The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the
Annual Report was:
Note: Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
The term new or revised financial accounting standard refers to any update
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
U.S. GAAP
☒
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
☐ Other ☐
Unless the context otherwise
requires, the terms Birks Group, the Company, we, us, and our are used in this Annual Report to refer to Birks Group Inc., a Canadian corporation, and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis. In addition, (i) the term Mayors refers to Mayors Jewelers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayors Jewelers of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, until October 23, 2017, upon
which date it was sold to a third party, and (ii) the merger refers to the merger of Mayors with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as approved by the stockholders on November 14, 2005. The term Birks refers to
Henry Birks & Sons Inc., the legal name of Birks Group prior to the merger.
Throughout this Annual Report, we refer to our fiscal year ending March 30, 2019, as fiscal 2019, and our fiscal years ended
March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, as fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in March of each year. The fiscal year ended March 30, 2019 consisted of 52 weeks. The fiscal years ended
March 31, 2018, and March 25, 2017 consisted of 53 and 52 weeks, respectively.
The Company has changed its reporting currency
in fiscal 2019 from U.S. dollars (USD) to Canadian dollars (CAD) for the period commencing April 1, 2018 in order to better reflect the fact that subsequent to the Companys divestiture of its former wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayors, on
October 23, 2017, its business is primarily conducted in Canada, and a substantial portion of its revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in CAD. The Companys functional currency remains CAD. All figures presented in
this Annual Report are in CAD unless otherwise specified and all prior periods comparative information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Form
20-F).
On August 11, 2017, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) with Aurum Holdings
Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, which assigned its rights and obligations under the Stock Purchase Agreement to Aurum Group USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (now known as Watches of Switzerland) (Aurum)
to sell its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayors, which operated in Florida and Georgia and was engaged primarily in luxury timepieces and jewelry retail activities. The sale was completed on October 23, 2017 for total consideration of
$135.0 million (USD $106.8 million) (the Aurum Transaction).
As part of the Aurum Transaction, Birks entered into a 5
year distribution agreement with Aurum (the Distribution Agreement) to sell Birks fine jewelry in the U.K. at Mappin & Webb and Goldsmiths stores and on their respective
e-commerce
platforms. Furthermore, pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, the Birks collections continue to be sold in the United States through Mayors stores in Florida and Georgia. The Distribution Agreement is an achievement in the Companys strategy
to develop the Birks brand into a global luxury brand. The Aurum Transaction represents a step forward in the Companys efforts to strengthen its balance sheet and to execute its strategic vision of investing in the Birks brand.
Proceeds from the Aurum Transaction were used to pay down outstanding debt under the Companys previous senior secured credit facilities
that included term debt and working capital debt associated with Mayors. The Company did not pay dividends as a result of the Aurum Transaction, but rather, the remaining transaction proceeds were used by Birks to continue its strategic growth
initiatives, specifically to invest in its Canadian flagship stores and to support its high-growth Birks brand wholesaling activities and
e-commerce,
as part of the Companys omni-channel strategy.
As a result of the Aurum Transaction, the Company has presented Mayors results as a discontinued operation in the consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. See Significant Transaction in Item 5 below for a reconciliation of the Companys results from continuing operations and from discontinuing operations for the fiscal
years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
This Annual Report and other written reports and releases and oral statements made from time to time by the Company contain forward-looking
statements which can be identified by their use of words like plans, expects, believes, will, anticipates, intends, projects, estimates,
could, would, may, planned, goal, and other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations, possibilities or projections about the future, including, without limitation,
statements about our strategies for growth, expansion plans, sources or adequacy of capital, expenditures and financial results are forward-looking statements.
One must carefully consider such statements and understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking
statements, such as inaccurate assumptions and other risks and uncertainties, some known and some unknown. No forward-looking statement is guaranteed and actual results may vary materially. Such statements are made as of the date provided, and we
assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future developments or circumstances.
One should carefully
evaluate such statements by referring to the factors described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), especially on this Form
20-F
and our Forms
6-K.
Particular review is to be made of Items 3, 4 and 5 of this Form
20-F
where we discuss in more detail various important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ from expected or historical results. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Since it is not possible to predict or identify all
such factors, the identified items are not a complete statement of all risks or uncertainties.
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
Selected Financial Data
The following
financial data as of March 30, 2019 and March 31, 2018 and for the years ended March 30, 2019, March 31, 2018, and March 25, 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following financial data as of March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 and for the years ended March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 have been derived starting with our audited
consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report, recast to CAD (see footnote * below) and then adjusted to reflect the effects of the discontinued operations (see footnote 5 below), which adjustments are unaudited. All fiscal
years, except for fiscal 2018, in the table below consisted of 52 weeks. Fiscal 2018 consisted of 53 weeks. The historical results included below and elsewhere in this Annual Report are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
2
The data presented below is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. You should also read the following summary data in conjunction with Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects included
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Data from
continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
March 25, 2016*
|
|
March 28, 2015*
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
151,049
|
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
|
$
|
152,992
|
|
|
$
|
168,713
|
|
|
$
|
163,071
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
92,472
|
|
|
|
90,915
|
|
|
|
91,460
|
|
|
|
99,249
|
|
|
|
95,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,577
|
|
|
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
61,532
|
|
|
|
69,464
|
|
|
|
67,274
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
67,106
|
|
|
|
66,754
|
|
|
|
61,599
|
|
|
|
63,384
|
|
|
|
60, 160
|
|
Restructuring charges (1)
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
Gain on sale of assets (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,235)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets (3)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
72,193
|
|
|
|
73,700
|
|
|
|
65,924
|
|
|
|
63,529
|
|
|
|
64,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(13,616)
|
|
|
|
(18,007)
|
|
|
|
(4,392)
|
|
|
|
5,935
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
Interest and other financial costs
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
5,639
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
Debt extinguishment charges (4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(18,305)
|
|
|
|
(21,995)
|
|
|
|
(8,859)
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
(3,560)
|
|
Income tax (recovery) expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(18,305)
|
|
|
|
(21,995)
|
|
|
|
(8,859)
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
(3,560)
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
(1,592)
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
6,836
|
|
|
|
(6,256)
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
36,090
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
6,836
|
|
|
|
(6,256)
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(18,686)
|
|
|
$
|
14,095
|
|
|
$
|
7,075
|
|
|
$
|
7,132
|
|
|
$
|
(9,816)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share, basic
|
|
$
|
(1.04)
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.55)
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share, diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.04)
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.55)
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(1.02)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.22)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.49)
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20)
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.02)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.20)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.48)
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20)
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,937
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
18,393
|
|
|
|
18,418
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,937
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*(5)
|
|
March 25, 2016*(5)
|
|
March 28, 2015*(5)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
7,464
|
|
|
$
|
22,449
|
|
|
$
|
1,530
|
|
|
$
|
9,907
|
|
|
$
|
13,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
133,795
|
|
|
$
|
120,275
|
|
|
$
|
115,163
|
|
|
$
|
119,451
|
|
|
$
|
117,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness
|
|
$
|
47,021
|
|
|
$
|
36,925
|
|
|
$
|
59,965
|
|
|
$
|
46,643
|
|
|
$
|
45,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
$
|
17,104
|
|
|
$
|
8,210
|
|
|
$
|
8,626
|
|
|
$
|
22,531
|
|
|
$
|
26,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
13,783
|
|
|
$
|
32,477
|
|
|
$
|
17,112
|
|
|
$
|
10,223
|
|
|
$
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
$
|
93,348
|
|
|
$
|
93,348
|
|
|
$
|
93,348
|
|
|
$
|
93,348
|
|
|
$
|
93,348
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
(*)
|
The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
|
|
(1)
|
In fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, restructuring charges relate primarily to severance as we eliminated certain
head office positions to further increase efficiency and to align corporate functions with our strategic direction following the Aurum Transaction. In fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, restructuring charges related to consolidating most of
our corporate administrative workforce to Montreal as well as outsourcing a portion of our jewelry manufacturing and other corporate staff reductions. Refer to note 12 to our consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report.
|
|
(2)
|
On August 4, 2015, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement for the sale of the assets of
the corporate sales division to Rideau Recognition Solutions Inc. (Rideau) for $5.6 million and executed a supply and licensing agreement for Birks products and Birks-branded products.
|
|
(3)
|
For fiscal 2018, impairment of long-lived assets represents a
non-cash
impairment of leasehold improvements at a retail location due to its projected operating performance as well as a
non-cash
impairment of software associated
with a decision to modify the scope of the implementation of the Companys new enterprise resource planning system. For fiscal 2015, impairment of long-lived assets represents a
non-cash
impairment of a
retail
shop-in-shop
location due to its projected operating performance.
|
|
(4)
|
Debt extinguishment charges in fiscal 2015 arising from amendments to the then existing senior secured term
loan and senior secured revolving credit facilities.
|
|
(5)
|
Retrospectively revised. For working capital, total assets, bank indebtedness and long-term debt for the
years ended March 28, 2015 to March 25, 2017 inclusively, the assets and liabilities of Mayors were retrospectively determined and excluded to reflect the remaining balances after the Aurum Transaction.
|
Dividends and Dividend Policy
We have
not paid dividends since 1998 and do not currently intend to pay dividends on our Class A voting shares or Class B multiple voting shares in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends on our Class A voting shares and
Class B multiple voting shares are restricted by our credit agreements. See Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Liquidity and Capital Resources. If dividends were declared by our Board of Directors,
shareholders would receive a dividend equal to the per share dividend we would pay to holders of our Class A voting shares or holders of Class B multiple voting shares. Dividends we would pay to U.S. holders would generally be subject to
withholding tax. See Item 10, Additional Information Taxation.
4
RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to the Company
The level of our
indebtedness could adversely affect our operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our debt levels fluctuate from time to
time based on seasonal working capital needs. In fiscal 2019, the Company incurred debt primarily for the purpose of financing the renovations of its flagship stores, which is in line with its strategic plan. The following table sets forth our total
indebtedness (including bank indebtedness and current and long-term portion of debt), total stockholders equity, total capitalization and ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
Total indebtedness (consisting of bank indebtedness and long-term debt, including current portion)
|
|
|
$64,125,000
|
|
|
|
$45,135,000
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
13,783,000
|
|
|
|
32,477,000
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
$77,908,000
|
|
|
|
$77,612,000
|
|
Ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization
|
|
|
82.3%
|
|
|
|
58.2%
|
|
Debt to equity ratio
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
(*)
|
The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report)
|
This level of leverage could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Some
examples of how high levels of indebtedness could affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition may include the following:
|
|
|
make it difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to fluctuations in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby
reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate
purposes or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have a lower degree of leverage; and
|
|
|
|
negatively affect the price of our stock.
|
Significant restrictions on our borrowing capacity could result in our inability to fund our cash flow requirements or maintain minimum excess
availability requirements under the terms of our secured asset-based credit facility needed to support our
day-to-day
operations and our ability to continue as a going
concern.
Our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash flow requirements is dependent upon our ability to maintain
positive excess availability under our $85.0 million senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility). Under the Credit Facility, our sole financial covenant is to maintain minimum excess availability of not less than
$8.5 million at all times, except that we shall not be in breach of this covenant if excess availability falls below $8.5 million for not more than two consecutive business days once during any fiscal month. Our excess availability was
above $8.5 million throughout fiscal 2019.
5
Both our Credit Facility and Term Loan (defined below) are subject to cross default provisions
with all other loans pursuant to which if we are in default of any other loan, we will immediately be in default of both the Credit Facility and the Term Loan. In the event that excess availability falls below $8.5 million for more than two
consecutive business days once during any fiscal month, this would be considered an event of default under the Credit Facility and Term Loan agreements, that provides the lenders the right to require the outstanding balances borrowed under our
Credit Facility and Term Loan to become due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on our other borrowings. We expect to have excess availability of at least $8.5 million for at least the next twelve months.
On June 29, 2018, we secured a $12.5 million senior secured term loan (the Term Loan) with Crystal Financial LLC
(Crystal). The Term Loan, which matures in October 2022, is subordinated in lien priority to the Credit Facility and bears interest at a rate of Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (CDOR) plus 8.25%. Under the Term Loan, we are
required to adhere to a similar financial covenant as under the Credit Facility (maintain minimum excess availability of not less than $8.5 million at all times, except that we shall not be in breach of this covenant if excess availability
falls below $8.5 million for not more than two consecutive business days once during any fiscal month). In addition, the Term Loan includes seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year of
$9.5 million and from January 21st to February 20th of each year of $4.5 million. The long term senior secured term loan is required to be repaid upon maturity. Our borrowing capacity under both the Credit Facility and Term Loan is based
upon the value of our inventory and accounts receivable, which is periodically assessed by our lenders and based upon these reviews, our borrowing capacity could be significantly increased or decreased.
Our lenders under our Credit Facility and our Term Loan may impose, at any time, discretionary reserves, which would lower the level of
borrowing availability under our credit facilities (customary for asset-based loans), at their reasonable discretion, to: i) ensure that we maintain adequate liquidity for the operation of our business, ii) cover any deterioration in the value of
the collateral, and iii) reflect impediments to the lenders to realize upon the collateral. There is no limit to the amount of discretionary reserves that our lenders may impose at their reasonable discretion. No discretionary reserves were imposed
during fiscal 2019, fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, by our current or former lenders.
For fiscal 2019, the Company reported a net loss from
continuing operations of $18.3 million (consolidated net loss of $18.7 million). The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations of $22.0 million (consolidated net income of $14.1 million) and a net loss from continuing
operations of $8.9 million (consolidated net income of $7.1 million) for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively. The Company used cash in operating activities from continuing operations of $4.3 million, $19.7 million and
$4.4 million for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Maintenance of sufficient availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed financing is necessary for the Company to fund its
day-to-day
operations. The Companys ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, or to fund planned capital expenditures and store operations
will depend on its ability to maintain adequate levels of available borrowing and its future performance, which to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, as well as other events
that are beyond the Companys control.
The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue its operations
for the foreseeable future and be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
Additional financing or capital that may be required may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or may not be available at all. Capital
raised through the sale or issuance of equity securities may result in dilution to our current shareholders. Failure to obtain such additional financing or capital could have an adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition including our
ability to continue as a going concern.
If we are unable to meet our financial projections, in order to invest in growth
initiatives, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, including funding from governmental sources, which may not be possible as the success of raising additional funds is beyond our control. The sale
of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to our current shareholders, and the securities issued in future financings may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our common stock. The terms of
our Credit Facility and Term Loan expire in October 2022, as such, financing may be unavailable in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, including our ability to continue as a
going concern. The Company continues to be actively engaged in identifying alternative sources of financing that include raising additional funds through public or private equity, the disposal of assets, and debt financing, including funding from
governmental sources which may not be possible as the success of raising additional funds is beyond the Companys control. The incurrence of additional indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in
operating and financing covenants that could restrict the Companys operations.
6
Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to continue to lease retail stores in prime
locations and successfully negotiate favorable lease terms.
Historically, we have generally been successful in negotiating and
improving leases for renewal as our current leases near expiration. As of May 31, 2019, we had 29 leased retail stores. The leases are generally in prime retail locations and generally have lease terms of ten years, with rent being a fixed
minimum base plus, for certain stores, a percentage of the stores sales volume (subject to some adjustments) over a specified threshold. Many uncontrollable factors can impact our ability to renew these leases, including but not limited to
competition for key locations from other retailers. Only 1 of the Companys store leases is renewable within the next two years and such store generated approximately 1% of our fiscal 2019 sales from continuing operations. The capital
expenditures related to our retail stores are estimated to be approximately $1.0 million during fiscal 2020 to remodel, relocate or open new stores, in accordance with our strategic plan. These planned capital expenditures are at the discretion
of management and not required by our landlords. We are able to finance these capital expenditures with internally generated funds and existing financing arrangements. However, in the future, if we are unsuccessful at negotiating favorable renewal
terms, locations or if more capital is required to meet landlord requirements for remodeling or relocating retail stores and we are unable to secure the necessary funds to complete these projects, our business, financial condition, and operating
results could be adversely affected. In addition, we may not be able to locate suitable alternative sites in a timely manner. Our sales, earnings and cash flows will decline if we fail to maintain existing store locations, renew leases or relocate
to alternative sites, in each case on attractive terms.
Our business depends, in part, on factors affecting consumer spending that are out of our
control.
Our business, like other retailers, depends on consumer demand for our products and, consequently, is sensitive to a
number of factors that are beyond our control that influence consumer spending, including general economic conditions, consumer confidence in future economic conditions and domestic and international political conditions, tourism, recession and
fears of recession, consumer debt, disposable consumer income, conditions in the housing market, consumer perceptions of personal well-being and security, fuel prices, inclement weather, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, sales tax rate
increases, inflation, and war and fears of war. Jewelry purchases are discretionary for consumers and may be particularly and disproportionately affected by adverse trends in the general economy and the equity markets. Adverse changes in factors
affecting discretionary consumer spending could reduce consumer demand for our products, resulting in a reduction in our sales and harming our business and operating results. A substantial portion of our customers use credit, either from our private
label and proprietary credit cards or another consumer credit source, to purchase jewelry. When there is a downturn in the general economy, fewer people may use or be approved for credit, which could result in a reduction in net sales and/or an
increase in bad debts, which in turn, could lead to an unfavorable impact on our overall profitability. Consequently, our belief that we currently have sufficient liquidity to fund our operations is based on certain assumptions about the future
state of the economy, the future availability of borrowings to fund our operations and our future operating performance. To the extent that the economy and other conditions affecting our business are significantly worse than we anticipate, we may
not achieve our projected level of financial performance and we may determine that we do not have sufficient capital to fund our operations.
Our
business could be adversely affected if our relationships with any primary vendors are terminated or if the delivery of their products is delayed or interrupted.
We compete with other jewelry retailers for access to vendors that will provide us with the quality and quantity of merchandise necessary to
operate our business, and our merchandising strategy depends upon our ability to maintain good relations with significant vendors. Certain brand name timepiece and jewelry manufacturers have distribution agreements with our Company that, among other
things, provide for specific sales locations, yearly renewal terms and early termination provisions at the manufacturers discretion. In fiscal 2019, merchandise supplied by our largest luxury timepiece supplier and sold through our stores
accounted for approximately 15% of our total net sales from continuing operations. Our relationships with primary suppliers are generally not pursuant to long-term agreements. We obtain materials and manufactured items from third-party suppliers.
Any delay or interruption in our suppliers abilities to provide us with necessary materials and components may require us to seek alternative supply sources. Any delay or interruption in receiving supplies could impair our ability to supply
products to our stores and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The abrupt loss of any of our significant third-party suppliers or a decline in the quality or quantity of
materials supplied by any third-party suppliers could cause significant disruption in our business.
7
We may not successfully manage our inventory, which could have an adverse effect on our net sales,
profitability, cash flow and liquidity.
As a retail business, our results of operations are dependent on our ability to manage
our inventory. To properly manage our inventory, we must be able to accurately estimate customer demand and supply requirements and purchase new inventory accordingly. If we fail to sell our inventory, we may be required to write-down our inventory
or pay our vendors without new purchases, creating additional vendor financing, which would have an adverse impact on our earnings and cash flows. Additionally, a significant portion of the merchandise we sell is carried on a consignment basis prior
to sale or is otherwise financed by vendors, which reduces our required capital investment in inventory. Any significant change in these consignment or vendor financing relationships could have a material adverse effect on our net sales, cash flows
and liquidity.
