SDCRBS
2時間前
VeeMost is about to launch a combination of 5 synergistic Platforms that will out perform anything CDW has. And what’s more, VeeMost doesn’t have to buy other IT companies to get additional income, it signs them up to be affiliates and Franchises that sell lots of services and equipment and shares a percentage with VeeMost. VeeMost’s expense, the platforms that are paid for, thus no expense, just profit!
This is going to be better than an E Ride!!
chemist72
4時間前
Updated Copilot comparison of VMST with CDW (computer Discount Warehouse):
Comparing VeeMost Technologies to CDW in Its Early Days
VeeMost Technologies, founded in 2002, is a long-established IT digital services provider offering cloud, cybersecurity, and managed IT solutions veemost.com+1. In contrast, CDW was founded in 1984 as MPK Computing and began as a small, local computer and printer retailer before evolving into a major B2B IT distributor Wikipedia+1.
Scale and Market Position
CDW early days: Started with a small ad in a free newspaper, selling computers and printers. By the mid-1990s, it had grown to over $1?billion in sales and a Fortune 500 listing CDW.
VeeMost early days: Founded in 2002, VeeMost began as a niche IT services provider with a focus on digital transformation, customer loyalty, and vendor partnerships veemost.com. It did not start with the same scale or national footprint as CDW.
Business Model
CDW: Evolved from a reseller into a fully automated, large-scale IT distributor with deep vendor relationships (Cisco, Microsoft, Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc.), automated procurement, and massive logistics infrastructure InvestorsHub+1.
VeeMost: Positioned itself as a partner in transformation, offering tailored IT solutions, lifecycle management, and vendor representation. Its early model was more service-oriented, with a focus on client retention and innovation veemost.com.
Growth Path
CDW: Rapid expansion through acquisitions (e.g., Micro Warehouse, Berbee), national distribution centers, and diversification into services, healthcare, and government Wikipedia+1.
VeeMost: Expanded service offerings over the years, including cloud, cybersecurity, and managed IT, while maintaining a strong vendor network CB Insights.
Key Similarities
Both companies have deep technology vendor relationships and aim to serve large enterprise and government clients.
Both have evolved from niche IT providers into broader IT solution providers, with VeeMost emphasizing automation and AI-driven platforms to compete with large distributors InvestorsHub.
Key Differences
Scale: CDW started much smaller but grew to a $20?B+ IT distributor; VeeMost remains a mid-sized IT services provider.
Model: CDW’s early growth was driven by aggressive acquisition and distribution expansion; VeeMost’s growth has been more service- and partnership-driven.
Automation: CDW’s early days were manual, but it quickly automated procurement and logistics; VeeMost is now building an AI-driven platform to match CDW’s automation capabilities InvestorsHub.
Bottom line: While VeeMost and CDW share some strategic goals—vendor partnerships, automation, and serving large clients—VeeMost’s early days were more service-focused and niche, whereas CDW’s early days were rooted in rapid reseller expansion and acquisition. VeeMost is now positioning itself to compete with CDW in platform capability and vendor depth, but it has not yet matched CDW’s scale or infrastructure InvestorsHub+3.
eb0783
14時間前
Thanks SDCRBS for all you do Here! You share extraordinary DD. Your real world experience and your knack for translating that into recognizable information for us not-so-technical people is super appreciated. Thanks to you and others here, I know what we have, and I have, what is it they say nowdays, "diamond hands." I'm not a trader, although good to them if they can do it.
SDCRBS
14時間前
Experience matters — and this board isn’t exactly full of rookies. Most people here know exactly what they’re holding, which is why the usual scare tactics don’t work on VeeMost shareholders. Market makers can rattle the weak hands somewhere else; they’re not shaking a crowd that’s already done the homework and invested in a company built like a tank. You can’t spook experienced traders with a rock-solid business — they’ve seen every trick in the book, and they’re not falling for amateur-hour panic games.
The reason they don't scare easy is that experienced traders often learn early in their careers that panic selling during a sharp drop is one of the fastest ways to lock in unnecessary losses. A common pattern goes like this: a stock suddenly plunges, traders scramble to find news, assume something catastrophic has happened, and start chasing the price downward — only to watch it rebound right back to its original level minutes later.
Over time, many market veterans discover that these sudden drops are not always driven by fundamentals. In some cases, they’re intentionally triggered events designed to shake out stop-loss orders, create liquidity, or exploit emotional reactions. Once traders recognize this, they begin treating these moments as opportunities rather than threats.
