Synbio International Inc (PK) (SYIN) ニュース

Here we go

https://x.com/SYINofficial/status/1894405892394594809?s=19

Post from X

news https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SYIN/news/Revolutionizing-Mental-Health-AI-Powered-Facial-Screening-Technology-Set-for-Clinical-Trials?id=468771

news out

Up 27.6% today - on 612k in volume - 9 trading days ago the high of the day was .0010 on 600k volume

It doesn't take much volume for big gains. GL2A

Another nice day, nice slow climb upwards.

Hopefully, it does - of the items the company said they are working on we can look for the following:

Name/symbol change (completed)
S-1 Registration for Global Corporate Finance - to cover the $5 mil line of credit they are extending
Uplisting to OTCQB - at a minimum they have implied that these need to happen to access funding

Then they said their 1st step would be an acquisition so that they have revenues. I would think that means, sufficient revenues to cover their expenses. I doubt that Global would put up a LOT of operating cash, with the potential that they funded the company for $5mil and have nothing to show for it.

Worst case we have to wait for the annual report, due by the end of March - we'll see if the current trend of buying continues - if it does we are getting closer. IMO

Picking up nice hopefully that means we are closer to something big happening 

$SYIN - 53 trades today for a total of 1,027,303 and majority at .0028 or .0029 - the last 4 trading days have seen
+7.69% (2.19), - vol 1,027,303
+8.33% (2/18), - vol 274,500
33.33% (2/14), - vol 690,000
80% (2/13), - volume 1,865,300

Is it finally waking up?!?

$SYIN the ask-slapping continues today

They just got there new website active that's why

$SYIN: If you like the moves in $JTAI today.................

Wait till you see what happens here.......... a future 50x bagger in the making.

Watch and learn.


GO $SYIN

Saw that, hopefully a positive step, maybe finally hear something.

Interesting trades at the end of the day - volume was 1,865,300

I agree...the only question I have is this. Global is the driver, we don't know all of the conditions they imposed on SYIN.

For example, did they say, "both S1 Registrations" had to be completed along with an OTCQB listing? We don't know the terms of their funding.

What we know is: "With a focus on revenue generation, the Company plans to allocate the initial funds primarily to the commercial launch of its nutraceutical products. A comprehensive marketing and sales strategy, including television and social media content, is in the advanced stages of planning. Initially, the Company’s focus will be on e-commerce in order to minimize costs and maximize market reach".

There is another part to the timing issue and that's the 2 funding sources. 1) Global is a dream-come-true for any OTC. They get to draw (I'm guessing with Globals approval) funds with shares being issued at a 9% discount. NO ONE offers that kind of loan to an OTC pink stock.

The 2nd funding is a little different. again from the fillings: Good to see that someone can read and do basic math! GL2U

On April 22, 2024, we issued a convertible promissory note to Quick Capital, LLC in an amount up to $555,555.55 which
bears interest at a rate of 12% and matures 9 months after the issue date. In conjunction with the issuance of the note, we issued Quick
Capital, LLC a common stock purchase warrant exercisable into shares of Common Stock equal to 50% of the amount funded under the
note and 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock as a commitment fee for entering into the transaction. As at December 31, 2023 the
Company had not drawn down on the convertible Promissory Note Agreement with Quick Capital LLC. On May 29, 2024 the Company
drew down $50,000 from Quick Capital Inc as part of the convertible promissory note facility.


The key, 3 words in that statement in the June 30th quarterly report is: "matures 9 months" - January 22nd (approx) I could comment on why they got 7 million shares or why there was a token loan of $50k...but I'm guessing we'll find out soon enough.

If OTCQB was part of Global's terms, then we wait for that. Time will tell.

Let's get some
Good vibes!

90 days end of next week, we'll see.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-unveils-ai-investment-plan-225351558.html

Should be good news on a macro scale. Here's a few important paragraphs from.the article.

Trump has signaled a wide-ranging approach to ensure US leadership in AI, with pledges to spur private-sector investment by accelerating the permit process and easing other regulations. Those efforts will be steered by tech industry leaders who’ve joined his administration, including incoming AI-crypto czar David Sacks and Elon Musk, who has emerged as one of the president’s closest advisers.

The president said he would use emergency declarations and executive action to help ease construction projects, including through easier access to energy. During their remarks, Trump and the executives highlighted potential applications for AI in health and other fields that would fuel US economic growth.

No, I was trying to provide a hint...that's all. Timing has been included in the filings. That's called a "HINT", if I was answering the question. I would have provided the link to the filings. That would have responded to the question.

No, I was trying to provide a hint...that's all. Timing has been included in the filings. That's called a "HINT", if I was answering the question. I would have provided the link to the filings. That would have responded to the question.

