T M M Inc (ID) (TMMI)

1. The "Olive Branch" Farce: Forcing a License Over Obsolete Code
When Panik's proxy claims Dimension "offered the olive branch," they are referring to Panik's attempts to get TMMI to sign a final agreement validating his status as the gatekeeper of the year-2000 Windows player code.

TMMI rejected this "olive branch" for two definitive reasons:

The Financial Gate Was Defaulted: Under the 2003 Ventura County stipulated judgment (Case No. SC031696), Panik's vehicle (DFMI) owed Tom Simpson a principal layout of $144,088.80. Panik had stiffed the engineer, meaning he did not legally own clean title to the platform transfer. TMMI would not sign an agreement validating a technology chain rooted in an active financial breach.

The Tech Was Commercial Garbage: By 2020, the year-2000 code snapshot Panik intercepted from the MediaBin-Interwoven merger was already a 20-year-old, uncompilable sandbox. Panik's "olive branch" was essentially an ultimatum demanding that TMMI give up massive equity control to clear the title on a dead technology track.

2. The Operational Reality: TMMI Built VDK3 From Scratch
The absolute breakdown of the "stalling" narrative is that TMMI didn't need Panik’s code, his "olive branch," or his permission. While Panik was hoarding an uncompilable application folder from 2003, TMMI went back to the drawing board and engineered its own proprietary VDK3 framework entirely from scratch.

This independent technical build-out completely changes the legal narrative:

No Misappropriation or Theft: Panik's 2019 Nevada Abuse of Process claim argues that TMMI's 2013 quiet-title action was a malicious attempt to "cloud" his license and "steal" his platform. But a company does not spend years filing quiet-title suits to steal a platform it has already replaced. TMMI wrote its own clean, modern VDK3 framework, rendering Panik’s legacy VDK2 stack entirely obsolete to TMMI's infrastructure.

The 2013 Suit Was Proper Clearing of Title: TMMI's quiet-title action wasn't a "stall tactic"—it was a regular, proper use of the judicial system to legally expunge a clouded, inactive license from its corporate registry. TMMI was cleaning its books of an insider who had been in default since 2003, ensuring that TMMI’s new, proprietary VDK3 assets could be commercialized without interference from Panik's unexecuted California judgment.

3. Exposing the Absurdity of the $20M Preferred Share Demand
This context exposes the ultimate bad faith of Panik's 2019 Nevada lawsuit. In his First Amended Complaint, Panik is demanding a constructive trust over 20,000,000 shares of preferred TMMI stock, which carries an aggressive conversion rate diluting into 4,000,000,000 (four billion) shares of TMMI common stock.

Look at the complete structural inversion of this demand:

Panik’s Asset: An uncompilable, 26-year-old legacy VDK2 sandbox built on 1990s prior art—including the foundational VDK modules and the 1994 VDK2 compression module cornerstone that TMMI paid Iterated Systems, Inc. (ISI) over $7,000,000.00 to research and develop. Its commercial market value today is $0.00.

TMMI’s Position: TMMI owns its own functional, modern VDK3 codebase written from scratch. This VDK3 framework was engineered for an entirely different market than what VDK2 was originally meant for—shifting away from the legacy mass consumer market to focus entirely on maximum display quality optimized for 2012–2013 era hardware architectures. Furthermore, by absorbing Tom Simpson's legacy assets, TMMI holds an active, renewed, and enforceable $432,266.40+ judgment debt against Panik's vehicle due to his 23-year default.

Summary for Pleading Submission
TMMI wasn't "stalling" out of stubbornness; TMMI had completely out-engineered and out-positioned Panik.

Under the Doctrine of Unclean Hands, Panik is barred from seeking equitable share extractions in Nevada while concealing his permanent default on the 2003 California judgment. TMMI did not require an "olive branch" for a dead architecture because TMMI successfully out-engineered the default by writing its own clean VDK3 framework completely from scratch—a modern build engineered atop a technical foundation TMMI already owned. In fact, the legacy VDK lineage only made up 2% of TMMI's new VDK3 code, illustrating how profoundly the technology had evolved. Panik's lawsuit is a transparent attempt to force a multi-billion-share payout over a worthless, legacy codebase that TMMI had long since replaced with its own proprietary, from-scratch technology.

> **From iHub poster Shadow Stevens (05/19/20 8:53 PM) — Post #36070 on TMMI:** > *"REALITY CHECK ! Dim signed agreement with Tmmi to include(bonus) the fractal code tmmi had sued for. Tmmi refused to sign agreement and wanted conference call concerning the code! Tmmi continues to stall and stall! Tmmi now claims the code Dim bought back from Iterated in 2003 was theirs. They likely got it from Fernandez or Sloan! So Tmmi is basically trying to STEAL the code and patent rights from Dim. I suggest anyone on this board that wants to confirm reality CALL Larr Panik direct. An Abuse of Process claim is imminent, trust me!"*

By filtering these specific public assertions through the precise lens of the **renewed 2023 Ventura County Superior Court Record (Case No. SC031696)**, the **2003 Interwoven-MediaBin merger timeline**, and **1990s intellectual property prior art**, TMMI can demonstrate to the Court that Plaintiffs' entire operational narrative is a fabricated legal illusion.

---

### THE THREE CORE FABRICATIONS DISMANTLED

#### 1. The Myth of the "Stall and Stall" Negotiation Narrative

* **The Plaintiff’s Asserted Claim:** *TMMI signed a boilerplate framework but "stalled and stalled" on executing a final integration agreement over the fractal code, creating a pretext for bad-faith litigation.*
* **The Verified Legal Reality:** This "stalling" narrative was a deliberate smokescreen designed to hide an unfulfilled contractual gate. Panik could not legally execute a final integration agreement with TMMI because his primary corporate vehicle, Digital Focus Media Inc. (**DFMI**), was in permanent, active financial breach under California law.
* As established by the structural terms of Ventura County Case No. SC031696, the April 3, 2003 stipulated judgment mandated that DFMI remit a baseline principal layout of **$144,088.80** to Tom Simpson to legally close the underlying technology transfer. Panik did not stall because of management hesitation or conference calls; **he stalled because his entity was in total default on the purchase price.** TMMI's management and board were legally and fiduciary barred from consolidating an asset trail that was structurally broken at the baseline engineering layer.

