surfkast
11時間前
Speaking of crimes...................
The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
For further information, see LR-18057 (March 31, 2003), LR-21423 (February 23, 2010), and LR-21492 (April 19, 2010).
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21884
shoondale
14時間前
👉️SEC..."They did so by forging Blagman's signature on the consulting agreements. The consulting agreements supposedly justifying the issuance of the counterfeit BMII stock were never agreed to by BMII. The federal criminal authorities seized some of the forged consulting agreements during their execution of the search warrant on Suburban Capital's offices."
https://www.sec.gov/files/AmendComplaint03-cv-02182Blagman.pdf
The 2004 SEC filing/federal investigation was never refuted by the SEC or anyone in the federal government. You can't find anything to refute it because, quite simply, it is factual and true, Mr. Blagman was never even mentioned, nor sanctioned, in any of the criminal proceedings as I have posted many times. Mr. Blagman's signature was forged by criminals according to the SEC and federal investigative bodies. That does not make him either a criminal or a bad person. Misleading posts are attacking the individual who co-operated with the investigation from the very start, fought no civil charges, and wanted to help reimburse and make investors whole again. Quite possibly, anyone who checks will find an accomplished and well known individual in the entertainment industry, one with a fantastic life long resume, who has worked extremely hard to achieve a goal that is actually coming to fruition.
surfkast
1日前
The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
For further information, see LR-18057 (March 31, 2003), LR-21423 (February 23, 2010), and LR-21492 (April 19, 2010).
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21884
surfkast
1日前
The 2004 SEC filing/federal investigation ..........................................
Then seven years later the SEC issued a final judgement which per the filings Blagman consented to. So the 2004 citation is meaningless as a final judgement is just that. There is no SEC filings referencing this case subsequent to the 2011 FINAL JUDGEMENT!
An SEC final judgment is the definitive court order that resolves a lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission against individuals or entities accused of violating federal securities laws. It officially closes the case mandates specific penalties, and outlines remedies such as permanent injunctions, disgorgement, or civil fines.,
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 21884 / March 14, 2011
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank J. Custable, Jr., et al., Civil Action No. 03-cv-2182 (N.D. Ill.)
SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against Three CEOs in Penny Stock Scheme
Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and enjoin Blagman Media from violations of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
For further information, see LR-18057 (March 31, 2003), LR-21423 (February 23, 2010), and LR-21492 (April 19, 2010).
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21884
shoondale
1日前
👉️SEC..."They did so by forging Blagman's signature on the consulting agreements. The consulting agreements supposedly justifying the issuance of the counterfeit BMII stock were never agreed to by BMII. The federal criminal authorities seized some of the forged consulting agreements during their execution of the search warrant on Suburban Capital's offices."
https://www.sec.gov/files/AmendComplaint03-cv-02182Blagman.pdf
The 2004 SEC filing/federal investigation was never refuted by the SEC or anyone in the federal government. You can't find anything to refute it because, quite simply, it is factual and true, Mr. Blagman was never even mentioned, nor sanctioned, in any of the criminal proceedings as I have posted many times. Mr. Blagman's signature was forged by criminals according to the SEC and federal investigative bodies. That does not make him either a criminal or a bad person. Misleading posts are attacking the individual who co-operated with the investigation from the very start, fought no civil charges, and wanted to help reimburse and make investors whole again. Quite possibly, anyone who checks will find an accomplished and well known individual in the entertainment industry, one with a fantastic life long resume, who has worked extremely hard to achieve a goal that is actually coming to fruition.
surfkast
2日前
Let's not forget the SEC convictions and charges. Blagman has a long history of scamming.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 21884 / March 14, 2011
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank J. Custable, Jr., et al., Civil Action No. 03-cv-2182 (N.D. Ill.)
SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against Three CEOs in Penny Stock Scheme
Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and enjoin Blagman Media from violations of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
The judgment against Blagman orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $250,000, prejudgment interest of $83,934, plus a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The judgment against Pacel requires it to pay disgorgement in the amount of $200,000, plus prejudgment interest of $96,459. Blagman, Bailey, Marshall Holdings and Pacel all consented to the entry of these final judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.
