Raadr Inc (PK) (RDAR)

Hello...hello...

$RDAR I'm surprised this scam is still trading, period. 🤔

KEEP CLIMBING - UP WE GO...!

FCCN
Spectral Capital Corporation (QB)
$5.15 - 0.0448 (0.88%)
Volume: 4,146
Day Range: 4.55 - 5.29
Bid: 5.16 Ask: 5.23
Last Trade Time: 9:40:18 AM EDT
Total Trades: 16

GO $$$RDAR$$$...! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

GM $RDAR$

the annual report was late and filed on 4/15. So hopefully we see quarterly this month.

That would explain a lot and be so helpful. Do we know when it’s due?

Pennies coming we will explode upwards soon !!!

Good Morning $RDAR

Agreed.. Need Patience here and then RDAR will fly...

I am still waiting on quarterly report to see how americrew is integrated in. Hopefully they give a future plan for expansion of the business and good current numbers.

Stockstoretirement: $RDAR Based on current financial data, Televantis, Inc. (RDAR) is trading heavily discounted below its mathematical intrinsic value.

To find the true target value per share, we divide the intrinsic market cap range ($43.7 million to $51.7 million) by the official outstanding share count of 7,996,260,674 shares (approximately 8 billion shares):

Bear Case Target Valuation ($43.7M Cap): $0.0055 per share
Bull Case Target Valuation ($51.7M Cap): $0.0065 per share

Compared to its actual open-market trading price of $0.0002 to $0.0003, the intrinsic math indicates that the stock is fundamentally undervalued by 1,700% to 2,000%
9:53 AM

GM $RDAR

STILL CLIMBING >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

FCCN - Spectral Capital Corporation (QB) $4.60
Volume: 15,528
Day Range: 4.29 - 4.60
Bid: 4.55 Ask: 4.74

Last Trade Time: 3:50:28 PM EDT
Total Trades: 51

Agreed- Locked and Loaded $$$

RDAR going to explode soon, 10 million shares at .005 brings 50,000 dollars. That’s a new car people $$$$

$RDAR DD:

✅ 2025 Revenue: $58.9M
✅ Operating Income: $6.4M
✅ Net Income: $7.3M
✅ EPS: $0.0011
✅ AmeriCrew acquisition targets $40M+ revenue and states no common share issuance for the deal.

With ~8B OS:

$40M MC = $0.005/share
$80M MC = $0.01/share
$160M MC = $0.02/share
$240M MC = $0.03/share

At current sub-penny levels, the market is valuing RDAR far below what even modest revenue multiples would suggest if management executes and AmeriCrew closes as planned.

Bottom line: Based on reported revenue and the AmeriCrew growth plan, a speculative valuation range of $0.01–$0.03 appears supportable. Not financial advice.

$RDAR moving higher soon.

MORASS

LETS GO $RDAR...

GM $RDAR$

I believe this wakes up very soon ! 2's are golden . 👀

MOASS

For years now I keep asking which part of this RDAR SCAM is legit...lol

Can you please elaborate on that.

112M BID- Something Brewing big time..

MOASS + New Acquisition = .001++++++++

Chop Chop Chop ==>> .0003++++

Bids stacking! BOOM Imminent $$$

20M Slap at .0003- Lets Go $RDAR

Where did you hear this rumor?

Rumer is there working on another acquisition to add more revenue here. 

RDAR
$0.0002
$0.00
(0.00%)

2,011
Back


Stockstoretirement

Follow
$RDAR This is analysis after Mexedia reduced ownership/control over Televantis: Overall, this announcement is a fundamentally positive structural milestone for Televantis. It confirms the successful execution of the corporate pivot to 5G infrastructure, protects the common stock from predatory dilution, and shifts the governance structure away from absolute foreign control into a more independent corporate model—all of which serve as healthy catalysts for long-term valuation expansion.

I agree with you that YOU are screwed.

Longs are not.

