Pimco Multisector Bond Active Exchange Traded Fund (PYLD)

"Honesty has never been in a otc chat board pumpers profile or vocabulary.
Facts are poison to otc shillers."
I agree. Imo, "Pumpers" are far more likely to post DISinformation than "Bashers" are.

GL🍀

To recap, the MHRA will not reject the DCVax-L MAA without the CHM issuing a CHM Letter to NWBO prior to rejection. A CHM Letter is clearly material information that must be disclosed to the investing public. The fact that there has been no disclosure of such a CHM Letter is widely interpreted by

Flipper, I agree 100% based on Facts from MHRA email and reading through the lines of the GZ email.

Stokd $NLST Regarding the DE Samsung/Google case on the 523 patent, Friday all parties agreed and jointly stipulated to extend the stay on the case pending the ITC action, which we have covered extensively is mandatory for any patents in current parallel litigation at ITC. If parties didn't file th

Stokd $NLST Netlist requested Director Review in 087 PGR & 731 IPR, then Dir Squires allowed Netlist's motion for additional discovery into the RPI issue, and Netlist also asked to address Samsung’s inconsistent position in ITC. Samsung in response claimed they didn't take inconstant positions but

Here’s where I’m at. IMO:

1. November 24, 2025 CTBVEAG did not give advice on DCVax-l.

2. November 28, 2025 CHM committee did give advice on DCVax-l, with no negative comments in the minutes.

This ties in to what you are saying:
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/fidelity-slashed-spacex-minimum-2-171500631.html

That was just Tungsten - whole lot more global reaching "elements" in play with China and others:


Go to NIOCORP_MINE
r/NIOCORP_MINE
•
3h ago
Gman-303
The Harsh Truth About China’s Critical Mineral Stranglehold OPINION - Daily Caller - James C

Stokd $NLST Let’s not lose the plot and drift off narrative by amplifying something unimportant, certainly not a catalyst, and incorrectly attribute significance to its outcome — Micron ID suit & CAFC hearing on remand from ID Fed to State.

As addressed extensively over time with re

flipper, I did ask for clarification on that, he came back with "They're linked. CTBVEAG is a sub-group of the CHM and it reports directly to the CHM" So he is speaking as one in the same apparently, that is reason I did not post anything to avoid any confusion. Bottom line is the EAG has nothing

No reason to hire anybody when your job is to sell the company.

Patent litigation - Supreme Court decision
From a lawyers point of view tge litigation was interesting
From Amarins point of view maybe it was worth the lawyers fees to recover damages many years hence or a settlement payout from Hikma
It was never going to change the USA gen

GL...

Apparently George doesn’t know the difference between EAG and CHM, or he is needlessly conflating them.

Ya ya good idea,keep buying this Scam.Chukkky remember the counter says its doubling in price in about 2 months lol

"Divy was an OTC ploy to get buyers. "
Methinks that is correct. NSAV did that in 2017.🙄

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/04/24/1087928/0/en/NSAV-Announces-10-Stock-Dividend-and-June-1-Record-Date.html
NSAV Announces 10% Stock Dividend and June 1 R

Stonkmaster just talked to him around June 2nd or 3rd.

Krisgo, I did get a follow up from GZ after the email from MHRA, I sent to GZ and DI my email from MHRA.



"Thank you for clarifying for your investor peers what we've pretty much been telling everyone all along: the CHM just provides advice, it does not make decisions

Has the merger with Wertheim been completed? Lmao

You are literally the only person left who believes that (or pretends to).

Does anyone know what happened to the Secret Plan?
(Asking for a friend)

https://featureassets.gocomics.com/assets/0a63ee302714013fc072005056a9545d?optimizer=image&width=1200&quality=85

https://featureassets.gocomics.com/assets/0a63ee302714013fc072005056a9545d?optimizer=image&width=1200&quality=85

I'll tell you exactly why I tend to trust their analysis. They recommended Voyager Digital at ~.50 when they signed a marketing contract with them. The stock then went to ~$30 over the next 1.5-2 years. Voyager offered another contract and the NIA refused bc of what they saw in their most recent fin

With LunarD on our side, we Fly tomorrow