false 0000882361 0000882361 2024-07-26 2024-07-26 0000882361 dei:FormerAddressMember 2024-07-26 2024-07-26 iso4217:USD xbrli:shares iso4217:USD xbrli:shares

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 26, 2024

 

APTOSE BIOSCIENCES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Canada 001-32001 98-1136802
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

66 Wellington Street West, Suite 5300

TD Bank Tower, Box 48

Toronto, Ontario M5K 1E6

Canada

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

(647) 479-9828

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

251 Consumers Road, Suite 1105

Toronto, Ontario M2J 4R3

Canada

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, no par value APTO NASDAQ Capital Market

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).

 

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

 

 

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

99.1   Aptose Corporate Presentation - July 2024
104   Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

  Aptose Biosciences Inc.
     
     
Date: July 26, 2024 By:  /s/ William G. Rice, Ph.D.        
    William G. Rice, Ph.D.
    Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

Aptose Precision oncology company developing oral targeted agents to treat hematologic malignancies C o r p o r a t e P r e s e n t a t i o n J u l y 26 , 2024 Tuspetinib to Treat Newly Diagnosed AML

 

 

Aptose Disclosure 2 This presentation does not, and is not intended to, constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, an offer or invitation for the sale or purchase of, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire, any securities, businesses and/or assets of any entity, nor shall it or any part of it be relied upon in connection with or act as any inducement to enter into any contract or commitment or investment decision whatsoever. This presentation contains forward - looking statements , which reflect APTOSE Biosciences Inc.’s (the “Company”) current expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events, including statements relating to our business strategy, our clinical development plans, our ability to obtain the substantial capital we require, our plans to secure strategic partnerships and to build our pipeline, our clinical trials and their projected timelines and milestones, the efficacy and toxicity of our product candidates, potential new intellectual property, our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions; and other statements including words such as “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “continue”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “will”, “should”, “may”, and other similar expressions. Such statements constitute forward - looking statements within the meaning of securities laws. Although the Company believes that the views reflected in these forward - looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Certain material factors or assumptions are applied in making these forward - looking statements, and actual results may differ materially from those statements. Those factors and risks include, but are not limited to, our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations, changing market conditions, the successful and timely completion of our clinical studies including delays, the demonstration of safety and efficacy of our drug candidates, our ability to recruit patients, the establishment and maintenance of corporate alliances, the market potential of our product candidates, the impact of competitive products and pricing, new product development, changes in laws and regulations, uncertainties related to the regulatory approval process and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s ongoing quarterly filings and annual reports. Forward - looking statements contained in this document represent views only as of the date hereof and are presented for the purpose of assisting potential investors in understanding the Company’s business and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward - looking statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on its behalf, except as required under applicable securities legislation. Investors should read the Company’s continuous disclosure documents available at EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml and SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com, especially the risk factors detailed therein.

 

 

Aptose Management Team William G. Rice, PhD Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Rafael Bejar, MD, PhD Sr. VP & Chief Medical Officer KOL, Hematologic Malignancies Fletcher Payne Sr. VP, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Business Officer 3

 

 

4 Tuspetinib Lead Clinical Asset TUS +VEN+HMA triplet is being developed as frontline therapy to treat newly diagnosed AML Frontline triplet clinical data expected 2H 2024 Unmet Need for Superior Frontline (1L) Therapy in AML • Progress made with VEN+HMA (SOC) but unmet needs still exists ‒ Response rates too low and survival too short in 1L therapy ‒ Resistance to VEN compromises subsequent R/R therapies • A 3 rd agent is needed to boost responses with VEN+HMA SOC • Current 3 rd agents inadequate – only address specific genetic subtypes and are limited by toxicities Tuspetinib Ideal 3 rd Agent for Addition to VEN and HMA • TUS has excellent safety in combination with VEN and HMA • TUS increases efficacy in combination with VEN and HMA • TUS has broad scope of activity across AML genetic subgroups • TUS may minimize VEN resistance by targeting VEN - resistance events TUS+VEN+HMA • Bring new SOC addressing needs of newly diagnosed AML patients • $1Bn+ market potential in frontline AML TUS : Tuspetinib ; VEN : Venetoclax ; HMA : Hypomethylating agent Potently targets SYK, FLT3, KIT MUT , JAK1/2, RSK2 kinases AML : Acute Myeloid Leukemia ; SOC : Standard of Care

