Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (EM) (BCAP)

BCAP shares are like lottery tickets; anyone not holding them is making a huge mistake. I’ve held mine since 2021, having bought in at $0.0001, and I have no intention of giving my shares away. I don't understand those who criticize this stock; you can't bet against it because it has nowhere left to fall. Last time, it climbed to $0.0009 on minimal news—just imagine how it will skyrocket if news breaks about the filing of documents, especially given the small float.

I originally bought for idea of bcap getting bought out by a big company or reverse merger type of play . The fact that they are trying to bring this back and this is taking the longest shows something is happening . There is bcap token , the name itself has a lot of controversy , nice share structure. This has gold written all over it . Price action doesn’t matter I’m waiting for the BIG NEWS. 

It's 2043, Jake is freshly released from Jail while Moe patiently awaits filings.

2030 will be your year bro, just hold, easy 2x

You don’t have shares btw . I wonder why he’s taking long I can wait , maybe because this one could be the winner 🤔. 

It's now July.
I seem to remember someone here confidently saying this would be trading on all platforms by July.
They meant July last year.


Good luck.

0,1 o 1$ 🚀💥💵💲💰️💸

cant file without TA info... where is that lawsuit Jake promised... over 2 years ago. Hes a liar.

Over 350 million 

How many millions of BCAP shares do you hold?
I hope the OTC markets rally someday like they did in January and February 2021 and we get rich; patience pays off.

I hope it goes up soon and this thing goes to the moon.

LETS SEE SOME FILINGS AND UPDATES !!! 

👇 Moe the Jack of all trades!! You work too hard!! I take back everything I said!! Lol 😂

Until then I work 7 days a week at my regular job , I trade spx options and getting into long term investing . Now I’m trying to create something. But I when OTC bull run happens again I will never have the same life again.  

300 😳 now in the meantime I can wait because I’m young . If this ever hits without dilution I will never have to work again . Oh and I’m young so that’s more valuable. :) hopefully when this goes up you better hope you will be around cause I’ll make sure you will never forget. 

No.
No updates.
Just a website with a picture of palm trees. That's all you get for your shares. (Is it 3 million or 30 million you've got?)

Any updates 👀 the haters always gonna talk . I can wait for the success. 

.0001 available

Posted by Jake on X:
I've retained a new service provider to begin the broker-dealer registration process.
It should be operational and generating positive cash flow within 3-4 months.

That was back on February 5th so I think 4 months have passed. Is anything operational and generating positive cash flow that he's forgotten to tell you about?

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/2019266999244013718

Fake prices wait until filings. 

Your shares are worth zero

Dumb nd dumber you actually  got me laughing with kash🤣. We all have been here before Jake mind you after the rules in 2021 no one can buy until filings. This is going to be the gold runner 🏃 big name , known , a lot of controversy .  

Big eyes?
Looking at Jake's activities?
Is this who you mean?

I don't want to cast aspersions, but someone with extra chromosones might be mistaken into thinking that he was refering to Chrome, the browser (made by Google, not Microsoft.)

I think you've got more chance of seeing completely unredacted Epstein files than the BCAP filings you've been asking Jake for since 2024.

Which chrome Microsoft  chrome 🤣? Ahh you think your words are useful lmaoo . BCAP LETS MAKE HISTORY 📈💥💨

Big eyes you say... seems fitting people with extra chrom would be interested ina Jakey scam thinking its a good investement.

Unbelievable outcome = un answered questions. I know there’s some big eyes on this.  

courts dont work suddenly, you file, have to serve, then each side needs to reply, make motions, etc. it's been 3 years since he filed for custodianship... nothing will be quick or sudden.

It’s going to happen suddenly , there is no trackmarks on how it goes when HISTORY WILL BE MADE. IM looking forward to seeing some insane stuff happening. This round it’s gg . 

I still see no lawsuit against the TA filed yet, how can he win? He promised to file that lawsuit Dec 2024 or so, hasnt even done it yet. That needs done before any filings and he seems busy turning the fake debt into an ABS no one will buy.

You said he would never reinstate the company ,he did. You said he would not win in court , he did . FILINGS NEXT .BCAP TO DA MOON ⚡️📈💰💥🌙

Nothing you said is correlated to Bcap

Let's catch the readers of the board up with all the fraud Jake P. Noch has committed (that we know of) from information that is publicly available.