For further information, see LR-18057 (March 31, 2003), LR-21423 (February 23, 2010), and LR-21492 (April 19, 2010).
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21884
ITYS
2日前
Any chance could elaborate on " I believe Blagman is going to make any buyers a lot of money."... .HOW?
This is what's puzzling. He failed before--- miserably.
Now a definitive deal with MWWC from a company no one can find registered anywhere??? OH and its 2nd biggest media company in world !
SO can assume it is not a "authentic business" but another scam that could make people money and many more lose money?
SO WHICH IS IT?
.
MORE FACTS---RECAP
In 2023, Blagman delivered MWM ...Marketing Worldwide Media LLC, a tiny Wyoming mailbox-LLC that MWWC “acquired” as its new media arm.
That company was supposed to bring:
Hollywood After Dark (HAD)
multiple TV concepts
ad-sales revenue
network distribution
“massive revenues”
It delivered none of it.
HAD never launched.
No networks.
No revenue.
No filings.
Nothing.
Now fast-forward to 2026, and suddenly Blagman claims that Media Fusion Inc. a company that doesn’t exist in any U.S. or international corporate registry BUT APPARENTLY is:the 2nd largest media giant behind Paramount/WBD
a global media empire
owner of HAD
operator of hundreds of FAST channels
reaching billions of viewers
and now doing a definitive deal with MWWC
So let’s ask the obvious question:
If Blagman really built the “2nd largest media company in the world” … why didn’t he bring THAT into MWWC in 2023 instead of a tiny Wyoming LLC?
Where was this “global empire” back then?
Why wasn’t Media Fusion part of the acquisition?
Why wasn’t HAD already owned by Media Fusion in 2023?
Why did MWM fail to deliver HAD, but Media Fusion magically owns it now?
And most importantly:
How is MWWC completing a “definitive agreement” with a company that does not legally exist anywhere?
Because:
Media Fusion Inc. is not registered in Wyoming
Not in Nevada
Not in Delaware
Not in California
Not in ANY U.S. state
Not in Hong Kong, UK, Singapore, or Canada
Not in ANY corporate registry worldwide
The only Blagman entity that exists is the same tiny Wyoming LLC MWWC already acquired and that company already failed to deliver everything it promised.
And let’s not forget:
Blagman was charged by the SEC in the Custable penny-stock dumping case.
His colleagues went to prison.
He was sanctioned and barred for a period.
That’s public record.
So maybe that’s why he can’t get a real U.S. corporation registered today and why everything he touches ends up being:
a SCAM
Bottom line:
MWM failed in 2023.
Now Blagman is recycling the same failed assets under a new, unregistered company name and calling it a “definitive agreement.”
It doesn’t add up and OTC, SEC have been notified ! HOW MANY MORE SCAMS can be run through MWWC ticker ????
ITYS
3日前
Wonder what the definition of "authentic business" or "real business" is???
MWWC hasn't made a penny on how many product acquired SCAMS?
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MWWC/disclosure
NOW they acquire an "unregistered company" with falsified business claims, from a convicted sec felon and his prisonmates ??
Didn't MWWC already acquire HAD, now bought it again ?
Seems some want to deflect to another company BUT CAN'T ANSWER MWWC questions..WHY ? lol
RECAP
In 2023, Blagman delivered MWM ...Marketing Worldwide Media LLC, a tiny Wyoming mailbox-LLC that MWWC “acquired” as its new media arm.
That company was supposed to bring:
Hollywood After Dark (HAD)
multiple TV concepts
ad-sales revenue
network distribution
“massive revenues”
It delivered none of it.
HAD never launched.
No networks.
No revenue.
No filings.
Nothing.
Now fast-forward to 2026, and suddenly Blagman claims that Media Fusion Inc. a company that doesn’t exist in any U.S. or international corporate registry BUT APPARENTLY is:the 2nd largest media giant behind Paramount/WBD
a global media empire
owner of HAD
operator of hundreds of FAST channels
reaching billions of viewers
and now doing a definitive deal with MWWC
So let’s ask the obvious question:
If Blagman really built the “2nd largest media company in the world” … why didn’t he bring THAT into MWWC in 2023 instead of a tiny Wyoming LLC?
Where was this “global empire” back then?
