pumper_stumper
1月前
So Dannie and Dianna are different people? I assumed one was a nickname for the same person.
Harry's removal was published on 4/18 in an update to the financials:
Without admitting or denying guilt, Harry Zhabilov agreed to a settlement with the SEC
that prohibits him from acting as an officer/director of a public OTC alternative reporting
for five years Mr. Zhabilov has stepped down from all officer and director positions with
the company and will serve as the Chief Consulting Scientist.
For sure the agreement was not signed off by the judge by then, and still wasn't, as of Friday.
Why would the other Zhabilov have SEC agreements to not serve as an Exec, if she never has had that position????
And PS... as "Chief Consulting Scientist" he'll probably do what a lot of these type do... still call the shots with a puppet CEO at the helm. So, not much has changed!
pumper_stumper
1月前
Entertainment from the accessory Zhabilov defendant's legal team!
To rehash, while Zhabilov and the SEC has agreed to a settlement, awaiting the Judge sign off, the other defendants are slimly trying everything they can to avoid a settlement, and so far are headed to trial. When they missed a deadline to respond to a filing, this is what the defense team filed. VERY entertaining and fitting, because this is analogous to a OTC company's excuses to investors, etc.
At approximately 19:45 CET on Friday, April 25, 2026— corresponding to
approximately 13:45 Eastern Time — a localized power outage affecting the building from which I was working caused a complete loss of electrical service and internet connectivity. The interruption rendered it impossible to access the workstation containing the final Answer or to log into the Court’s CM/ECF system. The cause of the outage was external to the undersigned and beyond the undersigned’s control, as it was the result of water damage to an electrical closet adjacent to the leak. The damage to the electrical was beyond my ability to quickly repair.
4. The undersigned undertook reasonable efforts to mitigate the effect of the outage and complete the filing before the Filing Deadline, but due to the fact that the workstation containing the final answer was disabled, no such efforts succeeded in restoring the capacity to file before the Filing Deadline. There was no other attorney, paralegal, or staff member at the firm available to complete the filing on Defendant’s behalf.
First, how good of a defense attorney is this, if he thinks April 25th is on a Friday? My version is the defense attorney had an toilet that overflowed, and this entire run on detailed list of excuses is due to him not having a plunger! Perhaps they all can debate this in court!
As I always say, following these scams is more entertaining than anything on TV or movies!
But as far as the drama in the excuses......get out the violins!
pumper_stumper
1月前
TJ PLEASE! You have so much to learn.
You really don't know that many OTC scams and other shady companies, use services that involve a mail box in a business office, along with several other companies, without actually having a presence there?
How about this. Think I am wrong? Spend the $ and time and go visit it yourself!
It sounds mean but it's the truth. You don't have the skills to invest. Any attempts, like with ENZC, will result in losses. That's the most helpful thing you will be told on this board!
pumper_stumper
1月前
Well it's a drug company, not a freakin defense company working on top secret projects. This just in, significant progress in drug development companies (public or private) involves public approvals, even to test, from the FDA or other similar agencies. SHOW ME ONE DAMN FILING OF ONE PIECE OF PROGRESS IN ANY OF THE "TECHNOLGIES" that you believe where stolen from you in the last TWO YEARS.
Drug research involves publish science (I have no doubts you have no idea of what I am referring to here)! Show me ANY PUBLISHED SCIENCE in the last 2 years from an entity having your "stolen technology"!!!
Your response will be typical... either no response, or changing the topic!
I will make a point to post this every year for an update from you, and then ask how many more years will it take you to figure this out!
TJ24
1月前
"Shareholders here on this forum are not brave enough to sue these crooked criminals. People on this forum are all talks, and no action"
I think that, to sue the Cotropias and Chandra successfully, the plaintiffs have to show damages. If the Cotropias and Chandra succeed with these technologies and make lots of money, then perhaps the plaintiffs can show that the plaintiffs lost money when these successful technologies were removed from ENZC.
Unfortunately, Adnexus is a private company, and their current activities are very secretive. I have absolutely no idea of what they are currently doing with these technologies.