UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event
reported): July 21, 2016
JAMMIN JAVA CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
Nevada
|
|
000-52161
|
|
264204714
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File
Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
4730 Tejon St., Denver, Colorado
80211
(Address of principal executive offices
and Zip Code)
323-556-0746
Registrant’s telephone number, including
area code:
Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
|
☐
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
|
|
☐
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|
|
|
☐
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|
Item 1.01
Entry into a Material Definitive
Agreement.
56 Hope Road/HRM Purported License Termination
and Lawsuit
On July 21, 2016, Hope Road
Merchandising (“
HRM
”) and Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited (“
56 Hope Road
”) provided Jammin
Java Corp. (the “
Company
”, “
we
” and “
us
”) notice of the termination of
the short term license agreement that had been entered into between us and HRM on June 27, 2016 (the “
Short-Term License
”),
as described in greater detail in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July
7, 2016, and demanded that all use of the Trademarks (defined below) cease immediately.
The Short-Term License provided
us a worldwide, exclusive, non-transferable license to utilize the “
Marley Coffee
” trademarks (the “
Trademarks
”) from
June 27, 2016 until December 27, 2016 (a term of six months), provided that the Short-Term License could have been extended in
the sole discretion of HRM (at our request) for an additional six month term after expiration thereof.
Previously, on June 27, 2016,
and effective June 24, 2016, 56 Hope Road provided the Company notice of the termination of a prior fifteen (15) year license agreement
entered into with 56 Hope Road on September 13, 2012 (the “
Long-Term License
”), which was replaced by the Short-Term
License.
56 Hope Road terminated the
Long-Term License, and most recently HRM terminated the Short-Term License, due to our alleged breach of certain of the terms of
the Long-Term License and Short-Term License, including, but not limited to, our failure to deliver quarterly statements and annual
audited financial statements in a timely manner, and issues raised regarding security interests alleged to have been granted by
us in connection with the licenses, to various third parties in alleged violation of the licenses.
We believe that the termination
notice received on July 21, 2016 as well as the termination of the Long-Term License, was without merit and that 56 Hope Road has
no reasonable basis for such terminations.
After we received the July
21, 2016, notice of termination, both sides worked to resolve the termination and to negotiate a forbearance of the alleged defaults.
One of the conditions of the forbearance set by HRM was for the Company to engage a restructuring consultant to provide a picture
of the Company and a potential turnaround plan. After discussion between the parties, both we and HRM agreed that we would engage
r
2
advisors llc (“
R2
”), a company with whom neither we nor HRM had any prior relationship. R2 provided
the preliminary assessment of the Company attached as
Exhibit 99.1
hereto. However, after the preliminary assessment was
prepared, HRM’s representatives determined that the assessment was biased towards the Company and unfairly promoted the Company’s
point of view. We vigorously disagree with this assessment.
Notwithstanding our
attempt to work in good faith through the issues raised with HRM in the termination notice, and without prior notice, on
August 1, 2016, 56 Hope Road and HRM filed a complaint against us in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Los Angeles, Central Division (Case No. BC628981)(a copy of the complaint can be found on our website here:
https://marleycoffee.com/content/uploads/2016/08/56-Jammin-Java-Complaint-1.pdf). The complaint (a) seeks a declaratory
judgment relating to the termination of the licenses, (b) seeks damages for our alleged (i) breaches of the Long-Term License
and Short-Term License, (ii) tortious interference with 56 Hope Road’s and HRM’s economic relationships with
licenses and prospective licensees, and (iii) trademark infringement; (c) requests an accounting of our books and records;
and (d) requests punitive and exemplary damages in connection with allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.
We vehemently deny the allegations
made by 56 Hope Road and HRM, and plan to vigorously defend ourselves against the claims made in the complaint.
