Researchfyi
2日前
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is unchanged at 0.04 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
LQMT through BW announces 3-13-25 EOY call. I’m presuming no Q&A. Just a one way call. I call that type of call: Company Spin. Or another way to put it: Protecting The Silence to avoid jeopardizing any endeavor real or imaginary. Staying inline or exit as outlined by the controlling shareholder.
So far for 37 months, the endeavors have been imaginary as LQMT has failed to ink a new parts order deal of any size worthy of a filed 8K to increase the share price. It’s the longest spin cycle without a wash rinse and repeat cycle.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250224759866/en/
End of year calls have been factually proven to be worth very little and have a factual history of not changing the fundamentals of the company. Projected forward worded comments year over year of more new contracts or deals have yet to come to fruition to increase shareholder value. In fact the unfulfilled expectations of any pipeline coming to fruition have culminated in a decrease in shareholder value.
I mean, doesn’t the new 0.16 cent shareholding shells with 179 million plus shares have a Q?
In essence to me and this is only my opinion having given the company each year the benefit of the doubt. Maybe others agree too. The End of Year calls are just for listening to another year of excuses for why the company has failed to increase shareholder value for the past & perhaps present year. Sort of like the expression: “My Bad.” If you don’t believe it. Just look at the disappointing long term price charts! Those charts are real facts not opinions. See link below reflecting 5 years.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/liquidmetal-technologies-qb-LQMT/chart/streaming
What I am saying is… if there is no real meat in the spin, then just wish everyone a happy and healthy life and just say and end the call in a few seconds with just a “My Bad.” There will be less disappointments and no giddiness based on BS spin. Can’t hurt to speak realistically with facts and not spin any facts into a yarn for those in la la land. Because they are fed up too, but too embarrassed to admit it. Maybe it’s peer pressure. Who the hell knows? Could be they fee like the broken clock only they haven’t been right once.
For anyone in LQMT, LQMT’s performances are accomplished by those who operate the company and are responsible for their own results good or bad.
If there is anyone thinking or believing that anyone’s comments factually or by opinion have an influence or agenda to see this stock go lower, with the extremely anemic trading volumes, liquidity and interest, which trade daily, weekly and monthly in the stock, that kind of thinking may qualify for a 911 call or an emergency trip to the nearest neurological emergency room for examination. One would have to be so far gone not to realize those who operate the company are the only ones responsible for its success or failure.
It’s like the opposite of looking for endless theories for success, when you are so pissed off at the company and start doing it for it’s failures, when the facts are staring you in the face and screaming out loud ; Hi there my name is TS, LL, BB, TC ETC., ETC.
The agenda here (at least for me and I'm sure everyone else) is to see LQMT succeed. .Unfortunately the performance results of LQMT is not in sync with that agenda. Just like all hope to see LQMT succeed each year but fail to see it happen. So too does LQMT do the same but fail to realize it. Pointing this out is not bashing. It’s noting the broken record of the company’s performance due to the silence, share price and bottom line.
Without new meaningful contracts they just talk the talk. They cannot walk the walk and they are even further away from walking the talk. The way many see it, I believe. Talk is cheap, but even at that price they can’t afford it. Not with these anemic revenues.
Speaking of contracts. There’s been no update on the MIM order from last summer. Maybe it will be in the 10K, who knows? Could be the outlier. Maybe it’s a huge deal. Who knows? Wouldn’t that be nice. I’d hate to think it is the renewal of the rental agreement or a new one even bigger with another tenant. Better news would be use of a new domestic manufacturing facility to fulfill new orders. One can only dream.
For now, LQMT’s share price is holding in the low pennies. Bouncing around in the low 0.04’s and occasionally dipping to the upper 0.03’s. The trend remains for the share price to head lower again and back to the 0.03’s. A new deal can change that or pause it.
While most stock markets are near their all time highs, LQMT is near its all time lows.of the 0.03’s.
IMO, anyone still stating a potential for LQMT to somehow circumvent the agreements with Apple, by using other agreements with other companies to earn revenues from CE are doing so just to be argumentative As zero CE $$$ has trickled in during the same years of those rumors. It more or less equates to Einstein’s definition of insanity.