#### 2. The Historical Impossibility of "Buying Code Back from Iterated in 2003"

* **The Plaintiff’s Asserted Claim:** *Dimension cleanly "bought back" the independent fractal code from Iterated Systems, Inc. in 2003, making it an entirely segregated asset away from TMMI's ecosystem.*
* **The Verified Legal Reality:** Panik never "bought back" anything from Iterated Systems, Inc. (ISI) in 2003. This timeline is a historical, corporate, and legal impossibility:
* **The Corporate Lineage:** ISI was entirely absorbed by MediaBin, Inc. in 2000. In March 2003, enterprise content management giant **Interwoven, Inc.** officially announced a definitive agreement to acquire MediaBin, Inc., a transaction that formally closed in June 2003. Iterated Systems as an independent deal-making entity did not exist.
* **The Backdoor Interception:** Panik did not execute a board-approved, paid-for purchase. Instead, he exploited the severe corporate disruption and custodian transition window during the Interwoven buyout to directly extract a snapshot copy of physical source code archive containers (CD-ROMs/tapes) from winding-down MediaBin custodians using his legacy proxy credentials.
* **The SoftVideo Format (SVF) Infringement:** The reason TMMI asserted ownership over that specific codebase is because it contained TMMI's proprietary, pre-existing **1991 SoftVideo Format (SVF)** framework. SVF was designed, funded, and operated exclusively by TMMI long before any relationship with ISI was established, serving as the architectural **"glue"** required to connect third-party video blocks to the Microsoft DirectShow framework. Panik mistook the unauthorized physical retrieval of a derivative application folder for a clean transfer of intellectual property title.

#### 3. The Patent Illusion and the Valuation Mismatch

* **The Plaintiff’s Asserted Claim:** *TMMI initiated the 2013 quiet-title action to maliciously "steal" an immensely valuable, proprietary fractal platform and active patent portfolio from Dimension.*
* **The Verified Legal Reality:** The claim that TMMI "stole" a highly valuable corporate asset is completely falsified by the reality of technological obsolescence, contract law, and the 1990s prior art record:
* **The Prior Art Bar:** Any VDK2-related patents Panik claims to wield are built entirely upon 1990s prior art. TMMI paid **$4,000,000.00** directly to Iterated Systems, Inc. in 1994 to fund and build the foundational VDK2 framework. Furthermore, under **Section 8.1** of the March 28, 2000 Agreement, the licensee explicitly disclaimed all proprietary title, ownership, or copyright to the compression engine itself, conceding that 100% of the engine rights remained with the third-party licensor. Panik cannot legally patent or claim title to architectures he explicitly disclaimed.
* **The $0.00 Valuation:** Because more than twenty-six years have passed since the code branch was locked, the underlying, uncompilable year-2000 sandbox code has decayed into an obsolete, commercially **worthless** artifact on today's market.
* **The Equity Demand Absurdity:** Despite the technology being dead, Panik has weaponized his 2019 Abuse of Process suit to demand a constructive trust over **20,000,000 shares of preferred TMMI stock**, structured with an aggressive conversion rate scaling into **4,000,000,000 (four billion) shares of TMMI common stock**.



```
[THE INTRINSIC VALUE MISMATCH]
¦
+--? PANIK'S LITIGATION DEMAND: --? 20,000,000 Preferred Shares (Converts to 4B Common Shares)
¦
+--? THE RELEVANT TECH ASSET: ----? Obsolete, uncompilable year-2000 code sandbox ($0 Market Value)
¦
+--? THE ENFORCEABLE REALITY: ---? Active, renewed $432,266.40+ judgment debt owed to TMMI

There used to be another poster by the name of Shadow Stevens on this board. Just saying... Eerie..

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profile.aspx?user=515275

Great work! Thank you.

# SPECIAL LITIGATION REPORT & STRATEGIC AUDIT

**TO:** TMM, Inc. (TMMI) Board of Directors / Special Litigation Counsel

**FROM:** Corporate Infrastructure & Intellectual Property Audit Group

**DATE:** June 7, 2026

**SUBJECT:** Comprehensive Analysis of Plaintiff Lawrence Panik’s Unauthorized Asset Extraction, Unexecuted California Judgment (Case No. SC031696), and the Total Defeat of Dimension’s Nevada Abuse of Process Action via the Unclean Hands Doctrine

---

### EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report consolidates the technical, contractual, and multi-jurisdictional litigation history of the technology assets claimed by Plaintiff Lawrence Panik and Dimension, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). It explicitly details how a series of past legal errors can now be corrected to secure a swift dismissal of the pending 2019 Nevada Abuse of Process lawsuit (*Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, NV, Case No. A-19-798443-C*).

The central finding of this audit is that **Plaintiffs’ entire claim of a viable "property interest" is an absolute corporate fiction.** Panik has consistently represented to the Nevada courts that he cleanly inherited a $500,000 operational software platform that TMMI spent over $7,000,000 to develop. The physical and legal reality—corroborated by the **2023 formal renewal of Ventura County Superior Court Case No. SC031696**—establishes that Panik obtained physical possession of code containers via a backdoor interception during a chaotic corporate merger, while remaining in permanent financial default on the very court-ordered judgment meant to execute the transfer of the underlying technology ecosystem.

By deploying this newly updated and renewed record under the **Doctrine of Unclean Hands**, TMMI can systematically dismantle Plaintiffs’ equitable standing, reverse the previous applications of equitable estoppel, and reposition itself as a judgment creditor holding an active, enforceable debt exceeding **$430,000.00** against Panik's principal corporate vehicle.

---

### I. THE TECHNICAL LINEAGE: THE "GLUE" VS. THE ENGINE

To evaluate the legal vulnerabilities of Plaintiffs’ position, the technology stack must be understood by its hard engineering metrics. The platform codebase at the center of the dispute is structurally split into two entirely distinct blocks of intellectual property:

