by the
Company’s subsidiary, Medicure International, Inc., and is sold in the United States of America through the Company’s subsidiary, Medicure Pharma, Inc. AGGRASTAT® is indicated to reduce the rate of thrombotic
cardiovascular events (combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia/repeat cardiac procedure) in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
AGGRASTAT® competes in a market
segment commonly referred to as the anti-thrombotic market (treatments to remove or prevent formation of blood clots). More specifically, AGGRASTAT® is an antiplatelet drug which affects thrombus (blood clot) formation by preventing
the aggregation of platelets in the blood stream. Of the different classes of antiplatelet drugs, AGGRASTAT® is a representative of the glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitors drug class. There are three of these agents approved for use,
including abciximab (ReoPro®), eptifibatide (Integrilin®), and tirofiban (AGGRASTAT®). All three are proprietary drugs and
only eptifibatide has generic equivalents, which were introduced beginning in December 2015. Of the two directly competing agents, AGGRASTAT® is most closely comparable to eptifibatide (Integrilin) as they are both highly potent,
small molecule drugs that have reversible antiplatelet effects.
The launch of the injectable antiplatelet agent, cangrelor (KengrealTM), by The Medicines Company, occurred in 2015 and has had some impact on the use and sale of GPIs,
including AGGRASTAT®.
The initial launch of generic versions of
eptifibatide (Integrilin) occurred in December 2015 and could impact the utilization of AGGRASTAT® in the future.
Due to the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases, the market for antihyperlipidemics is large and competition is intense. There are a number of approved
antihyperlipidemic drugs, currently on the market, awaiting regulatory approval or in development. ZYPITAMAGTM will compete with these drugs to the extent ZYPITAMAGTM and any of these drugs are approved for the same or similar
indications.
Although ZYPITAMAGTM would be
positioned as a relatively low-cost therapy, in certain circumstances, other treatment approaches are lower cost and may for this reason be preferred by health care professionals.
SNP was launched into a genericized market with
several competitors already selling generic versions of the product and as such there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in launching SNP in 2020 and growing sales for the product. The failure of the Company to successfully launch
and grow sales of SNP, or to establish a viable market for the Company’s version of the product, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
Competitors’
Products in Development
At present the Company is not aware of any other
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in mid to late stage clinical development. However, the choice and use of AGGRASTAT® may be affected by the continued advancement of new antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents, including the recently
approved oral antiplatelet agents, ticagrelor (Brilinta®) and prasugrel (Effient®). Any future launch of generic version of AGGRASTAT® and/or of other competitive drugs may also be expected to impact
utilization of the Company’s drug. Many companies, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, are conducting development of products that are intended to address the same or a similar medical need. Many of these companies have
much larger financial and other resources than the Company does, including those related to research and development, manufacturing, and sales and marketing. The Company also faces competition in recruiting scientific personnel from colleges,
universities, agencies, and research organizations who seek patent protection and licensing agreements for the technologies they develop.
There are a number of approved antihyperlipidemic drugs, currently on the market, awaiting regulatory approval or in development. ZYPITAMAGTM will compete with these
drugs to the extent ZYPITAMAGTM and any of these drugs are approved for the same or similar indications.
SNP is being sold into a genericized market with
several competitors already selling generic versions of the product and as such there is no assurance that the Company will be successful at growing sales of its SNP in 2020. The failure of the Company to successfully launch and grow sales of SNP,
or to establish a viable market for the Company’s version of the product, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term profitability.
Divesture of Apicore
On October 3, 2017, the Company sold its
interests in Apicore (the “Apicore Sale Transaction”) to an arm’s length, pharmaceutical company (the “Buyer”). Under the Apicore Sale Transaction, the Company received net proceeds of approximately U.S.
$105.0 million of which approximately U.S. $55.0 million was received on October 3, 2017, with the remainder received in early 2018. There is also a holdback that was to be received in 2019 as per the terms of the agreements. These funds received by
the Company were after payment of all transaction costs, the compensation paid to holders of Apicore’s employee stock options, the redemption of the remaining shares of Apicore not owned by Medicure and other adjustments.
On February 1, 2018, the
Company received the deferred purchase price proceeds of approximately U.S. $50.0 million from the Buyer as a result of the Apicore Sale Transaction. The U.S. $50.0 million was included in the total net proceeds of U.S. $105.0 million described
earlier. The Company did not receive any contingent payments based on an earn out formula as certain financial results within the Apicore business were not met following the Apicore Sale Transaction.
On February 13, 2019, the Company announced that
it had received notice from the purchaser of Medicure’s interests in Apicore of potential claims against funds held back in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore sale agreement. The notice did not contain sufficiently
detailed information to enable Medicure to assess the merits of the claims with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback receivable. The Company continued to proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to
satisfactorily resolve them with a view to having the holdback funds released. In conjunction with the sale of Medicure’s interests in Apicore, representation and warranty insurance was obtained by the purchaser that could result in mitigation
of the potential claims.
On
December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was
reached under which Medicure will receive a net payment of U.S. $5.1 million in relation to the holdback receivable.
Competitive Strategy and
Position
The Company is primarily focusing on:
|
●
|
Maintaining and growing AGGRASTAT® sales in the United States
|
The Company continues to work to expand the
sales of AGGRASTAT® in the United States. The use of AGGRASTAT® is recommended by the AHA and ACC Guidelines for the treatment of ACS. AGGRASTAT® has been shown, to reduce the rate of thrombotic
cardiovascular events (combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia/repeat cardiac procedure) in patients with NSTE ACS.
As stated previously, one of the
Company’s primary ongoing research and development activities is the continued development and further implementation of a new regulatory, brand and life cycle management strategy for AGGRASTAT®.
An important aspect of the
AGGRASTAT® strategy was the revision of its approved prescribing information. On October 11, 2013, the Company announced that the FDA approved the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen, as requested under Medicure’s sNDA. The
AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen (25 mcg/kg within 5 minutes, followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min) has become the recommended dosing for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with NSTE ACS.
The Company believes that further expanded
indications and dosing regimens could provide added value to further maximize the revenue potential for AGGRASTAT®. The Company is currently exploring the potential to make such changes, and the Company may need to conduct appropriate
clinical trials, obtain positive results from those trials, or otherwise provide support in order to obtain regulatory approval for such proposed indications and dosing regimens.
On September 1, 2016, the Company announced
that it had received approval from the FDA for its bolus vial product format for AGGRASTAT®. The product format is a concentrated, pre-mixed, 15 ml vial designed specifically for convenient delivery of the AGGRASTAT®
bolus dose (25 mcg/kg). Development of the bolus vial was in response to feedback from interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab nurses from across the United States. Commercial launch of the bolus vial took place in October of 2016
and the Company continues to believe this product format will have a positive impact on hospital utilization of AGGRASTAT®.
The Company is also providing funding for a
number of investigator sponsored research projects targeting contemporary utilization of AGGRASTAT® relative to its competitors. On December 12, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the
FABOLUS-FASTER Phase 4 trial, a randomized, open-label, multi-center trial assessing different regimens of intravenous platelet inhibitors, notably tirofiban and cangrelor (an IV P2Y12 inhibitor) in the
early phase of primary PCI. The study enrolled 120 patients. The Company expects to release top-line data in 2020.
|
●
|
Growing sales of ZYPITAMAGTM in the United States
|
On September 30, 2019 the Company announced
that through its subsidiary, Medicure International Inc., it has acquired the ownership of ZYPITAMAGTM from Zydus for U.S. and Canadian markets. Under terms of the agreement, Zydus will receive an
upfront payment of U.S. $5,000 and U.S. $2,000 in deferred payments to be made over the next four years, as well as contingent payments on achievement of milestones and royalties related to net sales.
Previously, on December 14, 2017, the
Company acquired from Zydus, an exclusive license to sell and market ZYPITAMAGTM, a branded cardiovascular drug, in the United States and its territories for a term of seven years with extensions to the term available.
ZYPITAMAGTM is used for the treatment of patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia and was approved in July 2017 by the FDA for sale and marketing in the United States. On May 1, 2018 ZYPITAMAGTM became
commercially available in retail pharmacies throughout the United States. The Company’s product launch utilized its existing commercial infrastructure and while not an in-hospital product like AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM
added to the Company’s cardiovascular portfolio and expanded the Company’s reach to new patients. ZYPITAMAGTM contributed revenue of $183,000 to Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $652,000 of revenue to the
Company during the year ended December 31, 2018. ZYPITAMAGTM is still in the early stages of its commercialization and the Company continues to work towards growing the ZYPITAMAGTM brand, usage of the product and revenues from
ZYPITAMAGTM. The 2018 revenues were higher than those earned in 2019 due to the initial ordering by wholesaler customers of the product.
|
●
|
Growing sales of ReDSTM in the United States
|
On January 28, 2019 the Company entered into
an agreement with Sensible to become the exclusive marketing partner for ReDS™ in the United States. ReDS™ is a non-invasive, FDA-cleared medical device that provides an accurate,
actionable and absolute measurement of lung fluid which is important in the management of congestive heart failure. The lung fluid measurements are used in guiding treatment and monitoring a heart failure patient’s condition and may lead to a
significant decrease in readmissions and hospital costs. Clinical studies have shown an 87% reduction in heart failure readmission rates for patients using the ReDS™ system at home for three
months post-discharge versus those who were treated with usual care alone. ReDS™ is already marketed to U.S. hospitals by Sensible and Medicure expects to begin marketing ReDS™ immediately using its existing commercial organization. Under the terms of the agreement, Medicure will receive a percentage of total U.S. sales revenue of the device and must meet minimum annual
sales quotas.
On September 17, 2019 the Company announced the launch of the ReDSTM PRO system, the next generation of lung fluid management technology for heart failure. The debut of the new system took place at the HFSA conference in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. ReDSTM PRO is optimized for the point-of-care market, designed for use in hospitals and sub-acute facilities. ReDSTM PRO utilizes non-invasive low energy radio frequency technology that produces
reliable fluid volume readings after only 45 seconds of measurement. The ReDSTM PRO can be utilized across the continuum of hospital care, from the emergency department to discharge and subacute rehabilitation. The ReDSTM
PRO represents the next generation of ReDSTM.
The Company has considered indicators of
impairment as at December 31, 2019 and recorded a write-down of intangible assets related to the ReDSTM license during the year ended December 31, 2019 totaling $6.3 million as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being
experienced in regards to the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding
ReDSTM. Additionally, a loss of $6.3 million was recorded within other comprehensive loss from the revaluation of the investment in Sensible made during the year ended December 31, 2019. Despite recording this impairment on the license
over ReDSTM and the investment in Sensible Medical, the Company continues to market ReDS™ PRO and continues to work to safeguard or monetize the Company’s
investment.
|
●
|
Acquisitions, licensing or marketing partnerships for new commercial products
|
The Company continues to explore additional
opportunities for the acquisition or licensing of other cardiovascular products that fit the commercial organization.
|
●
|
Developing additional cardiovascular generic and reformulation products
|
On August 13, 2018, the Company announced
that the FDA has approved its ANDA for SNP. SNP is indicated for the immediate reduction of blood pressure for adult and pediatric patients in hypertensive crisis. The product is also indicated for producing controlled hypotension in order to reduce
bleeding during surgery and for the treatment of acute congestive heart failure) The filing of the ANDA had been previously announced by the Company on December 13, 2016. Medicure’s SNP has recently
become available in the United States with the initial sales from SNP being recorded subsequent to December 31, 2019 in January of 2020.
Medicure is also developing two additional
generic versions of acute cardiovascular drugs and is exploring other potential opportunities.
C. Organizational Structure
Medicure International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was
incorporated pursuant to the laws of Barbados, West Indies, on May 23, 2000. Medicure International, Inc.’s registered office is located at Whitepark House, White Park Road, Bridgetown, Barbados. Medicure International Inc.’s head office
is located at 1st Floor Limegrove Centre Holetown, St. James, Barbados.
Medicure Pharma, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, on September 30, 2005.
Medicure Pharma Inc.’s registered office is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware, 19808. Medicure Pharma, Inc.’s head office is located at 116 Village Blvd. Suite 202, Princeton, NJ, 08540.
Medicure U.S.A., Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was
incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, on June 23, 2014. Medicure U.S.A. Inc.’s registered office is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware, 19808.
Medicure Mauritius Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company was
incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Republic of Mauritius on November 17, 2016. Medicure Mauritius Limited’s registered office is 6th floor, Tower A, 1 CyberCity, Ebene, Mauritius.
Apigen Investments Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was
incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Republic of Mauritius on June 27, 2014. Apigen Investments Limited’s registered office is 4th floor, Tower A, 1 CyberCity, Ebene, Mauritius.
Medicure Pharma Europe Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was
incorporated pursuant to the laws of Ireland on October 17, 2017. Medicure Pharma Europe Limited’s registered office is Block 3, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt Road, Dublin 2.
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Office Space
Included within the business and administration services agreement
entered into with Genesys Venture Inc. (see Item 5F - Contractual Obligations), is the use of office space at Genesys Venture Inc.’s head office located at 1250 Waverley Street in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. As at December 31, 2019,
the Company had use of approximately 14,720 square feet.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND
PROSPECTS
This section contains forward-looking statements involving risks and
uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under part Item 3D - Risk Factors. The following
discussion of the financial condition, changes in financial conditions and results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with IFRS included under Item 18 to this Annual Report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with
IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
Areas where management has made critical judgments in the process of applying accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the
consolidated financial statements include the determination of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ functional currencies.
Information about key assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities
within the next financial year are included in the following notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
●
|
The valuation of the investment in Sensible Medical
|
|
●
|
The valuation of the royalty obligation
|
|
●
|
The provisions for returns, chargebacks, rebates and
discounts
|
|
●
|
The measurement of intangible assets
|
|
●
|
The measurement of the amount and assessment of the recoverability of income tax
assets and income tax provisions
|
Valuation of financial instruments
Financial Assets
Initial recognition and measurement
Upon recognition of a financial asset, classification is made based on the business model for managing the asset and the asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics. The
financial asset is initially recognized at its fair value and subsequently classified and measured as (i) amortized cost; (ii) FVOCI; or (iii) FVTPL. Financial assets are classified as FVTPL if they have not been classified as measured at amortized
cost or FVOCI. Upon initial recognition of an equity instrument that is not held-for-trading, the Company may irrevocably designate the presentation of subsequent changes in the fair value of such equity instrument as FVTPL
Subsequent measurement
The subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on their classification
as follows:
Financial assets measured at amortized cost
A financial asset is subsequently measured at amortized cost, using the
effective interest method and net of any impairment allowance, if the asset is held within a business whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows; and the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise, on
specified dates, to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest. Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable are classified within this category.
Financial assets at FVTPL
Financial assets measured at FVTPL are carried in the statement of financial
position at fair value with changes in fair value therein recognized in the statement of net (loss) income. The holdback receivable was classified within this category.
Financial assets at FVOCI
Financial assets measured at FVOCI are carried in the statement of financial
position at fair value with changes in fair value therein recognized in the statement of comprehensive (loss) income. The Investment in Sensible Medical was classified within this category.
Derecognition
A financial asset or, where applicable a part of a financial asset or part of a
group of similar financial assets is derecognized when the contractual rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the
received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement; and either (a) the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Company has neither
transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
Financial liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
The Company recognizes a financial liability on the trade date in which it
becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument at fair value plus any directly attributable costs. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost or FVTPL, and are not subsequently reclassified. The
Company’s financial liabilities are accounts payable and accrued liabilities, royalty obligation and acquisition payable which are recognized on an amortized cost basis.
The royalty obligation was recorded at its fair value at the date at which the
liability was incurred and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method at each reporting date. Estimating fair value for this liability required determining the most appropriate valuation model which was
dependent on its underlying terms and conditions. This estimate also required determining expected revenue from AGGRASTAT® sales and an appropriate discount rate and making assumptions about them.
The acquisition payable was recorded at its fair value at the date at which the
liability was incurred and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method at each reporting date. Estimating fair value for this liability required determining an appropriate discount rate.
Offsetting of financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount
reported in the statement of financial position if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities
simultaneously.
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value is determined based on the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Typically, fair value is determined by
using quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs. When
observable valuation inputs are not available, significant judgement is required through determining the valuation technique to apply, the valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis and selecting inputs. The use of alternative
valuation techniques or valuation inputs may result in a different fair value.
Transaction costs
Transaction costs for all financial instruments measured at amortized cost, the transaction costs are included in the initial measurement of the financial asset or financial
liability and are amortized using the effective interest rate method over a period that corresponds with the term of the financial instruments. Transaction costs for financial instruments classified as FVTPL are recognized as an expense in
professional fees, in the period the cost was incurred.
Embedded Derivatives
For financial liabilities measured at amortized cost, under certain conditions,
an embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative. An embedded derivative causes some or all of the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the contract to be modified according to a specified
interest rate, financial instrument price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, a credit rating or credit index, or other variable, provided in the case of a non-financial variable that the variable is not specific to a
party to the contract. For financial assets at FVTPL, any embedded derivatives are not separated from its host contract.
Provision for returns, chargebacks, rebates and
discounts
The Company has three commercially available products that generated revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2019, AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAG™ and ReDSTM (the “Products”) which it sells to United States customers. AGGRASTAT® and ZYPITAMAG™ are sold to wholesalers for resale; with
AGGRASTAT® primarily being sold by the wholesalers to hospitals, while ZYPITAMAG™ is primarily sold by wholesalers to pharmacies. The Company sells ReDSTM directly to end users. Revenue from the sale of AGGRASTAT® and
ZYPITAMAG™ is recognized upon the receipt of goods by the wholesaler, the point in time in which title and control of the transferred goods pass from the Company to the wholesale customer. At this point in time, the wholesaler has gained the
sole ability to route the goods, and there are no unfulfilled obligations that could affect the wholesaler’s acceptance of the goods. Delivery of the product occurs when the goods have been received at the wholesaler in accordance with the
terms of the sale. Revenue from the sale of ReDSTM is recognized upon the receipt of goods by the end user, the point in time in which title and control of the transferred goods pass from the Company to the customer. At this point in
time, the customer has gained the sole ability to benefit from the product, and there are no unfulfilled obligations that could affect the customer’s acceptance of the goods. Delivery of the product occurs when the goods have been shipped to
the customer and the customer has accepted the products in accordance with the terms of the sale.
Sales are
made subject to certain discounts available for prompt payment, volume discounts, rebates or chargebacks. Revenue from these sales is recognized based on the price specified per the pricing terms of the sales invoices, net of the estimated
discounts, rebates or chargebacks. Variable consideration is based on historical information, using the expected value method. Revenue is only recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal will not occur. A
liability is included within accounts payable and accrued liabilities and is measured for expected payments that will be made to the customers for the discounts in which they are entitled. Sales do not contain an element of financing as sales are
made with credit terms within the normal operating cycle of the date of the invoice, which is consistent with market practice.
The measurement of intangible assets
Intangible assets that are acquired separately are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Subsequent expenditures are capitalized only
when they increase the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which they relate. All other expenditures are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.
Licenses are amortized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of
the acquired license. Patents and drug approvals are amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life of the respective patent, ranging from five to twenty years, or its economic life, if shorter. Trademarks are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the legal life of the respective trademark, being ten years, or its economic life, if shorter. Customer lists are amortized on a straight-line basis over approximately twelve years, or its economic life, if shorter.
Amortization on licenses commences when the intangible asset is available for
use, which would typically be in connection with the commercial launch of the associated product under the license.
Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. The cost of servicing the Company’s
patents and trademarks are expensed as incurred.