Anyone having a realistic understanding of that potential would know that the share prices steady decline makes that point of view moot. For if there were an inkling of truth to the interpretation of the 10k, for potential CE revenues from Apple, don’t you think there would be thousands of new dice rollers buying millions of shares on speculation driving up the share price?
I get the argument. Eontec is supposed to pay LQMT money for an amorphous metal part ordered by Apple, manufactured for sale in LQMT’s footprint.
Even though Apple doesn’t directly contract with LQMT and contracts directly with a company that is obligated to pay LQMT a fee. And the fee is for a part used for CE and this somehow doesn’t violate the LQMT/Apple agreement. Now if true. That would mean a hell of a lot of potential! Right! Not a little, but potentially millions! Right! Then where the hell are the thousands of other dice rollers? No hype no pump no market guru’s screaming opportunity of a lifetime! At this point in time I don’t think any outside shareholder is adverse to seeing the share price hit 0.50 cents or a buck on hype and BS. But it does seem like everyone else who owns no shares, is.
Other than belief in the technology and FOMO and other companies claiming to be earning revenues from various amorphous metal formulas. Are there any other realistic reasons for holding on? Well, another reason as suggested many times is: “We can always dream.” I say this, since no one from the company tells us what is going on regularly through PR’s. Like once or twice a month.
You get the once a year vaccine of spin in March from the End of Year Call, and then silence. Many get giddy and jump for joy and then like a fix, the spin wears off, withdrawal sets in again.
I’m beginning to think the year does end with that End of Year Call! :)
The management team can see the controversy on the boards. They can clear any controversy up in their executive blog. They choose not to.
This might be the only company that is reading posts from around the www to find out how they are doing in place of counting deals being signed. :)
In that respect the score is Bears 24. Bulls 0. However neither side is really winning. :)
Is it any wonder even the bulls like the walking dead, don’t even know what the heck is going on. They have no positive facts and the true facts of results never fit their agendas of hype and misinformation. So they bash others, who state without bias the facts, who also, want to see the company succeed rather than listing the positive facts to promote an intelligent discussion. Could be because there are none. Only hypocritical theories.
After all, how many times have outsiders had to endure the disappointment of others stating: I believe LQMT will hit $1.00 a dollar by the end of this year, year after year? Do they even still do that?
I don’t disagree with the statement or thought of that happening. Just the twisted unproven dots and dashes used to formulate the conclusion for a dollar a share and they know more than anyone else. Heaven forbid you disagree. You get bashed, put down mislabeled and ridiculed for it. I mean, like can’t you see the share price is closer to a penny each year and not a dollar?
I try to present a balanced realistic view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
I would rather see a weekly LQMT blog update on any progress from the company, or a more frequent PR monthly, than to post another week passes post. I’m sure everyone else would agree.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 4th Q’s will tell. 3 down and 1 to go. So far it looks good. Increasing revenues are always good. Significantly increasing revenues are even better.
The downside right now to LQMT’s consecutive successful quarterly growth is, it is dependant on one major customer to achieve it. Does that RING a bell?
Perhaps in 2026 or 2027 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2025, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC & Co., luck.
Follow the silence, not the science. It’s one of LQMT’s greatest achievements.
I expect LQMT to succeed
Almosthere
4日前
Apple rumors.
Eon and Sanxiang are flying , Chinese news artciles are specualting that its APPLE. I've come across a couple of reports in China. Hrres an excerpt from one: "interesting link is Yian Technology. According to rumors, Anno has signed a relevant agreement with Yian Technology, and Yian Technology will be the supplier of liquid metal internal components, key components of the folding iPhone hinge.
Previously, starting from Huawei's first generation of foldable screen mobile phones, Yian Technology has been one of the suppliers of this component. What's more special is that Apple has been cooperating with Yian Technology on a liquid metal project since 10 years ago ."
