boston745
4時間前
Here again media is publishing articles with misinformation in its headlines. Before there were several articles indicating Autopilot used used meanwhile the body of the article would say self driving. Now The Guardian is claiming Tesla said that Mr. Butler disengaged FSD when he supposedly applied the accelerator. This poor guy is getting railroaded atm.
Man charged with manslaughter over Tesla crash originally blamed on car’s self-driving mode
Tesla said Michael Butler disabled his car’s self-driving mode before it plowed into Martha Avila’s home in June
Nope thats not what Tesla said.
A man whose Tesla Model 3 was allegedly in self-driving mode when it crashed into a home near Houston and killed a 76-year-old woman inside recently has been jailed on a count of manslaughter.
Not allegedly, this was confirmed by Tesla.
Michael Butler’s arrest in the 19 June death of Martha Avila was announced late on Wednesday in a Facebook post by the sheriff of Harris county, Texas, Ed Gonzalez.
As I said, the timing of this, being the day before Tesla released record deliveries for Q2 is very convenient. Seems to me that Mr. Bulter is being railroaded to help control the narrative on this and to help distract from the Tesla Semi accident.
Ashok Elluswamy, posted on X that the driver involved in Avila’s death “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in [the] residential area”.
The Guardian has truncated what Mr. Elluswamy actually said and likely is depending on "overrode" to support its claim that Butler disabled FSD. If thats the case why change the word? Overriding can imply disable, but it does not necessarily mean disable. In the case of Teslas, to override using the accelerator does not in fact disable FSD as shown in Forbes coverage of this issue. Thus The Guardians article is just subtle enough in its misinformation that most people will not catch onto it.
The second issue here is the truncation of what Mr. Elluswamy said. The second part of his quote is very important and is a big part of what actually supports that this was not an issue of pedal misapplication, but SUA. Why? Because its physically impossible to do what Mr Elluswamy is saying. As indicated by the lawyers suing Tesla, if someone held the pedal down like this through the accident and afterward, they would have shattered their leg. Something that clearly did not happen. Thus there must be an alternative explanation for why the accelerator was showing as being applied 100%. That implies SUA was the cause...as does the fact that such a high percentage of accelerator was shown to be applied as I show in the second half of this post.
Lastly, I would argue the video footage also supports SUA and that Butler was not actually in control. I say this because of how perfectly the Tesla hit the curb and flew into the house. If a person has control of steering there should be some wiggle to the impact causing the car to at least, slightly change direction, before impact. That did not happen here as shown in the video footage.
a person controlling steering would cause a car to deviate from its path upon hitting a curb at high speed, is that correct?
Yes, that is absolutely correct. Striking a curb at high speed puts sudden, violent stress on the vehicle's suspension and steering components, which will almost certainly cause the car to pull hard to one side, veer off course, or result in a complete loss of directional control
========================================
Evidence indicating that the Katy, Tx crash was a result of SUA and an electrical glitch not mechanical failure.
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Researcher Discovers Tesla Design Flaw That May Cause Unintended Acceleration; NHTSA Reopens Investigation
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reopened its investigation into a potential design flaw in Tesla vehicles, which may lead to sudden unintended acceleration. This comes after allegations were made that a voltage spike deep within the control systems could cause the vehicle to incorrectly read an accelerator input, even when none has occurred.
When Voltage Spikes Trigger Unintended Acceleration
Under certain circumstances, such as slow driving, when the power steering requires more power, the draw on the 12-volt battery can cause a significant spike in the system. This voltage surge could lead the inverter to incorrectly conclude that the accelerator pedal has been pressed, resulting in unintended acceleration.
This unexpected acceleration could theoretically happen when a voltage spike, lasting only microseconds, occurs simultaneously as the car performs an ADC check, also lasting microseconds. Belt suggests that the frequency of these events aligns with the 200 or so incidents reported between 2013 and 2019.
Adding complexity to this issue, Belt contends that due to the nature of the fault, it does not get logged as an error. The inverter’s misinterpretation of a voltage spike as a throttle input leaves no trace, leading to discrepancies between Tesla's vehicle data and owners' accounts, possibly explaining why the ODI initially denied the petition.
While Belt's allegations primarily focus on the Model 3, which features a unique inverter design, he notes that similar errors could occur in Model S and Model X vehicles. This opens up the potential for a broader scope in the ongoing investigation.
NHTSA Petition Claims Tesla Sudden Unintended Acceleration Is Real
What's worse is that the incorrectly increased sensor signals will be sent via the CAN bus to the vehicle logs, causing Tesla and NHTSA to conclude that the driver caused the sudden increase in torque by stepping on the accelerator pedal. But in this case, the sudden acceleration was caused not by the driver stepping on the accelerator pedal but by a random superposition of a negative-going voltage spike (which is about 100 microseconds long), and the sampling time of the analog-to-digital converter (which is about 10 microseconds long). This random superposition explains the low occurrence rate of sudden acceleration in Tesla vehicles
SUA has impacted every main Tesla car model S/X, 3/Y, & even the Cybertruck. Im not aware of an incident involving a Semi...yet...although the one that drove into the trees with an engine fire may have experienced SUA.
As this issue has impacted just about every Tesla model and year, i doubt Dr Belt's theory in relation to the the origin of the fault, is exactly correct and certainly not easy to fix as its still a problem. Thus i expect the NHTSA will deny this petition at some point despite this issue continuing to plague Teslas. I believe the problem of SUA is EM interference induced which impacts other EVs as well per a study in China. EMI can cause these voltage spikes to compensate from a drop in voltage as described in the following quote. E3 usually pertains to EM blast from a nuclear explosion but during geostorms/unrest this same sort of voltage depression can be observed in electrical systems.
E3 can also affect subtransmission and distribution systems by causing harmonic distortion and voltage depression. The voltage regulators at the substation will attempt to correct for low voltage levels on distribution circuits. This attempt can result in overvoltages when the E3 stimulus decays to a low value
Part 2 - Proof Electromagnetic radiation is causing EVs to go out of control
4). Among the data records during the accidents according to the background data of the crashed vehicles or the data of on-vehicle terminals, the position values of most accelerator pedals were very high(99%) while the values of brake pedals were 0% or only non-zero in very limited moments (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
Continued very high accelerator pressure with no braking is how you differentiate SUA from pedal misapplication.
In recent years, there have been numerous out-of-control accidents of electric vehicles.
Occasional fault of electronic control unit caused by electromagnetic interference
External electromagnetic interference refers to that caused by electromagnetic radiation of various electrical facilities including the high voltage transmission line, broadcasting TV devices and radio communication equipment as well as natural phenomena such as lightning.
Electromagnetic wave interferes the electric control system of automobile through wiring harness and car body to make it hard to perform or even send wrong instructions leading to wrong actions of various actuators, affecting the safety, reliability and stability of automobile driving. The electromagnetic interference affects the automobile electronic control system mainly in two ways: one is to affect the input signal of the sensor of the electronic control system, causing distortion and resulting in electric control signal where the ECU output does not match the driver's intention, which leads to the wrong operation of the actuator; the other is to interfere the ECU output signal to result in its deviation, misleading the operation of the actuator.