The amortization method and amortization period of an intangible asset with a
finite useful life are reviewed at least annually. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the amortization period or method, as
appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates in the consolidated statements of net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income.
The measurement of the amount and assessment of the recoverability of
income tax assets
The Company and its subsidiaries are generally taxable under the statutes of
their country of incorporation.
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred taxes. Current taxes and
deferred taxes are recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that they relate to a business combination, or items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current taxes are the expected tax receivable or payable on the taxable income
or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax receivable or payable in respect of previous years.
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for deferred taxes.
Under this method, deferred taxes are recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred taxes are not
recognized for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, and differences relating to
investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, deferred taxes are not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the
initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred taxes are measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax
entities, but they intend to settle current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses, tax credits and
deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
The Company has provided for income taxes, including the impacts of tax
legislation in various jurisdictions, in accordance with guidance issued by accounting regulatory bodies, the Canada Revenue Agency, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, the Barbados Revenue Authority, the Mauritius Revenue Authority, as well as other
state and local governments through the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Additional guidance and interpretations can be expected and such guidance, if any, could impact future results. While management continues to
monitor these matters, the ultimate impact, if any, as a result of the application of any guidance issued in the future cannot be determined at this time.
The Company and its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns in Canada, the
United States, Barbados and other foreign jurisdictions, as well as various provinces and states in Canada and the United States, respectively. The Company and its subsidiaries have open tax years, primarily from 2010 to 2019, with significant
taxing jurisdictions, including Canada, the United States and Barbados. These open years contain certain matters that could be subject to differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations and tax treaties, as they relate to the
amount, timing or inclusion of revenues and expenses, or the sustainability of income tax positions of the Company and its subsidiaries. Certain of these tax years may remain open indefinitely.
Tax benefits acquired as part of a business combination, but not satisfying the
criteria for separate recognition at that date, would be recognized subsequently if information about facts and circumstances changed. The adjustment would either be treated as a reduction to goodwill if it occurred during the measurement period or
in profit or loss, when it occurs subsequent to the measurement period.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS
Set out below is the impact of the mandatory adoption of the new accounting standard:
IFRS 16, Leases (“IFRS 16”)
Effective January 1, 2019, the Company has adopted IFRS 16 using the modified
retrospective approach, recognizing a right of use asset equal to the lease liability at the date of initial application, and prior periods were not restated. IFRS 16 which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases, with
exemptions available for leases with a term that is twelve (12) months or less, or where the underlying asset is of a low value.
Unless exempted, as noted above, upon inception of a lease, lessees will be required to recognize a right-of use (“ROU”) asset, representing the Company’s
right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability representing its obligation for lease payments due to the lessor. ROU assets and the corresponding liability are initially measured at the present value of non-cancellable payments, including
those made in accordance with an option period when the Company expects to exercise an option period to extend or not terminate a lease.
Effective November 1, 2014, the Company entered into a sub-lease with Genesys Venture Inc. (“GVI”), a related party, to lease office space at a rate of $170,000 per
annum for three years ending October 31, 2017, with an 18-month renewal period available. The lease was amended on May 1, 2016 and increased the leased area covered under the lease agreement at a rate of $212,000 per annum until October 31, 2019
with an 18-month renewal period available. The leased area covered under the lease was again increased, effective November 1, 2018 at a rate of $306,000 per annum until the end of the term of the lease. The discount rate used by the Company in
calculating the lease obligation relating to the ROU asset is five percent.
The impact of the adoption of IFRS 16 on the Company’s statement of financial position at January 1, 2019 is as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Impact of transition to IFRS 16
|
|
|
January 1, 2019
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$
|
316,000
|
|
|
$
|
677,000
|
|
|
$
|
993,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
377,000
|
|
|
$
|
377,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
316,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
316,000
|
|
The impact of the adoption of the Company’s operating lease commitments to the lease obligations recognized as a result of the adoption of IFRS 16 is as follows:
Operating lease commitments, including renewal options, as at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
715,000
|
|
Adjustment of lease commitments to present value of lease liability
|
|
|
(38,000
|
)
|
Lease obligation as at January 1, 2019
|
|
$
|
677,000
|
|
Effective November 1, 2019, the Company modified and extended its sub-lease
with GVI to lease a reduced amount of office space at a rate of $238,000 per annum for three years ending October 31, 2022 with an 18-month renewal period available. This resulted in an increase to the ROU asset of $685,000. As at December 31, 2019,
the lease obligation of the statement of financial position totaled $1.1 million with $240,000 recorded as the current portion of the lease obligation.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD NOT YET ADOPTED
Amendments to IFRS 3 – definition of a business:
In October 2018, the International Accounting Standards Board
(“IASB”) issued amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations, that seek to clarify whether a transaction results in an asset or a business acquisition. The amendments include an election to use a concentration test. This is a simplified
assessment that results in an asset acquisition if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. The amendments apply to businesses acquired in
annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
A. Operating Results
General
Through 2019, the Company was focused on maintaining and growing the sales
AGGRASTAT® and ZYPITAMAGTM and the commercial launch of ReDSTM. The Company earned its initial revenue from SNP in January of 2020.
Historically, the Company concentrated primarily on research and development
and continues to invest a significant amount of funds in research and development activities. To date, the Company has yet to and may never derive any revenues from its research and development products.
The Company has a limited operating history and its prospects must be
considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered with the establishment of a business in a highly competitive industry, characterized by frequent new product introductions.
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2018
Net AGGRASTAT® product sales for year ended December 31, 2019
were $19.4 million compared to $28.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company currently sells finished AGGRASTAT® to drug wholesalers. These wholesalers subsequently sell AGGRASTAT® to hospitals where health care
providers administer the drug to patients. Wholesaler management decisions to increase or decrease their inventory of AGGRASTAT® may result in sales of AGGRASTAT® to wholesalers that do not track directly with demand
for the product at hospitals.
Hospital demand for AGGRASTAT® was lower during 2019 than the
prior year however the number of new hospital customers using AGGRASTAT® continued to increase leading to patient market share held by the product increasing to approximately 67% as at December 31, 2019. The Company’s commercial
team continues to work on expanding its customer base, however this continued increase in the customer base for AGGRASTAT® has not directly resulted in corresponding revenue increases as the Company continues to face increased
competition resulting from further genericizing of the Integrilin market which has created pricing pressures on AGGRASTAT® combined with lower hospital demand for the product. The Company continues to expect strong performance from
the AGGRASTAT® brand, due primarily to its patient market share, however diversifying revenues away from a single product has become increasingly important to the Company.
As all of the Company’s sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and the
U.S. dollar improved in value against the Canadian dollar when comparing the year ended December 31, 2019 with the year ended December 31, 2018, which led to increased AGGRASTAT® revenues, however this was offset by the increasing
price pressures facing AGGRASTAT® when comparing the two periods and decreased demand.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, ReDSTM contributed revenue of $618,000 from the sale of the product in the United States.
Net ZYPITAMAGTM product sales for year ended December 31, 2019 were
$183,000 compared to $652,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company currently sells ZYPITAMAGTM to drug wholesalers. These
wholesalers subsequently sell ZYPITAMAGTM to pharmacies who in turn sell the product to patients. The decrease in ZYPITAMAGTM product sales for the year ended December 31, 2019 is a result of initial stocking at the wholesale
level during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company expects ZYPITAMAGTM revenues to grow throughout 2020 and beyond.
Cost of goods sold represents direct product costs associated with AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM and SNP including write-downs for obsolete
inventory, amortization of the related intangible assets and royalties paid on ZYPITAMAGTM.
AGGRASTAT® cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $3.6 million compared to $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease to
cost of goods sold is the result of lower volume of AGGRASTAT product sold, as well as a higher percentage of 250 ml bags sold versus the other AGGRASTAT® formats.
ReDSTM cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2019
totaled $904,000 and consisted of $263,000 paid to Sensible in relation to ReDSTM from the revenue sharing arrangement relating to product sold by the Company during 2019 and $641,000 related to the amortization of the ReDSTM
license, which was recorded on the statement of financial position within intangible assets, prior to the impairment recorded over the ReDSTM intangible assets.
ZYPITAMAGTM cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2019
totaled $1.9 million and includes $34,000 relating to product sold to the Company’s wholesale customers, $1.0 million relating to a write-down of ZYPITAMAGTM product inventory, $797,000 from amortization of the
ZYPITAMAGTM license and $2,000 relating to royalties on the sale of ZYPITAMAGTM resulting from the acquisition of the product in September of 2019.
The cost of goods sold related to SNP relates to an impairment loss on the
write-down of inventory of $940,000 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of reduced selling prices for the product experienced in the market pertaining to SNP.
Selling expenses include salaries and related costs for those employees
involved in the commercial operations of the Company, as well as costs associated with marketing, promotion, distribution of the Company’s products as well as market access activities and other commercial activities. The expenditures are
required to support sales and marketing efforts of AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM, ReDSTM and SNP.
Selling expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $13.4 million compared to $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Commercial sales expenses decreased during the year ended December 31, 2019 as
compared to the prior year due to commercial launch costs relating to ZYPITAMAGTM being incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018 as well as cost reductions implemented by the Company during 2019.
General and administrative expenses include the cost of administrative
salaries, ongoing business development and corporate stewardship activities and professional fees such as legal, audit, investor and public relations.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were
$3.4 million compared to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily related to lower share-based compensation expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.
Research and development expenditures include costs associated with the Company’s clinical development and preclinical programs including salaries, monitoring and other
research costs. The Company expenses all research costs and has not had any development costs that meet the criteria for capitalization under IFRS. Prepaid research and development costs represent advance payments under contractual arrangements for
clinical activity outsourced to research centers.
Net research and development expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2019
were $4.3 million compared to $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Research and development expenditures include costs associated with the Company’s on-going AGGRASTAT® development, clinical development and
preclinical programs including salaries, research centered costs and monitoring costs, as well as research and development costs associated with the development projects being undertaken to develop additional cardiovascular products. The decrease
experienced during the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 is a result of the timing of expenses pertaining to the Company’s development projects, particularly the Company’s additional ANDA
development projects.
On February 13, 2019, the Company announced that it had received notice from
the purchaser of Medicure’s interests in Apicore of potential claims against funds held back in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore sale agreement. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed information to enable
Medicure to assess the merits of the claims with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback receivable. The Company continued to proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them with
a view to having the holdback funds released. In conjunction with the sale of Medicure’s interests in Apicore, representation and warranty insurance was obtained by the purchaser that could result in mitigation of the potential
claims.
In consideration of the uncertainty associated with
the potential claims asserted by the Buyer, the Company reduced the carrying value of the holdback receivable by $1.5 million on the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2018.
On December 5, 2019, the Company reached a settlement
agreement with the Buyer in the Apicore Sales Transaction with respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore Sales Transaction. A settlement agreement was reached under which the Company received U.S. $5.1 million (CDN$6.7 million) in relation
to the holdback receivable. In connection with this settlement the amounts owing to former President and Chief Executive Officer of Apicore which were recorded within
other long-term liabilities were settled by the Buyer. Immediately prior to the settlement, the Company reduced the carrying value on the statement of financial position of the holdback receivable by $3.6 million to the net recoverable value from
the negotiated settlement.
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment on an ongoing basis whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
The amount and timing of impairments and write-downs may vary substantially
from period to period depending on the business and research activities being undertaken at any one time and changes in the Company’s commercial strategy.
The Company has considered indicators of impairment as at December 31, 2019 and
2018. The Company recorded a write-down of intangible assets related to the ReDSTM license during the year ended December 31, 2019 totaling $6.3 million as a result of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to
the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers, resulting in the Company’s sales being below the committed amounts required by the exclusive marketing and distribution agreement regarding ReDSTM. The Company
did not record any write-down of intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2018.
With respect to the intangible asset related to
ZYPITAMAGTM, management calculated its fair value less costs to sell using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy) based upon financial forecasts prepared by management using a discount rate of 13.25%, a
cumulative aggregate growth rate of 300% over four years and a nominal terminal value. The Company has concluded that there was no impairment as a result of the analysis for the year ended December
31, 2019 as the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount by approximately $1.6 million at the high end of the reasonable range. However, the assessment identified that a reasonably possible change in the key assumption of the sales
growth rate forecast results in the recoverable amount being less than the carrying value. A seven percent reduction in the sales growth forecast per year would result in the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeding the reasonable
range of the recoverable amount.
The finance income for the year ended December 31, 2019 relates to interest on
cash and investments held by the Company and a recovery from accretion on the Company’s royalty obligation, partially offset by bank changes, accretion of the Company’s acquisition payable and other interest incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2019. This compares to finance income for the year ended December 31, 2018, which relates to interest on cash and investments held by the Company, offset primarily by accretion on the Company’s royalty obligation.
The foreign exchange loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to a
gain for year ended December 31, 2018 relates to decrease in the US dollar exchange rate between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, which led to the foreign exchange loss as it applies to the significant US dollar cash held by the Company as
at the end of both periods.
The income tax expense of $145,000 during the year ended December 30, 2019 is
primarily related to changes to the Company’s tax loss carryforwards in Barbados during the period compared to income tax expense of $897,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018, which resulted from taxable income in the United States from
the Company’s commercial business during the period.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded
a net loss of $19.8 million or $1.32 per share ($1.32 per share diluted) compared to net income of $3.9 million or $0.25 per share ($0.24 per share diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2018. As discussed above, the main factors contributing to
the net loss were the impairment loss recorded on the ReDSTM license, impairment losses recorded in regards to inventories of ZYPITAMAGTM and SNP, a loss recorded upon the settlement of the holdback receivable, lower revenues
and foreign exchange losses experienced during the year ended December 31, 2019.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a total
comprehensive loss of $26.8 million compared to total comprehensive income of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The change in comprehensive loss results from the factors described above resulting in the net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as well as a loss of $6.3 million from the revaluation of the investment in Sensible Medical made during the year ended December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded other comprehensive loss of
$6.3 million associated with the change in fair value of the investment in Sensible Medical. This resulted in a carrying value as at December 31, 2019 of one dollar. The change in the fair value of the investment in Sensible Medical is as a result
of uncertainties with ReDSTM being experienced in regards to the length of the sales cycle and uptake of the product with customers resulting in lower than expected amounts being paid to Sensible Medical under the exclusive marketing and
distribution agreement.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate
basic (loss) income per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 14,998,540 and 15,791,396, respectively.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted (loss) income per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 14,998,540 and
16,563,663, respectively.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had 10,804,013 common shares outstanding,
900,000 warrants to purchase common shares and 1,428,408 stock options, of which 1,059,308 were exercisable, to purchase common shares outstanding.
As at April 15, 2020, the Company had 10,804,013 common shares outstanding,
900,000 warrants to purchase common shares and 1,394,208 stock options, of which 1,074,708 were exercisable, to purchase common shares outstanding.
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2017
Net AGGRASTAT® product sales for year ended December 31, 2018
were $28.5 million compared to $27.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company currently sells finished AGGRASTAT® to drug wholesalers. These wholesalers subsequently sell AGGRASTAT® to the hospitals where health care
providers administer the drug to patients. Wholesaler management decisions to increase or decrease their inventory of AGGRASTAT® may result in sales of AGGRASTAT® to wholesalers that do not track directly with demand
for the product at hospitals.
Hospital demand
for AGGRASTAT® continued to increase compared to the prior year with the number of new hospital customers using AGGRASTAT® continuing to increase leading to patient market share held by the product increasing to over
50% during the year ended December 31, 2017 and to approximately 65% as at December 31, 2018. The Company’s commercial team continues to work on expanding its customer base, however this continued increase in the customer base for
AGGRASTAT® has not directly resulted in corresponding revenue increases as the Company continues to face increased competition resulting from further genericizing of the Integrilin market which has created pricing pressures on
AGGRASTAT®. The Company continues to expect strong performance from the AGGRASTAT® brand, due primarily to its patient market share, however diversifying revenues away from a single product became increasingly important
for the Company during 2018 and continues to occur during 2019.
The number of new customers reviewing and implementing
AGGRASTAT® increased sharply since October 11, 2013 as a result of FDA approval of the High Dose Bolus (“HDB”) regimen for AGGRASTAT® and due to the increased marketing and promotional efforts of the
Company.
As all of the Company’s sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar improved in value against the Canadian dollar during the second half of 2018 when compared to
the 2017, Canadian dollar revenue growth increased, however it was offset by the increasing price pressures facing AGGRASTAT® when comparing the two periods. Net revenue from AGGRASTAT® in U.S. dollars for 2018 totaled
$21.9 million compared to $20.9 million in 2017.
ZYPITAMAGTM contributed $652,000 of revenue to the Company during
the year ended December 31, 2018 and although early into the commercial availability of the product the Company continues to work towards growing the ZYPITAMAGTM brand.
Cost of goods sold represents direct product costs associated with
AGGRASTAT® and ZYPITAMAGTM, including write-downs for obsolete inventory and amortization of the related intangible assets.
AGGRASTAT® cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31,
2018 was $3.7 million compared to $3.5 million for the comparable period in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the increases to cost of goods sold is the result of higher volume of AGGRASTAT product sold offset by a significant
write-down of expired inventory during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company wrote-off inventory of $3,000 that had expired or was otherwise unusable, compared to $385,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2017.
ZYPITAMAGTM cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2018
is $142,000 relating to the cost of the ZYPITAMAGTM product sold to the Company’s wholesale customers and $196,000 pertaining to the amortization of the ZYPITAMAGTM license for the periods, which is recorded on the
statement of financial position within intangible assets and $92,000 relating to a write-down of inventory that had expired or was otherwise unusable.
Selling expenses include salaries and related costs for those employees involved in the commercial operations of the Company, as well as costs associated
with marketing, promotion, distribution of the Company’s products as well as market access activities and other commercial activities. The expenditures are required to support sales and marketing efforts of AGGRASTAT® and
ZYPITAMAGTM.
Selling expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2018 were $15.6 million compared to $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Commercial sales expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the prior year as sales and marketing costs including the size
of the Company’s commercial team increased between the two periods to support the launch of ZYPITAMAGTM as well as on going sales efforts of the commercial team in regards to the Company’s products.
General and administrative expenses include
the cost of administrative salaries, ongoing business development and corporate stewardship activities and professional fees such as legal, audit, investor and public relations.
General and administrative expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2018 were $3.9 million compared to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2017
primarily as a result of $1.0 million of stock-based compensation recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $491,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Research and development expenditures include costs associated with the
Company’s clinical development and preclinical programs including salaries, monitoring and other research costs. The Company expenses all research costs and has not had any development costs that meet the criteria for capitalization under
IFRS. Prepaid research and development costs represent advance payments under contractual arrangements for clinical activity outsourced to research centers.
Net research and development expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2018
were $6.7 million, compared to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Research and development expenditures include costs associated with the Company’s on-going AGGRASTAT® development, clinical development and
preclinical programs including salaries, research centered costs and monitoring costs, as well as research and development costs associated with the development projects being undertaken to develop additional cardiovascular products. The increase in
research and development expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 is as a result of the timing of expenses and work associated with each development project undertaken by the Company,
primarily the Company’s development of additional generic ANDA cardiovascular products.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, on February 13, 2019, the Company received notice from the Buyer in the Apicore Sales Transaction of potential
claims against the holdback receivable in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore Sales Transaction, with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback receivable. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed
information to enable the Company to assess the merits of the claims. The Company will proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them with a view to having the holdback receivable
released.
In consideration of the uncertainty associated with
the potential claims asserted by the Buyer, the Company reduced the carrying value of the holdback receivable by $1.5 million on the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2018. The Buyer did not make the required payments on the
holdback receivable in February and April 2019.