Submitted for federal government review:

https://downloads.regulations.gov
PDF

PRO Fraud in Relation to Pro Music Rights (PMR) and Jake P. Noch ...

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://downloads.regulations.gov/COLC-2025-0001-0006/attachment_1.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwibn4O8u62SAxWy6BoGHbdBCqkQFnoECCAQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3PTV6cmmYJsRdirGWou93t

PRO Fraud in Relation to Pro Music Rights (PMR) and Jake P. Noch
Introduction
I am submitting this report to bring to your attention significant concerns regarding Pro Music Rights (PMR), a purported performance rights organization (PRO) founded by Jake P. Noch as it concerns Docket No. 2025-1. Though claiming to be the 3rd largest PRO in the United States and cited in this offices report, evidence strongly suggests that PMR is engaging in fraudulent business practices, deceptive marketing, and potential securities violations; harming both licensees and investors in ways noted as a concern for your office. This report outlines how PMR has misrepresented its music catalog, falsely marketed its services, abuse of
local and federal court systems and manipulated financial disclosures to enrich its CEO. Specifically, the investigation reveals that:
• PMR’s catalog is largely comprised of fabricated works, many of which are AI-generated or
credited to shell companies owned by Jake P. Noch, rather than legitimate artists.
• The company has been selling music licenses for works that do not actually exist or are not
available for use, misleading businesses into purchasing a service that cannot be fulfilled.
• PMR has engaged in abusive litigation practices, using lawsuits to pressure victims into paying for
rights they do not need or that PMR does not control.
• Securities fraud concerns arise from the company’s misleading financial filings, including
claims of over $1 billion in revenue that appear to be artificially inflated.
• Jake P. Noch has exploited SEC Rule 3(a)(10) to issue and sell shares illegally, circumventing
restrictions that should apply to corporate insiders, resulting in massive dilution and potential
violations of securities laws.
This submission provides documented evidence, including data from PMR’s own database, SEC filings, social media claims, and independent financial analyses. Given the scale of these alleged infractions and their impact on consumers, investors, and the integrity of the U.S. music licensing system, I urge your office
to review these findings and consider taking regulatory or enforcement action, as an example to the much-needed improvements to PRO regulation.
Please find the following a full breakdown of the investigation, along with supporting citations.
1. PMR’s Work Library and Suspected Fake Entries
Scope and Structure of the Catalog:
PMR’s public work search database reveals a massive catalog (claimed “more than Two Million Musical works”(promusicrights.com). However, many entries have nonsensical titles and attributions, suggesting they are not real commercially released songs. For example, works titled “eile buck(a)” or “meningioma come” appear in the database (promusicrights.com) (promusicrights.com). These odd titles do not
correspond to known songs or artists, hinting they may be auto-generated placeholders rather than
legitimate compositions.
Shell Company Publishers:
A striking pattern is that the publishers for these works are often shell companies controlled by Jake P. Noch. In the PMR catalog, many songs list “Publishing Company A, LLC,” “Publishing Company B, LLC,” (promusicrights.com). Florida business records and SEC filings confirm these entities are companies formed in 2018 with Jake P. Noch as the managing member (sec.gov). PMR’s site frequently credits these same few LLCs (along with “Pro Music Rights Publishing Group, LLC,” another Noch entity
(promusicrights.com) as owning 100% of a work’s rights. In one example, “eile buck(a)” is attributed entirely to Publishing Co. A, Publishing Co. C, and PMR Publishing Group as publishers (promusicrights.com), and even lists Publishing Co. A and B as “writers” of the song (promusicrights.com) (promusicrights.com). This
circular ownership structure – where Noch’s own LLCs are both publisher and songwriter – strongly
indicates these works are not genuine third-party compositions, but rather entries created to pad PMR’s catalog.Further, Jakes notes that “… 2.5 million musical works, primarily sourced from songwriters, composers, and publishers affiliated with our CEO, Jake P Noch.” (sec.gov) This only confirms that instead of the numerous non-Jake related works claimed in promotional material, instead most of the works were sourced
from affiliates of Jake or Jake himself. This of course is not possible, unless the works themselves simply don’t exist in reality.
Proportion of Fake vs. Real Works:
By all indications, the overwhelming majority of works in PMR’s repertoire are these suspicious entries tied to Noch’s shell companies. In contrast, legitimate works by real artists or publishers are exceedingly scarce. For instance, PMR did sign a handful of actual artists; one known example is rapper OG Maco(famous for “U Guessed It”). Indeed, PMR’s database shows “U Guessed It” credited properly to OG Maco (Maco Mattox) as writer and artist (promusicrights.com) (promusicrights.com) – a normal attribution one would expect for a real song. Such entries with genuine artist names are rare. Meanwhile, dozens of pages of the catalog contain bizarrely titled songs with no discernible artist and only Jake Noch’s companies as rights-
holders (promusicrights.com)(promusicrights.com). This suggests that PMR’s “2 million works” claim is
largely built on fake or self-created works, with only a small fraction representing authentic songs from
independent artists.
Who Owns the Real Artists:
