Tap Real Estate Technologies Inc (ID) (RWAX)

“We found that international deals announced over the last year – a key source of the company’s perceived legitimacy – never got off the ground or have quietly collapsed behind the scenes.
For example, a partnership announced more than a year ago to bring HUMBL to Africa never got beyond the press release stage, according to an executive at its planned partner.
A landmark $15.6 million deal to sell rights to HUMBL’s business in 15 countries in Oceania, including Australia and Tonga, collapsed. We found the partner for this major planned deal has no presence beyond a local entity filing, and operates out of a small residence.”

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

“ Brian Foote said nothing, however, about the 335,610,000 shares, on an as-converted basis, held by The Stephen L. and Sandra M. Foote Revocable Trust. [Pg. 5] Based on background checks, Stephen and Sandra appear to be Brian’s parents. The HUMBL holdings in their trust are worth $292 million based on current prices.”

I just don’t think Brian’s gonna leave us hanging!

Not looking for PM. Public question & answer.
Won’t let me respond No fear - please present your thesis right here on the baord, I'm genuinely curious what YOU SEE that I'm missing.

Thx.

Try again between 4-5 pm today.

Won’t let me respond nomo prolly better at explaining it ask him!

One thing that gets overlooked is this great DD for Newbies


HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution




https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

When what "thing" happens? Referring to what specifically?
When this thing happens and it’s going to there’s gonna be some sad puppy’s on here I can’t wait! I've been reading the board for over 18 months.

Was lucky to get a little piece of Dec '24's very short move, so still kinda interested.

Is the "thing" you're referring to simply price-action busting a move finally?

Or is it specific "business" that will encourage enough share-demand to move price appreciably?

Or is it something else altogether?

Why would it make anybody "sad", and why would that excite you?

Looking forward to understanding what you believe,

Thx.

One thing I think gets overlooked in emerging markets is that the biggest opportunities rarely announce themselves clearly in the beginning. They usually look early, messy, incomplete, and misunderstood. They often come with shifting strategies, regulatory questions, fragmented technology, evolving business models, and a lot of disagreement over whether the sector is real, too early, or simply another cycle of hype.

That is usually how infrastructure markets develop. By the time everyone agrees an opportunity is obvious, a lot of the important work has already happened. The early standards have started forming. The early operators have taken the bruises. The technology has been tested, rebuilt, adjusted, and improved. Partnerships have been explored. Compliance expectations have become clearer. Customers have started identifying what they actually need versus what the market originally thought they wanted.

That is why I think it is important to separate short-term noise from long-term infrastructure development. The opportunity around RWAX is interesting to me because it sits near several themes that are still very early in their full commercial development, including real-world assets, digital ownership, blockchain-based infrastructure, modern payment rails, authenticated records, asset registries, tokenization, compliance-driven financial technology, and next-generation banking and settlement systems.

Those are not small ideas, and they are not simple ideas. They touch areas of the market that have been outdated, fragmented, and inefficient for a long time. Ownership records, asset verification, title management, compliance workflows, custody, payments, settlement, reporting, authentication, and data coordination are still spread across systems that were never really built to operate together in a modern digital environment.

That fragmentation creates friction. It creates delays, cost, operational risk, and inefficiencies that many people outside the industry may not fully see. It also creates opportunity for companies trying to build infrastructure that can make those systems more connected, more verifiable, more efficient, and more useful over time.

But this is also where people have to be realistic. Infrastructure does not usually scale overnight. It does not always produce the kind of visible momentum people expect from consumer apps or short-term trading narratives. A lot of the important progress happens behind the scenes through integrations, compliance work, product refinement, enterprise conversations, regulatory alignment, technical development, and actual use-case validation.

That can make the process frustrating to watch from the outside. It can also make it easy to misread. A company adapting its strategy is not automatically failing. A product being refined is not automatically broken. A sector waiting on regulatory clarity is not automatically dead. In many emerging markets, the companies that survive are often the ones that continue iterating while the broader industry figures out what the real demand, rules, workflows, and economics are going to look like.