A typical observation is that engineered drops often follow a rhythm:
a sharp initial fall,
a brief pause as stop-losses cascade,
a secondary drop,
and then a noticeable slowing of the decline.
When the momentum finally stalls, experienced traders may step in with dry powder, buying heavily at the bottom of the manufactured dip. As the price snaps back to its prior range — which it often does — they exit the position and let the market settle for a few days.
This approach has historically produced strong returns for traders who understand the mechanics behind these moves. And as their experience grows, many also learn the importance of tax-efficient structures, such as Roth accounts, which allow gains to compound without sharing a portion with the IRS.
jmeo
SDCRBS
1日前
Don't miss out on Happy Hour today (From 4pm - 5pm Eastern!) where you can use the board like you're a premium member. Unlimited private messaging !!
I just added a few more shares today and put in a bid at ask and the M&M's were kind enough to give me my shares at 0.01705, which saved me enough to pay for my next trade. As usual, their bid was hidden which really stinks and should not be allowed in my opinion, but this is the year that is going to change that. With the re-launch of the store.veemost.com and the 5 AI learning, trained and tested Platforms (of which VeeBids and VeeStore are currently functioning) we will see the ramp up of revenue. We should also see the launch (later this year) of the Affiliate and Franchise program whereby IT companies from across the US and the World, pay VeeMost (a % of their business - details to come) for the privilege of using this first of its kind synergistic - work finding - revenue generating - platform.
SDCRBS
1日前
6/52026 - PROGRESS ON E-RATE BILLINGS $$$:
FY 2026 (overall 1.7 million)
Requested FRNs 47
Funded FRNs 10
486 on File 7
Requested Amount............$1,015,659.88
Committed Category 1.......$0.00
Committed Category 2.......$209,035.16
Total Committed.................$209,035.16
Total Disbursed..................$0.00
Remaining Balance............$209,035.16
SDCRBS
3日前
CONTINUED ...
⭐ The 6 Cisco Specializations VeeMost Should Target — Matched to VeeMost’s AI Platforms
Below is the exact mapping between VeeMost’s platforms and Cisco’s specialization framework.
This is the same mapping Cisco channel architects use when evaluating partner differentiation.
1. Security Specialization (Core + Advanced)
Why it fits VeeMost:
VeeMost’s AI-driven cybersecurity, identity, and threat-automation platforms align directly with:
Cisco XDR
Cisco Umbrella
Duo
Secure Access
AI-assisted SOC tooling
How VeeMost’s AI helps:
Automated threat detection ? lifecycle value
AI-based identity verification ? Duo alignment
Policy automation ? Secure Access alignment
Impact on Preferred Partner:
Security is Cisco’s #1 weighted specialization for tier elevation.
2. Cloud & Compute Specialization
Why it fits VeeMost:
Your platforms include:
cloud orchestration
multi-tenant SaaS
automated provisioning
AI-based workload optimization
These map directly to Cisco’s:
Intersight
UCS X-Series
Cloud Networking
AI-ready infrastructure
Impact:
Cisco rewards partners who deliver cloud automation + lifecycle management — exactly what VeeMost’s platforms do.
3. Collaboration SaaS Specialization
Why it fits VeeMost:
If any of VeeMost’s platforms integrate with:
Webex
identity management
workflow automation
digital experience monitoring
…then Cisco counts that as IP-driven collaboration value.
Impact:
Cisco heavily rewards partners who bring their own IP to enhance Webex adoption and renewals.
4. Networking Specialization (Enterprise + Meraki)
Why it fits VeeMost:
Your AI platforms likely include:
network analytics
automated remediation
AI-based observability
policy enforcement
These map to:
Cisco AI-native networking
Meraki Insight
ThousandEyes
Catalyst Center automation
Impact:
AI-driven network intelligence is a major differentiator in Cisco’s scoring model.
5. Managed Services Specialization (MSP Track)
Why it fits VeeMost:
If VeeMost uses its AI platforms to deliver:
managed security
managed cloud
managed identity
managed networking
…then Cisco counts this as recurring lifecycle value, which is the #1 factor in Preferred Partner scoring.
Impact:
Managed services + proprietary AI = Cisco’s ideal partner profile.
6. Customer Experience (CX) Specialization
Why it fits VeeMost:
Your AI platforms can automate:
onboarding
adoption tracking
compliance
renewals
usage analytics
Cisco’s CX specialization is all about lifecycle outcomes, and AI-driven lifecycle automation is exactly what Cisco wants.
Impact:
This specialization is often the final requirement for Preferred Partner elevation.