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment on an ongoing basis whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
The Company recorded an impairment loss of $636,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 pertaining to a write-down in the value of the intangible assets relating to the license
acquired for PREXXARTAN® due to the on-going litigation surrounding the product.
The amount and timing of impairments and write-downs may vary substantially from period to period depending on the business and research activities being undertaken at any one time
and changes in the Company’s commercial strategy.
The finance income for the year ended December 31, 2018 relates primarily to
interest on cash and investments held by the Company during 2018 partially offset by accretion on the Company’s royalty obligation, which compares to finance expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 which primarily related to accretion on
the Company’s royalty obligation and interest on the Company’s long-term debt. The Company repaid its long-term debt during the fourth quarter of 2017.
The increase in the foreign exchange gain for the year ended December 31, 2018
when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 relates to increases in the US dollar exchange rate between the two periods combined with the significant increase in US dollar cash and short-term investments held by the Company during the year
ended December 31, 2018.
The income tax expense of $897,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 is
primarily related to taxable income in the United States during the year ended December 31, 2018. Income tax recovery of $9.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily the result of the utilization of Canadian tax losses as part
of the sale of the Apicore business and other credits offset by taxable income in the United States.
The loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 relates to the Apicore business, which was divested through the Apicore Sale Transaction which was
completed on October 2, 2017. As the Apicore business was divested during 2017, there is no income or loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded
consolidated net income from continuing operations of $3.9 million or $0.25 per share ($0.24 per share diluted) compared to consolidated net income from continuing operations of $11.5 million or $0.74 per share ($0.63 per share diluted) for the year
ended December 31, 2017. As discussed above, the main factors contributing to the net income decrease was higher selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to
the year ended December 31, 2017 and the revaluation of the holdback receivable, offset by higher foreign exchange gains and finance income, net. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not record any net income or loss from
discontinued operations related to the Apicore business compared to income from discontinued operations of $31.9 million or $2.04 per share ($1.76 per share diluted) in the year ended December 31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the
Company recorded net income of $3.9 million or $0.25 per share ($0.24 per share diluted) compared to net income of $43.4 million or $2.78 per share ($2.39 per share diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded
a total comprehensive income of $4.5 million compared to total comprehensive income of $43.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The change in comprehensive income results from the factors described above and the fluctuations in the US
dollar exchange rate during the periods.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate
basic income per share for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 15,791,396 and 15,636,853, respectively. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted income per share for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017 was 16,563,663 and 18,138,080, respectively.
As at December 31, 2018, the Company had 15,547,812 common shares outstanding,
900,000 warrants to purchase common shares and 1,394,642 stock options, of which 1,044,892 were exercisable, to purchase common shares outstanding.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since the Company’s inception, it has financed operations primarily from
net revenue received from the sale of AGGRASTAT®, ZYPITAMAGTM and ReDSTM, the sale of its equity securities, the issue and subsequent exercises of warrants and stock options, interest on excess funds held and the
issuance of debt.
On October 3, 2017, the Company announced the completion of the Apicore Sale
Transaction to the Buyer. Under the Apicore Sale Transaction, the Company received net proceeds of approximately U.S. $105.0 million of which approximately U.S. $55.0 million was received on October 3, 2017, with the remainder received in early
2018. There is also a holdback receivable of U.S. $10.0 million that is due in 2019. These funds received and yet to be received by the Company were after payment of all transaction costs, the compensation paid to holders of Apicore’s employee
stock options, the redemption of the remaining shares of Apicore not owned by Medicure and other adjustments.
On February 1, 2018, the Company announced that it had received the deferred purchase price proceeds of approximately U.S. $50.0 million from the
Buyer as a result of the Apicore Sale Transaction. The U.S. $50.0 million was included in the total net proceeds of U.S. $105.0 million described earlier. The Company did not receive any contingent payments based on an earn out formula as certain
financial results within the Apicore business were not met following the Apicore Sale Transaction.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with respect to the amounts
heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was reached under which Medicure received a net payment of U.S. $5.1 million in relation to the holdback receivable.
The funds received from the Apicore sales transaction were invested and used
for business and product development purposes and to fund operations as needed as well as funding the purchase of common shares under the Company’s recently completed SIB.
Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was
$14.6 million compared to cash from operations of $742,000 for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in cash from operating activities is primarily due to the net loss incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Cash from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled
$34.3 million primarily from the conversion of short-term investments into cash which totaled $47.7 million and $6.7 million was received in relation to the proceeds from the holdback receivable. Offsetting this where payments made by the Company
during the year ended December 31, 2019 in regards to the acquisition of ZYPITAMAGTM which totaled $6.6 million and the acquisition of ReDSTM intangible assets for $7.0 million and the investment in Sensible Medical Innovations
Ltd. of $6.3 million. Additionally, $186,000 was spent regarding the acquisition of property, plant and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, $65.2 million was received as proceeds from the Apicore
Sale Transaction, $44.1 million was used to acquire short-term investments, $1.3 million was paid for the acquisition of the ZYPITAMAGTM license and $197,000 was spent regarding the acquisition of property, plant and equipment resulting
in cash from investing activities of $19.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled
$30.3 million and related to cash paid to acquire the Company’s common shares under the SIB which totaled $26.1 million, cash paid to acquire the Company’s common shares under the NCIB which totaled $4.1 million, offset by the receipt of
$20,000 from employees exercising stock options during the year. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $2.7 million and related to cash paid to acquire the Company’s common shares under the NCIB which
totaled $3.0 million, offset by the receipt of $363,000 from employees exercising stock options during the year.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had unrestricted
cash totaling $13.0 million compared to $24.1 million as of December 31, 2018. The Company did not have any short-term investments as at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the Company had short-term investments in the form of term deposits
with maturities of greater than three months and less than one year which totaled $47.7 million. As at December 31, 2019, the Company had working capital of $19.7 million compared to $72.7 million as at December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased and cancelled
751,800 (2018 – 441,400), common shares as a result of the 2018 NCIB and 2019 NCIB. The aggregate price paid for these common shares totaled $4.1 million (2018 - $3.0 million). During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company recorded $1.8
million (2018 - $480,000) directly in its deficit representing the difference between the aggregate price paid for these common shares and a reduction of the Company’s share capital totaling $6.0 million (2018 - $3.5 million).
On December 20, 2019, the Company completed a SIB pursuant to which the Company
purchased 4,000,000 of its common shares for cancellation at a set purchase price of $6.50 per common share for a total purchase price of $26.0 million in cash. The Company incurred an additional $139,000 on transaction costs related to the SIB for
a total aggregate purchase price paid of $26.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $5.5 million directly in its retained deficit representing the difference between the aggregate price paid for these common shares
and a reduction of the Company’s share capital totaling $31.6 million.
The Company did not have any long-term debt recorded in its consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2019.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses,
Etc.
Research and Development
The Company’s research and development activities are predominantly
conducted by its wholly-owned Barbadian subsidiary, Medicure International Inc.
AGGRASTAT®
One of the primary ongoing research and development activities is the continued development and further implementation of a new regulatory, brand and life cycle management strategy
for AGGRASTAT®. The extent to which the Company is able to invest in this plan is dependent upon the availability of sufficient finances and the expected returns from those investments.
An important aspect of the AGGRASTAT® strategy was the revision
of its approved prescribing information. On October 11, 2013, the Company announced that the FDA approved the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen, as requested under Medicure’s sNDA. The AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen (25 mcg/kg
within 5 minutes, followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min) has become the recommended dosing for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with NSTE ACS.
The Company believes that further expanded indications and dosing regimens
could provide added value to further maximize the revenue potential for AGGRASTAT®. The Company is currently exploring the potential to make such changes, and the Company may need to conduct appropriate clinical trials, obtain
positive results from those trials, or otherwise provide support in order to obtain regulatory approval for such proposed indications and dosing regimens.
On April 23, 2015, the Company announced that the FDA approved a revision to
the duration of the bolus delivery for the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen. The dosing change and label modification was requested by the Company to help health care professionals more efficiently meet patient-specific administration needs and
to optimize the implementation of AGGRASTAT® at new hospitals. The newly approved labeling supplement now allows the delivery duration of the AGGRASTAT® HDB (25 mcg/kg) to occur anytime within 5 minutes, instead of the
previously specified duration of 3 minutes. This change was part of the Company’s ongoing regulatory strategy to expand the applications for AGGRASTAT®.
On September 10, 2015, the Company announced that it submitted a sNDA to the
FDA to expand the label for AGGRASTAT® to include the treatment of patients presenting with STEMI. If approved for STEMI, AGGRASTAT® would be the first in its class of GPIs to receive such a label in the United
States.
In previous communication with the Company, the FDA’s Division of
Cardiovascular and Renal Drug Products indicated its willingness to review and evaluate this label change request based substantially on data from the On-TIME 2 study, with additional support from published studies and other data pertinent to the
use of the AGGRASTAT® HDB regimen in the treatment of STEMI. The efficacy and safety of the HDB regimen in STEMI has been evaluated in more than 20 clinical studies involving over 11,000 patients and is currently recommended by the
ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of STEMI.
On July 7, 2016, the Company received a Complete Response Letter
(“CRL”) from the FDA for its sNDA requesting an expanded indication for patients presenting with STEMI. The FDA issued the CRL to communicate that its initial review of the application was completed; however, it could not approve
the application in its present form and requested additional information. The Company continues to work directly with the FDA to address these comments and explore other options available.
The sNDA filing was accompanied by a mandatory U.S. $1.2 million user fee paid
by Medicure International Inc. to the FDA. In December 2016, the Company received a waiver and full refund of the user fee which had been paid and expensed during fiscal 2015.
On September 1, 2016, the Company announced that it had received approval from
the FDA for its bolus vial product format for AGGRASTAT®.
This product format is a concentrated, 15 ml vial containing sufficient drug to administer the FDA approved, HDB of 25 mcg/kg given at the beginning of treatment.
AGGRASTAT® is also sold in two other sizes, a 100 ml vial and a 250 ml bag. The existing, pre-mixed products continue to be available, providing a convenient concentration for administering the post-HDB maintenance infusion of 0.15
mcg/kg/min. (Approved Dosing: Administer intravenously 25 mcg/kg within 5 minutes and then 0.15 mcg/kg/min for up to 18 hours). Commercial launch of the bolus vial occurred during the fourth quarter of 2016 and the Company continues to believe this
product format will have a positive impact on hospital utilization of AGGRASTAT®.
Another aspect of the AGGRASTAT® strategy is to advance studies
related to the contemporary use and future regulatory positioning of the product. On May 10, 2012, the Company announced the commencement of enrolment in a clinical trial of AGGRASTAT® entitled SAVI-PCI. SAVI-PCI is a randomized,
open-label study enrolling patients undergoing PCI at sites across the United States. The study was designed to evaluate whether patients receiving the HDB regimen of AGGRASTAT® (25 mcg/kg bolus over 3 minutes) followed by an infusion
of 0.15 mcg/kg/min for a shortened duration of 1 to 2 hours will have outcomes that are similar, or “non-inferior,” to patients receiving a 12 to 18-hour infusion of Integrilin® (eptifibatide) (Merck & Co., Inc.) at its FDA
approved dosing regimen.
The primary objective of SAVI-PCI is to demonstrate AGGRASTAT®
is non-inferior to Integrilin with respect to the composite endpoint of death, PCI-related myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, or major bleeding within 48 hours following PCI or hospital discharge. The secondary objectives
of this study include the assessment of safety as measured by the incidence of major bleeding.
The first patient was enrolled in June 2012. Enrolment was completed during the fourth quarter of 2018 and on December 17, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the
Shortened AGGRASTAT® (tirofiban hydrochloride) injection versus Integrilin® (eptifibatide) in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SAVI-PCI) Clinical Trial. Topline results of the SAVI-PCI trial will be communicated in
2020.
The Company is also providing funding for a number of investigator sponsored
research projects targeting contemporary utilization of AGGRASTAT® relative to its competitors. On December 12, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the FABOLUS-FASTER Phase 4 trial, a
randomized, open-label, multi-center trial assessing different regimens of intravenous platelet inhibitors, notably tirofiban and cangrelor (an IV P2Y12 inhibitor) in the early phase of primary PCI. The
study enrolled 120 patients. The Company expects to release top-line data in 2020.
FABOLUS-FASTER was funded by a grant from the Company. This study does not
imply comparable efficacy, safety, or product interchangeability. Please note that the use of AGGRASTAT® in STEMI patients has not been approved by the FDA. As of this time, neither AGGRASTAT® nor any of the GP IIb/IIIa
inhibitors are indicated for the use in STEMI patients. AGGRASTAT® is approved for use in NSTE-ACS patients.
Cardiovascular Generic and Reformulation Products
Through an ongoing research and development investment, the Company is
exploring new product opportunities in the interest of developing future sources of revenue and growth.
On August 13, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA has approved its ANDA for SNP. SNP is indicated for the immediate reduction of blood pressure for adult and pediatric patients
in hypertensive crisis. The product is also indicated for producing controlled hypotension in order to reduce bleeding during surgery and for the treatment of acute congestive heart failure. The filing of the ANDA was previously announced by the
Company on December 13, 2016. Medicure’s SNP has recently become available in the United States with the initial sales from SNP being recorded subsequent to December 31, 2019 in January of 2020.
The Company is focused on the development of two additional cardiovascular
generic drugs. When combined with the ANDA described above and the acquisition of ZYPITAMAGTM and the marketing partnership for ReDSTM, the Company expects to transform its commercial suite of products to at least five approved
products in 2021.
The Company had been devoting a modest amount of resources to its research and development programs, including, but not limited to the development of TARDOXALTM
(pyridoxal 5 phosphate (“P5P”) formerly known as MC-1) for neurological conditions such as Tardive Dyskinesia. This work included, but was not limited to, working with the FDA to better understand and refine the next steps
in development of the product. The advancement of TARDOXALTM is currently on hold. The Company changed its focus from TARDOXALTM to other uses of P5P and continues to devote time and resources to the advancement of P5P
development.
The following table summarizes the Company’s research and development programs,
their therapeutic focus and their stage of development.
Product Candidate
|
Therapeutic
focus
|
Stage of
Development
|
AGGRASTAT®
|
Acute Cardiology
|
Approved/Marketed – Additional studies
underway
|
ZYPITAMAGTM
|
Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia
|
Approved/Marketed
|
ReDSTM
|
Heart Failure – Medical Device
|
Approved/Marketed
|
PREXXARTAN®
|
Hypertension
|
Approved – Commercial launch on
hold
|
SNP
|
Acute Cardiology
|
ANDA approved/Marketed
|
Generic ANDA 2
|
Acute Cardiology
|
ANDA filed
|
Generic ANDA 3
|
Acute Cardiology
|
Formulation development underway
|
TARDOXALTM/P5P
|
TD/Neurological indications
|
TARDOXALTM – On hold
P5P - Regulatory and clinical planning underway
|
Other Products
The Company is investing in the research and development of other new product
development opportunities. The Company is also exploring opportunities to grow the business through acquisition. The Company has evaluated and continues to evaluate the acquisition or license of other approved commercial products with the objective
of further broadening its product portfolio and generating additional revenue.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had numerous issued United States patents (see
Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc. below).
Patents and Licenses
In addition to a number of pending patent applications, the Company has 1 issued patent
from the United States Patent Office providing protection for AGGRASTAT® and related its current and historic development compounds. The Company will continue to file patents related to its research and development activities. The
United States patents currently issued to the Company are as follows:
Patent Number
|
Issue
Date
|
Title
|
6,770,660
|
August 3, 2004
|
Method for Inhibiting Platelet
Aggregation
|
Patents 5,965,581, 5,972,967, 5,978,698, 6,136,794, 6,538,112 and 6,770,660 were purchased by the Company from MGI GP, INC. (a Delaware corporation doing business as MGI PHARMA and
its Affiliate, Artery, LLC). Pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 8, 2006, MGI GP, INC. sold the exclusive use of the patents to the Company in the specified territory (the United States of America including the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico; Guam; and the United States Virgin Islands). Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement the Company agreed to pay MGI GP, INC. a one-time fee for the procurement of the acquired assets. The Asset Purchase Agreement was executed August 8,
2006.
Much of the work, including some of the research methods, that is important to the
success of the Company’s business is germane to the industry and may not be patentable. For this reason, all employees, contracted researchers and consultants are bound by non-disclosure agreements.
Given that the patent applications for these technologies involve complex legal,
scientific and factual questions, there can be no assurance that patent applications relating to the technology used by the Company will result in patents being issued, or that, if issued, the patents will provide a competitive advantage or will
afford protection against competitors with similar technology, or will not be challenged successfully or circumvented by competitors.
The Company has filed patents in accordance with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (the
‘‘PCT’’). The PCT is a multilateral treaty that was concluded in Washington in 1970 and entered into force in 1978. It is administered by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (the
‘‘WIPO’’), headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The PCT facilitates the obtaining of protection for inventions where such protection is sought in any or all of the PCT contracting states (total of 104 at July 1999).
It provides for the filing of one patent application (the ‘‘international application’’), with effect in several contracting states, instead of filing several separate national and/or regional patent applications. At
the present time, an international application may include designation for regional patents in respect of contracting states party to any of the following regional patent treaties: The Protocol on Patents and Industrial Designs within the framework
of the African Regional Industrial Property Organization, the Eurasian Patent Convention, the European Patent Convention, and the Agreement Establishing the African Intellectual Property Organization. The PCT does not eliminate the necessity of
prosecuting the international application in the national phase of processing before the national or regional offices, but it does facilitate such prosecution in several important respects by virtue of the procedures carried out first on all
international applications during the international phase of processing under the PCT. The formalities check, the international search and (optionally) the international preliminary examination carried out during the international phase, as well as
the automatic deferral of national processing which is entailed; give the applicant more time and a better basis for deciding whether and in what countries to further pursue the application. Further information may be obtained from the official WIPO
internet website (http://www.wipo.int).
Although the Company is no longer developing MC-1 for cardiovascular indications, the Company does have a royalty bearing agreement with its subsidiary in regards to this
development program. On June 1, 2000, the Company entered into the Medicure International Licensing Agreement whereby it licensed the world-wide development and marketing rights for MC-1, except for Canada, to its wholly owned subsidiary, Medicure
International, Inc. As consideration for the grant of the license, Medicure International, Inc. agreed to pay the Company a fee of $1.00 upon the completion of specified milestones in the development process, together with a variable royalty of 7%
to 9% of net sales of MC-1 (if any sales are ever in fact made). The term of the Medicure International Licensing Agreement will expire on the date of expiration of the last to expire patent on MC-1, or in the absence of any such patent, on the 10th
anniversary of the date of the first commercial sale of MC-1 in the country where it was last introduced (if it is ever so introduced). The Medicure International Licensing Agreement may be terminated under a number of circumstances and, in any
event, by either party at any time by providing the other with at least 90 days prior written notice of its intention to terminate the Medicure International Licensing Agreement.
Medicure International, Inc. subsequently entered into a development agreement with
CanAm on June 1, 2000 to perform research and development of MC-1 and other compounds at cost, plus a reasonable mark-up not to exceed ten percent of any amount invoiced. The parties to the development agreements have agreed that the aggregate
amount of all invoiced expenditures shall not exceed $30,000,000 over the term of each agreement. The term of the CanAm development agreement is to expire on the completion of all research and development activities by CanAm and the written
acknowledgment by CanAm and Medicure International, Inc. that no further research projects will be undertaken. CanAm continues to perform work on AGGRASTAT®, TARDOXALTM and other projects under this agreement, however there
is no ongoing research activity related to MC-1.
