Alternative Energy Partners Inc (EM) (AEGY)

Scammy plenty of stuff still on the roster
besides Comey and Brenan My personnel belief is that Gensler has done
the most damage to the OTC, but only time will tell what happens to all the
so called looser's on the OTC including this one
Former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler is facing multiple congressional and federal probes regarding his time in office.The investigations involve several key issues:Lost Text Messages: An SEC Office of Inspector General report revealed institutional failures that led to the permanent destruction and loss of nearly a year's worth of Gensler's government text messages. This prompted a review by the House Committee on Financial Services regarding compliance with federal record-keeping laws.Transparency & Records: Lawmakers have repeatedly probed Gensler regarding transparency concerns, including previous allegations of using personal email accounts to conduct official business.Hiring & Enforcement Scrutiny: Congressional Republicans have investigated Gensler over allegations of politically biased hiring practices. Furthermore, under new SEC leadership, the agency released an enforcement report questioning the validity and investor benefit of many prior crypto-related enforcement actions brought during Gensler's tenure.

LOL! Jakey and his idiot lawyer submitted the wrong 3a10 fairness hearing order for the judge from another scam and now are gaslighting the judge about the order being misrepresented 🤣

The worst lawyer ever...

As Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
during the 2011 collapse of MF Global, Gary Gensler faced scrutiny due to his prior relationship with CEO Jon Corzine and his handling of the investigation. Gensler recused himself from the enforcement probe following criticism, though watchdog reports noted he participated in discussions before doing so.

Key details regarding the MF Global and Gensler intersection:
Conflicts of Interest: Gensler and Corzine were former colleagues at Goldman Sachs, which led to calls for Gensler's recusal.
Recusal Controversy: While Gensler recused himself from the formal enforcement investigation, he was criticized by a CFTC Inspector General report for his level of involvement before that decision.
Personal Email Use: An investigation into the collapse revealed that Gensler used a personal email account to conduct official business, a practice he defended, according to House Judiciary Committee Republicans.
Regulatory Actions: Despite the recusal, Republican senators questioned Gensler's involvement in subsequent rule-making related to the bankruptcy.
Outcome: The CFTC inspector general report concluded that while the recusal was not necessarily required by ethics rules, its timing and handling were, at times, questioned, note NJ.com and Bloomberg

Did Roto rooter finally find the triple sliding hitch in the pipe why do I keep thinking everything is connected to Epstein must be because I have read too much news on tractor supply in Minnesota

Reminder, a sitting congressman is calling for investigation into Jake P Noch for fraud. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

https://x.com/FLOWinvesting/status/1999221297579258123?s=20

If Jakey and his idiot lawyer ever get this trading, reminder you will lose everything. They are committing securities fraud.

Buyer beware of Jake P Noch aka Brick God Sosa and his 3a10 pump and dump schemes. Even if stocks are involved in a transaction with a 3(a)(10) fairness hearing approval, the possibility of a scam still exists.
Here's why:
Antifraud provisions still apply: While the 3(a)(10) exemption allows companies to issue shares without full SEC registration under certain circumstances (like debt-to-equity conversions or settlements), it doesn't exempt the transaction from the antifraud provisions of federal securities laws. This means that if the terms of the exchange were misrepresented or the underlying company's financial health was deliberately obscured, fraud could still occur.
Potential for Abuse and Predatory Schemes: There have been instances of companies and financiers misusing the 3(a)(10) exemption to engage in what are described as predatory financing schemes. These schemes can involve creating sham debts and lawsuits to issue discounted, unregistered shares that can then be quickly sold, potentially harming existing shareholders as the value of the shares declines. One example involved the exploitation of 3(a)(10) by a company that entered into purported loan agreements with various shell corporations, and it was understood that the company would purposefully default on the loans so that the shell companies could initiate sham lawsuits and receive unregistered shares.
Court Approval Focus: While fairness hearings require a court to determine the fairness of the terms and conditions of the exchange to the parties receiving the securities, they may not necessarily delve into the deeper legitimacy of the company or the true intentions behind the transaction.
In conclusion
A 3(a)(10) fairness hearing provides a layer of scrutiny and a determination of fairness for a securities exchange. However, it is not a guarantee against all forms of fraud or predatory practices, particularly if the initial underlying claims or company's financial health were misrepresented. Investors should always exercise caution and conduct their due diligence even when transactions have received such approval.