The most common cause of Natural EMI includes:
Lightning
Solar Magnetic Storms
Earth’s Magnetic Field Flux
Cosmic Radiation
Quote Sources:
https://www.inc.com/leila-sheridan/tesla-crash-key-part-missing/91330404
https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/1515/investigation-into-unintended-acceleration-of-teslas-reopened-could-a-design-flaw-be-at-fault
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/breaking-nhtsa-petition-shows-tesla-s-sudden-unintended-acceleration-is-real-and-curable-217525.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346368508_Special_Investigation_and_Countermeasure_Suggestions_on_Electric_Vehicle_out-of-control_Accidents
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/03/tesla-texas-crash-manslaughter
iHub News
12時間前
U.S. holiday pause, softer Fed expectations and Asia rebound shape global markets: Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq, Wall Street FuturesJuly 3, 2026 5:19 AM
IH Market News U.S. financial markets will remain closed on Friday for the Independence Day holiday, but futures pointed to a stronger Wall Street open when trading resumes. Asian equities recovered after a volatile week, helped by fading expectations of a near-term Federal Reserve rate increase following weaker-than-expected U.S. employment data. Investors also focused on gains among Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) Chinese suppliers and stronger-than-forecast growth in China’s services sector. Wall Street futures advance after weaker jobs data U.S. index futures moved higher after June’s employment report suggested a slower pace of hiring, easing fears that the Federal Reserve would tighten monetary policy again in the coming weeks. By 03:11 ET (07:11 GMT), Dow futures were up 148 points, or 0.3%, S&P 500 futures had added 30 points, or 0.4%, while Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 278 points, or 0.9%. Wall Street ended Thursday’s shortened trading week with mixed performances across the major indices. Meanwhile, benchmark 10-year Treasury yields were little changed and two-year yields edged lower. Investor sentiment shifted after the U.S. Labor Department reported softer-than-expected payroll growth in June. Although the unemployment rate fell to a one-year low of 4.2%, markets interpreted the report as reducing the urgency for further monetary tightening. Combined with comments earlier in the week from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh indicating inflation pressures had eased, expectations for a July rate increase declined sharply. Analysts at Deutsche Bank noted that market expectations for a July rate hike had fallen from 34% on Tuesday to just 18% by Thursday’s close. “Moreover, just 30 [basis points] of hikes are now priced in by the December meeting, the fewest since the Fed meeting a couple of weeks ago when the dot plot surprised in a hawkish direction,” they added. Asian markets recover as technology shares rebound Asian equity markets posted gains on Friday as investors responded positively to the shift in Federal Reserve expectations while bargain hunting returned to technology stocks. Semiconductor companies led the recovery after heavy profit-taking earlier in the week, when concerns about the sustainability of artificial intelligence infrastructure spending weighed on the sector. Samsung Electronics was among the strongest performers after reports that Anthropic, the company behind Claude Code, is exploring plans to develop its own AI chip in partnership with the South Korean technology group. The news helped lift South Korea’s KOSPI index after two consecutive sessions of losses, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 and Singapore’s STI also moved higher. Tesla suppliers rally in China Chinese suppliers to Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) advanced after the electric vehicle manufacturer reported stronger-than-expected second-quarter deliveries, raising hopes that demand may be stabilising after two years of declining sales. Auto parts manufacturers Ningbo Xusheng, Ningbo Tuopu and Zhejiang Sanhua gained between 5% and 9% in mainland Chinese trading. Tesla delivered a record 480,126 vehicles during the second quarter, supported by solid demand in Europe and modest growth in China. The introduction of lower-priced versions of the Model 3 and Model Y helped support sales, while the updated Model Y also contributed to stronger production and deliveries from the company’s Chinese operations. China’s services activity exceeds expectations China’s services sector expanded at a faster pace than economists had forecast in June, according to a private survey released on Friday. The RatingDog Services Purchasing Managers’ Index eased slightly to 54.1 from 54.4 in May but comfortably exceeded expectations of 53.0. Any reading above 50 signals expansion, with the index remaining in growth territory continuously since January 2023. The survey showed increases in both domestic and international orders, while export demand for services reached its strongest level since October 2024. Companies also increased selling prices for the first time in four months as supply disruptions linked to the Middle East pushed input costs higher. Strait of Hormuz fees remain under discussion Bloomberg News reported that some European policymakers have begun considering the possibility that shipping companies may eventually have to pay transit fees to Iran and Oman for passage through the Strait of Hormuz. According to people familiar with the discussions, some Gulf Arab officials also believe a form of service charge could emerge, although this is not yet the official position of their governments. Bloomberg added that uncertainty remains over the structure and level of any future fees, with questions continuing over the potential implications for international maritime law. The Strait of Hormuz has remained a focal point of geopolitical tensions since Iran effectively closed the waterway following the joint U.S.-Israeli military action in late February. Oil prices initially surged but have since retreated to around pre-conflict levels following the interim peace agreement between the United States and Iran. Tesla stock price The post U.S. holiday pause, softer Fed expectations and Asia rebound shape global markets: Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq, Wall Street Futures appeared first on US Editors. Original: U.S. holiday pause, softer Fed expectations and Asia rebound shape global markets: Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq, Wall Street Futures
iHub News
12時間前
Tesla’s strong Q2 deliveries lift Chinese supplier sharesJuly 3, 2026 5:21 AM
IH Market News Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) suppliers in China traded higher on Friday after the electric vehicle manufacturer reported stronger-than-expected second-quarter delivery figures, boosting investor confidence that the company may be emerging from a prolonged period of declining sales. Auto parts manufacturers Ningbo Xusheng, Ningbo Tuopu and Zhejiang Sanhua gained between 5% and 9% in mainland Chinese trading. In Hong Kong, Fuyao Glass advanced 3%, while leading battery producer CATL added 0.7%. Tesla delivered a record 480,126 vehicles during the June quarter, supported by robust demand in Europe and modest sales growth in China. The company also expanded its lineup with more affordable versions of its popular Model 3 and Model Y, helping maintain demand as higher fuel prices encouraged consumers to consider electric vehicles. Production of the updated Model Y further strengthened sales of China-built vehicles, highlighting the country’s continued importance as both a manufacturing base and one of Tesla’s largest global markets. The latest delivery performance comes despite intensifying competition from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, including BYD, which continues to expand its presence across European markets. Tesla stock priceThe post Tesla’s strong Q2 deliveries lift Chinese supplier shares appeared first on US Editors. Original: Tesla’s strong Q2 deliveries lift Chinese supplier shares
boston745
1日前
💀🚗🚚Tesla Semi involved in first fatal crash, killing 2 in Nevada
At around 7:20 a.m. on Sunday, June 28, deputies from the Lyon County Sheriff’s Office responded to a major collision at the intersection of U.S. 50 and Traditions Parkway in Dayton, Nevada, east of Carson City.
A semi-truck struck two passenger vehicles that were stopped at the traffic signal, according to the Nevada Highway Patrol and Lyon County Sheriff’s Office. Two people were pronounced dead at the scene, and a third person was flown by Care Flight to a local hospital with life-threatening injuries.
However, images from the scene clearly show a Tesla Semi — the distinctive center-seat, cab-forward tractor — pulling a white dry-van trailer. The identification was first flagged by FreightWaves’ Timothy Dooner.
That makes this the first known fatal crash involving Tesla’s electric semi truck.
The reported cause — a driver falling asleep — puts the focus on the truck’s safety systems, not any self-driving software.
Now for the good points made about this incident by Electrek:
Why didnt automatic emergency braking do what its designed to do?
That leaves the question of automatic emergency braking: why didn’t the truck slow or stop itself before hitting stationary vehicles at a lit intersection? AEB is designed for exactly this scenario — it detects vehicles or obstacles in the truck’s path and applies the brakes when a collision is imminent, regardless of driver input.
Tesla already builds drowsiness detection — into its cars
Tesla has not said whether the Semi has a cabin-facing camera or the same feature — a notable gap for a truck reportedly involved in a fatal crash because its driver fell asleep.
Tesla has every reason to keep this question unanswered if it indeed has this feature in its Semi like its cars as this would indicated that a second system failure occurred on top of its Automatic Emergency Braking. That is of course if the driver fell asleep at 7am which i strongly doubt.
This incident happened Sunday morning and I posted about it Monday but the media didnt really begin to cover this until yesterday oddly enough.
I suspect that the Semi suffered SUA just as its cars do. As more Tesla Semis hit the roads we will see more of this sort of thing and way worse accidents than this. Im waiting for the day a Tesla Semi ploys through cars and buildings. Then maybe people will know beyond a shadow of doubt, that Teslas suffer EM induced SUA glitching like ive known for years.
https://electrek.co/2026/07/01/tesla-semi-first-fatal-crash-nevada/
Multiple CMEs are heading for Earth, including one launched by the June 30th X-flare. A series of direct+glancing blows beginning on July 3rd could spark G2 to G3-class geomagnetic storms over the 4th of July holiday weekend.
We are going to see some interesting things over the next few days potentially starting later today. Including more out of control Teslas.
https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=02&month=07&year=2026
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
1日前
Thank you Jimr for posting this. This is another example of a Tesla causing an innocent person to be charged and timing of this charge being filed is suspect. I will also say that the article you are linking is piss poor coverage as it doesnt even indicate that Tesla confirmed FSD was in use and forbes shows that applying the accelerator, which I do not believe happened in this case, does NOT disengage FSD.
DRIVER CHARGED WITH MANSLAUGHTER AFTER TESLA CRASHES INTO HOME, KILLING WOMAN: SHERIFF
https://abc13.com/amp/post/tesla-driver-arrested-connection-manslaughter-crash-left-woman-dead-home-sheriff-says/19432699/
Investigators said Butler claimed his car was in self-driving mode, but Tesla disputed that and claimed he overrode the feature.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177754323
Forbes article:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brookecrothers/2026/06/28/tesla-autopilot-vs-fsd-explained--and-what-can-go-wrong/
First off, Tesla already confirmed that Butler was using FSD. Secondly, applying the accelerator does not disengage FSD. Therefore, FSD was engaged the entire time into the accident. Lastly, the information provided by Elluswamy, Tesla's VP of AI, supports what happened was actually a result of SUA not pedal misapplication. Butler should not have been charged!
