Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) 銘柄情報

Admitted what? I have shares and am not getting paid by anyone. I'm just sharing very well-founded opinions and facts. Based on the claims from the CEO, do you realize what that revenue stream would be? It would be at the Microsoft/Google level. All this while the share price can't get to and hold above .01 which tells you all that you need to know about the viability of this.

Ditto. I appreciated your "expressed opinion". As odd as it sounds, and I have had my reservations after digging all I could about Emil (for one).. I can't put my finger on it.. BUT, this stock (could).. shock us all. No matter. Time will tell. Unless .. VPLM TRULY drags it on endlessly. Nothing is impossible.. which means, there IS a possibility we will see a desired result. On the flip side... you have to admit, if.... con artistry is at work, this would make a great movie. The ending will determine all. Wait. What if this never ends! I think it will. And many will be surprised. Possibly pleasantly.

A worthy point you make "Their intentions became plenty obvious when they committed the biggest reneg ever seen on their previous promises re: their intentions what to do with patents.". Nevertheless, this has been and will continue to be an interesting watch..

Interesting point. Appreciate.

Appreciate your findings. What is the link to this report. I want to view also.. thx much.

And you just admitted it. Get back to me when you have shares in this stock AND you aren't getting paid my MMs to bash this

This song is enigmatic and has numerous different meanings that have been applied to the name. It's very generalized and I'm deadicating it to vplm, mostly it's shareholders, as well as it's ups and downs, stories that don't pan out, spikes, dips, and it's long term near death experience...

Vplm "word of the day" :

DECEPTION
`

Whether I have shares or not is none of you business. I have fun messing with mindless investors that can't see and accept the obvious truth that is right before their eyes.

i dont think babs will be doing to much dumping here..my gut tells me theyd like to keep it 9s and low .01s....as the month moves on ,the buying will pick up.

BRO LET'S SHAKE OUT BARB AT LOWS OF .005 TO .007s.THEN WE ROCK.BUT UNTIL SHE IS OUT.LET'S KEEP IT HERE AND LOWER.

there isnt one!

Vplm word of the day:

LANGUISH

Can you share the report link please.

chill and put on Europe '72..lol..

Negativity not. I'm very positive..........as to my opinions and facts.
And I've been right! (all that's necessary is to go back and check the record...) all along so far, for roughly last 10/11 yrs. Those correct things don't give a shit if you acknowledge or agree, they just ARE! Funny it is....that a read of your posts reveals all the NEGATIVITY.
KEEP EM COMIN.......you helped me cut the cable, lolol. Done with you now.
Buh-bye

how did you know I liked bacon.?.your very special..there's 6000 shareholders.and 6000 opinions..I cant entertain negativity...your trip?? mine ended at Madison square garden october 1983 with the 2nd to last st.. Stephen...hold me guilty on that and refer to dead base. ..if you hate Lord emu and Mr williams call and let them know your opinion...I've spoken to the 2nd and things will heat up!

Thanks for all the detail!

This has the potential to get real interesting the next few weeks!

SELL BARB SELL DAMMIT.I NEED SHARES.BARB.

Then why are you here if you don't believe in the patents? Do you own any shares at all? I don't believe you do

took a long nap but I see it closed green ..hmm..gotta be careful cuzz, cause the grateful dead boy and spit spot may get upset! lol..pay the one cent and wait it out..its not a crime to hold shares long? is it? you got deep pockets grab 2mil shares..that's 20k.. your loaded..go for it..and chill. ..

BARB IS SELLING TODAY BRO.

they're doing what they can to keep it one cent..

barb isn't out , cmon..Emil has a bil shares she needs pocket change..that's the cost of being an old dude with young tail .:)..seriously on a diff note the longs here are short on bread..we need new money to come in...that will happen when the parasites out there see the headlines..its all news oriented..but to pay one cent! man that's nothing ...jeez

:)))ONCE BARB IS OUT WE ROCK.UNTIL THEN IT MAKES NO SENSE TO BUY HER SHARES HIGH

sounds like a plan, but I've hung around for almost 3 years and accumulated thru the ups n downs.. I can wait till March , and keep buying along the way.,..getting the funds ready!

THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT INSIDERS ARE SELLING AND TODAY TOO.REMEMBER WHEN I POSTED THE SS WE HAD 10 MILLION MORE ADDED TO THE FLOAT IN TWO WEEKS.READ BELOW.WE ARE GOING TO WAIT FOR BARB TO SELL HER 36 MILLION BEFORE A TAKE OFF.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175726588

LET'S SHAKE OUT BARB FROM HER 36 MILLION.IN THE .005 AND .007 AREA BRO.THEN WE ROCK.

Odd,we just came across an interesting report on the back ground of some of the insiders selling VPLM stock that have one thing in common,they all owe Richard Kipping Money.
Barbara,Emil,DB and Rich Inza.
Very much looking like a conspiracy to defraud a public company seeing as this all happened before the VOIPPAL Acusition of Digifonica ???
We have not spoken to RK about this as of yet but hope to soon.
In our opinion only....so far

The bears I don't care what they post. But no Deer Balls?  That is concerning. 

I did buy 300000 when it was in the .008 range. But I would not be surprised if you are right about longs being tapped out. 

maybe most longs are outta coin? ever think that..? im still accumilating. let em chill

BARB SELL DAMMIT SELL.ORCA HAS RUN OUT OF SHARES BARB.SELL DAMMIT SELL.

I DO NOT SEE ANY LONGS BELIEVING THE $1.00 AND THE .85 AND THE .30 AND .20.IF THEY DID THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN BUYING THE .0095S AND THE .011.AND THE .015S.

You ppl will be intellectualizing and arguing all this nonsense til the cows come home and Vplm burns itself out. There will never be a sale, license or settlement. Vplm was never truly looking for those things anyway. There is only the inside activity of printing fiat shares and selling at insane profits as well as lord emus self serving so called "anti-dilution" clause sweetheart deal he carved out for self, then made believe he was ending it in the interest of fiduciary practice and then reinstated when no one was looking, lol.

A share selling scheme is all it's ever been or will be. All the dots connect for that from the git.

It's delusional to think Vplm is on the up and up. Their intentions became plenty obvious when they committed the biggest reneg ever seen on their previous promises re: their intentions what to do with patents.
.

i see your point, but to see that type of price action it would be on a major hype run on its own..settlement wise i dont think that type figure..the higher number sounds great but thats 3 bil in usd !!.tremendous amt ...id rather see the settlement and trading halted..at least we know where we stand..jmo..

God bless anyone who can read and understand all that as well as your final conclusions.

It's very simple to me...

Wifi calling has been around for a long time. I used wifi calling incl video over 20 years ago. I don't think Vplm invented wifi calling as the emu recently claimed. Maybe I'm wrong. In all the core patents I don't recall any of the language referring to wifi calling.

The monopoly/antitrust claims by vplm are ridiculous, as I've delineated several times recently. It will be laughed out of court. There is nothing close to a monopoly or antitrust activities. Instead, there has been and still is a healthy amt of competition that has resulted in the best conditions for consumers in terms of cost, features, coverage, reliability, and technical attributes. Consumers could not ask for better deals than are now offered or features and functions.

As to the vplm core patents. All these past years efforts has proven and shown vplm has no case. They are not able to show infringement. They are not able to sell the patents. They are not able to license the patents. They are not able to form any partnerships. And they never truly wanted to accomplish the above anyway. Their activities have always been an elaborate front for their true business, ie, fiat share printing and selling and insider ATM.
That's it and all it will ever be and I've called it right for a dozen yrs.

EOS

Appeal process is about two years that’s why!! Reconciliation is the best way first, then the appeal process.

IMHO

Yeah good luck with that pipe dream. We heard the same thing last year and have been hearing .85 from Deerballs for over a year now. My challenge continues. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

Some still speculate that a dollar is still possible! I say we let late Feb and March play out.. then we will see. 

cmon titan just slap that ask.

Just cut to the chase and say what you mean in three or sentences. 

Why delay from pursuing the MG patent case by going to the Appeals Court instead of the being distracted by AntiTrust and RICO cases? Has the VPLM Board of Directors lost the shareholder focus?

A Professor from South Korean University, inventor of a wi-fi calling patent, could hire a US law firm in US to win not only the TWO USPTO Reexaminations (tactics typically imposed by the defendants viz. VZ and TMUS-Deutsche Telekom, ATT) but also prevail in the Wi-Fi calling patent infringement cases vs. VZ, T Mobile-Deutsche Telekom, and ATT, in the US Eastern District Court of Texas, getting awarded $847 million infringement damages against Verizon; T Mobile played (playing) their usual games with cases. All defendants (VZ and T Mobile-Deutsche Telekom, and ATT) faced the same patent infringement allegations.