Krombacher

$RDAR Good News: Telvantis becomes more independent — no longer controlled by Mexedia, giving RDAR more strategic flexibility.

• AmeriCrew assets added — dilution happened because Telvantis acquired operating businesses, which could expand revenue.
• No insider selling — Mexedia didn’t dump shares, reducing negative sentiment.
• Larger operational footprint — Telvantis now has more infrastructure and capabilities than before the deal.
• Potential for new partnerships/investors — independence can make Telvantis more attractive to outside capital.

imo avi geller and the other note holders used the mexedia narritive to cash out. once the notes were done mexedia sold off the asset to fccn leaving rdar with very little. i don't know what is up with americrew but it doesn't seem to be enough to support the bloated rdar share structure.

i found another stock that looks to be going down the rdar path.
geller as the senior note holder just like he was in rdar
reg a was flied just like they did with rdar. no ammendments yet so it is way out but just like rdar.
an oil and gas robotics reverse merger inbound to support the pump just like rdar. robotics company per the corp twitter account has 4m plus in assets. there is the narritive.
tight share structure for now with only 452m in the float.

geller uses the narritve to unload and the robotics corp gets the funding they need through the reg a after the notes are sold off aka rdar.

seems like the same playbook unfolding on crdv. researching it i was like this is familiar.

No volume we are totally screwed 

It’s like there’s no one left to steer this ship away from an iceberg 
We are doomed, no light at the end of the tunnel 

Mexedia announces the reduction of its shareholding in Telvantis to 49%
Rome (Italy), 23 June 2026 – Mexedia S.p.A. Società Benefit (Euronext Growth Paris:
ALMEX, ISIN IT0005450819) (“Mexedia” or the “Company”) announces that, following the
completion by Telvantis Inc. (OTC: RDAR) of the acquisition of the operating entities of
AmeriCrew Inc. (OTC: ACRU), announced on 5 May 2026, Mexedia’s shareholding in
Telvantis has decreased from 75% to 49%.
The reduction results solely from the dilutive effect connected with the closing of the
AmeriCrew transaction, in connection with which Telvantis issued new shares of a voting
preferred class (Series G Voting Convertible Preferred Stock) to the members of
AmeriCrew, without any sale of shares by Mexedia. The transaction forms part of the path
already disclosed to the market through the Company’s press releases of 7 October 2025
and 30 December 2025, relating respectively to the signing of the agreement for the
acquisition of AmeriCrew by Telvantis and to the disposal of the Telvantis Voice Services
business to Spectral Capital Corporation.
As a result of the reduction of Mexedia’s shareholding in Telvantis to 49%, Mexedia no
longer holds a controlling interest in Telvantis. Consequently, Telvantis will no longer be
fully consolidated in Mexedia’s financial statements; the related accounting effects are being
determined and will be reflected in the Company’s financial reporting. The deconsolidation
of Telvantis will have a significant effect on the size of Mexedia's consolidated scope,
including on consolidated revenues and total assets as reported in future financial
statements. Mexedia will provide the market with timely updates in accordance with the
applicable regulatory provisions.
Paolo Bona, Chief Executive Officer of Mexedia S.p.A. Società Benefit, commented: “This
transaction reflects Mexedia’s progressive focus on its core activities. We will continue to

Did the shares that RDAR WAS SUPPOSED TO GET from FCCN go to Mexedia? Where does that leave this company?

Perhaps a RDAR resurgence is coming 🤔. Sale of stock in one to revive and renew another ! 👀

Re: the "scam" framing — an alternate reading from the same facts
I don't disagree with the parts of your post that are grounded in the filings. The Reg A issuance is real, it's a fully sufficient explanation for the price action on its own, and I've said as much in my own posts — the dilution doesn't need a short thesis to explain what we've seen. And the buyback hasn't been verifiably executed. Those are fair points and I'm not going to pretend otherwise.