I will add what the attorney suing Tesla for this accident said. If Butler actually held the pedal down all the way into the accident and afterward, as Elluswamy indicated, then his leg would have shattered. The evidence does not support pedal misapplication but SUA as i'll support in just a second.
I'll just say that the timing of this seems suspect as Tesla just reported high delivery numbers and reports came out about a Tesla Semi killing a couple. Almost seems like someones want to control the narrative for now.
Scientific observation and evidence that Tesla with FSD enabled actually suffered SUA...aka went 'Maximum Overdrive' on Bulter.
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Researcher Discovers Tesla Design Flaw That May Cause Unintended Acceleration; NHTSA Reopens Investigation
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reopened its investigation into a potential design flaw in Tesla vehicles, which may lead to sudden unintended acceleration. This comes after allegations were made that a voltage spike deep within the control systems could cause the vehicle to incorrectly read an accelerator input, even when none has occurred.
When Voltage Spikes Trigger Unintended Acceleration
Under certain circumstances, such as slow driving, when the power steering requires more power, the draw on the 12-volt battery can cause a significant spike in the system. This voltage surge could lead the inverter to incorrectly conclude that the accelerator pedal has been pressed, resulting in unintended acceleration.
This unexpected acceleration could theoretically happen when a voltage spike, lasting only microseconds, occurs simultaneously as the car performs an ADC check, also lasting microseconds. Belt suggests that the frequency of these events aligns with the 200 or so incidents reported between 2013 and 2019.
Adding complexity to this issue, Belt contends that due to the nature of the fault, it does not get logged as an error. The inverter’s misinterpretation of a voltage spike as a throttle input leaves no trace, leading to discrepancies between Tesla's vehicle data and owners' accounts, possibly explaining why the ODI initially denied the petition.
While Belt's allegations primarily focus on the Model 3, which features a unique inverter design, he notes that similar errors could occur in Model S and Model X vehicles. This opens up the potential for a broader scope in the ongoing investigation.
NHTSA Petition Claims Tesla Sudden Unintended Acceleration Is Real
What's worse is that the incorrectly increased sensor signals will be sent via the CAN bus to the vehicle logs, causing Tesla and NHTSA to conclude that the driver caused the sudden increase in torque by stepping on the accelerator pedal. But in this case, the sudden acceleration was caused not by the driver stepping on the accelerator pedal but by a random superposition of a negative-going voltage spike (which is about 100 microseconds long), and the sampling time of the analog-to-digital converter (which is about 10 microseconds long). This random superposition explains the low occurrence rate of sudden acceleration in Tesla vehicles
SUA has impacted every main Tesla car model S/X, 3/Y, & even the Cybertruck. Im not aware of an incident involving a Semi...yet...although the one that drove into the trees with an engine fire may have experienced SUA.
As this issue has impacted just about every Tesla model and year, i doubt Dr Belt's theory in relation to the the origin of the fault, is exactly correct and certainly not easy to fix as its still a problem. Thus i expect the NHTSA will deny this petition at some point despite this issue continuing to plague Teslas. I believe the problem of SUA is EM interference induced which impacts other EVs as well per a study in China. EMI can cause these voltage spikes to compensate from a drop in voltage as described in the following quote. E3 usually pertains to EM blast from a nuclear explosion but during geostorms/unrest this same sort of voltage depression can be observed in electrical systems.
E3 can also affect subtransmission and distribution systems by causing harmonic distortion and voltage depression. The voltage regulators at the substation will attempt to correct for low voltage levels on distribution circuits. This attempt can result in overvoltages when the E3 stimulus decays to a low value
Part 2 - Proof Electromagnetic radiation is causing EVs to go out of control
4). Among the data records during the accidents according to the background data of the crashed vehicles or the data of on-vehicle terminals, the position values of most accelerator pedals were very high(99%) while the values of brake pedals were 0% or only non-zero in very limited moments (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
Continued very high accelerator pressure with no braking is how you differentiate SUA from pedal misapplication.
In recent years, there have been numerous out-of-control accidents of electric vehicles.
Occasional fault of electronic control unit caused by electromagnetic interference
External electromagnetic interference refers to that caused by electromagnetic radiation of various electrical facilities including the high voltage transmission line, broadcasting TV devices and radio communication equipment as well as natural phenomena such as lightning.
Electromagnetic wave interferes the electric control system of automobile through wiring harness and car body to make it hard to perform or even send wrong instructions leading to wrong actions of various actuators, affecting the safety, reliability and stability of automobile driving. The electromagnetic interference affects the automobile electronic control system mainly in two ways: one is to affect the input signal of the sensor of the electronic control system, causing distortion and resulting in electric control signal where the ECU output does not match the driver's intention, which leads to the wrong operation of the actuator; the other is to interfere the ECU output signal to result in its deviation, misleading the operation of the actuator.
The most common cause of Natural EMI includes:
Lightning
Solar Magnetic Storms
Earth’s Magnetic Field Flux
Cosmic Radiation
Quote Sources:
https://www.inc.com/leila-sheridan/tesla-crash-key-part-missing/91330404
https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/1515/investigation-into-unintended-acceleration-of-teslas-reopened-could-a-design-flaw-be-at-fault
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/breaking-nhtsa-petition-shows-tesla-s-sudden-unintended-acceleration-is-real-and-curable-217525.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346368508_Special_Investigation_and_Countermeasure_Suggestions_on_Electric_Vehicle_out-of-control_Accidents
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
iHub News
1日前
Tesla beats delivery forecasts with 480,126 vehicles delivered in second quarter (TSLA)July 2, 2026 9:18 AM
IH Market News Deliveries outperform market expectations Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) reported second-quarter 2026 vehicle deliveries of 480,126 units, comfortably exceeding analyst expectations of 406,024 vehicles. The electric vehicle maker also produced 451,758 vehicles during the quarter, according to a company statement. Model 3 and Model Y continue to dominate sales The vast majority of Tesla’s deliveries came from its Model 3 and Model Y lineup. The company delivered 467,762 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles while producing 442,936 units of the two models during the quarter. Tesla’s remaining vehicle portfolio accounted for 12,364 deliveries and 8,822 vehicles produced over the same period. The company noted that approximately 2% of total deliveries across both vehicle categories were accounted for under operating lease accounting. Energy storage business continues to expand Beyond its automotive operations, Tesla deployed 13.5 GWh of energy storage products during the second quarter, highlighting continued growth in its energy division alongside its vehicle business. Tesla stock priceThe post Tesla beats delivery forecasts with 480,126 vehicles delivered in second quarter (TSLA) appeared first on US Editors. Original: Tesla beats delivery forecasts with 480,126 vehicles delivered in second quarter (TSLA)
US Market News
1日前
Tesla Second Quarter 2026 Production, Deliveries & DeploymentsJuly 2, 2026 9:05 AM
Business Wire In the second quarter, we produced over 450,000 vehicles, delivered over 480,000 vehicles and deployed 13.5 GWh of energy storage products. Thank you to all of our customers, employees, suppliers, shareholders and supporters who helped us achieve these results. Q2 2026 Production Deliveries Subject to operating lease accounting Model 3/Y 442,936 467,762 2% Other Models 8,822 12,364 2% Total 451,758 480,126 2% Tesla will post its financial results for the second quarter of 2026 after market close on Wednesday, July 22, 2026. At that time, Tesla will issue a brief advisory containing a link to the Q2 2026 update, which will be available on Tesla’s Investor Relations website. Tesla management will hold a live question and answer webcast that day at 4:30 p.m. Central Time (5:30 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the Company’s financial and business results and outlook. What: Tesla Q2 2026 Financial Results and Q&A Webcast
When: Wednesday, July 22, 2026
Time: 4:30 p.m. Central Time / 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time
Q2 2026 Update: https://ir.tesla.com
Webcast: https://ir.tesla.com (live and replay) Approximately two hours after the Q&A session, an archived version of the webcast will be available on the Company’s website. For additional information, please visit https://ir.tesla.com. Our net income and cash flow results will be announced along with the rest of our financial performance when we announce Q2 earnings. Tesla vehicle deliveries and storage deployments represent only two measures of the Company’s financial performance and should not be relied on as an indicator of quarterly financial results, which depend on a variety of factors, including average selling price, cost of sales, foreign exchange movements and others as to be disclosed in the 10-Q for the quarter ended on June 30, 2026. View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260702058054/en/ Investor Relations Contact:
ir@tesla.com Original: Tesla Second Quarter 2026 Production, Deliveries & Deployments
boston745
2日前
Teen Killed After Tesla Crashes Through Guardrail
Investigators said an adult male driving a Tesla was traveling at a high rate of speed and attempted to pass traffic on the right shoulder when he lost control of the vehicle and struck the guardrail.
