ir@fissionuranium.com
www.fissionuranium.com
TSX SYMBOL: FCU
OTCQX SYMBOL: FCUUF
FRANKFURT SYMBOL: 2FU
Results confirm PLS as one of the world's
elite uranium projects
KELOWNA,
BC, Jan. 17, 2023 /PRNewswire/ - FISSION
URANIUM CORP. ("Fission" or "the company") is pleased to announce
the results of a Feasibility Study conducted by Tetra Tech Canada
Inc. ("Tetra Tech") and titled "Feasibility Study on the Patterson
Lake South Property" (the "FS") for its PLS property in
Canada's Athabasca Basin region.
These impressive FS results further enhance the robust economics
outlined in the 2019 pre-feasibility study (the "PFS").
Highlights include a longer mine life of 10 years, greatly
increased after-tax NPV of $1.204B at
8% discount, higher after-tax IRR of 27.2% while still maintaining
a very low OPEX of $13.02/lb. All
currency figures are expressed in Canadian dollars unless denoted
otherwise. The exchange rate used is 0.75
US$/C$1.00. Of additional
note, initial CAPEX is marginally lower (~2%) than the PFS for a
total of $1.155B – a remarkable
achievement given current global inflation. The results confirm
the economic strength of the PLS project as well as its minimal
environmental footprint. With nuclear energy and the uranium
sector strengthening year on year, Fission is ideally positioned to
continue developing PLS through the environmental assessment and
licensing phase. The FS has an effective date of January 17, 2023.
Ross McElroy,
President and CEO of Fission, commented, "With greatly enhanced
economics, including an increase of 42% to the mine life, an
incredible 71.5% increase in post-tax NPV and a 10.2% growth in
post-tax IRR, this feasibility study confirms the Tier 1 PLS
project as one of the most economically significant and elite
uranium development projects in the world. Showing CAPEX to be
lower than in the 2019 Prefeasibility report, particularly with the
pressures of high global inflation, is a remarkable achievement and
speaks volumes regarding the team's design and planning abilities.
Beyond the economics, the shallow, high-grade nature of our deposit
gives us a very small environmental footprint – an advantage that
we have built on with comprehensive monitoring since the start of
drilling in 2012 and increasing Indigenous engagement. Going
forward, thanks to the strength of this feasibility study and the
success of our ongoing social engagement, we will continue
advancing through the Environmental Assessment and on towards a
construction decision."
Feasibility Study
Highlights
- Construction timeline of 3 years with an estimated initial
capital cost of $1.155B
- Increased mine life to ten years with LOM production of 90.9
million lbs of U3O8
- Addition of R840W orebody into the FS mine plan contributing to
increased Mineral Reserves
- Average unit operating cost of $13.02/lb U3O8
- Robust post-tax economics:
-
- IRR of 27.2%
- NPV of $1.204B at 8%
discount
- Payback period of 2.6 years
Scope for Resource
Growth
While the FS only considers Indicated Resources from the R780E,
R840W and R00E zones, the mine plan has been deliberately designed
to easily accommodate additional material from the R1515W and
R1620E zones based on the potential future conversion of Inferred
Resources to Indicated Resources. The majority of mineralization at
these two on-strike, high-grade zones is currently defined as
Inferred Mineral Resource classification and thus not considered
for inclusion in the FS mine plan. As proven by the Company's
drilling at the Triple R deposit's R780E, R840W and R00E zones,
Fission has an excellent track record of converting
Inferred-category resources to Indicated-category. As a result,
there is a clear path for growing the deposit, potentially leading
to an increased resource as well as a longer mine life.
- Mine Life and Zone
Expansion: The FS mine plan has increased the mine life to
10 years. Both the R780E and R840W zones are open at depth and
along the plunge to the east. Further opportunity exists to grow
the resource in those directions, potentially extending the
underground mine life even further.
- Additional Zones: The FS mine plan has a future
opportunity to accommodate the potential conversion of Inferred
Resources to Indicated Resources at two high-grade, on-strike zones
- R1515W and R1620E – that are not yet part of Mineral
Reserves.
- Mineralization Upgrade: The FS mine plan does not
include areas of Inferred Mineral Resources in the R00E, R840W and
R780E zones. An opportunity exists to upgrade to Indicated Mineral
Resource with future planned drilling.
