surfkast
3週前
An LOI with a fradulent company? You know that is one of the oldest OTCM tricks out there.
But how about facts?
If Blaggy had such a great company he would not need a bloated scam shell.
Well for a known scammer???????????????????????
Here is documented, irrefutable, factual DD from their filings and the SEC!
ITYS
Re: None
Thursday, May 14, 2026 9:15:54 AM
Post#
57567
of 57574
MWWC Q out, another cut and paste masterpiece...but yet they contradict the Annual filing prior...blatant scam and should be reported to OTC and it will smile
Four Major Disclosure Contradictions in the Latest MWWC Filing”
It’s amazing how much you catch when you actually read the filings.The new Q1 disclosure has four separate contradictions compared to the annual filing all of them material, all of them documented in their own reports.
ALL MISLEADING SHAREHOLDERS !!!
Here are the facts:
Annual Filing: 4,051,916,000 Shares From Convertible Debt
The annual report clearly disclosed:
- Total outstanding balance:$1,261,644
-Total potential shares:4,051,916,000..THATS 4 MORE BILLION !
That number is correct based on the note terms:
- 10% discount to bid
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
- PPS around .0002
The math checks out.
Q1 Filing: 44,691,033 Shares Using a Fictional $0.03 Conversion Price
The new Q1 filing shows:
- Total outstanding balance: $1,340,731
- Total shares:44,691,033
Problem:
None of the notes convert at $0.03.
Not the 2016 note.
Not the 2022 notes.
Not the contract.
Not the market.
Not the bid.
Not the lowest 90-day price.
The annual filing used the real formulas and got 4.05 billion.
The Q1 filing used a made-up price and got 44 million. FRADULENT
No Recapitalization Disclosed , not in Annual or Q1
The Q1 filing states:
“List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization… None.”
This statement covers the entire prior 12 months, including the annual period.
Yet the company increased the authorized shares and never:
- disclosed it in the annual
- disclosed it in Q1
- filed a Material Event
- listed it as a recapitalization
OTC guidelines require disclosure within 4 business days for any A/S increase or amendment to Articles.
It’s missing. MISLEADING INVESTORS= FRAUD
No LOI Disclosed Under Subsequent Events
If an LOI was signed and they publicly referenced one it belongs in:
Subsequent Events, or Material Events
The Q1 filing contains zero mention of any LOI, term sheet, acquisition, or pending transaction.
OTC rules require disclosure of any material agreement, binding or not.
NEWS RELEASE IS FAKE ?
Summary
Here’s what the filings show: MISLEADING INVESTORS
- Annual: 4.05 billion shares from convertible debt
- Q1:44.7 million shares using a price that doesn’t exist
- No recapitalization disclosed despite A/S changes
- No LOI disclosed despite public statements
- No Material Events filed for any of it
These aren’t opinions.
These are contradictions inside their own filings.
If anyone wants to debate it, they can start by explaining how the conversion price magically became $0.03 when the notes clearly state:
- 10% discount to bid, or
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
AND
ITYS
Re: 3Angels120702 post# 57551
Wednesday, May 06, 2026 6:27:09 AM
Post#
57556
of 57575
So it’s been about a month since the LOI…
No follow up. No definitive agreement. No filings. No update.
Basic due diligence on “Media Fusion Inc.” or “Media Fusion International” and what turns up....Old, defunct entities tied to Blagman… but no clearly active, registered operating company that matches what’s described in the LOI.
Yet somehow this is being presented as a global media platform with hundreds of channels, billions of viewers, and major relationships (3yr WBD contract?) all wrapped into a non binding LOI ? Even Blagman’s own LinkedIn CONTRADICTS everything stated in LOI !
BUT hey, solid update... i saw same HAD merch pic from 4 years ago lol
MWWC releasing this LOI news seems very very MISLEADING/FRADULENT to its investors/shareholders !!!
So the obvious question remains: What exactly is MWWC merging with?
There is no registered Media Fusion Inc. or Media Fusion International owned by Robert Blagman in any major jurisdiction. No filings, no corporate existence, no assets, no contracts, no FAST channels, no 3B viewers, no WBD partnership, no Paramount relationship--- nothing verifiable in any industry database.
