ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
100,787
|
|
$
|
136,444
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
41,407
|
|
|
43,721
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
18,404
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14,881
|
|
|
14,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
189,759
|
|
|
223,478
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
53,077
|
|
|
57,877
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,582
|
|
|
452,042
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
191,522
|
|
|
216,437
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
13,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
856,928
|
|
$
|
963,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
54,855
|
|
$
|
80,543
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
49,561
|
|
|
45,253
|
|
Member redemption liability
|
|
|
14,781
|
|
|
18,033
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
45,817
|
|
|
47,556
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
165,014
|
|
|
202,241
|
|
Member redemption liability
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Long-term debt, net of discounts
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
233,144
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net
|
|
|
24,025
|
|
|
31,896
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
9,295
|
|
|
14,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
426,641
|
|
|
488,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
501,115
|
|
|
500,769
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(23,983
|
)
|
|
(28,133
|
)
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(46,854
|
)
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
430,287
|
|
|
475,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
856,928
|
|
$
|
963,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
90,249
|
|
$
|
87,544
|
|
$
|
376,202
|
|
$
|
363,956
|
|
Services
|
|
|
84,464
|
|
|
90,207
|
|
|
267,644
|
|
|
287,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
174,713
|
|
|
177,751
|
|
|
643,846
|
|
|
651,900
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenuesproducts
|
|
|
69,809
|
|
|
67,892
|
|
|
289,317
|
|
|
279,726
|
|
Cost of revenuesservices
|
|
|
19,581
|
|
|
21,483
|
|
|
63,738
|
|
|
66,192
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
34,224
|
|
|
37,012
|
|
|
121,730
|
|
|
130,571
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
11,859
|
|
|
36,406
|
|
|
35,363
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
24,091
|
|
|
24,663
|
|
|
74,486
|
|
|
72,199
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
22,586
|
|
|
22,659
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
(5,124
|
)
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
14
|
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
216,765
|
|
|
169,335
|
|
|
655,863
|
|
|
605,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(42,052
|
)
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
(12,017
|
)
|
|
46,563
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
962
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,067
|
)
|
|
(3,260
|
)
|
|
(10,450
|
)
|
|
(10,301
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
550
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(45,917
|
)
|
|
5,664
|
|
|
(21,298
|
)
|
|
37,992
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
12,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,232
|
)
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
$
|
(30,861
|
)
|
$
|
25,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(47,611
|
)
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
$
|
(31,876
|
)
|
$
|
24,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to calculate basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,764
|
|
|
90,657
|
|
|
92,247
|
|
|
90,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,764
|
|
|
90,735
|
|
|
92,247
|
|
|
90,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid per common share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,232
|
)
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
$
|
(30,861
|
)
|
$
|
25,480
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in net gains (losses) on derivatives, net of tax of $(197) and $(13) for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and $98 and
$(480) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
146
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Derivative settlement losses reclassified into earnings, net of tax of $(54) and $(40) for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and $(94)
and $(68) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
112
|
|
Other hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in net gains (losses) on derivatives, net of tax of $(24) and $(58) for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and $39 and $(74) for
the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
62
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
16,147
|
|
|
5,754
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
7,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
15,897
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
6,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(31,335
|
)
|
$
|
11,166
|
|
$
|
(26,711
|
)
|
$
|
32,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
|
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
91,092
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
500,769
|
|
$
|
(28,133
|
)
|
$
|
2,441
|
|
$
|
475,086
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock units
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,357
|
)
|
Dividends and dividend equivalents paid on shares outstanding and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(18,434
|
)
|
|
(28,773
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
Tax benefits from equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,861
|
)
|
|
(30,861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2013
|
|
|
92,919
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
501,115
|
|
$
|
(23,983
|
)
|
$
|
(46,854
|
)
|
$
|
430,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(30,861
|
)
|
$
|
25,480
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,069
|
|
|
43,376
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
9,917
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
|
(5,124
|
)
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of discounts and amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
822
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes, net
|
|
|
(14,362
|
)
|
|
(2,220
|
)
|
Tax benefits (shortfalls) from equity awards
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from equity awards
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
(4,078
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
5,190
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(17,888
|
)
|
|
(22,810
|
)
|
Member redemption liability
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
(6,738
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
(5,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
39,772
|
|
|
43,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(14,244
|
)
|
|
(13,218
|
)
|
Purchases of rights, content and intellectual property
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,355
|
)
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(15,094
|
)
|
|
(25,951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on term loan
|
|
|
(246,013
|
)
|
|
(17,663
|
)
|
Payments for debt issue costs
|
|
|
(2,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
5
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(3,357
|
)
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
Dividends and dividend equivalents paid on outstanding shares and restricted stock units
|
|
|
(28,773
|
)
|
|
(28,087
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from equity awards
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
14
|
|
Cash paid for contingent consideration
|
|
|
(3,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(59,762
|
)
|
|
(46,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
732
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(35,657
|
)
|
|
(27,965
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
136,444
|
|
|
136,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
100,787
|
|
$
|
108,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Description of Business
United Online, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, "United Online" or the "Company"), through its operating subsidiaries, is a
leading provider of consumer products and services over the Internet under a number of brands, including FTD, Interflora, Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct, Drake Algar, Classmates, StayFriends, Trombi,
MyPoints, NetZero, and Juno. The Company reports its business in three reportable segments: FTD, Content & Media and Communications. The Company's FTD segment provides floral, gift and related
products and services to consumers and retail florists, as well as to other retail locations offering floral, gift and related products and services. The Company's Content & Media segment
provides online nostalgia products and services and an online loyalty marketing service. The Company's primary Communications service is Internet access. On a combined basis, the Company's web
properties attract a significant number of Internet users and the Company offers a broad array of Internet marketing services for advertisers.
On
August 1, 2012, United Online, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors had approved a preliminary plan to separate the Company into two independent, publicly-traded
companies: FTD
Companies, Inc., which will consist of the domestic and international operations of the Company's FTD segment, and United Online, Inc., which will consist of the businesses of the
Company's Content & Media and Communications segments (the "FTD Spin-Off Transaction"). In September 2013, the Company received a private letter ruling from the United States ("U.S.") Internal
Revenue Service ("IRS") confirming that the separation and the distribution of shares of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. On October 1, 2013, United Online, Inc. announced that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has declared the FTD Companies, Inc. Registration
Statement on Form 10 effective and that United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors has approved the separation of FTD Companies, Inc. from United Online, Inc. through a
tax-free dividend involving the distribution of all FTD Companies, Inc. common stock held by United Online, Inc. to United Online, Inc.'s stockholders on November 1, 2013.
United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors also determined to implement a one-for-seven reverse stock split of shares of United Online, Inc. common stock immediately prior to the
completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction. As a result, the following is expected to occur: (1) FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will be distributed at 12:01 a.m. Eastern
Daylight Time ("EDT") on November 1, 2013 to United Online, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 10, 2013; (2) United Online, Inc.
stockholders will receive one share of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock for every five shares of United Online, Inc. common stock they hold on the record date as of close of business on
October 10, 2013 (prior to giving effect to the reverse stock split of United Online, Inc. shares); and (3) United Online, Inc. will effect a one-for-seven reverse stock
split of United Online, Inc. common stock, which will become effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 31, 2013.
Following
completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, FTD Companies, Inc. will be an independent, publicly-traded company on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, utilizing the ticker
symbol: "FTD". FTD Companies, Inc. will consist of both the domestic and international operations of United Online's FTD segment and include the highly-recognized FTD® and
Interflora® brands, both supported by the Mercury Man logo that is displayed in approximately 40,000 floral shops worldwide. United Online will continue to operate the businesses of the
Company's Content & Media and Communications segments, supported by the Classmates®, StayFriends, MyPoints®, NetZero®, and Juno®
brands.
9
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
The
Company's corporate headquarters are located in Woodland Hills, California, and the Company also maintains offices in Downers Grove, Illinois; Centerbrook, Connecticut; Medford,
Oregon; Sleaford, England; Quebec, Canada; Seattle, Washington; San Mateo, California; Erlangen, Germany; Berlin, Germany; San Francisco, California; Schaumburg, Illinois; Fort Lee, New Jersey; and
Hyderabad, India.
Basis of Presentation
The Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2013
and 2012 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), including those for interim financial information, and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the SEC. Accordingly, such financial statements do not include all of the information and note disclosures
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods shown. The
results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any future periods. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet information at
December 31, 2012 was derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements, filed on March 4, 2013, with the SEC in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2012, but does not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP.
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. These unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
The
most significant areas of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that require management judgment include the Company's revenue recognition, goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets, member redemption liability, income taxes, contingent consideration, and legal contingencies.
The
Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to service its debt obligations and fund its working capital
requirements, capital expenditures, dividend payments, and other obligations through at least the next twelve months.
Reclassifications and Revisions
Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These
reclassifications had no impact on the previously-reported consolidated results of operations or stockholders' equity. Certain revisions have been recorded in prior periods, which had immaterial
impacts on the previously-reported consolidated financial statements.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Company identified an error related to the elimination of intercompany revenues within its FTD segment, whereby intercompany revenues
were being eliminated in consolidation from services revenues instead of products revenues. Reported revenues, both consolidated and for the FTD segment, were correct in total; however, the error
resulted in an overstatement of products revenues and an understatement of services revenues. The
10
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
Company
evaluated this error and concluded that it did not result in a material misstatement of the Company's previously-issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has
determined to revise, in this report and future filings, its previously-reported products revenues and services revenues reported in the Company's consolidated statements of operations, as well as FTD
segment products revenues and FTD segment services revenues within Note 2"Segment Information". The error represented an overstatement of products revenues and an understatement of
services revenues totaling $18.4 million, $17.7 million, and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.1 million and
$13.7 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Company identified an error in the calculation of the MyPoints member redemption liability, which impacted prior-period balances. The
Company evaluated this error and concluded that it did not result in a material misstatement of the Company's previously-issued consolidated financial statements, although the cumulative impact of
correcting for the adjustment in the quarter ended March 31, 2013 could be material to the year ending December 31, 2013. Accordingly, the Company has determined to revise, in this
report and future filings, its previously-reported consolidated financial statements, including the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2012, to adjust for this error. As a result of this error, accrued liabilities, additional paid-in capital and retained earnings were overstated by $0.4 million,
$0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012 and member redemption liabilitycurrent, member redemption liabilitylong-term, and other
liabilities were understated by $0.9 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012. Additionally, cost of revenuesservices was
understated by $22,000 and $72,000 for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, provision for income taxes was overstated by $9,000 and $27,000 for the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and net income was overstated by $14,000 and $45,000 for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. There was
no impact on net cash provided by operating activities; however, adjustments to deferred taxes, net, and changes in member redemption liability within cash flows from operating activities were
understated by $0.3 million and $72,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities within cash flows from
operating activities was overstated by $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Company identified an error in the calculation of the provision for income taxes as it relates to changes in the estimated fair value
of contingent consideration. Changes in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations, while, for tax purposes, such changes are
treated as a purchase price adjustment; however, the Company previously recorded a provision for income taxes associated with such changes. The Company evaluated this error and concluded that it did
not result in a material misstatement of the Company's previously-reported consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has determined to revise, in this report and future filings, its
previously-reported consolidated financial statements, including the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012. As a result of this error, other current assets, accrued
liabilities and retained earnings were understated by $0.4 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012. Additionally, the provision for
income taxes was overstated by $0.5 million for the quarter and nine months ended
11
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
September 30,
2012. There was no impact on net cash provided by operating activities; however, changes in other assets was understated by $0.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2012.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02,
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income
, as codified in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 220. The amendments in this update require an entity to provide information about the amounts
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the
notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be
reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to
cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists
In July
2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11,
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward
Exists
, as codified in ASC 740,
Income Taxes
. The amendments in this update state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion
of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward. However, to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable
jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the
entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with
deferred tax assets. This ASU applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the
reporting date. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The
amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
this update on its consolidated financial statements.
12
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment revenues and segment income from operations were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
Total
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
88,633
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
$
|
90,249
|
|
Services
|
|
|
29,894
|
|
|
20,501
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
|
67,101
|
|
Advertising and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,894
|
|
|
6,870
|
|
|
17,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
$
|
118,527
|
|
$
|
32,233
|
|
$
|
24,354
|
|
$
|
175,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
$
|
(41,293
|
)
|
$
|
8,118
|
|
$
|
(21,720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
Total
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
85,753
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
$
|
87,544
|
|
Services
|
|
|
30,609
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
18,882
|
|
|
72,524
|
|
Advertising and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,418
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
18,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
$
|
116,362
|
|
$
|
36,556
|
|
$
|
25,203
|
|
$
|
178,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income from operations
|
|
$
|
14,190
|
|
$
|
8,002
|
|
$
|
8,770
|
|
$
|
30,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
Total
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
370,980
|
|
$
|
2,492
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
$
|
376,202
|
|
Services
|
|
|
102,109
|
|
|
62,256
|
|
|
51,861
|
|
|
216,226
|
|
Advertising and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,230
|
|
|
19,338
|
|
|
52,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
$
|
473,089
|
|
$
|
97,978
|
|
$
|
73,929
|
|
$
|
644,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
59,394
|
|
$
|
(29,719
|
)
|
$
|
23,036
|
|
$
|
52,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
Total
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
359,151
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
$
|
1,919
|
|
$
|
363,956
|
|
Services
|
|
|
101,185
|
|
|
72,886
|
|
|
59,895
|
|
|
233,966
|
|
Advertising and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,215
|
|
|
16,959
|
|
|
55,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
$
|
460,336
|
|
$
|
113,987
|
|
$
|
78,773
|
|
$
|
653,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income from operations
|
|
$
|
60,931
|
|
$
|
21,933
|
|
$
|
27,701
|
|
$
|
110,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Note 1"Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies, and Recent Accounting PronouncementsBasis of
PresentationReclassifications and Revisions" for information related to the revisions of FTD segment products revenues and services revenues.
13
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
A
reconciliation of segment revenues to consolidated revenues was as follows for each period presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Segment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
$
|
118,527
|
|
$
|
116,362
|
|
$
|
473,089
|
|
$
|
460,336
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
32,233
|
|
|
36,556
|
|
|
97,978
|
|
|
113,987
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
24,354
|
|
|
25,203
|
|
|
73,929
|
|
|
78,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
|
175,114
|
|
|
178,121
|
|
|
644,996
|
|
|
653,096
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues
|
|
$
|
174,713
|
|
$
|
177,751
|
|
$
|
643,846
|
|
$
|
651,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
reconciliation of segment operating expenses (which excludes depreciation and amortization of intangible assets) to consolidated operating expenses was as follows for each period
presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Segment operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
$
|
107,072
|
|
$
|
102,172
|
|
$
|
413,695
|
|
$
|
399,405
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
73,526
|
|
|
28,554
|
|
|
127,697
|
|
|
92,054
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
16,236
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
50,893
|
|
|
51,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating expenses
|
|
|
196,834
|
|
|
147,159
|
|
|
592,285
|
|
|
542,531
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
17,625
|
|
|
19,559
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
|
25,444
|
|
|
23,817
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
7,685
|
|
|
7,897
|
|
|
21,659
|
|
|
20,626
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating expenses
|
|
$
|
216,765
|
|
$
|
169,335
|
|
$
|
655,863
|
|
$
|
605,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
A
reconciliation of segment income (loss) from operations (which excludes depreciation and amortization of intangible assets) to consolidated operating income (loss) was as follows for
each period presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
$
|
14,190
|
|
$
|
59,394
|
|
$
|
60,931
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
(41,293
|
)
|
|
8,002
|
|
|
(29,719
|
)
|
|
21,933
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
8,118
|
|
|
8,770
|
|
|
23,036
|
|
|
27,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(21,720
|
)
|
|
30,962
|
|
|
52,711
|
|
|
110,565
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(5,313
|
)
|
|
(6,464
|
)
|
|
(17,625
|
)
|
|
(19,559
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(7,334
|
)
|
|
(8,185
|
)
|
|
(25,444
|
)
|
|
(23,817
|
)
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(7,685
|
)
|
|
(7,897
|
)
|
|
(21,659
|
)
|
|
(20,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(42,052
|
)
|
$
|
8,416
|
|
$
|
(12,017
|
)
|
$
|
46,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
revenues totaled $133.7 million and $500.6 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and totaled $136.7 million and
$509.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. International revenues, which are primarily generated by the Company's operations in Europe,
totaled $41.0 million and $143.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and totaled $41.0 million and $142.8 million for the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The FTD segment's international revenues, which are primarily generated by Interflora in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland,
totaled $32.8 million and $118.2 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $32.5 million and $115.9 million for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
Geographic
information for long-lived assets, which consist of property and equipment and other assets, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
58,301
|
|
$
|
60,622
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
10,764
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
69,065
|
|
$
|
71,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
assets are not reported to, or used by, the Company's chief operating decision maker to allocate resources to, or assess performance of, the segments and therefore, total segment
assets have not been disclosed.