 

 

5 Tuspetinib Enhancing Venetoclax Efficacy in Frontline Therapy TUS and VEN mechanistically cooperate to prevent drug resistance FLT3 KIT MCL - 1 PI3K/AKT RAS/ MAPK SYK JAK/STAT TUS VEN BCL - 2i resistance involves mutations in multiple pathways to evade BCL - 2 blockade TUS targets VEN resistance pathways ‒ TUS suppresses SYK, KIT MUT , FLT3, JAK/STAT, RAS/MAPK pro - survival signaling and indirectly suppresses MCL - 1 anti - apoptotic signaling By shutting down escape pathways, TUS may re - sensitize prior - VEN failures to venetoclax VEN

 

 

6 Newly Diagnosed AML Intensive Chemotherapy (7+3) Therapeutic Failure Low Intensity Therapy (VEN + HMA) AML Patient Journey | 1L Therapy | Current Standard - of - Care (SOC) lead to therapeutic failure…… Complete Remission HSCT Maintenance Therapy Therapeutic Failure Therapeutic Failure Therapeutic Failure Maintenance Therapy Palliative Care 5 - year survival <10% for age >70 1 ; Most survive <1 year Patients “Unfit” for High Dose Chemotherapy Patients “Fit” for High Dose Chemotherapy • Need to Drive more Newly Diagnosed AML Patients into Complete Remissions and Keep Them There • Want to Prevent from Becoming a VEN Failure R/R Patient Only 30 - 50% patients “Fit” ; Many relapse 3 Annual new cases in U.S. ≈ 21,000 2 5 - yr survival ≈ 30% in adults 2 | Annual deaths in U.S. ≈ 11,200 2 | 5 - yr survival 9% for age >65 2 Median age at diagnosis 68 2 | Roughly equivalent in Europe 5 - year survival rate Age 2 65 - 70% Children < 14 52% Ages 15 to 34 37% Ages 35 to 54 20% Ages 55 to 64 9% Ages 65 to 74 CR/CRi = 66%, mOS = 14.7 months; <25% alive at 3 - years 4 Mutated FLT3, RAS, TP53 have poor response/outcomes 1 Pei, Cancer Discos 2020); DiNardo, Blood 2020); (Maiti et al., Haematologica 2021); (Mannis et al., Leukemia Research 2023); Bewersforf et al., Leukemia Research 2022; 122: 106942 2 NIH; Yale Medicine; American Cancer Society; NIH; Healthline 3 Kantarjian, Blood Canc J 2021 4 DiNardo, NEJM 2020; Pei, Cancer Discos 2020; DiNardo, Blood 2020; Maiti, Haematologica 2021; Mannis, Leukemia Research 2023; Bewersforf, Leukemia Research 2022 CR : Complete Remission ; CRc : composite Complete Remission ; OS : Overall Survival

 

 

Solution: TUS Fulfills Ideal Profile as 3 rd Agent for 1L Triplet Proof for Triplets : Addition of a 3 rd Targeted Agent Boosts VEN+HMA Responses in 1L AML Addition of gilteritinib (Gilt) FLT3i to VEN+HMA boosts CR rate to 90% in newly diagnosed FLT3+ AML patients 1 So, What’s the Problem: Current 3 rd Agents for Triplets have Limitations Gilt is not active in FLT3 - Wildtype AML (70% of patients) and toxicities of Gilt with VEN+HMA require SOC dose reductions New Paradigm in Frontline Therapy to Treat Newly Diagnosed AML Deploying Triplet Combinations of Targeted Drugs | Building on VEN + HMA Backbone for 1L Therapy TUS clean safety is ideal for addition to VEN+HMA backbone • TUS shows no QTc prolongation, muscle damage, differentiation syndrome, or prolonged myelosuppression in remission • TUS is not expected to require dose reductions or interruptions to SOC drugs TUS clinical efficacy broader than Gilt and achieves CR in high - risk AML • TUS achieves clinical responses in patients who failed prior therapy with Gilt • TUS achieves clinical responses at lower and better - tolerated doses than Gilt • TUS achieves clinical responses in FLT3 WT patients (70% of AML population), a population not addressable by Gilt FLT3i TUS preclinical safety, antitumor, mechanistic findings superior to Gilt 1 Short et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 26:JCO2301911. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38277619. • TUS MOA targets VEN - resistance mechanisms and re - sensitizes cells to VEN • TUS suppresses more oncogenic signaling pathways than Gilt and at lower doses • TUS potent antitumor activity in animal models of human AML resistant to Gilt • TUS+VEN & TUS+HMA safe and effective in animal models of human AML 7

