Tap Real Estate Technologies Inc (ID) (RWAX)

They can hit penny land if the Zermatt Resort deal goes through and revenues start coming in and they use that cash flow to address the share structure. Or they land some sort of partnership in the tokenization/RWA realm. Or they clean up their balance sheet and uplist to a higher tier OTC market. Or all the above which would be a trifecta of awesome. For example, Zermatt Resort goes through. Revenue starts coming in. They start paying off the legacy debt and buying back shares to reduce the OS by a good 40 billion shares using the new revenue to buy back shares on the open market . Thereafter they uplist to OTCQX and look for some partnerships. If (BIG IF)all that were to happen then rwax could see a significant share price increase. Id guess in that scenario the PPS hits between $0.30- $1.00. The Zermatt Resort is what all eyes should be on at the moment. Confirmation of that won't happen until Mid/late August assuming its a done deal. Be at least another quarter after acquiring the resort to see what revenue is pulled in. Id guess it will be at least 6 months to a year before any meaningful rise in price if Zermatt is acquired. If the deal falls through and Zermatt is a no-go RWAX can add $250k to their already stacked deficit. As some have pointed out it will take billions of shares to be bought just to pull it out of $0.0002. If billions of shares are bought any tick up will be met with flippers exiting their position and scalping profits making any progress without superb PR very difficult. Lot of headwinds and hurdles.

$250k is a big bet so im thinking management has high hopes for the resort and is banking on the deal going through. Probably why they don't mind diluting further at this time. They're looking to add value using RWA space, and creating a digital infrastructure to issue, register and trade real estate.

Whether RWAX can pull it off or not has yet to be seen. If some or all of the positive hypotheical scenarios pan out then rwax could see the SP rise bigly. If Zermatt falls through expect the same price action we see now between $0.0001-$0.0002 with a strong possibility of making out the AS and then increasing the AS by billions more.

Outside of someone buying 40-50 billion shares on a whim, bordom or spite we probably won't see much action until Q3/Q4 at the Earliest. Just my opinion on the outside looking in. GLTA

Exactly and they have eliminated the south beach get togethers.

It has always been about whether management can success fully execute on the vision they have laid out.

They have had zero problem fully executing the vision they laid out.

Which is conning the public out of hundreds of millions of dollars via a constant stream of fairy tales and non disclosing promotion.

What reasonable expectation is there of PPS responding?
whether management can successfully execute on the vision they have laid out. Nobody cares about "the company" or "the management" or "their vision" or your two-bit-MBA-tutorials-in-a-post.

Enough of all that garbage.

Folks buy & sell stocks to make money as PPS markedly appreciates in a given time-frame.

The rest is all blather.

The market continues to focus on today’s share count while largely ignoring what the company is attempting to build.

Many emerging companies compensate leadership with equity because preserving cash during growth phases is often the most responsible path. The real question is not whether shares are issued, but whether those shares are being used to attract talent, build infrastructure, acquire assets, and create long-term value.

Balance sheets are snapshots in time. Execution, partnerships, asset growth, and revenue generation are what ultimately determine whether dilution was destructive or accretive.

The opportunity in RWAX has never been about where the company stands today. It has always been about whether management can successfully execute on the vision they have laid out.

And here me and NoMo thought that the fertilizer mound was the home run.

Only Fools are Fooled

“ Brian Foote said nothing, however, about the 335,610,000 shares, on an as-converted basis, held by The Stephen L. and Sandra M. Foote Revocable Trust. [Pg. 5] Based on background checks, Stephen and Sandra appear to be Brian’s parents. The HUMBL holdings in their trust are worth $292 million based on current prices.”

Looks like he’s not the only following RWAX. Eh?

Or anybody interested in his long-winded solioquy.
Somehow he got a crazy idea that there are serious investors here.

