Music Licensing Inc (ID) (SONG)

0.0001 by ?

Sinking ship. RIP any shareholders who didnt learn their lesson the first 4 times, again.

Whomp whomp whomp

Still no fraud Charges for snakey Jakey???

Geeezzz...

Step it up regulators... This one is obvious.

.


.

Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Social Media Promoted Frontload Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..


.

This needs to be pointed out like you did, he has now created a vehicle to sell the debt to others... meaning it cannot and will not be cancelled. The opposite of his hopes and dreams.

ABS  = Asset Backed Security 
An analysis of the underlying free cash flows reported to date in the SONG financial statements together with reported historic asset disposals prima facie brings into question the net present value of the fair market value of the residual Assets still owned by SONG on its balance sheet as does the lack of visibility of real recordings of the majority of the music catalog titles that SONG claims to represent which posters on this forum have been unable to locate to date beyond a few songs.
To start to change this perception all Jake and The_Golden_One need to do is to stop with the endless pumping and start with the basics by showing us all transparently where we and potential customers can even listen to more than a few songs from the music catalog the company claims to represent 

There has to be a reason for all this selling, and I can't be the reason Jake told us directly; that he is selling 3a10 shares which he just triple downed on making that into an ABS... until his $12m per yer is realized in cash in his bank.

With the SONG share price down 90% (yet again) from a couple of weeks ago where is The_Golden_One telling us he is not crazy for seeing something that we are all missing ! 

And so on, and so on , and so on.....................

The Supreme Court's unanimous decision allows the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to recover all illegal profits from wrongdoers without needing to prove actual financial harm to investors. This strengthens the agency's enforcement powers and makes it much harder for individuals to keep money obtained through fraudulent schemes. Jake P. Noch and his affiliated entities (like the Jake P. Noch Family Office) have previously used Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act to settle outstanding debts and claims.The Scheme Mechanism: In these transactions, an individual or family office settles a debt owed by a dormant or distressed public company. The company pays this debt by issuing discounted, unrestricted stock directly to the financier rather than paying cash.No "No Harm" Defense: Under this new ruling, anyone conducting an unlawful or fraudulent stock scheme can no longer use the defense that no individual investor technically "lost money".Forced Disgorgement: If the SEC investigates these 3(a)(10) operations and finds that they were structured as manipulative or unregistered issuances to enrich insiders rather than legitimate debt settlements, the agency can force Noch or his entities to turn over all illicit profits.The Supreme Court clarified that the SEC's recovery is measured by the wrongdoer's "unjust gain". Therefore, if the SEC proves the stock issuance was unlawful, the agency can go after the entire amount of profit generated by selling that stock
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sec-disgorgement.html

I have been an OTC consultant, I have been issued shares, I have got them unrestricted after 2 years, I have deposited those shares at a broker, and I have sold them. Brokers that accept deposits for OTC stock have selling limitations, 20% of the weekly volume any day. So they say "we can sell X today" and you go "do it." Then the average vol starts to move up, you then get higher limits as you personally make the vol higher and sell more and more.

Jake has done this a few times. You will start to see daily vol go from thousands, to tens of thousands, to hundreds of thousands, to millions (where we are now), to tens of millions and maybe even hundreds of millions before another RS.

Every single bid there has ever been has been hit, so why not these..............?

Sure it wasn't The_Golden_One, LOL?

They know nothing, they are just running their MM algos. They have no access to the filings and dont care. The bids will get hit and they will walk it down trying to get their position out.

Hope they know something..........

Thanks

hit bid, MM's bought.

Who the hell is buying all this chit?

There was a 1.7 million share trade. Seriously?

2m dumped into the bid then 100 shares to paint it up. Gotta love that fraud. Remember, the tape dont lie, all trades are recorded.

Woof. This is all part of the plan right?