 

 

Tuspetinib Triplet Opportunity TUS + VEN + HMA Need a superior 1L therapy that treats more patients, increases survival, is safer, and avoids 1L therapeutic failures AML Patient Journey | 1L Therapy High - Level Overview Tuspetinib - containing triplet can become a new 1L SOC to increase survival • TUS has broad activity across AML genetic subgroups: Including those with TP53 , RAS/MAPK , FLT3 mutations • TUS is the only agent being developed in combination with VEN+HMA for high - risk AML subtypes with highly adverse TP 53 and RAS mutations • Potential to increase CR rates and survival of FLT3 MUT patients without the need to dose reduce SOC drugs • TUS is the only agent being developed in combination with VEN+HMA for FLT3 WT AML patients (70% of AML) • TUS+VEN+HMA expected to be a safer and broader therapy for “unfit” patients than any other triplet • TUS expected to minimize VEN resistance Tuspetinib Frontline Triplet Opportunities Newly Diagnosed AML Intensive Chemotherapy (7+3) Low Intensity Therapy (VEN + HMA) Patients “Unfit” for High Dose Chemotherapy Patients “Fit” for High Dose Chemotherapy 8

 

 

FDA Requirements for TUS to Enter Frontline Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML Tuspetinib has Met the FDA Requirements to Perform the Triplet Pilot Study • Next Step: TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet Study Initiate dosing and collect data from Triplet Pilot Study in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients FDA allowed triplet initiation with 40mg TUS (typical one dose level below single agent RP2D) and then escalate • Protocol implemented and clinical sites being prepared • Select optimal dose of TUS that allows for SOC dosing • Characterize safety and mitigate myelosuppression • Characterize activity in TP53 MUT and N/KRAS MUT • Characterize activity in FLT3 MUT and FLT3 UNMUT • Characterize PK of TUS and VEN in triplet • Determine CR, CRh, CRc, MRD rates • Characterize duration of dosing • Characterize mOS Aptose Completed What Does the FDA Want? Begin in R/R AML with TUS and TUS+VEN TUS Single Agent Study in R/R AML √ Thorough Single Agent Dose Exploration √ Demonstrate Single Agent Responses √ Demonstrate Single Agent Safety √ Orphan Drug Designation and Fast Track Status Tus+Ven Doublet Study in R/R AML √ Characterize Safety of TUS+VEN Doublet √ Characterize PK of TUS and VEN in Doublet 9

 

 

TUS+VEN+AZA TRIPLET Ph 1/2 Study: Design, Patient Populations, Dose Selection, Goals Patient Populations │ Approx. 18 - 26 Pts Total │ 50% FLT3 - MUT │ <20% TP53+/CK Trial Goals │ Safety, CR rate, MRD negativity and OS across AML subtypes (FLT3 MUT/WT , TP53 MUT , RAS MUT ) Dose Characterization │ Demonstrate TUS is Highly Active and May Avoid SOC Dose Reductions Cycle 1 Treatment Plan : Day 1 BM blasts <5% or aplastic Day 28 VEN held Cycle 1 extended if needed to allow for count recovery * Day 1 BM blasts ≥ 5% Day 28 VEN and TUS held if BM blasts <5% or aplastic, otherwise move to Cycle 2 Cycle 1 extended if needed to allow for count recovery * * GCSF permitted after D28 per protocol Day 18 Day 21 BM Decision TUS TUS once daily VEN 400 mg once daily TUS TUS once daily AZA 75mg/m 2 once daily AZA 75mg/m 2 once daily VEN 400 mg once daily Day 7 Day 7 10

 

 