RWAX#$$: Hey Bulba and JuneBugs. Have no fear . There is plenty of Shares coming just for the picking . My prediction is that our Outstanding Share Count by the end of this month will be 63 Billion and 70-72 Billion by the end of August. Hey , just Saying . I will be back come July 1st. to chew on this meatless bone. Here me CEO Greg . Give this Loin Puppy some Gravy-Train .

“ We found that international deals announced over the last year – a key source of the company’s perceived legitimacy – never got off the ground or have quietly collapsed behind the scenes.
For example, a partnership announced more than a year ago to bring HUMBL to Africa never got beyond the press release stage, according to an executive at its planned partner.
A landmark $15.6 million deal to sell rights to HUMBL’s business in 15 countries in Oceania, including Australia and Tonga, collapsed. We found the partner for this major planned deal has no presence beyond a local entity filing, and operates out of a small residence.”

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

Who does Foote think he's fooling with all his non stop bullshit?

Absolutely hilarious.

"Following" RWAX 😂 😂 😂

ListenToTheTrees many have overlooked your DD ✅

It’s a must read for newbie’s

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

One of the reasons I continue following RWAX is because the company appears focused on building within markets that are still in the early stages of development. While many investors focus on established industries, some of the most significant opportunities emerge while sectors are still searching for product market fit, regulatory clarity, and scalable infrastructure. Areas like real-world asset tokenization, digital ownership, blockchain verification, and modern financial rails are still evolving, which means much of the important work is happening behind the scenes long before widespread adoption occurs.

What stands out to me is the focus on infrastructure rather than hype. The market often pays attention to consumer-facing applications, but the companies building the underlying technology stack, compliance frameworks, authentication systems, and ownership registries are often laying the groundwork for future ecosystems. History has shown that meaningful adoption usually follows years of development, testing, partnerships, and refinement. The ability to fail fast, adapt, and continue building is often more important than generating short-term excitement.

Nobody knows exactly how these markets will develop, but the direction seems increasingly clear. Institutions continue exploring tokenization, financial infrastructure continues modernizing, and regulatory frameworks continue to mature. If RWAX can continue executing and positioning itself within these long-term trends, I believe it is operating in areas that could become significantly more relevant over the coming years. That's why I find the company's progress worth watching.

Tap A Con ™

Correct - nobody cares about the "company."
...there is a huge difference between watching a stock and watching a company. There may be more to comment on in your tl,dr post but I admit i stopped reading after the first sentence when I realized you don't get it.

Whatevs, GLTA!

One of the things I've learned over the years is that there is a huge difference between watching a stock and watching a company.

Stocks move for all kinds of reasons. Narratives change. Sentiment changes. Market conditions change. Social media conversations come and go. None of those things necessarily tell you much about whether a business is actually building something meaningful underneath the surface.

What has continued to interest me about RWAX is not day-to-day trading activity. It's the fact that the company appears focused on building infrastructure in sectors that are still in relatively early stages of adoption.

Many investors spend their time trying to identify the next trend after it has already become obvious. The challenge is that by the time a market opportunity becomes widely accepted, much of the foundational work has already been completed. The technology stack is often established. The strategic partnerships have been formed. The patents have been filed. Regulatory frameworks have started taking shape. Product market fit has been tested repeatedly.



What makes emerging sectors interesting is that much of this work happens long before the broader market begins paying attention.

When I look at RWAX, I see a company operating at the intersection of several themes that continue to gain momentum globally.

Real world asset digitization.

Tokenization infrastructure.

Blockchain verification systems.

Digital ownership frameworks.

Alternative investment access.

Authentication technologies.

Web3 integration.

Financial technology modernization.

Data transparency.

Regulatory evolution.

Each of these markets is developing independently, yet they increasingly overlap.

The future may not be defined by a single breakthrough technology. Instead, it may be defined by how multiple technologies converge into a unified ecosystem that creates better efficiency, transparency, accessibility, and trust.

That is where I believe much of the opportunity exists.

For years, conversations around blockchain were heavily focused on speculation. Today, the conversation is shifting toward utility.

Institutions are exploring tokenized assets.

