UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
& EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
__________________________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 26,
2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the transition period from
_________________ to ________________
Commission
File Number 1-9792
Cavalier
Homes, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
63-0949734
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
32 Wilson Boulevard 100,
Addison, Alabama 35540
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(256)
747-9800
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
¨
Yes
¨
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer
¨
Non-Accelerated
Filer
¨
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Accelerated
Filer
¨
Smaller
Reporting Company
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
þ
No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding
at July 22, 2009
|
Common
Stock, $0.10 Par Value
|
|
17,598,380
Shares
|
INDEX
CAVALIER
HOMES, INC.
FORM
10-Q
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CAVALIER HOMES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited,
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
23,465
|
|
|
$
|
50,353
|
|
|
$
|
42,719
|
|
|
$
|
99,034
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
19,098
|
|
|
|
41,447
|
|
|
|
34,246
|
|
|
|
82,663
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
|
8,906
|
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
|
|
16,371
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
7,808
|
|
|
|
10,885
|
|
|
|
15,357
|
|
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in
earnings (losses) of equity-method investees
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Equity
in earnings (losses) of equity-method investees
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations before income taxes, including gain on sale
of $677 in 2009
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(951
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
$
|
(810
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) per share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
From
discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,406
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,409
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,407
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CAVALIER HOMES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
June
26, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22,475
|
|
|
$
|
31,198
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for losses of $70 (2009) and $162
(2008)
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
Installment
contracts receivable held for resale (discontinued
operations)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
12,003
|
|
|
|
15,353
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
Property
held for sale
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
46,897
|
|
|
|
53,184
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,703
|
|
|
|
24,158
|
|
Installment
contracts receivable, less allowance for credit losses of $620 (2009)
and $604 (2008)
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
73,879
|
|
|
$
|
80,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
Note
payable under retail floor plan agreement
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
2,663
|
|
Amounts
payable under dealer incentives
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
Estimated
warranties
|
|
|
8,450
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
Accrued
insurance
|
|
|
4,516
|
|
|
|
4,348
|
|
Accrued
compensation and related withholdings
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
Reserve
for repurchase commitments
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
21,819
|
|
|
|
26,985
|
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
22,065
|
|
|
|
28,199
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Junior Participating Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000 shares authorized, none
issued
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Common
stock, $0.10 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 19,412,880 shares
issued; 17,598,380 shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
59,152
|
|
Deferred
compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(4,577
|
)
|
|
|
(3,767
|
)
|
Treasury
stock, at cost; 1,814,500 shares
|
|
|
(4,713
|
)
|
|
|
(4,713
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
51,814
|
|
|
|
52,596
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
73,879
|
|
|
$
|
80,795
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CAVALIER HOMES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited,
in thousands)
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(810
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Provision
for credit and accounts receivable losses
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Gain
on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Installment
contracts purchased for resale
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
|
(17,882
|
)
|
Sale
of installment contracts purchased for resale
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
16,221
|
|
Principal
collected on installment contracts purchased for resale
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
(3,373
|
)
|
|
|
(10,739
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
Amounts
payable under dealer incentives
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
Accrued
compensation and related withholdings
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
248
|
|
Other
assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,830
|
)
|
|
|
877
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(6,549
|
)
|
|
|
(5,846
|
)
|
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from dispositions of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of discontinued operations, net of cash sold
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Increase
in restricted cash
|
|
|
(3,773
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Notes
and installment contracts purchased for investment
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
Sale
of installment contracts purchased for investment
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
Principal
collected on notes, Amount Due, and installment contracts purchased for
investment
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
Other
investing activities
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
borrowings (repayments) on note payable under retail floor plan
agreement
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
282
|
|
Payments
on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,723
|
)
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
31,198
|
|
|
|
22,043
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
22,475
|
|
|
$
|
20,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for (received from):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
Due on sale of discontinued operations (see Note 4)
|
|
$
|
2,251
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment acquired through capital lease
transaction
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CAVALIER HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited
– dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, which has been
derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with
standards for interim financial reporting and Form 10-Q instructions and thus do
not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, these statements contain all
adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of June 26,
2009, and the results of operations for the quarter and year-to-date periods
ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008, and the results of our cash flows for the
year-to-date periods ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008. All such adjustments
are of a normal, recurring nature in preparing the financial statements.
Management completed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the
financial statements were issued. We changed our interim quarter-end dates from
Saturday to Friday beginning with the second quarter of 2009.
The
results of operations for the quarter ended June 26, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The information
included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and financial statements and notes thereto included in
our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For a
description of our significant accounting policies used in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We report
two net income (loss) per share numbers, basic and diluted, which are computed
by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
or weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution (diluted), as detailed
below (
shares shown in
thousands
):
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(953
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
(970
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(951
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
$
|
(810
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,406
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
Effect
of potential common stock from the exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,409
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
18,407
|
|
Income
(loss) per share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
From
discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Weighted
average option shares excluded from computation of diluted loss per share
because their effect is anti-dilutive
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
2.
|
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 165,
Subsequent Events
(“SFAS
165”). SFAS 165 is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events
and the basis for that date, and is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 is not expected to
impact our financial position or results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R)
(“SFAS 167”). This statement was issued to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is
effective for annual periods ending after November 15, 2009 and for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period. Earlier application is not
allowed. We have not yet completed our assessment of the impact, if any, SFAS
167 will have on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
In July
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(“SFAS 168”).
SFAS 168 supersedes Statement No. 162 issued in May 2008. SFAS 168 will become
the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will
supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. SFAS 168 will not impact our financial statements other than references to
authoritative accounting literature in future periods will be made in accordance
with SFAS 168.
3.
|
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
|
On June
14, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with
Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”) pursuant to which we will become
a wholly owned subsidiary of Southern Energy. Upon consummation of the merger,
each of our outstanding shares of common stock, except as provided in the
Agreement, will be converted into the right to receive $2.75 in cash, without
interest. All stock option plans will be terminated immediately prior to the
merger, and outstanding stock options granted under our stock incentive plans
will be cancelled as of the merger date.
The
Agreement contains certain representations, warranties and covenants, and
consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions, including, among
others, approval by our stockholders. A special meeting of the stockholders is
currently scheduled for August 13, 2009 to approve the Agreement. The Agreement
also contains certain termination rights for us and Southern Energy, and
provides that, in certain circumstances, we would be required to pay Southern
Energy a termination fee equal to three percent (3%) of the merger
consideration.