⭐ Summary Table
— VeeMost AI Platform ? Cisco Specialization
VeeMost AI Capability Cisco Specialization Why Cisco Rewards It
AI cybersecurity, identity, threat automation Security (Core + Advanced) Aligns with XDR, Duo, Umbrella, Secure Access
Cloud orchestration, SaaS automation Cloud & Compute Supports AI-ready infrastructure + lifecycle
Workflow automation, digital identity Collaboration SaaS Enhances Webex adoption & renewals
AI observability, network analytics Networking (Enterprise + Meraki) Matches Cisco’s AI-native networking push
AI-powered managed services Managed Services (MSP) Cisco rewards recurring lifecycle value
AI lifecycle automation Customer Experience (CX) Directly tied to Cisco’s scoring model
⭐ FINAL SUMMARY
Yes — VeeMost’s proprietary AI platforms don’t just help; they directly align with the Cisco specializations required for Preferred Partner status.
If VeeMost completes the specializations above and demonstrates customer lifecycle outcomes, the AI platforms become a major accelerant toward Preferred Partner elevation.
SDCRBS
3日前
How should we view the Cisco 360 partner program? Consider this ....
⭐ 1. Cisco’s 2026 Partner Program is shifting toward AI, automation, and lifecycle services
Cisco’s new Cisco Partner Program 360 (rolling out 2025–2026) emphasizes:
AI-ready infrastructure
AI-powered security
Automation & observability
Lifecycle services (adoption ? expansion ? renewal)
Cloud-delivered platforms
Managed services
Preferred Partners are expected to show differentiation, repeatable IP, and customer lifecycle value — not just resell Cisco gear.
VeeMost’s proprietary platforms check these boxes.
⭐ 2. VeeMost’s AI platforms align with Cisco’s required competencies
Cisco rewards partners who build their own intellectual property that enhances Cisco’s ecosystem.
Here’s how VeeMost’s platforms map to Cisco’s requirements:
✔ AI-Driven Security & Identity
Cisco is pushing AI-powered security (Umbrella, XDR, Duo, AI-assisted SOC tools).
VeeMost’s platforms in:
cybersecurity
digital identity
threat automation
policy enforcement
…directly complement Cisco’s security stack.
This is a major Preferred Partner differentiator.
✔ AI-Assisted Cloud & SaaS Automation
Cisco wants partners who deliver:
cloud automation
multi-tenant SaaS
AI-enhanced workflows
lifecycle management
VeeMost’s multi-platform ecosystem (licensing automation, cloud orchestration, blockchain-based verification, etc.) fits Cisco’s “IP-driven partner” model.
✔ AI for Observability & Network Intelligence
Cisco’s AI Observability and AI-native networking initiatives reward partners who can:
integrate AI insights
automate network operations
reduce customer friction
If VeeMost’s platforms include AI-based monitoring, analytics, or automated remediation, that’s a direct competency booster.
✔ AI-Enhanced Managed Services
Cisco is heavily rewarding partners who deliver:
managed security
managed cloud
managed networking
managed identity
If VeeMost uses its AI platforms to deliver managed services, that is exactly what Cisco wants from Preferred Partners.
⭐ 3. Proprietary AI = Differentiation = Higher Partner Tier Eligibility
Cisco explicitly states that partners with unique IP (software, platforms, automation tools) gain:
higher partner tier eligibility
better deal registration priority
stronger competitive scoring
more favorable lifecycle incentives
VeeMost’s proprietary AI platforms are IP — and Cisco loves partners who bring their own IP to the table.
⭐ 4. The biggest advantage: AI platforms help VeeMost demonstrate customer lifecycle value
Cisco’s new scoring model is based on:
Adoption
Expansion
Renewal
AI platforms that automate onboarding, monitoring, compliance, or security help VeeMost:
reduce churn
increase renewals
expand customer usage
deliver measurable outcomes
This is the #1 factor Cisco uses to elevate partners.
⭐ 5. So will these AI platforms help VeeMost become a Preferred Partner?
Yes — they materially strengthen VeeMost’s case.
Cisco wants partners who:
build AI-driven solutions
integrate with Cisco’s AI ecosystem
deliver lifecycle value
provide managed services
differentiate with proprietary IP
VeeMost is doing all of that.
