Preliminary Statement of Additional Information,
dated December 13, 2024
The information in this Statement of Additional
Information is not complete and may be changed. The Fund may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Statement of Additional Information is not an offer to sell these securities and
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Invesco Senior
Income Trust
STATEMENT OF
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Invesco Senior Income Trust
(the “Fund”) is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund’s primary investment objective is
to provide a high level of current income, consistent with preservation of capital. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve
its investment objective, and you could lose some or all of your investment.
This Statement of Additional
Information relates to the offering, from time to time, of up to [___] common shares of beneficial interest, no par value (“Common
Shares”) and/or rights to purchase Common Shares (“Rights” and with the Common Shares, “Securities”) in
one or more offerings. This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus, but should be read in conjunction
with the prospectus for the Fund, dated [____] (the “Prospectus”), and any related supplement to the Prospectus (each a “Prospectus
Supplement”). Investors should obtain and read the Prospectus and any related Prospectus Supplement prior to purchasing Common
Shares. A copy of the Prospectus and any related Prospectus Supplement may be obtained without charge, by calling the Fund at (800) 959-4246.
The Prospectus and this SAI
omit certain of the information contained in the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
The registration statement may be obtained from the SEC upon payment of the fee prescribed, or inspected at the SEC’s office or
via its website (www.sec.gov) at no charge. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE FUND
The Fund is a diversified,
closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)
and organized as a statutory trust under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Fund was originally organized as a Massachusetts business
trust on April 8, 1998. The Fund commenced operations on June 23, 1998. Effective as of August 27, 2012, the Fund completed
a redomestication to a Delaware statutory trust. Effective June 1, 2010, the Fund’s name was changed from Van Kampen Senior
Income Trust to Invesco Van Kampen Senior Income Trust. Effective December 3, 2012, the Fund’s name was changed from Invesco
Van Kampen Senior Income Trust to Invesco Senior Income Trust. The Fund’s currently outstanding common shares of beneficial interest,
no par value (the “Common Shares”) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VVR”
and the Common Shares offered by this Prospectus, subject to notice of issuance, will also be listed on the NYSE. The Fund’s principal
office is located at 1331 Spring Street NW, Suite 2500, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. and its phone number is (404) 892-0896.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES
Additional Investment Policies and Portfolio Contents
The following information
supplements the discussion of the Fund’s investment objective, policies and techniques that are described in the Prospectus. The
Fund may make the following investments, among others, some of which are part of its principal investment strategies and some of which
are not. The principal risks of the Fund’s principal investment strategies are discussed in the Prospectus.
Senior Loans and Other Loans
The Fund may invest in loans,
and in particular, in floating rate loans (sometimes referred to as “adjustable” rate loans) that hold (or in the judgment
of the Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the “Adviser”), hold) a senior position in the capital structure of U.S. and foreign
corporations, partnerships or other business entities that, under normal circumstances, allow them to have priority of claim ahead of
(or at least as high as) other obligations of a borrower in the event of liquidation. These investments are referred to as “Senior
Loans” in this SAI.
Senior Loans typically have
higher recoveries than other debt obligations that rank lower in the priority of payments for a particular debtor, because in most instances
they take preference over those subordinated debt obligations, with respect to payment of interest and principal, and over stock. However,
the Fund is still subject to the risk that the borrower under a loan will default on scheduled interest or principal payments and that
the assets of the borrower to which the Fund has recourse will be insufficient to satisfy in full the payment obligations that the borrower
has to the Fund. The risk of default will increase in the event of an economic downturn or, in the case of a floating rate loan, a substantial
increase in interest rates (because the cost of the borrower’s debt service will increase as the interest rate on its loan is upwardly
adjusted). The Fund may own a debt obligation of a borrower that becomes, or is about to become, insolvent. The Fund can also purchase
debt obligations that are extended to a bankrupt entity (so called debtor-in-possession or ‘DIP’ financing) or debt obligations
that are issued in connection with a restructuring of the borrower under bankruptcy laws.
Loans typically are arranged
through private negotiations between a borrower and one or more financial institutions (i.e., lenders). Usually the lenders are represented
by an agent, which usually is one of the lenders. The borrowers may use the proceeds of loans to finance leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations,
mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, debt refinancings, or for other purposes. Agents typically are commercial or investment banks
that originate loans and invite other parties to join the lending syndicate. In larger transactions, it is common to have several agents.
However, only one agent usually has primary responsibility for documentation and administration of the loan. Agents are normally paid
fees by the borrower for their services. While the Fund can serve as the agent or co-agent for a loan, the Fund currently does not intend
to act as an agent or co-agent. Agents, acting on behalf of the lenders, generally are primarily responsible for negotiating the loan
agreement, which establishes the terms and conditions of the loan and the rights of the borrower and the lenders. The Fund will rely
on agents to collect payments of principal and interest on a loan. The Fund also will rely in part on agents to monitor compliance by
the borrower with the restrictive covenants in the loan agreement and to notify the Fund (or the lender from whom the Fund has purchased
a participation) of any adverse change in the borrower’s financial condition.
The Fund has no limits as
to the maturity of other loans in which they invest or as to the market capitalization range of the borrowers. The Fund can invest a
variable amount of each of their net assets in investments rated below “B.”
Investments in Pooled
Investment Entities that Invest in Loans. The Fund can also buy interests in trusts and other pooled entities (including other investment
companies) that invest primarily or exclusively in loan obligations, including entities sponsored or advised by the Adviser or an affiliate.
The Fund will be subject to the pooled entity’s credit risks as well as the credit risks of the underlying loans. The loans underlying
these investments may include loans to foreign or U.S. borrowers, may be collateralized or uncollateralized and may be rated investment
grade or below investment-grade or may be unrated. These investments are subject to the risk of default by the borrower, interest rate
and prepayment risk, as well as credit risks of the pooled entity that holds the loan obligations.
Highly Leveraged Transactions
and Insolvent Borrowers. The Fund can invest in loans made in connection with highly leveraged transactions. These transactions may
include operating loans, leveraged buyout loans, leveraged capitalization loans and other types of acquisition financing. Those loans
are subject to greater credit risks than other loans. Highly leveraged loans and loans in default also may be less liquid than other
loans. Highly leveraged loans and loans in default also may be less liquid than other loans. If the Fund voluntarily or involuntarily
sold those types of loans, it might not receive the full value it expected.
The Fund can also invest
in loans of borrowers that are experiencing, or are likely to experience, financial difficulty. In addition, the Fund can invest in loans
of borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection or that have had involuntary bankruptcy petitions filed against them by creditors.
Various laws enacted for the protection of debtors may apply to loans. A bankruptcy proceeding against a borrower could delay or limit
the ability of the Fund to collect the principal and interest payments on that borrower’s loans. If a lawsuit is brought by creditors
of a borrower under a loan, a court or a trustee in bankruptcy could take certain actions that would be adverse to the Fund. For example:
| ● | Other creditors might convince the
court to set aside a loan or the collateralization of the loan as a “fraudulent conveyance”
or “preferential transfer.” In that event, the court could recover from the Fund
the interest and principal payments that the borrower made before becoming insolvent. There
can be no assurance that the Fund would be able to prevent that recapture. |
| ● | A bankruptcy court may restructure
the payment obligations under the loan so as to reduce the amount to which the Fund would
be entitled. |
| ● | The court might discharge the amount
of the loan that exceeds the value of the collateral or assets to which the lenders have
recourse. |
| ● | The court could subordinate the Fund’s
rights to the rights of other creditors of the borrower under applicable law. |
Companies involved in significant
restructuring tend to be subject to increased litigation risk, including for investors in these companies, such as the Fund. Expenses
of asserting, or defending against, claims in connection with such restructurings are generally directly or indirectly borne by the Fund.
See also “Litigation Risk” herein.
Delayed Draw Loans. There
may be obligations under a loan agreement to make disbursements of loans after the initial disbursement in certain circumstances, for
example if the loan was partially “unfunded” at the time the Fund invested or if there otherwise is an ongoing commitment
from the lenders to disburse further loans.
General risks associated
with loans:
The use by the Fund of loans
involves special considerations and risks, as described below:
Fees. The Fund may
be required to pay and may receive various fees and commissions in connection with purchasing, selling and holding interests in loans.
Borrowers typically pay three kinds of fees to lenders: facility fees (which may be structured as original issue discount) when a loan
is originated; commitment fees on an ongoing basis based on the unused portion of a loan commitment; and prepayment penalties when a
borrower prepays a loan.
The Fund receives these fees
directly from the borrower if the Fund is an original lender or, in the case of commitment fees and prepayment penalties, if the Fund
acquires an assignment. Whether the Fund receives a facility fee in the case of an assignment or participation interest depends on negotiations
between the Fund and the lender selling the interests.
When the Fund buys an assignment
or a participation, it may be required to pay a fee, or cede a portion of the interest and fees that accrued prior to settlement of the
assignment, to the lender selling the assignment or the participant. Occasionally, the selling lender pays a fee to the assignee or the
participant. If the Fund assigns a loan or sells a participation, it may be required to pass along to a buyer a portion of any interest
and fees that the Fund would otherwise be entitled to. In addition, in the case of an assignment, the Fund may be required to pay a transfer
fee to the lending agent. If the Fund sells a participation Interest, the Fund may be required to pay a transfer fee to the lender that
holds the nominal interest in the loan.
Delayed Settlement. Compared
to securities and to certain other types of financial assets, purchases, and sales of loans, including via participation, take relatively
longer to settle. This is partly due to the nature of loans, which require a written assignment agreement and various ancillary documents
for each transfer, and frequently require discretionary consents from both the borrower and the administrative agent. In addition, dealers
frequently insist on matching their purchases and sales, which can lead to delays in the Fund’s settlement of a purchase or sale
in circumstances where the dealer’s corresponding transaction with another party is delayed. Dealers will also sometimes sell loans
short, and hold their trades open for an indefinite period while waiting for a price movement or looking for inventory to purchase.
This extended settlement
process can (i) increase the counterparty credit risk borne by the Fund; (ii) leave the Fund unable to timely vote, or otherwise
act with respect to, loans it has agreed to purchase; (iii) delay the Fund from realizing the proceeds of a sale of a loan; (iv) inhibit
the Fund’s ability to re-sell a loan that it has agreed to purchase if conditions change (leaving the Fund more exposed to price
fluctuations); (v) prevent the Fund from timely collecting principal and interest payments; and (vi) expose the Fund to adverse
tax or regulatory consequences.
The Loan Syndications and
Trading Association (LSTA) has promulgated a “delay compensation” provision in its standard loan documentation that mitigates
the direct risk of permanently losing interest payments as a result of delayed settlement by causing interest to begin to accrue for
the buyer’s account after the seventh business day following the trade date (for distressed trades, the twentieth business day).
However, this does not mitigate the other risks of delayed settlement. In addition, the mechanism itself can result in opportunistic
behavior: A seller, having locked in its trade, might delay closing for seven business days in order to maximize its interest collections,
even if it could have closed earlier, while a buyer may no longer feel any pressure to close at all, since interest is accruing for its
benefit, and may choose to use its cash elsewhere. The LSTA has further attempted to put an outer limit on long, unjustified settlement
delays by promulgating “buy-in/sell-out” provisions that allow a party to enter into a “cover” trade if the other
party refuses to close. However, these provisions are complicated, time-consuming, and little-used, and are in any event not triggered
until the fifteenth business day after the trade date (for distressed trades, the fiftieth business day).
Interest Rate Benchmarks
for Floating Rate Loans. The loans in which the Fund invests typically have floating or adjustable interest rates. For that reason,
the Adviser expects that when interest rates change, the values of these floating rate loans will fluctuate less than the values of fixed-rate
debt securities, and that the net asset values of the Fund’s shares will fluctuate less than the shares of funds that invest mainly
in fixed-rate debt obligations. However, the interest rates of some floating rate loans adjust only periodically. Between the times that
interest rates on floating rate loans adjust, the interest rates on those floating rate loans may not correlate to prevailing interest
rates. That will affect the value of the loans and may cause the net asset values of the Fund’s shares to fluctuate. The applicable
rate is defined in the loan agreement. Borrowers tend to select the base lending rate that results in the lowest interest cost, and the
benchmark selected by a borrower for its loans may change from time to time (but the benchmark selected for a particular loan will remain
the same for the life of that loan). If the benchmark interest rate on a floating rate loan changes, the rate payable to lenders under
the floating rate loan will, in turn, change at the next scheduled adjustment date. If the benchmark rate increases, the Fund would earn
interest at a higher rate on that floating rate loan after the next scheduled adjustment date. If the benchmark rate decreases, the Fund
would earn interest at a lower rate on that floating rate loan after the next scheduled adjustment date.
The Fund may use interest
rate swap agreements and other hedging practices to mitigate fluctuations in value when the interest rate under the loan is periodically
reset. The Fund may invest in loans having a fixed rate of interest; however, it is unlikely to do so because fixed rate loans are uncommon
in the loan market generally.
Interest rates on floating
rate loans adjust periodically based on a benchmark rate plus a premium or spread over the benchmark rate. The benchmark rate usually
is the Prime Rate, the Federal Reserve federal funds rate, SOFR (or, previously LIBOR) or other base lending rates used by commercial
lenders (each as defined in the applicable loan agreement).
● The Prime Rate quoted
by a major U.S. bank is generally the interest rate at which that bank is willing to lend U.S. dollars to its most creditworthy borrowers,
although it may not be the bank’s lowest available rate.
● The Federal Reserve
federal funds rate is the rate that the Federal Reserve Bank charges member banks for borrowing money.
● The Secured Overnight
Financing Rate (SOFR) is a benchmark interest rate for dollar-denominated loans that generally replaced the London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) effective July 1, 2023, and is calculated using data from overnight Treasury repurchase market activity (Treasuries
loaned or borrowed overnight). SOFR is published every business day by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The interest rate on
SOFR based loans may reset daily, monthly or quarterly, or may be computed for a monthly or quarterly period on the basis of an average
of daily SOFR observed over that monthly or quarterly period.
The interest rate on SOFR-based
loans may reset daily, monthly or quarterly, or may be computed for a monthly or quarterly period on the basis of an average of daily
SOFR observed over that monthly or quarterly period. Quarterly interest periods are most common for floating rate loans in which the
Fund invests. Certain floating or variable rate loans may permit the borrower to select an interest rate reset period of up to one year
(although interest periods longer than six months will often require lender consent). Investing in loans with longer interest rate reset
periods or fixed interest rates may increase fluctuations in the Fund’s net asset value as a result of changes in market interest
rates: falling short-term floating interest rates tend to decrease the income payable to the Fund on its floating rate loan investments,
and rising short-term floating interest rates tend to increase that income. However, the Fund may attempt to hedge its fixed rate loans
against interest rate fluctuations by entering into interest rate swaps or total return swap transactions. Nevertheless, changes in interest
rates can affect the value of the Fund’s floating rate loans, especially if rates change sharply in a short period, because the
resets of the interest rates on the underlying portfolio of floating rate loans occur periodically and will not all happen simultaneously
with changes in prevailing rates.
In addition, in market conditions
where short term interest rates are particularly low, certain floating rate loans may be issued with a feature that prevents the relevant
benchmark rate from adjusting below a specified minimum level. This is achieved by defining a “floor” to the benchmark rate,
so that if downward market movements of the benchmark rate would, absent this feature, cause the benchmark rate to fall below the floor,
with this feature, the benchmark rates of these floating rate loans become fixed at the applicable minimum floor level until short term
interest rates (and therefore the benchmark rate) rise above that level.
Although this feature is
intended to result in these floating rate loans yielding more than they otherwise would when short term interest rates are low, the feature
might also result in the secondary market prices of these floating rate loans becoming more sensitive to changes in interest rates should
short term interest rates rise.
Credit Quality Standards
for Loans. Debt securities rated below “BBB-” by S&P or “Baa3” by Moody’s are commonly referred
to as “high risk” securities or, in the case of bonds, “junk bonds.” Loans rated “B” are below investment
grade and are regarded by rating organizations as predominantly speculative with respect to the borrower’s ability to repay interest
and principal when due over a long period. The Fund may invest in loans that are rated both investment grade and below-investment grade
by rating organizations. An appendix to the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information includes the definitions of the rating categories
of the principal rating organizations. Many loans are not rated by rating organizations. The lack of a rating does not necessarily imply
that a loan is of lesser investment quality.
Limited Public Information.
While the Fund expects to have access to financial and other information regarding the borrower that has been made available to the lenders
under a loan, it may not have such information in connection with participation interests and certain loan assignments. Additionally,
the amount of public information available with respect to loans generally will be less extensive than what is available for exchange-listed
or otherwise registered securities.
Potential Material Non-Public
Information. In certain cases, the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser may receive material, non-public information regarding loans,
and its ability to trade in such loans for the account of the Fund could potentially be limited by its possession of such information.
Such limitations on the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser’s ability to trade could have an adverse effect on the Fund by, for
example, preventing the Fund from selling a loan that is experiencing a material decline in value. In some instances, these trading restrictions
could continue in effect for a substantial period of time.
Prepayment. Because
of prepayments, the actual remaining maturity of a loan may be considerably less than its stated maturity. Notwithstanding their stated
maturity, loans may be prepaid prior to their stated terms for reasons including, but not limited to, high market demand for loans, refinancing
by the borrower, mandatory prepayment requirements or desire of the borrower to repay outstanding debt. If a borrower prepays a loan,
the proceeds will have to be reinvested in other loans or financial assets that may pay lower rates of return.
The reinvestment by the Fund
of the proceeds of prepaid loans could result in a reduction of income to the Fund in falling interest rate environments. Prepayment
penalty fees that may be assessed in some cases may help offset the loss of income to the Fund in those cases.
Subordination. Senior
loans typically hold the most senior position in a borrower’s capital structure. They may include loans that hold the most senior
position alone, loans that hold an equal ranking with other senior debt, or loans that are, in the judgment of the Adviser, in the category
of senior debt of the borrower. Borrowers typically are required contractually to pay the holders of senior loans before they pay the
holders of subordinated debt and preferred or common shareholders and give the holders of senior secured loans a claim on some or all
of the borrower’s assets that is senior to that of subordinated debt, preferred stock and common stock of the borrower in the event
that the borrower defaults or becomes bankrupt. Lenders obtain priority liens that typically provide the first right to cash flows or
proceeds from the sale of a borrower’s collateral, if any, if the borrower becomes insolvent. That right is subject to the limitations
of bankruptcy law, which may provide higher priority to certain other claims such as, for example, employee salaries, employee pensions
and taxes. Senior loans are subject to the risk that a court could subordinate a senior loan to presently existing or future indebtedness
or take other action detrimental to the holders of senior loans.
That senior position in the
borrower’s capital structure typically gives the holders of senior loans a claim on some or all of the borrower’s assets
that is senior to that of subordinated debt, preferred stock and common stock of the borrower in the event that the borrower defaults
or becomes bankrupt. This means in the event the assets of the borrower are insufficient in value to satisfy all its creditors, senior
debt will be satisfied in priority to debt that is subordinate to senior debt.
Lien Position. Loans
that are collateralized may have multiple lenders or other creditors that take different lien positions. This means that if the borrower
defaults on its obligations under the loan and the loan creditors enforce their security interest or if the borrower becomes bankrupt,
the secured claims of the creditors in the first lien position will be satisfied prior to the secured claims of the creditors in the
second lien position. While second lien loan positions generally are subject to similar risks as those associated with investments in
first lien loan positions, second lien loan positions have the additional risk that if the borrower defaults on its obligations under
the loan and the loan creditors enforce their security interest or if the borrower becomes bankrupt, the secured claims of the creditors
in the first lien position will be satisfied prior to the secured claims of the creditors in the second lien position. If the cash flow
and assets of the borrower are insufficient to satisfy both the first lien loans and the second lien loans in full, the creditors in
the second lien position may not be satisfied in full. Intercreditor arrangements that are often present where a loan has first and second
lien positions typically include ‘standstill’ provisions whereby the enforcement rights of second lien creditors are restricted
in favor of the first lien creditors’ rights and give the first lien creditors the right to accept or reject any restructuring
plans in the event of the default or insolvency of the borrower. If a loan has first and second lien positions, typically the Fund will
invest in the first lien position; however, it may invest in the second lien position. Second lien positions generally pay a higher margin
than first lien positions to compensate second lien creditors for the greater risk they assume.
Collateral. Loans,
like other debt obligations, are subject to the risk of the borrower’s non-payment of scheduled interest and/or principal. While
certain of the Fund’s investments in loans may be secured by collateral that the Adviser or Sub-Adviser believes to be equal to
or in excess of the principal amount of the loan at the time of investment, there can be no assurance that the liquidation of such collateral,
if any, would satisfy the borrower’s obligations in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal payments, or that
the collateral could be readily liquidated. In the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy, the Fund could experience delays or limitations
in its ability to realize the benefits of collateral securing a loan.
For the loans in which the
Fund invests that are secured by collateral, that collateral may include the borrower’s tangible assets, such as cash, accounts
receivable, inventory, real estate, buildings, and equipment, common and/or preferred stock of subsidiaries, and intangible assets including
trademarks, copyrights, patent rights and franchise value. The Fund may also receive guarantees or other credit support as a form of
security. A loan agreement may or may not require the borrower to pledge additional collateral to secure a loan if the value of the initial
collateral declines, or if additional assets are acquired by the borrower. Collateral may consist of assets that may not be readily liquidated,
and there is no assurance that the liquidation of those assets would satisfy in full a borrower’s obligations under a loan. A borrower’s
subsidiaries, affiliates, shareholders, or owners may provide collateral in the form of secured guarantees and/or security interests
in assets that they own. However, the value of the collateral may decline after the Fund invests in the loan, particularly if the collateral
consists of equity securities of the borrower or its subsidiaries or affiliates. If the collateral consists of stock of the borrower
or its subsidiaries or affiliates, the stock may lose all of its value in the event of a bankruptcy, which would leave the Fund exposed
to greater potential loss.
If a borrower defaults, insolvency
laws may limit the Fund’s access to the collateral, or the lenders may be unable to liquidate the collateral. A bankruptcy court
might find that the lenders’ security interest or their enforcement of their security under the loan to be invalid, or a bankruptcy
court may require the borrower to use the collateral to pay other outstanding obligations prior to satisfying the lenders in full. If
the collateral consists of stock of the borrower or its subsidiaries, the stock may lose all of its value in the event of a bankruptcy,
which would leave the Fund exposed to greater potential loss. In addition, in the event of a borrower default on a collateralized loan,
the Fund may receive assets other than cash or securities in full or partial satisfaction of the borrower’s obligation under the
loan. Those assets may be illiquid, and the Fund might not be able to realize the benefit of the assets for legal, practical or other
reasons. The Fund might hold those assets until the Adviser determines it is appropriate to dispose of them. If the collateral becomes
illiquid or loses some or all of its value, the collateral may not be sufficient in value to compensate the Fund in full in the event
of a default of scheduled interest or principal payments.
The Fund can invest in loans
that are not secured by any specific collateral of the borrower. If the borrower is unable to pay interest or defaults in the payment
of principal, there will be no collateral on which the Fund can foreclose. Therefore, these loans present greater risks than collateralized
loans because the recourse of the Fund to the borrower’s assets in the case of a default would be as a general unsecured creditor.
The Fund applies the same investment and credit standards to unsecured loans as to secured loans, except for collateral requirements.
Generally, the agent for
a particular loan is responsible for monitoring collateral and for exercising remedies available to the lenders such as foreclosure upon
collateral in the event of the borrower’s default. In reliance upon the opinions of their legal counsel, agents generally are also
responsible for determining that the Lenders have obtained a perfected security interest in the collateral securing loans, if any. However,
the agent will usually only be liable for its gross negligence or willful misconduct, and not for ordinary negligence. In certain circumstances,
the loan agreement may authorize the agent to liquidate the collateral and to distribute the liquidation proceeds pro rata among the
lenders. Financial difficulties of agents can also pose a risk to the Fund. If an agent for a particular loan becomes insolvent, the
Fund could incur losses in connection with its investment in that loan. An agent could declare bankruptcy, and a regulatory authority
could appoint a receiver or conservator. Should this occur, the assets that the agent holds under the loan agreement, if any, should
continue to be available to the lenders, including the Fund. A regulator or a court, however, might determine that any such assets are
subject to the claims of the agent’s general or secured creditors. If that occurs, the Fund might incur costs and delays in realizing
final payment on a loan, or the Fund might suffer a loss of principal or interest. The Fund may be subject to similar risks when it buys
a participation interest in a loan. Most participations purchased by the Fund are structured to be “true sales” of the underlying
loan, in which case the loan should not be included in the bankruptcy estate of the participation seller. However, a court might determine
that the participation was not in fact a “true sale,” in which case the Fund would be a general unsecured creditor of the
participation seller.
The Fund may also invest
in loans that are not secured by collateral. Unsecured loans involve additional risk because the lenders are general unsecured creditors
of the borrower and any secured creditors may have prior rights of recourse to the assets of the borrower, and the assets of the borrower
may be insufficient to satisfy in full all obligations owed to its creditors.
Borrower Covenants and
Lender Rights. Loan agreements historically have had contractual terms designed to protect lenders, which often include restrictive
covenants that limit the activities of the borrower. A restrictive covenant is a promise by the borrower not to take certain actions
that might impair the rights of lenders. Those covenants typically require the scheduled payment of interest and principal and may include
restrictions on dividend payments and other distributions to the borrower’s shareholders, provisions requiring the borrower to
maintain specific financial ratios or relationships and limits on the borrower’s total debt. In addition, a covenant may require
the borrower to prepay the loan or debt obligation with any excess cash flow, proceeds of asset sales or casualty insurance, or other
available cash. A breach of a covenant (after the expiration of any cure period) in a loan agreement that is not waived by the agent
and the lenders normally is an event of default, permitting acceleration of the loan. This means that the agent has the right to demand
immediate repayment in full of the outstanding loan. If a lender accelerates the repayment of a loan because of the borrower’s
violation of a restrictive covenant under the loan agreement, the borrower might default in payment of the loan. If a loan is not paid
when due, or if upon acceleration of a loan, the borrower fails to repay principal and accrued (but unpaid) interest in full, this failure
may result in a reduction in value of the loan (and possibly the Fund’s net asset value).
Lenders historically have
had certain voting and consent rights under a loan agreement. Action subject to a lender vote or consent generally requires the vote
or consent of the holders of some specified percentage of the outstanding principal amount of a loan. Certain decisions, such as reducing
the amount or increasing the time for payment of interest on or repayment of principal of a loan, or releasing collateral for the loan,
frequently requires the unanimous vote or consent of all lenders affected. If the Fund is not a direct lender under the loan because
it has invested via a participation, derivative or other indirect means, the Fund may not be entitled to exercise some or all of the
lender rights described in this section.
Over time, the customary
terms of loans have evolved such that they are no longer accompanied by the various restrictive covenants that historically accompanied
most loans and that were in favor of the investor.
Newly originated loans (including
reissuances and restructured loans) in which the Fund may invest have varied terms and conditions, but generally contain few or no financial
maintenance covenants (sometimes referred to as “covenant lite”). Financial maintenance covenants are those that require
a borrower to maintain certain financial metrics during the life of the loan, such as maintaining certain levels of cash flow or limiting
leverage. In the event of financial deterioration on the part of the borrower, these covenants are included to permit the lenders to
renegotiate the terms of the loan, such as increasing the borrowing costs to the borrower, or to take other actions which would improve
the position of the lender. Accordingly, the Fund may experience difficulty or delays in enforcing its rights on its holdings of loans,
which may result in losses to the Fund, especially during a downturn in the credit cycle. Although loans may contain few or no financial
maintenance covenants, information necessary to monitor a borrower’s financial performance may be available without covenants to
lenders and the public alike and can be used to detect such early warning signs as deterioration of a borrower’s financial condition
or results. When such information is available, the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will seek to take appropriate action without the help of covenants
in the loans.
Limited Secondary Market
for Loans. Due to restrictions on transfers in loan agreements and the nature of the private syndication of loans, some loans are
not as easily purchased or sold as publicly-traded securities. If there is no active secondary market for a loan, it may be more difficult
to sell the interests in such a loan at a price that is acceptable or to even obtain pricing information. Further, some loans, loan participations
and assignments may not be rated by major rating agencies. As a result, some loans are illiquid, which means that the Fund may be limited
in its ability to sell those loans at an acceptable price when it wants to in order to generate cash or avoid losses. The market for
illiquid financial assets is more volatile than the market for liquid securities and it may be more difficult to obtain accurate valuations
for the Fund’s investments.
Possible Limited Legal
Recourse. Investments in loans, loan participations and assignments present the possibility that the Fund could be held liable as
a co-lender under emerging legal theories of lender liability. In certain circumstances, loans may not be deemed to be securities, and
in the event of fraud or misrepresentation by a borrower or an arranger, lenders will not have the protection of anti-fraud provisions
of the federal securities laws, as would be the case for bonds or stocks. Instead, in such cases, lenders generally rely on the contractual
provisions in the loan agreement itself, and common-law fraud protections under applicable state law.
Possible Limited Availability
of Loans. Direct investments in loans and, to a lesser degree, investments in participation interests in or assignments of loans
may be limited. The limited availability may be due to a number of factors. Direct lenders may allocate only a small number of loans
to new investors, including the Fund. There may be fewer loans available for investment that meet the Fund’s credit standards,
particularly in times of economic downturns. Also, lenders or agents may have an incentive to market the less desirable loans to investors
such as the Fund while retaining attractive loans for themselves. This would reduce the amount of attractive investments for the Fund.
If market demand for loans increases, the interest paid by loans that the Fund holds may decrease.
Credit and Counterparty
Risk Associated with Participation Interests. Participation interests are primarily dependent upon the creditworthiness of the borrower,
which is obligated to make payments of principal and interest on the loan. In buying a participation interest, however, the Fund assumes
both the credit risk of the borrower and the counterparty risk of the lender selling the participation interest. As with an assignment
or a loan originated by the Fund, there is a risk that a borrower may have difficulty making payments. If a borrower fails to pay scheduled
interest or principal payments, the Fund’s income may be reduced and the value of the investment in the participation interest
might also decline. Further, the seller of the participation interest will have no obligation to the Fund other than to pay the Fund
the proportionate amount of the principal and interest payments it receives from the borrower. In addition, if the seller of the participation
interest fails to perform its obligations, purchasers might incur costs and delays in realizing payment and suffer a loss of principal
and/or interest, including in cases where the borrower may have performed its obligation to the lender that issued the participation
(e.g., if the participation seller fails to pass along to the Fund payments received from the borrower). Although most participation
interests purchased by the Fund are structured to cause the Fund to become beneficial owner of the relevant loans, and therefore avoid
this outcome, if a lender that sells the Fund a participation interest becomes insolvent, the Fund may be treated as a general creditor
of the lender. As a general creditor, the Fund will have to share the proceeds of the loan with any other creditors of the lender. A
Fund will acquire a participation interest only if the Adviser or Sub-Adviser determines that the lender (or other intermediary Participant)
selling the participation interest is creditworthy.
A Fund’s rights under
a participation interest with respect to a particular loan may be more limited than the rights of original lenders or of investors who
acquire an assignment of that loan. A Fund has the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled
only from the lender selling the participation interest and only when the lender receives the payments from the borrower. In purchasing
participation interests, the Fund will usually have a contractual relationship only with the selling institution and not the underlying
borrower. A Fund generally will have no right directly to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the related loan agreement,
nor will the Fund necessarily have the right to object to certain changes to the loan agreement agreed to by the selling institution.
If the Fund buys a participation interest in a loan, the Fund may be subject to any rights of set-off the borrower has against the selling
institution (although recourse to the selling institution may be available in the event of any such set-off). In the event of bankruptcy
or insolvency of the borrower, the obligation of the borrower to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that can be asserted
by the borrower as a result of any improper conduct of the lender selling the participation (although recourse to the lender may be available).
As a result, the Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that exist when the Fund is an original
lender or assignee, and therefore a participation may be relatively illiquid as compared to a direct investment in a loan because of
a smaller universe of investors who are willing to assume these additional risks present in a participation.
Derivative Transactions and Related Risk Factors
The Fund may invest in derivatives.
A derivative is a financial instrument whose value is dependent upon the value of other assets, rates or indices, referred to as “underlying
reference assets.” These underlying reference assets may include, among others commodities, stocks, bonds, interest rates, currency
exchange rates or related indices. Derivatives include, among others, swaps, options, futures and forward foreign currency contracts.
Some derivatives, such as futures and certain options, are traded on U.S. commodity and securities exchanges, while other derivatives,
such as many types of swap agreements, are privately negotiated and entered into in the OTC market. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) and implementing rules require certain types of swaps to
be traded on public execution facilities and centrally cleared.
Derivatives may be used for
“hedging,” which means that they may be used when the portfolio managers seek to protect the Fund’s investments from
a decline in value, which could result from changes in interest rates, market prices, currency fluctuations and other market factors.
Derivatives may also be used when the portfolio managers seek to increase liquidity, implement a tax or cash management strategy, invest
in a particular stock, bond or segment of the market in a more efficient or less expensive way, modify the characteristics of the Fund’s
portfolio investments, for example, duration, and/or to enhance return. However derivatives are used, their successful use is not assured
and will depend upon, among other factors, the portfolio managers’ ability to predict and understand relevant market movements.
Certain derivatives involve
leverage, that is, the amount invested may be smaller than the full economic exposure of the derivative instrument and the Fund could
lose more than it invested. The leverage involved in these derivative transactions may result in the Fund’s net asset value being
more sensitive to changes in the value of its investments.
Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) Regulation and
Exclusions:
With respect to the Fund, Invesco
has claimed an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” (CPO) under the CEA and the rules of the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and, therefore, is not subject to CFTC registration or regulation as a CPO. In addition, Invesco
is relying upon a related exclusion from the definition of “commodity trading advisor” (CTA) under the CEA and the rules of
the CFTC with respect to the Fund.
