Date of event requiring
this shell company report _________________________
(Name,
Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act. None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares
of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report (December
31, 2018): 83,158,778 ordinary shares.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company.
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements
in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark which basis of
accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been checked
in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references in
this annual report to:
This annual report contains forward-looking
statements and information relating to us that are based on the current beliefs, expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections
of our management regarding our company and industry. When used in this annual report, the words “may”,
“will”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”,
“plan” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements reflect management’s current view concerning future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, including among many others: our potential inability to achieve similar growth in future periods as we did historically,
the emergence of additional competing technologies, changes in domestic and foreign laws, regulations and taxes, changes in economic
conditions, uncertainties related to China’s legal system and economic, political and social events in China, a general
economic downturn, a downturn in the securities markets, and other risks and uncertainties which are generally set forth under
Item 3, “Key information — Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report. Should any of these
risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from
those described as anticipated, estimated or expected in this annual report.
All forward-looking statements included
herein attributable to us or other parties or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable laws and regulations,
we undertake no obligations to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this
annual report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS
AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table presents selected
financial data regarding our business. It should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and related notes contained elsewhere in this annual report and the information under Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects.” The selected consolidated statement of income data for the Company’s fiscal years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, have been
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this annual report beginning on page F-1. The
selected statement of income data for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the balance sheet data as of December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual
report.
Our consolidated financial statements
are prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. The
selected financial data information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial
statements and related notes contained elsewhere herein. The financial statements contained elsewhere fully represent
our financial condition and operations; however, they are not indicative of our future performance.
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except number
of shares and per share data)
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(285,783
|
)
|
|
|
(107,988
|
)
|
|
|
(59,322
|
)
|
|
|
(52,579
|
)
|
|
|
(52,661
|
)
|
Net income (loss) before non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(284,673
|
)
|
|
|
(107,491
|
)
|
|
|
(59,047
|
)
|
|
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
|
(52,619
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(284,673
|
)
|
|
|
(107,491
|
)
|
|
|
(59,047
|
)
|
|
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
|
(52,619
|
)
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted ordinary shares
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
|
|
83,173,778
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.008
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
(0.004
|
)
|
|
|
(0.003
|
)
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.008
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
(0.004
|
)
|
|
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
304,955
|
|
|
$
|
183,097
|
|
|
$
|
123,464
|
|
|
$
|
71,109
|
|
|
$
|
18,463
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
304,955
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
123,464
|
|
|
|
71,109
|
|
|
|
18,463
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,304,751
|
|
|
|
2,452,951
|
|
|
|
2,610,773
|
|
|
|
2,914,449
|
|
|
|
3,091,795
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,304,751
|
|
|
|
2,452,951
|
|
|
|
2,610,773
|
|
|
|
2,914,449
|
|
|
|
3,091,795
|
|
Non-controlling Interest
|
|
|
1,079,563
|
|
|
|
1,079,563
|
|
|
|
1,079,563
|
|
|
|
1,079,563
|
|
|
|
1,079,563
|
|
Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(3,079,359
|
)
|
|
|
(3,349,417
|
)
|
|
|
(3,566,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,922,903
|
)
|
|
|
(4,152,895
|
)
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks
described below, which constitute the material risks facing us. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could
be harmed. You should also refer to the other information about us contained in this Annual Report, including our financial statements
and related notes.
We currently have no business operations nor any revenues
or earnings from operations.
We currently have no business operations
or any revenues or earnings from operations. Neither do we have significant assets or financial resources; and we will, in all
likelihood, continue to sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues until the development of a new business plan
or the consummation of a business combination. The auditor issues an audit opinion including an explanatory paragraph regarding
going concern in our audited financial statements.
Our proposed operations are purely speculative.
The success of our proposed plan of operation
will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the identified target company. While business
combinations with entities having established operating histories are preferred, there can be no assurance that we will be successful
in locating candidates meeting these criteria. If we complete a business combination, the success of our operations will be dependent
upon management of the target company and numerous other factors beyond our control. There is no assurance that we can identify
a target company and consummate a business combination.
We may have significant difficulty in locating a viable
business combination candidate.