If a Professor from South Korea can hire a US law firm to prove infringement and win $847 million damages, why Voip Pal can not get a better law firm and continue the cases vs. the defendants in the Appeals Court.

The ’728 Patent was invented by Dr. Dong-Ho Cho when he was a professor at the Korea Advanced Institute for Science and Technology (KAIST)

Analyzing the precedents cited by Hudnell - ABS Global and SALAZAR vs. not so bright precedent "In Varma" used by Judge Albright - the Appeals Court Judges did a much better job of analyzing the claims, PTAB's own claim constructions, and infringements thereof, compared to Judge Albright with his choice of a bogus precedent "In Varma".

These Appeals Court judges rejected the claim constructions written by USPTO's PTAB judge panel and remanded the case back to PTAB. That is the status of US Intellectual Property Rights and Protections.

In the last MG patent case, Hudnell made the mistake of letting himself sucked into trash arguments about the precedents like "In Varma", ABS Global, and Salazar. Has Hudnell been side-lined in favor of the Anti-trust and RICO cases?

To refresh the memory, from a previous post - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175563616
CASE #3:
Verizon and T-Mobile Sued For Infringing Wi-Fi Calling Patent
https://lawstreetmedia.com/news/tech/verizon-and-t-mobile-sued-for-infringing-wi-fi-calling-patent/
In 2020, KAIFI LLC filed a patent infringement complaint against Verizon and T-Mobile.

The ’728 Patent was invented by Dr. Dong-Ho Cho when he was a professor at the Korea Advanced Institute for Science and Technology (KAIST)…

L&P Secures Positive Reexamination Outcome for Valuable “WiFi Calling” Patent
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2022/5/05/lampp-secures-positive-reexamination-outcome-for-valuable-wifi-calling-patent

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has concluded two reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 6,922,728 owned by KAIFI, LLC. The reexaminations were requested by T-Mobile and Verizon and then merged by the PTO’s Central Reexamination Unit (CRU). The reexamination certificates, issued today, confirmed the patentability of all claims. One dependent claim was amended, and all other claims were confirmed in their original form. T-Mobile and Verizon filed the reexamination requests after KAIFI had sued each company alleging that their WiFi calling feature infringed the ’728 Patent. Both parties (Verizon and T Mobile) have since settled with KAIFI, as did AT&T following an earlier lawsuit.

Plaintiff KAIFI LLC, a self-described “intellectual property consulting company that promotes and manages intellectual property directed to telecommunications technologies,” filed complaints against Verizon, T-Mobile and other related entities for patent infringement on Friday in the Eastern District of Texas over their alleged use of Wi-Fi calling technology.
The patent-in-suit is United States Patent No. 6,922,728 (the '728 patent), “Optimal Internet Network Connecting and Roaming System and Method Adapted for User Moving Outdoors or Indoors.” The ’728 patent is “directed to an Internet network connecting and roaming system and method.” Specifically, “with the patented invention, voice and data communications may be seamlessly transitioned to a Wi-Fi network from an LTE network.” The plaintiff claimed that this “reduces load and congestion on cellular networks, reduces network costs, and increases voice and data communication coverage quality and range.”
KAIFI averred that Verizon and T-Mobile adopted this patented technology to “enable seameless (sic) voice and data communication services, including Defendants’ Wi-Fi calling” and other services. The plaintiff noted that Verizon began offering Wi-Fi calling in 2015. Verizon stated that its customers could “make and receive calls and initiate video calls over a Wi-Fi Internet connection…Once Advanced Calling is enabled, customers can activate Wi-Fi Calling.” T-Mobile allegedly made similar claims about its Wi-Fi Calling. According to Verizon, the call experience should be the same, except carried out over a Wi-Fi connection instead of a cellular connection. For example, “(i)f you have a Wi-Fi connection and are in an area where voice service is weak or unavailable, use Wi-Fi calling to continue making voice calls.” KAIFI alleged that Verizon’s and T-Mobile’s accused instrumentalities include “systems, networks, and components and services thereto used and controlled by Defendants for implementing seamless network transition, including off-loading to a customer’s home Wi-Fi network, (cited in VPLM Anti Trust and RICO case) such as through their Wi-Fi Calling system and service, and include both native and third-party, over the top (OTT) voice and data applications,” which can be used to make a Wi-Fi call.
Specifically, Verizon is accused of infringing at least claim 1 of the patent-in-suit through its instrumentalities that include a wireless network, user mobile device, Wi-Fi Calling service, internet service, etc. to make the Wi-Fi call possible. The plaintiff proffered that Verizon utilized the patented technology to provide its Wi-Fi Calling service. As previously mentioned, a user can switch between a Wi-Fi and an Advanced Calling call. As described in the patent, Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling service is comprised of a “data communication terminal,” namely, a mobile device that can connect to both Wi-Fi and a cellular network and stores both of the connecting information in the device, which can be evidenced through Auto Join, whereby the device recognizes the Wi-Fi network and auto joins said network. Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling system also use an “indoor gateway,” which “may be any Wi-Fi access point, to connect to a Wi-Fi network and the internet via a wire, such as a…router, modem, or ‘hotspot.’” This helps to connect the phone to the Wi-Fi, thus allowing an individual to make a Wi-Fi call. Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling system also allegedly takes advantage of location data to recognize and use networks, as described in the patent. (VPLM Anti Trust-RICO case) Thus, by using the patented system to create and allow users to have Wi-Fi Calling, Verizon has purportedly infringed the ’728 patent. The allegations against T-Mobile are similar to the claims against Verizon.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendants were notified of their infringement, but continue to infringe the ’728 patent in addition to not obtaining a license for this patent. KAIFI charged the defendants with direct, indirect and induced infringement.