The development agreements may be terminated under a number of circumstances and, in
any event, by Medicure International, Inc. at any time by providing CanAm with at least 30 days prior written notice of its intention to terminate, or by CanAm at any time by providing Medicure International, Inc., with at least 90 days prior
written notice of its intention to terminate the development agreement.
The agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known during
the course of the relationship with the Company is to be kept confidential except in specific circumstances.
D. Trend Information
Net AGGRASTAT® product sales for year ended December 31, 2019 were $19.4
million compared to $28.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company currently sells finished AGGRASTAT® to drug wholesalers.
These wholesalers subsequently sell AGGRASTAT® to hospitals where health care providers administer the drug to patients. Wholesaler management decisions to increase or decrease their inventory of AGGRASTAT® may result
in sales of AGGRASTAT® to wholesalers that do not track directly with demand for the product at hospitals.
Hospital demand for
AGGRASTAT® was lower during 2019 than the prior year however the number of new hospital customers using AGGRASTAT® continued to increase leading to patient market share held by the product increasing to approximately
67% as at December 31, 2019. The Company’s commercial team continues to work on expanding its customer base, however this continued increase in the customer base for AGGRASTAT® has not directly resulted in corresponding revenue
increases as the Company continues to face increased competition resulting from further genericizing of the Integrilin market which has created pricing pressures on AGGRASTAT® combined with lower hospital demand for the product. The
Company continues to expect strong performance from the AGGRASTAT® brand, due primarily to its patient market share, however diversifying revenues away from a single product became increasingly important to the Company.
The number of new customers reviewing and implementing AGGRASTAT®
increased sharply since October 11, 2013 as a result of FDA approval of the High Dose Bolus (“HDB”) regimen for AGGRASTAT® and due to the increased marketing and promotional efforts of the Company.
As all of the Company’s sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar
improved in value against the Canadian dollar when comparing the year ended December 31, 2019 with the year ended December 31, 2018, this led to increased AGGRASTAT® revenues, however this was offset by the increasing price pressures
facing AGGRASTAT® when comparing the two periods as well as decreases in demand.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, ReDSTM contributed revenue of
$618,000 from the sale of the product in the United States.
Net ZYPITAMAGTM product sales for year ended December 31, 2019 were $183,000
compared to $652,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018. The 2018 revenues were higher than those earned in 2019 due to the initial ordering by wholesaler customers of the product.
The Company currently sells ZYPITAMAGTM to drug wholesalers. These
wholesalers subsequently sell ZYPITAMAGTM to pharmacies who in turn sell the product to patients. The decrease in ZYPITAMAGTM product sales for the year ended December 31, 2019 is a result of initial stocking at the wholesale
level during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company expects ZYPITAMAGTM revenues to grow throughout 2020 and beyond.
The Company is not aware of any other trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or
events which are reasonably likely to have a material effect upon the Company’s net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information not
necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
E. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2019, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements,
other than those disclosed below.
F. Contractual Obligations
The following tables set forth the Company’s contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2019:
|
|
Contractual Obligations Payment Due By Period (in Thousands)
|
(in thousands of CDN$)
|
|
Total
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
2024
|
|
Thereafter
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
9,384
|
|
|
|
9,384
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Lease Obligation
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Acquisition Payable
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchase Agreement Commitments
|
|
|
5,919
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,646
|
|
|
$
|
13,831
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
Payments in connection with the Company’s royalty obligation, as described below,
are excluded from the table above.
Commitments
The Company has entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement to purchase a minimum
quantity of AGGRASTAT® unfinished product inventory totaling U.S.$150,000 annually (based on current pricing) until 2024 and a minimum quantity of AGGRASTAT® finished product inventory totaling U.S.$218,000 annually
(based on current pricing) until 2022 and €525,000 annually (based on current pricing) until 2022.
Effective January 1, 2019, the Company renewed its business and administration services
agreement with GVI, under which the Company is committed to pay $7,000 per month or $85,000 per year for a one-year term.
Contracts with contract research organizations are payable over the terms of the
associated agreements and clinical trials and timing of payments is largely dependent on various milestones being met, such as the number of patients recruited, number of monitoring visits conducted, the completion of certain data management
activities, trial completion, and other trial related activities.
On October 31, 2017, the Company acquired an exclusive license to sell and market
PREXXARTAN® (valsartan) oral solution in the United States and its territories with a seven-year term, with extensions to the term available, which had been granted tentative approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(“FDA”), and which was converted to final approval during 2017. The Company acquired the exclusive license rights for an upfront payment of U.S.$100,000, with an additional U.S.$400,000 payable on final FDA approval and will be obligated
to pay royalties and milestone payments from the net revenues of PREXXARTAN®. The U.S.$400,000 payment is on hold pending resolution of the dispute between the licensor and the third-party
manufacturer of PREXXARTAN® described in note 16(d) to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and is recorded within accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial
position.
On December 14, 2017 the Company acquired an exclusive license to sell and market a branded cardiovascular drug, ZYPITAMAGTM (pitavastatin magnesium) in the United States
and its territories for a term of seven years with extensions to the term available. The Company had entered into a profit-sharing arrangement resulting in a portion of the net profits from ZYPITAMAGTM being paid to the licensor. No
amounts are due and/or payable pertaining to profit sharing on this product and the profit-sharing arrangement was eliminated with the Company’s acquisition of ZYPITAMAGTM on September 30, 2019 as described in note 9 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company periodically enters into research agreements with third parties that include indemnification provisions customary in the industry. These guarantees generally require the
Company to compensate the other party for certain damages and costs incurred as a result of claims arising from research and development activities undertaken on behalf of the Company. In some cases, the maximum potential amount of future payments
that could be required under these indemnification provisions could be unlimited. These indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement. The nature of the indemnification obligations prevents the Company from
making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay. Historically, the Company has not made any indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.
As a part of the
Birmingham debt settlement described in note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, beginning on July 18, 2011, the Company is obligated to pay a royalty to Birmingham based on future commercial AGGRASTAT® sales
until 2023. The royalty is based on 4% of the first $2.0 million of quarterly AGGRASTAT® sales, 6% on the portion of quarterly sales between $2.0 million and $4.0 million and 8% on the portion of quarterly sales exceeding $4.0 million
payable within 60 days of the end of the preceding three-month periods ended February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30. Birmingham has a one-time option to switch the royalty payment from
AGGRASTAT® to a royalty on the sale of MC-1. Management has determined there is no value to the option to switch the royalty to MC-1 as the product is not commercially available for sale and the extended long-term development timeline
associated with commercialization of the product. Royalties for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $1.0 million (2018 – $1.7 million) with payments made during the year ended December 31, 2019 of
$1.4 million (2018 – $1.5 million).
Beginning with the acquisition of ZYPITAMAGTM, completed on September 30,
2019, the Company is obligated to pay royalties on any commercial net sales of ZYPITAMAGTM to Zydus subsequent to the acquisition date. During the three months ended December 31, 2019, the Company accrued $2,000 in royalties in regards to
ZYPITAMAGTM which is recorded within cost of goods sold on the statement of net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income and within accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the statement of financial position as at December 31,
2019.
The Company is obligated to pay royalties on any future commercial
net sales of PREXXARTAN® to the licensor of PREXXARTAN®. To date,
no royalties are due and/or payable.
In the normal course of business, the Company may from time to time be subject to
various claims or possible claims. Although management currently believes there are no claims or possible claims that if resolved would either individually or collectively result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows, these matters are inherently uncertain and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
During 2018, the Company was named in a civil
claim in Florida from the third-party manufacturer of PREXXARTAN® against the licensor. The claim disputed the rights granted by the licensor to the Company with respect to PREXXARTAN®. The claim against the
Company has since been withdrawn, however the dispute between the licensor and the third-party manufacturer continues.
On September 10, 2015, the Company submitted a supplemental New Drug Application (“sNDA”) to the FDA to expand the label for AGGRASTAT®. The label change
is being reviewed and evaluated based substantially on data from published studies. If the label change submission were to be successful, the Company will be obligated to pay €300,000 over the course of a three-year period in equal quarterly
instalments following approval. On July 7, 2016, the Company announced it received a Complete Response Letter stating the sNDA cannot be approved in its present form and requested additional information. The payments are contingent upon the success
of the filing and as such the Company has not recorded any amount in the consolidated statements of net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income pertaining to this contingent liability.
During 2015, the Company began a development project of a cardiovascular generic drug
in collaboration with Apicore. The Company has entered into a supply and development agreement under which the Company holds all commercial rights to the drug. In connection with this project, the Company is obligated
to pay Apicore 50% of net profit from the sale of this drug. On August 13, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA has approved its ANDA for SNP, a generic intravenous cardiovascular product and the product became available commercially
during the third quarter of 2019. To date, no amounts are due and/or payable pertaining to profit sharing on this product.
Claims and Possible Claims
In the normal course of business, the Company may from time to time be subject to
various claims or possible claims. Although management currently believes that aside from the information noted below, there are no claims or possible claims that if resolved would either individually or collectively result in a material adverse
impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, these matters are inherently uncertain and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
On February 13, 2019, the Company received notice
from the Buyer in the Apicore Sales Transaction of potential claims against the holdback receivable in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore Sales Transaction, with the maximum exposure of the claims being the total holdback
receivable. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed information to enable the Company to assess the merits of the claims. The Company will proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them
with a view to having the holdback receivable released.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement
with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was reached under which Medicure received a net payment of US$5.1 million in relation to the
holdback receivable.
During 2018, the Company was named in a civil
claim in Florida from the third-party manufacturer of PREXXARTAN® against Carmel. The claim disputed the rights granted by Carmel to the Company with respect to PREXXARTAN®. The Company believed the
claim against it was without merit and intended to defend itself against the claim. The claim against the Company has been subsequently withdrawn, however the dispute between the third-party manufacturer and Carmel continues.
G. Safe Harbor
Statements in Item 5.E and Item 5.F of this Annual Report on Form 20-F that are not statements of historical fact, constitute “forward-looking statements.” See
“Forward-Looking Statements” on page 1 of this Annual Report. Our Company is relying on the safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, in making such forward-looking statements.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
EMPLOYEES
A. Directors and Senior Management
Directors and Senior Management
The members of the board of directors and senior officers of the Company including a
brief biography of each are as follows:
Dr. Albert D. Friesen, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada - Director, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
The founder, President, CEO and Chair of the Board of Medicure Inc., Dr. Friesen holds
a Ph.D. in protein chemistry from the University of Manitoba. Dr. Friesen played a key role in founding several health industry companies including the first employee and President of the Winnipeg Rh Institute for over 20 years, where he
oversaw the development of WinRho (then acquired by Cangene Inc. and more recently by Emergent BioSolutions), ABI Biotechnology (acquired by Apotex Inc.), Viventia Biotech Inc., Genesys Pharma Inc., Waverley Pharma Inc. DiaMedica Inc, Miraculins
Inc., Kane Biotech Inc. and KAM Scientific Inc. Dr. Friesen has experience in the establishment of pharmaceutical production facilities and has also managed and initiated the research and clinical development of several pharmaceutical
candidates. Dr. Friesen is a founder of the Industrial Biotechnology Association of Canada (IBAC) and past Chairman of its board of directors and former member of the Industrial Advisory Committee to the Biotechnology Research Institute in
Montreal. In addition to his role with the Company, Dr. Friesen is currently the President and Chairman of Genesys Venture Inc., a biotech incubator, based in Winnipeg and a member of the Board of Directors of Waverley Pharma Inc, a TSX-V
listed company. Dr. Friesen provides his services to the Company through A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd., his private consulting corporation. Dr. Friesen served as both CEO and President of Medicure Inc. Dr. Friesen’s date of birth
is May 19, 1947.
Dr. Arnold Naimark, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada - Director
Dr. Arnold Naimark, O.C., O.M., M.D., L.L.D., F.R.C.P.(C), F.R.S.C, FCAHS, FAAAS,. has
had a distinguished career in biomedical research, medicine and higher education. He is President Emeritus and Dean of Medicine Emeritus and Professor of Medicine and Physiology at the University of Manitoba. He is currently Director of
the Centre for the Advancement of Medicine, Chair of Genome Prairie Immediate Past-Chair of CancerCare Manitoba. Dr. Naimark serves on the National Statistics Council of Canada and is Vice-Chair of the Statistics Canada Audit
Committee. He was formerly on the Research Council of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Chair of Health Canada’s Ministerial Science Advisory Board, Member of the International Advisory Committee on Research of the Alberta Cancer
Board, Vice-Chair of the Manitoba Health Research Council and Director of the Robarts Research Institute. He is the founding Chairman of the North Portage Development Corporation, the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and the Canadian
Biotechnology Advisory Committee. He has served as President of several academic bodies including, the Canadian Physiological Society, the Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation, the Association of Canadian Medical Colleges, the Association of
Universities and Colleges of Canada and as Chairman of the Association of Commonwealth Universities. Dr. Naimark is an Officer of the Order of Canada, a Member of the Order of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and
Surgeons of Canada, the Royal Society of Canada, and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. He is recipient of the G. Malcolm Brown Award of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons and Medical Research Council of Canada, the Osler
Award, the Distinguished Service Award of Ben Gurion University, the Symons Award of the Association of Commonwealth Universities; and of honorary doctorates from Mount Allison University and the University of Toronto, and of several other awards
and distinctions related to his professional, academic and civic activities. Date of birth is August 24, 1933.
Gerald P. McDole, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, MBA – Director
Mr. McDole is currently a director of one Canadian healthcare company. Mr. McDole is
Past President of AstraZeneca Canada Inc. He was named President and CEO of AstraZeneca Canada Inc.’s pharmaceutical operations in 1999 and immediately led the merger of Astra Pharma and Zeneca Pharma Inc. Prior to this, Mr. McDole was
president and CEO of Astra Pharma Inc., a position he assumed in 1985 after having served as Executive Vice-President. Mr. McDole is a member of the Canadian Healthcare Marketing Hall of Fame, and has been recognized by Canadian Healthcare Manager
Magazine with the Who’s Who in Healthcare Award in the pharmaceutical category. In recognition of Mr. McDole’s outstanding contributions to the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, the University of Manitoba established The Gerry
McDole Fellowship in Health Policy and Economic Growth. Mr. McDole holds a Bachelor of Science and a Certificate of Business Management from the University of Manitoba, an MBA from Simon Fraser University, and a Business Administration diploma from
the University of Toronto. Date of birth is January 25, 1940.
Peter Quick, Mill Neck, New York, USA - Director
Peter Quick has over 30 years experience in the securities and financial services
industries. He is a recognized leader in the securities industry with experience in the domestic and international equities market, equities market making, market structure reform, trading technology and clearing operations. Mr. Quick is a Partner
of Burke and Quick Partners Holdings LLP, the parent company of Burke & Quick Partners LLC a broker dealer. Mr. Quick was President at the American Stock Exchange from 2000 to 2005. Prior to joining the American Stock Exchange, he served as
President of Quick & Reilly Inc., a Quick & Reilly subsidiary and a national discount brokerage firm. He also served as President of Quick & Reilly/Fleet Securities. Mr. Quick is a graduate from the University of Virginia with a B.S. in
Engineering and attended Stanford University’s Graduate School of Petroleum Engineering. He served four years active duty from 1978 to 1982 as an Officer in the United States Navy. He is the former Chairman and a current member of the Board of
Directors of Gain Capital (GCAP: NYSE) and a member of the Boards of Trustees of First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC: NASDAQ) and First National Bank of Long Island. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Fund for the Poor. Mr. Quick serves
as the Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Mill Neck, NY. He is a former member of the Board of Alliance Capital Money Market Fund, Chicago Stock Exchange Inc (CHX), The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), The Midwest Trust Company,
Securities Industry Automation Corporation (SIAC), National Security Clearing Corporation, The American Stock Exchange and the National Association of Security Dealers Inc), Quick & Reilly, Inc., (NYSE: BQR), Reckson Associates Realty Corp
(NYSE: RX) and The Bear Stearns Current Yield Fund (AMEX:YYY). He is a former Chairman of the Board of Governors of St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY and Mercy Medical Center, Rockville Centre, NY. Date of birth is February 11, 1956.
Brent Fawkes, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada - Director
Mr. Fawkes is a Chartered Professional Accountant with over 20
years of experience in accounting and finance. Mr. Fawkes is currently the Vice President of Finance with Standard Aero Limited, one of the world’s largest independent providers of a variety of aerospace services serving a diverse array of
customers in business and general aviation, airline, military, helicopter, components and energy markets. In his current role, Mr. Fawkes is responsible for the oversight of the finance department including external reporting, budgeting and planning
and treasury management. Date of birth is December 21, 1969.
Manon Harvey, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada - Director
Ms. Manon Harvey joined the UBC Okanagan Campus as Director,
Integrated Planning and Chief Budget Officer in January 2019 where she is responsible for supporting the University’s mission through long range financial planning, financial advice and effective resource allocation strategies. For the prior
21 years as Vice-President, Finance and Corporate Services for the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Manon was responsible for the finance function, human resources, information technology, and administrative services. She was an Officer of the CFI
Board of Directors, and served as the Secretary and Treasurer. Ms Harvey is a CPA, CA, with membership in British Columbia. She has her ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors. Manon holds a Bachelor of Commerce (summa cum
laude) from the University of Ottawa. For over 10 years, until June 2014, she was both a member of the Board of Directors, as well as the Chair of the Audit Committee, for Hydro Ottawa. She is an external member of the Departmental Audit
Committee (DAC) of the RCMP.
Neil Owens – President and Chief Operating Officer
Dr. Neil Owens is responsible for
implementing Medicure’s strategic plans and overseeing day-to-day operations including the advancement and management of new and existing pharmaceutical products. Dr. Owens has worked with Medicure since 2014, serving in various positions of
escalating responsibility within Medical Affairs, and most recently as Director, Scientific Affairs. His responsibilities have included providing scientific input and expertise to support manufacturing, product development and clinical studies, as
well as KOL engagement and team management. Dr. Owens holds a Bachelor of Science and a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the University of Manitoba and has Postdoctoral experience with the European Institute of Chemistry and Biology (Bordeaux, France). His
research background has focused on organic & medicinal chemistry, and the overall application of science towards solving health-related issues.
James Kinley – Chief Financial Officer
Effective September 21, 2011 Mr. James Kinley was appointed as CFO of the Company, replacing Dawson Reimer, who has served as Chief Financial Officer in an
interim capacity since July 15, 2011 until Mr. Kinley’s appointment. Mr. Kinley’s services are provided to the Company through a Consulting Agreement. Previous to his time at Genesys Venture Inc. and the Company, he was Manager,
Financial Reporting at Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. and was involved in all aspects of financial reporting, including publicly filed documents such as their financial statements. James is a CPA, CA and holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Hons.) degree
from the University of Manitoba. Date of birth is July 9, 1978.
Management
Dr. Albert D. Friesen - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director: Dr.
Friesen directs the overall business management of the Company (see “Directors and Senior Management” under this item).
Dr. Neil Owens - President and Chief Operating Officer: Dr. Owens is responsible
for the day to day operations of the Company (see “Directors and Senior Management” under this item).
James Kinley - Chief Financial Officer: Mr. Kinley is responsible for the
Company’s financial management and accounting practices (see “Directors and Senior Management” under this item).
B. Compensation
Compensation paid to the directors, and executive officers of the Company during the
year ended December 31, 2019, is described below and stock-based compensation described in Item 6(E) below:
The Company recorded $66,000 in fees paid or payable to Board members for attendance at
meetings between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 and the chairs of the Audit and Finance Committee and executive compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee were paid an additional $5,000 each for services as committee
chairs.
