gitreal
4時間前
In January 2025, a new Qualified Person (QP) Geologist has been hired to perform additional Sonic drilling programs on the current Stockpile and on an additional estimated 2,000,000 tons of tailings dump nearby, which the Company is in negotiations to acquire from the landowners. We expect to have a complete NI 43-101 geological report certified by new QP by end of February. The report is expected to further validate the value of our Stockpile Agreement and attract a larger investor base.
From their website. Who is the new QP? Did they actually do the sonic drilling?
Or issue the NI 43-101 report? Of course, you being a savvy mining investor know that NI 43-101 is not appropriate for a solely US-traded company to refer to, right? The BCSC gets a bit bent out of shape when a US company claims to have a technical report compliant with NI 43-101. They have issued cease and desist orders before.
condor1
5時間前
As expected, you are nothing but a excuse making BS chatterbox. . I provide you with an honest opportunity without requiring you to ciopy paste the entire report, and you balk on only three pages.
You are nothing but a chaterrbox phony.
Let's try this, provide the link to the two terreros reports you reference. Then, support your position by stating the precise page of the report, and the precise langauge you rely on to support your contention.
If you refuse, you are possibly the biggest phony I have ever had the displeasure of experiencing. BUT, I will reserve that characterization until you do what I expect, which is not to engage in any actual terreros report, to support your contentions.
Go on Git, display your TRUE SELF KNOWLEDGE, or the complete lack of knowledge. , basing all of your positions a/ contentions on NOTHING but your unsupported beliefs and opinions, which have absolutel6y no accountability or value. In 48,000 posts. Challenge Biath=ch !!!! Which specific mines are you referencing and provide the links, and I will review, tosee if you have anything worthwhile to say.,
condor1
22時間前
Tell you what,copy and paste only the page of the relevant portion that you would base your position, and the page before and after. Then state your poition, based exclusively on the subject page. State the what, why, when, how and what mine/ ie Bonanza, for example. Oh, that's right. AABB sold the Bonanza mine, and supposedly at a decent profit, but then, you would contradict that profit, , once again, with no facts , but only your belief and opinion, as usual.
The Terrarp report of the yield indicated that Bonanza would not provide a profitable mine. Yet, that is a bad thing, according to you.
Gee, I guess I did read the terreros report.
Well, what was the second report? Again, the exact same protocol, copy and paste the subject page, the page before and after. Then indicate your position based exclusively on that report page. Theree, I have created an opening and opportunity for you, without copy and paste of the entire two reports.
Golden Cross
2日前
The Golden Baboons are a pioneering multi-chain NFT ecosystem spanning Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin, and ApeChain—blending digital ownership with real-world value in a way few projects have ever achieved. Each NFT is uniquely backed by physical gold, bridging the gap between Web3 innovation and tangible assets. Beyond ownership, our community thrives on engagement, offering exclusive access to weekly entertainment experiences like Poker Night, Bingo, and interactive games within our Discord. At the heart of our vision lies Tequila Falls—our virtual homeland within Yuga Labs’ Otherside metaverse—where storytelling, gaming, and immersive experiences will continue to evolve. This world is further brought to life through an expanding intellectual property universe, including a growing series of books that chronicle the adventures of the Golden Baboons and their ongoing battles against the Rascals. As part of the digital assets division of Asia Broadband Inc., a gold mining company with operations across Mexico, the Golden Baboons stand at the intersection of blockchain, storytelling, and real-world resource backing—building a community-driven ecosystem unlike any other in Web3.
https://goldenbaboons.com/
Golden Cross
2日前
⚡ Asia Broadband Enters into LOI for Acquisition of Underground Mine and Mining Concession in Etzatlán, Mexico for Total Consideration of $5.5M
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/01/3320547/0/en/asia-broadband-enters-into-loi-for-acquisition-of-underground-mine-and-mining-concession-in-etzatl%c3%a1n-mexico-for-total-consideration-of-5-5m.html
⚡ Announces that the Company has entered into a Letter of Intent ("LOI") to acquire a high-grade gold and silver underground mining concession located in the Etzatlán region of Jalisco, Mexico, for a total consideration of $5,500,000 USD.
"This LOI represents an important component in expanding our Etzatlán production district," said Chris Torres, $AABB President and CEO. "The historical gold and silver grades evaluated to date are extremely attractive, and the underground mining profile fits well with our strategy of acquiring mineralized material in proximity to our Etzatlán plant. We believe that this acquisition holds tremendous potential for us."
NotTheRealBeeny
3日前
"Strong numbers." That's one way to describe it if you only read the largest figures on the page.
Let's look at what the Q1 report actually says.
First, the oft-quoted "$6.2M production revenue."
That is GROSS production revenue.
The same filing also reports approximately $4.0M of production was retained in inventory. After accounting for cost of mining production and retained production, net production revenue is roughly $1.24M.
Those are very different numbers.
Second, "$4M retained production."
Retained production is inventory. It is not realized profit and it is not cash. It still has to be sold.
Third, "$43.5M bullion."
Yes, that's what is carried on the balance sheet at historical cost.
What still doesn't exist is an independent audit identifying the bullion, serial numbers, custodians, or ownership. Investors are simply expected to accept the reported figure.
Now let's talk about the balance sheet that promoters love to cite when claiming AABB is "undervalued."
The same balance sheet also contains a $23.5M intangible asset created through the rGO transaction.
That asset came from issuing roughly 940 million shares in exchange for rights to technology that, as of today, has not produced publicly released pilot data, commercial licensing, or disclosed revenue attributable to rGO.
If you're going to compare market cap to book value, you don't get to ignore the quality of the assets making up that book value.
The buyback deserves scrutiny as well.
The company has spent millions under its buyback program, yet those purchases appear under "Equities Investments."
If those are truly buybacks:
• How many shares were purchased?
• How many have been retired?
• How many remain as treasury shares?
• Can they be reissued?
• Where is the transaction ledger showing dates, quantities, and average purchase price?
Simply saying "we spent millions buying back stock" doesn't tell shareholders what actually happened to those shares.
Then there's the production story.
The company projects more than $25M of gross production revenue for 2026.
Q1 gross production was approximately $6.27M. Annualize that and you arrive at roughly $25M. That projection is essentially maintaining the existing run rate, not demonstrating accelerating production.
Finally, we're still waiting for the operational evidence.
Where are the throughput reports?
Where are the recovery reports?
Where is the cyanidation production data?
Where are the results from the 90-day rGO pilot that supposedly justified issuing 940 million shares?
Announcements are not operating results.
Comparing market cap to total assets is easy.
Determining whether those assets are independently verifiable, properly valued, and actually producing shareholder value is the real analysis.
There's a reason promoters quote the largest numbers in the filing.
They hope investors never read the rest of it.