docsetc
4日前
It takes the lowest of fools to make claims they can't even begin to prove. You and Chandra wear the same line of women's panties?
The only list I'm making is the known list of Chandra pimps, because it will be a portion of our lawsuit, defamation has a lot of involvement where Chandra's operations are considered. And since you talk just like them, especially the last 4 lines that are Chandra's talking points in this last uggh, 'post' of yours, I'm not the only one making this list either, and, if Chandra bothers to check in with CC on what can get him nailed in a court of law, you'd hear about some seriously internal dissension pretty quickly.
You like to talk tough and run away for a while. I'm right here, face to face is no issue kid. Go tell Fat-Daddy we're about ready to engage, and he already knows, there's no such thing as a 'penny-ante' class action lawsuit. Any educated person knows that.
My list, we only list the articles of evidence moron, and we turn it over to the attorneys.
Your opinion is mindless, and if you had any credibility as an investor, you would not still be on a stock-ticker page of an empty shell company. I see Trading-Gee(whiz) is loving your posts here, and he 'says' he was all anti ENZC. Apparently, he loves Chandra as much as you do.
Scurry on back to Fat-Daddy now, get more instructions for what is to come.
docsetc
4日前
Soy boys,,,, lol.....
Remember, Chandra and his pumper pimps are all over this board, that we have proof of also for how he's been operating when we go to court. Chubby has no idea what is going to happen to him, even in the first hearing. They're also all over the ENZC Google pages, Discord, Twitter/X, Pacer and one other I am forgetting right now. Chandra must be making big promises to keep his pumpers lying their arses off.
GLTA
docsetc
4日前
Hey Doc-H,
No, not at all, you can buy whatever you want, I'd never say that to anyone. What I said was, the shares, if bought after 5/1/2024 or before 2019, could not be counted as your share total in the lawsuit, as a member plaintiff in the class action lawsuit.
So, any shares you had from 2019 to 5/1/2024 count as your bulk load of shares giving you standing as plaintiff in our lawsuit. And a Judge in court, could conceivably reduce that to 4/1/2024 as well. Reasons for this are threefold:
1) CCC left Enzolytics as far as any shareholders know by notice, at the end of March, 2024. And Dr. Chandra began calling investors directly about it in mid-May of 2024. Zhabilov began making more ownership changes and false statements in very late April of 2024 as well. So, the liability falls in that time period, as do share counts of valid involvement in being defrauded as an ENZC shareholder.
2) Any shares bought after 5/1/2024 can't count as a liability in a case of fraud since it was purchased after both public awareness of the situation had crested openly, and the CCC group was no longer there to be part of any current fraud of the time after their departure. Even though CCC Group left at the end of March officially, it was actually earlier I found out back in April, they made no public announcements until late April themselves, about the IP's being moved to their 2 new shell companies. So, the 1st of May was selected as their closeout time of ENZC fraud participation. A judge could actually reduce that time period by 1-2 months or carry it open indefinitely since contradicting promises and inferences were made by the 4 principles combined. You take what we have on Chandra's big mouth alone, and the Judge might get really mad and increase their liability in terms of time period allowed.
3) If some sort of proportional penalty based upon plaintiff counts and their respective share counts is leveled at the CCC group, buying shares after that time would be considered invalid claims against Adnexus principals long after they were gone from ENZC, with full public knowledge. A court would not allow those shares bought after CCC was gone from ENZC, to be unfairly penalized against Adnexus principals simply because the cost and effect would no longer be actual.
First known fraudulent statements only run back to 2019, best we can find thus far, if anyone knows better, tell us and we'll amend the upcoming case filing.
So, say you had 600,000 shares of ENZC, but 100,000 shares were bought on say, 6/10/2024, you could only claim a 500,000 shares damage being a plaintiff in the lawsuit. That's why the attorneys will be having us collect brokerage reports for all plaintiffs, because we have to prove the share counts and dollar amounts the plaintiffs were defrauded by. Their various forms of perpetrated fraud, and there are about 5 main ones, 2 biggies, with more that could be named later, all account for the damages to your share's former value and dollars invested in such.
So, any shares you had in ENZC, from 2019 - 5/1/2024, (possibly 4/1/2024, judge's discretion there) can count as your standing in the lawsuit. Anything after 5/1/2024 will most certainly not count. The new website states that clearly on the webpage too.
Hope that explains it all.
GLTA
docsetc
4日前
I would not tell a Chandra-pimp in either case idiot. Too bad you'll find out in the coming weeks anyway.