On October 1, 2001, a compensation agreement was entered into between the Company and A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd., a corporation owned by Dr. Friesen and subsequently amended on
October 1, 2003, October 1, 2005, October 1, 2006, October 1, 2007, July 18, 2011, July 18, 2016, January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded payable to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.,
$331,000 and 315,000, respectively, in consulting compensation, including taxable benefits. Dr. Friesen is eligible for an annual bonus, if certain objectives of the Company are met, as determined by the Board of Directors. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, a bonus of $125,000 was accrued to Dr. Friesen, which was paid to him during the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a bonus of $31,500 was accrued to Dr. Friesen, which was paid to him during
the year ended December 31, 2019. No bonus has been accrued as at December 31, 2019.
Dawson Reimer served as the Company’s as President and Chief Operating Officer
and received a salary of $205,000 payable in equal semi-monthly installments and a bonus at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company. On May 9, 2016, the Company announced that the employment agreement with the Company’s
President and Chief Operating Officer had been terminated, effective immediately. Mr. Reimer was paid $73,000 up to the date of his termination and $222,000 pertaining to severance during the year ended December 31,
2016. All amounts pertaining to this severance were paid during 2016 and there is no additional liability in this regard.
Effective January 1, 2016, the business and administration services agreement with GVI
no longer included the Chief Financial Officer’s services and the Company signed a consulting agreement with its Chief Financial Officer, through JFK Enterprises Ltd., a company owned by the Chief Financial Officer, for a one-year term, at a
rate of $135,000 annually. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a bonus of $10,000 to its Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 1, 2017, consulting agreement with the Chief Financial Officer, through JFK Enterprises
Ltd., a company owned by the Chief Financial Officer, was renewed for a one-year term, at a rate of $155,000 annually. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a bonus of $200,000 to its Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company renewed its consulting agreement with its Chief Financial Officer, through JFK Enterprises Ltd., for a one-year term, at a rate of $155,000 annually. Effective June 1, 2018, this
consulting agreement was converted into an employment agreement with the Chief Financial Officer. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Chief Financial Officer received a salary of $185,000.
Neil Owens serves the Company as President and Chief Operating Officer beginning on
July 1, 2019 and received a salary of $68,000 for during the year ended December 31, 2019 in relation to the portion of the year he was the President and Chief Operating Officer.
Graeme Merchant served the Company as Vice President, Commercial Operations until the
conclusion of his employment in September 2017 and received a salary of $161,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company paid directors a total of Nil
(December 31, 2017: Nil; December 31, 2016: Nil, December 31, 2015: Nil and December 31, 2014: Nil) for consulting fees.
The Company has agreed to provide its independent directors $2,000 for each quarterly
board meeting they personally attend ($1,000 via telephone), and $1,500 for each quarterly executive compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee meeting or audit and finance committee meeting they attend that is not held in
conjunction with a regular Board meeting.
For fiscal 2011 and prior, due to the Company’s financial position, the board had offered and committed not to request, and has therefore not received, any compensation for
their services as independent directors. Subsequent to the debt settlement that occurred on July 18, 2011, the Company began paying the Board members this amount owing and had paid $54,000 during fiscal 2013 relating to these accrued amounts. During
fiscal 2013, the members of the Board of Directors agreed to further defer payments on amounts owing. Beginning on February 22, 2013 and until June 30, 2015, these amounts bore interest at a rate of 5.5% per annum. For the year ended December 31,
2015, $5,000 (seven months ended December 31, 2014 –$10,000 and year ended May 31, 2014 – $15,000) was recorded within finance expense in relation to these amounts payable to the members of the Company’s Board of Directors. No
interest was paid or recorded pertaining to amounts owing to the Board of Directors for the year ended December 31, 2019. As at December 31, 2018, the Company had $1,000 of accrued compensation owing to the independent members of the Board of
Directors relating to Directors fees.
On July 11, 2014, the Company announced that, subject to all necessary regulatory
approvals, it has entered into shares for debt agreements with certain members of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which the Company issued 106,490 of its common shares at a deemed price of $1.98 per common share to satisfy $211,000 of
outstanding amounts owing to the Company’s Board of Directors. The shares were issued on January 9, 2015.
On January 27, 2015, the Company announced that, subject to all necessary regulatory
approvals, it has entered into shares for debt agreements with certain members of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which the Company issued 75,472 of its common shares at a deemed price of $1.44 per common share to satisfy $109,000 of outstanding
amounts owing to these individuals. The shares were issued on March 20, 2015.
The Company does not provide any cash compensation for its directors who are also
officers of the Company for their services as directors.
No pension, retirement fund and other similar benefits have been set aside for the
officers and directors of the Company.
C. Board Practices
The Board of Directors presently consists of five directors, who were all elected at
the Company’s annual general meeting of the shareholders held on June 26, 2019. Each director holds office until the next annual general meeting of the Company or until his successor is elected or appointed, unless his office is earlier
vacated in accordance with the By-Laws of the Company, or pursuant to the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act.
Dr. Albert D. Friesen has served as a director of the Company since September 1997. Dr.
Arnold Naimark has served as a director of the Company since March 2000. Gerald McDole has served as a director of the Company since January 2004. Peter Quick has served as a director of the Company since November 2005. Brent Fawkes has served as a
director of the Company since January 2013. Manon Harvey has served as a director of the Company since May 2019.
As discussed in more detail below, the Board of Directors maintains an Audit and
Finance Committee and an Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Corporate Governance
The Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) have adopted
National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines, which provides non-prescriptive guidelines on corporate governance practices for reporting issuers such as the Company. In addition, the CSA have implemented National Instrument NI
58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices, which prescribes certain disclosure by the Company of its corporate governance practices. The Company’s approach to corporate governance is set forth below.
The Board believes that a clearly defined system of corporate governance is essential
to the effective and efficient operation of the Company. The system of corporate governance should reflect the Company’s particular circumstances, having always as its ultimate objective, the best long-term interests of the Company and the
enhancement of value for all shareholders.
Directors are considered to be independent if they have no direct or indirect material
relationship with the Company. A “material relationship” is a relationship which could, in the view of the Company’s board of directors, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of a director’s independent
judgment.
The Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has reviewed
the independence of each director on the basis of the definition in section 1.4 of National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”). The Board has determined, after reviewing the roles and relationships of
each of the directors, that Dr. Arnold Naimark, Brent Fawkes, Gerald McDole, Manon Harvey and Peter Quick are independent from the Company. Only Dr. Albert Friesen is deemed to not be independent from the Company. As part of every regularly
scheduled Board and committee meeting, the independent directors are given the opportunity to meet separately from management and the non-independent director. Board committees are entirely composed of independent directors who meet without
management when required.
The Board has an orientation program in place for new directors which the Board feels
is appropriate having regard to the current makeup of the Board. Each director receives relevant corporate and business information on the Company, the Board, and its committees. The directors regularly meet with Management and are given periodic
presentations on relevant business issues and developments.
Presentations are made to the Board from time to time to educate and keep it informed
of changes within the Company and of regulatory and industry requirements and standards.
The Company’s Board has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to directors,
officers and employees, copies of which are available on the Company’s website (www.medicure.com). A copy may also be obtained upon request to the Secretary of the Company at its head office, 2-1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T
6C6. The ECNCG Committee regularly monitors compliance with the Code of Ethics and also ensures that Management encourages and promotes a culture of ethical business conduct.
Audit and Finance Committee
Pursuant to Section 171 of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the
“Act”), the Company is required to have an Audit Committee. Section 171(1) of the Act requires the directors of a reporting corporation to elect from among their number a committee composed of not fewer than three directors, of
whom a majority must not be officers or employees of the corporation or an affiliate of the corporation. Section 171(3) of the Act provides that, before financial statements are approved by the directors, they must be submitted to the audit
committee for review. Section 171(4) of the Act provides that the auditor must be given notice of, and has the right to appear before and to be heard at, every meeting of the audit committee, and must appear before the audit committee when requested
to do so by the committee. Finally, section 171(5) of the Act provides that on the request of the auditor, the audit committee must convene a meeting of the audit committee to consider any matters the auditor believes should be brought to the
attention of the directors or members.
Pursuant to section 6.1 of NI 52-110, the Company is exempt from the requirements of
Parts 3 and 5 of NI 52-110 for the year ended December 31, 2018, by virtue of the Company being a “venture issuer” (as defined in NI 52-110).
Part 3 of NI 52-110 prescribes certain requirements for the composition of audit
committees of non-exempt companies that are reporting issuers under Canadian provincial securities legislation. Part 3 of NI 52-110 requires, among other things that an audit committee be comprised of at three directors, each of whom, is, subject to
certain exceptions, independent and financially literate in accordance with the standards set forth in NI 52-110.
Part 5 of NI 52-110 requires an annual information form that is filed by a non-exempt
reporting issuer under National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations, as adopted the CSA, to include certain disclosure about the issuer’s audit committee, including, among other things: the text of the audit
committee’s charter; the name of each audit committee member and whether or not the member is independent and financially literate; whether a recommendation of the audit committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor was not adopted
by the issuer’s board of directors, and the reasons for the board’s decision; a description of any policies and procedures adopted by the audit committee for the engagement of non-audit services; and disclosure of the fees billed by the
issuer’s external auditor in each of the last two fiscal years for audit, tax and other services.
Notwithstanding the exemption available under section 6.1 of NI 52-110, as at the date
hereof, the Audit and Finance Committee is comprised of four independent directors: Brent Fawkes (Chair), Gerald McDole, Dr. Arnold Naimark, Manon Harvey and Peter Quick. The relevant experience of each member is described above. (See “Item 6
- Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.)
As a result of their education and experience, each member of the audit committee has
familiarity with, an understanding of, or experience in:
|
●
|
the accounting principles used by the Company to prepare its financial statements, and the ability to assess the general application of those
principles in connection with estimates, accruals and reserves;
|
|
●
|
reviewing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable
to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements, and
|
|
●
|
an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.
|
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the independent auditor of a public Company is
prohibited from performing certain non-audit services. The Audit and Finance Committee has adopted procedures and policies for the pre-approval of non-audit services, as described in the Audit and Finance Committee Charter reproduced
below.
AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER
GENERAL FUNCTIONS, AUTHORITY, AND ROLE
The purpose of the Audit and Finance Committee (the “Committee”) is to
oversee the accounting, financial reporting and disclosure processes of the Company and the audits of its financial statements, and thereby assist the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in monitoring the
following:
(1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Company;
(2) compliance by the Company with ethical policies and legal and regulatory requirements
related to financial reporting and disclosure;
(3) the appointment, compensation, qualifications, independence and performance of the
Company’s internal and external auditors;
(4) the performance of the Company’s independent auditors;
(5) performance of the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting and
disclosure processes; and
(6) that management of the Company has assessed areas of potential significant financial
risk to the Company and taken appropriate measures.
The Committee has the power to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters
within its scope of responsibilities, with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, its auditors and its legal advisors. In connection with such investigations or otherwise in the course of fulfilling its
responsibilities under this charter, the Committee has the authority to independently retain, and set and pay compensation to, special legal, accounting, or other consultants to advise it, and may request any officer or employee of the Company, its
independent legal counsel or independent auditor to attend a meeting of the Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee. The Committee has the power to create specific sub-committees with all of the power to conduct or
authorize investigations into any matters within the scope of the mandate of the sub-committee, with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, its auditors and its legal advisors.
In the course of fulfilling its specific responsibilities hereunder, the Committee has
authority to, and must, maintain free and open communication between the Company’s independent auditor, Board and Company management. The responsibilities of a member of the Committee are in addition to such member’s duties as a member
of the Board.
While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this charter, it is
not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete, accurate, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This is the
responsibility of management and the independent auditor. Nor is it the duty of the Committee to conduct investigations, to resolve disagreements, if any, between management and the independent auditor or to assure compliance with laws and
regulations and the Company’s Code of Ethics. Any responsibilities that the Committee has the power to act upon, may be recommended to the Board to act upon.
MEMBERSHIP
The membership of the Committee will be as follows:
The Committee shall consist of a minimum of three members of the Board, appointed from
time to time, each of whom is affirmatively confirmed as independent by the Board in accordance with the definition of independence for audit committee members set out in Appendix I hereto, with such affirmation
disclosed in the Company’s Management Information Circular for its annual meeting of shareholders. All members of the Committee should be “financially literate”, as
defined in Appendix I, and at least one of the members shall be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in as defined in Appendix I.
The Board will elect, by a majority vote, one member as chairperson. In the absence of
the Chair of the Committee, the members shall appoint an acting Chair.
The members of the Committee shall meet all independence and financial literacy
requirements of The TSX Venture Exchange, and the requirements of such other securities exchange or quotations system or regulatory agency as may from time to time apply to the Company.
Any member of the Committee may be removed and replaced at any time by the Board and will
automatically cease to be a member of the Committee as soon as such member ceases to be a Director. The Board may fill vacancies in the Committee by election from among the members of the Board. If and whenever a vacancy exists on the Committee, the
remaining members may exercise all its powers so long as a quorum remains in office.
A
quorum shall be a majority of the members provided that if the number of members is an even number, one half of the number plus one shall constitute a quorum.
A member of the Committee may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the
Committee, the Board, or any other Board committee, accept any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Company, and may not be an affiliated person of the Company or any subsidiary thereof.
RESPONSIBILITIES
The responsibilities of the Committee shall be as follows:
Frequency of Meetings
Meet quarterly or more often as may be deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment,
either in person or telephonically.
The Committee will meet with the independent auditor at least annually, either in person
or telephonically.
Reporting Responsibilities
Provide to the Board proper Committee minutes.
Report Committee actions to the Board with such recommendations as the Committee may deem
appropriate.
Committee and Charter Evaluation
The Committee shall annually review, discuss and assess its own performance. In addition,
the Committee shall periodically review its role and responsibilities.
Annually review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter and recommend any proposed
changes to the Board for approval.
Whistleblower Mechanism
Adopt and review annually a procedure through which employees and others can
confidentially and anonymously inform the Committee regarding any concerns about the Company’s accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters. The procedure shall include responding to and the retention of, any such complaints.
Legal Responsibilities
Perform such functions as may be assigned by law, by the Company’s certificate of
incorporation, memorandum, articles or similar documents, or by the Board.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
Nomination, Compensation and Evaluation
The Company’s independent auditor is ultimately accountable to the Committee and
the Board and shall report directly to the Committee. The Committee shall review the independence and performance of the auditor and annually recommend to the Board the appointment and compensation of the independent auditor or approve any discharge
of auditor when circumstances warrant.
Review of Work
The Committee is directly responsibility for overseeing the work of the independent
auditor engaged to prepare or issue an audit report or perform other audit, review or attest services for the Company, including the resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting.
Approval in Advance of Related Party Transactions
Pre-approval of all “related party transactions,” which are transactions or
loans between the Company and a related party involving goods, services, or tangible or intangible assets that are:
(1)
material to the Company or the related party; or
(2) unusual in their nature or conditions.
A related party includes an affiliate, major shareholder, officer, other key management
personnel or director of the Company, a company controlled by any of those parties or a family member of any of those parties.
Engagement Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services
Approve in advance all audit services to be provided by the independent auditor.
Establish policies and procedures that establish a requirement for approval in advance of the engagement of the independent auditor to provide permitted non-audit services provided to the Company or its subsidiary entities and to prohibit the
engagement of the independent auditor for any activities or services not permitted by any of the Canadian provincial securities commissions, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or any securities exchange on which the
Company’s shares are traded including any of the following non-audit services:
|
●
|
Bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements of the
Company;
|
|
●
|
Financial information systems design and implementation consulting services;
|
|
●
|
Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contributions-in-kind reports;
|
|
●
|
Internal audit outsourcing services;
|
|
●
|
Any management or human resources function;
|
|
●
|
Broker, dealer, investment advisor, or investment banking services;
|
|
●
|
Expert services related to the auditing service; and
|
|
●
|
Any other service the Board determines is not permitted.
|
Hiring Practices
Review and approve the Company’s hiring policy regarding the partners, employees
and former partners and employees of the present and former independent auditor of the Company. Ensure that no individual who is, or in the past three years has been, affiliated with or employed by a present or former auditor of the Company or an
affiliate, is hired by the Company as a senior officer until at least three years after the end of either the affiliation or the auditing relationship.
Independence Test
Take reasonable steps to confirm the independence of the independent auditor, which shall
annually include:
|
●
|
Ensuring receipt from the independent auditor of a formal written statement delineating all
relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, consistent with the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and related Canadian regulatory body standards;
|
|
●
|
Considering and discussing with the independent auditor any relationships or services provided to the
Company, including non-audit services, that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditor; and
|
|
●
|
As necessary, taking, or recommending that the Board take, appropriate action to oversee the
independence of the independent auditor and evaluate whether it is appropriate to rotate the independent auditor on a regular basis.
|
Audit and Finance Committee Meetings
Notify the independent auditor of every Committee meeting and permit the independent
auditor to appear and speak at those meetings.
At the request of the independent auditor, convene a meeting of the Committee to consider
matters the auditor believes should be brought to the attention of the directors or shareholders.
Keep
minutes of its meetings and report to the Board for approval of any actions taken or recommendations made.
Restrictions
Confirm with management and the independent auditor that no restrictions are placed on
the scope of the auditors’ review and examination of the Company’s accounts.
OTHER PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
Engagement Review
As necessary, consider with management the rationale and selection criteria for engaging
professional consulting services firms.
Ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and approve professional
consulting services engagements.
AUDIT AND REVIEW PROCESS AND RESULTS
Scope
Consider, in consultation with the independent auditor, the audit scope, staffing and
planning of the independent auditor.
Review Process and Results
Consider and review with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by
such auditing standards as may be applicable.
Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor at the completion of
annual and quarterly examinations, if any:
|
●
|
The Company’s audited and unaudited financial statements and related notes;
|
|
●
|
The Company’s Management Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) and news releases
related to financial results;
|
|
●
|
The Company’s management certifications of the financial statements and accompanying MD&A as
required under applicable securities laws;
|
|
●
|
The Company’s annual information form (“AIF”), if one is prepared and
filed.
|
|
●
|
The independent auditor’s audit of the financial statements and its report thereon;
|
|
●
|
Any significant changes required in the independent auditor’s audit plan;
|
|
●
|
The appropriateness of the presentation of any non-IFRS related financial information;
|
|
●
|
Any serious difficulties or disputes with management encountered during the course of the audit;
and
|
|
●
|
Other matters related to the conduct of the audit, which are to be communicated to the Committee under
generally accepted auditing standards.
|
Review the management letter, if any, delivered by the independent auditor in connection
with the audit.
Following such review and discussion, if so determined by the Committee, recommend to the
Board that the annual financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report.
Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the adequacy of the
Company’s internal accounting and financial controls that management and the Board have established and the
effectiveness of those systems, and inquire of management and the independent auditor about significant financial risks or exposures and the steps management has taken to minimize such risks to the
Company.
Meet separately with the independent auditor and management, as necessary or appropriate,
to discuss any matters that the Committee or any of these groups believe should be discussed privately with the Committee.
Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the accounting policies
which may be viewed as critical, including all alternative treatments for financial information within IFRS that have been discussed with management, and review and discuss any significant changes in the accounting policies of the Company and
industry accounting and regulatory financial reporting proposals that may have a significant impact on the Company’s financial reports.
Review with management and the independent auditor the effect of regulatory and
accounting initiatives as well as off-balance sheet structures, if any, on the Company’s financial statements.
Review with management and the independent auditor any correspondence with regulators or
governmental agencies and any employee complaints or published reports which raise material issues regarding the Company’s financial statements or accounting policies.
