Fannie Mae (QB) (FNMAT)

Tightcoil - This Bill is another DC Nightmare

This is the last thing we need is more regulations piled on Top of the ones that already exist.

This conservatorship needs unwound and the people in charge are a bunch of ( Yes Men ) to weak to start the process. Ofcourse all of it could be unwound in one day instead of 17 years.

The release should have already started in Nov 25.They admin Lied ( One More Time ).

Long and Strong Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

You've always been annoying. No one is keeping you here.

Oh now he’s tweeting for his own benefit so not worth sharing but if he’s tweeting lies that sounds good for us then share even though they are lies?

Thurm, the guy has been spreading lies on X intentionally and has zero credibility .

We all know if it doesn't happen before midterms it's over as Trump is getting impeached after the Dems take back control.

I pay attention and Bessent has done everything except say in simple term, this isn't happening. When and if it does, it will be because Trump forces it. Didn't Trump say "no hurry" recently?

When did Scott Bessent say that?  Unless SB refers to someone else

SB even said any minute the announcement would come out during one weekend. What a jerk !

True that.

Pulte has open dinner invitations, though AND a serious mini-me going on with papa Trump.

So both of their opinions are worthless. Noted. 😂

Well, so did Pulte, so that opinion was valid.

Thurm. He's the guy that said release was imminent in January. LOL.

What's a Thurm?

You mean like re-posting GB, Holden from X? Feel like there are only a few bashers on X and the only re-tweets are Pulte saying they are golden companies and the posts that have the Great American cos... Fannie & Freddie. Those are reality and not opinions (like here).

APB on Glen Batford
Help Us - what latest on restructuring?

Too bad Lisa Cook..........

....... doesn't work for a TBTF bank, then she'd have nothing to worry about

Anemic volume today. No doubt the MM will screw with us later.

From Inside Mortgage Finance - Just Now!
(But first) - AEye backwards is EyeA = Intelligent Adversaries

House Bill a First Step to Releasing GSEs
dhollier@imfpubs.com
Draft legislation released last week by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-WI, if passed, would set the stage for releasing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from conservatorship.
Proponents for releasing the two mortgage giants from government control have long argued that reforms enacted by the Federal Housing Finance Agency over the past 18 years have largely resolved the safety and soundness issues that landed Fannie and Freddie in trouble in the first place. The problem is that many of those reforms are administrative rules that won’t have the force of law once the conservatorships end.
Fitzgerald’s bill would remedy that oversight. For example, FHFA under former Director Mark Calabria established the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework, which dictates the minimum capital requirements for the enterprises. This bill would codify those strict standards, ensuring they can’t be unilaterally lowered by future administrations.
Similarly, Fitzgerald’s legislation would formalize the GSEs’ credit risk transfer programs, creating a statutory requirement for these risk-sharing operations. The bill would also enshrine in law the strict portfolio caps that were originally established through the preferred stock purchase agreements between FHFA and Treasury.
Fitzgerald’s bill also includes an important change in how the conforming loan limits are calculated. Currently, increases in the limits are based on increases in area median income, a method some critics say is inflationary. The new law would permit the use of FHFA’s housing price index if that is lower.

He is tweeting for the price to be lower so that he can buy more (his words). So what's there to share 

How about @FHFA 's $301 billion fraud against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Look in the mirror before accusing others.

FREE FANNIE!
FREE FREDDIE!
MAGA!@POTUS @DNIPulte @SecScottBessent @SecretaryTurner @howardlutnick @RepMeuser @RepYoungKim @BillAckman @michaeljburry https://t.co/9IKWGwjnF9— Guido da Costa Pereira (@GuidoPerei) June 29, 2026

You do it for us, lol.

Folks on this board only retweet good stuff but not bad stuff.

Thurm tweeted that “no rush” means take your kids to the beach in the summer and wait for target price of $5-$5.89 to buy.

How come nobody retweets that?

A few days ago, I posted attached.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177736896

Since then, others have been more eloquent:

$FNMA $FMCC

It cannot be emphasized enough. This bill from @RepFitzgerald is complete trash.@EphraimH1980 hit the nail on the head.