MWWC is a maxed-out OTC shell with 5.7B shares issued, another 4B+ in convertible debt, no revenue, no operations, and no working capital.
Even if Media Fusion were real, MWWC has no financial capacity to build anything.
LET'S NOT FORGET
The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21423
ITYS
3週前
WELL, i don't understand how you can call anyone "fraudsters"...these facts are not based anyone's OPINONS, they are from SEC filings, MWWC own financial disclosures or lack of their OTC obligation to shareholders...that's what's puzzling, items identified like Media fusion not being a registered company...again, not anyone making false claims...simply cant find it registered any state that's ACTIVE, .
Same for Blagmans 3 billion viewers, FAST etc etc (bigger than Paramount??)...everything he STATED in LOI isn't found to be truthful/factful...so that's what's been presented by surf, myself , tech and others and simply we've asked to be disputed IF able...not name calling or being called "fraudsters"....PROVE US WRONG with factual data is all anyone asks in debates.
i don't want to see pictures of merchandise mad for HAD that hasn't materialized, again MWWC owns, funded. No proof but thats old news, now its LOI which Blagman states HAD is feature???
Anyhow, sorry people lost here, don't blame people presenting facts.
ITYS
3週前
I don't see anywhere that anyone made such a claim of "didn't PR the LOI" ?
Comments that LOI is made with an unregistered media fusion Inc seems a bit shady??
Blagman stating in LOI his unregistered company is larger than Paramount ...kinda seems bit far fetched IMO?
What I claimed wasthe Q just out contradicts the Annual filing .
Four Major Disclosure Contradictions in the Latest MWWC Filing”
It’s amazing how much you catch when you actually read the filings.The new Q1 disclosure has four separate contradictions compared to the annual filing all of them material, all of them documented in their own reports.
ALL MISLEADING SHAREHOLDERS !!!
Here are the facts:
Annual Filing: 4,051,916,000 Shares From Convertible Debt
The annual report clearly disclosed:
- Total outstanding balance:$1,261,644
-Total potential shares:4,051,916,000..THATS 4 MORE BILLION !
That number is correct based on the note terms:
- 10% discount to bid
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
- PPS around .0002
The math checks out.
Q1 Filing: 44,691,033 Shares Using a Fictional $0.03 Conversion Price
The new Q1 filing shows:
- Total outstanding balance: $1,340,731
- Total shares:44,691,033
Problem:
None of the notes convert at $0.03.
Not the 2016 note.
Not the 2022 notes.
Not the contract.
Not the market.
Not the bid.
Not the lowest 90-day price.
The annual filing used the real formulas and got 4.05 billion.
The Q1 filing used a made-up price and got 44 million. FRADULENT
No Recapitalization Disclosed , not in Annual or Q1
The Q1 filing states:
“List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization… None.”
This statement covers the entire prior 12 months, including the annual period.
Yet the company increased the authorized shares and never:
- disclosed it in the annual
- disclosed it in Q1
- filed a Material Event
- listed it as a recapitalization
OTC guidelines require disclosure within 4 business days for any A/S increase or amendment to Articles.
It’s missing. MISLEADING INVESTORS= FRAUD
No LOI Disclosed Under Subsequent Events
If an LOI was signed and they publicly referenced one it belongs in:
Subsequent Events, or Material Events
The Q1 filing contains zero mention of any LOI, term sheet, acquisition, or pending transaction.
OTC rules require disclosure of any material agreement, binding or not.
NEWS RELEASE IS FAKE ?
Summary
Here’s what the filings show: MISLEADING INVESTORS
- Annual: 4.05 billion shares from convertible debt
- Q1:44.7 million shares using a price that doesn’t exist
- No recapitalization disclosed despite A/S changes
- No LOI disclosed despite public statements
- No Material Events filed for any of it
These aren’t opinions.
These are contradictions inside their own filings.
If anyone wants to debate it, they can start by explaining how the conversion price magically became $0.03 when the notes clearly state:
- 10% discount to bid, or
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
Everything else is noise.