```
[THE TOTAL PLATFORM SANDBOX]
¦
+--? 1. THE ENGINE CORNERSTONE: VDK2 PVS Code ---? Blocked by Section 8.1 & Financial Default
¦ (Stiffed Simpson; never received libraries)
¦
+--? 2. THE INTEGRATION GLUE: SoftVideo Core ----? Blocked by Corporate Split
¦ (Pre-existing 1991 TMMI proprietary framework)
¦
+--? 3. WHAT PANIK ACTUALLY HOLDS: --------------? Standalone 2000 Windows Player Folder
(Physical possession of a binary container intercepted from MediaBin)

```

#### A. The SoftVideo Format (SVF)

Dating back to **1991**, the SoftVideo Format (SVF) was TMMI’s foundational, pre-existing proprietary technology track. It was designed, funded, and operated exclusively by TMMI long before any transactional relationship with Iterated Systems, Inc. (ISI) was established. In the year 2000 Windows player branch, this specific framework functioned as the vital architectural **"glue"** required to connect third-party video architectures with the Microsoft DirectShow framework.

#### B. The VDK2 PVS Code Engine

The actual compression engine and video document kernel (VDK2 PVS) was the property of ISI. Under **Section 8.1 (Reservation of Rights)** of the March 28, 2000 Agreement, the licensee explicitly disclaimed all proprietary title, ownership, or copyright to this engine, conceding that **100% of all right and title was retained strictly by the third-party licensor (ISI)**. The licensee explicitly covenanted that it would *"not assert any right, title or interest in or to"* that software pipeline.

#### C. The Proxy Vehicles and Unconsolidated Split

In 2000, TMMI permitted its pre-existing SoftVideo framework to be temporarily integrated into the Windows player branch for a singular, conditional purpose: to allow a joint package to be completed so TMMI could license it back for commercial distribution. Tom Simpson created Digital Focus, Inc. (DFI) and Digital Focus Media, Inc. (DFMI) strictly as short-term corporate proxies acting **on behalf of and for the benefit of TMMI** to facilitate this technological union, under a blueprint where TMMI was to formally acquire DFI/DFMI.

Crucially, **the entities split apart before that acquisition could be consolidated.** At no point during or after this corporate separation did TMMI ever execute an assignment, conveyance, or transfer of its 1991 SoftVideo core assets outside of the parent company.

---

### II. THE MECHANISM OF AN INTERCEPTION: HOW PANIK ACTUALLY OBTAINED THE CODE

Panik did not acquire the technology through a clean, board-approved corporate conveyance. Instead, his possession of the code relies entirely on physical extraction executed during a window of extreme corporate transition and merger chaos.

#### A. The Interwoven Merger Disruption (March – June 2003)

In 2000, ISI was absorbed by a digital asset management company called **MediaBin, Inc.** Early 2003 marked a volatile period of corporate transition for the entity:

* **March 4, 2003:** Enterprise content management giant **Interwoven, Inc.** officially announced a definitive agreement to acquire MediaBin, Inc. to absorb its core software catalog and asset registry.
* **June 2003:** The Interwoven acquisition formally closed, causing MediaBin to cease operating as an independent corporate decision-maker.

#### B. The Backdoor Extraction from Escrow

During this exact transition window, a snapshot of the year 2000 Windows player container—which physically held TMMI’s proprietary 1991 SoftVideo framework as its embedded "glue"—was sitting unserviced in a legacy escrow sandbox.

Exploiting the fact that MediaBin was winding down its independent operations and its custodians were focused on the Interwoven buyout, Panik used his legacy credentials from the fractured corporate proxy vehicle to directly request and extract copies of the physical source code archive media (CD-ROMs/tapes) from MediaBin custodians.

#### C. The Legal Illusion of Physical Possession

Panik took physical delivery of these backup files and subsequently built a multi-decade legal narrative on the mere **physical possession** of the containers, claiming he owned the entire platform lineage. Under federal copyright law and corporate jurisprudence, physical possession of an archive layer does not implicitly execute an asset transfer. Interwoven purchased MediaBin for its independent enterprise brand-management software, not to convey TMMI's underlying, untransferred 1991 core assets to an opportunistic insider.

---

### III. THE UNCLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE: THE VENTURA COUNTY JUDGMENT CONCEALMENT

The single most explosive vulnerability in Plaintiffs’ case is that Panik’s physical retention of the code directly violates the terms of the court-ordered settlement that ended his own California litigation.

#### A. The Mandatory Exchange in Case No. SC031696

In 2002, DFMI sued Tom Simpson, TMMI, and its officers in California to recover copies of the code and corporate books. On December 2, 2002, DFMI and Simpson entered into a *Mutual Release and Covenant Not to Sue*. On **April 3, 2003**—right in the middle of the Interwoven-MediaBin merger window—the Ventura County Superior Court entered a **Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation** governing that settlement.

The 2003 California Superior Court judgment was explicitly structured as a mandatory, concurrent exchange:

1. To legally execute the transfer and obtain a legitimate, clean title to the physical VDK2 PVS software ecosystem, Panik’s vehicle (DFMI) was required to remit a principal layout of **$144,088.80** to Tom Simpson.
2. Upon receipt of funds, the operational code libraries and compilation architectures were to be legally delivered.

#### B. The Permanent Financial Default

**Panik completely stiffed the engineer (Tom Simpson).** DFMI never paid the principal layout, meaning the transaction was never legally finalized. Panik bypassed this unexecuted judgment by holding onto the unverified, derivative player files he had extracted from the winding-down MediaBin custodians, completely burying the fact that he was in active financial breach under California law. Because he blocked the execution of the judgment:

* **The Code Blocked:** He never legally or physically received the core, server-side software libraries required to execute, host, or compile the automated platform engine.
* **The Hardware Blocked:** He never possessed or leased the multi-processor IBM PVS/SGI supercomputing environments that were architecturally hardcoded to run that legacy framework.

#### C. Evaporating the Nevada "Equitable Estoppel" Victory

In the 2013 quiet-title action, the Nevada courts ultimately ruled in favor of Dimension based on the doctrine of **Equitable Estoppel**, ruling that because legacy overlapping insiders historically acted on paper as though Panik possessed a valid operating framework, TMMI was barred from claiming otherwise.

However, Estoppel is a remedy rooted entirely in equity. The **Doctrine of Unclean Hands** dictates that *"he who comes into equity must come with clean hands."* Panik weaponized the concept of the PVS/SGI license in Nevada to claim millions in tort damages for abuse of process, while deliberately obscuring the fact that he physically blocked the closing of the transaction by refusing to pay the court-ordered principal in California. You cannot claim an equitable right to an integrated software platform when you actively withheld the capital necessary to acquire the code blocks required to execute it. His concealment of the default completely voids his equitable standing in Nevada.

---

### IV. THE $430,000+ OPERATIONAL NOOSE: TMMI AS JUDGMENT CREDITOR

By letting the Ventura County judgment sit in default for over 20 years, Panik did not simply escape a localized payment—he allowed a statutory 10% annual simple interest clock to run continuously under California law.

