Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (CE) (IPIX) 銘柄情報

Who would have purchased those shares? Certainly nobody on this message board. LOL.

He'll probably stiff his attorneys too....

Nobody can find him....

With such perceived promise, you should sell all your assets and try to put all your money into IPIX. How can you let such an opportunity pass you by? Even if you are homeless for a few months, no worries...Dustbowl Leo won't let you down.

"IPIX owns a big chunk of that company"

Bet it doesn't.

"their potential for success is massive with their StingRay Laser System."

Nah - they filed as a copycat of an existing medical device. If it ever reaches the market, it will have to compete on price.

"One can only speculate as to their motivations."

As I've mentioned many times, I derive satisfaction from studying stock scams and those who promote them.

IPIX is merely one of many, as a brief perusal of my posts will confirm.

Was the source nerby lol

Too bad this reliable source didn't ask Leo's son Elliot a question about his dad's outlook on the future of IPIX in regard to the alliance of IPIX with BeaMed Technologies. IPIX owns a big chunk of that company, and their potential for success is massive with their StingRay Laser System. When you have individuals hell-bent on convincing investors day after day that IPIX is DEAD, DEAD, DEAD! Well, that has convinced me that if it was true, they would have shut up and been gone long ago. One can only speculate as to their motivations.

"Is Leo a criminal genius? Is that why he has never been arrested or charged with a crime?"

Nah. It's just that anybody who still thinks IPIX and Leo are legit is criminally stupid.

P T Barnum said it best (apocryphally, at least).

Is Leo a criminal genius? Is that why he has never been arrested or charged with a crime? 

You do appear to have an inordinate amount of insider sources regarding IPIX. Interesting.

Wonder how much money has been lost  on this deal as of today. 
15mil? 

The website still works, so who's paying the web host cost. I figure it must be Leo.

Hope your source is not running girl! Full of poo poo imo! Although I do agree Leo is a stinky turd for cutting all communication and wouldn’t put it past him! All though why is the Cummings thing continuing if he’s done with Ipix?

How do we know that he's not buying back shares as we speak? If he really sold, why is he bothering to spend attorney fees to fight Cummings? Something is not jiving!!!

You were saying?

A very good source who knows Elliot Ehrlich( Leo's son) has confirmed that Leo surrendered the last of his IPIX shares in November of 2024 to offset gains in the market. Leo now has ZERO shares of IPIX. I guess we now know why he stopped doing SEC filings. He didn't want anyone to know. Besides other reasons I'm sure. What a lowlife Piece of Shit. I guess he is going to live in his Saturday hat wearing gated community the rest of his life.
He stiffed to many people to feel safe outside of it.

A reminder for all.

https://www.beam-med.com/

Brain

Epilepsy is the most prevalent serious neurologic condition in the world, affecting about 70 million people. Unfortunately, 30%-40% of those patients are afflicted with drug resistant epilepsy, meaning they receive no relief from medication. BeaMed will offer new hope for this core group of patients. In addition, BeaMed’s advanced products will provide better surgical options for Brain tumors.

Addressing a significant market.

Lungs

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer related death today. Major investments and advances have been made in the last decades in robotic and highly precise navigation and diagnostic tools for early stage lung cancer, yet the goal of less invasive therapeutic tools to be deployed through these advanced platforms remains to be solved. BeaMed targets development of new therapeutic options for early stage lung cancer.

Prostate

Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer and the second leading cause of death in males. Surgical treatment options carry the risk of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Better control and shaping of energy deposition to match the target lesion while avoiding critical structures can greatly enhance the tradeoff between outcome and complication rate. BeaMed will aim at altering this tradeoff for millions of patients.

IPIX is dead.

And some bad math to boot :o)

Another IPIX underperform notice as it hits a new 52 week low. They should come up with a special designation for IPIX - Six Feet Underperform.

A waste of $1.

1 million shares for 1 dollar, what a bargain!

“ Exhibiting a complete lack of integrity must also be bliss.”

Ask Leo and Mr. Bean.

They’re the ones who stole your money after all, although to be fair it’s your own fault as you ignored all the warnings that brighter posters like loanranger and others gave you.

What I need to look at is your purpose here. I've have defiantly known the reason since well before 2018. No ignorance there.

Exhibiting a complete lack of integrity must also be bliss.

IPIX is a kola superdeep shithole.

You don't need to look? I get it....ignorance is bliss. But a little research might have saved you some money. You've been watching this thing shrivel up since 2018, haven't you?

Since it's not my job to destroy the company, I wouldn't have the need to look. You on the other hand........

Common sense - All the people on this board are doing more than nothing which is a better job than Leo.

Half the people who post on this board could do a better job than Leo. Some common sense goes a long way.

