Who can vote at the annual meeting?
As of the close of business on February 23, 2024 (the “Record Date”), a total of 161,279,328 shares of Class A common stock, including Charter Communications Holdings, LLC (“Charter Holdings”) common units on an as-if-exchanged basis, are entitled to be voted by our stockholders at the annual meeting. Each holder of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share, representing 144,386,152 votes. Advance/Newhouse Partnership (“A/N”) holds one share of our Class B common stock, which is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Class A common stock into which the Charter Holdings common units held by A/N may be exchanged, or 16,893,176 votes. The enclosed proxy card indicates the number of Class A shares that our records show you are entitled to vote. There are no other classes of common stock outstanding.
What is the difference between being a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?
You are a stockholder of record if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were registered in your name with Computershare Shareowner Services, our transfer agent and registrar.
You are a beneficial owner if at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were held by a brokerage firm or other nominee and not directly in your name, but are held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner of your shares, you have the right to direct your broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, i.e., for or against the proposals to be considered at the annual meeting. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will be able to vote your shares with respect to some of the proposals, but not all. See, “What if I do not provide instructions on how to vote my shares?” below.
What do I do if my shares are held in “street name”?
If your shares are held in the name of your broker or other nominee, you should return your proxy in the envelope provided by your broker or nominee or instruct the person responsible for holding your shares to execute a proxy on your behalf. In either case, your shares will be voted according to your instructions.
What if I do not provide instructions on how to vote my shares?
If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy, but do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the Company’s director nominees on proposal 1, “FOR” proposals 2 through 4 and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposals.
If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or nominee has discretionary authority to vote for certain proposals, but not others pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements. Brokers and other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters such as proposal 4, but not on non-routine matters such as proposals 1 through 3 and 5 and 6. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to the broker or nominee that holds your shares, the broker or nominee may only vote for proposal 4 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the annual meeting.
What is the quorum required for the meeting?
We will hold the annual meeting if holders of shares having a majority of the voting power of Charter’s capital stock as of the Record Date either sign and return their proxy cards, vote via the Internet or attend the meeting. If you sign and return your proxy card or vote via the Internet, your shares will be counted to determine whether we have a quorum, even if you fail to indicate your vote.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the annual meeting.
How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated?
If an executed proxy is returned by a broker holding shares in street name that indicates that the broker does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on one or more matters (a broker non-vote), such shares will be considered present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum on all matters, but will not be considered to be votes cast with respect to such matters.
Charter Communications | 2 | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal No. 2: Increase the Number of Shares in the Company’s 2019 Stock Incentive Plan
(Item 2 on Proxy Card)
Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve an amendment to the 2019 Plan (the “Plan Amendment”) to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2019 Plan by 7.0 million shares. The Board adopted the Plan Amendment on January 30, 2024 upon recommendation of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. The Plan Amendment will only become effective if approved by stockholders at the annual meeting. If approved, the effective date of the Plan Amendment will be April 23, 2024.
The 2019 Plan was approved by shareholders on April 23, 2019 with an initial share authorization of 16.0 million shares. Over the approximately five-year period from adoption through January 31, 2024, the Company made awards of approximately 14.2 million shares under the 2019 Plan. Of these awards, approximately 0.8 million shares have been forfeited or cancelled and approximately 0.3 million shares have been withheld for payment of taxes and exercise prices, leading to approximately 2.9 million shares remaining for future awards. See “Long-Term Incentives” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, above, for a description of the 2019 Plan and awards made under the 2019 Plan.
Our long-term incentive award compensation program is designed to recognize scope of responsibilities, reward demonstrated performance and leadership, motivate future superior performance, align the interests of our executives with that of our stockholders, and incentivize and retain our executives through the term of the awards. We believe that performance-based incentives help to drive our performance through their direct linkage to controllable business results while, at the same time, rewarding executives for the value created through stock price appreciation. Approval of the Plan Amendment would allow the Compensation and Benefits Committee to continue making awards to participants as the Committee deems appropriate. The 2,871,620 million shares currently available for future grant under the 2019 Plan represents approximately 1.6% of the Company’s outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. Approval of the Plan Amendment would result in the Company having 9,871,620 million shares available for future grants under the 2019 Plan, representing approximately 5.5% of the Company’s outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis.