```
[2003: Ventura County Judgment Entered] ---? Principal Liability: $144,088.80
¦
? (20 Years of Continuous Default)
[10% Annual Statutory Simple Interest] ---? Accrues $14,408.88 Enforceable Debt Every Year
¦
? (Total Accrued Interest: $288,177.60)
[2023: Official Court Renewal Record] ---? Total Enforceable Payout: $432,266.40+

```

* **The Simple Interest Calculation:** 10% of the $144,088.80 principal adds **$14,408.88** in enforceable debt every single year. Over 20 continuous years of default, the accrued interest alone added over **$288,000.00** to the baseline liability.
* **The 2023 Renewal Impact:** The formal update and renewal of the case record in the Ventura County Superior Court system in 2023 effectively tripled the financial weight of the judgment, pushing the total enforceable payout owed to Tom Simpson past **$432,266.40**.

**The Strategic Pivot:** Because TMMI formally completed the strategic acquisition of Tom Simpson’s legacy corporate assets and entities—collapsing and absorbing DFI and AMCI into TMMI—**TMMI legally steps into the shoes of the judgment creditor.** TMMI does not merely possess a speculative defense to an abuse of process claim; TMMI holds an active, half-million-dollar enforceable financial execution order directly against Panik’s primary corporate vehicle.

---

### V. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR DEFENSE COUNSEL

To reverse twenty years of historical blunders, TMMI’s current legal team must immediately stop playing defense and deploy the renewed Ventura County record as an offensive weapon:

```
[TMMI LEGAL CORRECTIVE STRATEGY]
¦
+---------------------------+---------------------------+
? ? ?
[FILE JUDICIAL NOTICE] [EXECUTE JUDGMENT DEBT] [DEMAND SOURCE CODE]
Introduce renewed 2023 Place immediate liens on File a Motion to Compel
Ventura County record Dimension's assets; move the 2003 MediaBin files;
into NV Supreme Court to seize the PVS license forensically expose the
Anti-S.L.A.P.P. appeal. via a sheriff's sale. uncompilable "empty folder."

```

#### 1. File an Immediate Request for Judicial Notice in Nevada

Formally introduce the renewed 2023 Ventura County Superior Court record into the pending Nevada Supreme Court Anti-S.L.A.P.P. appellate track. Prove to the justices that Dimension’s entire standing as a "proprietor" is predicated on an unexecuted, financially breached transaction, completely destroying the "compensable property interest" required to sustain a tort claim for abuse of process.

Here is the revised, high-leverage rewrite of these sections, incorporating the technological obsolescence of the asset contrasted against Panik's absurd valuation demands, as well as the updated draft conclusion for the legal pleadings.

---

#### 2. Execute the Debt Against Dimension's Purported Assets and Expose the Valuation Absurdity

Armed with the active $432,266.40+ judgment rights acquired via the Tom Simpson asset collapse, TMMI must file immediate judgment liens and execution orders against Dimension, Inc., DFMI, and any residual licensing or patent portfolios Panik claims to hold. While more than 20 years have passed—rendering the underlying, uncompilable year-2000 code practically obsolete and commercially **worthless** on today's market—the statutory $432,000+ financial debt is alive, enforceable, and fully liquidated.

This creates an insurmountable roadblock for Plaintiffs. In their 2019 action, Panik is aggressively demanding a constructive trust over **20,000,000 shares of preferred TMMI stock**, structured with an astronomical conversion rate that could dilute into **4,000,000,000 (four billion) shares of TMMI common stock**. TMMI must weaponize this extreme mismatch in open court:

* **The Paradox of the Claim:** Panik is demanding massive equity control—billions of potential shares—over a software sandbox that is entirely worthless today, yet he was in total financial default on the baseline $144,088.80 principal required to legally acquire that very tech when it actually mattered in 2003.
* **The Valuation Checkmate:** If Panik argues in the Nevada courts that his legacy PVS/SGI license possesses the immense commercial value required to justify a multi-billion-share extraction, TMMI will immediately move to seize that exact license via a sheriff’s sale to satisfy his half-million-dollar California debt. Conversely, if he admits the asset is worthless to prevent TMMI from credit-bidding on it, his entire claim for tortious injury and compensatory damages instantly evaporates. A plaintiff cannot demand four billion shares in equity damages for the alleged "clouding" of a valueless, dead sandbox.

#### 3. File a Targeted Motion to Compel Production of Source Code to Prove Obsolescence

Demand the immediate physical production of the exact source code files and executable binaries Panik extracted from MediaBin in 2003. This forces a definitive technical and legal checkmate:

* **Forensic Infringement:** If Plaintiffs produce the code, forensic analysis of file headers, timestamps, and architectural dependencies will prove that the repository is an uncompilable, orphaned application layer that improperly contains TMMI's own untransferred 1991 SoftVideo Format (SVF) framework as its "glue."
* **Evaporation of Tort Damages:** Production will visually and structurally demonstrate to the Court that Panik's asset is a completely dead, legacy architecture that has been commercially unusable for over two decades. If Plaintiffs refuse or are unable to produce a functional, modern code engine, they fail to demonstrate an active property interest capable of sustaining millions of dollars in commercial tort damages, inviting immediate evidentiary dismissal sanctions.

---

### DRAFT CONCLUSION FOR PLEADING SUBMISSION

> **"Plaintiffs' multi-million dollar claim for abuse of process is built upon an absolute legal, physical, and commercial vacuum. A software platform cannot be 'misappropriated,' 'raided,' or 'clouded' when the party claiming ownership never legally or physically possessed the underlying source code libraries or the specialized computing hardware required to compile and operate it. More than twenty years have passed since the initiation of this dispute, rendering the underlying legacy code completely obsolete and commercially worthless.**
> **Yet, while the technology has decayed into worthlessness, a concrete $432,266.40+ financial judgment remains active and enforceable against Plaintiffs. As conclusively established by the renewed 2023 record of the Ventura County Superior Court (Case No. SC031696), Plaintiffs have remained in permanent financial default for over two decades on the very judgment that dictated the mandatory closing conditions of their alleged technology transfer. By withholding the court-ordered $144,088.80 principal from the baseline engineer, Plaintiffs legally and structurally blocked the transaction from ever closing. Their physical possession of derivative player files was an unauthorized extraction executed during the chaotic corporate transition of the Interwoven-MediaBin merger, conveying zero intellectual property title.**
> **It is a gross distortion of equity for Plaintiffs to demand a constructive trust over 20,000,000 preferred shares—carrying a conversion rate into 4,000,000,000 shares of TMMI common stock—over an obsolete sandbox they never legally paid for. Under the Doctrine of Unclean Hands, Plaintiffs are completely barred from invoking the equitable protections of estoppel to sustain their claims in Nevada while hiding a multi-decade, multi-state financial breach. Because TMMI has absorbed the assets of the underlying judgment creditor, TMMI holds an active, enforceable debt against Plaintiffs exceeding $432,000.00 due to accrued statutory interest. TMMI's 2013 quiet-title suit was a completely proper, regular invocation of the judicial system to resolve an asset trail obscured by an insider's default. Plaintiffs hold no compensable property interest, they have suffered no cognizable tort damages, and this action must be dismissed as a matter of law."**

FINALLY... The first meaningful post in along time. Thank you for sharing 👍

Excellent !

Excellent read
'Great American AI Act'
https://share.google/ya2BZN5H9zNBjxsPO

Interesting info flying in by pigeon. Hard to imagine TMMI's management & legal team would not have taken steps to follow up on this +20 year judgement. But a nicely worded post.

'TMMI must immediately stop looking backward at past legal mistakes and aggressively deploy this updated Ventura County record to shut down the current settlement and the 2019 lawsuit:'

Ventura County Superior Court records

SC031696

SC031696 - DIGITAL FOCUS VS THOMAS SIMPSON

Judgment PURSUANT TO STIPULATION filed 4/3/2003

Judgment entered on CROSS COMPLAINT of SIMPSON for THOMAS SIMPSON

Judgment entered on CROSS COMPLAINT of SIMPSON against DIGITAL FOCUS MEDIA INC

Principal is $144088.80
Total Judgment is $144088.80 .

Compounding 20 Years of Post-Judgment Interest

In California, unpaid judgments accrue a mandatory statutory interest rate of 10% simple interest per year. By formally updating and renewing the case record in the Ventura County Superior Court system, the interest was officially calculated and tacked onto the principal.

The Math: 10% of $144,088.80 is roughly $14,408 a year. Over 20 continuous years of default, the accrued interest alone added over $288,000 to the debt.

The 2023 update effectively tripled the financial weight of the judgment, pushing the total enforceable payout owed to Tom Simpson closer to $430,000+.

The 2003 California Superior Court judgment explicitly laid out an exchange: Panik's company (DFMI) had to remit $144,088.88 to Tom Simpson to legally execute the transfer and obtain a copy of the physical PVS/SGI code.

Court records state that DFMI never paid that money, and the code was never transferred.

No Code, No Hardware, No Title

Panik could not have developed, compiled, or legally "owned" anything on that platform because he lacked the underlying physical realities of the VDK 2 software ecosystem:

The Source Code Block: Because he stiffed Simpson on the court-ordered settlement amount, he never received the software libraries required to execute the platform license.

It is completely mind-boggling that past legal counsel failed to weaponize Ventura County Superior Court Case SC031696. By treating the 2013 and 2019 cases as speculative arguments over corporate mergers and estoppel, they allowed Larry Panik to stand before the Nevada courts and paint himself as a legitimate tech owner who was simply being bullied by TMMI.

They allowed him to build a legal narrative on a foundation that never actually existed.

Now that the record has been officially updated and renewed, the absolute reality of this unexecuted 2003 judgment completely changes TMMI’s position.

1. The $430,000+ Financial and Legal Noose

By letting this judgment sit in default for 20 years, Panik didn't just escape a payment—he let a statutory 10% compound interest clock tick in California. The 2023 court record renewal transforms this from a dusty, forgotten dispute into an active $430,000+ enforceable debt owed directly to Tom Simpson.

Because TMMI formally completed the acquisition of Tom Simpson’s corporate assets and entities (collapsing DFI/AMCI into TMMI), TMMI effectively steps into the shoes of the judgment creditor.

TMMI doesn't just have an argument; TMMI holds an active, half-million-dollar financial execution order against Panik’s corporate vehicle (DFMI).

Dismantling the Nevada "Estoppel" Defense

The Nevada Supreme Court previously ruled in favor of Dimension based on Equitable Estoppel, essentially saying: "TMMI's predecessors acted on paper like Panik owned the license, so TMMI can't say otherwise now."

But under the law, estoppel is an equitable remedy. To receive equity from a court, a party must come with "clean hands." Panik hid the fact that he was in active, multi-decade default on the exact California judgment that dictated the physical transfer of the code.

He used the concept of the PVS/SGI license to sue TMMI in Nevada.

But he deliberately concealed that he blocked the execution of the contract by refusing to pay the court-ordered $144,088.80 in Ventura County.

You cannot claim an equitable right to a license when you actively blocked the closing of the transaction by stiffing the engineer on the principal layout.

The Physical Impossibility: No Code, No Engine

This is the technical argument that past lawyers completely missed. A software platform license is not just a piece of paper; it requires the physical delivery of source code libraries to be executed.

Because Panik stiffed Simpson on Case SC031696:

The Code Blocked: He never physically or legally received the VDK 2 PVS source code from Simpson.

The Hardware Blocked: He never possessed or leased the multi-million dollar IBM PVS supercomputers required to compile, host, or run that multi-processor architecture.

How TMMI Corrects the Historical Blunder Right Now

TMMI must immediately stop looking backward at past legal mistakes and aggressively deploy this updated Ventura County record to shut down the current settlement and the 2019 lawsuit:

File a Judicial Notice in Nevada: Formally introduce the updated, renewed 2023 Ventura County Superior Court record into the pending Nevada Supreme Court Anti-S.L.A.P.P. appeal. Prove to the Nevada justices that Dimension's entire standing is predicated on a transaction that was left dead and uncompleted via financial default.

Execute the Debt Against Dimension's Assets: Use the $430,000+ judgment to place an immediate judgment lien on Dimension, Inc., DFMI, and any patents or licensing rights Panik claims to hold. If he claims the PVS/SGI license is his asset, TMMI (holding Simpson's judgment rights) can move to seize the license back via a sheriff’s sale or judgment execution to satisfy the $430,000 debt.

Expose the Grift: Leverage the $430,000 California default to show Dimension shareholders the truth. Panik has been telling them for years that he is "winning" against TMMI, while completely hiding that his primary corporate entity faces an active, ruinous financial judgment in California that effectively triples the weight of his original liabilities.

The Bottom Line

Past management and legal teams failed to connect the dots between the California tech layout and the Nevada corporate litigation. They fought a technical battle with their hands tied behind their backs.

The renewed Ventura County record changes everything. Larry Panik has zero code, zero hardware, a questionable patent portfolio built on 1994 prior art, and an active $430,000+ financial judgment hanging over his head. TMMI should execute this judgment to dismantle Dimension once and for all.

An Gemini search on the court case:
TMMI's Pivot to Avoid More Damage
"Because negotiating a favorable settlement is highly unlikely under these conditions, TMMI's actual strategy has been to voluntarily dismiss or back away from pushing their aggressive claims. By shifting resources toward their new non-fractal technologies and trying to put the old fractal VDK code disputes behind them, management has been trying to minimize the financial bleeding.

Ultimately, while TMMI can try to negotiate, any settlement at this stage would likely look less like a mutual compromise and more like a structured surrender, where TMMI would have to agree to terms heavily favoring Panik just to get him to release them from future legal fee liabilities"
I agree with your comment "If only we had some type of quidance from management" Come on Susan et al help us out.

Under Nevada's revised anti-SLAPP standard, TMMI must present clear prima facie evidence proving they have a high probability of winning their underlying business claims.

If TMMI cannot meet this high evidentiary threshold, the district court must grant a final dismissal of the claims against Panik.


If only we had some type of guidance from management, nothing....
Crickets....

We'll never know until Panik is completely gone. Simple. Maybe 2027 will be the year...

Very easily, TMM expanded its AI R&D pipeline through a co-development agreement with virtual character firm CodeBaby, Inc....

This partnership focuses on engineering emotionally intelligent avatars and building out multi-connectivity avatar experiences.Core Video & Hardware InfrastructureWhile scaling up its AI investments,

TMM continues to allocate R&D capital to enhance its foundational digital video compression and scaling ecosystem:TRUDEF & TRUSCALE Technologies: Maintaining and upgrading its patented TRUSCALE hardware-accelerated upscaler and TRUZOOM brands.Fractal Codecs:

Fine-tuning its TRUDEF VDK3 fractal video codec alongside its proprietary internal video pipelines to improve visual quality on ultra-high-resolution....

How can it be TMMI's ? They have spent no money on R&D for years. Check the filings.

If you scroll down to the end, isn't the ACT Showreel AI driven, and wouldn't that be TMMI AI tools driving that video????

The infrastructure is built on cutting-edge, scalable micro services architecture.
Isn't that TMMI AI technology????

Susan Bala has been busy on the promoting circuit. The following link has her being interviewed on a podcast mentioning her company Advanced Compliance Technology. But I am still awaiting to see where TMMI ties into all of this. The good news is that she is active and building a reputation in gaming compliance. At this time, both her ACT & PGT companies are private. Where as TMMI is a public company with the ability to quickly raise capital with activity.

142:In her Element: Racing to Justice


Advanced Compliance Technology

Phoenix Global Technology

CES was another missed opportunity, imo....
Remember Ted Schilowitz????
He cofounded Volygon and their technology not up to par, according to their website....
Why not try TMMI AI????
Mmm Doesn't he still sit on TMMI board of directors????
One of their partners Amazon Studios....
Perhaps another missed opportunity....

AI, Cinematic Creativity, Spatial & XR: The Next Level of Innovation https://share.google/imCp5fkc9xuCAvV5n

Crickets....

trying to view S Bala's skill set. seems like this opportunity would have been a great time to announce how tmm inc is planning to use AI, along with avatars created in conjunction with codebaby and tmm. As I dug for tmm being mentioned at this event here is what I found out.