Did you just ask a question and then reply to yourself?

The answer is in the filings...it's public information...GL2 All

We're getting closer. anyone care to venture why shares are being fed to buyers - down here?

Let's go!

Read all of the tweets from the company, they aren't going for Pink Current. Do you have any idea as to who is in charge? Read the company tweets.

They've laid out where this is heading and Pink Current is not the destination.

I don't remember attacking you...could you copy the "arrogance" post?

Gumza is the Man!!

Absolutely Gumza Absolutely!!

Hope so!

You don't need attorney letter for pink current at the end if the month probably alot of regulations will loosen up under Trump $$$

Arrogance was 1st dealt by you bud. Good luck to us here.

Hey Junior, my first trade was in 1984...

Arrogance is usually just a sign of insecurity. GLTU - I was just trying to stay positive. This one will do well regardless of what anyone else thinks.

Lol. You have no clue who you talking to. I dont need lessons from you I have been trading OTC for almost 20 years. $90-220 is nothing. I hit 10.000% gainers quite frequently back in the day when the OTC had volume. When you can turn $100 into to $10,000 on big boards come see me. Traders abandoned the OTC because the SEC over regulated it and deleted half the tickers from the market. Due to the new OTC regulations brokers also made it harder for people to buy and sell so its not surprising why volume dried up. Alot of shareholders got screwed and left. Its not "blaming" its a fact!

And yes I do hold some of this have for years. Perfect example of why the SEC should have left shit alone. Some nice RM's happen out of former shells.

Some volume today...are we getting closer? Strange to see that on the 31st of December.

so what you're saying is that "big" boards with their required transparency vs the "Pinks" limited requirements is the way to go?

Out of curiosity why do you think that just about everyone has abandoned the OTC scams?

I bought Amazon over a year ago when it was in the $90's - and it's now at $220 per share. Name the OTC stocks that you owned and had those kind of gains. And Amazon had liquidity, i.e. easy to get in and easy to get out. Same with Dell, TSLA, etc. they have VOLUME and name the big volume OTCs you prefer?

And somehow you want to blame the government? Wake up!!! You're living in an imaginary world.

The good news is that this one will move, not because the government approved it, but because it has something real. Quit picking "stories" and try picking substance, this one will be good for you if you have any shares.

Big boards are the biggest scams in the entire market even with your so called "rules". People lose millions daily. Bigger scams, bigger dilution, more reverse splits, bigger pump and dumps and massive shorting. Only reason the OTC got shackled is because the little guy was winning and the government wasn't getting a big enough piece of that pie..

LOL, with all due respect...this shouldn't be trading at all. NOT 1 mil volumes per day. On the plus side, they are not trying to pump this by putting out superfluous PRs.

Based on what they've said to us, we need a S-1 Registration for Global (putting up the $5mil vehicle) - why would it trade millions per day without seeing that completed?

I'm going to guess on this but the big dogs putting up $5 million would also like to see OTCQB. The reason? Because that requires greater transparency.

I called a SEC attorney that I've known for some time, I did not mention the symbol. He said a S-1 registration takes, on average, 2 months. of preparation. Then it goes to the SEC. The last S-1 took 3 months. Again just guessing, that would put us at the end of January on this one for Global.

And for the last 40 years, that I've been involved in startups. Anyone putting up $5 mil (Global) wants OTCQB as a minimum, anything less allows the company to hide from the lender that is happening.

If any one wants to put up $5 mil with NO transparency...call the company.

So when you see what you think is a promising company and you buy stock in it......do you marry that stock and never sell? Is that what you feel we should do in the OTC? Most LEGITIMATE companies on this market are selling stock because they need to grow their company. Even legitimate companies will dilute and end up doing a reverse split, or many reverse splits before they go to the big boards, IF they go to the big boards. Does that mean the company scammed you? Or, if you sold the company's stock because you see that they are diluting and so you sell your stock to others who see promise in the company, does that mean you are scamming them?

My very first trade in penny stocks was CMKX. I think I lost about $7k. I never contacted the SEC and complained. I never blamed the market or wanted to see the entire market go under because I made a lousy investment. I took responsibility for my own actions. I persisted in this market and made my money back many times over.

EXACTLY.......YOU GET IT. The OTC used to be a thriving, prosperous market. It is now a ghost town. All because the SEC wanted to protect people who are unable to recognize a skull/crossbones mean danger/risky investment. Heck....those people probably should'nt be driving, either LOL.