Shareholders face total losses when "investing" in Jake P. Noch-affiliated companies due to the highly dilutive compensation plans and "dollar-denominated" court settlements that rely on dumping stock on the open market. These questionable payouts allow Noch to sell millions of shares directly to retail investors. Noch's company restructurings (like Music Licensing, Inc. and Baron Capital Enterprise Inc.) are governed by section 3(a)(10) exemptions. Noch then uses his private entity (the Jake P. Noch Family Office) to claim securities from the public company. Instead of receiving a fixed amount of shares, the agreement entitles Noch to receive new shares until a specific cumulative dollar value is realized from their sale. When Noch's family office sells these freshly issued shares into the open market, the selling pressure floods the market with new supply. This rapid increase in the number of outstanding shares dilutes existing investor holdings, driving down the share price. Because of the sheer volume of shares available for compensation, the company's underlying market capitalization must grow by billions of dollars just to offset the continuous dilution

Correct, but remember, he will hide that from anyone he is trying to steal money from he's soliciting for the ABS. All they will see is 5 pubco's, owing the Lux entity $119M, that can be paid back with unlimited free trading shares being sold into the market, with a 2% compounding interest PER MONTH. So the paper value just keeps going up no matter what and artificial paper value will just keep going up even of the money isn't realized.

Same game he played on the fake SONG revenue, just pretend it is real, put it in the filings, then write it off later. But in this case, the number will only get artificially bigger which he can then make value creation without actually receiving anything from the scam shells he is running. Will be a few years before those people catch on if he has no check by authorities.

Not sure I understand the structure but it all appears to be paper money between affiliated companies under common control with few real assets as far as I can see so i will leave it to the market to figure out what this instrument actually means as somehow I doubt it means cash for minority ordinary shareholders or for minority Noteholders 

Plus another $12 m of new accrued salary presumably 

LOL! You wanted him to cancel debt... but he just added a 2% monthly compounding interest to the $47M 🤣. That means the 47M will be 60M in 12 months. You begged him to eliminate debt and he just made it go up endlessly. 🤣

I'm dying in laughter.

Do you really believe in magic & financial wizardry ?
https://open.spotify.com/track/1udKn1oNKYQSQ9OmiIWCMu?si=qgO_5RzPRAuSYYMKcvTUbA

I’ve gone back and reread the company’s strategic roadmap and masterplan. To be fair, portions of the plan appear to have been followed. The 3(a)(10) structure was implemented, acquisitions were discussed, and reverse splits occurred as outlined.

What I haven’t seen yet are the other pieces that were supposed to accompany that strategy. The plan specifically mentioned creating enough buying pressure and value to overcome dilution associated with the 3(a)(10) process, moving beyond low-priced security status, and utilizing forward stock splits to support future growth.

That’s the part shareholders are still waiting to see. The dilution side of the equation has been highly visible. The mechanisms intended to offset that dilution have been much harder to identify.

The original vision doesn’t seem to be about simply restructuring obligations. It was about creating enough demand and shareholder value that dilution would eventually be overcome. Again, the buying pressure, move beyond low-priced security status, and forward split side of the equation seem to be taking longer to appear.

I’d welcome an update on where we stand relative to those original objectives. If the strategy remains intact, shareholders deserve to understand what milestones have been achieved, what remains ahead, and how the company intends to deliver on the portions of the plan that have yet to materialize.

Sometimes things are on the radar before they happen. I’m hopeful shareholders will eventually see the rest of the roadmap come into view.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/music-licensing-inc-song-unveils-181400360.html

If I didn't see it with my own eyes, I would never believe it!!!!!!!!!!!!

Best case scenario Jake goes down sooner than later while his momma still has the chance to purchase him a pardon for his white collar crimes.

Its massively illegal. Actually, it moves debt from SONG to other shells he stole. So debt in SONG goes down,
Illegally.

What the hell does this even mean?

I know it's not good for shareholders, that's for sure........

Funny enough, his original scam was hilariously obvious. The share selling scheme came LATER. When you read below, this was SO obvious after the fact that it makes it even funnier.