And, I would not have spent a dime on this if it were a fraud's effort, you moron. (and, I have spent quite a bit of my own money too, our group has also chipped in kindly, and we've turned down $$$-assistance from kind folks here on IHub who want in.) Legal fee donations might come into play later, but we have serious points to still resolve over the next 2 weeks first.
Please don't bother to sign up for the new website once it goes live. Scum need not apply.
GLTA (almost all anyway)
Lil' stubbie, go back and pump Adnexus, not interested in your deceitful opinion.
Timing101
5日前
Just for all. MY posts on any Symbol have links for ANYONE to do the DD and then go from there. I look for changes, disclosures, updates, trends etc and then post that for all to look at and go from there. Take a look at the links and make your own decision and if one as I always say see any FACTS (not IMO's) then post back a LINK so it can be VALIDATED. IMO Opinions are NOT FACTS and rarely if EVER have links , so if they do will look at it as long as it is NOT to another IMO poster.
--
Jeremy F has been in OTC Land for a long, long time with CRTD which should tell anyone to look further.
--
However I have been pretty clear with the Fraudulent Four/Five listed in the SEC Complaints, How Harry used Dannie as a shield, anything Bulgaria Scams and so forth . Lets See here
Its_TradingG
5日前
Hilarious LOL, I've been laughing since he posted the site. "Thanks docsetc for your hard work" Hahahaha
1. No law firm mentioned anywhere on the site. BEWARE, screams SCAM.
2. His personal business and contact information in the "Contact Us" section, when it should be the law firm, DOH!! All donations will go to his business
3. Half the website in a foreign language, come on! This is what you’ve been working MONTHS on? OK
docsetc
5日前
An ENZC R/S is just a nastier time in the trips. I don't even care about that anymore, and this Frommer guy, who most analysts and commentators think is a giant fraud himself, runs an online media company who's stock PPS still respectable, but his shareholders are pissed at his company, Created's, own stock dilution.
He paints himself as a good guy working the OTC, but his results are otherwise.
He can make love with Zhabilov all he wants, Sharabura flew the coop, making him the smarter of the two.
GLTA
docsetc
5日前
We'll be finding out before long as to why and how CCC escaped, at the very least, heavy witness duty in the SEC case. I know for a fact, several other 3rd parties contacting us from the Twitter/X side have made claims to be speaking with the SEC and turning in notes and statements made by CCC during all of 2022-2024. The lady's reply from the SEC has been a solid 'No Comment' watch for new case filings for developments.
The SEC has not even touched Zhabilov on some of the fraud charges we're levelling at CCC, so I expect a reaction from them in about 15-30 days as the lawsuit coming for them becomes more of a public-knowledge media byte soon. That $92 million aimed at Harry's head only touches fraud charges where financial malfeasance and illegal stock sales are involved. We're aiming some of that, and a lot more at CCC.
So, in a nutshell, the SEC has confirmed they know that CCC is not named and is significant, but won't give us a clue as to why or when any charges get leveled at them (or if they were the ones who really turned in Harry and were granted some form of limited immunity.)
However, even if CCC has some form of immunity on Harry's mess, the charges we've levelled at them are not the same charges, and not accessible by any immunity claim they might have with Harry's mess now.
GLTA
docsetc
5日前
Thanks, development link up today. You'll see it constantly updating for a few days as it transitions to the live website. Right now,, a lot of depressing boiler-plate text is still showing on the dev-site, so don't let it discourage anyone.
The final content is in, and the pages will be updating a large chunk at a time. As the website goes full active and live, you'll be able to sign up for the case participation and upload any evidence you want to add. MS Word documents, saved as PDF files, for your explanations of the evidence, and descriptions of it, are strongly encouraged to accompany any screenshots, other graphics, video and audio files.
The repository page will be where you'll be able to upload all evidence files and descriptions/notes. Only you, the system admins, and the attorney's will be able to review your files and see them once uploaded. (So, no Hacks or Chandra pimps will be able to pollute this process or damage the site.) There will be a case sign-up form that will launch from the homepage from the 'get started' button you'll see there in red.
If you're on a business network or VPN trying to see this, you could be blocked by network security, as this dev-site does not use a full website suffix for viewing. (Development sites never do.) I'll get a screenshot posted for those who can't see it right away. Full website live to everyone in a few days.
I know waiting for this has been a pain, but thanks for tagging along with it.