Why wasn’t Media Fusion part of the acquisition?
Why wasn’t HAD already owned by Media Fusion in 2023?
Why did MWM fail to deliver HAD, but Media Fusion magically owns it now?
And most importantly:
How is MWWC completing a “definitive agreement” with a company that does not legally exist anywhere?
Because:
Media Fusion Inc. is not registered in Wyoming
Not in Nevada
Not in Delaware
Not in California
Not in ANY U.S. state
Not in Hong Kong, UK, Singapore, or Canada
Not in ANY corporate registry worldwide
The only Blagman entity that exists is the same tiny Wyoming LLC MWWC already acquired and that company already failed to deliver everything it promised.
And let’s not forget:
Blagman was charged by the SEC in the Custable penny-stock dumping case.
His colleagues went to prison.
He was sanctioned and barred for a period.
That’s public record.
So maybe that’s why he can’t get a real U.S. corporation registered today and why everything he touches ends up being:
a SCAM
Bottom line:
MWM failed in 2023.
Now Blagman is recycling the same failed assets under a new, unregistered company name and calling it a “definitive agreement.”
It doesn’t add up and OTC, SEC have been notified ! HOW MANY MORE SCAMS can be run through MWWC ticker ????
ITYS
6日前
Wonder what the definition of "authentic business" is?
MWWC hasn't made a penny on how many product acquired SCAMS?
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MWWC/disclosure
NOW they acquire an "unregistered company" with falsified business claims,from a convicted sec felon and his prison mates ??
Didn't MWWC already acquire HAD, now bought it again ?
Seems some want to deflect to another company BUT CAN'T ANSWER MWWC questions..WHY ? lol
RECAP
In 2023, Blagman delivered MWM ...Marketing Worldwide Media LLC, a tiny Wyoming mailbox-LLC that MWWC “acquired” as its new media arm.
That company was supposed to bring:
Hollywood After Dark (HAD)
multiple TV concepts
ad-sales revenue
network distribution
“massive revenues”
It delivered none of it.
HAD never launched.
No networks.
No revenue.
No filings.
Nothing.
Now fast-forward to 2026, and suddenly Blagman claims that Media Fusion Inc. a company that doesn’t exist in any U.S. or international corporate registry BUT APPARENTLY is:the 2nd largest media giant behind Paramount/WBD
a global media empire
owner of HAD
operator of hundreds of FAST channels
reaching billions of viewers
and now doing a definitive deal with MWWC
So let’s ask the obvious question:
If Blagman really built the “2nd largest media company in the world” … why didn’t he bring THAT into MWWC in 2023 instead of a tiny Wyoming LLC?
Where was this “global empire” back then?
Why wasn’t Media Fusion part of the acquisition?
Why wasn’t HAD already owned by Media Fusion in 2023?
Why did MWM fail to deliver HAD, but Media Fusion magically owns it now?
And most importantly:
How is MWWC completing a “definitive agreement” with a company that does not legally exist anywhere?
Because:
Media Fusion Inc. is not registered in Wyoming
Not in Nevada
Not in Delaware
Not in California
Not in ANY U.S. state
Not in Hong Kong, UK, Singapore, or Canada
Not in ANY corporate registry worldwide
The only Blagman entity that exists is the same tiny Wyoming LLC MWWC already acquired and that company already failed to deliver everything it promised.
And let’s not forget:
Blagman was charged by the SEC in the Custable penny-stock dumping case.
His colleagues went to prison.
He was sanctioned and barred for a period.
That’s public record.
So maybe that’s why he can’t get a real U.S. corporation registered today and why everything he touches ends up being:
a SCAM
Bottom line:
MWM failed in 2023.
Now Blagman is recycling the same failed assets under a new, unregistered company name and calling it a “definitive agreement.”
It doesn’t add up and OTC, SEC have been notified ! HOW MANY MORE SCAMS can be run through MWWC ticker ????
surfkast
6日前
It was probably so laughable legal refused to acknowledge.
But they may know about the following?
March 14, 2011 Blagman consented to the entry of these final judgments'
For further information, see LR-18057 (March 31, 2003), LR-21423 (February 23, 2010), and LR-21492 (April 19, 2010).
