Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) オプション

Kevin McCarthy pushes for nuclear energy policy


The Scoop

Kevin McCarthy is urging his former colleagues to incorporate nuclear energy policy into a sprawling energy package Republicans intend to move through budget reconciliation.

In his new role as chairman of the ALFA Institute, the former House speaker released a blueprint, first shared with Semafor, to accelerate nuclear energy production by reforming the permitting process and giving tax credits to certain energy providers.

“America’s future — from AI to manufacturing — depends on generating more power,” McCarthy said in a statement. “With the incredible advancements in nuclear energy, Congress has the opportunity to unleash a new era of American exceptionalism.”

Nuclear energy supplied around 19% of electricity generated in the US as of 2023. The industry is looking to double nuclear output over the next three decades, in part to meet the increasing energy demand of artificial intelligence.

Original Link

MIGA:

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/modi-trump-commit-to-us-india-partnership

This great article from Idaho research facility was posted on Stocktwits LTBR board:

https://interestingengineering.com/energy/us-lightbridge-nuclear-fuel-breakthrough

Mark this day. Video from 4 days ago was first time I watched a relevant video and at the 7:00 minute mark heard the magic word: HALEU. 

On this board, over years, I've been vocal about the lack of HALEU in the news. This story has the potential to make HALEU a household name. Perhaps, the new nuclear won't even be called nuclear. It will be called HALEU.


In video below, HALEU is being tested by NASA as source fuel for next generation space travel. How cool is that?

There is no better story. I hope to see Seth sitting on a panel where all eyes and questions are aimed at him. And I hope he begins looking at the many LTBR patents and tunes them to the new fuels which may be built upon LTBRs research.

https://youtu.be/8tWmoldRpB0?si=_X0kuIXI-J0wV3on

Going to $20 back in with a few  final rise to Nuclear power 

Back out $13.47 nice news today 

China - The New Nuclear Energy Superstar

How China Became The World’s New Nuclear Energy Superstar
By Alexander C. Kaufman - Feb 9, 2025
China is on a clear course to become the world’s first “electrostate"— and is likely to eclipse the U.S. in atomic power in the next decade.


Aerial drone photo taken on Feb. 22, 2024 shows construction on the second phase of the Zhangzhou nuclear power project in Zhangzhou, southeast China's Fujian Province.

This story is the second installment in a two-part series on nuclear power in Asia.

Maani-Ana Yikpotey saw the world changing.

In his three decades of life, the rain patterns shifted dramatically in his native village in northwestern Ghana. Drought parched the land. Millet, yams and beans withered on the vine. A bag of corn that once cost 900 cedis — a little under $60 at today’s exchange rate — shot up to 1,500 cedis.

Mobile phones and the Internet might have offered Ghanians another way to make money. But sometimes, it was a challenge just to keep their devices charged. When the water ran dry, the hydropower dams that provided the region’s electricity supply faced shortfalls, making blackouts more common.

After high school, Yikpotey went to university 13 hours south in Ghana’s booming coastal capital, Accra, and ultimately graduated with a degree in applied physics. He realized that if his fast-growing West African homeland was going to modernize, he’d need to help bring it into the club of 31 countries that harvest the power of splitting uranium atoms to generate clean, reliable electricity.

He dreamed of going abroad to get real-life experience working on nuclear reactors in Europe or in the United States, which still operates the world’s largest fleet of atomic power stations. But there was a problem. Since Yikpotey had been born, few new reactors had been built on either side of the Atlantic. Competition was fierce for the few opportunities left.

So Yikpotey looked east. He applied to Tsinghua University, which boasts Beijing’s premiere nuclear research program. It had begun admitting foreigners and offering classes largely taught in English.

Before going to Tsinghua, Yikpotey had a bad impression of China.

“When I got there, I learned it was not what I was thinking. They are peaceful and clean, and their technology is so advanced,” he told me by phone from Beijing one recent morning.

“In Ghana, we have an energy crisis,” he said. “In China, I never had to go without electricity.”

China’s nuclear industry is on the leading edge, and the country has been building more reactors than any other.

The leading reactor the legendary U.S. developer Westinghouse designed in the mid-2000s to be the workhorse of a new American nuclear renaissance? China built four before the U.S. could complete its first two, and went on to reverse-engineer its own, more powerful version.

The smaller, mass-produced reactors the U.S. was banking on to bring down the cost and time it takes to construct new atomic power stations? China’s first so-called serialized small modular reactor was under development before U.S. regulators approved their first design.

The cutting-edge reactor technology meant to revolutionize nuclear power by using coolants instead of water, so promising to tech companies like Amazon and Google? China hooked its first such reactor onto the grid last December, vaulting Beijing so far ahead of the West that analysts predicted it would take at least a decade to catch up.

China is on a clear course to become the world’s first “electrostate.” The term, a new spin on “petrostate,” describes a global superpower whose geopolitical independence — or “energy dominance,” in the parlance of American lawmakers — comes not from fossil fuels, but from electricity.

On the streets of Chinese cities, electric vehicles are now everywhere. All sorts of renewable energy sources are booming. There’s the older kind, like hydropower, that Yikpotey knew well. When the Three Gorges Dam in the landlocked Hubei province opened in 2006, it was the world’s largest hydroelectric power station. Last year, Beijing announced plans to build an even bigger dam in Tibet.

Then there are newer technologies. Over the past two decades, China’s factories captured 80% of the world’s market for solar manufacturing, exporting panels at such cheap prices that American and European governments slapped tariffs on the imports to keep domestic producers from going out of business. But China is also deploying the panels and wind turbines at home at a record pace. Wind and solar today comprise at least 16% of China’s electricity output.

Nuclear power now makes up just 5%. Still, with nearly two dozen reactors under construction, and dozens more planned, China has already vaulted past France to become the world’s second largest user of atomic energy. Within a decade, U.S. government researchers predict Beijing will eclipse America to take the top spot, a pivot point that could shake up global oversight of the most powerful and efficient source of energy humanity has yet harnessed.


A 550-ton outer dome is hoisted in place at the construction site of the world's first commercial small modular reactor Linglong One, marking the main structure of its reactor building completed on February 6, 2024.

The U.S. is now racing to regain its edge in atomic energy, both at home and abroad. An increasingly hot world where air conditioning is necessary for survival, plus the massive power demands of, for example, the computers that drive artificial intelligence software, is driving up demand for more electricity. Countries across Africa, Asia and Latin America are looking to build their first reactors. In 2023, the Biden administration led the world in a pledge to triple the world’s production of nuclear power over the next quarter-century, and enlisted Ghana as one of the newcomer nations looking to partner with the U.S. on its debut atomic power station.

President Donald Trump is now rescinding America’s global climate promises and hacking away at international agreements, though his new administration has vowed to continue the country’s work on nuclear power and look for opportunities to sell U.S. technology overseas.

Blackouts are worsening in the U.S. as the aging grid heaves under rising demand and as old power stations shut down. The U.S. managed last year to finally finish the first two reactors it had built from scratch in decades, but only with the guidance of engineers who’d helped China complete its own reactors years earlier. It was a sign of what cooperation between the world’s two great superpowers could yield — and an omen of what will be lost going forward, thanks to sanctions both the Trump and Biden administrations maintained on Chinese nuclear companies.

To win the global competition for the nuclear future, the U.S. will need to prove it can actually build reactors again at a reasonable price and speed. It has a long way to go.
The Dawn of a Nuclear Revival

Over the past three years, I have traveled the world visiting nuclear power facilities and writing stories about different countries’ relationships to atomic energy.