Where I part company is the jump from those facts to "scam." Scam is a claim about intent, and the chronology you're citing — floated, paused, went quiet — is equally consistent with a much more ordinary story: a company reached for something, counsel told them the version they reached for wouldn't fly, and they went back to the drawing board. That's not me asserting that's what happened — I can't read their intent any more than you can. It's me pointing out that the same observable facts support a good-faith-attempt-that-hit-a-legal-wall reading at least as well as they support a deliberate-fleecing reading. When a single set of facts fits both an innocent and a malicious explanation, calling it a scam isn't a finding — it's a choice of frame.

And going back to the drawing board, if that's what's happening, isn't a scam. It's what companies do when legal says no. My earlier posts on the preferred dividend and the rights offering were aimed at exactly that — here's why the first instrument likely stalled under counsel's eye, and here's a cleaner, executable version of what they appeared to be reaching for. That's the opposite of assuming bad faith.

So to me the open question isn't "scam or not" — that's unprovable from where any of us sit. It's narrower and more interesting: does the intent to execute survive the regroup? If it doesn't, your skeptical read ages well. If it does, then this gets fun for a specific reason.

And here's the part I'd frame honestly as the speculative appeal, clearly labeled as such: a position here is really a bet on two independent axes. One is the ordinary fundamentals-and-execution axis — can a small, thin-margin telecom operation fund its acquisitions cleanly and grow. The other is the experimental axis — if they do execute a capital raise structured to incentivize registered-holder participation, we get a low-cost natural experiment that happens to reveal whether the cross-border short exposure everyone speculates about is actually there. Not because the mechanism is a trap or a squeeze — I've been clear it's a probe, not a squeeze, and that dilution already explains the price without any shorts. But because a holder-level verification channel either surfaces shortfalls or it doesn't, and either answer is informative. You don't usually get to run that experiment for the price of a sub-penny lottery ticket.

So I hold it as a two-layered bet: interesting on the fundamentals, and interesting as a cheap experiment on a question this board has argued about for years. Neither layer requires me to assert the shorts exist — only that the question is open, and that one plausible corporate action would help close it. If you think the regroup reading is wrong, or that execution intent is dead, make that case — that's the actual disagreement worth having.

Krombacher

Mexedia announces the reduction of its shareholding in Telvantis to 49%

full statement at mexida website under press releases. Any opinions on weather this is good or bad for us?

You're not showing up anywhere, lol

I get this game better than you think I do.

Good luck,

Krombacher

No one is selling tis trash short. 🙄 It will very likely be dropped to the expert market soon for failure to file their financials which I believe is part of their plan after fleecing shareholders. They promoted at least once nearly every single week while they ran the share count to 8 Billion. Now they have been silent for many months and about to go dark as they convert and distribute their Spectral Capital shares. Raadr Inc still owes three of these individuals around $1.4 million for notes that they wrote themselves shortly after the so called reverse merger. My favorite scam from these guys is detailed in post #48935. It worked brilliantly to generate the liquidity needed for those converting the offering to take around $2 million or so off of retail after months of dilution.

You will likely not get any notice that this will get dropped to the expert market. The 2025 annual revealed that what they sold Spectral Capital in the share exchange agreement is, and has always been, cash flow negative. They do not need someone like me showing up over there with the Q1 2026 with terrible numbers while they are trying to convert their Spectral stock. So I doubt you all see the filing. You will simply find one morning that you are not be able to trade it. Good Luck.

Management Certification April 15, 2026
https://www.otcmarkets.com/file/company/financial-report/551844/content

Bubae
Monday, August 25, 2025 7:56:48 AM
Post# 48935 of 48983
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176615239
The company can not hide from what they did. The con to sell 1.3 billion shares of that reg A offering before they filed the Q2 report had two very important parts. The first is that they updated nearly weekly the share structure on the OTC site for months without revealing the ongoing dilution. Post # 48002 shows the near weekly updates since the beginning of the year showing the 25 million shares of the first tranche of the reg A being issued. After that they report zero increases.