4.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
On
February 27, 2009, we completed the sale of our financial services subsidiary,
CIS Financial Services, Inc. (“CIS”) to Triad Financial Services, Inc. (“Triad”)
and recorded a gain of $677. The purchase price was $765 in cash, paid at
closing, plus a total of $2,251 (“Amount Due”) for the principal balance of
installment contracts held for resale, which will be paid to us as collected by
the purchaser within 180 days of the closing date. The Amount Due bears interest
at 6% on the average outstanding balance. Through June 26, 2009, we have
received payments from Triad on the Amount Due of $2,030. Prior to the sale, we
transferred certain net assets of CIS that we retained, primarily cash and
installment contracts held for investment, into a newly formed wholly-owned
subsidiary.
Summary
operating results of discontinued operations for the quarter and year-to-date
periods ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008 are:
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
737
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
1,572
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include an allocation for labor
and overhead costs. Inventories at June 26, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
8,518
|
|
|
$
|
11,469
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
Total
inventories
|
|
$
|
12,003
|
|
|
$
|
15,353
|
|
SFAS No.
144,
Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
, provides that a long-lived
asset or asset group that is to be sold shall be classified as “held for sale”
if certain criteria are met, including the expectation supported by evidence
that the sale will be completed within one year. We had idle assets of $5,603
and $5,906 at June 26, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, recorded at the
lower of carrying value or fair value. Idle assets are comprised primarily of
closed home manufacturing facilities, some of which we are attempting to sell.
In February 2009, we sold an idle facility in Cordele, Georgia, recognized a
gain on the sale of $1,259, and received net cash of $2,797 after deducting
closing costs. In August 2008, we sold an idle building in Addison, Alabama,
recognized a gain of $30, and received $20 in cash and a $392 note from the
purchaser payable over 10 years. Management does not have evidence at the
balance sheet date that it is probable that any other sales of idle assets will
occur within one year, and thus, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No.
144, such assets are classified as “held and used” and depreciation has
continued on these assets. However, we entered into an agreement in June 2009 to
sell an idle facility in Conway, Arkansas that provides the buyer with a due
diligence period in which to complete its evaluation of the property and obtain
financing and other approvals. During this period, which expires in the third
quarter of 2009, the buyer can rescind this agreement. Due to a number of
factors, including the current economic environment, management does not
consider a sale probable until it has closed.
We
recorded an income tax provision from continuing operations of $1 in the quarter
ended June 26, 2009 that represents interest related to uncertain tax positions.
The income tax provision from continuing operations of $43 in the quarter ended
June 28, 2008 includes $2 of interest related to uncertain tax positions, net of
a tax provision of $41 allocated to discontinued operations. We recorded an
income tax benefit from continuing operations of $155 in the year-to-date period
ended June 26, 2009 that includes an $11 reduction for uncertain tax positions
taken in prior years and $0 of interest related to uncertain tax positions, net
of a tax provision of $146 allocated to discontinued operations. The income tax
benefit from continuing operations of $3 in the year-to-date period ended June
28, 2008 includes $4 of interest related to uncertain tax positions, net of a
tax provision of $98 allocated to discontinued operations.
Since
December 31, 2006, we have maintained a valuation allowance to fully reserve our
deferred tax assets due to a number of factors, including among others,
operating losses and uncertainty of future operating results. We did not record
a federal income tax benefit in the quarters or year-to-date periods ended June
26, 2009 and June 28, 2008 because management believes it is not appropriate to
record income tax benefits in excess of anticipated refunds and certain
carryforward items under the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
.
As of June 26, 2009, our valuation allowance against deferred tax assets totaled
approximately $16,300. The valuation allowance may be reversed to income in
future periods to the extent that the related deferred income tax assets are
realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no longer needed.
We
recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in income tax expense. To the extent interest and penalties are not
assessed in the future with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued
will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax
provision.
We file
consolidated and separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction
and in various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax
authorities in our major tax jurisdictions for years before 2005.
We
provide retail home buyers a one-year limited warranty covering defects in
material or workmanship in home structure, plumbing and electrical systems. We
have provided a liability of $8,450 and $10,100 at June 26, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively, for estimated future warranty costs relating to homes
sold, based upon management’s assessment of
historical
experience factors and current trends, which have been consistently applied.
Activity in the liability for estimated warranties was as follows:
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,784
|
|
|
$
|
10,100
|
|
|
$
|
11,720
|
|
Provision
for warranties issued in the current period
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
Adjustments
for warranties issued in prior periods
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,509
|
)
|
|
|
(3,290
|
)
|
|
|
(3,092
|
)
|
|
|
(6,423
|
)
|
Balance,
end of period
|
|
$
|
8,450
|
|
|
$
|
11,690
|
|
|
$
|
8,450
|
|
|
$
|
11,690
|
|
We
evaluate actual warranty costs on a quarterly basis in conjunction with the
review of our liability for estimated warranties. Based on these evaluations, we
recorded changes in the accounting estimates in the quarters ended June 26, 2009
and June 28, 2008 totaling $629 and $46, respectively, which decreased the
warranty provision. For the year-to-date periods ended June 26, 2009 and June
28, 2008, the changes in accounting estimates of $1,524 and $23, respectively,
reduced the warranty provision in 2009 and increased the warranty provision in
2008.
We had a
credit agreement, as amended, with our primary lender (the “Credit Facility”),
which terminated in April 2009. After evaluating the renewal terms offered, we
decided not to renew the Credit Facility due to the cost of the renewal,
collateral requirements, and the fact that we had only borrowed under the
revolving line of credit portion of the Credit Facility on two instances during
the last five years. We entered into a security agreement with this lender
related to outstanding letters of credit and transferred $3,773 of cash in April
2009 to a restricted cash account that is pledged as collateral for outstanding
letters of credit.
In prior
periods, we had amounts outstanding under Industrial Development Revenue Bond
issues, notes payable under a retail floor plan agreement and capital leases. At
June 26, 2009, no amounts were outstanding.
10.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
We are
contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial
institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of our products. These
arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of
products sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of
loss under these agreements is spread over numerous retailers. The price we are
obligated to pay generally declines over the period of the agreement (generally
9 – 24 months) and the risk of loss is further reduced by the sales value of
repurchased homes. We applied FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45,
Guarantor’s Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107
and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34
and SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies
to account for our liability for repurchase commitments. Under the provisions of
FIN 45, during the period in which a home is sold (inception of a repurchase
commitment), we record the greater of the estimated value of the non-contingent
obligation or a contingent liability under the provisions of SFAS No. 5
,
based on historical
information available at the time, as a reduction to revenue. Additionally,
subsequent to the inception of the repurchase commitment, we evaluate the
likelihood that we will be called on to perform under the inventory repurchase
commitments. If it becomes probable that a dealer will default and a SFAS No. 5
loss reserve should be recorded, then such contingent liability is recorded
equal to the estimated loss on repurchase. Based on identified changes in
dealers’ financial conditions, we evaluate the probability of default for the
group of dealers who are identified at an elevated risk of default and apply a
probability of default to the group based on historical default rates. Changes
in the reserve are recorded as an adjustment to revenue. Following the inception
of the commitment, the recorded reserve is reduced over the repurchase period
and is eliminated once the dealer sells the home. Under the repurchase
agreements, we were contingently liable at June 26, 2009, to financial
institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of our products up to a
maximum of approximately $34,000 in the event we must perform under the
repurchase commitments. During the quarter ended June 26, 2009, we repurchased
20 homes due to dealer failures at a net cost of $140 compared to 10 homes
repurchased in the quarter ended June 28, 2008 at a net cost of $91. During the
year-to-date period ended June 26, 2009, we repurchased 37 homes at a net cost
of $597 compared to 10 homes repurchased in the year-to-date period ended June
28, 2008 at a net cost of $87. We recorded an estimated liability of $800 at
June 26, 2009 and $1,141 at December 31, 2008 related to these commitments.