ITYS
3週前
MWWC Q out, another cut and paste masterpiece...but yet they contradict the Annual filing prior...blatant scam and should be reported to OTC and it will
Four Major Disclosure Contradictions in the Latest MWWC Filing”
It’s amazing how much you catch when you actually read the filings.The new Q1 disclosure has four separate contradictions compared to the annual filing all of them material, all of them documented in their own reports.
ALL MISLEADING SHAREHOLDERS !!!
Here are the facts:
Annual Filing: 4,051,916,000 Shares From Convertible Debt
The annual report clearly disclosed:
- Total outstanding balance:$1,261,644
-Total potential shares:4,051,916,000..THATS 4 MORE BILLION !
That number is correct based on the note terms:
- 10% discount to bid
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
- PPS around .0002
The math checks out.
Q1 Filing: 44,691,033 Shares Using a Fictional $0.03 Conversion Price
The new Q1 filing shows:
- Total outstanding balance: $1,340,731
- Total shares:44,691,033
Problem:
None of the notes convert at $0.03.
Not the 2016 note.
Not the 2022 notes.
Not the contract.
Not the market.
Not the bid.
Not the lowest 90-day price.
The annual filing used the real formulas and got 4.05 billion.
The Q1 filing used a made-up price and got 44 million. FRADULENT
No Recapitalization Disclosed , not in Annual or Q1
The Q1 filing states:
“List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization… None.”
This statement covers the entire prior 12 months, including the annual period.
Yet the company increased the authorized shares and never:
- disclosed it in the annual
- disclosed it in Q1
- filed a Material Event
- listed it as a recapitalization
OTC guidelines require disclosure within 4 business days for any A/S increase or amendment to Articles.
It’s missing. MISLEADING INVESTORS= FRAUD
No LOI Disclosed Under Subsequent Events
If an LOI was signed and they publicly referenced one it belongs in:
Subsequent Events, or Material Events
The Q1 filing contains zero mention of any LOI, term sheet, acquisition, or pending transaction.
OTC rules require disclosure of any material agreement, binding or not.
NEWS RELEASE IS FAKE ?
Summary
Here’s what the filings show: MISLEADING INVESTORS
- Annual: 4.05 billion shares from convertible debt
- Q1:44.7 million shares using a price that doesn’t exist
- No recapitalization disclosed despite A/S changes
- No LOI disclosed despite public statements
- No Material Events filed for any of it
These aren’t opinions.
These are contradictions inside their own filings.
If anyone wants to debate it, they can start by explaining how the conversion price magically became $0.03 when the notes clearly state:
- 10% discount to bid, or
- 75% discount to lowest price in 90 days
Everything else is noise.
ITYS
4週前
So it’s been about a month since the LOI…
No follow up. No definitive agreement. No filings. No update.
Basic due diligence on “Media Fusion Inc.” or “Media Fusion International” and what turns up....Old, defunct entities tied to Blagman… but no clearly active, registered operating company that matches what’s described in the LOI.
Yet somehow this is being presented as a global media platform with hundreds of channels, billions of viewers, and major relationships (3yr WBD contract?) all wrapped into a non binding LOI ? Even Blagman’s own LinkedIn CONTRADICTS everything stated in LOI !
BUT hey, solid update... i saw same HAD merch pic from 4 years ago lol
MWWC releasing this LOI news seems very very MISLEADING/FRADULENT to its investors/shareholders !!!
So the obvious question remains: What exactly is MWWC merging with?
There is no registered Media Fusion Inc. or Media Fusion International owned by Robert Blagman in any major jurisdiction. No filings, no corporate existence, no assets, no contracts, no FAST channels, no 3B viewers, no WBD partnership, no Paramount relationship--- nothing verifiable in any industry database.
MWWC is a maxed-out OTC shell with 5.7B shares issued, another 4B+ in convertible debt, no revenue, no operations, and no working capital.
Even if Media Fusion were real, MWWC has no financial capacity to build anything.
surfkast
4週前
What is more amazing is that some investors like to use personal attacks instead of providing real DD! Shows where their head is at.
MWWC is a scam and Blagman is a proven liar and a conman which so far no one has been able to dispute with hard facts. Only playground attacks and cherry picked parts of filings!