The only missing pieces are:
completing the required Cisco specializations
demonstrating customer success metrics
showing lifecycle adoption data
scaling platform usage across multiple clients
If VeeMost executes those, the AI platforms become a major accelerant toward Preferred Partner status.
jmo and AI's
Plato_
4日前
CONTRASTING THE CISCO 360 PARTNER PROGRAM TO THE LEGACY PROGRAM
From what I can gather, the legacy partner program consisted of static roles and levels that applied to the whole company. The partner's role in the Cisco ecosystem was either an Integrator, Provider, Developer, or Advisor. Similarly, the partner's certified level of expertise was either Gold, Premier or Select. As a point of reference, VeeMost is an Integrator with a certified level of expertise of Premier.
In the 360 Program, instead of the company performing just one role, Cisco believes the company plays all roles to varying degrees as it engages its customers over the customer lifecycle. The new metric is "motion (sell, build, manage, and advise in no particular order)." Sell and Build motions are associated with the Integrator role. Manage motions are associated with the Provider role. Specialized Build and Automation motions are associated with the Developer role. Finally, Strategic Advise motion is associated with the Advisor role. I haven't had time to investigate but I wouldn't be surprised if these various motions were averaged together to come up with some kind of customer engagement score. This would likely be done for all of the Cisco-defined technology portfolios that the company supports (see next paragraph).
Levels are no longer company-wide. They apply to specific Cisco-defined technology "portfolios." The two levels are:Cisco Portfolio Partner: Indicates foundational practice maturity and investment in a specific portfolio’s sales and technical capabilities.
Cisco Preferred Partner: Signals advanced technical mastery, established scalable practices, and comprehensive lifecycle management within a given portfolio. Source: Google AI But remember these levels do not apply company-wide. They only apply to Cisco-defined technology portfolios: Networking, Cloud and AI Infrastructure, Security, Splunk, Collaboration, and Services. A company could have Cisco Preferred Certifications for some of its technology portfolios but not others. This is in contrast to the legacy levels - such as Cisco Gold - where the designation applied to the whole company not just certain product or customer groups.
So whereas before the possible levels were Gold, Premier or Select and they applied to the whole company, in the 360 Program you only have two levels but they apply to technology portfolios, not the entire company. These are the designations:
Cisco Networking Partner
Cisco Cloud and AI Infrastructure Partner
Cisco Security Partner
Cisco Splunk Partner
Cisco Collaboration Partner
Cisco Services Partner
Cisco Preferred Networking Partner
Cisco Preferred Cloud and AI Infrastructure Partner
Cisco Preferred Security Partner
Cisco Preferred Splunk Partner
Cisco Preferred Collaboration Partner
Cisco Preferred Services Partner
With the 360 Program a partner can be certified in multiple portfolios. They're not just limited to one.
Twelve designations are possible now by my count. We no longer have Gold, Premier, and Select. Those are relics of the past.
The question is, which of these designations will VeeMost acquire? I haven't seen anything in the filings that address this question.
I don't envy Melvin. I think I kind of understand what Cisco is trying to do. But in the process, they have created an administrative nightmare for its partners.
Some good Cisco references that explain it better than I:
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-designations-faq.pdf
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-solicitations-faq.pdf
DISCLAIMER: These are just my interpretations and opinions. Please do your own due diligence.
Plato_
4日前
Dasqeezr, If I was a Gold Certified Cisco VAR I would be livid at Cisco's decision to screw their partners. Imagine if VeeMost had obtained the Gold certification a couple of years back, then Cisco canceled the designation on February 1, 2026! Actually, now that I think about it, that probably would have been okay in the short run 😉💲!
Plato_
4日前
It didn't take long. My very first post on this board was about Cisco Gold Certification.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175118190
It was a major catalyst that we were all looking forward to. In fact, all of the platforms to be rolled out soon were in support of that goal.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176492866
But Cisco killed the program effective February 1, 2026. That was very disappointing. It was replaced by the Cisco 360 Partner program.
https://web.archive.org/web/20241101132431/https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-program/cisco-360-partner-program-highlights.pdf
Blowback
I noticed Cisco removed all of the language from their "At A Glance" handout pertaining to the previous roles and levels framework being retired .
Original (2024): https://web.archive.org/web/20241101132431/https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-program/cisco-360-partner-program-highlights.pdf
Current (2026): https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-program/cisco-360-partner-program-highlights.pdf Transitioning to the Cisco 360 Partner Program
Future of roles and levels
To simplify and improve our partners’ experience, we are moving away from the current roles and levels framework to a new structure that will enable them to more clearly showcase their Cisco expertise to customers.
This new framework will have two designations: Cisco Partner and Cisco Preferred Partner. To further help partners differentiate their practice, the Cisco Preferred designation can be earned for each portfolio. For example, if a partner earns the Cisco Preferred Partner designations in Security and Networking, they will be recognized and can market themselves as a Cisco Preferred Security Partner and a Cisco Preferred Networking Partner.