Fluctuations in the availability and prices of our raw materials and finished goods may adversely affect our results of operations.
We offer a large selection of distinctive high quality merchandise, including diamond, gemstone and precious metal jewelry,
rings, wedding bands, earrings, bracelets, necklaces, charms, timepieces and gifts. Accordingly, significant changes in the availability or prices of diamonds, gemstones, and precious metals we require for our products could adversely affect our
earnings. We do not hedge a material portion of the price of raw materials. A significant increase in the price of these materials could adversely affect our net sales and gross margins.
Applicable laws and regulations related to consumer credit may adversely affect our business.
The operation of our credit business subjects us to substantial regulation relating to disclosure and other requirements upon origination,
servicing, debt collection and particularly upon the amount of finance charges we can impose. Any adverse change in the regulation of consumer credit could adversely affect our earnings. For example, new laws or regulations could limit the amount of
interest or fees we, or our banks, can charge on consumer loan accounts, or restrict our ability to collect on account balances, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings. Compliance with existing and future laws or regulations
could require material expenditures or otherwise adversely affect our business or financial results. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in negative publicity, and fines, either of which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are exposed to currency exchange risks that could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
A portion of the purchases we make from our suppliers are denominated in U.S.
dollars. As a result, a depreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar would increase the cost of acquiring those goods in Canadian dollars, which would have a negative effect on our gross profit margin. In addition, material
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could reduce our borrowing availability under our Credit Facility which is denominated in Canadian dollars, and limit our ability to finance our operations. For purposes of financial reporting, the
Company has changed its reporting currency in fiscal 2019 from USD to CAD in order to better reflect that its business is primarily conducted in Canada, and a substantial portion of its revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in
CAD. The consolidated financial statements for comparative periods have been recast to CAD by translating net sales and expenses into CAD using monthly average foreign currency rates prevailing during the period, while assets and liabilities are
translated at
year-end
exchange rates, with the effect of such translation recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented industry.
The retail jewelry and timepiece business is highly competitive and fragmented, and we compete with nationally-recognized jewelry chains as
well as a large number of independent regional and local jewelry and timepiece retailers and other types of retailers who sell jewelry, timepieces, and gift items, such as department stores and mass merchandisers. We also compete with
e-commerce
sellers of jewelry and timepieces. Because of the breadth and depth of this competition, we are constantly under competitive pressure that both constrains pricing and requires extensive merchandising and
marketing efforts in order for us to remain competitive.
8
We are controlled by a single shareholder whose interests may be different from yours.
As of May 31, 2019, The Grande Rousse Trust (Grande Rousse) beneficially owns or controls 76.0% of all classes of our
outstanding voting shares, which are directly owned by Mangrove Holdings S.A (Mangrove) and Montel Sarl (Montel), previously Montrovest B.V. Montel and Mangrove own 49.3% and 26.7% of our outstanding voting shares
respectively. The trustee of Grande Rousse is Meritus Trust Company Limited (the Trustee). Confido Limited has the power to remove the Trustee and as a result may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the Class A voting shares
held by Montel and Mangrove. Under our restated articles, Montel and Mangrove, as holders of the Class B multiple voting shares, have the ability to control most actions requiring shareholder approval, including electing the members of our
Board of Directors and the issuance of new equity.
Grande Rousse, Montel and Mangrove may have different interests than you have and may
make decisions that do not correspond to your interests. In addition, the fact that we are controlled by one shareholder may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our management or voting control.
Terrorist acts or other catastrophic events could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Terrorist acts, acts of war or hostility, natural disasters or other catastrophic events could have an immediate disproportionate impact on
discretionary spending on luxury goods upon which our operations are dependent, and could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property and may be required to engage in costly litigation as a protective measure.
To establish and protect our intellectual property rights, we rely upon a combination of trademark and trade secret laws,
together with licenses, exclusivity agreements and other contractual covenants. In particular, the Birks trademarks are of significant value to our retail operations. The measures we take to protect our intellectual property rights may
prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our intellectual property. Monitoring the unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the
validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation of this type could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources, may result in counterclaims or other claims against us and could significantly harm our results of
operations.
A significant privacy breach of our information systems could disrupt or negatively affect our business.
The protection of customer, employee and company data is important to us, and our customers expect that their personal information will be
adequately protected. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and data privacy is becoming increasingly demanding, as requirements in respect of personal data use and processing, including significant penalties for
non-compliance,
continues to evolve in the various jurisdictions in which the Company does business. Although we have developed and implemented systems and processes that are designed to protect our information and
prevent data loss and other security breaches, such measures cannot provide absolute security. We rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic
information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including
e-commerce
sales, supply chain, merchandise distribution, customer invoicing and collection of payments. We use
information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Additionally, we collect
and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the proprietary business information of our customers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in our
information technology systems. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our business operations and strategy. To date, our business and operations have not
been materially impacted by a cyber-attack or data breach, however a significant breach of customer, employee or company data could damage our reputation, our relationship with customers and the Birks brand and could result in lost sales, sizable
fines, significant breach-notification costs and lawsuits as well as adversely affect results of operations. In addition, it could harm our ability to execute our business and adversely impact sales, costs and earnings. Because the techniques used
to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate cost-effective
preventative measures. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches.
9
Failure to successfully implement or make changes to information systems could disrupt or negatively impact
our business.
In addition to regularly evaluating and making changes and upgrades to our information systems, we have begun to
implement since fiscal 2016, a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system with the Microsoft Dynamics D365 for Retail platform in order to update our retail systems including point of sale (POS), supply chain, warehouse management,
wholesale, and finance. While we follow a disciplined methodology when evaluating and making such changes, there can be no assurances that we will successfully implement such changes, that such changes will occur without disruptions to our
operations, that the new or upgraded systems will achieve the desired business objectives or that the internal controls will be effective in preventing misstatements in financial reporting. Any such disruptions, inadequate internal controls or the
failure to successfully implement new or upgraded systems such as those referenced above, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could also affect our reputation, our relationship with customers and our brands.
The Company conducts retail operations in Canada and conducts wholesale operations in North America and the United Kingdom. The Company sources its
inventory from several suppliers within and outside North America, and has cross border financing arrangements. As a result, the Company is subject to the risks of doing business in jurisdictions within and outside North America.
The Company generates the majority of its net sales in Canada. The Company also relies on certain foreign third-party vendors and suppliers.
As a result, the Company is subject to the risks of doing business in jurisdictions within and outside North America, including:
|
|
|
the laws, regulations and policies of governments relating to loans and operations, the costs or desirability
of complying with local practices and customs and the impact of various anti-corruption, anti-money laundering and other laws affecting the activities of the Company;
|
|
|
|
potential negative consequences from changes in taxation policies or currency restructurings;
|
|
|
|
potential negative consequences from the application of taxation policies, including transfer pricing rules
and sales tax matters;
|
|
|
|
import and export licensing requirements and regulations, as well as unforeseen changes in regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
|
economic instability in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties as to enforcement of certain contract and other rights;
|
|
|
|
the potential for rapid and unexpected changes in government, economic and political policies, political or
civil unrest, acts of terrorism or the threat of boycotts; and
|
|
|
|
inventory risk exposures.
|
Changes in regulatory, political, economic, or monetary policies and other factors could require the Company to significantly modify its
current business practices and may adversely affect its future financial results. For example, the Company could be adversely impacted by U.S. trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, including trade policies and tariffs affecting China,
the E.U., Canada and Mexico, as well as retaliatory tariffs by such countries. Such tariffs and, if enacted, any further legislation or actions taken by the U.S. government that restrict trade, such as additional tariffs or trade barriers, and other
protectionist or retaliatory measures taken by governments in Europe, Asia and elsewhere, could have a negative effect on the Companys ability to sell products in those markets.
While these factors and the effect of these factors are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could lower the Companys revenues,
impact its cash flow, increase its costs, reduce its earnings or disrupt its business.
Risks Related to Class A Voting Shares
Our share price could be adversely affected if a large number of Class A voting shares are offered for sale or sold.
Future issuances or sales of a substantial number of our Class A voting shares by us, Montel, Mangrove, or another significant
shareholder in the public market could adversely affect the price of our Class A voting shares, which may impair our ability to raise capital through future issuances of equity securities. As of May 31, 2019, we had 10,242,911 Class A
voting shares issued and outstanding. Sales of restricted securities in the public market, or the availability of these Class A voting shares for sale, could adversely affect the market price of Class A voting shares.
10
As a retail jeweler with a limited public float, the price of our Class A voting shares may fluctuate
substantially, which could negatively affect the value of our Class A voting shares and could result in securities class action claims against us.
The price of our Class A voting shares may fluctuate substantially due to, among other things, the following factors:
(1) fluctuations in the price of the shares of a small number of public companies in the retail jewelry business; (2) additions or departures of key personnel; (3) announcements of legal proceedings or regulatory matters; and
(4) general volatility in the stock market. The market price of our Class A voting shares could also fluctuate substantially if we fail to meet or exceed expectations for our financial results or if there is a change in financial estimates
or securities analysts recommendations.
Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred in the past with respect to the
securities of retail jewelry and related companies. In addition, because the public float of our Class A voting shares is relatively small, the market price of our Class A voting shares is likely to be volatile. There is limited trading
volume in our Class A voting shares, rendering them subject to significant price volatility. In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that has affected the market prices of equity securities of many companies, and that has often
been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. A number of other factors, many of which are beyond our control, could also cause the market price of our Class A voting shares to fluctuate substantially. In the past, following
periods of downward volatility in the market price of a companys securities, class action litigation has often been pursued. If our Class A voting shares were similarly volatile and litigation was pursued against us, it could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our managements attention and resources.
We are governed by the laws of Canada, and, as a result, it may
not be possible for shareholders to enforce civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S.
We are governed by the
laws of Canada. Our assets are located outside the U.S. and some of our directors and officers are residents outside of the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service within the U.S. upon us or our directors and officers,
or to realize in the U.S. upon judgments of courts of the U.S. predicated upon civil liability of Birks Group and such directors or officers under U.S. federal securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability in Canada by a court in original
actions, or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of the civil liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal securities laws.
We expect to
maintain our status as a foreign private issuer under the rules and regulations of the SEC and, thus, are exempt from a number of rules under the Exchange Act of 1934 and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than a company
incorporated in the U.S.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from rules under the Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) that impose certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the
reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our Class A voting shares. Moreover, we are not required
to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation Fair Disclosure, which restricts the
selective disclosure of material information. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning us than there is for other U.S. public companies.
If we were treated as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) some holders of our Class A voting shares would be subject to
additional taxation, which could cause the price of our Class A voting shares to decline.
We believe that our Class A
voting shares should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we expect to continue operations in such a manner that we will not be a PFIC. If, however, we are or become a PFIC, some holders of our Class A
voting shares could be subject to additional U.S. federal income taxes on gains recognized with respect to our Class A voting shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred under
the PFIC rules.
11
Our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting may identify material
weaknesses in the future which could reduce confidence in our financial statements and negatively affect the price of our securities.
We are subject to reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws. Beginning with our Annual Report on Form
20-F
for fiscal 2008, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to prepare a management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude
that our internal control over our financial reporting is not effective. If at any time in the future, we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, market perception of our financial condition and the
trading price of our stock may be adversely affected and customer perception of our business may suffer, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Further, our auditors do not audit our internal controls over financial
reporting due to our market capitalization, and therefore, there has been no independent attestation of our internal controls over financial reporting.
If the costs and burden of being a public company outweigh its benefits, we may in the future decide to discontinue our status as a publicly traded
company.
As a public company, we currently incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NYSE American LLC (NYSE American), have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective
disclosure and financial controls as well as mandating certain corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time and financial resources to these compliance initiatives. As such, if it is
determined in the future that the costs and efforts of being a public company outweigh the benefits of being a public company, we may decide to discontinue our status as a publicly traded or registered company.
Item 4. Information on the Company
THE COMPANY
Corporate History and
Overview
Birks Group is a leading designer of fine jewelry, timepieces and gifts and operator of luxury jewelry stores in Canada,
with wholesale customers in North America and the U.K.. As of May 31, 2019, Birks Group operated 26 stores under the Birks brand in most major metropolitan markets in Canada, 1 retail location in Calgary operated under the Brinkhaus brand,
1 retail location in Vancouver operated under the Graff brand and 1 retail location in Vancouver operated under the Patek Philippe brand. Birks fine jewelry collections are also available through select Mappin & Webb and Goldsmiths
locations in the United Kingdom, in Mayors stores in the United States as well as at certain jewelry retailers across North America. For fiscal 2019, we had net sales of $151.0 million from continuing operations.
Birks predecessor company was founded in Montreal in 1879 and developed over the years into Canadas premier designer, manufacturer
and retailer of fine jewelry, timepieces, sterling and plated silverware and gifts. In addition to being a nationwide retailer with a strong brand identity, we are also highly regarded in Canada as a jewelry designer. We believe that operating our
stores under the Birks brand and the fact that we sell Birks-branded jewelry distinguishes us from many competitors because of our longstanding reputation and heritage, our ability to offer distinctively designed, exclusive products, and by placing
a strong emphasis on providing a superior shopping experience to our clients.
Birks was purchased by Borgosesia Acquisitions Corporation
in 1993, a predecessor company of Regaluxe Investment S.á.r.l., which is referred to in this Annual Report as Regaluxe. Effective March 28, 2006, Regaluxe was acquired through a merger with Iniziativa S.A.
(Iniziativa). As of May 31, 2007 and June 4, 2007, respectively, following a reorganization, Iniziativa and Montrolux S.A. transferred all of the shares they respectively held in the Company to their parent company, Montel
(previously known as Montrovest B.V.). Following the 1993 acquisition of Birks, Birks operations were evaluated and a program of returning Birks to its historic core strength as the leading Canadian prestige jeweler was initiated.
In August 2002, Birks invested $23.6 million to acquire approximately 72% of the voting control in Mayors, which was experiencing an
unsuccessful expansion beyond its core markets and was incurring significant losses.
12
Between August 2002 and November 2005, it became apparent to both Mayors and Birks management
that it was in the best interests of the shareholders to combine its operations. The Company believed that such combination would create a stronger capital base, improve operating efficiencies, reduce the impact of regional issues, simplify the
corporate ownership of Mayors, eliminate management and board of directors inefficiencies with managing intercompany issues, and possibly increase shareholder liquidity. Upon the consummation of the merger on November 14, 2005, each
outstanding share of Mayors common stock not then owned by Birks was converted into 0.08695 Class A voting shares of Birks. As a result of the merger, Mayors common stock ceased trading on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and
Birks Group began trading on the AMEX, which is now known as the NYSE American, under the trading symbol BGI. Following the merger, Birks Group worked very diligently to fully integrate the Birks business with Mayors. As a result of the
merger, we believe Birks Group improved operational efficiencies and diversity and depth of its products and distribution capabilities.
In December 2015, Montel transferred a portion of its Class A and Class B voting shares to Mangrove and as a result Montel owns
49.3% of the voting shares of the Company and Mangrove owns 26.7%.
In August 2017, Birks entered into the Stock Purchase Agreement with
Aurum, the largest fine watch and jewelry retailer in the U.K., to sell its wholly-owned subsidiary Mayors. The Aurum Transaction closed on October 23, 2017 for total cash consideration of $135.0 million (USD $106.8 million). As part of
the transaction, Birks entered into a 5 year distribution agreement with Aurum to sell Birks fine jewelry in the U.K. at Mappin & Webb, Goldsmiths stores and on their
e-commerce
websites.
In the last three fiscal years, we invested a total of approximately $30.7 million in capital expenditures primarily associated with the
remodeling of our existing store network. This included the completion of major transformative renovations at our three flagship locations, in Montreal (completed in June 2018), Vancouver (completed in February 2019) and Toronto (completed in March
2019). We also opened our Graff and Patek Philippe boutiques in Vancouver (completed in December 2018), and invested in the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system.
The last three fiscal years were very capital-intensive for the Company as we implemented our growth-driven strategic objective which included
the remodeling of our retail network including our flagship locations. This capital intensive spending period resulted in temporarily lower sales and contribution margin at the flagship locations under renovation, with a view to generate future
long-term returns for the Company. We expect to invest a significantly lower amount in capital expenditures in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 as we focus solely on operations and on delivering a return on our strategic investment spending during the
period from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2019. In fact, in fiscal 2020, approximately $1.0 million is expected to be spent in capital expenditures, primarily related to minor store remodels and store relocations. We expect to finance these capital
expenditures from operating cash flows, and existing financing arrangements.
The Company regularly reviews the locations of its retail
network that leads to decisions that impact the opening, relocation or closing of these locations. During fiscal 2019, we closed two Birks stores (one in Edmonton, Alberta and one in Toronto, Ontario) and closed one store operated under the
Brinkhaus brand in Vancouver, British Colombia. During fiscal 2019, we also opened one store operated under the Graff brand and one store operated under the Patek Philippe brand in Vancouver, British Columbia. During fiscal 2019, we also relocated
two Birks stores (one in Vancouver, British Columbia and one in Toronto, Ontario) during the remodeling of their respective malls. During fiscal 2018, we opened a new store in Oshawa, Ontario and a new store in Surrey, British Columbia and closed no
stores. In fiscal 2017, we did not open or close any stores.
The Toronto flagship store
re-opened
in its original location in March 2019 after having been moved to a smaller temporary location in the mall (which itself was undergoing, and continues to undergo, significant construction activities) during fiscal 2017. The Company temporarily
closed its Montreal flagship store in early 2018 to undertake a complete renovation of the store. The renovations were completed and the store
re-opened
in June 2018. Certain delays in the completion of these
two major renovation projects significantly affected the sales of the Company during the fiscal year.
Our sales are divided into two
principal product categories: jewelry and timepieces. Jewelry also includes sales of other product offerings we sell such as giftware, as well as repair and custom design services.
13
The following table compares our sales from continuing operations of each product category for
the last three fiscal years (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-Ended
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewelry and other
|
|
$
|
99,043
|
|
|
|
65.6%
|
|
|
$
|
103,058
|
|
|
|
70.3%
|
|
|
$
|
105,657
|
|
|
|
69.1%
|
|
Timepieces
|
|
|
52,006
|
|
|
|
34.4%
|
|
|
|
43,550
|
|
|
|
29.7%
|
|
|
|
47,335
|
|
|
|
30.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
151,049
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
152,992
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
|
The decline in sales from the jewelry and other product category in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018 has been the
result of direct competition in our major markets from corporate owned stores operated by certain third party jewelry brands which we carry. This has been partially offset by the continued sales growth of Birks branded jewelry, which is the
Companys strategic focus going forward. From fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018, the decline in sales from this product category was driven primarily by the renovation of our Montreal and Toronto flagship stores during fiscal 2018, and the temporary
closure of the Montreal flagship store for the last two months of fiscal 2018.
The increase in sales from the timepieces product category
in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018 was driven primarily by an improved assortment of third party timepiece inventory, including the addition of certain globally renowned and desirable brands in our newly renovated flagship locations. From
fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018, the decline in sales from this product category was driven primarily by the renovation of our Montreal and Toronto flagship stores during fiscal 2018, and the temporary closure of the Montreal flagship store for the last
two months of fiscal 2018.