The terms of the CPO exclusion
require the Fund, among other things, to adhere to certain limits on its investments in “commodity interests.” Commodity
interests include commodity futures, commodity options and swaps, which in turn include non-deliverable forwards, as further described
below. Because Invesco and the Fund intend to comply with the terms of the CPO exclusion, the Fund may, in the future, need to adjust
its investment strategies, consistent with their investment objectives, to limit their investments in these types of instruments. The
Fund is not intended as a vehicle for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. The CFTC has neither reviewed
nor approved Invesco’s reliance on these exclusions, or the Fund, its investment strategies, its prospectus or this SAI.
Generally, the exclusion
from CPO regulation on which Invesco relies requires the Fund to meet one of the following tests for its commodity interest positions,
other than positions entered into for bona fide hedging purposes (as defined in the rules of the CFTC): either (1) the aggregate
initial margin and premiums required to establish the Fund’s positions in commodity interests may not exceed 5% of the liquidation
value of the Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions); or (2) the
aggregate net notional value of the Fund’s commodity interest positions, determined at the time the most recent such position was
established, may not exceed 100% of the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits
and unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition to meeting one of these trading limitations, the Fund may not market itself
as a commodity pool or otherwise as a vehicle for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. If, in the future,
the Fund can no longer satisfy these requirements, Invesco would withdraw its notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of
a CPO, and Invesco would be subject to registration and regulation as a CPO with respect to the Fund, in accordance with the CFTC rules that
allow for substituted compliance with CFTC disclosure and shareholder reporting requirements based on Invesco’s compliance with
comparable SEC requirements. However, as a result of CFTC regulation with respect to the Fund, the Fund may incur additional compliance
and other expenses.
General risks associated with derivatives:
The use by the Fund of derivatives
may involve certain risks, as described below.
Counterparty Risk:
The risk that a counterparty under a derivatives agreement will not live up to its obligations, including because of the counterparty’s
bankruptcy or insolvency. Certain agreements may not contemplate delivery of collateral to support fully a counterparty’s contractual
obligation; therefore, the Fund might need to rely solely on contractual remedies to satisfy the counterparty’s full obligation.
As with any contractual remedy, there is no guarantee that the Fund will be successful in pursuing such remedies, particularly in the
event of the counterparty’s bankruptcy or insolvency. Many derivative trading agreements, such as an ISDA Master Agreement governing
OTC swaps, provide for netting of derivatives transactions governed by the agreement in the event of a default by either counterparty,
pursuant to which the Fund’s and the counterparty’s obligations under the relevant transactions can be netted and set-off
against each other, in which case the Fund’s obligation or right will be the net amount owed to or by the counterparty. Netting
agreements are intended to function as a counterparty credit risk mitigant, but in the case of a bankruptcy or insolvency of the relevant
counterparty, are subject to the risk that the insolvency regime applicable to the counterparty might not recognize the enforceability
of the contractual netting provisions. The Fund will not enter into a derivative transaction with any counterparty that Invesco and/or
the Sub-Advisers believe does not have the financial resources to honor its obligations under the transaction. Invesco monitors the financial
stability of counterparties. Where the obligations of the counterparty are guaranteed, Invesco monitors the financial stability
of the guarantor and the counterparty. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the derivative would also likely
decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund.
Leverage Risk: Leverage
exists when the Fund can lose more than it originally invests because it purchases or sells an instrument or enters into a transaction
without investing an amount equal to the full economic exposure of the instrument or transaction. Leverage may cause the Fund to be more
volatile because it may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities. The
use of some derivatives may result in economic leverage, which does not result in the possibility of the Fund incurring obligations beyond
its initial investment, but that nonetheless permits the Fund to gain exposure that is greater than would be the case in an unlevered
instrument.
Liquidity Risk: The
risk that a particular derivative is difficult to sell or liquidate. If a derivative transaction is particularly large or if the relevant
market is illiquid, it may not be possible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position at an advantageous time or price, which
may result in significant losses to the Fund.
Pricing Risk: The
risk that the value of a particular derivative does not move in tandem or as otherwise
expected relative to the corresponding underlying instruments.
Special Regulatory Risks
of Derivatives: The regulation of derivatives is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and
judicial action. In addition, the SEC, CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency,
including, for example, the implementation or reduction of speculative position limits, the implementation of higher margin requirements,
the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading.
It is not possible to predict
fully the effects of current or future regulation. However, it is possible that developments in government regulation of various types
of derivative instruments, such as speculative position limits on certain types of derivatives, or limits or restrictions on the counterparties
with which the Fund engages in derivative transactions, may limit or prevent the Fund from using or limit the Fund’s use of these
instruments effectively as a part of its investment strategy, and could adversely affect the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment
objective. Invesco will continue to monitor developments in the area, particularly to the extent regulatory changes affect the Fund’s
ability to enter into desired swap agreements. New requirements, even if not directly applicable to the Fund, may increase the cost of
the Fund’s investments and cost of doing business.
Tax Risks: For a discussion
of the tax considerations relating to derivative transactions, see “Tax Matters.”
General risks of hedging strategies using
derivatives:
The use by the Fund of hedging
strategies involves special considerations and risks, as described below. Successful use of hedging transactions depends upon Invesco’s
and the Sub-Advisers’ ability to predict correctly the direction of changes in the value of the applicable markets and securities,
contracts and/or currencies. While Invesco and the Sub-Advisers are experienced in the use of derivatives for hedging, there can be no
assurance that any particular hedging strategy will succeed.
In a hedging transaction,
there might be imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between the price movements of an instrument used for hedging and the price
movements of the investments being hedged. Such a lack of correlation might occur due to factors unrelated to the value of the investments
being hedged, such as changing interest rates, market liquidity, and speculative or other pressures on the markets in which the hedging
instrument is traded.
Hedging strategies, if successful,
can reduce risk of loss by wholly or partially offsetting the negative effect of unfavorable price movements in the investments being
hedged. However, hedging strategies can also reduce opportunity for gain by offsetting the positive effect of favorable price movements
in the hedged investments. Investors should bear in mind that the Fund is not obligated to actively engage in hedging. For example, the
Fund may not have attempted to hedge its exposure to a particular foreign currency at a time when doing so might have avoided a loss.
Cybersecurity Risk.
With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, the Fund, like all companies, may be susceptible to
operational, information security and related risks. Cybersecurity incidents involving the Fund and its service providers (including,
without limitation, the Fund’s investment adviser, sub-adviser, fund accountant, custodian, transfer agent and financial intermediaries)
have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, impediments to trading,
the inability of Fund shareholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties,
reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs.
Cybersecurity incidents can
result from deliberate cyberattacks or unintentional events and may arise from external or internal sources. Cyberattacks may include
infection by malicious software or gaining unauthorized access to digital systems, networks or devices that are used to service the Fund’s
operations (e.g., by “hacking” or “phishing”). Cyberattacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not
require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable
to intended users). These cyberattacks could cause the misappropriation of assets or personal information, corruption of data or operational
disruptions. Geopolitical tensions may, from time to time, increase the scale and sophistication of deliberate cyberattacks.
Similar adverse consequences
could result from cybersecurity incidents affecting issuers of securities in which the Fund invests, counterparties with which the Fund
engages, governmental and other regulatory authorities, exchange and other financial market operators, banks, brokers, dealers, insurance
companies, other financial institutions and other parties. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cybersecurity
incidents in the future. Although the Fund’s service providers may have established business continuity plans and risk management
systems to mitigate cybersecurity risks, there can be no guarantee or assurance that such plans or systems will be effective, or that
all risks that exist, or may develop in the future, have been completely anticipated and identified or can be protected against. The
Fund and its shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.
The rapid development and
increasingly widespread use of AI Technologies (as discussed under “AI Technologies” herein) could increase the effectiveness
of cyberattacks and exacerbate the risks.
Risks Relating to Fund’s
RIC Status. Although the Fund intends to elect and qualify each year to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, no assurance
can be given that the Fund will be able to qualify for and maintain RIC status. If the Fund qualifies as a RIC under the Code, the Fund
generally will not be subject to corporate-level federal income taxes on its income and capital gains that are timely distributed (or
deemed distributed) as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to its shareholders. To qualify as a RIC under the Code and to
be relieved of federal taxes on income and gains distributed as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the Fund’s shareholders,
the Fund must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income, asset diversification and distribution requirements. The distribution
requirement for a RIC is satisfied if the Fund distributes dividends each tax year for U.S. federal income tax purposes of an amount
generally at least equal to 90% of the sum of its net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital
losses, if any, to the Fund’s shareholders.
Receipt of Issuer’s
Nonpublic Information. The Adviser or Sub-Advisers (through their portfolio managers, analysts, or other representatives) may receive
material nonpublic information about an issuer that may restrict the ability of the Adviser or Sub-Advisers to cause the Fund to buy
or sell securities of the issuer on behalf of the Fund for substantial periods of time. This may impact the Fund’s ability to realize
profit or avoid loss with respect to the issuer and may adversely affect the Fund’s flexibility with respect to buying or selling
securities, potentially impacting Fund performance. For example, activist investors of certain issuers in which the Adviser or Sub-Advisers
hold large positions may contact representatives of the Adviser or Sub-Advisers and may disclose material nonpublic information in such
communication. The Adviser or Sub-Advisers would be restricted from trading on the basis of such material nonpublic information, limiting
their flexibility in managing the Fund and possibly impacting Fund performance.
Business Continuity and
Operational Risk. The Adviser, the Fund and the Fund’s service providers may experience disruptions or operating errors, such
as processing errors or human errors, inadequate or failed internal or external processes, systems or technology failures, or other disruptive
events, that could negatively impact and cause disruptions in normal business operations of the Adviser, the Fund or the Fund’s
service providers. The Adviser has developed a Business Continuity Program (the “Program”) designed to minimize the disruption
of normal business operations in the event of an adverse incident affecting the Fund, the Adviser and/or its affiliates. The Program
is also designed to enable the Adviser to reestablish normal business operations in a timely manner during such an adverse incident;
however, there are inherent limitations in such programs (including the possibility that contingencies have not been anticipated and
procedures do not work as intended) and, under some circumstances (e.g. natural disasters, terrorism, public health crises, power or
utility shortages and failures, system failures or malfunctions), the Adviser, its affiliates, and any service providers or vendors used
by the Adviser, its affiliates, or the Fund could be prevented or hindered from providing services to the Fund for extended periods of
time. These circumstances could cause disruptions and negatively impact the Fund’s service providers and the Fund’s business
operations, potentially including an inability to calculate the Fund’s net asset value and price the Fund’s investments,
and impediments to trading portfolio securities.
Artificial Intelligence
Risk. The rapid development and increasingly widespread use of certain artificial intelligence technologies, including machine learning
models and generative artificial intelligence (collectively “AI Technologies”), may adversely impact markets, the overall
performance of the Fund’s investments, or the services provided to the Fund by its service providers. For example, issuers in which
the Fund invests and/or service providers to the Fund (including, without limitation, the Fund’s investment adviser, sub-adviser,
fund accountant, custodian, or transfer agent) may use and/or expand the use of AI Technologies in their business operations, and the
challenges with properly managing its use could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, legal liability, and/or an adverse effect
on business operations. AI Technologies are highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data and complex algorithms,
and it is possible that the information provided through use of AI Technologies could be insufficient, incomplete, inaccurate or biased
leading to adverse effects for the Fund, including, potentially, operational errors and investment losses. Additionally, the use of AI
Technologies could impact the market as a whole, including by way of use by malicious actors for market manipulation, fraud and cyberattacks,
and may face regulatory scrutiny in the future, which could limit the development of this technology and impede the growth of companies
that develop and use AI.
To the extent the Fund invests
in companies that are involved in various aspects of AI Technologies, it is particularly sensitive to the risks of those types of companies.
These risks include, but are not limited to, small or limited markets for such securities, changes in business cycles, world economic
growth, technological progress, rapid obsolescence, and government regulation. Such companies may have limited product lines, markets,
financial resources, or personnel. Securities of such companies, especially smaller, start-up companies, tend to be more volatile than
securities of companies that do not rely heavily on technology. Rapid change to technologies that affect a company’s products could
have a material adverse effect on such company’s operating results. Companies that are extensively involved in AI Technologies
also may rely heavily on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secret laws to establish and protect their proprietary
rights in their products and technologies. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by these companies to protect their proprietary
rights will be adequate to prevent the misappropriation of their technology or that competitors will not independently develop technologies
that are substantially equivalent or superior to such companies’ technology. Such companies may engage in significant amounts of
spending on research and development, and there is no guarantee that the products or services produced by these companies will be successful.
Actual usage of AI Technologies
by the Fund’s service providers and issuers in which the Fund invests will vary. AI Technologies and their current and potential
future applications, and the regulatory frameworks within which they operate, continue to rapidly evolve, and it is impossible to predict
the full extent of future applications or regulations and the associated risks to the Fund.
Natural Disaster/Epidemic
Risk. Natural or environmental disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, other severe weather-related
phenomena, and widespread disease including pandemics and epidemics, can be highly disruptive to economies and markets, sometimes severely
so, and can adversely impact individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation rates, credit ratings,
investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of the Fund’s investments. Given the increasing interdependence among
global economies and markets, conditions in one country, market, or region are increasingly likely to adversely affect markets, issuers,
and/or foreign exchange rates in other countries, including the U.S. These disruptions could prevent the Fund from executing advantageous
investment decisions in a timely manner and negatively impact the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective.
Any such event(s) could
have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund. The recent spread of the human coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) is an example. In the first quarter of 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized COVID-19 as a global pandemic
and both the WHO and the U.S. declared the outbreak a public health emergency. The subsequent spread of COVID-19 resulted in, among other
significant adverse economic impacts, instances of market closures and dislocations, extreme volatility, liquidity constraints and increased
trading costs. Efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 resulted in travel restrictions, closed international borders, disruptions of
healthcare systems, business operations (including business closures) and supply chains, employee layoffs and general lack of employee
availability, lower consumer demand, and defaults and credit downgrades, all of which contributed to disruption of global economic activity
across many industries and exacerbated other pre-existing political, social and economic risks domestically and globally. Although the
WHO and the U.S. ended their declarations of COVID-19 as a global health emergency in May 2023, the full economic impact at the
macro-level and on individual businesses, as well as the potential for a future reoccurrence of COVID or the occurrence of a similar
epidemic or pandemic, are unpredictable and could result in significant and prolonged adverse impact on economies and financial markets
in specific countries and worldwide and thereby negatively affect the Fund’s performance.
Litigation Risk. From
time to time, the Fund may pursue or be involved as a named party in litigation arising in connection with its role or status as a shareholder,
bondholder, lender or holder of portfolio investments, its own activities, or other circumstances. Litigation that affects the Fund’s
portfolio investments may result in the reduced value of such investments or higher portfolio turnover if the Fund determines to sell
such investments. Litigation could result in significant expenses, reputational damage, increased insurance premiums, adverse judgment
liabilities, settlement liabilities, injunctions, diversions of Fund resources, disruptions to Fund operations and/or other similar adverse
consequences, any of which may increase the expenses incurred by a Fund or adversely affect the value of the Fund’s shares.
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The following are fundamental
investment restrictions of the Fund and may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of the Fund’s outstanding
voting securities (which for this purpose and under the 1940 Act means the lesser of (i) 67% or more of the Fund’s voting
securities present at a meeting at which more than 50% of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities are present or represented by
proxy or (ii) more than 50% of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities). Except as otherwise noted, all percentage limitations
set forth below apply immediately after a purchase and any subsequent change in any applicable percentage resulting from market fluctuations
does not require any action. With respect to the limitations on the issuance of senior securities and in the case of borrowings, the
percentage limitations apply at the time of issuance and on an ongoing basis. In accordance with the foregoing, the Fund may not:
| 1. | The Fund is a “diversified company”
as defined in the 1940 Act. The Fund will not purchase the securities of any issuer if, as
a result, the Fund would fail to be a diversified company within the meaning of the 1940
Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as such statute, rules and
regulations are amended from time to time or are interpreted from time to time by the SEC
staff (collectively, the “1940 Act Laws and Interpretations”) or except to the
extent that the Fund may be permitted to do so by exemptive order or similar relief (collectively,
with the 1940 Act Laws and Interpretations, the “1940 Act Laws, Interpretations
and Exemptions”). In complying with this restriction, however, the Fund may purchase
securities of other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations
and Exemptions. |
| 2. | The Fund will not make investments that
will result in the concentration (as that term may be defined or interpreted by the 1940
Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions) of its investments in the securities of issuers
primarily engaged in the same industry. This restriction does not limit the Fund’s
investments in (i) obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies
or instrumentalities, or (ii) tax-exempt obligations issued by governments or political
subdivisions of governments. In complying with this restriction, the Fund will not consider
a bank-issued guaranty or financial guaranty insurance as a separate security. |
| 3. | The Fund may not borrow money or issue
senior securities, except as permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions. |
| 4. | The Fund may not underwrite the securities
of other issuers. This restriction does not prevent the Fund from engaging in transactions
involving the acquisition, disposition or resale of its portfolio securities, regardless
of whether the Fund may be considered to be an underwriter under the 1933 Act. |
| 5. | The Fund may not make personal loans
or loans of its assets to persons who control or are under common control with the Fund,
except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.
This restriction does not prevent the Fund from, among other things, purchasing debt obligations,
entering into repurchase agreements, loaning its assets to broker-dealers or institutional
investors, or investing in loans, including assignments and participation interests. |
| 6. | The Fund may not purchase real estate
or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments.
This restriction does not prevent the Fund from investing in issuers that invest, deal, or
otherwise engage in transactions in real estate or interests therein, or investing in securities
that are secured by real estate or interests therein. |
| 7. | The Fund may not purchase or sell physical
commodities except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and any other governing statute,
and by the rules thereunder, and by the SEC or other regulatory agency with authority
over the Fund. |
The Fund’s investment
objective to provide a high level of current income, consistent with preservation of capital is also fundamental and may not be changed
without shareholder approval. The investment restrictions set forth above provide each of the Fund with the ability to operate under
new interpretations of the 1940 Act or pursuant to exemptive relief from the SEC without receiving prior shareholder approval of the
change. The Board may adopt non-fundamental restrictions for the Fund relating to certain of these restrictions which Invesco and, when
applicable, the Sub-Advisers must follow in managing the Fund. Any changes to these non-fundamental restrictions require the approval
of the Board.
Explanatory Note
For purposes of the Fund’s
fundamental restriction related to industry concentration above, investments in tax-exempt municipal securities where the payment of
principal and interest for such securities is derived solely from a specific project associated with an issuer that is not a governmental
entity or a political subdivision of a government are subject to the Fund’s industry concentration policy.
For purposes of the Fund’s
fundamental restriction related to physical commodities above, the Fund is currently permitted to invest in futures, swaps and other
instruments on physical commodities to the extent permitted by the fundamental restriction and the 1940 Act does not prohibit a fund
from owning commodities or contracts related to commodities. The extent to which the Fund can invest in futures, swaps and other instruments
on physical commodities, and/or commodities or contracts related to commodities is set out in the investment strategies described in
the Fund’s prospectus and this SAI and permitted by the Fund’s fundamental restriction.
For purposes of the Fund’s
fundamental restriction related to real estate above, the 1940 Act does not prohibit a fund from owning real estate. The extent to which
the Fund can invest in real estate is set out in the investment strategies described in the Fund’s prospectus or this SAI.
For purposes of the Fund’s
fundamental restriction related to senior securities above, the 1940 Act prohibits a fund from issuing a “senior security,”
which is generally defined as any bond, debenture, note, or similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing indebtedness,
or any stock of a class having priority over any other class of the fund’s shares with respect to the payment of dividends or the
distribution of fund assets, except that the fund may borrow money as described above.
For purposes of the Fund’s
fundamental restriction related to loans above made by the Fund, current SEC staff interpretations under the 1940 Act prohibit a fund
from lending more than one-third of its total assets, except through the purchase of debt obligations or the use of repurchase agreements.
Non-Fundamental Restrictions. Non-fundamental
restrictions may be changed for any Fund without shareholder approval.
| 1. | In complying with the fundamental restriction
regarding issuer diversification, the Fund will not, with respect to 75% of its total assets,
purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the
U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities and securities issued by other
investment companies), if, as a result, (i) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets
would be invested in the securities of that issuer, or (ii) the Fund would hold more
than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer. The Fund may purchase securities
of other investment companies as permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and
Exemptions. |
In complying with the fundamental restriction
regarding issuer diversification, the Fund will regard each state (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico), territory and
possession of the United States, each political subdivision, agency, instrumentality, and authority thereof, and each multi-state agency
of which a state is a member as a separate issuer. When the assets and revenues of an agency, authority, instrumentality or other political
subdivision are separate from the government creating the subdivision and the security is backed only by assets and revenues of the subdivision,
such subdivision would be deemed to be the sole issuer. Similarly, in the case of an Industrial Development Bond or Private Activity
Bond, if that bond is backed only by the assets and revenues of the non-governmental user, then that non-governmental user would be deemed
to be the sole issuer. However, if the creating government or another entity guarantees a security, then to the extent that the value
of all securities issued or guaranteed by that government or entity and owned by the Fund exceeds 10% of the Fund’s total assets,
the guarantee would be considered a separate security and would be treated as issued by that government or entity. Securities issued
or guaranteed by a bank or subject to financial guaranty insurance are not subject to the limitations set forth in the preceding sentence.
| 2. | In complying with the fundamental restriction
regarding borrowing money and issuing senior securities, the Fund may borrow money in an
amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities
(other than borrowings). |
| 3. | In complying with the fundamental restriction
regarding industry concentration, the Fund may invest up to 25% of its total assets in the
securities of issuers whose principal business activities are in the same industry. |
| 4. | In complying with the fundamental restriction
with regard to making loans, the Fund may lend up to 33 1/3% of its total assets and may
lend money to an Invesco Fund, on such terms and conditions as the SEC may require in an
exemptive order. |
| 5. | The Fund invests, under normal market
conditions, at least 80% of its total assets are invested in Senior Loans (either as an Original
Lender or as a purchaser of an Assignment or Participation) of domestic Borrowers or foreign
Borrowers. |
For purposes of the foregoing,
“assets” means net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes. Derivatives and other instruments that
have economic characteristics similar to the securities in the Fund’s 80% policy described above for the Fund may also be counted
toward the Fund’s 80% policy. The Fund will provide written notice to its shareholders prior to any change to this policy, as required
by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.
It is the intention of the
Fund, unless otherwise indicated, that with respect to the Fund’s policies that are a result of application of law, the Fund will
take advantage of the flexibility provided by rules or interpretations of the SEC currently in existence or promulgated in the future,
or changes to such laws.
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
The business and affairs
of the Fund are managed under the direction of the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) and the Fund’s officers
appointed by the Board. The tables below list the trustees and the executive officers of the Fund and their principal occupations, other
directorships held by the trustees and their affiliations, if any, with the Adviser or its affiliates. The “Fund Complex”
includes each of the investment companies advised by the Adviser as of November 30, 2024. Trustees serve until their successors are duly elected
and qualified. Officers are annually elected by the Board. The principal business address of each Trustee and Officer is c/o Invesco
Senior Income Trust, 1331 Spring Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.
Name, year of Birth
and Position(s) Held
with the Trust |
|
Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since |
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 years |
|
Number of
Funds in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
by Trustee |
|
Other
Trusteeship(s)/
Directorship
Held by
Trustee/Director
During Past
5 Years |
Interested Trustees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffery H. Kupor1 – 1969
Trustee |
|
2024 |
|
Senior Managing Director and General Counsel, Invesco Ltd.;
Trustee, Invesco Foundation, Inc.; Director, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Invesco Asset
Management (Bermuda), Ltd., Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd.; and Vice President, Invesco Group Services, Inc.
Formerly: Head of Legal of the Americas, Invesco Ltd.;
Senior Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.)
(registered investment adviser); Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM
Distributors, Inc.); Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM
Investment Services, Inc.); Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary and General
Counsel, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Secretary and General
Counsel, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.) and Chief Legal Officer, Invesco
Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco
Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco
Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Secretary and Vice President, Harbourview Asset Management Corporation; Secretary and Vice
President, OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC; Secretary and Senior Vice President, OFI Global
Institutional, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, OFI SteelPath, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, Oppenheimer
Acquisition Corp.; Secretary and Vice President, Shareholder Services, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, Trinity Investment
Management Corporation, Senior Vice President, Invesco Distributors, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President,
Jemstep, Inc.; Head of Legal, Worldwide Institutional, Invesco Ltd.; Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO Private
Capital Investments, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc.
(formerly known as Invesco AIM Management Group, Inc.); Assistant Secretary, INVESCO Asset Management (Bermuda) Ltd.;
Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Private Capital, Inc.; Assistant Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO
Realty, Inc.; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; Secretary, Sovereign G./P.
Holdings Inc.; Secretary, Invesco Indexing LLC; and Secretary, W.L. Ross & Co., LLC.
|
|
164 |
|
None |
Name, year of Birth
and Position(s) Held
with the Trust |
|
Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since |
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 years |
|
Number of
Funds in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
by Trustee |
|
Other
Trusteeship(s)/
Directorship
Held by
Trustee/Director
During Past
5 Years |
Douglas Sharpe 2 – 1974
Trustee |
|
2024 |
|
Senior Managing Director and Head of Americas &
EMEA, Invesco Ltd.
Formerly: Director and Chairman Invesco UK
Limited; Director, Chairman and Chief Executive, Invesco Fund Managers Limited
|
|
164 |
|
None |
Independent Trustees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beth Ann Brown – 1968
Trustee (2019) and Chair (2022) |
|
2019 |
|
Independent Consultant
Formerly: Head of Intermediary Distribution, Managing Director,
Strategic Relations, Managing Director, Head of National Accounts, Senior Vice President, National Account Manager and Senior Vice President,
Key Account Manager, Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC; Vice President, Key Account Manager, Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc;
and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds |
|
164 |
|
Director, Board of Directors of Caron Engineering Inc.; Formerly:
Advisor, Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc.; President and Director, Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation Corps (non-profit)
President and Director Director of Grahamtastic Connection (non-profit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carol Deckbar – 1962
Trustee |
|
2024 |
|
Formerly: Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer,
TIAA Financial Services; Executive Vice President and Principal, College Retirement Equities Fund at TIAA; Executive Vice President
and Head of Institutional Investments and Endowment Services, TIAA
|
|
164 |
|
Formerly: Board Member, TIAA Asset Management, Inc.;
and Board Member, TH Real Estate Group Holdings Company |
Cynthia Hostetler – 1962
Trustee |
|
2017 |
|
Non-Executive Director and Trustee of a number of public and private
business corporations
Formerly: Director, Aberdeen Investment Funds (4 portfolios);
Director, Artio Global Investment LLC (mutual fund complex); Director, Edgen Group, Inc. (specialized energy and infrastructure
products distributor); Director, Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. (railroads); Head of Investment Funds and Private Equity,
Overseas Private Investment Corporation; President, First Manhattan Bancorporation, Inc.; and Attorney, Simpson Thacher &
Bartlett LLP |
|
164 |
|
Resideo Technologies, Inc. (smart home technology); Vulcan
Materials Company (construction materials company); Trilinc Global Impact Fund; Textainer Group Holdings, (shipping container
leasing company); Investment Company Institute (professional organization); and Independent Directors Council (professional
organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eli Jones– 1961
Trustee |
|
2016 |
|
Professor and Dean Emeritus, Mays Business School - Texas A&M
University
Formerly: Dean of Mays Business School-Texas A&M University;
Professor and Dean, Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas and E.J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University;
and Director, Arvest Bank |
|
164 |
|
Insperity, Inc. (formerly known as Administaff) (human
resources provider); Board Member of the regional board, First Financial Bank Texas; and Boad Member, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
Texas |
Name, year of Birth
and Position(s) Held
with the Trust |
|
Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since |
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 years |
|
Number of
Funds in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
by Trustee |
|
Other
Trusteeship(s)/
Directorship
Held by
Trustee/Director
During Past
5 Years |
Elizabeth Krentzman– 1959
Trustee
|
|
2019 |
|
Formerly: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management
Services and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader of Deloitte & Touche LLP; General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade
association); National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice, Principal, Director and Senior Manager
of Deloitte & Touche LLP; Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and Investment
Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and various positions with the Division of Investment Management
– Office of Regulatory Policy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP; and Trustee
of certain Oppenheimer Funds
|
|
164 |
|
Formerly: Member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors
(private investment fund); Trustee of the University of Florida NationalBoard Foundation; and Member of the University of Florida
Law Center Association, Inc.Board of Trustees, Audit Committee and Membership Committee |
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. – 1956
Trustee |
|
2019 |
|
Formerly: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Blue Hills
Bank (publicly traded financial institution) and Managing Partner, KPMG LLP
|
|
164 |
|
Member and Chairman, of the Bentley University, Business School
Advisory Council; and Board Member and Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and Nominating Committee, KPMG LLP
|
Prema Mathai-Davis – 1950
Trustee
|
|
2014 |
|
Formerly: Co-Founder & Partner of Quantalytics Research,
LLC, (a FinTech Investment Research Platform for the Self-Directed Investor); Trustee of YWCA Retirement Fund; CEO of YWCA of the
USA; Board member of the NY Metropolitan Transportation Authority; Commissioner of the NYC Department of Aging; and Board member
of Johns Hopkins Bioethics Institute
|
|
164 |
|
Member of Board of Positiv Planet US (non-profit) and HealthCare
Chaplaincy Network (non-profit) |
James “Jim” Liddy – 1959
Trustee |
|
2024 |
|
Formerly: Chairman, Global Financial Services, Americas and Retired
Partner, KPMG LLP |
|
164 |
|
Director and Treasurer, Gulfside Place Condominium Association, Inc.
and Non-Executive Director, Kellenberg Memorial High School
|
Joel W. Motley – 1952
Trustee
|
|
2019 |
|
Director of Office of Finance, Federal Home Loan Bank System;
Managing Director of Carmona Motley Inc. (privately held financial advisor); Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and its Finance
and Budget Committee; Chairman Emeritus of Board of Human Rights Watch and Member of its Investment Committee; and Member of Investment
Committee Board of Historic Hudson Valley (non-profit cultural organization); Member of the Board, Blue Ocean Acquisition Corp.;
and Member of the Vestry and the Investment Committee of Trinity Church Wall Street.
Formerly: Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately
held financial advisor); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman, Inc. (privately held financial advisor); Trustee of certain
Oppenheimer Funds; and Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately held financial advisor)
|
|
164 |
|
Member of Board of Trust for Mutual Understanding (non-profit
promoting the arts and environment); Member of Board of Greenwall Foundation (bioethics research foundation) and its Investment Committee;
Member of Board of Friends of the LRC (non- profit legal advocacy); and Board Member and Investment Committee Member of Pulitzer
Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism) |
Name, year of Birth
and Position(s) Held
with the Trust |
|
Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since |
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 years |
|
Number of
Funds in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
by Trustee |
|
Other
Trusteeship(s)/
Directorship
Held by
Trustee/Director
During Past
5 Years |
Teresa M. Ressel – 1962
Trustee |
|
2017 |
|
Non-executive director and trustee of a number of public and private business corporations
Formerly: Chief Executive Officer, UBS Securities LLC (investment banking); Group Chief Operating Officer, UBS AG Americas (investment banking); Sr. Management Team Olayan America, The Olayan Group (international investor/commercial/industrial); and Assistant Secretary for Management & Budget and Designated Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Department of Treasury |
|
164 |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Troccolli – 1949
Trustee |
|
2017 |
|
Formerly: Adjunct Professor, University of Denver – Daniels
College of Business; and Managing Partner, KPMG LLP |
|
164 |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel S. Vandivort – 1954
Trustee |
|
2019 |
|
President, Flyway Advisory Services LLC (consulting and property management) and Member, Investment Committee of Historic Charleston
Foundation
Formerly: President and Chief Investment Officer, previously Head of Fixed Income, Weiss Peck and Greer/Robeco Investment
Management; Trustee and Chair, Weiss Peck and Greer Funds Board; and various capacities at CS First Boston including Head of Fixed Income
at First Boston Asset Management. |
|
164 |
|
Formerly: Trustee and Governance Chair, Oppenheimer Funds; Treasurer,
Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee, Huntington Disease Foundation of America T-3 Invesco Senior Income Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn Brightman – 1972
President and Principal Executive Officer
|
|
2023 |
|
Chief Operating Officer, Americas, Invesco Ltd.; Senior Vice
President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; President and Principal Executive Officer, The Invesco Funds; Manager, Invesco
Investment Advisers LLC.