If the Plan Amendment is approved by stockholders, we intend to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the increased number of shares issuable under the 2019 Plan pursuant to the Plan Amendment.
Material Terms of the 2019 Plan
The following summary of the material terms of the 2019 Plan, as amended by the Plan Amendment, is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2019 Plan, a copy of which is filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as amended by the Plan Amendment, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B. You also may obtain a copy of the 2019 Plan, as amended, free of charge, by writing to the Company, 400 Washington Boulevard, Stamford, CT 06902, Attention: Investor Relations.
Effective Date; Duration of the 2019 Plan
The 2019 Plan became effective upon approval by the Company’s stockholders on April 23, 2019 and no awards were granted under the 2019 Plan prior to such approval. Except with respect to awards then outstanding, unless sooner terminated, the 2019 Plan will expire on January 29, 2029, the tenth anniversary of the date it was adopted by the Board, and no further awards may be granted after such date.
2019 Plan Administration
The 2019 Plan is administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee or, in the Board’s discretion, by the Board. The Compensation and Benefits Committee has the authority to, among other things, interpret the 2019 Plan, determine who will be granted awards under the 2019 Plan, prescribe the terms and conditions of each award, interpret, administer, reconcile any inconsistency in, correct any defect in and supply any omission in the 2019 Plan, and exercise discretion to make any and all other determinations which it determines to be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2019 Plan.
Charter Communications | 63 | 2024 Proxy Statement
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2019
USD ($)
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
Pay Versus Performance Results & Discussion An assessment of Charter’s pay versus performance alignment was conducted pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, evaluating the alignment of Charter’s executive pay, stock price performance, and financial performance for the 4-year period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 (referred to as the “measurement period” throughout this Pay Versus Performance discussion). As discussed on page 24 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Charter’s philosophy for NEO compensation is to provide the largest portion of pay in the form of long-term incentives that vest over a multi-year timeframe and are tied to stock price appreciation; it is Charter’s view that this creates the strongest possible alignment between executives and shareholders. When evaluating this philosophy through the lens of pay versus performance, actual compensation realized or earned by NEOs should therefore be primarily dependent upon Charter creating sustained stock price growth, with increases in executive pay from periods of stock price appreciation and decreases in executive pay from periods where the stock price declines. Furthermore, while financial performance achievement drives payouts under Charter’s annual bonus plan, such outcomes should have a lesser impact than stock price performance given that – based on values disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table – 2023 bonus payouts represented 4% of Mr. Winfrey’s total compensation and 4% of total compensation for the other NEOs compared to the value of equity awards granted in 2023 (including both awards under the annual long-term incentive plan and the 2023 Performance Equity Program) which represented 94% of Mr. Winfrey’s total compensation, and 93% of total compensation for the other NEOs. For purposes of evaluating the impact of performance on pay, the required disclosure utilizes two measurements of compensation, referred to as the “Summary Compensation Table Total” and “Compensation Actually Paid”. These measures are formally defined under “Description of Disclosure Requirements” at the end of this section (which also provides complete information on the methodology for the pay versus performance analysis), but are summarized as follows:
|
• |
|
Summary Compensation Table Total – Total compensation as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for each year, approximating an NEO’s target compensation opportunity with the exception that it reflects actual payouts from the annual bonus plan (versus target opportunities) and includes certain other compensation and benefits items not traditionally included in target compensation, such as matching contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan. |
|
• |
|