Birks Group is a Canadian corporation. Our corporate headquarters are located at 2020 Robert-Bourassa
Boulevard, Suite 200, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 2A5. Our telephone number is (514)
397-2501.
Our website is
www.birksgroup.com
.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) maintains a website that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers (including Birks Group) that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company also maintains a public website at
http://www.birks.com
.
Products
We offer distinctively designed, exclusive products and a large selection of distinctive high quality merchandise at various price
points. This merchandise includes our own designed jewelry and designer jewelry that includes diamonds, gemstones, and precious metals. We also offer a large selection of desirable timepieces at various price points and giftware. Part of our
strategy is to increase our exclusive offering of internally-designed goods sold to our customers, consisting primarily of fine jewelry, bridal offerings, and timepieces, all of which leverage the Birks brand loyalty in their respective markets and
in order to differentiate our products with unique and exclusive designs.
Our stores, operating under the Birks, Brinkhaus, Graff and
Patek Phillippe brands, carry a large selection of prestigious brand name timepieces, including our own proprietary Birks watch line as well as timepieces made by Baume & Mercier, Breitling, Bvlgari, Cartier, Chaumet,
Frédérique Constant, Graff, IWC, Jaeger Lecoultre, Montblanc, Panerai, Patek Phillippe, Richard Mille, Rolex, Tag Heuer, Tudor, and Van Cleef & Arpels. We also carry an exclusive collection of high quality jewelry and
timepieces that we design. We emphasize Birks brand jewelry offerings but also include other designer jewelry made by Bvlgari, Chaumet, Graff, Marco Bicego, Messika, Roberto Coin, Van Cleef & Arpels and Vhernier. We also offer a variety of
high quality giftware, including writing instruments made by Montblanc.
We have one primary channel of distribution, the retail division,
which accounts for approximately 95% of net sales, as well as two other channels of distribution, namely
e-commerce
and wholesale, which combined account for approximately 5% of net sales.
14
Product Design, Development, Sourcing and Manufacturing
We established a product development process that supports our strategy to further develop and enhance our product offering in support of the
Birks brand development. During fiscal 2019, 2018, and fiscal 2017, approximately 45%, 52%, and 45%, respectively, of our jewelry products acquired for sale were internally designed and sourced. Products that are not designed and manufactured for
us, are sourced from suppliers worldwide, enabling us to sell an assortment of fine quality merchandise often not available from other jewelers in our markets. Our staff of buyers procures distinctive high quality merchandise directly from
manufacturers, diamond cutters, and other suppliers worldwide. Our loose stone acquisition team, product sourcing team and category managers specialize in sourcing merchandise in categories such as diamonds, precious gemstones, pearls, timepieces,
gold jewelry, and giftware. Retail and merchandising personnel frequently visit our stores and those of competitors to compare value, selection, and service, as well as to observe client reaction to merchandise selection and determine future needs
and trends.
Availability of Products
Although purchases of several critical raw materials, notably platinum, gold, silver, diamonds, pearls and gemstones, are made from a
relatively limited number of sources, we believe that there are numerous alternative sources for all raw materials used in the manufacture of our finished jewelry, and that the failure of any principal supplier would not have a material adverse
effect on our operations. Any material changes in foreign or domestic laws and policies affecting international trade may have a material adverse effect on the availability of the diamonds, other gemstones, precious metals and
non-jewelry
products we purchase. Significant changes in the availability or prices of diamonds, gemstones and precious metals we require for our products could adversely affect our earnings. We do not maintain
long-term inventories or otherwise hedge a material portion of the price of raw materials. A significant increase in the price of these materials could adversely affect our net sales, gross margin and earnings. However, in the event of price
increases, we will generally attempt to pass along any price increases to our customers.
In fiscal 2019, we purchased jewelry, timepieces
and giftware for sale in our stores from several suppliers. Many of these suppliers have long-standing relationships with us. We compete with other jewelry and timepiece retailers for access to vendors that will provide us with the quality and
quantity of merchandise necessary to operate our business. Our relationships with primary suppliers are generally not pursuant to long-term agreements. Although we believe that alternative sources of supply are available, the abrupt loss of any of
our key vendors, or a decline in the quality or quantity of merchandise supplied by our vendors could cause significant disruption in our business. In fiscal 2019, merchandise supplied by our largest luxury timepiece supplier and sold through our
stores accounted for approximately 15% of our total net sales. If our largest luxury timepiece supplier terminated its distribution agreements with us, such termination would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results. We believe that current relationships with our key vendors are strong.
Seasonality
Our sales are highly seasonal, with the third fiscal quarter (which includes the holiday shopping season) historically contributing
significantly higher net sales than any other quarter during the year. Net sales from continuing operations in the first, second, third and fourth quarters in fiscal 2019 were 25%, 21%, 33% and 21%, respectively, in fiscal 2018 were 23%, 20%, 36%
and 20% respectively, and in fiscal 2017 were 24%, 21%, 35% and 20%, respectively.
Retail Operations, Merchandising and Marketing
General
We believe we are
differentiated from most of our competitors because we offer distinctively designed, exclusive products and a selection of distinctive high quality merchandise at a wide range of price points. We keep the majority of our inventory on display in our
stores rather than at our distribution facility. Although each store stocks a representative selection of jewelry, timepieces, and giftware, certain inventory is tailored to meet local tastes and historical merchandise sales patterns of specific
stores.
15
We believe that our stores elegant surroundings and distinctive merchandise displays play
an important role in providing an atmosphere that encourages sales. We pay careful attention to detail in the design and layout of each store, particularly lighting, colors, choice of materials, and placement of display cases. We also use window
displays as a means of attracting
walk-in
traffic and reinforcing our distinctive image. Our Visual Display department designs and creates window and store merchandise case displays for all of our stores.
Window displays are frequently changed to provide variety and to reflect seasonal events such as Christmas, Chinese New Year, Valentines Day, Mothers Day and Fathers Day.
Personnel and Training
We place
substantial emphasis on the professionalism of our sales force to maintain our position as a leading prestige jeweler. We strive to hire only highly motivated, professional and customer-oriented individuals. All new sales professionals attend an
intensive training program where they are trained in technical areas of the jewelry and timepiece business, specific sales and service techniques and our commitment to client service. Management believes that attentive personal service and
knowledgeable sales professionals are key components to our success.
As part of our commitment to continuous,
on-the-job
training, we have established Birks University, a formalized system of
in-house
training with a primary focus on
client service, selling skills and product knowledge that involves extensive classroom training, the use of detailed operational manuals,
in-store
mentorship programs and a leading edge product knowledge
program which includes
on-line
testing. In addition, we conduct
in-house
training seminars on a periodic basis and administer training modules with audits to
(i) enhance the quality and professionalism of all sales professionals, (ii) measure the level of knowledge of each sales professional, (iii) update sales professionals on changes to our credit programs available to customers and
changes to applicable laws, including anti-money laundering legislation, and (iv) identify needs for additional training. We also provide all management team members with more extensive training that emphasizes leadership skills, general
management skills,
on-the-job
coaching and training instruction techniques.
Advertising and Promotion
One of
our key marketing goals is to build on our reputation in our core markets as a leading luxury jewelry brand offering high quality merchandise in an elegant, sophisticated environment. For example, we frequently run advertisements that associate the
Birks brand with internationally recognized brand names such as Cartier, Patek Philippe, Rolex, and Van Cleef & Arpels, among others. Advertising and promotions for all stores are developed by our personnel in conjunction with
outside creative professionals.
Our advertising reinforces our role as a world-class luxury brand that aims to deliver a total shopping
experience that is as memorable as our merchandise. Our marketing efforts consist of advertising campaigns on digital platforms (including on our website and on social media), billboards, print, direct mail, special events, media and public
relations, distinctive store design, elegant displays, partnerships with key suppliers and associations with prestige institutions. The key goals of our marketing initiatives are to enhance customer awareness and appreciation of our retail brand,
Birks, as well as the Birks product brand, and to increase customer traffic, client acquisition and retention and net sales.
Credit Operations
We have a private label credit card, which is administered by a third-party financial institution that owns the credit card
receivable balances. We also have a Birks proprietary credit card, which we administer. Our credit programs are intended to complement our overall merchandising and sales strategy by encouraging larger and more frequent sales to a loyal customer
base. Sales under the Birks private label credit cards accounted for approximately 18.0% of our net sales during fiscal 2019 and 14.6% during fiscal 2018. The increase in penetration of our net sales is substantially due to the introduction of more
attractive term plans during fiscal 2019 as well as due to the launch of the Birks Prestige private label credit card program in April 2018. Sales under the Birks private label credit cards are generally made without credit recourse to us. However,
we are permitted to ask the financial institution to approve credit purchases under these private label credit cards, for which the financial institution holds credit recourses against the Company if the customer does not pay.
16
Distribution
Our retail locations receive the majority of their merchandise directly from our distribution warehouse located in Montreal, Québec.
Merchandise is shipped from the distribution warehouse utilizing various air and ground carriers. We also transfer merchandise between retail locations to balance inventory levels and to fulfill client requests, and a small portion of merchandise is
delivered directly to the retail locations from suppliers.
Competition
The North American retail jewelry industry is highly competitive and fragmented, with a few very large national and international competitors
and many medium and small regional and local competitors. The market is also fragmented by price and quality. Our competitors include national and international jewelry chains as well as independent regional and local jewelry and timepiece
retailers. We also compete with other types of retailers such as department stores and specialty stores and, to a lesser extent, catalog showrooms, discounters, direct mail suppliers, televised home shopping networks, and pure
e-commerce
players. Many of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do. We believe that competition in our markets is based primarily on the total brand experience including trust, quality
craftsmanship, product design and exclusivity, product selection, marketing and branding elements (including web), service excellence, including after sales service, and, to a certain extent, price. With the
on-going
consolidation of the retail industry, we believe that competition with other general and specialty retailers and discounters will continue to increase. Our success will depend on various factors,
including general economic and business conditions affecting consumer spending, the performance of national and international retail operations, the acceptance by consumers of our merchandising and marketing programs, store locations and our ability
to properly staff and manage our stores.
Regulation
Our operations are affected by numerous federal and provincial laws that impose disclosure and other requirements upon the origination,
servicing and enforcement of credit accounts and limitations on the maximum amount of finance charges that may be charged by a credit provider. In addition to our private label and proprietary credit cards, credit to our clients is primarily
available through third-party credit cards such as American Express
®
, Discover
®
, MasterCard
®
, Union Pay
®
and Visa
®
, without recourse to us in the case of a clients
failure to pay. Any change in the regulation of credit that would materially limit the availability of credit to our traditional customer base could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We generally utilize the services of independent customs agents to comply with U.S. and Canadian customs laws in connection with our purchases
of gold, diamond and other jewelry merchandise from foreign sources.
Diamonds extracted from certain regions in Africa, including
Zimbabwe, that are believed to be used to fund terrorist activities, are considered conflict diamonds. We have designed a conflict minerals compliance initiative to implement a consistent, company-wide compliance process which includes:
|
-
|
Educating our employees and suppliers about conflict minerals;
|
|
-
|
Establishing a cross-functional management team including members of senior management and subject matter
experts from relevant functions such as supply chain, product development, merchandising, legal and finance responsible for implementing our conflict minerals compliance strategy; and
|
|
-
|
Reporting mechanisms for questions and concerns, including a toll-free confidential and anonymous hotline.
|
Our compliance program has been designed to conform, in all material respects, with the framework in The Organization
of Economic
Co-operation
and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas Second Edition, and the related gold supplement for conflict
minerals. In addition, we have adopted a conflict minerals policy which has been communicated to our suppliers and is included in our Merchandise Quality Manual and available on our website at www.birks.com. Our conflict mineral policy indicates
that suppliers who do not comply with this policy will be reviewed and evaluated accordingly for future business and sourcing decisions.
We support the Kimberley Process, an international initiative intended to ensure diamonds are not illegally traded to fund conflict. As part
of this initiative, we require our diamond suppliers to acknowledge compliance with the Kimberley Process and invoices received for diamonds purchased by us must include certification from the vendor that the diamonds and diamond containing jewelry
are conflict free. Through this process and other efforts, we believe that the suppliers from whom we purchase diamonds exclude conflict diamonds from their inventories.
17
In August 2012, the SEC issued rules that require companies that manufacture products using
certain conflict minerals, including gold, to determine whether those minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries (DRC). If the minerals originate in the DRC, or if companies are not able to
establish where they originated, extensive disclosure regarding the sources of those minerals, and in some instances an independent audit of the supply chain, is required. We filed our sixth disclosure report on June 4, 2019 for the calendar
year ended December 31, 2018. We determined that we had no reason to believe that any conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our products may have originated in the DRC.
Trademarks and Copyrights
The
designations Birks, and the Birks logos, are our principal trademarks and are essential to our ability to maintain our competitive position in the prestige jewelry segment. We maintain a program to protect our trademarks and will institute legal
action where necessary to prevent others from either registering or using marks that are considered to create a likelihood of confusion with our trademarks. We are also the owner of the original jewelry designs created by our
in-house
designers and have entered into agreements with several outside designers pursuant to which these designers have assigned to us the rights to use copyrights of designs and products created for us.
Organizational Structure
Not
applicable.
Properties
In December
2000, we entered into a capital lease agreement for our Montreal head office and store pursuant to which we sold and leased back the building, including the Montreal flagship store, for a term of 20 years ending December 11, 2020. The net
annual rental rate was $2.2 million for the period that ended on December 11, 2016. On November 1, 2016, we entered into an agreement with the new owner of the building to terminate the then existing lease agreement for the building
in advance of its expiry date in December 2020 and to lease the premises for our flagship store at its current location, which is an operating lease. As a result, a capital lease asset of $8.7 million and a capital lease obligation of
$11.6 million at November 1, 2016 were derecognized and a
non-cash
gain of $2.9 million (included as part of other long-term liabilities) is being deferred and amortized over the term of the new
lease of the flagship store.
We lease all of our store locations. We believe that all of our facilities are well maintained and in good
condition and are adequate for our current needs. We actively review all leases that expire within the next 12 months to determine whether to renew the leases.
18
Following is a listing of all our properties as of March 30, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size
(Square Feet)
|
|
|
Expiration of Lease
|
|
Location
|
Operating Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayshore Centre
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
September 2027
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
Bloor Flagship Store
|
|
|
9,695
|
|
|
February 2034
|
|
Toronto, ON
|
Brinkhaus
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
March 2022
|
|
Calgary, AB
|
Carrefour Laval
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
April 2025
|
|
Laval, QC
|
Chinook Shopping Centre
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
|
September 2024
|
|
Calgary, AB
|
Dix-30
Mall
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
July 2023
|
|
Brossard, QC
|
Fairview Pointe-Claire
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
August 2030
|
|
Pointe-Claire, QC
|
First Canadian Place
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
August 2028
|
|
Toronto, ON
|
Guildford Town Centre
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
September 2027
|
|
Surrey, BC
|
Graff Boutique
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
October 2028
|
|
Vancouver, BC
|
Mapleview Centre
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
June 2023
|
|
Burlington, ON
|
Montreal Flagship Store
|
|
|
7,714
|
|
|
April 2032
|
|
Montreal, QC
|
Oakridge Shopping Centre
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
August 2023
|
|
Vancouver, BC
|
Oshawa
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
September 2027
|
|
Oshawa, ON
|
Park Royal
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
October 2024
|
|
West Vancouver, BC
|
Patek Philippe Boutique
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
October 2028
|
|
Vancouver, BC
|
Place
Ste-Foy
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
September 2027
|
|
Ste-Foy,
QC
|
Rideau Centre
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
May 2024
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
Saskatoon
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
October 2020
|
|
Saskatoon, SK
|
Sherway Gardens
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
September 2025
|
|
Etobicoke, ON
|
Southgate Shopping Centre
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
April 2028
|
|
Edmonton, AB
|
Square One
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
May 2024
|
|
Mississauga, ON
|
Toronto Dominion Square
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
January 2022
|
|
Calgary, AB
|
Vancouver Flasghip Store
|
|
|
20,221
|
|
|
January 2026
|
|
Vancouver, BC
|
Victoria
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
March 2022
|
|
Victoria, BC
|
West Edmonton Mall
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
August 2024
|
|
Edmonton, AB
|
Willowdale Fairview Mall
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
August 2029
|
|
North York, ON
|
Winnipeg
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
February 2023
|
|
Winnipeg, MB
|
Yorkdale
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
|
October 2026
|
|
Toronto, ON
|
Other Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montreal corporate office
|
|
|
26,423
|
|
|
May 2033
|
|
Montreal, QC
|
Total annual base rent for the above locations for fiscal 2019 was approximately $15.4 million.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable
19
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this Annual Report. The following discussion includes certain forward-looking statements. For a discussion of important factors, including the continuing development of our business, actions of regulatory authorities and competitors and other
factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements, see Item 3., Key Information under the heading Risk Factors and the discussion under the heading
Forward-Looking Information at the beginning of this Annual Report.
Throughout this Annual Report we refer to our fiscal
years ended March 30, 2019, March 31, 2018, and March 25, 2017, as fiscal 2019, fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in March of each year. The financial reporting period referred to as
fiscal 2019 consisted of 52 weeks, while fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 consisted of 53 and 52 weeks, respectively.
Overview
Birks Group is a leading designer of fine jewelry, timepieces and gifts and operator of luxury jewelry stores in Canada, with wholesale
customers in North America and the U.K. As of March 30, 2019, we have two reportable segments, Retail and Other. Retail consists of our retail operations whereby we operate 26 stores in Canada, under the Birks brand, one
store under the Brinkhaus brand, one store under the Graff brand, and one store under the Patek Phillippe brand. Other consists primarily of our wholesale business and our
e-commerce
business.
As of March 30, 2019, our retail operations total square footage was approximately 94,000. The average square footage of our three
Birks flagship stores was approximately 12,500, while the average square footage for all other Birks retail stores was approximately 2,300. The average square footage of the Brinkhaus, Graff, and Patek Phillippe locations was approximately 1,200.
Significant Transaction
On
August 11, 2017, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) with Aurum Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, which assigned its rights and obligations
under the Purchase Agreement to Aurum Group USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (now known as Watches of Switzerland) (Aurum) to sell its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayors, which operated in Florida and Georgia and was engaged primarily in
luxury timepieces and jewelry retail activities. The sale was completed on October 23, 2017 for total consideration of $135.0 million (USD $106.8 million) (the Aurum Transaction).
As a condition of the Aurum Transaction, Birks entered into a 5 year distribution agreement with Aurum (the Distribution
Agreement) to sell Birks fine jewelry in the U.K. at Mappin & Webb and Goldsmiths stores and on their respective
e-commerce
platforms. Furthermore, pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, the
Birks collections will continue to be sold in the United States through Mayors stores in Florida and Georgia. The Distribution Agreement is an important achievement in the Companys strategy to develop the Birks brand into a global luxury
brand. The Aurum Transaction constitutes a significant step in the Companys efforts to strengthen its balance sheet and to execute its strategic vision of investing in the Birks brand.
Proceeds from the Aurum Transaction were used to pay down outstanding debt under the Companys previous senior secured credit facilities
that included term debt and working capital debt associated with Mayors. The Company did not pay dividends as a result of the Aurum Transaction, but rather, the remaining transaction proceeds were used by Birks to continue its strategic growth
initiatives, specifically to invest in its Canadian flagship stores and new store concepts, as well as in its high-growth Birks brand wholesaling activities and
e-commerce,
as part of the Companys
omni-channel strategy.
