KIDBQ Kid Brands Inc (CE)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Kid Brands, Inc. (“KID”), together with its subsidiaries (collectively with KID, the “Company”), is a leading designer, importer, marketer and distributor of infant and juvenile consumer products. The Company operates in one segment: the infant and juvenile business.

The Company’s current operating subsidiaries consist of Kids Line, LLC (“Kids Line”), Sassy, Inc. (“Sassy”), LaJobi, Inc. (“LaJobi”) and CoCaLo, Inc. (“CoCaLo”), which are each direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of KID, and design, manufacture through third parties, and market products in a number of categories including, among others; infant bedding and related nursery accessories and décor, nursery appliances, diaper bags, and bath/spa products (Kids Line ^® and CoCaLo ^® ); nursery furniture and related products (LaJobi ^® ); and developmental toys and feeding products, and bath and baby care items with features that address the various stages of an infant’s early years, including the Kokopax ^® line of baby gear products (Sassy ^® ). In addition to branded products, the Company also markets certain categories under various licenses, including Carters ^® , Disney ^® , Graco ^® and Serta ^® . The Company’s products are sold primarily to retailers in North America and Australia, including large, national retail accounts and independent retailers (including toy, specialty, food, drug, apparel and other retailers). See Note 14 for a discussion of the Company’s determination to suspend LaJobi’s wood furniture operations and the related mutual termination of its Graco ^® license, and a notice of breach received by the Company with respect to each of LaJobi’s Serta ^® license and Sassy’s Carters ^® license.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such principles and regulations. The information furnished reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily an indication of results to be expected for the year. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as amended (the “2013 10-K”).

Subsequent Events

The Company evaluates all subsequent events prior to filing.

Going Concern

Based on the circumstances described in detail in Note 13, there continues to be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, however, have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business, and do not include any adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2—SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share-Based Compensation

Equity Plans

As of March 31, 2014, the Company maintained (i) its 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 EI Plan”), which is a successor to the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 EI Plan”), and (ii) its 2008 EI Plan, which is a successor to the Company’s 2004 Stock Option, Restricted and Non-Restricted Stock Plan (the “2004 Option Plan”, and together with each of the 2008 EI Plan and the 2013 EI Plan, the “Plans”) . The Company’s 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan expired by its terms on December 31, 2013. The 2013 EI Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders on July 18, 2013. The 2008 EI Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders on July 10, 2008. In addition, the Company may (and has) issued equity awards outside of the Plans. The exercise or measurement price for equity awards issued under the Plans or otherwise is generally equal to the closing price of KID’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if not so listed, on the principal over-the-counter system (“OTC System”) on which the common stock is traded on the date of grant. Generally, equity awards under the Plans (or otherwise) vest over a period ranging from zero to five years from the date of grant as provided in the relevant award agreement. Options and stock appreciation rights generally expire ten years from the date of grant. Shares in respect of equity awards are issued from authorized shares reserved for such issuance or treasury shares.

The 2013 EI Plan provides for awards in any one or a combination of: (a) Stock Options, (b) Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), (c) Restricted Stock, (d) Stock Units, (e) Non-restricted Stock, and/or (f) Dividend Equivalent Rights. Any award under the 2013 EI Plan may, as determined by the committee administering the 2013 EI Plan (the “Plan Committee”) in its sole discretion, constitute a “Performance-Based Award” (an award that qualifies for the performance-based compensation exemption of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). All awards granted under the 2013 EI Plan are evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and each participant (which need not be identical with respect to each grant or participant) that provides the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the requirements of the 2013 EI Plan, associated with such awards, as determined by the Plan Committee in its sole discretion. At inception, a total of 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the 2013 EI Plan. In the event all or a portion of an award is forfeited, terminated or cancelled, expired, is settled for cash, or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to the award in connection with the exercise or settlement of such award (“Unissued Shares”), such Unissued Shares will in each case again be available for awards under the 2013 EI Plan pursuant to a formula set forth therein. At March 31, 2014, 1,581,442 shares were available for issuance under the 2013 EI Plan.

7

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The 2008 EI Plan, which became effective July 10, 2008 (at which time no further awards could be made under the 2004 Option Plan), provided for the same types of awards as are issuable under the 2013 EI Plan. All awards granted under the 2008 EI Plan were evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and each participant (which did not need to be identical with respect to each grant or participant) that provided the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the requirements of the 2008 EI Plan, associated with such awards, as determined by the Plan Committee in its sole discretion. A total of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the 2008 EI Plan. Any Unissued Shares were in each case again available for awards under the 2008 EI Plan pursuant to a formula set forth therein. The preceding sentence also applied to any awards outstanding on July 10, 2008, under the 2004 Option Plan, up to a maximum of an additional 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock. No further awards could be made under the 2008 EI Plan as of July 10, 2013 as the 2008 EI Plan expired on that date.

As of March 31, 2014, an aggregate of 200,000 stock options and 417,910 SARs were outstanding that were granted as inducement awards outside any of the Plans. Of these non-Plan grants, the 200,000 stock options vested in full upon issuance on March 15, 2013, and if unexercised (unless terminated earlier) generally expire on March 15, 2023. 373,134 of the SARs vest ratably over a five year period (commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant), and if unexercised (unless terminated earlier), expire on September 14, 2022. 179,105 of the SARs were forfeited on January 29, 2014, and the remaining 44,776 of the SARs expired on April 29, 2014.

The Company records share-based compensation expense in the statements of operations within the same categories that payroll expense is recorded in selling, general and administrative expense. No share-based compensation expense was capitalized in inventory or any other assets for the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013. The relevant Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) standard requires the cash flows related to tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation costs recognized for those equity compensation grants (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.

The fair value of stock options and SARs granted under the Plans or otherwise is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model using assumptions with respect to dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, volatility and expected term. Expected volatilities are calculated based on the historical volatility of KID’s Common Stock. The expected term of options or SARs granted is derived from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and represents the period of time that the award is expected to be outstanding. Management monitors exercises and employee termination patterns to estimate forfeiture rates within the valuation model. Separate groups of employees, directors and officers that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free interest rate is based on the Treasury note interest rate in effect on the date of grant for the expected term of the award.

Stock Options

Stock options are rights to purchase KID’s Common Stock in the future at a predetermined per share exercise price (generally the closing price for such stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if not so listed, on the principal OTC System on which the common stock is tradedon the date of grant). Stock options may be either: “Incentive Stock Options” (stock options which comply with Section 422 of the Code), or Non-Qualified Stock Options (stock options which are not Incentive Stock Options). Stock options are accounted for at fair value at the date of grant in the consolidated statement of operations, are amortized on a straight line basis over the vesting term, and are equity-classified in the consolidated balance sheets. No options will be exercisable later than ten (10) years after the date of grant. The options issued under the 2008 and 2013 EI Plans vest ratably over a period ranging from zero to five years and, unless terminated earlier, expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

8

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

There were 0 and 400,000 options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, 600,000 cash SARs granted to the Company’s President and CEO on March 15, 2013 were converted into stock options, on a one-for-one basis, on July 18, 2013 upon the approval of such conversion at KID’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (with no change to the grant date, exercise price, vesting schedule, or other terms thereof). As a result, the 600,000 cash SARs were terminated, and the stock options which replaced them (the “Replacement Options”) are equity classified in the consolidated balance sheets as of July 18, 2013. Prior to such conversion, the 600,000 cash SARs were classified as a short-term liability on the consolidated balance sheets, and the fair value of this award was recalculated each quarter based upon its fair value at each balance sheet date. There were no options exercised in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the 400,000 stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were as follows (no stock options were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014):

The foregoing table does not include the 600,000 Replacement Options described above. As the conversion date for such options was July 18, 2013, they are included in the remainder of the tables in this section.

As of March 31, 2014, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, net of forfeitures, was approximately $0.6 million, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.

Activity regarding outstanding stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:

The aggregate intrinsic value of the unvested and vested outstanding stock options was $0 at each of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The aggregate intrinsic value is the total pretax value of in-the-money stock options, which is the difference between the fair value at the measurement date and the exercise price of each stock option. There were no stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. There were 96,875, and 250,000 stock options vested, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average fair value of stock options vested for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $78,327 and $204,991, respectively.

A summary of the Company’s unvested stock options at March 31, 2014 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:

9

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Restricted Stock Units

A Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) is a notional account representing a grantee’s conditional right to receive at a future date one (1) share of Common Stock or its equivalent in value. Shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of an RSU may be issued with or without other consideration as determined by the Plan Committee in its sole discretion. RSUs may be settled in the sole discretion of the Plan Committee (i) by the distribution of shares of Common Stock equal to the grantee’s RSUs, (ii) by a lump sum payment of an amount in cash equal to the fair value of the shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be distributed to the grantee, or (iii) by a combination of cash and Common Stock. The RSUs granted under the 2008 and 2013 EI Plans vest (and will be settled) ratably over a 5-year period and are equity classified in the consolidated balance sheets. There were no RSUs granted in either the three months ended March 31, 2014 or March 31, 2013.

The fair value of each RSU grant is estimated on the grant date. The fair value of RSUs is set using the closing price of KID’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if not so listed, on the principal OTC System on which the common stock is traded on the date of grant. Compensation expense for RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period, based upon the market price of the shares underlying the awards on the date of grant. Pursuant to the terms of a transition and release agreement with Guy Paglinco (the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer), notwithstanding the terms of such awards, an aggregate of 2,000 unvested RSUs that otherwise would have been forfeited upon the termination of his employment (March 2, 2014), were permitted to remain outstanding and vest on March 8, 2014. The Company recognized $1,360 of incremental compensation expense as a result of the modification.

The following table summarizes information about RSU activity:

As of March 31, 2014, there was approximately $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.

Stock Appreciation Rights

A SAR is a right to receive a payment in cash, Common Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Plan Committee (other than with respect to 600,000 cash SARs granted to our current President and CEO discussed below) in an amount or value equal to the excess of (i) the fair value, or other specified valuation (which may not exceed fair value), of a specified number of shares of Common Stock on the date the right is exercised, over (ii) the fair value or other specified amount (which may not be less than fair value) of such shares of Common Stock on the date the right is granted; provided , however, that if a SAR is granted in tandem with or in substitution for a stock option, the designated fair value for purposes of the foregoing clause (ii) will be the fair value on the date such stock option was granted. No SARs will be exercisable later than ten (10) years after the date of grant. The SARs issued under the 2008 and 2013 EI Plans vest ratably over a period ranging from zero to five years, and unless terminated earlier, expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. SARs are granted at an exercise price equal to at least the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if not so listed, on the principal OTC System on which the common stock is traded on the date of grant.