Q3 Q4 2024 ASH EHA ASH EHA Triplet Frontline Therapy Newly Diagnosed AML TUS+VEN+HMA Planned Clinical Development Plan, Timelines and Milestones ASH EHA Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2025 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2026 TUS+VEN+HMA Ph 1/2 Triplet Study Frontline Therapy for Newly Diagnosed AML Dose Characterization for Ph 2/3 Pivotal trial TUS+VEN+HMA Triplet Phase 2/3 Pivotal Frontline Therapy for Newly Diagnosed AML Q1 Q2 TUS Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet data in R/R AML supporting advancement into TUS+VEN+AZA Initiate TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet Study First report of CR/MRD and Safety Data in 1L AML from Triplet Study Second report of CR/MRD and Safety data from Triplet Preparation for Triplet pivotal trials Third report of CR/MRD and Safety data from Ph 1 / 2 Triplet Study First report of data from Triplet Ph 2 / 3 Pivotal Trial Second Report of CR and MRD from Triplet Ph2/3 Pivotal Trial First Report of CR, MRD, mOS 1 data from Ph 3 11

 

 

Tuspetinib (TUS) Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet Clinical Findings Support TUS+VEN+HMA Triplet

 

 

TUS Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet Study Designs in R/R AML Patients Positions TUS for Combination 1L Therapy to Treat Newly Diagnosed AML Cohort 1: 20 mg QD 2 TUS Single Agent Dose Escalation and Exploration 1 Total n=91 1 Data cut Feb 09, 2024 2 GCSF permitted anytime per protocol Cycle 1 Treatment Plan : Day 1 Day 15 (BM blasts <5% or aplastic) Day 28 (up to Day 42) TUS 80 mg or 40 mg daily VEN 400 mg daily VEN held Cycle 1 extended if needed to allow for count recovery 2 VEN held if BM blasts <5% or aplastic Day 1 Day 15 (BM blasts ≥ 5%) Day 28 (up to Day 56) TUS 80 mg or 40 mg daily VEN 400 mg daily Cycle 1 extended if needed to allow for count recovery 2 TUS+VEN Doublet Study 1 Extensive dose exploration (TUS 80mg or 40mg + VEN 400mg) n= 77 dosed | n=65 in 80 mg/400 mg | n=12 in 40 mg/400 mg 17 Cohort 2: 40 mg QD 20 Cohort 3: 80 mg QD 32 Cohort 4: 120 mg QD 16 Cohort 5: 160 mg QD 4 Cohort 6: 200 mg QD Doses with CR & no DLT 13

 

 

14 TUS and TUS+VEN : Patient Characteristics of Highly Treatment Experienced R/R AML Patients WT FLT3 MUT FLT3 Patient Characteristics (n=91) 56 34 2 Patient number n (%) 65.5 (18 - 83) 60 (21 - 84) Median Age Years (Range) 24 (42.9%) 14 (41.2%) Female n (%) 2.4 (1 - 6) 3.3 (1 - 11) Lines prior therapy Mean (Range) 33 (58.9%) 19 (55.9%) Prior - VEN 3 (5.4%) 17 (50.0%) Prior FLT3 Inhibitor 36 (64.3%) 26 (76.5%) Prior Cytotoxic chemotherapy 37 (66.1%) 22 (64.7%) Prior HMAs 19 (33.9%) 14 (41.2%) Prior HSCT 1 Data cut Feb 09, 2024 2 Number of patients in the Single Agent Study as of Feb 09, 2024 . One patient had an indeterminant status for FLT3. 3 Four patients had an indeterminant status for FLT3 as of Feb 09, 2024 in the TUS+VEN Doublet Study. TUS Single Agent Study Baseline Patient Characteristics 1 • 91 patients dosed as of Feb 09, 2024 • Median age > 60 years : Older population • Over 36% failed Prior - transplant • 50% of FLT3 MUT failed Prior - FLT3i • Population included FLT3 WT and FLT3 MUT • Population included 16% TP53 MUT /CK and 15% NKRAS MUT • Over 56% failed Prior - VEN : Correlates with poor outcome TUS+VEN Doublet Study Baseline Patient Characteristics 1 • 77 patients dosed as of Feb 09, 2024 • Median age > 68 years : Older than TUS single agent trial • Over 25% failed Prior - transplant • Over 77% of FLT3 MUT failed Prior - FLT3i • Population included FLT3 WT and FLT3 MUT • Population included 30% TP53 MUT /CK and 15% NKRAS MUT • Over 74% failed Prior - VEN : Correlates with poor outcome WT FLT3 MUT FLT3 Patient Characteristics (n=77) 57 18 3 Patient number n (%) 69 (31 - 86) 68.5 (39 - 84) Median Age Years (Range) 28 (49.1%) 10 (55.6%) Female n (%) 2.2 (1 - 7) 2.9 (1 - 5) Prior lines of therapy Mean (Range) 41 (71.9%) 14 (77.8%) Prior - VEN 7 (12.3%) 14 (77.8%) Prior FLT3 Inhibitor 29 (50.9%) 10 (55.6%) Prior Cytotoxic chemotherapy 44 (77.2%) 13 (72.2%) Prior HMAs 13 (22.8%) 7 (38.9%) Prior HSCT