20
As a result of the Aurum Transaction, the Company has presented Mayors results as a
discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. The tables below reconcile the Companys results from continuing operations and from discontinuing operations for the fiscal years
2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $
000s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,049
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,472
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
92,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,577
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,106
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
67,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,616)
|
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
(13,997)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,305)
|
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
(18,686)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2018*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
Operations**
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $
000s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,608
|
|
|
|
110,789
|
|
|
|
257,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,915
|
|
|
|
72,615
|
|
|
|
163,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
38,174
|
|
|
|
93,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,754
|
|
|
|
30,902
|
|
|
|
97,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,007)
|
|
|
|
5,598
|
|
|
|
(12,409)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
7,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt extinguishment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,682)
|
|
|
|
(37,682)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,995)
|
|
|
|
36,090
|
|
|
|
14,095
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $
000s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,992
|
|
|
|
224,319
|
|
|
|
377,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,460
|
|
|
|
143,194
|
|
|
|
234,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,532
|
|
|
|
81,125
|
|
|
|
142,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,599
|
|
|
|
61,970
|
|
|
|
123,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
3,170
|
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,392)
|
|
|
|
15,774
|
|
|
|
11,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,065)
|
|
|
|
(7,065)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,859)
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
(**) The results of Mayors are included in the Companys consolidated results for the period up to and including October 23, 2017.
Description of operations continuing operations
Our net sales are comprised of revenues, net of discounts, in each case, excluding sales tax. Sales are recognized at the point of sale when
merchandise is taken or shipped. Sales of consignment merchandise are recognized on a full retail basis at such time that the merchandise is sold. Revenues for gift certificates and store credits are recognized upon redemption. Customers use cash,
checks, debit cards, third-party credit cards, private label credit cards and proprietary credit cards to make purchases. The level of our sales is impacted by the number of transactions we generate and the size of our average sales transaction.
Our operating costs and expenses are primarily comprised of cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A). Cost of sales includes cost of merchandise, direct inbound freight and duties, direct labor related to repair services, the costs of our design and creative departments, inventory shrink, damage and obsolescence, jewelry,
watch and giftware boxes, as well as product development costs. SG&A includes, among other things, all
non-production
payroll and benefits (including
non-cash
compensation expense), store and head office occupancy costs, overhead, credit card fees, information systems, professional services, consulting fees, repairs and maintenance, travel and entertainment, insurance, legal, human resources and training
expenses. Occupancy, overhead and depreciation are generally less variable relative to net sales than other components of SG&A, such as credit card fees and certain elements of payroll, such as commissions. Another significant item in SG&A
is marketing expenses, which include marketing, public relations and advertising costs (net of amounts received from vendors for cooperative advertising) incurred to increase customer awareness of both the Birks product brand and our third party
retail brands. Marketing has historically represented a significant portion of our SG&A. As a percentage of net sales, marketing expenses represented 5.8%, 6.5%, and 4.8% of sales for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Additionally,
SG&A includes indirect costs such as freight, including inter-store transfers, receiving costs, distribution costs, and warehousing costs. Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation and amortization of our stores and head office,
including leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, computer hardware and software and amortization of intangibles.
Over the
short-term, we will focus our efforts on those strategies and key drivers of our performance that are necessary in the current business climate, which include our ability to:
|
|
|
grow sales, gross margin rate and gross profits;
|
|
|
|
manage expenses and assets efficiently in order to optimize profitability and cash flow with the objective of
growing earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA);
|
22
|
|
|
streamline the operational overhead costs that were incurred to support the operations of the Company prior to
the Aurum Transaction in order to reflect the needs of the continuing operations going forward;
|
|
|
|
align our operations to effectively and efficiently deliver benefits to our shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
maintain flexible and cost effective sources of borrowings to finance our operations and strategies.
|
Over the long-term, we believe that the key drivers of our performance will be our ability to:
|
|
|
continue to develop our Birks product brand through the expansion of all sales channels including
international channels of distribution and
e-commerce;
|
|
|
|
execute our merchandising strategy to increase net sales and maintain and expand gross margin by lowering
discounts, developing and marketing higher margin exclusive and unique products, and further developing our internal capability to design, develop, and source products;
|
|
|
|
execute our marketing strategy to enhance customer awareness and appreciation of the Birks product brand as
well as our third party retail brands with an objective of maintaining and eventually increasing customer traffic, client acquisition and retention and net sales through regional, national and international advertising campaigns using digital
channels (including our website), billboards, print, direct mail, magazine,
in-store
events, community relations, media and public relations, partnerships with key suppliers, and associations with prestige
institutions;
|
|
|
|
provide a superior omni-channel client experience through consistent outstanding customer service that will
ensure customer satisfaction and promote frequent customer visits, customer loyalty, and strong customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
increase our retail stores average retail transaction, conversion rate, productivity of our store
professionals, inventory and four-wall profitability; and
|
|
|
|
recruit and retain top talent whose values are aligned with our omni-channel strategic visions.
|
Fiscal 2019 Summary results from continuing operations
|
●
|
|
Net sales were $151.0 million for fiscal 2019, an increase of $4.4 million compared to net sales of
$146.6 million in fiscal 2018. The increase in sales in fiscal 2019 was primarily driven by the successful
re-opening
of the Companys Montreal flagship store in June 2018 after undergoing major
renovations in fiscal 2018 and the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and being closed for a 5 month period, yielding a 102% sales increase in this location over the comparable period of time. The Company also experienced sales growth throughout the
majority of its retail network as well as through it
e-commerce
channel, partially offset by lower sales in the Vancouver region driven by a temporary decline in certain affluent tourists in the second half of
the fiscal year;
|
|
●
|
|
Comparable store sales increased by 1.0% compared to the prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 driven by
strong sales of Birks branded products and increased sales of third party branded timepieces;
|
|
●
|
|
Gross profit was $58.6 million, or 38.8% of net sales, for fiscal 2019 compared to $55.7 million, or
38.0% of net sales, for fiscal 2018. The increase of 80 basis points in gross margin percentage was mainly attributable to product sales mix as well as to a reduction in sales promotions in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 during which the
Company was engaged in more promotional activity as a result of the Montreal and Toronto flagship locations undergoing major renovations during the fiscal year;
|
|
●
|
|
SG&A expenses were $67.1 million, or 44.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2019 compared to
$66.8 million, or 45.5% of net sales, in fiscal 2018. This nominal increase is driven in part by higher direct variable costs driven by increased sales, such as sales commissions and credit card transaction fees, as well as by higher occupancy
costs resulting from new leases, notably at our Toronto flagship location. As a percentage of sales, SG&A expenses in fiscal 2019 have decreased by 110 basis points as compared to fiscal 2018;
|
23
|
●
|
|
The Companys fiscal 2019 reported operating loss from continuing operations was $13.6 million, a
decrease of $4.4 million compared to a reported operating loss from continuing operations of $18.0 million for fiscal 2018. Adjusted operating loss from continuing operations (see
Non-GAAP
measures), which excludes restructuring costs and impairment charges was $12.4 million, a decrease of $1.9 million compared to an adjusted operating loss from continuing operations of $14.3 million in fiscal 2018 (excluding
restructuring costs and impairment charges);
|
|
●
|
|
The Company recognized a net loss for fiscal 2019 of $18.7 million, or $1.04 per share, comprised of a
net loss from continuing operations of $18.3 million or $1.02 per share, and a net loss from discontinued operations of $0.4 million, or $0.02 per share, compared to net income in fiscal 2018 of $14.1 million, or $0.78 per share
comprised of a net loss from continuing operations of $22.0 million, or $1.22 per share, and a net income from discontinued operations of $36.1 million (including a
one-time
gain on disposal of
discontinued operations of $37.7 million), or $2.00 per share.
|
Comparable Store Sales from continuing operations
We use comparable store sales as a key performance measure for our business. Comparable store sales include stores open in the
same period in both the current and prior year. We include our
e-commerce
sales in comparable store calculations. Stores enter the comparable store calculation in their thirteenth full month of operation under
our ownership. Stores that have been resized and stores that are relocated are evaluated on a
case-by-case
basis to determine if they are functionally the same store or
a new store and then are included or excluded from comparable store sales, accordingly. Comparable store sales measures the percentage change in net sales for comparable stores in a period compared to the corresponding period in the previous year.
If a comparable store is not open for the entirety of both periods, comparable store sales measures the change in net sales for the portion of time that such store was open in both periods. We believe that this measure provides meaningful
information on our performance and operating results. However, readers should know that this financial metric has no standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
The percentage increase (decrease) in comparable store sales for the periods presented below is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018
|
|
|
March 25, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales from continuing operations
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(4)%
|
|
|
|
(8)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in comparable store sales of 1% in fiscal 2019 is attributable in part by an increase in sales of
Birks branded products across the retail and
e-commerce
channels, an increase in sales of third party branded watches driven by the Companys improved portfolio of third party watch brands, as well as the
successful execution of targeted marketing campaigns. In fiscal 2018, the decrease in comparable store sales in was primarily driven by a decrease in sales of third party branded fine jewelry and bridal offerings.
24
Fiscal 2019 Compared to Fiscal 2018
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, the amounts in our consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
151,049
|
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
92,472
|
|
|
|
90,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,577
|
|
|
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
67,106
|
|
|
|
66,754
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
72,193
|
|
|
|
73,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(13,616)
|
|
|
|
(18,007)
|
|
Interest and other financing costs
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations,
|
|
|
(18,305)
|
|
|
|
(21,995)
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
(1,592)
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
36,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(18,686)
|
|
|
$
|
14,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1,
2018. Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report).
Net Sales from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales Retail
|
|
$
|
143,499
|
|
|
$
|
141,607
|
|
Net sales Other
|
|
|
7,550
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales
|
|
$
|
151,049
|
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Net sales for fiscal 2019 were $151.0 million compared to $146.6 million for fiscal 2018, which is an increase
of $4.4 million, or 3.0%, as compared to fiscal 2018. Net retail sales were $1.9 million greater than last year primarily driven by the
re-opening
of the Montreal flagship store in June 2018 as well
as by a 1% increase in comparable store sales. The increase in Net Sales Other of $2.5 million related primarily to an increase in
e-commerce
sales of $1.7 million driven by increased traffic
to the Companys updated website.
25
Gross Profit from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit Retail
|
|
$
|
57,310
|
|
|
$
|
53,655
|
|
Gross Profit Other
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
58,577
|
|
|
$
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Total gross profit for fiscal 2019 was $58.6 million or 38.8% of net sales, as compared to $55.7 million or
38.0% of net sales, in fiscal 2018. The increase of 80 basis points in gross margin percentage was mainly attributable to product sales mix and a reduction in sales promotions in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 during which the Company was
engaged in more promotional activity as a result of the Montreal and Toronto flagship locations undergoing major renovations during the fiscal year. Gross Profit Other for fiscal 2019 was $1.3 million compared to $2.0 million for
fiscal 2018, which is a decrease of $0.7 million as compared to fiscal 2018 driven by an increase in sales promotional activity during the period.
SG&A Expenses from continuing operations
In fiscal 2019, SG&A expenses were $67.1 million or 44.4% of net sales, compared to $66.8 million or 45.6% of
net sales in fiscal 2018. This nominal increase is driven in part by higher direct variable costs driven by increased sales, such as sales commissions and credit card transaction fees, as well as by higher occupancy costs resulting from new leases,
notably at our Toronto flagship location. As a percentage of sales, SG&A expenses in fiscal 2019 have decreased by 110 basis points as compared to fiscal 2018.
Restructuring Charges from continuing operations
During fiscal 2019, we incurred $1.2 million of restructuring charges associated with the Companys
right-sizing
initiative put in place subsequent to the Aurum Transaction, compared to $0.9 million in fiscal 2018 as part of the third phase of the Companys previous restructuring plan originally put in
place in July 2014. The $1.2 million of charges incurred in fiscal 2019 are primarily associated with severance costs as the Company eliminated certain head office positions to further increase efficiency and to align corporate functions with
the Companys strategic direction following the Aurum Transaction. In July 2014, the Company announced an operational restructuring plan to reduce corporate overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization. The
restructuring plan included consolidating most of the Companys corporate administrative workforce from its former regional office in Tamarac, Florida to its Montreal corporate head office as well as the outsourcing of a portion of our jewelry
manufacturing and other corporate head office staff reductions. The first and second phases of this previous restructuring plan were rolled out during fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017. In fiscal 2018, the Company implemented the third phase of the
operational restructuring plan, incurring restructuring charges of approximately $0.9 million, primarily associated with severance.
Depreciation and Amortization from continuing operations
Depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2019 was $3.9 million compared to $3.3 million during fiscal
2018, driven by amortization on additions to property, plant and equipment.
Interest and Other Financing Costs from continuing
operations
Interest and other financing costs in fiscal 2019 were $4.7 million compared to $4.0 million in
fiscal 2018, an increase of $0.7 million driven primarily by the impact of the Companys $12.5 million Term Loan signed in June 2018 and by an increase in the Companys working capital debt of approximately $10.1 million
from $36.9 million as of March 31, 2018 to $47.0 million as of March 30, 2019. The increase in working capital and term debt balances are driven primarily by the Companys extensive investments in the renovation of its
retail network, and particularly its Montreal, Vancouver and Toronto flagship locations during fiscal 2019.
26
Income Tax Expense from continuing operations
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of March 30,
2019, the Company had no accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions due to available tax loss carry forwards. The tax years 2012 through 2019 remain open to examination in the major tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. We have
continued to record a 100% valuation allowance on the full value of the deferred tax assets generated from our continuing operations during these periods as the criteria for recognition of these assets was not met at March 30, 2019.
Fiscal 2018 Compared to Fiscal 2017
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, the amounts in our consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
|
$
|
152,992
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
90,915
|
|
|
|
91,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
61,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
66,754
|
|
|
|
61,599
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
73,700
|
|
|
|
65,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(18,007
|
)
|
|
|
(4,392
|
)
|
Interest and other financing costs
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(21,995
|
)
|
|
|
(8,859
|
)
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
36,090
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
14,095
|
|
|
$
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Net Sales from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Net sales Retail
|
|
$
|
141,607
|
|
|
$
|
149,323
|
|
Net sales Other
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales
|
|
$
|
146,608
|
|
|
$
|
152,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
27
Net sales for fiscal 2018 were $146.6 million compared to
$153.0 million for fiscal 2017, which is a decrease of $6.4 million, or 4.2%, as compared to fiscal 2017. Net retail sales in fiscal 2018 were $7.7 million lower than in fiscal 2017 primarily driven by the renovation of our Montreal
and Toronto flagship stores during fiscal 2018, and the temporary closure of the Montreal flagship store for the last two months of the fiscal year, as well as a softer luxury retail environment in Canada throughout the fiscal year and particularly
during the holiday season. The increase in Net Sales Other of $1.3 million related primarily to an increase in wholesale sales of $1.6 million driven by the Companys entrance into the U.K market through its exclusive
distribution agreement for Birks branded jewelry with Aurum, as well as greater
e-commerce
sales of $0.2 million driven by increased traffic to the Companys updated website, partially offset by
lower corporate sales of $0.5 million.
Gross Profit from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit Retail
|
|
$
|
53,655
|
|
|
$
|
60,219
|
|
Gross Profit Other
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
55,693
|
|
|
$
|
61,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Total gross profit for fiscal 2018 was $55.7 million or 38.0% of net sales, as compared to $61.5 million or 40.2% of
net sales, in fiscal 2017, a decrease of $5.8 million compared to fiscal 2017. The reduction of 220 basis points in gross margin percentage was mainly attributable to product sales mix and increased sales promotions as a result of the Montreal
and Toronto flagship locations undergoing major renovations during the fiscal year. Gross Profit Other for fiscal 2018 was $2.0 million compared to $1.3 million for fiscal 2017, which is an increase of $0.7 million or 53.8% compared
to fiscal 2017. This 53.8% increase was driven by increased wholesale and
e-commerce
activity during the fiscal year, as the Company continued its focus on growth in these high gross margin channels.
SG&A Expenses from continuing operations
In fiscal 2018, SG&A expenses were $66.8 million or 45.5% of net sales, compared to $61.6 million or 40.3% of
net sales in fiscal 2017. The increase was driven in part by higher marketing and operational costs related to the Companys strategic focus on the promotion and development of the Birks brand as well as by higher professional fees incurred in
relation to the Companys strategic plan.
Restructuring Charges from continuing operations
During fiscal 2018, we incurred $0.9 million of restructuring charges associated with the third phase of our operational
restructuring plan launched in fiscal 2015, compared to $0.9 million in fiscal 2017 as part of the second phase of the restructuring plan. In July 2014, we provided to our senior secured lenders and announced an operational restructuring plan
to reduce corporate overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization. The restructuring plan included consolidating most of our corporate administrative workforce from our regional office in Tamarac, Florida to our
Montreal corporate head office as well as the outsourcing of a portion of our jewelry manufacturing and other corporate head office staff reductions. In February 2018, we began the third phase of the operational restructuring plan, incurring
restructuring charges of approximately $0.9 million, primarily associated with severance, as we eliminated certain head office positions to further increase efficiency and to align corporate functions with the Companys strategic direction
following the Aurum Transaction.
Depreciation and Amortization from continuing operations
Depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2018 was $3.3 million compared to $3.4 million during fiscal
2017.
28
Interest and Other Financing Costs from continuing operations
Interest and financing costs in fiscal 2018 were $4.0 million compared to $4.5 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease of
$0.5 million driven by lower average outstanding working capital debt during the period of $4.9 million as a result of the significant debt repayments made by the Company as a result of the Aurum Transaction.
NON-GAAP
MEASURES
The Company reports financial information in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S.
GAAP). The Companys performance is monitored and evaluated using various sales and earnings measures that are adjusted to include or exclude amounts from the most directly comparable GAAP measure
(non-GAAP
measures). The Company presents such
non-GAAP
measures in reporting its financial results to investors and other external stakeholders to provide
them with useful complimentary information which will allow them to evaluate the Companys operating results using the same financial measures and metrics used by the Company in evaluating performance. The Company does not, nor does it suggest
that investors and other external stakeholders should, consider
non-GAAP
measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These
non-GAAP
measures may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies.