Formerly: Global Head of Finance, Invesco Ltd; Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Nuveen
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Melanie Ringold– 1975
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
|
2023 |
|
Head of Legal of the Americas, Invesco Ltd.; Senior Vice
President and Secretary, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered
investment adviser); Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Secretary, Invesco
Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.); Senior Vice President, Chief Legal
Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc.;
Chief Legal Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded
Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Secretary and Vice President, Harbourview
Asset Management Corporation; Secretary and Senior Vice President, OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC;
Secretary and Senior Vice President, Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp.; Secretary, SteelPath Funds Remediation LLC; and Secretary and
Senior Vice President, Trinity Investment Management Corporation
Formerly: Secretary and Senior Vice President, OFI SteelPath, Inc.,
Assistant Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc., Invesco Advisers, Inc., Invesco Investment Services, Inc., Invesco
Capital Markets, Inc., Invesco Capital Management LLC and Invesco Investment Advisers LLC; and Assistant Secretary and
Investment Vice President, Invesco Funds
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Crissie M. Wisdom – 1969
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer |
|
2013 |
|
Anti-Money Laundering and OFAC Compliance Officer for Invesco
U.S. entities including: Invesco Advisers, Inc. and its affiliates, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc., Invesco Distributors, Inc., Invesco
Investment Services, Inc., The Invesco Funds, Invesco Capital Management, LLC, Invesco Trust Company; and Fraud Prevention
Manager for Invesco Investment Services, Inc
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Name, year of Birth
and Position(s) Held
with the Trust |
|
Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since |
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 years |
|
Number of
Funds in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
by Trustee |
|
Other
Trusteeship(s)/
Directorship
Held by
Trustee/Director
During Past
5 Years |
Tony Wong – 1973Senior Vice President |
|
2023 |
|
Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.;
Director and Chairman, Invesco Private Capital, Inc., INVESCO Private Capital Investments, Inc. and INVESCO Realty, Inc.;
Director, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; President, Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC and SNW Asset Management Corporation;
and Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds
Formerly: Assistant Vice President, The Invesco Funds; and Vice President, Invesco
Advisers, Inc. |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephan C. Butcher – 1971Senior Vice President |
|
2023 |
|
Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Director and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco
Asset Management Limited |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrien Deberghes – 1967Principal Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President |
|
2020 |
|
Head of the Fund Office of the CFO and Fund Administration; Vice
President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Director, Invesco Trust Company; Principal Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior
Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust
II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively
Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd F. Kuehl – 1969Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President |
|
2020 |
|
Formerly: Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Senior Vice President and Treasurer, Fidelity
Investments Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser); and Chief Compliance Officer
and Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds Formerly: Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer, Legg Mason (Mutual
Funds); Chief Compliance Officer, Legg Mason Private Portfolio Group (registered investment adviser) |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Bordewick, Jr. – 1959 Senior Vice President and Senior Officer |
|
2022 |
|
Senior Vice President and Senior Officer, The Invesco Funds
Formerly: Chief Legal Officer, KingsCrowd, Inc. (research and analytical
platform for investment in private capital markets); Chief Operating Officer and Head of Legal and Regulatory, Netcapital (private capital
investment platform); Managing Director, General Counsel of asset management and Chief Compliance Officer for asset management and private
banking, Bank of America Corporation; Chief Legal Officer, Columbia Funds and BofA Funds; Senior Vice President and Associate General
Counsel, MFS Investment Management; Chief Legal Officer, MFS Funds; Associate, Ropes & Gray; and Associate, Gaston Snow &
Ely Bartlett |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| 1 | Mr. Kupor is considered an interested person (within the meaning of
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of the Fund because he is an officer of the Adviser
to the Trust, and an officer of Invesco Ltd., ultimate parent of the Adviser. |
| 2 | Mr. Sharp is considered an interested person (within the meaning of
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of the Fund because he is an officer of the Adviser
to the Trust, and an officer of Invesco Ltd., ultimate parent of the Adviser. |
Additional Information about the Trustees
Interested Trustees
Jeffrey H. Kupor, Trustee
Jeffrey Kupor has been a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2024. Mr. Kupor is Senior Managing Director and General Counsel at Invesco
Ltd.
Mr. Kupor joined Invesco
Ltd. in 2002 and has held a number of legal roles, including, most recently, Head of Legal, Americas, in which role he was responsible
for legal support for Invesco's Americas business. Prior to joining the firm, he practiced law at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP (now
known as Norton Rose Fulbright), specializing in complex commercial and securities litigation. He also served as the general counsel
of a publicly traded communication services company.
Mr. Kupor earned a BS
degree in economics from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and a JD from the Boalt Hall School of Law (now known as
Berkeley Law) at the University of California at Berkeley.
The Board believes that Mr. Kupor’s
current and past positions with the Invesco complex along with his legal background and experience as an executive in the investment
management area benefits the Fund.
Douglas Sharp, Trustee
Douglas Sharp has been a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2024. Mr. Sharp is Senior Managing Director, Head of Americas &
EMEA (Europe, the Middle East, and Africa) at Invesco Ltd. He also served as Director and Chairman of the Board of Invesco UK Limited
(Invesco’s European subsidiary board) and as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive of Invesco Fund Managers Limited.
Mr. Sharp joined Invesco
Ltd. in 2008 and has served in multiple leadership roles across the company, including his previous role as Head of EMEA. Prior to that,
he ran Invesco Ltd.’s EMEA retail business and served as head of strategy and business planning and as chief administrative officer
for Invesco Ltd.’s US institutional business. Before joining the firm, he was with the strategy consulting firm McKinsey &
Co., where he served clients in the financial services, energy, and logistics sectors.
The Board believes that Mr. Sharp’s
current and past positions within the Invesco complex along with his experience in the investment management business benefits the Fund.
Independent Trustees
Beth Ann Brown, Trustee and Chair
Beth Ann Brown has been a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2019 and Chair since 2022. From 2016 to 2019, Ms. Brown served on the
boards of certain investment companies in the Oppenheimer Funds complex.
Ms. Brown has served
as Director of Caron Engineering, Inc. since 2018 and as an Independent Consultant since 2012.
Previously, Ms. Brown
served in various capacities at Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC, including Head of Intermediary Distribution, Managing Director,
Strategic Relations and Managing Director, Head of National Accounts. She also served as Senior Vice President, National Account Manager
from 2002-2004 and Senior Vice President, Key Account Manager from 1999 to 2002 of Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc. From 2013 through
2022, she served as Director, Vice President (through 2019) and President (2019-2022) of Grahamtastic Connection, a non-profit organization.
From 2014 to 2017, Ms. Brown
served on the Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc. and also served as President and Director of Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation
Corps, a non–profit organization, from 2012 to 2015.
The Board believes that Ms. Brown’s
experience in financial services and investment management and as a director of other investment companies benefits the Fund.
Carol Deckbar, Trustee
Carol Deckbar has been a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2024. Ms. Deckbar previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Product Officer at Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association (TIAA) Financial Services from 2019 to 2021. She also served as Executive
Vice President and Principal of College Retirement Equities Fund at TIAA from 2014 to 2021. Ms. Deckbar served in various other
capacities at TIAA since joining in 2007, including Executive Vice President and Head of Institutional Investments and Endowment Services
from 2016 to 2019.
Prior to joining TIAA, Ms. Deckbar
was a Senior Vice President of AMSOUTH Bank from 2002 to 2006, and before that she served as Senior Vice President, Managing Director,
for Bank of America Capital Management from 1999 to 2002. She began her asset management career with the Evergreen Funds where she served
as Senior Vice President, Managing Director from 1991 to 1998.
From 2019 to 2020, Ms. Deckbar
served as Chairman of the TIAA Retirement Plan Investments Committee and as an Executive Sponsor at Advance, a council for the advancement
of women. She has also held various memberships, including at Investment Company Institute, from 2017 to 2019, Fortune 400 Most Powerful
Women Network, from 2012 to 2015, and Mutual Fund Education Alliance, from 2010 to 2015.
The Board believes that Ms. Deckbar’s
experience in financial services and investment management benefits the Fund.
Cynthia Hostetler, Trustee
Cynthia Hostetler has been a member of the Board
of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2017.
Ms. Hostetler is currently
a member of the board of directors of the Vulcan Materials Company, a public company engaged in the production and distribution of construction
materials, Trilinc Global Impact Fund LLC, a publicly registered non-traded limited liability company that invests in a diversified portfolio
of private debt instruments, and Resideo Technologies, Inc., a public company that manufactures and distributes smart home security
products and solutions worldwide. Ms. Hostetler also serves on the board of governors of the Investment Company Institute and is
a member of the governing council of the Independent Directors Council, both of which are professional organizations in the investment
management industry.
Previously, Ms. Hostetler
served as a member of the board of directors/trustees of Aberdeen Investment Funds, a mutual fund complex, Edgen Group Inc., a public
company that provides products and services to energy and construction companies, from 2012 to 2013, prior to its sale to Sumitomo, Genesee &
Wyoming, Inc., a public company that owns and operates railroads worldwide, from 2018 to 2019, prior to its sale to Brookfield Asset
Management, and Textainer Group Holdings Ltd., a public company that is the world’s second largest shipping container leasing company,
prior to its sale to Stonepeak in March 2024. Ms. Hostetler was also a member of the board of directors of the Eisenhower Foundation,
a non- profit organization.
From 2001 to 2009, Ms. Hostetler
served as Head of Investment Funds and Private Equity at Overseas Private Investment Corporation (“OPIC”), a government agency
that supports US investment in the emerging markets. Ms. Hostetler oversaw a multi-billion dollar investment portfolio in private
equity funds. Prior to joining OPIC, Ms. Hostetler served as President and member of the board of directors of First Manhattan Bancorporation,
a bank holding company, from 1991 to 2007, and its largest subsidiary, First Savings Bank, from 1991 to 2006 (Board Member) and from
1996 to 2001 (President).
The Board believes that Ms. Hostetler’s
knowledge of financial services and investment management, her experience as a director of other companies, including a mutual fund complex,
her legal background, and other professional experience gained through her prior employment benefit the Fund.
Dr. Eli Jones, Trustee
Dr. Eli Jones has been a member of the Board
of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2016.
Dr. Jones has served
as Board Member of the regional board, First Financial Bank Texas since 2021 and Board Member, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
Texas since 2022. Since 2020, Dr. Jones has served as a director on the board of directors of Insperity, Inc. (“Insperity”).
From 2004 to 2016, Dr. Jones was chair of the Compensation Committee, a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
and a director on the board of directors of Insperity.
Dr. Jones is a Professor
of Marketing, Lowry and Peggy Mays Eminent Scholar, and Dean Emeritus of Mays Business School at Texas A&M University. From 2015
to 2021, Dr. Jones served as Dean of Mays Business School at Texas A&M University. From 2012 to 2015, Dr. Jones was the
dean of the Sam M. Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas and holder of the Sam M. Walton Leadership Chair in Business.
Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Arkansas, he was dean of the E. J. Ourso College of Business and Ourso Distinguished
Professor of Business at Louisiana State University from 2008 to 2012; professor of marketing and associate dean at the C.T. Bauer College
of Business at the University of Houston from 2007 to 2008; an associate professor of marketing from 2002 to 2007; and an assistant professor
from 1997 until 2002. He taught at Texas A&M University for several years before joining the faculty of the University of Houston.
Dr. Jones served as
the executive director of the Program for Excellence in Selling and the Sales Excellence Institute at the University of Houston from
1997 to 2007. Before becoming a professor, he worked in sales and sales management for three Fortune 100 companies: Quaker Oats, Nabisco,
and Frito- Lay. Dr. Jones is a past director of Arvest Bank. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in journalism in 1982, his
MBA in 1986 and his Ph.D. in 1997, all from Texas A&M University.
The Board believes that Dr. Jones’
experience in academia and his experience in marketing benefits the Fund.
Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee
Elizabeth Krentzman has been
a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2019. From 2014 to 2019, Ms. Krentzman served on the boards of certain
investment companies in the Oppenheimer Funds complex.
Ms. Krentzman served
from 2017 to 2022, as a member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors (private investment funds). Ms. Krentzman previously served
as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida National Board Foundation from 2016 to 2021. She also served as a member
of the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association, Inc. from 2016 to 2021, as a member of its Audit Committee
from 2016 to 2020, and as a member of its Membership Committee from 2020 to 2021.
Ms. Krentzman served
from 1997 to 2004 and from 2007 and 2014 in various capacities at Deloitte & Touche LLP, including Principal and Chief Regulatory
Advisor for Asset Management Services, U.S. Mutual Fund Leader and National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting
Practice. She served as General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute from 2004 to 2007.
From 1996 to 1997, Ms. Krentzman
served as an Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and Investment Adviser Regulation of
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. She also served from 1991 to 1996 in various positions with the Division of Investment Management
– Office of Regulatory Policy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and from 1987 to 1991 as an Associate at Ropes &
Gray LLP.
The Board believes that Ms. Krentzman’s
legal background, experience in financial services and accounting and as a director of other investment companies benefits the Fund.
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr., Trustee
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr.
has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2019.
Previously, Mr. LaCava served as a member
of the board of directors and as a member of the audit committee of Blue Hills Bank, a publicly traded financial institution.
Mr. LaCava retired after
a 37-year career with KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) where he served as senior partner for a wide range of firm clients across the retail,
financial services, consumer markets, real estate, manufacturing, health care and technology industries. From 2005 to 2013, Mr. LaCava
served as a member of the board of directors of KPMG and chair of the board’s audit and finance committee and nominating committee.
He also previously served as Regional Managing Partner from 2009 through 2012 and Managing Partner of KPMG’s New England practice.
Mr. LaCava currently
serves as Member and Chairman of the Business School Advisory Council of Bentley University and as a member of American College of Corporate
Directors and Board Leaders, Inc.
The Board believes that Mr. LaCava’s
experience in audit and financial services benefits the Fund.
James “Jim” Liddy, Trustee
James “Jim” Liddy
has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2024. Mr. Liddy is a Retired Partner of KPMG LLP (KPMG) and
previously served as Chairman of KPMG’s Global Financial Services, Americas practice from 2017 through 2021. He also led KPMG’s
U.S. Financial Services practice from 2015 through 2021.
Prior to assuming his most
recent role in 2017, Mr. Liddy served as Vice Chair of Audit and on various other committees at KPMG. He also previously served
as National Managing Partner of Audit and was a member of the firm’s Global Audit Steering Group.
The Board believes that Mr. Liddy’s
audit experience and knowledge of financial services and investment management benefits the Fund.
Dr. Prema Mathai-Davis, Trustee
Dr. Prema Mathai-Davis has been a member
of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 1998.
Since 2021, Dr. Mathai-Davis has served as
a member of the Board of Positive Planet US, a non-profit organization and Healthcare Chaplaincy Network, a non-profit organization.
Previously, Dr. Mathai-Davis
served as co-founder and partner of Quantalytics Research, LLC, (a FinTech Investment Research Platform) from 2017 to 2019, when the
firm was acquired by Forbes Media Holdings, LLC.
Dr. Mathai-Davis previously
served as Chief Executive Officer of the YWCA of the USA from 1994 until her retirement in 2000. Prior to joining the YWCA, Dr. Mathai-Davis
served as the Commissioner of the New York City Department for the Aging. She was a Commissioner and Board Member of the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority of New York, the largest regional transportation network in the U.S. Dr. Mathai-Davis also served as a
Trustee of the YWCA Retirement Fund, the first and oldest pension fund for women, and on the advisory board of the Johns Hopkins Bioethics
Institute. She was a member of the Board of Visitors of the University of Maryland School of Public Policy, and on the visiting Committee
of The Harvard University Graduate School of Education.
Dr. Mathai-Davis was
the president and chief executive officer of the Community Agency for Senior Citizens, a non-profit social service agency that she established
in 1981. She also directed the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine-Hunter College Long-Term Care Gerontology Center, one of the first of its
kind.
The Board believes that Dr. Mathai-Davis’
extensive experience in running public and charitable institutions benefits the Fund.
Joel W. Motley, Trustee
Joel W. Motley has been a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2019. From 2002 to 2019, Mr. Motley served on the boards of certain investment
companies in the Oppenheimer Funds complex.
In May 2022, Mr. Motley
rejoined the Vestry and the Investment Committee of Trinity Church Wall Street. Since 2021, Mr. Motley has served as a Board member
of the Trust for Mutual Understanding, which makes grants to arts and environmental organizations in Eastern Europe. Since 2021, Mr. Motley
has served as a member of the board of Blue Ocean Acquisition Corp. Since 2016, Mr. Motley has served as an independent director
of the Office of Finance of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. He has served as Managing Director of Carmona Motley, Inc., a privately-held
financial advisory firm, since 2002.
Mr. Motley also serves
as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and its Finance and Budget Committee. He is a member of the Investment Committee and
is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Human Rights Watch and a member of the Investment Committee and the Board of Historic Hudson Valley,
a non-profit cultural organization.
Since 2011, he has served
as a Board Member and Investment Committee Member of the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting, a non-profit journalism organization.
Mr. Motley also serves as Director and member of the Board and Investment Committee of The Greenwall Foundation, a bioethics research
foundation, and as a Director of Friends of the LRC, a South Africa legal services foundation.
Previously, Mr. Motley
served as Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC, a privately held financial advisory firm, from 2006 to 2017. He also served
as Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman Inc. a privately-held financial advisor, and served as a Director of Columbia Equity Financial
Corp., a privately-held financial advisor, from 2002 to 2007.
The Board believes that Mr. Motley’s
experience in financial services and as a director of other investment companies benefits the Fund.
Teresa M. Ressel, Trustee
Teresa Ressel has been a member of the Board of
Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2017.
Ms. Ressel has previously
served within the private sector and the U.S. government as well as consulting. Formerly, Ms. Ressel served at UBS AG in various
capacities, including as Chief Executive Officer of UBS Securities LLC, a broker-dealer division of UBS Investment Bank, and as Group
Chief Operating Officer of the Americas.
Between 2001 and 2004, Ms. Ressel
served at the U.S. Treasury, initially as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Management & Budget and then as Assistant Secretary
for Management and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Ressel was confirmed by the U.S. Senate and anchored financial duties at the Department,
including finance, accounting, risk, audit and performance measurement.
Ms. Ressel also volunteers
within her community across a number of functions and serves on the board of GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance (non-profit) supporting
children’s health.
The Board believes that Ms. Ressel’s
risk management and financial experience in both the private and public sectors benefits the Fund.
Robert C. Troccoli, Trustee
Robert C. Troccoli has been a member of the Board
of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2016.
Mr. Troccoli retired
after a 39-year career with KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), where he served as a senior Partner. From 2013 to 2017, he was an adjunct
professor at the University of Denver’s Daniels College of Business.
Mr. Troccoli’s
leadership roles during his career with KPMG included managing partner and partner in charge of the Denver office’s Financial Services
Practice. He served regulated investment companies, investment advisors, private partnerships, private equity funds, sovereign wealth
funds, and financial services companies. Toward the end of his career, Mr. Troccoli was a founding member of KPMG’s Private
Equity Group in New York City, where he served private equity firms and sovereign wealth funds. Mr. Troccoli also served mutual
fund clients along with several large private equity firms as Global Lead Partner of KPMG’s Private Equity Group.
The Board believes that Mr. Troccoli’s
experience as a partner in a large accounting firm and his knowledge of investment companies, investment advisors, and private equity
firms benefits the Fund.
Daniel S. Vandivort, Trustee
Daniel S. Vandivort has been
a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2019. From 2014 to 2019, Mr. Vandivort served on the boards of certain
investment companies in the Oppenheimer Funds complex, as a Trustee and as the Governance Committee Chair.
Mr. Vandivort also served
as Chairman, Lead Independent Director, and Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Value Line Funds from 2008
through 2014.
Previously, Mr. Vandivort
also served as a Trustee and Chairman of the Weiss Peck and Greer Mutual Funds Board from 2004 to 2005.
Previously, Mr. Vandivort
served at Weiss Peck and Greer/Robeco Investment Management from 1994 to 2007, as President and Chief Investment Officer and prior to
that as Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income. Mr. Vandivort also served in various capacities at CS First Boston from 1984
to 1994, including as Head of Fixed Income at CS First Boston Investment Management.
Mr. Vandivort was also
a Trustee on the Board of Huntington Disease Foundation of America from 2007 to 2013 and from 2015 to 2019. He also served as Treasurer
and Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee of Huntington Disease Foundation of America from 2016 to 2019.
Mr. Vandivort currently
serves as President of Flyway Advisory Services LLC, a consulting and property management company. He is also a Member of the Investment
Committee for the Historic Charleston Foundation.
The Board believes that Mr. Vandivort’s
experience in financial services and investment management and as a director of other investment companies benefits the Fund.
Management Information
The Trustees have the authority
to take all actions that they consider necessary or appropriate in connection with oversight of the Fund, including, among other things,
approving the investment objectives, investment policies and fundamental investment restrictions for the Fund. The Fund has entered into
agreements with various service providers, including the Fund’s investment advisers, administrator, transfer agent, distributor
and custodians, to conduct the day-to-day operations of the Fund. The Trustees are responsible for selecting these service providers,
approving the terms of their contracts with the Fund, and exercising general oversight of these arrangements on an ongoing basis.
Certain Trustees and officers
of the Fund are affiliated with Invesco and Invesco Ltd., the parent corporation of Invesco. All of the Trust’s executive officers
hold similar offices with some or all of the other Trusts.
Leadership Structure and the Board of Trustees.
The Board is currently composed
of fourteen Trustees, including twelve Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as that term is defined in
the 1940 Act (collectively, the Independent Trustees and each, an Independent Trustee). In addition to eight regularly scheduled meetings
per year, the Board holds special meetings or informal conference calls to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to
the next regular meeting. As discussed below, the Board has established four standing committees – the Audit Committee, the Compliance
Committee, the Governance Committee and the Investments Committee (the Committees), to assist the Board in performing its oversight responsibilities.
The Board has appointed an
Independent Trustee to serve in the role of Chair. The Chair’s primary role is to preside at meetings of the Board and act as a
liaison with the Adviser and other service providers, officers, attorneys, and other Trustees between meetings. The Chair also participates
in the preparation of the agenda for the meetings of the Board, is active with mutual fund industry organizations, and may perform such
other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. Except for any duties specified pursuant to the Trust’s Declaration
of Trust or By-laws, the designation of Chair does not impose on such Independent Trustee any duties, obligations or liability that is
greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Board generally.
The Board believes that its
leadership structure, including having an Independent Trustee as Chair, allows for effective communication between the Trustees and management,
among the Trustees and among the Independent Trustees. The existing Board structure, including its Committee structure, provides the
Independent Trustees with effective control over Board governance while also allowing them to receive and benefit from insight from the
interested Trustee who is an active officer of the Fund’s investment adviser. The Board’s leadership structure promotes dialogue
and debate, which the Board believes allows for the proper consideration of matters deemed important to the Fund and its shareholders
and results in effective decision-making.
Risk Oversight. The
Board considers risk management issues as part of its general oversight responsibilities throughout the year at its regular meetings
and at regular meetings of its Committees. Invesco prepares regular reports that address certain investment, valuation and compliance
matters, and the Board as a whole or the Committees also receive special written reports or presentations on a variety of risk issues
at the request of the Board, a Committee or the Senior Officer.
The Board also oversees risks
related to the Fund’s use of derivatives as part of its general oversight responsibilities. The Board has approved a derivatives
risk manager, which is responsible for administering the derivatives risk management program (“DRM Program”) for the funds
that are required to implement a DRM Program. The Board meets with the derivatives risk manager on a periodic basis, including receiving
quarterly and annual reports from the derivatives risk manager, to review the implementation of the DRM Program.
The Audit Committee assists
the Board with its oversight of the Fund’s accounting and auditing process. The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting the
Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm (auditors), including evaluating their independence and meeting with such
auditors to consider and review matters relating to the Fund’s financial reports and internal controls. In addition, the Audit
Committee meets regularly with representatives of Invesco Ltd.’s internal audit group to review reports on their examinations of
functions and processes within Invesco that affect the Fund. The Audit Committee also oversees the Adviser’s process for valuing
the Fund’s portfolio investments and receives reports from management regarding its process and the valuation of the Fund’s
portfolio investments as consistent with the valuation policy approved by the Board and related procedures.
The Compliance Committee
receives regular compliance reports prepared by Invesco’s compliance group and meets regularly with the Fund’s Chief Compliance
Officer (CCO) to discuss compliance issues, including compliance risks. The Compliance Committee has recommended and the Board has adopted
compliance policies and procedures for the Fund and for the Fund’s service providers. The compliance policies and procedures are
designed to detect, prevent and correct violations of the federal securities laws.
The Governance Committee
monitors the composition of the Board and each of its Committees and monitors the qualifications of the Trustees to ensure adherence
to certain governance undertakings applicable to the Fund. In addition, the Governance Committee oversees an annual self-assessment of
the Board and its committees and addresses governance risks, including insurance and fidelity bond matters, for the Fund.
The Investments Committee
and its sub-committees receive regular written reports describing and analyzing the investment performance of the Invesco Funds. In addition, Invesco’s
Chief Investment Officers and the portfolio managers of the Fund meet regularly with the Investments Committee or its sub-committees
to discuss portfolio performance, including investment risk, such as the impact on the Fund of investments in particular types of securities
or instruments, such as derivatives. To the extent that the Fund changes a particular investment strategy that could have a material
impact on the Fund’s risk profile, the Board generally is consulted in advance with respect to such change.
Committee Structure
The members of the Audit
Committee are Messrs. LaCava (Chair), Liddy and Troccoli, Dr. Jones, and Mss. Hostetler and Ressel. The Audit Committee performs
a number of functions with respect to the oversight of the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting, including: (i) assisting
the Board with its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accountants; (ii) selecting
independent registered public accountants for the Fund; (iii) to the extent required, pre-approving certain audit and permissible
non-audit services; (iv) overseeing the financial reporting process for the Fund; (v) assisting the Board with its oversight
of the integrity of the Fund’s financial statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Fund’s
accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; (vi) pre-approving engagements
for non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Fund’s investment adviser or to any of its
affiliates; and (vii) overseeing the performance of the fair valuation determinations by the Adviser. During the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2024, the Audit Committee held six meetings.
The members of the Compliance
Committee are Messrs. Motley and Vandivort, and Mss. Brown, Deckbar and Krentzman (Chair) and Dr. Mathai-Davis. The Compliance
Committee performs a number of functions with respect to compliance matters, including: (i) reviewing and making recommendations
concerning the qualifications, performance and compensation of the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer; (ii) reviewing recommendations
and reports made by the Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund regarding compliance matters; (iii) overseeing compliance policies
and procedures of the Fund and their service providers; (iv) overseeing potential conflicts of interest that are reported to the
Compliance Committee by Invesco, the Chief Compliance Officer or other independent advisors; (v) reviewing reports prepared by a
third party’s compliance review of Invesco; (vi) if requested by the Board, overseeing risk management with respect to the
Fund (other than risks overseen by the other Committees), including receiving and overseeing risk management reports from Invesco that
are applicable to the Fund and their service providers; and (vii) reviewing reports by Invesco on correspondence with regulators
or governmental agencies with respect to the Fund and recommending to the Board what action, if any, should be taken by the Fund in light
of such reports. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024, the Compliance Committee held four meetings.
The members of the Governance
Committee are Messrs. Motley and Vandivort (Chair) and Mss. Brown and Hostetler and Dr. Mathai-Davis. The Governance Committee
performs a number of functions with respect to governance, including: (i) nominating persons to serve as Independent Trustees and
as members of each Committee, and nominating the Chair of the Board and the Chair of each committee, except that the members and Chair
of each Sub-Committee of the Investments Committee shall be appointed by the Chair of the Investments Committee in consultation with
the Chair of the Governance Committee; (ii) reviewing and making recommendations to the full Board regarding the size and composition
of the Board and the compensation payable to the Independent Trustees; (iii) overseeing the annual evaluation of the performance
of the Board and its Committees; (iv) considering and overseeing the selection of independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees;
(v) considering and overseeing the selection and engagement of a Senior Officer if and as they deem appropriate, including compensation
and scope of services, and recommending all such matters to the Board or the independent trustees as appropriate; (vi) reviewing
administrative and/or logistical matters pertaining to the operations of the Board; and (vii) reviewing annually recommendations
from Invesco regarding amounts and coverage of primary and excess directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance and
allocation of premiums. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024, the Governance Committee held nine meetings.
The Governance Committee
will consider nominees recommended by a shareholder in accordance with the Fund’s governing instruments to serve as trustees, provided:
(i) that such submitting shareholder provides the information required by, and otherwise complies with the applicable provisions
of, the Fund’s governing instruments, (ii) that such submitting shareholder is a shareholder of record, with proof of such
ownership or holding reasonably satisfactory to the Fund to be provided by such record owner or nominee holder, at the time he or she
submits such names and is entitled to vote at the meeting of shareholders at which trustees will be elected; and (iii) that the
Governance Committee or the Board, as applicable, shall make the final determination of persons to be nominated. While the Governance
Committee believes that there are no specific minimum qualifications for a nominee to possess or any specific qualities or skills that
are necessary, in considering a candidate’s qualifications, the Governance Committee may consider, among other things: (1) whether
or not the person is an “interested person,” as defined in the 1940 Act, and is otherwise qualified under applicable laws
and regulations to serve as a trustee of the Fund; (2) whether or not the person is willing to serve as, and willing and able to
commit the time necessary for the performance of the duties of, a trustee; (3) whether the person can make a positive contribution
to the Board and the Fund, with consideration being given to the person’s specific experience, education, qualifications and other
skills; and (4) whether the person is of good character and high integrity, and whether the person has other desirable personality
traits, including independence, leadership and the ability to work with other Board members.
Under the Fund’s governing
instruments, nominees must meet certain additional qualifications to qualify for nomination and service as a Trustee. Nominees may be
disqualified if they engaged in disabling conduct outlined in the Fund’s Declarations of Trust. Nominees that are associated with
other investment vehicles and investment advisers may not be eligible for nomination and service as a Trustee if the Board finds that
such associations have conflicts of interest with the long-term best interests of the Fund, impede the ability of the nominee to perform,
or impede the free-flow of information from management. Nominees that are acting in concert with control persons of other investment
companies that are in violation of Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act shall be disqualified from nomination and service as a
Trustee.
Notice procedures set forth
in the Fund’s Bylaws require that any shareholder of the Fund desiring to nominate a trustee for election at an annual shareholder
meeting must deliver to the Fund’s Secretary notice of the shareholder’s intent to nominate in writing not less than ninety
(90) nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding
year.
The members of the Investments
Committee are Messrs. LaCava, Liddy, Motley (Sub-Committee Chair), Troccoli (Sub-Committee Chair) and Vandivort, Mss. Brown, Deckbar,
Hostetler (Chair), Krentzman and Ressel and Drs. Jones and Mathai-Davis (Sub-Committee Chair). The Investments Committee’s
primary purposes are to assist the Board in its oversight of the investment management services provided by Invesco and the Sub-Advisers
and to periodically review Fund performance information, and information regarding the investment personnel and other resources devoted
to the management of the Fund and make recommendations to the Board, when applicable. During the fiscal year ended February 29,
2024, the Investments Committee held four meetings.
The Investments Committee
has established three Sub-Committees and delegated to the Sub-Committees responsibility for, among other matters: (i) reviewing
the performance of the Invesco Funds that have been assigned to a particular Sub-Committee (for each Sub-Committee, the Designated Funds),
except to the extent the Investments Committee takes such action directly; (ii) reviewing with the applicable portfolio managers
from time to time the investment objective(s), policies, strategies, performance and risks and other investment-related matters of the
Designated Funds; and (iii) being generally familiar with the investment objectives and principal investment strategies of the Designated
Funds.
Compensation
Each Trustee who is not affiliated
with Invesco is compensated for his or her services according to a fee schedule that recognizes the fact that such Trustee also serves
as a Trustee of other Invesco Funds. Each such Trustee receives a fee, allocated among the Invesco Funds for which he or she serves as
a Trustee that consists of an annual retainer component and a meeting fee component. The Chair of the Board and of each Committee and
Sub-Committee receive additional compensation for their services
Information regarding compensation paid or accrued
for each trustee of the Fund who was not affiliated with Invesco during the year ended December 31, 2024, unless otherwise noted,
are as follows:
Name |
|
Aggregate
Compensation from
the Fund(1) |
|
Retirement
Benefits
Accrued by All
Invesco Funds |
|
Estimated
Annual
Benefits Upon
Retirement(2) |
|
Total
Compensation
from the Invesco Fund
Complex(3) |
Independent Trustees(4)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beth Ann Brown |
|
$ |
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Carol Deckbar |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Cynthia Hostetler |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Eli Jones |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Elizabeth Krentzman |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
James “Jim” Liddy |
|
[ ] |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
Prema Mathai-Davis |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Joel W. Motley |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Theresa M. Ressel |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Robert C. Troccoli |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
|
[ ] |
Daniel S. Vandivort |
|
[ ] |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
| (1) | Amounts shown are based on
the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024. The total amount of compensation deferred by
all trustees of the Fund during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024, including earnings,
was $ [ ]. On November 10, 2021, Russell Burk resigned from his role as Senior Vice
President and Senior Officer of the Invesco Funds. During the fiscal year ended February 29,
2024, aggregate compensation from the Fund for Mr. Burk was $[____]. |
| (2) | These amounts represent the
estimated annual benefits payable by the Invesco Funds upon the trustees’ retirement
and assumes each trustee serves until his or her normal retirement date. These amounts are
not adjusted to reflect deemed investment appreciation or depreciation. |
| (3) | These amounts represent the compensation paid from all Invesco
Funds to the individuals who serve as trustees. All trustees currently serve as trustee of 32 registered investment companies advised
by Invesco, unless otherwise noted. |
| (4) | On August 28, 2022, Christopher Wilson retired. During
the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024, compensation from the Fund for Mr. Wilson for consultant services provided to the
Fund subsequent to his retirement was $[___]. Pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Trust, Mr. Wilson may receive payments
for consulting services provided to the Fund for up to three years following his retirement. |
| (5) | Effective January 16, 2024, Carol Deckbar and James Liddy
have been onboarded as two new Trustees. |
Trustee Beneficial Ownership of Securities
The dollar range of equity
securities beneficially owned by each trustee (i) in the Fund and (ii) on an aggregate basis, in all registered investment
companies overseen by the trustee within the Invesco Funds complex, as of December 31, 2024, are as follows:
Name |
|
Fund |
|
Aggregate
dollar range
of equity securities in all
registered investment
companies overseen by
trustee in the Invesco
Fund Complex(1) |
|
Independent Trustees |
|
|
|
|
|
Beth Ann Brown |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Carol Deckbar |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Cynthia Hostetler |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Eli Jones |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Elizabeth Krentzman |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
James “Jim” Liddy |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Prema Mathai-Davis |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Joel W. Motley |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Theresa M. Ressel |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Robert C. Troccoli |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Daniel S. Vandivort |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Beth Ann Brown |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
|
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Interested Trustees |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey H. Kupor |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
Douglas Sharp |
|
[__] |
|
[__] |
|
| (1) | Includes total amount of compensation deferred by the
trustee at his or her election pursuant to a deferred compensation plan. Such deferred compensation
is placed in a deferral account and deemed to be invested in one or more of the Invesco Funds. |
Retirement Policy
The Trustees have adopted
a retirement policy that permits each Trustee to serve until December 31 of the year in which the Trustee turns 75.