We are and will continue to be an insignificant
participant in the business of seeking mergers with and acquisitions of business entities. A large number of established and well-financed
entities, including venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies which may be merger or acquisition
target candidates for us. Nearly all of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise
and managerial capabilities than we do and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business
opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete with numerous other small public
companies in seeking merger or acquisition candidates.
It is possible that the per share value of your stock
will decrease upon the consummation of a business combination.
A business combination normally will involve
the issuance of a significant number of additional shares. Depending upon the value of the assets acquired in a business combination,
the per share value of our ordinary shares may decrease, perhaps significantly.
Any business combination that we engage in may have tax
effects on us.
Federal and state tax consequences will,
in all likelihood, be major considerations in any business combination that we may undertake. Currently, a business combination
may be structured so as to result in tax-free treatment to both companies pursuant to various federal and state tax provisions.
We intend to structure any business combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both us and the target
company; however, there can be no assurance that a business combination will meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization
or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying reorganization
could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes which may have an adverse effect on both parties to the transaction.
US federal income tax reform could have unforeseen effects
on our financial condition and results of operations.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”), which significantly changed U.S. tax law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly
modified the U.S. Internal Revenue Code by, among other things, reducing the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate
from 35% to 21% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017; limiting and/or eliminating many business deductions; migrating
the U.S. to a territorial tax system with a one-time transition tax on a mandatory deemed repatriation of previously deferred
foreign earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries; subject to certain limitations, generally eliminating U.S. corporate income
tax on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; and providing for new taxes on certain foreign earnings. We are still in the process
of analyzing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and its possible effects on us. The impact of this tax reform on holders of our ordinary
shares is uncertain and could be adverse. In addition, the actual impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on us may differ from our
estimates, and we may update the provisional amount upon obtaining, preparing or analyzing additional information, based on our
review of future regulations or guidance issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and specific actions we may take in the
future.
Our ordinary shares are quoted on
the OTC Pink which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.
Our ordinary shares are quoted on the
OTC Pink. The OTC Pink is a significantly more limited market than the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq system. The quotation
of our shares on the OTC Pink may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential shareholders to trade shares
of our ordinary shares, could depress the trading price of our ordinary shares and could have a long-term adverse impact on our
ability to raise capital in the future.
Future sales or perceived sales
of our ordinary shares could depress our stock price.
A substantial number of shares of our
ordinary shares held by our current shareholders are freely tradable. If the holders of these shares were to attempt
to sell a substantial amount of their holdings at once, the market price of our ordinary shares could decline. Moreover, the perceived
risk of this potential dilution could cause shareholders to attempt to sell their shares and investors to short the ordinary shares,
a practice in which an investor sells shares that he or she does not own at prevailing market prices, hoping to purchase shares
later at a lower price to cover the sale. As each of these events would cause the number of our ordinary shares for sale to increase,
our ordinary shares market price would likely further decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends
on our ordinary shares for the foreseeable future.
For the foreseeable future, we intend
to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
on our ordinary shares. Accordingly, investors must be prepared to rely on sales of their ordinary shares after price appreciation
to earn an investment return, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our ordinary shares.
Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our
results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors
our board deems relevant.
We are a “foreign private
issuer,” and have disclosure obligations that are different than those of U.S. domestic reporting companies so you should
not expect to receive the same information about us at the same time as a U.S. domestic reporting company may provide.
We are a foreign private issuer and, as
a result, we are not subject to certain of the requirements imposed upon U.S. domestic issuers by the SEC. For example, we
are not required by the SEC or the federal securities laws to issue quarterly reports or proxy statements with the SEC.
We are allowed four months following the end of our fiscal year to file our annual report with the SEC. We are not
required to disclose certain detailed information regarding executive compensation that is required from U.S. domestic issuers.
Further, our directors and executive officers are not required to report equity holdings under Section 16 of the Securities Act. As
a foreign private issuer, we are also exempt from the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) which, generally, are meant
to ensure that select groups of investors are not privy to specific information about an issuer before other investors. We are,
however, still subject to the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation rules of the SEC, such as Rule 10b-5. Since many of
the disclosure obligations required of us as a foreign private issuer are different than those required by other U.S. domestic
reporting companies, our shareholders should not expect to receive information about us in the same amount and at the same time
as information is received from, or provided by, other U.S. domestic reporting companies. We are liable for violations of the
rules and regulations of the SEC which do apply to us as a foreign private issuer. Violations of these rules could affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
You may have difficulty enforcing
judgments obtained against us.