Step 1: Create a "PRO" under the new rules
Step 2: Create shell "publishing" companies to hold "works" - "Publishing Company A LLC" "Publishing Company B LLC" "Publishing Company C LLC"

Step 3: Fill those shells with AI generated "works" BEFORE the the AI actually made the songs, this was 2017 before AI could even really make a song. The tech didn't exist yet and certainly not in a garage full of cheap PC's.

Step 4: Create a business where the "rights holders" get the majority of the revenue collected and "Pro Music Rights" only keeps some monthly fees. Guess who owns all the works?
Step 5: Make sure you own all the "playable" works in the library, meaning is someone wanted to actually use the song at their store for example, it could only be the songs he made available to play... which were all his.

I think he believed if he faked it long enough he would be personally getting basically all the revenue once the tech could actually make the music. The Tech was easily 7+ years away from makable music and he really had no idea how to get the fake titles and fake artist in there to have something for anyone to play... so he switched to a pubco shell he could milk. Again, he still would get all the revenue but could also steal people's money by selling shares by being "innovative" with the first to embrace AI. If he faked it well enough real artist would join... but they all new he was a trust fund loser.

But the original plan was clear, fake a PRO with a large works library, be both the company and the rights holder, pocket ALL the revenue. Sadly, he just sucks so bad at this he has to get a new scam to follow his old scam... on repeat. He just leveled up the fraud.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SONG/news/Joint-Public-Disclosure-Issuers-Irrevocably-Consent-to-Assignment-of-Section-3a10-Hybrid-Convertible-Note-Obligations-to?id=523870

One can not put into words how f'ing stupid someone has to be to do this. I'm dying laughing... we are witnesses someone asking to go to jail for a very long time.

Competitor to what ?
Personally, I still don’t understand what the SONG underlying business model is supposed to be other than printing shares and selling to retail investors before the next R/S
Doesn’t appear to be “Music” as no one on this forum can find links to where we can listen to more than a small number of real life recordings of music tracks from the SONG Music catalog - none of which have inspired me personally and hence non have even made it to my personal Spotify playlists

Wouldn't it be wild if one of us worked for a competitor and he still hasnt figured it out yet 🤫

Whereas SONG seems to be little more than a part-time one man band, the other SONG Directors, and the company’s external lawyers and accountants and other advisors all seemingly happy to take money from Jake’s gravy train and to sign off on or help shape Jake’s actions often seemingly at the direct expense of minority shareholders, retail investors and other stakeholders all have fiduciary and / or professional responsibilities and also need to be held accountable for their not insignificant part in helping facilitate and not halting the train crash that has sadly been the recurring history of SONG over many years now 

RIGHT! It'd be Jake rolling up alone as the sole employee, board member, artist, producer, and rights holder 🤣 He's never beating these allegations. At least it seems Alltracks is trying to fake it... Jake one man scam band.

I guess this is where SONG comes up short. They don't seem to have a group of executives and songwriters that would attend such a meeting. With SONG it's all an illusion.

This is getting good. Alltrack, instead of attacking the Congressman, met with and showed they have interest in making it right. Meanwhile, dumby Jake decided too act like a child and threaten a lawsuit... then claimed (like a loser) racism. Why? Because he knows he is a criminal and got caught. This is how real companies act when confronted with their problems... Jake acted just like a scammer caught in the corner... like someone who got caught lying and never learned to be a decent human.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.billboard.com/pro/alltrack-meets-us-lawmakers-to-dispel-transparency-concerns/

AllTrack, a U.S. performing rights organization for independent musicians, says it has been meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill to dispel concerns about how PROs like itself can “increase transparency, improve ease of use, and reduce confusion for the businesses that license music.” The collection society also met with six other members of Congress to advocate for independent artists and songwriters and explain what it sees as the benefits of competition among PROs.

The meetings included a group of AllTrack executives and songwriters, and according to a representative, “led to a set of mutually agreeable resolutions with Rep. Scott Fitzgerald’s office to strengthen AllTrack’s commitment to transparency, eliminating the need for further inquiry.

Meanwhile, because of his anti-gentile racism refuses to distribute songs that have more plays than anything else his joke of a distribution service pretended to release so far.