Activity in the reserve for repurchase commitments was as follows:
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year-to-Date
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
990
|
|
|
$
|
1,159
|
|
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,131
|
|
Reduction
for payments made on inventory purchases
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Recoveries
for inventory repurchases
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Accrual
for guarantees issued during the period
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Reduction
to pre-existing guarantees due to declining obligations or expired
guarantees
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
Changes
to the accrual for pre-existing guarantees for those dealers deemed to be
probable of default
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Balance,
end of period
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
In
conjunction with the quarterly review of our critical accounting estimates, we
evaluate our historical loss factors applied to the reserve for repurchase
commitments, including changes in dealers’ circumstances and industry
conditions, for those dealers deemed to be probable of default.
Our
workers’ compensation, product liability and general liability insurance are
provided by fully-insured, large deductible policies. The current deductibles
under these programs are $250 for workers’ compensation and $100 for product
liability and general liability. Under these plans, we incur insurance expense
based upon various rates applied to current payroll costs and sales. Refunds or
additional premiums are estimated and recorded when sufficiently reliable data
is available. We recorded an estimated liability of $3,835 at June 26, 2009 and
$4,079 at December 31, 2008 related to these contingent claims.
Litigation
is subject to uncertainties and we cannot predict the probable outcome or the
amount of liability of individual litigation matters with any level of
assurance. We are engaged in various legal proceedings that are incidental to
and arise in the course of our business. Certain of the cases filed against us
and other companies engaged in businesses similar to ours allege, among other
things, breach of contract and warranty, product liability, personal injury and
fraudulent, deceptive or collusive practices in connection with their
businesses. These kinds of suits are typical of suits that have been filed in
recent years, and they sometimes seek certification as class actions, the
imposition of large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages and trials by
jury. Our liability under some of this litigation is covered in whole or in part
by insurance. Anticipated legal fees and other losses, in excess of insurance
coverage, associated with these lawsuits are accrued at the time such cases are
identified or when additional information is available such that losses are
probable and reasonably estimable. In our opinion, the ultimate liability, if
any, with respect to the proceedings in which we are currently involved is not
presently expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial position or liquidity.
We
provided letters of credit totaling $3,773 as of June 26, 2009. These letters of
credit are to providers of surety bonds ($2,157) and insurance policies
($1,616). While the current letters of credit have a finite life, they are
subject to renewal at different amounts based on the requirements of the
insurance carriers. We recorded insurance expense based on anticipated losses
related to these policies.
11.
|
EQUITY-METHOD
INVESTEES
|
Our
minority ownership interests in joint ventures are accounted for using the
equity method and are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets in the amounts of $860 and $1,038 at June 26, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. We recorded equity in earnings (losses) of equity-method
investees of $9 and $78 for the quarters ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008,
respectively, and $(8) and $123 for the year-to-date periods then ended. Cash
distributions received from investees accounted for by the equity method were
$116 and $223 for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended June 26, 2009 and
June 28, 2008, respectively. In the year-to-date period ended June 26, 2009,
none of our equity-method investees were defined as significant.
12. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock
Incentive Plans
At June
26, 2009, our stock incentive plans included the following:
a.
|
The
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for both
incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to key employees.
The 2005 Plan also provides for stock appreciation rights and awards of
both restricted stock and performance shares. Awards are granted at prices
and terms determined by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors. The term for awards granted under the 2005 Plan cannot exceed
ten years from the date of grant. Upon adoption of the 2005 Plan, our 1996
Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”) was terminated.
However, the termination of the 1996 Plan did not affect any options which
were outstanding and unexercised under that Plan. A total of 1,500,000
shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2005 Plan. As
of June 26, 2009, shares authorized for grant and available to be granted
under the 2005 Plan totaled 1,430,000
shares.
|
b.
|
The
2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Directors Plan”)
provides for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of our common stock,
which is reserved for grant to non-employee directors. Options are granted
upon the director’s initial election and automatically on an annual basis
thereafter at fair market value on the date of such grant. Stock option
grants become exercisable at a rate of 1/12th of the shares subject to the
stock option on each monthly anniversary of the date of grant. Except in
the case of death, disability, or retirement, options granted under the
2005 Directors Plan expire ten years from the date of grant. Upon adoption
of the 2005 Directors Plan, the 1993 Non-employee Director Plan (the “1993
Plan”) was terminated. However, the termination of the 1993 Plan did not
affect any options which were outstanding and unexercised under that Plan.
As of June 26, 2009, shares available to be granted under the 2005
Directors Plan totaled 380,000
shares.
|
The
following table sets forth the summary of activity under our stock incentive
plans for the year-to-date period ended June 26, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Shares
Available for Grant
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,855,000
|
|
|
|
523,923
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
90,925
|
|
|
|
(90,925
|
)
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(90,925
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Balance
at June 26, 2009
|
|
|
1,810,000
|
|
|
|
477,998
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable at June 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447,160
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
The
weighted average fair values of options granted during the year-to-date periods
ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008 were $0.73 and $0.94, respectively. No
options were exercised during the year-to-date periods ended June 26, 2009 and
June 28, 2008. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options
exercisable as of June 26, 2009 was $102 and $61, respectively.
Stock-based
Compensation
We use
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
option shares granted. The determination of the fair value of stock-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by
our stock price as well as other assumptions, including our expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. We
estimate the expected term of options granted by calculating the average term
from our historical stock option exercise experience. We estimate the volatility
of our common stock by using the historical volatility in our common stock over
a period similar to the expected term on the options. We base the risk-free
interest rate that we use in the option valuation model on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the
options. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option
valuation model. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant
and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Based on historical data, we assumed zero forfeitures in
our 2009 calculation of stock-based compensation expense. All stock-based
payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.