The guardrail penetrated the front of the Tesla and tore through the roof for approximately 80 feet before the vehicle came to an abrupt stop.
The violent impact ejected a 17-year-old male who was seated in the left rear seat and was not wearing a seatbelt. He suffered fatal injuries and was pronounced deceased at the scene.
The adult male driver sustained major life-threatening injuries, while the adult female front passenger suffered serious injuries. An adult female seated in the right rear suffered minor injuries, and another adult female passenger seated in the middle rear escaped without injury.
This accident was much more horrific than the last article made it seem. To really do it justice you need to see the video footage as the Tesla ripped up a good bit of guardrail. Both this and the Tesla Semi accident occurred before an earthquake early Monday morning suggesting it may have contributed to the glitches that caused the accidents.
Expect more out of control Teslas this week as a X rated flare CME is due to hit late tomorrow to early Friday .
NOAA analysts say that a G2-class (Moderate) geomagnetic storm is possible on July 3rd when yesterday's X-class CME reaches Earth. In the northern hemisphere, aurora visibility will be challenged by several factors: (1) a bright moon, (2) short nights, (3) the Russell-McPherron Effect, which suspresses solstice auroras. The best time to look is during the dark hours around midnight.
Quote Sources:
https://onscene.tv/teen-killed-after-tesla-crashes-through-guardrail/
https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=01&month=07&year=2026
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
iHub News
2日前
BYD poised to retake global EV sales crown from Tesla (TSLA)July 1, 2026 10:00 AM
IH Market News Chinese automaker widens lead in second-quarter electric vehicle deliveries BYD Co. (USOTC:BYDDY) is on track to regain its position as the world’s largest seller of fully electric vehicles, with second-quarter deliveries expected to outpace those of Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA). The Chinese manufacturer reported battery-electric vehicle (BEV) deliveries of 557,090 units during the second quarter, according to figures released on Wednesday. Tesla is scheduled to publish its quarterly delivery figures next week, with analysts currently forecasting sales of approximately 396,500 vehicles. BYD continues international expansion BYD first overtook Tesla in the fourth quarter of 2024 and retained the global leadership position throughout 2025. Tesla briefly reclaimed the top spot during the first quarter of 2026 after exceeding BYD’s BEV deliveries by roughly 48,000 vehicles, helped in part by softer demand in China’s domestic market. Across all powertrain types and vehicle categories, BYD sold 403,472 vehicles in June, representing a 5.5% increase from a year earlier. International markets accounted for 43% of total deliveries, highlighting the company’s growing presence outside China. Technology investment remains a key priority BYD continues to invest heavily in new technologies as competition intensifies across China’s electric vehicle industry. The company is competing with domestic rivals including Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. and Xiaomi Corp., both of which are expanding their own electric vehicle offerings amid aggressive pricing across the sector. In May, BYD unveiled several technology initiatives, including what it described as China’s most powerful chip for autonomous driving applications. The automaker is also increasing production of its next-generation Blade battery technology as it looks to strengthen its competitive position. Tesla works to strengthen its position in China Meanwhile, Tesla has begun recruiting for driver-assistance technology roles in China following repeated delays to the rollout of advanced software features considered critical to competing with local manufacturers. While global electric vehicle sales are expected to reach another record level this year, growth has begun to moderate in several key markets. According to the China Passenger Car Association, sales of new energy vehicles—including battery-electric and plug-in hybrid models—declined 7.5% year over year in May. BYD stock price Tesla stock priceThe post BYD poised to retake global EV sales crown from Tesla (TSLA) appeared first on US Editors. Original: BYD poised to retake global EV sales crown from Tesla (TSLA)
iHub News
2日前
Tesla Q2 deliveries seen rising as European demand gathers pace (TSLA)July 1, 2026 6:56 AM
IH Market News Analysts forecast stronger quarterly deliveries Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) is expected to report higher vehicle deliveries for the second quarter when it releases production and delivery figures on Thursday, with Wall Street forecasting a rebound driven primarily by improving demand in Europe. According to a survey of 20 analysts compiled by Visible Alpha, Tesla is expected to deliver 402,780 electric vehicles during the June quarter. That would represent a 4.9% increase from a year earlier and a 12.5% improvement compared with the previous quarter. Europe expected to lead growth Analysts expect Europe to be Tesla’s strongest-performing market during the quarter, helped by rising fuel prices that have encouraged more consumers to switch to electric vehicles. Deutsche Bank forecasts deliveries in Europe will increase by nearly 40% year over year, while China is expected to post modest growth of around 3%. North America, by contrast, is projected to see deliveries fall by 21% from the same period last year. Tesla does not disclose vehicle deliveries by individual region. Fuel prices and FSD rollout support demand Higher fuel costs following the conflict involving Iran have strengthened demand for both new and used electric vehicles across Europe. The anticipated recovery follows a difficult 2025, when Tesla experienced a sharp decline in European sales amid criticism of Chief Executive Elon Musk’s far-right political comments. Analysts also believe wider availability of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) advanced driver assistance system could support future demand across Europe, although the software is currently approved in only a limited number of countries. A European Union vote on expanding its rollout is expected later this year. Several European countries are due to publish monthly and quarterly vehicle sales data on Wednesday, offering further insight into regional demand trends. Lower-priced models remain central to strategy As part of its efforts to attract more customers, Tesla has introduced lower-cost versions of its Model 3 and Model Y over the past year, broadening the appeal of its electric vehicle lineup in an increasingly competitive market. Tesla stock priceThe post Tesla Q2 deliveries seen rising as European demand gathers pace (TSLA) appeared first on US Editors. Original: Tesla Q2 deliveries seen rising as European demand gathers pace (TSLA)
zen222
3日前
Elon Musk Is Crashing Out Badly
He's back to name-calling his critics.
https://futurism.com/future-society/elon-musk-crashing-out-usaid-killed
Musk’s decision to slash USAID funding has been linked to millions of preventable deaths, including 4.5 million children, with spikes in HIV/AIDS and malaria reported.
Over the weekend, Elon Musk publicly challenged anybody to “cite a single name of someone who died” as a result of him gutting USAID last year during the early weeks of the second Trump administration — a “death sentence for an estimated 4.5 million children around the world,” according to representative Ro Khanna (D-CA).
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof valiantly took him up on the offer, painstakingly listing the identities of specific children and even an infant who had died in Liberia and South Sudan.
“I could go on and on,” Kristof wrote. “In almost every village you go to in South Sudan, Uganda, Liberia, Sierra Leone or other countries I reported in, you find people dying because of aid cuts.”
Musk didn’t take kindly to the journalist doing exactly what he’d asked, melting down in an expletive-laden tweet storm on Monday.
“Kristof is utterly evil,” a fuming Musk wrote, without offering up any evidence.
“Kristof is lying through his teeth,” he added scathingly in a separate response.
“Nothing that Kristoff [sic] has said is true,” the richest man in the world tweeted. “He is an utter piece of s*** and liar.”
Musk kept repeating himself in variations of the same messages, which doesn’t seem healthy.
“You’re an utter piece of s*** and a liar,” Musk responded to Kristof, who argued that “kids died unnecessarily” due to USAID cutting off funding “abruptly with no time for countries to adjust.”
It’s far from the first time Musk has resorted to name-calling his critics. He has a long track record of flinging personal insults at his detractors when confronted with the consequences of his actions.
Other netizens also pointed out that Musk was similarly wrong about COVID-19, betting $1 million that it would quickly fade — and similarly melting down when deaths grew far beyond his prediction.
Despite the near-trillionaire’s decidedly immature objections, his decision to lead his so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to dismantle USAID last year has been nothing short of disastrous for humanitarian efforts around the world.
As Kristof has extensively reported for the NYT, the massive gap in funding has caused cases of HIV/AIDS and malaria to spike. According to a March 2025 report by the Center for Global Development, US assistance once saved around 3.3 million lives worldwide per year, meaning that millions more are now at risk.
A 2025 study published in the journal Lancet found that the “current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14?million additional all-age deaths, including 4.5 million in children younger than age five, by 2030.”
Despite DOGE claiming it was trying to save the government money, foreign aid is not even a “rounding-error of our wealth to save millions of lives overseas,” Refugees International president Jeremy Konyndyk, who led disaster relief for USAID during the COVID-19 pandemic, tweeted.
Indeed, the US government spent anywhere between 0.7 and 1.4 percent of its total federal budget on foreign aid before the most cuts.
“In polling, huge majorities of Americans support this,” Konyndyk added. “Empathy is an American value; just not to sociopathic weirdos like Rufo & Elon.”
Besides basic levels of empathy, there are a litany of other reasons the US once provided foreign aid, from soft power and political influence to securing its own interests abroad. As Kristof later pointed out, “USAID served our interests as well as our values, by protecting us from diseases like the Ebola outbreak now ravaging Congo.”
