Navient Corp. - Medium Term Notes, Series A, Cpi-Linked Notes Due March 15, 2017 (OSM)

There’s a fine line between f-reward looking and misleading for CEO’s in general. Me personally, I feel misled with comments like doll and land, no one can stop us, going to the Nasdaq and now mergers / Acquisition. Just my personal opinion. Not saying he’s lying. I’m sure he means well.

Here is the link to their website about what this peptide is thought to do:
http://www.msksignal.com 
Go to Peptide Science

No fat lady currently in sight. When the WAMU receivership closes, and if nothing happens soon after, then maybe she is getting warmed up, preparing to sing............. but that is just my opinion. I really don't know...

Heh it was supposed to be 3! as in Door 3 but $31 sounds better. 😁

I’m sharing our original deep-dive analysis from April 2026. Everything we are discussing now—the cracks in the structural integrity, the concentration risk, and the circular credit loops—was already identified months ago.

We don't react to market noise; we analyze the footnotes. Here

Looks like well be over 11 soon

Uh red is out the window it looks like. For this round anyway. One can always hope, but the only as worthless as hope is prayer.

A company officer will not release a regulator's decision at a small conference.
The regulator will release the decision to the company, which will then release a PR to the public.

If there is a partnership with Joel's Gagniers private company, its clear they are starting Phase 1 trials based off this 3 month old post:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/msksignal_we-are-starting-on-a-phase-1b-trial-of-bpc-activity-7438672755048312832-_rrL?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_

I have no doubt these Harvard / Yale educated analysts know what they’re doing. Thanks

Doc, I do not think that 10K language is about whether FDA “approves” an SAP.

The filing says the SAP uses external control patients rather than within study controls, and then warns there can be no assurance regulatory authorities will allow product approval to be based on that appro

The so-called “world renowned” KOLs were wrong. They were basing their views on flawed data from flawed trials. After a comprehensive review, the CHMP said there was no evidence of safety or efficacy in any indication. The CHMP’s report was thorough and devastating. At the end of the day, only the r

To all the 'Buy-the-Dip' crowd and the 25 analysts fueling this rally:

You are looking at price targets and growth narratives; I am looking at the structural integrity of the balance sheet. Nvidia isn't just selling chips—they are running a massive credit expansion disguised as a tech

Me too ,I'm not Superstitious but that's pretty funny Yesterday's closing:
LQMT:0.202. ...... " +0.00777"
Lucky Seven!

From the January 14, 2026 Update:

This is a full drilling operation, uh, similar to what we've done in the past. We have just about 2,000 meters of drilling to do.

The first half, pretty much vertical, then straight horizontal followed by a multi-stage stimulation ope

If you truly want to trust those 25 analysts, answer me one question: How many of them have actually read the 'Concentration of Credit Risk' section in the latest 10-K?

They are reporting billions in 'Revenue', but look at the Accounts Receivable footnote. A massive chunk of that 'rev

The important question is….Are the new job postings replacement hires or addition to staff?

I hope it is the latter.

That’s great news. Some will get back to even after topping off.

Back to Nasrat - can we agree that if we take a big hit after the CC we should demand that he be fired. It’s still a public company. Stock drops , we all need to write a letter demanding that he be fired. The boa

Agreed. Well said.

On Monday, if the Nasdaq falls 1% or more, the SPCX will already close the day below $150.

The $150 value is a value like any other.

On the side of caution, hiring a rating agency could be just another way to waste money. The one RXMD hired didn't do anything.

Oh. Can’t wait. Eye rolls indeed. 

Many are in an “I’ll believe it when I see it” mode.  Years of anticipation and excitement have taken their toll on many.  We have had reasons to be excited in the past, based on Kim’s communications.  We can all see how that worked out, so far.  
Yes, we all hope this time is different.  Som

I forgot the main factor in the dismissal request by Nvidia HDC is addressing why this case should NOT be dismissed for the reason of (FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Yes I complained about this earlier but now after reading these documents I see why however it doesn't mean anything other than that. There

Doubtful. More like a reverse split to hit the wires.