Risks associated with investing with Jake P. Noch
Investing with Jake P. Noch, or entities associated with him, such as Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC, carries a number of risks that investors should carefully consider:
Reliance on specific strategies and their outcomes: Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC, for example, specializes in acquiring distressed or dormant companies, restructuring them, and aiming for public listing or other exits. They also mention exploring opportunities in areas like ultra-high-frequency trading and derivatives structuring. The success of these strategies depends heavily on market conditions, the specific companies chosen, and the effectiveness of the implemented restructuring plans.
Controlling stake and potential for conflicts of interest: In some cases, entities linked to Jake P. Noch have acquired controlling stakes in companies, such as through court-ordered custodianship and the creation of special share classes with significant voting power. This level of control can lead to potential conflicts of interest, as decisions may be made that primarily benefit the controlling entity rather than all shareholders. For instance, Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC was granted custodianship of Baron Capital Enterprise Inc. (OTC: BCAP) and received a new class of shares with 80% voting power.
Past allegations of fraud and legal disputes: Jake P. Noch and his affiliated companies have been involved in legal disputes, including allegations of fraudulent activities, such as artificially inflating streaming numbers on platforms like Spotify, according to Spotify's countersuit against Noch and Sosa Entertainment, according to Billboard. While some cases may have been settled, these allegations raise concerns about the ethical conduct and integrity associated with past business dealings

Federal Securities Fraud:
Maximum Sentence: Up to 25 years in federal prison. This applies to cases with significant financial harm and intent to defraud.
Securities Exchange Act Violations:
Potential Sentence: Up to 20 years of imprisonment. Securities Act Violations:
Potential Sentence: Up to 5 years of imprisonment. Sarbanes-Oxley Act Violations:
Potential Sentence: Up to 25 years of imprisonment for violating the securities fraud provision. State Securities Fraud Laws:
Penalties vary by state. For example, Florida's main securities fraud law carries up to 5 years for a third-degree felony, but up to 30 years for a first-degree felony involving more than $50,000 from five or more people.
Texas's securities fraud law carries 2-10 years for cases involving less than $10,000, and 2-20 years for cases involving $10,000 to $100,000. Cases involving $100,000 or more can carry 5-99 years or potentially life in prison.
Additional Penalties:
Fines: Individuals may face fines up to $5 million, and corporations or entities may be fined up to $25 million.
Restitution: Courts typically order defendants to pay restitution to victims for financial losses. The severity of the sentence depends on various factors, including the nature of the crime, the amount of money involved, the number of victims, and the defendant's prior criminal history.

I believe the soft reads into the Risk is directly connected to AI Sarbanes-Oxley and AI is naked shorting everything with Market manipulation.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requires companies to identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks that could affect their financial reporting and internal controls. This process, known as SOX risk assessment, helps companies understand potential vulnerabilities and establish controls to prevent fraud and ensure accurate financial statements.
Key elements of a SOX risk assessment include:
Identifying Risks: This involves pinpointing specific risks that could affect the integrity of financial reporting. These risks can be quantitative or qualitative.
Quantitative Risks: These are measurable risks, such as fraud, financial reporting errors, or broken internal controls.
Qualitative Risks: These are risks that are not statistically quantifiable but can still pose a SOX compliance risk, like regulatory changes, poor leadership, or natural disasters.
Assessing Risk Impact and Likelihood: Companies analyze each identified risk to determine the potential impact it could have and the probability of it occurring.
Prioritizing Risks: Based on the assessment, risks are ranked according to their severity, which helps in prioritizing mitigation efforts.
Developing Mitigation Plans: Strategies are developed to address the identified risks and reduce their potential impact. This can involve implementing new controls, updating existing ones, or changing business processes.
Implementing Controls: Appropriate internal controls are put in place to address the identified risks and ensure the accuracy and reliability of financial reporting.
Monitoring and Updating: Risk assessment and management are ongoing processes. Companies need to continuously monitor their risk landscape, assess new risks, and update their controls accordingly.
The importance of SOX risk assessment:
Enhanced Financial Integrity: By identifying and mitigating risks, companies improve the accuracy and reliability of their financial reporting, which is crucial for maintaining investor trust and market stability.
Improved Internal Controls: Risk assessment helps companies design and implement effective internal controls, which are essential for preventing financial fraud and ensuring compliance with SOX requirements.
Compliance with SOX Mandates: Companies must demonstrate compliance with SOX mandates, including establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.
Protection against SOX Violations: Failure to comply with SOX can lead to severe consequences, including legal actions, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
Better Data Handling: SOX risk assessment ensures that companies have secure data handling systems that protect financial information from internal and external tampering.
In essence, SOX risk assessment is a fundamental process that helps companies build a robust internal control system, safeguard financial data, and comply with the regulations designed to prevent corporate fraud and protect investors

Gary Gensler played a key role in the creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). He served as a senior advisor to Senator Paul Sarbanes, one of the bill's sponsors, while it was being written according to the SEC. The Act was a direct response to major corporate accounting scandals like Enron and WorldCom, and it aimed to improve the accuracy of financial reporting and restore investor confidence

everything in sabanes oxley is connected to Risk
The crucial role of SOX risk assessment in financial reporting
Risk assessment is critical in regulatory compliance—particularly in the world of SOX.