It all started in 2022, in Finland. Russia had just invaded Ukraine a few months earlier. Europe was in the throes of an energy crisis, as the supply of Russian gas shipped westward to German factories and Italian furnaces dwindled. I traveled west to a tiny island called Olkiluoto where the Finns had done two remarkable things. First — and this is what initially drew me there — they had built the world’s first permanent repository for radioactive waste. But the second thing, the importance of which I only understood once I arrived, was that the government-owned utility had built the only new reactor in Western Europe in more than a decade.

The next month, I visited the Netherlands’ only nuclear power reactor. Soon after, I found myself writing about a major U.S. deal — first brokered under Trump and finalized under Biden — to fund Westinghouse’s plans to build Poland’s first nuclear power plant with American technology. The following year, I traversed the Taiwan archipelago to tell the story of why the self-governing island, which became a technological powerhouse thanks to nuclear power, was abandoning its reactors at the very moment they seemed most necessary. (My reporting there included an interview with the island’s former president from the party that supports reunification with the Chinese mainland.)


Repository in ONKALO, a deep geological disposal underground facility, designed to safely store nuclear waste. Pictured on May 2, 2023, on the island of Eurajoki, western Finland.

During this time, the U.S. approved its first design for a small modular reactor, a shrunken-down unit that could ostensibly be mass produced to bring down costs. The federal government, as well as private companies with burgeoning data centers, such as Microsoft, pumped billions into reviving at least two shuttered nuclear stations. In Europe, France — which has generated for decades most of its electricity from atomic fission — vowed to construct new reactors. Japan promised to bring the nuclear plants it mothballed after the 2011 Fukushima accident back online. Argentina set sights on installing new reactors once again. And country after country — from Ghana and Kenya to Sri Lanka and Indonesia — laid plans to build their first nuclear stations.

The revival has partly been driven by climate change. The alternatives to fossil fuels all come with tradeoffs. Hydroelectric dams are highly destructive to nature and sensitive to changes in water patterns. Wind turbines and solar panels are cheap, but require vast areas of land, plus batteries or gas-fired plants to serve as backup when the weather isn’t optimal, and far more transmission lines to distribute electricity from where it can be generated to where it’s needed. Geothermal power — harnessing the Earth’s molten heat to make steam that spins turbines — shows promise, but has been geographically limited to volcanic hot zones. Nuclear reactors produce radioactive waste, of course, but far less than depictions of nuclear power in the media, including “The Simpsons,” would have you think.

By the time nuclear started gaining favor again in the 2020s, China’s buildout was well underway. Over the previous decade, Chinese utilities constructed more than three dozen new reactors. In 2020, Beijing set a goal of building 150 additional reactors by 2035.

Given its size and significance, no country fascinated me more than China. I had visited in 2018 on a press junket organized by the East-West Center, a Honolulu-based nonprofit that encourages intercultural dialog between the U.S. and China. Last year, the same organization awarded me a grant to report on nuclear power in China.

For months, I tried everything to get a temporary journalist visa. The country opened some of its nuclear power facilities to tours, but not to foreigners. I contacted China’s two biggest nuclear utilities, the China General Nuclear Power Group, or CGN, and the China National Nuclear Company, CNNC. Neither responded to my inquiries. I wrote letters and passed them via Western interlocutors to Chinese executives and provincial officials. No response. At one point, I arranged through one of my contacts to meet Chinese executives at a conference in London, but the officials canceled and my contact warned me that attempting to track them down at the conference would almost certainly rule out any future chances. Multiple attempts to reach academics at Tsinghua University went unanswered.

It wasn’t just me. A major U.S. media executive representing a global news organization said arranging a conference in China proved impossible last year. When I asked the U.S. State Department for advice, an official offered little guidance but asked that, on the off-chance that I was successful, I share what worked to get a temporary journalist visa. An American analyst in China later told me the problem was that the Chinese government holds companies responsible for whatever foreign journalists write about them. Sponsoring my visa and arranging a visit to a handful of nuclear energy sites posed too great a risk.

But interviews with analysts, former workers at Chinese nuclear plants and graduates from Tsinghua still paint a clear picture of how China became the emerging force in nuclear power.


A journalist passes by a rendering of the Sanmen Nuclear Power Plant on June 4, 2009 in Sanmen of Zhejiang Province, China

Building The Nuclear Future, No CAP

In 2005, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved a new Westinghouse reactor, the AP-1000. The machine — equipped with passive safety features designed to make a meltdown virtually impossible — was meant to be the workhorse for what was then expected to be a new era of atomic power station construction in America. But it wasn’t until 2011 that the agency gave the green light to begin work on the first AP-1000s in the U.S., at power plants in Georgia and South Carolina.

China was already three years ahead. Work had started in 2008 at the Sanmen Nuclear Power Station, roughly four hours’ drive south of the bustling commercial capital of Shanghai. A decade later, China’s first AP-1000 came online.

By the time the U.S. finished its first pair of AP-1000s in Georgia last year, China had completed all four of its own units and placed an order with Westinghouse for another four. The South Carolina project was abandoned completely in 2017.

Soon, not only had China built more American-made nuclear reactors than the U.S. had — Chinese engineers knew more about building them than their U.S. counterparts did.

The crews in Georgia, the first Americans to build an AP-1000, kept making revisions, requiring lengthy new approvals from regulators that added to delays. American engineers at Westinghouse who’d overseen construction in China returned to the U.S. and applied what had worked to actually finish the Georgia plant.

““The way they work continuously throughout the whole project. I was so impressed.””
- Maani-Ana Yikpotey

Speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly, one American expert described lines of Chinese workers milling about outside the construction site in hopes of getting a chance to work on the project.

Indeed, the round-the-clock workdays were one of the first things Yikpotey noticed on his post-graduate internships with CGN and CNNC.

“The way they work continuously throughout the whole project,” he said, trailing off in amazement. “I was so impressed.”

The Chinese had learned lessons from the Americans, too. Westinghouse had pioneered plans for “modularizing” the construction process — manufacturing parts of the reactor, then using the world’s largest crane to lift the giant pieces of machinery into place. But while the Pennsylvania-based company never quite got around to making the idea work, China — drawing on its industrial clusters and experience building behemoth infrastructure — actually pulled it off.

China eventually set about making the Hualong One, its own version of the AP-1000 reactor. It mirrored the Westinghouse design, but was all-Chinese, giving China control over the supply chain. The first Hualong One reactor came online in 2021.

Soon after, European Union and British regulators certified the design, opening the door to what CNNC chairman Yu Jianfeng described in a state press release as “a bid to promote the Hualong One to export and achieve the target of carbon neutrality.”

As the U.S. slapped trade restrictions on American companies working in China, officials in Beijing needed “something they [could] control,” said David Fishman, a Shanghai-based analyst and expert in the Chinese power sector at the Lantau Group consultancy.

“The workhorse is now going to a Chinese indigenous design,” he told me. “No exposure to tariffs or export controls.”

That wasn’t China’s only design. In fact, China appears to be gaining momentum on a number of different units.

While U.S. developers struggled to gain regulatory approval for so-called SMR designs, China charged ahead. The world’s first terrestrial small modular reactor, the Linglong One, neared completion on the island province of Hainan as of last September. (Russia had built the world’s first SMR on a floating barge.)