Compensation Actually Paid – The Summary Compensation Table Total with certain modifications applied to capture the change in the actual value of such compensation over time. With respect to Charter’s executive pay program, the difference between the Summary Compensation Table Total and Compensation Actually Paid primarily represents the change in fair value of unvested long-term incentive awards, mainly stock options, over the course of the year. | As outlined above, in order to demonstrate alignment between pay and performance for Charter’s executive compensation program, Compensation Actually Paid should be greater than or less than the Summary Compensation Table Total in proportion to respective positive or negative TSR achievement and, to a lesser degree, financial performance. Based on the outcomes observed from the pay versus performance analysis as applied to Charter – detailed below in both the required Tabular Disclosure of Pay Versus Performance as well as the Pay Versus Performance Graph – Charter’s executive pay program demonstrates the anticipated alignment between targeted compensation, actual compensation, stock price performance, and financial performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of Pay Versus Performance (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Table Total for
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
$89,077,078 |
|
$93,575,272 |
|
$25,243,133 |
|
$27,459,371 |
|
$80 |
|
$96 |
|
$5,261 |
|
$21,894 |
2022 |
|
$39,213,350 |
|
($35,738,207) |
|
$15,626,967 |
|
($7,482,444) |
|
$7,482,328 |
|
($4,316,044) |
|
$70 |
|
$84 |
|
$5,849 |
|
$21,616 |
2021 |
|
$41,860,263 |
|
$39,859,417 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
$8,196,657 |
|
$11,663,225 |
|
$134 |
|
$114 |
|
$5,320 |
|
$20,630 |
2020 |
|
$38,846,705 |
|
$251,702,262 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
$16,403,815 |
|
$74,038,050 |
|
$136 |
|
$113 |
|
$3,676 |
|
$18,518 |
(1) |
See the “Description of Disclosure Requirements” section below for additional information on the requirements for this Pay Versus Performance Disclosure and the required Tabular List of Additional Performance Metrics. |
(2) |
Mr. Rutledge served as Chairman and CEO in each of 2020, 2021 and 2022 and is therefore included as the CEO in the table for each such year. Mr. Winfrey served as President and CEO from December 1, 2022 and is therefore included as the CEO for 2022 and 2023 only. The average values for Other NEOs pertain to the following executives and their roles for each year: | 2020 – John R. Bickham (President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. DiGeronimo (Chief Product & Technology Officer), David G. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), and Mr. Winfrey (Chief Financial Officer) 2021 – Mr. Bickham (Vice Chairman), Mr. DiGeronimo (Chief Product & Technology Officer), Mr. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), and Mr. Winfrey (Chief Operating Officer) 2022 – Mr. DiGeronimo (President, Product & Technology), Mr. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), and Mr. Hargis (Special Advisor to the COO). 2023 – Mr. DiGeronimo (President, Product & Technology), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), Mr. Howard (EVP, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller), Mr. Ray (EVP, Chief Commercial Officer), and Mr. Rutledge (Former Executive Chairman)
(3) |
The table below provides a reconciliation of the adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Compensation Actually Paid; refer to the “Determination of Compensation Actually Paid” section below for additional information on the methodology and assumptions for determining the fair value of stock and option awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($176,085 |
) |
|
|
($59,302 |
) |
|
|
$249,614 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
($33,655 |
) |
|
($11,136) |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
additional service cost of pension plan |
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
($30,005,695) |
|
|
|
($30,004,409) |
|
|
|
($30,005,043) |
|
|
|
($12,001,909) |
|
|
|
($83,653,337 |
) |
|
|
($12,999,065) |
|
|
($4,000,613) |
|
($5,325,719) |
|
($22,689,724) |
the fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year-end (a) |
|
|
$39,025,852 |
|
|
|
$32,007,744 |
|
|
|
$9,911,059 |
|
|
|
$5,490,586 |
|
|
|
$87,091,096 |
|
|
|
$16,074,306 |
|
|
$4,093,165 |
|
$2,034,016 |
|
$23,621,816 |
the change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year-end or the vesting date, if earlier (b) |
|
|
$204,011,485 |
|
|
|
($3,944,879 |
) |
|
|
($55,107,188 |
) |
|
|
($16,598,088 |
) |
|
|
$1,060,435 |
|
|
|
$54,592,650 |
|
|
$3,385,151 |
|
($8,506,669) |
|
$1,284,147 |
Compensation Actually Paid (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The values for each of years 2020 – 2022 have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement, which incorrectly presented the change in fair value of such awards instead of the fair value at year end. |
(b) |
The 2020 value for Rutledge and the 2022 value for Winfrey have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement due to an incorrect award valuation being used for each amount when calculating the values for the 2023 Proxy Statement. |
(c) |
As a result of the adjustments described in footnotes (a) and (b), above, the values for Compensation Actually Paid for each of years 2020 – 2022 are different than the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement for those years. |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Selected Measure Name |
AdjustedEBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
(2) |
Mr. Rutledge served as Chairman and CEO in each of 2020, 2021 and 2022 and is therefore included as the CEO in the table for each such year. Mr. Winfrey served as President and CEO from December 1, 2022 and is therefore included as the CEO for 2022 and 2023 only. The average values for Other NEOs pertain to the following executives and their roles for each year: | 2020 – John R. Bickham (President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. DiGeronimo (Chief Product & Technology Officer), David G. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), and Mr. Winfrey (Chief Financial Officer) 2021 – Mr. Bickham (Vice Chairman), Mr. DiGeronimo (Chief Product & Technology Officer), Mr. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), and Mr. Winfrey (Chief Operating Officer) 2022 – Mr. DiGeronimo (President, Product & Technology), Mr. Ellen (Senior Executive Vice President), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), and Mr. Hargis (Special Advisor to the COO). 2023 – Mr. DiGeronimo (President, Product & Technology), Ms. Fischer (Chief Financial Officer), Mr. Howard (EVP, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller), Mr. Ray (EVP, Chief Commercial Officer), and Mr. Rutledge (Former Executive Chairman)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
(3) |
The table below provides a reconciliation of the adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Compensation Actually Paid; refer to the “Determination of Compensation Actually Paid” section below for additional information on the methodology and assumptions for determining the fair value of stock and option awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($176,085 |
) |
|
|
($59,302 |
) |
|
|
$249,614 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
($33,655 |
) |
|
($11,136) |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
additional service cost of pension plan |
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
($30,005,695) |
|
|
|
($30,004,409) |
|
|
|
($30,005,043) |
|
|
|
($12,001,909) |
|
|
|
($83,653,337 |
) |
|
|
($12,999,065) |
|
|
($4,000,613) |
|
($5,325,719) |
|
($22,689,724) |
the fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year-end (a) |
|
|
$39,025,852 |
|
|
|
$32,007,744 |
|
|
|
$9,911,059 |
|
|
|
$5,490,586 |
|
|
|
$87,091,096 |
|
|
|
$16,074,306 |
|
|
$4,093,165 |
|
$2,034,016 |
|
$23,621,816 |
the change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year-end or the vesting date, if earlier (b) |
|
|
$204,011,485 |
|
|
|
($3,944,879 |
) |
|
|
($55,107,188 |
) |
|
|
($16,598,088 |
) |
|
|
$1,060,435 |
|
|
|
$54,592,650 |
|
|
$3,385,151 |
|
($8,506,669) |
|
$1,284,147 |
Compensation Actually Paid (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The values for each of years 2020 – 2022 have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement, which incorrectly presented the change in fair value of such awards instead of the fair value at year end. |
(b) |
The 2020 value for Rutledge and the 2022 value for Winfrey have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement due to an incorrect award valuation being used for each amount when calculating the values for the 2023 Proxy Statement. |
(c) |
As a result of the adjustments described in footnotes (a) and (b), above, the values for Compensation Actually Paid for each of years 2020 – 2022 are different than the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement for those years. |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 25,243,133
|
$ 7,482,328
|
$ 8,196,657
|
$ 16,403,815
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 27,459,371
|
(4,316,044)
|
11,663,225
|
74,038,050
|
|
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
(3) |
The table below provides a reconciliation of the adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Compensation Actually Paid; refer to the “Determination of Compensation Actually Paid” section below for additional information on the methodology and assumptions for determining the fair value of stock and option awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($176,085 |
) |
|
|
($59,302 |
) |
|
|
$249,614 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
($33,655 |
) |
|
($11,136) |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
additional service cost of pension plan |
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
|
$0 |
grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
($30,005,695) |
|
|
|
($30,004,409) |
|
|
|
($30,005,043) |
|
|
|
($12,001,909) |
|
|
|
($83,653,337 |
) |
|
|
($12,999,065) |
|
|
($4,000,613) |
|
($5,325,719) |
|
($22,689,724) |
the fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year-end (a) |
|
|
$39,025,852 |
|
|
|
$32,007,744 |
|
|
|
$9,911,059 |
|
|
|
$5,490,586 |
|
|
|
$87,091,096 |
|
|
|
$16,074,306 |
|
|
$4,093,165 |
|
$2,034,016 |
|
$23,621,816 |
the change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year-end or the vesting date, if earlier (b) |
|
|
$204,011,485 |
|
|
|
($3,944,879 |
) |
|
|
($55,107,188 |
) |
|
|
($16,598,088 |
) |
|
|
$1,060,435 |
|