On August 4, 2016, we
filed (a) a notice of removal with the court, requesting the case be removed from state court to the United States District
Court for the Central District of California; (b) a request for a temporary restraining order requesting the court to
reinstate the Short-Term License until a final decision on the pending lawsuit is determined; and (c) an answer to the
complaint denying the allegations of 56 Hope Road and HRM, including certain affirmative defenses, and pleading counterclaims
against (i) 56 Hope Road for breach of contract and breach of implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) 56 Hope
Road and HRM for intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage and intentional and negligent
misrepresentation, and (iii) breach of fiduciary duty against Rohan Marley, our former Chairman, and seeking that the court
enter judgment in favor of us on all claims alleged by 56 Hope Road and HRM and further seeking economic damages, punitive
and exemplary damages, pre-and-post judgment interest and court costs from 56 Hope Road, HRM and Mr. Marley (a copy of the
answer and counterclaims can be found on our website here:
https://marleycoffee.com/content/uploads/2016/08/3-Answer-Counterclaims-and-Third-Party-Complaint.pdf).
To date, no rulings have been
made by the court on our notice of removal or request for temporary restraining order and the lawsuit is in the very early stages
of litigation.
In the event that our request
for a temporary restraining order is denied by the court, HRM fails to recognize the validity of the Short-Term License, or we
are unable, through the pending litigation or otherwise, to obtain rights to the Trademarks, it will have a material adverse effect
on our ability to generate revenue, our results of operations and assets, could force us to abandon or attempt to change our business
operations, which are currently solely focused on monetizing the Trademarks, and may force us to seek bankruptcy protection, all
of which could cause the value of our common stock to decline in value or become worthless. Furthermore, we believe that our ability
to generate revenue will be significantly limited during the period the lawsuit, described above, is pending.
If a temporary restraining
order is granted, we hope that HRM and its representatives can come back to the table to negotiate a long term licensing deal to
replace the Long-Term License, which we believe was unreasonably terminated.
Item 1.02
Termination of a Material Definitive
Agreement.
The disclosures in Item 1.01
above regarding the termination of the Short-Term License are incorporated by reference in this Item 1.02.
Item 8.01
Other Events.
r
2
advisors llc Agreement
As referenced above in Item
1.01, on July 28, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with r
2
advisors llc to provide interim management services
for a term of two weeks. R2 provided us the services of Thomas M. Kim whose biographical information is provided below. The agreement
provides for a project fee of $20,000 in consideration for R2 providing us an assessment of our business, a copy of which is attached
hereto as
Exhibit 99.1
. The agreement also includes standard and customary indemnification and confidentiality obligations
of the parties.
Since 1988, Mr. Kim
has worked in the turnaround or insolvency industry. He has been involved with troubled companies as a bankruptcy lawyer, business
analyst and as a turnaround practitioner. Prior to founding r² advisors llc, Mr. Kim was an originator and asset manager
with Republic Financial Corporation, a private investment company based in Denver, Colorado, where he recovered troubled loans
and performed valuations of distressed companies from an investor’s perspective. Prior to Republic, Mr. Kim was an attorney
with LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP, where he practiced bankruptcy and corporate law.
Mr. Kim holds
a Bachelor of Science degree in economics from the University of Utah and a J.D. and MBA from the School of Law and the School
of Business Administration at Santa Clara University. Mr. Kim served as global President, Chairman, Immediate Past Chairman, VP
of Finance and VP of Membership for the Turnaround Management Association. He has also served as a member of TMA’s Executive
Committee and Chair of TMA’s Chapter Resource and Response Council.
Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
|
99.1*
|
August 1, 2016 Preliminary Assessment/Executive Summary re: Status of Jammin Java Corp. by r
2
advisors llc
|
*Filed Herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
|
Jammin Java Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2016
|
By:
|
/s/ Anh Tran
|
|
|
|
Anh Tran
|
|
|
|
President
|
|
*Filed Herewith.
Jammin Java (PK) (USOTC:JAMN)
過去 株価チャート
から 12 2024 まで 1 2025
Jammin Java (PK) (USOTC:JAMN)
過去 株価チャート
から 1 2024 まで 1 2025