Model of the "Hualong One" nuclear power unit displayed at the 2024 Yantai International Nuclear Power Industry and Equipment Expo in Yantai, East China's Shandong province. - Aug 15, 2024

In November, China started up its first CAP-1400, an even bigger and more powerful reactor based on the AP-1000 design.

Many U.S. designs for SMRs rely on using liquid metal or high-temperature gases like helium as coolants instead of water, making it possible for them to safely reach higher temperatures — and potentially supplant fossil fuels in more industrial processes. In the U.S., none have yet won regulators’ approval.

In December, China’s prototype competitor, a high-temperature gas-cooled unit at the Shidao Bay Nuclear Power Plant on the northeast coast, entered into commercial use.

Even more experimental designs are under consideration, including reactors that use thorium instead of uranium as a fuel. Another Chinese project is proposing to power the world’s largest shipping barge with a thorium reactor.
Billion-Dollar Differences

Local industrial clusters that can forge the equipment needed for reactors and an eager workforce with experience building giant infrastructure aren’t China’s only advantages in the nuclear industry.

The country’s reactor developers are state-owned enterprises, and receive preferential loans with low interest rates.

That’s a stark contrast from U.S. and European projects, which can overrun their budgets by billions of dollars each time a regulatory delay holds them up, sending interest on their loans soaring.

China’s electricity markets are also structured differently than broad parts of the U.S. Whereas CGN and CNNC can count on steady electricity rates from industrial buyers to help pay off the cost of a multibillion-dollar investment in new reactors, much of the U.S. system is divvied up into markets, where nuclear plants are forced to compete against other energy sources, like natural gas, to see who can deliver the least expensive electrons to the grid.

The U.S.' various experiments with investing in different types of reactors hasn’t done much to make them less expensive to build. The first AP-1000, at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Georgia was billions of dollars more expensive than the second, for example, but the U.S. canceled plans for a third, fourth or fifth beyond that. Now U.S. regulators and companies are angling to construct reactors that haven’t yet been built anywhere, guaranteeing higher costs. Research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology estimates that the cheapest reactor to build next in the U.S. would still be an AP-1000.

While some companies are now considering building a third AP-1000 in the U.S., China is already onto its fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth, in addition to the Hualong One.

If the U.S. is to slash its planet-heating emissions, it could take a big step by installing quartets of giant, 1,100-megawatt reactors — enough to power over 1 million homes each — in some markets. But the U.S.' aging and disconnected grid system can only handle so much power at once. China, on the other hand, has a newer, more nationally-connected grid — allowing a giant nuclear plant in one place to ship power to cities and factories hours away.

It’s proven popular, too.

For a second year in a row, international polling by the nuclear consultancy Radiant Energy found China had the highest net support for building new reactors of all 32 countries surveyed. The results, shared exclusively with HuffPost and set to publish in the coming weeks, showed five times more support than opposition to new nuclear plants in China.


Aerial photo taken on Dec. 1, 2021 shows nuclear power units under the China National Nuclear Corporation CNNC in Fuqing, southeast China's Fujian Province. China's Hualong One demonstration project, a domestically designed third-generation nuclear reactor, has been completed and put into commercial operation.

The International Footprint

For now, China has proven it can build reactors faster and more efficiently at home than any other country. The big test of the Chinese industry’s future going forward will be exports.

China recently built its first overseas reactors — a pair of Hualong Ones — at Pakistan’s Karachi Nuclear Power Plant. Another CNNC official, Lu Tiezhong, told the nationalist Global Times newspaper last year that China could export its next reactors to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kazakhstan or Turkey.

“We continue to advance comprehensive cooperation with ‘old friends’ such as Russia and France, expand in-depth cooperation with ‘new partners’ such as other key European countries,” Lu said.

“We plan to establish a research and development center in Eastern Europe, seize the opportunity of accelerated global innovation resource flow and reshuffling, continuously increase the participation of international scientific and technological talents in CNNC’s scientific research tasks and engineering implementation, coordinate with international development strategies, expand international influence, open up international markets and help CNNC’s full industry chain ‘go global.’”

Russia still dominates nuclear exports. While countries such as Poland have opted for American reactor technology out of a desire to strengthen ties to the U.S., Washington and Brussels don’t offer state-backed financing packages that can compete with Russian or Chinese government-funded deals.

One idea to bridge this gap was to establish a new global bank to fund nuclear infrastructure, which would pool resources from nations like the U.S., Canada, South Korea, France and the United Arab Emirates to fund overseas projects. But getting funding for such an idea from the U.S. Congress seemed unlikely even under former President Joe Biden. With Trump starting trade wars with allies and withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization and the Paris climate accords, the prospects for a nuclear lending group seem dimmer now.

Foreign students returning home from studying at Tsinghua could give Chinese companies a leg up when trying to sell nuclear technology abroad.

But not everyone who values their education in China comes away convinced Beijing is a trustworthy partner for a giant infrastructure project like a nuclear plant.

Nethmi Godawattha, from Sri Lanka, studied alongside Yikpotey and interned at CGN last year. Her experience impressed her. But she’s wary of Chinese investment: China once seized a key port in her home country when Sri Lankan officials couldn’t pay their debts to Beijing back.

“Technology-wise, China would be capable of” building Sri Lanka’s first nuclear plant, she told me. “But in the past, Sri Lanka could not pay back loans, and we had to give control of our ports and other projects to the Chinese. It was more like invading a country. We had no idea.”

She said Japan or Russia, which is building many of the nuclear plants under construction in neighboring India, might be better partners.

If Trump continues to pillory global allies, the U.S. could become a less attractive partner, too. But there are other pro-Western options. South Korea is an industry leader lauded for its successful construction of the UAE’s first nuclear plant. France’s state-owned EDF utility, despite recent struggles, has projects underway in neighboring European countries. Canada’s homegrown CANDU reactor technology is considered a breakthrough innovation that could be exported.

For now, Yikpotey said he’s focused on shoring up Ghana’s grid and finding a solution that can curb the world’s appetite for fossil fuels better than solar and wind.

“Climate change is real, even though there’s some people who say climate change is some kind of ideology,” he said.

Original Link

Hope this doesn't end like that Framatome deal. https://www.ltbridge.com/news-media/press-releases/detail/309/lightbridge-corporation-and-framatome-announce-settlement

Thanks for the info flipped out early morning at $7.40s market seemed weakening into Powell. Will revisit 

This deal between Lightbridge and OKLO facilitates the manufacture of the fuel rods, which utilize some small amount of nuclear waste.

The deal is definitely helpful for Lightbridge in that the rods have to actually exist before they can be sold.

But I don't see where it says OKLO will help Lightbridge market their fuel rods. Not does the deal say that OKLO will actually utilize Lightbridge fuel rods. If I recall correctly the OKLO reactor uses a fuel in the form of small ceramic pellets, referred to as "pebbles", not at all similar to the Lightbridge fuel rod design.

OKLO is deeply connected financially and technically with the company OpenAI, currently the largest A.I. company in the market. OKLO has previously stated that their reactors will be installed "behind the meter" meaning they will not be attached to the Grid. They will not produce power for public consumption. The OKLO reactors will be used exclusively to provide power to one or more A.I. Data Centers, most likely owned by OpenAI.

So personally, I am not going to read between the lines in this deal. Too early to determine how it will develop or what benefit it will provide

Good Luck to All Longs.