SOX risk assessments look at risks affecting how companies use financial data. They assess security vulnerabilities that could allow external agents access to confidential data. They ensure financial data is segregated from other information and protected by robust defenses. And they check that only authorized users can access financial information.

Companies that execute SOX risk assessments gain a thorough understanding of SOX compliance requirements. Risk assessments generate documents that guide control implementation and policy development. They make sure companies focus on SOX-related risks and meet every core requirement.

Ensuring SOX compliance is a time- and resource-consuming process, and non-compliance has significant ramifications. While in-house teams once were able to manage compliance processes, conduct internal audits, and ensure adherence to regulatory requirements, many companies now require more consultative support from technical resources even as they struggle against the rising cost of their SOX programs.
Gary Gensler,
Currently, he is serving as a Professor of the Practice in the Global Economics and Management Group and the Finance Group at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He previously held this position before his appointment to the SEC.
At MIT, he is focusing on the intersection of finance and technology, including research and teaching on areas like blockchain technology, digital currencies, financial technology, and public policy. He is also the co-director of the FinTechAI@CSAIL initiative at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL).

Addressing these realities can be expensive, especially if your organization lacks a comprehensive governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform—a costly proposition in and of itself.

yes Sir Elton John is right on it.

Lyrics
Goodbye Norma Jeane
Though I never knew you at all
You had the grace to hold yourself
While those around you crawled
They crawled out of the woodwork
And they whispered into your brain
They set you on the treadmill
And they made you change your name
And it seems to me you lived your life
Like a candle in the wind
Never knowing who to cling to
When the rain set in
And I would've liked to known you
But I was just a kid
Your candle burned out long before
Your legend ever did
Loneliness was tough
The toughest role you ever played
Hollywood created a superstar
And pain was the price you paid
Even when you died
Oh the press still hounded you
All the papers had to say
Was that Marilyn was found in the nude
And it seems to me you lived your life
Like a candle in the wind
Never knowing who to cling to
When the rain set in
And I would've liked to known you
But I was just a kid
Your candle burned out long before
Your legend ever did
Goodbye Norma Jeane
Though I never knew you at all
You had the grace to hold yourself
While those around you crawled
Goodbye Norma Jeane
From the young man in the twenty second row
Who sees you as something as more than sexual
More than just our Marilyn Monroe
And it seems to me you lived your life
Like a candle in the wind
Never knowing who to cling to
When the rain set in
And I would've liked to known you
But I was just a kid
Your candle burned out long before
Your legend ever did
Your candle burned out long before
Your legend ever did
Source: Musixmatch

The reason probably
is because Elton John is still singing candle in the wind
and the wind currents from al Gore keep blowing it out.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176085790

How do i get in touch with you. You can answer a lot of questions for me.

Noch is a shell hijacker and self promoter - here is an example:

"Charlestown, St. Kitts & Nevis, Dec. 11, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC. is pleased to announce a landmark legal victory with the approval of its amended motion for final default judgment by the County Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in Collier County, Florida. This decision marks a transformative milestone for Alaska Pacific Energy Corp. (OTC: ASKE), paving the way for compliance, strategic growth, and enhanced shareholder value."

Oh, no look what I found:

"Alaska Pacific Energy Corp.
Common Stock
Expert Market
Dark or Defunct"

That didn't workout very well.

"Miami, FL, Aug. 27, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Baron Capital Enterprise, Inc. (OTC: BCAP) is pleased to announce the court-ordered appointment of Jake P. Noch as Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chairman of the Board (COB), and Court-Ordered Custodian, effective August 23, 2024. This leadership change marks the start of an ambitious strategy aimed at restoring the company’s regulatory compliance, rebranding its identity, and positioning it for substantial growth and long-term success."

Another OTC scam as BCAP is at $0.0001 and no volume.

Noch you are headed to prison.