According to the Harvard School of Public Health, USAID cuts are fueling the spread of new strains of the deadly disease in the central African nation.
boston745
3日前
Tesla crashes into porch of North Tampa home; TECO responds to downed power line: Police
A Tesla crashed into the front porch of a home in the North Tampa area Tuesday morning, according to the Tampa Police Department. Officers are investigating whether speed played a role in the wreck.
Speaking of Out of Control Teslas in Florida, heres another one. Not much detail, but it looks like another Tesla suffered SUA and/or sudden veering and crashed into this home.
https://www.fox13news.com/news/tesla-crashes-porch-north-tampa-home-teco-downed-power-line-police
========================================
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Researcher Discovers Tesla Design Flaw That May Cause Unintended Acceleration; NHTSA Reopens Investigation
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reopened its investigation into a potential design flaw in Tesla vehicles, which may lead to sudden unintended acceleration. This comes after allegations were made that a voltage spike deep within the control systems could cause the vehicle to incorrectly read an accelerator input, even when none has occurred.
When Voltage Spikes Trigger Unintended Acceleration
Under certain circumstances, such as slow driving, when the power steering requires more power, the draw on the 12-volt battery can cause a significant spike in the system. This voltage surge could lead the inverter to incorrectly conclude that the accelerator pedal has been pressed, resulting in unintended acceleration.
This unexpected acceleration could theoretically happen when a voltage spike, lasting only microseconds, occurs simultaneously as the car performs an ADC check, also lasting microseconds. Belt suggests that the frequency of these events aligns with the 200 or so incidents reported between 2013 and 2019.
Adding complexity to this issue, Belt contends that due to the nature of the fault, it does not get logged as an error. The inverter’s misinterpretation of a voltage spike as a throttle input leaves no trace, leading to discrepancies between Tesla's vehicle data and owners' accounts, possibly explaining why the ODI initially denied the petition.
While Belt's allegations primarily focus on the Model 3, which features a unique inverter design, he notes that similar errors could occur in Model S and Model X vehicles. This opens up the potential for a broader scope in the ongoing investigation.
NHTSA Petition Claims Tesla Sudden Unintended Acceleration Is Real
What's worse is that the incorrectly increased sensor signals will be sent via the CAN bus to the vehicle logs, causing Tesla and NHTSA to conclude that the driver caused the sudden increase in torque by stepping on the accelerator pedal. But in this case, the sudden acceleration was caused not by the driver stepping on the accelerator pedal but by a random superposition of a negative-going voltage spike (which is about 100 microseconds long), and the sampling time of the analog-to-digital converter (which is about 10 microseconds long). This random superposition explains the low occurrence rate of sudden acceleration in Tesla vehicles
SUA has impacted every main Tesla car model S/X, 3/Y, & even the Cybertruck. Im not aware of an incident involving a Semi...yet...although the one that drove into the trees with an engine fire may have experienced SUA.
As this issue has impacted just about every Tesla model and year, i doubt Dr Belt's theory in relation to the the origin of the fault, is exactly correct and certainly not easy to fix as its still a problem. Thus i expect the NHTSA will deny this petition at some point despite this issue continuing to plague Teslas. I believe the problem of SUA is EM interference induced which impacts other EVs as well per a study in China. EMI can cause these voltage spikes to compensate from a drop in voltage as described in the following quote. E3 usually pertains to EM blast from a nuclear explosion but during geostorms/unrest this same sort of voltage depression can be observed in electrical systems.
E3 can also affect subtransmission and distribution systems by causing harmonic distortion and voltage depression. The voltage regulators at the substation will attempt to correct for low voltage levels on distribution circuits. This attempt can result in overvoltages when the E3 stimulus decays to a low value
Part 2 - Proof Electromagnetic radiation is causing EVs to go out of control
4). Among the data records during the accidents according to the background data of the crashed vehicles or the data of on-vehicle terminals, the position values of most accelerator pedals were very high(99%) while the values of brake pedals were 0% or only non-zero in very limited moments (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
Continued very high accelerator pressure with no braking is how you differentiate SUA from pedal misapplication.
In recent years, there have been numerous out-of-control accidents of electric vehicles.
Occasional fault of electronic control unit caused by electromagnetic interference
External electromagnetic interference refers to that caused by electromagnetic radiation of various electrical facilities including the high voltage transmission line, broadcasting TV devices and radio communication equipment as well as natural phenomena such as lightning.
Electromagnetic wave interferes the electric control system of automobile through wiring harness and car body to make it hard to perform or even send wrong instructions leading to wrong actions of various actuators, affecting the safety, reliability and stability of automobile driving. The electromagnetic interference affects the automobile electronic control system mainly in two ways: one is to affect the input signal of the sensor of the electronic control system, causing distortion and resulting in electric control signal where the ECU output does not match the driver's intention, which leads to the wrong operation of the actuator; the other is to interfere the ECU output signal to result in its deviation, misleading the operation of the actuator.
The most common cause of Natural EMI includes:
Lightning
Solar Magnetic Storms
Earth’s Magnetic Field Flux
Cosmic Radiation
Quote Sources:
https://www.inc.com/leila-sheridan/tesla-crash-key-part-missing/91330404
https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/1515/investigation-into-unintended-acceleration-of-teslas-reopened-could-a-design-flaw-be-at-fault
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/breaking-nhtsa-petition-shows-tesla-s-sudden-unintended-acceleration-is-real-and-curable-217525.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346368508_Special_Investigation_and_Countermeasure_Suggestions_on_Electric_Vehicle_out-of-control_Accidents
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
3日前
💀🚶🚗79-year-old woman struck, killed by Tesla outside Simi Valley restaurant
Police said a white Tesla careened off a roadway and struck the woman as she was walking on a sidewalk outside the restaurant. The vehicle crashed into the building, leaving mangled chairs, tables and shattered glass scattered across the sidewalk.
Investigators said the Tesla jumped a curb, hitting the victim and narrowly missing two customers who had gotten up to leave moments before the collision.
When first responders arrived, the elderly victim was found trapped underneath the vehicle.
"We don't believe it was an intentional act but until we can determine what the cause was, whether it was mechanical failure or there was impairment by the driver, it's still to be determined," Morton said.
Another Tesla seems to have suffered SUA and instead of negotiating a turn, it kept driving straight into an unfortunate pedestrian and cafe. Police are investigating to see if this was mechanical failure or impairment. ITS NOT MECHANICAL! Its ELECTRICAL! Of course you cant find what you dont look for!
Yesterday I posted this:
Unlike the Tesla Semi accident, this has all the hallmarks of an out of control Tesla. Thats my 2 posts for today, see you tomorrow.
Any Seismic activity in the area i wonder (pretty much always in Cali)? Theres been more Florida accidents recently (this is in Cali not Florida) and more seismic activity around the Gulf.
Sure enough there was a decent earthquake yesterday early morning i found out about shortly after that post. A 5.5 earthquake occurred just off the Oregon/Northern California coast. Just before and after there have been several out of control Teslas. I believe this can occur because there is in fact EM radiation emanating around the area where the earthquake occurs in the days leading up to and after an earthquake. This not only impacts EVs, but can impact airplanes as well so the EM issue is larger than it seems.
It was either in 2023 or 2024 I noticed a series of Tesla related incidents that followed the pacific plate. First occurred in San Diego, with an out of control Tesla. This was followed by a deployed Megapack spontaneously combusting along the I-15 to help deal with the increased traffic coming home from Vegas after New Years. this was the same time the Doctor supposedly drove his family off Devils Slide which I still believe was caused by the car. The next incident I recall occurred along the I-5 in southern Oregon followed by another one along I-5 in the Tacoma, WA area i think it was. The last incident was when a Tesla seemed to suffer SUA, drove through a closed ferry gate into the bay near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. All these events came in succession along the pacific plate like a slow moving EM wave traveled South-North over a 1 week period.