Based on the official agendas, panel announcements, and media coverage of the 19th International Conference on Gambling & Risk Taking (held May 26–28, 2026, at the Bellagio), there is no mention of TMMI or TMM Inc.were listed as participants, sponsors, or subjects of research during these specific AI gambling safety sessions.another missed opportunity

https://www.google.com/search?q=What%27s+happening+with+the+law+suit+between+Tmmi+and+Panik%3F+A+new+judge+was+assigned.&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&hs=n9d&sca_esv=0051c22bd9d6ba86&sxsrf=ANbL-n6xAVVgJYi3RRZ-7hReaoTuAS_sZQ%3A1780077243257&udm=50&fbs=ADc_l-ZexlP7EBCNvIngZQ0PrpGnde5EenWPl3ujHKe4IVU9DPvUHpXUr4FRBILrvrNAVeJ-5NdkCGJUHPA47UxUM_43_xIh9baqIDd73T76uy65K7n09CI08uQfkR1_vtb9VmZtsKRduMRv-uUCk9I_NWUJi2ma1JkxoWYV2W6sSS46ze4q6xY4ZWiTgaHXlucFL-8q-4aZmdJWpQQY60RMQHMhCwoKd7SYGwKI5_0HgBF8oeMKVIM&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjsh4e-iN-UAxVLLUQIHbOCCdUQ2J8OegQIDhAE&biw=347&bih=628&dpr=2.08&mstk=AUtExfCxYnwgcUUyZAnzyz75un1vVwjlZqxFhNqDFtls9Ww6MqcbPuLJMRmOqHZ-EwCePuMbpCQ-4oAlY1_3uMBeon6DHfmkp3eR38PpIgu5AtJzwrxi3eNtdHHLCOO7RXOPLeF56BZfz2QKf5K_nuEI8QR9TPfTzmWGupUlmcPCIbFZg4xwb2Z2f3FAbljIROG5ZNskrDsD5H16iWnVXzxFtijSdjcUEXULeiYuBzbseUniXYmGVViimZxyfQ&csuir=1

What's happening with the law suit between Tmmi and Panik? A new judge was assigned.

If only we could get some type of clarification from management....

I asked Google search, not AI but, Google search on whether or not TMMI AI was still operating in Brazilian gaming and here's the answer....

TMM Inc. (OTC: TMMI) is no longer actively operating its intended AI-avatar technology in the Brazilian gaming market.
Following its initial venture in 2025, the company’s Brazilian partner, LMR Services Ltda., was severely impacted by a regulatory crackdown.
In April 2026, the Brazilian Ministry of Finance and telecommunications regulator (Anatel) blocked numerous prediction platforms.
This was followed by a strict new resolution prohibiting the exact types of derivatives and betting products TMM’s AI technology was designed to run.

Consequently, TMM Inc. continues to face extreme financial instability regarding its survival and gaming ventures.

Google ChatGPT says the opposite....

Crickets....

Love these low OS, low float, double 00 plays, They don't always pan out quick, or at all but its def worth a buck or two just in case.

Let's see what today brings ... hopefully we see sustained buying and it wasn't a one-off slap-fest.

$TMMI

Rambling Rose this is relevant news, especially being in Vegas and it just happens to be our CEOs skill-set....

May 26–28:
The 19th International Conference on Gambling & Risk Taking at the Bellagio in Las Vegas, featuring keynotes focused heavily on AI oversight and risk.

By the way,
given Susan Bala's long history as a pioneer in the pari-mutuel and gaming technology space—as well as her notable legal battles and final exoneration involving gaming operations—she is a relevant figure to the subject matter.

You are still rambling.... didn't you notice the 2mil in volume today. Mostly buys. Talk about something relevant please.

Specific 2026 event dates featuring major AI discussions in the gaming sector including, compliance and cyber security....

May 26–28:
The 19th International Conference on Gambling & Risk Taking at the Bellagio in Las Vegas, featuring keynotes focused heavily on AI oversight and risk.

June 9–11:
The Casino & Gambling Conferences 2026 at the Broward County Convention Center in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, which includes tracks for AI and product innovation.

July 14–16: The Casino Marketing & Technology Conference at Pechanga Resort Casino in Temecula, California, which focuses on machine learning and AI in the casino space.

Susan Bala holds the key to TMMI AI technology in the palm of her hand....

Interesting training day. All good on the L2 LongCA?

Dunno about 10 bucks but 10 cents from here would be a real nice start.

Given the OTC and sub-dollar nature of the stock, any potential 2026 PPS target would be entirely speculative, relying on the company formally announcing and executing specific commercial contracts rather than broader macroeconomic or regulatory trends in Brazil....

I will say this, in my opinion, there's two people in management that could very easily get at least two contracts, maybe more, right now....
One avenue, contract, off track betting and the other avenue, contract, casinos....
Both can use AI regulation and compliance....
Imo
very positive News, with contracts could very well see a bounce of 100,000 percent from 0.01 to $10.00 is a nice start....

What PPS are we looking at for 2026 if they can overcome the roadblocks in brazil? IYOOC.

You guys need to stop rambling about nothing. It's the same nonsense over and over and over.
If you really believe it's a great time to buy.
Either buy or just stop posting until we actually have news/updates from the company.

jay re your post , specifically # 1. "The Reality Hurdles:
Brazil's recent financial decree (Resolution 5,298/2026) outlawed the exact predictive gaming structures TMMI designed its AI-avatar and video platforms to support.
Unless TMMI strips down and totally re-engineers its software to fit strictly within highly restricted state-run charity laws, this revenue stream remains frozen."

Reply :

"Agility of a CoE Software in Adapting to New Programs"

A Center of Excellence (CoE) — whether a Software CoE, Cloud CoE, or Automation CoE — is designed to accelerate adaptation to new programs by standardizing processes, reusing assets, and aligning teams around best practices saison-technology-intl.com+1. This structure makes it easier to adjust software or systems to new requirements without starting from scratch.

Why CoEs Adapt Quickly

Standardized templates and reusable assets: CoEs maintain libraries of approved tools, configurations, and workflows that can be repurposed for new programs, cutting setup time and reducing rework saison-technology-intl.com.

Centralized knowledge management: By capturing lessons learned and proven solutions, CoEs avoid reinventing the wheel, enabling faster onboarding and configuration for new initiatives www.coennect.com.

Governance and alignment: CoEs provide a governance framework that ensures new programs meet organizational standards, compliance, and integration requirements, reducing delays from misalignment vFunction+1.

Cross-functional expertise: A CoE team often includes specialists in strategy, technology, and process, allowing them to quickly assess new program needs and recommend optimal adaptations fusionSpan+1.

Proven change management: CoEs are built to manage large-scale change, which means they can guide rapid adjustments while minimizing risk and maintaining quality fusionSpan.

Practical Impact
Organizations with mature CoEs report up to 40% faster project delivery when adapting to new programs, thanks to streamlined processes and shared resources saison-technology-intl.com. This agility is especially valuable in fast-moving environments like cloud migration, AI integration, or automation scaling, where speed and consistency are critical.

In short: Yes — a well-structured CoE can make software or program adaptation quick and easier by leveraging reuse, governance, and cross-team expertise, which together reduce time-to-value and lower the risk of costly rework.

TMM, Inc. (TMMI) can theoretically make money, but based on its structural financial position, doing so depends on overcoming massive regulatory barriers and executing a functional commercial rollout.

Currently, the company does not make money. It operates at a net loss with a trailing twelve months (TTM) P/E ratio of -1.62.

The primary pathways for TMMI to generate actual revenue and the massive hurdles blocking it include:

1. B2B Software Royalties

(The Brazil Strategy)
The potential:
TMMI's primary commercialization strategy relies on licensing its video technology and skill-game software to its Brazilian infrastructure partner, LMR Services, Ltda.
If LMR's lottery-style digital sweepstakes apps scale successfully, TMMI would make money through recurring software licensing fees and volume-based royalties.

The Reality Hurdles:
Brazil's recent financial decree (Resolution 5,298/2026) outlawed the exact predictive gaming structures TMMI designed its AI-avatar and video platforms to support.
Unless TMMI strips down and totally re-engineers its software to fit strictly within highly restricted state-run charity laws, this revenue stream remains frozen.

2. Monetizing the Video Tech Stack