15
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Financing Receivables
Credit quality of financing receivables was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
11,879
|
|
$
|
12,130
|
|
Past due
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,259
|
|
$
|
15,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
significant majority of the past due financing receivables at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were 120 days or more past due. Financing receivables on
nonaccrual status at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 totaled $3.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
The
changes in allowance for credit losses related to financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
3,464
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
Current period provision
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
225
|
|
Write-offs charged against allowance
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30
|
|
$
|
3,301
|
|
$
|
3,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Assets
Other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
$
|
7,735
|
|
$
|
7,178
|
|
Prepaid advertising and promotion expense
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
Prepaid floral catalog expenses
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
957
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,881
|
|
$
|
14,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS (Continued)
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Employee compensation and related liabilities
|
|
$
|
25,227
|
|
$
|
24,672
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
Non-income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
68
|
|
Reserves for legal and dispute settlements
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
700
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
|
6,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,561
|
|
$
|
45,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration related to the acquisition of schoolFeed, Inc. ("schoolFeed") was measured based on three annual
earnout periods ending June 30, 2013, 2014 and 2015 (each period, an "Earnout Period" and together, the "Earnout Periods") and, if earned, would be paid annually shortly after the closing of
each Earnout Period. The range of the amounts the Company could pay under the contingent consideration arrangement was between $0 and $27.5 million. The estimated fair value of contingent
consideration was $8.6 million at December 31, 2012 using a Monte-Carlo simulation.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2013, Facebook restricted certain functionality of the schoolFeed app, which limited schoolFeed's ability to use the Facebook service to contact
users who are not registered members of schoolFeed. Subsequently, in May 2013, Facebook discontinued the schoolFeed app's access to the Facebook service, which resulted in the termination of future
new installations of the schoolFeed app through Facebook, as well as the discontinuance of the sharing of Facebook content through the schoolFeed app.
At
June 30, 2013, the Company had accrued $3.4 million for the contingent consideration payment for the Earnout Period ended June 30, 2013, which was paid in full in
August 2013. The Company does not currently expect any contingent consideration will be earned for the Earnout Periods ending June 30, 2014 and 2015.
17
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
(Losses)
on Cash Flow
Hedging
Instruments,
Net of Tax
|
|
Gains
on Other
Hedging
Instruments,
Net of Tax
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
(813
|
)
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
(27,333
|
)
|
$
|
(28,133
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
(514
|
)
|
$
|
75
|
|
$
|
(23,544
|
)
|
$
|
(23,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss were related to losses on derivatives classified as cash flow hedges. These reclassifications impacted
technology and development expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
4. GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (excluding impairment charges)
|
|
$
|
447,987
|
|
$
|
137,172
|
|
$
|
13,227
|
|
$
|
598,386
|
|
Accumulated impairment charges
|
|
|
(114,000
|
)
|
|
(26,606
|
)
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
(146,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at December 31,
2012
|
|
|
333,987
|
|
|
110,566
|
|
|
7,489
|
|
|
452,042
|
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(50,221
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
4,756
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (excluding impairment charges)
|
|
|
452,743
|
|
|
137,177
|
|
|
13,227
|
|
|
603,147
|
|
Accumulated impairment charges
|
|
|
(114,000
|
)
|
|
(76,827
|
)
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
(196,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at September 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
338,743
|
|
$
|
60,350
|
|
$
|
7,489
|
|
$
|
406,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment, which increased FTD's goodwill and decreased
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Company's balance sheet at September 30, 2013 by $5.3 million and was considered immaterial to the current period and all prior periods. Such
out-of-period adjustment was netted in the foreign currency translation line item in the table above.
18
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS (Continued)
Impairment of Goodwill
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, due to a decline in internal financial projections, the Company performed an
interim quantitative goodwill assessment for its Classmates reporting unit. Due to the complexity and the effort required to estimate the fair value of the Classmates reporting unit in step one of the
impairment test and to estimate the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the Classmates reporting unit in step two of the test, the fair value estimates were derived based on preliminary
assumptions and analysis that are subject to change. Based on the Company's preliminary analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill was substantially lower than the carrying value of goodwill for the
Classmates reporting unit. As a result, the Company recorded its best estimate of $50.2 million for the goodwill impairment charge during the quarter ended September 30, 2013. The
impairment charge was included in impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived
assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Any adjustment to the estimated impairment charge will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Pay accounts and free accounts
|
|
$
|
103,308
|
|
$
|
(98,389
|
)
|
$
|
4,919
|
|
Customer contracts and relationships
|
|
|
113,840
|
|
|
(97,837
|
)
|
|
16,003
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
185,364
|
|
|
(23,465
|
)
|
|
161,899
|
|
Software and technology
|
|
|
49,869
|
|
|
(47,645
|
)
|
|
2,224
|
|
Rights, content and intellectual property
|
|
|
14,562
|
|
|
(8,085
|
)
|
|
6,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
466,943
|
|
$
|
(275,421
|
)
|
$
|
191,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Pay accounts and free accounts
|
|
$
|
103,284
|
|
$
|
(96,253
|
)
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
Customer contracts and relationships
|
|
|
113,927
|
|
|
(84,894
|
)
|
|
29,033
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
185,561
|
|
|
(22,098
|
)
|
|
163,463
|
|
Software and technology
|
|
|
49,896
|
|
|
(41,647
|
)
|
|
8,249
|
|
Rights, content and intellectual property
|
|
|
14,494
|
|
|
(5,833
|
)
|
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
467,162
|
|
$
|
(250,725
|
)
|
$
|
216,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company's acquired trademarks and trade names related to the acquisition by the Company of FTD Group, Inc. in August 2008 are indefinite-lived and,
accordingly, there is no associated amortization expense or accumulated amortization. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, such trademarks and trade names after impairment and
foreign currency translation adjustments totaled $158.3 million and $158.5 million, respectively.
Amortization
expense related to intangible assets for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $7.3 million and $25.4 million, respectively.
Amortization expense related to
19
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS (Continued)
intangible
assets for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $8.2 million and $23.8 million, respectively.
Estimated
future intangible assets amortization expense at September 30, 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct-Dec
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Estimated amortization of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
33,244
|
|
$
|
6,011
|
|
$
|
17,741
|
|
$
|
3,284
|
|
$
|
2,826
|
|
$
|
1,812
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
5. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
In connection with the acquisition of FTD Group, Inc. in August 2008, UNOLA Corp., which was then an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of United Online, Inc., and which
subsequently merged into FTD Group, Inc., entered into a $425 million senior secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (the "2008
Credit Agreement"), consisting of (i) a term loan A facility of $75 million, (ii) a term loan B facility of $300 million, and (iii) a revolving credit facility of up
to $50 million. On June 10, 2011, FTD Group, Inc. entered into a new credit agreement (the "2011 Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative
Agent for the lenders, to refinance the 2008 Credit Agreement. The 2011 Credit Agreement provided FTD Group, Inc. with a $315 million senior secured credit facility consisting of
(i) a $265 million seven-year term loan and (ii) a $50 million five-year revolving credit facility, and certain other financial accommodations, including letters of credit.
On
June 10, 2011, FTD Group, Inc. repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness under the 2008 Credit Agreement. No penalties were paid in connection with such repayment. The
repayment of obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement was financed with the proceeds of the $265 million of term loan borrowings under the 2011 Credit Agreement and FTD's available cash.
On
July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. entered into a new credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") by and among FTD Companies, Inc., Interflora British Unit, the
material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. party thereto as guarantors, the financial institutions party thereto from time to time, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders, to refinance the 2011 Credit Agreement. On
July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. drew $220 million of the new $350 million revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and used approximately
$19 million of its existing cash balance to repay in full all outstanding indebtedness under the 2011 Credit Agreement and the fees and expenses related to the Credit Agreement.
The
obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by FTD Companies, Inc.'s material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively, with FTD Companies, Inc., the
"U.S. Loan Parties").
In addition, the obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the U.S. Loan Parties, including a pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock of
certain direct subsidiaries of the U.S. Loan Parties (except with respect to foreign subsidiaries and certain domestic subsidiaries whose assets consist primarily of foreign subsidiary equity
interests, in which case such pledge shall be limited to 66% of the outstanding capital stock).
The
interest rates set forth in the Credit Agreement for loans are either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum, or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to
2.25% per
20
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
annum,
calculated according to the net leverage ratio of FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The initial base rate margin was 0.75% per annum and the initial LIBOR margin was 1.75% per
annum. In addition, FTD Companies, Inc. will pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement contains
customary representations and warranties, events of default, affirmative covenants and negative covenants, that, among other things, require FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries to maintain
compliance with a maximum net leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, and impose restrictions and limitations on, among other things, investments, dividends, and asset sales, and FTD
Companies, Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' ability to incur additional indebtedness and liens.
Under
the terms of the Credit Agreement, FTD Companies, Inc. is generally restricted from transferring funds to United Online, Inc., with certain exceptions prior to the
completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction in connection with the reimbursement of certain expenses. These restrictions resulted in the restricted net assets (as defined in Rule 4-08(e)(3) of
Regulation S-X) of FTD Companies Inc., and its subsidiaries totaling $283.7 million at September 30, 2013, which exceeded 25% of the consolidated net assets of United
Online, Inc. and its subsidiaries. FTD Companies, Inc. was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement at September 30, 2013.
The
changes in the Company's debt balances, net of discounts, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 under the 2011 Credit Agreement were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31,
2012
|
|
Repayments
of Debt
|
|
Accretion
of Discounts
|
|
Write Off of
Discounts
|
|
Balance at
September 30,
2013
|
|
2011 Credit Agreement, Term Loan
|
|
$
|
244,000
|
|
$
|
(246,013
|
)
|
$
|
281
|
|
$
|
1,732
|
|
$
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2013, $220 million was outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. At September 30, 2013, the borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit
Facility, which was further reduced by $1.4 million in outstanding letters of credit, was $128.6 million.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values and notional values of outstanding derivative instruments were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value of
Derivative
Instruments
|
|
Notional Value of
Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Derivative Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
1,169
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
Other derivative assets
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
687
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivative liabilities
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
$
|
7,333
|
|
21
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
The
effect of the Company's interest rate caps on accumulated other comprehensive loss was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Gains (Losses)
Recognized in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
on Derivatives Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
$
|
(368
|
)
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
$
|
469
|
|
$
|
(1,139
|
)
|
At
September 30, 2013, the effective portion, before tax effect, of the Company's interest rate caps was $0.7 million, none of which was expected to be reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations within the next 12 months.
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Financial Assets and Derivative Instruments
The following table presents information about financial assets and derivative instruments that were required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
69,827
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
69,827
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
69,827
|
|
$
|
11,909
|
|
$
|
81,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
89,507
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
89,507
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,021
|
|
|
9,021
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,507
|
|
$
|
9,720
|
|
$
|
99,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Long-Term Debt
The Company estimated the fair value of its long-term debt using a discounted cash flow approach that incorporates a market interest
yield curve with adjustments for duration and the Company's credit risk profile. In determining the market interest yield curve, the Company considered, among other factors, its estimated credit
spread. At September 30, 2013, the Company estimated its credit spread as 1.8% for the long-term debt associated with the Credit Agreement, resulting in a yield-to-maturity estimate of 3.1%. At
December 31, 2012, the Company estimated its credit rating as BB+/BB for the long-term debt associated with the 2011 Credit Agreement, resulting in a discount rate of 3.8%. The table below
summarizes the estimated fair values for long-term debt (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Long-term debt, net of discounts, including current portion
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
$
|
221,807
|
|
$
|
244,000
|
|
$
|
261,090
|
|
MyPoints Goodwill and Intangible Assets
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge and an intangible assets impairment
charge related to MyPoints.com, Inc. ("MyPoints") totaling $26.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Accordingly, such goodwill and trademarks were required to be measured at
fair value on a non-recurring basis and, at December 31, 2012, the estimated fair values were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
MyPoints reporting unit goodwill
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
MyPoints reporting unit trademarks
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company estimated the fair value of the MyPoints reporting unit using a combination of the income approach and the market approach. The inputs for the fair value calculations of the
reporting unit included a 4.0% growth rate to calculate the terminal value and a discount rate of 14.0%. In addition, the Company assumed revenue growth and applied margin and other cost assumptions
consistent with the reporting unit's historical trends. The Company estimated the fair value of the MyPoints trademarks using the relief from royalty method, which is a form of the income approach
that incorporates elements of the market approach. The inputs for the fair value calculations of the trademarks included revenue projections, a trademarks royalty rate of 0.3% and a discount rate of
14.5%.
Classmates Goodwill
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge related to the Classmates
reporting unit totaling $50.2 million. Accordingly, such goodwill was
23
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
required
to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and, at September 30, 2013, the estimated fair value was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Classmates reporting unit goodwill
|
|
$
|
37,834
|
|
The
Company estimated the fair value of the Classmates reporting unit using the income approach. The inputs for the fair value calculations of the reporting unit included a 4.0% growth
rate to calculate the terminal value and a discount rate of 12.0%. In addition, the Company assumed revenue growth and applied margin and other cost assumptions consistent with the reporting unit's
historical trends.
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Repurchases
United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program (the "Program") that allows United
Online, Inc. to repurchase shares of its common stock through open market or privately negotiated transactions based on prevailing market conditions and other factors. From August 2001 through
December 31, 2010, United Online, Inc. had repurchased $150.2 million of its common stock under the Program, leaving $49.8 million of authorization remaining under the
Program. In February 2011, United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors extended the Program through December 31, 2011 and authorized an increase in the $49.8 million authorization
amount to $80.0 million. In December 2011, United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors extended the Program through December 31, 2012. In January 2013, United Online, Inc.'s
Board of Directors approved and ratified the extension of the Program through December 31, 2013, and in September 2013, the Board of Directors further extended the Program through
December 31, 2014. There were no repurchases under the Program in the year ended December 31, 2012 or the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and, at September 30, 2013,
the authorization remaining under the Program was $80.0 million.