The
assumptions used to value stock option grants are as follows:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
|
|
63.82
|
%
|
|
|
52.10
|
%
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
Expected
life (years)
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
No
restricted stock awards have been granted since March 2006. We recognize the
estimated compensation cost of restricted stock awards, defined as the fair
value of our common stock on the date of grant, on a straight line basis over
the three year vesting period. During the year-to-date periods ended June 26,
2009 and June 28, 2008, 13,332 and 23,334 restricted stock awards vested,
respectively. No restricted stock awards were unvested as of June 26,
2009.
Stock-based
compensation in the quarters ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008 totaled $8
and $45, respectively, and totaled $28 and $90 in the year-to-date periods ended
June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. We charge stock-based
compensation to selling, general and administrative expense in our condensed
consolidated statement of operations. As noted in Note 3 above, all outstanding
stock options will be cancelled in connection with our merger with Southern
Energy, and stock-based compensation will cease.
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands)
Overview
Cavalier
Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries produce and sell manufactured housing. Unless
otherwise indicated by the context, references to the terms “we,” “us,” “our,”
“Company,” or “Cavalier” include Cavalier Homes, Inc., its subsidiaries,
divisions of these subsidiaries and their respective predecessors, if any. The
manufactured housing industry is cyclical and seasonal and is influenced by many
of the same economic and demographic factors that affect the housing market as a
whole. The crises in the credit markets and overall economic conditions have
created a very challenging environment in the manufactured housing
industry.
On June
14, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Southern Energy
Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”) pursuant to which we will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Southern Energy. Upon consummation of the merger, each of our
outstanding shares of common stock, except as provided in the Agreement, will be
converted into the right to receive $2.75 in cash, without interest. All
outstanding stock options granted under our stock incentive plans will be
cancelled as of the merger date.
The
Agreement contains certain representations, warranties and covenants, and
consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions, including, among
others, approval by our stockholders. A special meeting of the stockholders is
currently scheduled for August 13, 2009 to approve the Agreement. The Agreement
also contains certain termination rights for us and Southern Energy, and
provides that, in certain circumstances, we would be required to pay Southern
Energy a termination fee equal to three percent (3%) of the merger
consideration.
Two
transactions were completed during the first quarter this year that impacted our
earnings, which are as follows:
|
·
|
In
February 2009, we sold an idle facility in Cordele, Georgia, recognized a
gain on the sale of $1,259, and received net cash of $2,797 after
deducting closing costs.
|
|
·
|
In
February 2009, we completed the sale of our financial services subsidiary
and recorded a gain of $677. The total purchase price of $3,016 consists
of the following: $765 paid at closing plus an Amount Due of $2,251, which
will be paid to us within 180 days of the closing date. The Amount Due
bears interest at 6% on the average outstanding balance. We received total
payments of $2,030 on the Amount Due through June 26,
2009.
|
Industry/Company
Shipments and Market Share
Based on
the latest data available from MHI, wholesale floor shipments of HUD-Code homes
declined 46% in the first five months of 2009 compared to the first five months
of 2008. The following table shows the decline in floor shipments over the last
three years and information with respect to Cavalier during those
years.
|
|
Floor
Shipments
|
|
|
|
Nationwide
|
|
|
Cavalier’s
Core 11 States
|
|
Year
|
|
Industry
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) from prior
year
|
|
|
Cavalier
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) from prior
year
|
|
|
Market
Share
|
|
|
Industry
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) from prior
year
|
|
|
Cavalier
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) from prior
year
|
|
|
Market
Share
|
|
2006
|
|
|
206,822
|
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)%
|
|
|
8,261
|
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
86,748
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)%
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
163,761
|
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)%
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
69,115
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)%
|
|
|
6,568
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
135,338
|
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)%
|
|
|
6,076
|
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
58,145
|
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Q1
2009
|
|
|
18,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
8,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Two
months ended 5/29/09
|
|
|
14,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
During
2008, our floor shipments decreased 17.6% as compared to 2007, while industry
wide shipments decreased 17.4%, with our market share in 2008 remaining 4.5%. In
our core states, our market share in 2008 increased to 10.0% from 9.5% in 2007
due to our participation in the MEMA Alternative Housing Pilot Program. For the
five months ended May 29, 2009, our total market share decreased to 4.3% and our
market share in our core 11 states decreased to 9.1% due in part to the
completion of our contract with MEMA in mid-2008.
A major
factor that impacts the manufactured housing industry is the availability of
credit and the tightening/relaxation of credit standards. In late 2008, the
three major national floor plan lenders announced plans to discontinue or modify
their programs, which negatively impacted the amount of funds available to
dealers in the manufactured housing industry during
the first
quarter of 2009 and contributed to the 46% decrease in HUD-Code wholesale floor
shipments in the first five months of 2009 as noted above.
Capacity
and Overhead Cost
Our
plants operated at capacities ranging from 21% to 40% in the first half of 2009.
We continue to monitor the relationship between demand and capacity and may take
additional steps to adjust our capacity or enhance our operations based on our
views of the industry and its general direction.
Results
of Operations
Quarters
Ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008
The
following table summarizes certain financial and operating data, including, as
applicable, the percentage of total revenue:
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
Differences
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
23,465
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,353
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26,888
|
)
|
|
|
(53.4
|
)%
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
19,098
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|
41,447
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
(22,349
|
)
|
|
|
(53.9
|
)
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
8,906
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
(4,539
|
)
|
|
|
(51.0
|
)
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
7,808
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
(2,422
|
)
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(47.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method
investees
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(97.7
|
)
|
Equity
in earnings of equity-method investees
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(88.5
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(96.9
|
)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,189
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
%
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Operating
Data:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Home
manufacturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HUD-Code
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
Modular
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Total floor
shipments
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Home
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-section
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
Multi-section
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
Wholesale home
shipments
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Shipments to company-owned
retail locations
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
MEMA shipments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
Shipments to independent
retailers
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
98.7
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
Retail home
shipments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Shipments other than to
MEMA
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
99.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
89.8
|
%
|
Other
operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home manufacturing facilities
(operating)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent exclusive dealer
locations
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Revenue
for the second quarter of 2009 totaled $23,465, decreasing $26,888, or 53.4%,
from 2008’s second quarter revenue of $50,353. Wholesale home shipments
decreased 48.8%, with floor shipments decreasing by 49.8%. The decrease in
manufactured home revenue and shipments is generally consistent with the decline
in overall industry shipments in the first five months of the year, excluding
the 121 MEMA units shipped in the second quarter of 2008 totaling $5,835.