That does not mean every company succeeds. Most will not. Emerging sectors naturally produce pivots, delays, mistakes, failed experiments, restructurings, competitive pressure, and consolidation. That is part of the cycle, especially in markets where technology, finance, regulation, and asset ownership all intersect.

But the bigger picture is still worth paying attention to. Financial infrastructure is changing. Ownership infrastructure is changing. The way assets are recorded, verified, transferred, financed, and connected to digital systems is changing. The conversation around blockchain has also matured beyond the early obsession with speculation and token prices.

The more interesting long-term discussion may be around practical utility: how records are authenticated, how assets are represented digitally, how payments move, how compliance is embedded, how institutions interact with new rails, and how fragmented systems become more interoperable. That is where the real infrastructure opportunity may exist. Not in hype, not in buzzwords, and not in assuming every blockchain-related company becomes important, but in the possibility that certain parts of the financial system, real estate market, registry infrastructure, and asset ownership stack are due for modernization.

RWAX is interesting from that standpoint because the company appears positioned around several of those developing themes, including real estate, real-world asset infrastructure, digital record systems, blockchain-enabled ownership frameworks, tokenization, registry concepts, and financial modernization. Those are large markets, but they are also difficult markets. They require patience, execution, regulatory awareness, technical credibility, and real-world implementation.

A good narrative is not enough. A large addressable market is not enough. The only thing that ultimately matters is whether the company can turn the opportunity into durable products, meaningful partnerships, defensible infrastructure, measurable utility, and sustainable adoption.

That is the real question. Can the technology solve actual operational problems? Can it reduce friction in markets that need modernization? Can it create value beyond speculation? Can it support compliance, security, scalability, and institutional requirements? Can the company build something that becomes useful enough for customers, partners, or market participants to rely on?

Those are the questions worth watching. The mistake, in my opinion, is assuming that because something is early, uncertain, or still developing, it is automatically irrelevant. Some of the most meaningful infrastructure shifts begin exactly that way. They are unclear at first, underappreciated by many, and dismissed by people focused only on what is visible today. Then, over time, the market starts to understand why the plumbing matters.

That is what makes this space worth following. Not because anything is guaranteed. Not because every company tied to real-world assets, blockchain, tokenization, or digital ownership will win. Not because a narrative alone creates value. But because the underlying problems are real, the systems are outdated, and the long-term opportunity around financial modernization may be much larger than many people currently recognize.

As always, execution is the separator. Filings matter. Product delivery matters. Partnerships matter. Compliance readiness matters. Technology development matters. Real-world adoption matters. Measurable progress matters. The companies that can move from concept to utility will be the ones worth paying attention to. Everything else is just noise.

That is why RWAX remains interesting to follow from a thematic perspective. The story is not simply about a ticker. It is about whether a company positioned around real-world assets, ownership infrastructure, registry systems, and financial modernization can execute inside a market that is still forming.

That is a difficult challenge. It is also the kind of challenge that, if solved well, could matter far beyond one short-term market cycle.

When this thing happens and it’s going to there’s gonna be some sad puppy’s on here I can’t wait!

This absolute filth has a bid? Amazing

All these ones on the plate, and yet none of these pump tarts want to eat them.

They want other people to buy em up, but they won't touch them personally, what's up with that?

😂 😂 😂

So freaking transparent...

Absolutely hilarious.

The volume here is dry as the Mohave. Y'all have run out of marks to con.

Absolutely hilarious.

The volume here is dry as the Mohave. Y'all have run out of marks to con.

Seems like after days like this, there will be a 2billion volume day tomorrow 

Yep ol foote and friends will make lots of money. Just not for the shareholders. One of the biggest crooks and family of crooks I have ever found .

Yep that's a winner uh?