On February 1, 2026, these new designations will replace the current Gold, Premier and Select levels. We will share the new designations and provide access to new customer facing logos well in advance of the retirement of the current levels. These new partnership logos closely connect the Cisco brand to our partners’ brand – allowing them to communicate their Cisco relationship to customers. We will continue to amplify the value of our partners and drive awareness to the market that these new designations represent the most capable and trusted partners in the industry.
Protecting partners’ investments is our top priority. Whether they are Gold, Premier or Select in today’s program, the investments, outcomes, and lifecycle support our partners have been delivering to customers will continue to be recognized in the partner value index. To ensure a smooth transition, we will extend all partner anniversary dates for roles, levels, and the Customer Experience Specializations to February 1, 2026, and no action is needed if partners wish to maintain their current status.
During the transition period, if they achieve a new role, level, or Customer Experience Specialization, partners’ anniversary dates will be set to February 1, 2026, regardless of when that credential is earned. On February 1, 2026, we will officially retire the Integrator, Provider, Developer, and Advisor roles and the Gold, Premier and Select levels. The new Cisco Partner and Cisco Preferred Partner designations will be effective as of this date.
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20241101132431/https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/partners/cisco-partner-program/cisco-360-partner-program-highlights.pdf Disclaimer: While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, Plato_ assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness. Do your own due diligence.
SDCRBS
5日前
⭐ What Form 486 Is (E-Rate Program)
Form 486 = “Receipt of Service Confirmation and Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Certification.”
It is filed after services begin and serves two critical purposes:
⭐ 1. It tells USAC that services have started
The school or library uses Form 486 to officially notify USAC:
“Our E-Rate-funded services have begun.”
“We are ready for invoicing to start.”
Until Form 486 is filed:
USAC will not pay invoices
Service providers cannot submit SPI invoices
BEAR reimbursements cannot be processed
This is why delays in Form 486 filing delay revenue recognition for vendors.
⭐ 2. It certifies CIPA compliance
Form 486 also confirms whether the applicant:
Is compliant with CIPA,
Is working toward compliance, or
Is exempt (libraries have different rules)
CIPA compliance includes:
Internet safety policy
Technology protection measures (filters)
Public notice and hearing requirements
USAC cannot release funding until CIPA status is certified.
⭐ When Form 486 Must Be Filed
The deadline is:
120 days after the later of:
The FCDL date, or
The service start date
Missing the deadline can result in:
Funding reductions
Invoice delays
Loss of funding for the period before filing
⭐ Where Form 486 Fits in the E-Rate Timeline
Form 470 – Open competitive bidding
Form 471 – Request funding
PIA Review – USAC reviews the application
FCDL – Funding Commitment Decision Letter
Form 486 – You are here
Certify service start
Certify CIPA
Enable invoicing
Invoicing – SPI or BEAR
Form 500 – Adjustments (if needed)
Form 486 is the bridge between funding approval and invoicing.
⭐ Why Form 486 Matters to Vendors (like VeeMost)
For service providers, Form 486 is the trigger that allows:
SPI invoicing to begin
USAC to release funds
Revenue to be recognized
If a district delays Form 486, the vendor’s revenue is delayed — sometimes by months.
This is why tracking Form 486 status is essential for modeling VMST’s E-Rate revenue timing.
SDCRBS
5日前
Good catch on the AL — nicely done.
And yes, I made another mistake… I’m just waiting to see if you spot this one too.
Now, looking ahead and this is where it gets interesting: we’re in June, and I still expect the platforms to be ready this month. But if I were Melvin, I wouldn’t announce anything until July. I’d time the PR rollouts, so it builds momentum right into the Q2 report. There’s plenty he could PR between now and then, and by the time the Q2 filing hits, he should have enough visibility to start giving revenue projections — at least for the 47 E-Rate contracts.
Here’s where the FY2026 E-Rate numbers stand as of 5/27/2026:
Requested FRNs: 47
Funded FRNs: 9 (updated 6/1)
486 on File: 6 (updated 6/1)
Requested Amount: $1,015,659.88
Committed Category 1: $0.00
Committed Category 2: $164,461.25 (updated 6/1: $204,892.57)
Total Committed: $164,461.25 (updated 6/1: $204,892.57)
Total Disbursed: $0.00
Remaining Balance: $164,461.25 (updated 6/1: $204,892.57)
Source:
https://tools.e-ratecentral.com/us/public/utilizationSummaryChart.asp?typ=spin&ky=143036071&ste=TX