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-21884
ALSO
ITYS
7日前
And here’s the part nobody on this board wants to touch or explain without deflecting to the past or deflect about another company that is irrelevant here.
RECAP
In 2023, Blagman delivered MWM ...Marketing Worldwide Media LLC, a tiny Wyoming mailbox-LLC that MWWC “acquired” as its new media arm.
That company was supposed to bring:
Hollywood After Dark (HAD)
multiple TV concepts
ad-sales revenue
network distribution
“massive revenues”
It delivered none of it.
HAD never launched.
No networks.
No revenue.
No filings.
Nothing.
Now fast-forward to 2026, and suddenly Blagman claims that Media Fusion Inc. a company that doesn’t exist in any U.S. or international corporate registry BUT APPARENTLY is:the 2nd largest media giant behind Paramount/WBD
a global media empire
owner of HAD
operator of hundreds of FAST channels
reaching billions of viewers
and now doing a definitive deal with MWWC
So let’s ask the obvious question:
If Blagman really built the “2nd largest media company in the world” … why didn’t he bring THAT into MWWC in 2023 instead of a tiny Wyoming LLC?
Where was this “global empire” back then?
Why wasn’t Media Fusion part of the acquisition?
Why wasn’t HAD already owned by Media Fusion in 2023?
Why did MWM fail to deliver HAD, but Media Fusion magically owns it now?
And most importantly:
How is MWWC completing a “definitive agreement” with a company that does not legally exist anywhere?
Because:
Media Fusion Inc. is not registered in Wyoming
Not in Nevada
Not in Delaware
Not in California
Not in ANY U.S. state
Not in Hong Kong, UK, Singapore, or Canada
Not in ANY corporate registry worldwide
The only Blagman entity that exists is the same tiny Wyoming LLC MWWC already acquired and that company already failed to deliver everything it promised.
And let’s not forget:
Blagman was charged by the SEC in the Custable penny-stock dumping case.
His colleagues went to prison.
He was sanctioned and barred for a period.
That’s public record.
So maybe that’s why he can’t get a real U.S. corporation registered today and why everything he touches ends up being:
a SCAM
Bottom line:
MWM failed in 2023.
Now Blagman is recycling the same failed assets under a new, unregistered company name and calling it a “definitive agreement.”
It doesn’t add up and OTC, SEC have been notified ! HOW MANY MORE SCAMS can be run through MWWC ticker ????
surfkast
1週前
Complaints were sent into the SEC. Got to love this!
MWWC gains access to a global distribution and brand-activation footprint built over decades, reaching nearly 3 billion consumers worldwide, more than 850 FAST channels, and connected television and digital touchpoints spanning North America, EMEA, MENA, APAC, Africa, and Latin America.
Now waiting to nail the coffin shut!
ITYS
1週前
So I guess everyone is still trying to find a registered Media Fusion Inc company with ties to Blagman ??
One would think be easy to find the 2nd largest global media company in world??
SO AGAIN---HOW can MWWC even do a definitive agreement with a phantom business entity?
What's Blagman selling "MAGIC BEANS" ??????
So MWWC doesn't acquire the "fictious" company but its magical assets ?
THIS COULD BE BIGGEST SUMMER SCAM.......wonder if Blagman is being assisted again by his felony ex-business partners
Marketing Worldwide Corp. (OTC:MWWC) and Media Fusion, Inc. Execute Definitive Agreement to Reposition MWWC as a Global Media, AI, and Brand Partnership Platform
The transaction is designed to transition MWWC from dormancy to an active operating company focused on global media transactions, AI-powered monetization, and international growth.
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESS Newswire / June 4, 2026 / Marketing Worldwide Corp. (OTCID:MWWC) ("MWWC") and Media Fusion, Inc. ("MFI") today announced the execution of a definitive agreement bringing Media Fusion's global media, brand-partnership, and AI-driven operating platform into MWWC. The transaction provides the structural foundation for MWWC to exit dormancy and move forward as an active public company focused on global media transactions, AI-powered monetization, and international business development.
For an extended period, MWWC remained largely inactive. With this agreement now in place, the Company believes it has reached a clear turning point. The objective is direct: build a real operating business across media and technology, execute with discipline, and create a company shareholders can respect and follow with confidence.