GLTA
docsetc
6日前
Okay guys, the development link is available. This website preview is not fully active, and we still have a lot of nonsensical boilerplate text (content) on it. Over the next 3 days, the final legal edits will be replacing what you see here now. Right now, this will give you a decent look at the home page and the 'about us' page. We had to remove a lot of stuff we had up and ready, due to the attorney's concerns about not tipping off the defendants. This is just a crude preview. The real active site will be up to everyone in a few days. Demo link is:
https://shyamfuture.in/superior-intellect/dev
Final active site link will be:
https://superiorintellect.net
Jack Torrance
1週前
Doesn't matter. ENZC has no I.P.s left except for their shit-ass ITV-1, which they couldn't even give away to certain African countries, and despite assurances it will be in European clinical trials for years, nothing happens. ENZC is dunzo. Clone 3 was the valuable I.P., and CCC took that when they skipped out, after assuring ENZC shareholders for years that it was part of the package. Scammed on all fronts.
I-Glow
1週前
No one trusts your pumping BS.
Out of your 2504 posts - 2080 have been on the ENZC scam.
"Deportes
Tuesday, 07/20/2021
If you’re not seeing ENZC as a great investment, sell and move on. It’s OK."
Great call - how much did you lose on the great investment?
Here you are riding docsetc's leg again.
"Deportes
Thursday, 10/31/2024
Thanks docsetc for continuing to give us relevant information regarding the lawsuit if it comes to that. Appreciate your effort!"
docsetc is a bottom feeding pumper who caused many people to lose their investment.
This one is hilarious!
"Deportes
Thursday, 05/09/2024
Thanks docsetc, you are the one keeping us informed with facts not regurgitating BS"
docsetc has yet to provide any useful/truthful information about the ENZC scam.
"docsetc
Thursday, 11/14/2024
Nothing's changed, the URL will be https://superiorintellect.com
Just spoke with the group and one of the law firms yesterday (2 firms have been consulting us), and they've advised we go with the class-action legal text and format for the lawsuit, so we're finally executing final launch development. I know this has been delayed, thanks in advance for your patience, but the lawyers finally settled on the Class Action format, even if they decide to try the case in a different manner."
Odd that docsetc doesn't name the law firms and oh he is working so hard so be certain to donate money to a Class Action lawsuit.
The URL is still dead and the post was from November 14, 2024.
A Law Firm doing a Class Action lawsuit wouldn't ask a shareholder to build a website and ask a shareholder to - "they've advised we go with the class-action legal text and format for the lawsuit, so we're finally executing final launch development." So Docsetc to write a Motion to Certify the Class.
No one could possibly believe this nonsense.
IG
I-Glow
1週前
I don't believe that you understand the problems with a class action lawsuit.
Here are the steps for a Class Action lawsuit.
File a complaint:
The plaintiff(s) file a lawsuit against the defendant, outlining the alleged wrongdoing and the basis for the class action.
Motion for class certification:
The plaintiff must convince the court to certify the class, meaning the group of people affected by the alleged harm is large enough and shares common legal issues to be represented in a single lawsuit.
Class definition:
The court will define the parameters of the class, determining who is eligible to be part of the lawsuit.
Notice to class members:
Once the class is certified, all potential class members must be notified about the lawsuit, including their right to opt-out.
Discovery:
Both sides gather evidence and information through depositions, document requests, and interrogatories.
Settlement negotiations:
Often, the parties attempt to reach a settlement agreement before going to trial.
Court approval of settlement:
If a settlement is reached, the court must review and approve it to ensure fairness to all class members.
Trial (if necessary):
If no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to trial where the court will hear evidence and arguments from both sides.
Attorney fees: If the lawsuit is successful, the plaintiff's attorney will typically receive a percentage of the settlement amount as fees.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) outlines the prerequisites for a class action lawsuit, meaning that a group of individuals can sue or be sued as a collective unit, requiring that the class be numerous, share common questions of law or fact, have representative parties with typical claims, and that the representatives adequately protect the interests of the entire class.
Getting a Judge to Certify the lawsuit as class action is difficult.
Key points about class action certification:
Burden on the plaintiff:
The plaintiff must prove that the class meets all the necessary requirements to be certified.
Rigorous analysis:
Courts perform a thorough examination of the facts to ensure the class meets the certification standards.
Class certification hearing:
A hearing is typically held where both parties present arguments regarding whether the class should be certified.
"Numerosity" requirement:
To qualify as a class action, the group must be "numerous" enough that joining all members individually would be impractical.
The docsetc BS about a class action lawsuit is vert misleading - first the law firm would be responsible for a website to solicit clients - the the docsetc excuses about the website are ridiculous as the law firm is responsible for all cost. They are pay between 33% and 40% plus costs.
But ENZC doesn't have anything of value to attach.
Caveat Emptor about sending docsetc any funds to participate in a lawsuit - why hasn't he named the Law Firm(s) involved so that shareholders can contact them?
IG