Per other PRO databases, PMR doesn’t even own a large number of the stated catalogue works by both Jake Noch (BMI.com) and OG MACO (BMI.com), reported in the PMR catalogue as owning 100. BMI owning the rights to these works makes more sense, as these were all published well before the creation of PMR and no indications of rights transfer has occurred. Meaning, even the rights to works that are playable online and are attached to real artists are in question. In fact, Jake P Noch has a history of filing fraudulent copyright claims
on other artists works on multiple online platforms and in courts.
Statistical Breakdown by Publisher:
Although PMR has not published a full breakdown, a review of random samples from the database shows the same few shell publishers recurring. “Publishing Company A, LLC” appears to be attached to a huge number of entries, as do its sister entities B and C. All three were formed on the same date and managed by Noch (sec.gov), indicating they function as shell conduits for his catalog. In essence, Jake P. Noch (through
various LLCs) is on both sides of most works – he is the purported publisher and writer – meaning PMR is largely licensing music to itself. The proportion of works not owned by Noch’s entities seems minuscule. In the absence of official stats, anecdotal evidence suggests nearly 99% of PMR’s listed songs are tied to Noch’s companies, with very few legitimate outside publishers or PRO members represented, and even those are questionable. It is unclear how many legitime works PMR actually owns.Fake Works with Egregious Details:
The fake works in PMR’s library are often identifiable by their amateurish or absurd titles and credits. For example, “Meningioma Come” (seemingly named after a type of brain tumor) is one such entry(promusicrights.com). Its publishers are Publishing Company A and C, and PMR’s own pub group(promusicrights.com), and its writers include Publishing Company A and B, LLC as “Authors” (promusicrights.com)(promusicrights.com). The credited “artist” is “WholeRest,” a term more associated with a musical notation symbol than a performer(promusicrights.com). Other amusing examples include titles like “Cataleptic Zwischen,” “Gala(a) Dumfoundered,” and “Bibliopole Aquatics,” all of which list the same trio of shell publishers. Such entries read more like randomly generated word salad than actual songs. This pattern led observers to conclude that PMR populated its catalog with made-up works—potentially
even AI-generated titles or music. Indeed, industry commenters have noted that Noch “is marketing a
massive library, most of which are just songs he made up with AI, and never produced. This is fraud.”
(investorshub.advfn.com). In short, PMR’s work library appears to be largely a Potemkin catalogue –
millions of “ghost” works created to convey the illusion of a vast repertory.
2. Fraudulent Marketing of Services
Alleged Misrepresentation by PMR:
PMR and Jake P. Noch have marketed their PRO services on claims that appear to be false or grossly
exaggerated. They advertise PMR as the “5th ever” PRO with a “7.4% market share” and over 2 million
works, including songs by famous artists (docdroid.net) (justice.gov). In reality, if most of those works are fake (as detailed above), then PMR is offering licenses for a repertoire it cannot genuinely provide. This would mean that businesses paying PMR for music licenses are being misled – the service (access to a large catalog of popular music) is not what it seems. Such behavior falls under fraudulent marketing or false advertising, and legal precedent establishes that selling a service under false pretenses is unlawful.
Applicable Fraud and False Advertising Principles:
While there may be no identical case of a PRO inventing a catalog, general fraud case law and consumer protection statutes apply. Fraudulent inducement occurs when a company makes knowing misrepresentations to entice customers into a contract. Here, PMR’s representations about its catalog size and contents could qualify. For instance, if PMR tells a bar or streaming service that its license covers hit songs by artists like A$AP Rocky or Pharrell (justice.gov), but in truth PMR has no valid rights to those works per some federal alwsuits, the client has been misled into a contract that PMR cannot fulfill. This is analogous to a service provider promising a capability it does not have, which courts have found to be deceptive. U.S. law (both federal and state) prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” in commerce –
a standard that would encompass a music licensor overstating its repertory. For example, the Federal Trade Commission Act and state unfair trade practices acts allow authorities to take action when a business makes materially false claims about its product or service. In the music industry, even performance rights organizations are not exempt from truth-in-marketing; they must actually control the rights they license.
PRO-Specific Context:
Within the performance rights industry, we have seen disputes when rights are misrepresented, though typically in good faith errors or licensing overlaps – not outright fabrication. PMR’s case is unprecedented in scope. However, even established PROs have faced scrutiny. For example, in 2023 the rights administrator Songtrust was suspended by major societies (PRS, SACEM) over fraudulent accounts that had snuck into its system (digitalmusicnews.com). This wasn’t a marketing fraud by Songtrust per se, but it underscores
how seriously the industry treats fraudulent representations of rights ownership. If PMR knowingly bulked up its catalog with dummy entries and pitched itself as the “third-largest” PRO, a court or regulator would likely view that as a knowing misrepresentation of a material fact – the very definition of fraud. In any litigation or enforcement, PMR’s own statements (e.g., boasting a 7.4% market share and naming famous