Pre-Amendment Retirement Plan For Trustees
The Trustees have adopted
a Retirement Plan for the Trustees who are not affiliated with the Adviser. A description of the pre-amendment Retirement Plan follows.
Annual retirement benefits are available from the Fund and/or the other Invesco Funds for which a Trustee serves (each, a Covered Fund),
for each Trustee who is not an employee or officer of the Adviser, who either (a) became a Trustee prior to December 1, 2008,
and who has at least five years of credited service as a Trustee (including service to a predecessor fund) of a Covered Fund, or (b) was
a member of the Board of Trustees of a Van Kampen Fund immediately prior to June 1, 2010 (Former Van Kampen Trustee), and has at
least one year of credited service as a Trustee of a Covered Fund after June 1, 2010.
For Trustees other than Former
Van Kampen Trustees, effective January 1, 2006, for retirements after December 31, 2005, the retirement benefits will equal
75% of the Trustee’s annual retainer paid to or accrued by any Covered Fund with respect to such Trustee during the twelve-month
period prior to retirement, including the amount of any retainer deferred under a separate deferred compensation agreement between the
Covered Fund and the Trustee. The amount of the annual retirement benefit does not include additional compensation paid for Board meeting
fees or compensation paid to the Chair of the Board and the Chairs and Vice Chairs of certain Board committees, whether such amounts
are paid directly to the Trustee or deferred. The annual retirement benefit is payable in quarterly installments for a number of years
equal to the lesser of (i) sixteen years or (ii) the number of such Trustee’s credited years of service. If a Trustee
dies prior to receiving the full amount of retirement benefits, the remaining payments will be made to the deceased Trustee’s designated
beneficiary for the same length of time that the Trustee would have received the payments based on his or her service or, if the Trustee
has elected, in a discounted lump sum payment. A Trustee must have attained the age of 65 (60 in the event of disability) to receive
any retirement benefit. A Trustee may make an irrevocable election to commence payment of retirement benefits upon retirement from the
Board before age 72; in such a case, the annual retirement benefit is subject to a reduction for early payment.
If the Former Van Kampen
Trustee completes at least 10 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the retirement benefit will equal 75% of the Former
Van Kampen Trustee’s annual retainer paid to or accrued by any Covered Fund with respect to such Trustee during the twelve-month
period prior to retirement, including the amount of any retainer deferred under a separate deferred compensation agreement between the
Covered Fund and such Trustee. The amount of the annual retirement benefit does not include additional compensation paid for Board meeting
fees or compensation paid to the Chair of the Board and the Chairs and Vice Chairs of certain Board committees, whether such amounts
are paid directly to the Trustee or deferred. The annual retirement benefit is payable in quarterly installments for 10 years beginning
after the later of the Former Van Kampen Trustee’s termination of service or attainment of age 72 (or age 60 in the event of disability
or immediately in the event of death). If a Former Van Kampen Trustee dies prior to receiving the full amount of retirement benefits,
the remaining payments will be made to the deceased Trustee’s designated beneficiary or, if the Trustee has elected, in a discounted
lump sum payment.
If the Former Van Kampen
Trustee completes less than 10 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the retirement benefit will be payable at the applicable
time described in the preceding paragraph, but will be paid in two components successively. For the period of time equal to the Former
Van Kampen Trustee’s years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the first component of the annual retirement benefit will
equal 75% of the compensation amount described in the preceding paragraph. Thereafter, for the period of time equal to the Former Van
Kampen Trustee’s years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the second component of the annual retirement benefit will
equal the excess of (x) 75% of the compensation amount described in the preceding paragraph, over (y) $68,041 plus an interest
factor of 4% per year compounded annually measured from June 1, 2010 through the first day of each year for which payments under
this second component are to be made. In no event, however, will the retirement benefits under the two components be made for a period
of time greater than 10 years. For example, if the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes 7 years of credited service after June 1,
2010, he or she will receive 7 years of payments under the first component and thereafter 3 years of payments under the second component,
and if the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes 4 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, he or she will receive 4 years of
payments under the first component and thereafter 4 years of payments under the second component.
Amendment of Retirement Plan and Conversion
to Defined Contribution Plan
The Trustees approved an
amendment to the Retirement Plan to convert it to a defined contribution plan for active Trustees (the Amended Plan). Under the Amended
Plan, the benefit amount was amended for each active Trustee to the present value of the Trustee’s existing retirement plan benefit
as of December 31, 2013 (the Existing Plan Benefit) plus the present value of retirement benefits expected to be earned under the
Retirement Plan through the end of the calendar year in which the Trustee attained age 75 (the Expected Future Benefit and, together
with the Existing Plan Benefit, the Accrued Benefit). On the conversion date, the Covered Funds established bookkeeping accounts in the
amount of their pro rata share of the Accrued Benefit, which is deemed to be invested in one or more Invesco Funds selected by the participating
Trustees. Such accounts will be adjusted from time to time to reflect deemed investment earnings and losses. Each Trustee’s Accrued
Benefit is not funded and, with respect to the payments of amounts held in the accounts, the participating Trustees have the status of
unsecured creditors of the Covered Funds. Trustees will be paid the adjusted account balance under the Amended Plan in quarterly installments
for the same period as described above.
Deferred Compensation Agreements
Certain former Trustees and
current Independent Trustees (for purposes of this paragraph only, the Deferring Trustees) have executed a Deferred Compensation Agreement
(collectively, the Compensation Agreements). Pursuant to the Compensation Agreements, the Deferring Trustees have the option to elect
to defer receipt of up to 100% of their compensation payable by the Fund, and such amounts are placed into a deferral account and deemed
to be invested in one or more Invesco Funds selected by the Deferring Trustees. Amounts deferred by Deferring Trustees pursuant to a
Compensation Agreement during the most recent fiscal year are shown above.
Distributions from these
deferral accounts will be paid in cash, generally in equal quarterly installments over a period of up to ten (10) years (depending
on the Compensation Agreement) beginning on the date selected under the Compensation Agreement. If a Deferring Trustee dies prior to
the distribution of amounts in his or her deferral account, the balance of the deferral account will be distributed to his or her designated
beneficiary. The Compensation Agreements are not funded and, with respect to the payments of amounts held in the deferral accounts, the
Deferring Trustees have the status of unsecured creditors of the Fund and of each other Invesco Fund from which they are deferring compensation.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES
Investment Adviser
Invesco serves as the Fund’s
investment adviser. The Adviser manages the investment operations of the Fund as well as other investment portfolios that encompass a
broad range of investment objectives, and has agreed to perform or arrange for the performance of the Fund’s day-to-day management.
The Adviser, as successor in interest to multiple investment advisers, has been an investment adviser since 1976. Invesco is an indirect,
wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. Invesco Ltd. and its subsidiaries are an independent global investment management group. Certain
of the directors and officers of Invesco are also executive officers of the Fund and their affiliations are shown in this Statement of
Additional Information
As investment adviser, Invesco
supervises all aspects of the Fund’s operations and provides investment advisory services to the Fund. Invesco obtains and evaluates
economic, statistical and financial information to formulate and implement investment programs for the Fund. The Fund’s Investment
Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) provides that, in fulfilling its responsibilities, Invesco may engage
the services of other investment managers with respect to the Fund. The investment advisory services of Invesco are not exclusive and
Invesco is free to render investment advisory services to others, including other investment companies.
Pursuant to an administrative
services agreement with the Fund, the Adviser is also responsible for furnishing to the Fund at the Adviser’s expense, the services
of persons believed to be competent to perform all supervisory and administrative services required by the Fund and that, in the judgment
of the Trustees, are necessary to conduct the business of the Fund effectively, as well as the offices, equipment and other facilities
necessary for their operations. Such functions include the maintenance of the Fund’s accounts and records, and the preparation
of all requisite corporate documents such as tax returns and reports to the SEC and shareholders.
The Advisory Agreement provides
that the Fund will pay or cause to be paid all expenses of such Fund not assumed by Invesco, including, without limitation: brokerage
commissions, taxes, legal, auditing, or governmental fees, custodian, transfer and shareholder service agent costs, expenses of issue,
sale, redemption and repurchase of shares, expenses of registering and qualifying shares for sale, expenses relating to trustees and
shareholder meetings, the cost of preparing and distributing reports and notices to shareholders, the fees and other expenses incurred
by the Fund in connection with membership in investment company organizations and the cost of printing copies of prospectuses and statements
of additional information distributed to the Fund’s shareholders.
Invesco, at its own expense, furnishes to the
Fund office space and facilities. Invesco furnishes to the Fund all personnel for managing the affairs of the Fund.
Advisory fees paid for the last three fiscal years
of the Fund are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended | |
Advisory Fees Paid | |
February 29, 2024 | |
$ | 7,878,909 | |
February 28, 2023 | |
$ | 8,199,226 | |
February 28, 2022 | |
$ | 8,455,119 | |
Invesco may from time to
time waive or reduce its fee. Voluntary fee waivers or reductions may be rescinded at any time without further notice to investors. During
periods of voluntary fee waivers or reductions, Invesco will retain its ability to be reimbursed for such fee prior to the end of
their respective fiscal year in which the voluntary fee waiver or reduction was made.
Invesco has contractually
agreed through at least June 30, 2026, to waive advisory fees payable by the Fund in an amount equal to 100% of the net advisory
fee Invesco receives from the affiliated money market funds as a result of the Fund’s investment of uninvested cash in the affiliated
money market funds. Unless Invesco continues the fee waiver agreement, it will terminate as indicated above. During its term, the fee
waiver agreements cannot be terminated or amended to reduce the advisory fee waivers without approval of the Board.
Investment Sub-Advisers
Invesco has entered into
a Sub-Advisory Agreement with certain affiliates to serve as sub-advisers to the Fund pursuant to which these affiliated sub-advisers
may be appointed by Invesco from time to time to provide discretionary investment management services, investment advice, and/or order
execution services to the Fund.
These affiliated sub-advisers, each of which is
a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act are:
Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH (Invesco Deutschland)
Invesco Asset Management Limited (Invesco Asset Management)
Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited (Invesco Japan)
Invesco Hong Kong Limited (Invesco Hong Kong)
Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. (Invesco Senior
Secured)
Invesco Canada Ltd. (Invesco Canada); (each a “Sub-Adviser”
and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”).
Invesco and each Sub-Adviser is an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Invesco Ltd.
The only fees payable to
the Sub-Advisers under the Sub-Advisory Agreement are for providing discretionary investment management services. For such services, Invesco
(and not the Fund) pays each Sub-Adviser a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, equal to (i) 40% of the monthly compensation that
Invesco receives from the Fund, multiplied by (ii) the fraction equal to the net assets of such Fund as to which such Sub-Adviser
shall have provided discretionary investment management services for that month divided by the net assets of such Fund for that month.
Pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, this fee is reduced to reflect contractual or voluntary fee waivers or expense limitations by
Invesco, if any, in effect from time to time. In no event shall the aggregate monthly fees paid to the Sub-Advisers under the Sub-Advisory
Agreement exceed 40% of the monthly compensation that Invesco receives from the Fund pursuant to its advisory agreement with the Fund,
as reduced to reflect contractual or voluntary fees waivers or expense limitations by Invesco, if any.
Securities Lending Arrangements
The Fund may lend its portfolio
securities to generate additional income. The Fund may participate in a securities lending program pursuant to a securities lending agreement
that establishes the terms of the loan, including collateral requirements. The Fund may lend securities to securities brokers and other
borrowers.
Under the securities lending
program, Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) served as a securities lending agent for certain of the Fund’s most recently completed
fiscal year. The Board also appointed Invesco to serve as an affiliated securities lending agent for the Fund under the securities lending
program. Invesco served as an affiliated securities lending agent for the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year, as listed
in the table below (as applicable).
To the extent the Fund utilizes
Invesco as an affiliated securities lending agent, the Fund conducts its securities lending in accordance with and in reliance upon no-action
letters issued by the SEC staff that provide guidance on how an affiliate may act as a direct agent lender and receive compensation for
those services without obtaining exemptive relief. The Board has approved policies and procedures that govern the Fund’s securities
lending activities when utilizing an affiliated securities lending agent, such as Invesco, consistent with the guidance set forth in
the no-action letters.
Invesco serves as a securities
lending agent to other clients in addition to the Fund. There are potential conflicts of interests involved in the Fund’s use of
Invesco as an affiliated securities lending agent, including but not limited to: (i) Invesco as securities lending agent may have
an incentive to increase or decrease the amount of securities on loan, lend particular securities, delay or forgo calling securities
on loans, or lend securities to less creditworthy borrowers, in order to generate additional fees for Invesco and its affiliates; and
(ii) Invesco as securities lending agent may have an incentive to allocate loans to clients that would provide more fees to Invesco.
Invesco seeks to mitigate these potential conflicts of interest by utilizing a methodology designed to provide its securities lending
clients with equal lending opportunities over time.
Service Agreements
Administrative Services
Agreement. Invesco and the Fund have entered into a Master Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administrative Services
Agreement”) pursuant to which Invesco may perform or arrange for the provision of certain accounting and other administrative services
to the Fund which are not required to be performed by Invesco under the Advisory Agreement. The Administrative Services Agreement provides
that it will remain in effect and continue from year to year only if such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the
Board, including the independent trustees, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for such purpose. Under the Administrative Services
Agreement, Invesco is entitled to receive from the Fund reimbursement of its costs or such reasonable compensation as may be approved
by the Board. Currently, Invesco is reimbursed for the services of the Fund’s principal financial officer and her staff and
any expenses related to fund accounting services.
Administrative services fees paid for the last
three fiscal years of the Fund are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended | |
Administrative Fees Paid | |
February 29, 2024 | |
$ | 1,839,770 | |
February 28, 2023 | |
$ | 1,971,139 | |
February 28, 2022 | |
$ | 1,994,363 | |
OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS
Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company,
N.A. (“Computershare”), 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021 is the transfer agent for the Fund.
The Transfer Agency and Service
Agreement (the “TA Agreement”) between the Fund and Computershare provides that Computershare will perform certain services
related to the servicing of shareholders of the Fund. Other such services may be delegated or subcontracted to third party intermediaries.
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust
Company (the “Custodian”), 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, is custodian of all securities and cash of the
Fund. The Bank of New York Mellon, 2 Hanson Place, Brooklyn, New York 11217-1431, also serves as sub-custodian to facilitate cash management.
The Custodian’s
responsibilities include safeguarding and controlling the Fund’s portfolio securities and handling the delivery of such
securities to and from the Fund. These services do not include any supervisory function over management or provide any protection
against any possible depreciation of assets.
The Custodian and sub-custodian
are authorized to establish separate accounts in foreign countries and to cause foreign securities owned by the Fund to be held outside
the United States in branches of U.S. banks and, to the extent permitted by applicable regulations, in certain foreign banks and securities
depositories. Invesco is responsible for selecting eligible foreign securities depositories and for assessing the risks associated with
investing in foreign countries, including the risk of using eligible foreign securities’ depositories in a country. The Custodian
is responsible for monitoring eligible foreign securities depositories.
Under its contract with the
Fund, the Custodian maintains the portfolio securities of the Fund, administers the purchases and sales of portfolio securities, collects
interest and dividends and other distributions made on the securities held in the portfolio of the Fund and performs other ministerial
duties. These services do not include any supervisory function over management or provide any protection against any possible depreciation
of assets.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Fund’s independent
registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements of the Fund. The Audit Committee of the Fund’s
Board has selected, and the Board has ratified and approved, [___], as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the
financial statements of the Fund. In connection with the audit of the Fund’s financial statements, the Fund entered into an engagement
letter with [___]. The terms of the engagement letter required by [___], and agreed to by the Fund’s Audit Committee, include a
provision mandating the use of mediation and arbitration to resolve any controversy or claim between the parties arising out of or relating
to the engagement letter or the services provided thereunder. The Fund’s audited financial statements incorporated by reference
in this SAI and the report of [___] thereon, have been incorporated by reference in this SAI in reliance upon the report of such firm
given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
Portfolio Manager Fund Holdings and Information on Other Managed
Accounts
Invesco’s portfolio
managers develop investment models which are used in connection with the management of certain Invesco funds as well as other mutual
funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and
other accounts managed for organizations and individuals. The ‘Investments’ chart reflects the portfolio managers’
investments in the Fund and includes investments in the Fund’s shares beneficially owned by a portfolio manager, as determined
in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (beneficial ownership includes ownership
by a portfolio manager’s immediate family members sharing the same household). The ‘Assets Managed’ chart reflects
information regarding accounts other than the Fund for which each portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. Accounts
are grouped into three categories: (i) other registered investment companies; (ii) other pooled investment vehicles; and (iii) other
accounts. To the extent that any of these accounts pay advisory fees that are based on account performance (performance-based fees),
information on those accounts is specifically noted. In addition, any assets denominated in foreign currencies have been converted into
U.S. dollars using the exchange rates as of the applicable date.
Investments
The following information is as of February 29,
2024:
Portfolio Manager | |
Dollar Range of Investments in the Fund | |
Scott Baskind | |
| None | |
Thomas Ewald | |
| None | |
Philip Yarrow | |
| None | |
Assets Managed
The following information is as of February 29,
2024:
| |
Other Registered
Investment Companies
Managed (assets in millions) | | |
Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles Managed (assets in millions) | | |
Other Accounts
Managed (assets in millions) | |
Portfolio Manager | |
Number of Accounts | | |
Assets | | |
Number of Accounts | | |
Assets | | |
Number of Accounts | | |
Assets | |
Scott Baskind | |
| 4 | | |
$ | 10,421.1 | | |
| 10 | | |
$ | 7,130.8 | | |
| 14 | | |
$ | 6,342.5 | |
Thomas Ewald | |
| 4 | | |
$ | 6,778.9 | | |
| 3 | | |
$ | 4,479.3 | | |
| 14 | | |
$ | 6,342.5 | |
Philip Yarrow | |
| 4 | | |
$ | 6,778.9 | | |
| 3 | | |
$ | 4,479.3 | | |
| 14 | | |
$ | 6,342.5 | |
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts
of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other
account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds and/or other accounts may be presented with one or more of the
following potential conflicts:
| ● | The management of multiple funds and/or
other accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the
management of the Fund and/or other account. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to manage
such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio
managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio
manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the
management of the funds. |
| ● | If a portfolio manager identifies a
limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one Fund or other account,
the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation
of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible funds and other accounts. To deal with
these situations, the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser and the funds have adopted procedures for
allocating portfolio transactions across multiple accounts. |
| ● | The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser determine
which broker to use to execute each order for securities transactions for the funds, consistent
with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, for certain other accounts
(such as mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled
investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for
organizations and individuals), the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser may be limited by the client
with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a
particular broker. In these cases, trades for the Fund in a particular security may be placed
separately from, rather than aggregated with, such other accounts. Having separate transactions
with respect to a security may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the
execution of the transaction, or both, to the possible detriment of the Fund or other account(s) involved. |
| ● | The appearance of a conflict of interest
may arise where the Adviser or Sub-Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based
management fee, which relates to the management of one Fund or account but not all funds
and accounts for which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. |
The Adviser, each Sub-Adviser,
and the Fund have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no
guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
Description of Compensation Structure
The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser
seek to maintain a compensation program that is competitively positioned to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals.
Portfolio managers receive a base salary, an incentive cash bonus opportunity and a deferred compensation opportunity. Portfolio manager
compensation is reviewed and may be modified each year as appropriate to reflect changes in the market, as well as to adjust the factors
used to determine bonuses to promote competitive Fund performance. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser evaluate competitive market compensation
by reviewing compensation survey results conducted by an independent third party of investment industry compensation. Each portfolio
manager’s compensation consists of the following three elements:
Base Salary. Each
portfolio manager is paid a base salary. In setting the base salary, the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser’s intention is to be competitive
in light of the particular portfolio manager’s experience and responsibilities.
Annual Bonus. The
portfolio managers are eligible, along with other employees of the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser, to participate in a discretionary year-end
bonus pool. The Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. reviews and approves the firm-wide bonus pool available based upon progress against
strategic objectives and annual operating plan, including investment performance and financial results. In addition, while having no
direct impact on individual bonuses, assets under management are considered when determining the starting bonus funding levels. Each
portfolio manager is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus which is based on quantitative (i.e. investment performance) and non-quantitative
factors (which may include, but are not limited to, individual performance, risk management and teamwork).
Each portfolio manager’s
compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment performance of the Fund/accounts managed by the portfolio manager as described in the
table below.
Sub-Adviser |
|
Performance time period(5) |
|
|
Invesco(1)
Invesco Canada(1)
Invesco Deutschland(1)
Invesco Hong Kong(1)
Invesco Asset Management(1)
Invesco Listed Real Assets Division(1) |
|
One-, Three- and Five-year performance against Fund peer group. |
|
|
Invesco Senior Secured(1),(2) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Invesco Japan |
|
One-, Three- and Five-year performance |
(1) |
Portfolio Managers may be granted an annual deferral award that vests on a pro-rata basis over
a four year period. |
(2) |
Invesco Senior Secured’s bonus is based on annual measures of equity return and standard
tests of collateralization performance. |
High investment performance
(against applicable peer group and/or benchmarks) would deliver compensation generally associated with top pay in the industry (determined
by reference to the third-party provided compensation survey information) and poor investment performance (versus applicable peer group)
would result in low bonus compared to the applicable peer group or no bonus at all. These decisions are reviewed and approved collectively
by senior leadership which has responsibility for executing the compensation approach across the organization.
Deferred/Long-Term Compensation.
Portfolio managers may be granted a deferred compensation award based on a firm-wide bonus pool approved by the Compensation Committee
of Invesco Ltd. Deferred compensation awards may take the form of annual fund deferral awards or long-term equity awards. Annual fund
deferral awards are notionally invested in certain Invesco funds selected by the Portfolio Manager and are settled in cash. Long-term
equity awards are settled in Invesco Ltd. common shares. Both fund deferral awards and long-term equity awards have a four-year ratable
vesting schedule. The vesting period aligns the interests of the Portfolio Managers with the long-term interests of clients and shareholders
and encourages retention.
Retirement and health
and welfare arrangements. Portfolio managers are eligible to participate in retirement and health and welfare plans and programs
that are available generally to all employees.
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE ALLOCATION
Invesco and the Sub-Advisers
have adopted compliance procedures that cover, among other items, brokerage allocation and other trading practices. If all or a portion
of the Fund’s assets are managed by one or more Sub-Advisers, the decision to buy and sell securities and broker-dealer selection
will be made by the Sub-Adviser for the assets it manages. Unless specifically noted, the Sub-Advisers brokerage allocation procedures
do not materially differ from the Advisers’s procedures.
As discussed below, Invesco
and the Sub-Advisers, unless prohibited by applicable law, may cause the Fund to pay a broker-dealer a commission for effecting a transaction
that exceeds the amount another broker-dealer would have charged for effecting the same transaction in recognition of the value of brokerage
and research services provided by that broker-dealer.
With respect to interests
in Senior Loans, the Fund generally will engage in privately negotiated transactions for purchase or sale in which the Adviser will negotiate
on behalf of the Fund, although a more developed market may exist for certain Senior Loans. The Fund may be required to pay fees, or
forgo a portion of interest and any fees payable to the Fund, to the Lender selling Participations or Assignments to the Fund. The Adviser
will determine the Lenders from whom the Fund will purchase Assignments and Participations by considering their professional ability,
level of service, relationship with the Borrower, financial condition, credit standards and quality of management. The illiquidity of
many Senior Loans may restrict the ability of the Adviser to locate in a timely manner persons willing to purchase the Fund’s interests
in Senior Loans at a fair price should the Fund desire to sell such interests. Affiliates of the Adviser may participate in the primary
and secondary market for Senior Loans. Because of certain limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, this may restrict the Fund’s ability
to acquire some Senior Loans. The Adviser does not believe that this will have a material effect on the Fund’s ability to acquire
Senior Loans consistent with its investment policies.
Brokerage Transactions
Placing trades generally
involves acting on portfolio manager instructions to buy or sell a specified amount of portfolio securities, including selecting one
or more broker-dealers, including affiliated and third-party broker-dealers, to execute the trades, and negotiating commissions and spreads.
Various Invesco Ltd. subsidiaries have created a global equity trading desk. The global equity trading desk has assigned local traders
in primary trading centers around the world to place equity securities trades in their regions. Invesco’s Americas desk, with locations
in the United States and Canada (the Americas Desk), generally places trades of equity securities trading in North America, Canada and
Latin America; the Asia Pacific desk, with locations in Hong Kong, Japan, Australia and China (the Asia Pacific Desk), generally places
trades of equity securities trading in the Asia-Pacific markets; and the EMEA trading desk, with locations in the United Kingdom (the
EMEA Desk), generally places trades of equity securities trading in European, Middle Eastern and African countries. Additionally, various
Invesco Ltd. subsidiaries have created an alternatives trading desk that generally places trades in derivatives, options and foreign
currency.
Invesco, Invesco Canada, Invesco
Japan, Invesco Deutschland, Invesco Hong Kong, Invesco Capital and Invesco Asset Management use the global equity trading
desk and the alternatives desk to place trades. Other Sub-Advisers may use the global equity trading desk and the alternatives desk in
the future. The trading procedures for the global trading desks are similar in all material respects. References in the language below
to actions by Invesco or a Sub-Adviser making determinations or taking actions related to equity trading include these entities’
delegation of these determinations/actions to the Americas Desk, the Asia Pacific Desk, and the EMEA Desk. Even when trading is delegated
by Invesco or the Sub-Advisers to the various arms of the global equity trading desk or to the alternatives desk, Invesco or the
Sub-Adviser that delegates trading is responsible for oversight of this trading activity.
Commissions
Substantially all of the
Fund’s trades are effected on a principal basis. Brokerage commissions during the Fund’s last three fiscal years are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended | |
Brokerage Commissions | |
February 29, 2024 | |
$ | 0 | |
February 28, 2023 | |
$ | 0 | |
February 28, 2022 | |
$ | 0 | |
The Fund does not and will not pay brokerage commissions
to Brokers affiliated with the Fund, the Adviser, the Sub-Advisers or any affiliates of such entities.
The Fund may purchase or sell a security from
or to certain other Invesco funds or other accounts (and may invest in affiliated money market funds) provided the Fund follows procedures
adopted by the Boards of the various Invesco funds, including the Fund. These inter-fund transactions do not generate brokerage commissions
but may result in custodial fees or taxes or other related expenses.
Broker Selection
The Adviser’s or the
Sub-Advisers’ primary consideration in selecting Brokers to execute portfolio transactions for an Invesco fund is to obtain best
execution. In selecting a Broker to execute a portfolio transaction in equity or fixed income securities for the Fund, the Adviser or
the Sub-Advisers consider the full range and quality of a Broker’s services, including, but not limited to, the value of research
and/or brokerage services provided (if permitted by applicable law and regulation), execution capability, commission rate, spread or
mark-up or mark-down (as applicable), and willingness to commit capital, anonymity and responsiveness. In each case, the determinative
factor is not the lowest commission, spread or mark-up or mark-down available but whether the transaction represents the best qualitative
execution for the Fund under the circumstances. The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers will not select Brokers based upon their promotion or
sale of shares of funds advised by the Adviser and/or the Sub-Advisers.
Unless prohibited by applicable
law, such as MiFID II (described herein), in choosing brokers to execute portfolio transactions for the Fund, the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers
may select Brokers that provide brokerage and/or research services (“Soft Dollar Products”) to the Fund and/or the other
accounts over which the Adviser and its affiliates have investment discretion. For the avoidance of doubt, European Union and United
Kingdom investment advisers, including Invesco Deutschland and Invesco Asset Management, which may act as sub-adviser to certain Invesco
Funds as described in such Fund’s prospectuses, must pay for research from Brokers directly out of their own resources, rather
than through client commissions. Therefore, the use of the defined term “Sub-Advisers” throughout this section shall not
be deemed to apply to those Sub-Advisers subject to the MiFID II prohibitions. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, provides that the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers, under certain circumstances, lawfully may cause a client account
to pay a higher commission than the lowest available. Under Section 28(e)(1), the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers must make a good faith
determination that the commissions paid are “reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided
viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the Adviser’s or the Sub-Advisers’ overall responsibilities with
respect to the accounts as to which it exercises investment discretion.” The Soft Dollar Products provided by the Broker also must
lawfully and appropriately assist the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers in the performance of their investment decision-making responsibilities.
Accordingly, the Fund may pay a Broker commissions that are higher than those charged by another Broker in recognition of the Broker’s
provision of Soft Dollar Products to the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers.
The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers
face a potential conflict of interest when they use client trades to obtain Soft Dollar Products. This conflict exists because the Adviser
and the Sub-Advisers are able to use the Soft Dollar Products to manage client accounts without paying cash for the Soft Dollar Products,
which reduces the Adviser’s or the Sub-Advisers’ expenses to the extent that the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers would have purchased
such products had they not been provided by Brokers. Section 28(e) permits the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers to use Soft Dollar
Products for the benefit of any account it manages. Certain Invesco-managed client accounts (or accounts managed by the Sub-Advisers)
may generate soft dollars used to purchase Soft Dollar Products that ultimately benefit other Adviser- managed accounts (or Sub-Adviser-managed
accounts), effectively cross subsidizing the other Adviser-managed accounts (or the other Sub-Adviser-managed accounts) that benefit
directly from the product. The Adviser or the Sub-Advisers may not use all of the Soft Dollar Products provided by Brokers through which
the Fund effects securities transactions in connection with managing the Fund whose trades generated the soft dollar commissions used
to purchase such products. Fixed income trading normally does not generate soft dollar commissions to pay for Soft Dollar Products. Therefore,
soft dollar commissions used to pay for Soft Dollar Products which are used to manage certain fixed income Invesco funds or other fixed-income
client accounts are generated entirely by equity-focused Invesco funds and other equity-focused client accounts managed by the Adviser.
In other words, certain fixed income Invesco funds are cross-subsidized by the equity Invesco Funds in that the fixed income Invesco
funds receive the benefit of Soft Dollar Products for which they do not pay.
Similarly, other client accounts
managed by the Adviser or certain of its affiliates may benefit from Soft Dollar Products for which they do not pay. The Adviser and
the Sub-Advisers attempt to reduce or eliminate the potential conflicts of interest concerning the use of Soft Dollar Products by directing
client trades for Soft Dollar Products only if the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers conclude that the Broker supplying the product is capable
of providing best execution.
Certain Soft Dollar Products
may be available directly from a vendor on a hard dollar basis; other Soft Dollar Products are available only through Brokers in exchange
for soft dollars. The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers use soft dollar commissions to purchase two types of Soft Dollar Products:
| ● | proprietary research created by the
Broker executing the trade, and |
| ● | other research and brokerage products
and services created by third party vendors that are supplied to the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser
through the Broker executing the trade. |
Proprietary research consists
primarily of traditional research reports, recommendations and similar materials produced by the in-house research staffs of broker-dealer
firms. This research includes evaluations and recommendations of specific companies or industry groups, as well as analyses of general
economic and market conditions and trends, market data, contacts and other related information and assistance. The Adviser periodically
rates the quality of proprietary research produced by various Brokers. Based on the evaluation of the quality of information that the
Adviser receives from each Broker, the Adviser develops an estimate of each Broker’s share of Invesco clients’ commission
dollars and attempts to direct trades to these firms to meet these estimates.
Soft Dollar Products are
paid for by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers using soft dollar commissions through one of two methods: full-service trading or commission
sharing agreements (“CSAs”). In a full-service trading arrangement, the Broker itself provides proprietary research products
and brokerage services to Invesco or the Sub-Adviser, and commissions paid to the Broker are retained by it to pay for both trade execution
and the proprietary research products and brokerage services provided by it. In a CSA arrangement with a Broker, a portion of the commission
paid to the Broker is made available by the Broker to Invesco or the Sub-Adviser to pay a third party for third party research and brokerage
products and services.
The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers
also use soft dollars to acquire products from third parties that are supplied to the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers through Brokers executing
the trades or other Brokers who “step in” to a transaction and receive a portion of the brokerage commission for the trade.
The Adviser or the Sub-Advisers may from time to time instruct the executing Broker to allocate or “step out” a portion of
a transaction to another Broker. The Broker to which the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers have “stepped out” would then settle
and complete the designated portion of the transaction, and the executing Broker would settle and complete the remaining portion of the
transaction that has not been “stepped out.” Each Broker may receive a commission or brokerage fee with respect to that portion
of the transaction that it settles and completes.