Reduced Environmental
Impact
- The underground mine plan eliminates direct physical impacts on
Patterson Lake and the Clearwater River drainage. Other than a
dock, freshwater intake and treated effluent diffuser, all other
infrastructure related to mining and processing at PLS is set back
to maintain an acceptable riparian buffer to the shoreline of
Patterson Lake.
- The revised Project layout maintains a compact footprint, and
facilities have been placed to avoid local areas of old-growth jack
pine forest and heritage resource sites.
- In the absence of hydro utilities, using LNG for site power
generation instead of diesel, while only marginally reducing the
greenhouse gases, significantly decreases emissions of particulates
and sulphur and nitrogen compounds.
- Metallurgical test work indicates that the Project will be able
to meet the water quality ranges for treated effluent discharges
found at other uranium mining operations in Saskatchewan.
- Modelling of the Tailings Management Facility (TMF)
interactions with groundwater indicates that the current design
will be protective of groundwater quality in the long term and thus
protective of the Patterson Lake drainage.
- At year-end 2022, Fission had engagement agreements with all
the Indigenous groups with the potential for impacts to their
traditional land use and treaty rights due to the Project.
- Fission responded to local concerns over the proposed bypass of
Highway 955 around the site by leaving the road route as it
is.
Technical Summary
Overview
The FS was prepared by independent consultants led by Tetra
Tech, who carried out the process and infrastructure design,
capital cost and operating cost summary, financial analysis and
overall compilation, assisted by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (resource estimation), Mining
Plus Canada Consulting Ltd. (mineral reserve estimation, mining
design, mining infrastructure, mining capital and operating costs),
Clifton Engineering Group Ltd. (environment, permitting,
socio-economics and tailings), and BGC Engineering Inc.
(geotechnical and hydrogeological aspects).
In addition to managing radiological issues common to uranium
mining, key technical challenges to developing the operation will
be 1) accessing the deposit through the saturated sandy overburden
and 2) recovery of the crown pillar reserves using artificial
ground freezing techniques.
To access the deposit, a decline is planned through the
dewatered overburden using a tunnel shield method and a hydrostatic
segmental concrete tunnel liner, a common technique for developing
through soft ground. In addition to the decline, two vertical
shafts will be developed to provide a dedicated ventilation system
for the mine and secondary egress. The crown pillar will be
partially recovered with the installation of an artificial ground
freezing system, using holes drilled from offset underground drifts
below the crown pillar zones. Once the holes are drilled, a
refrigerated brine solution is pumped through the holes to freeze
the ground, providing ground improvement and reducing the
permeability of the rock.
Mineral Resources
The updated Mineral Resource estimate used as the basis for the
FS was previously disclosed by Fission in a press release dated
September 12, 2022. The FS Mineral
Resource estimate is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Mineral Resource Statement by Zone – May 17, 2022
Zone
|
Tonnes
|
Metal
Grade
|
Contained
Metal
|
('000
t)
|
(%
U3O8)
|
(g/t
Au)
|
(M lbs
U3O8)
|
('000 oz
Au)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
R780E
|
2,170
|
2.03
|
0.67
|
97.0
|
46.9
|
R00E
|
98
|
1.50
|
0.15
|
3.2
|
0.5
|
R1620E
|
42
|
1.98
|
0.19
|
1.9
|
0.3
|
R840W
|
312
|
1.63
|
0.42
|
11.2
|
4.2
|
R1515W
|
67
|
1.15
|
0.38
|
1.7
|
0.8
|
Total
Indicated
|
2,688
|
1.94
|
0.61
|
114.9
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
R780E
|
271
|
0.60
|
0.46
|
3.6
|
4.0
|
R00E
|
9
|
3.83
|
0.79
|
0.7
|
0.2
|
R1620E
|
59
|
3.55
|
0.48
|
4.6
|
0.9
|
R840W
|
63
|
1.10
|
0.37
|
1.5
|
0.7
|
R1515W
|
234
|
0.96
|
0.42
|
5.0
|
3.1
|
Total
Inferred
|
635
|
1.10
|
0.44
|
15.4
|
9.0
|
Notes:
|
|
1.
|
CIM (2014) definitions
were followed for Mineral Resources.
|
2.
|
Mineral Resources are
reported at a cut-off grade of 0.25% U3O8,
based on a long-term price of US$50/lb U3O8,
an exchange rate of C$1.00/US$0.75, and cost estimates derived
during the PFS with a metallurgical recovery of 95%.