$7.20s back to $14 on news soon enough .. 06:58 AM EST, 01/28/2025 (MT Newswires) -- Lightbridge (LTBR) said Tuesday that it signed a memorandum of understanding with Oklo (OKLO) to consider co-locating a Lightbridge commercial-scale nuclear fuel fabrication facility at Oklo's proposed commercial fuel fabrication facility and to explore collaboration in recycling nuclear waste.

Actual incoming income. Funny how that works.

9's

On January 22, 2025, Lightbridge Corporation (“Lightbridge” or the “Company”) and Oklo Inc., an advanced nuclear power and nuclear fuel recycling company (“Oklo”), entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding to conduct a feasibility study of co-locating a Lightbridge Commercial-scale Fuel Fabrication Facility at Oklo’s proposed commercial fuel fabrication facility and to explore opportunities for collaboration on reprocessing and recycling of spent uranium-zirconium fuel.

another one going, nuclear stock sector hot lately :) take your pick

Is this good for LTBR?Thanks

Biden-Harris Administration Announces Contracts to Buy U.S.-Sourced Low Enriched Uranium

Selected companies to expand U.S. enrichment and conversion services

Office of Nuclear Energy

December, 10 2024


Contracts Leverage DOE’s Buying Power to Establish a Secure Source of Low Enriched Uranium for U.S. Nuclear Power Plants

WASHINGTON, D.C.— As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America agenda

, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today selected 6 companies from which it can sign contracts to procure low enriched uranium (LEU) in order to incentivize the build-out of new uranium production capacity in the United States. Today’s announcement reinforces the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to ensuring consumers across the country have access to affordable, reliable electricity and good-paying clean energy jobs, while building resilient supply chains free from Russian influence.

“These contracts generated from this action will help spur the safe and responsible build-out of uranium enrichment capacity in the United States,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Dr. Michael Goff. “We must increase our capacity to produce enriched uranium domestically to support the energy security and resilience of the Nation.”

DOE selected these 6 companies that will be able to compete for future work to supply LEU, fostering strong commercial sector investment:

American Centrifuge Operating, LLC
General Matter, Inc.
Global Laser Enrichment, LLC
Louisiana Energy Services, LLC
Laser Isotope Separation Technologies, Inc.
Orano Federal Services, LLC

Developing new domestic production capacity for LEU ensures an adequate fuel supply is available from trusted sources to maintain the current fleet of U.S. reactors and builds a strong base to supply future deployments of advanced nuclear reactors both at home and abroad. Through these contracts, DOE will acquire LEU generated by new domestic sources—either at entirely new facilities or from projects that expand existing capacity. All contracts will last for up to 10 years and each awardee receives a minimum contract of $2 million.

More information on DOE’s efforts to develop nuclear fuel supply chains for existing and future reactors can be found at
Domestic Low Enriched Uranium Supply Chain | Department of Energy.

LANL researchers complete HALEU criticality experiment
Friday, 29 November 2024

The Deimos experiment at Los Alamos National Laboratory is the first criticality experiment using high assay low-enriched uranium fuel to be carried out in the USA in more than 20 years, and will help to develop public data and criticality benchmarks for the material.


A graphite fuel 'cup' containing fuel pellets ready for insertion into a Deimos graphite monolith (Image: DOE)

Criticality benchmarks are essential to nuclear design and safety evaluations required by the industry and regulatory bodies, but there are very few benchmarks that use high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU). The US Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission are collaborating on the development of criticality data for HALEU: in August, the DOE awarded USD17 million of funding to 16 projects to help develop public data and criticality benchmarks related to the use, storage, and transportation of HALEU fuels.

The Deimos criticality demonstration, funded by Los Alamos National Laboratory’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development programme, took place at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center at the Nevada National Security Site. The centre has four critical experiment machines and is the only general-purpose critical experiments facility in the USA equipped to conduct experiments on fissionable material at or near criticality.

One of the critical assembly machines at the centre was modified to accommodate a new graphite core and 'cups' to hold HALEU-based fuel pellets containing TRISO (tri-structural isotropic) fuel particles. After demonstrating criticality of the system, the experiment was then measured at room temperature and heated to more than 200° Fahrenheit (93.3° Celsius) to generate new criticality safety data on HALEU fuel.


Assembling the Deimos experiment (Image: Department of Energy (DOE)

"The Deimos experiment is an important step towards deploying HALEU-fuelled nuclear reactors," said Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Programme Manager for Nuclear Energy Chris Stanek said. "We are excited and proud to make use of unique LANL capabilities to advance the nation's advanced reactor goals, and we look forward to future experiments that Deimos enables."

Many advanced reactors will require HALEU to achieve smaller designs, longer operating cycles, and increased efficiencies over existing nuclear technologies. Data developed from the projects funded through the DOE and Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Criticality Benchmarking solicitation will be made publicly available to enable efficient future design and safety reviews and help the nuclear industry develop new and novel solutions to address data gaps.

A New Reckoning for Nuclear Energy

The U.S. is softening towards the idea of building a new fleet of nuclear reactors.

By Matteo Wong



December 2, 2024

This spring kicked off the best stretch for America’s nuclear industry in decades. It started in April, when, for the first time since 1990, the United States added nuclear capacity for the second year in a row. In June, Congress passed a major law to accelerate nuclear-energy development. The Republican Party’s national platform trumpeted nuclear power, as did Kamala Harris in describing her economic agenda; this fall, three of the world’s largest companies—Amazon, Google, and Microsoft—announced substantial investments in nuclear-energy facilities. In November, the U.S. issued official goals to massively expand its nuclear capacity. “We have ambitious targets for the next 10 years,” Michael Goff, the acting assistant secretary of the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, told me, as well as for the decade after. The DOE aims to add roughly 60 times more nuclear power in a quarter century than the country built in the previous one.

As recently as 15 years ago, or perhaps even five, imagining all of this would have been a stretch. For decades, the industry was stagnant and vehemently opposed by environmentalists. But nuclear energy—a potential source of abundant, reliable, emissions-free electricity—is a powerful tool to fight climate change, and now the federal government, major companies, and a growing number of climate advocates are supporting a series of nuclear-energy projects that could transform America’s grid. This is at least the country’s third attempt to do so—the original push to install a nationwide fleet of reactors ground to a spectacular halt in the 1980s, and a so-called nuclear “renaissance” in the late 2000s, which included dozens of proposed reactors, also failed to materialize. This round, “the industry itself has really got to deliver,” Goff said. The next few years might be the country’s last chance to get nuclear right.

America’s opposition to nuclear power runs deep. Some of the oldest and most influential environmental groups, including Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resources Defense Council, have long opposed the fallout from nuclear-weapons testing and, as an extension, the environmental risk of nuclear-power plants. Broader public attitudes turned against nuclear power when Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island facility suffered a meltdown in 1979. The Democratic Party officially opposed new nuclear plants the following year, and after the Chernobyl accident in 1986, nearly three-quarters of Americans said they were against the building of a nuclear plant within five miles of their home.

Economic factors might have doomed nuclear build-out anyway. Energy companies did build many nuclear-power plants in the 1970s—and those plants still provide about one-fifth of the United States’ electricity today—but skyrocketing costs and interminable construction delays, combined with plateauing electricity demand, eventually made new facilities unattractive investments. The emergence of cheap natural gas in the 2000s has helped doom any nuclear growth since, Jessica Lovering, an expert on nuclear economics and the executive director of the Good Energy Collective, told me. (The Great Recession also helped squelch plans for new facilities, she said.)