Monroe1
5日前
Liquidmetal Technologies Sets 2024 Year End Earnings Conference Call for Thursday, March 13th, 2025 at 4:30 p.m. EST
Business Wire
5:15 PM ET Feb-24-2025
LAKE FOREST, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc. , Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc., the world’s leading developer of amorphous alloys and composites, will hold its year-end earnings conference call on Thursday, March 13th, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. Liquidmetal Technologies (LQMT.NaE) CEO Tony Chung will host the call.
Please Dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below:
Date: Thursday, March 13th, 2025
Time: 4:30 p.m. Eastern time (1:30 p.m. Pacific time)
To join the conference call, participants should complete an online registration form before 11:59 p.m. EST, Wednesday, March 12th, at the following link, whereupon dial-in information and a unique PIN will be provided:
https://register.vevent.com/register/BI533cdbb0bc0643098c894d790a61a4ed
The conference call will also be accessible by live webcast at the following link:
https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/7bxnhfds
A replay of the call will be available after 3:30 p.m. Pacific time on the same day through 3:30 p.m. March 20th, 2025.
iateclube
6日前
Monday. Hi tech. AI & Quantum Computing stocks all over the place, what is going on? They are shredding the defense dept budget, on and on. But who will rewarded? Who voted? WHO CONTRIBUTED to the PACS, yada yada all day. Through all of this turmoil across the board, LQMT remains flatlined. No sign of life from Valencia Circle. Surely one of the usual suspects will come out with the silver lining: "Not to worry, we have a very stable stock here"! My view has been consistent all along. This company is dead in the water until/unless somebody in China decides to energize it into a profit center, or sell it in which case it will likely die. I see squat liklihood of us the outsiders, ever seeing more than 16 cents, if that. But hay, that would be a triple. And only one person would draw that line.
RSuave25020
1週前
Why would a Chinese CEO keep a company around for 9 years as an empty shell when he obtained its patents in 2016 and took them to China. What would be the benefit of the shell game? Is it to make sure the patents extend beyond 7 years ?
ChatGPT
Keeping a company as an empty shell for nine years after transferring its patents to China could serve multiple strategic purposes. Here are a few possibilities:Avoiding Scrutiny & Legal Challenges – Keeping the company active may help avoid drawing attention to the fact that its intellectual property (IP) was transferred. If the company were shut down immediately, it could trigger legal or regulatory scrutiny, especially if the patents were taken to a jurisdiction with different enforcement standards.Patent Lifespan & Litigation Shielding – While patents typically last 20 years, certain jurisdictions and agreements may have restrictions on how they are enforced or transferred. Maintaining the shell company might help keep claims of ownership or licensing rights intact for a longer period. If legal challenges arise, the shell could serve as a buffer, shielding the real beneficiaries of the IP.Maintaining Business Relationships & Market Presence – Even as a shell, the company might still hold contracts, trademarks, or market recognition that could be leveraged later, either for licensing deals, attracting investors, or selling the entity itself.Financial & Tax Advantages – A shell company can still serve financial purposes, such as moving money, claiming losses for tax benefits, or being used in offshore arrangements. It might also be useful for obscuring cash flows or holding assets in ways that benefit the CEO.Regulatory & Trade Strategy – Some countries impose restrictions on direct IP transfers, but an ongoing U.S. entity might be useful for licensing arrangements that allow continued access to U.S. markets without raising immediate red flags.If the patents were obtained in 2016, a seven-year threshold (2023) might be relevant if there were contractual, licensing, or regulatory clauses that expire or become harder to contest after that period. Would you happen to know if the company retained any licensing agreements or ongoing litigation risks? That could give more clues.
iateclube
1週前
Every time BMG comes up anywhere, anytime, by anybody, there is a rash of expectation that Valencia Circle is about to prosper. That has been the mantra since 2016, 2010, and long before. The result? 4 cents. Now come the tales of our once fateful partner Materion, getting together with the dark side (Visser) to make hay. Would make perfect sense, since LL et.alia have done nothing to energy the company and create a dynamic business. They already have the IP and the brand to grow their business in the homeland. Somebody else will have to figure out how to do that here.