|
3.
|
A minimum mining width
of 1 m was applied to the resource domain wireframe.
|
4.
|
Mineral Resources are
inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
5.
|
Numbers may not add due
to rounding
|
Mineral Reserves
An updated estimate of Mineral Reserves for the Project was
carried out by Mining Plus based on the underground mine plan that
captures the majority of the High-Grade Indicated Resources in the
R780E, R840W and R00E zones. The FS supersedes all previous mine
plans and Mineral Reserve statements. The Mineral Reserves are
summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Mineral Reserve Statement – January 17, 2023
Classification
|
Tonnes
|
Grade
|
Contained
Metal
|
('000
t)
|
(%
U3O8)
|
(M lbs
U3O8)
|
Probable
Reserves
|
3,007
|
1.41
|
93.7
|
Notes:
|
|
1.
|
CIM Definition
Standards (2014) were followed for the classification of Mineral
Reserves.
|
2.
|
The Mineral Reserves
are reported with an effective date of January 17, 2023.
|
3.
|
Mineral Reserves were
estimated using a long-term metal price of US$65 per pound of
U3O8 and a US$/C$ exchange rate of 0.75
(C$1.00 = US$0.75)
|
4.
|
Underground Mineral
Reserves were estimated by creating stope shapes using Datamine's
Mineable Shape Optimizer (MSO). The MSO outputs were evaluated in
the context of the mine design, and then a 0.25%
U3O8 cut-off was applied. For longhole
stoping, a minimum mining width of 4m (including hanging wall and
footwall dilution) and stope height of 20m was used. Following MSO,
the mineable shapes were further subdivided in Deswik to produce a
maximum width of 12m (including hanging wall and footwall
dilution). Drift and fill mining is designed at 5m wide by 5m high
for development shapes located in the crown pillar areas of the
orebodies.
|
5.
|
Mining recovery of 95%
was applied to all stopes, while all development mining assumes
100% extraction.
|
6.
|
The density varies
based on block model values. An estimated waste density of 2.42
t/m3 was used for areas outside the block model
boundary.
|
7.
|
By-product credits were
not included in the estimation of Mineral Reserves.
|
8.
|
Numbers may not add due
to rounding.
|
Mining
The FS is based on accessing the deposit using a decline
developed from a position southwest of the deposits in close
proximity to the processing plant and waste stockpile areas. The
area of the decline is temporarily dewatered while the development
progresses through the overburden. The decline excavation is
planned to use a tunnel shield method utilizing a hydrostatic
segmental concrete liner for ground support. In addition to the
decline, two vertical shafts are excavated sequentially to provide
a dedicated ventilation system for the mine (one fresh air intake
shaft and one exhaust air shaft). After the decline extends through
the overburden and transition bedrock zone, more typical hardrock
development can commence. Mining uses the Longhole Stoping method
in a longitudinal retreat orientation with Cemented Rock Fill as
backfill.
A partial recovery of the mineralized material approaching the
contact between the overburden and bedrock is achieved by utilizing
artificial ground freezing to achieve a bulk freeze. The ground is
frozen by way of drilling holes into the overburden and shallow
bedrock using underground drilling collared from a dedicated freeze
drift below the crown area. Upon completion of the ground freezing
holes, a refrigeration plant pumps a chilled brine solution through
the holes to create a frozen cap to provide increased ground
stability and reduced groundwater inflow. Once frozen, a low
disturbance Drift and Fill mining method with Cemented Hydraulic
Fill is utilized to extract the mineralized material. Roadheader
tunnelling equipment will be used in the crown pillar areas to
remove the need for explosives. A portion of the Mineral Resources
approaching the overburden contact will be sterilized due to
geotechnical constraints; however, this sterilized material could
be further evaluated for eventual extraction in future
analysis.
Processing
Tetra Tech completed the design for the process plant and
related infrastructure facilities for this FS using proven uranium
extraction technology, processes and equipment and has drawn on its
knowledge of other Athabasca
uranium plants, including Rabbit
Lake, Key Lake, and McClean
Lake. The processing plant has been designed to process ore
at a nominal throughput of 1,000 t/d to produce market-grade
uranium concentrate. The average LOM mill feed grade will be 1.41%
U3O8, and the anticipated
U3O8 recovery will be 97.0%.
