T M M Inc (PK) (TMMI) 銘柄情報

Rebert De Niro was there?

Unfortunately no pole dancers this year. Last year got to out of hand with the dwarf tossing and dancers.

I can only guess who the pole dancer was!

Yeah, I just got done having dinner with Kozole and headed to the shareholders appreciation party now.

Has there been any human contact with TMMI? Be nice to see if they are still functional and not just nonresponsive.

True but TMMI still meets a minimum requirement for public quoting under Rule 15c2-11....

It is time though, if this case is a done deal to put forth a PR on the future of TMMI....

Our CEO Bala should say something....

She was confident with the News about bringing on board the gentleman that ran the casino programs....
A field that TMMI would thrive in....
That was the PR from December 22' shareholders can read what she said off the TMMI website, a well scripted announcement....

She is owner of another company, which she pointed out in a press release that they were working with a company, which Imo, is TMMI as well as taking steps into the future of surveillance security and Artificial Intelligence....
As CEO it is her duty to standup for her shareholders and report, especially now, if this case is actually over, on the futures of TMMI technology....

IS the technology outdated or will it be used with today's world of Artificial Intelligence and security surveillance????
A field that has been around for decades and will be EPIC in 2025 and beyond!!!!

DaGeekster: IMO Looks like the court case is over and TMMI owes. Seems to be now or never for the truth and status.
All the other reports were copy and pasted. Either sh... or get off the pot!

The quarterly report was due on the 15th. It failed to appear and this morning the stock is now Pink Limited. Oops. This has been a consistent pattern with TMMI.

Stockseed: Why buy? If North Star Ventures Holding, Inc. has a significant connection to TMM, Inc. (TMMI) and has put up $million+- why wouldn't they have driven up the price by now? Hopefully TMMi will update on status and future products. As I read the last case they owe money they don't seem to have. Just does not make any sense.

" Anybody know the facts? ". An opinion, buy.

I just read the court (Case No.: A-19-798443-C) case. looks like TMMi owes Dimension & Digital Focus IMO. What about the rights to any patent etc? You would think with all the intertwined business's Susan would fine a way to report to the shareholders of TMMI. North Star Ventures Holding, Inc. has a significant connection to TMM, Inc. (TMMI). In December 2017, North Star Ventures converted $1 million of its debt to equity in TMMI, making it the largest shareholder of the company. This move was a strong vote of confidence in TMMI's new direction and technology suite1. Also Phoenix Capital. These are from a search on Pilot. Anybody know the facts?

Adamph85: Thank you for your input. The Nevada court system has been difficult to navigate.
If there is a URL to follow please post. Just trying to locate the facts. What was the outcome of the last court date? Thank you
for your time.

For someone who post as often as you should know actually where to find the court updates. I think you're pulling my leg here.

Adamph85. I could not find it. What is the outcome? TY

I believe there's been a recent court update. You should check it out.

Any word on the court case etc?

Knock Knock

July 15th TMMI's statement: to keep TMMI supported and work continues to clear the way. At the proper time, there will be a great deal to say, which I look forward to. Your patience is needed and appreciated. Who wrote this????
7:39 PM · Jul 15, 2024. I'm patient and have been since 1997. TMMI please elaborate.

Well at least that address is not the usual mail stop. Looks like a home not an office. I could be wrong but it looks like the same transfer company as TMMI.
Please verify if you know the facts.

You snooze, you lose.

Don those DD caps !

First Name: Susan
Last Name: Bala
Full Name: Susan Bala
Title: President
Address:
Map Icon spacer Phoenix Global Technology, Inc.
222 80th Street
Brooklyn, NY
Company Name: Phoenix Global Technology, Inc.
Registered
Agent Address:
Map Icon spacer 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880
Reno, NV 89501

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175211578

Not to worry.

From the Dimension site. Their website news appears to mention other than the usual Video compression and upscaling and video CODEC technology based on this recent news...?

I see the terms 'Big Data' and 'AI' here. Oh boy... I don't know if see light at the end of the tunnel or the light of an incoming train. This is the first time I caught wind of Dimension's underlying intentions.



Dimension announces signing of an LOI with CONQ, Inc, a Florida corporation
July 15, 2024

Las Vegas, NV, July 15, 2024 - Dimension, Inc., a Nevada corporation, is actively engaged in licensing the rights to certain patented technology components to CONQ, Inc., a Florida corporation, who is actively engaged in the business of developing software tools for CONQ’s AI-based information systems processing that are exclusively available only from Dimension.

________

Dimension announces the filing of 5 provisional patents dealing with Dimension’s family of BigData and AI
September 9, 2024

Las Vegas, NV, September 9, 2024 - Las Vegas - Dimension Inc. a Nevada corporation, has just finished filing the last of 5 provisional patents in Dimension’s family of VideoAnalytics/BigData/AI patents

1. Video Preconditioning for Machine Learning
2. Data Assembly for BigData Information Processing
3. Data Exploration for BigData Information Processing
4. Data Discovery for BigData Information Processing
5. Multi-Frame Video Analytics on Dynamical Content

Dimension site- Look for Press releases

Buckle up! Take off imminent, imo.

