Aquahoya
18時間前
It's very hard to believe anyone on this forum because its so open about marketing and communicating what a company wants people to know. Investorshub itself is very odd. So, much what we see written here could be planted. Lenders coming on here and trying to get sellers. Doesnt mean that poster is, but one always has to be weary.
Anyway, I think shareholders have been punished enough and if we do not see something this next month in terms of the audit, which I believe we will, not sure many people will be left. The audit confirms the cost of the land, and also the value of the entire company, as well as the bare bones value of the mine at $170,000,000 bare minimum. That in itself should pull in serious investors and set this company up for higher market cap.
This data and financials are the groundwork where the company shouldnt be giving shares away for nothing anymore and make investors pay more with incentive if they continue to sell shares to grow.
Aquahoya
18時間前
What you decide to do is completely up to you. And you have every right to feel the way you do and take the actions you do. I just do not understand coming on a board and letting everyone know you sold and basically dumping on people like "cya suckers". It's rather juvenile to me. No one has to come on and profess they sold. You decided to for whatever reason. It is your choice, but I can view my opinion as well. It was very clear based on your posts and continue posts.
You have to understand its very late where he is. He is doing a conference call, and he is answering the same redundant questions in which in any really company where growth and continued structure requires influx of cash. He is right, it is what it is. I think what many of us are asking is why based on the audit and the mine potential, with these investors, require them to pay higher levels based on what is known and tested on the mine. Certain other mining companies like SDRC* have done such like that.
Anyway, I do not care about your selling, it's the need to drop a "Sayonara" in what I read as a condescending statement.
IVRT
18時間前
o/t I don’t care much for your posts either—how about them apples? You’re probably offended by my opinion, but I gave the company one last chance to make good on the audit (which, let’s be honest, is just kicking the can down the road to sell 300 million more shares). That promise hasn’t materialized, and for me, it was the nail in the proverbial coffin.
People are allowed to have a change of heart. You can sulk all you want over my opinion, but the BMXI conference call was the final straw for me.
IVRT
18時間前
The BMXI investor conference call was one of the weakest and most unconvincing attempts to garner investor attention. Toward the end of the call, Nils became condescending and belligerent. He essentially summed it up by saying, paraphrased, "After all, we are a very small company, and it is what it is." It was the same old shtick, as I’ve mentioned before. In my humble opinion (IMHO), your mileage may vary (YMMV).
It would be nice if someone actually visited the BMXI mine to verify if anyone is actively working there. There was no substantial explanation for the increase in authorized shares (A/S) other than the vague justification of keeping the mine open, which essentially translates to selling more shares. Nils was unable to name the so-called "qualified investor," and I doubt his name will appear in any press release or filing. Could this investor be fictitious?
Nils also skirted around the topic of the samples that were supposedly "glistening with world-class gold deposits." All in all, after giving him the benefit of the doubt, I’ve come to the conclusion that he does not know how to operate a mine. Instead, he seems more focused on making grand promises about future developments that never materialize. He’s full of intentions but has nothing to show for them. imho
gitreal
1日前
None of it makes any sense and there would be need for investors if they are making such fantastic profit year after year. Their financials never made sense.
They are never consistent about what kind of ore deposit their rubber-boot and shorts workers are mining......volcanic hosted sediments? Reef? Nothing of a technical nature on their website, just weird stuff about how wonderful gold is. Never any exploration data, maps, cross-sections, geologic maps, assay reports. Never any gold grades, tonnages, cost per ounce, or heaven-forbid, an estimate of resources/reserves.
And of course.....no audit. Because there is probably very little to audit related to mining.
I strongly suspect they do no mining, and they make no revenue or profits from gold. Their only income is probably what they reap from selling shares in their imaginary mining operations through convertible notes, private lenders, etc. It can't go on forever, these things eventually run their course.....someone gets pissed off enough about their losses to hire a lawyer, or they get some agency interested enough to do some digging.