artists (justice.gov) could be used as evidence that it misled stakeholders. Those statements were used to bolster PMR’s credibility in the market, attract licensees, and even influence government perception (PMR made these claims in a filing to the DOJ (justice.gov). 3. Suspected SEC Rule 3(a)(10) Violations in Noch’s Stock Scheme
How is PMR’s parent company, Music Licensing Inc. and Jake P Noch benefiting from this fraudulent PRO scheme?
Overview of the Scheme:
Jake P. Noch’s activities with Music Licensing, Inc. (the public company owning PMR, trading as
$SONG/SONGD) have drawn scrutiny as a potential stock-dumping scheme. In 2022, Noch orchestrated a reverse merger to take PMR public via Nuvus Gro Corp, and subsequent maneuvers allowed him to issue himself large blocks of stock. In particular, he utilized Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act – a provision that exempts certain securities issuances from registration if done to settle bona fide claims in a court-approved fairness hearing.
This exemption is meant for arm’s-length settlements, not for insiders to print stock for themselves. Yet, evidence suggests Noch did exactly that: he had his own affiliate entity (Jake P. Noch Family Office or similar) present a claim or note payable, then “settled” it by having the court approve the issuance of a massive number of new shares to that affiliate (i.e., to himself) under 3(a)(10). This allowed those shares to be issued
ostensibly as “free trading” (unrestricted) stock, bypassing the usual holding restrictions
(investorshub.advfn.com) (investorshub.advfn.com).
Why This Likely Violates SEC Rules:
SEC Rule 3a10 (Section 3(a)(10) exemption) has strict conditions. Notably, it cannot be used by insiders (affiliates) to issue themselves stock for capital-raising. The law requires a court to approve the fairness of the exchange, and it’s generally intended for situations like a company settling a debt with an unrelated creditor by issuing shares. The SEC’s Staff Legal Bulletin on 3(a)(10) makes clear that if the recipients are affiliates of the issuer, any shares they get are restricted and subject to resale limitations (sec.gov). In fact, affiliates are barred from freely reselling 3(a)(10) shares – they would have to abide by Rule 144, which
imposes holding periods and volume limits (sec.gov) (sec.gov). In PMR’s case, Jake Noch is an affiliate (as CEO and majority shareholder). By using an affiliate entity he controlled to receive shares, Noch was effectively on both sides of the “settlement.” According to commentary on the case, Noch’s lawyer misled the court about the 3(a)(10) rules, obtaining an illegal exemption so that Noch could “use company stock as an open bank account.” (investorshub.advfn.com)(investorshub.advfn.com). This would be a blatant violation because Section 3(a)(10) may not be used for insider self-dealing or as a means to raise new capital for the company (securitieslawyer101.com). The SEC itself has stated that 3(a)(10) is “commonly misused by dilution funders” and is not to be used as a capital-formation tool (securitieslawyer101.com). Noch’s maneuver appears to fit that forbidden pattern.
Affiliate Status and Legal Bar:
As an affiliate, Noch was explicitly barred from using Section 3(a)(10) to get unrestricted stock. The law treats affiliates receiving such shares as underwriters, meaning any resale is a distribution that typically requires registration or a valid exemption (sec.gov) (sec.gov). By bypassing that, Noch exposed himself and the company to liability for unregistered stock sales (violation of Securities Act §5). In plainer terms, he printed stock without a registration statement or legitimate exemption, which is illegal. Note that the company’s own attorney essentially aided Noch in this self-dealing instead of protecting the company – a
severe conflict of interest.
All of this would be red flags to the SEC. If investigated, Noch’s stock scheme could result in enforcement action for securities fraud, cancellation of the illegally issued shares, and/or insider trading allegations.
In summary, Noch’s 3(a)(10) stock issuance appears to have brazenly violated the letter and spirit of SEC rules, similar to past microcap fraud schemes that have been prosecuted. 4. Additional Supporting Evidence and Claims by PMR
Inflated Market Position Claims:
PMR has consistently portrayed itself as a major player among U.S. PROs, notably claiming to be the “third largest” by market share. In an August 2018 press release, PMR announced it had “reached a 7.4% market share making it the 3rd largest public performance rights organization in the United States.”(justice.gov). This statistic was based on the number of works in its repertory, as PMR explained in legal filings (justice.gov). Essentially, Jake Noch argued that with ~2 million works, PMR’s share of the total universe of songs was about 7.4%, putting it behind only ASCAP and BMI (and ahead of SESAC and the much smaller GMR). However, this claim is not substantiated by any independent industry data. Market share in the PRO context is usually measured by performance royalties collected/distributed, not just raw catalog count. By revenue or actual usage, PMR is nowhere near ASCAP/BMI/SESAC. In fact, PMR’s own financial filings suggest negligible real-world licensing revenue (as discussed below). Thus, the “7.4% market share” figure appears to be a self-calculated vanity metric. No evidence has emerged that PMR truly commands such a portion of performances or income; it’s a boast likely designed to lend credibility to an untested startup. Industry observers have greeted this claim with skepticism, especially
given the dubious nature of PMR’s catalog. Without widespread license adoption by music users, PMR’s true market impact is minimal – certainly not third place. The assertion seems to be more marketing spin than reality.
AI-Generated Works and Social Media Boasts:
Jake Noch has not been shy about touting the size and innovation of PMR’s catalog on social media. In late 2023, PMR’s official Twitter/X account made waves by suggesting that it was leveraging artificial intelligence to expand its music library. Noch claimed to have developed proprietary AI (based on ChatGPT) to create new musical works, implying that PMR could generate music content at scale. An industry blog reported “PRO Music Rights’ subsidiary Music Licensing, Inc. takes its first step into AI-generated content with proprietary technology based onChatGPT.”(themusicandcopyrightblog.com). PMR even issued a press release in Feb 2023 about enhancing AI-based music with ChatGPT (prnewswire.com). These statements corroborate the notion that a significant portion of PMR’s 2+ million works may be AI-created compositions or otherwise synthetic. Noch essentially suggested PMR could swell its catalog by having AI write music, which is unprecedented for a PRO (PROs traditionally represent human songwriters).
On one hand, this was positioned as PMR being on the cutting edge of technology; on the other, it raises
serious questions about the quality and legitimacy of those works. The social media posts by PMR often celebrate milestones (e.g., number of works, market share) and sometimes even take jabs at competitors or critics, painting PMR as a disruptive force. However, these pronouncements have drawn incredulous reactions. Jake hints clearly to an AI music program in his garage prior to the formation of PMR in two X (formerly Twitter) posts highlighting 300 PC’s in a garage (X.com) (X.com). In company Jake notes that AI is a substantial part of the business, but noting in footnotes in the public shell’s filings (sec.gov). However, this disclosure stands in stark contrast to PMR’s practices, which include fabricating a music catalog filled with AI-generated works and falsely marketing it as one of the largest repertoires in the industry. This self-admitted risk raises serious questions about PMR’s licensing model, as the company appears to be knowingly leveraging AI-created music to mislead licensees into believing they are accessing a legitimate catalog.The use of AI to inflate a music catalog is a novel twist in this saga, but it ultimately reinforces the central allegation: PMR’s catalog and market stature are largely a fiction created by Noch.
Press Releases vs. Reality (Revenue and Deals):
PMR’s press releases and OTC market filings present a rosy picture of financial success that is starkly at odds with reality. For instance, PMR (under its parent Music Licensing, Inc.) announced “stellar” financial performance for 2023, claiming over $1.05 billion in total revenue and $46 million in net profit(globenewswire.com). These figures are astonishing – and almost certainly deceptive. The financial statement reveals that nearly all that “revenue” was booked as accounts receivable (unpaid license fees) and then largely written off as bad debt (globenewswire.com). In fact, the cash flow statement shows only a few hundred dollars in actual cash at year-end (globenewswire.com). This suggests PMR issued invoices for license fees to licensees who do not believe they are licensees – hence the huge bad debt expense of ~$993 million in 2023 (globenewswire.com). In fact, you can read the lawsuits, primarily in Collier County Court, many of his “licensees” where shocked to find out they were signed up for a “5 year contract” on 5+ locations after simply creating an account. This somehow has turned into “fees” of >$100k per lawsuit on average, for a service: they don’t believe they signed up for, did not use, PMR could not provide, and PMR falsely marketed to them to entice them to simply “make an account.” Some of them are single location small businesses other PROs offer almost free services for, like dance studios. Most are individuals who just signed up to see an account, one individual is on food stamps and his family is living in a shelter.
11-2024-CA-002212-0001-01
11-2024-CA-002204-0001-01
11-2024-CA-002004-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001625-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001624-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001622-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001610-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001608-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001394-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001381-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001380-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001377-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001368-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001367-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001366-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001037-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001025-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001024-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001022-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001021-0001-01
11-2024-CA-001019-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000868-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000867-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000864-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000855-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000849-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000472-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000466-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000463-0001-01
11-2024-CA-000455-0001-01
This is part of a publicly stated “collections campaign” noted on the company’s social media (x.com), filings, and press releases (globenewswire.com). PMR is utilizing the courts as a weapon to manufacture revenue claims for services Jake P Noch knowingly and purposefully cannot provide to licensees as part of a larger self-enrichment scheme for himself. To date,

