DeerBalls
18時間前
$.00882 Whiners gonna whine, especially at market bottoms🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️... I have been fortunate to build a relationship with Rich and I feel somewhat obligated(less and less so) to pass on what I hear. THE STOCK MARKET IS BUILT ON "FEELINGS/EXCITEMENT" and if that's what I'm hearing, that's what I'm passing on. "Pumpers gonna pump"...sorry, not pumping, just passing on...Yeah, on second thought, the whining/negative is much better...
Feelings/excitement don't translate to payouts? True, but they can translate to long and sustained runs in the market, look at gme/bynd/the AI craze and many others. Although they didn't stick, VPLM had runs $.10 to $.30, $.10 to $.35 and many others, the highest being $.0125 to $.45, all built on excitement over this or that. THE CURRENT VPLM STORY GETS OUT, and I'm EXCITED that it may soon, look out....$3/share? We go on the ride I think we may, few are going to be worrying about payouts and fundamentals.
As to Rich not mattering? WHAAAAAT? Rich, as Investor Relations Rep., is on nearly every call regarding VPLM business....nah, that probably isn't helpful.... It is hard for me to imagine where this kind of thinking comes from! Well, on second thought, I do have an idea....not a good one! We get very little in the way of PR...I'D SUGGEST RICH'S VIEWS ARE VERY HELPFUL!
SO, IN ENDING, MY EXCITEMENT IS HIGH, MY FEELINGS ARE AS HIGH and you'll never find me whining about VPLM, nor the management... Things coming soon!
chazzy1
19時間前
I agree with you, Drumming4life, particularly with regard to the "lock and key" assertion being substantiated or proven. However, the judge still has the "cease and desist" option as a "tool;" and he could use it as a catalyst to bring the defendants to the negotiating table, or he could use it as an "either/or" threat (Either start paying the plaintiffs a reasonable licensing fee, or stop using their technology while the case is being litigated). In that scenario, the defendants would have no choice but to pay. But I agree that the judge would not likely invoke a cease and desist order with no escape clause for the defendants.
Or, as you state, the judge could require the defendants to start offering the WiFi feature as a stand alone option to subscribers. There are many possibilities and potential outcomes, and nearly all of them are good!
InvestorinAZ
20時間前
I agree, Chazzy.
There are several very realistic scenarios that could happen even BEFORE a settlement announcement that could cause a MAJOR price increase, especially from this point at below a penny.
Here's one that depends on the Judge deciding to allow just ONE of our 17 claims to move forward to trial.
That alone should send the share price higher as now there is much more leverage to force the defendants to the negotiating table.
But...
What if we end up with SEVERAL entities wanting to purchase our IP, perhaps one that has deep pockets that could easily carry an antitrust TRIAL to fruition, which could essentially motivate the defendants to settle sooner... what if they want in on the action and there's a battle for highest bidder?
There are other scenarios which don't even require waiting for a decision from the Judge.
For example, what if a well-known person or attorney general were to join our case, giving it more eyeballs and even more credibility to the public investor?
We could finally get the public awareness of our case that we need for the share price to reflect the true value of this case.
Of course, this is just my opinion and speculation.
chazzy1
21時間前
Yes, Drumming4life, I was a member of the subscriber class in the BCBC settlement. You are exactly right about how long it takes for these kinds of cases to be resolved through the court system. Even after a court victory would come the inevitable appeal process, which could take additional years.
The significance for VPLM shareholders, however, would be the immediate and dramatic rise in share price due to a positive change in sentiment about the stock (if/when Judge Moss rules that not all claims are being dismissed).
Longs could capitalize on this news long before the case is settled.
And let's not forget, if this case proceeds to trial, the judge could invoke a cease and desist order on the defendants, so as to mitigate damage to the plaintiffs while the case is being heard. This would also have a positive impact on the share price.
Any and/or all of these events would trigger a rise in share price. So there is the short term effect as well as the long term at play here.
And by the way, these are realistic observations and speculations as I see them, and not hyperbole or hype. There is a difference. 🙂
drumming4life
21時間前
Were you part of the BCBS lawsuit? The anti-competitive behavior is the only thing similar to VPLM. Now the real facts as I am a class member in this case.
The lawsuit started in 2012 and combined into a class action case in 2013. There were 2 tracks to the lawsuit…on for subscribers (general public) and one for healthcare providers (employers, etc) It took years of litigation and delays before case was settled with subscribers…7 years to be exact! The subscriber case was settled in 2020. The case was appealed to SCOTUS and finally upheld in late 2024. Also in late 2024, the healthcare provider case was settled. Even though both tracks settled, it took 2 more years before subscribers saw any payouts. Specifically, on May 29, 2026, I received my initial payout…a check for a whopping $ 11.29!
My point to this is, just because the parties settled, it took 14 years to get a payout! Obviously, the goal for longs watching the VPLM CA case is stock price appreciation and not receiving a payout from the the defendants. It will take a long time before anything concrete is decided. “Feelings” and “excitement” doesn’t always translate to payouts! Pumpers gonna pump but the fundamentals of the case are what we need to watch!
VVVVVV
1日前
Hopefully a judge that might have TDS, isn’t bias as well towards VPLM with ours cases. It’s my main concern, if VPLM will get a fair chance.
These defendants would be foolish if they didn’t settle or acquire VPLM, prior to the judge’s decision on the motion to dismiss. It would be just stupid, as the ramification would be great.
Although, I’d love to see the public reaction to all VPLM’s claims. All the major business outlets would have to discuss VPLM’s case (s).
The PPS would absolutely increase to new highs and there’s no telling how high it could go!!!
IMHO
nyt
3日前
Once again <sighs> this is total bullshit as the fact o matter is, as I have pointed out numerous times, presenting facts and figures, there has been extremely healthy measure of competition in the cellular realm which has undeniably resulted is a steady decrease in the charges for service and increase in options, reliability, functuality, coverage and every attribute you can think of. Customers are recieving the best deal in the entire world of technology. Period, eos.
chazzy1
3日前
A court found that BCBS insurance companies colluded to restrict competition, resulting in higher premiums for subscribers. In this unprecedented $2.67 billion antitrust lawsuit, subscribers started receiving settlement payments recently. I received a check from this settlement yesterday, and thought, "Wow, this could happen to VPLM." VPLM's day is coming, and how wonderful that day will be. Perhaps not all of our claims will be found valid by this judge. However, all it takes is one.
When the judge rules that he is not dismissing all claims, I think that we shall see a buying frenzy that may rival Gamestop, well before any final ruling from the court, or settlement announcement. What judge would not want to rule that millions of phone subscribers have been overcharged and oversee settlement checks going out to every one? JMHO.
ORCA
5日前
ANOTHER 144 HIT.FOR 3,5 MILLION SHARES.INSIDERS WANT TO BAIL IT SEEMS.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=19495481&guid=abC-kFN_K2tsdth
#1 COMMON
WILSON DAVIS
136 SOUTH MAIN STREET
SUITE 500
SALT LAKE CITY
UTAH
84101
3,582,606 $35,826.00 3,817,570,684 06/01/2026
OTCID