The second very important part is the false share buy back narrative. This gave the company a certain air of legitimacy to be able to buy back shares though the business is cash flow negative. This also encourages people to buy the stock, but convincing people hold was key to the price increase. The company then tweets out on the 27th "buyback has started today!". The sales of the reg A began in earnest on that day. Details and links in post# 48921 linked below.

I don't think they're scammers at all.

They're on the verge of outsmarting short sellers.

It's fun to be a part of that... but not fun if one is a short.

Krombacher

They still have not filed the Q1 report. It would be a smart move for these scammers to let this drop to the expert market and go dark for their final maneuvers to convert their FCCN shares. The Daniel Gilcher and Orlando Taddeo schemers are now preparing to pump and dump Spectral Capital stock. This scam has moved over to FCCN.

Bubae
Sunday, April 26, 2026 5:00:22 PM
Post# 51742 of 51851
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177540876

Bubae
Sunday, April 26, 2026 5:28:41 PM
Post# 51743 of 51851
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177540926

Yes - FCCN On The Move Today...!
Last Time I Looked!
FCCN - SPECTRAL CAP CORP COM = 4.20 1.52 (56.72%)
Opened at $2.80

fccn caught some wind hopefully we get dragged along

Refining the rights-offering idea for RDAR — with a correction worth making

I posted earlier about a rights offering as a clean, non-toxic way for RDAR/Telvantis to raise capital. A sharp exchange on a related board sharpened the mechanics, and I want to update this honestly rather than leave an overstatement standing.

The correction first. I'd implied the reconciliation in a rights offering reaches positions in the common stock. It doesn't — the rights reconcile within their own temporary CUSIP, and a broker short on rights simply buys rights to flatten. That mechanism, by itself, doesn't force anything in the underlying shares. Credit to the back-and-forth that clarified it; I'd rather state the plumbing accurately than claim more than it supports.

Where reconciliation actually reaches the holder level is through DRS. When a holder direct-registers shares out of street name, the broker has to deliver real shares from its DTC position to the transfer agent's books for that specific named holder. If it can't source them, the transfer rejects — the documented reason being insufficient book-entry shares. That operates at the individual-holder level, not the net-participant level. I'll be precise and not overclaim: brokers can manage timing through borrowing and netting, so this isn't an instant audit or a forced mass buy-in. It's a voluntary verification channel — any holder who chooses to direct-register confirms their ownership one at a time, and any shortfall surfaces as a reject rather than a confirmation. A probe, not a squeeze.

So a rights offering structured to incentivize registered-holder participation — DRS being a standard, always-available, non-chillable process — is a legitimate capital raise that also gives holders a real, individual way to verify their shares. Not a trap. Not a magic float audit. Exactly what the plumbing supports.

On RDAR specifically, two things make this more than academic. First, the company is actively pursuing acquisitions and an uplisting path — the AmeriCrew agreement and the voice-services sale are on the table. A company doing real deals has a real use for capital raised from its own base. Second, the relevant comparison isn't "rights offering versus a large raise." It's "rights offering versus how OTC companies usually fund themselves" — which is floorless, toxic convertible debt that raises modest sums by handing lenders conversion rights at a discount to a falling price. A fixed-price rights offering to existing holders raises comparable money without the floorless overhang. Small-but-clean beats small-but-toxic, and for a company funding acquisitions rather than just survival, the case is stronger still.

As before: I'm not asserting anything specific about RDAR's share structure. I'm describing a legitimate, executable, shareholder-friendly financing tool — available to a Reg A issuer with the standard Form 1-A qualification step, as precedent like Teton Advisors shows — and being precise about what its mechanics do and don't do.

Sources: DTC Operational Arrangements; DTC ASOP Agent User Guide; STA Profile Direct Registration Processing Guidelines; Regulation A (17 CFR 230.251 et seq.); Teton Advisors Form 1-A.

GM $RDAR$