Multi-section home shipments, as a percentage of total shipments, were 55.7% in
the second quarter of 2009 as compared to 58.9% in 2008. Single-section homes,
as a percentage of total shipments, increased to 44.3% in the second quarter of
2009 from 41.1% in the same quarter of 2008. Of the non-MEMA revenue, 49% and
51% in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, was due to sales to
exclusive dealers. The number of independent dealers participating in our
exclusive dealer program declined from 56 at June 28, 2008 to 42 at June 26,
2009. This reduction in our exclusive dealer program is due primarily to a shift
by some of these dealers to non-exclusive dealer programs that we offer. Total
home shipments (wholesale and retail) for the second quarter of 2009 were 609
versus 1,190 in 2008. Inventory of our product at all retail locations,
including the Company-owned retail center, decreased to approximately $56,000 at
June 26, 2009 from $83,900 at June 28, 2008.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit was $4,367, or 18.6% of total revenue, for the second quarter of 2009, a
decrease from $8,906, or 17.7%, in 2008. The decrease in gross profit is
attributable to the decline in unit volume. The improvement in gross margin is a
result of a number of factors, including (i) the impact of an adjustment to
warranty reserves as described below, (ii) increases in unit sales prices during
the last year, and (iii) improvements in manufacturing efficiencies, offset by
the negative impact of the volume decrease. Our average wholesale sales price
per unit (including MEMA) in the second quarter of 2009 decreased to
approximately $38,000 from $41,700 in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of
product sales mix. Excluding MEMA home shipments, our average wholesale sales
price per unit was $41,000 in the second quarter of 2008. Overhead costs
associated with the service group have decreased as part of our cost reduction
plans. This reduction resulted in an adjustment to the warranty reserve in the
second quarter of 2009, which increased gross profit by $629. Gross margin in
the second quarter of 2009, excluding this item, was 15.9%.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) during the second quarter of
2009 were $5,386 or 22.9 % of revenue, compared to $7,808 or 15.5 % in 2008, a
decrease of $2,422, as a result of our focus to reduce costs during the last
year. Lower SG&A was primarily due to (i) a decrease in salaries and wages
of $1,705, including an $825 decrease in incentive compensation expense, (ii) a
decrease in employee benefits of $411, (iii) a decrease in advertising/promotion
costs of $350 (primarily trade show), and (iv) a decrease of fixed warranty
costs of $548, offset by increases in other costs totaling $591, which included
costs associated with the contested proxy election and costs associated with the
negotiation of the merger agreement with Southern Energy Homes, Inc. In
comparing the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2008, legal
expenses increased $185, other professional fees increased $147, and proxy costs
were up $251, which included the settlement we paid in connection with the
contested proxy election of $200.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest
expense for the quarter was $3 compared to $117 in the second quarter of 2008.
This decrease is due to principal payments on outstanding debt during the last
year. During the second quarter of 2009, the remaining balances of all
outstanding debt and capital lease obligations were paid in full.
Other,
net is comprised primarily of interest income and decreased $48 to $53 for the
second quarter of 2009 from $101 for the same period in 2008 due to the decrease
in interest rates.
Income
Tax Provision
We
recorded an income tax provision from continuing operations of $1 in the quarter
ended June 26, 2009 that represents interest related to uncertain tax positions.
The income tax provision from continuing operations of $43 in the quarter ended
June 28, 2008 includes $2 of interest related to uncertain tax positions, net of
a tax provision of $41 allocated to discontinued operations.
Since
December 31, 2006, we have maintained a valuation allowance to fully reserve our
deferred tax assets due to a number of factors, including among others,
operating losses and uncertainty of future operating results. We did not record
a federal income tax benefit in the quarters ended June 26, 2009 and June 28,
2008 because management believes it is not appropriate to record income tax
benefits in excess of anticipated refunds and certain carryforward items under
the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
.
As of June 26, 2009, our valuation allowance against deferred tax assets totaled
approximately $16,300. The valuation allowance may be reversed to income in
future periods to the extent that the related deferred income tax assets are
realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no longer needed.
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
On
February 27, 2009, we completed the sale of our financial services subsidiary,
CIS Financial Services, Inc. (“CIS”) to Triad Financial Services, Inc. (“Triad”)
and recorded a gain of $677, of which $2 was recorded in the second quarter. The
purchase price was $765 in cash, paid at closing, plus a total of $2,251
(“Amount Due”) for the principal balance of installment contracts held for
resale, which will be paid to us as collected by the purchaser within 180 days
of the closing date. The Amount Due bears interest at 6% on the average
outstanding balance. We received payments from Triad on the Amount Due of $1,030
in the quarter ended June 26, 2009. Revenues from CIS totaled $0 and $737 for
the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and income (loss) from
discontinued operations before provision for income taxes was $0 and $105 for
the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The provision for income
taxes allocated to discontinued operations totaled $0 and $41, respectively. No
installment contracts were purchased or sold during the second quarter of 2009.
For the quarter ended June 28, 2008, we purchased contracts of $9,512 and sold
installment contracts totaling $9,560.
Net
Income (Loss)
Net loss
for the second quarter of 2009 was $951 or $0.05 per diluted share compared to
net income of $1,238 or $0.07 per diluted share in the same period last year.
The changes between these two periods are due to the items discussed
above.