Soft Dollar Products received from Brokers supplement
the Adviser’s and or the Sub-Advisers’ own research (and the research of certain of its affiliates), and may include the
following types of products and services:
| ● | Database Services — comprehensive
databases containing current and/or historical information on companies and industries and
indices. Examples include historical securities prices, earnings estimates and financial
data. These services may include software tools that allow the user to search the database
or to prepare value-added analyses related to the investment process (such as forecasts and
models used in the portfolio management process). |
| ● | Quotation/Trading/News Systems —
products that provide real time market data information, such as pricing of individual securities
and information on current trading, as well as a variety of news services. |
| ● | Economic Data/Forecasting Tools —
various macro-economic forecasting tools, such as economic data or currency and political
forecasts for various countries or regions. |
| ● | Quantitative/Technical Analysis —
software tools that assist in quantitative and technical analysis of investment data. |
| ● | Fundamental Company/Industry Analysis
— company or industry specific fundamental investment research. |
| ● | Fixed Income Security Analysis –
data and analytical tools that pertain specifically to fixed income securities. These tools
assist in creating financial models, such as cash flow projections and interest rate sensitivity
analyses, which are relevant to fixed income securities. |
| ● | Other Specialized Tools — other
specialized products, such as consulting analyses, access to industry experts, and distinct
investment expertise or custom-built investment-analysis software. Occasionally, the Adviser
or a Sub-Adviser will receive certain “mixed-use” research and brokerage services,
a portion of the cost of which is eligible under Section 28(e) for payment with
soft dollar commissions and a portion of which is not. In these instances, the Adviser or
the Sub-Adviser will make a reasonable allocation of the cost of the product or service according
to its use and pay for only that portion of the cost that is eligible under Section 28(e) with
soft dollar commission (and will pay for the remaining portion with its own resources). |
Outside research assistance
is useful to the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers because the Brokers used by the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers and the providers of other Soft
Dollar Products tend to provide more in-depth analysis of a broader universe of securities and other matters than the Adviser’s
or the Sub-Advisers’ staff follows. In addition, such services provide the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers with a diverse perspective
on financial markets. In some cases, Soft Dollar Products are available only from the Broker providing them. In other cases, Soft Dollar
Products may be obtainable from alternative sources in return for cash payments. The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers believe that because
Broker research supplements rather than replaces the Adviser’s or the Sub-Advisers’ research, the receipt of such research
tends to improve the quality of the Adviser’s or the Sub-Advisers’ investment advice. The advisory fee paid by the Fund is
not reduced because the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers receives such services. To the extent the Fund’s portfolio transactions are
used to obtain Soft Dollar Products, the brokerage commissions charged to the Fund might exceed those that might otherwise have been
paid.
Portfolio transactions may
be effected through Brokers that recommend the Fund to their clients, or that act as agent in the purchase of the Fund’s shares
for their clients, provided that the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers believes such Brokers provide best execution and such transactions are
executed in compliance with the Adviser’s policy against using directed brokerage to compensate Brokers for promoting or selling
Invesco fund shares. The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers will not enter into a binding commitment with Brokers to place trades with such
Brokers involving brokerage commissions in precise amounts. As noted above, under MiFID II, European Union and United Kingdom investment
advisers, including Invesco Deutschland and Invesco Asset Management, are not permitted to use soft dollar commissions to pay for research
from brokers but rather must pay for research out of their own profit and loss or have research costs paid by clients through research
payment accounts that are funded by a specific client research charge or the research component of trade orders. Such payments for research
must be unbundled from the payments for execution. As a result, Invesco Deutschland and Invesco Asset Management are restricted
from using Soft Dollar Products in managing the Invesco funds that they sub-advise.
Directed Brokerage (Research Services)
The Fund did not pay any directed brokerage (research
services) during its most recently completed fiscal year.
Affiliated Transactions
The Adviser or a Sub-Adviser
may place trades for equity securities with Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (ICMI), a broker-dealer with whom it is affiliated, provided
that the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser determines that ICMI’s trade execution costs are at least comparable to those of non-affiliated
brokerage firms with which the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser could otherwise place similar trades for similar securities. ICMI receives
brokerage commissions in connection with effecting trades for the Fund and, therefore, use of ICMI presents a conflict of interest for
the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser. Trades placed through ICMI, including the brokerage commissions paid to ICMI, are subject to procedures
adopted by the Board that are designed to mitigate this conflict of interest. The Fund did not pay brokerage commissions on affiliated
transactions for the last three fiscal years or periods, as applicable.
Regular Brokers
During its last fiscal year, the Fund did not
acquire any securities of regular brokers or dealers, as defined in Rule 10b-1 under the 1940 Act.
Allocation of Portfolio Transactions
The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers
manage numerous Invesco funds, and other client accounts. Some of these client accounts may have investment objectives similar to the
Fund. Frequently, identical securities will be appropriate for investment by one the Fund and by another fund or one or more other client
accounts. However, the position of each client account in the same security and the length of time that each client account may hold
its investment in the same security may vary. The Adviser and the Sub-Advisers will also determine the timing and amount of purchases
for a client account based on its cash position. If the purchase or sale of securities is consistent with the investment policies of
the Fund and one or more other client accounts, and is considered at or about the same time, the Adviser or the Sub-Advisers will allocate
transactions in such securities among the Fund and these client accounts on a pro rata basis based on order size or in such other
manner believed by the Adviser to be fair and equitable. In determining what is fair and equitable, the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser can
consider various factors, including how closely the investment opportunity matches the investment objective and strategy of the Fund
or client account, the capital available to the Fund or client account, and which portfolio management team sourced the opportunity.
The Adviser or the Sub-Adviser may combine orders for the purchase or sale of securities and other investments for multiple client accounts,
including the Fund in accordance with applicable laws and regulations to obtain the most favorable execution. Aggregated transactions
could, however, adversely affect the Fund’s ability to obtain or dispose of the full amount of a security which it seeks to purchase
or sell.
TAX MATTERS
The following discussion
is a brief summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations affecting the Fund and the purchase, ownership and disposition of
the Fund’s Common Shares. Except as otherwise noted, this discussion assumes you are a taxable U.S. person (as defined for U.S.
federal income tax purposes) and that you hold your Common Shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally,
assets held for investment). This discussion is based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),
the regulations promulgated thereunder and judicial and administrative authorities, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations
by the courts or the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), possibly with retroactive effect. No attempt is made to present
a detailed explanation of all U.S. federal income tax concerns affecting the Fund and its Common Shareholders (including Common Shareholders
subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law). No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court
would not sustain, a position contrary to those set forth below. This summary does not discuss any aspects of foreign, state or local
tax. The discussions set forth herein and in the Prospectus do not constitute tax advice and potential investors are urged to consult
their own tax advisers to determine the specific U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences to them of investing in the
Fund.
Taxation of the Fund
The Fund intends to elect
to be treated and to qualify each year as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly,
the Fund must, among other things, (i) derive in each taxable year at least 90% of its gross income from (a) dividends, interest
(including tax-exempt interest), payments with respect to certain securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock,
securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including but not limited to gain from options, futures and forward contracts) derived
with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or foreign currencies and (b) net income derived from interests
in “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (as defined in the Code); and (ii) diversify its holdings so that, at the
end of each quarter of each taxable year (a) at least 50% of the market value of the Fund’s total assets is represented by
cash and cash items, U.S. Government securities, the securities of other RICs and other securities, with such other securities limited,
in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and not more than 10% of
the outstanding voting securities of such issuer and (b) not more than 25% of the market value of the Fund’s total assets
is invested in the securities (other than U.S. Government securities and the securities of other RICs) of (I) any one issuer, (II) any
two or more issuers that the Fund controls and that are determined to be engaged in the same business or similar or related trades or
businesses or (III) any one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” Generally, a qualified publicly traded
partnership includes a partnership the interests of which are traded on an established securities market or readily tradable on a secondary
market (or the substantial equivalent thereof) and that derives less than 90% of its gross income from the items described in (i)(a) above.
As long as the Fund qualifies
as a RIC, the Fund generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income and gains that the Fund distributes to its Common
Shareholders, provided that it distributes each taxable year at least 90% of the sum of (i) the Fund’s investment company
taxable income (which includes, among other items, dividends, interest, the excess of any net short-term capital gain over net long-term
capital loss, and other taxable income, other than any net capital gain (defined below), reduced by deductible expenses) determined without
regard to the deduction for dividends paid and (ii) the Fund’s net tax-exempt interest (the excess of its gross tax-exempt
interest over certain disallowed deductions). The Fund intends to distribute substantially all of such income each year. The Fund will
be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates on any taxable income or gains that it does not distribute to its Common Shareholders.
The Code imposes a 4% nondeductible
excise tax on the Fund to the extent the Fund does not distribute by the end of any calendar year at least the sum of (i) 98% of
its ordinary income (not taking into account any capital gain or loss) for the calendar year and (ii) 98.2% of its capital gain
in excess of its capital loss (adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for a one-year period generally ending on October 31 of the
calendar year (unless an election is made to use the Fund’s taxable year). In addition, the minimum amounts that must be distributed
in any year to avoid the excise tax will be increased or decreased to reflect any under-distribution or over-distribution, as the case
may be, from the previous year. For purposes of the excise tax, the Fund will be deemed to have distributed any income on which it paid
U.S. federal income tax. While the Fund intends to distribute any income and capital gain in the manner necessary to minimize imposition
of the 4% nondeductible excise tax, there can be no assurance that sufficient amounts of the Fund’s ordinary income and capital
gain will be distributed to avoid entirely the imposition of the excise tax. In that event, the Fund will be liable for the excise tax
only on the amount by which it does not meet the foregoing distribution requirement.
If for any taxable year the
Fund were to fail to qualify as a RIC, all of its taxable income (including its net capital gain, which consists of the excess of its
net long-term capital gain over its net short-term capital loss) would be subject to tax at regular corporate rates without any deduction
for distributions to Common Shareholders, and such distributions would be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary dividends to
the extent of the Fund’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. Such dividends, however, would be eligible (i) to be
treated as “qualified dividend income” in the case of Common Shareholders taxed as individuals and (ii) for the dividends
received deduction in the case of corporate Common Shareholders, subject, in each case, to certain holding period and other requirements.
In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay taxes and make distributions (which could be subject to interest
charges) before requalifying for taxation as a RIC. To qualify again to be taxed as a RIC in a subsequent year, the Fund would generally
be required to distribute to its Common Shareholders its earnings and profits attributable to non-RIC years. Subject to savings provisions
for certain inadvertent failures to satisfy the income requirement or asset diversification requirement which, in general, are limited
to those due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, it is possible that the Fund will not qualify as a RIC in any given tax year.
Even if such savings provisions apply, the Fund may be subject to a monetary sanction of $50,000 or more.
The remainder of this discussion
assumes that the Fund qualifies for taxation as a RIC.
The Fund’s Investments
Certain of the Fund’s
investment practices may be subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions (including mark-to-market, constructive
sale, straddle, wash sale, short sale and other rules) that may, among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the
allowance of certain losses or deductions, including the dividends received deduction, (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital
gains or “qualified dividend income” into higher taxed short-term capital gains or ordinary income, (iii) convert ordinary
loss or a deduction into capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (iv) cause the Fund to recognize income or gain
without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed
to occur, (vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions and (vii) produce income that
will not be “qualified” income for purposes of the 90% annual gross income requirement described above. These U.S. federal
income tax provisions could therefore affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to Common Shareholders. The Fund intends
to monitor its transactions and may make certain tax elections or take other actions to mitigate the effect of these provisions and prevent
disqualification of the Fund as a RIC. Additionally, the Fund may be required to limit its activities in derivative instruments in order
to enable it to maintain its RIC status.
The Fund may invest a portion
of its net assets in below investment grade securities, commonly known as “junk” securities. Investments in these types of
securities may present special tax issues for the Fund. U.S. federal income tax rules are not entirely clear about issues such as
when the Fund may cease to accrue interest, original issue discount or market discount, when and to what extent deductions may be taken
for bad debts or worthless securities, how payments received on obligations in default should be allocated between principal and income
and whether modifications or exchanges of debt obligations in a bankruptcy or workout context are taxable. These and other issues will
be addressed by the Fund, in the event that they arise with respect to Senior Loans it owns, in order to seek to ensure that it distributes
sufficient income to preserve its status as a regulated investment company and does not become subject to federal income or excise tax.
Certain debt securities acquired
by the Fund may be treated as debt securities that were originally issued at a discount. Generally, the amount of the original issue
discount is treated as interest income and is included in taxable income (and required to be distributed by the Fund in order to qualify
as a RIC or avoid corporate level income or excise taxes) over the term of the security, even though payment of that amount is not received
until a later time, usually when the debt security matures. If the Fund purchases a debt security on a secondary market at a price lower
than its adjusted issue price, the excess of the adjusted issue price over the purchase price is “market discount.” Unless
the Fund makes an election to accrue market discount on a current basis, any gain realized on the disposition of, and any partial payment
of principal on, a debt security having market discount is generally treated as ordinary income to the extent the gain, or principal
payment, does not exceed the “accrued market discount” on the debt security. Market discount generally accrues in equal daily
installments. If the Fund ultimately collects less on the debt instrument than its purchase price plus the market discount previously
included in income, the Fund may not be able to benefit from any offsetting loss deductions.
The Fund may invest in preferred
securities or other securities the U.S. federal income tax treatment of which may not be clear or may be subject to recharacterization
by the IRS. To the extent the tax treatment of such securities or the income from such securities differs from the tax treatment expected
by the Fund, it could affect the timing or character of income recognized by the Fund, requiring the Fund to purchase or sell securities,
or otherwise change its portfolio, in order to comply with the tax rules applicable to RICs under the Code.
Gain or loss on the sale
of securities by the Fund will generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the securities have been held by the Fund for more than
one year. Gain or loss on the sale of securities held for one year or less will be short-term capital gain or loss.
Because the Fund may invest
in foreign securities, its income from such securities may be subject to non-U.S. taxes. The Fund will not be eligible to elect to “pass
through” to Common Shareholders of the Fund the ability to use the foreign tax deduction or foreign tax credit for foreign taxes
paid by the Fund with respect to qualifying taxes.
Income from options on individual
securities written by the Fund will not be recognized by the Fund for tax purposes until an option is exercised, lapses or is subject
to a “closing transaction” (as defined by applicable regulations) pursuant to which the Fund’s obligations with respect
to the option are otherwise terminated. If the option lapses without exercise, the premiums received by the Fund from the writing of
such options will generally be characterized as short-term capital gain. If the Fund enters into a closing transaction, the difference
between the premiums received and the amount paid by the Fund to close out its position will generally be treated as short-term capital
gain or loss. If an option written by the Fund is exercised, thereby requiring the Fund to sell the underlying security, the premium
will increase the amount realized upon the sale of the security, and the character of any gain on such sale of the underlying security
as short-term or long-term capital gain will depend on the holding period of the Fund in the underlying security. Because the Fund will
not have control over the exercise of the options it writes, such exercises or other required sales of the underlying securities may
cause the Fund to realize gains or losses at inopportune times.
Options on indices of securities
and sectors of securities that qualify as “section 1256 contracts” will generally be “marked-to-market” for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. As a result, the Fund will generally recognize gain or loss on the last day of each taxable year equal to
the difference between the value of the option on that date and the adjusted basis of the option. The adjusted basis of the option will
consequently be increased by such gain or decreased by such loss. Any gain or loss with respect to options on indices and sectors that
qualify as “section 1256 contracts” will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss to the extent of 40% of such gain
or loss and long-term capital gain or loss to the extent of 60% of such gain or loss. Because the mark-to-market rules may cause
the Fund to recognize gain in advance of the receipt of cash, the Fund may be required to dispose of investments in order to meet its
distribution requirements. “Mark-to-market” losses may be suspended or otherwise limited if such losses are part of a straddle
or similar transaction.
Taxation of Common Shareholders
The Fund will either distribute
or retain for reinvestment all or part of its net capital gain. If any such gain is retained, the Fund will be subject to a corporate
income tax on such retained amount. In that event, the Fund expects to report the retained amount as undistributed capital gain in a
notice to its Common Shareholders, each of whom, if subject to U.S. federal income tax on long-term capital gains, (i) will be required
to include in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes as long-term capital gain its share of such undistributed amounts, (ii) will
be entitled to credit its proportionate share of the tax paid by the Fund against its U.S. federal income tax liability and to claim
refunds to the extent that the credit exceeds such liability and (iii) will increase its basis in its Common Shares by the amount
of undistributed capital gain included in such Common Shareholder’s gross income net of the tax deemed paid the shareholder under
clause (ii).
Distributions paid to you
by the Fund from its net capital gain, if any, that the Fund properly reports as capital gain dividends (“capital gain dividends”)
are taxable as long-term capital gains, regardless of how long you have held your Common Shares, whether paid in cash or reinvested in
additional Common Shares. All other dividends paid to you by the Fund (including dividends from net short-term capital gains) from its
current or accumulated earnings and profits (“ordinary income dividends”) are generally subject to tax as ordinary income.
Provided that certain holding period and other requirements are met, ordinary income dividends (if properly reported by the Fund) may
qualify (i) for the dividends received deduction in the case of corporate shareholders to the extent that the Fund’s income
consists of dividend income from U.S. corporations, and (ii) in the case of individual shareholders, as “qualified dividend
income” eligible to be taxed at long-term capital gains rates to the extent that the Fund receives qualified dividend income. Qualified
dividend income is, in general, dividend income from taxable domestic corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations (e.g.,
generally, foreign corporations incorporated in a possession of the United States or in certain countries with a qualifying comprehensive
tax treaty with the United States, or whose stock with respect to which such dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States). Capital gain dividends are not eligible for the dividends received deduction or for the reduced rates applicable
to qualified dividend income. There can be no assurance as to what portion, if any, of the Fund’s distributions will constitute
qualified dividend income.
Any distributions you receive
that are in excess of the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to
the extent of your adjusted tax basis in your Common Shares, and thereafter as capital gain from the sale of Common Shares (assuming
the Common Shares are held as a capital asset). The amount of any Fund distribution that is treated as a tax-free return of capital will
reduce your adjusted tax basis in your Common Shares, thereby increasing your potential gain or reducing your potential loss on any subsequent
sale or other disposition of your Common Shares. In determining the extent to which a distribution will be treated as being made from
the Fund’s earnings and profits, the Fund’s earnings and profits will be allocated on a pro rata basis first to distributions
with respect to the Fund’s preferred shares, and then to the Fund’s Common Shares.
Common Shareholders may be
entitled to offset their capital gain dividends with capital losses. The Code contains a number of statutory provisions affecting when
capital losses may be offset against capital gain, and limiting the use of losses from certain investments and activities. Accordingly,
Common Shareholders that have capital losses are urged to consult their tax advisers.
Dividends and other taxable
distributions are taxable to you even though they are reinvested in additional Common Shares of the Fund. Dividends and other distributions
paid by the Fund are generally treated under the Code as received by you at the time the dividend or distribution is made. If, however,
the Fund pays you a dividend in January that was declared in the previous October, November or December to common shareholders
of record on a specified date in one of such months, then such dividend will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as being
paid by the Fund and received by you on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared. In addition, certain other distributions
made after the close of the Fund’s taxable year may be “spilled back” and treated as paid by the Fund (except for purposes
of the 4% nondeductible excise tax) during such taxable year. In such case, you will be treated as having received such dividends in
the taxable year in which the distributions were actually made.
The price of Common Shares
purchased at any time may reflect the amount of a forthcoming distribution. Those purchasing Common Shares just prior to the record date
of a distribution will receive a distribution which will be taxable to them even though it represents, economically, a return of invested
capital.
The Fund will send you information
after the end of each year setting forth the amount and tax status of any distributions paid to you by the Fund.
The sale or other disposition
of Common Shares will generally result in capital gain or loss to you and will be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held such
Common Shares for more than one year at the time of sale. Any loss upon the sale or other disposition of Common Shares held for six months
or less will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital gain dividends received (including amounts credited as
an undistributed capital gain dividend) by you with respect to such Common Shares. Any loss you recognize on a sale or other disposition
of Common Shares will be disallowed if you acquire other Common Shares (whether through the automatic reinvestment of dividends or otherwise)
within a 61-day period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after your sale or exchange of the Common Shares. In such case, your
tax basis in the Common Shares acquired will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
The Fund is required to report
to Common Shareholders and the IRS annually on Form 1099-B the cost basis of Common Shares purchased or acquired on or after January 1,
2012 where the cost basis of the Common Shares is known by the Fund (referred to as “covered shares”) and which are disposed
of after that date. However, cost basis reporting is not required for certain Common Shareholders, including such shareholders investing
in the Fund through a tax-advantaged retirement account, such as a 401(k) plan or an individual retirement account. When required
to report cost basis, the Fund will calculate it using the Fund’s default method of average cost, unless the Common Shareholder
instructs the Fund to use a different calculation method. For additional information regarding the Fund’s available cost basis
reporting methods, including its default method, Common Shareholders should contact the Fund. If a Common Shareholder holds their Fund
shares through a broker (or other nominee), the Common Shareholder should contact their broker (nominee) with respect to report of cost
basis and available elections for their account.
Current U.S. federal income
tax law taxes both long-term and short-term capital gain of corporations at the regular corporate tax rates. For non-corporate taxpayers,
short-term capital gain is currently taxed at rates applicable to ordinary income while long-term capital gain generally is taxed at
reduced maximum rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.
Certain U.S. shareholders
who are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare tax on all
or a portion of their “net investment income,” which includes dividends received from the Fund and capital gains from the
sale or other disposition of the Fund’s shares.
A Common Shareholder that
is a nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation (a “foreign investor”) generally will be subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax at the rate of 30% (or possibly a lower rate provided by an applicable tax treaty) on ordinary income dividends (except
as discussed below). In general, U.S. federal withholding tax and U.S. federal income tax will not apply to any gain or income realized
by a foreign investor in respect of any distribution of net capital gain (including amounts credited as an undistributed capital gain
dividend) or upon the sale or other disposition of Common Shares of the Fund. Different tax consequences may result if the foreign investor
is engaged in a trade or business in the United States or, in the case of an individual, is present in the United States for 183 days
or more during a taxable year and certain other conditions are met.
For purposes of this and
the following paragraphs, a “Non-U.S. Shareholder” shall include any shareholder that is not a partnership (or an entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and who is not:
| ● | an individual who is a citizen or
resident of the United States; |
| ● | a corporation created or organized
under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
| ● | an estate, the income of which is
subject to federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
| ● | a trust that (i) is subject to
the primary supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more U.S. fiduciaries who have
the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) has a valid
election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. |
A Non-U.S. Shareholder generally
will be subject to withholding of federal income tax at a 30% rate (or lower applicable treaty rate), rather than backup withholding
(discussed below), on dividends from the Fund (other than capital gain dividends) that are not “effectively connected” with
a U.S. trade or business carried on by such shareholder, provided that the shareholder furnishes to the Fund a properly completed IRS
Form W-8BEN, IRS Form W-8BEN-E or IRS From W-8EXP certifying the shareholder’s non-United States status.
If the income from the Fund
is not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by a Non-US Shareholder, distributions to such shareholder will
be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% (or lower treaty rate) upon the gross amount of the distribution, subject to certain
exemptions including those for dividends reported by the Fund to shareholders as:
| ● | capital gain dividends paid by the
Fund from its net long-term capital gains (other than those from disposition of a U.S. real
property interest), unless you are a nonresident alien present in the United States for a
period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar year; and |
| ● | interest-related dividends paid by
the Fund from its qualified net interest income from U.S. sources and short-term capital
gain dividends. |
However, the Fund does not
intend to utilize the exemptions for interest-related dividends paid and short-term capital gain dividends paid. Moreover, notwithstanding
such exemptions from U.S. withholding at the source, any dividends and distributions of income and capital gains, including the proceeds
from the sale of your Fund Shares, will be subject to backup withholding at a rate of 24% if you fail to properly certify that you are
not a U.S. person.
If income from the Fund or
gains recognized from the sale of Shares are effectively connected with a Non-U.S. Shareholder’s U.S. trade or business, then such
amounts will not be subject to the 30% withholding described above, but rather will be subject to federal income tax on a net basis at
the tax rates applicable to U.S. citizens and residents or domestic corporations. To establish that income from the Fund or gains recognized
from the sale of Shares are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, a Non-U.S. Shareholder must provide the Fund with a
properly completed IRS Form W-8ECI certifying that such amounts are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Shareholder’s
U.S. trade or business. Non-U.S. Shareholders that are corporations may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax”
with respect to income from the Fund that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business.
The tax consequences to a
Non-U.S. Shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may be different from those described in this section.
To claim tax treaty benefits, Non-U.S. Shareholders will be required to provide the Fund with a properly completed IRS Form W-8BEN
or IRS Form W-8BEN-E certifying their entitlement to the benefits. In addition, in certain cases where payments are made to a Non-U.S.
Shareholder that is a partnership or other pass-through entity, both the entity and the persons holding an interest in the entity will
need to provide certification. For example, an individual Non-U.S. Shareholder who holds Shares in the Fund through a non-U.S. partnership
must provide an IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty. Non-U.S. Shareholders
are advised to consult their advisers with respect to the tax implications of purchasing, holding and disposing of Shares of the Fund.
Under the Foreign Account
Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), the Fund will be required to withhold a 30% tax on income dividends made by the Fund to certain
foreign entities, referred to as foreign financial institutions or non-financial foreign entities, that fail to comply (or be deemed
compliant) with extensive reporting and withholding requirements designed to inform the U.S. Department of the Treasury of U.S.-owned
foreign investment accounts. After December 31, 2018, FATCA withholding also would have applied to certain capital gain distributions,
return of capital distributions and the proceeds arising from the sale of Fund shares; however, based on proposed regulations issued
by the IRS, which can be relied upon currently, such withholding is no longer required unless final regulations provide otherwise (which
is not expected). The Fund may disclose the information that it receives from its shareholders to the IRS, non-U.S. taxing authorities
or other parties as necessary to comply with FATCA or similar laws. Withholding also may be required if a foreign entity that is a shareholder
of the Fund fails to provide the Fund with appropriate certifications or other documentation concerning its status under FATCA.
The Fund may be required
to withhold federal income tax (“backup withholding”) from dividends and proceeds from the repurchase of Shares paid to non-corporate
shareholders. This tax may be withheld from dividends paid to a shareholder (other than a Non-U.S. Shareholder that properly certifies
its non-United States status) if (i) the shareholder fails to properly furnish the Fund with its correct taxpayer identification
number, (ii) the IRS notifies the Fund that the shareholder has failed to properly report certain interest and dividend income to
the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect or (iii) when required to do so, the shareholder fails to certify that the taxpayer
identification number provided is correct, that the shareholder is not subject to backup withholding and that the shareholder is a U.S.
person (as defined for federal income tax purposes). Repurchase proceeds may be subject to backup withholding under the circumstances
described in (i) above.
Generally, dividends paid
to Non-U.S. Shareholders that are subject to the 30% federal income tax withholding described above under “Withholding on Payments
to Non-U.S. Shareholders” are not subject to backup withholding. To avoid backup withholding on capital gain dividends and gross
proceeds from the repurchase of Shares, Non-U.S. Shareholders must provide a properly completed IRS Form W-8BEN, IRS Form W-8BEN-E
or W-8EXP certifying their non-United States status.
Backup withholding is not
an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from payments made to a shareholder may be refunded or
credited against such shareholder’s federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished timely
to the IRS.
The Fund must report annually
to the IRS and to each shareholder (other than a Non-U.S. Shareholder that properly certifies its non-United States status) the amount
of dividends from investment company taxable income and capital gains and repurchase proceeds paid to such shareholder and the amount,
if any, of tax withheld pursuant to backup withholding rules with respect to such amounts. In the case of a Non-U.S. Shareholder,
the Fund must report to the IRS and such Shareholder the amount of dividends from investment company taxable income and capital gains
and repurchase proceeds paid that are subject to withholding (including backup withholding, if any) and the amount of tax withheld, if
any, with respect to such amounts. This information may also be made available to the tax authorities in the Non-U.S. Shareholder’s
country of residence.
Non-U.S. Shareholders
should consult their tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of investing in the Fund’s Common Shares.
Foreign investors should
consult their tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of investing in the Fund’s Common Shares.
Ordinary income dividends,
capital gain dividends, and gain from the sale or other disposition of Common Shares of the Fund also may be subject to state, local,
and/or foreign taxes. Common Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding specific questions about U.S. federal,
state, local or foreign tax consequences to them of investing in the Fund.
***
The foregoing is a general
and abbreviated summary of certain provisions of the Code and the Treasury Regulations presently in effect as they directly govern the
taxation of the Fund and its shareholders. For complete provisions, reference should be made to the pertinent Code sections and Treasury
Regulations. The Code and the Treasury Regulations are subject to change by legislative or administrative action, and any such change
may be retroactive with respect to Fund transactions. Prospective shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisers for more
detailed information concerning the tax consequences of an investment in the Fund.
OTHER INFORMATION
Principal Shareholders
As of the date of this Statement
of Additional Information, to the knowledge of the Fund, no person beneficially owned more than 5% of the voting securities of any class
of equity securities of the Fund, except as provided below.
Title of Class | |
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner | |
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership | |
Percent of Class |
Common Shares | |
| |
| |
|
Preferred Shares | |
| |
| |
|
As of [____], the trustees
and officers as a group owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each class of the Fund.
Proxy Voting Policy and Proxy Voting Record
The Board believes that the
voting of proxies on securities held by the Fund is an important element of the overall investment process. The Board has delegated the
day-to-day responsibility to the Adviser and Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. to vote such proxies pursuant to the Board
approved Proxy Voting Policy. A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating
to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, from our Client Services department at (800) 341-2929 or at invesco.com/corporate/about-us/esg.
The information is also available on the SEC website, sec.gov.
Information regarding how
the Fund voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available at
invesco.com/proxysearch. The information is also available on the SEC website, sec.gov.
Code of Ethics
Invesco, the Fund, Invesco
Distributors and certain of the Sub-Advisers each have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all Invesco Fund trustees and officers,
and employees of Invesco, the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates, and governs, among other things, the personal trading activities of
all such persons. Certain Sub-Advisers have adopted their own Code of Ethics. Each Code of Ethics is designed to detect and prevent improper
personal trading by portfolio managers and certain other employees that could compete with or take advantage of the Fund’s portfolio
transactions. Unless specifically noted, to the extent a Sub-Adviser has adopted its own Code of Ethics, each Sub-Adviser’s Code
of Ethics does not materially differ from Invesco’s Code of Ethics discussed below. The Code of Ethics is intended to address conflicts
of interest with the Fund that may arise from personal trading in the Invesco Funds. Personal trading, including personal trading involving
securities that may be purchased or held by an Invesco Fund, is permitted under the Code of Ethics subject to certain restrictions; however,
employees are required to pre-clear security transactions with the Compliance Officer or a designee and to report transactions on a regular
basis. The Code of Ethics can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s internet website at www.sec.gov.
In addition, a copy of the Code of Ethics may be obtained, after paying the appropriate duplicating fee, by e-mail request
at publicinfo@sec.gov.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The audited financial statements for the Fund’s
most recent fiscal year ended February 29, 2024, including the notes thereto and the reports of [__] thereon, are incorporated by
reference to the Fund’s Form N-CSR filed on May 2, 2024.
The portions of such Form N-CSR that are
not specifically listed above are not incorporated by reference into this SAI and are not a part of this SAI.
Appendix A
APPENDIX
[var:Appendix Ratings of Debt Securities,0000vr] - RATINGS OF DEBT SECURITIES
The following is a description of the factors
underlying the debt ratings of Moody's, S&P, and Fitch.
Moody's Long-Term Debt Ratings
Aaa: Obligations
rated 'Aaa' are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Aa: Obligations
rated 'Aa' are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
A: Obligations
rated 'A' are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Baa: Obligations
rated 'Baa' are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
Ba: Obligations
rated 'Ba' are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.
B: Obligations
rated 'B' are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
Caa: Obligations
rated 'Caa' are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca: Obligations
rated 'Ca' are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C: Obligations
rated 'C' are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
Note: Moody's appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic
rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating
category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating
category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance
companies, and securities firms*.
* By their terms, hybrid securities allow for the omission of scheduled
dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in impairment if such an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may
also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of principal that could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator,
the long-term obligation rating assigned to a hybrid security is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.
Moody's Short-Term Prime Rating System
P-1: Ratings
of Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-2: Ratings
of Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-3: Ratings
of Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.
NP (Not Prime):
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
Moody's MIG/VMIG US Short-Term Ratings
Short-Term Obligation Ratings
We use the global short-term Prime rating scale
for commercial paper issued by US municipalities and nonprofits. These commercial paper programs may be backed by external letters of
credit or liquidity facilities, or by an issuer’s self-liquidity.
For other short-term municipal obligations, we
use one of two other short-term rating scales, the Municipal Investment Grade (MIG) and Variable Municipal Investment Grade (VMIG) scales
discussed below.
We use the MIG scale for US municipal cash flow
notes, bond anticipation notes and certain other short-term obligations, which typically mature in three years or less. Under certain
circumstances, we use the MIG scale for bond anticipation notes with maturities of up to five years.
MIG 1: This
designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support,
or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG 2: This
designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.
MIG 3: This
designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is
likely to be less well-established.
SG: This designation
denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.
VMIG Ratings
For variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs),
Moody’s assigns both a long-term rating and a short-term payment obligation rating. The long-term rating addresses the issuer’s
ability to meet scheduled principal and interest payments. The short-term payment obligation rating addresses the ability of the issuer
or the liquidity provider to meet any purchase price payment obligation resulting from optional tenders (“on demand”) and/or
mandatory tenders of the VRDO. The short-term payment obligation rating uses the VMIG scale. Transitions of VMIG ratings with conditional
liquidity support differ from transitions of Prime ratings reflecting the risk that external liquidity support will terminate if the issuer’s
long-term rating drops below investment grade. Please see our methodology that discusses obligations with conditional liquidity support.
For VRDOs, we typically assign a VMIG rating if
the frequency of the payment obligation is less than every three years. If the frequency of the payment obligation is less than three
years, but the obligation is payable only with remarketing proceeds, the VMIG short-term rating is not assigned and it is denoted as “NR”.
Industrial development bonds in the US where the
obligor is a corporate may carry a VMIG rating that reflects Moody’s view of the relative likelihood of default and loss. In these
cases, liquidity assessment is based on the liquidity of the corporate obligor.
VMIG Scale
VMIG 1: This
designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity
provider and structural and legal protections.
VMIG 2: This
designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider
and structural and legal protections.
VMIG 3: This
designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity
provider and structural and legal protections.
SG: This designation
denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not
have a sufficiently strong short-term rating or may lack the structural or legal protections.