Adjusted
operating expenses and adjusted operating loss
The Company evaluates its operating earnings performance using
financial measures which exclude expenses associated with operational restructuring plans and impairment losses. The Company believes that such measures provide useful supplemental information with which to assess the Companys results relative
to the corresponding period in the prior year and can result in a more meaningful comparison of the Companys performance between the periods presented. The table below provides a reconciliation of the
non-GAAP
measures presented to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated with GAAP.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of
non-GAAP
measures
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
($000)
|
|
GAAP
Measure
|
|
Restructuring
costs (a)
|
|
Impairment
of long lived
assets (b)
|
|
Non-GAAP
Adjusted
Measure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses and total adjusted operating expenses from continuing operations
|
|
72,193
|
|
(1,182)
|
|
(46)
|
|
70,965
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
47.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss and adjusted operating loss from continuing operations
|
|
(13,616)
|
|
1,182
|
|
46
|
|
(12,388)
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
(9.0)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.2)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of
non-GAAP
measures
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018*
|
|
|
|
|
|
($000)
|
|
GAAP
Measure
|
|
Restructuring
costs (a)
|
|
Impairment
of long lived
assets (b)
|
|
Non-GAAP
Adjusted
Measure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses and total adjusted operating expenses from continuing operations
|
|
73,700
|
|
(894)
|
|
(2,788)
|
|
70,018
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
50.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss and adjusted operating loss from continuing operations
|
|
(18,007)
|
|
894
|
|
2,788
|
|
(14,325)
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
(12.3)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of
non-GAAP
measures
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
|
|
|
($000)
|
|
GAAP
Measure
|
|
Restructuring
costs (a)
|
|
Impairment
of long lived
assets (b)
|
|
Non-GAAP
Adjusted
Measure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses and total adjusted operating expenses from continuing operations
|
|
65,924
|
|
(897)
|
|
-
|
|
65,027
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
43.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss and adjusted operating loss from continuing operations
|
|
(4,392)
|
|
897
|
|
-
|
|
(3,495)
|
as a % of net sales from continuing
operations
|
|
(2.9)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3)%
|
*
|
The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
|
(a)
|
Expenses associated with the Companys operational restructuring plan
.
|
(b)
|
Non-cash
impairment associated with the impairment of long-lived
assets at a retail location due to the projected operating performance of the location and software impairment associated with a decision to modify the scope of the implementation of the Companys new ERP.
|
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys ability to fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements is dependent upon its ability to
maintain positive excess availability under the Companys Credit Facility (defined below). As of March 30, 2019, the Company had approximately $47.0 million outstanding on its $85.0 million credit facility, which is used to
finance working capital and capital expenditures, provide liquidity to fund the Companys
day-to-day
operations and for other general corporate purposes. The terms
of the Credit Facility require the Company to maintain positive excess availability at all times.
On October 23,
2017, in connection with the closing of the Aurum Transaction, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Canada Corporation for a maximum amount of $85.0 million (the Credit Facility). The Credit
Facility, which matures in October 2022, also provides the Company with an option to increase the total commitments thereunder by up to $13.0 million. The Company will only have the ability to exercise this accordion option if it has the
required borrowing capacity at such time. The Credit Facility bears interest at a rate of CDOR plus a spread ranging from 1.5% - 3.0% depending on the Companys excess availability levels. Under the Credit Facility, the sole financial covenant
which the Company is required to adhere to is to maintain minimum excess availability of not less than $8.5 million at all times, except that the Company shall not be in breach of this covenant if excess availability falls below
$8.5 million for not more than two consecutive business days once during any fiscal month. The Companys excess availability was above $8.5 million throughout fiscal 2019.
On June 29, 2018, the Company secured a $12.5 million senior secured term loan (the Term Loan) with
Crystal Financial LLC (Crystal). The Term Loan, which matures in October 2022, is subordinated in lien priority to the Credit Facility and bears interest at a rate of CDOR plus 8.25%. Under the Term Loan, the Company is required to
adhere to a similar financial covenant as under the Credit Facility (maintain minimum excess availability of not less than $8.5 million at all times, except that the Company shall not be in breach of this covenant if excess availability falls
below $8.5 million for not more than two consecutive business days once during any fiscal month). In addition, the Term Loan includes seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year of $9.5 million and
from January 21st to February 20th of each year of $4.5 million. The Term Loan is required to be repaid upon maturity.
The Companys borrowing capacity under both the Credit Facility and the Term Loan is based upon the value of the
Companys inventory and accounts receivable, which is periodically assessed by its lenders, and based upon these reviews the Companys borrowing capacity could be significantly increased or decreased.
Both the Companys Credit Facility and Term Loan are subject to cross default provisions with all other loans pursuant to
which if the Company is in default of any other loan, the Company will immediately be in default of both its Credit Facility and Term Loan. In the event that excess availability falls below $8.5 million for more than two consecutive business
days once during any fiscal month, this would be considered an event of default under the Credit Facility and Term Loan, that provides the lenders the right to require the outstanding balances borrowed under the Companys Credit Facility and
Term Loan to become due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Companys other borrowings. The Company expects to have excess availability of at least $8.5 million for at least the next twelve months.
The Credit Facility and Term Loan also contain limitations on the Companys ability to pay dividends, more specifically,
among other limitations, the Company can pay dividends only at certain excess borrowing capacity thresholds. The Company is required to either i) maintain excess availability of at least 40% of the borrowing base in the month preceding payment or
ii) maintain excess availably of at least 25% of the borrowing base and maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.10 to 1.00. Other than these financial covenants related to paying dividends, the terms of the Credit Facility and Term Loan
provide that no financial covenants are required to be met other than already described.
The Companys lenders under
its Credit Facility and Term Loan may impose, at any time, discretionary reserves, which would lower the level of borrowing availability under the Companys credit facilities (customary for asset-based loans), at their reasonable discretion,
to: i) ensure that the Company maintain adequate liquidity for the operation of its business, ii) cover any deterioration in the value of the collateral, and iii) reflect impediments to the lenders to realize upon the collateral. There is no limit
to the amount of discretionary reserves that the Companys lenders may impose at their reasonable discretion. No discretionary reserves have been imposed since the inception of the Credit Facility and the Term Loan on October 23, 2017 and
June 29, 2018, respectively.
31
Borrowings under our Credit Facility for the periods indicated in the table below were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
March 31, 2018
*(1)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Credit facility availability
|
|
$
|
61,449
|
|
|
$
|
56,860
|
|
Amount borrowed at year end
|
|
$
|
47,021
|
|
|
$
|
36,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess borrowing capacity at year end (before minimum threshold)
|
|
$
|
14,428
|
|
|
$
|
19,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average outstanding balance during the year continuing operations
|
|
$
|
44,772
|
|
|
$
|
45,588
|
|
Average excess borrowing capacity during the year continuing operations
|
|
$
|
15,816
|
|
|
$
|
18,444
|
|
Maximum borrowing outstanding during the year continuing operations
|
|
$
|
55,596
|
|
|
$
|
60,710
|
|
Minimum excess borrowing capacity during the year continuing operations
(2)
|
|
$
|
9,716
|
|
|
$
|
3,330
|
|
Weighted average interest rate for year
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
(*) The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
(1)
|
Note that for fiscal 2018, credit facility availability, excess borrowing capacity and outstanding
borrowings related to the period prior to the Aurum Transaction (up to and including October 22, 2017) are calculated based on the terms existing under the then existing senior secured credit facilities, while credit facility availability,
excess borrowing capacity and outstanding borrowings related to the period subsequent to the Aurum Transaction (October 23, 2017 and thereafter) are calculated based on the terms existing under the Credit Facility.
|
(2)
|
The Companys former lenders consented to the Company having an excess borrowing capacity lower than the
then existing minimum threshold of $7.7 million (USD $6.0 million) under its then existing credit facilities for the 4 days leading up to the closing of the Aurum Transaction to allow the Company to hold excess cash on hand during the
Companys transition period towards the new lenders banking operations.
|
Investissement Québec
As at March 30, 2019, the Company had term loans outstanding in the aggregate amount of $0.8 million at
March 30, 2019 with Investissement Québec, which are outlined below:
|
-
|
$2.0 million secured term loan of which $0.2 million remained outstanding, bearing interest at a
rate of Canadian prime plus 10% per annum, which equated to 13.4% at March 30, 2019. $5.0 million secured term loan of which $0.6 million remained outstanding, bearing interest at a rate of Canadian prime plus 7.0% per annum, which
equated to 10.4% at March 30, 2019. The term loans with Investissement Québec require the Company on an annual basis to have a working capital ratio of at least 1.15. On May 21, 2019, the Company obtained a waiver from Investissement
Québec with respect to the requirement to meet the working capital ratio for fiscal 2019.
|
|
-
|
On June 5, 2019, the Company repaid the outstanding balances on its terms loans from Investissement
Quebec. As a result, the outstanding loan balances as at March 30, 2019 have been presented as short-term liabilities within current portion of long-term debt on the Companys balance sheet.
|
Other Financing
As of
March 30, 2019, we had a balance of $2.0 million (USD $1.5 million) outstanding from an original $6.7 million (USD $5.0 million) cash advance from one of our controlling shareholders, Montel Sarl (Montel, previously known
as Montrovest B.V.). This advance is payable upon demand by Montel once conditions stipulated in our Credit Facility permit such a payment. The conditions that are required to be met are the same as those that are required to be met for the Company
to pay dividends (outlined in above section).This advance bears an annual interest rate of 11%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 12.2%.
As of March 30, 2019, we had a balance of $1.7 million (USD $1.25 million) outstanding from an original
$3.4 million (USD $2.5 million) loan from Montrovest. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 11%, net of withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 12.2%. In May 2019, Montel granted the Company a one year
extension of the term of the outstanding balance of $1.7 million (USD $1.25 million) which was scheduled to be fully repaid in July 2019. Subsequent to the one year term extension, the principal balance of the loan will now come due in July
2020. As part of the one year term extension, Montel also granted the Company a one year moratorium on the monthly interest payments on the outstanding loan balance (approximately $16,800 in Canadian dollars). The accrued interest will become due
with the remaining outstanding principal balance, in July 2020.
32
Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities from continuing operations
The following table summarizes cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Fiscal 2019
|
|
Fiscal 2018*
|
|
Fiscal 2017*
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(4,340)
|
|
|
$
|
(19,748)
|
|
|
$
|
(4,373)
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(13,611)
|
|
|
|
(8,707)
|
|
|
|
(5,761)
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
18,506
|
|
|
|
(22,104)
|
|
|
|
9,633
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations:
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
|
49,529
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(565)
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
(1,595)
|
|
|
$
|
(510)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018. Prior
periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $4.3 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to
$19.7 million in fiscal 2018. The $15.4 million increase in cash flows related to operating activities from continuing operations was primarily the result of a $3.7 million decrease in net loss from continuing operations in fiscal
2019 versus fiscal 2018, a $5.9 million decrease in the level of prepaids and other current assets during fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, a $4.3 million decrease in the level of accounts receivable during fiscal 2019 compared to
fiscal 2018, a $4.8 million increase in the level of accounts payable during fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, a $5.2 million increase in the level of other long-term liabilities and accrued liabilities during fiscal 2019 compared to
fiscal 2018 and a $1.0 million increase in depreciation and amortization and other operating activities in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, partially offset by a $2.7 million reduction in
non-cash
impairment on long-lived assets in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 and by a $6.8 million increase in the level of inventories in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018.
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $19.7 million in fiscal 2018 as compared to
$4.4 million in fiscal 2017. The approximate $15.4 million decrease in cash flows related to operating activities from continuing operations was primarily the result of a $13.1 million increase in operating loss from continuing
operations in fiscal 2018 versus fiscal 2017, an increase in the level of accounts receivable growth of $2.2 million during fiscal 2018 versus fiscal 2017, as well as an increase in the level of prepaids and other current assets of
$3.1 million during fiscal 2018 versus fiscal 2017, partially offset by a $2.8 million
non-cash
impairment on long-lived assets in fiscal 2018.
During fiscal 2019, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $13.6 million compared to
$8.7 million used during fiscal 2018. The $4.9 million increase in net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was primarily attributable to an increase in capital expenditures in relation to the major renovations of
our flagship stores over fiscal 2018.
During fiscal 2018, net cash used in investing activities from continuing
operations was $8.7 million compared to $5.8 million used during fiscal 2017. The $2.9 million increase in net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was primarily attributable to an increase in capital
expenditures and additions to intangible assets related to our ERP project over fiscal 2017.
Net cash provided by
financing activities from continuing operations was $18.5 million in fiscal 2019, as compared to $22.1 million of cash flows used in financing activities from continuing operations during fiscal 2018. The $40.6 million increase in
cash flows related to financing activities from continuing operations was primarily due to an increase in bank indebtedness of $10.1 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to a decrease in bank indebtedness of $20.8 million in fiscal 2018, an
increase of long-term debt levels of $8.7 million, as well as a net decrease of $4.3 million in repayment of long-term debt in fiscal 2019 versus fiscal 2018, partially offset by an advance from shareholder of $3.2 million in fiscal
2018 compared to nil in fiscal 2019, respectively.
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was
$22.1 million in fiscal 2018, as compared to $9.6 million provided by during fiscal 2017. The $31.7 million decrease in cash flows related to financing activities from continuing operations was primarily due a decrease in bank
indebtedness in fiscal 2018 of $20.8 million as compared to an increase of $13.6 million in fiscal 2017, partially offset by an advance from shareholder of $3.2 million in fiscal 2018 as compared to nil in fiscal 2017, respectively.
33
Net cash used in discontinued operations amounted to $0.4 million in fiscal
2019 as a result of transaction related costs, net of recovery of expenses received as part of the transition service agreement with Aurum, compared to $49.5 million in fiscal 2018 represented by the excess proceeds received as a result of the
Aurum Transaction, net of the repayment of Mayors outstanding term and working capital debt and transaction related costs.
The following table details capital expenditures in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
March 31, 2018*
|
|
March 25, 2017*
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
6,593
|
|
|
$
|
4,848
|
|
|
$
|
2,077
|
|
Electronic equipment, computer hardware and software
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
Furniture and fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
(1)
|
|
$
|
14,533
|
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
|
$
|
5,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
The Company has changed its reporting currency from USD to CAD for the period commencing April 1, 2018.
Prior periods comparative financial information has been recast as if the Company always used CAD as its reporting currency (refer to note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
|
(1)
|
Includes capital expenditures financed by capital leases of nil in fiscal 2019, $1.1 million in fiscal 2018,
and $0.5 million in fiscal 2017 as well as capital expenditures included in accounts payable as of the end of the fiscal year.
|
In the last three fiscal years, we invested a total of approximately $30.7 million in capital expenditures primarily
associated with the remodeling of our existing store network including the completion of major transformative renovations at our three flagship locations in Montreal (completed in June 2018), Vancouver (completed in February 2019) and Toronto
(completed in March 2019) as well as the opening of our Graff and Patek Philippe boutiques in Vancouver (completed in December 2018), the opening of new stores and a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation.
The last three fiscal years were very capital-intensive for the Company as we implemented our strategic objective of
completing the remodeling of our retail network including our flagship locations. This capital intensive spending period resulted in temporarily lower sales and contribution margin at the flagship locations under renovation, with a view to generate
future long-term returns for the Company. We expect to invest a significantly lower amount in capital expenditures in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 as we focus solely on operations and on delivering a return on our heavy investment spending during the
period from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2019. In fact, in fiscal 2020, approximately $1.0 million is expected to be spent in capital expenditures, primarily related to minor store remodels and store relocations. We expect to finance these capital
expenditures from operating cash flows, and existing financing arrangements.
Maintenance of sufficient availability of
funding through an adequate amount of committed financing is necessary for us to fund our
day-to-day
operations. Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or
to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, or to fund planned capital expenditures and store operations will depend on our ability to maintain adequate levels of available borrowing and our future performance, which to a certain extent, is
subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, as well as other events that are beyond our control. We believe that we currently have sufficient working capital to fund our operations. This belief is based
on certain assumptions about the state of the economy, the availability of borrowings to fund our operations and estimates of projected operating performance. To the extent that the economy and other conditions affecting our business are
significantly worse than we anticipate, we may not achieve our projected level of financial performance and we may determine that we do not have sufficient capital to fund our operations.
The Company believes that it will be able to adequately fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements for at least
the next twelve months. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future and be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business. The financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption was not appropriate.
Research
and development, patents and licenses, etc.
None.
34
Trend Information
During fiscal 2019, we were faced with several challenges such as a weaker holiday season in the luxury retail industry
globally, the planned major renovations of two of our flagship store locations (Montreal and Toronto), the temporary closure of our flagship store in Montreal, the delayed opening of the Toronto flagship store, and a softening in luxury spending by
certain affluent tourists within our customer base. Increased competition for space in Canada continued to put pressure on occupancy costs and space retention for key locations. In fiscal 2019, we achieved several important milestones as evidenced
by our investments in both short-term and long-term initiatives. We finalized the major renovations and remodeling of our three flagship locations, namely: Montreal (completed in June 2018), Vancouver (completed in February 2019) and Toronto
(completed in March 2019).
We continue to successfully pursue our strategy to develop the Birks product brand and in
fiscal 2019, we launched several new collections under the Birks brand. In addition, we continued to pursue our strategies to enhance our customers
in-store
experience which included the remodeling of
our retail network (including the major renovations to our flagship locations) to provide our clients with an engaging buying experience.
Our gross profit margin from continuing operations has declined over the past five years primarily due to changes in our
product sales mix and the increased efforts over the past years to more quickly and aggressively sell through slow moving and discontinued product brands in an effort to improve the productivity and turnover of our inventory. Going forward, we
believe that our gross profit margin will stabilize and begin to increase as we continue to promote the development of the Birks product brand which we expect will provide us with higher gross profit margins. Going forward, we also intend to execute
our merchandising strategy to expand gross margins by developing and marketing exclusive and unique third-party branded products with higher margins.
Over the past few years we have also decreased the number of stores we operate through our closure of underperforming stores.
Going forward we will continue to evaluate the productivity of our existing stores and close unproductive stores. In addition, we will be continuing to review opportunities to open new stores in new prime retail locations when the right
opportunities exist. Moreover, we will continue to invest in our website and e-commerce platform to bolster our online distribution channel which has experienced significant sales growth during fiscal 2019 (110% year-over-year) and which represents
an area of focus for us going forward.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
From time to time, we guarantee a portion of our private label credit card sales to our credit card vendor. As of
March 30, 2019 and March 31, 2018, the amount guaranteed under such arrangements was approximately $5.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The bad debt experienced under these guarantees has not been material. See Note 14(b)
to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form
20-F
for additional discussion. We had no other
off-balance
sheet arrangements as of
March 30, 2019 other than our operating lease commitments as detailed below and in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.
Commitments
and Contractual Obligations
The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual cash
obligations as of March 30, 2019 and the periods in which payments are due:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than
1 Year
|
|
|
2-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt maturities
(1)
|
|
$
|
63,450
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
48,115
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on debt
(2)
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Operating lease obligations
(3)
|
|
|
132,457
|
|
|
|
10,231
|
|
|
|
26,091
|
|
|
|
25,308
|
|
|
|
70,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(4)
|
|
$
|
201,443
|
|
|
$
|
12,994
|
|
|
$
|
77,071
|
|
|
$
|
38,326
|
|
|
$
|
73,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes bank indebtedness in the
2-3
year category to reflect the
current expiration date of the line of credit.
|
(2)
|
Excludes interest payments on amounts outstanding under our credit facility as the outstanding amounts
fluctuate based on our working capital needs. Interest expense on other variable rate long-term debts was calculated assuming the rates in effect at March 30, 2019.
|
(3)
|
The operating lease obligations do not include insurance, taxes and common area maintenance (CAM) charges to
which we are obligated. CAM charges were $1.8 million in fiscal 2019, $1.9 million in fiscal 2018, and $3.1 million in fiscal 2017.
|
(4)
|
In addition to the above and as of March 31, 2019, we had $1.0 million of outstanding letters of
credit.
|
35
Leases
We lease all of our retail locations under operating leases. Additionally, we have operating leases for certain equipment.