Review with the Company’s legal counsel legal matters that may have a material
impact on the financial statements, the Company’s financial compliance policies and any material reports or inquiries received from regulators or governmental agencies related to financial matters.
SECURITIES REGULATORY FILINGS
Review filings with the Canadian provincial securities commissions and the SEC and other
published documents containing the Company’s financial statements.
Review, with management, prior to public disclosure, the Company’s financial
statements and MD&A and related press releases. The chairperson of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this review.
Ensure that adequate procedures are in place for the review of the Company’s public
disclosure of financial information extracted or derived from the Company’s financial statements, other than the disclosure stated above, and periodically assess the adequacy of those procedures.
RISK ASSESSMENT
Meet periodically with management to review the Company’s major financial risk
exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.
Assess risk areas and policies to manage risk including, without limitation,
environmental risk, insurance coverage and other areas as determined by the Board from time to time.
Review and discuss with management, and approve changes to, the Company’s Corporate
Investment Policy.
LIMITATION ON DUTIES OF AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
In contributing to the Committee’s discharging of its duties under this charter,
each member of the Committee shall be obliged only to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. Nothing in this charter is intended, or may be construed,
to impose on any member of the Committee a standard of care or diligence that is in any way more onerous or extensive than the standard to which all Board members are subject.
ADOPTION OF CHARTER
This charter was originally adopted by the Board on August 23, 2004 and revised on
January 17, 2012.
APPENDIX I
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
“Independent” means a director who has no direct or indirect material
relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries.
A “material relationship” is a relationship which could, in the view
of the Board of the Company, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of the person’s independent judgment.
For
greater certainty, certain individuals will be deemed not to be independent:
|
a)
|
an individual who is, or has been within the last three years, an employee or executive officer of the Company;
|
|
b)
|
an individual whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company;
|
|
c)
|
an individual who is a partner of, or employed by the Company’s internal or external auditor or who was, within the last three years, a
partner or employee of that audit firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time. For this purpose, “partner” does not include a fixed income partner;
|
|
d)
|
an individual whose child or stepchild shares a home with the individual or whose spouse, is a partner of the Company’s internal or
external auditor, or is an employee of the audit firm and participates in its audit, assurance or tax compliance practice or who was within the last three years a partner or employee of the audit firm and personally worked on the Company’s
audit within that time. For this purpose, “partner” does not include a fixed income partner;
|
|
e)
|
an individual who, or whose immediate family member, is or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of an entity if any of the
Company’s current executive officers serve or served at the same time on the entity’s compensation committee; and
|
|
f)
|
an individual who received, or whose immediate family member who is employed as an executive officer of the Company received, more than $75,000
in direct compensation from the Company during any 12 month period within the last three years. For purposes hereof, direct compensation does not include remuneration for acting as a member of the Board or of any Board committee or remuneration
consisting of fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan for prior service provided that such compensation is not contingent on any way on continued service.
|
For purposes hereof, “Company” includes Medicure Inc. and any
subsidiaries thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person will not be considered to have a material relationship with the Company solely because he or she:
|
a)
|
has previously acted as an interim chief executive officer of the issuer, or
|
|
b)
|
acts, or has previously acted, as a chair or vice-chair of the Board or any Board committee, on a part-time basis.
|
Meaning Of “Independence” For Audit Committees
In addition to the requirement of being an Independent Director as described above,
members of the Audit Committee will not be considered “independent” for that purpose where the individual:
|
a)
|
accepts, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or subsidiary of the Company, other than as
remuneration for acting in his or her capacity as a member of the Board or any Board committee, or as a part-time or vice-chair of the Board or any Board Committee; or
|
|
b)
|
is an affiliated entity (as defined in National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees) of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
|
For purposes hereof, indirect acceptance by an individual of any consulting, advisory or
other compensatory fee includes acceptance of a fee by (i) an individual’s spouse, minor child or stepchild, or child or stepchild who shares the individual’s home, or (ii) an entity in which such individual is a partner, member,
executive officer or managing director (or comparable position) and which provides accounting, consulting, legal, investment banking or financial advisory services to the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
compensatory fees do not include receipt of fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with the issuer if the compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service.
Meaning of “financially literate”
For purposes hereof, an individual is financially literate if he or she has the ability
to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the
Company’s financial statements.
Meaning of “audit committee financial expert”
An “audit committee financial expert” means a person who has the following
attributes:
(1) An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial
statements;
(2) The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with
the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;
(3) Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that
present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements, or experience actively
supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;
(4) An understanding of internal controls over financial reporting;
(5) An understanding of audit committee functions.
A person shall have acquired such attributes through:
(1)
Education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the performance of similar functions;
(2) Experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer, controller, public accountant, auditor or person performing similar functions;
(3)
Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements; or
(4) Other relevant experience.
Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
The Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible
for determining the compensation of executive officers of the Company. The current members of the Committee are Dr. Arnold Naimark (Chair), Gerald McDole, Manon Harvey, Peter Quick and Brent Fawkes, none of whom is a current or former executive
officer of the Company. The Committee meets at least once a year.
The Committee has developed a policy to govern the Company’s approach to corporate
governance issues and provides a forum for concerns of individual directors about matters not easily or readily discussed in a full board meeting, e.g., the performance of management. The Committee ensures there is a clear definition and separation
of the responsibilities of the Board, the Committees of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and other management employees. It also ensures there is a process in place for the orientation and education of new directors and for continuing
education of the Board. The Committee also assesses the effectiveness of the Board and its committees on an ongoing ad hoc basis. It also reviews at least annually the Company’s responsiveness to environmental impact, health and safety and
other regulatory standards.
The Committee reviews the objectives, performance and compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board for change. The Committee makes recommendations based upon the Chief Executive Officer’s suggestions regarding the salaries and incentive compensation for senior
officers of the Company. The Committee also reviews significant changes to compensation, benefits and human resources policies and compliance with current human resource management practices, such as pay equity, performance review and staff
development. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending changes to the compensation of directors as necessary.
The charter of the Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
can be found on the Company’s website at www.medicure.com.
D. Employees
In addition to the individuals disclosed in Section A. Directors and Senior Management
of this item, the Company has 45 employees through Medicure as at December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s total employment decreased from the previous year as part of the Company’s cost curtailment
activities.
E. Share Ownership
The following table discloses the number of shares (each share possessing identical
voting rights), stock options and percent of the shares outstanding held by the directors and officers of the Company, and their respective affiliates, directly and indirectly, at December 31, 2019.
Title of Class
|
Identity of Person or
Group
|
Amount
Owned
|
Percentage of
Class
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
Dr. Albert D. Friesen(1)
|
2,273,227(1)
|
21.04%
|
Common shares
|
Dr. Arnold Naimark
|
39,194
|
0.36%
|
Common shares
|
Gerald P. McDole
|
48,950
|
0.45%
|
Common shares
|
Peter Quick
|
28,150
|
0.26%
|
Common shares
|
Brent Fawkes
|
12,376
|
0.11%
|
Common shares
|
Manon Harvey
|
-
|
-
|
Common shares
|
Dr. Neil Owens
|
-
|
-
|
Common shares
|
James Kinley
|
47,100
|
0.44%
|
|
(1)
|
Dr. Albert D. Friesen holds 721,267 shares personally or in an RRSP, a Canadian individual retirement
plan. The rest of the shares are held by ADF Family Holding Corp. ADF Enterprises Inc., his wife Mrs. Leona M. Friesen, and CentreStone Ventures Limited Partnership Fund. Dr. Friesen is the General Partner of CentreStone Ventures Limited Partnership
Fund.
|
Incentive Stock Options
The Company has established an Incentive Stock Option Plan (the
‘‘Plan’’) for its directors, key officers, employees and consultants. Options granted pursuant to the Plan will not exceed a term of ten years and are granted at an option price and on other terms which the directors
determine is necessary to achieve the goal of the Plan and in accordance with regulatory requirements, including those of the TSX Venture Exchange. Each option entitles the holder thereof to purchase one (1) Common Share of the Company on the terms
set forth in the Plan and in such purchaser’s specific stock option agreement. The option price may be at a discount to market price, which discount will not, in any event, exceed that permitted by any stock exchange on which the
Company’s Common Shares are listed for trading.
The number of Common Shares allocated to the Plan, the exercise period for the options,
and the vesting provisions for the options will be determined by the board of directors of the Company from time to time. The Company’s stock option plan allowed for the issuance of stock options to purchase up to a maximum of 20% of the
outstanding common shares at the time of approval of the stock option plan, which resulted in a fixed number of stock options allowed to be granted totaling 2,934,403. The Plan was adopted by the shareholders of the Company on June 22,
2016.
The Common Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options, when fully paid for by a
participant, are not included in the calculation of Common Shares allocated to or within the Plan. Should a participant cease to be eligible due to the loss of corporate office (being that of an officer or director) or employment, the option shall
cease for varying periods not exceeding 90 days. Loss of eligibility for consultants is regulated by specific rules imposed by the directors when the option is granted to the appropriate consultant. The Plan also provides that estates of deceased
participants can exercise their options for a period not exceeding one year following death.
The following table discloses the stock options beneficially held by the directors and
officers of the Company, and their respective affiliates, directly and indirectly, as of December 31, 2019. The stock options are subject to the Plan and are for shares of Common Stock of the Company.
Name of Person
|
Number of Shares Subject to Issuance
|
Exercise Price per Share
|
Expiry Date
|
Dr. Albert D. Friesen
|
5,000
414,000
15,000
100,000
15,000
7,500
9,000
|
$6.16
$1.50
$7.20
$7.30
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
July 18,
2021
December 19, 2022
January 31, 2023
June 26, 2024
July 7,
2024
March 27, 2025
|
Dr. Arnold Naimark
|
4,000
5,000
45,000
5,000
4,500
7,200
|
$6.16
$7.20
$0.30
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
December 19,
2022
May 10, 2023
June 26, 2024
July 7,
2024
March 27, 2025
|
Gerald P. McDole
|
4,000
5,000
45,000
5,000
4,500
7,200
|
$6.16
$7.20
$0.30
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
December 19,
2022
May 10, 2023
June 26, 2024
July 7,
2024
March 27, 2025
|
Peter Quick
|
4,000
5,000
45,000
5,000
4,500
7,200
|
$6.16
$7.20
$0.30
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
December 19,
2022
May 10, 2023
June 26, 2024
July 7,
2024
March 27, 2025
|
Brent Fawkes
|
4,000
5,000
45,000
5,000
4,500
7,200
|
$6.16
$7.20
$0.30
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
December 19,
2022
May 10, 2023
June 26, 2024
July 7,
2024
March 27, 2025
|
Manon Harvey
|
15,000
|
$4.95
|
June 26, 2024
|
Dr. Neil Owens
|
3,000
1,050
4,000
100,000
3,500
1,350
|
$3.90
$6.16
$7.20
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
November 25, 2020
April 7,
2021
December 19, 2022
June 26, 2024
July 7, 2024
March 27,
2025
|
James Kinley
|
4,000
100,000
15,000
7,500
7,200
|
$6.16
$7.20
$4.95
$1.90
$1.90
|
April 7, 2021
December 19,
2022
June 26, 2024
July 7, 2024
March 27,
2025
|
On June 26, 2019, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved the grant of an aggregate of 262,000 stock options to certain directors, officers, employees and
management company employees of the Company pursuant to its stock option plan. These options, which were subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange, are set to expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and were issued at an
exercise price of $4.95 per share. Of the stock options granted 180,000 were granted to officers and directors of the Company.
On February 1, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the grant of 100,000 stock options to an officer of the Company pursuant
to its stock option plan. These options, which were subject to the approval of the TSX-V, are set to expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and were issued at an exercise price of $7.30 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, Gerald McDole, Arnold
Naimark and Peter Quick each exercised 667 stock options to acquire 667 common shares of the Company each at an exercise price of $0.60.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, James Kinley exercised 45,000 stock options to acquire 45,000 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.30.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
As of December 31, 2019, the following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the
Company’s common shares by each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. Information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by each nominee or
over which each nominee exercises control or direction, not being within the knowledge of the Company, has been furnished by the respective nominees individually. The Company does not know the majority of the ultimate beneficial owners of these
common shares.
Title of Class
|
Identity of Person or Group
|
Amount Owned
(3)
|
Percentage of
Class
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
Dr. Albert D.
Friesen
Winnipeg, Manitoba
|
2,273,227 (1)
|
21.04%
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
MM Asset Management Inc.
|
2,410,567
|
22.31%
|
|
Toronto, Ontario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
PenderFund Capital Management Ltd
|
1,150,597
|
10.65%
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Dr. Albert Friesen holds 781,267 shares personally or in an RRSP. The rest of the shares are held by
ADF Family Holding Corp., his wife Mrs. Leona M. Friesen, and CentreStone Ventures Limited Partnership Fund. Dr. Friesen is the General Partner of CentreStone Ventures Limited Partnership Fund.
|
To the best of the Company’s knowledge, it is not owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by another Company, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly.
As
of December 31, 2019, the total number of issued and outstanding common shares of the Company beneficially owned by the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group was 2,448,997 (or 22.67% of common shares).
To the best of the Company’s knowledge, there are no arrangements, the operation
of which at a subsequent date will result in a change in control of the Company.
The major shareholders do not have any special voting rights.
Insider Reports under Canadian Securities Legislation
Since the Company a reporting issuer under the Securities Acts of each of the provinces
of Canada, certain “insiders” of the Company (including its directors, certain executive officers, and persons who directly or indirectly beneficially own, control or direct more than 10% of its common shares) are generally required to
file insider reports of changes in their ownership of the Company’s common shares five days following the trade under National Instrument 55-104 – Insider Reporting Requirements and Exemptions, as adopted by the Canadian
Securities Administrators. Insider reports must be filed electronically five days following the date of the trade at www.sedi.ca. The public is able to access these reports at
www.sedi.ca.
The U.S. rules governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must
be disclosed are more stringent than those discussed above. Section 13 of the Exchange Act imposes reporting requirements on persons who acquire beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in the Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than 5
per cent of a class of an equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. In general, such persons must file, within 10 days after such acquisition, a report of beneficial ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission
containing the information prescribed by the regulations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act. This information is also required to be sent to the issuer of the securities and to each exchange where the securities are traded.
B. Related Party Transactions
Except as disclosed below, the Company has not, since January 1, 2015, and does not at
this time propose to:
|
(1)
|
enter into any transactions which are material to the Company or a related party or any transactions
unusual in their nature or conditions involving goods, services or tangible or intangible assets to which the Company or any of its former subsidiaries was a party;
|
|
(2)
|
make any loans or guarantees directly or through any of its former subsidiaries to or for the benefit
of any of the following persons:
|
|
(a)
|
enterprises directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlling or controlled by or
under common control with the Company;
|
|
(b)
|
associates of the Company (unconsolidated enterprises in which the Company has significant influence
or which has significant influence over the Company) including shareholders beneficially owning 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company;
|
|
(c)
|
individuals owning, directly or indirectly, shares of the Company that gives them significant
influence over the Company and close members of such individuals families;
|
|
(d)
|
key management personnel (persons having authority in responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the Company including directors and senior management and close members of such directors and senior management); or
|
|
(e)
|
enterprises in which a substantial voting interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person
described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence.
|
On
July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. pursuant to which Dr. Albert Friesen serves the Company as its Chief Executive Officer. The agreement is for a term of five years, at a rate of
$180,000 annually. Dr. Friesen is also eligible for a yearly merit/performance bonus, if any, that the Company’s board of directors, in its sole discretion, may authorize. Effective July 18, 2016, the Company renewed its consulting agreement
with its Chief Executive Officer, through A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd., a company owned by the Chief Executive Officer. for a term of five years, at a rate of $300,000 annually, increasing to $315,000 annually, effective January 1, 2017 and
increasing to $331,000 annually, effective January 1, 2019. The Company may terminate this agreement at any time upon 120 days’ written notice. As at December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no amounts included in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities payable to A. D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. as a result of this consulting agreement. Any amounts payable to A. D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. are unsecured, payable on demand and non-interest bearing.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a bonus of $32,000 to its
Chief Executive Officer which was recorded within general and administrative expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a bonus of $125,000 to its Chief Executive Officer which is recorded within the gain on the sale of
Apicore, which was paid during fiscal 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a bonus of $54,000 to its Chief Executive Officer which is recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses. During the year ended
December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a bonus of $100,000 to its Chief Executive Officer which is recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses.
On July 11, 2014, the Company announced that, subject to all necessary regulatory
approvals, it has entered into shares for debt agreements with its Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Albert Friesen and certain members of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which the Company will issue 205,867 of its common shares at a deemed price of
$1.98 per common share to satisfy $408,000 of outstanding amounts owing to CEO and members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The shares were issued on January 9, 2015.
The Company may terminate the consulting agreement with the CEO for any reason and at any time upon 120 days’ written notice. In relation to the consulting
agreement with A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. the Company recorded consulting fees payable to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a total of $331,000 to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. During the
year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a total of $315,000, respectively, to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a total of $300,000 to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd. During
the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a total of $186,000 to A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.
Dr. Friesen, a director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company is also the majority shareholder
in a management services company, Genesys Venture Inc. (“GVI”) which entered into a management services agreement with the Company as of October 1, 2010. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company entered into a new business and
administration services agreement with GVI under which the Company is committed to pay $15,833.33 per month or $190,000 per annum along with an additional $500 per month for each office space it requests and is given access to by GVI. The agreement
was for an initial term of one year and shall be automatically renewed for succeeding terms of one year. Either party may terminate the agreement at any time after June 30, 2012, upon 90 days written notice to the other party. The Chief Financial
Officer's services, accounting, payroll, human resources, and information technology are provided pursuant to this agreement. The agreement was renewed for the 2013 and 2014 calendar years. Effective November 1, 2014, the business and administration
services agreement was renegotiated for a further 14 month term ending December 31, 2015 at a rate of $17,917 per month, or $215,000 per year. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company entered into a new business and administration services agreement
with GVI, under which the Company is committed to paying $7,000 per month or $85,000 per year for a one year term and the agreement no longer includes the services of the Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company renewed its
business and administration services agreement with GVI, under which the Company is committed to pay $7,000 per month or $85,000 per year for a one-year term and effective January 1, 2018, this agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term.
Effective January 1, 2019, this agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term.
Effective November 1, 2014, the Company entered into a sub-lease
with GVI to lease office space at a rate of $170,000 per annum for three years ending October 31, 2017. The lease was amended on May 1, 2016 and increased the leased area covered under the lease agreement at a rate of $212,000 per annum until
October 31, 2019. The leased area covered under the lease was again increased, effective November 1, 2018 at a rate of $306,000 per annum until the end of the term of the lease. Effective November 1, 2019, the Company modified and extended its
sub-lease with GVI to lease a reduced amount of office space at a rate of $238,000 per annum for three years ending October 31, 2022 with an 18-month renewal period available.
During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company paid GVI, a company controlled by the Chief Executive Officer, a total of $85,000 (2018 – $85,000;
2017 – $85,000; 2016 – $85,000, 2015 - $215,000) for business administration services, $295,000 (2018 - $228,000, 2017 – $212,000; 2016 – $223,000; 2015 - $176,000) in rental costs and
$47,000 (2018 - $47,000, 2017 – $44,000; 2016 – $42,000; 2015 – $34,000) for commercial and information technology support services. As described in note 17(b) to the Company’s audited
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, the business administration services summarized above are provided to the Company through a consulting agreement with GVI. The business administration services summarized above are
provided to the Company through a consulting agreement with GVI. Until December 31, 2015, the GVI agreement included the Chief Financial Officer's services to the Company, as well as accounting, payroll, human resources and some information
technology services. The business and administration services agreement entered into effective January 1, 2016 and subsequently no longer includes the Chief Financial Officer's services, which effective January 1, 2016, have been paid directly by
the Company through a consulting agreement.