We are a BVI company and substantially
all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Virtually all of our assets and a substantial portion of our current
business operations are conducted in the PRC. In addition, almost all of our directors and officers are nationals and
residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside
the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It
may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability
provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors, many of whom are not residents
in the United States and whose assets are located in significant part outside of the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty
as to whether the courts of the British Virgin Islands or the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against
us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state. In
addition, it is uncertain whether such British Virgin Islands or PRC courts would be competent to hear original actions brought
in the British Virgin Islands or the PRC against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or
any state.
Failure to comply with PRC regulations
relating to the investment in offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident stockholders to
personal liability, limit our ability to acquire PRC companies or to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’
ability to distribute profits to us or otherwise materially adversely affect us.
On July 14, 2014, SAFE issued the Circular
on Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Residents’ Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose
Vehicles, or Circular 37, which replaced the Circular 75, promulgated by SAFE on October 21, 2005. Circular 37 requires PRC residents
to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity,
for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests
in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to in Circular 37 as a “special purpose vehicle.”
We have notified substantial beneficial
owners of our company who we know are PRC residents to comply with the registration obligation. However, we may not be aware of
the identities of all our beneficial owners who are PRC residents. In addition, we do not have control over our beneficial owners
and cannot assure you that all of our PRC resident beneficial owners will comply with Circular 37. The failure of our beneficial
owners who are PRC residents to register or amend their SAFE registrations in a timely manner pursuant to Circular 37 or the failure
of future beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents to comply with the registration procedures set forth in Circular
37 may subject such beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to fines and legal sanctions. Failure to register or amend the registration
may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC subsidiaries or receive dividends or other distributions
from our PRC subsidiaries or other proceeds from disposal of our PRC subsidiaries, or we may be penalized by SAFE. These risks
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Security Review Rules may make
it more difficult for us to make future acquisitions or dispositions of our business operations or assets in China.
The Security Review Rules, effective as
of September 1, 2011, provides that when deciding whether a specific merger or acquisition of a domestic enterprise by foreign
investors is subject to the national security review by MOFCOM, the principle of substance-over-form should be applied and foreign
investors are prohibited from circumventing the national security review requirement by structuring transactions through proxies,
trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through contractual arrangements or offshore transactions. If the business
of any target company that we plan to acquire falls within the scope subject to national security review, we may not be able to
successfully acquire such company by equity or asset acquisition, capital increase or even through any contractual arrangement.
Under the Enterprise Income Tax
Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification will likely result in unfavorable
tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.
On March 16, 2007, the National People’s
Congress of China passed a new Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the EIT Law, and on November 28, 2007, the State Council of China
passed its implementing rules, which took effect on January 1, 2008. Under the EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China
with “de facto management bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it
can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the EIT
Law define de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel,
accounting, and properties” of the enterprise.
On April 22, 2009, the State Administration
of Taxation issued the Notice Concerning Relevant Issues Regarding Cognizance of Chinese Investment Controlled Enterprises Incorporated
Offshore as Resident Enterprises pursuant to Criteria of de facto Management Bodies, or the Notice, further interpreting the application
of the EIT Law and its implementation non-Chinese enterprise or group controlled offshore entities. Pursuant to the Notice, an
enterprise incorporated in an offshore jurisdiction and controlled by a Chinese enterprise or group will be classified as a “non-domestically
incorporated resident enterprise” if (i) its senior management in charge of daily operations reside or perform their duties
mainly in China; (ii) its financial or personnel decisions are made or approved by bodies or persons in China; (iii) its substantial
assets and properties, accounting books, corporate chops, board and shareholder minutes are kept in China; and (iv) at least half
of its directors with voting rights or senior management often resident in China. A resident enterprise would be subject to an
enterprise income tax rate of 25% on its worldwide income and must pay a withholding tax at a rate of 10% when paying dividends
to its non-PRC shareholders. However, it remains unclear as to whether the Notice is applicable to an offshore enterprise incorporated
by a Chinese natural person. Nor are detailed measures on imposition of tax from non-domestically incorporated resident enterprises
are available. Therefore, it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each case.