When Broeksmit (Feb 11) said "guard rails", he may as well have said "shackles".

These guys are terrified of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac being… https://t.co/AR1RBxWYBV— Horseman Country (@HorsemanCountry) June 28, 2026

@HorsemanCountry thanks for sending me this clip. This testimony makes it crystal clear why the MBA is terrified by a free and unencumbered $FNMA and $FMCC. I gave a handful of reasons but he literally vocalized when I said below that the MBA is looking for:

Protection from… https://t.co/UMvQi6xbGm pic.twitter.com/fZsMOYcOwE— Ephraim Hirschfeld (@EphraimH1980) June 28, 2026

I don't want to be negative, but it's always helpful to understand people's motivation.

On February 11, 2026, during a House Financial Services Committee hearing entitled "Homeownership and the Role of the Secondary Mortgage Market," Rep Fitzgerald had a chummy back and forth… https://t.co/tKxSfVRzT6— Ephraim Hirschfeld (@EphraimH1980) June 26, 2026

How does this bill affect fannie Mae and Freddie mac?

@RepFitzgerald 's bills indicate he's a damn COMMIE! Despite our government already looting $301 billion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac equity, he proposes more.@POTUS @pulte @SecScottBessent @SecretaryTurner @howardlutnick @RepMeuser @kim @BillAckman @michaeljburry https://t.co/VeihaWtXRE— Guido da Costa Pereira (@GuidoPerei) June 29, 2026

I do not think anyone takes it to the Supreme Court.

All bets are off, if in the meantime, SPS is converted - then we (all F2, even common) would have a new case or just do with the facts here. Meaning the true loss was great.

The Conservatorship IS
a MASSIVE TAKINGS, under
the 5th Amendment, Takings Clause
--------> M-A-S-S-I-V-E <-------

UPLIST NOW - UPLIST TODAY

I agree, and have been saying for years that the terms of the CONservatorship is a massive Takings crime. No one in this country could write themselves the terms that are in the CONservatorship, terms that change at the whim of those that are in control of this scam. A loan that can never be repaid, nationalizing the companies, seizing 95+% ownership through the SPS and warrants, and seizing the profits.

Hold the line! The thing that I always go back to is that for the Government to make anything, the share price has to go up tremendously. In that case our share price will go up along with it. We are both needing a higher price per share to maximize this investment! GLTA!

Fannie Mae - All The Way - Freddie Mac - Load Up and Don't Look Back
Remember:Again- Will you be quick enough to grab some of these shares once one or more current "announcements in the making," are made? Will you be quicker than the big gun buying stampede when even one announcement is made?

I am not too interested in this case that primarily benefits the JPS and Freddie commons. A parallel case along the same lines should be instituted by the fnma common shareholders. It’s not clear why Ackman did not file a lawsuit. In theory “takings” has a wider ramification and it is unconstitutional for the USG to profit unreasonably from a public company. Given the level of self-dealing with HERA, Ackman probably has taken a compromise deal by agreeing to 80% dilution which might be the best bipartisan deal that will guarantee win-win for all. 

Johnson to send housing bill to Trump on Monday - https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/johnson-send-housing-bill-trump-183420743.html

This is a good post. Likely could be some of the reason for the on again off again we have seen. Perhaps they figured it would resolve quicker?  Doubt they can influence any decision without raising flags. The governments lawyer didn’t seem like he was really trying. Maybe they are waiting on th ruling and ramp activity up when there is a chance of resolution?  

Ok, $wipe + virtual initial "bailout" =$470...so when Trump-Bessent talk about monetizing $30b is that $30b + $470b?

301B false loan that could never pay back
All the rest is the additional "liquidation preference"

All mine! Says the USA

And many believe it, most... so here we are.

It's Ickman's number - Ick!

Where did $470b come from?

You are not your Own.
This IHub messageboard
owns you - We Own You.
Comprendo?