FYI ...this is who is acquiring your last hope .... last financial submitted for raise ... https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1870100/000121465924007679/ex99annualreport2023.pdf

Tap A Con ©

If it wants to go public it will be srnw, forw or gvsi. Rwax is a horrible ticker because it has 61 bil o/s. 

There are no actual hold co shares. That doesn't matter though. You have been completely diluted out.

Further .. https://kingscrowd.com/fintech-tv-on-tzero-2023/

It(FintechTV) trades on an ATS through tzero. They don't need a public Company at this tine. That is at least where they did their crowdfunding.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1870100/000121465923013558/ex99.pdf

If you are nor familiar... https://www.tzero.com/

Sorry man.

Wonder in Fintech wants to go public with Foote shell company 

Fintech.TV is a private company. It is owned by its parent company, FINTECH Media Group, which operates as a global financial media network and a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC).

✅ ❌Facts HMBL Required DD for Newbies ❌✅


HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution




https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

Is the 50 milly in stock holding co shares?asking for a friend.

Wow....RWAX is getting shut out. This will dilute what ever small bit of ownership they have left in Tap.

Absolutely hilarious.

For the O/S...


.


.

Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Social Media Promoted Frontload Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..


.

ITS ONLY UP FROM HERE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ll let you figure that out!

Well the explain, rwax is a 4% owner of tap invest. How does rwax benefit? 

Oh but it is !!!

Are you sure

Just more nonsense.

The news is not $rwax related. 

Nobody has any thoughts on this news?

Good morning Huggy,
I see you are still here, I take that as a good sign!

What company 😂 ???

This isn't a company, it's a total fraud

LOL ...too much here:

The same people who complain about a company having no cash are usually the first to complain when a company raises capital, adds executives, or issues shares to grow.

Outstanding Shares
61,746,332,657

“…or issues shares to grow.“

The company has increased its OS by 6000% since 2021.

How much has it grown since then?

LOL.

Lol, Markets punish insolvency.
Markets reward execution. Quickest way to financial failure & the poorhouse is NOT managing the balance sheet.

Your lack of understanding this suggests you've never run a real business successfully.

Whatever.

GLTA ~

The same people who complain about a company having no cash are usually the first to complain when a company raises capital, adds executives, or issues shares to grow.

Building a business requires resources. Building one in a new market requires even more. The question isn’t whether shares are being issued, it’s whether management can turn those resources into assets, revenue, and long-term value.

Everyone can see today’s share count. Far fewer are paying attention to what the company is actually trying to build over the next few years.

Markets reward execution. If RWAX executes, today’s arguments won’t matter nearly as much as people think.

This fits..lol....

Blue skies ahead !!!

Haven't enough people been conned already?

🚀 Newbie’s Updated DD 🚀

HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

“ some investors wised up to the latent dilution”,

And some still haven’t

A lot of people seem fixated on the current balance sheet while ignoring the reality of where the company is in its lifecycle.

Companies that are attempting to build something meaningful rarely look their strongest at the beginning. They are investing in people, infrastructure, technology, operations, and growth initiatives long before those investments are reflected in revenue and earnings. That’s not unique to RWAX, that’s how most early-stage growth stories start.

The addition of experienced leadership is being portrayed as a negative because compensation may include equity. Personally, I would rather see executives aligned with shareholders than collecting large cash salaries that drain an already limited treasury. Equity compensation only becomes a problem if management fails to create value with the resources they’re given.

The market often rewards execution, not perfection. Every company has a period where investors must decide whether they are evaluating today’s numbers or tomorrow’s opportunity. Those are two very different conversations.

Nobody knows exactly how this story ends, but judging a developing company solely on a snapshot of cash, assets, or share count while ignoring management additions, strategic direction, and long-term objectives feels like looking at a foundation and declaring the building will never exist.

Easy money... for somebody.
225 milly dumped into the bid… The sheep are oblivious.