https://abc7.com/post/simi-valley-crash-1-killed-5-injured-car-slams-urbane-cafe-restaurant/19416545/
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
iHub News
3日前
Magnificent Seven shed $2.3 trillion in June as AI spending comes under closer scrutiny (MSFT)June 30, 2026 9:00 AM
IH Market News Investor sentiment shifts toward infrastructure costs The so-called “Magnificent Seven” technology stocks have collectively lost around $2.3 trillion in market value during June as investors reassessed the scale of artificial intelligence infrastructure spending by the sector’s largest companies. The group comprises Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META), Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN). Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in semiconductors and data centre capacity to expand their AI capabilities, with part of that spending financed through debt. During June, Microsoft shares fell 20%, Nvidia declined about 13%, while Apple and Amazon each dropped roughly 8%. Markets await proof that AI investment will deliver returns Investors have become increasingly cautious as technology giants commit record sums to AI infrastructure, with many now looking to the upcoming second-quarter earnings season for evidence that those investments are translating into stronger financial performance. The reporting season, which begins in July, is expected to provide greater insight into whether the industry’s heavy capital expenditure is generating meaningful returns. Chipmakers continue to outperform While the largest technology companies have come under pressure, semiconductor stocks have continued to outperform. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index advanced around 6% during June and has climbed more than 90% this year, compared with a 3.4% decline for the Magnificent Seven over the same period. Demand from major technology companies has continued to benefit semiconductor manufacturers, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Micron Technology Inc. and ASML Holding NV, with strong chip orders creating supply shortages throughout the industry. The resulting shortage of memory components has also driven prices higher, adding to supply chain constraints across the semiconductor market. Microsoft stock price Nvidia stock price Alphabet stock price Apple stock price Meta stock price Tesla stock price Amazon stock priceThe post Magnificent Seven shed $2.3 trillion in June as AI spending comes under closer scrutiny (MSFT) appeared first on US Editors. Original: Magnificent Seven shed $2.3 trillion in June as AI spending comes under closer scrutiny (MSFT)
boston745
4日前
💀🚗One Confirmed Dead from MoVal Crash
At least one person died Sunday when a Tesla struck a guardrail on the Moreno Valley (60) Freeway in Moreno Valley and went over the side of the road.
The crash was first reported at 9:42 p.m. Sunday on the westbound Moreno Valley Freeway at Heacock Street, according to the California Highway Patrol.
Witnesses told the CHP the driver and three other people were trapped inside the black Tesla and that the car was driven recklessly before the crash.
Unlike the Tesla Semi accident, this has all the hallmarks of an out of control Tesla. Thats my 2 posts for today, see you tomorrow.
Any Seismic activity in the area i wonder (pretty much always in Cali)? Theres been more Florida accidents recently (this is in Cali not Florida) and more seismic activity around the Gulf.
https://mynewsla.com/crime/2026/06/28/at-least-one-person-killed-in-crash-on-60-freeway-in-moreno-valley/
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
4日前
💀🚗🚚Highway 50 reopened after two killed in collision
The couple were reportedly westbound and stopped at the traffic signal on Highway 50 at Traditions Way when they were struck from behind by a Tesla semi truck.
Lyon County Sheriff’s Sgt. Shaun Lee said that preliminary statements indicated the driver of the semi might have fallen asleep at the wheel.
The collision has both lanes of the highway closed at Traditions Parkway. The Nevada Highway Patrol, Central Lyon County Fire District and the Nevada Department of Transportation responded to the crash.
Fell asleep at 7:14am? Something smells about this. Worth noting for now as not enough evidence to suggest this Tesla Semi glitched.
https://www.recordcourier.com/news/2026/jun/28/highway-50-closed-for-dayton-fatality/
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
iHub News
4日前
Morgan Stanley Lifts Tesla Delivery Forecast on Stronger Europe and China Demand (TSLA)June 29, 2026 6:52 AM
IH Market News Morgan Stanley has increased its forecast for Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) second-quarter vehicle deliveries after stronger-than-expected sales trends in Europe and China, although the bank continues to take a cautious view of the company’s energy storage business. The brokerage now expects Tesla to deliver around 413,000 vehicles during the second quarter, up from its previous estimate of approximately 373,000 and above the current market consensus of roughly 401,000 units. The upward revision reflects stronger vehicle registrations and sales data recorded across major international markets in April and May. Europe provided the largest positive surprise, with registrations running comfortably ahead of year-earlier levels and April extending the recovery that followed a difficult period in 2025. China also showed improving momentum, as domestic sales rebounded both month-on-month and year-on-year in May, ending two consecutive months of annual declines and pointing to stabilising demand. Although U.S. sales remained below last year’s levels through May, regional trends still exceeded Morgan Stanley’s previous expectations. Morgan Stanley maintained its US$415 price target on Tesla but said it remains more conservative than the broader market regarding the company’s energy storage operations. The bank forecasts second-quarter energy storage deployments of 11.8 GWh, below the consensus estimate of approximately 14.3 GWh, citing a cautious outlook on project timing following delays experienced during the first quarter. Even so, it expects deployments to accelerate during the second half of the year, with full-year installations reaching roughly 55 GWh, broadly matching market expectations. The stronger delivery outlook also led the brokerage to increase its earnings forecasts. Morgan Stanley raised its second-quarter adjusted EBITDA estimate by 11% and modestly lifted its full-year revenue and profit projections, reflecting higher expected vehicle deliveries and improved automotive margins. Tesla shares rose 1.2% to close at US$379.71 on Friday after reaching an intraday high of US$387.80. The stock added a further 0.2% in after-hours trading to US$380.41. Tesla stock price The post Morgan Stanley Lifts Tesla Delivery Forecast on Stronger Europe and China Demand (TSLA) appeared first on US Editors. Original: Morgan Stanley Lifts Tesla Delivery Forecast on Stronger Europe and China Demand (TSLA)
boston745
5日前
Multiple agencies battle Tesla, structure fire in Niskayuna - From April
Firefighters were dispatched to the residence just before 5:40 a.m. Upon arrival, crews reportedly found heavy fire through the roof of an attached garage.
According to the fire department, a Tesla was engulfed in flames, with a second car beginning to catch fire. A building on the right side of the home was also impacted and nearing ignition due to radiant heat, authorities said.
Fire officials were reportedly able to bring the house and garage fire under control within 20 minutes. However, the Tesla required extended operations because the lithium-ion batteries were in thermal runaway and actively burning.
The incident was declared out just before 7 a.m., according to the fire department. The home was reportedly significantly damaged.
This is a problem with EVs. They do on occasion, spontaneously combust threatening to burn down your home and your neighbors homes around you. I do not recall posting this incident back in April but it deserve revisiting because of the structural threat these cars represent. Thing is, Optimus robots are a potential greater threat because they should spontaneously combust in the home instead of garage, and thus I will continue to advocate that Optimus robots not be sold to consumers if they are ever brought to market. They should only be sold to governments that can handle the potential hazard they represent. The more sold the greater the chance for this sort of thing to happen at a much larger scale, in wealthier neighborhoods mind you. If it happens, coupled with wind and dry conditions, it could lead to significant multi-acre fires that spread fast. Im actually surprised a Tesla hasnt kicked off anything but a small multi-acre fire so far and the the occasional house fires like this.
In addition to this fire, a much more recent one occurred:
Firefighters and hazmat teams responded to a Tesla fire at 490 Riverside Dr in New York City. The vehicle was confirmed to be on fire, and video footage shows firefighters managing the scene with the burnt car.
From what I can see, there was a person inside this Tesla when it caught fire...
https://www.news10.com/news/schenectady-county/multiple-agencies-battle-tesla-structure-fire-in-niskayuna/
https://citizen.com/-OvC5dBHiF72QN9_8Zl0
========================================
How does EMF cause lithium batteries to experience thermal runaway and thus spontaneously combust? One of two main ways:
#1 - Overcharge/Discharge
With various impressed external magnetic field intensities an effect was noticed on the charge and discharge curves as well as the charge and mass concentrations within the batteries. With the two-dimensional model starting from 0mT and going to 1mT had the effect of discharging the battery faster and charging the battery faster. With the two-dimensional model starting from 1mT and going to -1mT had the effect of charging the battery faster. In either case an effect on the various characteristics of the battery were studied. With the experiments conducted on the two types of batteries the effect was more profound than subtle. Discharge times were twice as fast and charge times were equally
affected. With the smaller batteries they all generally charged faster under the presence of a magnetic field due to more uniform penetration. In the presence of the field they also discharged faster. The larger batteries would not see the same uniform penetration because only a small area of the battery sees the center of the coil it is placed on
In this dissertation, they found that external magnetic fields significantly increased charge and discharge rates in individual lithium battery cells; like shown in the following image. They also found that smaller batteries were impacted to a greater degree than larger ones. This is likely a reason Tesla is switching to larger battery cells in addition to employing magnetic attenuating honeycomb sandwich battery pack.
Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries Triggered by Electromagnetic Interference
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9025761
https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0378775320302172-fx1_lrg.jpg
#2 - Stimulation of Dendrite Growth
Thermoelectric current causes asymmetric growth pattern of dendrites.
thermoelectromagnetic convection occurs in the vicinity of the solid-liquid interface, and vortices are generated between dendritic arms. It is shown that the thermoelectromagnetic convection has a major influence on dendritic morphology.
Quote Sources:
#1:https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/1743
#2:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001793101930225X
boston745
6日前
A Fatal Tesla Crash in Texas Sets Up a Legal Showdown - (The most balanced and accurate article ive seen on this incident)
Did Full Self-Driving (Supervised), Tesla’s driver assistance feature, play a role in a woman’s death?