A conventional grinding and leaching circuit will be used for
the recovery process. The ore will be trucked from the mine to the
ROM pad and ground in a single-stage semi-autogenous grinding
circuit to 150 µm. The ground ore will be leached using sulfuric
acid and hydrogen peroxide at 50°C. The leached slurry will be fed
to a counter-current decantation circuit followed by a
clarification stage to produce the pregnant leach solution. A
solvent extraction (SX) circuit will purify and concentrate uranium
in the solution for yellowcake precipitation. The precipitated
yellowcake will be calcined at 450°C before packaging in drums.
Tailings will be neutralized and deposited in the Tailings
Management Facility. The TMF utilizes the previous surround design
method of tailings management, a common method used in uranium
mines in northern Saskatchewan.
Effluent and contact water will be treated, monitored, and sampled
before being discharged.
Infrastructure
The major components of infrastructure include:
- Backfill plant and refrigeration plant
- Surface ventilation fans and LNG direct-fired heater
- Decline portal
- LNG power plant
- Process facilities
- Tailings management facility
- Administration building, fuel bay, warehouse and maintenance
facility
- Effluent treatment facility
- Permanent camp
The general arrangement of the site infrastructure is provided
in Figure 1.
Financial Summary
Revenue
- Uranium price of US$65/lb
U3O8, based on long-term
consensus forecasts
- Exchange rate of 0.75
US$/C$1.00
- Gross revenue of $7,875
million
-
- Less Saskatchewan Government Gross Revenue Royalties of
$571 million
- Net revenue of $7,304
million
Operating Costs
A summary of operating costs is shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Summary of Operating Costs
Description
|
LOM
Cost
|
Average
Annual
|
Unit
Cost
|
Unit
Cost
|
(C$
millions)
|
(C$
millions)
|
(C$/t
proc)
|
(C$/lb
U3O8)
|
Mining
|
458.8
|
45.9
|
153
|
5.05
|
Processing
|
489.6
|
49.0
|
163
|
5.39
|
General and
Administration
|
234.9
|
23.5
|
78
|
2.59
|
Total
|
1,183.3
|
118.3
|
393
|
13.02
|
Capital Costs
A summary of capital costs is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Summary of Capital Costs
Capital Cost
Area
|
Value
|
(C$
millions)
|
Mining
|
176
|
Processing
|
141
|
Infrastructure
|
159
|
Tailings Management
Facility
|
235
|
Direct Costs
|
711
|
Indirect
Costs
|
198
|
Owner's
Costs
|
109
|
Contingency
|
137
|
Total Initial
Capital Cost
|
1,155
|
Sustaining
Capital
|
384
|
Total LOM Capital
Cost
|
1,539
|
Taxes and Royalties Paid to the
Government
A summary of taxes and royalties paid to provincial and federal
governments is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Summary of Taxes and Royalties
Parameter
|
Value
|
(C$
millions)
|
Provincial revenue
royalties
|
571
|
Provincial profit
royalties
|
728
|
Corporate income
tax
|
992
|
Total taxes and
royalties paid
|
2,291
|
Economic Results
Pre-tax and post-tax economic results are summarized in Table
6.
Table 6: Summary of Economic Results
Parameter
|
Units
|
Pre-Tax
|
Post-Tax
|
Cash Flow
|
C$ millions
|
4,508
|
2,787
|
Payback
Period
|
yrs.
|
2.3
|
2.6
|
IRR
|
%
|
35.5 %
|
27.2 %
|
NPV @ 8%
discount
|
C$ millions
|
2,095
|
1,204
|
PLS Mineralized Trend & Triple
R Deposit Summary
Uranium mineralization of the Triple R deposit at PLS occurs
within the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor and has been traced
by core drilling over ~3.18 km of east-west strike length in five
separated mineralized "zones", which collectively make up the
Triple R deposit. From west to east, these zones are R1515W, R840W,
R00E, R780E and R1620E. Through successful exploration programs
completed to date, Triple R has evolved into a large, near-surface,
basement-hosted, structurally controlled high-grade uranium
deposit. The discovery hole was announced on November 05, 2012, with drill hole PLS12-022 from
what is now referred to as the R00E zone.