Below is the final judgement involving Blagman and his coconspirators. (Sadly some do not understand what a final judgement is)
Litigation Release No. 21423 / February 23, 2010
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank J. Custable, Jr., et al., Civil Action No. 03-CV-2182 (N.D. Ill.)
SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against 12 Defendants in Penny Stock Scheme
On January 28, 2010, Judge Joan B. Gottschall of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued final judgments, by default, against: (i) Suburban Capital Corporation, the entity through which Custable perpetrate his scheme; (ii) Blagman Media International, Inc. (now doing business as "Marketing Concepts International, Inc."), one of the penny stock company defendants with whom Custable perpetrate his scheme; (iii) Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc., another penny stock company defendant; (iv) ThermoElastic Technologies, Inc. (now doing business as Wannigan Capital Corp."), a third penny stock company defendant; (v) and three relief defendants to which Custable transferred ill-gotten stock and sale proceeds - Active Investments, Inc., Pine Services, Ltda., and Sothis III, LDC. The final judgments permanently enjoin Suburban Capital, Wasatch and ThermoElastic from violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and enjoin Blagman Media from violations of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The Court also barred Suburban Capital from engage in any future penny stock offering. The Court ordered Suburban Capital to disgorge ill-gotten gains amounting to $3,447,617, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $1,667,026.67, for a total monetary judgment of $5,114,644.47. The Court ordered Blagman Media to disgorge $803,500, plus prejudgment interest of $388,516.39, for a total of $1,192,016.39. The Court ordered Wasatch to disgorge $779,065, plus prejudgment interest of $376,701.31, for a total of $1,155,766.31. The court ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest totaling $506,774.32 against Active Investments, $224,275.08 against Pine Services, and $33,300.79 against Sothis II.
On February 12, 2010, the court entered final judgments, by consent, against defendants Sara Wetzel (an employee of Custable) and David Giles (the former Chief Operating Officer of Wasatch), permanently enjoining them from violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and barring them from participating an any future penny stock offering. The judgment against Giles also bars him from serving as an officer or director of a public company. The judgment against Wetzel requires her to pay disgorgement of $56,500, prejudgment interest of $27,739, and a civil penalty of $120,000. Wetzel and Giles consented to the entry of these judgments without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint. Wetzel and Giles also pled guilty in the related criminal actions for their roles in Custable's scheme, each receiving 5 years probation.
Previously, on October 8, 2009, the court entered final judgments, by consent, against defendants Robert Blagman (the former CEO of Blagman Media), Pacel Corporation, Marshall Holdings International, Inc, and its former CEO, Richard Bailey. Those judgments permanently enjoin each of the defendants from violations of Section 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act, and additionally permanently enjoin defendants Pacel, Bailey and Marshall Holdings from violations Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. The judgment against Bailey also bars him, for a period of five years, from acting as an officer or director of a publicly held company. The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21423
ITYS
1月前
In the last 5 years, MWWC has PR’d a cybersecurity platform, a global crypto mining ecosystem, a token, an auction site, security acquisitions, Hollywood After Dark, Afrobeats, and now a “global AI driven media platform” with 3B digital consumers and 900M TV households.
Yet the financials over the same period show little to no operating revenue, no media scale assets, no production spend consistent with funding HAD, and a share structure blown out to nearly 10B issued on 10B authorized with over $1M in debt still sitting there.
The news flow reads like a new business every quarter; the filings read like a shell that never built any of them. ALL SCAMS ??
2021–early 2022 – Minosis / crypto / security pivot
o PRs: acquisitions, patent pending Minosis, global launch, token, auction crypt, partnerships.
o Financials: no sustained crypto revenue, no meaningful security revenue, no balance sheet build consistent with a growing tech platform.
2022–2023 – HAD / Afrobeats / “formula for success”
o PRs: funding HAD, PPV plans, $2M projections, “green lights” for production.
o Financials: no clear production spend, no PPV revenue, no media assets capitalized, no evidence of a $2M revenue engine.
2023–2024 – Reverse split games and capital “plans”
o PRs: cancel reverse split, seek alternative capitalization, “overhaul operations.”
o Reality: A/S raised, conversions explode the float, debt still there, no operating business.