Through the contributed Media Fusion platform, MWWC gains access to a global distribution and brand-activation footprint built over decades, reaching nearly 3 billion consumers worldwide, more than 850 FAST channels, and connected television and digital touchpoints spanning North America, EMEA, MENA, APAC, Africa, and Latin America. The operating model is designed to work across broadcast and streaming, digital and social, experiential and data, and commerce and merchandising, creating multiple potential revenue streams across content integration, live events, subscriptions, merchandising, micro-content, and direct-response channels.
ITYS
1週前
YAWN and Double yawn....so anyone find a Media Fusion Inc tied to Blagman ???
HOW can MWWC do a definitive deal with an unregistered company that claims to be 2nd biggest media empire in world behind Paramount/WBD ?
MISLEADING SHAREHOLDERS...BLAGMAN back to his scam ways again?
What the press release explicitly claims
• They “executed a definitive agreement”
• The deal is to bring “Media Fusion’s global media… platform into MWWC”
• It’s described as:
o an asset/platform contribution
o meant to transition MWWC “from dormancy to an active operating company”
These statements are consistent across all sources — but all are company-issued press release copies, not independent reporting.
________________________________________
What is NOT stated anywhere in that release
This is the critical part:
No legal details of the deal
The release does NOT specify:
• purchase price
• equity issued
• % ownership transferred
• whether it’s cash vs stock vs note
• whether it has closed
A real M&A disclosure normally includes at least one of those.
________________________________________
No identification of the specific legal entity
It says:
“Media Fusion, Inc.”
But does NOT clarify:
• which jurisdiction
• which filing ID
• who owns it
• whether it’s the Wyoming entity, Nevada entity, etc.
already found:
• none of the obvious “Media Fusion Inc” entities line up cleanly with Blagman + active status
________________________________________
No financials for what is being acquired
No mention of:
• revenue
• EBITDA
• contracts
• customers
• assets contributed
Yet it claims:
• “3 billion consumers”
• “850+ channels”
Those are not backed by numbers or filings in the release itself.
________________________________________
No filed agreement attached (as far as public records show)
All versions of the announcement are:
• ACCESS Newswire press releases
• explicitly labeled as third-party content / not independently verified
did NOT find:
• an SEC filing with the agreement
• a detailed OTC disclosure attaching the contract
________________________________________
What this means in practice
Legally sufficient
They can say:
“we executed a definitive agreement”
Because:
• a private contract could exist
• OTC rules allow disclosure by press release
________________________________________
But economically unclear
What you do NOT know from this:
• What exactly was transferred
• Whether it has real operating value
• Whether Media Fusion is a functioning company
• Whether the “platform” is IP, relationships, or just a concept
________________________________________
“bringing Media Fusion’s… platform into MWWC”
That wording is VERY important.
It does not say:
• “acquired Media Fusion Inc.”
• “merged with Media Fusion Inc.”
• “purchased shares of Media Fusion Inc.”
It suggests:
• an asset contribution / integration
• which could be:
o IP
o branding
o relationships
o development plans
________________________________________
Combine that with entity research
already found:
• No clear active Blagman-controlled Media Fusion Inc
• Wyoming entity ? inactive + unrelated officers
• Older entities ? defunct
So the most consistent interpretation is:
The “Media Fusion” being contributed is not clearly tied to an active, verifiable corporate entity in public records
ITYS
1週前
SO not sure how another company information ir relevant here to MWWC but if it helps you share the answer to MWWC's board questions then so be it.
Ive explained this several times on BKTH board but here is again....
The BKTH APAC contract, so here it is straight from OTC Markets, fully disclosed, filed, and verifiable:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BKTH/news](https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BKTH/news
BKTH Secures Exclusive APAC Sales & Licensing Partner
Breakthrough Chemistry signed an exclusive Master APAC Sales & Licensing Agreement with Interway International Ltd., a *registered Hong Kong company*.
Interway handles sales, logistics, regulatory filings, warehousing, invoicing the whole APAC operation while BKTH keeps 100% of its IP
There’s a $100k agency fee, tiered profit-sharing, and BKTH approval rights on sublicensing.
Everything is filed, transparent, and publicly available.