We may be deemed to be a resident enterprise
by Chinese tax authorities. If the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise
income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to the enterprise income
tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In our case,
this would mean that income such as interest on financing proceeds and non-China source income would be subject to PRC enterprise
income tax at a rate of 25%. Second, although under the EIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiaries
would qualify as “tax-exempt income,” we cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to a 10% withholding
tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the withholding tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect
to the processing of outbound remittances to entities that are treated as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes.
Finally, it is possible that future guidance issued with respect to the new “resident enterprise” classification could
result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax is imposed on dividends we pay to our non-PRC shareholders and with respect
to gains derived by our non-PRC stockholders from transferring our shares.
If we were treated as a “resident
enterprise” by PRC tax authorities, we would be subject to taxation in both the U.S. and China, and our PRC tax may not
be creditable against our U.S. tax.
Heightened scrutiny of acquisition
transactions by PRC tax authorities may have a negative impact on Chinese company’s business operations and its acquisition
strategy.
Pursuant to the Notice on Strengthening
Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Circular 698, effective on
January 1, 2008, and the Announcement on Several Issues Related to Enterprise Income Tax for Indirect Asset Transfer by Non-PRC
Resident Enterprises , or SAT Announcement 7, effective on February 3, 2015, issued by the SAT, if a non-resident enterprise transfers
the equity interests of or similar rights or interests in overseas companies which directly or indirectly own PRC taxable assets
through an arrangement without a reasonable commercial purpose, but rather to avoid PRC corporate income tax, the transaction
will be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable assets subject to PRC corporate income tax. SAT Announcement
7 specifies certain factors that should be considered in determining whether an indirect transfer has a reasonable commercial
purpose. However, as SAT Announcement 7 is newly issued, there is uncertainty as to the application of SAT Announcement 7 and
the interpretation of the term “reasonable commercial purpose.”
Under SAT Announcement 7, the entity which
has the obligation to pay the consideration for the transfer to the transferring shareholders has the obligation to withhold any
PRC corporate income tax that is due. If the transferring shareholders do not pay corporate income tax that is due for a transfer
and the entity which has the obligation to pay the consideration does not withhold the tax due, the PRC tax authorities may impose
a penalty on the entity that so fails to withhold, which may be relieved or exempted from the withholding obligation and any resulting
penalty under certain circumstances if it reports such transfer to the PRC tax authorities.
Although SAT Announcement 7 is generally
effective as of February 3, 2015, it also applies to cases where the PRC tax treatment of a transaction that took place prior
to its effectiveness has not yet been finally settled. As a result, SAT Announcement 7 could be determined by PRC tax authorities
to be applicable to the historical reorganization, and it is possible that these transactions could be determined by PRC tax authorities
to lack a reasonable commercial purpose. As a result, the transfer of shares by certain shareholders to other parties could be
subject to corporate income tax of up to 10% on capital gains generated from such transfers, and PRC tax authorities could impose
tax obligations on the transferring shareholders or subject us to penalty if the transferring shareholders do not pay such obligations
and withhold such tax.
SAT Announcement 7 and its interpretation
by relevant PRC authorities clarify that an exemption provided by SAT Circular 698 for transfers of shares in a publicly-traded
entity that is listed overseas is available if the purchase of the shares and the sale of the shares both take place in open-market
transactions. However, if a shareholder of an entity that is listed overseas purchases shares in the open market and sells them
in a private transaction, or vice-versa, PRC tax authorities might deem such a transfer to be subject to SAT Circular 698 and
SAT Announcement 7, which could subject such shareholder to additional reporting obligations or tax burdens. Accordingly, if a
holder of the Company’s ordinary shares purchases such ordinary shares in the open market and sells them in a private transaction,
or vice-versa, and fails to comply with SAT Circular 698 or SAT Announcement 7, the PRC tax authorities may take actions, including
requesting to provide assistance for their investigation or impose a penalty on it, which could have a negative impact on the
company’s business operations.
We may be exposed to liabilities
under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Chinese anti-corruption laws, and any determination that we violated these laws could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt
Practice Act, or FCPA, and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials
and political parties by U.S. persons and issuers as defined by the statute, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.