The result has been that, from 1979 to 1988, 67 reactors were canceled; for more than three decades, the nation has added barely any new nuclear capacity. The reactors that did open were years behind schedule. Beginning in the 1960s, the number of nuclear-engineering degrees granted each year steadily climbed, to a peak of roughly 1,500 in 1978, then plummeted to fewer than 400 by 2000.

But then, slowly, Americans started studying nuclear engineering again. When Kathryn Huff, who led the U.S. Office for Nuclear Energy for two years prior to Goff, finished her Ph.D. in 2013, more than 1,000 nuclear-engineering degrees were being issued annually, a number that has remained roughly steady since. Huff now teaches nuclear engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and she told me that the motivation of her own cohort and her students is clear: “The reason people are in nuclear now is the environment.”

Beginning in the 2000s, greenhouse-gas emissions and all their consequences for the planet were becoming a pressing concern for growing numbers of scientists, government officials, and even corporations. The link between commercial nuclear power and the Cold War and nuclear radiation had faded; more people learned that the technology was safer than fossil fuels, or even wind power, measured by deaths per unit of energy produced. As more places in the U.S. started building more renewable energy, experts found that a decarbonized grid running purely on solar panels and wind turbines might be impossible, or prohibitively expensive. The Department of Energy estimates, for instance, that each unit of energy from a renewable grid with nuclear power will cost 37 percent less than from a grid without. Huff told me her students “understand how much carbon-free power we need, and that’s what’s driving them into nuclear energy—and that’s also what’s happening in the Democratic Party.”

In the past decade or so, more scientists and advocacy organizations began to mobilize around nuclear power. The Clean Air Task Force, for instance, concluded that nuclear energy was the “most advanced and proven” source of carbon-free, weather-independent power, the group’s executive director, Armond Cohen—who was a staunch anti-nuclear activist in the 1980s—told me. In 2015, four of the world’s most influential climate scientists wrote an editorial in The Guardian that called nuclear energy “the only viable path forward on climate change.” A 2018 United Nations special report found that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels would require “unprecedented changes”—including in the world’s energy systems, which made nuclear, as a scalable source of copious and clean electricity, still more appealing.

The support for nuclear power in the U.S.—particularly among climate advocates—is far from unequivocal, but relative to a couple of decades ago, it represents an epochal shift, Ted Nordhaus, an early nuclear-energy advocate and the executive director of the Breakthrough Institute, an environmental research center that promotes nuclear energy, told me. In 2020, the Democratic Party’s platform endorsed nuclear energy for the first time since 1972. Bernie Sanders is a long-standing opponent of nuclear energy, but the Biden-Sanders Unity Taskforce—a group formed to unify the party’s more moderate and radical wings in 2020—listed nuclear as a key technology for combatting climate change. Federal efforts to build nuclear energy have run through the Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies. Republicans have long supported nuclear as a matter of energy security and reliability; President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act includes substantial incentives for nuclear projects. Billions of dollars in corporate investment have gone to nuclear facilities and start-ups. Similar support exists across states as politically varied as Texas, California, Pennsylvania, and New York.

One more factor has propelled the nuclear industry. After decades of relatively flat power use nationwide, AI and data-center growth are sending projections for electricity demand soaring upward, Goff said. Because many of the companies operating large data centers have made substantial climate commitments, they need abundant sources of carbon-free electricity, and see nuclear as the quickest and most reliable way of generating it. These giant tech firms appear willing to pay above-market rates to get those new nuclear-power sources up and running. “I just can’t think of any precedent for it,” Matt Bowen, a nuclear-energy researcher at Columbia, told me.

Still, to speak of a nuclear “revival” might be premature—it’s more accurate to say that the industry is approaching an inflection point. To meet its ambitious nuclear targets, Goff said, the U.S. will likely need a mixture of existing and more experimental reactors. The next several years will be crucial for demonstrating that America can build a large nuclear fleet. Two recently completed reactors at a Georgia power plant—the project that made 2023 and 2024 the first consecutive years of added nuclear capacity in decades—have made that facility the nation’s largest single source of clean energy, but both were years behind schedule.

Meanwhile, the “advanced nuclear” projects drawing attention from the federal government and tech companies will need to prove their case. These technologies, Lovering said, are smaller and simpler than the behemoth facilities of old, which should reduce costs and construction times. But more advanced nuclear technologies have been the industry’s promised future for decades now, and yet have never made the leap to regular deployment in the U.S. And the first commercial deployments will be expensive (efficiency gains and savings will likely accompany later iterations). Experts I spoke with had mixed opinions about whether a Republican-controlled government will continue the generous loans and tax incentives the initial projects depend on.

Perhaps the greatest risk is that expectations are too high—that politicians and tech companies hope to be awash in abundant, cheap, nuclear-generated electricity within five years, instead of 10 or 20. An industry with so many decades of setbacks and failures cannot afford many more; if nuclear power really is so vital to decarbonization, then neither can the climate. The door is open for nuclear power, Cohen told me. “The question is whether we can have an industry that can walk through.”

Nuclear sector’s views on second Trump administration mixed as Rogan interview raises questions

Donald Trump enacted pro-nuclear policies during his first term and supported an “all-of-the-above” energy policy during the campaign, but some advocates fear a “divide between words and actions.”

Published Nov. 8, 2024



Dive Brief:
President-elect Donald Trump in August vowed to “approve new drilling, new pipelines, new refineries, new power plants [and] new reactors” on “day one” of his administration...

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/nuclear-energy-sector-mixed-views-second-trump-administration-joe-rogan/732407/

US plans to triple nuclear power by 2050


Shannon Stapleton/File Photo/Reuters

The News

US President Joe Biden’s outgoing administration released its roadmap for tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050, citing the ”critical role? nuclear power is poised to play in the green transition.

The net new capacity gains would come from multiple sources, the roadmap said, including new plants and restarted and upgraded reactors.

The US’ northern neighbor also has nuclear ambitions: Canada hopes to become a ”one-stop shop? for nuclear material, the BBC reported, making it a uranium “superpower.”



Trump may back nuclear energy, but subsidy cuts could harm expansion

President-elect Donald Trump is expected to try to undo many of his predecessor’s efforts to slash greenhouse gas emissions, but nuclear energy might be the exception, as it enjoys bipartisan support and backing from tech firms that want to use it to power their data centers, The Verge reported. However, Trump has himself flip-flopped on the issue, telling podcaster Joe Rogan in October that nuclear energy is too expensive and carries “dangers.” Trump’s ally Robert F. Kennedy has also opposed federal nuclear energy subsidies, and the incoming administration’s likely focus on spending cuts is “a concern for a lot of potential customers” of advanced nuclear energy, the executive director of a pro-nuclear advocacy group told Utility Dive.

Nuclear energy isn’t a panacea to the climate crisis

Tech companies need round-the-clock nuclear energy to power their data centers, and advanced nuclear reactors require substantial upfront capital investment, which tech heavyweights are well-placed to provide, experts argued for the Atlantic Council. But even if nuclear energy meets the needs of tech companies, some argue that it doesn’t meet the needs of the green transition: Cheaper options provide more emissions reductions per dollar, and the time it takes to build a nuclear plant is “incompatible with the urgent demands of climate science,” the author of a book on the subject told the University of British Columbia. Still, nuclear energy remains one of many important levers at our disposal, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency argued for the World Economic Forum.