Operating leases for store locations are expensed over the term of the initial lease period. While lease renewal periods
are available on most leases, renewal periods are not included in the accounting lease term because we believe there are no punitive terms or circumstances associated with
non-renewal
that would reasonably
assure renewal. The accounting lease term typically includes a fixturing period and the rental payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. All reasonably assured rent escalations, rent holidays, and rent concessions are
included when considering the straight-line rent to be expensed. Lease incentives are recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease term. Contingent rent payments vary by lease, are based on a percentage of
revenue above a predetermined sales level and are expensed when it becomes probable the sales levels will be achieved. This level is different for each location and includes and excludes various types of sales.
Leasehold improvements are capitalized and typically include fixturing and store renovations. Amortization of leasehold
improvements begins on the date the asset was placed in service and extends to the lesser of the economic life of the leasehold improvement and the initial lease term.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions about
future events and their impact on amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results may differ from those estimates. These estimates and
assumptions are evaluated on an
on-going
basis and are based on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable. We have identified certain critical accounting policies as noted
below.
Going concern assumption
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the U.S. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future and be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal
course of business. In evaluating our ability to continue as a going concern, we are required to determine whether we have the ability to fund our operations and meet our cash flow requirements. This evaluation requires us to estimate and forecast
our cash flows for at least the next twelve months from the date the financial statements were authorized for issuance. Significant estimates that have the greatest impact on our analysis include our estimate of sales, gross margins and expenses,
estimates of collateral values performed by our lenders throughout the year which could increase or decrease our availability under our senior secured credit facility, timing of inventory acquisitions, vendor terms and payments, interest rate and
foreign exchange rate assumptions. Further, we have also made judgments on whether any reserves would be imposed by our senior secured lenders. Significant variances from our assumptions used in preparing our going concern analysis could
significantly impact our ability to meet our projected cash flows. Our ability to meet our projected cash flows could also be impacted if our senior secured lenders impose additional restrictions on our ability to borrow on our collateral or if we
do not adhere to the financial covenant applicable under our senior secured credit facilities which is an event of default.
The Company funds its operations primarily through committed financing under its senior secured credit facility and its senior
secured term loan described in Note 7 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
20-F.
The Credit Facility along with the Term Loan are used to finance working capital, finance capital
expenditures, provide liquidity to fund the Companys
day-to-day
operations and for other general corporate purposes. The Companys ability to meet its cash
flow requirements in order to fund its operations is dependent upon its ability to attain profitable operations as well as specified excess availability levels under its Credit Facility and its Term Loan. The sole financial covenant which the
Company is required to adhere to under both Credit Facility and its Term Loan is to maintain minimum excess availability of not less than $8.5 million at all times, except that the Company shall not be in breach of this covenant if excess
availability falls below $8.5 million for not more than two consecutive business days once during any fiscal month. In the event that excess availability falls below the minimum requirement, this would be considered an event of default under
the Credit Facility and under the Term Loan, that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under the Companys Credit Facility and Term Loan becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Companys other
borrowings. The Company met its excess availability requirement as of and throughout the year ended March 30, 2019 and as of the date the financial statements were authorized for issuance, and expects to have excess availability of at least
$8.5 million for at least the next twelve months.
36
Allowance for inventory shrink and slow moving inventory
The allowance for inventory shrink is estimated for the period from the last physical inventory date to the end of the
reporting period on a store by store basis and at our distribution centers. The shrink rate from the most recent physical inventory, in combination with historical experience, is the basis for providing a shrink allowance.
We write down inventory for estimated slow moving inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Impairment of long-lived assets
We periodically review the estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets and changes in useful lives are made on a
prospective basis unless factors indicate the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable and an impairment write-down is necessary. However, we review our long-lived assets for impairment once events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying
value. Measurement of an impairment loss for such long-lived assets is based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset, with fair value being determined based upon discounted cash flows or appraised values,
depending on the nature of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. During fiscal 2019, the Company recorded impairment charges on long-lived assets of
$0.1 million associated with the projected operating performance of a retail location. During fiscal 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges on long-lived assets of $2.8 million associated with the projected operating performance of
a retail location and software impairment associated with a decision to modify the scope of the implementation of the Companys new ERP. No impairment charges were recorded in fiscal 2017.
Inflation
The
impact of inflation on our operations has not been significant to date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 (s) to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form
20-F.
Safe Harbor
See section entitled Forward-Looking Information at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form
20-F.
37
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth information about our executive officers and directors, and their respective ages and positions as of
June 1, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Niccolò Rossi di Montelera
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board & Director
|
Jean-Christophe Bédos
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
|
Davide Barberis Canonico
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Emily Berlin
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Shirley A. Dawe
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank Di Tomaso
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Louis L. Roquet
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Director
|
Joseph F.X
Zahra
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
Pat Di Lillo
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Maryame El Bouwab
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President, Merchandising, Planning and Supply Chain
|
Miranda Melfi
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary
|
Aurélie Pépion
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Vice President, Omni-Channel Sales, Operations & Marketing
|
Directors
Niccolò Rossi di Montelera
, age 46, was elected to the Companys Board of Directors on September 23, 2010 and served
as Vice-Chairman of the Companys Board of Directors from June 2015 until being appointed Executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2017. Mr. Rossi di Monteleras term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2019.
Mr. Rossi di Montelera was a consultant for Gestofi from August 2009 until December 31, 2016 and provided consulting services to the Company in the areas of new product and brand development in addition to being involved with the
Companys business development activities and strategic initiatives. From 2007 to 2009, he served as the Companys Group Divisional Vice President responsible for product development, wholesale and
e-commerce.
From 2005 to 2006, he served as the Companys Group Director responsible for product development. From 2002 to 2003, he worked at Regaluxe Investments SA and was responsible for the North
American business development for Royale de Champagne and from 1999 to 2002 he was a Project Leader for Ferrero Group. He was a member of the Supervisory Board of Directors of Montrovest until June 30, 2012. Mr. Rossi di Montelera is the
son of Dr. Rossi di Montelera, who was the Companys Chairman of the Board until December 31, 2016, and is the
brother-in-law
of Mr. Carlo
Coda-Nunziante
who was the Companys Vice President, Strategy until March 31, 2018.
Jean-Christophe Bédos,
age 54, was appointed to the Companys Board of Directors on April 19, 2012. He was the
Companys Chief Operating Officer from January 2012 to March 2012 and became the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2012. He became a director of Birks Group on April 19, 2012 and his term as a director
expires in 2019. He has over 25 years of experience in merchandising, marketing, branding and product development in the global retail luxury sector. Mr. Bédos was President and Chief Executive Officer of French jeweler Boucheron from
May 2004 to September 2011. Prior to that, he was the Managing Director of Cartier France from 2002 to 2004, and International Executive Manager alongside the President and Chief Executive Officer of Richemont International from 2000 to 2002.
Mr. Bédos started his career in the jewelry industry at Cartier in 1988.
Davide Barberis Canonico,
age 53, was elected
to the Companys Board of Directors in September 2013. Mr. Canonicos term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2019. From January 1, 2016 until April 2018, Mr. Canonico was also the Chief Executive Officer of Autofil
Yarn Ltd., a company in the textile industry supplying yarn to the automotive industry with manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom and Bulgaria and was the Group Strategy Director from June 2015 to December 2015. From 1998 to March 2016, he
was President and Chief Executive Officer of Manifattura di Ponzone S.p.A., an Italian family-owned company in the textile industry. From 2001 to 2015, he was also a member of the board of Sinterama S.p.A., a company in the textile industry with
manufacturing facilities worldwide. He was a member of the Supervisory Board of Montrovest B.V. until April 2018.
38
Emily Berlin
, age 72, has been a member of the Companys Board of Directors since
November 2005. Ms. Berlins term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2019. She was a Senior Managing Director of Helm Holdings International from 2001 until December 2012, which was a member of a diversified privately owned group of
companies operating principally in Central and South America where she focused principally on the banking and energy sectors. Since January 2013, Ms. Berlin has been a strategic consultant to SoEnergy International Inc., an affiliate of Helm
Holdings International, operating in the energy sector. From 1974 to 2000, she was a member of the law firm Shearman & Sterling, becoming a partner in 1981.
Shirley A. Dawe
, age 72, has been a member of the Companys Board of Directors since 1999. Ms. Dawes term as a director
of Birks Group expires in 2019. She is also a corporate director and has been President of Shirley Dawe Associates Inc., a Toronto-based management advisory company specializing in the retail sector since 1986. From 1969 to 1985, she held
progressively senior executive positions with Hudsons Bay Company. Her expertise in the retail sector led to her appointment on industry-specific public task forces and to academic and
not-for-profit
boards of directors. Her wide management and consumer marketing experience brought Ms. Dawe to the board of directors of numerous public and private companies in Canada and the U.S.
Frank Di Tomaso,
age 72, was elected to the Companys Board of Directors in September 2014. Mr. Di Tomasos term as a
director of Birks Group expires in 2019. Mr. Di Tomaso is a corporate director. He has been a Chartered Professional Accountant since 1972. He was an audit and advisory partner at Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP from 1981 to 2012 where he
held the position of Managing Partner Audit Public Companies until he retired in 2012. Mr. Di Tomaso also has been and currently is a member of a number of other public company corporate boards, namely Intertape Polymer Group Inc. and
ADF Group Inc.
Louis L. Roquet,
age 76, was appointed to the Companys Board of Directors on May 11, 2016.
Mr. Roquets term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2019. Mr. Roquet is the Chancellor and Chairman of the Board of Université de Montréal since June 2018. Mr. Roquet was previously a member of the
Companys Board of Directors from August 2007 to July 2014 before being appointed by the Québec Government to the position of Chairman of the Board of Investissement Québec in July 2014 from which he resigned on May 2, 2016.
From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Roquet was Managing Director of Cevital Spa, a large Algerian manufacturer of food products. Mr. Roquet has served as General Manager of the City of Montréal from January 2010 to January 2012. From April 2004
to October 2009, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Desjardins Venture Capital and was responsible for managing Desjardins venture capital funds together with those of Capital Régional and Coopératif Desjardins, a
publicly-traded company established in 2001 with an authorized capitalization of $1.0 billion. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Roquet served as President and General Manager of Société des alcools du Québec ,
Québecs Liquor Board. Prior to 2002 he held the title of President and Chief Executive Officer of Investissement Québec, Secretary General of the City of Montréal and General Manager of Montréal Urban Community. He
also serves as a director of numerous
non-profit
organizations
.
Joseph F.X. Zahra,
age 63, was appointed to the Companys Board of Directors on November 9, 2016. Mr. Zahras term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2019. Mr. Zahra is a founding partner and director of SurgeAdvisory Limited, an
advisory firm which focuses on strategy and transformation management, succession planning and boardroom coaching operating in Malta, since January 1, 2017. Prior thereto, he was a founding partner and managing director of MISCO, an independent
consulting group operating in Malta, Cyprus and Italy from 1983 to 2016. Mr. Zahra also serves as director of several private, publicly-listed and regulated companies operating in the following industries: financial services (insurance and
investment services), oil services, transportation, retail and hospitality. Mr. Zahra is also chairman of the board of directors of Forestals Investments Ltd. and of Multi Risk Ltd. and chairman of the audit committee of Corinthia Palace Hotel
Co. Ltd., Medserv plc and member of the audit committee of United Finance plc. He also serves as chairman of the investment committee of Pendergardens Developments plc and of Multi Risk Indemnity Ltd. and is a member of the investment committee of
Chasophie Group Limited. Mr. Zahra was director of the Central Bank of Malta from 1992 to 1996 and served as executive chairman of Bank of Valletta Plc from 1998 to 2004, Maltacom Plc in 2003 and Middlesea Insurance Plc from 2010 to 2012.
Mr. Zahra was appointed as one of the five international auditors at the Prefettura per gli Affari Economici of the Holy See from 2010 to 2014 and was the president of the economic and administrative reform commission (COSEA) from 2013 to 2014
as well as the vice coordinator of the newly formed Council for the Economy of the Holy See since 2014.
Other Executive Officers
Pasquale (Pat) Di Lillo,
age 57, is our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and has been with Birks Group since January 2015. Prior
to joining us, he was Senior Vice President, and Corporate Controller at
SNC-Lavalin
Group Inc., one of the worlds largest engineering and construction companies from May 2010 to December 2014 and was
Vice-President, Taxation from August 2007 to May 2010. From October 1983 to August 2007, he was with KPMG LLP, where he was appointed a partner in 1995.
39
Maryame El Bouwab
, age 41, is our Vice President, Merchandising, Planning and Supply
Chain. She has been with the Company since March 2013. Prior to her current position, she was the Companys Vice President, Planning and Supply Chain from June 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 and Vice President, Merchandise Planning
from February 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018. From March 2013 to February 2017, she was the Companys Director of Merchandise Planning. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. El Bouwab was, from 2005 to 2012, with Mexx Canada and Lucky Brand
Jeans and held the position of Merchandising and Planning Manager.
Miranda Melfi,
age 55, is our Vice President, Human Resources,
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary and has been with Birks Group since April 2006. Prior to her current position, she was our Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary from April 2006 to September 2018. Prior to joining us,
Ms. Melfi was with Cascades Inc., a publicly-traded pulp and paper company for eight years and held the position of Vice President, Legal Affairs, Boxboard Group. From 1994 to 1998, Ms. Melfi was Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate
Secretary at Stella-Jones Inc., a publicly-traded wood products company, and from 1991 to 1994, practiced corporate, commercial and securities law with Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.
Aurélie Pépion
, age 38, is our Vice President, Omni-Channel Sales, Operations and Marketing, and has been with the
Company since April 2018. Prior to her current position, she was our Vice President, Omni-Channel, Sales and Operations from April 2018 to September 2018. Prior to joining us, Ms. Pépion was the Managing Director Canada of Swarovski
(Consumer Goods Business) from March 2016 to March 2018 and prior thereto, she held various positions with Swarovski since February 2009, namely, Director Multibrand (Europe, Middle East, Africa), Head of Retail Multibrand (France), Key Account
Manager (France), and Watch Distribution Manager (France). Prior thereto, she was with Gucci Group Watches sales management from February 2007 to January 2009 and was a District Manager for Puig Prestige in 2005 and 2006.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Director Compensation
During fiscal
2019, each director who was not an employee of the Company received an annual fee of USD$25,000 (approximately $33,000 in Canadian dollars) for serving on our Board of Directors, USD$1,500 (approximately $2,000 in Canadian dollars) for each Board
meeting attended in person and USD$750 (approximately $1,000 in Canadian dollars) for each Board meeting attended by phone. The chairperson of each of the audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee
received an additional annual fee of USD$10,000, USD$8,000 and USD$5,000 (approximately $13,000, $10,500 and $6,500 in Canadian dollars) respectively. The members of each of the audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and
nominating committee received an additional annual fee of USD$5,000, USD$4,000 and USD$2,500 (approximately $6,500, $5,250 and $3,275 in Canadian dollars), respectively, and the independent member of the executive committee received an additional
annual fee of USD$4,000 (approximately $5,250 in Canadian dollars). The chairperson and any other members of any special independent committee of directors that may be established from time to time is entitled to receive compensation as may be
determined by the Board of Directors for his or her service on such committee. Since September 2018 and every September thereafter, each director who is not an employee of the Company is entitled to receive deferred stock units equal to a value of
USD$25,000 (approximately $33,000 in Canadian dollars). In November 2016, September 2017 and September 2018, each non-employee director received deferred stock units equal to a value of USD$10,000, USD$20,000 and USD$25,000 (approximately $13,000,
$25,000 and $33,000 in Canadian dollars), respectively. In April 2014 and April 2015, 5,000 stock appreciation rights were granted to each
non-employee
director. In addition, in September 2014, 2,000 stock
appreciation rights were granted to a new member of the Companys Board of Directors. All directors were reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their duties as directors.
On November 15, 2016, the Companys Board of Directors approved annual payments of €200,000 (approximately $303,000 in Canadian
dollars) and €50,000 (approximately $76,000 in Canadian dollars) to Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera for his role as Executive Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, respectively, effective January 1,
2017.
Executive Compensation
We
are a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities laws and not a reporting issuer under Canadian securities laws and are therefore not required to publicly disclose detailed individual information about executive compensation under U.S.
securities laws to the extent that we comply with the rules of our home jurisdiction. As such, the executive compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers are detailed
in our Management Proxy Circular described below. Under the
Canada Business Corporations Act
, being the statute under which we were incorporated, we are required to provide certain information on executive compensation. The aggregate
compensation paid by us to our five executive officers, and two executive officers that left, in fiscal 2019, was approximately $2,278,000 (annual salary).
40
The summary compensation table regarding our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
three other most highly compensated executive officers and the option/RSU grants and exercise of options/RSU tables in our Management Proxy Circular will be filed on Form
6-K
with the SEC in connection with
our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Birks Group Incentive Plans
The following plans make reference to stock prices, since BGI trades publicly on the NYSE American, all stock prices are denominated in U.S.
dollars.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In 2006, Birks Group adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial
responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees and consultants and to promote the success of Birks Groups business. As of May 31, 2019, there were 110,000 cash-based stock appreciation rights exercisable by members of the
Companys Board of Directors and outstanding stock options to purchase 570,000 shares of the Companys Class A voting shares granted to members of the Companys senior management team under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock
appreciation rights outstanding as of May 31, 2019, under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, have a weighted average exercise price of $1.10 and the stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2019, under the Long-Term Incentive Plan have a
weighted average exercise price of $1.05.
In general, the Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by Birks Groups Board of
Directors or a committee designated by the Board of Directors (the Administrator). Any employee or consultant selected by the Administrator is eligible for any type of award provided for under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, except that
incentive stock options may not be granted to consultants. The selection of the grantees and the nature and size of grants and awards are wholly within the discretion of the Administrator.
In the event of a change in control of Birks Group, the Administrator, at its sole discretion, may determine that all outstanding awards shall
become fully and immediately exercisable and vested. In the event of dissolution or liquidation of Birks Group, the Administrator may, at its sole discretion, declare that any stock option or stock appreciation right shall terminate as of a date
fixed by the Administrator and give the grantee the right to exercise such option or stock option right.
In the event of a merger or
asset sale or other change in control, as defined by the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, take any of the following actions or any other action the Administrator deems to be fair to the holders of the awards:
|
|
Provide that all outstanding awards upon the consummation of such a merger or sale shall be assumed by, or an
equivalent option or right shall be substituted by, the successor corporation or parent or subsidiary of such successor corporation;
|
|
|
Prior to the occurrence of the change in control, provide that all outstanding awards to the extent they are
exercisable and vested shall be terminated in exchange for a cash payment equal to the change in control price; or
|
|
|
Prior to the occurrence of the change in control, provide for the grantee to have the right to exercise the
award as to all or a portion of the covered stock, including, if so determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shares as to which it would not otherwise be exercisable.
|
The Long-Term Incentive Plan authorized the issuance of 900,000 Class A voting shares, which consisted of authorized but unissued
Class A voting shares. The Long-term Incentive Plan expired on February 10, 2016 and no further awards will be granted under this plan. However, this plan will remain effective until the outstanding awards issued thereunder terminate or
expire by their terms.