 

 

15 TUS and TUS+VEN Safe and Well Tolerated in Highly Treatment Experienced R/R AML TUS+VEN Doublet TUS Single Agent Related to TUS/VEN, n(%) (n=79) Adverse Events Treatment Emergent AEs Related to VEN Treatment Emergent AEs Related to TUS Treatment Emergent AEs Treatment Related AEs Treatment Emergent AEs 38 (48.1%) 41 (51.9%) 77 (97.5%) 29 (31.2%) 89 (95.7%) Any Most Frequent AEs ≥10% 3 (3.8%) 2 (2.5%) 16 (20.3%) 0 (0%) 31 (33.3%) Pneumonia 10 (12.7%) 14 (17.7%) 21 (26.6%) 9 (9.7%) 20 (21.5%) Nausea 4 (5.1%) 5 (6.3%) 14 (17.7%) 9 (9.7%) 18 (19.4%) Diarrhea 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 11 (13.9%) 0 (0%) 18 (19.4%) Pyrexia 3 (3.8%) 3 (3.8%) 12 (15.2%) 2 (2.2%) 13 (14.0%) Alanine aminotransferase increased 1 (1.3%) 2 (2.5%) 10 (12.7%) 0 (0%) 13 (14.0%) Hypokalaemia 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (5.1%) 0 (0%) 12 (12.9%) Epistaxis 4 (5.1%) 4 (5.1%) 11 (13.9%) 2 (2.2%) 11 (11.8%) Decreased appetite 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 4 (5.1%) 0 (0%) 11 (11.8%) Hypomagnesaemia 4 (5.1%) 3 (3.8%) 20 (25.3%) 1 (1.1%) 11 (11.8%) Febrile neutropenia 5 (6.3%) 6 (7.6%) 15 (19.0%) 2 (2.2%) 10 (10.8%) Fatigue 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 4 (5.1%) 0 (0%) 10 (10.8%) Abdominal pain 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (7.6%) 2 (2.2%) 10 (10.8%) Constipation 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (11.4%) 0 (0%) 10 (10.8%) Dyspnoea 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (7.6%) 1 (1.1%) 10 (10.8%) Headache 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (12.7%) 0 (0%) 8 (8.6%) Cough 4 (5.1%) 4 (5.1%) 11 (13.9%) 0 (0%) 6 (6.5%) Anaemia 5 (6.3%) 6 (7.6%) 8 (10.1%) 2 (2.2%) 5 (5.4%) Neutrophil count decreased 3 (3.8%) 4 (5.1%) 10 (12.7%) 1 (1.1%) 5 (5.4%) Platelet count decreased 7 (8.9%) 6 (7.6%) 10 (12.7%) 2 (2.2%) 4 (4.3%) White blood cell count decreased 2 (2.5%) 2 (2.5%) 11 (13.9%) 1 (1.1%) 4 (4.3%) Aspartate aminotransferase increased 23 (29.1%) 23 (29.1%) 67 (84.8%) 9 (9.7%) 66 (71.0%) Grade ≥ 3 AEs (≥10%) 3 (3.8%) 2 (2.5%) 14 (17.7%) 0 (0%) 26 (28.0%) Pneumonia 3 (3.8%) 2 (2.5%) 19 (24.1%) 1 (1.1%) 10 (10.8%) Febrile neutropenia 3 (3.8%) 3 (3.8%) 11 (13.9%) 0 (0%) 5 (5.4%) Anaemia 3 (3.8%) 4 (5.1%) 11 (13.9%) 0 (0%) 4 (4.3%) Platelet count decreased 1 (1.1%) SAEs 3 (3.8%) (1.1%) 1 11 (11.8%) 12 (12.9%) Leading to treatment termination 0(0%) 0(0%) 17 (21.5%) 0(0%) 18 (19.4%) Leading to death TUS Single Agent Study Excellent Safety and Tolerability • No drug - related myelosuppression in remission • No treatment related QTc prolongation or CPK elevations • No drug - related discontinuations or deaths • No drug - related non - hematologic SAEs • No differentiation syndrome TUS+VEN Doublet Study Excellent Safety and Tolerability • No new or unexpected safety signals with TUS+VEN • No drug related AE of QTc prolongation • No differentiation syndrome observed • No drug related deaths Data Cut 26 April 2024