2026 – Media Fusion LOI / 3B viewers / 900M households / 850 FAST channels
o PR: global AI driven media platform, WBD linked programming, global relationships.
o Reality: no Media Fusion entity in filings, no media scale revenue, no assets, no capex, no evidence of a global platform in the financials.
THE RESIDENT CLOWN SHOWED UP ON 11/18/2021...hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Media Fusion Inc. and Marketing Worldwide Corp. (OTC: MWWC) Execute LOI for Global AI-Driven Media PlatformACCESSWIRE | 04/09/2026
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Announces Pre-Production "Hollywood After Dark" and "Afrobeats" Pay-Per-ViewAccesswire | 05/04/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Plans Hollywood After Dark Production and Pay-Per-View Events with $2 Million (USD) Revenue Projections | 04/26/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Begins Funding Hollywood After Dark and Explores Pay-Per-View OptionsAccesswire | 04/14/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Media Specialist Talks Formula for Success and Hollywood After Dark in Video Interview with SmallCapVoice.com| 04/06/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Shares Global Vision in Video Interview with SmallCapVoice.comAccesswire | 03/23/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Cancels Reverse Split and Seeks Alternative Means to Capitalize OperationsAccesswire | 03/21/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Discusses Powerful Global Strategy in Video Interview with SmallCapVoice.comAccesswire | 03/16/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Green Lights Pursuit of "Hollywood After Dark" Live TV SeriesAccesswire | 03/15/2023
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Closes New Acquisition And Retains Media Pioneer and SpecialistAccesswire | 03/09/2023
Marketing Worldwide Begins Overhaul Of Current OperationsAccesswire | 10/07/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Acquires Doxed, LLC.Accesswire | 09/08/2022
Marketing Worldwide Activates Minosis Token Pre-Sale LaunchpadAccesswire | 05/19/2022
Marketing Worldwide Hires Dubai Marketing Firm and Announces Minosis $MNS Token Launch DateAccesswire | 04/28/2022
Marketing Worldwide Releases Minosis V.5 Update, Adds BTG to Mineable Coins and Embarks on Campaign to Add UsersGlobeNewswire | 04/20/2022
CEO Presenting on the Emerging Growth Conference on April 13 Register NowGlobeNewswire | 04/12/2022
Marketing Worldwide ‘MWWC’ Begins Interviewing PR Marketing Firms for Minosis.io Community Development Ahead of Token Launch | 04/06/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Initiates Development on ‘Auction Crypt’, a Minosis Crypto-Mining Auction WebsiteGlobeNewswire | 03/31/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Announces Global Launch of Simple Click to Mine Crypto-Mining Platform MINOSIS.IOAccesswire | 03/28/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Launches Its “Data Breach Response Toolkit” (DBRT) Via Advanced Risk Controls (ARC)Accesswire | 03/16/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Acquires Application Security Company and Partners with Global Digital Forensics, Inc. to Earn a Stake in the Multi-Billion Dollar Cyber Security IndustryAccesswire | 03/09/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Cancels Forward Split to Focus on Expanding Stock Buy Back ProgramsAccesswire | 03/03/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Completes NEW Strategic Partnership with DOXed, LLCAccesswire | 03/01/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Update on Forward Split and Initiation of Stock Buyback ProtocolAccesswire | 02/22/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Approves 10 to 1 Forward-SplitAccesswire | 02/17/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Deploys $MNS Token on TestnetAccesswire | 02/14/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation #Minosis Projections for 2022 and Corporate UpdateAccesswire | 02/09/2022
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Expands Minosis (Beta v2.0), Achieves [D.A.C.M.P.] Patent Pending Status, and Acquires ASIC Crypto-Miners.| 11/17/2021
Marketing WorldWide Corporation Launches 3-part Plan to Expand Near-Term OperationsAccesswire | 11/03/2021
Marketing WorldWide Corporation prepares for User Test Protocol of the Minosis PlatformAccesswire | 10/21/2021
Marketing WorldWide Corporation Acquires an Operational, User-Focused Crypto Mining EcosystemAccesswire | 10/13/2021
Marketing Worldwide Corporation Provides Shareholder UpdateAccesswire | 10/05/2021