US Unveils Plan to Triple Nuclear Power By 2050 as Demand Soars

(Bloomberg) — President Joe Biden’s administration is setting out plans for the US to triple nuclear power capacity by 2050, with demand climbing for the technology as a round-the-clock source of carbon-free power...

https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/us-unveils-plan-to-triple-nuclear-power-by-2050-as-demand-soars?fbclid=IwY2xjawGgmnhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHToCcZEq_-Yt75B2_IdBtOKIwBXHPy5FylNONmhbRPIDPKA-ndbBK0ynLQ_aem_XbEnWt0nLKF7WihyaAEPdA

OKLO could easily be 3 to 5 years away from getting regulatory authorization to build their first plant.

But that process might speed up under the Trump administration.

It could depend on how bad the coming energy crunch is going to be. And that might depend on how fast A.I. goes mainstream in the business world. And of course don't forget about Bitcoin Mining which is historically a very large consumer of energy now.

Oklo Inc cleared to begin site characterisation for first-of-a-kind plant

The completion of the environmental compliance process means Oklo Inc can now begin site characterisation for its first commercial advanced fission power plant in Idaho.


Oklo's preferred site for its first Aurora powerhouse at INL (Image: Oklo)

Completion by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) of the process addressing DOE requirements for the site and the resulting Environmental Compliance Permit, following on from the recent finalisation of a Memorandum of Agreement with the DOE, initiates site characterisation activities, Oklo said.

"These approvals represent pivotal steps forward as we advance toward deploying the first commercial advanced fission plant," Oklo CEO and co-founder Jacob DeWitte said. "With this process complete, we can begin site characterisation."

California-based Oklo received a site use permit from the DOE in 2019 to build and operate a prototype of its Aurora reactor - which will be a commercial power plant selling power to customers - at INL: according to company information, it intends to deploy its first commercial unit before the end of the decade. It also intends to build a facility to fabricate fuel for the liquid metal-cooled fast reactor plant at the same site. The DOE approved the Conceptual Safety Design Report for the Aurora Fuel Fabrication Facility in September.

The memorandum of agreement finalised with DOE's Idaho Operations Office in September grants Oklo access to conduct site investigations at its preferred site, focusing on geotechnical assessments, environmental surveys and infrastructure planning.

The Aurora powerhouse is a fast neutron reactor that uses heat pipes to transport heat from the reactor core to a supercritical carbon dioxide power conversion system to generate electricity. It uses metallic fuel to produce about 15 MWe as well as producing usable heat, and can operate on fuel made from fresh HALEU or used nuclear fuel.

When I learned that the Three Mile Island reactor would be restarted I immediately thought that this might be an excellent opportunity for Lightbridge.
They have to get their first sale at some point. Then I ran across this report on CNBC and it looks like their is plenty of time for Lightbridge to get their first install.

"...Microsoft struck a 20-year agreement with Constellation Energy to restart a reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the site of the most serious nuclear meltdown in U.S. history in 1979. The reopening is planned for 2028."

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/23/big-tech-is-driving-a-nuclear-power-revival-energy-guru-dan-yergin-says.html

Nuclear Regulatory Affairs = United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

https://www.nrc.gov

Then go here, and note that Lightbridge's fuel is being monitored by the NRC

https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/power/atf/technologies/longer-term.html

Longer Term Accident Tolerant Fuel Technologies

Extruded Metallic Fuel
The company Lightbridge is developing a new fuel design that incorporates an extruded metallic bar composed of a zirconium-uranium matrix within a zirconium alloy cladding.

The potential benefits of extruded metallic fuel are:

Significant increase in fuel thermal conductivity (compared to ceramics) promotes lower operating temperatures
Complete retention of fission products means no burst release of those products upon cladding failure
Supports higher power and longer fuel cycles.

The potential challenges of extruded metallic fuel that need to be overcome are:

Due to the relatively low density of uranium in the zirconium-uranium matrix compared to the uranium density in uranium dioxide fuel, a higher U-235 enrichment is necessary (up to 19.8%, much higher than the currently desired up to 10% for other ATF technologies). This enrichment has a greater criticality risk
Little data and experience exists for light water reactors
Extruded metallic fuel is undergoing research and development. The NRC staff continues to follow developments in the technology.

Been in LTBR many years noticed it runs up then sells off deeply, this time we have more near term catalyst. The samples will be put into the experimental reactor early 2025, and the work with LEU should show progress by then.
One thought passed through my mussing is possible buyout by LEU if all projected work pans out, seems a good fit. Your thoughts?

On Oct 21, 2019, LTBR did the dreaded 12:1 reverse stock split. I'm hoping LTBR is the first company I've ever seen make positive use of such a move to survive the cutthroat crucible of capiltalism. Now I'm waiting for $20 per share, when LTBR needs more shares, which will put LTBR in the company of NVIDIA. 
To Seth and the Board: reverse the Oct 21, 2019, 12:1 RS, allowing LTBR to take its rightful place in the energy future.

On deck for tomorrow Oct. 30/24:

October 30, 2024 – Mr. Grae will speak on a panel at 12:00 PM in Washington, DC, hosted by the Global America Business Institute. The panel will focus on nuclear energy at COP29, exploring the role of nuclear in international climate initiatives.

Today's State of Nuclear webinar available now:

https://www.ans.org/webinars/view-statenuclear24/

LTBR: July 31/24 Presentation

https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_b96f79ad74aff135b05a9d1434d63103/ltbridge/db/776/7220/pdf/LTBR+Investor+Presentation+July+2024.pdf

LTVR $13.80 +'50% rocket fuel.. RESTON, Va., Oct. 28, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lightbridge Corporation ("Lightbridge") (Nasdaq: LTBR), an advanced nuclear fuel technology company, today shares insightful findings from three technical papers presented at the TopFuel 2024 Conference in Grenoble, France. These papers, produced by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Structural Integrity Associates (SIA), and Lightbridge further validate the enhanced safety and performance of Lightbridge Fuel, particularly its improved performance under extreme conditions.Click here for full release.

LTBR new 52 week high

LTBR: Press release of interest dated June 25/24:

Lightbridge Welcomes Passage of the ADVANCE Act, Landmark Legislation to Expedite Commercial Deployment of Advanced Nuclear Fuel and Other Advanced Nuclear Technologies

RESTON, Va., June 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lightbridge Corporation (“Lightbridge”) (Nasdaq: LTBR), an advanced nuclear fuel technology company, applauds the passage of the ADVANCE Act, or the Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act, which aims to accelerate the deployment of advanced nuclear energy in the United States. Earlier this year, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill on a 365-36 vote, and the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly voted 88-2 to approve the legislation.

The ADVANCE Act focuses on streamlining the regulatory process at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), supporting the development and deployment of new nuclear technologies, and strengthening the domestic nuclear supply chain.

Seth Grae, President & CEO of Lightbridge Corporation, commented, "We are thrilled to see the ADVANCE Act pass with such overwhelming support in both the House and the Senate. While the Act does not remove all hurdles facing deployment of advanced nuclear technologies, this landmark legislation marks a significant step forward for the nuclear industry and reinforces the critical role of advanced nuclear technologies in our clean energy future. By streamlining regulatory processes, supporting the development of innovative nuclear technologies, and strengthening the domestic supply chain, the ADVANCE Act paves the way for a more financially sustainable and competitive nuclear energy landscape in the United States.”