SARs are accounted for at fair value at the date of grant in the consolidated statements of operations, are amortized on a straight line basis over the vesting term, and are equity-classified in the consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of 600,000 cash SARs granted to the Company’s President and CEO (until their conversion to the Replacement Options as described above). Including the 600,000 cash SARs, there were 545,000 and 700,000 SARs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The following modifications of SAR grants occurred with respect to grants outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and 2013: (i) 600,000 SARs granted to the Company’s President and CEO on March 15, 2013, which at the time of grant could be exercised solely for cash (the “Cash SARs”),were converted into the Replacement Options, on a one-for-one basis, on July 18, 2013 upon the approval of such conversion at KID’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (with no change to the grant date, exercise price, vesting schedule, or other terms thereof). As a result, the 600,000 Cash SARs were terminated, and the Replacement Options are equity classified in the consolidated balance sheets as of July 18, 2013. Prior to such conversion, the 600,000 Cash SARs were classified as a short-term liability on the consolidated balance sheets, and the fair value of this award was recalculated each quarter based upon its fair value at each balance sheet date; and (ii) pursuant to the terms of a transition and release agreement with Guy Paglinco, notwithstanding the terms of such awards, an aggregate of 5,600 unvested SARs that otherwise would have been forfeited on the date of the termination of his employment (March 2, 2014) were permitted to remain outstanding and vest on March 8, 2014. No incremental compensation cost resulted from these modifications. There were no SARs exercised in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

10

Table of Contents

Activity regarding outstanding SARs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (excluding the 600,000 Cash SARs) is as follows:

A summary of the Company’s unvested SARs at March 31, 2014 and changes during 2014 is as follows:

As of March 31, 2014, there was approximately $1.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested SARs, (excluding the 600,000 Cash SARs) which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.

The aggregate intrinsic value of the non-vested and vested outstanding SARs, including the 600,000 Cash SARs in 2013, at each of March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $164,438, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is the total pre-tax value of in-the-money SARs, which is the difference between the fair value at the measurement date and the exercise price of each SAR. The weighted average fair value of SARs, including the 600,000 Cash SARs in 2013, vested for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $350,000 and $233,000, respectively.

11

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Non-Restricted Stock Awards

Non-restricted stock is Common Stock awarded that is not subject to any restrictions, such as risk of forfeiture. Non-restricted stock awards are equity classified within the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of each non-restricted stock award is estimated on the date of grant using the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if not so listed, on the principal OTC System on which the common stock is traded on the date of grant.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 45,730 and 0 shares of non-restricted stock issued under the 2013 EI Plan, respectively. The awards in the first quarter of 2014 were made to the Company’s current directors in lieu of an aggregate cash payment of $37,500 for the February 2014 semi-annual directors’ retainer fee. Non-restricted stock grants, when made, are not subject to vesting restrictions. Compensation expense is equal to the fair value of the Common Stock awarded based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.

As of March 31, 2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to issuances of non-restricted stock.

Option/SAR Forfeitures

Except for 975 stock options which expired unexercised at the conclusion of their ten year contractual term in January 2014, all of the forfeited options/SARs described in the charts set forth above resulted from the termination of the employment of the respective grantees and the resulting forfeiture of non-vested and/or vested but unexercised options/SARs. Pursuant to the Company’s Plans, upon the termination of employment of a grantee, such grantee’s outstanding unexercised options/SARs are typically cancelled and deemed terminated as of the date of termination; provided, that if the termination is not for cause, all vested options/SARs generally remain outstanding for a period ranging from 30 to 90 days, and then expire to the extent not exercised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as of March 2, 2014, an aggregate of 5,600 unvested SARs that otherwise would have been forfeited upon the termination of the employment of Guy Paglinco (under his transition and release agreement), were permitted to remain outstanding and vest on March 8, 2014.

RSU Forfeitures

All of the forfeited RSUs described in the charts set forth above resulted from the termination of the employment of the respective grantees and the resulting forfeiture of unvested RSUs. Pursuant to the award agreements governing the outstanding RSUs, upon a grantee’s termination of employment, such grantee’s outstanding unvested RSUs are typically forfeited, except in the event of disability or death, in which case all restrictions lapse. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the termination of the employment of Guy Paglinco, an aggregate of 2,000 unvested RSUs that otherwise would have been forfeited upon such termination were permitted to remain outstanding and vest on March 8, 2014.

NOTE 3—WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES

Earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method is computed by dividing earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In determining EPS, earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the respective number of weighted-average shares outstanding for the period. Participating securities include unvested restricted stock awards (when outstanding) where, like the Company’s restricted stock awards, such awards carry a right to receive non-forfeitable dividends, if declared. As a result of the foregoing, and in accordance with the applicable accounting standard, vested and unvested shares (if any) of restricted stock are also included in the calculation of basic earnings per share. With respect to RSUs, as the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents is contingent upon vesting, in accordance with the applicable accounting standard, the Company does not include unvested RSUs in the calculation of basic earnings per share. To the extent such RSUs are settled in stock, upon settlement, such stock is included in the calculation of basic earnings per share. With respect to SARs and stock options, as the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents is contingent upon vesting and exercise (with respect to SARs, to the extent they are settled in stock), in accordance with the applicable accounting standard, the Company does not include unexercised SARs or stock options in the calculation of basic earnings per share. To the extent such SARs and stock options have vested and are exercised (with respect to SARs, to the extent they are settled in stock), the stock received upon such exercise is included in the calculation of basic earnings per share.

12

Table of Contents

The computation of net loss per diluted common share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 excluded 1.5 million and 0.5 million stock options (consisting of all outstanding options), respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss incurred during such periods.

The computation of net loss per diluted common share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 excluded 1.7 million and 1.5 million SARs (consisting of all outstanding SARs), respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss incurred during such periods.

NOTE 4—CONSOLIDATION PLAN AND 3PL AGREEMENT

The Company evaluated the long-term location of its distribution facilities to assess their effectiveness in servicing the Company’s customers, and determined to implement a consolidation plan (the “Consolidation Plan”), consisting of the transition to a single third-party logistics (“3PL”) company, the related closure (upon expiration of the applicable lease agreements) of its subsidiaries’ distribution centers in Cranbury, New Jersey; Southgate, California (closed in the first quarter of 2014); and Kentwood, Michigan, and the termination of certain existing 3PL agreements. Management authorized the Consolidation Plan as of November 13, 2013. The Consolidation Plan is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 2014.

As part of the Consolidation Plan, on November 13, 2013, KID entered into an Operating Services Agreement (the “3PL Agreement”) with National Distribution Centers, L.P., the warehousing and distribution division of NFI (“NFI”) for comprehensive 3PL services for the Company’s warehousing and distribution operations, based out of NFI’s distribution center in Chino, California. The initial term of the 3PL Agreement will continue through March 1, 2019, subject to customary early termination provisions, and the right by either party to terminate in the event that specified pricing assumptions materially change, and the parties are unable to agree upon an appropriate fee adjustment. The term of the 3PL Agreement will automatically renew for successive 12-month periods (up to an additional 5 years), unless either party provides written notice to the other party of its desire to terminate the 3PL Agreement at least 120 days prior to the end of the then current term.

The Company is obligated to pay $1.5 million to NFI in start-up costs over a nine-month period beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013, which will be partially offset by reduced fixed costs over the initial term of the 3PL Agreement, including zero or reduced monthly storage fees during the four-month period beginning on the commencement date. If the Company terminates the 3PL Agreement prior to its expiration following a breach by NFI of its material obligations thereunder (after an applicable cure period), NFI will be obligated to reimburse the Company for a specified pro-rated portion of the start-up costs paid by the Company.

Of the $1.5 million to be paid to NFI in start-up costs as described above, approximately $0.9 million was paid in installments over the course of the fourth quarter of 2013, $0.2 million was paid in installments over the course of the first quarter of 2014, and the remainder is anticipated to be paid during the second quarter of 2014. The Company recorded these payments as a prepaid expense and will amortize the payment over the term of the agreement. In addition to these start-up costs, the Company estimates that it will incur a total of approximately $1.7 million in cash expenditures in connection with the Consolidation Plan, consisting primarily of the following: one-time termination benefits of approximately $600,000; project management costs of approximately $600,000; moving costs of approximately $400,000; and retention bonuses of approximately $100,000. Approximately $1.1 million of the $1.7 million in anticipated cash expenditures described above was recognized as an expense in the fourth quarter of 2013 (as set forth in the table below), $147,000 was recognized as an expense in the first quarter of 2014, with the remainder expected to be expensed during the second quarter of 2014. In addition to the $1.1 million in start-up costs paid to NFI as described above, approximately $0.6 million of actual cash expenditures were paid through March 31, 2014, with the remainder currently anticipated to be paid during the second quarter of 2014.

13

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information of Other Consolidation Plan Expense (in thousands)

NOTE 5—DEBT

See the section captioned “Post-Amendment No. 5 Events” below for a description of certain circumstances which constitute failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default under the Company’s credit agreement, which have not been waived as of the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and a reservation of rights letter received by the Company from its senior lenders in connection therewith.

Credit Agreement

On December 21, 2012, the Company, specified domestic subsidiaries consisting of Kids Line, LLC, Sassy, Inc., LaJobi, Inc., CoCaLo, Inc., I&J Holdco, Inc., and RB Trademark Holdco, LLC (such entities collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers”), executed a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Salus Capital Partners, LLC, as Lender, Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (the “Agent”), and the other lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Lenders”). The obligations of the Borrowers under the Credit Agreement are joint and several. All of the Company’s indebtedness for borrowed money under the Credit Agreement is classified as short term debt. The Credit Agreement was amended on each of April 16, 2013, May 16, 2013, August 13, 2013, November 14, 2013, April 8, 2014, and May 14, 2014. The current provisions of the Credit Agreement (as amended) are provided immediately below (but are subject to, and are in all cases qualified by, the provisions of the reservation of rights letter described in “Post-Amendment No. 5 Events”). Each amendment to the Credit Agreement (including the reasons therefor) is described in detail in the following section captioned “ Prior Financial Covenants and Amendments to Credit Agreement” .

The Credit Agreement currently provides for an aggregate maximum $60.0 million revolving credit facility, composed of: (i) a revolving $44.0 million tranche (the “Tranche A Revolver”), with a $5.0 million sublimit for letters of credit; and (ii) a $16.0 million first-in last-out tranche (the “Tranche A-1 Revolver”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Borrowers will be permitted to (upon irrevocable notice to the Agent) to increase the maximum commitment under the Tranche A Revolver to $48.0 million, and maximum commitment under the Tranche A-1 Revolver to $17.0 million, provided that, among other things, applicable conditions to lending are satisfied, and prior to delivery of such notice, the Borrowers shall have delivered to the Agent an updated business plan demonstrating the need for such increase to the reasonable satisfaction of the Agent. The Borrowers may not request extensions of credit under the Tranche A Revolver unless they have borrowed the full amount available under the Tranche A-1 Revolver. Borrowers must cash collateralize all outstanding letters of credit.