This banger is just too accurate:

The Ballad of Golden Glenn
https://suno.com/s/IGqeJeViUJMfhwQp

The board said, “Glenn, it’s over”
He said, “You just don’t see
The music, the movement, the hidden gem
And Grandma’s prophecy”

[Chorus]
Oh, Golden Glenn
With your AI pen
Writing novels in the OTC den
The ask is high
The bid is gone
But somehow Glenn keeps holding on
He says, “It’s not dilution
It’s a spiritual test”
While Jake plays chess
With the shareholder’s nest

[Verse 3]
He saw two trades hit the tape
At exactly 3:08
Said, “This could be market structure
Or maybe hidden fate”

It isn't complicated.

It doesn't take mathematical terms.

It's a scam - you're lost all your money.

End of story.......

I only have one answer - SHARE PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I found formula he posted and asked AI assistant to break it down in plain English.

The explanation was surprisingly simple:

Imagine owning a stock and putting guardrails around it.

You buy insurance that protects you if the stock falls below a certain price, but in exchange you agree to cap your gains above a certain price.

The AI compared it to a dog running in a fenced yard:
• The left fence protects against major losses.
• The right fence limits major gains.
• Between the fences, the stock moves normally.

In mathematical terms, if the stock falls too far, the protection kicks in. If it rises too much, the agreed sale price kicks in. Between those levels, you simply participate in the stock’s movement.

The purpose isn’t to maximize returns. The purpose is to define risk and create a range of possible outcomes.

One of the things I appreciate about mathematics is that it often takes something that seems complicated and reveals a simple underlying principle:

Know your downside. Know your upside. Make decisions accordingly.

One thing I still think about is a mathematical formula Jake posted early on. If memory serves me right, he challenged others to figure it out.

Looking back, I wonder if it should be revisited.

I seem to recall claims that purchases were somehow showing up as sales. I’ve also noticed other odd coincidences that make me wonder whether there are variables in the equation that many of us haven’t fully considered.

I’m not making accusations and I don’t claim to have the answer.

I simply find it interesting that years later, there are still pieces of the puzzle that don’t seem fully explained.

If anyone still has a copy of that original formula, I’d be curious to see it again. Sometimes the clues are hidden in plain sight.

Still not giving up on advocacy for debt cancellation.

Imagine, instead if being a massive scammer... he took that effort and instead chose to actually do real work? He's never worked a real day in his life, so Im sure he doesnt even know what that is... being a trust fun crybaby scammer and all. All he's known is theft from shareholders and committing massive securities fraud.

All that activity of multiple micro sales all day for under $1,000 of proceeds and the bid price is now at $0.005 ! Good day at the office Jake?
Plenty of plumbers earning more than $1,000 a day with zero risk of breaching Federal laws 
If my maths is right Jake needs to dump closer to circa $50,000 of SONG shares each and every trading day just to cover his $12m per annum basic salary accrual and avoid yet more debt to the part time CEO building up on the already indebted company balance sheet

Whew, just massive dumping into the bid. Savage.

The_Golden_One : Was that you buying at sub $0.01 yesterday before the SONG share price falls to $0.001 ? 
Or is Jake buying himself in an attempt to try to stabilise the share price before he dumps yet more shares ?  
Neither your posts on this forum nor the recent company announcements about securitisation of bad and highly doubtful debt on the company balance sheet seem to resonate with the market with the bid price seemingly continuing to decline 
Maybe you can enlighten us with what was happening with the SONG share price yesterday 

Pity actions speak louder than words !

“Music Licensing Inc has repeatedly emphasized the protection of artists, songs, intellectual property, and rights holders. I respect that mission.”

Personally if I lost my entire investment, on multiple tickers, multiple times, and are about to for the 4th or fifth time ... down 99.9995% ... id prolly call authorities.

It's a scam. Full stop. All the talk is just noise. A distraction if you will.
You clearly have fallen for it. Others didn't. There's nothing more to this story.