|
|
$54,592,650 |
|
|
$3,385,151 |
|
($8,506,669) |
|
$1,284,147 |
Compensation Actually Paid (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The values for each of years 2020 – 2022 have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement, which incorrectly presented the change in fair value of such awards instead of the fair value at year end. |
(b) |
The 2020 value for Rutledge and the 2022 value for Winfrey have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement due to an incorrect award valuation being used for each amount when calculating the values for the 2023 Proxy Statement. |
(c) |
As a result of the adjustments described in footnotes (a) and (b), above, the values for Compensation Actually Paid for each of years 2020 – 2022 are different than the amounts disclosed in our 2023 Proxy Statement for those years. |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
Pay Versus Performance Graph
(1) |
The ratio of Compensation Actually Paid to Summary Compensation Table Total is calculated based on the corresponding CEO and Other NEO values disclosed in the Tabular Disclosure of Pay Versus Performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
Pay Versus Performance Graph
(1) |
The ratio of Compensation Actually Paid to Summary Compensation Table Total is calculated based on the corresponding CEO and Other NEO values disclosed in the Tabular Disclosure of Pay Versus Performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 80
|
70
|
134
|
136
|
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
96
|
84
|
114
|
113
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
$ 5,261,000,000
|
$ 5,849,000,000
|
$ 5,320,000,000
|
$ 3,676,000,000
|
$ 1,992,000,000
|
Company Selected Measure Amount |
21,894,000,000
|
21,616,000,000
|
20,630,000,000
|
18,518,000,000
|
16,855,000,000
|
Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Capital and Free Cash Flow Management
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Network Expansion and Evolution
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rutledge [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
|
$ 39,213,350
|
$ 41,860,263
|
$ 38,846,705
|
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
|
$ (35,738,207)
|
$ 39,859,417
|
$ 251,702,262
|
|
PEO Name |
|
Mr. Rutledge
|
Mr. Rutledge
|
Mr. Rutledge
|
|
Mr. Winfrey [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 89,077,078
|
$ 15,626,967
|
|
|
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 93,575,272
|
$ (7,482,444)
|
|
|
|
PEO Name |
Mr. Winfrey
|
Mr. Winfrey
|
|
|
|
PEO | Mr. Rutledge [Member] | Change in pension value [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
$ 249,614
|
$ (59,302)
|
$ (176,085)
|
|
PEO | Mr. Rutledge [Member] | Additional service cost of pension plan [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
PEO | Mr. Rutledge [Member] | Grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
(30,005,043)
|
(30,004,409)
|
(30,005,695)
|
|
PEO | Mr. Rutledge [Member] | The fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year end [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
9,911,059
|
32,007,744
|
39,025,852
|
|
PEO | Mr. Rutledge [Member] | The change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year end or the vesting date, if earlier [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
(55,107,188)
|
(3,944,879)
|
(204,011,485)
|
|
PEO | Mr. Winfrey [Member] | Change in pension value [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 0
|
0
|
|
|
|
PEO | Mr. Winfrey [Member] | Additional service cost of pension plan [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
PEO | Mr. Winfrey [Member] | Grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(83,653,337)
|
(12,001,909)
|
|
|
|
PEO | Mr. Winfrey [Member] | The fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year end [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
87,091,096
|
5,490,586
|
|
|
|
PEO | Mr. Winfrey [Member] | The change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year end or the vesting date, if earlier [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
1,060,435
|
(16,598,088)
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in pension value [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
0
|
0
|
(11,136)
|
(33,655)
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Additional service cost of pension plan [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Grant value of stock and option awards made during the year, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(22,689,724)
|
(5,325,719)
|
(4,000,613)
|
(12,999,065)
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | The fair value of unvested stock and option awards made during the year, measured as of year end [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
23,621,816
|
2,034,016
|
4,093,165
|
16,074,306
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | The change in fair value of unvested stock and option awards granted in prior years, measured as of year end or the vesting date, if earlier [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 1,284,147
|
$ (8,506,669)
|
$ 3,385,151
|
$ 54,592,650
|
|