Nothing you said is correlated to Bcap . BCAP 🫢😈📈⚡️ LETS PROVE ALL THE HATERS AND LOSERS WRONG!!!

The Supreme Court's unanimous decision allows the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to recover all illegal profits from wrongdoers without needing to prove actual financial harm to investors. This strengthens the agency's enforcement powers and makes it much harder for individuals to keep money obtained through fraudulent schemes. Jake P. Noch and his affiliated entities (like the Jake P. Noch Family Office) have previously used Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act to settle outstanding debts and claims.The Scheme Mechanism: In these transactions, an individual or family office settles a debt owed by a dormant or distressed public company. The company pays this debt by issuing discounted, unrestricted stock directly to the financier rather than paying cash.No "No Harm" Defense: Under this new ruling, anyone conducting an unlawful or fraudulent stock scheme can no longer use the defense that no individual investor technically "lost money".Forced Disgorgement: If the SEC investigates these 3(a)(10) operations and finds that they were structured as manipulative or unregistered issuances to enrich insiders rather than legitimate debt settlements, the agency can force Noch or his entities to turn over all illicit profits.The Supreme Court clarified that the SEC's recovery is measured by the wrongdoer's "unjust gain". Therefore, if the SEC proves the stock issuance was unlawful, the agency can go after the entire amount of profit generated by selling that stock
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sec-disgorgement.html