Dr. Friesen, a director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
also owns a clinical research organization, GVI Clinical Development Solutions Inc. (“GVI CDS”) which entered into the following clinical research contracts with the Company;
Nature of
Agreement
|
Effective Date
|
Terms
|
Regulatory affairs support
|
June 22, 2009
|
Services provided as needed on an hourly basis
|
Pharmacovigilance and medical affairs support
|
January 1, 2014
|
Monthly retainer of $2,000, plus hourly charges for pharmacovigilance services outside base services.
|
Pharmacovigilance and medical affairs support
|
January 1, 2014
|
Monthly retainer of $1,250, plus hourly charges for pharmacovigilance services outside base services.
|
Quality assurance support
|
June 1, 2010
|
Services provided as needed on an hourly basis.
|
Clincial services
|
May 1, 2010
|
Services provided as needed on an hourly basis.
|
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid GVI CDS $406,000 (2018 - $858,000, 2017 – $716,000; 2016 – $592,000, 2015 - $331,000) for
clinical research services.
The Company also has a consulting
agreement with CanAm Bioresearch Inc. (“CanAm”), a company controlled by a close family member of Dr. Friesen’s to provide contract research services. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid CanAm $133,000
(2018 - $393,000, 2017 – $458,000; 2016 – $560,000; 2015 - $400,000) for research and development services.
These transactions have been measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.
Beginning on February 22, 2013 and until June 30, 2015, the amounts owing to GVI, GVI CDS
and CanAm bore interest at a rate of 5.5% per annum. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no interest charged on these amounts payable to related parties. For the year ended December 31, 2015 $5,000 was recorded within finance
expense in relation to these amounts payable to related parties.
Beginning with the acquisition of Apicore (the “Acquisition”) on December 1,
2016 and ending with the Apicore Sales Transaction on October 2, 2017, as described in note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred rental charges pertaining to leased manufacturing facilities and office space from Dap
Dhaduk II LLC (“Dap Dhaduk”), an entity controlled by a minority shareholder and member of the board of directors of Apicore Inc. Included within discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of net income and comprehensive
income is payments to Dap Dhaduk totaling $263,000 and $30,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Beginning with the
Acquisition on December 1, 2016 and ending with the Apicore Sales Transaction on October 2, 2017, as described in note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company purchased inventory from Aktinos Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and
Aktinos HealthCare Private Limited (together, “Aktinos”), an entity significantly influenced by a close family member of the Chief Executive Officer of Apicore Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid Aktinos $1.6
million (2016 – $217,000) for purchases of inventory, which were included in assets of the Apicore business sold (note 5) in connection with the Apicore Sales Transaction.
Beginning with the Acquisition on December 1, 2016 and ending with
the Apicore Sales Transaction on October 2, 2017, as described in note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred research and development charges from Omgene Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (“Omgene”), an entity
significantly influenced by a close family member of the Chief Executive Officer of Apicore Inc. Included within discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of net income and comprehensive income is payments to Omgene totaling $26,000 and
nil for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Beginning with the Acquisition on December 1, 2016 and ending with the Apicore Sales Transaction on October 2, 2017, as described in note 5 of the consolidated
financial statements,, the Company incurred pharmacovigilance charges from 4C Pharma Solutions LLC (“4C Pharma”), an entity significantly influenced by a close family member of the Chief Executive Officer of Apicore Inc. Included within
discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of net income and comprehensive income is payments to 4C Pharma totaling $6,000 and nil for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
As at December 31, 2019, included in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $95,000 (2018 - $17,000) payable to GVI, $56,000 (2018 – $134,000) payable to GVI CDS, and no amounts (2018 –
$40,000) payable to CanAm. These amounts are unsecured, payable on demand and non-interest bearing. In addition, the other long-term liability totaling $1.2 million as at December 31, 2018 (2017 - $1.1 million)
is payable to the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Apicore upon receipt of the holdback receivable.
As at
December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any amounts payable (2018 – $5,000) recorded within accounts payable and accrued liabilities relating to amounts payable to the members of the Company's Board
of Directors for services provided.
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company renewed its consulting agreement with its Chief Financial Officer,
through JFK Enterprises Ltd., a company owned by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, for a one-year term, at a rate of $155,000 annually. The agreement could have been terminated by either party, at any time, upon 30 days written notice. Any
amounts payable to JFK Enterprises Ltd. were unsecured, payable on demand and non-interest bearing. Effective June 1, 2018, this consulting agreement was converted into an employment agreement with the Chief Financial Officer.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated Statements or Other Financial
Information
financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at December 31, 2019
and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, and are included under Item 18 of this Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements including related notes
are accompanied by the report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as at and for the years ended December 2019 and 2018 and Ernst & Young LLP for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Legal Proceedings
On February 13, 2019, the Company announced that it had received notice from the purchaser of Medicure's interests in Apicore of potential claims against
funds held back in respect of representations and warranties under the Apicore sale agreement. The notice did not contain sufficiently detailed information to enable Medicure to assess the merits of the claims with the maximum exposure of the claims
being the total holdback receivable. The Company continued to proceed diligently to investigate the potential claims and attempt to satisfactorily resolve them with a view to having the holdback funds released. In conjunction with the sale of
Medicure's interests in Apicore, representation and warranty insurance was obtained by the purchaser that could result in mitigation of the potential claims.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with the purchaser of the Company’s interests in Apicore with
respect to the amounts heldback under the Apicore sale agreement. A settlement agreement was reached under which Medicure received a net payment of US$5.1 million in relation to the holdback receivable.
On December 5, 2019, the Company announced it had filed a patent
infringement action against in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of the ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement action is in response to Nexus’ filing of an ANDA seeking approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT®
before the expiration of the ’660 patent.
The
’660 patent is listed in FDA’s orange book with an expiry date of May 1, 2023. Medicure will vigorously defend the ’660 patent and will pursue the patent infringement action against Nexus and all other legal options available to
protect its product.
Previously, on November 16, 2018, the Company
filed a patent infringement action against Gland in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of the ‘660 patent.
The patent infringement actions were in response to Gland’s
filing of an ANDA seeking approval from the FDA to market a generic version of AGGRASTAT® before the expiration of the ’660 patent.
On August 21, 2019 the Company announced that its subsidiary, Medicure
International Inc., has settled this ongoing patent infringement action. As part of the settlement, Gland has acknowledged that the ‘660 patent is valid, enforceable and infringed. The settlement resulted in the Company entering into a license
agreement with Gland with an anticipated launch date for Gland’s generic product of March 1, 2023. The remaining terms of the settlement are confidential.
During 2018, the Company was named in a civil claim in Florida from
the third-party manufacturer of PREXXARTAN® against Carmel. The claim disputed the rights granted by Carmel to the Company with respect to PREXXARTAN®. The Company believed the claim against it was without
merit and intended to defend itself against the claim. The claim against the Company has been subsequently withdrawn, however the dispute between the third-party manufacturer and Carmel continues.
Aside from the above, there are no additional legal or arbitration
proceedings, including those relating to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings and those involving any third party, which may have, or have had in the recent past, significant effects on the Company’s financial position or
profitability. There are no additional significant legal proceedings to which the Company is a party, nor to the best of the knowledge of the Company’s management are any legal proceedings contemplated.
Dividend Policy
The Company has not paid dividends in the past and it has no present intention of paying
dividends on its shares as it anticipates that all available funds will be invested to finance the growth of its business. The directors of the Company will determine if and when dividends should be declared and paid in the future based upon the
Company’s financial position at the relevant time. All of the Company’s Shares are entitled to an equal share of any dividends declared and paid.
B. Significant Changes
There have been no significant changes to the accompanying financial statements since
December 31, 2018, except as disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
ITEM 9. THE OFFERING AND LISTING
A. Listing Details
On October 24, 2011, the Company’s common shares commenced trading on the TSX-V
under the symbol “MPH”.
By Articles of Amendment filed by the Company under the Canada Business Corporations
Act on November 1, 2012, the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares were consolidated on the basis of one post-consolidation common share for every fifteen pre-consolidation common shares. The Company’s name and trading
symbol did not change as a result of the consolidation. The Company’s common shares were reduced from 182,947,595 to 12,196,508 issued and outstanding as a result of the consolidation. The trading prices presented here have not been adjusted
to reflect the consolidation.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the price history of the Company’s common shares on the TSX-V.
|
TSX-V
|
TSX-V
|
|
High ($)
|
Low ($)
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
5.24
|
3.00
|
September 30, 2019
|
5.02
|
4.15
|
June 30, 2019
|
6.35
|
4.68
|
March 31, 2019
|
6.90
|
5.95
|
December 31, 2018
|
7.15
|
5.71
|
September 30, 2018
|
7.38
|
6.60
|
June 30, 2018
|
7.55
|
5.90
|
March 31, 2018
|
7.40
|
6.70
|
December 31, 2017
|
8.71
|
6.90
|
September 30, 2017
|
8.45
|
7.50
|
June 30, 2017
|
9.82
|
6.50
|
March 31, 2017
|
10.55
|
8.52
|
December 31, 2016
|
10.67
|
5.48
|
September 30, 2016
|
7.20
|
5.49
|
June 30, 2016
|
6.98
|
4.73
|
March 31, 2016
|
7.29
|
4.18
|
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
The Company’s common shares are listed for trading on the TSX-V under the symbol
“MPH”. Certain market makers also trade the Company’s common shares on the OTC Pink Market, under the symbol “MCUJF”.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share Capital
Not applicable
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
1. Objects and Purposes of the Company
The Articles of Continuance (as amended, the “Articles”) and the
By-Laws of the Company place no restrictions upon the Company’s objects and purposes.
2.
Directors
Under applicable Canadian law, the directors and officers of the Company, in exercising
their powers and discharging their duties, must act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The directors and officers must also exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would
exercise in comparable circumstances.
Section 4.18 of By-Law No.1A of the Company (the “By-Law”) provides
that a director shall not be disqualified by reason of his office from contracting with the Company or a subsidiary thereof. Subject to the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “Act”), a director shall
not by reason only of his office be accountable to the Company or its shareholders for any profit or gain realized from a contract or transaction in which he has an interest. Such contract or transaction shall not be voidable by reason only of such
interest, or by reason only of the presence of a director so interested at a meeting, or by reason only of his presence being counted in determining a quorum at a meeting of the directors at which such a contract or transaction is approved, provided
that a declaration and disclosure of such interest shall have been made at the time and in the manner prescribed by section 120 of the Act, and the director so interested shall have refrained from voting as a director on the resolution approving the
contract or transaction (except as permitted by the Act) and such contract shall have been reasonable and fair to the Company and shall have been approved by the directors or shareholders of the Company as required by section 120 of the
Act.
The Company’s Articles provide that the Company’s board shall consist of a
minimum of one and a maximum of 15 directors. The exact number of directors to form the board, between the minimum and maximum number of directors prescribed by the Articles, is determined from time to time by the board. Section 4.01 of the By-Law
states that the quorum of the board shall be a majority of the board, or such other number of directors as the board may from time to time determine. No business shall be transacted at a meeting unless a quorum is present.
Section 3.01 of the By-Law states that the board may, without the authorization of the
shareholders:
|
i)
|
borrow money upon the credit of the Company;
|
|
ii)
|
issue, reissue, sell or pledge debt obligations of the Company, including bonds, debentures, notes or
other evidences of indebtedness or guarantees, whether secured or unsecured;
|
|
iii)
|
subject to section 44 of the Act, give a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of
any present or future indebtedness, liability or obligation of any person; and
|
|
iv)
|
mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest in all or any property of the
Company, owned or subsequently acquired, to secure any obligation of the Company.
|
The borrowing powers of the directors can be varied by amending the By-Law of the
Company.
There is no provision in the By-Law imposing a requirement for retirement or
non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement.
Section 4.02 of the By-law states that a director need not be a shareholder to be
qualified as a director. However, section 4.02 also provides that at least 25% of the directors shall be resident Canadians unless the Company has less than four directors, in which case at least one director must be a resident Canadian.
Under section 4.03 of the By-law, directors are to be elected yearly by ordinary
resolution to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholder. If directors fail to be elected at any such meeting of shareholders, then the incumbent directors continue in office until their successors are elected.
3. Shares
The Articles of the Company provide that the Company is authorized to issue an unlimited
number of shares designated as Common Shares, Class A Common Shares and Preferred Shares. Except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares of the Company are entitled to vote separately as a class or series,
each holder of the Common and Class A shares is entitled to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at all meetings of the shareholders of the Company. Subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to any other class of
shares of the Company, the holders of the Common and Class A shares are also entitled to receive dividends if, as and when declared by the directors of the Company and are entitled to share equally in the remaining property of the Company upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.
The Preferred Shares may from time to time be issued in one or more series and, subject
to the following provisions, and subject to the sending of articles of amendment in respect thereof, the directors may fix from time to time and before issue a series of Preferred Shares, the number of shares which are to comprise that series and
the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions to be attached to that series of Preferred Shares including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rate or amount of dividends or the method of calculating dividends,
the dates of payment of dividends, the redemption, purchase and/or conversion, and any sinking fund or other provisions.
The Preferred Shares of each series shall, with respect to the payment of dividends and
the distribution of assets or return of capital in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other return of capital or distribution of the assets of the Company among its
shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs, rank on a parity with the Preferred Shares of every other series and be entitled to preference over the Common and Class A Common Shares and over any other shares of the Company ranking junior
to the Preferred Shares. The Preferred Shares of any series may also be given other preferences, not inconsistent with these articles, over the Common Shares and Class A Common Shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the
Preferred Shares of a series as may be fixed in accordance with terms outlined above.
If any cumulative dividends or amounts payable on the return of capital in respect of a
series of Preferred Shares are not paid in full, all series of Preferred Shares shall participate rateably in respect of accumulated dividends and return of capital.
Unless the directors otherwise determine in the articles of amendment designating a
series of Preferred Shares, the holder of each share or a series of Preferred Shares shall not, as such, be entitled to receive notice of or vote at any meeting of shareholders, except as otherwise specifically provided in the Act.
4. Rights of Shareholders
Under the Act, shareholders of the Company are entitled to examine, during its usual
business hours, the Company’s articles and by-laws, notices of directors and change of directors, any unanimous shareholder agreements, the minutes of meetings and resolutions of shareholders and the list of shareholders.
Shareholders of the Company may obtain a list of shareholders upon payment of a
reasonable fee and sending an affidavit to the Company or its transfer agent stating, among other things, that the list of shareholders will not be used by any person except in connection with an effort to influence the voting of shareholders of the
Company, an offer to acquire shares of the Company or any other matter relating to the affairs of the Company.
Under the Act, shareholders of the Company may apply to a court having jurisdiction
directing an investigation to be made of the Company. If it appears to the court that the formation, business or affairs of the Company were conducted for fraudulent or unlawful purposes, or that the powers of the directors were exercised in a
manner that is oppressive or unfairly disregards the interests of the shareholders, the court may order an investigation to be made of the Company.
To
change the rights of holders of stock, where such rights are attached to an issued class or series of shares, requires the consent by a separate resolution of the holders of the class or series of shares, as the case may be, requiring a majority of
two-thirds of the votes cast.
The Company is organized under the laws of Canada. The majority of the Company’s
directors, officers, and affiliates of the Company, as well as the experts named in this registration statement, are residents of Canada and, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, all or a substantial portion of their assets and all of the
Company’s assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for shareholders of the Company in the United States to effect service of process on the Company or these persons above within the United States, or to
realize in the United States upon judgments rendered against the Company or such persons. Additionally, a shareholder of the Company should not assume that the courts of Canada (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against
the Company or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the United States, or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against the Company or such persons predicated
upon the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the United States.
Laws in the United States and judgments of U.S. courts would generally be enforced by a
court of Canada unless such laws or judgments are contrary to public policy in Canada, are or arise from foreign penal laws or laws that deal with taxation or the taking of property by a foreign government and are not in compliance with applicable
laws in Canada regarding the limitation of actions. Further, a judgment obtained in a U.S. court would generally be recognized by a court of Canada, except under the following examples:
|
i)
|
the judgment was rendered in a U.S. court that had no jurisdiction according to applicable laws in
Canada;
|
|
ii)
|
the judgment was subject to ordinary remedy (appeal, judicial review and any other judicial proceeding
which renders the judgment not final, conclusive or enforceable under the laws of the applicable state) or not final, conclusive or enforceable under the laws of the applicable state;
|
|
iii)
|
the judgment was obtained by fraud or in any manner contrary to natural justice or rendered in
contravention of fundamental principles of procedure; and
|
|
iv)
|
a dispute between the same parties, based on the same subject matter has given rise to a judgment
rendered in a court of Canada or has been decided in a third country and the judgment meets the necessary conditions for recognition in a court of Canada.
|
5. Meetings
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the annual general meeting of the shareholders
shall be on such date in each year as the board of directors may determine, and a special meeting of the shareholders may be convened at any time by order of the President or by the board on their own motion or on the requisition of shareholders as
provided for in the Act. Notice of the time and place of each meeting of shareholders shall be given not less than 21 days nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting to each director and shareholder. A meeting of shareholders may be held
without notice at any time and at any place provided a waiver of notice is obtained in accordance with section 136 of the Act. The quorum for the transaction of business at meetings of the shareholders shall consist of not less than two shareholders
present or represented by proxy and holding in all not less than 10% percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting. At any meeting of shareholders, every person shall be entitled to vote who, at the time of the taking of a vote
(or, if there is a record date for voting, at the close of business on such record date) is entered in the register of shareholders as the holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at such meeting, subject to the provisions of the
Act.
6. Ownership of Securities
There are no limitations imposed by the Act, or by the Articles or By-Law or any other
constituent document of the Company on the right of non-resident or foreign shareholders to own or vote securities of the Company. However, the Investment Canada Act (Canada) will prohibit implementation, or if necessary, require divestiture of an
investment deemed “reviewable” under the Investment Canada Act (Canada) by an investor that is not a “Canadian” as defined in the Investment Canada Act (Canada), unless after review the Minister responsible for
the Investment Canada Act (Canada) is satisfied that the “reviewable” investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.
The following discussion summarizes the principal features of the Investment Canada Act
for a non-Canadian who proposes to acquire common shares of the Company. The discussion is general only; it is not a substitute for independent legal advice from an investor’s own adviser; and, except where expressly noted, it does not
anticipate statutory or regulatory amendments.
The Investment Canada Act is a federal statute of broad application regulating the
establishment and acquisition of Canadian businesses by non-Canadians, including individuals, governments or agencies thereof, corporations, partnerships, trusts or joint ventures, Investments by non-Canadians to acquire control over existing
Canadian businesses or to establish new ones are either reviewable or notifiable under the Investment Canada Act. If an investment by a non-Canadian to acquire control over an existing Canadian business is reviewable under the Investment Canada Act,
the Investment Canada Act generally prohibits implementation of the investment unless, after review, the Minister of Industry is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.
An investment in the Company’s common shares by a non-Canadian, who is not a resident of a World Trade Organization (“WTO”) member, would be reviewable
under the Investment Canada Act (Canada) if it was an investment to acquire control of the Company and the value of the assets of the Company was CAN $5 million or more. An investment in common shares of the Company by a resident of a WTO
member would be reviewable only if it was an investment to acquire control of the Company and the enterprise value of the assets of the Company was equal to or greater than a specified amount, which is published by the Minister after its
determination for any particular year. This amount is currently CAN $1 billion (unless the WTO member is party to one of a list of certain free trade agreements, in which case the amount is currently CAN $1.5 billion); beginning January 1, 2019,
both thresholds will be adjusted annually by a GDP (Gross Domestic Product) based index.