KAIFI has sought declaratory judgment in its favor, an award for monetary relief, for the defendants to pay ongoing royalties, to enjoin defendants from further infringement, and other relief. The plaintiff is represented by Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth PC and LTL Attorneys LLP.

Summary Judgment Granted in Favor of L&P Client
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2023/07/19/summary-judgment-granted-in-favor-of-lp-client

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas today granted summary judgment in favor of Laurence & Phillips IP Law (L&P) client KAIFI LLC and against T-Mobile. T-Mobile brought the case to get out from under a settlement agreement T-Mobile entered into with KAIFI to resolve an infringement case concerning Kaifi’s U.S. Patent No. 6,922,728, which covers so-called “WiFi calling.” L&P had successfully represented KAIFI in two ex parte reexaminations of the ’728 Patent, which was fully confirmed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) during the reexaminations. In this latest suit, T-Mobile accused L&P partner Matt Phillips of inequitable conduct during the reexaminations, (the court’s summary-judgment ruling sided with KAIFI. Phillips remarked, “There was absolutely no merit in T-Mobile’s inequitable-conduct assertions,(T Mobile game "inequitable conduct" - sounds familiar?) and today’s ruling appropriately puts those unpleasant and unfounded accusation behind us.”
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2022/5/05/lampp-secures-positive-reexamination-outcome-for-valuable-wifi-calling-patent.

VZ patents
(Verizon also has patents related to Wi-Fi calling, including:
US9906992B1: A patent on PDN management between LTE and Wi-Fi (https://patents.google.com/patent/US9906992B1/en
2017-04-04 Application filed by Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc)
This patent was filed in 2017, much later than VPLM wi-fi patents filing as early as 2010. Albright failed to check the traditinoal aspects of patent idea development; and Hudnell did not even put forth arguments on idea records, due diligence and testing of concepts, reduction to commercial practice, etc. Not so BRIGHT!

SELL BARB,I NEED SHARES.SELL DAMMIT SELL.

from his last post hes still in a delusional state of mind of his prediction of .85 per share..

Deer Balls, What is your take on everything?  You have been quiet!

For what it's worth....Our system’s recommendation today is to STAY LONG. The previous BUY signal was issued on 01/27/2025, 1 day ago, when the stock price was 0.0091. Since then VPLM has risen by +14.29%. (American Bulls)

VoIP-Pal Files Amended Complaint in Class Action Lawsuit, Expands Claims to Include RICO and Add Deutsche Telekom as a Defendant

https://www.stocktitan.net/news/VPLM/vo-ip-pal-files-amended-complaint-in-class-action-lawsuit-expands-ndkrojir9x2l.html

---

This caught my eye...

"VoIP-Pal is currently one of the lead plaintiffs in this litigation and is actively expanding the group of lead plaintiffs to include additional representation. Interviews with prospective lead plaintiffs are ongoing, with the goal of securing over nine total lead plaintiffs to strengthen the case."

About time to add the 51% owner!

>>... Add Deutsche Telekom as a Defendant...