The Potential:
TMMI owns algorithms built around high-efficiency video scaling and frame interpolation. It could make money by licensing these tools to streaming platforms, mobile application developers, or hardware media players looking to reduce bandwidth costs.

The Reality Hurdles:
TMMI does not have an active sales pipeline or enterprise distribution partners to sell its software to global B2B clients. With a total cash reserve of only $98.14k, the company lacks the marketing budget required to scale a software sales team or compete against established video compression giants.

3. Relying on Equity Financing Instead of Revenue

The Present Reality:
Currently, TMMI "survives" rather than makes money from operations.
To fund its day-to-day legal and executive costs, it relies on equity financing—diluting its stock by printing and issuing millions of new shares (growing from roughly 662M to over 792M shares).
This method keeps the lights on but actively diminishes value for existing retail investors.

Summary

For TMMI to turn a profit, it must successfully pivot its software code away from Brazil's restricted sports prediction market and find an entirely new, fully compliant commercial application. Until it reports positive cash flow above its ultra-low 0.65 current ratio, it will continue to lose money.

Looks sad. Hard to imagine anyone would sell down here for any reasons other than 1. They are broke and need cash or 2. They have a grudge

$TMMI L2
[url=https://postimages.org/][/url]

let me explain a bit further.
"I think you’re confusing a tax definition with economic reality.

While it’s true that a realized loss for tax purposes only happens when I sell, a loss of capital value is very real right now.

Think of it like real estate: If my house was worth $500,000 two days ago, and a sinkhole opens up next door driving the market value down to $300,000 today, I haven't 'lost' money by selling it—but my net worth and total asset value just took a $200,000 hit. I can't borrow against the old value, and I can't buy anything with the old value.

On paper, my TMM position went from nearly $5,000 to less than $3,000 in 48 hours. That is a real, measurable loss of equity and purchasing power today, regardless of whether I press the sell button or not."

I found this....
The gaming venture is the most critical component of TMM, Inc.’s (TMMI) survival strategy, but it is currently facing a high-stakes bottleneck.
Below is the operational breakdown of what this venture entails, the target market, and why it is currently at risk:
The Core Venture: LMR Services, Ltda.

The Transaction:
TMM, Inc. acquired an equity ownership stake in LMR Services, Ltda., a Brazilian-based technology and marketing firm.

The Mechanism:
LMR is structured around lottery-style skill games, digital predictions, and online raffles linked with charitable sponsorships.

The AI Integration:
TMMI intended to combine its proprietary technical stack with LMR’s gaming interface to create highly scalable, automated digital raffle platforms optimized by AI workflows.

The Thesis:
Capturing Brazil’s $40 Billion Gaming Boom
The entire financial justification for TMMI pivoting away from traditional corporate video codecs was to capture massive market share in South America.


The Transition:
The gaming venture was designed to capitalize on Brazil's transition into a fully federally regulated online gaming environment.

The Target Size:
TMMI executives cited Brazil's $40 billion online gaming space as an ideal environment for triple-digit growth.
They initially projected immediate revenue generation shortly after finalizing the asset acquisition.


The Operational Headwind:
Regulatory Roadblocks
Despite the highly publicized launch, actual revenue execution has hit major roadblocks due to shifting laws in the region.

The Crackdown:
The Brazilian Ministry of Finance and the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting (SPA) implemented aggressive compliance audits to clean up the newly open iGaming landscape.

Platform Blockages:
The national telecommunications agency (Anatel) ordered broad localized blockages against unauthorized digital prediction markets and online betting setups.

The Impact on TMMI:
If LMR Services' specific lottery and skill-game frameworks are classified alongside these restricted "bet-like" derivative products, TMMI’s expected geographic cash flow could face complete paralysis.


Current Financial Status
Because TMMI is completely out of operational cash ($375 remaining on the balance sheet), they have had to rely entirely on $500,000 in low-interest loans from principal shareholders to keep this Brazilian venture afloat while navigating the complex international regulatory structure.

Down big-time last I posted.

very true, however I'm talking about value loss I have not sold a share and yet my tmm porfolio is down way down.

It's only a loss if you sell.

dang keyboard looks like nothing is working today. he % key is not functioning just like Susan Bala where is Mike Fernandez when you need him?at least Mr Fernandez had tmm in control as I took home over a hundred K.

sorry just updated. not 45& loss tmm inc. has just lost 53.33& in value over 24 hours. is this ship sinking or sunk already.

so you don' think there are any shareholders of tmmi stock that maybe concerned that a 45& loss in value over 24 hours is perhaps a reason to bail? the great s. bala also must feel a bit of a loss on her millions of tmmi shares. notice no comment from the CEO or any tmm management. well I Isurer would like to hear why their confidence was so high.

Lol....

The only ones selling these days are fools and shorties....
lol....
By the way;)
I've been long-term since 1990....

I added.

Jay you selling at a loss today again?

I got in this in 1993 or 1994 when it was $1/share.
So much tech promise...then it died.
Ya win some, you lose some.

I asked AI how TMMI plans to survive and grow moving forward....

To see how TMM, Inc. (TMMI) plans to survive and grow, it helps to analyze exactly how they are trying to merge their old technology with their new international ventures, and how other tiny tech companies handle these same massive regulatory roadblocks.

1. The Strategy:
Merging Video Tech with AI Gaming

TMMI is trying to solve its $0.00 revenue problem by repurposing its core asset: TRUDEF™ video compression technology.

The Goal:
Running high-quality digital raffles and live streaming games across mobile networks requires massive amounts of data. In countries like Brazil, where cellular internet speeds can be slow or unstable, streaming high-definition video is expensive and difficult.

The Plan:
TMMI wants to use its compression software to stream these gaming platforms using a fraction of the normal data bandwidth. They hope this will make LMR Services' platforms run smoother and cheaper than competitors.

The AI Twist:
They intend to pair this video streaming with AI-driven player analytics and digital avatars to automate the games and keep users engaged.

2. The Micro-Cap Playbook:
Navigating International Laws
When a tiny tech company faces a sudden regulatory crackdown—like Brazil's strict new gaming resolutions—they generally choose one of three paths to survive:

3. The Compliance Pivot
(The Expensive Route): Companies hire local legal teams to completely rebuild their software to comply with the new laws.
For a company with low cash reserves like TMMI, this is incredibly difficult because legal and licensing fees can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

4.The Geographic Shift
(The Flexible Route): If one country shuts its doors, micro-caps often try to quickly license their tech to partners in different regions (like Peru, Colombia, or parts of Africa) where online gaming laws are still more relaxed.

5. White-Label Licensing
(The B2B Route): Instead of running the games themselves, the company stops trying to face consumers. They simply sell or lease their video compression software to other already-licensed, multi-billion-dollar casino operators who have the cash to handle the regulations.


The Critical Milestone to Watch For TMMI, the ultimate test over the next few quarters is commercial execution.
Having real technology, a real board, and a real plan is a great start, but it does not pay the bills.
Investors tracking the company are waiting to see if management can convert these plans into a signed, revenue-generating contract that puts actual cash into their bank account.