Governments are exploring digital infrastructure.

Financial firms are evaluating settlement improvements.

Private markets are searching for greater liquidity solutions.

Asset managers are studying digital ownership models.

Large enterprises are exploring immutable record keeping.

Whether these developments occur quickly or slowly is open for debate. What is becoming increasingly difficult to debate is that the direction of travel appears to be toward greater digitization of ownership, verification, and financial infrastructure.

This is why I spend more time looking at what companies are building than I do looking at daily price movements.

Building products is difficult.

Building compliant products is even harder.

Building compliant products in emerging industries is harder still.

You have to navigate evolving regulations.

You have to manage development timelines.

You have to secure technical talent.

You have to build systems that can scale.

You have to test assumptions.

You have to fail fast when something doesn't work.

You have to iterate repeatedly until product market fit begins to emerge.

None of that happens overnight.

One reason I continue following RWAX is because the company appears to understand that long-term value creation comes from infrastructure rather than hype.

Infrastructure is rarely exciting in the beginning.

People get excited about applications.

They get excited about consumer-facing products.

They get excited about headlines.

Meanwhile, the companies building the underlying rails often receive very little attention until years later.

History shows this repeatedly.

The internet needed infrastructure before social media could flourish.

Cloud computing needed infrastructure before software-as-a-service exploded.

Mobile ecosystems needed infrastructure before app economies emerged.

Digital payments needed infrastructure before fintech became mainstream.

The same principle may apply to digital asset infrastructure and real world asset digitization.

The companies focused on building rails, compliance systems, verification systems, ownership frameworks, marketplaces, and settlement mechanisms are often laying the foundation for future ecosystems.

That doesn't guarantee success.

Nothing does.

But it does create the possibility of participating in markets before they become crowded.

Another aspect I find encouraging is the apparent willingness to evolve.

Many companies become trapped by their own history.

They become attached to old business models.

They continue pursuing initiatives that no longer make sense.

The strongest organizations tend to reassess constantly.

They adapt.

They simplify.

They focus resources on areas where they believe future opportunities exist.

The corporate landscape is full of examples where reinvention became the catalyst for long-term success.

The market rarely rewards that transformation immediately.

In many cases it takes years before the impact becomes visible.

That is why patience remains one of the most underappreciated investment traits.

Not every quarter tells the full story.

Not every press release tells the full story.

Not every development receives immediate recognition.

Sometimes the most important progress is happening quietly behind the scenes through development work, strategic planning, compliance efforts, partnership discussions, intellectual property initiatives, platform design, and operational execution.

The broader tokenization conversation is still in its infancy.

The regulatory environment continues to evolve.

Institutional adoption continues to develop.

Technology standards continue to mature.

Banking rails continue to modernize.

Web3 continues moving beyond its earliest use cases.

As these trends proliferate, companies that have spent years building foundations may find themselves operating in a significantly different environment than the one that exists today.

That is ultimately why I continue watching RWAX.

Not because I expect overnight results.

Not because I expect instant validation.

Not because I believe every initiative will succeed.

I continue watching because the company appears focused on participating in markets that may look substantially larger five or ten years from now than they do today.

Execution will always matter.

Regulatory clarity matters.

Product market fit matters.

Technology matters.

Leadership matters.

Partnerships matter.

Patents matter.

Infrastructure matters.

The ability to adapt matters.

If RWAX continues moving in the direction of building practical solutions around real world assets, verification systems, ownership frameworks, and digital financial infrastructure, then I believe the company is at least positioning itself in areas that have the potential to become increasingly relevant over time.

For me, that's a much more interesting conversation than what happened on any single trading day.