Standard & Poor's Long-Term Issue
Credit Ratings
Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees,
on S&P Global Ratings’ analysis of the following considerations:
| ● | The likelihood of payment--the capacity and willingness of the obligor to
meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation; |
| ● | The nature and provisions of the financial obligation, and the promise we
impute; and |
| ● | The protection afforded by, and relative position of, the financial obligation
in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights. |
An issue rating is an assessment of default risk
but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically
rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply when
an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company obligations.)
AAA: An obligation
rated 'AAA' has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the
obligation is extremely strong.
AA: An obligation
rated 'AA' differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments
on the obligation is very strong.
A: An obligation
rated 'A' is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in
higher-rated categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.
BBB: An obligation
rated 'BBB' exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to
weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
BB, B, CCC, CC and C:
Obligations rated 'BB', 'B', 'CCC' 'CC', and 'C' are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. 'BB' indicates the least
degree of speculation and 'C' the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these
may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposure to adverse conditions.
BB: An obligation
rated 'BB' is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to
adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments
on the obligation.
B: An obligation
rated 'B' is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated 'BB', but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial
commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor's capacity or willingness
to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
CCC: An obligation
rated 'CCC' is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the
obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the
obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
CC: An obligation
rated 'CC' is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The 'CC' rating is used when a default has not yet occurred but S&P Global
Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.
C: An obligation
rated 'C' is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate
recovery compared with obligations that are rated higher.
D: An obligation
rated 'D' is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the 'D' rating category is used when payments
on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within five business
days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The 'D' rating also
will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual
certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation's rating is lowered to 'D' if it is subject to a distressed exchange
offer.
Plus (+) or minus (-):
The ratings from 'AA' to 'CCC' may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major
rating categories.
NR: This indicates
that no rating has been requested, or that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that S&P Global Ratings
does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.
Standard & Poor's Short-Term Issue
Credit Ratings
A-1: A short-term
obligation rated 'A-1' is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments
on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor's
capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2: A short-term
obligation rated 'A-2' is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations
in higher rating categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3: A short-term
obligation rated 'A-3' exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more
likely to weaken an obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
B: A short-term
obligation rated 'B' is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity
to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity
to meet its financial commitments.
C: A short-term
obligation rated 'C' is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions
for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
D: A short-term
obligation rated 'D' is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the 'D' rating category is
used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made
within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days.
The 'D' rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation
is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to 'D' if it is subject to
a distressed debt restructuring.
Standard & Poor's Municipal Short-Term
Note Ratings Definitions
An S&P Global Ratings U.S. municipal note
rating reflects S&P Global Ratings’ opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due
in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive
a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, S&P Global Ratings’ analysis will review the
following considerations:
| ● | Amortization schedule -- the larger final maturity relative to other maturities,
the more likely it will be treated as a note; and |
| ● | Source of payment -- the more dependent the issue is on the market for its
refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note. |
Note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1: Strong
capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+)
designation.
SP-2: Satisfactory
capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.
SP-3: Speculative
capacity to pay principal and interest.
D: ‘D’
is assigned upon failure to pay the note when due, completion of a distressed exchange offer, or the filing of a bankruptcy petition or
the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions.
Standard & Poor's Dual Ratings
Dual ratings may be assigned to debt issues that
have a put option or demand feature. The first component of the rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest
as due, and the second component of the rating addresses only the demand feature. The first component of the rating can relate to either
a short-term or long-term transaction and accordingly use either short-term or long-term rating symbols. The second component of the rating
relates to the put option and is assigned a short-term rating symbol (for example, 'AAA/A-1+' or 'A-1+/A-1'). With U.S. municipal short-term
demand debt, the U.S. municipal short-term note rating symbols are used for the first component of the rating (for example, 'SP-1+/A-1+').
Fitch Credit Rating Scales
Fitch Ratings publishes credit ratings that are
forward-looking opinions on the relative ability of an entity or obligation to meet financial commitments. Issuer default ratings (IDRs)
are assigned to corporations, sovereign entities, financial institutions such as banks, leasing companies and insurers, and public finance
entities (local and regional governments). Issue level ratings are also assigned, often include an expectation of recovery and may be
notched above or below the issuer level rating. Issue ratings are assigned to secured and unsecured debt securities, loans, preferred
stock and other instruments, Structured finance ratings are issue ratings to securities backed by receivables or other financial assets
that consider the obligations’ relative vulnerability to default. Credit ratings are indications of the likelihood of repayment
in accordance with the terms of the issuance. In limited cases, Fitch may include additional considerations (i.e., rate to a higher or
lower standard than that implied in the obligation’s documentation). Please see the section Specific Limitations Relating to Credit
Rating Scales for details. Fitch Ratings also publishes other ratings, scores and opinions. For example, Fitch provides specialized ratings
of servicers of residential and commercial mortgages, asset managers and funds. In each case, users should refer to the definitions of
each individual scale for guidance on the dimensions of risk covered in each assessment.
Fitch’s credit rating scale for issuers
and issues is expressed using the categories ‘AAA’ to ‘BBB’ (investment grade) and ‘BB’ to ‘D’
(speculative grade) with an additional +/-for AA through CCC levels indicating relative differences of probability of default or recovery
for issues.
The terms “investment grade” and “speculative
grade” are market conventions and do not imply any recommendation or endorsement of a specific security for investment purposes.
Investment grade categories indicate relatively low to moderate credit risk, while ratings in the speculative categories signal either
a higher level of credit risk or that a default has already occurred.
Fitch may also disclose issues relating to a rated
issuer that are not and have not been rated. Such issues are also denoted as ‘NR’ on its web page.
Credit ratings express risk in relative rank order,
which is to say they are ordinal measures of credit risk and are not predictive of a specific frequency of default or loss. For information
about the historical performance of ratings, please refer to Fitch’s Ratings Transition and Default studies, which detail the historical
default rates. The European Securities and Markets Authority also maintains a central repository of historical default rates.
Fitch’s credit ratings do not directly address
any risk other than credit risk. Credit ratings do not deal with the risk of market value loss due to changes in interest rates, liquidity
and/or other market considerations. However, market risk may be considered to the extent that it influences the ability of an issuer to
pay or refinance a financial commitment. Ratings nonetheless do not reflect market risk to the extent that they influence the size or
other conditionality of the obligation to pay upon a commitment (for example, in the case of payments linked to performance of an equity
index).
Fitch will use credit rating scales to provide
ratings to privately issued obligations or certain note issuance programs, or for private ratings using the same public scale and criteria.
Private ratings are not published, and are only provided to the issuer or its agents in the form of a rating letter. The primary credit
rating scales may also be used to provide ratings for a narrower scope, including interest strips and return of principal or in other
forms of opinions such as Credit Opinions or Rating Assessment Services.
Credit Opinions are either a notch- or category-specific
view using the primary rating scale and omit one or more characteristics of a full rating or meet them to a different standard. Credit
Opinions will be indicated using a lower-case letter symbol combined with either an ‘*’ (e.g. ‘bbb+*’) or (cat)
suffix to denote the opinion status. Credit Opinions will be typically point-in-time but may be monitored if the analytical group believes
information will be sufficiently available.
Rating Assessment Services are a notch-specific
view using the primary rating scale of how an existing or potential rating may be changed by a given set of hypothetical circumstances.
While Credit Opinions and Rating Assessment Services are point-in-time and are not monitored, they may have a directional Watch or Outlook
assigned, which can signify the trajectory of the credit profile.
Ratings assigned by Fitch are opinions based on
established, approved and published criteria. A variation to criteria may be applied but will be explicitly cited in our rating action
commentaries (RACs), which are used to publish credit ratings when established and upon annual or periodic reviews.
Ratings are the collective work product of Fitch,
and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. Ratings are not facts and, therefore, cannot be described
as being "accurate" or "inaccurate." Users should refer to the definition of each individual rating for guidance on
the dimensions of risk covered by the rating.
Fitch Long-Term Rating Scales
Issuer Default Ratings
Rated entities in a number of sectors, including
financial and non-financial corporations, sovereigns, insurance companies and certain sectors within public finance, are generally assigned
Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs). IDRs are also assigned to certain entities in global infrastructure and project finance. IDRs opine on
an entity's relative vulnerability to default on financial obligations. The threshold default risk addressed by the IDR is generally that
of the financial obligations whose non-payment would best reflect the uncured failure of that entity. As such, IDRs also address
relative vulnerability to bankruptcy, administrative receivership or similar concepts.
In aggregate, IDRs provide an ordinal ranking
of issuers based on the agency's view of their relative vulnerability to default, rather than a prediction of a specific percentage likelihood
of default.
AAA: Highest credit quality.
'AAA' ratings denote the lowest expectation of
default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is
highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.
AA: Very high credit quality.
'AA' ratings denote expectations of very low default
risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable
events.
A: High credit quality.
'A' ratings denote expectations of low default
risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse
business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
BBB: Good credit quality.
'BBB' ratings indicate that expectations of default
risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions
are more likely to impair this capacity.
BB: Speculative.
'BB' ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability
to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial
flexibility exists that supports the servicing of financial commitments.
B: Highly speculative.
'B' ratings indicate that material default risk
is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment
is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment.
CCC: Substantial credit risk.
Very low margin of safety. Default is a real possibility.
CC: Very high levels of credit risk.
Default of some kind appears probable.
C: Near default
A default or default-like process has begun, or
the issuer is in standstill, or for a closed funding vehicle, payment capacity is irrevocably impaired. Conditions that are indicative
of a 'C' category rating for an issuer include:
a. the issuer has entered into a grace or cure period following
non-payment of a material financial obligation;
b. the issuer has entered into a temporary negotiated waiver
or standstill agreement following a payment default on a material financial obligation; or
c. the formal announcement by the issuer or their agent
of a distressed debt exchange;
d. a closed financing vehicle where payment capacity is
irrevocably impaired such that it is not expected to pay interest and/or principal in full during the life of the transaction, but where
no payment default is imminent
RD: Restricted default.
‘RD’ ratings indicate an issuer that
in Fitch’s opinion has experienced:
a. an uncured payment default or distressed debt exchange
on a bond, loan or other material financial obligation, but
b. has not entered into bankruptcy filings, administration,
receivership, liquidation, or other formal winding-up procedure, and
c. has not otherwise ceased operating.
This would include:
i. the selective payment default on a specific class or
currency of debt;
ii. the uncured expiry of any applicable grace period, cure
period or default forbearance period following a payment default on a bank loan, capital markets security or other material financial
obligation;
iii. the extension of multiple waivers or forbearance periods
upon a payment default on one or more material financial obligations, either in series or in parallel; ordinary execution of a distressed
debt exchange on one or more material financial obligations.
D: Default.
'D' ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch Ratings'
opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure or which has
otherwise ceased business.
Default ratings are not assigned prospectively
to entities or their obligations; within this context, non-payment on an instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will
generally not be considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace period, unless a default is otherwise driven
by bankruptcy or other similar circumstance, or by a distressed debt exchange.
In all cases, the assignment of a default rating
reflects the agency's opinion as to the most appropriate rating category consistent with the rest of its universe of ratings and may differ
from the definition of default under the terms of an issuer's financial obligations or local commercial practice.
Notes
The modifiers + or - may be appended to a rating
to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the 'AAA' Long-Term IDR category, or to Long-Term
IDR categories below 'B'.
Fitch Short-Term Ratings Assigned to Issuers
and Obligations
A short-term issuer or obligation rating is based
in all cases on the short-term vulnerability to default of the rated entity and relates to the capacity to meet financial obligations
in accordance with the documentation governing the relevant obligation. Short-term deposit ratings may be adjusted for loss severity.
Short-Term Ratings are assigned to obligations whose initial maturity is viewed as "short term" based on market convention.
Typically, this means up to 13 months for corporate, sovereign, and structured obligations and up to 36 months for obligations in U.S.
public finance markets.
F1: Highest Short-Term
Credit Quality. Indicates the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations
in the same country. Under the agency’s National Rating scale, this rating is assigned to the lowest default risk relative to other
in the same country or monetary union. Where the liquidity profile is particularly strong, a “+” is added to the assigned
rating.
F2: Good Short-Term Credit
Quality. Indicates a good capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in
the same country or monetary union. However, the margin of safety is not as great as in the case of the higher ratings.
F3: Fair Short-Term Credit
Quality. Indicates an uncertain capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations
in the same country or monetary union.
B: Speculative Short-Term
Credit Quality. Indicates an uncertain capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations
in the same country or monetary union.
C: High Short-Term Default
Risk. Indicates a highly uncertain capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations
in the same country or monetary union.
RD: Restricted Default.
Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations.
Applicable to entity ratings only.
D: Default.
Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.
Appendix B
APPENDIX B - PROXY POLICY AND PROCEDURES
The Adviser and each sub-adviser rely on this policy. In addition, Invesco Asset Management
(Japan) Limited has also adopted operating guidelines and procedures for proxy voting
particular to each regional investment center. Such guidelines and procedures are attached hereto.
Invesco’s Policy Statement on Global
Corporate Governance
and Proxy Voting
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Our Approach to Proxy Voting
|
|
|
B. Applicability of Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Proxy Voting Operational Procedures
|
|
|
A. Oversight and Governance
|
|
|
B. The Proxy Voting Process
|
|
|
C. Retention and Oversight of Proxy Service Providers
|
|
|
D. Disclosures and Recordkeeping
|
|
|
E. Market and Operational Limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Good Governance Principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Board Composition and Effectiveness
|
|
|
D. Long-Term Stewardship of Capital
|
|
|
E. Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Oversight
|
|
|
F. Executive Compensation and Alignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco Ltd. and its wholly owned investment adviser subsidiaries (collectively, “Invesco”, the “Company”, “our” or “we”) have adopted and implemented this Policy Statement on Global Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting (“Global Proxy Voting Policy” or “Policy”), which we believe describe policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure proxy voting matters are conducted in the best interests
of our clients.
A.
Our Approach to Proxy Voting
Invesco understands proxy voting is an integral aspect of the investment management
services it provides to clients. As an investment adviser, Invesco has a fiduciary duty to act
in the best interests of our clients. Where Invesco has been delegated the authority to vote proxies with respect
to securities held in client portfolios, we exercise such authority in the manner we believe best
serves the interests of our clients and their investment objectives. We recognize that proxy voting is an
important tool that enables us to drive shareholder value.
A summary of our global operational procedures and governance structure is included
in Part II of this Policy. Invesco’s good governance principles, which are included in Part III of this Policy, and our internal proxy voting guidelines are both principles and rules-based and cover topics
that typically appear on voting ballots. Invesco’s portfolio management teams retain ultimate authority to vote proxies. Given the complexity of proxy issues across our clients’ holdings globally, our investment teams consider many factors when determining how to cast votes. We seek to evaluate and
make voting decisions that favor proxy proposals and governance practices that, in our view, promote
long-term shareholder value.
B.
Applicability of Policy
Invesco’s portfolio management teams vote proxies on behalf of Invesco-sponsored funds and both fund and non-fund advisory clients that have explicitly granted Invesco authority in writing
to vote proxies on their behalf. In the case of institutional or sub-advised clients, Invesco will vote
the proxies in accordance with this Policy unless the client agreement specifies that the client
retains the right to vote or has designated a named fiduciary to direct voting.
This Policy is implemented by all entities listed in Exhibit A, except as noted below.
Due to regional or asset class-specific considerations, certain entities may have local proxy voting
guidelines or policies and procedures that differ from this Policy. In the event local policies and this
Policy differ, the local policy will apply. These entities subject to local policies are listed in Exhibit
A and include: Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd, Invesco Taiwan
Ltd, Invesco Real Estate Management S.a.r.l and Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. for Invesco Unit
Investment Trusts.
Where our passively managed strategies and certain other client accounts managed in
accordance with fixed income, money market and index strategies (including exchange-traded funds)
(referred to as “passively managed accounts”) hold the same investments as our actively managed equity funds, voting decisions with respect to those accounts generally follow the voting decisions made
by the largest active holder of the equity shares. Invesco refers to this approach as “Majority Voting.” This process of Majority Voting seeks to ensure that our passively managed accounts benefit from the engagement
and deep dialogue of our active investment teams, which Invesco believes benefits shareholders
in passively managed accounts. Invesco will generally apply the majority holder’s vote instruction to these passively managed accounts. Where securities are held only in passively managed accounts and
not owned in our actively managed accounts, the proxy will be generally voted in line with this
Policy and internal proxy voting guidelines. Notwithstanding the above, portfolio management teams of
our passively managed accounts retain full discretion over proxy voting decisions and may determine
it appropriate to individually evaluate a specific proxy proposal or override Majority Voting and vote
the shares as they determine to be in the best interest of those accounts, absent certain types of conflicts
of interest, which are discussed elsewhere in the Policy. To the extent our portfolio management teams
believe a specific proxy proposal requires enhanced analysis or if it is not covered by the Policy or
internal guidelines, our portfolio management teams will evaluate such proposal and execute the voting decision.
II.
Global Proxy Voting Operational Procedures
Invesco’s global proxy voting operational procedures (the “Procedures”) are in place to implement the provisions of this Policy. Invesco aims to vote all proxies where we have been granted
voting authority in accordance with this Policy, as implemented by the Procedures outlined in this Section
II. It is the responsibility of Invesco’s Proxy Voting and Governance team to maintain and facilitate the review of the Procedures annually.
A.
Oversight and Governance
Oversight of the proxy voting process is provided by the Proxy Voting and Governance
team and the Global Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee (“Global IPAC”). For some clients, third parties (e.g., U.S. fund boards) and internal sub-committees also provide oversight of the proxy voting
process.
Guided by its philosophy that investment teams should manage proxy voting, Invesco
has created the Global IPAC. The Global IPAC is an investments-driven committee comprised of representatives
from various investment management teams globally and Invesco’s Global Head of ESG and is chaired by its Director of Proxy Voting and Governance. Representatives from Invesco’s Legal and Compliance, Risk and Government Affairs departments may also participate in Global IPAC meetings. The
Global IPAC provides a forum for investment teams, in accordance with this Policy, to:
●
monitor, understand and discuss key proxy issues and voting trends within the Invesco
complex;
●
assist Invesco in meeting regulatory obligations;
●
review votes not aligned with our good governance principles; and
●
consider conflicts of interest in the proxy voting process.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Global IPAC meets as necessary, but no less
than semi-annually, and has the following responsibilities and functions: (i) acts as a key liaison between
the Proxy Voting and Governance team and portfolio management teams to ensure compliance with this Policy;
(ii) provides insight on market trends as it relates to stewardship practices; (iii) monitors proxy
votes that present potential conflicts of interest; and (iv) reviews and provides input, at least annually,
on this Policy and related internal procedures and recommends any changes to the Policy based on, but
not limited to, Invesco’s experience, evolving industry practices, or developments in applicable laws or regulations. In addition, when necessary, the Global IPAC Conflict of Interest Sub-committee makes
voting decisions on proxies that require an override of the Policy due to an actual or perceived conflict
of interest; the Global IPAC reviews any such voting decisions.
B.
The Proxy Voting Process
At Invesco, investment teams execute voting decisions through our proprietary voting
platform and are supported by the Proxy Voting and Governance team and a dedicated technology team. Invesco’s proprietary voting platform streamlines the proxy voting process by providing our
global investment teams with direct access to proxy meeting materials including ballots, Invesco’s internal proxy voting guidelines and recommendations, as well as proxy research and vote recommendations
issued by Proxy Service Providers (as such term is defined below). Votes executed on Invesco’s proprietary voting platform are transmitted to our proxy voting agent electronically and are then delivered
to the respective designee for tabulation.
Invesco’s Proxy Voting and Governance team monitors whether we have received proxy ballots for shareholder meetings in which we are entitled to vote. This involves coordination
among various parties in the proxy voting ecosystem, such as our proxy voting agent, custodians and ballot
distributors. If necessary, we may choose to escalate a matter to facilitate our ability to exercise
our right to vote.
Our proprietary systems facilitate internal control and oversight of the voting process.
To facilitate the casting of votes in an efficient manner, Invesco may choose to pre-populate and leverage
the capabilities of these proprietary systems to automatically submit votes based on its
internal proxy voting
guidelines and in circumstances where Majority Voting, share blocking (as defined
below) or proportional voting applies. If necessary, votes may be cast by Invesco or via the Proxy Service
Providers Web platform at our direction.
C.
Retention and Oversight of Proxy Service Providers
Invesco has retained two independent third party proxy voting service providers to
provide proxy support globally: Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis (“GL”). In addition to ISS and GL, Invesco may retain certain local proxy service providers to access regionally
specific research (collectively with ISS and GL, “Proxy Service Providers”). The services may include one or more of the following: providing a comprehensive analysis of each voting item and interpretations
of each based on Invesco’s internally developed proxy voting guidelines; and providing assistance with the administration of the proxy process and certain proxy voting-related functions, including, but not
limited to, operational, reporting and recordkeeping services.
While Invesco may take into consideration the information and recommendations provided
by the Proxy Service Providers, including based upon Invesco’s internal proxy voting guidelines and recommendations provided to such Proxy Service Providers, Invesco’s portfolio management teams retain full and independent discretion with respect to proxy voting decisions.
Updates to previously issued proxy research reports and recommendations may be provided
to incorporate newly available information or additional disclosure provided by the issuer
regarding a matter to be voted on, or to correct factual errors that may result in the issuance
of revised proxy vote recommendations. Invesco’s Proxy Voting and Governance team periodically monitors for these research alerts issued by Proxy Service Providers that are shared with our portfolio
management teams.
Invesco performs extensive initial and ongoing due diligence on the Proxy Service
Providers it engages globally. Invesco conducts annual due diligence meetings as part of its ongoing oversight
of Proxy Service Providers. The topics included in these annual due diligence reviews include
material changes in service levels, leadership and control, conflicts of interest, methodologies for
formulating vote recommendations, operations, and research personnel, among other things. In addition,
Invesco monitors and communicates with these firms throughout the year and monitors their
compliance with Invesco’s performance and policy standards.
As part of our annual policy development process, Invesco may engage with other external
proxy and governance experts to understand market trends and developments. These meetings provide
Invesco with an opportunity to assess the Proxy Service Providers’ capabilities, conflicts of interest and service levels, as well as provide investment professionals with direct insight into the Proxy Service Providers’ stances on key corporate governance and proxy topics and their policy framework/methodologies.
Invesco completes a review of the System and Organizational Controls (“SOC”) Reports for Proxy Service Providers to confirm the related controls operated effectively to provide
reasonable assurance.
D.
Disclosures and Recordkeeping
Unless otherwise required by local or regional requirements, Invesco maintains voting
records for at least seven (7) years. Invesco makes its proxy voting records publicly available in
compliance with regulatory requirements and industry best practices in the regions below:
●
In accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, Invesco
will file a record of all proxy voting activity for the prior 12 months ending June 30th for each
U.S. registered fund. In addition, Invesco, as an institutional manager that is required
to file Form 13F, will file a record of its votes on certain executive compensation (“say on pay”) matters. These fund proxy voting filings and institutional manager say on pay voting filings will
generally be made on or before August 31st of each year. Each year, the proxy voting records for
each U.S. registered fund are made available on Invesco’s website here. Moreover, and to the extent applicable, the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), including Department of Labor regulations and guidance thereunder, provide that the
named
fiduciary generally should be able to review not only the investment adviser’s voting procedure with respect to plan-owned stock, but also to review the actions taken in individual
proxy voting situations. In the case of institutional and sub-advised clients, clients may contact
their client service representative to request information about how Invesco voted proxies on their
behalf. Absent specific contractual guidelines, such requests may be made on a semi-annual
basis.
●
In the UK and Europe, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes monthly in compliance
with the UK Stewardship Code and for the European Shareholder Rights Directive annually here.
●
In Canada, Invesco publicly discloses our annual proxy votes each year here by August 31st, covering the 12-month period ending June 30th in compliance with the National Instrument
81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure.
●
In Japan, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes annually in compliance with the
Japan Stewardship Code here.
●
In India, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes quarterly here in compliance with The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) Circular on stewardship code for all Mutual Funds and all categories of Alternative Investment Funds in relation to their investment
in listed equities. SEBI has implemented principles on voting for Mutual Funds through circulars
dated March 15, 2010, March 24, 2014 and March 5, 2021, which prescribed detailed mandatory
requirements for Mutual Funds in India to disclose their voting policies and actual
voting by Mutual Funds on different resolutions of investee companies.
●
In Hong Kong, Invesco Hong Kong Limited will provide proxy voting records upon request
in compliance with the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) Principles of Responsible Ownership.
●
In Taiwan, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy voting policy and proxy votes annually
in compliance with Taiwan’s Stewardship Principles for Institutional Investors here.
●
In Australia, Invesco publicly discloses a summary of its proxy voting record annually
here.
●
In Singapore, Invesco Asset Management Singapore Ltd. will provide proxy voting records
upon request in compliance with the Singapore Stewardship Principles for Responsible Investors.
Invesco may engage Proxy Service Providers to make available or maintain certain required
proxy voting records in accordance with the above stated applicable regulations. Separately
managed account clients that have authorized Invesco to vote proxies on their behalf will receive
proxy voting information with respect to those accounts upon request. Certain other clients may obtain information
about how we voted proxies on their behalf by contacting their client service representative or
advisor. Invesco does not publicly pre-disclose voting intentions in advance of shareholder meetings.
E.
Market and Operational Limitations
In the great majority of instances, Invesco will vote proxies. However, in certain
circumstances, Invesco may refrain from voting where the economic or other opportunity costs of voting exceed
any benefit to clients. Moreover, ERISA fiduciaries, in voting proxies or exercising other shareholder
rights, must not subordinate the economic interests of plan participants and beneficiaries to unrelated
objectives. These matters are left to the discretion of the relevant portfolio manager. Such circumstances
could include, for example:
●
Certain countries impose temporary trading restrictions, a practice known as “share blocking.” This means that once the shares have been voted, the shareholder does not have the
ability to sell the shares for a certain period of time, usually until the day after the conclusion
of the shareholder meeting. Invesco generally refrains from voting proxies at companies where
share blocking applies. In some instances, Invesco may determine that the benefit to the
client(s) of voting a specific proxy outweighs the client’s temporary inability to sell the shares.
●
Some companies require a representative to attend meetings in person to vote a proxy,
or submit additional documentation or the disclosure of beneficial owner details to vote.
Invesco may determine that the costs of sending a representative or submitting additional
documentation or disclosures outweigh the benefit of voting a particular proxy.
●
Invesco may not receive proxy materials from the relevant fund or client custodian
with sufficient time and information to make an informed independent voting decision.
●
Invesco held shares on the record date but has sold them prior to the meeting date.
In some non-U.S. jurisdictions, although Invesco uses reasonable efforts to vote a
proxy, proxies may not be accepted or may be rejected due to changes in the agenda for a shareholder
meeting for which Invesco does not have sufficient notice, due to a proxy voting service not being offered
by the custodian in the local market or due to operational issues experienced by third parties involved
in the process or by the issuer or sub-custodian. In addition, despite the best efforts of Invesco and
its proxy voting agent, there may be instances where our votes may not be received or properly tabulated by
an issuer or the issuer’s agent. Invesco will generally endeavor to vote and maintain any paper ballots received provided they are delivered in a timely manner ahead of the vote deadline.
Invesco’s funds may participate in a securities lending program. In circumstances where funds’ shares are on loan, the voting rights of those shares are transferred to the borrower. If
the security in question is on loan as part of a securities lending program, Invesco may determine that the
vote is material to the investment and therefore, the benefit to the client of voting a particular proxy outweighs
the economic benefits of securities lending. In those instances, Invesco may determine to recall
securities that are on loan prior to the meeting record date, so that we will be entitled to vote those shares.
For example, for certain actively managed funds, the lending agent has standing instructions to systematically
recall all securities on loan for Invesco to vote the proxies on those previously loaned shares.
There may be instances where Invesco may be unable to recall shares or may choose not to recall
shares. Such circumstances may include instances when Invesco does not receive timely notice of
the meeting, or when Invesco deems the opportunity for a fund to generate securities lending revenue
to outweigh the benefits of voting at a specific meeting. The relevant portfolio manager will make
these determinations.
There may be occasions where voting proxies may present a perceived or actual conflict
of interest between Invesco, as investment adviser, and one or more of Invesco’s clients or vendors.
Firm-Level Conflicts of Interest
A conflict of interest may exist if Invesco has a material business relationship with
either the company soliciting a proxy or a third party that has a material interest in the outcome of
a proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxy vote. Such relationships may
include, among others, a client relationship, serving as a vendor whose products / services are material
or significant to Invesco, serving as a distributor of Invesco’s products, or serving as a significant research provider or broker to Invesco.
Invesco identifies potential conflicts of interest based on a variety of factors,
including but not limited to the materiality of the relationship between the issuer or its affiliates to Invesco.
Material firm-level conflicts of interests are identified by individuals and groups
within Invesco globally based on criteria established by the Proxy Voting and Governance team. These criteria
are monitored and updated periodically by the Proxy Voting and Governance team so up-to-date information
is available when conducting conflicts checks. Operating procedures and associated governance
are designed to seek to ensure conflicts of interest are appropriately considered ahead
of voting proxies. The Global IPAC Conflict of Interest Sub-committee maintains oversight of the process.
Companies identified as conflicted will be voted in line with the principles below as implemented by Invesco’s
internal proxy voting guidelines. To the extent a portfolio manager disagrees with
the Policy, our processes and procedures seek to ensure that justifications and rationales are fully
documented and presented to the Global IPAC Conflict of Interest Sub-committee for approval by a
majority vote.
As an additional safeguard, persons from Invesco’s marketing, distribution and other customer-facing functions may not serve on the Global IPAC. For the avoidance of doubt, Invesco may
not consider Invesco Ltd.’s pecuniary interest when voting proxies on behalf of clients. To avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest, Invesco will not vote proxies issued by Invesco Ltd. that are
held in client accounts.
Personal Conflicts of Interest
A conflict also may exist where an Invesco employee has a known personal or business
relationship with other proponents of proxy proposals, participants in proxy contests, corporate
directors, or candidates for directorships. Under Invesco’s Global Code of Conduct, Invesco entities and individuals must act in the best interests of clients and must avoid any situation that gives
rise to an actual or perceived conflict of interest.
All Invesco personnel with proxy voting responsibilities are required to report any
known personal or business conflicts of interest regarding proxy issues with which they are involved.
In such instances, the individual(s) with the conflict will be excluded from the decision-making process
relating to such issues.
There may be conflicts that arise from Invesco voting on matters when shares of Invesco-sponsored
funds are held by other Invesco funds or entities. The scenarios below set out examples
of how Invesco votes in these instances:
●
When required by law or regulation, shares of an Invesco fund held by other Invesco
funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders of the underlying
fund. If such proportional voting is not operationally possible, Invesco will not vote the
shares.
●
When required by law or regulation, shares of an unaffiliated registered fund held
by one or more Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders
of the underlying fund. If such proportional voting is not operationally possible, Invesco
will not vote the shares.
●
For U.S. funds of funds where proportional voting is not required by law or regulation,
shares of Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders
of the underlying fund. If such proportional voting is not operationally possible, Invesco
will vote in line with our internally developed voting guidelines.
●
Non-U.S. funds of funds will not be voted proportionally. The applicable Invesco entity
will vote in line with its local policies, as indicated in Exhibit A. If no local policies exist,
Invesco will vote non-U.S. funds of funds in line with the firm level conflicts of interest process
described above.
●
Where client accounts are invested directly in shares issued by Invesco affiliates
and Invesco has proxy voting authority, shares will be voted proportionally in line with non-affiliated
holders. If proportional voting is not possible, the shares will be voted in line with a Proxy
Service Provider’s recommendation.
It is the responsibility of the Global IPAC to review this Policy and the internal
proxy voting guidelines annually to consider whether any changes are warranted. This annual review seeks to
ensure this Policy and the internal proxy voting guidelines remain consistent with clients’ best interests, regulatory requirements, local market standards and best practices. Further, this Policy and
our internal proxy voting guidelines are reviewed at least annually by various departments within Invesco
to seek to ensure that they remain consistent with Invesco’s views on best practice in corporate governance and long-term investment stewardship.
III.
Our Good Governance Principles
Invesco’s good governance principles outline our views on best practice in corporate governance and long-term investment stewardship. These principles have been developed by our global investment
teams in collaboration with the Proxy Voting and Governance team and various departments internally.
The broad philosophy and guiding principles in this section inform our approach to long-term
investment stewardship and proxy voting. The principles and positions reflected in this Policy are designed to guide Invesco’s investment professionals in voting proxies; they are not intended to be exhaustive
or prescriptive.
Our portfolio management teams retain full discretion on vote execution in the context
of our good governance principles and internal proxy voting guidelines, except where otherwise
specified in this Policy. The final voting decisions may consider the unique circumstances affecting companies,
regional best practices and any dialogue we have had with company management. As a result, different
portfolio management teams may vote differently on particular proxy votes for the same company.
To the extent portfolio management teams choose to vote a proxy in a way that is not aligned with
the principles below, such manager’s rationales are fully documented.
When evaluating proxy issues and determining how to cast our votes, Invesco’s portfolio management teams may engage with companies in advance of shareholder meetings, and throughout
the year. These meetings can be joint efforts between our global investment professionals.
The following guiding principles apply to proxy voting with respect to operating companies.
We apply a separate approach to open-end and closed-end investment companies and unit investment
trusts. Where appropriate, these guidelines may be supplemented by additional internal guidance
that considers regional variations in best practices, company disclosure and region-specific voting items.
Invesco may vote on proposals not specifically addressed by these principles based on an evaluation of a proposal’s likelihood to enhance long-term shareholder value.
Our good governance principles are divided into six key themes that Invesco endorses:
We expect companies to provide accurate, timely and complete information that enables
investors to make informed investment decisions and effectively carry out their stewardship activities.