Shares
withheld upon the vesting of restricted stock units to pay minimum statutory employee withholding taxes are considered common stock repurchases, but are not counted as purchases
against the Program. Upon vesting of restricted stock units, the Company currently does not collect the minimum statutory withholding taxes from employees. Instead, the Company automatically
withholds, from the restricted stock units that vest, the portion of those shares with a fair market value equal to the amount of the minimum statutory employee withholding taxes due, which is
accounted for as a repurchase of common stock. The Company then pays the minimum statutory withholding taxes in cash. The amounts remitted in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
were $3.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for which the Company withheld 0.5 million and 0.4 million shares of common stock, respectively, that were underlying the
restricted stock units that vested.
Dividends
Dividends are paid on shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date. In addition, dividend equivalents are generally paid on
nonvested restricted stock units outstanding as of the record date.
24
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)
In
January, April and July 2013, United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per share of common stock. The dividends were paid on
February 28, 2013, May 31, 2013 and August 30, 2013 and totaled $9.4 million, $9.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively, including dividend equivalents paid
on nonvested restricted stock units.
The
payment of future dividends is discretionary and is subject to determination by United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of the Company's
financial performance and other factors. Dividends that are declared by United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors are currently paid out of the Company's surplus, as defined and computed in
accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation that has been included in the following line items within the unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues-products
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Cost of revenues-services
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
192
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
6,159
|
|
|
6,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
3,153
|
|
$
|
3,430
|
|
$
|
9,300
|
|
$
|
9,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Awards
Effective March 6, 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of United Online, Inc. approved restricted
stock unit grants to certain executive officers totaling 0.9 million shares. The restricted stock units will vest as to one-third of the total number of units awarded annually over a three-year
period beginning February 15, 2013.
Effective
March 6, 2013, the Secondary Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of United Online, Inc. approved restricted stock unit grants to certain
non-executive officer employees totaling 1.4 million shares. The restricted stock units will vest as to one-quarter of the total number of units awarded annually over a four-year period
beginning February 15, 2013.
Under
the terms of an employment agreement entered into on October 2, 2013 between United Online, Inc. and Francis Lobo regarding his appointment as President and Chief
Executive Officer of United Online, Inc. effective November 5, 2013, in the first quarter of 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will grant to Mr. Lobo
(i) a number of restricted stock units with an aggregate value of $1.5 million and (ii) a number of options to purchase United Online, Inc.'s common stock equal to 1.33
multiplied by the number of restricted stock units granted, with an exercise price equal to the per-share closing price on the date of grant. These awards will vest at the rate of one-third on each of
the first three anniversaries of November 5, 2013.
25
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. INCOME TAXES
The Company's effective income tax rate for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 differed from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to the
Classmates reporting unit goodwill impairment charge recorded during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
11. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,232
|
)
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
$
|
(30,861
|
)
|
$
|
25,480
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(47,611
|
)
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
$
|
(31,876
|
)
|
$
|
24,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to calculate basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,764
|
|
|
90,657
|
|
|
92,247
|
|
|
90,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Dilutive effect of non-participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,764
|
|
|
90,735
|
|
|
92,247
|
|
|
90,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
diluted net income (loss) per common share computations exclude stock options and restricted stock units which are antidilutive. Weighted-average antidilutive shares for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were 7.0 million and 4.2 million, respectively. Weighted-average antidilutive shares for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2012 were 3.9 million and 5.4 million, respectively.
26
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE (Continued)
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
The following table sets forth pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share, giving effect to the one-for-seven
reverse stock split of United Online, Inc. common stock declared on October 1, 2013, which will become effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 31, 2013 (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Shares used to calculate pro forma basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
13,252
|
|
|
12,951
|
|
|
13,178
|
|
|
12,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to calculate pro forma diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
13,252
|
|
|
12,996
|
|
|
13,178
|
|
|
12,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(3.59
|
)
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
$
|
(2.42
|
)
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(3.59
|
)
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
$
|
(2.42
|
)
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER EXIT COSTS
Restructuring and other exit costs were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
Termination
Costs
|
|
Contract
Termination
Costs
|
|
Total
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other exit costs at December 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Cash paid for restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other exit costs at September 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded restructuring and other exit costs totaling $0.3 million, consisting of employee termination costs. In the
nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded restructuring and other exit costs totaling $2.5 million, consisting of $2.3 million and $0.2 million of employee
termination costs and contract termination costs, respectively, in the Content & Media segment. These restructuring charges were a result of management's decision to streamline segment
operations and increase segment profitability. At September 30, 2013, accrued restructuring and other exit costs totaled $0.5 million, which will be paid over the next 12 months.
There
were no restructuring and other exit costs in the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Restructuring and other exit costs totaled $14,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2012.
27
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. CONTINGENCIESLEGAL MATTERS
In June 2011, Memory Lane, Inc., a California corporation, filed a complaint in United States District Court, Central District of California, against Classmates
International, Inc., Classmates Online, Inc. and the Company's Memory Lane, Inc. subsidiary ("Memory Lane"), alleging false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
section 1125, and state and common law unfair competition. The complaint includes requests for an award of damages and for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. Notwithstanding the
request for preliminary injunctive relief, no motion for such relief has been filed. Memory Lane responded to the complaint in September 2011. In October 2011, the plaintiff amended its complaint to,
among other things, dismiss Classmates International, Inc. and add United Online, Inc. as a defendant. Discovery and all pre-trial filings have been completed. A trial date of
February 11, 2014 has been set.
In
March 2012, Hope Kelm, Barbara Timmcke, Regina Warfel, Brett Reilly, Juan M. Restrepo, and Jennie H. Pham filed a purported class action complaint (the "Kelm Class Action") in United
States District Court, District of Connecticut, against the following defendants: (i) Chase Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation, Citigroup, Inc., and
Citibank, N.A. (collectively, the "Credit Card Company Defendants"); (ii) 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Classmates
International, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Days Inns Worldwide, Inc., Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, PeopleFindersPro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc.,
Rakuten USA, Inc., IAC/InterActiveCorp, and Shoebuy.com, Inc. (collectively, the "E-Merchant Defendants"); and (iii) Trilegiant Corporation, Inc. ("Trilegiant"), Affinion
Group, LLC ("Affinion"), and Apollo Global Management, LLC ("Apollo"). The complaint alleges (1) violations of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") by all
defendants, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Credit Card Company Defendants; (2) aiding and abetting violations of federal mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud statutes by
the Credit Card Company Defendants; (3) violations of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act ("ECPA") by Trilegiant, Affinion and the E-Merchant Defendants, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Credit Card Company Defendants; (4) violations
of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act by Trilegiant, Affinion, Apollo, and the E-Merchant Defendants, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Credit Card Company Defendants;
(5) violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17602 by Trilegiant, Affinion, Apollo, and the E-Merchant Defendants; and (6) unjust enrichment by all
defendants. The plaintiffs seek class certification, restitution and disgorgement of all amounts wrongfully charged to and received from plaintiffs, damages, treble damages, punitive damages,
preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and pre- and post-judgment interest on any amounts awarded.
In
March 2012, Debra Miller and William Thompson filed a purported class action complaint (the "Miller Class Action") in United States District Court, District of Connecticut, against
the following defendants: (i) Trilegiant, Affinion, Apollo, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Adaptive Marketing, LLC (collectively, the "Membership Companies");
(ii) 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Classmates International, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., FTD Group, Inc.,
IAC/Interactivecorp, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Peoplefinderspro, Inc., Rakuten USA, Inc., Shoebuy.com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Wells Fargo & Company,
and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (collectively, the "Marketing Companies"); and (iii) Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation, Chase Bank USA, N.A., and Citibank, N.A.
(collectively, the "Credit Card Companies"). The complaint alleges (1) violations of RICO by all defendants, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Credit Card Companies;
(2) aiding and abetting violations of federal mail
28
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. CONTINGENCIESLEGAL MATTERS (Continued)
fraud,
wire fraud and bank fraud statutes by the Credit Card Companies; (3) violations of the ECPA by the Membership Companies and the Marketing Companies, and aiding and abetting violations of
such act by the Credit Card Companies; (4) violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act by the Membership Companies and the Marketing Companies, and aiding and abetting violations
of such act by the Credit Card Companies; (5) violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17602 by the Membership Companies and the Marketing Companies; and
(6) unjust enrichment by all defendants. The plaintiffs seek class certification, restitution and disgorgement of all amounts wrongfully charged to and received from the plaintiffs, damages,
treble damages, punitive damages, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and pre- and post-judgment interest on any amounts awarded.
In
April 2012, the Kelm Class Action and the Miller Class Action were consolidated with a related case under the case caption In re Trilegiant Corporation, Inc. In September 2012,
the plaintiffs filed their consolidated amended complaint and named five additional defendants. The defendants have responded to the consolidated amended complaint by joining in motions to dismiss
filed by other defendants on December 7, 2012. Those motions were argued before the district court on September 25, 2013, and taken under submission. The court has not yet ruled on the
motion to dismiss, and no trial date has been set.
In
addition, in December 2012, David Frank filed a purported class action complaint (the "Frank Class Action") in United States District Court, District of Connecticut, against the
following defendants: Trilegiant, Affinion, Apollo (collectively, the "Frank Membership Companies"); 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Classmates
International, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Hotwire, Inc., IAC/Interactivecorp, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Orbitz Worldwide, LLC,
PeopleFindersPro, Inc., Priceline.com, Inc., Shoebuy.com, Inc., TigerDirect, Inc., United Online, Inc., and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (collectively, the "Frank
Marketing Companies"); Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc., and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. (collectively, the "Frank Credit Card Companies"). The complaint alleges (1) violations of RICO by all defendants; (2) aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Frank
Credit Card Companies; (3) aiding and abetting commissions of mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud by the Frank Credit Card Companies; (4) violation of the ECPA by the Frank Membership
Companies and the Frank Marketing Companies, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Frank Credit Card Companies; (5) violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act by
the Frank Membership Companies and the Frank Marketing Companies, and aiding and abetting violations of such act by the Frank Credit Card Companies; (6) violation of California Business and
Professions Code section 17602 by the Frank Membership Companies and the Frank Marketing Companies; and (7) unjust enrichment by all defendants. The plaintiff seeks class certification,
restitution and disgorgement of all amounts wrongfully charged to and received from plaintiff, damages, treble damages, punitive damages, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, attorneys' fees,
costs of suit, and pre- and post-judgment interest on any amounts awarded. On January 23, 2013, the plaintiff moved to consolidate the Frank Class Action with the In re Trilegiant
Corporation, Inc. action. In response, the court ordered the plaintiff to show cause as to why, among other things, the plaintiff should be afforded named plaintiff status. The plaintiff filed
his response to the order to show cause on February 15, 2013. The court has not yet ruled upon the request for consolidation or the order to show cause.
29
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. CONTINGENCIESLEGAL MATTERS (Continued)
In
December 2008, Interflora, Inc. (in which United Online has an indirect, two-thirds ownership interest) and Interflora British Unit (an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
United Online) issued proceedings against Marks and Spencer plc ("Marks and Spencer") seeking injunctive relief, damages, interest, and costs in an action claiming infringement of U.K.
trademark registration number 1329840 and European Community trademark registration number 909838, both for the word "Interflora". Marks and Spencer did not make a counterclaim. In July
2009, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales (the "High Court"), referred questions to the Court of Justice of European Union ("CJEU") for a preliminary ruling. In September 2011, the CJEU
handed down its judgment on the questions referred by the High Court. In February 2012, the High Court scheduled the trial for April 2013. In September 2012, Interflora British Unit executed an
indemnity agreement by which Interflora British Unit agreed to indemnify Interflora, Inc. against all losses and expenses arising out of this action which Interflora, Inc. may incur
after July 10, 2012. The trial in this matter concluded in April 2013. In May 2013, the High Court ruled that Marks and Spencer infringed the Interflora trademarks. In June 2013, the High Court
issued an injunction prohibiting Marks and Spencer from infringing the Interflora trademarks in specified jurisdictions and ordered Marks and Spencer to provide certain disclosures in order for
damages to be quantified. The High Court granted Marks and Spencer permission to appeal
the ruling. Marks and Spencer has submitted its appeal on the grounds for which permission was granted to the High Court, and is further seeking permission to appeal on additional grounds.
In
January 2013, Unified Messaging Solutions LLC ("Unified Messaging") filed a complaint in United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, against United
Online, Inc., Juno Online Services, Inc., NetZero, Inc. and Memory Lane, Inc. alleging patent infringement of five patents related to email index lists. This case is part
of a 58-case Multi-District Litigation in Chicago, Illinois with two separate "waves" of defendants. This action is part of "Wave II". In February 2013, Unified Messaging filed a stipulation of
dismissal without prejudice of all claims against defendant United Online, Inc. The remaining defendants responded to the complaint in March 2013 by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint.
The plaintiff addressed the issues raised by the defendants' motion to dismiss by filing an amended complaint on October 16, 2013. The Wave II defendants have formed a Joint Defense Group that
works with a similar Joint Defense Group for the Wave I defendants to coordinate strategy. The defendants filed a motion to transfer the case, but the court denied the motion without prejudice and
directed the defendants to file the motion after the upcoming "Markman" claim construction ruling for the Wave I cases. The defendants filed a motion to challenge the consolidation of the Wave II
cases with the Wave I cases and a motion against the plaintiff for bringing the case without having ownership of the patents and in violation of the terminal disclaimer provisions of the patents.
While the former motion was denied, the latter motion resulted in Unified Messaging being directed to add Advanced Messaging Technologies as a plaintiff. The defendants have prepared initial rounds of
discovery, but the plaintiff's response is on hold pending the court's issuance of the Markman ruling. No trial date has been set.
The
Company has been cooperating with certain governmental authorities in connection with their respective investigations of its former post-transaction sales practices and certain other
current or former business practices.
-
-
In 2010, FTD.COM Inc. and Classmates Online, Inc., renamed Memory Lane, Inc., received subpoenas from
the Attorney General for the State of Kansas and the Attorney General for the State of Maryland, respectively. These subpoenas were issued on behalf of a Multistate Work
30
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. CONTINGENCIESLEGAL MATTERS (Continued)
Group
that consists of the Attorneys General for the following states: Alabama, Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Dakota,
Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and Washington. The primary focus of the
inquiry concerns certain post-transaction sales practices in which these companies previously engaged with certain third-party vendors. In the second quarter of 2012, the Company received an offer of
settlement from the Multistate Work Group consisting of certain injunctive relief and the consideration of two areas of monetary relief: (1) restitution to consumers and (2) a
$20 million payment by these companies for the violations alleged by the Multistate Work Group and to reimburse the Multistate Work Group for its investigation costs. The Company rejected the
Multistate Work Group's offer. The Company has since had ongoing discussions with the Multistate Work Group regarding the non-monetary aspects of a negotiated resolution. The Company is continuing to
cooperate with the Multistate Work Group and is providing requested information. There can be no assurances as to the terms on which the Multistate Work Group and the Company may agree to settle this
matter, or that any settlement of this matter may be reached. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the amount of possible loss or range of loss that may arise, if any. In the event that the
Multistate Work Group and the Company agree to settle this matter, or if no settlement is reached and there are adverse judgments against the Company in connection with litigation filed by the
Attorneys General of the Multistate Work Group, there could be a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
-
-
In 2010, Memory Lane, Inc. received a subpoena from the Attorney General for the District of Columbia regarding the
subsidiary's marketing, billing and renewal practices, including, without limitation, its former post-transaction sales practices. In July 2013, the parties entered into a settlement agreement in
which Memory Lane, Inc. agreed to change certain of its practices and disclosures and pay the District of Columbia $300,000 for its cost of investigation and associated attorney fees.