Year-to-date
Periods Ended June 26, 2009 and June 28, 2008
The
following table summarizes certain financial and operating data, including, as
applicable, the percentage of total revenue:
|
|
Year-to-date
Period Ended
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
Differences
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
42,719
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
99,034
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(56,315
|
)
|
|
|
(56.9
|
)%
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
34,246
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
82,663
|
|
|
|
83.5
|
|
|
|
(48,417
|
)
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
16,371
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
(7,898
|
)
|
|
|
(48.2
|
)
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
10,885
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
15,357
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(2,216
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(58.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings (losses) of
equity-method investees
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Equity
in earnings (losses) of equity-method investees
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2,170
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations including gain on sale of $677, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
%
|
|
|
Year-to-date
Period Ended
|
|
Operating
Data:
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
Home
manufacturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HUD-Code
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
Modular
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Total floor
shipments
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
3,719
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Home
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-section
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
Multi-section
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
Wholesale home
shipments
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Shipments to company-owned
retail locations
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
MEMA shipments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Shipments to independent
retailers
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
Retail home
shipments
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Shipments other than to
MEMA
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
100.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
%
|
Other
operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home manufacturing facilities
(operating)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent exclusive dealer
locations
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Revenue
for the first half of 2009 totaled $42,719, decreasing $56,315 or 56.9%, from
2008’s first half revenue of $99,034. Wholesale home shipments decreased 47.5%,
with floor shipments decreasing by 52.8%. The decrease in manufactured home
revenue and shipments is generally consistent with the decline in overall
industry shipments in the first five months of the year, excluding the 291 MEMA
units shipped in the first half of 2008 for $13,905. Multi-section home
shipments, as a percentage of total shipments, were 61.9% in the first half of
2009 as compared to 58.0% in 2008. Single-section homes, as a percentage of
total shipments, decreased to 38.1% in the first half of 2009 from 42.0% in the
same period of 2008. The primary cause of the decrease in single-section
shipments in the first half 2009 was due to single-section units shipped to MEMA
in the first half of last year. Of the non-MEMA revenue, 52% and 53% in the
first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively, was due to sales to exclusive
dealers. Total home shipments (wholesale and retail) for the first half of 2009
were 1,084 versus 2,349 in 2008.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit was $8,473, or 19.8% of total revenue, for the first half of 2009, a
decrease from $16,371, or 16.5%, in 2008. The decrease in gross profit is
attributable to the decline in unit volume. The improvement in gross margin is a
result of a number of factors, including (i) the impact of adjustments to
certain accruals and reserves as described below, (ii) increases in unit sales
prices during the last year, and (iii) improvements in manufacturing
efficiencies, offset by the negative impact of the volume decrease. Our average
wholesale sales price per unit (including MEMA) in the first half of 2009
decreased to approximately $38,700 from $41,400 in the first half of 2008 as a
result of product sales mix. Excluding MEMA home shipments, our average
wholesale sales price per unit was $40,400 in the first half of 2008. We
adjusted accruals as a result of the sale of the Cordele, Georgia facility,
which increased gross profit by $250. Overhead costs associated with the service
group have decreased as part of our cost reduction plans. This reduction
resulted in an adjustment to the warranty reserve in the first half of 2009,
which increased gross profit by $1,524. During the first half of 2009, we
repurchased 57 homes under our dealer repurchase agreements due to dealer
failures compared to 10 homes repurchased in the first half of 2008, which
reduced gross profit between the two periods by $272. Gross margin in the first
half of 2009, excluding these three items, was 16.2%.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) during the first half of 2009
were $10,885 or 25.5 % of revenue, compared to $15,357 or 15.5 % in 2008, a
decrease of $4,472, as a result of our focus to reduce costs during the last
year. Lower SG&A was primarily due to (i) a decrease in salaries and wages
of $2,751, including an $1,067 decrease in incentive compensation expense, (ii)
a decrease in employee benefits of $752, (iii) a decrease in
advertising/promotion costs of $613 (primarily trade show), and (iv) a decrease
of fixed warranty costs of $996, offset by increases in other costs totaling
$640, which included costs associated with the contested proxy election and
costs associated with the negotiation of the merger
agreement
with Southern Energy. In comparing the first half of 2009 to the first half of
2008, legal expenses increased $401, other professional fees increased $180, and
proxy costs were up $256.
Gain
on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment
In
February 2009, we completed the sale of our idled facility in Cordele, Georgia,
and recorded a gain of $1,259.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest
expense for the first half of 2009 was $75 compared to $245 in the first half of
2008. This decrease is due to the repayment of outstanding debt in the last
year.
Other,
net is comprised primarily of interest income and decreased $145 to $103 for the
first half of 2009 from $248 for the same period in 2008 due to the decrease in
interest rates.
Income
Tax Provision
We
recorded an income tax benefit from continuing operations of $155 in the
year-to-date period ended June 26, 2009 that includes an $11 reduction for
uncertain tax positions taken in prior years and $0 of interest related to
uncertain tax positions, net of a tax provision of $146 allocated to
discontinued operations. The income tax benefit from continuing operations of $3
in the year-to-date period ended June 28, 2008 includes $4 of interest related
to uncertain tax positions, net of a tax provision of $98 allocated to
discontinued operations.
Income
from Discontinued Operations including Gain on Sale of $677, Net of Income
Taxes
We
recorded a gain on the sale of CIS totaling $677. Revenues from CIS totaled $243
and $1,572 for the first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and income (loss)
from discontinued operations before provision for income taxes was $(371) and
$254 for the first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The provision for income
taxes allocated to discontinued operations totaled $146 and $98, respectively.
For the first half of 2009, we purchased contracts of $2,182 and sold
installment contracts totaling $853. For the first half 2008, we purchased
contracts of $18,279 and sold installment contracts totaling $18,315. We
received payments from Triad on the Amount Due of $2,030 in the first half of
2009.
Net
Income (Loss)
Net loss
for the first half of 2009 was $810 or $0.05 per diluted share compared to net
income of $1,356 or $0.07 per diluted share in the same period last year. The
changes between these two periods are due to the items discussed
above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
Balances
as of
|
|
|
|
June
26, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
Cash,
cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
22,475
|
|
|
$
|
31,198
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
25,078
|
|
|
$
|
26,199
|
|
Current
ratio
|
|
2.1
to 1
|
|
|
1.9
to 1
|
|
Long-term
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
Installment
loan portfolio
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
|
|
$
|
3,543
|
|
Year-to-Date
Period Ended June 26, 2009
Cash
decreased $8,723 from $31,198 at December 31, 2008 to $22,475 at June 26, 2009.
Historically, our cash and cash equivalents in the first half of each year
generally decrease significantly from the beginning of the year balances due to
a number of factors: (i) the closing of our facilities at the end of December
for plant-wide vacations and holidays, which results
in lower
average levels of inventories and accounts receivable and higher levels of cash
at December 31
st
, and
(ii) a return to normal operating levels of inventory and accounts receivable at
the beginning of each year. The decrease in cash at June 26, 2009 was generally
consistent with this trend.
Operating
activities used net cash of $6,549 primarily as a result of the
following:
|
(a)
|
an
increase in accounts receivable of $3,373 due to the seasonal increase in
receivables from the traditional low point in
December,
|
|
(b)
|
a
net loss of $1,342, excluding the following non-cash items totaling $532,
depreciation, stock-based compensation, provision for credit and accounts
receivable losses, gain on sale of property, plant and equipment and gain
on sale of discontinued operations,
|
|
(c)
|
a
decrease in amounts payable under dealer incentive programs of
$940,
|
|
(d)
|
the
net purchase of installment contracts for resale of
$1,329,
|
|
(e)
|
a
decrease in accrued compensation and related withholdings of $1,159 due to
the payment in 2009 of incentive compensation earned and accrued in 2008,
and
|
|
(f)
|
a
decrease in other assets and liabilities of $1,830, all of which were
offset by
|
|
(g)
|
a
decrease in inventories that provided net cash of
$3,350.
|
Investing
activities used cash of $255. An increase in restricted cash used $3,773 to
collateralize outstanding letters of credit following the termination of our
Credit Facility with our primary lender in April 2009. Changes in our
outstanding letters of credit in future periods will result in corresponding
changes in restricted cash. Capital expenditures totaled $527 for property,
plant and equipment additions and replacements, including the purchase of land
at our Addison, Alabama facility totaling $260. In the first half of 2009, we
loaned $1,869 to a national lender under its modified dealer floor plan lending
program, which required that we advance to it two-thirds of the invoice amount
for homes floored with this lender. Following our merger with Southern Energy,
we will no longer be required to advance funds under this program. Cash from
investing activities in the first half of the year was provided by the following
three items, (i) proceeds on the sale of the idle facility in Cordele, Georgia
of $2,797, (ii) proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations of $694, and
(iii) collections on notes and Amount Due totaling $2,334.