"We are particularly encouraged by the expedited NRC licensing process for advanced nuclear fuel technologies. The Act directs the NRC to establish an initiative to enhance preparedness and coordination with respect to qualification and licensing of advanced nuclear fuel. The Act also specifically calls for government agency coordination relating to enabling the testing and demonstration of accident tolerant fuels for existing commercial nuclear reactors and also directs the NRC to assess the preparedness of the NRC to review and qualify use of accident tolerant fuel and high-assay low-enriched uranium fuels. The NRC’s inclusion of Lightbridge Fuel™ on its website under Longer Term Accident Tolerant Fuel Technologies (https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/power/atf/technologies/longer-term.html) is a testament to the innovative potential of our fuel technology. We expect this accelerated pathway will lead to expediting licensing of Lightbridge Fuel for commercial use when it is in the NRC licensing process," concluded Mr. Grae.

About?Lightbridge Corporation
Lightbridge Corporation (NASDAQ: LTBR) is focused on developing advanced nuclear fuel technology essential for delivering abundant, zero-emission, clean energy and providing energy security to the world. The Company is developing Lightbridge Fuel™, a proprietary next-generation nuclear fuel technology for existing light water reactors and pressurized heavy water reactors, significantly enhancing reactor safety, economics, and proliferation resistance. The Company is also developing Lightbridge Fuel for new small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring the same benefits plus load-following with renewables on a zero-carbon electric grid.

Lightbridge has entered into two long-term framework agreements with Battelle Energy Alliance LLC, the United States Department of Energy’s operating contractor for Idaho National Laboratory, the United States' lead nuclear energy research and development laboratory. DOE’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear program has twice awarded Lightbridge to support the development of Lightbridge Fuel over the past several years. Lightbridge is participating in two university-led studies through the DOE Nuclear Energy University Program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Texas A&M University. An extensive worldwide patent portfolio backs Lightbridge’s innovative fuel technology. Lightbridge is included in the Russell Microcap® Index. For more information, please visit www.ltbridge.com.

On deck for Tuesday October 29/24:

https://www.ltbridge.com/news-media/press-releases/detail/423/lightbridge-announces-participation-in-upcoming-industry

Upcoming Events:

October 29, 2024 – Mr. Grae will participate in an American Nuclear Society (ANS) State of Nuclear webinar at 3:00 PM ET, discussing the latest trends in nuclear energy. A link to the webinar will be provided closer to the event date.

https://www.ans.org/webinars/view-statenuclear24/

LTBR: Lightbridge Surges 28% as New Study Highlights Safety Gains Over Traditional Nuclear Fuel

https://prismmarketview.com/lightbridge-surges-28-as-new-study-highlights-safety-gains-over-traditional-nuclear-fuel/

October 28, 2024 at 12:40 pm - by Ashlee Vogenthaler

Lightbridge Corporation (Nasdaq: LTBR) announced compelling new research at the TopFuel 2024 Conference, presenting independent MIT and SIA studies that showcase the safety and performance benefits of its advanced Lightbridge Fuel™ in nuclear reactors.

Key Findings:

MIT Study: Simulations within NuScale’s Small Modular Reactor reveal that Lightbridge Fuel operates at notably lower temperatures than conventional nuclear fuel, enhancing safety margins and enabling potential power increases.
SIA Study: Under DOE’s GAIN grant, SIA analysis indicates Lightbridge Fuel maintains reduced cladding temperatures and oxidation under accident scenarios, positioning it as a safer alternative to standard uranium dioxide fuel.
Lightbridge Testing: Experimental trials confirmed Lightbridge Fuel could endure over 24 hours without water flow while retaining its structural integrity—an endurance conventional fuel lacks under such conditions.
Next Steps:
Lightbridge is advancing its plans for in-reactor testing at Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor, a strategic move toward regulatory approval and broader commercial deployment.

LTBR: Independent Modeling Studies from MIT and SIA and Results from Previous Testing Presented at TopFuel 2024 Conference Further Validate that Lightbridge Fuel™ has Safety Advantages Over Current Nuclear Fuel

https://www.ltbridge.com/news-media/press-releases/detail/424/independent-modeling-studies-from-mit-and-sia-and-results

Centrus Energy ( LTBR partner)

https://www.centrusenergy.com/what-we-do/nuclear-fuel/high-assay-low-enriched-uranium/

LEU - Centrus Energy

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/AMEX/centrus-energy-LEU/stock-price

HALEU: A Fuel for the Future

https://www.thirdway.org/blog/haleu-a-fuel-for-the-future

LTBR: World Nuclear News

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/pilot-plant-for-lightbridge-fuel-mooted-for-ohio

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/extrusion-demo-is-milestone-for-lightbridge-fuel-f

More articles here:

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/search?search=lightbridge

LTBR: Article of interest Oct.26/24

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-nuclear-power-stocks-could-084500238.html

LTBR: Lightbridge Announces Participation in Upcoming Industry Events

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lightbridge-announces-participation-upcoming-industry-120000787.html

LTBR
+23.95%
RESTON, Va., Oct. 22, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lightbridge Corporation (“Lightbridge”) (Nasdaq: LTBR), an advanced nuclear fuel technology company, today announced its participation in several upcoming key industry panels and provided an update on recent events.

Seth Grae, President & Chief Executive Officer of Lightbridge Corporation, commented, "We are at an exciting point in the nuclear industry, as recent investments from tech giants and surging interest in clean, reliable energy continue to shape the future of power generation. At Lightbridge, we’re proud to be at the forefront of these developments, contributing to the advancement of nuclear fuel technology that will play a critical role in powering tomorrow's data centers and meeting global energy demands. I look forward to sharing insights at these key industry events in the coming weeks and continuing to showcase how Lightbridge Fuel™ can drive innovation in the nuclear sector.”


Upcoming Events:

October 29, 2024 – Mr. Grae will participate in an American Nuclear Society (ANS) State of Nuclear webinar at 3:00 PM ET, discussing the latest trends in nuclear energy. A link to the webinar will be provided closer to the event date.

October 30, 2024 – Mr. Grae will speak on a panel at 12:00 PM in Washington, DC, hosted by the Global America Business Institute. The panel will focus on nuclear energy at COP29, exploring the role of nuclear in international climate initiatives.

November 5-6, 2024 – Lightbridge will participate in the World Economic Forum Advanced Energy Solutions CEO Meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, before Mr. Grae heads to COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan. The meeting will discuss advanced energy solutions and will be a closed-door event with no public access.

November 12-15, 2024 – Mr. Grae will attend COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, as part of Week 1 of the climate summit, where he will engage with global leaders on the role of nuclear energy in addressing climate challenges. He will have a Blue Zone pass provided by the American Nuclear Society to access the diplomatic area where negotiations among the parties will take place.


November 18, 2024 – Mr. Grae will speak at the ANS Winter Meeting in Orlando, Florida, as part of the State of Nuclear panel at 1:00 PM ET. The panel will cover the impact of COP29 on the nuclear industry, with Mr. Grae sharing insights from his participation in the COP29 climate summit. https://www.ans.org/meetings/wc2024/session/view-2907/

Recent Events and Media Coverage:

On October 21, 2024, Mr. Grae was featured in a live interview on BNN Bloomberg’s “The Close”, hosted by Andrew Bell. The interview covered the growing demand for nuclear energy from major tech companies, seeking clean, 24/7 power sources to support their AI facilities and data centers, which has driven a surge in nuclear energy-related stocks. The full interview can be viewed on Lightbridge’s official YouTube channel at .