At March 31, 2014, an aggregate of $48.0 million was borrowed under the Credit Agreement ($32.3 million under the Tranche A Revolver and $15.7 million under the Tranche A-1 Revolver). At December 31, 2013, an aggregate of $53.1 million was borrowed under the Credit Agreement ($37.4 million under the Tranche A Revolver and $15.7 million under the Tranche A-1 Revolver). At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, revolving loan availability was $0.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a specified 30-day LIBOR rate (subject to a minimum LIBOR floor of 0.50%), plus a margin of 6.0% per annum with respect to the Tranche A Revolver and a margin of 13.25% per annum with respect to the Tranche A-1 Revolver. Interest is payable monthly in arrears and on the maturity date of the facility. During the continuance of any event of default, existing interest rates may be increased by 3.50% per annum (such default rate is in effect as of May 19, 2014). The weighted average interest rates for the outstanding loans under the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were 4.5% with respect to the Tranche A Revolver and 11.75% with respect to the Tranche A-1 Revolver (interest rate margins on each of the Tranche A Revolver and the Tranche A-1 Revolver were increased by 2% per annum as of April 1, 2014 pursuant to the April 2014 amendment to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 4”)).

Subject to the borrowing base described below, the Borrowers may borrow, repay (without premium or penalty) and re-borrow advances under each of the Tranche A Revolver and the Tranche A-1 Revolver until December 21, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), at which time all outstanding obligations under the Credit Agreement are due and payable (subject to early termination provisions). Other than in connection with a permanent reduction of the Tranche A-1 Revolver as described below, repayments shall be first applied to the Tranche A Revolver, and upon repayment of the Tranche A Revolver in full, to the Tranche A-1 Revolver.

14

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Borrowers may in their discretion terminate or permanently reduce the commitments under the Tranche A Revolver or the Tranche A-1 Revolver, provided that the Borrowers may not reduce the commitments under the Tranche A-1 Revolver to less than $15.0 million while commitments under the Tranche A Revolver remain outstanding, and if the commitments under the Tranche A Revolver are terminated or reduced to zero, the commitments under the Tranche A-1 Revolver will be automatically terminated. In the event of such permanent reduction (or in the event of any termination of the commitments prior to the Maturity Date), the Borrowers shall pay to the Agent for the benefit of the Lenders or as otherwise determined by the Agent, specified termination fees (ranging from 1.5% to 0.50% of the amount of the commitments so reduced or outstanding at the time of termination), depending on how long after December 21, 2012 such reduction or termination occurs, provided that the Borrowers may permanently reduce the commitments under the Tranche A-1 Revolver from time to time to no less than $15.0 million without the incurrence of any premium, penalty or fee, so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing. specified termination fees (ranging from 1.5% to 0.50% of the amount of the commitments so reduced or outstanding at the time of termination), depending on how long after December 21, 2012 such reduction or termination occurs, provided that the Borrowers may permanently reduce the commitments under the Tranche A-1 Revolver from time to time to no less than $15.0 million without the incurrence of any premium, penalty or fee, so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing.

The Tranche A Revolver is subject to borrowing base limitations based on 95% of the face amount of specified eligible accounts receivable, net of reserves established in the reasonable discretion of the Agent, including dilution reserves; plus the lesser of: (x) 68% of eligible inventory stated at the lower of cost or market value (in accordance with the Borrowers’ accounting practices), net of reserves established in the reasonable discretion of the Agent; and (y) 100% of the appraised orderly liquidation value, net of costs and expenses, of eligible inventory stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of inventory reserves; minus an availability block of $2.768 million (increasing to $3.5 million on June 14, 2014, and reverting to $4.0 million, its original amount, on August 1, 2014), or if an event of default exists, such other amount established by the Agent; minus customary availability reserves (without duplication).

The Tranche A-1 Revolver is subject to borrowing base limitations based on the lesser of: (i) 50% of the fair market value (as determined by an independent appraiser engaged by the Agent from time to time) of specified registered eligible intellectual property, net of reserves established in the reasonable discretion of the Agent, and (ii) the aggregate commitments for the Tranche A-1 Revolver at such time; provided that availability under the Tranche A-1 Revolver is capped at 40% of the combined borrowing bases of the Tranche A Revolver and Tranche A-1 Revolver.

The Company is currently subject to the following financial covenants (the “New Financial Covenants”):

(a) the Loan Parties may not permit the Collateral Coverage Ratio (defined as the appraised value of eligible inventory, the net orderly liquidation value of eligible intellectual property, and the face amount of eligible receivables, minus reserves and the availability block, to total amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement) for the trailing 30 day average, to be less than 1.0:1.0. This covenant shall be tested monthly, commencing April 30, 2014, and as of the last day of each month thereafter. The Company was in compliance with this financial covenant as of April 30, 2014.

In addition, commencing with the month ending August 31, 2014:

(b) the Loan Parties may not permit the average daily Availability for any fiscal month, calculated under, or in accordance with, the Agent’s loan accounting system, to be more than fifteen percent (15%) less than the Availability projected for the last day of such month in the Business Plan most recently delivered to the Agent; and

(c) the Loan Parties may not permit gross sales for the trailing 3-month period, calculated as of the last day of each month, to be more than fifteen percent (15%) less than the gross sales projected for such period (ended as of the end of such month) in the Business Plan most recently delivered to the Agent.

Prior to the execution of the Amendment No. 4, the Company had been subject to the financial covenants set forth in clauses (b) and (c) above for each month commencing in November of 2013.

Loans under the Credit Agreement are required to be prepaid upon the occurrence, and with the net proceeds, of certain transactions, including the incurrence of specified indebtedness, most asset sales and debt or equity issuances, as well as extraordinary receipts, including tax refunds, litigation proceeds, certain insurance proceeds and indemnity payments. Loans under the Credit Agreement are also required to be prepaid with cash collateral required to be held by letter of credit issuers pursuant to the Credit Agreement on account of expired or reduced letters of credit.

15

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, as well as various affirmative and negative covenants in addition to the New Financial Covenants, including, without limitation, financial reporting requirements, notice requirements with respect to specified events, required compliance certificates, and certificates from the Company’s independent auditors. In addition, among other restrictions, the Loan Parties (the Borrowers and guarantors, if any) and their subsidiaries (other than specified inactive subsidiaries) are prohibited from: consummating a merger or other fundamental change; paying cash dividends or distributions; purchasing or redeeming stock (including under the Company’s stock purchase plan); incurring additional debt or allowing liens to exist on their assets; making acquisitions; disposing of assets; issuing equity and consummating other transactions outside of the ordinary course of business; making specified payments and investments; engaging in transactions with affiliates; amending material contracts to the extent such amendment would result in a default or event of default or would be materially adverse to the Lenders; paying Duty Amounts (defined below); or paying any earnout consideration with respect to the Company’s 2008 purchase of the LaJobi assets (“LaJobi Earnout Consideration”), subject to limited specified exceptions, the more significant of which are described below. “Duty Amounts” refers to all customs duties, interest, penalties and any other amounts payable or owed to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) by LaJobi, Kids Line, CoCaLo or Sassy, to the extent that such amounts relate to specified duty underpayments by such subsidiaries to U.S. Customs and LaJobi’s business and staffing practices in Asia prior to March 30, 2011.

To the extent the Company has sufficient availability (and is permitted to borrow) under the Credit Agreement therefor, Duty Amounts and LaJobi Earnout Consideration may be paid either: (i) in accordance with the business plan required to be provided to the Agent for the relevant year, or (ii) otherwise, so long as no default or event of default is continuing or would result therefrom, and availability, both before and after giving effect to such payment, is at least $10.0 million.

The Company will be permitted to issue and sell equity interests (other than equity interests that mature or are mandatorily redeemable or redeemable at the option of the holder, in whole or in part, on or prior to the date that is ninety-one days after the Maturity Date), so long as the net proceeds therefrom are applied to repayment of outstanding obligations under the Credit Agreement, or pursuant to other specified exceptions as set forth in the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement also requires that the Borrowers provide the Agent with, among other things, an annual business plan containing specified monthly information and projections, monthly compliance certificates, and frequent and detailed financial, business and collateral reports. In addition, the Borrowers are required to provide, on the 7 ^th business day of each month, a certified gross sales report indicating gross sales figures for the immediately preceding completed fiscal month.

Substantially all cash, other than cash set aside for the benefit of employees (and certain other exceptions), will be swept and applied to repayment of amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default (including any failure to remain in compliance with the New Financial Covenants). See the section captioned “Post-Amendment No. 5 Events” below for a description of certain circumstances which constitute failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default which have not been waived as of the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and a reservation of rights letter received by the Company from its senior lenders in connection therewith. While an event of default occurs and is continuing (in addition to default interest as described above and other remedies available to the Lenders), the Agent may, in its discretion, declare the commitments under the Credit Agreement to be terminated and/or refuse to permit further borrowings thereunder, declare outstanding obligations thereunder to be due and payable, demand cash collateralization of letters of credit, capitalize any accrued and unpaid interest by adding such amount to the outstanding principal balance (provided that upon events of bankruptcy, the commitments will be immediately due and payable, and the Borrowers will be required to cash collateralize letters of credit, without any action of the Agent or any Lender), and/or seize collateral or take other actions of secured creditors. In addition, an event of default under the Credit Agreement constitutes a cross-default under certain license agreements that the Company maintains.

The Credit Agreement also contains customary conditions to lending, including that no default or event of default shall exist, or would result from any proposed extension of credit.

In December 2012, the Company paid fees to the Agent in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.1 million in connection with the execution of the Credit Agreement. The Borrowers are also required to pay a monthly commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the aggregate unused portion of each of the Tranche A Revolver and the Tranche A-1 Revolver (payable monthly in arrears); customary letter of credit fronting fees (plus standard issuance and other processing fees) to the applicable issuer; a monthly monitoring fee to the Agent; an annual agency fee, and other customary fees and reimbursements of expenses. Financing costs, including fees and expenses paid upon execution of the Credit Agreement, were recorded in accordance with applicable financial accounting standards.