-
-
In 2011, Classmates Online, Inc. received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General for the State of
Washington regarding its marketing, refund, cancelation, and renewal practices. Prior to that, in 2009, Classmates Online, Inc. had received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney
General for the State of Washington regarding certain post-transaction sales practices in which it had previously engaged with certain third-party vendors. In 2012, the Attorney General for the State
of Washington joined the aforementioned Multistate Work Group. The Company believes that by joining the Multistate Work Group, the Attorney General's investigation may have been consolidated into the
Multistate Work Group's inquiry.
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of these or any other governmental investigations or other legal actions or their potential implications for its business. There are no assurances
that additional governmental investigations or other legal actions will not be instituted in connection with the Company's former post-transaction sales practices or other current or former business
practices.
The
Company records a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a loss will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company evaluates, at
least quarterly, developments in its legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and makes adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to
determine both probability and the estimated amount. The Company may be unable to estimate a
31
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. CONTINGENCIESLEGAL MATTERS (Continued)
possible
loss or range of possible loss due to various reasons, including, among others: (i) if the damages sought are indeterminate; (ii) if the proceedings are in early stages,
(iii) if there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals, motions or settlements, (iv) if there are significant factual issues to be determined or resolved, and (v) if
there are novel or unsettled legal theories presented. In such instances, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss, if
any. With respect to the other legal matters described above, the Company has determined, based on its current knowledge, that the amount of possible loss or range of loss, including any reasonably
possible losses in excess of amounts already accrued, is not reasonably estimable. However, legal matters are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are
beyond the Company's control. As such, there can be no assurance that the final outcome of these matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
14. PLANNED FTD SPIN-OFF TRANSACTION
The Company expects to complete the FTD Spin-Off Transaction on November 1, 2013. However, there can be no assurance that it will be completed on the anticipated schedule or that
its terms will not change. In September 2013, the Company received a private letter ruling from the IRS confirming that the separation and the distribution of shares of FTD Companies, Inc.
common stock will qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and as such, the distribution of shares of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will not result in
the recognition, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, of income, gain or loss by United Online, Inc. or its stockholders. On October 1, 2013, United Online, Inc. announced that
the SEC has declared the FTD Companies, Inc. Registration Statement on Form 10 effective and that United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors has approved the separation of FTD
Companies, Inc. from United Online, Inc. through a tax-free dividend involving the distribution of all FTD Companies, Inc. common stock held by United Online, Inc. to United Online,
Inc.'s stockholders on November 1, 2013. United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors also determined to implement a
one-for-seven reverse stock split of shares of United Online, Inc. common stock immediately prior to completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction. As a result, the following is expected to occur:
(1) FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will be distributed at 12:01 a.m. EDT on November 1, 2013 to United Online, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of
business on October 10, 2013; (2) United Online, Inc. stockholders will receive one share of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock for every five shares of United
Online, Inc. common stock they hold on the record date of the close of business on October 10, 2013 (prior to giving effect to the reverse stock split of United Online, Inc.
shares); and (3) United Online, Inc. will effect a one-for-seven reverse stock split of United Online, Inc. common stock, which will become effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on
October 31, 2013. The FTD Spin-Off Transaction does not require stockholder approval. Following completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, the historical results of the FTD segment will be
presented as discontinued operations in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company recorded $4.5 million and $7.6 million of transaction-related costs in the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, in connection with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction and its exploration of strategic alternatives for its other businesses and potential
monetization opportunities for its portfolio of patents and patent applications. The transaction-related costs were included in general and administrative expenses in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
32
Table of Contents
UNITED ONLINE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. PLANNED FTD SPIN-OFF TRANSACTION (Continued)
On
April 30, 2013, Mark R. Goldston, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Online, Inc., announced that, subject to the completion of the FTD Spin-Off
Transaction, he would resign as a director and officer of United Online immediately thereafter. Under the terms of Mr. Goldston's employment agreement, the FTD Spin-Off Transaction would
constitute a change in control of United Online. His resignation following the FTD Spin-Off Transaction would constitute an involuntary termination for purposes of his employment agreement due to
there having been a material decrease in his authorities, duties and responsibilities following a change in control. As a result, effective upon such resignation, and subject to the terms and
conditions of his employment agreement, Mr. Goldston would be entitled to the severance and other benefits described in his employment agreement in connection with an involuntary termination,
including an estimated cash severance payment totaling approximately $7.2 million (assuming a November 1, 2013 termination date), as well as full and accelerated vesting of
Mr. Goldston's outstanding nonvested restricted stock units and unvested stock options. Mr. Goldston's employment agreement has previously been filed with the SEC.
33
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain certain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, based on our current expectations, estimates and
projections about our operations, industry, financial condition, performance, results of operations, and liquidity. Statements containing words such as "may," "believe," "anticipate," "expect,"
"intend," "plan," "project," "projections," "business outlook," "estimate," or similar expressions constitute
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the expected benefits of our acquisitions; the Company's strategies, including the
planned separation of the Company and FTD Companies, Inc. into separate, publicly-traded companies and the expected benefits of such transaction; anticipated changes to senior management;
future financial performance; revenues; segment metrics; operating expenses; market trends, including those in the markets in which we compete; liquidity; cash flows and uses of cash; dividends;
capital expenditures; depreciation and amortization; tax payments; foreign currency exchange rates; hedging arrangements; our ability to repay indebtedness, pay dividends and invest in initiatives;
our products and services; pricing; marketing plans; competition; settlement of legal matters; and the impact of accounting pronouncements. Potential factors that could affect the matters about which
the forward-looking statements are made include, among others, the factors disclosed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and additional factors that
accompany the related forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of the date hereof. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or
results and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual performance and results to differ materially from those predicted. Reported results should not be considered an indication of future
performance. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or
circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
United Online, through its operating subsidiaries, is a leading provider of consumer products and services over the Internet under a
number of brands, including FTD, Interflora, Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct, Drake Algar, Classmates, schoolFeed, StayFriends, Trombi, MyPoints, NetZero, and Juno.
United
Online, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, headquartered in Woodland Hills, California, that commenced operations in 2001 following the merger of dial-up Internet access
providers NetZero, Inc. ("NetZero") and Juno Online Services, Inc. ("Juno"). In 2004, we acquired Classmates Online, Inc. (whose name was changed to Memory Lane, Inc. in
February 2011), a provider of online nostalgia services, and in 2006, we acquired MyPoints.com, Inc. ("MyPoints"), a provider of an online loyalty marketing service. In 2008, we acquired FTD
Group, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries and its parent, FTD Companies, Inc., "FTD"), a provider of floral, gift and related products and services to consumers and retail florists, as
well as to other retail locations offering floral, gift and related products and services under the FTD and Interflora brands. In April 2012, we acquired certain assets of the Gifts Division of Flying
Brands Limited, specifically the Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct and Drake Algar businesses. In June 2012, we acquired schoolFeed, Inc. ("schoolFeed"), owner of the schoolFeed Facebook app and a
leading online high school social network that enables members to reconnect and interact with their former classmates.
34
Table of Contents
We
report our businesses in three reportable segments:
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Products and Services
|
FTD
|
|
Floral, gift and related products and services for consumers, retail florists and other retail locations
|
Content & Media
|
|
Online nostalgia products and services and an online loyalty marketing service
|
Communications
|
|
Internet access services and devices, including dial-up, mobile broadband and DSL, and email, Internet security and web hosting services
|
We
generate revenues from three primary sources:
-
-
Products revenues.
Products revenues in our FTD segment
are derived primarily from selling floral, gift and related products to consumers and the related shipping and service fees. Products revenues in our FTD segment also include revenues generated from
sales of branded and non-branded hard goods, software and hardware systems, cut flowers, packaging and promotional products, and a wide variety of other floral-related supplies to floral network
members. Products revenues in our Content & Media segment are derived from the sale of yearbook reprints and related shipping and handling fees, as well as revenues generated from reselling
third party merchandise. Products revenues in our Communications segment are derived from the sale of mobile broadband devices and the related shipping and handling fees.
-
-
Services revenues.
Services revenues in our FTD segment
are derived primarily from orders sent to floral network members and fees for floral network services. Services revenues in our Content & Media and Communications segments are derived from
selling subscriptions to consumers who are typically billed in advance for the entire subscription term.
-
-
Advertising and other revenues.
Advertising and other
revenues are primarily derived from a wide variety of advertising, marketing and media-related initiatives in our Content & Media and Communications segments.
Planned FTD Spin-Off Transaction
On August 1, 2012, United Online, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors had approved a preliminary plan to separate
the Company into two independent, publicly-traded companies: FTD Companies, Inc., which will consist of the domestic and international operations of the Company's FTD segment, and United
Online, Inc., which will consist of the businesses of the Company's Content & Media and Communications segments (the "FTD Spin-Off Transaction"). The FTD Spin-Off Transaction will take
the form of a tax-free pro rata distribution to stockholders of United Online, Inc. In September 2013, the Company received a private letter ruling from the United States ("U.S.") Internal
Revenue Service (the "IRS") confirming that the separation and the distribution of shares of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, and as such, the distribution of shares of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will not result in the recognition, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, of income, gain or
loss by United Online, Inc. or its stockholders. On October 1, 2013, United Online, Inc. announced that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has declared the
FTD Companies, Inc. Registration Statement on Form 10 effective and that United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors has approved the separation of FTD Companies, Inc. from
United Online, Inc. through a tax-free dividend involving the distribution of all FTD Companies, Inc. common stock held by United Online, Inc. to United Online, Inc.'s
stockholders on November 1, 2013. United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors also determined to implement a one-for-seven reverse stock split of shares of United Online, Inc. common
35
Table of Contents
stock
immediately prior to the completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction. As a result, the following will occur: (1) FTD Companies, Inc. common stock will be distributed at
12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time ("EDT") on November 1, 2013 to United Online, Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 10, 2013;
(2) United Online, Inc. stockholders will receive one share of FTD Companies, Inc. common stock for every five shares of United Online, Inc. common stock they hold on the
record date of the close of business on October 10, 2013 (prior to giving effect to the reverse stock split of United Online, Inc. shares); and (3) United Online, Inc. will
effect a one-for-seven reverse stock split of United Online, Inc. common stock, which will become effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 31, 2013. See
Note 14"Planned FTD Spin Off" of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and "Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors" for additional
information and risk factors associated with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction.
Following
completion of the spin off, FTD Companies, Inc. will be an independent, publicly-traded company on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, utilizing the ticker symbol: "FTD".
FTD Companies, Inc. will consist of both the domestic and international operations of United Online's FTD segment and include the highly-recognized FTD® and Interflora® brands,
both
supported by the Mercury Man logo that is displayed in approximately 40,000 floral shops worldwide. United Online will continue to operate the businesses of the Company's Content & Media and
Communications segments, supported by the Classmates®, StayFriends, MyPoints®, NetZero®, and Juno® brands.
Segment Services
FTD
FTD is a premier floral and gift products and services company. FTD provides floral, gift and related products and services to
consumers and retail florists, as well as to other retail locations offering floral and gift products primarily in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and the Republic of Ireland. FTD's business uses the
highly-recognized FTD and Interflora brands, both supported by the Mercury Man logo that is displayed in tens of thousands of floral shops worldwide. FTD's portfolio of brands also includes Flying
Flowers, Flowers Direct and Drake Algar in the U.K. FTD is a leading provider of floral and gift items to consumers, which FTD refers to as its consumer business, and a provider of floral network
products and services, which FTD refers to as its floral network business. These businesses are complementary as the majority of floral orders generated by the consumer business are fulfilled and hand
delivered by members of FTD's floral networks, with the remaining orders delivered via direct shipment from third-party suppliers. FTD owns and operates one retail shop and various concession stands
in the U.K. FTD does not maintain significant physical inventory because its floral network members and third-party suppliers maintain substantially all floral and gift physical inventory and
facilities. FTD generally receives payment from consumers before paying its floral network members and third parties for fulfillment and delivery of products.
Consumer Business.
FTD operates in the U.S. and Canada, primarily through the
www.ftd.com
website and
the 1-800-SEND-FTD telephone number, and in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland, primarily through the
www.interflora.co.uk
website and various
telephone numbers. FTD also operates mobile websites for these same markets, excluding Canada, that are optimized for mobile devices with Internet connections. While floral arrangements and plants are
FTD's primary offerings, FTD also markets and sells gift items, including jewelry, sweets, gift baskets, wine, fruit, and spa products.
Consumers
place orders on FTD's websites and, to a much lesser extent, over the telephone. Orders are transmitted to floral network members or third-party suppliers for processing and
delivery. The majority of consumer orders are hand-delivered by FTD's floral network members, who provide
same-day and future-day delivery services. The other consumer orders are fulfilled and shipped directly to the consumer in an elegant gift box by third parties, who provide next-day and future-day
delivery services.
36
Table of Contents
Floral Network Business.
FTD provides a comprehensive suite of products and services to members of its floral networks, including
services that
enable such members to send, receive and deliver floral orders. Floral network members include traditional retail florists, as well as other retail locations offering floral and related products, that
are located primarily in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and the Republic of Ireland. The large networks of floral network members provide an order fulfillment vehicle for FTD's consumer business and
allow FTD to offer same-day delivery capability (subject to certain limitations) to populations throughout the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and the Republic of Ireland.
FTD's
products and services available to floral network members include access to the FTD and Interflora brands and the Mercury Man logo, supported by various marketing campaigns; access
to the floral networks; credit card processing services; e-commerce website services; online advertising tools; clearinghouse services; order transmission services; and system support services, as
well as floral-related products, such as fresh flowers and containers. FTD provides point-of-sale systems and related technology services that enable FTD's floral network members to transmit and
receive orders and manage several back office functions of a floral retailer's business, including accounting, customer relationship management, direct marketing campaigns, delivery route management,
event planning, and mobile applications. FTD also acts as a national wholesaler to its floral network members, providing branded and non-branded hard goods and cut flowers, as well as packaging,
promotional products and a wide variety of other floral-related supplies. Wholesaling branded vases and other hard goods to floral network members helps to ensure consistency between the consumer
orders fulfilled by FTD's floral network members and the product imagery displayed on FTD's websites.
Content & Media
Our Content & Media segment provides online nostalgia products and services under the Classmates, schoolFeed, StayFriends, and
Trombi brands. Our Content & Media products consist of yearbook reprints, as well as third-party merchandise. Our Content & Media segment also offers an online loyalty marketing service
under the MyPoints brand.
Online Nostalgia Services.
We operate our nostalgia services as a platform to enable users to locate and interact with acquaintances
from their past,
with high school affiliations as the primary focus. Our domestic and international nostalgia services comprise a large and diverse population of users, with over 100 million registered accounts
at September 30, 2013.
Domestic.
Visitors to the Classmates website can experience a substantial amount of nostalgic content free of charge. Members with free
accounts can
use our search feature to locate individuals in our database or in our collection of yearbooks; post information and view information posted by other members; tag yearbook photos; and organize
reunions and engage in other reunion-related activities. To engage in the premium features, including access to our Classmates® Guestbook, access to our Classmates location feature and
ability to send double-blind emails through our Classmates website to other members and respond to email messages from any other member, a member is required to purchase an All-Access Pass, which is
generally available for terms ranging from three months to two years. Revenues from our Classmates website are derived primarily from the sale of these subscriptions and, to a lesser extent, from
advertising fees and other transactions on our website, including the sale of yearbook reprints.
International.