The R1515W, R840W and R00E zones make up the western region of
the Triple R deposit and are located on land, where overburden
thickness is generally between 55 m
to 100 m. R1515W is the westernmost
of the zones and is drill defined to ~90 m in strike length, ~68 m
across strike and ~220 m vertical and where mineralization remains
open in several directions. R840W is located ~515 m to the east
along the strike of R1515W and has a drill-defined strike length of
~430 m. R00E is located ~485 m to the east along strike of R840W
and is drill defined to ~115 m in strike length. The R780E and
R1620E zones make up the eastern region of the Triple R deposit.
Both zones are located beneath Patterson Lake, where water depth is
generally less than six metres, and overburden thickness is
generally about 50 m. R780E is
located ~225 m to the east of R00E and has a drill-defined strike
length of ~945 m. R1620E is located ~210 m along strike to the east
of R780E and is drill defined to ~185 m in strike length.
Mineralization along the Patterson Lake Corridor trend remains
prospective along strike in both the western and eastern
directions. Basement rocks within the mineralized trend are
identified primarily as mafic volcanic rocks with varying degrees
of alteration. Mineralization is both located within and associated
with mafic volcanic intrusives with varying degrees of
silicification, metasomatic mineral assemblages and hydrothermal
graphite. The graphitic sequences are associated with the PL-3B
basement Electro-Magnetic (EM) conductor.
Patterson Lake South
Property
The 31,039-hectare PLS project is 100% owned and operated by
Fission Uranium Corp. PLS is accessible by road with primary access
from all-weather Highway 955, which runs north to the former
Cluff Lake mine.
Qualified Persons
This News Release describes a Mineral Resource estimate, an
updated Mineral Reserve estimate, and an FS Life of Mine Plan and cash flow based upon geological,
engineering, technical and cost inputs developed by Tetra Tech and
other study participants. A National Instrument 43-101 Technical
Report will be filed on SEDAR and made available on the Company's
website within 45 days. The technical information in this news
release has been prepared in accordance with the Canadian
regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 and
reviewed and approved by Hassan
Ghaffari, P.Eng., Dr. Jianhui (John)
Huang, P.Eng., Patrick
Donlon, FSAIMM, FAusIMM, and Dr. Sabry Abdel Hafez, P.Eng., of Tetra Tech,
Mark Mathisen, C.P.G., of SLR
Consulting (Canada) Ltd.,
Catherine Schmid, P.Eng. and
Randi Thompson, P.Eng., of BGC
Engineering Inc., Maurice Mostert,
P.Eng., of Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd., and Wayne Clifton, P.Eng. and Mark Wittrup, P.Eng., P.Geo., of Clifton
Engineering Group Ltd., each of whom is a "qualified person" under
National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
The technical information in this news release has been prepared
in accordance with the Canadian regulatory requirements set out in
National Instrument 43-101 and reviewed on behalf of the company by
Ross McElroy, P.Geo., President and
CEO for Fission Uranium Corp., a qualified person.
About Fission Uranium
Corp.
Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canadian-based resource company
specializing in the strategic exploration and development of the
Patterson Lake South uranium property - host to the class-leading
Triple R uranium deposit - and is headquartered in Kelowna, British Columbia. Fission's common
shares are listed on the TSX Exchange under the symbol "FCU" and
trade on the OTCQX marketplace in the U.S. under the symbol
"FCUUF."
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Ross McElroy"
____________________________
Ross McElroy, President and CEO
Cautionary Statement:
Certain information contained in this press release
constitutes "forward-looking information", within the meaning of
Canadian legislation. Generally, these forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
"plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget",
"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words
and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may",
"could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur", "be
achieved" or "has the potential to". Forward looking statements
contained in this press release may include statements regarding
the future operating or financial performance of Fission and
Fission Uranium which involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties which may not prove to be accurate. Actual results
and outcomes may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in these forward-looking statements. Such statements are
qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties
surrounding future expectations. Among those factors which could
cause actual results to differ materially are the following: market
conditions and other risk factors listed from time to time in our
reports filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. The forward-looking statements
included in this press release are made as of the date of this
press release and the Company and Fission Uranium disclaim any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as expressly required by applicable securities
legislation.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fission-announces-tier-1-economics-for-pls-with-feasibility-study-lower-initial-capex-increased-mine-life-npv-and-irr-301723039.html
SOURCE Fission Uranium Corp.