Invesco supports the highest standards in corporate transparency and believes that these disclosures
should be made available ahead of the voting deadlines for the Annual General Meeting or Extraordinary
General Meeting to allow for timely review and decision-making.
Financial reporting: Company accounts and reporting must accurately reflect the underlying economic position of a company. Arrangements that may constitute an actual or perceived conflict
with this objective should be avoided.
●
We will generally support proposals to accept the annual financial statements, statutory
accounts and similar proposals unless these reports are not presented in a timely manner or
significant issues are identified regarding the integrity of these disclosures.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent audit committee chair, or nearest equivalent,
where the non-audit fees paid to the independent auditor exceed audit fees for two consecutive
years or other problematic accounting practices are identified such as fraud, misapplication
of audit standards or persistent material weaknesses/deficiencies in internal controls over
financial reporting.
●
We will generally not support the ratification of the independent auditor and/or ratification
of their fees payable if non-audit fees exceed audit and audit related fees or if there are
significant auditing controversies or questions regarding the independence of the external auditor.
We will consider an auditor’s length of service as a company’s independent auditor in applying this policy.
Robust shareholder rights and strong board oversight help ensure that management adhere
to the highest standards of ethical conduct, are held to account for poor performance and
responsibly deliver value creation for stakeholders over the long-term. We therefore encourage companies
to adopt governance features that ensure board and management accountability. In particular,
we consider the following as key mechanisms for enhancing accountability to investors:
One share one vote: Voting rights are an important tool for investors to hold boards and management teams accountable. Unequal voting rights may limit the ability of investors to exercise
their stewardship obligations.
●
We generally do not support proposals that establish or perpetuate dual classes of
voting shares, double voting rights or other means of differentiated voting or disproportionate
board nomination rights.
●
We generally support proposals to decommission differentiated voting rights.
●
Where unequal voting rights are established, we expect these to be accompanied by
reasonable safeguards to protect minority shareholders’ interests.
Anti-takeover devices: Mechanisms designed to prevent or unduly delay takeover attempts may unduly limit the accountability of boards and management teams to shareholders.
●
We generally will not support proposals to adopt antitakeover devices such as poison
pills. Exceptions may be warranted at entities without significant operations and to preserve
the value of net operating losses carried forward or where the applicability of the pill is
limited in scope and duration.
●
In addition, we will generally not support capital authorizations or amendments to
corporate articles or bylaws at operating companies that may be utilized for antitakeover purposes,
for example, the authorization of classes of shares of preferred stock with unspecified
voting, dividend, conversion or other rights (“blank check” authorizations).
Shareholder rights: We support the rights of shareholders to hold boards and management teams accountable for company performance. We generally support best practice aligned proposals
to enhance shareholder rights, including but not limited to the following:
●
Adoption of proxy access rights
●
Rights to call special meetings
●
Rights to act by written consent
●
Reduce supermajority vote requirements
●
Remove antitakeover provisions
●
Requirement that directors are elected by a majority vote
In addition, we oppose practices that limit shareholders’ ability to express their views at a general meeting such as bundling unrelated proposals or several significant article or bylaw
amendments into a single voting item. We will generally vote against these proposals unless we are satisfied
that all the underlying components are aligned with our views on best practice. We may make exceptions
to this policy for non-operating companies (e.g., open-end and closed-end investment companies).
Director Indemnification: Invesco recognizes that individuals may be reluctant to serve as corporate directors if they are personally liable for all related lawsuits and legal costs.
As a result, reasonable limitations on directors’ liability can benefit a company and its shareholders by helping to attract and retain qualified directors while preserving recourse for shareholders in the event
of misconduct by directors. Accordingly, unless there is insufficient information to make a decision
about the nature of the
proposal, Invesco will generally support proposals to limit directors’ liability and provide indemnification and/or exculpation, provided that the arrangements are reasonably limited in scope
to directors acting in good faith and, in relation to criminal matters, limited in scope to directors having
reasonable grounds for believing the conduct was lawful.
Responsiveness: Boards should respond to investor concerns in a timely fashion, including reasonable
requests to engage with company representatives regarding such concerns, and address
matters that receive significant voting dissent at general meetings of shareholders.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent chair of the governance committee, or
nearest equivalent, in cases where the board has not adequately responded to items receiving
significant voting opposition from shareholders at an annual or extraordinary general meeting.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent chair of the governance committee, or
nearest equivalent, where the board has not adequately responded to a shareholder proposal
which has received significant support from shareholders.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent chair of the compensation committee,
or nearest equivalent, if there are significant ongoing concerns with a company’s compensation practices that have not been addressed by the committee or egregious concerns with the company’s compensation practices for two years consecutively.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent compensation committee chair, or nearest
equivalent, where there are ongoing concerns with a company’s compensation practices and there is no opportunity to express dissatisfaction by voting against an advisory vote
on executive compensation, remuneration report (or policy) or nearest equivalent.
●
Where a company has not adequately responded to engagement requests from Invesco or
satisfactorily addressed issues of concern, we may oppose director nominations, including,
but not limited to, nominations for the lead independent director and/or committee chairs.
Virtual shareholder meetings: Companies should hold their annual or special shareholder meetings in a manner that best serves the needs of its shareholders and the company. Shareholders
should have an opportunity to participate in such meetings. Shareholder meetings provide an important
mechanism by which shareholders provide feedback or raise concerns without undue censorship
and hear from the board and management.
●
We will generally support management proposals seeking to allow for the convening
of hybrid shareholder meetings (allowing shareholders the option to attend and participate either
in person or through a virtual platform).
●
Management or shareholder proposals that seek to authorize the company to hold virtual-only
meetings (held entirely through virtual platform with no corresponding in-person physical
meeting) will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Companies have a responsibility
to provide strong justification and establish safeguards to preserve comparable rights and opportunities
for shareholders to participate virtually as they would have during an in-person meeting.
Invesco will consider, among other things, a company’s practices, jurisdiction and disclosure, including the items set forth below:
i.
meeting procedures and requirements are disclosed in advance of a meeting detailing
the rationale for eliminating the in-person meeting;
ii.
clear and comprehensive description of which shareholders are qualified to participate,
how shareholders can join the virtual-only meeting, how and when shareholders submit and
ask questions either in advance of or during the meeting;
iii.
disclosure regarding procedures for questions received during the meeting, but not
answered due to time or other restrictions; and
iv.
description of how shareholder rights will be protected in a virtual-only meeting
format including the ability to vote shares during the time the polls are open.
C.
Board Composition and Effectiveness
Director election process: Board members should generally stand for election annually and individually.
●
We will generally support proposals requesting that directors stand for election annually.
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent governance committee chair or nearest
equivalent, if a company has a classified board structure that is not being phased out. We may
make exceptions to this policy for non-operating companies (e.g., open-end and closed-end
investment companies) or in regions where market practice is for directors to stand for election
on a staggered basis.
●
When a board is presented for election as a slate (e.g., shareholders are unable to
vote against individual nominees and must vote for or against the entire nominated slate of directors)
and this approach is not aligned with local market practice, we will generally vote against
the slate in cases where we otherwise would vote against an individual nominee.
●
Where market practice is to elect directors as a slate we will generally support the
nominated slate unless there are governance concerns with several of the individuals included
on the slate or we have broad concerns with the composition of the board such as a lack independence.
Board size: We will generally defer to the board with respect to determining the optimal number
of board members given the size of the company and complexity of the business, provided
that the proposed board size is sufficiently large to represent shareholder interests and sufficiently
limited to remain effective.
Board assessment and succession planning: When evaluating board effectiveness, Invesco considers whether periodic performance reviews and skills assessments are conducted
to ensure the board represents the interests of shareholders. In addition, boards should have a
robust succession plan in place for key management and board personnel.
Definition of independence: Invesco considers local market definitions of director independence but applies a proprietary standard for assessing director independence considering a director’s status as a current or former employee of the business, any commercial or consulting relationships
with the company, the level of shares beneficially owned or represented and familial relationships,
among others.
Board and committee independence: The board of directors, board committees and regional equivalents should be sufficiently independent from management, substantial shareholders
and conflicts of interest. We consider local market practices in this regard and in general we look
for a balance across the board of directors. Above all, we like to see signs of robust challenge
and discussion in the boardroom.
●
We will generally vote against one or more non-independent directors when a board
is less than majority independent, but we will take into account local market practice with regards
to board independence in limited circumstances where this standard is not appropriate.
●
We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the audit committee.
●
We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the compensation
committee.
●
We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the nominating
committee.
●
In relation to the board, compensation committee and nominating committee we will
consider the appropriateness of significant shareholder representation in applying this policy.
This exception will generally not apply to the audit committee.
Separation of Chair and CEO roles: We believe that independent board leadership generally enhances management accountability to investors. Companies deviating from this best
practice should provide a strong justification and establish safeguards to ensure that there is independent
oversight of a board’s activities (e.g., by appointing a lead or senior independent director with clearly defined powers and responsibilities).
●
We will generally vote against the incumbent nominating committee chair, or nearest
equivalent, where the board chair is not independent unless a lead independent or senior director
is appointed.
●
We will generally support shareholder proposals requesting that the board chair be
an independent director.
●
We will generally not vote against a CEO or executive serving as board chair solely
on the basis of this issue, however, we may do so in instances where we have significant concerns
regarding a company’s corporate governance, capital allocation decisions and/or compensation practices.
Attendance and over boarding: Director attendance at board and committee meetings is a fundamental part of their responsibilities and provides efficient oversight for the
company and its investors. In addition, directors should not have excessive external board or managerial
commitments that may interfere with their ability to execute the duties of a director.
●
We will generally vote against or withhold votes from directors who attend less than
75% of board and committee meetings for two consecutive years. We expect companies to disclose
any extenuating circumstances, such as health matters or family emergencies, that would
justify a director’s low attendance, in line with good practices.
●
We will generally vote against directors who have more than four total mandates at
public operating companies. We apply a lower threshold for directors with significant commitments
such as executive positions and chairmanships.
Diversity: We believe an effective board should be comprised of directors with a mix of skills,
experience, tenure, and industry expertise together with a diverse profile of individuals
of different genders, ethnicities, race, culture, age, perspectives and backgrounds. The board
should reflect the diversity of the workforce, customers, and the communities in which the business operates.
In our view, greater diversity in the boardroom contributes to robust challenge and debate, avoids
groupthink, fosters innovation, and provides competitive advantage to companies. We consider diversity
at the board level, within the executive management team and in the succession pipeline.
●
In markets where there are regulatory expectations, listing standards or minimum quotas
for board diversity, Invesco will generally apply the same expectations. In all other
markets, we will generally vote against the incumbent nominating committee chair of a board, or nearest
equivalent, where a company failed to demonstrate improvements are being made to diversity
practices for three or more consecutive years, recognizing that building a qualified
and diverse board takes time. We may make exceptions to this policy for non-operating companies
(e.g., open-end and closed-end investment companies).
●
We generally believe that an individual board’s nominating committee is best positioned to determine whether director term limits would be an appropriate measure to help achieve
these goals and, if so, the nature of such limits. Invesco generally opposes proposals to
limit the tenure of outside directors through mandatory retirement ages.
D.
Long-Term Stewardship of Capital
Capital allocation: Invesco expects companies to responsibly raise and deploy capital toward the long-term, sustainable success of the business. In addition, we expect capital allocation authorizations
and decisions to be made with due regard to shareholder dilution, rights of shareholders
to ratify significant corporate actions and pre-emptive rights, where applicable.
Share issuance and repurchase authorizations: We generally support authorizations to issue shares up to 20% of a company’s issued share capital for general corporate purposes. Shares should not be issued at a substantial discount to the market price or be repurchased at a substantial
premium to the market price.
Stock splits: We generally support management proposals to implement a forward or reverse stock
split, provided that a reverse stock split is not being used to take a company private.
In addition, we will generally support requests to increase a company’s common stock authorization if requested to facilitate a stock split.
Increases in authorized share capital: We will generally support proposals to increase a company’s number of authorized common and/or preferred shares, provided we have not identified
concerns regarding a company’s historical share issuance activity or the potential to use these authorizations for antitakeover purposes. We will consider the amount of the request in relation to the company’s current authorized share capital, any proposed corporate transactions contingent on approval
of these requests and the cumulative impact on a company’s authorized share capital, for example, if a reverse stock split is concurrently submitted for shareholder consideration.
Mergers, acquisitions, proxy contests, disposals and other corporate transactions: Invesco’s investment teams will review proposed corporate transactions including mergers, acquisitions,
reorganizations, proxy contests, private placements, dissolutions and divestitures based on a proposal’s individual investment merits. In addition, we broadly approach voting on other corporate
transactions as follows:
●
We will generally support proposals to approve different types of restructurings that
provide the necessary financing to save the company from involuntary bankruptcy.
●
We will generally support proposals to enact corporate name changes and other proposals
related to corporate transactions that we believe are in shareholders’ best interests.
●
We will generally support reincorporation proposals, provided that management have
provided a compelling rationale for the change in legal jurisdiction and provided further that
the proposal will not significantly adversely impact shareholders’ rights.
●
With respect to contested director elections, we consider the following factors, among
others, when evaluating the merits of each list of nominees: the long-term performance of
the company relative to its industry, management’s track record, any relevant background information related to the contest, the qualifications of the respective lists of director nominees, the
strategic merits of the approaches proposed by both sides, including the likelihood that the proposed
goals can be met, and positions of stock ownership in the company.
E.
Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Oversight
Director responsibility for risk oversight: The board of directors are ultimately responsible for overseeing management and ensuring that proper governance, oversight and control mechanisms
are in place at the companies they oversee. Invesco may take voting action against director
nominees in response to material governance or risk oversight failures that adversely affect shareholder
value.
Invesco considers the adequacy of a company's response to material oversight failures
when determining whether any voting action is warranted. In addition, Invesco will consider
the responsibilities delegated to board sub-committees when determining if it is appropriate to hold the
incumbent chair of the relevant committee, or nearest equivalent, accountable for these material failures.
Material governance or risk oversight failures at a company may include, without limitation:
i.
significant bribery, corruption or ethics violations;
ii.
events causing significant climate-related risks;
iii.
significant health and safety incidents; or
iv.
failure to ensure the protection of human rights.
Reporting of financially material ESG information: Companies should report on their environmental, social and governance opportunities and risks where material to their business operations.
●
Climate risk management: We encourage companies to report on material climate-related
risks and opportunities and how these are considered within the company’s strategy, financial planning, governance structures and risk management frameworks aligned with applicable
regional regulatory requirements. For companies in industries that materially contribute
to climate change, we encourage comprehensive disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions and Paris-aligned emissions reduction targets, where appropriate. Invesco may take voting action
at companies that fail to adequately address climate-related risks, including opposing
director nominations in cases where we view the lack of effective climate transition risk management
as potentially detrimental to long-term shareholder value.
Shareholder proposals addressing environmental and social issues: We recognize environmental and social (E&S) shareholder proposals are nuanced and therefore, Invesco will analyze
such proposals on a case-by-case basis.
Invesco may support shareholder resolutions requesting that specific actions be taken
to address E&S issues or mitigate exposure to material E&S risks, including reputational risk, related
to these issues. When considering such proposals, we will consider the following but not limited to:
a company's track record on E&S issues, the efficacy of the proposal's request, whether the requested
action is unduly burdensome, and whether we consider the adoption of such a proposal would promote
long-term shareholder value. We will also consider company responsiveness to the proposal and
any engagement on the issue when casting votes.
We generally do not support resolutions where insufficient information has been provided
in advance of the vote or a lack of disclosure inhibits our ability to make fully informed voting
decisions.
Ratification of board and/or management acts: We will generally support proposals to ratify the actions of the board of directors, supervisory board and/or executive decision-making
bodies, provided there are no material oversight failures as described above. When such oversight concerns
are identified, we will consider a company’s response to any issues raised and may vote against ratification proposals instead of, or in addition to, director nominees.
F.
Executive Compensation and Alignment
Invesco supports compensation polices and equity incentive plans that promote alignment
between management incentives and shareholders’ long-term interests. We pay close attention to local market practice and may apply stricter or modified criteria where appropriate.
Advisory votes on executive compensation, remuneration policy and remuneration reports: We will generally not support compensation-related proposals where more than one of the
following is present:
i.
there is an unmitigated misalignment between executive pay and company performance
for at least two consecutive years;
ii.
there are problematic compensation practices which may include, among others, incentivizing
excessive risk taking or circumventing alignment between management and shareholders’ interests via repricing of underwater options;
iii.
vesting periods for long-term incentive awards are less than three years;
iv.
the company “front loads” equity awards;
v.
there are inadequate risk mitigating features in the program such as clawback provisions;
vi.
excessive, discretionary one-time equity grants are awarded to executives;
vii.
less than half of variable pay is linked to performance targets, except where prohibited
by law.
Invesco will consider company reporting on pay ratios as part of our evaluation of
compensation proposals, where relevant.
Equity plans: Invesco generally supports equity compensation plans that promote the proper alignment
of incentives with shareholders’ long-term interests, and generally votes against plans that are overly dilutive to existing shareholders, plans that contain objectionable structural features
which may include provisions to reprice options without shareholder approval, plans that include evergreen
provisions or plans that provide for automatic accelerated vesting upon a change in control.
Employee stock purchase plans: We generally support employee stock purchase plans that are reasonably designed to provide proper incentives to a broad base of employees, provided
that the price at which employees may acquire stock represents a reasonable discount from the market
price.
Severance Arrangements: Invesco considers proposed severance arrangements (sometimes known as “golden parachute” arrangements) on a case-by-case basis due to the wide variety among their terms. Invesco acknowledges that in some cases such arrangements, if reasonable, may be in shareholders’ best interests as a method of attracting and retaining high-quality executive talent.
We generally vote in favor of proposals requiring shareholder ratification of senior executives’ severance agreements where the proposed terms and disclosure align with good market practice.
Exhibit A
Harbourview Asset Management Corporation
Invesco Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd*1
Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited*1
Invesco Asset Management (Schweiz) AG
Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH
Invesco Asset Management Limited1
Invesco Asset Management Singapore Ltd
Invesco Capital Management LLC
Invesco Capital Markets, Inc.*1
Invesco Fund Managers Limited
Invesco Hong Kong Limited
Invesco Investment Advisers LLC
Invesco Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited
Invesco Investment Management Limited
Invesco Loan Manager, LLC
Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC
Invesco Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited
Invesco Private Capital, Inc.
Invesco Real Estate Management S.a.r.l1
Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.
* Invesco entities with specific proxy voting guidelines
1 Invesco entities with specific conflicts of interest policies
Proxy Voting Guidelines
Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited
Invesco Japan Proxy Voting Guideline
Invesco Japan (hereinafter “we” or “our) votes proxies to maximize the interests of our clients (investors) and beneficiaries in the long term, acknowledging the importance of corporate governance
based on fiduciary duties to our clients (investors) and beneficiaries. We do not vote proxies
for the interests of ourselves and any third party other than clients (investors) and beneficiaries. The
interests of clients (investors) and beneficiaries are to expand the corporate value or the shareholders’ economic interests or prevent damage thereto. Proxy voting is an integral part of our stewardship activities,
and we make voting decisions considering whether the proposal would contribute to corporate value expansion
and sustainable growth.
To vote proxies adequately, we have established the Responsible Investment Committee
and developed the Proxy Voting Guideline to govern the decision-making process of proxy voting. While
we may seek advice from an external service provider based on our own guidelines, our investment professionals
make voting decisions in principle, based on the proxy voting guideline, taking into account whether
they contribute to increasing the subject company’s shareholder value.
Responsible proxy voting and constructive dialogue with investee companies are important
components of stewardship activities. While the Proxy Voting Guideline are principles for our voting
decisions, depending on the proposals, we may make an exception if we conclude that such a decision is
in the best interests of clients (investors) and beneficiaries after having constructive dialogue with the
investee companies. In such a case, approval of the Responsible Investment Committee shall be obtained.
The Responsible Investment Committee consists of members including Chief Investment
Officer, as the chair, Head of Compliance, Head of ESG, investment professionals nominated by the
chair and the other members, including persons in charge at the Client Reporting department.
We have established the Conflict of Interest Management Policy. In the situation that
may give rise to a conflict of interest, we aim to control it in the best interests of clients (investors)
and beneficiaries. The Compliance department is responsible for governing company-wide control of a conflict
of interest. The Compliance department is independent of Investment and Sales departments and shall
not receive any command or order for the matters compliant with the laws and regulations, including
a conflict of interest, from them.
1. Appropriations of Retained Earnings and Dividends
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking approval for appropriations of retained
earnings and dividends, taking into account the subject company’s financial conditions and business performance, shareholders’ economic interests and so on.
●
Taking into account the company’s capital adequacy, business strategies, and so on if the total payout ratio, including dividends and share repurchases, is significantly low, we
consider voting against the proposals unless reasonable explanations are given by the company.
●
With respect to the company where the Board of Directors determines appropriations
of retained earnings, taking into account the subject company’s capital adequacy, business strategies, and so on if the total payout ratio, including dividends and share repurchases, is significantly
low, we consider voting against the reappointment of board directors unless reasonable explanations
are given by the company.
●
Taking into account the subject company’s capital adequacy, business strategies, and so on if the total payout ratio, including dividends and share repurchases, is significantly low,
we consider voting for shareholder proposals increasing shareholder returns.
2. Appointment of Board Directors
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the appointment of board directors,
taking into account their independence, competence, anti-social activity records (if any), and so on.
Furthermore, we decide how to vote on the reappointment of board directors, taking into account their corporate
governance practices, accountability during their tenures, the company’s business performance and anti-social records (if any), and so on in addition to the above factors.
Board directors should make best efforts to continuously gain knowledge and skills
to fulfill the critical role and responsibilities in the company’s governance. A company should also provide sufficient training opportunities.
Independent outside directors are expected to play a significant role, such as safeguarding
minority shareholders’ interests through action based on their insights to increase the company’s corporate value. It is desirable to enhance the board’s governance function with independent outside directors accounting for the board majority. However, given the challenge to secure competent candidates, we
also recognize that it is difficult for all the companies, irrespective of their size, to deploy the independent outside directors’ majority on the Board.
Sufficient disclosure is a prerequisite for reflecting the assessment of independence
and suitability of director candidates and board composition in voting decisions. Currently, there are
cases where sufficient information cannot be obtained due to insufficient disclosure on a board chair, each committee’s function and committee chairs in Notice of Annual General Meeting (AGM) and a corporate governance
report, as well as untimeliness of these issuances. We generally make decisions based on Notice
of AGM, a corporate governance report and an annual securities report disclosed by the time of voting.
However, this shall not apply if we obtain such information from direct engagement with the company or find
relevant disclosure elsewhere.
We generally vote for the appointment of outside directors. However, we generally
vote against if a candidate is not regarded as independent of the subject company. It is desirable that
the company discloses information, such as numerical data, which supports our decision on board independence.
●
We view the following outside director candidates are not independent enough.
●
Candidates who have been working for the following companies for the last ten years
or are those people’s relatives.
●
Candidates who have been working for the following companies for the last five years
or are those people’s relatives.
●
Shareholders who own more than 10% of the subject company
●
Principal securities brokers
●
Major business partners
●
Audit companies, consulting companies or any related service providers which have
any consulting contracts with the subject company
●
Any other counterparts which have any interests in the subject company
In cases other than above, we separately scrutinize the independence of candidates
who are regarded as not independent enough.
●
We take extra care when we assess the independence of candidates from a company which
is regarded as a policy shareholder under cross shareholding, mutually sends outside directors
to each other, and so on, as such cases potentially raise doubts about their independence. The company should
give reasonable explanations. It is also desirable that the company contrives the timing
and method of disclosure to allow investors to understand those relationships enough.
●
We judge board independence according to the stock exchange’s independence criteria with emphasizing independence ensured practically. We consider each company’s business environment and make the best effort to engage with the subject company to determine the independence
of the candidates.
●
We regard an outside director with a significantly long tenure as non-independent
and consider voting against the reappointment of such an outside director. We generally consider voting
against the reappointment of outside directors whose tenures are longer than ten years.
●
If the subject company is a company with Audit Committee, we judge the independence
of outside director candidates who become audit committee board members using the same independence
criteria for the appointment of statutory auditors in principle.
●
We generally consider voting against the appointment of top executives and a nominating
committee chair at a company with three Committees if independent outside directors of the subject
company account for less than 1/3 of the Board after the AGM. However, this shall not apply
if we confirm sufficient planning or special circumstances on increasing the number of independent
outside directors in engagements.
●
In case the subject company has a parent company, we generally consider voting against
the appointment of top executives and a nominating committee chair at a company with three
Committees if independent outside directors account for less than half of the Board after the AGM.
However, this shall not apply if we confirm sufficient planning or special circumstances on increasing
the number of independent outside directors in engagements.
(2)
Attendance rate and concurrent duties
●
All members are expected to attend board and respective committee meetings in principle.
A Company is generally obligated to facilitate all members to attend these meetings. We generally
vote against the reappointment of board directors who attended less than 75% of board or respective
committee meetings.
●
We take into account not only the number of attendance but nomination reasons and candidates’ real contributions if disclosed.
●
We take extra care when we assess the capability of board directors who have many
concurrent duties as an outside director or outside statutory auditor of listed companies, as
such cases potentially arise doubts about their capacity given the importance of outside directors’ role and responsibilities. Accordingly, we consider voting against the appointment of board
directors who perform five or more duties as a director or statutory auditor of a listed company
or equivalent company.
●
If a company nominates a board director with many concurrent duties, it should provide
reasonable explanations. It is also desirable that the company contrives disclosure timing and
methods to allow investors to understand the situation enough.
(3)
Company’s business performance
●
We consider voting against the reappointment of board directors if the subject company
made a loss for the three consecutive years during their tenures.
●
We consider voting against the reappointment of board directors if we judge that the subject company’s business performance significantly lags the peers in the same industry during their
tenures.
●
We consider voting against top executives if, concerning capital efficiency including
return on capital, business strategies achieving corporate value expansion and sustainable growth are
not demonstrated, and constructive dialogues are not conducted.
(4)
Company’s anti-social activities
●
If we judge that a corporate scandal damages or is likely to damage shareholder value
with having a significant effect on society during a board tenure, we conduct adequate dialogues
with the subject company on the background and subsequent resolutions of the scandal. Based on the
dialogues, we decide how to vote on the reappointment of top executives, board directors in charge
of those cases and audit committee board members at a company with Audit Committee or three Committees,
considering the impact on shareholder value.
●
With respect to domestic corporate scandals, at the time a company receives administrative
dispositions to cartel, bid-rigging, and so on from authorities, such as the Fair
Trade Commission, we consider voting against the reappointment of top executives, directors in charge and
audit committee board members at a company with Audit Committee or three Committees. However, in case
final dispositions are subsequently determined based on appeal or complaints resolutions,
we do not vote against the reappointment again at that time. We vote on a case-by-case basis concerning
compensation orders in a civil case, dispositions from the Consumer Affairs Agency
or administrative dispositions from overseas authorities.
●
With respect to administrative dispositions to an unlisted subsidiary or affiliate,
we consider voting against the reappointment of top executives, directors in charge and audit committee
board members at a company with Audit Committee or three Committees of the holding or parent company.
If a subsidiary or affiliate is listed, we consider voting against the reappointment of
top executives, directors in charge and audit committee board members at a company with Audit Committee
or three Committees of both the subsidiary or affiliate and the holding or parent company.
However, we may vote on a case-by-case basis, depending on the importance of the disposition to the
subsidiary or affiliate, its impact on the holding or parent company’s financial performance, and so on.
●
With respect to employees’ scandals, if the scandal damages or is likely to damage shareholder value, and we judge that the subject company owes management responsibility, we consider
voting against the reappointment of top executives, directors in charge and audit committee
board members at a company with Audit Committee or three Committees.
●
We consider voting against the reappointment of board directors if the subject company
engages in window dressing or inadequate accounting practices during their tenures.
(5)
Activities against shareholder interest
●
If a company raises capital through an excessively dilutive third-party allotment without a shareholders’ meeting’s approval, we consider voting against the reappointment of board directors, particularly top executives.
●
If a company raises capital through a large-scale public offering without reasonable
explanations, we consider voting against the reappointment of board directors, particularly top executives.
●
If a company does not execute a shareholder proposal regarded as favorable for minority
shareholders receiving the majority support from shareholders or does not make a similar company
proposal at an AGM in the following year, we consider voting against the appointment of top executives.
●
If a company insufficiently discloses board director candidates’ information, we generally vote against such candidates.
3. Composition of Board of Directors
While each company’s board structure would differ depending on its size and so on, we believe that a company with three Committees (Nomination, Audit and Remuneration) is desirable to
achieve better governance as a listed company. For a company with Board of Statutory Auditors (Kansayaku)
or Audit Committee, it is also desirable to voluntarily deploy a Nomination Committee, a Remuneration
Committee and other necessary committees. Besides, it is desirable that Board Chair is an independent
outside director. We believe that a highly transparent board composition ensures management
accountability and contributes to sustained enterprise value expansion. Finally, the disclosure of the
third-party assessment on the Board of Directors is desirable.
To strengthen the Board of Directors’ monitoring function and increase its transparency and effectiveness, we believe it is important to ensure gender, nationality, career, and age diversity
in principle. It is desirable that each company adopts a skills matrix that defines the diversity and expertise
required to fulfill the Board’s responsibilities reflecting its situation and selects director candidates accordingly.
We are concerned about retired directors assuming consulting, advisory or other similar
positions which could negatively impact transparency and decision making of the Board. If such positions
exist, and retired directors assume them, it is desirable that the company discloses their existence,
their expected roles and contributions and compensations for such posts.
(1)
Number of board members and change in board composition
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the number of board members and change
in board composition, taking into account the impacts on the subject company and shareholders’ economic interests compared to the current situations.
●
The number of board members should be optimized to make the right management decision
at the right time. We may consider each company’s business situation and scale. However, we generally consider voting against the appointment of top executives and a nominating committee
chair at a company three Committees if the number of board members is expected to exceed 20 without
decreasing from the previous AGM, and reasonable explanations are not given.
●
We generally vote against the appointment of top executives and a nomination committee
chair at a company three Committees if a decrease in outside directors or an increase in internal
directors reduces the percentage of outside directors to less than half of the board members.
●
If there are no females on the Board, we consider voting against the appointment of
top executives and a nomination committee chair at a company three Committees. However, this shall
not apply if we confirm sufficient planning or special circumstances on increasing the number of
female directors in engagements.
●
We believe that board diversity is important and may set a higher target for a female
board member ratio in the future. Similarly, we may set a racial and nationality diversity
target, especially for companies with global business operations.
(2)
Procedures of board director appointment, scope of their responsibilities and so on
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning change in board director appointment
procedures, taking into account the rationales, and so on, compared to the current procedures.
●
We generally vote against proposals reducing board directors’ responsibilities for financial damages on fiduciary duty breach.
●
Board directors’ responsibilities include effective monitoring of top executives succession planning. The Nomination Committee at a company with three Committees or the arbitrary Nomination
Committee created at a company with the other governance structures should provide effective
monitoring of successor development and appointment with transparency. It is desirable that an independent
outside
director serves as Nomination Committee Chair. If we judge that the succession procedure
significantly lacks transparency and rationality, we consider voting against the appointment of
top executives.
4. Appointment of Statutory Auditors (Kansayaku)
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the appointment of statutory auditors,
taking into account their independence, competence and anti-social activities records (if any), and so
on. We decide how to vote on the reappointment of statutory auditors, taking into account their corporate
governance practices and accountability during their tenures, the company’s anti-social activity records, and so on in addition to the above factors.
Statutory auditors and audit committee board directors at a company with Audit committee
or three Committees should have deep knowledge specialized in accounting, laws and regulations
and should make best efforts to continuously gain knowledge and skills to fulfill the critical role
and responsibilities in the company’s governance. A company should also provide sufficient training opportunities.
●
We generally vote against the appointment of outside statutory auditors without independency.
●
In general, a person who has no relationship with the subject company other than a
statutory auditor appointment is regarded as independent.
●
We regard that an outside statutory auditor with a significantly long tenure is not
independent and generally vote against the reappointment of such an outside statutory auditor. We
generally consider voting against the candidate whose tenure is longer than ten years.
(2)
Attendance rate and concurrent duties
●
All statutory auditors are expected to attend board or board of statutory auditors
meetings in principle. A companies is generally obligated to facilitate all statutory auditors to attend these
meetings. We generally vote against the reappointment of statutory auditors who attended less than 75% of
board or board of statutory auditors meetings.
●
We take into account not only the number of attendance but nomination reasons and candidates’ real contributions if disclosed.
●
We take extra care when we assess the capability of statutory auditors who have many
concurrent duties as an outside director or outside statutory auditor of listed companies, as
such cases potentially arise doubts about their capacity given the importance of outside statutory auditors’ role and responsibilities. Accordingly, we consider voting against the appointment of statutory
auditors who perform five or more duties as a board director or statutory auditor of a listed
company or equivalent company. If a company nominates a statutory auditor with many concurrent
duties, it should give reasonable explanations. It is also desirable that the company contrives
disclosure timing and methods to allow investors to understand the situation enough.
●
If there are material concerns about a published audit report or audit procedures,
or insufficiencies of required disclosures, we vote against the reappointment of statutory auditors.
(4)
Company’s anti-social activities
●
If we judge that a corporate scandal damages or is likely to damage shareholder value
with having a significant impact on society during a statutory auditor’s tenure, we conduct adequate dialogues with the subject company on the background and subsequent resolutions of the scandal. Based
on the dialogues, we decide how to vote on the reappointment of statutory auditors, considering the
impact on shareholder value.
●
With respect to domestic corporate scandals, at the time a company receives administrative
dispositions to cartel, bid-rigging, and so on from authorities, such as the Fair
Trade Commission, we consider voting against the reappointment of statutory auditors. However, in case
the final dispositions are subsequently determined based on appeal or complaints resolutions,
we do not vote against the reappointment again at that time. We vote on a case-by-case basis concerning
compensation orders in a civil case, dispositions from the Consumer Affairs Agency
or administrative dispositions from overseas authorities.