In order to secure the obligations of the Loan Parties under the Credit Agreement, each Borrower has pledged 100% of the equity interests of its domestic subsidiaries (other than inactive subsidiaries), including a pledge of the capital stock of each Borrower (other than the Company), as well as 65% of the equity interests of specified foreign subsidiaries, to the Agent, and has granted security interests to the Agent in substantially all of its personal property, all pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012, by the Company and the other Borrowers and Loan Parties party thereto from time to time in favor of the Agent, as Collateral Agent. As additional security for Sassy, Inc.’s obligations under the Credit Agreement, Sassy, Inc. had previously granted a mortgage for the benefit of the Agent and the Lenders on the real property located at 2305 Breton Industrial Park Drive, S.E., Kentwood, Michigan, however, this mortgage was released by the Agent upon the consummation of the sale of such property in November of 2013.

16

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Prior Financial Covenants and Amendments to Credit Agreement

Amendment No. 1

Under the original terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company was subject to a monthly minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant, based on a trailing twelve-month period ending on the applicable testing date, and a minimum quarterly consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.1:1.0 (the “Prior Financial Covenants”). The minimum monthly consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounts required are described in detail in Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s Quarterly Report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. A description of how the Prior Financial Covenants were defined and calculated can be found in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2013 10-K. On April 16, 2013 the Borrowers and the Agent executed a First Amendment to Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”), to amend the definition of Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of determining compliance with the Prior Financial Covenants to include an additional add-back to net income for the amount of any additional expense or accrual in excess of the Company’s existing product return reserves in connection with the a deduction from outstanding amounts payable made by a large customer, up to a maximum aggregate amount of $600,000 (an “Excess Accrual”). In April 2013, the Borrowers paid a fee of $50,000 in connection with the execution of Amendment No. 1. As a result of the use of an Excess Accrual of $261,000 (recorded in the third quarter of 2013 in final settlement of this matter), the Borrowers accrued an additional $50,000 fee payable to the Lenders.

Amendment No. 2 and Letter Agreement

As of March 31, 2013, although the Company was in compliance with the Prior Financial Covenants, it believed that it would be unlikely to remain in compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the month ended April 30, 2013 and, potentially, certain future monthly testing periods. Accordingly, the Borrowers and the Agent executed a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”) on May 16, 2013, effective as of April 1, 2013. Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, among other things: (i) the Adjusted EBITDA covenant would be tested on a quarterly basis, unless and until specified trigger events described below occur; (ii) the minimum Adjusted EBITDA required was lowered for all remaining testing periods other than the trailing twelve-month period ending December 31, 2013; and (iii) the definition of Adjusted EBITDA was amended to increase the amount of certain permissible add-backs to net income in the calculation thereof. The minimum quarterly consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounts required prior to the occurrence of the Trigger Event described below were as follows: $8.2 million for the trailing twelve-month period ending June 30, 2013; $10.9 million for the trailing twelve-month period ending September 30, 2013; and $14.338 million for the trailing twelve-month period ending December 31, 2013. The Borrowers paid a fee of $50,000 in connection with the execution of Amendment No. 2, and agreed to a four month increase in the Agent’s monthly monitoring fee (for an aggregate additional payment of $30,000).

Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, monthly testing of the Adjusted EBITDA covenant would resume if the Loan Parties failed to maintain: (x) average daily availability for a trailing two month period of $9.0 million, measured on each of July 1, 2013 and August 1, 2013, and $11.0 million, measured on the first day of each month commencing September 1, 2013; or (y) a ratio of operating expenses to gross profit, tested as of the last day of each month, commencing June 30, 2013, for the year-to-date period, of not more than 105% (either of such events, a “Trigger Event”). The Trigger Event pertaining to availability occurred as of July 1, 2013, requiring a reversion to monthly testing. Subsequent to the occurrence of the Trigger Event as of July 1, 2013, the minimum consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounts for the trailing twelve-month period ending as of the end of each remaining month in 2013 were as follows: July 31, 2013: $9.0 million; August 31, 2013: $9.7 million; September 30, 2013: $10.9 million; October 31, 2013: $12.8 million; November 30, 2013: $14.3 million; and December 31, 2013: $14.338 million.

As previously disclosed, the Company believed that it would be unlikely to remain in compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the month ended July 31, 2013, and may not remain in compliance with such covenant for certain other monthly testing periods in 2013. As a result, the Borrowers and the Agent executed a letter agreement on August 13, 2013 (the “Letter Agreement”), to, among other things, eliminate the requirement for the Company to comply with the monthly Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the testing periods ending on each of July 31, 2013 and August 31, 2013. In connection with the execution of the Letter Agreement, the Company paid a fee of $25,000 to the Agent, and agreed, commencing October 1, 2013, to a $5,000 monthly increase in the monitoring fee payable to the Agent.

17

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Covenant Defaults and Amendment No. 3

As of September 30, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with the monthly consolidated Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the trailing twelve month period ended September 30, 2013, or the consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, and anticipated that it would not be in compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the trailing twelve month period ended October 31, 2013 (the “Covenant Defaults”). As a result, the Credit Agreement was amended on November 14, 2013, via a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Limited Waiver (“Amendment No. 3”), among other things: (i) to waive the Covenant Defaults (and any default or event of default resulting therefrom); (ii) commencing with the month ending November 30, 2013, to eliminate the Adjusted EBITDA covenant and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant, and replace them with the New Financial Covenants; (iii) to require delivery of a monthly gross sales report; and (iv) to accelerate the delivery date of the 2014 business plan (which with the consent of the Agent, was delivered on December 20, 2013).

Commitment Reduction

As originally executed, the Credit Agreement provided for an aggregate maximum $80.0 million revolving credit facility, composed of: (i) a $60.0 Tranche A Revolver, with a $5.0 million sublimit for letters of credit; and (ii) a $20.0 Tranche A-1 Revolver. As the Borrowers, the Agent and the Lenders agreed that it was in the interests of the parties to reduce the Aggregate Commitments under the Credit Agreement, effective as of December 16, 2013, they executed an Agreement Regarding Commitments (“Commitment Reduction”), pursuant to which: (i) maximum commitments under the Tranche A Revolver were reduced to $44.0 million, and (ii) maximum commitments under the Tranche A-1 Revolver were reduced to $16.0 million. The Agent and the Lenders waived the termination fee of approximately $300,000 that would otherwise have been applicable to such commitment reduction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Borrowers will be permitted (upon irrevocable notice to the Agent) to increase the maximum commitment under the Tranche A Revolver to $48.0 million, and maximum commitment under the Tranche A-1 Revolver to $17.0 million on the conditions described above. In connection with Commitment Reduction, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for the unamortized portion of deferred financing costs in the fourth quarter of 2013 in the approximate amount of $440,000 which was recorded as interest expense.

Amendment No. 4

The Company was not in compliance with the financial covenant pertaining to Availability under the Credit Agreement for the month ended February 28, 2014, the financial covenants pertaining to Availability and gross sales for the month ended March 31, 2014, or the covenant requiring the delivery of annual financial statements within 90 days of the end of 2013, accompanied by a report and opinion of its auditors without a going concern or other qualification or exception. In addition, trading of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was suspended as of March 31, 2014. The Company also anticipated that it may not be in compliance with both financial covenants for the month ended April 30, 2014. All of the foregoing, in addition to the Going Concern Events (as defined below), constituted (or may have constituted) events of default under the Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Existing Events of Default”). The Company also anticipated that it would determine and disclose in its financial statements for 2013 that there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, and that a related explanatory paragraph would be included in the report and opinion of the Company’s auditors for such year (the “Going Concern Events”). The Going Concern Events may also violate specified provisions of the Credit Agreement, and result in a failure of the conditions to lending thereunder.

In connection with the foregoing, the Borrowers, the Agent and the Required Lenders entered into Amendment No. 4, which waived the Existing Events of Default, and any event of default or failure of any condition to lending arising from the violation of specified provisions of the Credit Agreement resulting from the Going Concern Events or the failure of the Borrowers to make a payment under a material license and receipt of a related notice of breach (which breach has since been cured). In addition, among other things, compliance with each of the Availability and gross sales financial covenants was suspended until the month ending August 31, 2014, the availability block was reduced by $0.5 million (i.e., $3.5 million, instead of $4.0 million, will be subtracted from amounts otherwise available for borrowing to compute availability) for a period of four months, and the permitted transit period for in-transit inventory was increased (thereby increasing the amount of eligible inventory used to calculate availability) for a period of four months. In consideration of the foregoing, among other things, the Company is subject to a new monthly Collateral Coverage Ratio (the value, as defined in Amendment No. 4, of eligible inventory, intellectual property and trade receivables to total outstandings under the Credit Agreement) of 1.0:1.0, interest rate margins applicable to each of the Tranche A Revolver and the Tranche A-1 Revolver were increased by 2.0% per annum, and the Agent was granted specified KID board of directors observation and participation rights (in a non-voting capacity).

Amendment No. 5

The Company notified the Agent of circumstances which constitute or may constitute failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default (the “Events of Default”) pertaining to the breach of various representations and covenants under the Credit Agreement resulting from the Company’s non-payment of several suppliers and other service providers, and the receipt of a related notice of breach from one of LaJobi’s material licensors claiming that LaJobi failed to ship certain goods to the licensor’s customers as a result of outstanding subcontractor invoices. See Note 13 for further detail.

Accordingly, the Borrowers, the Agent and the Required Lenders executed a Waiver and Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement as of May 14, 2014 (“Amendment No. 5”), to waive any failures of conditions to lending and events of default resulting from the Events of Default. In addition, in order to increase the amount of eligible receivables under the Tranche A borrowing base, Amendment No. 5 further reduces the availability block from $3.5 million to $2.768 million for 30 days (such block will return to $3.5 million on June 14, 2014, and will revert to its original amount of $4.0 million on August 1, 2014). The Company recorded a fee of $132,000 in connection with the execution of Amendment No. 5 in May of 2014, which is payable on June 14, 2014.

Post-Amendment No. 5 Events

Subsequent to the execution of Amendment No. 5, the Company received a notice of breach and amendment from one of Sassy’s material licensors as a result of a late royalty payment (which was cured prior to receipt of the notice) and breaches arising from cessation of certain shipping and distribution activities. Also subsequent to the execution of Amendment No. 5, and as previously disclosed, the Company has determined to suspend LaJobi’s wood furniture operations, and in connection with such suspension, has terminated (on mutually agreed terms), a related license agreement with Graco Children’s Products, Inc. (“Graco”).