First off the Articles says Full Self Driving not Autopilot like so many other articles. Tesla confirmed it was FSD. It covers the claim that self driving was used by the driver, the lack of impairment, cooperation, and it covers Teslas rebuttle claiming the driver applied the accelerator as well as Musk's X post showing confusion. It even brings up the recent case where Tesla was ordered to pay 240m for an incident very similar to this where the data indicates the driver kept their foot on the accelerator...or the Tesla suffered SUA as I believe the evidence indicates. If Tesla was partially responsible then you can bet it'll be found to be again. Hopefully with these attorney's being given the information I've been collecting for the past 5 years, they can prove Tesla was fully responsible.
The suit alleges Tesla’s tech “was defective in design and unreasonably dangerous,”
This is 100% the truth. Teslas are defective and unreasonably dangerous. I have been covering this for years and I strongly believe Tesla is aware and not able to fix the problem as is evidenced by this sort of thing occurring in every Tesla vehicle to date including the Semi and the Model Y Juniper. Its not the software folks, its hardware as Dr Belt indicates in his paper. Its not a Tesla specific problem, its an EV problem mainly but can and has been seen in ICE vehicles at times as well. In 2008, Toyotas were suffering from SUA but Toyota managed to fix the cause; believed to be caused by EM interference but thats not the official story.
“If the product is designed in a way that it leaves drivers vulnerable to situations where suddenly the system is not working and they’ve lost situational awareness, Tesla could be found responsible,” says Matthew Wansley, a professor with Yeshiva University’s Cardozo School of Law who studies automotive tech.
In fact, it’s happened before. Last year, a Florida jury found that the driver of a Tesla Model S using Autopilot, Tesla’s earlier driver assistance software, was mostly responsible for a crash in which he failed to see that the T-shaped intersection his car was traveling on was ending. He kept his foot on the accelerator, and the Tesla collided with and killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon.
The problem isnt that drivers lose situational awareness, although that can contribute. The problem is when these Teslas malfunction there can be little if anything the driver can do about it. There have been cases where yes the driver was able to steer the Tesla as it was accelerating uncontrollably. This was seen in China a few years ago and Paris. Both incidents driven by professional drivers and at least in the case of the incident in China, the driver attempted to apply the ebrake (confirmed by Tesla). It is not logical that this driver did not attempt to apply the regular brake before trying to use the ebrake 4 times. In fact there is photographic evidence of the Teslas brake lights being on as it sped off.
Then there are incidents where the Tesla suffers SUA but the steering locks. This, i believe happened to a Doctor in Texas back in 2021 i think it was. Its happened in Florida a few years back, it happened in NJ back in 2019 i think it was, and more recently in 2024, in a Cybertruck. In the case of the brand new Cybertruck, it suddenly sped up on its driver and steering locked preventing the driver from being able to take control. Before I quote the incident, I just want to reiterate, when Teslas malfunction there is little if anything you can do. Best case you can steer to try to avoid hitting people, but ul;timately to stop, you have to hit something significantly enough to stop as its possible only a computer reset will clear the error. This could be why the recent incident in Katy, Tx indicates the accelerator was being held down after the accident. For which the attorney of the family whose house was struck said that if the person actually held their foot on the accelerator as Tesla claimed, he would have shattered his leg. His leg was fine and he walked away thus indicating he did not likely have his foot on the accelerator into the house and after the house stopped the Tesla.
Twitter user u/ bfreshwa claims his stainless-steel-clad machine accelerated unexpectedly after only 4 hours total on the road. In surveillance footage, the impractical pickup darted up a hill into a neighbor’s house with the rear wheels completely locked up. The owner stated that the throttle and steering were unresponsive as he held the brake pedal to the floor, putting down a pair of 50-foot-long skid marks. The owner claimed that a Tesla representative said during a phone call:
“We have reviewed logs and due to the terrain, the accelerator may or may not disengage when the brake is depressed. As far as the back tire locking we are reviewing.”
Tesla vice president of AI software Ashok Elluswamy wrote that Tesla data showed that Butler “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100 percent” and “had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
This claim by Tesla in regards to the data the Tesla recorded actually validates that the Tesla suffered SUA and that the driver did not apply the accelerator. I say this to be true because if the driver misapplied the pedal, they would pump the pedal not hold it down trying to get it to respond. They certainly would not hold the pedal down into the accident and afterwards as the data indicates.
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
An Old paper by Dr Belt who submitted to the NHTSA about Teslas SUA issue:
An electronic cause for sudden unintended acceleration was discussed in a previous paper. The cause
was attributed to a negative voltage spike on the battery supply line leading to a brownout error that causes faulty
operation of the CPUs, keep-alive memory, and/or EEPROM memory, resulting in a data error that causes
unpredictable engine operation, such as sudden acceleration. While this cause explained many observations
associated with sudden acceleration, the theory was incomplete because it never identified the precise hardware or
software fault producing the data error. In this paper a mechanism for this data error is presented. The mechanism
involves a sudden change in the correction value that is used to adjust the PWM duty cycle applied to the throttle
motor to compensate for variations in the battery voltage. The evidence for and against this mechanism is discussed
Quote Sources:
https://www.wired.com/story/a-fatal-tesla-crash-in-texas-sets-up-a-legal-showdown/
https://www.reddit.com/r/CrazyFuckingVideos/comments/1dnt8r2/cybertruck_owner_claims_his_vehicle_accelerated/
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
https://www.autosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/import/Belt%20A%20Detailed%20Electronic%20Mechanism%20for%20Sudden%20Unintended%20Acceleration.pdf
Researcher Discovers Tesla Design Flaw That May Cause Unintended Acceleration; NHTSA Reopens Investigation
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reopened its investigation into a potential design flaw in Tesla vehicles, which may lead to sudden unintended acceleration. This comes after allegations were made that a voltage spike deep within the control systems could cause the vehicle to incorrectly read an accelerator input, even when none has occurred.
When Voltage Spikes Trigger Unintended Acceleration
Under certain circumstances, such as slow driving, when the power steering requires more power, the draw on the 12-volt battery can cause a significant spike in the system. This voltage surge could lead the inverter to incorrectly conclude that the accelerator pedal has been pressed, resulting in unintended acceleration.
This unexpected acceleration could theoretically happen when a voltage spike, lasting only microseconds, occurs simultaneously as the car performs an ADC check, also lasting microseconds. Belt suggests that the frequency of these events aligns with the 200 or so incidents reported between 2013 and 2019.
Adding complexity to this issue, Belt contends that due to the nature of the fault, it does not get logged as an error. The inverter’s misinterpretation of a voltage spike as a throttle input leaves no trace, leading to discrepancies between Tesla's vehicle data and owners' accounts, possibly explaining why the ODI initially denied the petition.
While Belt's allegations primarily focus on the Model 3, which features a unique inverter design, he notes that similar errors could occur in Model S and Model X vehicles. This opens up the potential for a broader scope in the ongoing investigation.
NHTSA Petition Claims Tesla Sudden Unintended Acceleration Is Real
What's worse is that the incorrectly increased sensor signals will be sent via the CAN bus to the vehicle logs, causing Tesla and NHTSA to conclude that the driver caused the sudden increase in torque by stepping on the accelerator pedal. But in this case, the sudden acceleration was caused not by the driver stepping on the accelerator pedal but by a random superposition of a negative-going voltage spike (which is about 100 microseconds long), and the sampling time of the analog-to-digital converter (which is about 10 microseconds long). This random superposition explains the low occurrence rate of sudden acceleration in Tesla vehicles
SUA has impacted every main Tesla car model S/X, 3/Y, & even the Cybertruck. Im not aware of an incident involving a Semi...yet...although the one that drove into the trees with an engine fire may have experienced SUA.
As this issue has impacted just about every Tesla model and year, i doubt Dr Belt's theory in relation to the the origin of the fault, is exactly correct and certainly not easy to fix as its still a problem. Thus i expect the NHTSA will deny this petition at some point despite this issue continuing to plague Teslas. I believe the problem of SUA is EM interference induced which impacts other EVs as well per a study in China. EMI can cause these voltage spikes to compensate from a drop in voltage as described in the following quote. E3 usually pertains to EM blast from a nuclear explosion but during geostorms/unrest this same sort of voltage depression can be observed in electrical systems.
E3 can also affect subtransmission and distribution systems by causing harmonic distortion and voltage depression. The voltage regulators at the substation will attempt to correct for low voltage levels on distribution circuits. This attempt can result in overvoltages when the E3 stimulus decays to a low value
Part 2 - Proof Electromagnetic radiation is causing EVs to go out of control
4). Among the data records during the accidents according to the background data of the crashed vehicles or the data of on-vehicle terminals, the position values of most accelerator pedals were very high(99%) while the values of brake pedals were 0% or only non-zero in very limited moments (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
Continued very high accelerator pressure with no braking is how you differentiate SUA from pedal misapplication.