●
With respect to administrative dispositions to an unlisted subsidiary or affiliate,
we consider voting against the reappointment of statutory auditors of the holding or parent company.
If a subsidiary or affiliate is listed, we consider voting against the reappointment of statutory auditors
of both the subsidiary or affiliate and the holding or parent company. However, we may decide
on a case-by-case basis, depending on the importance of the dispositions to the subsidiary or affiliate,
its impact on the holding or parent company’s financial performance, and so on.
●
With respect to employees’ scandals, if the scandal damages or is likely to damage shareholder value, and we judge that the subject company owes management responsibility, we consider
voting against the reappointment of statutory auditors.
●
We consider voting against the reappointment of statutory auditors if the subject
company engages in window-dressing or inadequate accounting practices during their tenures.
5. Composition of Board of Statutory Auditors (Kansayaku)
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the number of members or change in composition
of the board of statutory auditors, taking into account the impact on the subject company and shareholders’ economic interests compared to the current situations.
●
We consider an increase in statutory auditors favorably. However, in case of a decrease,
we consider voting against the reappointment of top executives unless clear and reasonable explanations
are given.
6. Appointment of Accounting Auditors
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the appointment and replacement of accounting
auditors, taking into account their competence, audit fee levels, and so on.
●
We generally vote against the reappointment of statutory auditors (Kansayaku) or audit
committee board members at a company with Audit Committee or three Committees if we judge that a company
reappoints an accounting auditor without replacing it despite the following accounting
audit problems.
●
It is determined that an accounting auditor provides an unfair opinion on the company’s financial conditions.
●
In case there are concerns on financial statements, required disclosures are insufficient.
●
In case an accounting auditor has a service contract other than accounting audit services
with the subject company, it is regarded that such a contract creates a conflict of interest
between them.
●
Excessive audit fees are paid.
●
It is regarded that an accounting auditor makes fraud or negligence.
●
If it is regarded that an accounting auditor has issues in other company’s audits, in case a company appoints or reappoints the accounting auditor without replacing it, we take the impact on the company’s corporate value full consideration into voting decisions.
●
We generally vote against proposals concerning accounting auditor replacement if it
is regarded that a company changes an incumbent accounting auditor due to a dispute about accounting
principles.
7. Compensation for Board Directors, Statutory Auditors (Kansayaku) and Employees
(1)
Board directors’ salaries and bonuses
●
It is desirable to increase the proportion of stock incentive plans in board directors’ salaries and bonuses, on condition that a performance-based compensation structure is established, transparency,
such as disclosures of a benchmark or formula laying the foundations for calculation, ensures
accountability, and the impact on shareholders, such as dilution, are taken into considerations. The Remuneration
Committee at a company with three Committees (Nomination, Audit and Remuneration)
or the arbitrary Remuneration Committee preferably deployed at a company with the other governance
structures should ensure the accountability of compensation schemes. It is desirable that an independent
outside director serves as Remuneration Committee Chair.
●
We consider voting against proposals seeking approval for salaries and bonuses in
the following cases.
●
Negative correlation between company’s financial performance and directors’ salaries and bonuses are observed.
●
Inappropriate systems and practices are in place.
●
The total amount of salaries and bonuses is not disclosed.
●
Management failures, such as a significant share price decline or serious earnings
deterioration, are apparent.
●
The remuneration proposal includes people determined to be responsible for activities
against shareholder interest.
●
We generally vote for shareholder proposals requesting disclosure of individual directors’ salaries and bonuses.
●
If a company implements any measures ensuring transparency other than disclosure,
we take it into consideration.
●
If there is no proposal seeking approval for directors’ salaries and bonuses, and the compensation structure lacks transparency, we consider voting against the appointment of top executives.
●
We generally vote against bonuses for statutory auditors at a company with Board of
Statutory Auditors and audit committee board members at a company with Audit Committee.
●
We separately consider voting to audit committee board members at a company with three
Committees.
(2)
Stock incentive plans
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning stock incentive plans, including stock
options and restricted stock units, taking into account the impact on shareholder value and rights,
compensation levels, the scope, the rationales, and so on.
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to lower the strike price of stock options.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to change the strike price on condition that shareholders’ approval is required every time.
●
We generally vote against stock incentive plans if the terms and conditions for exercising
options, including equity dilution, lack transparency. We generally consider voting against
proposals potentially causing 10% or more equity dilution.
●
It is desirable that stock incentive plans is a long-term incentive aligned with sustainable
growth and corporate value expansion. As such, we generally vote against stock incentive plans
allowing recipients to exercise all the rights within two years after vested for the subject
fiscal year. However,
this shall not apply to recipients who retire during the subject fiscal year. We assess
the validity if a vesting period is regarded as too long.
●
We generally vote against stock incentive plans granted to statutory auditors and
audit committee board members at a company with Audit Committee.
●
We separately consider stock incentive plans granted to audit committee board members,
including both inside and outside directors, at a company with three Committees.
●
We generally vote against stock incentive plans granted to any third parties other
than employees.
●
We generally vote against stock incentive plans in case a company is likely to adopt
the plans as takeover defense.
(3)
Employee stock purchase plan
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning employee stock purchase plans, taking
into account the impact on shareholder value and rights, the scope and the rationales, and so on.
(4)
Retirement benefits for board directors
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning grant of retirement benefits, taking
into account the scope and scandals (if any) of recipients and business performance and scandals (if
any) of the subject company, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals granting retirement benefits if all the following
criteria are satisfied.
●
The granted amount is disclosed.
●
Outside directors, statutory auditors and audit committee board members at a company
with Audit Committees are excluded.
●
Recipients do not cause any significant scandals during their tenures.
●
The subject company does not make a loss for the three consecutive years, or its business
performance is not determined to significantly lag behind the peers in the same industry.
●
The company does not cause scandals that significantly impact society and damage,
or are unlikely to damage, shareholder value during their tenures.
●
The company does not engage in window-dressing or inadequate accounting practices
during their tenures.
If a company holds shares for the sake of business relations (cross shareholdings),
the company should explain the medium- to long-term business and financial strategies, including capital
costs, and disclose proxy voting guidelines, voting results, and so on. If the company does not give reasonable
explanations and engage in constructive dialogues, we consider voting against the appointment of
top executives. It is important that the company does not hinder the sales/reduction of cross shareholdings
when a policy shareholder intends.
●
If a company's cross shareholdings account for 20% or more of its net assets, we generally
consider voting against the appointment of top executives. However, this shall not apply if
we confirm that the company makes a reduction, does sufficient planning or has industry- specific circumstances
that should be taken into consideration in engagement.
As a listed companies’ capital policy is likely to significantly impact shareholder value and interests, a company should implement a rational capital policy and explain capital policy guidelines
to shareholders. We consider voting against proposals concerning capital policies that we judge damage
shareholder value. If a
company has a capital policy that is not part of proposals at an AGM but regarded
to damage shareholder value, we consider voting against the reappointment of board directors.
●
It is undesirable that a company intends to maintain or increase so-called “friendly” stable shareholders and infringes minority shareholders’ rights by the third-party allotment, treasury stocks transfer or company management holdings’ transfer to foundations affiliated with the company.
(1)
Change in authorized shares
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to increase authorized shares, taking into
account the impact on shareholder value and rights, the rationales, the impact on the sustainability
of stock market listing and a going concern, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to increase authorized shares if we judge
that not increasing authorized shares is likely to lead to delisting or have a significant impact on a
going concern.
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to increase authorized shares after an
acquirer emerges.
●
We decide how to vote on new share issues, taking into account the rationales, the
terms and conditions of issues, the impact of dilution on shareholder value and rights and the impact on
the sustainability of stock market listing or a going concern, and so on.
(3)
Share repurchase and reissue
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning share repurchase or reissue, taking
into account the rationales, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking a stock split.
(5)
Consolidation of shares (reverse stock split)
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking consolidation of shares, taking into account
the rationale, and so on.
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to issue blank-cheque preferred shares
or increase authorized shares without specifying voting rights, dividends, conversion and other
rights.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to issue preferred shares or increase authorized
shares if voting rights, dividends, conversion and other rights are specified, and those rights are
regarded as reasonable.
●
We generally vote for proposals requiring approvals for preferred shares issues from
shareholders.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to issue convertible bonds, taking into
account the number of new shares, the time to maturity, and so on.
(8) Corporate bonds and credit facilities
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning a corporate bond issue or a credit facility
expansion, taking into account the subject company’s financial conditions, and so on.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to change the number of authorized shares
or issue shares for debt restructuring, taking into account the terms and conditions of the change
or the issue, the impact
on shareholder value and rights, the rationales, the impact on the sustainability
of stock market listing and a going concern, and so on.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning capital reduction, taking into account
the impact on shareholder value and rights, the rationales and the impact on the sustainability
of stock market listing and a going concern, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking capital reduction following standard accounting
procedures.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning a financing plan, taking into account
the impact on shareholder value and rights, the rationales and the impact on the sustainability
of stock market listing and a going concern, and so on.
(12) Capitalization of reserves
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking capitalization of reserves, taking into
account the rationales, and so on.
10. Amendment to Articles of Incorporation and Other Legal Documents
(1) Change in an accounting period
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to change an accounting period unless it is
regarded as an aim to delay an AGM.
(2) Amendment to articles of incorporation
●
We decide how to vote on proposals to amend an article of incorporation, taking into
account the impact on shareholder value and rights, the necessity, the rationales, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to amend an article of incorporation if it
is required by law.
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to amend an article of incorporation if
we judge that it is likely to infringe shareholder rights or damage shareholder value.
●
We generally vote for transition to a company with three Committees.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to relax or eliminate special resolution
requirements, taking into account the rationale.
●
We are concerned about retired directors assuming advisory, consulting, or other similar
positions which could negatively impact on transparency and decision making of the Board of
Directors. We generally vote against proposals seeking to create such a position.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to authorize a company to hold virtual-only
meetings, taking into account the impact on shareholder value and rights.
●
We will consider, among other things, a company’s practices, jurisdiction and disclosure, including the items set forth below:
●
meeting procedures and requirements are disclosed in advance of a meeting detailing
the rationale for eliminating the in-person meeting,
●
safeguard and clear and comprehensive description as to how and when shareholders
submit and ask questions either in advance of or during the meeting,
●
disclosure regarding procedures for questions received during the meeting, but not
answered due to time or other restrictions, and
●
description of how shareholder rights will be protected in a virtual-only meeting
format including the ability to vote on proposals during the time the polls are open.
(3) Change in a quorum for an annual general meeting (AGM)
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning change in quorum for an AGM, taking
into account the impact on shareholder value and rights, and so on.
11. Company Organization Change
(1) Change in a registered company name and address
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to change a registered company name, taking
into account the impact on shareholder value, and so on.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to change a registered address.
(2) Company reorganization
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the following company reorganization,
taking into account their respective impacts on shareholder value and rights, the subject company’s financial conditions and business performance, and the sustainability of stock market listing
or a going concern, and so on.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals concerning the appointment of directors with opposition
candidates, taking into account their independence, competence, anti-social activity records (if
any), corporate governance practices and accountability of the candidates and business performance
and anti-social activity records (if any) of the subject company, the proxy fight background, and
so on.
(2)
Proxy context defense
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to introduce a classified board.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to set a director's term of one year.
●
Shareholder rights to remove a director
●
We generally vote against proposals seeking to tighten requirements for shareholders
to remove a director.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to introduce cumulative voting for director
appointments, taking into account the background, and so on.
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to terminate cumulative voting for director
appointment, taking into account the background, and so on.
We believe that management and shareholder interest is not always aligned. As such,
we generally vote against the creation, amendment and renewal of takeover defense measures that we judge
decrease shareholder value or infringes shareholder rights. We generally vote against the reappointment
of directors if takeover defense measures are not part of proposals at an AGM but are regarded to
decrease shareholder value or infringes shareholder rights.
●
Relaxing requirements to amend articles of incorporation and company policies
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to relax requirements to amend articles
of incorporation or company policies, taking into account the impact on shareholder value and rights,
and so on.
●
Relaxing of requirements for merger approval
●
We decide how to vote on proposals seeking to relaxing requirements for merger approval,
taking into account the impact on shareholder value and rights, and so on.
14. Environment, Social and Governance (ESG)
We support the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) and acknowledge
that company’s ESG practices are an important factor in investment decision making. Thus, we consider voting against the reappointment of top executives and directors in charge if we judge that
there is an issue that could significantly damage corporate value. We consider voting for proposals related
to ESG materiality, including climate change or diversity, if we judge that such proposals contribute
to preventing from damaging or expanding corporate value. If not, we consider voting against such proposals.
Disclosure and constructive dialogues based thereon are important in proxy voting
and investment decision making. Furthermore, proactive disclosure and effective engagement are desirable as
demand for ESG disclosure, including climate change, has been increasing, and the disclosure frameworks
have been rapidly progressing.
●
We generally vote against proposals that lack sufficient disclosure to make proxy
voting decisions.
●
We generally vote for proposals seeking to enhance disclosures if such information
is beneficial to shareholders.
●
If a company’s financial and non-financial disclosures is significantly poor, and if the level of investor relations activities by management or people in charge is significantly low, we consider
voting against the reappointment of top executives and directors in charge.
We abstain from voting proxies of the following companies that are likely to have
a conflict of interest. We also abstain from voting proxies with respect to the following investment trusts that
are managed by us or Invesco group companies, as a conflict of interest may rise.
●
Companies and investment trusts that we abstain from voting proxies:
We have established the Conflict of Interest Management Policy. In the situation that
may give rise to a conflict of interest, we aim to control it in the best interests of clients (investors)
and beneficiaries. The Compliance department is responsible for governing company-wide control of a conflict
of interest. The Compliance department is independent of the Investment and Sales departments and shall
not receive any
command or order for the matters compliant with the laws and regulations, including
a conflict of interest, from the Investment and Sales departments.
Proxy voting and stewardship activities are reported to the Responsible Investment
Committee. The Responsible Investment Committee approves them. Besides, the Compliance department
reviews whether conflicts of interest are properly managed in proxy voting and then reports the results
to the Conflict of Interest Oversight Committee. Furthermore, the results are reported to the Executive
Committee in Tokyo and the Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee.
17. Shareholder Proposals
We vote on a case-by-case basis on shareholder proposals while we follow the Proxy
Voting Guidelines in principle.
DISCLAIMER: The English version is a translation of the original in Japanese for information
purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Japanese original will prevail. You can
download the Japanese version from our website: http://www.invesco.co.jp/footer/proxy.html.
WHEREAS, the Trust
is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as a closed-end management investment
company;
WHEREAS, the Adviser
is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), as an investment adviser and engages
in the business of acting as an investment adviser;
WHEREAS, the Trust
and the Adviser desire to enter into an agreement to provide for investment advisory services to the Trust upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth; and
NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:
(b) obtain
and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise,
whether affecting the economy generally or the Trust, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the
assets of the Trust or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Adviser considers desirable
for inclusion in the Trust’s assets;
(c) determine
which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Trust’s investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board
of Trustees;
(d) formulate
and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board
of Trustees; and
(e) take,
on behalf of the Trust, all actions which appear to the Trust necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory
functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Trust.
As compensation
for such services provided by the Adviser in connection with securities lending activities, the Trust shall pay the Adviser a fee equal
to 25% of the net monthly interest or fee income retained or paid to the Trust from such activities.
(a) all
applicable provisions of the 1940 Act and the Advisers Act and any rules and regulations adopted thereunder;
(b) the
provisions of the registration statement of the Trust, as the same may be amended from time to time under the Securities Act of 1933 and
the 1940 Act;
(c) the
provisions of the Trust’s Declaration of Trust, as the same may be amended from time to time;
(d) the
provisions of the by-laws of the Trust, as the same may be amended from time to time; and
(e) any other applicable provisions of state, federal or foreign law.
(a) The
Adviser’s primary consideration in effecting a security transaction will be to obtain the best execution.
(b) In
selecting a broker-dealer to execute each particular transaction, the Adviser will take the following into consideration: the best
net price available; the reliability, integrity and financial condition of the broker-dealer; the size of and the difficulty in
executing the order; and the value of the expected contribution of the broker-dealer to the investment performance of the Trust on a
continuing basis. Accordingly, the price to the Trust in any transaction may be less favorable than that available from another
broker-dealer if the difference is reasonably justified by other aspects of the fund execution services offered.
(c) Subject
to such policies as the Board of Trustees may from time to time determine, the Adviser shall not be deemed to have acted unlawfully or
to have breached any duty created by this Agreement or otherwise solely by reason of its having caused the Trust to pay a broker or dealer
that provides brokerage and research services to the Adviser an amount of commission for effecting a fund investment transaction in excess
of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, if the Adviser determines in good
faith that such amount of commission was reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker
or dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the Adviser’s overall responsibilities with respect to the Trust,
and to other clients of the Adviser as to which the Adviser exercises investment discretion. The Adviser is further authorized to allocate
the orders placed by it on behalf of the Trust to such brokers and dealers who also provide research or statistical material, or other
services to the Trust, to the Adviser, or to any sub-adviser. Such allocation shall be in such amounts and proportions as the Adviser
shall determine and the Adviser will report on said allocations regularly to the Board of Trustees indicating the brokers to whom such
allocations have been made and the basis therefor.
(d) With
respect to the Trust, to the extent the Adviser does not delegate trading responsibility to one or more sub-advisers, in making decisions
regarding broker-dealer relationships, the Adviser may take into consideration the recommendations of any sub-adviser appointed to provide
investment research or advisory services in connection with the Trust, and may take into consideration any research services provided
to such sub-adviser by broker-dealers.
(e) Subject
to the other provisions of this Section 8, the 1940 Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and rules and regulations thereunder,
as such statutes, rules and regulations are amended from time to time or are interpreted from time to time by the staff of the SEC,
any exemptive orders issued by the SEC, and any other applicable provisions of law, the Adviser may select brokers or dealers with which
it or the Trust are affiliated.
(a) (i) by
the Board of Trustees or (ii) by the vote of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the Trust (as defined
in Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act); and
(b) by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as defined
in the 1940 Act) of a party to this Agreement (other than as trustees of the Trust), by votes cast in person at a meeting specifically
called for such purpose.
16. Liability
of Adviser and Trust. In the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of obligations or
duties hereunder on the part of the Adviser or any of its officers, directors or employees, the Adviser shall not be subject to liability
to the Trust or to any shareholder of the Trust for any act or omission in the course of, or connected with, rendering services hereunder
or for any losses that may be sustained in the purchase, holding or sale of any security.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate by their respective officers on the day and year first written
above.
The Trust shall pay the Adviser, out
of its assets, as full compensation for all services rendered, an advisory fee for the Trust set forth below.
“Managed assets” for this
purpose means the Trust’s net assets, plus assets attributable to outstanding preferred shares and the amount of any borrowings
incurred for the purpose of leverage (whether or not such borrowed amounts are reflected in the Trust’s financial statements for
purposes of generally accepted accounting principles).
NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows:
(a) In
all matters relating to the performance of this Contract, each Sub-Adviser will act in conformity with the Agreement and Declaration
of Trust, By-Laws and Registration Statement of the Trust and with the instructions and directions of the Adviser and the Board and will
comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act, the rules, regulations, exemptive orders and no-action positions thereunder, and all other
applicable laws and regulations.
(b) Each
Sub-Adviser shall maintain compliance procedures for the Trust that it and the Adviser reasonably believe are adequate to ensure compliance
with the federal securities laws (as defined in Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act) and the investment objective(s) and policies as
stated in the Trust’s prospectuses and statement of additional information. Each Sub-Adviser at its expense will provide the Adviser
or the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer with such compliance reports relating to its duties under this Contract as may be requested
from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Sub-Adviser will promptly report to the Adviser any material violations of the
federal securities laws (as defined in Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act) that it is or should be aware of or of any material violation
of the Sub-Adviser’s compliance policies and procedures that pertain to the Trust.
(c) Each
Sub-Adviser at its expense will make available to the Board and the Adviser at reasonable times its portfolio managers and other appropriate
personnel, either in person or, at the mutual convenience of the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser, by telephone, in order to review the investment
policies, performance and other investment related information regarding the Trust and to consult with the Board and the Adviser regarding
the Trust’s investment affairs, including economic, statistical and investment matters related to the Sub-Adviser’s duties
hereunder, and will provide periodic reports to the Adviser relating to the investment strategies it employs. Each Sub-Adviser and its
personnel shall also cooperate fully with counsel and auditors for, and the Chief Compliance Officer of, the Adviser and the Trust.
(d) Each
Sub-Adviser will assist in the fair valuation of portfolio securities held by the Trust. The Sub-Adviser will use its reasonable efforts
to provide, based upon its own expertise, and to arrange with parties independent of the Sub-Adviser such as broker-dealers for the provision
of, valuation information or prices for securities for which prices are deemed by the Adviser or the Trust’s administrator not
to be readily available in the ordinary course of business from an automated pricing service. In addition, each Sub-Adviser will assist
the Trust and its agents in determining whether prices obtained for valuation purposes accurately reflect market price information relating
to the assets of the Trust at such times as the Adviser shall reasonably request, including but not limited to, the hours after the close
of a securities market and prior to the daily determination of the Trust’s net asset value per share.
(e) Each
Sub-Adviser represents and warrants that it has adopted a code of ethics meeting the requirements of Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act
and the requirements of Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act and has provided the Adviser and the Board a copy of such code of ethics,
together with evidence of its adoption, and will promptly provide copies of any changes thereto, together with evidence of their adoption.
Upon request of the Adviser, but in any event no less frequently than annually, each Sub-Adviser will supply the Adviser a written report
that (A) describes any issues arising under the code of ethics or procedures since the Sub-Adviser’s last report, including
but not limited to material violations of the code of ethics or procedures and sanctions imposed in response to the material violations;
and (B) certifies that the procedures contained in the Sub-Adviser’s code of ethics are reasonably designed to prevent “access
persons” from violating the code of ethics.
(f) Upon
request of the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser will review draft reports to shareholders and other documents provided or available to it and
provide comments on a timely basis. In addition, each Sub-Adviser and each officer and portfolio manager thereof designated by the Adviser
will provide on a timely basis such certifications or sub-certifications as the Adviser may reasonably request in order to support and
facilitate certifications required to be provided by the Trust’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and
will adopt such disclosure controls and procedures in support of the disclosure controls and procedures adopted by the Trust as the Adviser,
on behalf of the Trust, deems are reasonably necessary.
(g) Unless
otherwise directed by the Adviser or the Board, each Sub-Adviser will vote all proxies received in accordance with the Adviser’s
proxy voting policy or, if the Sub-Adviser has a proxy voting policy approved by the Board, the Sub-Adviser’s proxy voting policy.
Each Sub-Adviser shall maintain and shall forward to the Trust or itsdesignated agent such proxy voting information as is necessary for
the Trust to timely file proxy voting results in accordance with Rule 30b1-4 of the 1940 Act.
(h) Each
Sub-Adviser shall provide the Trust’s custodian on each business day with information relating to all transactions concerning the
assets of the Trust and shall provide the Adviser with such information upon request of the Adviser.
(a) The
only fees payable to the Sub-Advisers under this Contract are for providing discretionary investment management services pursuant to
paragraph 2(c) above. For such services, the Adviser will pay each Sub-Adviser a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, equal to
(i) 40% of the monthly compensation that the Adviser receives from the Trust pursuant to its advisory agreement with the Trust,
multiplied by (ii) the fraction equal to the net assets of the Trust as to which the Sub-Adviser shall have provided discretionary
investment management services pursuant to paragraph 2(c) above for that month divided by the net assets of the Trust for that month.
This fee shall be payable on or before the last business day of the next succeeding calendar month. This fee shall be reduced to reflect
contractual or voluntary fee waivers or expense limitations by the Adviser, if any, in effect from time to time as set forth in paragraph
9 below. In no event shall the aggregate monthly fees paid to the Sub-Advisers under this Contract exceed 40% of the monthly compensation
that the Adviser receives from the Trust pursuant to its advisory agreement with the Trust, as reduced to reflect contractual or voluntary
fee waivers or expense limitations by the Adviser, if any.
(b) If
this Contract becomes effective or terminates before the end of any month, the fees for the period from the effective date to the end
of the month or from the beginning of such month to the date of termination, as the case may be, shall be prorated according to the proportion
which such period bears to the full month in which such effectiveness or termination occurs.
(c) If
a Sub-Adviser provides the services under paragraph 2(c) above to a Trust for a period that is less than a full month, the fees
for such period shall be prorated according to the proportion which such period bears to the applicable full month.
(a) This
Contract shall become effective with respect to each Sub-Adviser upon the later of the date hereabove written and the date that such
Sub-Adviser is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act, if a Sub-Adviser is not so registered as of the
date hereabove written; provided, however, that this Contract shall not take effect with respect to the Trust unless it has first been
approved (i) by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on
such approval, and (ii) by vote of a majority of the Trust’s outstanding voting securities, when required by the 1940 Act.
(b) Unless
sooner terminated as provided herein, this Contract shall continue in force and effect until June 30, 2021. Thereafter, if not terminated,
with respect to the Trust, this Contract shall continue automatically for successive periods not to exceed twelve months each, provided
that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually (i) by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees, cast in
person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, and (ii) by the Board or by vote of a majority of the outstanding
voting securities of the Trust.
(c) Notwithstanding
the foregoing, with respect to the Trust or any Sub-Adviser(s), this Contract may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any
penalty, (i) by vote of the Board or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Trust on sixty days’
written notice to such Sub-Adviser(s); or (ii) by the Adviser on sixty days’ written notice to such Sub-Adviser(s); or (iii) by
a Sub-Adviser on sixty days’ written notice to the Trust. Should this Contract be terminated with respect to a Sub-Adviser, the
Adviser shall assume the duties and responsibilities of such Sub-Adviser unless and until the Adviser appoints another Sub-Adviser to
perform such duties and responsibilities. Termination of this Contract with respect to one or more Sub-Adviser(s) shall not affect
the continued effectiveness of this Contract with respect to any remaining Sub-Adviser(s). This Contract will automatically terminate
in the event of its assignment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed by their officers designated as of the day and year first above written.
Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.
Invesco Canada Ltd.
Invesco Income
Advantage U.S. Fund
Invesco Short Duration High Yield Municipal
Fund Invesco Short Term Municipal Fund
Invesco Oppenheimer V.I. International Growth
Fund
Invesco® V.I. NASDAQ 100 Buffer Fund - December
Invesco®
V.I. Nasdaq 100 Buffer Fund - June
Invesco® V.I. Nasdaq 100 Buffer Fund - March
Invesco® V.I. Nasdaq 100 Buffer Fund
- September
Invesco® V.I. S&P 500 Buffer Fund - December
Invesco® V.I. S&P 500 Buffer Fund -
June
Invesco® V.I. S&P 500 Buffer Fund - March
Invesco®
V.I. S&P 500 Buffer Fund - September
Invesco V.I. American Franchise Fund
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
Invesco V.I. Capital Appreciation
Fund
Invesco V.I. Conservative Balanced Fund
Invesco V.I. Comstock Fund
Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund
Invesco V.I. Core Plus Bond Fund
Invesco V.I. Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
Invesco V.I. Diversified
Dividend Fund
Invesco V.I. Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund
Invesco V.I. Equity and Income Fund
Invesco V.I. EQV International Equity
Fund
Invesco V.I. Global Core Equity Fund
Invesco V.I. Global Fund
Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund
Invesco V.I. Global Strategic
Income Fund
Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund
Invesco V.I. Growth and Income Fund
Invesco V.I. Health Care Fund
Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund
Invesco V.I. Main Street Fund ®
Invesco V.I. Main Street Mid Cap Fund®
Invesco V.I. Main Street Small Cap Fund®
Invesco V.I. Small Cap
Equity Fund
Invesco V.I. Technology Fund
(a) In
the event the Custodian becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, the transfer or assignment of this Agreement
(and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) by the Custodian will be effective to the same
extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement (and any interest and obligation
in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States;
and
(b) In
the event the Custodian or an Affiliate of the Custodian becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, Default
Rights with respect to this Agreement that may be exercised against the Custodian are permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than
the Default Rights could be exercised under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement (and any interest and obligation in or
under, and any property securing, this Agreement) were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States.
“Affiliate” has the meaning
given in section 2(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. §1841(k)) and section 225.2(a) of the Federal Reserve
Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR § 225.2(a)).
(i) right of a party, whether
contractual or otherwise (including, without limitation, rights incorporated by reference to any other contract, agreement, or document,
and rights afforded by statute, civil code, regulation, and common law), to liquidate, terminate, cancel, rescind, or accelerate such
agreement or transactions thereunder, set off or net amounts owing in respect thereto (except rights related to same-day payment netting),
exercise remedies in respect of collateral or other credit support or property related thereto (including the purchase and sale of property),
demand payment or delivery thereunder or in respect thereof (other than a right or operation of a contractual provision arising solely
from a change in the value of collateral or margin or a change in the amount of an economic exposure), suspend, delay, or defer payment
or performance thereunder, or modify the obligations of a party thereunder, or any similar rights; and
(ii) right
or contractual provision that alters the amount of collateral or margin that must be provided with respect to an exposure
thereunder, including by altering any initial amount, threshold amount, variation margin, minimum transfer amount, the margin value
of collateral, or any similar amount, that entitles a party to demand the return of any collateral or margin transferred by it to the other party or a custodian or that modifies
a transferee's right to reuse collateral or margin (if such right previously existed), or any similar rights, in each case, other than
a right or operation of a contractual provision arising solely from a change in the value of collateral or margin or a change in the amount
of an economic exposure.
“ISDA” refers to the International Swaps and
Derivatives Association, Inc.
“ISDA Protocol” means the
ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol as published by ISDA as of July 31, 2018.
“U.S. Special Resolution Regime”
means the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. §1811–1835a) and regulations promulgated thereunder and Title II of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. § 5381–5394) and regulations promulgated thereunder.
This Memorandum of Agreement
is entered into as of the effective date on the attached Exhibit A (the “Exhibit”), between AIM Counselor Series Trust
(Invesco Counselor Series Trust), AIM Equity Funds (Invesco Equity Funds), AIM Funds Group (Invesco Funds Group), AIM Growth Series (Invesco
Growth Series), AIM International Mutual Funds (Invesco International Mutual Funds), AIM Investment Funds (Invesco Investment Funds),
AIM Investment Securities Funds (Invesco Investment Securities Funds), AIM Sector Funds (Invesco Sector Funds), AIM Tax-Exempt Funds (Invesco
Tax-Exempt Funds), AIM Treasurer's Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust), AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco
Variable Insurance Funds), Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II, Invesco Bond Fund, Invesco California Value Municipal
Income Trust, Invesco Dynamic Credit Opportunity Fund, Invesco Exchange Fund, Invesco High Income Trust II, Invesco Management
Trust, Invesco Municipal Income Opportunities Trust, Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust, Invesco Municipal Trust, Invesco
Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust, Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust, Invesco Senior Income Trust, Invesco
Trust for Investment Grade Municipals, Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals and Invesco Value Municipal Income
Trust (each a “Trust” or, collectively, the “Trusts”), on behalf of the funds listed on the Exhibit to this
Memorandum of Agreement (the “Funds”), and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (“Invesco”). Invesco shall and hereby agrees
to waive fees of the Funds, on behalf of their respective classes as applicable, severally and not jointly, as indicated in the Exhibit.
For and in consideration of
the mutual terms and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Trusts and Invesco agree that until at least the expiration date set forth on the Exhibit (the “Expiration
Date”) and with respect to those Funds listed on the Exhibit, Invesco will waive its advisory fees at the rate set forth on
the Exhibit.
Neither a Trust nor Invesco
may remove or amend the waivers set forth on the Exhibit to a Fund’s detriment prior to the Expiration Date without requesting
and receiving the approval of the Board of Trustees of the applicable Fund’s Trust to remove or amend such waiver. Invesco will
not have any right to reimbursement of any amount so waived.
Subject to the foregoing paragraphs, Invesco
agrees to review the then-current waivers for each class of the Funds listed on the Exhibit on a date prior to the Expiration Date
to determine whether such waivers should be amended, continued or terminated. The waivers will expire upon the Expiration Date unless
Invesco has agreed to continue them. The Exhibit will be amended to reflect any such agreement.
It is expressly agreed that
the obligations of the Trusts hereunder shall not be binding upon any of the trustees, shareholders, nominees, officers, agents or employees
of the Trusts personally, but shall only bind the assets and property of the Funds, as provided in each Trust’s Agreement and Declaration
of Trust. The execution and delivery of this Memorandum of Agreement have been authorized by the trustees of each Trust, and this Memorandum
of Agreement has been executed and delivered by an authorized officer of each Trust acting as such; neither such authorization by such
trustees nor such execution and delivery by such officer shall be deemed to have been made by any of them individually or to impose any
liability on any of them personally, but shall bind only the assets and property of the Funds, as provided in each Trust’s Agreement
and Declaration of Trust.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of
the Trusts, on behalf of itself and its Funds listed on Exhibit A to this Memorandum of Agreement, and Invesco have entered into
this Memorandum of Agreement as of the Effective Date on the attached Exhibit.
This Amendment No. 2
(“Amendment”), dated October 1, 2019, hereby amends that certain Transfer Agency and Service Agreement by and among each
of the Invesco Closed-End Investment Companies, severally and not jointly set forth in Schedule A thereto (each such investment
company, a “Fund’’), and Computershare Inc., and its fully owned subsidiary Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
(collectively, “Agent”, and individually, “Computershare” and the “Trust Company”, respectively,
dated October 1, 2016 (the “Agreement’’).
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as parties
to the Agreement; and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and in compliance with the Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows;
Rev. 8/27/2019