The
decrease in long-term debt for the first half of 2009 was due to scheduled and
additional principal payments totaling $1,666. Net payments on our retail floor
plan agreement totaled $253 in the first half of 2009. At June 26, 2009, no
amounts were outstanding under debt agreements or capital lease
obligations.
Year-to-Date
Period Ended June 28, 2008
Cash
decreased $1,145 from $22,043 at December 31, 2007 to $20,898 at June 28,
2008.
Operating
activities used net cash of $5,846 primarily as a result of the
following:
|
(a)
|
an
increase in accounts receivable of $10,739 due to the seasonal increase
from the traditional December low
point,
|
|
(b)
|
the
net purchase of installment contracts of $1,661, offset
by
|
|
(c)
|
income
excluding non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, provision for credit
and accounts receivable losses, stock-based compensation and gain on
disposal of property, plant and equipment, totaling
$2,708,
|
|
(d)
|
a
reduction in inventories of $1,860,
and
|
|
(e)
|
an
increase of $1,421 in accounts payable, again reflecting normal production
levels this quarter compared to the low production levels in
December.
|
Investing
activities provided cash in the first half of 2008 of $5,150, primarily from the
cash received on the sale of a portion of our installment contracts held for
investment totaling $4,414. Capital expenditures during the first half of 2008
totaled $223 for normal property, plant and equipment additions and
replacements. Principal collected on notes and installment contracts purchased
for investment totaled $1,116 during the first half of 2008.
The
decrease in long-term debt for the first half of 2008 was due to scheduled
principal payments of $731, and net borrowings under our retail floor plan
agreement provided cash of $282.
The
installment loan portfolio totaling $8,399 at June 28, 2008 decreased $1,445
from the balance at December 31, 2007 due to our decision to reduce the balance
in this portfolio.
General
Liquidity and Debt Agreements
Historically,
we have funded our operating activities with cash flows from operations
supplemented by available cash on hand and, when necessary, funds from our
Credit Facility. We have also benefited from the proceeds from sales of idle
facilities as an additional source of funds. As noted above, we received cash of
$2,797 from the sale of the Cordele, Georgia facility in the first half of 2009.
We have one remaining idle facility that is being marketed for sale. We entered
into an agreement in June 2009 to sell this facility in Conway, Arkansas that
provides the buyer with a due diligence period in which to complete its
evaluation of the property and obtain financing and other approvals. During this
period, which expires in the third quarter of 2009, the buyer can rescind this
agreement. Due to a number of factors, including the current economic
environment, management does not consider a sale probable until it has
closed.
We had a
credit agreement, as amended, with our primary lender (the “Credit Facility”),
which terminated in April 2009. After evaluating the renewal terms offered, we
decided not to renew the Credit Facility due to the cost of the renewal,
collateral requirements, and the fact that we had only borrowed under the
revolving line of credit portion of the Credit Facility on two instances during
the last five years. We entered into a security agreement with this lender
related to outstanding letters of credit and transferred $3,773 of cash in April
2009 to a restricted cash account that is pledged as collateral for outstanding
letters of credit.
In prior
periods, we had amounts outstanding under Industrial Development Revenue Bond
issues, notes payable under a retail floor plan agreement and capital leases,
which were repaid during the second quarter of 2009.
We
believe existing cash and cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund
our operations and plans for the next twelve months. However, there can be no
assurances to this effect. If it is not, we would seek to obtain short or
long-term indebtedness or other forms of financing, asset sales, and/or the sale
of equity or debt securities in public or private transactions, the availability
and terms of which will depend on various factors and market and other
conditions, some of which are beyond our control. Additionally, our ability to
deliver homes under any large contract for disaster relief, such as the
contracts with the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2005, may be limited
without a line of credit. Following the merger with Southern Energy, this
limitation should no longer be applicable.
Cash to
be provided by operations in future periods is largely dependent on sales
volume. Our manufactured homes are sold mainly through independent dealers who
generally rely on third-party lenders to provide floor plan financing for homes
purchased. In addition, third-party lenders generally provide consumer financing
for manufactured home purchases. Our sales depend in large part on the
availability and cost of financing for manufactured home purchasers and dealers
as well as our own retail location. The availability and cost of such financing
is further dependent on the number of financial institutions participating in
the industry, the departure of financial institutions from the industry, the
financial institutions’ lending practices, strength of the credit markets in
general, governmental policies, and other conditions, all of which are beyond
our control. Throughout the past nine years the industry has been impacted
significantly by reduced financing available at both the wholesale and retail
levels, with several lenders exiting the marketplace or limiting their
participation in the industry, coupled with more restrictive credit standards
and increased home repossessions which re-enter home distribution channels and
limit wholesale shipments of new homes. This tightening of credit standards
continued in 2008 as a response to the crisis in the credit markets and resulted
in changes by the national floor plan lenders to modify terms of their program
offerings or to curtail funds available for these programs. We believe these
changes limited financing available to independent dealers and end consumers in
the first half of 2009, which we believe reduced manufactured home sales and may
further reduce manufactured home sales in future periods. We continue to explore
alternatives to the current crisis in wholesale floor plan lending for our
independent dealers to enable them to purchase our products. Some of these
alternatives have required the use of our cash and will require additional cash
in the future, and we may incur additional debt. Additional unfavorable changes
in these factors and terms of financing in the industry may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 165,
Subsequent Events
(“SFAS
165”). SFAS 165 is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS
165
requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date, and is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 is not expected
to impact our financial position or results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R)
(“SFAS 167”). This statement was issued to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is
effective for annual periods ending after November 15, 2009 and for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period. Earlier application is not
allowed. We have not yet completed our assessment of the impact, if any, SFAS
167 will have on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
In July
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(“SFAS 168”).
SFAS 168 supersedes Statement No. 162 issued in May 2008. SFAS 168 will become
the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will
supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. SFAS 168 will not impact our financial statements other than references to
authoritative accounting literature in future periods will be made in accordance
with SFAS 168.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Our
material off-balance sheet arrangements consist of repurchase obligations and
letters of credit.
We are
contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial
institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of our products. Under
the repurchase agreements, we were contingently liable at June 26, 2009, for a
maximum of approximately $34,000 in the event we must perform under the
repurchase commitments.