The Company notified the Agent and the Required Lenders of these events (and the breach of various representations and covenants in connection therewith), and has requested a waiver of the failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default arising therefrom. There can be no assurance that that the requested relief will be granted (on terms acceptable to the Company or at all), or that if obtained, the Company will remain in compliance with the Credit Agreement. Unless and until the Company is able to secure a waiver of the failure of conditions to lending, its lenders are entitled to refuse to permit any further draw-downs on the Company’s revolvers. Unless and until the Company is able to secure a waiver of the events of default, its lenders are entitled to, among other things, accelerate the loans under the Credit Agreement, declare the commitments thereunder to be terminated and/or refuse to permit further draw-downs on the revolvers, seize collateral or take other actions of secured creditors. Any of the foregoing is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and to cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent. See Item 1A — Risk Factors, “Inability to maintain compliance with the bank covenants” of the 2013 10-K.

With respect to the foregoing, on May 19, 2014 the Lead Borrower received a notice of default and reservation of rights letter (the “Reservation of Rights Letter”) from the Agent. Pursuant to the Reservation of Rights Letter, the Agent informed the Borrowers that there are a number of failures of conditions to lending and events of default existing under the Credit Agreement and that effective immediately, all Loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at the default rate set forth in the Credit Agreement. Further, the Reservation of Rights Letter specifies that the Borrowers comply with certain requirements, including, without limitation, the immediate retention of a financial advisor and investment banker in order to prepare their assets and businesses for sale, and delivery of weekly rolling 13-week cash flow forecasts. According to the Reservation of Rights Letter, the Agent and the Lenders are presently evaluating all available courses of action that may be available under the Credit Agreement, law or in equity with respect to the existing events of default, such that their voluntary forbearance does not constitute a waiver of such events of default, and the Agent and Lenders expressly reserve all such rights and remedies with respect thereto. The Reservation of Rights Letter also indicates that while the Lenders are not obligated to make additional loans or otherwise extend credit to the Borrowers, to the extent a Lender makes any such loans or extensions of credit, such loans or extensions of credit shall be made at such Lender’s sole discretion, and shall not prevent such Lender from ceasing to make additional loans or other extensions of credit, or to exercise any rights or remedies.

As a result of the foregoing and the circumstances described in Note 13, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be permitted to borrow under the Credit Agreement or that its senior lenders will not exercise their rights and remedies under the Credit Agreement or otherwise, and there continues to be substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

18

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 6—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of assets and liabilities is determined by reference to the estimated price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The relevant FASB standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures.

Financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company currently has no Level 1 assets or liabilities that are measured at a fair value on a recurring basis.

Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assessment about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company currently has no Level 3 assets or liabilities that are measured at a fair value on a recurring basis.

This hierarchy requires the Company to minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs are based on the Company’s market assumptions. Unobservable inputs require significant management judgment or estimation. In some cases, the inputs used to measure an asset or liability may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is required to be classified using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In accordance with the applicable standard, the Company is not permitted to adjust quoted market prices in an active market.

Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, current portion of note receivable (described below), inventory, income tax receivable, trade accounts payable and accrued expenses are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company has a note receivable (in connection with the sales of specified trademarks and trade names) with a face value of $500,000, of which $400,000 is reflected on the consolidated balance sheet in other long term assets at its present value of $357,000, with the balance of $100,000 being reflected in other current assets.

The carrying value of the Company’s borrowings under both the Tranche A Revolver and the Tranche A-1 Revolver (defined and described in Note 5) approximates fair value because interest rates applicable thereto are variable, based on prevailing market rates.

There were no material changes to the Company’s valuation techniques during the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to those used in prior periods.

19

Table of Contents

On June 30, 2013, RB Trademark Holdco LLC (“Seller”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an acquisition agreement (the “Agreement”) with Larsen and Bowman Holdings Ltd., a Limited Corporation organized under the laws of British Columbia (“Buyer”), for the sale by Seller to Buyer of specified intellectual property, consisting generally of the “Russ” and “Applause” trademarks and trade names, and associated goodwill (collectively, the “IP”). The purchase price for the IP (which has no value on the Company’s books) was $1.25 million, payable by Buyer to Seller by promissory note (the “Note”). A $100,000 installment on the Note was paid on July 2, 2013, a payment of $655,000 was paid on July 31, 2013, and the remaining $500,000 is payable in specified installments over a four year period. The obligations of the Buyer under the Note are secured by the IP pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement dated June 30, 2013. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of $1.2 million during the second quarter of 2013 for this transaction.

Aggregate amortization expense was approximately $295,000 and $420,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) Topic 350, indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if a triggering event occurs indicating that an impairment may exist. The Company’s annual impairment testing is performed in the fourth quarter of each year (unless specified triggering events warrant more frequent testing). The Company’s other intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. All intangible assets, both definite-lived and indefinite-lived, were tested for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2013. The review for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including trade names, is based on whether the fair value of such trade names exceeds their carrying value. We determined fair value by performing a projected discounted cash flow analysis based on the Relief-From-Royalty Method for all indefinite-lived trade names. Definite-lived intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, which is generally based on discounted cash flows. In its analysis, the Company used a five-year projection period, which has been its prior practice, and projected the long-term growth rate of each of its four business units, as well as the assumed royalty rate that could be obtained by each such business unit by licensing out each intangible trade name. For the year-end 2013 testing, the Company kept its long-term growth rate at 2.5% for all of its business units, and used assumed royalty rates of 3.0%, 4.5%, 2.0% and 5.0% for Kids Line, Sassy, LaJobi and CoCaLo, respectively. For 2012, the Company used assumed royalty rates of 3.0%, 3.5%, 2.0% and 5.5% for Kids Line, Sassy, LaJobi and CoCaLo, respectively. The assumed royalty rate increased with respect to Sassy from the 2012 rate of 3.5%, as a result of projected increased profitability at this business unit. The assumed royalty rate decreased with respect to CoCaLo from the 2012 rate of 5.5%, as a result of decreased profitability at this business unit in 2013. The Company also increased the discount rate slightly to mitigate risks inherent in any projections. As the carrying value of the Kids Line, LaJobi, and CoCaLo trade names exceeded their respective fair values due to revised future cash flow projections resulting from meaningfully lower sales for the year, the Company recorded an impairment with respect thereto of $2.0 million, $1.8 million, and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The Company also recorded an impairment of approximately $4.0 million to the LaJobi trade name in the third quarter of 2013, for an aggregate impairment of $5.8 million to the LaJobi trade name for the year ended December 31, 2013. As the fair value of the Sassy trade name exceeded its carrying value, no impairments to this intangible asset were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2013. No impairments were recorded with respect to intangible assets with definite lives in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Due to continued liquidity issues during the first quarter of 2014, the Company again determined that indicators of impairment of its definite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets other than the Sassy trade name existed, and as a result conducted testing of all such assets as of March 31, 2014. The Company determined the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets by performing a projected discounted cash flow analysis based on the Relief-From-Royalty Method. In the Company’s March 31, 2014 analysis, it used a five-year projection period, consistent with prior practice. For the interim testing, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to retain the assumed royalty rate of 5% for CoCaLo, and as a result of decreased profitability, reduced the assumed royalty rate for Kids Line from 3.0% to 1.0%. The fair value of the Kids Line and CoCaLo trade names were determined to be lower than their respective carrying values due to revised future cash flow projections resulting from meaningfully lower sales to certain of its major customers. This resulted in non-cash impairments of approximately $3.3 million and $2.8 million to the Kids Line and CoCaLo trade names, respectively, which were recorded in cost of sales in the quarter ended March 31, 2014. In addition, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Kids Line definite lived intangibles exceeded its estimated future cash flows, and in connection therewith, recorded a non-cash impairment of $6.1 million for Kids Line customer relationships in cost of sales in the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Finally, the LaJobi trade names and customer relationships were each determined to be fully impaired as a result of continuing unprofitability in this business unit. Accordingly, an aggregate non-cash impairment charge of approximately $11.8 million (approximately $2.9 million for the LaJobi trade name and approximately $8.9 million for the LaJobi customer relationships) was recorded in cost of sales in the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

20

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

As many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, the assumptions and estimates used in such assessment may change in future periods, which could require that the Company record additional impairment charges to the Company’s assets. The Company will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether additional asset impairment testing or recordation is warranted.

A measure of profit or loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and long lived assets for March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 can be found in the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively.

The Company currently categorizes its sales in five product categories: Hard Good Basics, Soft Good Basics, Toys and Entertainment, Accessories and Décor, and Other. Hard Good Basics includes cribs and other nursery furniture, feeding products, baby gear and organizers. Soft Good Basics includes bedding, blankets and mattresses. Toys and Entertainment includes developmental toys, bath toys and mobiles. Accessories and Décor includes hampers, lamps, rugs and décor. Other includes all other products that do not fit in the above four categories. The Company’s consolidated net sales by product category, as a percentage of total consolidated net sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Customers who account for a significant percentage of the Company’s gross sales are shown in the table below:

21

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The loss of these customers or any other significant customers, or a significant reduction in the volume of business conducted with such customers, could have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Company does not normally require collateral or other security to support credit sales.

As part of its ongoing risk assessment procedures, the Company monitors concentrations of credit risk associated with financial institutions with which it conducts business. The Company seeks to avoid concentration with any single financial institution. The Company also monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to which it grants credit terms in the normal course of business.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately 79% of the Company’s dollar volume of purchases was attributable to manufacturing in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). The PRC currently enjoys “permanent normal trade relations” (“PNTR”) status under U.S. tariff laws, which generally provides a favorable category of U.S. import duties. The loss of such PNTR status would result in a substantial increase in the import duty for products manufactured for the Company in the PRC and imported into the United States and would result in increased costs for the Company.

For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the suppliers accounting for the greatest dollar volume of the Company’s purchases accounted for approximately 9% and 16%, respectively, of such purchases, and the five largest suppliers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 36% and 47% of such purchases, respectively.

NOTE 9—INCOME TAXES

The Company uses the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to allow for the utilization of its deductible temporary differences and loss and credit carry forwards.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions, both within the United States and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities regarding the inclusion of certain items in taxable income, the deductibility of certain expenses, transfer pricing, the utilization and carryforward of various tax credits, and the utilization of various carryforward items such as capital losses, and net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”). At March 31, 2014, the amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state, and foreign taxes was approximately $304,000, including approximately $90,000 of interest and penalties.

Activity regarding the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:

Based upon the expiration of statutes of limitations and/or the conclusion of tax examinations in several jurisdictions, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the total amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits discussed above may decrease by up to $260,000 within twelve months of March 31, 2014, and such amount is reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as current income taxes payable.