That’s how a real company does it.
Now… back to MWWC, since that’s what the thread is actually about.
You still haven’t answered the real question:
How did MWWC “complete a definitive agreement” with a company that doesn’t legally exist?
Because nobody and I mean *nobody* can find Media Fusion Inc. registered in:
- Wyoming
- Nevada
- Delaware
- California
- Texas
- ANY U.S. jurisdiction
The only Blagman entity that exists is a tiny Wyoming LLC formed in 2023 — not the “global media empire” he claims.
And let’s not pretend his history is clean.
Blagman was charged by the SEC in the Custable case.
His colleagues in that same scheme went to prison.
He was sanctioned and barred for a period that’s why he’s been bouncing around OTC shells ever since.
So maybe that’s why he can’t get a real, registered U.S. corporation today.
And again where is MWWC’s:
- material event filing
- deal terms
- corporate disclosure
- explanation of the “definitive agreement”
- clarification on whether Blagman is joining the board
- clarification on whether he’s involved in stock transactions
- explanation of whether a reverse split is coming
BKTH disclosed everything.
MWWC disclosed nothing.
So before deflecting, maybe answer the actual question:
How does a public company execute a “definitive agreement” with an unregistered entity that doesn’t exist in any state database?
That’s the issue and nobody on the MWWC board seems able to answer it.
shoondale
2週前
👉️Blatant lies...SEC..."were never agreed to by BMII"
"They did so by forging Blagman's signature on the consulting agreements. The consulting agreements supposedly justifying the issuance of the counterfeit BMII stock were never agreed to by BMII. The federal criminal authorities seized some of the forged consulting agreements during their execution of the search warrant on Suburban Capital's offices."
https://www.sec.gov/files/AmendComplaint03-cv-02182Blagman.pdf
The 2004 SEC filing/federal investigation was never refuted by the SEC or anyone in the federal government. You can't find anything to refute it because, quite simply, it is factual and true, Mr. Blagman was never even mentioned, nor sanctioned, in any of the criminal proceedings as I have posted many times. Mr. Blagman's signature was forged by criminals according to the SEC and federal investigative bodies. That does not make him either a criminal or a bad person. Misleading posts are attacking the individual who co-operated with the investigation from the very start, fought no civil charges, and wanted to help reimburse and make investors whole again. Quite possibly, anyone who checks will find an accomplished and well known individual in the entertainment industry, one with a fantastic life long resume, who has worked extremely hard to achieve a goal that is actually coming to fruition.
ITYS
2週前
It’s amazing how some keep repeating the fantasy that “they forged Blagman’s signature in 2004 so he didn’t do anything wrong.”
That’s not what the SEC case says at all.
Blagman was charged in the Custable penny-stock dumping scheme.
His company (BMII) was one of the issuers used to dump counterfeit shares, and the SEC charged every CEO involved, forged signature or not because the issuers enabled the fraud. His BUDDIES/associates in that same case were convicted, barred, or sent to prison. That’s the record.
Blagman:
was charged
was enjoined
was barred (time-limited)
was NOT permanently banned
That’s why he can legally attach himself to MWWC today, but it doesn’t make it credible.
Fast-forward to 2026, and now we’re supposed to believe Media Fusion is some gigantic global media empire… yet nobody can find a single active corporate registration for it in any U.S. jurisdiction. Not one.
YET, Blagmans claims on Media fusion Inc make it 2nd largest in industry behind paramount/WBD merger...2ND in WORLD and yet nowhere to be found..LMFAO !!
So how exactly did MWWC “complete a definitive agreement” with a company that doesn’t legally exist?
Where’s the material event filing?
Where are the deal terms?
Where’s the corporate disclosure?
Are they doing a massive reverse split?
Is Blagman joining the board?
Is he involved in stock transactions?
These are basic questions any legitimate public company would answer.
Instead, we get a press release about a “definitive agreement” with an unregistered entity that cannot be found in any state database. That alone = another SCAM !.
If the company can’t even show that its merger partner exists, that’s not “FUD.”
That’s called due diligence.
SEEMS others need to bring up other companies to DEFLECT realities on MWWC board... WHY NOT JUST DISCUSS MWWC ONLY and discuss other companies on their message boards???