In addition to our Classmates website, we operate five international websites that offer nostalgia services, primarily
as a social
networking platform to reconnect friends and acquaintances from high school. We operate StayFriends in Germany, Sweden, Austria, and Switzerland (
www.stayfriends.de,
www.stayfriends.se, www.stayfriends.at
, and
www.stayfriends.ch
, respectively), and Trombi in France
(
www.trombi.com
). Similar to the Classmates website, each international website
37
Table of Contents
includes
free and pay memberships, although the features of our international pay services differ from those of the Classmates pay services.
Online Loyalty Marketing.
Our online loyalty marketing service, MyPoints, connects advertisers with its members by allowing members to
earn rewards
points for engaging in online activities. MyPoints is a free service for consumers who register and provide certain identifying information to receive direct email marketing and other online loyalty
promotions. The MyPoints website
(www.mypoints.com)
serves as a shopping portal for our advertising clients and direct sales partners. Members earn
points for responding to email offers, shopping online at the MyPoints website, taking market research companies'
surveys, playing MyPoints branded online games, searching the Internet through a MyPoints branded toolbar, and engaging in other online activities. In addition to these online point earning
opportunities, MyPoints also offers a member credit card with opportunities to earn points through both online and offline shopping. Rewards points are redeemable primarily in the form of third-party
gift cards currently from approximately 80 merchants, including, among others, leading retailers, theaters, restaurants, airlines, and hotels.
Communications
Our principal Communications pay service is dial-up Internet access, offered under the NetZero and Juno brands. We also offer mobile
broadband, DSL, email, Internet security, web hosting services, and other services. In total, we had 0.6 million Communications pay accounts at September 30, 2013, of which
0.4 million were Internet access pay accounts and 0.2 million were pay accounts subscribed to our other Communications services, including email, Internet security and web hosting
services. Most of our Communications revenues are derived from dial-up Internet access pay accounts.
Internet Access Services.
Our Internet access services consist of dial-up and, to a much lesser extent, our mobile broadband service
and DSL service.
Our dial-up Internet access services are provided on both a free and pay basis, with the free services subject to hourly and other limitations. Basic pay dial-up Internet access services include
Internet access and an email account. In addition, we offer accelerated dial-up Internet access services which can significantly reduce the time required for certain web pages to load during Internet
browsing when compared to our basic dial-up Internet access services. Our accelerated dial-up Internet access services are also bundled with additional benefits, including antivirus software and
enhanced email storage, although we also offer each of these features and certain other value-added features as stand-alone pay services. Our dial-up Internet access services are available in more
than 12,500 cities across the U.S. and Canada.
In
2012, we began offering our NetZero Mobile Broadband service as part of a wholesale agreement with Clearwire. We offer consumers the option to access the service by purchasing either
a NetZero USB modem to connect a single device such as a PC or a Mac® computer, or a NetZero personal hotspot that can connect up to eight Wi-Fi enabled devices simultaneously. NetZero USB
modem and NetZero hotspot customers are able to connect to our mobile broadband service within the Clearwire coverage area using a variety of devices, including a PC, Mac® computer,
iPad® mobile digital device, and other tablets, netbooks and smartphones. Our mobile broadband service is generally available for use in the home, at the office or on the go by customers
across the U.S. within the Clearwire coverage area. In addition, in July 2013, we entered into an agreement with a third-party provider of nationwide wholesale mobile broadband service to expand the
coverage area of our NetZero Mobile Broadband service, which we expect to launch in the first quarter of 2014.
Our
DSL broadband Internet access service consists of digital subscriber lines (also known as "DSL") service that we purchase from third parties and resell under our own
brands. This service is primarily used as a means to retain members who are leaving our dial-up Internet access services. Since we have conducted very limited marketing of our DSL service to the
general public, we have experienced limited adoption of our DSL service.
38
Table of Contents
Key Business Metrics
We review a number of key business metrics to help us monitor our performance and trends affecting our businesses, and to develop
forecasts and budgets. These key measures include the following:
FTD Segment Metrics
Consumer Orders.
We monitor the number of consumer orders for floral, gift and related products during a given period. Consumer orders
are orders
delivered during the period that originated in the U.S. and Canada, primarily from the
www.ftd.com
website and the 1-800-SEND-FTD telephone number, and
in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland, primarily from the
www.interflora.co.uk
website and various telephone numbers. The number of consumer orders is
not adjusted for non-delivered orders that are refunded on or after the scheduled delivery date. Orders originating with a florist or other retail location for delivery to consumers are not included.
The number of consumer orders received may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to seasonality resulting from the timing of key holidays; general economic conditions; fluctuations in
marketing expenditures on initiatives designed to attract new and retain existing customers; changes in pricing for our floral, plant and gift products or competitive offerings; new or terminated
partnerships; and changing consumer preferences, among other factors.
Average Order Value.
We monitor the average value for consumer orders delivered in a given period, which we refer to as the average
order value.
Average order value represents the average U.S. Dollar amount received for consumer orders delivered during a period. For orders placed outside the U.S. (principally in the U.K. and the Republic of
Ireland), this average U.S. Dollar amount is determined after translating the local currency amounts received into U.S. Dollars. Average order value includes merchandise revenues and shipping and
service fees paid by the consumer, less discounts and refunds (net of refund-related fees charged to floral network members). Average order values may fluctuate from period to period based on the
average foreign currency exchange rates; product mix; changes in merchandise pricing, shipping and service fees; levels of refunds issued; and discounts, among other factors.
Content & Media and Communications Segment Metrics
Pay Accounts.
We generate a significant portion of our revenues from our pay accounts and they represent one of the most important
drivers of our
business model. A pay account is defined as a member who has paid for a subscription to a Content & Media or Communications service, and whose subscription has not terminated or expired. A
subscription provides the member with access to our service for a specific term (for example, a month or a year) and may be renewed upon the expiration of each term. One time purchases of our
services, with the exception of our free mobile broadband service, are not considered subscriptions and thus, are not included in the pay accounts metric. A pay account does not equate to a unique
subscriber since one subscriber could have several pay accounts. In addition, at any point in time, our pay account base includes a number of accounts receiving a free period of service as either a
promotion or retention tool, such as the subscribers receiving our free mobile broadband service, and a number of accounts that have notified us that they are terminating their service but whose
service remains in effect. In general, the key metrics that affect our revenues from our pay accounts base include the number of pay accounts and ARPU. A pay account generally becomes a free account
following the expiration or termination of the related subscription.
ARPU.
We monitor ARPU, which is a monthly measure calculated by dividing services revenues generated from the pay accounts of our
Content &
Media or Communications segment, as applicable, for a period (after translation into U.S. Dollars) by the average number of segment pay accounts for that period, divided by the number of months in
that period. The average number of pay accounts is
39
Table of Contents
the
simple average of the number of pay accounts at the beginning and the end of a period. ARPU may fluctuate significantly from period to period as a result of a variety of factors, including, but
not limited to, the extent to which promotional, discounted or retention pricing is used to attract new, or retain existing, paying subscribers; changes in the mix of pay services and the related
pricing plans; increases or decreases in the price of our services; the timing of pay accounts being added or removed during a period; and for the Content & Media segment the average foreign
currency exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro.
Churn.
To evaluate the retention characteristics of our membership base, we also monitor the percentage of pay accounts that terminate
or expire,
which we refer to as our average monthly churn rate. Our average monthly churn rate is calculated as the total number of pay accounts that terminated or expired in a period divided by the average
number of pay accounts for that period, divided by the number of months in that period. Our average monthly churn percentage may fluctuate from period to period due to our mix of subscription terms,
which affects the timing of subscription expirations, and other factors. We make certain normalizing adjustments to the calculation of our churn percentage for periods in which we add a significant
number of pay accounts due to acquisitions. For our Communications segment pay accounts, we do not include in our churn calculation accounts canceled during the first 30 days of service, other
than dial-up accounts that have upgraded from free accounts. A number of such accounts nevertheless will be included in our account totals at any given measurement date. Subscribers who cancel one pay
service but subscribe to another pay service are not necessarily considered to have canceled a pay account depending on the services and, as such, our segment churn rates are not necessarily
indicative of the percentage of subscribers canceling any particular service.
Active Accounts.
We monitor the number of active accounts among our membership base. Content & Media segment active accounts
are defined as
the sum of all pay accounts as of the date presented; the monthly average for the period of all free accounts who have visited our domestic or international online nostalgia websites (excluding
schoolFeed and The Names Database) at least once during the period; and the monthly average for the period of all online loyalty marketing members who have earned or redeemed points during such
period. Communications segment active accounts include all Communications segment pay accounts as of the date presented combined with the number of free dial-up Internet access and email accounts that
logged on to our services at least once during the preceding 31 days. Content & Media segment and Communications segment active accounts for the six-month, nine-month and annual periods,
as applicable, are calculated as a simple average of the quarterly active accounts for each respective segment.
In
general, we count and track pay accounts and free accounts by unique member identifiers. Users have the ability to register for separate services under separate brands and member
identifiers independently. We do not track whether a pay account has purchased more than one of our services
unless the account uses the same member identifier. As a result, total active accounts may not represent total unique users.
Revenues
and operating results from the FTD segment are impacted by seasonal holiday timing variations and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As such, we believe that
comparisons of the FTD segment's revenues and operating results for any period with those of the immediately preceding period or, in some instances, the same period of the preceding fiscal year, may
be of limited relevance in evaluating its historical financial performance and predicting its future financial performance.
The
pay accounts and ARPU metrics for the Content & Media segment may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to various factors, including, but not limited to, the
extent to which discounted pricing is offered in prior and current periods, the percentage of pay accounts being
40
Table of Contents
represented
by international pay accounts, which, on average, have lower-priced subscription plans compared to U.S. pay accounts, and the churn rate.
The
pay accounts, churn and ARPU metrics for the Communications segment may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to various factors, including, but not limited to, the
number of wireless pay accounts, which have a higher churn rate and ARPU.
The
table below sets forth, for the periods presented, as applicable, our consolidated revenues, segment revenues, consumer orders, average order value, average currency exchange rates,
pay accounts, segment churn, ARPU, and segment active accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
June 30,
2013
|
|
March 31,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
174,713
|
|
$
|
221,749
|
|
$
|
247,384
|
|
$
|
218,983
|
|
$
|
177,751
|
|
$
|
643,846
|
|
$
|
651,900
|
|
FTD:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
118,527
|
|
$
|
164,279
|
|
$
|
190,283
|
|
$
|
153,178
|
|
$
|
116,362
|
|
$
|
473,089
|
|
$
|
460,336
|
|
% of consolidated revenues
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
71
|
%
|
Consumer orders (in thousands)
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
Average order value
|
|
$
|
61.69
|
|
$
|
61.27
|
|
$
|
61.01
|
|
$
|
60.13
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
$
|
61.26
|
|
$
|
61.65
|
|
Average currency exchange rate: GBP to USD
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Content & Media:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
32,233
|
|
$
|
32,919
|
|
$
|
32,826
|
|
$
|
39,509
|
|
$
|
36,556
|
|
$
|
97,978
|
|
$
|
113,987
|
|
% of consolidated revenues
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
17
|
%
|
Pay accounts (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
Segment churn
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
ARPU
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
Segment active accounts (in millions)
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Average currency exchange rate: EUR to USD
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
Communications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
24,354
|
|
$
|
24,935
|
|
$
|
24,640
|
|
$
|
26,669
|
|
$
|
25,203
|
|
$
|
73,929
|
|
$
|
78,773
|
|
% of consolidated revenues
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
12
|
%
|
Pay accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet access
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
440
|
|
Other
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pay accounts
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
675
|
|
Segment churn
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
ARPU
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
$
|
8.97
|
|
$
|
9.31
|
|
$
|
8.93
|
|
Segment active accounts (in millions)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired entity over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible
assets acquired. Indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired in a business combination are initially recorded at management's estimate of their fair values. We account for goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350,
IntangiblesGoodwill and Other
, which
among other things, addresses financial accounting and reporting requirements for acquired goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. ASC 350 prohibits the amortization of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets and requires us to test goodwill, at the reporting unit level, and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually.
41
Table of Contents
We
test the goodwill of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year and whenever events occur or
circumstances change that would more likely than not indicate that the goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets might be impaired. Events or circumstances which could trigger an impairment
review include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of
key management or other personnel, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the acquired business or our overall business, significant and sustained
decline in market capitalization, significant negative industry or economic trends, or significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations.
The
determination of whether or not goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired involves a significant level of judgment in the assumptions underlying the approaches
used to determine the estimated fair values of our reporting units. The determination of the fair values of our reporting units generally includes a study of market comparables, including the
selection of appropriate valuation multiples and discounted cash flow models based on our internal forecasts and projections. The estimated fair value of each of our reporting units is typically
determined using a combination of the income approach and the market approach.
Goodwill
We operate in three reportable segments, in accordance with ASC 280,
Segment Reporting
,
and we have identified five reporting unitsFTD, Interflora, Classmates, MyPoints, and Communicationsfor purposes of evaluating goodwill. These reporting units each constitute
a business or group of businesses for which discrete financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by segment management. The goodwill related to our acquired businesses is specific to
each reporting unit and the goodwill amounts are assigned as such.
Testing
goodwill for impairment involves a two-step quantitative process. However, prior to performing the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test, we have the option to first
assess qualitative factors to determine whether or not it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test for selected reporting units. If we choose that option, we are not
required to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test unless we have determined, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the two-step quantitative impairment test is required or chosen, the first step of the impairment test involves comparing the estimated fair value
of a reporting unit with its respective carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, including goodwill, goodwill is considered not
to be impaired and no additional steps are necessary. If, however, the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then the carrying amount of the
goodwill is compared with its implied fair value. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
Impairment of Goodwill
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, due to a decline in internal financial projections, we performed an interim
quantitative goodwill assessment for our Classmates reporting unit. Due to the complexity and the effort required to estimate the fair value of the Classmates reporting unit in step one of the
impairment test and to estimate the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the Classmates reporting unit in step two of the test, the fair value estimates were derived based on preliminary
assumptions and analysis that are subject to change. Based on our preliminary analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill was substantially lower than the carrying value of goodwill for our
Classmates reporting unit. As a result, we recorded our best estimate of $50.2 million for the goodwill
42
Table of Contents
impairment
charge during the quarter ended September 30, 2013. The impairment charge was included in impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets in the consolidated
statements of operations. Any adjustment to the estimated impairment charge will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013.
The
estimated fair value of the Classmates reporting unit was determined using the income approach, which was estimated based on the discounted cash flow method. The discounted cash flow
method is dependent upon a number of factors, including projections of the amounts and timing of future revenues and cash flows, assumed discount rates and other assumptions. The inputs for the fair
value calculations of the Classmates reporting unit included a 4.0% growth rate to calculate the terminal value and a discount rate of 12.0%. In addition, the Company assumed revenue growth and
applied margin and other cost assumptions consistent with the reporting unit's historical trends.
The
determination of whether or not goodwill is impaired involves a significant level of judgment in the assumptions underlying the approaches used to determine the estimated fair value
of our reporting units. We believe our analysis included sufficient tolerance for sensitivity in key assumptions. We believe the assumptions and rates used in our impairment assessment are reasonable,
but they are judgmental, and variations in any assumptions could result in materially different calculations of fair value.
Financial Statement Presentation
Revenues
Products Revenues
Products revenues are derived primarily from selling floral, gift and related products to consumers and the related shipping and
service fees. Products revenues also include revenues generated from sales of branded and non-branded hard goods, software and hardware systems, cut flowers, packaging and promotional products, and a
wide variety of other floral-related supplies to floral network members.