The resort ruse will just be unwinding #97-FU-28

RWAX#$$: Hey Bulba and JuneBugs, as the Resort deal has kicked the can down the road another 90 days ; it's likely safe to assume it actually won't close until sometime in October even if there is a deal , meaning nothing will show up on the books until March/April '2027. Hey CEO Hopkins your 1yr. Anniversary is September 16th ... ya think you can get this Loin Puppy to $.001 by then , out of the Tripps . It is clear Several more Dumps are in the works that will take Outstanding Shares to 70-Billion by Mid September. Show me my 635 Million Shares is doing something other than collecting dust. We Shareholders deserve some Share Price Appreciation. We want to see the Benefits of your 1yr. of hard work.

At least those 90% are mostly on-topic...
If you look at the last six months and beyond…All you see is your group making up 90% of the post here. Most of the others are similar to what you just posted:

Complaining about those who have read filings & done some DD and post their thoughts about the stock.

Why is that a problem for you?

Use the ignore function of you prefer to only read like-minded opinions.

GLTA

? What do you mean "your group". Why in the hell would I be vested with something so blatantly skewed. Wake the F' up man.

Absolutely hilarious.

If you look at the last six months and beyond…All you see is your group making up 90% of the post here.

Pretty sad really when you have no vested interests in this stock.

No vested interests. Really?

You may not but, the one paying you sure does. 😁

Also, look at the past six Months. They had 7.5 - 1 Billion volume days over the past six Months. Backlog, bottleneck....fucked.

I expect they need to have at least one of those a week until mid August. Average that is...

Nope. Expect a billion share dump at some point. It will be hard to resist that bid for too long.

Not enough volume to turn inventory.

Surely there has to be a few more marks out there to purchase these absolutely worthless shares.

As-expected and zero surprises there.

There appears to be only one source of funds.

More shares for everyone!

Unrestricted is now 4 Billion more than DTC deposits. That’s quite the backup.

Excellent! NoMo loves fresh shares and especially when they are on sale.

Looks like another Billion shares were added yesterday to the outstanding. great job.

Some would argue the volume is anemic. I consider the volume in general volatile and unpredictable. Always interesting around here. GLTA

👍

There are those 500K buys again…..hmmmmLast time there were a ton of those buys….its popped a little bit 

I think that is entirely the point. You act like this is some eye opening new thing. It is not. Total smoke up your ass and you can't even tell.

I hope you believe in ... https://alpaca.markets/

Because that is what Tap Invest is using as their base. And the other component is there own investment advisor(social). If you didn't know...there are a rough 17,000 investment advisors that are SEC registered in the US.

The unfortunate thing is that no one knows who TAP is due to the fact they hide it. They even had to file an amendment and remove ownership notations in a previous filing in their jurisdiction.

Good luck.

"Lurking" lol.
HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution Been a constant for as long as I can recall.

Whatever - everybody knows what's going on here.

And why PPS is where its at.

GLTA

✅ ❌Facts HMBL Required DD for Newbies ❌✅


HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution




https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

It's an advert on repeat cycle. Can't stop using the word "thematic" as well...lol. What a pathetic loser as a Company

AI posting AI. Who is pulling your pathetic strings?

Any company capable of reducing friction while maintaining regulatory alignment, operational reliability, scalability, and measurable utility could potentially create meaningful value over time.

This particular CONPANY is capable of one thing only.

Scamming and pocketing over a hundred million dollars via this endless con game.

Lock em up Trees. All of em. That would actually be beneficial to society.

Zero revenue, highly promoted, CON GAME.

Haven't enough people been conned already Monk?

Something that stands out to me is how many people assume major market opportunities are already obvious by the time they become worth discussing.

In reality, some of the most important infrastructure shifts spend years developing beneath the surface before broader adoption becomes visible. By the time a trend reaches mainstream attention, the foundational technology, partnerships, operating frameworks, and competitive positioning are often much further advanced than most people realize.

The challenge is identifying sectors that are still early in their development cycle, where standards are forming, products are evolving, regulations are being established, and market participants are still determining what successful business models ultimately look like.

That larger backdrop is one reason RWAX remains an interesting company to follow from a thematic standpoint.