IG

Hey Noch, what kind of scam are you trying to do.

Your recommendations to the SEC are so absurd - you want the OTC to operate in complete darkness.

"Caveat Emptor:
? The "Caveat Emptor" flag is among the most arbitrary, often assigned clear criteria. The symbol—a skull and crossbones—can have a devastating impact on a security’s liquidity and reputation, often leading to a significant
decrease in market activity. The assignment of this label without a transparent process and without the possibility of appeal is a direct affront to the principles of fair and orderly markets."

Out of 15,000 stocks on the OTC only 742 have a CE - that is 4.9%. And those with a CE deserve it.

"Penny Stock:
? The "Penny Stock" designation is another example of an overly broad and arbitrary classification. While some penny stocks are indeed high-risk, others are legitimate small-cap companies that are unfairly stigmatized by this label, which can lead to reduced investor interest and hinder the company’s ability to raise capital."

Noch, the SEC defines any stock below $5 as a penny stock.

"Bankruptcy & Delinquency:
? Labels such as "Bankruptcy" and "Delinquency" are particularly detrimental as they often signal financial distress. However, the criteria for these labels are not
always clear, and the labels can remain long after a company has resolved its issues, continuing to harm the issuer’s marketability without justification."

Q stocks have to remain because investors must know that the company has significant financial issues.

You are wanting to keep investors in the dark so you can operate a share selling scheme.

"Reverse Splits & Name Changes:
? The "Reverse Splits" and "Name Changes" categories are often used to flag securities without considering the reasons behind these actions. Companies
frequently undergo reverse splits or name changes as part of legitimate business strategies, but these actions are unfairly penalized by these labels, leading to a negative perception among investors."

On the OTC I have never seen where a reverse split has been good for investors.

All of your proposed changes would only help those operating a share selling scheme.

IG

Rule making
https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/petitions/2022/petn4-796.pdf

Liar liarrrrr



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766244983302987942

Oh wow.  Oh boy oh girl.

Oh wow.  Here we go.

Oh wow.  $10 on deck.  Oh wow.  Oh boy oh girl.

The list of Participants
that are on the export board.
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/client-center/DTC/DTC-Participant-in-Numerical-Sequence-1.pdf

After reading the changes that Jake P Noch has suggested and the large list of Participants recorded with the DTCC does this indicated after many years of this activity from the past they are liable for damages how does one figure out who is the culprit without the help of the SEC and the DTCC. Since Bud the Spud is not a participant you cant find a single solitary issue from the DTCC.

Contributing individuals to SEC rule changes
https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/petitions-rulemaking-submitted-to-sec

Why isn't Jake P Noch's company Pro Music Rights (SONG) recognized in this? He claims it to be the fifth music rights organization with 7.4% market share but according to this his company isn't even recognized as a legitimate music rights organization. Why is it that in every legitimate major third party publication in regards to the industry his company is never mentioned, recognized or acknowledged as a legitimate company in the space? The only one that seems to recognize it as such is Jake. https://www.billboard.com/pro/house-judiciary-letter-copyright-office-examine-pro-royalty-distributions/

https://x.com/flowinvesting

Peeps giving away free shares with an active custodian. How dumb 😆

Jake claims to have made EDM. EDM? Oh you mean all the auto generated electronic music that was used in the attempted Spotify streaming scam? https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Genslers name is on absolutely nothing
of any significance before he became head of the SEC. Nothing to advance anything for the protection of any shareholder.

Lime
Noche should be the head of the SEC in lieu of Gensler been fighting for years this guy is a warrior.
https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/petitions-rulemaking-submitted-to-sec

This will be a tough one, has CE. I wonder if Jake will be successful with this ticker. A future investment here, definitely. I like a good gamble with things being in your favor 🚀

Need to light up one candle not the whole cake

Interesting. GLTA AEGY shareholders

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175000889

Sir You are the best
That is the most uplifting post I have ever read.
Thankyou for that notification.

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1826398068646052150

I got 5s on it

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1823410463855522030

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1823411505142095925

Would be nice to see some upward movement

My friend
That is a huge wad of chewing gum after chewing it I stuck it on the bed post

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766244983302987942

Seems to me like someone is trying to keep this thing alive. Every so often there's a buy that pulls the price up again.

Tom
There is one company on the expert market that has revived SBNY I was hoping it could spread to others but I have not seen another not One. So Im only filled with a little hope something corrects the melt down

Gv. Haven’t been here in a long time either… How have you been?… I remember you… I made some good money on this one years ago.