In recent years, there have been numerous out-of-control accidents of electric vehicles.
Occasional fault of electronic control unit caused by electromagnetic interference
External electromagnetic interference refers to that caused by electromagnetic radiation of various electrical facilities including the high voltage transmission line, broadcasting TV devices and radio communication equipment as well as natural phenomena such as lightning.
Electromagnetic wave interferes the electric control system of automobile through wiring harness and car body to make it hard to perform or even send wrong instructions leading to wrong actions of various actuators, affecting the safety, reliability and stability of automobile driving. The electromagnetic interference affects the automobile electronic control system mainly in two ways: one is to affect the input signal of the sensor of the electronic control system, causing distortion and resulting in electric control signal where the ECU output does not match the driver's intention, which leads to the wrong operation of the actuator; the other is to interfere the ECU output signal to result in its deviation, misleading the operation of the actuator.
The most common cause of Natural EMI includes:
Lightning
Solar Magnetic Storms
Earth’s Magnetic Field Flux
Cosmic Radiation
Quote Sources:
https://www.inc.com/leila-sheridan/tesla-crash-key-part-missing/91330404
https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/1515/investigation-into-unintended-acceleration-of-teslas-reopened-could-a-design-flaw-be-at-fault
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/breaking-nhtsa-petition-shows-tesla-s-sudden-unintended-acceleration-is-real-and-curable-217525.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346368508_Special_Investigation_and_Countermeasure_Suggestions_on_Electric_Vehicle_out-of-control_Accidents
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
7日前
Tesla settles FSD crash lawsuit as federal investigations continue
The lawsuit was filed against Tesla and the driver by the daughter of Johna Story, a 71-year-old woman who was struck by a Tesla Model Y. Story was hit after she stepped out of her own vehicle to direct traffic around a crash that had occurred earlier due to sun glare.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened an investigation into Tesla’s FSD (Supervised) automated driving software in 2024 after four reported crashes in low visibility conditions — including the one involving Story.
https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/26/tesla-settles-fsd-crash-lawsuit-as-federal-investigations-continue/
The accident I believe that triggered the investigation in October 2024 is one i predicted in September 2024 as this accident occurred the 9th and the investigation was kicked off on the 18th I believe it was. Just as I have been calling the real cause for Teslas going out of control in this way since 2021. Its not the software but the hardware!
Alot more lawsuits to come...
On September 10th 2024 I posted this:
Be funny if on Oct 10th, theres a geostorm and the robotaxi runs a red light like MobileEye did when it was showcasing its autonomous tech and some EM interference caused it to run a red light.
Then said this on Oct 2nd, 2024:
We need another one of these, with a little more oomph, around the 6-8th so it arrives around the 10th for Teslas hyped production event! Although sometimes faint CMEs cause more apparent issues than the ones that cause larger storms. Due to the Russel-McPherron Effect, things could be interesting regardless.
Posted this October 25th, 2024:
On the 7&8th two more X-Flare CMEs were launched hitting on the 9th and 10th in time for Teslas event and for a Tesla to run a red light/hit a Firetruck. Somehow i predicted events that would transpire almost a month before they happened with incredible accuracy. The obvious difference being it seems a regular Tesla that ran the red light not a robotaxi. Be nice to know if the Tesla that ran the red light had AP or FSD enabled. Then it really was a "robotaxi'.
I recall reading that this Tesla was in fact using AP/FSD, as indicated by the NHTSA investigation, when it ran the redlight and collided with the firetruck effectively making this Tesla a "robotaxi".
October 9th, 2024:
A Tesla just ran a red light and T-boned a firetruck in Tampa, Florida. Horrible
October 18th, 2024 NHTSA launched a probe into Teslas running red lights with FSD engaged:
NHTSA said it has six reports in which a Tesla vehicle, operating with full self-driving (FSD) engaged, “approached an intersection with a red traffic signal, continued to travel into the intersection against the red light and was subsequently involved in a crash with other motor vehicles in the intersection”.
Doesnt specify this particular incident but it implies it as these probes are triggered after yet another incident occurs.
Quote Sources:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175064475
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175172385
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175287650
https://autos.yahoo.com/tesla-runs-red-light-t-205502443.html
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/09/tesla-cars-self-driving-us-regulators-investigation
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
1週前
A Tesla crashes into a Beverly Hills playground on Santa Monica Boulevard
An out-of-control Tesla plowed through a perimeter fence and collided with a playground structure Tuesday afternoon, narrowly missing a public park area where no children were present, authorities said.
Beverly Hills Police Department officers responded to the scene at the intersection of North Camden Drive and Santa Monica Boulevard following reports of the solo-vehicle collision. Video footage from the scene, published by the crowd-sourced safety application Citizen, showed the electric sedan resting directly inside the perimeter of the recreational play area after impacting the equipment.
Department officials confirmed that the playground was unoccupied at the time of the incident. No injuries were reported among bystanders or the driver.
Investigators have not yet disclosed the cause of the crash or whether speed or mechanical failure played a role.
Already posted about this accident but here is a little more information including calling this Tesla "Out of Control" and not sure if mechanical failure played a role. However its not really mechanical failure that causes this, but electrical glitch not unlike the Tesla that slammed into a home in Katy, Tx. Definitely seems like this Tesla suffered SUA and possibly sudden veering.
https://thepridela.com/2026/06/a-tesla-crashes-into-a-beverly-hills-playground-on-santa-monica-boulevard/
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
boston745
1週前
🚚🚗FHP: 2 women dead after driver crashes Tesla into flatbed truck in Homestead
According to the Florida Highway Patrol, the crash occurred at about 2:30 a.m. in the northbound lanes of South Dixie Highway near Southwest 127th Avenue.
Troopers said the driver of the gray Tesla crashed into the back of the truck, which was part of a caravan of trucks driving slowly in the area, at about 20 mph.
The truck drivers had just finished working up the street before the crash occurred, authorities said.
Both women, who authorities said were in their late 20s or early 30s, were pronounced dead at the scene.
It’s unclear what caused the driver to crash into the back of the truck.
Sounds to me like SUA caused the Tesla to slam into the back of this caravan of trucks.
https://www.local10.com/news/local/2026/06/25/fhp-2-women-dead-after-driver-crashes-tesla-into-large-truck-in-homestead/
=======================================
This is where Tesla FSD gets really scary.
I was driving to work had Full Self-Driving on. The oncoming car passed, and the wheel started turning rapidly, driving into the ditch, and side-swiping the tree, and the car flipped over. I did not have any time to react
As the two were traveling north on Highway 35 in Thomas County, the Model 3, which was reportedly in self-driving mode at the time, “abruptly departed the road, struck a tree and burst into flames,” the complaint says.
SUA is caused by voltage spikes due to EMI
I'm begging all of you to NEVER get in a Tesla as long as you live. It started accelerating on its own in a parking garage and my dad lost all control of the car and we ran into a wall at 40 mph. Most horrifying experience of my life.
“The movement of the Tesla Model 3 occurred – according to the Tesla EDR records – as the ‘Accelerator Pedal (percent)’ went from 0.0 (with a speed of 63 mph) to 100.0 without any significant change in vehicle speed
But independent experts disagree with the conclusion that the accelerator signal necessarily means the driver’s foot was on the pedal. Simen Huse, one of only five authorized Bosch CDR tool operators in Norway, and researchers from Sintef, argue that electronic malfunctions, software errors, or voltage spikes could produce the same accelerator signal in the data — without the driver ever pressing the pedal.
Quote Sources:
https://electrek.co/2025/05/23/tesla-full-self-driving-veers-off-road-flips-car-scary-crash-driver-couldnt-prevent/ - (With Video Evidence)
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-model-3-crash-inside-parking-garage-generates-dramatic-appeal-against-ev-maker-207530.html
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/tesla-self-driving-deaths-lawsuit-musk-b2951558.html
https://electrek.co/2026/04/13/tesla-norway-crash-evidence-stolen-network-card-missing/
Tesla's sudden veer issue is so well known they made a meme out of it:
=======================================
If you made it down to here checkout my board with all the accidents I post on TSLA forum.
Collection of Out of Control or spontaneously combusting Tesla products: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
My research on many topics: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
Hot Features
プレミアム
登録してリアルタイムのアラート、カスタムポートフォリオ、市場の動きを入手してください。
GVInvestments
1日前
mm41
1日前
mik1234
4日前
Zardiw
5日前
メールアドレスで登録