The broader movement surrounding real-world assets, blockchain infrastructure, digital ownership systems, Web3 architecture, financial modernization, registries, and next-generation banking rails continues to gain momentum across multiple industries. What was once viewed primarily as a niche digital asset discussion is increasingly becoming part of larger conversations involving financial institutions, enterprise software providers, payment companies, policymakers, and regulators.

Regulatory clarity matters.

Not because regulation guarantees success, but because sustainable infrastructure businesses need predictable operating environments. As markets mature, issues such as compliance, settlement, custody, reporting, ownership verification, interoperability, and governance become increasingly important. Companies looking to scale within financial ecosystems eventually need to address those realities.

That creates an environment where both opportunity and uncertainty can exist simultaneously.

Many participants in emerging sectors will embrace a fail fast mentality. Products evolve, strategies change, tech stacks get rebuilt, partnerships shift, and teams continue searching for stronger product market fit as customer needs and regulatory expectations become clearer.

That process is often misunderstood.

People sometimes interpret adaptation as weakness when, in reality, many successful platforms spend years refining their approach before reaching broader adoption. Iteration is frequently part of building durable infrastructure.

What continues to interest me about the broader RWAX opportunity is the infrastructure layer beneath the headlines.

When blockchain or Web3 enters the conversation, attention often centers on tokens, trading activity, or market speculation. Yet a significant portion of the long-term opportunity may exist elsewhere: ownership systems, registries, authentication frameworks, compliance tooling, transaction infrastructure, payment networks, verification systems, and the coordination of data across fragmented environments.

Those challenges are substantial.

Today's financial and ownership systems remain highly fragmented. Information exists across separate databases. Transactions move through multiple banking rails. Verification, compliance, reconciliation, title management, and record keeping frequently depend on disconnected systems that were not originally designed to communicate efficiently with one another.

That fragmentation introduces inefficiencies.

Any company capable of reducing friction while maintaining regulatory alignment, operational reliability, scalability, and measurable utility could potentially create meaningful value over time.

That is where infrastructure discussions become more compelling than short-term market narratives.

There is also a legitimate blue ocean element to many areas of digital asset infrastructure and real-world asset enablement. Numerous standards, workflows, and dominant platforms are still being established. That does not imply guaranteed outcomes, but it does suggest portions of the industry remain relatively early compared to more mature technology markets.

Execution remains the deciding factor.

Can companies solve real operational problems? Can they establish sustainable product market fit? Can their tech stack support security, compliance, integrations, scalability, payments functionality, and institutional requirements? Can patents, intellectual property, partnerships, or unique technical capabilities create long-term differentiation?

Those are the questions that ultimately matter.

Infrastructure businesses rarely develop according to the timelines many investors expect. Unlike consumer applications, where adoption can be highly visible, infrastructure platforms often grow through backend integrations, enterprise relationships, ecosystem expansion, and operational utility that compounds gradually over time.

Of course, not every company pursuing these opportunities will succeed.

Emerging industries naturally produce setbacks, pivots, failed launches, competitive pressures, consolidations, and strategic adjustments. That is simply part of the process.

At the same time, the broader themes continue moving forward.

Digitized ownership frameworks, interoperable financial infrastructure, blockchain-enabled verification, modern banking rails, authenticated records, and real-world asset systems are all receiving increasing levels of institutional attention globally.

Viewed through that lens, RWAX appears positioned around conversations that extend far beyond any single market cycle.

Whether the company ultimately translates those opportunities into meaningful execution, defensible infrastructure, sustainable product market fit, measurable utility, or broader adoption remains to be seen. Those answers will come through development progress, operational performance, partnerships, and real-world implementation.

That is what makes the sector interesting to follow.

Not because outcomes are certain, but because the long-term opportunity surrounding financial modernization, ownership infrastructure, and digital systems may be significantly larger than many people currently appreciate.

As always, execution matters more than narratives. Research, filings, technology development, compliance readiness, partnerships, product delivery, and measurable results will ultimately carry far more weight than speculation, hype cycles, or short-term sentiment.