The Company’s policy is to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $97.1 million and $85.5 million, respectively. The Company has recorded valuation allowances on substantially all of its deferred tax assets, and the increase in the valuation allowance during the three months ended March 31, 2014 of $11.6 million from the year ended December 31, 2013 is due to the changes in the underlying deferred tax assets for the period. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible and other factors. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates all available positive and negative evidence, including the Company’s past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses and near-term forecasts of future taxable income that is consistent with the plans and estimates management is using to manage its underlying businesses, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, and tax planning strategies. This analysis is updated quarterly. Based on this analysis, the Company has recorded valuation allowances on substantially all of its deferred tax assets since 2012 as a result of the Company’s estimates of current and future taxable income during the carry forward period, and the fact that it is in a three-year cumulative loss position. Management will continue to periodically evaluate the valuation allowance and, to the extent that conditions change, a portion of such valuation allowance could be reversed in future periods.

22

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $27,000 on loss before income tax provision of $31.7 million. The difference between the effective tax rate of -0.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% was related to: (i) a loss before income tax provision for which the Company did not record a benefit due to a year-to-date loss and valuation allowances on its deferred tax assets ($11.1 million); (ii) foreign tax provisions and withholding taxes in a jurisdiction with year-to-date income and historical profitability ($18,000); (iii) an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits ($5,000) as a result of additional interest being accrued; and (iv) state tax provisions ($3,000). The income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $37,000 on loss before income tax provision of $946,000. The difference between the effective tax rate of -3.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% was related to: (i) a loss before income tax provision for which the Company did not record a benefit due to a year-to-date loss and valuation allowances on its deferred tax assets ($331,000); (ii) foreign tax provisions and withholding taxes in a jurisdiction with year-to-date income and historical profitability ($32,000); and (iii) an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits ($5,000) as a result of additional interest being accrued.

The Company is currently under examination in several tax jurisdictions and remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for the applicable tax jurisdiction. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, all years prior to 2010 are closed. The Company was recently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2011 tax year. The examination commenced in the second quarter of 2013 and concluded in January 2014 with no assessment. In states and foreign jurisdictions, the years subsequent to 2009 remain open and are currently under examination or are subject to examination by the taxing authorities.

NOTE 10—LITIGATION; COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a) LaJobi Matters

As has been previously disclosed, the Company’s LaJobi subsidiary was selected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) for a “Focused Assessment” of its import practices and procedures, which commenced in January 2011. In preparing for this “Focused Assessment,” the Company found certain potential issues with respect to LaJobi’s import practices and submitted a preliminary voluntary prior disclosure to U.S. Customs due to issues regarding customs duty paid on products imported into the U.S. Upon becoming aware of these issues, our Board initiated an investigation, which found instances at LaJobi in which incorrect anti-dumping duties were applied on certain wooden furniture imported from vendors in the PRC, resulting in a violation of anti-dumping laws. In connection therewith, in 2011, certain LaJobi employees, including Lawrence Bivona, LaJobi’s then-President, were terminated from employment.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed LaJobi’s voluntary prior disclosure to U.S. Customs, including the Company’s final determination of amounts it believes are owed for all relevant periods. The Company estimates that LaJobi will owe an aggregate of approximately $7.0 million relating to anti-dumping duties (plus approximately $1.2 million in aggregate related interest) to U.S. Customs for the period commencing April 2, 2008 (the date of purchase of the LaJobi assets by the Company) through March 31, 2014, and the Company is fully accrued for all such amounts. The completed voluntary prior disclosure submitted to U.S. Customs in the fourth quarter of 2012 included proposed settlement amounts and proposed payment terms with respect to the anti-dumping duties owed by LaJobi (the “Settlement Submission”), as well as a payment of $0.3 million, to be credited against the amount that U.S. Customs determines is to be paid in satisfaction of LaJobi’s customs duty matters. Of the total amount accrued as of March 31, 2014, $0.1 million was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 for anticipated interest expense. In connection with the previously-disclosed restatement of certain prior period financial statements (the “Restatement”), these amounts are recorded in the periods to which they relate.

As U.S. Customs has not yet responded to the Settlement Submission, it is possible that the actual amount of duties owed for the periods covered thereby will be higher than the amounts accrued by the Company and in any event, additional interest will continue to accrue until full payment is made. In addition, U.S. Customs may assess a penalty of up to 100% of the duty owed, and the Company may be subject to additional fines, penalties or other measures from U.S. Customs or other governmental authorities. In a related matter, on August 19, 2011, the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey (“USAO”) contacted Company counsel requesting information relating to LaJobi previously provided by the Company to U.S. Customs and the SEC (described below), as well as additional documents and information. Since that time, the Company has been cooperating, and intends to continue to cooperate, with the USAO on a voluntary basis. The Company is currently seeking to negotiate a global resolution of these issues with the USAO and U.S. Customs, however, there can be no assurance that these discussions will be successful. The Company is currently unable to predict the duration, the resources required or outcome of the Focused Assessment or the USAO investigation or these related global discussions, the nature of any sanction that may be imposed or the impact such investigations or resolution may have. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to adverse publicity, or adverse customer, licensor or market reactions in connection with the resolution of these matters, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. An unfavorable outcome in these matters may result in a default under certain license agreements that we maintain, and is likely to result in a default under our Credit Agreement and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. With respect to the actual amount of duties determined to be owed by LaJobi, and any such additional fines, penalties or other measures, the Company cannot currently estimate the amount of the loss (or range of loss), if any.

23

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Promptly upon becoming aware of the issues relating to LaJobi’s customs practices and related misconduct, as described above, the Company voluntarily disclosed the findings of its internal investigation, as well as certain previously-disclosed Asia staffing matters, to the SEC on an informal basis. On June 20, 2011, the Company received a letter from the SEC indicating that the Staff was conducting an informal investigation and requesting that the Company provide certain documents on a voluntary basis. Subsequent thereto, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the SEC the existence of the Customs Review (described below) and related investigation. The Company believes that it has fully cooperated, and will continue to fully cooperate, with the SEC. The Company is currently unable to predict the duration, resources required or outcome of the investigation, possible sanctions or the impact such investigation may have on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Prior to the Restatement, the Company had recorded the applicable anti-dumping duties anticipated to be owed by LaJobi (and related interest) in the quarter and year ended December 31, 2010, the period of discovery (the “Original Accrual”) and had recorded additional interest expense in subsequent quarterly periods. As a result of the Original Accrual and other factors, the Company concluded that no earnout consideration (“LaJobi Earnout Consideration”) (and no related finder’s fee) under the Asset Purchase Agreement relating to the Company’s 2008 purchase of the LaJobi assets (the “LaJobi Asset Purchase Agreement”) was payable. Accordingly, prior to the Restatement, the Company had not recorded any amounts related to the LaJobi Earnout Consideration in the Company’s financial statements. The Company had previously disclosed a potential earnout payment of approximately $12.0 to $15.0 million in the aggregate relating to its acquisitions of LaJobi and CoCaLo, substantially all of which was estimated to relate to LaJobi.

Because the Restatement resulted in the technical satisfaction of the formulaic provisions for the payment of a portion of the LaJobi Earnout Consideration under the LaJobi Asset Purchase Agreement, applicable accounting standards required that the Company record a liability in the amount of the formulaic calculation, without taking into consideration the Company’s affirmative defenses, counterclaims and third party claims in the arbitration. Accordingly, in connection with the Restatement, the Company recorded a liability in the approximate amount of $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 ($10.6 million relating to the LaJobi Earnout Consideration and $1.1 million in respect of a related finder’s fee), with an offset in equal amount to goodwill, all of which goodwill was impaired as of December 31, 2011.

As has been previously disclosed, the Company received letters on July 25, 2011 from counsel to Lawrence Bivona demanding payment of the LaJobi Earnout Consideration to Mr. Bivona in the amount of $15.0 million, alleging that Mr. Bivona’s termination by LaJobi “for cause” violated his employment agreement and demanding payment to Mr. Bivona of amounts purportedly due under his employment agreement. In December 2011, Mr. Bivona initiated an arbitration proceeding relating to these issues, as well as a claim for defamation, seeking damages in excess of $25.0 million. On February 22, 2012, the Company and LaJobi filed an answer to the complaint initiated by Mr. Bivona, in which they denied any liability, asserted defenses and counterclaims against Mr. Bivona, and asserted a third-party complaint against Mr. Bivona’s brother, Joseph Bivona, and the LaJobi seller. Post-hearing briefs were submitted and closing statements were made during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

On March 6, 2014, an Interim Award was released by the arbitration panel (the “Panel”) in the arbitration proceeding initiated by Mr. Bivona. The Interim Award notes that both parties “are to some extent prevailing parties”, and states that until the Panel can make a final determination with respect to the amount of all damages and setoffs, no damages awarded will be payable by either party. The Panel stated that because U.S. Customs has not yet finally determined the amount of anti-dumping duties and/or penalties owed by KID or LaJobi, it is not possible to ascertain the precise amount of damages awarded to either side (as described below). The Panel retained jurisdiction to receive further evidence and award damages when U.S. Customs concludes its review and determines the duties and/or penalties owed. KID and LaJobi intend to submit further evidence in support of their damage award. The Interim Award had no effect on the Company’s results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2013 or the first quarter of 2014.

In the Interim Award, the Panel, based on its finding that Mr. Bivona breached his fiduciary duty and breached his employment agreement on and after August 24, 2010, awarded damages to KID and LaJobi, including damages for the additional duties assessed for transactions on and after that date, and in addition, awarded KID and LaJobi $2.85 million for reasonable legal expenses and other costs (collectively, the “KB Award Amounts”). In reaching its determination, the Panel noted that as of August 24, 2010, Mr. Bivona “consciously ignored information that demanded further investigation, which would have led to discovery and cessation of the improper practice”, in breach of his fiduciary duty and his employment agreement. The Panel found in favor of Mr. Bivona with respect to: (i) his right to receive a portion of the LaJobi Earnout Consideration; (ii) his claim for indemnification with respect to reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses (in an amount to be determined at a subsequent proceeding) for KID’s failure to pay such LaJobi Earnout Consideration; and (iii) his claim that KID and LaJobi breached his employment agreement by improperly terminating him for “cause” (and awarded him $655,000), but stated that any recovery on these claims must be offset by the KB Award Amounts. The Panel denied Mr. Bivona’s claims for breach of fiduciary duty and punitive damages, and awarded him $1.00 on his defamation claim. The Panel denied KID’s and LaJobi’s counterclaims for breach of the LaJobi Asset Purchase Agreement (although a representation was determined to be breached, no damages were found) and fraudulent inducement. Except as described above, the parties will bear their own legal fees and costs.

24

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In the Interim Award, the Panel determined that because U.S. Customs has not yet finally determined the amount of anti-dumping duties and/or penalties, it would not be possible to ascertain the amount of the LaJobi Earnout Consideration due to Mr. Bivona, or the precise amount of damages to KID and LaJobi resulting from Mr. Bivona’s breach of his fiduciary duty and employment agreement.