A
non-Canadian would be deemed to acquire control of the Company for the purposes of the Investment Canada Act if the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the outstanding common shares (or less than a majority but controlled the Company in fact through
the ownership of one-third or more of the outstanding common shares) unless it could be established that, on the acquisition, the Company is not controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of such common shares. Certain transactions in
relation to the Company’s common shares would be exempt from review under the Investment Canada Act, including, among others, the following:
|
a)
|
the acquisition of voting shares or other voting interests by any person in the ordinary course of
that person’s business as a trader or dealer in securities;
|
|
ii)
|
the acquisition of control of the Company in connection with the realization of security granted for a
loan or other financial assistance and not for any purpose related to the provisions of the Investment Canada Act (Canada), if the acquisition is subject to approval under the Bank Act (Canada), the Cooperative Credit Associations
Act (Canada), the Insurance Companies Act (Canada) or the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada); and
|
|
iii)
|
the acquisition of control of the Company by reason of an amalgamation, merger, consolidation or
corporate reorganization following which the ultimate direct or indirect control of the Company, through the ownership of voting interests, remains unchanged.
|
7. Change in Control of Company
No provision of the Company’s Articles or By-Law would have the effect of
delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of the Company, and operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Company no longer has a shareholder rights
plan.
C. Material Contracts
The following are the material contracts of the Company, other than those mentioned
elsewhere in this Form, to which the Company or any member of the group is a party, for the two years immediately preceding publication of this registration statement.
None
D. Exchange Controls
There is no law or governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the export
or import of capital, or affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of Common Shares, other than withholding tax requirements. Any such remittances to United States residents are generally subject to
withholding tax, however no such remittances are likely in the foreseeable future. (See “Item 10E - Taxation”, below.)
Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada), which has rules regarding
certain acquisitions of shares by non-residents, there is no limitation imposed by Canadian law, or by the Company’s Articles or By-Law, or by any other constituent documents of the Company, on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote the
Company’s common shares. Investment Canada Act is a Canadian federal statute of broad application regulating the establishment and acquisition of Canadian businesses by non-Canadians, including individuals, governments or agencies thereof,
corporations, partnerships, trusts or joint ventures. Investments by non-Canadians to acquire control over existing Canadian businesses or to establish new ones are either reviewable or notifiable under the Investment Canada Act. If an investment by
a non-Canadian to acquire control over an existing Canadian business is reviewable under the Investment Canada Act, the Investment Canada Act generally prohibits implementation of the investment unless, after review, the Minister of Industry is
satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.
E. Taxation
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of the anticipated material U.S. federal income tax
considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Company’s common shares (“Common Shares”).
This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a
complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder as a result of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account
the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares for such U.S. Holder. Accordingly, this summary is not
intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any particular U.S. Holder. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. Each
U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.
No opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the
“IRS”) has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not
precluded from taking a position that is different from, or contrary to, any position taken in this summary. In addition, because the authorities upon which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts
could disagree with one or more of the positions taken in this summary.
Scope of this Summary
Authorities
This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published
rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the “Canada-U.S. Tax
Convention”), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this Annual Report. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse
manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive basis, which could affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences described in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or
beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive basis.
U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner
of Common Shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (a) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S., (b) a corporation, or any other entity classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is
created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S., any state in the U.S., or the District of Columbia, (c) an estate if the income of such estate is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source of such income, or (d) a
trust if (i) such trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons
have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust.
Non-U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial
owner of Common Shares other than a U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares to non-U.S. Holders. Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should
consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any tax treaties) of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common
Shares.
U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including the following U.S. Holders: (a) U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement
plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) U.S. Holders
that are dealers in securities or currencies or U.S. Holders that are traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S.
dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that are liable for the alternative minimum tax under the Code; (f) U.S. Holders that own Common Shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement
involving more than one position; (g) U.S. Holders that are subject to Section 451(b) of the Code; (h) U.S. Holders that acquired Common Shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services;
(i) U.S. Holders that hold Common Shares other than as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); (j) U.S. Holders who are U.S. expatriates or former long-term
residents of the United States; (k) U.S. Holders that own (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the outstanding shares of the Company; or (l) corporations that accumulate earnings to
avoid U.S. federal income tax. U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and
non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.
If
an entity that is classified as a partnership (or other “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership (or other “pass-through”
entity) and the partners of such partnership (or owners of such other “pass-through” entity) generally will depend on the activities of the partnership (or other “pass-through” entity) and the status of such partners (or
owners). This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences for any such partner or partnership (or other “pass-through” entity or owner). Partners of entities that are classified as partnerships (or owners of other
“pass-through” entities) for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.
Tax Consequences Other than U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Not
Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and gift,
U.S. Medicare contribution, or non-U.S. tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and
gift, U.S. Medicare contribution, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares. (See “Taxation—Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents” below).
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Acquisition, Ownership, and Disposition of Common Shares
Distributions on Common Shares
General Taxation of Distributions
Subject to the “passive foreign investment company” rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with
respect to Common Shares will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated
“earnings and profits” of the Company, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, such distribution will be
treated (a) first, as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Common Shares, and (b) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of such Common Shares. (See more detailed discussion at
“Disposition of Common Shares” below). The Company may not maintain calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the
Company with respect to Common Shares will constitute a dividend.
Reduced Tax Rates for Certain Dividends
A dividend paid by the Company generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates
applicable to long-term capital gains if (a) the Company is a “qualified foreign corporation” (as defined below), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) such dividend is
paid on Common Shares that have been held by such U.S. Holder for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the “ex-dividend date.” The Company generally will be a “qualified foreign corporation”
under Section 1(h)(11) of the Code (a “QFC”) if (a) the Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, or (b) Common Shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the
U.S.
However, even if the Company satisfies one or more of such requirements, the Company
will not be treated as a QFC if the Company is a “passive foreign investment company,” or “PFIC” (as defined below) for the taxable year during which the Company pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable year.
As discussed below, the Company does not believe that it was a PFIC for the taxable year
ended December 31, 2019, and does not expect that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2020. (See more detailed discussion at “Additional Rules that May Apply to U.S. Holders” below). However, there can be no
assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status or that the Company will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year.
Accordingly, although the Company expects that it may be a QFC for the taxable year
ending December 31, 2020, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its QFC status, or that the Company will be a QFC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2020, or any subsequent
taxable year.
If the Company is not a
QFC, subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a dividend paid by the Company to a U.S. Holder, including a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust, generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (and not at the preferential tax
rates applicable to long-term capital gains). The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the dividend rules.
Distributions Paid in Foreign Currency
The amount of a distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency generally will be
equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distribution based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt. A U.S. Holder that does not convert foreign currency received as a distribution into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt generally will
have a tax basis in such foreign currency equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency on the date of receipt. Such a U.S. Holder generally will recognize ordinary income or loss on the subsequent sale or other taxable disposition of such
foreign currency (including an exchange for U.S. dollars).
Dividends Received Deduction
Dividends paid on Common Shares generally will not be eligible for the “dividends
received deduction.” The availability of the dividends received deduction is subject to complex limitations that are beyond the scope of this discussion, and a U.S. Holder that is a corporation should consult its own tax advisor regarding the
dividends received deduction.
Disposition of Common Shares
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder will recognize capital gain or
loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in
the Common Shares sold or otherwise disposed of. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in Common Shares generally will be such U.S. Holder’s U.S. dollar cost for such Common Shares. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
Common Shares have been held for more than one year at the time of sale or other taxable disposition. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares generally will be treated as “U.S.
source” for purposes of applying the U.S. foreign tax credit rules.
Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an
individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.
The amount realized on a sale or other taxable disposition of
Common Shares for an amount in foreign currency will generally be the U.S. dollar value of this amount on the date of sale or disposition. On the settlement date, the U.S. Holder will recognize U.S. source foreign currency gain or loss (taxable as
ordinary income or loss) equal to the difference (if any) between the U.S. dollar value of the amount received based on the exchange rates in effect on the date of sale or other disposition and the settlement date.
Foreign Tax
Credit
A U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax
with respect to dividends paid on Common Shares or gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income
tax paid. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on
a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.
Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal
income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must
be classified, under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income. Dividends paid by the Company generally
will constitute “foreign source” income and generally will be categorized as “passive income.” The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit
rules.
Information Reporting; Backup Withholding Tax
Payments made within the U.S., or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of distributions
with respect to, or proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, Common Shares generally will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 24%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S.
Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on IRS Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly
report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is
subject to backup withholding tax. However, U.S. Holders that are corporations generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding tax rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the U.S.
backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner. Each U.S. Holder
should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.
Additional Rules that May Apply to U.S. Holders
The Company believes it was a PFIC in one or more previous taxable years. If the Company
is or becomes a PFIC, or U.S. Holders held Common Shares while the Company was a PFIC, the preceding sections of this summary may not describe the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of
Common Shares.
Passive Foreign
Investment Company
The Company generally will be a PFIC if, for a taxable year, (a) 75% or more of the
gross income of the Company for such taxable year is passive income (“income test”) or (b) on average for such taxable year, 50% or more of the assets held by the Company either produce passive income or are held for the production
of passive income (“asset test”), based on the fair market value of such assets. Passive income includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain
gains from commodities transactions. Passive income does not include any interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from a “related person” (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to
the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income. Assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income generally include cash, even if held as working capital or raised in a
public offering, marketable securities and other assets that may produce passive income.
For purposes of the income test and asset test, if the Company owns, directly or
indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a
proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. , In addition, if the Company is a PFIC and owns shares of another foreign corporation that also is a PFIC (“subsidiary PFIC”), a disposition of the shares of such other
foreign corporation or a distribution received from such other foreign corporation generally will be treated as an indirect disposition by a U.S. Holder or an indirect distribution received by a U.S. Holder, subject to the rules of Section 1291 of
the Code discussed below. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should be aware that they could be subject to tax even if no distributions are received and no redemptions or other dispositions of Common Shares are made. To the extent that gain recognized on the
actual disposition by a U.S. Holder of Common Shares or income recognized by a U.S. Holder on an actual distribution received on Common Shares was previously subject to U.S. federal income tax under these indirect ownership rules, such amount
generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
If the Company is a PFIC, or a U.S. Holder held Common Shares while the Company was a
PFIC, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares will depend on whether such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company and any subsidiary PFIC as a
“qualified electing fund” or “QEF” under Section 1295 of the Code (a “QEF Election”) or a mark-to-market election for the Company under Section 1296 of the Code (a “Mark-to-Market
Election”). A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election is referred to in this summary as a “Non-Electing U.S. Holder.”
Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable
disposition of Common Shares, and any “excess distribution” (as defined in Section 1291(b) of the Code) paid on the Common Shares, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the
Common Shares. The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the current year and any year prior to the first year in which the Company was a PFIC generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as ordinary income in the
current year. The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to other years generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the current year at the highest tax rate applicable to ordinary income in each such prior year, and a
Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be required to pay interest on the resulting tax liability for each such prior year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such prior year.
A U.S. Holder that makes
a QEF Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above. Instead, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder’s pro rata
share of (a) the “net capital gain” of the Company, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) the “ordinary earnings” of the Company, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such
U.S. Holder. A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by
the Company. Taxable gains on the disposition of Common Shares by a U.S. Holder that has made a timely and effective QEF Election are generally capital gains. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability and
desirability of, and procedure for, making a timely and effective QEF Election for the Company and any subsidiary PFIC.
A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above. A U.S. Holder may make a
Mark-to-Market Election only if Common Shares are “marketable stock” (as defined in Section 1296(e) of the Code). A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in gross income, as ordinary income, for each taxable
year in which the Company is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the Common Shares as of the close of such taxable year over (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Common Shares. A U.S.
Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will, subject to certain limitations, be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares over (b) the fair
market value of such Common Shares as of the close of such taxable year. Any gain recognized upon a disposition of Common Shares by a U.S. Holder who has made a Mark-to-Market Election generally will be treated as ordinary income, and any loss
recognized upon a disposition generally will be treated as an ordinary loss to the extent of net mark-to-market income recognized for all prior taxable years. Any loss recognized in excess thereof will be taxed as a capital loss. Capital losses are
subject to significant limitations under the Code. A Mark-to-Market election may not be made with respect to the stock of any subsidiary PFIC because such stock is not “marketable stock.” Hence, a Mark-to-Market Election will not be
effective to eliminate the application of the default rules of Section 1291 of the Code, described above, with respect to deemed dispositions of subsidiary PFIC stock or excess distributions with respect to a subsidiary PFIC. Each U.S. Holder should
consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability and desirability of, and procedure for, making a timely and effective Mark-to-Market Election with respect to Common Shares.
The Company believes it was a PFIC in one or more prior taxable years but does not
believe that it was a PFIC for the taxable years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and, based on current operations and financial projections, does not expect that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2020. The
determination of whether the Company was, or will be, a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. In addition, whether the Company will be a
PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2020, and each subsequent taxable year depends on the assets and income of the Company over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of
this Annual Report. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status or that the Company was not, or will not be, a PFIC for any taxable year.
If the Company meets the income test or asset test for any taxable year during which a
U.S. Holder owns Common Shares, the Company will be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for that taxable year and for all subsequent taxable years, regardless of whether the Company meets the PFIC income test or asset test for such
subsequent taxable years, unless the U.S. Holder elects to recognize any unrealized gain in the Common Shares or makes a timely and effective QEF Election or Mark-to-Market Election.
The PFIC rules are
complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC rules and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.
THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF ALL U.S.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP, AND DISPOSITION OF COMMON SHARES. U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR
PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for United States Residents
The following, as of the date hereof, is a summary of the principal Canadian federal
income tax considerations generally applicable to the holding and disposition of common shares by a holder (a) who, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”) and at all relevant times, is not resident or
deemed to be resident in Canada, deals at arm’s length and is not affiliated with the Company, holds the common shares as capital property and does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, the common shares in the course of carrying
on, or otherwise in connection with, a business in Canada, and (b) who, for the purposes of the Canada - United States Income Tax Convention (the “Convention”) and at all relevant times, is a resident solely of the United States,
has never been a resident of Canada, has not held or used (and does not hold or use) common shares in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada, and who otherwise qualifies for the full benefits of the Convention. The Canada
Revenue Agency has introduced special forms to be used in order to substantiate eligibility for benefits under the Convention, and affected holders should consult with their own advisers with respect to these forms and all relevant compliance
matters.
Holders who meet all such criteria in clauses (a) and (b) above are referred to in this
summary as a “U.S. Holder” or “U.S. Holders”, and this summary only addresses such U.S. Holders. The summary does not deal with special situations, such as particular circumstances of traders or dealers, limited liability
companies, tax-exempt entities, insurers, financial institutions (including those to which the mark-to-market provisions of the Tax Act apply), entities considered fiscally transparent under applicable law, or otherwise.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, and the regulations
thereunder, all proposed amendments to the Tax Act and regulations publicly announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) to the date hereof, the current provisions of the Convention and our understanding of the current administrative practices of
the Canada Revenue Agency. It has been assumed that all currently proposed amendments to the Tax Act and regulations will be enacted as proposed and that there will be no other relevant change in any governing law, the Convention or administrative
policy, although no assurance can be given in these respects. This summary does not take into account provincial, U.S. or other foreign income tax considerations, which may differ significantly from those discussed herein.
This summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian income tax consequences. It
is not intended as legal or tax advice to any particular U.S. Holder and should not be so construed. The tax consequences to a U.S. Holder will depend on that U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances. All holders, including U.S. Holders or
prospective U.S. Holders as defined above, should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences applicable to them having regard to their own particular circumstances. The discussion below is qualified
accordingly.
For the purposes of the
Tax Act, all amounts relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of the common shares must be converted into Canadian dollars based on the relevant exchange rate applicable thereto.
Dividends
Dividends paid or deemed to be paid or credited by the Company to a U.S. Holder are
subject to Canadian withholding tax. In general terms, the Tax Act provides for withholding at the rate of 25% unless the holder is able to substantiate a reduced rate under an applicable tax treaty or convention.
The rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to a U.S. Holder who can substantiate eligibility for benefits under the Convention is generally limited to 15% of the gross amount of
the dividends (or 5%, if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company).
Dispositions
A U.S. Holder is generally not subject to tax under the Tax Act in respect of a capital
gain realized on the disposition of a common share in the open market, unless the share is “taxable Canadian property” to the holder thereof and the U.S. Holder is not entitled to relief under the Convention.
Provided that the Company’s common shares are listed on a “designated stock
exchange” for purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX Venture) at the time of disposition, a common share will generally not constitute taxable Canadian property to a U.S. Holder unless, at any time during the 60 month period
ending at the time of disposition, (i) the U.S. Holder, persons with whom the U.S. Holder did not deal at arm’s length, partnerships in which the U.S. Holder or such non-arm’s length persons holds a membership interest directly or
indirectly, or the U.S. Holder together with any of the foregoing, owned 25% or more of the issued shares of any class or series of the Company AND (ii) more than 50% of the fair market value of the share was derived directly or indirectly from
certain types of assets, including real or immoveable property situated in Canada, Canadian resource properties or timber resource properties, and options, interests or rights in respect of any of the foregoing. Common shares may also be deemed to
be taxable Canadian property under the Tax Act in certain other circumstances. A U.S. Holder who may hold common shares as taxable Canadian property should consult with the U.S. Holder’s own tax advisors in advance of any disposition or deemed
disposition of common shares under the Tax Act in order to determine whether any relief from tax under the Tax Act may be available by virtue of the Convention, and any related compliance procedures.
While intended to address material Canadian federal income tax considerations
relevant to the holding or disposition of common shares by U.S. Holders, this summary is for general information purposes only, and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of
common shares. No opinion was requested by the Company, or is provided by its legal counsel and/or auditors. Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of common shares (including U.S. Holders as defined above) should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the consequences of purchasing, owning, and disposing of common shares of the Company.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable
H. Documents on Display
Exhibits attached to this Annual Report are available for viewing on EDGAR, or may be
inspected at the head office of Company at 2 – 1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 6C6, during normal business hours. Copies of the Company’s financial statements and other continuous disclosure documents required under
Canadian securities legislation are available for viewing on the internet at www.sedar.com.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
The primary objective of the Company’s investment activities is to preserve
principal by maximizing the income the Company receives from such activities without significantly increasing risk. Securities that the Company invests in are generally highly liquid short-term investments such as term deposits with terms to
maturity of less than one year.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is not exposed to any significant interest rate risk as it does not have any variable rate borrowings.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
The Company’s primary currency of operations is the Canadian dollar. Its wholly-owned operating subsidiaries primary currency of
operations is the US dollar. The Company has expenditures and holds investments denominated in US dollars. During the year ended December 31, 2019, it is estimated that approximately 60% of the Company’s consolidated expenditures were
denominated in a foreign currency, primarily being the US dollar and 100% of the Company’s consolidated product revenues were denominated in the US dollar. To date the Company has not entered into any future or forward contracts, or other
derivative instruments, for either hedging or speculative purposes, to mitigate the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on these costs or revenues. Based on the above net exposures as at December 31, 2019, assuming that all other variables
remain constant, a 5% appreciation or deterioration of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar would result in a corresponding increase or decrease, respectively on the Company's net (loss) income of approximately $448,000.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY
SECURITIES
Not applicable