Half the people who post on this board could do a better job than Leo. Some common sense goes a long way.

I know that I'm not dopey enough to think that the IPIX attorney would have failed to file a document that made clear the Company's intent to terminate the lease.
No spin, just a fact.

Read the court filings.

You are indeed the king of spin.....you know nothing while you pretend to know.....

I'm not pretending anything.
I've read the publicly available court filings that IPIX has made (have you?) and there is no indication that IPIX sent an email during the renewal option period that explicitly stated that they did not intend to renew the lease at the time of its expiration.
One would have to be pretty dopey to think that such an email would be left out of the IPIX claims and exhibits if it existed. Even IF email wasn't specifically excluded in the lease as a method of communicating the tenant's renewal intentions (as it was) such an email would likely have mitigated against the courts finding that IPIX owed for the full term of the lease.

BTW, Leo turned over the lease termination mechanics to JH and the company bookkeeper. I guess he was too busy.

Cummings knew what they were doing and your boy didn't. And apparently neither do you.

Thank you so much for the update. There is a way forward.

You have zero proof that Leo never sent the email and you know it......stop pretending you do!!!!

“ Are IPIX shareholders destined to lose our control over Brilicidin?”

Best as I can gauge, IPIX shareholders never had any control over IPIX.

Leo Ehrlich long neglected his fiduciary and other responsible governance responsibilities to his investors ( or “marks” as he and Mr. Bean invariably refer to you). more recently he has also decided to ignore his legal responsibilities under US Securities Laws.

Are IPIX shareholders destined to lose our control over Brilicidin the same way we got it; through a bargain basement bankruptcy auction?
gh

Attorney Dwyer gave them to me. Gave them to everybody. If only you knew where to look.

It's little wonder that some people hold these shares.

When exactly did you gain access to IPIX emails?

Unbelievable.
Leo never "sent the mail" and Dwyer took the case in January of 2020.

I'm sure if Dwyer is taking the case, Leo had sent the mail.....

Could be they argued Leo thought he sent Cummings an email but it got stuck in the "draft" menu.

Did Leo send an email at the time?

It's too bad that the Appeals Court doesn't provide a .pdf of their docket items the way the lower court does. I'd like to know how IPIX responded.

Reply brief filed for Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc. by Attorney Daniel Dwyer.

"after a lengthy pause due to the Israel war with Hamas". Sez you. If Ehrlich thought he could sell that story we would have heard it before YOU told it.
Or maybe BeaMed made an announcement to that effect and I missed it. Did they?

Hi, Pete. Good to see your post. I agree with you that we need a "white hat" company to carry the ball from here, and it looks like our best hope is our investment in BeaMed Pharma and their StingRay laser system, which, after after a lengthy pause due to the Israel war with Hamas, has begun to move forward as demonstrated by two recent hires. Our potential there is big, along with Brilacidin. I still hold out hope.

Virtually identical! Except for the no email part.

You are correct. It just all seemed so similar to the Innovation case. I should have read more carefully!

"So Leo did provide notice to Cummins before the renewal date, albeit through email, which was not an approved means."
IPIX sent no such email and the article doesn't say that it did.

The case(s) referred to in the article involved leases with similar if not identical terms regarding the notice requirements regarding automatic renewal and in one case the Judge ruled that, even though the lease explicitly precluded email as a proper method of communication, he decided as the article headline states: "Email to landlord was sufficient written notice of nonrenewal".

The Exhibit List in the IPIX/Cummins case does not include an email from anyone at IPIX during the option period indicating that there was no intention to renew the lease. It seems obvious then that even if the current Judge was inclined to accept email as an acceptable form of communication it wouldn't matter at all.

This case and the case(s) in the cited article are different in the most critical of elements.

Note from current Appeals Court Docket:
11/26/2024 #19 Motion of Appellant to extend date for filing Reply Brief filed for Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc. by Attorney Daniel Dwyer.
11/26/2024 RE#19: Allowed to 1/19/25. *Notice.

The article that you linked is not the complete article, which can be seen here:
https://masslawyersweekly.com/2023/06/12/email-to-landlord-was-sufficient-written-notice-of-nonrenewal/?utm_term=Email%20to%20landlord%20was%20sufficient%20written%20notice%20of%20nonrenewal&utm_campaign=Email%20to%20landlord%20was%20sufficient%20written%20notice%20of%20nonrenewal&utm_content=Editorial&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_medium=MALW&Email=ddwyer@verrill-law.com

The article makes no mention at all of Innovation Pharmaceuticals.
The thing that IPIX and the other plaintiffs had in common were the terms of the lease and the lease extension.
(See response to subsequent post.)