 

 

TUS Single Agent Treatment Bone Marrow Leukemic Blasts │Percent Change from Baseline Blast Reductions Demonstrate Activity Across 4 Dose Levels Activity in Patients Who Failed Prior - VEN and Prior - FLT3i Note: Blast percent change was calculated as 100 X (the lowest post - baseline bone marrow blast - baseline bone marrow blast)/baseline bone marrow blast. Patients with blast percent change >=100% are shown as 100%. Only patients who reported both baseline and any post - baseline bone marrow blast results are included in the figure. Black triangle indicates patients who received prior Ven before starting Tuspetinib. Red triangle indicates prior FLT3i. * Black asterisk indicates patients who administered hydoxyurea within 7 days prior to the lowest marrow blast value Data cut Feb 09, 2024 TUS and TUS+VEN : Bone Marrow Blast Reductions and Responses in R/R AML Patients - 100 - 80 - 60 - 40 - 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Change from Baseline (%) 200 mg 160 mg 120 mg 80 mg 40 mg Initial Dose Leve Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ PR CRp PR CRp PR PR CR CR CRh CRp CR CRp CR CRi CR Prior - VEN Prior FLT3i TUS Initial Dose Level - 100 - 80 - 60 - 40 - 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Change from Baseline (%) 40mg/400mg 80mg/400mg Initial Dose Leve Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ ŸŸŸŸ ŸŸ ŸŸ ŸŸŸŸŸŸŸ ŸŸŸŸŸ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ ŸŸŸŸŸŸ ŸŸŸŸ ŸŸ ŸŸŸ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ ŸŸ ŸŸŸ ŸŸ ŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸ ŸŸ Ÿ CRi PR PR PR CR CRi PR PR CRp CR C p Ri PR PR CR CRi CRCi Ri CRi * * Prior - VEN Prior FLT3i TUS+VEN Dose Level TUS - VEN Doublet Treatment Bone Marrow Leukemic Blasts │Percent Change from Baseline Blast Reductions in VEN - Naïve and Prior - VEN R/R AML Blast Reduction in R/R AML Who Failed Prior - VEN and Prior - FL3i 16 40mgTUS+400mgVEN • 11 Patients evaluable ‒ 73% failed prior - VEN • 55% (n=6/11) achieved blast reductions ‒ 67% (4/6) failed prior - VEN 80mgTus+400mgVEN • 60 Patients evaluable ‒ 72% failed prior - VEN • 67% (n=40/60) achieved blast reductions ‒ 65% (26/40) failed prior - VEN

 

 

TUS Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet Support Development for 1L Triplet Therapy TUS+VEN+AZA Protocol is Active TUS + VEN + HMA Phase 1/2 Triplet Study Tuspetinib advancing into a triple drug combination (triplet) of target agents Newly diagnosed AML patients are VEN - naïve, FLT3i - naïve, HMA - naïve and highly responsive to triplets TUS+VEN+HMA may become a new Standard - of - Care for frontline (1L) therapy of Newly Diagnosed AML Patients TUS Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet 17 • Extensive Dose Exploration to Satisfy Project Optimus • Highly Favorable Safety Profile • Highly Active with in VEN - naïve Patients • Highly Active with in Patients with High - Risk Genetics

 

 

Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) highly enthusiastic for TUS+VEN+HMA triplet 18 ‒ Investigators' enthusiasm enrolled the TUS+VEN doublet trial ahead of schedule ‒ KOLs now ramping up TUS+VEN HMA triplet trial in newly diagnosed AML Dr. Naval Daver, MD Anderson Cancer Center AML Drug Combination KOL and Global Lead Investigator for Tuspetinib Clinical Trials • “Tuspetinib is clearly an active and surprisingly well - tolerated agent in one of the most challenging and heterogeneous disease settings in oncology — relapsed and refractory AML.” Aptose Press Release for ASH 2023 Dec. 09, 2023 • “Tuspetinib has demonstrated broad activity , including activity in patients with FLT3 wild - type AML (accounting for more than 70% of the AML population), FLT3 mutated AML, NPM1 mutated AML, as well as in patients with mutations historically associated with resistance to targeted therapy. Most notably, TUS targets VEN resistance mechanisms , enabling TUS+VEN uniquely to treat the very ill prior - VEN AML population , including both FLT3 mutant and FLT3 wildtype disease.” • “From a broader perspective, the growing body of antileukemic activity, and continued favorable safety profile, support advancement of tuspetinib in a TUS+VEN+HMA triplet for the treatment of frontline newly diagnosed AML patients .”

 

 

Investment Thesis 2024: EHA ‒ Report TUS Single Agent and TUS+VEN Doublet data in R/R AML supporting TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet trial in newly diagnosed AML 2024: Summer (Q3) ‒ Initiate dosing of TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet in newly diagnosed AML 2024: ASH ‒ Report of CR/MRD/Safety data from TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet pilot 2025: 1H ‒ Complete enrollment in TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet pilot and report CR/MRD/Safety data 2025: EHA ‒ Data readout TUS+VEN+AZA Triplet pilot ‒ Select TUS dose for TUS+VEN+HMA Triplet PIVOTAL trials 2025: ASH ‒ Initiate Ph 2 portion of Ph 2 / Ph 3 PIVOTAL program • Highest unmet medical needs in frontline AML • Need to safely increase survival across all subgroups • TUS emerging as ideal agent to combine with VEN+HMA ‒ Excellent safety profile ‒ Broad activity on FLT3 MUT and FLT3 WT AML (70% of cases) ‒ High - risk TP53 and RAS mutated AML sensitive ‒ May minimize resistance to VEN (Venetoclax) ‒ KOLs support TUS as the ideal 3 rd agent for 1L triplet ‒ Extended patent life and premium pricing • Near - term milestones can create shareholder value Near - Term Milestones

 

 

Thank you

v3.24.2
Cover
Jul. 26, 2024
Entity Addresses [Line Items]  
Document Type 8-K
Amendment Flag false
Document Period End Date Jul. 26, 2024
Entity File Number 001-32001
Entity Registrant Name APTOSE BIOSCIENCES INC.
Entity Central Index Key 0000882361
Entity Tax Identification Number 98-1136802
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code Z4
Entity Address, Address Line One 66 Wellington Street West, Suite 5300
Entity Address, Address Line Two TD Bank Tower
Entity Address, Address Line Three Box 48
Entity Address, City or Town Toronto
Entity Address, State or Province ON
Entity Address, Country CA
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code M5K 1E6
City Area Code (647)
Local Phone Number 479-9828
Written Communications false
Soliciting Material false
Pre-commencement Tender Offer false
Pre-commencement Issuer Tender Offer false
Title of 12(b) Security Common Shares, no par value
Trading Symbol APTO
Security Exchange Name NASDAQ
Entity Emerging Growth Company false
Former Address [Member]  
Entity Addresses [Line Items]  
Entity Address, Address Line One 251 Consumers Road
Entity Address, Address Line Two Suite 1105
Entity Address, City or Town Toronto
Entity Address, State or Province ON
Entity Address, Country CA
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code M2J 4R3

Aptose Biosciences (NASDAQ:APTO)
過去 株価チャート
から 6 2024 まで 7 2024 Aptose Biosciencesのチャートをもっと見るにはこちらをクリック
Aptose Biosciences (NASDAQ:APTO)
過去 株価チャート
から 7 2023 まで 7 2024 Aptose Biosciencesのチャートをもっと見るにはこちらをクリック