Any significant payment required by us to Mr. Bivona or U.S. Customs is likely to result in a default under the Credit Agreement and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

See Note 5 for a description of the Company’s Credit Agreement, including a discussion of restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay Customs duties and any LaJobi earnout payment requirements, the financial and other covenants applicable to the Company, and the Reservation of Rights Letter received from the Agent. Also see Part I Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the caption “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, and Item 1A — Risk Factors, including—“Inability to maintain compliance with the bank covenants”, “We are party to litigation and other matters that have and continue to be costly to defend and distracting to management, and if decided against us, are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business”, and “There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash obligations when required” of the 2013 10-K.

(b) Consumer Product Safety Commission Staff Investigation

By letter dated July 26, 2012, the staff (the “CPSC Staff”) of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) informed the Company that it has investigated whether LaJobi timely complied with certain reporting requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Act (the “CPSA”) with respect to various models of drop-side and wooden-slat cribs distributed by LaJobi and its predecessor company during the period commencing in 1999 through 2010, which cribs were recalled voluntarily by LaJobi during 2009 and 2010. The letter states that, unless LaJobi is able to resolve the matter with the CPSC Staff, the CPSC Staff intends to recommend to the CPSC that it seek the imposition of a substantial civil penalty for the alleged violations.

The Company disagrees with the position of the CPSC Staff, and believes that such position is unwarranted under the circumstances. As permitted by the notice, the Company provided the CPSC Staff with additional supplemental information in support of the Company’s position, including relevant factors in the Company’s favor that are required to be considered by the CPSC prior to the imposition of any civil penalty. The Company is currently working with the CPSC Staff regarding a possible resolution to the issue, and during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company accrued $1.0 million with respect thereto and no additional amounts were accrued in the first quarter of 2014. While settlement discussions are ongoing, it is possible that no settlement will be achieved, or that any settlement or other disposition of the matter will involve substantially higher amounts than the amount accrued or will be on terms that are less favorable to the Company.

Given the current status of this matter, however, it is not yet possible to determine what, if any, actions will be formally taken by the CPSC, or the amount of any civil penalty that may be assessed. Based on currently available information, the Company cannot estimate the amount of the loss (or range of loss) in connection with this matter. In addition, as this matter is ongoing, the Company is currently unable to predict its duration, resources required or outcome, or the impact it may have on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. An adverse decision in this matter that requires any significant payment by us could result in a default under the Credit Agreement and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

(c) Customs Compliance Investigation (Non-LaJobi)

As has been previously disclosed, following the discovery of the matters described above with respect to LaJobi, our Board authorized a review of customs compliance practices at the Company’s non-LaJobi operating subsidiaries (the “Customs Review”). In connection with this review, instances were identified in which these subsidiaries filed incorrect entries and invoices with U.S. Customs as a result of, in the case of Kids Line, incorrect descriptions, classifications and valuations of certain products imported by Kids Line and, in the case of CoCaLo, incorrect classifications and valuations of certain products imported by CoCaLo. Promptly after becoming aware of these issues, the Company submitted voluntary prior disclosures to U.S. Customs identifying such issues and duties anticipated to be owed. The Board also authorized an investigation into these non-LaJobi customs matters, and did not discover evidence that would lead it to conclude that there was intentional misconduct on the part of Company personnel.

25

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

As of March 31, 2014, the Company estimates that it will incur aggregate costs of approximately $2.0 million relating to such customs duties (plus approximately $0.3 million in aggregate related interest), for the period ended 2006 through March 31, 2014, and the Company is fully accrued for all such amounts. Of the total amount accrued as of March 31, 2014, $18,000 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 for anticipated interest expense. As a result of the Restatement, these amounts are recorded in the periods to which they relate. (The Company had initially recorded the applicable anticipated customs duty payment requirements (and related interest) in the third quarter of 2011 (the period of discovery), and recorded additional interest expense in the subsequent quarterly periods.)

In the fourth quarter of 2012 (upon completion of the Customs Review), the Company completed and submitted to U.S. Customs voluntary prior disclosures, which included the Company’s final determination of customs duty amounts it believes are owed by Kids Line and CoCaLo. The Kids Line submission included proposed payment terms for customs duties believed to be owed by Kids Line. As part of these settlement submissions in 2012, the Company included the following initial payments to U.S. Customs, to be credited against the amounts that U.S. Customs determines is to be paid in satisfaction of the Company’s customs duties matters: $0.2 million with respect to Kids Line customs duties and $0.3 million with respect to CoCaLo customs duties. With respect to CoCaLo, the Company’s payment represented the Company’s determination of all amounts it believes are owed by CoCaLo for the relevant periods, including interest.

As U.S. Customs has not yet responded to these settlement submissions, it is possible that the actual amount of duties owed for the relevant periods will be higher than the amounts accrued by the Company and in any event, additional interest will continue to accrue until full payment is made. In addition, U.S. Customs may assess a penalty of up to 100% of the duty owed, and the Company may be subject to additional fines, penalties or other measures from U.S. Customs or other governmental authorities. With respect to the actual amount determined by U.S. Customs to be owed, and any such additional fines, penalties or other measures, the Company cannot currently estimate the amount of the loss (or range of loss), if any. The Company remains committed to working closely with U.S. Customs to address issues relating to incorrect duties.

(d) Wages and Hours Putative Class Action

On November 3, 2011, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, encaptioned Guadalupe Navarro v. Kids Line, LLC (the “Wages and Hours Action”). One plaintiff brought the Wages and Hours Action on behalf of a putative class for damages and equitable relief for: (i) failure to pay minimum, contractual and/or overtime wages (including for former employees with respect to their final wages), and failure to provide adequate meal breaks, in each case based on defendant’s time tracking system and automatic deduction and related policies; (ii) statutory penalties for failure to provide accurate wage statements; (iii) waiting time penalties in the form of continuation wages for failure to timely pay terminated employees; and (iv) penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The plaintiff sought wages for all hours worked, overtime wages for all overtime worked, statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226(e), and Labor Code Section 203, restitution for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code Section 17203 of all monies owed, compensation for missed meal breaks, and injunctive relief. The complaint also sought unspecified liquidated and other damages, statutory penalties, reasonable attorney’s fees, costs of suit, interest, and such other relief as the court deems just and proper. Although the total amount claimed was not set forth in the complaint, the complaint asserted that the plaintiff and the class members were not seeking more than $4.9 million in damages at that time (with a statement that plaintiff would amend his complaint in the event that the plaintiff and class members’ claims exceed $4.9 million).

On January 30, 2013, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification with respect to two of the proposed classes and continued for further briefing the motion for class certification with respect to the remaining proposed classes. During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company reached an agreement in principle with counsel for the plaintiff on behalf of the purported classes to settle the litigation for $350,000, and during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 the Company accrued such amount. The Court has preliminarily approved the settlement, with the final approval hearing set for September 3, 2014. As the settlement has not yet been finally approved by the Court, there can be no assurance that the disposition of the litigation will not be in excess of amounts accrued or on terms less favorable to the Company than the agreed settlement.

(e) Proceedings for Outstanding Obligations

Allied Hill

On April 15, 2014, Allied Hill Enterprise, Ltd. (“Allied”) submitted a Demand for Arbitration to the American Arbitration Administration in Los Angeles, California in connection with outstanding amounts (approximately $1.2 million) under purchase order invoices for products manufactured by Allied and shipped to Sassy. The demand claims, among other things, breach of contract, fraud, and claim and delivery, and seeks damages in an amount exceeding $1.5 million to be proven at trial, compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages (unspecified in amount), prejudgment interest at the maximum legal rate, attorney’s fees and the costs of suit, possession of the collateral and loss of use damages, and such further relief deemed proper.

Solid Toys Ind. Ltd.

On April 16, 2014, Solid Toys Ind. Ltd. filed a complaint against Sassy in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division (Bergen County) for the price of goods sold and services rendered in the amount of approximately $0.5 million plus the costs of suit.

Going Concern

See Note 13 for a description of the Company’s insufficient capital resources to satisfy outstanding payment obligations to certain of its suppliers/manufacturers and other service providers (in an aggregate amount of approximately $16.5 million), several of which have demanded payment in writing, are refusing to ship product, are requiring payment in advance of shipment or production, and/or are otherwise threatening to take action against the Company, including terminating their relationship with the Company and/or initiating legal proceedings for amounts owed and other damages (such proceedings to date are described in this paragraph (e)). Without a significant increase in available cash, we will continue to have insufficient capital resources to satisfy such obligations, similar demands/proceedings instituted for payment, which are expected to continue, or any significant damages/costs awarded in connection with such failure (the potential amount of which the Company is unable to predict), and a requirement to make such payments will materially and adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations, and may result in other material negative consequences to the Company.

(f) Other

In addition to the proceedings described above, in the ordinary course of its business, the Company is from time to time party to various copyright, patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition, breach of contract, customs, employment and other legal actions incidental to the Company’s business, as plaintiff or defendant. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any such actions that are currently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

26

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(g) Kokopax Earnout

As partial consideration for the purchase of the Kokopax ^® assets, Sassy has agreed to pay to the seller of such assets, on a quarterly basis (when and if applicable), an amount equal to 10% of net sales achieved in respect of Kokopax products (commencing July 3, 2012) in excess of the first $2.0 million of such net sales until the earlier of: (i) March 31, 2015, and (ii) the date that such Kokopax net sales equal at least $10.0 million (the “Additional Consideration”); provided, that the aggregate amount paid in respect of the Additional Consideration (including an advance of $200,000 accrued by Sassy at closing) shall not exceed $1.0 million. The Company did not pay any amounts in connection with the foregoing during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and based on current projections the Company does not anticipate making any payments in the future.

(h) Purchase Commitments

The Company has approximately $27.9 million in outstanding purchase commitments at March 31, 2014, consisting primarily of purchase orders for inventory.