Here is my analysis:

The multi-billion-dollar legal battle involving Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) shareholders centers around the government's controversial 2012 "Net Worth Sweep". After a landmark $812 million final judgment (the original $612.4 million jury verdict plus pre-judgment interest) was secured by shareholders in March 2024 and upheld by the district court in March 2025, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) launched an appeal. Oral arguments were heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

If the appellate court denies the government’s appeal and upholds the jury's finding that the government breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a legal settlement or payout mechanism would likely proceed through a highly specific federal process.

1. Post-Appeal Pressures on the Government
If the D.C. Circuit denies the government's appeal, the FHFA and the U.S. Treasury lose their primary shield.
• Escalating Interest Fees: Simple interest continues to accumulate daily on the $812 million judgment. Every week the government delays payment, the taxpayer liability increases.
• The Supreme Court Hurdle: The government's only remaining legal avenue would be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. However, because the Supreme Court already ruled on the statutory scope of the Net Worth Sweep in Collins v. Yellen (2021), it is highly unlikely they would agree to hear a secondary case focused strictly on state-level contract law and implied covenants.
• Political Capital and Market Stability: Keeping Fannie and Freddie trapped in endless litigation conflicts with broader administrative goals of stabilizing the housing market or orchestrating a final conservatorship exit.

2. Formulating the Settlement and Payout Mechanism
Because this is a certified federal class action lawsuit involving government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), the settlement cannot happen via a simple handshake. It follows a rigid sequence:
• Financing Payout: The actual funds to pay the $812+ million judgment will not come directly out of the federal budget. Instead, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac corporate accounts (or the FHFA acting as conservators) will be mandated to pay out the damages to the class action fund administered by the plaintiffs’ lead counsel.
• The Compromise (The "Haircut"): If the government agrees to drop further appeals to the Supreme Court, they may negotiate a slight reduction in the total accrued interest in exchange for immediate, guaranteed payment to the shareholders.
• Class Action Allocation Plan: The plaintiffs' law firms—including Boies Schiller Flexner and Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check—will submit a formal "Plan of Allocation" to the district court. This plan dictates exactly how many cents per share will be distributed to holders of:
1. Fannie Mae junior preferred stock
2. Freddie Mac junior preferred stock
3. Freddie Mac common stock

3. Finalizing the Agreement
• Rule 23 Court Approval: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, any class action settlement must be officially approved by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth. The court will hold a Fairness Hearing where shareholders can voice objections to the payout terms or attorney fees.
• Release of Future Claims: In exchange for the $812+ million distribution, the final settlement text will feature an airtight clause releasing the FHFA, Treasury, FNMA, and FMCC from any future breach-of-contract claims related to the 2012 Net Worth Sweep.
• The Path to Conservatorship Exit: Resolving this massive legal liability is widely considered a mandatory prerequisite before the government can formally release FNMA and FMCC from conservatorship and allow them to fully return to the private capital markets.

So we're watching the 30th, the 4th, the 9th. Maybe a day within the next week from Burry. Let's just say we're watching everyday for something good because honestly that what I'm doing.

Like a relentless weed all unhinged poster can offer is speculation and conjecture that add up to huge financial risk for unsuspecting investor. When you have something substantial let us know. I won’t hold my (FNMA) breath.

July 9 is a date to watch as well. That's he day the housing bill becomes law is Trump ignores it. If he vetoes it, the House and Senate EASILY have the votes to overturn it so he won't veto it as that would be such a black eye to have a veto overturned. Interesting time.

I bet it's gonna be Jaw-Droppin'
Best to Load Up before she's
finished with her analysis - because we
all know what it's gonna say...
Fannie and Freddie are the most profitable,
stable, regulation compliant, American companies, ever, in History - Load Up before the analysis is released

I am working on part 3 of my analysis of Fannie and Freddie right now. Hopefully this week— Cassandra Unchained (@michaeljburry) June 28, 2026

The jury that voted in our favor 3 or 4 years ago  with 8-0 verdict and for which we waited 1 year for Lamberth to write a ruling and the appeal that we are still waiting on?  Okay

No Rush- But court ruling forced to rush

Stocktwits
Bill Ackman Reportedly Urges Washington To Retire $470B Claim On Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
9 hours ago
By Jaiveer Shekhawat