Can't pretend I am not aware of what is going on then belittle it. It's either one or the other, he sued me so it got personal and I will destroy his fraud. Takes very little time, he is very stupid and announces his fraud publicly. Few minutes a day tops for a hobby that makes me happy is well worth the time and effort.

Good luck ever getting your money out here. 🤣 At least I didnt take a financial L from a scammer.

Shareholders face total losses when "investing" in Jake P. Noch-affiliated companies due to the highly dilutive compensation plans and "dollar-denominated" court settlements that rely on dumping stock on the open market. These questionable payouts allow Noch to sell millions of shares directly to retail investors. Noch's company restructurings (like Music Licensing, Inc. and Baron Capital Enterprise Inc.) are governed by section 3(a)(10) exemptions. Noch then uses his private entity (the Jake P. Noch Family Office) to claim securities from the public company. Instead of receiving a fixed amount of shares, the agreement entitles Noch to receive new shares until a specific cumulative dollar value is realized from their sale. When Noch's family office sells these freshly issued shares into the open market, the selling pressure floods the market with new supply. This rapid increase in the number of outstanding shares dilutes existing investor holdings, driving down the share price. Because of the sheer volume of shares available for compensation, the company's underlying market capitalization must grow by billions of dollars just to offset the continuous dilution.

You dont realize the damage I and the others have caused his reputation. He PAST TENSE extracted from the other tickers. For the past 1-2 years, because of public awareness of his fraud on X, here, and other boards + the fact he sued half the OTC traders for doing nothing but liking some tweets...

... no one will touch SONG or his new scams. He has now created a new scam, to find new victims, across the pond who don't use social media/stock boards or trade OTC's. He can barely get any stock sold on SONG, no one bought ASKE going OTCID and he is already going to do a RS that no one will buy, so there is a new scheme in play.

What you fail to understand, is the level of success myself and others have by making the OTC trading community aware of Jake's fraud. I personally reached out to almost every victim in Collier County court and their lawyers to pass on the information that cucked him from getting anywhere. Some used the same lawyer to ensure a consistent L in court across cases. He lost money trying collect on his fraud contracts.

To top it off, CONGRESS is asking the FTC to investigate.

Most of what I state is rhetorical, not a real question. I know how this ends because I decide how it ends. He is desperate to recoup the money he sunk trying to get these shells , he is sitting at a $50-100k L on each one after he gets them trading. So far, he only has one trading 🤣 I dont even see where he has gained OTCID access on 2 of them. Then there is BCAP where he still has to file a lawsuit to force Continental ST to hand over the TA books.

Whatever trash he can get trading, there is endless shares going to be dumped on the bid until a RS is needed. Then rinse and repeat. Now, on top of the $6M a year adder to the debt from just his fraudulent salary, you have to eat 2% compound interest PER MONTH on top of that. That can ONLY be paid for by selling free trading shares dumped into the market.

He's been doing this for 3 years now on SONG, buyers dried up. He just started with ASKE, buyers never showed up. BCAP will be the same, any bid he can get... tank. I'm not the one lost, you are the one trying to pretend you'll get some exit liquidity on a OTCID pump. Sorry didn't happen on ASKE, won't happen here. Jake will issue and deposit shares BEFORE you can sell yours.

There is nothing you can say to counter these facts, I am like white on rice... or since Jake is so racist I should stay away from those analogies. Maybe more like flies on 💩

👇 You seem to be answering your own question but I'm lost that you don't realize it!! If he's extracting Money from other assets why would he be in haste to use another?? Believe me I don't agree much with Mo but he's right, eventually he will get to this one!! Besides what's your hurry?? You have Nothing better to do!! Lol 😂

He just assigned a $18M note to his new Lux entity racking up 2% compounding interest per month only payable by selling shares. That is $360k of new shares that need to be sold each month JUST to keep the debt at $18M 🤣.

It's been 2 years and you've been saying "its coming" too, yet he doesnt even have access to the TA books. I still see no lawsuit filed to get it. All I have been is right. This is cooked.

You guys been saying this for 2 years it’s always something . He can’t make mistakes forever .ALL IT TAKES IS ONE HIT . 

He's gonna financial wizard himself right into jail 🤣 Adding the 2% MONTHLY is just the chef's kiss of crime.

He's gonna financial wizard himself right into jail 🤣 Adding the 2% MONTHLY is just the chef's kiss of crime.

All long suffering portfolio company minority shareholders will not be surprised to hear how Jake negotiated yet another 200 basis point compounding interest sweetener with himself on this latest episode of financial wizardry 
Each Issuer expressly acknowledges that the 200 basis point monthly compounding interest accrual was consented to as a  to facilitate and induce the Noteholder's assignment of the note obligations to the Assignee, and that such term is a binding economic condition of each Issuer's acknowledgment of the Transaction.

You just got one, check the new. Jake just took $SONG's 3a10 debt and reassigned a large portion of it to BCAP to dilute more 😂😂😂😂. Its hilarious, youre gonna lose every penny here bud.

WE NEED UPDATES 

👇 I aim to please!! Glad I could bring some Sunshine to your day!!

Its now almost June and Jake has yet to file (or share where he filed) the lawsuit against the TA to gain access to the records. Shocker... more lies.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Be a part of something Great!! Help me achieve my Dream of living in New York City!! AnthonyV664 is the Cashapp and 100K is the Goal!! Thanks in Advance!!