Products revenues consist of revenues generated from the sale of yearbook reprints and related shipping and handling fees, as well as
revenues generated from reselling third-party merchandise.
Products revenues consist of revenues generated from the sale of mobile broadband devices and the related shipping and handling fees.
Services Revenues
FTD services revenues are derived primarily from orders sent to floral network members and fees for floral network services.
Content & Media services revenues primarily consist of amounts charged to pay accounts for online nostalgia services.
Communications services revenues consist of amounts charged to pay accounts for dial-up Internet access, mobile broadband, DSL, email, Internet security, web hosting, and other services, with
substantially all of such revenues associated with Internet access. Our Content & Media
43
Table of Contents
and
Communications services revenues are primarily dependent on two factors: the average number of pay accounts for a period and ARPU. In general, we charge our pay accounts in advance of providing a
service, which results in the deferral of services revenue to the period in which the services are provided. Communications services revenues also include revenues generated from the resale of
telecommunications to third parties.
Advertising and Other Revenues
We provide advertising opportunities to marketers with both brand and direct response objectives through a full suite of display,
search, email, and text-link opportunities across our various properties.
Our online nostalgia services generate advertising revenues primarily from display advertisements on our websites. Advertising
inventory on our online nostalgia websites includes text and graphic placements on the user home page, profile page, class list page, and most other pages on our websites.
Our
online loyalty marketing service revenues are derived from advertising fees, consisting primarily of fees based on performance measures, that are generated when emails are
transmitted to members, when members respond to emails, when members complete online transactions, and when members engage in a variety of other online activities, including, but not limited to,
games, Internet searches and market research surveys. Our online loyalty marketing service revenues also include revenues generated from the sale of gift cards.
Our Communications services generate advertising revenues from search placements, display advertisements and online market research
associated with our Internet access and email services. Advertising revenues also include intercompany commissions from the Content & Media segment which are included in reported segment
results and are eliminated upon consolidation.
Cost of Revenues
FTD
FTD cost of revenues includes product costs; shipping and delivery costs; costs associated with taking orders; printing and postage
costs; systems installation, training and support costs; data center costs; depreciation of network computers and equipment; license fees; costs related
to customer billing and billing support for floral network members; fees associated with the storage and processing of customer credit cards and associated bank fees; and domain name registration
fees.
Content & Media
Content & Media cost of revenues includes costs related to the sale of gift cards; costs of points earned by members of our
online loyalty marketing service; data center costs; personnel- and overhead-related costs associated with operating our networks and data centers; depreciation of network computers and equipment;
amortization of content purchases; license fees; costs related to providing customer support; costs related to customer billing and billing support for our pay accounts; fees associated with the
storage and processing of customer credit cards and associated bank fees; domain name registration fees; costs associated with the sale of yearbook reprints and the related shipping and handling
costs; and costs related to third-party merchandise.
44
Table of Contents
Communications
Communications cost of revenues includes telecommunications and data center costs; personnel- and overhead-related costs associated
with operating our networks and data centers; depreciation of network computers and equipment; license fees; costs related to providing customer support; costs related to customer billing and billing
support for our pay accounts; fees associated with the storage and processing of customer credit cards and associated bank fees; domain name registration fees, and the costs associated with the sale
of mobile broadband devices, including the related shipping and handling costs.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses include expenses associated with promoting our brands, products and services and with generating
advertising revenues. Expenses associated with
promoting our brands, products and services include advertising and promotion expenses; fees paid to distribution partners, third-party advertising networks and co-registration partners to acquire new
pay and free accounts; personnel and overhead-related expenses for marketing, merchandising, customer service, and sales personnel; and telemarketing costs incurred to acquire and retain pay accounts
and up-sell pay accounts to additional services. Expenses associated with generating advertising revenues include sales commissions and personnel-related expenses. We have expended significant amounts
on sales and marketing, including branding and customer acquisition campaigns consisting of television, Internet, public relations, sponsorships, print, and outdoor advertising, and on retail and
other performance-based distribution relationships. Marketing and advertising costs to promote our products and services are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising and promotion expenses include
media, agency and promotion expenses. Media production costs are expensed the first time the advertisement is run. Media and agency costs are expensed over the period the advertising runs.
Technology and Development
Technology and development expenses include expenses for product development, maintenance of existing software, technology and
websites, and development of new or improved software and technology, including personnel-related expenses for our technology group in various office locations. Costs incurred by us to manage and
monitor our technology and development activities are expensed as incurred.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses, which include unallocated corporate expenses, consist of personnel-related expenses for executive,
finance, legal, human resources, facilities, internal audit, investor relations, internal customer support personnel and personnel associated with operating our corporate network systems. In addition,
general and administrative expenses include, among other costs, professional fees for legal, accounting and financial services; insurance; occupancy and other overhead-related costs; office relocation
costs; non-income taxes; gains and losses on the sale of assets; bad debt expense; and reserves or expenses incurred as a result of settlements, judgments, fines, penalties, assessment, or other
resolutions related to litigation, arbitration, investigations, disputes, or similar matters. General and administrative expenses also include expenses resulting from actual or potential transactions
such as business combinations, mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, spin offs, financing transactions, and other strategic transactions, including, without limitation, expenses for advisors and
representatives such as investment bankers, consultants, attorneys, and accounting firms.
45
Table of Contents
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets includes amortization of acquired pay accounts and free accounts; certain acquired trademarks and
trade names; acquired software and technology; acquired customer and advertising contracts and related relationships; acquired rights, content and intellectual property; and other acquired
identifiable intangible assets.
Contingent ConsiderationFair Value Adjustment
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment includes changes in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration, as
well as interest expense related to such contingent consideration. Changes to one or multiple inputs to the Monte-Carlo simulation used to estimate fair value, including the discount rate, mean growth
rates, volatility rates, the estimated number of daily registrations, and the estimated rate of conversion of new subscribers to pay accounts, could significantly impact the estimated fair value of
contingent consideration. We review and reassess the estimated fair value of contingent consideration on a quarterly basis, and future fair value estimates could differ from the initial estimate.
Restructuring and Other Exit Costs
Restructuring and other exit costs consist of costs associated with the realignment and reorganization of our operations and other
employee termination events. Restructuring and other exit costs include employee termination costs, facility closure and relocation costs, and contract termination costs. The timing of associated cash
payments is dependent upon the type of exit cost and can extend over a 12-month period. We record restructuring and other exit cost liabilities in accrued liabilities or other liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets.
Interest Income
Interest income consists primarily of earnings on our cash and cash equivalents and interest on long-term receivables, including those
from FTD's technology system sales.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists of interest expense on our credit facilities, including accretion of discounts and amortization of debt issue
costs and loss on extinguishment of debt.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net, consists of gains and losses on foreign currency exchange rate transactions; realized and unrealized gains
and losses on certain forward foreign currency exchange contracts; gains or losses related to ineffectiveness of derivative instruments; equity earnings on investments in subsidiaries; and other
non-operating income and expenses.
46
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 compared to
Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
The following tables set forth, for the periods presented, selected historical consolidated statements of operations and segment
information data. The information contained in the tables below should be read in conjunction with Liquidity and Capital Resources, Contractual Obligations, and Other Commitments included in this
Item 2, as well as "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" included in Part I, Item 3 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part 1, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If we complete the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, we
will be a substantially smaller company than we were prior to the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, and we anticipate that our consolidated revenues, results of operations and cash flows will be substantially
lower when compared to periods prior to the FTD Spin-Off Transaction.
Unaudited
condensed consolidated information was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
174,713
|
|
$
|
177,751
|
|
$
|
643,846
|
|
$
|
651,900
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
89,390
|
|
|
89,375
|
|
|
353,055
|
|
|
345,918
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
34,224
|
|
|
37,012
|
|
|
121,730
|
|
|
130,571
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
11,859
|
|
|
36,406
|
|
|
35,363
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
24,091
|
|
|
24,663
|
|
|
74,486
|
|
|
72,199
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
22,586
|
|
|
22,659
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
(5,124
|
)
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
14
|
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
216,765
|
|
|
169,335
|
|
|
655,863
|
|
|
605,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(42,052
|
)
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
(12,017
|
)
|
|
46,563
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
962
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,067
|
)
|
|
(3,260
|
)
|
|
(10,450
|
)
|
|
(10,301
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
550
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(45,917
|
)
|
|
5,664
|
|
|
(21,298
|
)
|
|
37,992
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
12,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,232
|
)
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
$
|
(30,861
|
)
|
$
|
25,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Table of Contents
Information
for our three reportable segments, which excludes depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
118,527
|
|
$
|
116,362
|
|
$
|
32,233
|
|
$
|
36,556
|
|
$
|
24,354
|
|
$
|
25,203
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
71,574
|
|
|
69,938
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
8,386
|
|
|
8,139
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
|
21,096
|
|
|
9,640
|
|
|
11,696
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
4,531
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,430
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
4,897
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
107,072
|
|
|
102,172
|
|
|
73,526
|
|
|
28,554
|
|
|
16,236
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
$
|
14,190
|
|
$
|
(41,293
|
)
|
$
|
8,002
|
|
$
|
8,118
|
|
$
|
8,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
473,089
|
|
$
|
460,336
|
|
$
|
97,978
|
|
$
|
113,987
|
|
$
|
73,929
|
|
$
|
78,773
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
295,078
|
|
|
287,045
|
|
|
22,338
|
|
|
25,384
|
|
|
24,925
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
79,128
|
|
|
78,453
|
|
|
31,008
|
|
|
38,604
|
|
|
12,146
|
|
|
13,723
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
9,026
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
14,540
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
|
5,964
|
|
|
5,492
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
30,463
|
|
|
25,450
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
15,363
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,124
|
)
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
413,695
|
|
|
399,405
|
|
|
127,697
|
|
|
92,054
|
|
|
50,893
|
|
|
51,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
59,394
|
|
$
|
60,931
|
|
$
|
(29,719
|
)
|
$
|
21,933
|
|
$
|
23,036
|
|
$
|
27,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Table of Contents
Consolidated Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
174,713
|
|
$
|
177,751
|
|
$
|
(3,038
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
$
|
643,846
|
|
$
|
651,900
|
|
$
|
(8,054
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Revenues as a percentage of total segment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
|
70.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in consolidated revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was due to a $4.3 million decrease
in revenues from our Content & Media segment and an $0.8 million decrease in revenues from our Communications segment, partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in revenues from
our FTD segment.
The
decrease in consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to a $16.0 million
decrease in revenues from our Content & Media segment and a $4.8 million decrease in revenues from our Communications segment, partially offset by a $12.8 million increase in
revenues from our FTD segment.
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
89,390
|
|
$
|
89,375
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
%
|
$
|
353,055
|
|
$
|
345,918
|
|
$
|
7,137
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Cost of revenues as a percentage of total segment cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
%
|
|
85.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
cost of revenues was relatively flat for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, which was due to a
$1.6 million increase in cost of revenues associated with our FTD segment and a $0.3 million increase in cost of revenues associated with our Communications segment. These increases were
offset by a $1.4 million decrease in cost of revenues associated with our Content & Media segment and a $0.5 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense.
The
increase in consolidated cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to an
$8.0 million increase in cost of revenues associated with our FTD segment, a $1.2 million increase in cost of revenues associated with our Communications segment and a
$0.9 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense. These increases were partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in cost of revenues associated with our Content &
Media segment.
49
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
34,224
|
|
$
|
37,012
|
|
$
|
(2,788
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
$
|
121,730
|
|
$
|
130,571
|
|
$
|
(8,841
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total segment sales and marketing expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
31.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in consolidated sales and marketing expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a
$2.1 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses associated with our Content & Media segment and a $0.7 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses associated with our
Communications segment.
The
decrease in consolidated sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$7.6 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses associated with our Content & Media segment, a $1.6 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses associated with our
Communications segment and a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation expense. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in sales and marketing expenses associated
with our FTD segment.
Technology and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
$
|
11,481
|
|
$
|
11,859
|
|
$
|
(378
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
$
|
36,406
|
|
$
|
35,363
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Technology and development expenses as a percentage of total segment technology and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
52.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
50.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in consolidated technology and development expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$0.5 million decrease in depreciation expense and a $0.4 million decrease in technology and development expenses associated with our Content & Media segment, partially offset by a
$0.4 million increase in technology and development expenses associated with our Communications segment.
The
increase in consolidated technology and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due
to a $0.6 million increase in technology and development expenses associated with our FTD segment, a $0.5 million increase in technology and development expenses associated with our
Communications segment and a $0.4 million increase in technology and development expenses associated with our Content & Media segment. These increases were partially offset by a
$0.4 million decrease in depreciation expense.
50
Table of Contents
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
24,091
|
|
$
|
24,663
|
|
$
|
(572
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
$
|
74,486
|
|
$
|
72,199
|
|
$
|
2,287
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total segment general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content & Media
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in consolidated general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily
due to a $3.0 million decrease in general and administrative expenses associated with our Content & Media segment, a $0.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses
associated with our Communications segment and a $0.2 million decrease in unallocated corporate expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and restructuring and other
exit costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses associated with our FTD segment.
The
increase in consolidated general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was
primarily due to a $5.0 million increase in general and administrative expenses associated with our FTD segment and a $1.1 million increase in unallocated corporate expenses, excluding
depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and restructuring and other exit costs. These increases were partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in general and administrative expenses
associated with our Content & Media segment, a $0.5 million decrease in depreciation expense, and a $0.2 million decrease in general and administrative expenses associated with
our Communications segment.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
7,082
|
|
$
|
7,813
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
$
|
22,586
|
|
$
|
22,659
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
%
|
The
decrease in consolidated amortization of intangible assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due
to a $0.7 million decrease in FTD amortization of intangible assets primarily due to certain intangible assets being fully amortized.
Consolidated
amortization of intangible assets was relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012,
primarily due to a $0.6 million decrease in FTD amortization of intangible assets primarily due to certain intangible assets being fully amortized, partially offset by a $0.6 million
increase in Content & Media amortization of intangible assets primarily related to the acquisition of schoolFeed in the second quarter of 2012.
51
Table of Contents
Contingent ConsiderationFair Value Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(1,387
|
)
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
$
|
(5,124
|
)
|
$
|
(1,387
|
)
|
$
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
Contingent
considerationfair value adjustment for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was comprised of a $2.0 million decrease in the
estimated fair value of contingent consideration, partially offset by $0.6 million of interest expense related to such contingent consideration.
Contingent
considerationfair value adjustment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of a $5.7 million decrease in the estimated fair value
of contingent consideration, partially offset by $0.5 million of interest expense related to such contingent consideration. During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, Facebook restricted
certain functionality of the schoolFeed app, which limited schoolFeed's ability to use the Facebook service to contact users who are not registered members of schoolFeed. In May 2013, Facebook
discontinued the schoolFeed app's access to the Facebook service, which resulted in the termination of future new installations of the schoolFeed app through Facebook, as well as the discontinuance of
the sharing of Facebook content through the schoolFeed app.
Restructuring and Other Exit Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
*
|
Consolidated
restructuring and other exit costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 included $0.3 million of employee termination costs recorded in our
Content & Media segment.
Consolidated
restructuring and other exit costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $2.3 million of employee termination costs and $0.2 million of
contract termination costs recorded in our Content & Media segment.
Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
A
goodwill impairment charge totaling $50.2 million was recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 due to a material reduction in the fair value of the Classmates
reporting unit. See
52
Table of Contents
"Critical
Accounting Policies, Estimates and AssumptionsImpairment of Goodwill" for additional information.