That's usually the plaintiff's surety bond....

It guarantees that the plaintiff
(nonresident of the jurisdiction)
will pay all the court expenses in the litigation....

Antro, Who posted the bond, who is the payee and who will receive. Is the case over? Hope so! Now on to the moon!

this is what AI Overview said when I googled it:

A motion to return a bond to a law firm that posted it requires a proposed order of court to be attached. The order should include the name and mailing address of the payee, and the amount to be returned. For civil cases, the original receipt is required and may be included as an exhibit to the motion.
In civil cases, bonds are usually eligible for return when the case has been dismissed or a judgment has been entered.

Case status: Result: Matter Heard 10/20/2024 - Order for return of cost bond. Can anyone comment on the
meaning of this? Who is it returned to?

Stockseed: You stated: The reason Panik continues this bs is that he knows of TMMI's existing and forthcoming technology.
OK, what are your facts of what forthcoming technology? Hope you are an insider.

Thank you , I appreciate that.

Have fun with that. Good luck with your dreams.

I will ignore yours - thanks. I will respect any that are valid and helpful to the other shareholders here.

I did not think that this was a members only site. Opinions are allowed. Ignore mine if you choose. Thanks for your opinion and GLTY

You owned shares back in the 90’s according to your 7/24 post / why are you here? For entertainment? We are here because we want shareholders opinions only.
So? Looks like motion to be in within 14 days. We will see what develops.

Lawsuits between these “companies” for over 10 years and neither is worth a dime. SMH. Silliness at this point.

Here's the latest as of 1:21pm: 10/09/2024 Status Check: Status of Case (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Sturman, Gloria)


Minutes
10/09/2024 9:00 AM
- Upon Court's inquiry, Mr. Austin provided an overview of the case and stated that he planned to file a motion for fees and costs. Court confirmed that a hearing cannot be set before the motion is filed. Court stated matter would proceed in ordinary course.

Stockseed: We would all like to see a positive PR. Do you have any factual first hand info to support your statement? Or just like my assumption
and opinions?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175160783

Stockseed: That does not make sense. With all of the high powered professional people on TMMi's board you would think
they would be trying to settle if the technology is what both parties need. Why not let the stockholders have a say in the pursuit.
Just sounds like ego not wanting to let go or succeed. I wish a quick solution & prosperity to all parties.

that is from 8/9. Nothing posted about 10/9.

The reason Panik continues this bs is that he knows of TMMI's existing and forthcoming technology.

There’s a lot of buying going on👍

There’s a lot of buying going on👍

DaGreekster: Thank you! Be nice to know what is worth fighting for. Why slap stayed for 30 days is the question?

don't think anyone won yet....

Minutes
08/09/2024 10:00 AM
- HEARING: ANTI-SLAP MOTION - 2ND PRONG THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT PANIK'S MOTION TO VACATE TMM, INC.'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT Arguments by counsel regarding the Motion to Vacate and the Anti-SLAPP law. COURT ORDERED, Third-Party Defendant Panik's Motion to Vacate TMM, Inc.'s Voluntary Dismissal of Third-Party Complaint GRANTED as to the Anti-SLAPP second prong proceedings, Trade Libel, Injunctive Relief, Alter Ego, and Abuse of Process with the other two claims remaining voluntarily dismissed. COURT FURTHER ORDERED, Trade Libel, Injunctive Relief, Alter Ego, and Abuse of Process DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under the Anti-SLAPP statute, case STAYED for 30 days following the Notice of Entry of Order, and matter SET for a status check as to status of the case. Mr. Austin to prepare the orders. 10/9/2024 9:00 AM STATUS CHECK: STATUS OF CASE

Again IMO and reading of the cases I feel he did. If TMMi won what are we all waiting for. The SLAP cases
were awarded to Panik, correct? Why can't the advisors/owners/mangers etc. put out a PR with the facts?
If TMMi is the victor why not celebrate and move on?

None of my posts say Panik won.
All of my posts are my own opinion and I said / recommended for more clarification of the case read the court docs from 2018.

IMO, Why do you think Panik won? The cost to all parties must be greater than a settlement. Does not
make sense to me. And what has value, who owns any patents etc?

Read 12/27/2018 -TMMI Inc vs Dim 2018, and you can read how untruthful Panik was about trying to take the rights. He is trying to appeal something that was decided already based on the same lies of acquisition.
He also did Not List the TMMI license on his tax returns from 2002 to 2011.
Of course there will be new legal court documents to come out but that is a good foundation to who really owns the rights and that is what the whole case is about.
(All of my opinions are my own - do your own research)