41
Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
On August 15, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted the Companys Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Omnibus LTIP),
and same was approved by the Companys shareholders on September 21, 2016. Under the Omnibus LTIP, the Companys directors, officers, senior executives and other employees of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, consultants and
service providers providing ongoing services to the Company and its affiliates may from
time-to-time
be granted various types of compensation awards, as same are further
described below. The Omnibus LTIP is meant to replace the Companys former equity awards plans. A total of 1,000,000 shares of the Companys Class A voting shares are reserved for issuance under the Omnibus LTIP. In no event shall the
Company issue Class A voting shares, or awards requiring the Company to issue Class A voting shares, pursuant to the Omnibus LTIP if such issuance, when combined with the Class A voting shares issuable upon the exercise of awards
granted under the Companys former plan or any other equity awards plan of the Company, would exceed 1,796,088 Class A voting shares, unless such issuance of Class A voting shares or awards is approved by the shareholders of the
Company. This limit shall not restrict however, the Companys ability to issue awards under the Omnibus LTIP that are payable other than in shares. As of May 31, 2019, the only awards outstanding under the Omnibus LTIP were 257,005
deferred stock units granted to members of the Companys Board of Directors, 102,000 restricted stock units granted to members of the Companys senior management team and 168,000 Class A voting shares underlying options granted to
members of the Companys senior management team.
Birks Employee Stock Option Plan
Effective May 1, 1997, Birks adopted an Employee Stock Option Plan (the Birks ESOP) designed to attract and retain the
services of selected employees or
non-employee
directors of Birks or its affiliates who are in a position to make a material contribution to the successful operation of its business. The Birks ESOP was amended
as of June 20, 2000. Effective as of November 15, 2005, no awards will be granted under the Birks ESOP. However, the Birks ESOP will remain in effect until the outstanding awards thereunder terminate or expire by their terms. As of
May 31, 2019, there were 3,060 Class A voting shares underlying options granted under the Birks ESOP at a weighted average exercise price of $1.05 per share.
42
BOARD PRACTICES
Our
by-laws
state that the Board of Directors will meet immediately following the election of
directors at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders and as the directors may from time to time determine. See Item 10. Additional InformationArticles of Incorporation and
By-laws.
Under our Restated Articles of Incorporation, our directors serve
one-year
terms although they
will continue in office until successors are appointed. None of the members of our Board has service agreements providing for benefits upon termination of employment, except for Mr. Bédos, our President and Chief Executive Officer. See
Item 10. Additional InformationMaterial ContractsEmployment Agreements.
Our Board of Directors has determined
that five of our eight directors (Emily Berlin, Shirley A. Dawe, Frank Di Tomaso, Louis L. Roquet and Joseph F.X Zahra) qualify as independent directors within the meaning of Section 803A of the NYSE American Company Guide.
All of the directors on our Compensation, Corporate Governance and Audit committees are independent. We are a controlled company
(one in which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company) within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE American. Accordingly, we are not required under the NYSE American rules to have a majority of
independent directors, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee (each of which, under the NYSE American rules, would otherwise be required to be comprised entirely of independent directors). Since November 2005,
our Board of Directors has been comprised of a majority of independent directors, except for (i) fiscal year 2013 following the appointment of Mr. Bédos, our President and Chief Executive Officer, as an additional director of the
Company, during which period our Board of Directors was comprised of 50% independent directors, (ii) part of fiscal year 2015 following the 2014 annual shareholder meeting where four of the Companys eight directors qualified as
independent directors, (iii) part of fiscal year 2016 following the resignation of Mr. Guthrie J. Stewart in December 2015 until the appointment of Mr. Louis L. Roquet in May 2016, and (iv) part of fiscal year 2017
until the appointment of Mr. Joseph F.X. Zahra, during which period our Board of Directors was comprised of a majority of
non-independent
directors.
Notwithstanding the fact that we qualify for the controlled company exemption, we maintain a Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee and a Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors.
During fiscal 2019, our Board of Directors held a total
of eight board of directors meetings and eighteen committee meetings. During such period, all of the directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board of Directors except for one member who attended 88% of these meetings.
Our Board of Directors is supported by committees, which are working groups that analyze issues and provide recommendations to the Board of
Directors regarding their respective areas of focus. The executive officers interact periodically with the committees to address management issues. During fiscal 2019, our Board of Directors was composed of the four main committees below. The Board
of Directors may from time to time also create special committees of the Board as needed.
1.
Audit Committee
. We have a separately
designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The audit committee reviews the scope and
results of the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements conducted by our independent auditors, the scope of other services provided by our independent auditors, proposed changes in our financial accounting standards and principles, and
our policies and procedures with respect to its internal accounting, auditing and financial controls. The audit committee also examines and considers other matters relating to our financial affairs and accounting methods, including selection and
retention of our independent auditors. During fiscal 2019, the audit committee held four meetings. During such period, all the members of the audit committee attended 100% of these meetings, except for one member who attended 75% of these meetings.
During fiscal year 2019, the audit committee was comprised of Frank Di Tomaso (Chair), Emily Berlin, Louis L. Roquet and Joseph F.X. Zahra, each of whom was financially literate and an independent (as defined by the NYSE American listing standards
and SEC rules),
non-employee
director of the Company. We have determined that Frank Di Tomaso is an audit committee financial expert as this term is defined under SEC rules. Neither the SEC nor the
NYSE American requires us to designate an audit committee financial expert. A copy of the audit committee charter is available on the Companys website at
www.birks.com
.
43
2.
Compensation Committee
. We have a standing compensation committee. The compensation
committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The purpose of the compensation committee is to recommend to the Board of Directors (i) director compensation and (ii) executive compensation, including base
salaries, bonuses and long-term incentive awards for the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers of Birks Group. The compensation committee also establishes criteria for goals and objectives for variable compensation, evaluates
the performance of the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis and provides recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding Chief Executive Officer and senior management succession plans. Certain decisions regarding compensation of certain
other executive officers are reviewed by the compensation committee. During fiscal 2019, the compensation committee held six meetings and all of the members of the compensation committee attended 100% of these meetings during such period. During
fiscal 2019, the compensation committee was comprised of Shirley A. Dawe (Chair), Frank Di Tomaso and Louis L. Roquet. Each member of the compensation committee is an independent (as defined by the NYSE American listing standards),
non-employee
director of the Company.
3.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
. The
corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our corporate governance policies. The corporate governance and nominating committee is also responsible for the oversight and review of all related party
transactions and for nominating potential nominees to the Board of Directors. Our policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by a shareholder is that we will consider such candidates and evaluate such candidates
by the same process as candidates identified by the corporate governance and nominating committee. During fiscal 2019, the corporate governance and nominating committee held four meetings and all members of the corporate governance and nominating
committee attended 100% of these meetings during such period. Our corporate governance and nominating committee is comprised of three directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. During fiscal 2019, the corporate
governance and nominating committee was comprised of: Emily Berlin (Chair), Shirley Dawe, and Frank Di Tomaso. Every member of the corporate governance and nominating committee is an independent (as defined by the NYSE American listing standards),
non-employee
director of Birks Group.
4.
Executive Committee.
We have a standing executive
committee. The executive committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The purpose of the executive committee is to provide a simplified review and approval process in between meetings of the Board of Directors for
certain corporate actions. The intent of the executive committee is to facilitate our efficient operation with guidance and direction from the Board of Directors. The goal is to provide a mechanism that can assist in our operations, including but
not limited to monitoring the implementation of policies, strategies and programs. In addition, the executive committees mandate is to assist the Board with respect to the development, continuing assessment and execution of the Companys
strategic plan. The executive committee is comprised of at least three members of the Board of Directors. Vacancies on the committee are filled by majority vote of the Board of Directors at the next meeting of the Board of Directors following the
occurrence of the vacancy. During fiscal year 2019, the executive committee consisted of: Niccolò Rossi di Montelera (Chair), Jean-Christophe Bédos, Davide Barberis Canonico, Louis L. Roquet and Joseph F.X. Zahra. For fiscal 2019, the
executive committee held six meetings. All of the members of the executive committee attended 100% of these meetings during such period. Messrs. Roquet and Zahra are independent,
non-employee
directors of the
Company.
44
EMPLOYEES
As of March 30, 2019, we employed 341 persons. None of our employees are governed by a collective bargaining agreement with a labor
union. We believe our relations with our employees are good and we intend to continue to place an emphasis on recruiting, training, retraining and developing the best people in our industry.
Retail employees include only those employees within our retail selling locations, while administration includes all other activities
including corporate office, merchandising, supply chain operations and wholesale sales. The table below sets forth headcount by category for our continuing operations in the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
As of March 30, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
123
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
124
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 25, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
135
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
SHARE OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A voting shares as of May 31, 2019, based
on 10,242,911 Class A voting shares, by each executive officer and each director:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Class A
Voting
Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
Niccolò Rossi di Montelera
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Christophe Bédos
(1)
|
|
|
416,666
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
Davide Barberis Canonico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley A. Dawe
(2)
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Emily Berlin
(3)
|
|
|
46,952
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frank Di Tomaso
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis L. Roquet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph F.X. Zahra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pat Di Lillo
(4)
|
|
|
77,333
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Maryame
El-Bouwab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miranda Melfi
(5)
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Aurélie Pépion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Less than 1%.
(1)
|
Includes (a) an option to purchase 150,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$1.04 per share and which expires on January 4, 2022; (b) an option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$0.84 per share and which expires on April 18, 2023, and (c) an option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019 at a price
of USD$0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025; and (d) an option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares, of which 66,666 shares are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of
USD$1.43 per share and which expires on November 15, 2026.
|
(2)
|
Includes 1,545 Class A voting shares.
|
(3)
|
Includes 46,952 Class A voting shares.
|
(4)
|
Includes (a) an option to purchase 50,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$1.94 per share and which expires on January 5, 2025; (b) an option to purchase 10,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025, and (c) an option to purchase 26,000 Class A voting shares, of which 17,333 are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31,
2019, at a price of USD$1.43 per share and which expires on November 15, 2026.
|
(5)
|
Includes (a) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$1.25 per share and which expires on September 23, 2020; (b) an option to purchase 10,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$0.89 per share and which expires on November 14, 2022; (c) an option to purchase 25,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of
USD$1.66 per share and which expires on September 12, 2023; (d) an option to purchase 25,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$0.78 per share and which
expires on September 16, 2025; and (e) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, of which 10,000 shares are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2019, at a price of USD$1.43 per share and which
expires on November 15, 2026.
|
For arrangements involving the issuance or grant of options or shares of the Company
to such named executive officers and other employees, see above under the heading Compensation of Directors and Officers and Item 10. Additional InformationMaterial ContractsEmployment Agreements.
46
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A voting shares as of May 31, 2019 by
each person or entity who beneficially owns 5% or more of outstanding voting securities, including the Class A voting shares and/or Class B multiple voting shares. The major shareholders listed with Class B multiple voting shares are
entitled to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held, whereas holders of Class A voting shares are entitled to one vote per Class A voting share held. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, each of the individuals named
below, to the Companys knowledge, has sole voting and investment power with respect to the voting shares beneficially owned by them. The calculation of the percentage of outstanding shares is based on 10,242,911 Class A voting shares and
7,717,970 Class B multiple voting shares outstanding on May 31, 2019, adjusted where appropriate, for shares of stock beneficially owned but not yet issued.
Beneficial ownership is determined under rules issued by the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any of the Class A
voting shares or Class B multiple voting shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership
within 60 days through the exercise of any warrant, stock option or other right. The inclusion in this Annual Report of such voting shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named individual is a direct or indirect beneficial owner
of such voting shares. The voting shares that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days of May 31, 2019 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed outstanding for the
purpose of calculating the percentage owned by any other person listed. For information regarding entities or persons that directly or indirectly control us, see Item 3. Key Information Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
(1)
|
|
Number of Class A
Voting
Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of Beneficially
Owned
|
|
The Grande Rousse Trust
(2)
|
|
|
13,646,692
|
|
|
|
76.0%
|
|
Meritus Trust Company Limited
(3)
|
|
|
13,646,692
|
|
|
|
76.0%
|
|
Montel Sàrl
(4)
|
|
|
8,846,692
|
|
|
|
63.4%
|
|
Mangrove Holding S.A.
(5)
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
33.7%
|
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise noted, each person has sole voting and investment power over the shares listed opposite its
name.
|
(2)
|
Includes 13,646,692 Class A voting shares, of which 7,717,970 Class A voting shares to which Montel
Sàrl (Montel previously Montrovest B.V. (Montrovest)) and Mangrove Holding S.A. (Mangrove) collectively would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montel and
Mangrove collectively. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. The shares
held by Montel and Mangrove collectively are beneficially owned by The Grande Rousse Trust. Montrovest merged with its parent company, Montel, on August 31, 2018 (the Montrovest Merger), and as such, all of the shares hel by
Montrovest at the time of the Montrovest Merger are now held by Montel. Confido Limited has the power to remove the trustee of The Grande Rousse Trust. As a result, Confido Limited may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the Class A
voting Shares held by Montel or Mangrove.
|
(3)
|
Trustee of The Grande Rousse Trust. Includes 13,646,692 Class A voting shares, of which 7,717,970
Class A voting shares to which Montel and Mangrove collectively would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montel and Mangrove collectively. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to
ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. The shares held by Montel and Mangrove collectively are beneficially owned by The Grande Rousse
Trust. Meritus Trust Company Limited replaced Rohan Private Trust Company Limited as trustee of The Grande Rousse Trust on December 21, 2017.
|
(4)
|
Comprised of 8,846,692 Class A voting shares, of which 3,717,970 Class A voting shares, to which
Montel would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montel and Mangrove collectively. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held
and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share.
|
(5)
|
Includes 4,800,000 Class A voting shares, of which 4,000,000 Class A voting shares to which
Mangrove would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Mangrove. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B
multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. The Grande Rousse Trust is the sole shareholder of Mangrove.
|
As of May 31, 2019, there were a total of 174 holders of record of our Class A voting shares, of which 128 were registered with
addresses in the United States. Such United States record holders were, as of such date, the holders of record of approximately 74% of our outstanding Class A voting shares. The number of record holders in the United States is not
representative of the number of beneficial holders nor is it representative of where such beneficial holders are resident since many of these ordinary shares were held of record by brokers or other nominees. None of our Class B multiple voting
shares are held in the United States. Each Class B multiple voting share entitles the holder to ten (10) votes at all meetings of our shareholders (except meetings at which only holders of another specified class of shares are entitled to
vote pursuant to the provisions of our restated articles or the Canada Business Corporations Act).
47
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management Consulting Services Agreement
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company entered into a management consulting services agreement with Gestofi S.A.
(Gestofi), all in accordance with the Companys Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. Under the management consulting services agreement, Gestofi provides the Company with services related to the obtaining of
financing, mergers and acquisitions, international expansion projects, and such other services as the Company may request. Under the agreement, The Company paid an annual retainer of 140,000 (approximately $202,000 in Canadian dollars). The
original term of the agreement was until December 31, 2016 and the agreement was automatically extended for successive terms of one year as neither party gave a 60 days notice of its intention not to renew. The yearly renewal of the
agreement was subject to the review and approval of the Companys corporate governance and nominating committee and the Board of Directors in accordance with the Companys Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. In November
2018, the agreement was renewed on the same terms and conditions except that the retainer was reduced to 40,000 (approximately $61,000 in Canadian dollars). In fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company incurred expenses of 40,000,
115,000 and 140,000 (approximately $61,000, $173,000 and $202,000 in Canadian dollars) respectively under this agreement to Gestofi. In March 2019, the agreement was amended to (i) eliminate the yearly retainer and reimburse only
the
out-of-pocket
expenses related to the services, and (ii) allow for a success fee to be mutually agreed upon between the Company and Gestofi in the event that
financing or a capital raise is achieved.
Cash Advance Agreements
The Company has a cash advance outstanding from the Companys controlling shareholder, Montel (formerly Montrovest), of
USD$1.5 million (approximately $2 million in Canadian dollars) originally received in May 2009 from Montrovest. This cash advance was provided to the Company by Montrovest to finance working capital needs and for general corporate
purposes. This advance and any interest thereon is subordinated to the indebtedness of the Companys Credit Facility and Term Loan. This cash advance bears an annual interest rate of 11%, net of withholding taxes, representing an effective
interest rate of approximately 12%, and is repayable upon demand by Montel once conditions stipulated in the Companys Credit Facility permit such a payment. At March 30, 2019 and March 31, 2018, advances payable to Montel amounted to
USD$1.5 million (approximately $2.0 million in Canadian dollars).
On July 28, 2017, the Company received a
USD$2.5 million (approximately $3.3 million in Canadian dollars) loan from Montrovest, to finance its working capital needs. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 11%, net of withholding taxes, representing an effective interest
rate of approximately 12%, and is due and payable in two equal payments of USD$1.25 million (approximately $1.55 million in Canadian dollars) in each of July 2018 and July 2019. During fiscal year 2019, USD$1.25 million (approximately
$1.55 million in Canadian dollars) was repaid. The Company obtained a one year moratorium on principal repayments and as such the loan will become due in July 2020. At March 30, 2019 and March 31, 2018, loans payable to Montel
amounted to USD$1.25 million and USD$2.5 million (approximately $1.7 million and $3.2 million in Canadian dollars) respectively.
Due to the Montrovest Merger, Montrovests separate legal existence ceased and as a result of such merger, all of the
shares previously held by Montrovest are now held by Montel.
48
Consulting Services Agreement
On June 30, 2009, our Companys Board of Directors approved our Company entering into a consulting services
agreement with Gestofi in accordance with our Companys Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. Under the agreement, Gestofi undertook to assign Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera as the employee of Gestofi responsible
for providing the consulting services. The consulting services relate to providing advice and assistance in (i) new product development and product brand collection assortment, (ii) strategic and business development projects and financial
matters, (iii) the implementation of the Companys strategy and planning, and (iv) such other services reasonably requested by our Chief Executive Officer or Chairman (collectively, the Consulting Services). The initial
one-year
term of the agreement began on August 1, 2009 and the agreement may be renewed for additional
one-year
terms. The agreement has been renewed yearly. The
Consulting Services prior to June 2014, were provided to us for a fee of approximately $13,700 per month less any applicable taxes plus out of pocket expenses. In June 2014, upon the renewal of the agreement for an additional
one-year
term, the monthly fee changed to 13,000 Swiss francs (CAD$15,560). On August 1, 2015, an amended and restated consulting agreement was entered into on substantially the same terms and conditions until
July 31, 2016. In June 2016, the agreement was renewed for an additional
one-year
term. In addition, in February 2015, our Board of Directors approved the payment of an annual fee of $12,500 in U.S
dollars (approximately CAD$15,625) to Gestofi for services it provided in connection with the issuance and maintenance of a letter of credit for our benefit. The agreement as it relates to the Consulting Services provided by Mr. Niccolò
Rossi di Montelera was terminated effective December 31, 2016. Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera is a member of the Companys Board of Directors and is the son of Dr. Rossi di Montelera, the Companys former Chairman and
a director and chairman of the board of Gestofi.