Lightbridge was mentioned in an article in the Financial Times on October 20, 2024, titled “Nuclear Energy Stocks Hit Record Highs on Surging Demand from AI,” highlighting the growing momentum behind nuclear energy, particularly with the surge in demand from tech giants like Amazon and Google, which have made significant investments in small modular reactors. https://www.ft.com/content/33eeadbe-edf4-40b5-b973-e76c570d0681

On October 18, 2024, Mr. Grae was featured in a live interview from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Schwab Network’s “Trading 360”, hosted by Diane King Hall. The interview covered important developments in the nuclear industry, including recent nuclear investments by tech giants such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. Discussions focused on how the growing demand for clean, reliable energy to power data centers positions nuclear power as a critical component of the energy mix. Mr. Grae also discussed the surge in nuclear stock prices, which have reached record highs due to increased investment from the tech sector, and how these trends drive the development of advanced nuclear technologies, such as Lightbridge Fuel™. The full interview can be viewed on Lightbridge’s official YouTube channel at .

Additionally, Lightbridge was mentioned in a Barron’s article on October 18, 2024, titled “Nuclear Energy Is Making a Comeback. A New Batch of Stocks to Play the Trend,” highlighting the resurgence of nuclear energy investments and identifying Lightbridge as a key player in the nuclear fuel development space. https://www.barrons.com/articles/nuclear-power-energy-stocks-db8ffb2f?mod=Searchresults

On October 15, 2024, Mr. Grae moderated the “Super Panel” at the inaugural World Nuclear Forum at Tennessee Tech University. This premier annual event brought together global leaders, innovators, and experts to promote excellence in nuclear energy through collaboration and shared knowledge. https://www.tntech.edu/research/world-nuclear-forum.php

About Lightbridge Corporation
Lightbridge Corporation (NASDAQ: LTBR) is focused on developing advanced nuclear fuel technology essential for delivering abundant, zero-emission, clean energy and providing energy security to the world. The Company is developing Lightbridge Fuel™, a proprietary next-generation nuclear fuel technology for existing light water reactors and pressurized heavy water reactors, significantly enhancing reactor safety, economics, and proliferation resistance. The Company is also developing Lightbridge Fuel for new small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring the same benefits plus load-following with renewables on a zero-carbon electric grid.

Lightbridge has entered into two long-term framework agreements with Battelle Energy Alliance LLC, the United States Department of Energy’s operating contractor for Idaho National Laboratory, the United States' lead nuclear energy research and development laboratory. DOE’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear program has twice awarded Lightbridge to support the development of Lightbridge Fuel over the past several years. Lightbridge is participating in two university-led studies through the DOE Nuclear Energy University Program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Texas A&M University. An extensive worldwide patent portfolio backs Lightbridge’s innovative fuel technology. Lightbridge is included in the Russell Microcap® Index. For more information, please visit www.ltbridge.com.

LTBR: October 24/24

https://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=90423&ref=318665859&type=PDF&symbol=LTBR&cdn=8eb5b2017cde2b90c5b976d3d33ae2a4&companyName=Lightbridge+Corporation&formType=8-K&formDescription=Current+report+pursuant+to+Section+13+or+15%28d%29&dateFiled=2024-10-25

LTBR: From the 10Q - 08/01/2024

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/ltbr/sec-filings

Project Task Statements - INL Project
On March 26, 2024, the Company and BEA entered into Modification No. 2 (Modification No. 2) to the project task statement (PTS) under the Strategic
Partnership Project Agreement (SPPA), dated December 9, 2022, as amended on May 23, 2023, by and between the Company and BEA. Pursuant to the
terms of Modification No. 2, the potential amounts payable by the Company to reimburse BEA for its expenses and employee time were increased by
approximately $0.6 million, bringing the total estimated cost for the work to be performed under the “umbrella” SPPA to $1.7 million.
After Modification No. 2, total cash payments from the Company to BEA under both Agreements were estimated at approximately $4.3 million (excluding
project contingencies) on a cost reimbursable basis over the performance periods under the initial releases.
As of June 30, 2024, the Company had approximately $2.8 million in outstanding PTSs to BEA relating to the R&D work being conducted under the SPPA
and “umbrella” Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) at INL. Performance of work under these agreements may be terminated at
any time by either party, without any liability, after the effective date of termination, upon giving a thirty-day written notice under the SPPA and a sixty-day
written notice under the CRADA, to the other party. In the event of termination, the Company shall be responsible for BEA’s costs (including the closeout
costs), through the effective date of termination, but in no event shall the Company’s cost responsibility exceed the total estimated cost stated in each PTS
and any subsequent modification to the PTS.
Romania Feasibility Study of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors
On October 16, 2023, the Company engaged Institutul de Cercetari Nucleare Pite?ti, a subsidiary of Regia Autonoma Tehnologii pentru Energia Nucleara
(RATEN ICN) in Romania to perform an engineering study to assess the compatibility and suitability of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors.
On July 2, 2024, the Company and RATEN ICN agreed to a change order modifying the remaining scope, schedule, and total fee for the engineering study.
The revised total fee is now $0.2 million. As of June 30, 2024, the Company had approximately $0.1 million in remaining outstanding project
commitments to RATEN ICN, payable upon the acceptance of the final engineering study report by the Company.
FEED Study with Centrus Energy for a Lightbridge Pilot Fuel Fabrication Facility
On December 5, 2023, the Company entered into an agreement with Centrus Energy Corp. (Centrus Energy) to conduct a front-end engineering and design
(FEED) study to construct a Lightbridge Pilot Fuel Fabrication Facility (LPFFF) to manufacture Lightbridge Fuel™ using high-assay low-enriched
uranium (HALEU) at the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon. In the second quarter of 2024, Centrus completed Phase 1 of the FEED Study and issued a
report.
On June 27, 2024, the Company and Centrus Energy agreed to a Change Order modifying the remaining scope, schedule, and total fee for the FEED study.
The revised total fee is now $0.3 million with $0.1 million as the remaining amount due to Centrus Energy, upon the acceptance of the final FEED study
report by the Company.

Has not had a dollar of revenue in years. There is no product. This is a tulip stock

LTBR HERE COMES 10.00...3 DOLLA NET PROFIT

No revenues, millions in losses year after year, running out of cash, pump and dump du jour

LTBR...TOOK A FEW SHARES HERE...NUC BOOM STILL IN PLAY

Thanks for sharing

Excellent short overview of the situation.

IMO, Lightbridge's main advantage at this time is that their rods can be retrofitted into the current US reactor fleet of about 95 sites.

However, there are other newer competing forms of nuclear fuel that are promising. For example, the fuel inside of ceramic "pebbles" deployed in a fuel bed. In my opinion, those newer design fuel configurations are in part a market response to the incredible number of worldwide patents that Lightbridge owns. And these other fuel designs are dependent on the deployment of the new design SMR installations. And right now there are just a tiny few worldwide, all experimental. SMR will not be commonly available until about 2030 when they are finally generating power to the grid and generating revenue.

In the meantime, the Lightbridge fuel rods are the ONLY new tech design that can be deployed immediately. And from what I understand they produce about 30% more power at a lower temperature which makes them safer. And they last up to 30% longer which means more profit for the power company, and maybe cheaper cost to the consumer..

All Lightbridge needs is just one installation. This is why the restarting of Three Mile Island is such a great opportunity. And this is happening to service the power needs of Microsoft. And I am sure they always strive for excellence and efficiency, which are factors that Lightbridge can deliver.

All just my opinion...