And how is that working out for you? Making any money in the OTC? Doubtful. OTC's last quarterlies tell us that the entire market is suffering for lack of volume. I used to make great money in this market. Over regulation killed it. Were there scams in the OTC? Absolutely. There were also legit opportunities/businesses. If one is a trader that is unable to recognize that a skull and crossbones along with the words "CAVEAT EMPTOR" is a risky investment, you never belonged in this particular market. Buy big board stocks or bonds. Don't ruin the market for the rest of us. The OTC is now dead and it hurts those legitimate businesses who want to trade publically without giving a percentage of their companies up to IPO.

You guys are okay with this volume? We should be having 1mil volume days at minimum. 15c2-11 has been horrible for the stock market. And if we're talking about scams, IG*X turned out to be a scam and was even pink current after the rule was introduced. This rule makes it harder for companies to merge and makes the process more expensive. Not a surprise that most companies aren't going public these days. And if you're relying on a Twitter personality to introduce you to stocks, you shouldn't be trading at all. 

I agree with SOLONG

People like you just don't get it.......done with this convo.

When a person with influence (number of followers) tells you to ignore the warning signs and has Tier One followers which he brought in before you - saying that this is the real deal - exactly how does the newbie figure that it's a scam?

I, for one, know how to dig into the filings to figure that out and I know that you have to dig deep to see if it's real or just smoke and mirrors. The newbie doesn't know how to do that because they've been told they are on the road to easy money. They've bought into your dream world. The SEC was formed to protect the weakest among us from scams. It's why we warn people to be careful about providing info the scammers on the phone trying to steal your information.

And you argue that there should be no protections...I think there should be protections and that we should keep scams away. Look at what happened when regulations were abandoned on Banks in the early 2000's, with the argument that it would unleash our entrepreneurial tendencies. The result was what happened in 2008 when the US Banking system nearly brought down the entire World banking system. You have road blocks to protect the vultures from killing everyone else.

When you have curbs, then the big dogs with their 10's of thousands of followers would have to learn how to find REAL investments and be real investors instead of scaming someone else. Your argument is that scammers should be free to scam and then blame their followers.

I hope we don't back to that day, you seem to think it would be a revival. I hope it doesn't happen.

"Maybe we should do away with warnings at street lights"? We had warning signs in the OTC, Skull and crossbones, Caveat emptor, buyer beware. Do you think that we should remove the warning signs and ban vehicles? Because that is what the SEC did when they removed the buy button from over 3k tickers and put them on the expert market where only "sophisticated investors" can trade. Yes, there were plenty of scams on the OTC.......but there are also big board companies that are cooking the books. Remember Lehman Bros? I stand by my statement that the OTC was not supposed to be regulated like the big boards. Over regulation is never good. Stop playing a victim and take responsibility for your own trades.

$SYIN - I thing they will provide an acquisition with revenue. We'll need to see the details to place a value on this stock:

From the August PR: With a focus on revenue generation, the Company plans to allocate the initial funds primarily to the commercial launch of its nutraceutical products.

I don't think this one is a scam...

Ok, so you don't think that those with 1,000s of followers were part of the problem? They knew that they were going to take the gullible investors' money but the problem, in your mind, is that the newbie has to accept all the responsibility. Did I get that right?

Because the markets have rules, i.e. NYSE and Nasdaq - the OTC should be labeled as a rogue market? Maybe with warnings for anyone who tried to place a trade? I.e. "you are about to buy a myth?" I'm guessing you are against warning newbies with dreams of gains promoted by those with 1ks of followers that this might not be good?

We should have no protections so that we can take their money? I think that's what you want?

It's why we have "regulated" markets, whether here or in Europe/Asia. I've had experience with foreign investors and they want NO PART with the OTC. they see it as a casino.

Maybe we should do away with warnings at street lights? Just take your chance and see how it works out? Or do you have a line you draw at some point to warn people they are making a bad decision? Like all scams, do you want to return to a day when a poster can promise or allude to huge profits?

With the caveat, of course, that they are not a financial advisor so that they can claim....innocence. And in your mind that's what would mean a resurgence of the OTC Pink boom? I've been watching some of the big dogs and the market has figured them out.

I don't think you can find enough gullible newbies to fill your coffers with ill-gotten gains. JMOP

The same could be said for crypto currencies right now......do you want to regulate them to death as well? "Good riddance to those who can't make money without hurting someone else". Over regulation is never a good thing. Perhaps there are less victims.....but there are also no millionaires being created as well. The OTC was never supposed to be like the Nasdaq. Traders did not come here for long term investments. The OTC was the wild west of stock trading and most of us liked it that way. The only "victims" there were are those who could not grasp the simple concept that a skull and crossbones meant a risky trade. Those victims are people who cannot take responsibility for their own trades/investments. Right now the OTC is dead, and the reason for that is alot of the so called "victims" who went crying to the SEC every time they got burned.