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
|
(53
|
)%
|
$
|
619
|
|
$
|
962
|
|
$
|
(343
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)%
|
The
decrease in consolidated interest income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, was
primarily related to higher interest income at our India subsidiary during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
4,067
|
|
$
|
3,260
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
$
|
10,450
|
|
$
|
10,301
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
The
increase in consolidated interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a
$2.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt recognized in connection with the refinancing of FTD's credit facilities, partially offset by a $1.5 million reduction in interest expense
related to lower interest rates and lower amounts outstanding under the credit facilities.
The
increase in consolidated interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a
$2.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt recognized in connection with the refinancing of FTD's credit facilities, partially offset by a $2.0 million reduction in interest expense
related to lower interest rates and lower amounts outstanding under the credit facilities.
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
*
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
$
|
768
|
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
Consolidated
other expense, net, was relatively flat for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
The
decrease in consolidated other income, net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a
decrease in gains associated with foreign currency exchange transactions and a decrease in realized and unrealized gains related to forward foreign currency exchange contracts, partially offset by an
increase in gains on investments.
53
Table of Contents
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,315
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
$
|
9,563
|
|
$
|
12,512
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
(44.9
|
)%
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
For
the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a tax provision of $1.3 million on pretax loss of $45.9 million, compared to a tax provision of
$0.2 million on pretax income of $5.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a tax provision of
$9.6 million on pretax loss of $21.3 million, compared to a tax provision of $12.5 million on pretax income of $38.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2012. The change in our effective income tax rate for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily
due to the Classmates reporting unit goodwill impairment charge.
FTD Segment Results
FTD Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and average order value)
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
88,633
|
|
$
|
85,753
|
|
$
|
2,880
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
370,980
|
|
$
|
359,151
|
|
$
|
11,829
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Services
|
|
|
29,894
|
|
|
30,609
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
102,109
|
|
|
101,185
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FTD Revenues
|
|
$
|
118,527
|
|
$
|
116,362
|
|
$
|
2,165
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
$
|
473,089
|
|
$
|
460,336
|
|
$
|
12,753
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer orders
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
5,375
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Average order value
|
|
$
|
61.69
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
$
|
61.26
|
|
$
|
61.65
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
The
increase in total FTD revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to an
increase in revenues generated by our consumer business. The increase in FTD products revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012,
was driven by a 1% increase in consumer order volume, as well as a 1% increase in average order value due to higher average order values in both the U.S. and the U.K., excluding the unfavorable impact
of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates, average order value increased 2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013
compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Also contributing to the increase in FTD products revenues was a $1.1 million increase in container sales to our floral network members.
The decrease in FTD services revenues for the quarter was primarily related to a decrease in membership and subscription-based revenues. Foreign currency exchange rates had a
$0.6 million unfavorable impact on total FTD revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, due to a weaker British Pound
versus the U.S. Dollar.
The
increase in total FTD revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to an increase in
revenues generated by our consumer business, including a $4.1 million increase in revenues generated by the Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct and Drake Algar businesses, which were acquired in
April 2012. The increase in FTD products revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was driven by a 3% increase in
consumer order volume, substantially all of which was due to orders from the Flying Flowers and Flowers Direct businesses. This increase in order volume was partially offset by a 1% decrease in
average order value primarily due to consumer orders
54
Table of Contents
generated
by the Flying Flowers and Flowers Direct businesses, which have lower average order values compared to the rest of FTD's consumer business. Excluding the Flying Flowers and Flowers Direct
businesses and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates, average order value increased by 1%. Also contributing to the increase in FTD products revenues was a $3.3 million
increase in container sales to our floral network members. The increase in FTD services revenues was primarily related to a $1.4 million increase in order-related revenues driven by an increase
in order volume in the floral network business, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in membership and subscription-based revenue. Foreign currency exchange rates had a
$2.9 million unfavorable impact on total FTD revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 due to a weaker British Pound versus the U.S. Dollar.
FTD Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
FTD cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
71,574
|
|
$
|
69,938
|
|
$
|
1,636
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
$
|
295,078
|
|
$
|
287,045
|
|
$
|
8,033
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
FTD cost of revenues as a percentage of FTD revenues
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increase in FTD cost of revenues for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter and nine months ended September 30,
2012, primarily due to the increase in FTD products revenues. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.4 million and $2.0 million favorable impact on FTD cost of revenues for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, due to a weaker British Pound versus the U.S. Dollar. FTD cost of revenues as a percentage of FTD revenues remained relatively flat for
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
FTD Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
FTD sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
21,164
|
|
$
|
21,096
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
%
|
$
|
79,128
|
|
$
|
78,453
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
FTD sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of FTD revenues
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTD
sales and marketing expenses were relatively flat for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
The
increase in FTD sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily related
to a $2.0 million increase in marketing costs related to the Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct and Drake Algar businesses and a $1.1 million increase in marketing expenditures related to
the increase in floral network order volume. These increases were partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in certain higher cost marketing programs in the consumer business and a
$0.8 million decrease in selling costs in the floral network business. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.3 million favorable impact on FTD sales and marketing expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2013.
55
Table of Contents
FTD Technology and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
FTD technology and development
|
|
$
|
2,904
|
|
$
|
2,787
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
$
|
9,026
|
|
$
|
8,457
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
FTD technology and development expenses as a percentage of FTD revenues
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increases in FTD technology and development expenses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2012, were primarily due to increases in personnel-related costs.
FTD General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
FTD general and administrative
|
|
$
|
11,430
|
|
$
|
8,351
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
$
|
30,463
|
|
$
|
25,450
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
FTD general and administrative expenses as a percentage of FTD revenues
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increase in FTD general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was
primarily due to $3.3 million in costs recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 associated with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction and a $0.2 million increase in
personnel-related costs. These increases were partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in bad debt expense.
The
increase in FTD general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily
due to $4.7 million in costs recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 associated with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, compared to $0.6 million of transaction-related
costs recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 associated with the acquisition of the Gifts Division of Flying Brands Limited, which includes the Flying Flowers, Flowers Direct and
Drake Algar businesses, a $2.0 million increase in legal fees and dispute settlement costs and a $0.6 million increase in personnel-related costs. These increases were partially offset
by an interim award of $1.7 million as reimbursement of legal fees in the Marks and Spencer litigation and a $0.4 million decrease in bad debt expense.
Content & Media Segment Results
Content & Media Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and ARPU)
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
$
|
2,492
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
Services
|
|
|
20,501
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
(2,532
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
62,256
|
|
|
72,886
|
|
|
(10,630
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
Advertising and other
|
|
|
10,894
|
|
|
12,418
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
33,230
|
|
|
38,215
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Content & Media Revenues
|
|
$
|
32,233
|
|
$
|
36,556
|
|
$
|
(4,323
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
$
|
97,978
|
|
$
|
113,987
|
|
$
|
(16,009
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Average pay accounts
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
56
Table of Contents
The
decrease in Content & Media services revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was a
result of an 11% decrease in our average number of pay accounts, partially offset by a 1% increase in ARPU. Content & Media advertising and other revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease
in advertising revenues from our online loyalty marketing services as a result of lower average revenues per advertising customer, as well as a decrease in online loyalty marketing active accounts. We
anticipate that Content & Media pay accounts and revenues will continue to decline year over year, at least in the near term. The decrease in Content & Media products revenues for the
quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was related to the phasing out of third-party merchandise sales. Adjusting for the favorable impact of
foreign currency exchange rates of $0.5 million due to a stronger Euro versus the U.S. Dollar, Content & Media revenues decreased by $4.8 million, or 13%.
The
decrease in Content & Media services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was a result of
a 14% decrease in our average number of pay accounts, as well as a 1% decrease in ARPU. Content & Media advertising and other revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease in advertising
revenues from our online loyalty marketing services as a result of lower average revenues per advertising customer, as well as a decrease in online loyalty marketing active accounts. The decrease in
Content & Media products revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was related to the phasing out of third-party
merchandise sales. Adjusting for the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates of $0.7 million due to a stronger Euro versus the U.S. Dollar, Content & Media revenues decreased
by $16.7 million, or 15%.
Content & Media Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
6,977
|
|
$
|
8,386
|
|
$
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
$
|
22,338
|
|
$
|
25,384
|
|
$
|
(3,046
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Content & Media cost of revenues as a percentage of Content & Media revenues
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Content & Media cost of revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was due
to a $0.7 million decrease in cost of points earned by members of our online loyalty marketing service due to lower revenues, a $0.4 million decrease in hosting-related fees due to the
consolidation of certain data centers, a $0.2 million decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs, and a $0.2 million decrease in costs associated with the sale of third-party
merchandise. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in costs related to the sale of gift cards.
The
decrease in Content & Media cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$1.6 million decrease in cost of points earned by members of our online loyalty marketing service due to lower revenues, a $1.1 million decrease in hosting-related fees due to the
consolidation of certain data centers and lower software licensing fees, a $1.1 million decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs due to our restructuring initiatives, and a
$0.3 million decrease in costs associated with the sale of third-party merchandise. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in costs related to the sale of gift
cards.
57
Table of Contents
Content & Media Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
9,640
|
|
$
|
11,696
|
|
$
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
$
|
31,008
|
|
$
|
38,604
|
|
$
|
(7,596
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Content & Media sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of Content & Media revenues
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Content & Media sales and marketing expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30,
2012, was due to a $1.2 million decrease in online marketing costs to acquire new online nostalgia members due to our cost-cutting efforts and a $0.7 million decrease in personnel- and
overhead-related costs due to our restructuring initiatives.
The
decrease in Content & Media sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was
due to a $4.7 million decrease in online marketing costs to acquire new online nostalgia members due to our cost-cutting efforts, a $2.5 million decrease in personnel- and
overhead-related costs due to our restructuring initiatives and a $0.4 million decrease in costs to acquire new online loyalty marketing members.
Content & Media Technology and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media technology and development
|
|
$
|
4,531
|
|
$
|
4,962
|
|
$
|
(431
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
$
|
14,540
|
|
$
|
14,181
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Content & Media technology and development expenses as a percentage of Content & Media revenues
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Content & Media technology and development expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended
September 30, 2012, was due to a decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs.
The
increase in Content & Media technology and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2012, was the result of an increase in personnel- and overhead-related costs primarily due to the acquisition of schoolFeed in June 2012.
58
Table of Contents
Content & Media General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media general and administrative
|
|
$
|
1,881
|
|
$
|
4,897
|
|
$
|
(3,016
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)%
|
$
|
12,211
|
|
$
|
15,363
|
|
$
|
(3,152
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
Content & Media general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Content & Media revenues
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Content & Media general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended
September 30, 2012, was due to a $2.8 million insurance reimbursement received in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 related to a legal settlement and a $0.3 million
decrease in professional services and consulting fees. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in bad debt expense.
The
decrease in Content & Media general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2012, was due to a $2.8 million insurance reimbursement received in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 related to a legal settlement, an $0.8 million decrease in personnel-
and overhead-related costs, and a $0.5 million decrease in transaction-related costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in reserves for legal settlements
and a $0.5 million increase in bad debt expense.
Content & Media Contingent ConsiderationFair Value Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media contingent considerationfair value adjustment
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(1,387
|
)
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
$
|
(5,124
|
)
|
$
|
(1,387
|
)
|
$
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
-
*
-
Not
meaningful
Content &
Media contingent considerationfair value adjustment for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was comprised of a
$2.0 million decrease in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration, partially offset by $0.6 million of interest expense related to such contingent consideration.
Content &
Media contingent considerationfair value adjustment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of a $5.7 million decrease in
the estimated fair value of contingent consideration, partially offset by $0.5 million of interest expense related to such contingent consideration. During the quarter ended March 31,
2013, Facebook restricted certain functionality of the schoolFeed app, which limited schoolFeed's ability to use the Facebook service to contact users who are not registered members of schoolFeed. In
May 2013, Facebook discontinued the schoolFeed app's access to the Facebook service, which resulted in the termination of future new installations of the schoolFeed app through Facebook, as well as
the discontinuance of the sharing of Facebook content through the schoolFeed app.
59
Table of Contents
Content & Media Restructuring and Other Exit Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
$
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
*
|
-
*
-
Not
meaningful
Content &
Media restructuring and other exit costs for the quarter months ended September 30, 2013 included $0.3 million of employee termination
costs.
Content &
Media restructuring and other exit costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $2.3 million of employee termination costs and
$0.2 million of contract termination costs. These restructuring and other exit costs were a result of management's initiative to improve the operational effectiveness and efficiency of the
Content & Media segment, as well as segment profitability. At September 30, 2013, accrued restructuring and other exit costs totaled $0.5 million, which will be paid over the next
12 months.
Content & Media Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Content & Media impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
50,221
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
A
goodwill impairment charge totaling $50.2 million was recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 due to a material reduction in the fair value of
the Classmates reporting unit. See "Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and AssumptionsImpairment of Goodwill" for additional information.
Communications Segment Results
Communications Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and ARPU)
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
$
|
1,919
|
|
$
|
811
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Services
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
|
18,882
|
|
|
(2,176
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
51,861
|
|
|
59,895
|
|
|
(8,034
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
Advertising
|
|
|
6,870
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
19,338
|
|
|
16,959
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Communications Revenues
|
|
$
|
24,354
|
|
$
|
25,203
|
|
$
|
(849
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
$
|
73,929
|
|
$
|
78,773
|
|
$
|
(4,844
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
$
|
8.97
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
$
|
9.31
|
|
$
|
8.93
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Average number of dial-up Internet access pay accounts
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
315
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
The
decrease in Communications services revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due
to a 26% decrease in our average number of dial-up Internet access pay accounts, partially offset by a 5% increase in ARPU and growth in mobile broadband pay accounts. The increase in ARPU was
attributable to a higher percentage of mobile broadband pay accounts, which have higher ARPUs, and to an increase in ARPU for such accounts. The increase in Communications advertising revenues was due
to higher advertising rates driven by optimization of advertising inventory and stronger market demand.
60
Table of Contents
The decrease in Communications services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012,
was primarily due to a 27% decrease in our average number of dial-up Internet access pay accounts, partially offset by a 4% increase in ARPU and growth in mobile broadband pay accounts. The increase
in ARPU was attributable to a higher percentage of mobile broadband pay accounts, which have higher ARPUs. The decrease in Communications services revenues was partially offset by a
$2.4 million increase in Communications advertising revenues due to higher advertising rates driven by optimization of advertising inventory and stronger market demand and an
$0.8 million increase in Communications products revenues from the sale of mobile broadband devices and the related shipping and handling fees, the sale of which commenced at the end of the
first quarter of 2012.
Communications Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Communications cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
8,139
|
|
$
|
7,821
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
$
|
24,925
|
|
$
|
23,763
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Communications cost of revenues as a percentage of Communications revenues
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
%
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increase in Communications cost of revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$1.7 million increase in costs associated with our mobile broadband service due to an increase in the number of pay accounts. This increase was partially offset by a $0.9 million
decrease in costs associated with our DSL service and a $0.5 million decrease in telecommunications, customer support and billing-related costs for our dial-up Internet access services.
The
increase in Communications cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$5.3 million increase in costs associated with our mobile broadband service, which was launched at the end of the first quarter of 2012. This increase was partially offset by a
$2.1 million decrease in costs associated with our DSL service, a $1.3 million decrease in telecommunications, customer support and billing-related costs, a $0.6 million decrease
in costs associated with our email, Internet security and web hosting services, and a $0.2 million decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs.