Reimbursement Letter Agreement
In accordance with the Companys Code of Conduct related to related party transactions, in April 2011, the Companys corporate
governance and nominating committee and Board of Directors approved the reimbursement to Regaluxe Srl, of certain expenses, such as rent, communication, administrative support and analytical service costs, incurred in supporting the office of
Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera, the Companys then Chairman, and of Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera, the Companys Chairman of the Executive Committee and the Companys current Executive Chairman of the Board, for the
work performed on behalf of the Company, up to a yearly maximum of US$260,000 (approximately $340,000 in Canadian dollars). The yearly maximum was reduced to US$130,000 (approximately $170,000 in Canadian dollars). This agreement has been renewed
annually and was renewed in March 2019 for an additional
one-year
term, except that the only services being reimbursed are for administrative support and analytical services costs. During fiscal 2019, 2018,
and 2017, the Company incurred expenses of USD$127,000, USD$245,000, and USD$177,000 (approximately $167,000, $315,000 and $234,000 in Canadian dollars) respectively to Regaluxe Srl under this agreement.
Distribution Agreement
In April 2011,
our corporate governance and nominating committee and Board of Directors approved the Companys entering in a Wholesale and Distribution Agreement with Regaluxe Srl. Under the agreement, Regaluxe Srl is to provide services to the Company to
support the distribution of the Companys products in Italy through authorized dealers. The initial
one-year
term of the agreement began on April 1, 2011. Under this agreement, the Company pays
Regaluxe Srl a net price for the Companys products equivalent to the price, net of taxes, for the products paid by retailers to Regaluxe Srl less a discount factor of 3.5%. The agreements initial term was until March 31, 2012, and
may be renewed by mutual agreement for additional one year terms. This agreement has been renewed annually and in March 2019, the agreement was renewed for an additional
one-year
term. During fiscal year 2019,
fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, the Company did not make any payments to Regaluxe Srl under this agreement.
Advisory Consulting Services Agreement
On November 15, 2016, the Companys Board of Directors approved entering into a consulting services agreement with Gestofi
effective January 1, 2017. Under the agreement, Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera is providing advice and assistance on strategic and development projects and financial matters for a total fee of $50,000 in U.S dollars (approximately
CAD$65,000) during the period from January to September 2017. In fiscal 2018, the Company paid US$33,333 (approximately CAD$43,000) in relation to this agreement. In fiscal 2017, the Company paid US$16,667 (approximately CAD$22,000) in relation to
this agreement.
49
Consulting Agreement
On March 28, 2018, the Companys Board of Directors approved the Companys entry into a consulting services agreement with
Carlo Coda Nunziante effective April 1, 2018. Under the agreement, Carlo Coda Nunziante, the Companys former Vice President, Strategy, is providing advice and assistance on the Companys strategic planning and business strategies for
a total annual fee, including reimbursement of
out-of-pocket
expenses of 146,801 (approximately $222,000 in Canadian dollars), net of applicable taxes. In fiscal
2019, the Company incurred charges of 153,000 (approximately $231,000 in Canadian dollars), including applicable taxes. This agreement has been renewed in March 2019 for an additional
one-year
term upon
the same terms and conditions.
Item 8. Financial Information
Consolidated Financial Statements
See
Item 18. Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
For a discussion of our dividend policy, see Item 3. Key InformationDividends and Dividend Policy.
Legal Proceedings
We are from time to
time involved in litigation incident to the conduct of our business. Although such litigation is normally routine and incidental, it is possible that future litigation can result in large monetary awards for compensatory or punitive damages. We
believe that no litigation that is currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Significant Changes
No significant changes have occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
TRADING MARKET
Effective
November 15, 2005, our Class A voting shares were listed and began to trade on the NYSE American and are currently trading under the symbol BGI.
Item 10. Additional Information
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND
BY-LAWS
Our Restated Articles of Incorporation do not restrict the type of business that we may carry on. A copy of our Restated Articles of
Incorporation were set out in the
F-4
registration statement (File
No. 333-126936)
that was filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on
September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005, and which we incorporate by reference. A copy of our
By-law
No. One is contained as an exhibit to the Form
20-F
that we filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012, and which we incorporate by reference. Additionally, certain rights of our shareholders pursuant to our Restated Articles of Incorporation, our
By-laws
and the
Canada Business Corporations Act
were set out in the
F-4
registration statement (File
No. 333-126936)
that
was filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005, and which we incorporate by reference herein and we refer you to the headings therein entitled Description of Birks Capital Stock and Comparison of Stockholder Rights.
On April 19, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our
By-laws
to, among other
things, add the title and description of the Vice Chairman position, revise the declaration of dividends section of the
By-laws,
and add a banking and borrowing arrangements section to the
By-laws.
Under Canadian law, the amendment to our
By-laws
had to be ratified by the shareholders of the Company. At our 2012 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders, our
shareholders ratified the amendment to our
By-laws.
50
On September 12, 2013, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved
articles of amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to change our corporate name to Birks Group Inc. A copy of the articles of amendment is filed with our Annual Report on Form
20-F
filed with the
SEC on July 25, 2014.
On September 24, 2014, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved articles of
amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to allow our board of directors, at any time and from time to time, to issue preferred shares for an aggregate consideration to be received by the Company of up to five million Canadian dollars
($5,000,000) which shall be subject to a 5% dividend limitation as contained in the Restated Articles of Incorporation. A copy of the articles of amendment is filed with our Annual Report on Form
20-F
filed
with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
We have not entered into any material contract other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described below or in Items
4, 5, 7 and 19 of this Annual Report on Form
20-F.
Employment Agreements
Jean-Christophe Bédos
On
January 4, 2012, we entered into an employment agreement, or the Agreement, with Jean-Christophe Bédos, who became the President & Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2012, and prior to that was our Chief
Operating Officer. The Agreement provides Mr. Bédos with a base salary of $700,000 an annual cash bonus set at a minimum of $282,500 for fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, of which $141,250 was paid during fiscal 2012 and $141,250
was paid in fiscal 2014, an annual target cash bonus of 85% of base salary based on achievement of a targeted level of performance and performance criteria set by the Company, an option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Companys Class A
voting shares which vested over three years and other health and retirement benefits. Mr. Bédos base salary was increased to $730,000, and $750,000, effective October 1, 2015 and November 1, 2016, respectively. If
Mr. Bédos is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, as these terms are defined in the Agreement, the Agreement provides that Mr. Bédos will receive (i) any earned and accrued but
unpaid base salary, (ii) up to 12 months of salary in lieu of further salary or severance payments, which may be increased by one additional month after five years of service for each additional year of service thereafter, up to a maximum of
eighteen months after ten years of service, (iii) certain health benefits for the period that the severance will be payable in, and (iv) his bonus through the date of termination and up to twelve months average annual cash bonus (based on
the average annual cash bonus paid to him over the previous three fiscal years). Mr. Bédos is prohibited from competing with us during his employment and for a period of twelve-months thereafter.
EXCHANGE CONTROLS
There
are currently no laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital or that affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to
non-resident
holders of our securities other than withholding tax requirements. There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by our Restated Articles of Incorporation or our other organizational documents on the right of a
non-resident
of Canada to hold or vote our Class A voting shares, other than as provided in Investment Canada Act.
The Investment Canada Act requires notification and, in certain cases, advance review and approval by the federal minister of Innovation,
Science and Economic Development of the acquisition by a
non-Canadian
of control of a Canadian business, all as defined in the Investment Canada Act. Generally, the threshold for review
will be higher in monetary terms, and in certain cases an exemption will apply, for an investor ultimately controlled by persons who are WTO investors or trade agreement investors, in each case within the meaning of the Investment Canada Act. The
Investment Canada Act also provides for review of investments in Canada, including by acquisition of the whole or part of any entity with operations in Canada, if the aforementioned Minister determines that such an investment may be injurious to
national security.
51
TAXATION
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OWNING AND DISPOSING OF BIRKS CLASS A VOTING SHARES
The following discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), applicable Treasury regulations,
administrative rulings and pronouncements and judicial decisions currently in effect, all of which could change. Any change, which may be retroactive, could result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below.
The discussion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described below.
Except where specifically noted, the discussion below does not address the effects of any state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws (or other tax consequences such as estate or gift tax consequences). The discussion below relates to persons who hold Birks Group Class A voting shares as capital assets within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. The tax treatment of those persons may vary depending upon the holders particular situation, and some holders may be subject to special rules not discussed below. Those holders would include, for
example:
|
|
banks, insurance companies, trustees and mutual funds;
|
|
|
tax-exempt
organizations;
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
pass-through entities and investors in pass-through entities;
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a
mark-to-market
method of accounting;
|
|
|
holders who are not U.S. Holders (as defined below);
|
|
|
persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; and
|
|
|
holders of Birks Group Class A voting shares who own 5% or more of either the total voting power or the
total value of the outstanding Class A voting shares of Birks Group.
|
Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning
the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership of Birks Group Class A voting shares in light of their particular situations, as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
As used in this document, the term U.S. Holder means a beneficial holder of Birks Group Class A voting shares that is
(1) an individual who is a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien, (2) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any political subdivision of the U.S.,
(3) an estate which is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide income regardless of its source or (4) a trust (x) that is subject to primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more
U.S. persons as described in section 7701(a)(30) of the Code or (y) that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
If a partnership holds Birks Group Class A voting shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships that hold Birks Group Class A voting shares should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to them.
52
Dividends and Distributions
Subject to the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules discussed below, the gross amount of dividends paid to U.S. Holders of our
Class A voting shares, including amounts withheld to reflect Canadian withholding taxes, will be treated as dividend income to these U.S. Holders, to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S.
federal income tax principles. This income will be includable in the gross income of a U.S. Holder on the day actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder. Dividends generally will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction
allowed to corporations upon the receipt of dividends distributed by U.S. corporations.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations,
Canadian withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on our Class A voting
shares will be treated as income from sources outside the U.S. and generally will constitute passive income. Special rules apply to certain individuals whose foreign source income during the taxable year consists entirely of
qualified passive income and whose creditable foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year do not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine their eligibility to
use foreign tax credits.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a
taxable year, the distribution first will be treated as a
tax-free
return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of our Class A voting shares (thereby increasing the amount of gain, or
decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by the U.S. Holder on a subsequent disposition of the Class A voting shares), and the balance in excess of adjusted basis will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange.
With respect to certain U.S. Holders who are not corporations, including individuals, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign
corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the U.S. Treasury
determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of information program. U.S. Treasury guidance indicates that the current income tax treaty between Canada and the U.S. meets these requirements, and we believe we are
eligible for the benefits of that treaty. In addition, a foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the U.S. Our Class A voting shares, which are listed on the NYSE American, should be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. Individuals that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during
which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as investment income pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of the
trading status of our Class A voting shares. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related
property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances. The rules governing the foreign
tax credit are complex. Certain U.S. Holders of our Class A voting shares may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to amounts withheld for Canadian withholding taxes. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors
regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.
Sale or Exchange of Class A Voting Shares
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, subject to the rules relating to PFICs described below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable
gain or loss on any sale or exchange of our Class A voting shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for our Class A voting shares and the U.S. Holders tax basis in such shares. This gain or loss will be
capital gain or loss and generally will be treated as U.S. source gain or loss. Long-term capital gains recognized by certain U.S. Holders who are not corporations, including individuals, generally will be subject to a maximum rate of U.S. federal
income tax of currently 23.8%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare surtax imposed by Section 1411 of the Code. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
53
Passive Foreign Investment Company
We believe that our Class A voting shares should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we expect to
continue our operations in such a manner that we will not be a PFIC. In general, a company is considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its
assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The 50% of value test is based on the average of the value of our assets for each quarter during the taxable year. If we own at least 25% by value of
another companys stock, we will be treated, for purposes of the PFIC rules, as owning our proportionate share of the assets and receiving our proportionate share of income of the other company. Based on the nature of our income, assets and
activities, and the manner in which we plan to operate our business in future years, we do not expect that we will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year.
If, however, we are or become a PFIC, U.S. Holders could be subject to additional U.S. federal income taxes on gain recognized with respect to
our Class A voting shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred by the U.S. Holder under the PFIC rules.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of our Class A voting shares or the proceeds received
on the sale, exchange, or redemption of our Class A voting shares paid within the United States (and in certain cases, outside of the U.S.) to U.S. Holders other than certain exempt recipients (such as corporations), and a 24% backup
withholding tax may apply to these amounts if the U.S. Holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number, to report dividends required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax returns or, in certain circumstances, to comply with
applicable certification requirements. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or credit against the U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required
information or appropriate claim for refund is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.
Certain Information Reporting Obligations
Certain U.S. Holders are required to report their ownership of specified foreign financial assets, including stock or securities
issued by
non-U.S.
entities, subject to exceptions, by including a completed IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with their tax return for each year in which they own such assets.
U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding information reporting requirements relating to the ownership of Class A voting shares.
MATERIAL CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR CLASS A VOTING SHARES
The following discussion is a summary of the material Canadian federal income tax considerations under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the
regulations adopted thereunder (referred to in this Form
20-F
as the Canadian Tax Act) of the ownership of our Class A voting shares, generally applicable to holders of our Class A voting
shares who, for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and at all relevant times, are not (and are not deemed to be) resident in Canada, are the beneficial owners of our Class A voting shares, hold our Class A voting shares as capital property,
deal at arms length, and are not affiliated, with Birks Group, and who do not use or hold (and are not deemed to use or hold) Class A voting shares in connection with carrying on business or part of a business in Canada (referred to in
this Form
20-F
as
Non-resident
Holders). This discussion does not apply to
Non-resident
Holders that are insurers
that carry on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere or an authorized foreign bank (as defined under the Canadian Tax Act).
This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act, the current provisions of the Canada-United States Income Tax
Convention (1980), as amended, if applicable (referred to in this Form
20-F
as the Convention), all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act publicly announced by the Minister of Finance of
Canada prior to the date hereof (referred to in this Form
20-F
as the Tax Proposals) and the current published administrative and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency. This summary
assumes that the Tax Proposals will be enacted substantially as proposed and does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any change in law or administrative and assessing practices, whether by legislative, governmental or judicial action,
although no assurance can be given in these respects. This summary does not take into account or consider any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax legislation or considerations. For purposes of the Canadian Tax Act, all amounts relevant in
computing a
Non-resident
Holders liability under the Canadian Tax Act must be computed in Canadian dollars. Amounts denominated in a currency other than Canadian dollars (including adjusted cost base and
proceeds of disposition) must be converted into Canadian dollars based on the prevailing exchange rate at the relevant time.
54
This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to
be, legal or tax advice to
Non-resident
Holders of our Class A voting shares. Accordingly,
Non-resident
Holders of our Class A voting shares should consult
their own tax advisors with respect to their particular circumstances.
Dividends on Our Class A Voting Shares
Dividends paid or credited (or deemed to have been paid or credited) on our Class A voting shares to a
Non-resident
Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax of 25% of the gross amount of those dividends (subject to reduction in accordance with an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the
Non-resident
Holders country of residence). In the case of a
Non-resident
Holder who is a resident of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention, is entitled to the
benefits of the Convention (referred to in this Form
20-F
as a U.S. Holder) and is the beneficial owner of the dividend, the rate of withholding tax will generally be reduced to 15% or, if the
Non-resident
Holder is a corporation that owns at least 10% of our voting shares, to 5%.
Disposition of Our
Class A Voting Shares
A
Non-resident
Holder will not be subject to tax under the
Canadian Tax Act in respect of any capital gain realized by that
Non-resident
Holder on a disposition (or deemed disposition) of a Class A voting share, unless the Class A voting share constitutes
taxable Canadian property (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) of the
Non-resident
Holder at the time of disposition and the
Non-resident
Holder is not
entitled to relief under an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the
Non-resident
Holders country of residence. If at the time of such disposition the Class A voting shares are listed
on a designated stock exchange (which includes the NYSE American), the Class A voting shares will generally not constitute taxable Canadian property of a
Non-resident
Holder unless (A) at
any time during the
60-month
period that ends at the time the Class A voting shares are disposed of, both (i) 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Corporation were
owned by or belonged to one or any combination of (a) the
Non-resident
Holder, (b) persons with whom the
Non-resident
Holder did not deal at arms length,
and (c) partnerships in which the
Non-resident
Holder or a person referred to in (b) holds a membership interest, directly or indirectly, through one or more partnerships, and (ii) more than 50%
of the fair market value of the Class A voting shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from one or any combination of real or immovable property situated in Canada, Canadian resource properties, timber resource
properties (as such terms are defined under the Canadian Tax Act) or options in respect of, interests in, or civil law rights in, any such properties, or (B) the Class A voting shares are otherwise deemed to be taxable Canadian
property. Generally, to the extent that the Class A voting share are no longer listed on a designated stock exchange at the time of their disposition, the above-listed criteria (with the exception of (i)) will apply to determine if
the Class A voting shares are taxable Canadian property.
As long as Class A voting shares are listed on a
recognized stock exchange (which includes the NYSE American), a
Non-resident
Holder who disposes of Class A voting shares that are taxable Canadian property will not be required to satisfy the
obligations imposed under section 116 of the Canadian Tax Act.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We file reports, including Annual Reports on Form
20-F,
and other information with the SEC pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the following location of the SEC, Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call
the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. Filings we make electronically with the SEC are
also available to the public on the Internet at the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov
.
Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks. Market risk is the potential loss
arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates. We have not entered into derivative or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to
market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. Borrowing under the credit facility and the term loan from Crystal Financial and the loans from Investissement Québec bear interest at floating rates, which are based on LIBOR, CDOR or prime
plus a fixed additional interest rate. As of March 30, 2019, we have not hedged these interest rate risks. As of March 30, 2019, we had approximately $59.6 million of floating-rate debt. Accordingly, our net income will be affected by
changes in interest rates. Assuming a 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate under our floating rate debt, our interest expense on an annualized basis would have increased or decreased, respectively, by approximately
$0.6 million.
55
Currency Risk
The Company has changed its reporting currency in fiscal 2019 from U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars for the period commencing April 1,
2018 in order to better reflect the fact that subsequent to the Companys divestiture of its former wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayors Jewelers Inc. on October 23, 2017, its business is primarily conducted in Canada, and a substantial
portion of its revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities are denominated in $CAD. The Companys functional currency remains $CAD.
To mitigate the impact of foreign exchange volatility on our earnings, from time to time we may enter into agreements to fix the exchange rate
of U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars. For example, we may enter into agreements to fix the exchange rate to protect the principal and interest payments on our U.S. dollar denominated debt and other liabilities held in our Canadian operation. If we do
so, we will not benefit from any increase in the value of the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar when these payments become due. As of March 30, 2019, we had not hedged these foreign exchange rate risks. As of March 30, 2019, we
had approximately $8.8 million of net liabilities subject to foreign exchange rate risk related to changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar, which would impact the level of our earnings if there were fluctuations
in U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate. Assuming a 100 basis point strengthening or weakening of the Canadian dollar in relationship to the U.S. dollar, as of March 30, 2019, our earnings would have increased or decreased, respectively, by
approximately $0.1 million. This analysis does not consider the impact of fluctuations in U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rates on the translation of Canadian dollar results into U.S. dollars. Changes in the exchange rates of Canadian dollars
to U.S. dollars could also impact our Canadian sales and gross margin if the Canadian dollar strengthens significantly and impacts our Canadian consumers behavior.
Commodity Risk
The nature of our
operations results in exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, specifically diamonds, platinum, gold and silver. We do not currently use derivatives to hedge these risks. Our retail sales and gross margin could be materially impacted if prices
of diamonds, platinum, gold or silver rise so significantly that our consumers behavior changes or if price increases cannot be passed onto our customers.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.