(i) License and Distribution Agreements

The Company enters into various license and distribution agreements relating to trademarks, copyrights, designs, and products which enable the Company to market items compatible with its product line. Although the Company does not believe its business is dependent on any single license, the LaJobi Graco ^® license (which was terminated by mutual agreement of the parties as of May 22, 2014) and the Kids Line Carter’s ^® license (which expires on December 31, 2014) are each material to and accounted for a material portion of the net revenues of LaJobi and Kids Line, respectively, as well as a significant percentage of the net revenues of the Company, in each case for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. In addition, the LaJobi Serta ^® license (which expires by its terms on December 31, 2018, but with respect to which the Company received a notice of breach on April 25, 2014) is material to and accounted for a significant percentage of the net revenues of LaJobi for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. In November 2013, Kids Line signed a new license agreement with Disney ^® (which expires on December 31, 2014 and which replaced a license agreement that expired on December 31, 2013), which is material to and accounted for a significant percentage of the net revenues of Kids Line for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The Sassy Carters ^® license (which expires on December 31, 2014, but with respect to which the Company received a notice of breach on May 14, 2014 ) and the Sassy Garanimals ^® license (which expires on December 31, 2014) are each material to and accounted for a significant percentage of the net revenues of Sassy, in each case for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. See Note 14 for further details with respect to the termination of the Graco ^® license, and the notices of breach with respect to the LaJobi Serta ^® license and the Sassy Carter’s ^® license. While historically the Company has been able to renew the license agreements that it wishes to continue on terms acceptable to it, there can be no assurance that this will be the case, and the loss of any of the foregoing and/or other significant license agreements is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent. See Note 13. Several of these agreements require pre-payments of certain minimum guaranteed royalty amounts. The aggregate amount of minimum guaranteed royalty payments with respect to all license agreements pursuant to their original terms aggregates approximately $19.4 million, of which approximately $8.3 million remained unpaid at March 31, 2014. Royalty expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $1.9 million, and $2.4 million, respectively.

With respect to Items (a) through (e) above, the outcome of such matters (individually or in the aggregate) could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with its financial covenants under its amended Credit Agreement, its financial position and/or its liquidity. See Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

NOTE 11—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Effective September 12, 2012 through January 29, 2014, Renee Pepys Lowe was President of Kids Line and CoCaLo. During 2013, CoCaLo contracted for warehousing and distribution services from a company that is managed by the spouse of Ms. Lowe. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, CoCaLo paid approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, to such company for these services, respectively.This agreement terminated as of April 11, 2014.

From September 12, 2011 through March 13, 2013, Mr. Benaroya served as interim Executive Chairman and acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to an agreement between the Company and RB, Inc., a Delaware corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Benaroya (the “Interim Agreement). The Interim Agreement was terminated on March 13, 2013, in connection with the appointment of Mr. Benaroya as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Company paid $185,000 to RB, Inc. for the services of Mr. Benaroya pursuant to the Interim Agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

27

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 12—RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The Company has implemented all applicable accounting pronouncements in effect as of March 31, 2014, and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements issued during the three months ended March 31, 2014, that might have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 13—GOING CONCERN

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 our cash and cash equivalents were $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, our revolving loan availability was $0.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and such availability is currently expected to remain very tight for the remainder of 2014. As a result, the Company has had insufficient capital resources to satisfy outstanding payment obligations to certain of its suppliers/manufacturers and other service providers (in an aggregate amount of approximately $16.5 million), several of which have demanded payment in writing, are refusing to ship product, are requiring payment in advance of shipment or production, and/or are otherwise threatening to take action against the Company, including terminating their relationship with the Company and/or initiating legal proceedings for amounts owed (one such supplier has filed a complaint and another has made a demand for arbitration, as is described in Note 10). In connection with these events, the Company received a notice of breach dated April 25, 2014 from one of LaJobi’s material licensors claiming that LaJobi failed to ship licensed goods to the licensor’s customers as a result of outstanding subcontractor invoices. All of the foregoing circumstances (referred to collectively as the “ Events of Default”) constituted or may have constituted failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default under the Credit Agreement. Accordingly, the Borrowers, the Agent and the Required Lenders executed a Waiver and Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement as of May 14, 2014 (“Amendment No. 5”), to waive any failures of conditions to lending and events of default resulting from the Events of Default. In addition, in order to increase the amount of eligible receivables under the Tranche A borrowing base, Amendment No. 5 further reduces the availability block from $3.5 million to $2.768 million for 30 days (such block will return to $3.5 million on June 14, 2014, and will revert to its original amount of $4.0 million on August 1, 2014). Notwithstanding the execution of Amendment No. 5, without a significant increase in available cash, we will continue to be unable to satisfy such obligations (or similar demands/proceedings instituted for payment, which are expected to continue) or make such advanced payments, which will negatively impact our ability to meet our customers’ product demands and likely result in further breaches of our license agreements and certain of our customers ceasing to purchase products from us. All of the foregoing will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and may result in our bankruptcy or insolvency.

Subsequent to the execution of Amendment No. 5, the Company received a notice of breach and amendment from one of Sassy’s material licensors as a result of a late royalty payment (which was cured prior to receipt of the notice) and breaches arising from cessation of certain shipping and distribution activities. Also subsequent to the execution of Amendment No. 5, and as previously disclosed, the Company has determined to suspend LaJobi’s wood furniture operations, and in connection with such suspension, has terminated (on mutually agreed terms), a related license agreement with Graco.

The Company notified the Agent and the Required Lenders of these events (and the breach of various representations and covenants in connection therewith), and has requested a waiver of the failures of conditions to lending and/or events of default arising therefrom. There can be no assurance that the requested relief will be granted (on terms acceptable to the Company or at all), or that if obtained, the Company will remain in compliance with the Credit Agreement. Unless and until the Company is able to secure a waiver of the failure of conditions to lending, its lenders are entitled to refuse to permit any further draw-downs on the Company’s revolvers. Unless and until the Company is able to secure a waiver of the events of default, its lenders are entitled to, among other things, accelerate the loans under the credit agreement, declare the commitments thereunder to be terminated and/or refuse to permit further draw-downs on the revolvers, seize collateral or take other actions of secured creditors. Any of the foregoing is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and to cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

See Item 1A – Risk Factors –“There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash obligations when required”, “Our going concern uncertainty may have an adverse effect on our customer, licensor and supplier relationships”, and “Inability to maintain compliance with the bank covenants” of the Company’s 2013 10-K.

With respect to the foregoing, on May 19, 2014 the Lead Borrower received a notice of default and reservation of rights letter (the “Reservation of Rights Letter”) from the Agent. Pursuant to the Reservation of Rights Letter, the Agent informed the Borrowers that there are a number of failures of conditions to lending and events of default existing under the Credit Agreement and that effective immediately, all Loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at the default rate set forth in the Credit Agreement. Further, the Reservation of Rights Letter specifies that the Borrowers comply with certain requirements, including, without limitation, the immediate retention of a financial advisor and investment banker in order to prepare their assets and businesses for sale, and delivery of weekly rolling 13-week cash flow forecasts. According to the Reservation of Rights Letter, the Agent and the Lenders are presently evaluating all available courses of action that may be available under the Credit Agreement, law or in equity with respect to the existing events of default, such that their voluntary forbearance does not constitute a waiver of such events of default, and the Agent and Lenders expressly reserve all such rights and remedies with respect thereto. The Reservation of Rights Letter also indicates that while the Lenders are not obligated to make additional loans or otherwise extend credit to the Borrowers, to the extent a Lender makes any such loans or extensions of credit, such loans or extensions of credit shall be made at such Lender’s sole discretion, and shall not prevent such Lender from ceasing to make additional loans or other extensions of credit, or to exercise any rights or remedies.

Based on our current operational expectations, the existence of failures of conditions to lending and events of default under the Credit Agreement, the receipt of the Reservation of Rights Letter, the current limited availability anticipated under the Credit Agreement even if borrowing continues to be permitted thereunder, the Company’s current inability to meet its payment obligations to certain of its suppliers/manufacturers and service providers and consequently, the demands of certain of its customers (and anticipated decreased sales resulting therefrom), we are currently unable to satisfy our ordinary course working capital requirements. In addition to these near-term liquidity issues, as a result of the uncertainty of the amount and timing of any payments that we will be required to make to U.S. Customs and/or other governmental authorities in respect of pending Customs duty matters, to satisfy any obligations resulting from the arbitration with Mr. Bivona, and/or to the CPSC in respect of its pending investigation (collectively, the “Pending Obligations”), in each case when such matters are finalized, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance with the financial covenants or will be able to borrow under our Credit Agreement when such obligations become payable, or whether any such payment obligations will result in a further default under such Credit Agreement. As a result of all of the foregoing, there can be no assurance that we will continue to be permitted to borrow under our Credit Agreement or that our senior lenders will not exercise their rights and remedies under the Credit Agreement or otherwise, and there continues to be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern (our independent registered public accounting firm issued a report including an explanatory paragraph to that effect with respect to the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s 2013 10-K). The accompanying unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and, therefore, be required to liquidate its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts that may differ from those reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In response to these uncertainties: (i) we will continue to use reasonable efforts to procure waivers to our Credit Agreement for existing failures of conditions to lending and events of default; (ii) in addition to our determination to suspend LaJobi’s wood furniture operations, we are continuing our review of strategic and financing alternatives, to increase the Company’s liquidity (described under “Recent Developments” below); (iii) we will continue to use all reasonable efforts to further increase Availability under the Credit Agreement by reducing levels of ineligible items; (iv) as part of our Settlement Submissions to U.S. Customs, we proposed settlement amounts and payment terms; (v) we are seeking to negotiate a global settlement, including payment terms, with U.S. Customs and the USAO; (vi) we have proposed settlement amounts and payments terms to the CPSC; and (vii) we intend to continue to explore opportunities to reduce operating and administrative costs, continue to consolidate back office functions, and liquidate excess inventory. We cannot make assurances as to whether any of these actions can be effected on a timely basis, on satisfactory terms or maintained once initiated. Even if such actions are successfully implemented, our liquidity plan could result in limiting certain operational and strategic initiatives that were designed to grow our business over the long term. In addition, our Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a 1.0:1.0 Collateral Coverage Ratio, and as of August 31, 2014, minimum Availability and gross sales levels, as further described in Note 5 to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, which we could have difficulty meeting to the extent that our plans are unsuccessfully implemented or for a number of additional reasons that are outside of our control, including but not limited to, the loss of key customers or suppliers. 

28

Table of Contents

KID BRANDS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

As described above, our liquidity is highly dependent on our ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement and the continued voluntary forbearance of our senior lenders thereunder, our ability to increase capital resources available to us, and the amount and timing of required payments in respect of the Pending Obligations. Without the ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement and a sufficient increase in liquidity resulting from operations or as a result of an action or transaction arising out of our review of strategic and financing alternatives described herein (in addition to the suspension of LaJobi’s wood furniture operations) or otherwise, we will continue to be unable to satisfy our ordinary course and other cash requirements, and payments in respect of the Pending Obligations once finalized. LaJobi’s issues with U.S. Customs, the USAO and the SEC, as well as the arbitration with Mr. Bivona and the pending investigation of the CPSC have continued over a period of several years. The Company believes that the lack of finality, and consequent uncertainty stemming from these issues, has (and continues to) hinder the Company in its efforts to raise additional capital.