Communications Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Communications sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
3,641
|
|
$
|
4,299
|
|
$
|
(658
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
$
|
12,146
|
|
$
|
13,723
|
|
$
|
(1,577
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Communications sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of Communications revenues
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Communications sales and marketing expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to
a $0.4 million decrease in marketing costs associated with the promotion of our mobile broadband service and a $0.3 million decrease in advertising, promotion and distribution costs
primarily related to our dial-up Internet access services.
61
Table of Contents
The
decrease in Communications sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due to a
$0.9 million decrease in advertising, promotion and distribution costs primarily related to our dial-up Internet access services and an $0.8 million decrease in marketing costs
associated with the promotion of our mobile broadband service.
Communications Technology and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Communications technology and development
|
|
$
|
2,079
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
$
|
5,964
|
|
$
|
5,492
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Communications technology and development expenses as a percentage of Communications revenues
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increases in Communications technology and development expenses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2012, were due to increases in personnel- and overhead-related costs.
Communications General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Communications general and administrative
|
|
$
|
2,377
|
|
$
|
2,641
|
|
$
|
(264
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
$
|
7,858
|
|
$
|
8,102
|
|
$
|
(244
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Communications general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Communications revenues
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in Communications general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily
due to a decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs.
The
decrease in Communications general and administrative expenses for nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due
to a $0.3 million decrease in personnel- and overhead-related costs and a $0.2 million decrease in bad debt expense, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in professional
services and consulting fees.
Communications Restructuring and Other Exit Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Communications restructuring and other exit costs
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
62
Table of Contents
Unallocated Corporate Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
$
|
7,685
|
|
$
|
7,897
|
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
$
|
21,659
|
|
$
|
20,513
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
The
decrease in unallocated corporate expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and restructuring and other exit costs, for the quarter ended
September 30, 2013, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a $0.6 million decrease in costs associated with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, the
exploration of strategic alternatives for our other businesses and potential monetization opportunities for our portfolio of patents and patent applications, partially offset by a $0.5 million
increase in personnel- and overhead-related costs.
The
increase in unallocated corporate expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and restructuring and other exit costs, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in costs associated with the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, the
exploration of strategic alternatives for our other businesses and potential monetization opportunities for our portfolio of patents and patent applications and a $1.0 million increase in
personnel- and overhead-related costs primarily due to an increase in executive search placement fees, partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in professional services and consulting fees.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In connection with the FTD acquisition in August 2008, UNOLA Corp., which was then an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of United
Online, Inc., and which subsequently merged into FTD Group, Inc., entered into a $425 million senior secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent (the "2008 Credit Agreement"), consisting of (i) a term loan A facility of $75 million, (ii) a term loan B facility of $300 million, and (iii) a
revolving credit facility of up to $50 million. On June 10, 2011, FTD Group, Inc. entered into a new credit agreement (the "2011 Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent for the lenders, to refinance the 2008 Credit Agreement. The 2011 Credit Agreement provided FTD Group, Inc. with a $315 million senior secured credit
facility consisting of (i) a $265 million seven-year term loan and (ii) a $50 million five-year revolving credit facility, and certain other financial accommodations,
including letters of credit.
On
June 10, 2011, FTD Group, Inc. repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness under the 2008 Credit Agreement. No penalties were paid in connection with such repayment. The
repayment of obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement was financed with the proceeds of the $265 million of term loan borrowings under the 2011 Credit Agreement and FTD's available cash.
On
July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. entered into a new credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") by and among FTD Companies, Inc., Interflora British Unit, the
material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. party thereto as guarantors, the financial institutions party thereto from time to time, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders, to refinance the 2011 Credit Agreement. On
July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. drew $220 million of the
new $350 million revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and used approximately $19 million of its existing cash balance to repay in full all outstanding indebtedness
under the 2011 Credit Agreement and the fees and expenses related to the Credit Agreement.
63
Table of Contents
The
obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by FTD Companies, Inc.'s material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively, with FTD Companies, Inc., the
"U.S. Loan Parties"). In addition, the obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the U.S. Loan Parties, including a pledge of all of the
outstanding capital stock of certain direct subsidiaries of the U.S. Loan Parties (except with respect to foreign subsidiaries and certain domestic subsidiaries whose assets consist primarily of
foreign subsidiary equity interests, in which case such pledge shall be limited to 66% of the outstanding capital stock).
The
interest rates set forth in the Credit Agreement are either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.50% per annum to 1.25% per annum, or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to
2.25% per annum, calculated according to the net leverage ratio of FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The initial base rate margin is 0.75% per annum and the initial LIBOR margin is
1.75% per annum. In addition, FTD Companies, Inc. will pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement
contains customary representations and warranties, events of default, affirmative covenants and negative covenants, that, among other things, require FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries to
maintain compliance with a maximum net leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, and impose restrictions and limitations on, among other things, investments, dividends, and asset sales,
and FTD Companies, Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' ability to incur additional indebtedness and liens. FTD Companies, Inc. was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement at
September 30, 2013.
Under
the terms of the Credit Agreement, FTD Companies, Inc., is generally restricted from transferring funds to United Online, Inc., with certain exceptions prior to the
FTD Spin-Off Transaction in connection with the reimbursement of certain expenses. These restrictions resulted in restricted net assets (as defined in Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X)
of FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries totaling $283.7 million, including cash of $28.3 million, at September 30, 2013.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Our total cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $35.7 million, or 26%, to $100.8 million at September 30,
2013, compared to $136.4 million at December 31, 2012. Our summary cash flows for the periods presented were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
39,772
|
|
$
|
43,453
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
$
|
(15,094
|
)
|
$
|
(25,951
|
)
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
$
|
(59,762
|
)
|
$
|
(46,199
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities decreased by $3.7 million, or 8%. Net cash provided by operating activities is driven by our net income (loss) adjusted for non-cash
items and changes in working capital, including, but not limited to, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets, and
deferred taxes. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was due to a $56.3 million decrease in net income (loss). This decrease was partially offset by a $36.5 million
increase in non-cash items primarily related to a $50.2 million impairment of goodwill charge and a $2.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt, partially offset by a
$12.1 million decrease in deferred taxes and a $3.7 million decrease in contingent consideration resulting from the fair value adjustment. The decrease in net cash provided by operating
activities was also impacted by a $16.1 million favorable change in working capital. Changes in working capital can cause variation in our cash flows provided by operating activities due to
seasonality, timing and other factors.
64
Table of Contents
Net
cash used for investing activities decreased by $10.9 million, or 42%. The decrease was primarily due to $11.4 million of cash paid for the acquisitions of schoolFeed
and the Gifts Division of Flying Brands Limited during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and an $0.8 million decrease in purchases of rights, content and intellectual property.
These decreases were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in purchases of property and equipment.
Capital
expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $14.2 million. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had
$1.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of property and equipment that was not yet paid for and was included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets. We currently anticipate that our total capital expenditures for 2013, excluding capital expenditures of FTD Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, will be in the range of $10 million to
$12 million, which includes $1.8 million of purchases on account at December 31, 2012. The actual amount of future capital expenditures may fluctuate due to a number of factors,
including, without limitation, potential future acquisitions and new business initiatives, which are difficult to predict and which could change significantly over time. Additionally, technological
advances may require us to make capital expenditures to develop or acquire new equipment or technology in order to replace aging or technologically obsolete equipment.
Net
cash used for financing activities increased by $13.6 million, or 29%. In July 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. drew $220 million under the Credit Agreement and paid
$2.9 million of debt issuance costs. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. repaid $246.0 million on the outstanding balance under the 2011 Credit
Agreement, compared to payments totaling $17.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we paid $3.4 million for
contingent consideration related to the acquisition of schoolFeed. The increase in net cash used for financing activities was also due to a $1.1 million increase in repurchases of common stock
and a $0.7 million increase in payments of dividends and dividend equivalents. These increases were partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in proceeds from exercises of stock
options.
The
payment of dividends and dividend equivalents is a cash outflow from financing activities. In January, April and July 2013, United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share of common stock. The dividends were paid on February 28, 2013, May 31, 2013 and August 30, 2013 and totaled $9.4 million,
$9.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively, including dividend equivalents paid on nonvested restricted stock units. The payment of future dividends is discretionary and is subject to
determination by United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of our financial performance and other factors.
On
an ongoing basis, we assess opportunities for improved operational effectiveness and efficiency. We recorded $2.5 million of restructuring and other exit costs in the nine
months ended September 30, 2013 in our Content & Media segment, which consisted of $2.3 million of employee termination costs, as well as $0.2 million of contract
termination costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we paid $2.1 million of restructuring and other exit costs. At September 30, 2013, accrued restructuring and
other exit costs totaled $0.5 million, which will be paid over the next 12 months.
Future
cash flows from financing activities may also be affected by our repurchases of our common stock. United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors authorized a common stock
repurchase program (the "Program") that allows us to repurchase shares of our common stock through open market or privately negotiated transactions based on prevailing market conditions and other
factors. From August 2001 through December 31, 2010, we repurchased a total of $150.2 million of our common stock under the Program, leaving $49.8 million of authorization
remaining under the Program. In February 2011, the Board of Directors extended the Program through December 31, 2011 and authorized an increase in the
$49.8 million authorization remaining to $80.0 million. In December 2011, the Board of Directors extended the Program through December 31, 2012. In January 2013, the Board of
Directors approved and ratified the extension of the Program through December 31, 2013 and in September 2013, the
65
Table of Contents
Board
of Directors further extended the Program through December 31, 2014. We did not make any repurchases under the Program during the year ended December 31, 2012 or the nine months
ended September 30, 2013 and, at September 30, 2013, the authorization remaining under the Program was $80.0 million.
Cash
flows from financing activities may also be negatively impacted by the withholding of a portion of shares underlying the restricted stock units we grant to employees. In general, we
currently do not collect the minimum statutory employee withholding taxes from employees upon vesting of restricted stock units. Instead, we automatically withhold, from the restricted stock units
that vest, the portion of those shares with a fair market value equal to the amount of the minimum statutory employee withholding taxes due. We then pay the minimum statutory withholding taxes in
cash. The withholding of these shares, although accounted for as a common stock repurchase, does not reduce the amount available under the Program. Similar to repurchases of common stock under the
Program, the net effect of such withholding will adversely impact our cash flows from financing activities. The amounts remitted in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were
$3.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for which we withheld 0.5 million and 0.4 million shares of common stock, respectively, that were underlying the restricted
stock units that vested. The amount we pay in future periods will vary based on our stock price and the number of applicable restricted stock units vesting during the period. In August 2013, we paid a
$3.4 million contingent consideration payment for the earnout period ended June 30, 2013 related to the schoolFeed acquisition. We do not expect any contingent consideration will be
earned for the earnout periods ending June 30, 2014 and 2015.
Based
on our current projections, we expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operations, at least for the next twelve months. We may use our existing cash balances and
future cash generated from operations to fund, among other things, both contractual payments and optional prepayments on the outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement; dividend payments, if
declared by United Online, Inc.'s Board of Directors; the development and/or acquisition of other services, businesses or technologies; the repurchase of our common stock underlying restricted
stock units to pay the minimum statutory employee withholding taxes due on vested restricted stock units; the repurchase of our common stock under the Program; future capital expenditures; and future
acquisitions of intangible assets, including rights, content and intellectual property. At September 30, 2013, the remaining borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement was
$128.6 million.
If
we complete the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, we will be a substantially smaller company than we were prior to the FTD Spin-Off Transaction, and we anticipate that our consolidated cash
flows will be substantially lower when compared to periods prior to the FTD Spin-Off Transaction.
On
April 30, 2013, Mark R. Goldston, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Online, announced that, subject to the completion of the FTD Spin-Off Transaction,
he would resign as a director and officer of United Online immediately thereafter. Under the terms of Mr. Goldston's employment agreement, the FTD Spin-Off Transaction would constitute a change
in control of United Online. His resignation following the FTD Spin-Off Transaction would constitute an involuntary termination for purposes of his employment agreement due to there having been a
material decrease in his authorities, duties and responsibilities following a change in control. As a result, effective upon such resignation, and subject to the terms and conditions of his employment
agreement, Mr. Goldston would be entitled to the severance and other benefits described in his employment agreement in connection with an involuntary termination, including an estimated cash
severance payment totaling approximately $7.2 million (assuming a November 1, 2013 termination date), as well as full and accelerated vesting of Mr. Goldston's outstanding
nonvested restricted stock units and unvested stock options. Mr. Goldston's employment agreement has previously been filed with the SEC.
If
we need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements, this capital might not be available to us in a
timely manner, on
66
Table of Contents
acceptable
terms, or at all. Our failure to raise sufficient capital when needed could severely constrain or prevent us from, among other factors, developing new or enhancing existing services or
products, repurchasing our common stock, acquiring other services, businesses or technologies or funding significant capital expenditures and/or purchases of intangible assets, including rights,
content and intellectual property, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, as well as impair our ability to pay future dividends
and our ability to service our debt obligations. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage of stock owned by the then-current
stockholders could be reduced. Furthermore, such equity or any debt securities that we issue might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to holders of our common stock. In addition, trends in
the securities and credit markets may restrict our ability to raise any such additional funds, at least in the near term.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at September 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
1 Year to
Less than
3 Years
|
|
3 Years to
Less than
5 Years
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
|
Debt, including interest and fees
|
|
$
|
255,972
|
|
$
|
4,981
|
|
$
|
13,447
|
|
$
|
237,544
|
|
$
|
|
|
Member redemption liability
|
|
|
20,996
|
|
|
14,781
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable operating leases
|
|
|
19,345
|
|
|
9,702
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
16,100
|
|
|
13,615
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
9,994
|
|
|
9,050
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
322,407
|
|
$
|
52,129
|
|
$
|
29,275
|
|
$
|
240,571
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2013, we had liabilities for uncertain tax positions totaling $14.2 million, of which $7.9 million was included in other liabilities in the
contractual obligations table above and, at September 30, 2013, was expected to be due in less than one year. We are not able to reasonably estimate when or if cash payments for long-term
liabilities related to uncertain tax positions will occur.
Commitments
under letters of credit at September 30, 2013 were scheduled to expire as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
1 Year to
Less than
3 Years
|
|
3 Years to
Less than
5 Years
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
1,530
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
$
|
|
|
Letters
of credit are maintained pursuant to certain of our lease arrangements. The letters of credit remain in effect at declining levels through the terms of the related leases.
Standby letters of credit are maintained by FTD to secure credit card processing activity and additional letters of credit are maintained related to inventory purchases.
Other Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, sureties
and insurance companies, business partners, and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of such agreements, services to be
provided by us, or from intellectual property
infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers and employees that will require us, among other
things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. We have also agreed to indemnify certain former officers,
directors and employees of
67
Table of Contents
acquired
companies in connection with the acquisition of such companies. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities, including those arising from our obligation to
indemnify our directors and certain of our officers and employees, and former officers, directors and employees of acquired companies, in certain circumstances.
It
is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of exposure under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique
facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements may not be subject to maximum loss clauses.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of
Regulation S-K) that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures,
or capital resources.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted the Financial Accounting
Standards Board
("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02,
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
, as
codified in ASC 220. The amendments in this update require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an
entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the
respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are
not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those
amounts. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists
In July
2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11,
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward
Exists
, as codified in ASC 740,
Income Taxes
. The amendments in this update state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion
of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward. However, to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable
jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the
entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with
deferred tax assets. This ASU applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the
reporting date. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The
amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of this
update on our consolidated financial statements.
68
Table of Contents