We have
provided letters of credit totaling $3,773 as of June 26, 2009 to providers of
certain of our surety bonds and insurance policies. While the current letters of
credit have a finite life, they are subject to renewal at different amounts
based on the requirements of the insurance carriers. We have recorded insurance
expense based on anticipated losses related to these policies.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Market
risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and
interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk inherent in our financial
instruments, but are not currently subject to foreign currency or commodity
price risk. We manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular
operating and financing activities.
We have
installment contract receivables held for investment with fixed interest rates,
which we initially acquired in the ordinary course of business. We retained
these receivables in connection with our sale of CIS. Our portfolio consists of
fixed rate contracts with interest rates generally ranging from 6.75% to 13.5%
and an average original term of 246 months at June 26, 2009. We estimated the
fair value of our installment contracts receivable at $1,511 using Level 3
inputs as defined in SFAS 157. In general, these inputs were based on the
underlying collateral value on certain loans based on appraisals, when
available, or industry price guides for used manufactured housing.
We have a
retail floor plan agreement (of which no amounts were outstanding at June 26,
2009) that is exposed to interest rate changes, which is floating rate debt
based on the prime interest rate.
Item 4T: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 26,
2009. Based on that evaluation, our chief
executive
officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 26, 2009.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no internal control changes that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting since December 31, 2008.
CAUTIONARY
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Safe
Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995:
Our
disclosure and analysis in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain some
forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements give our current
expectations or forecasts of future events, including statements regarding
trends in the industry and the business, financing and other strategies of
Cavalier. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. They generally use words such as
“estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,”
“plans,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any
discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we
also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials
released to the public. These forward-looking statements include statements
involving known and unknown assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to differ from
any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements or words. In particular, such assumptions, risks,
uncertainties, and factors include those associated with the
following:
|
·
|
the
impact from a failure to complete the merger with Southern Energy,
including the payment of any termination fee that may be
required;
|
|
·
|
continuing
changes in the availability of wholesale (dealer) financing, including the
modification and/or termination of programs by national floor plan
lenders;
|
|
·
|
changes
in the availability of retail (consumer)
financing;
|
|
·
|
the
cyclical and seasonal nature of the manufactured housing industry and the
economy generally;
|
|
·
|
the
severe and continuing downturn in the manufactured housing
industry;
|
|
·
|
limitations
in our ability to pursue our business
strategy;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to secure borrowings to support our business strategy and
operations;
|
|
·
|
changes
in demographic trends, consumer preferences and our business
strategy;
|
|
·
|
changes
and volatility in interest rates and the availability of
capital;
|
|
·
|
changes
in level of industry retail
inventories;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to attract and retain quality independent dealers in a competitive
environment, including any impact from the consolidation of independent
dealers;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to attract and retain executive officers and other key
personnel;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to produce modular and HUD-code products within the same
manufacturing plants;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to substantially grow our modular
business;
|
|
·
|
increased
requirements under contingent repurchase and guaranty
obligations;
|
|
·
|
uncertainties
regarding our retail financing
activities;
|
|
·
|
the
potential unavailability of and price increases for raw
materials;
|
|
·
|
the
potential unavailability of manufactured housing
sites;
|
|
·
|
regulatory
constraints;
|
|
·
|
the
potential for additional warranty
claims;
|
|
·
|
litigation,
including formaldehyde-related regulation and litigation;
and
|
|
·
|
the
potential for deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting
or in disclosure controls and
procedures.
|
Any or
all of the forward-looking statements in this report, in the 2008 Annual Report
to Stockholders, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong.
These statements may be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by
known or unknown risks and
uncertainties.
Many factors listed above will be important in determining future results.
Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future
results may vary materially.
We
undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are
advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects
in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in any of our
press releases. Also note that, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” we have provided a
discussion of factors that we think could cause the actual results to differ
materially from expected and historical results. Other factors besides those
listed could also adversely affect us. This discussion is provided as permitted
by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Reference
is made to the legal proceedings previously reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 under the heading “Item 3 – Legal
Proceedings”.
Litigation
is subject to uncertainties and we cannot predict the probable outcome or the
amount of liability of individual litigation matters with any level of
assurance. We are engaged in various legal proceedings that are incidental to
and arise in the course of our business. Certain of the cases filed against us
and other companies engaged in businesses similar to ours allege, among other
things, breach of contract and warranty, product liability, personal injury and
fraudulent, deceptive, or collusive practices in connection with their
businesses. These kinds of suits are typical of suits that have been filed in
recent years, and they sometimes seek certification as class actions, the
imposition of large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages and trials by
jury. Our liability under some of this litigation is covered in whole or in part
by insurance. Anticipated legal fees and other losses, in excess of insurance
coverage, associated with these lawsuits are accrued at the time such cases are
identified or when additional information is available such that losses are
probable and reasonably estimable. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
liability, if any, with respect to the proceedings in which we are currently
involved is not presently expected to have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
There
have been no material changes in our risk factors since December 31, 2008. See
risk factors at December 31, 2008 within our Form 10-K.
Our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) was held May 26, 2009, and the
stockholders elected ten directors. The following is a tabulation of voting on
this matter:
|
|
Shares
Voting
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Thomas
A. Broughton III
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Barry
B. Donnell
|
|
|
8,509,419
|
|
|
|
2,371,923
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Curtis
D. Hodgson
|
|
|
10,449,936
|
|
|
|
431,406
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Lee
Roy Jordan
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Jonathan
B. Lowe
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Kenneth
E. Shipley
|
|
|
10,449,936
|
|
|
|
431,406
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Kenneth
J. Smith
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Bobby
Tesney
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
Carl
S. Thigpen
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
J.
Don Williams
|
|
|
10,449,836
|
|
|
|
431,506
|
|
|
|
10,881,342
|
|
The
election of our directors at the Annual Meeting was the subject of a proxy
contest. We settled the proxy contest prior to the date of the Annual Meeting,
and the terms of the settlement are disclosed in our proxy supplement filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2009.
The
stockholders also ratified the Board of Director’s appointment of Carr, Riggs
& Ingram, LLC as our Independent Registered Public Accountants for 2009. The
appointment was ratified by a vote of 10,868,583 for, 12,559 against, and 200
abstained.
The
exhibits required to be filed with this report are listed below.
31.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) or
15d-15(e).
|
31.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) or
15d-15(e).
|
32
|
Certification
of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
CAVALIER
HOMES, INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date:
July 23, 2009
|
/s/
BOBBY TESNEY
|
|
Bobby
Tesney
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date:
July 23, 2009
|
/s/
MICHAEL R. MURPHY
|
|
Michael
R. Murphy
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Cavalier Homes (AMEX:CAV)
過去 株価チャート
から 12 2024 まで 1 2025
Cavalier Homes (AMEX:CAV)
過去 株価チャート
から 1 2024 まで 1 2025