We have operations, agreements with third parties, and make most of our sales in China. The PRC also strictly prohibits bribery
of government officials. Our activities in China create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by the employees,
consultants, sales agents, or distributors of our Company, even though they may not always be subject to our control. It is our
policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees. However, our existing safeguards and any future
improvements may prove to be less than effective, and the employees, consultants, sales agents, or distributors of our Company
may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA or Chinese anti-corruption laws may result
in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business,
operating results and financial condition. In addition, the U.S. government may seek to hold our Company liable for successor
liability FCPA violations committed by companies in which we invest or that we acquire.
If we become directly subject to
the recent scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity involving U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we may have to expend significant
resources to investigate and resolve the matter which could harm our business operations, stock price and reputation and could
result in a loss of your investment in our stock, especially if such matter cannot be addressed and resolved favorably.
Recently, U.S. public companies that have
substantially all of their operations in China, particularly companies like us which have completed so-called reverse merger transactions,
have been the subject of intense scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity by investors, financial commentators and regulatory
agencies, such as the SEC. Much of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity has centered around financial and accounting
irregularities and mistakes, a lack of effective internal controls over financial accounting, inadequate corporate governance
policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result of the scrutiny, criticism and negative
publicity, the publicly traded stock of many U.S. listed Chinese companies has sharply decreased in value and, in some cases,
has become virtually worthless. Many of these companies are now subject to shareholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions and
are conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations. It is not clear what effect this sector-wide scrutiny,
criticism and negative publicity will have on our Company, our business and our stock price. If we become the subject of any unfavorable
allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we will have to expend significant resources to investigate
such allegations and/or defend our company. This situation will be costly and time consuming and distract our management from
growing our company.
The disclosures in our reports and
other filings with the SEC and our other public pronouncements are not subject to the scrutiny of any regulatory bodies in the
PRC. Accordingly, our public disclosure should be reviewed in light of the fact that no governmental agency that is located in
China where substantially all of our operations and business are located have conducted any due diligence on our operations or
reviewed or cleared any of our disclosure.
We are regulated by the SEC and our reports
and other filings with the SEC are subject to SEC review in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Unlike public reporting companies whose operations are located primarily in the United
States, however, substantially all of our operations are located in China. Since substantially all of our operations and business
takes place in China, it may be more difficult for the staff of the SEC to overcome the geographic and cultural obstacles that
are present when reviewing our disclosure. These same obstacles are not present for similar companies whose operations or business
take place entirely or primarily in the United States. Furthermore, our SEC reports and other disclosure and public pronouncements
are not subject to the review or scrutiny of any PRC regulatory authority. For example, the disclosure in our SEC reports and
other filings are not subject to the review of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, a PRC regulator that is tasked with
oversight of the capital markets in China. Accordingly, you should review our SEC reports, filings and our other public pronouncements
with the understanding that no local regulator has done any due diligence on our company and with the understanding that none
of our SEC reports, other filings or any of our other public pronouncements has been reviewed or otherwise been scrutinized by
any local regulator.
Because we are incorporated under
the laws of the BVI, it may be more difficult for our shareholders to protect their rights than it would be for a shareholder
of a corporation incorporated in another jurisdiction.
Our corporate affairs are governed by
our memorandum and articles of Association and by the BVI Companies Act, 2004 (as amended) of the BVI. Principles of law relating
to such matters as the validity of corporate procedures, the fiduciary duties of management and the rights of our shareholders
differ from those that would apply if we were incorporated in the United States or another jurisdiction. The rights
of shareholders under BVI law are not as clearly established as are the rights of shareholders in many other jurisdictions. Under
the laws of most jurisdictions in the United States, majority and controlling shareholders generally have certain fiduciary responsibilities
to the minority shareholders. Shareholder action must be taken in good faith, and actions by controlling shareholders which are
obviously unreasonable may be declared null and void. BVI law protecting the interests of minority shareholders may not be as
protective in all circumstances as the law protecting minority shareholders in US jurisdictions. In addition, the circumstances
in which a shareholder of a BVI company may sue the company derivatively, and the procedures and defenses that may be available
to the company, may result in the rights of shareholders of a BVI company being more limited than those of shareholders of a company
organized in the US. Furthermore, our directors have the power to take certain actions without shareholder approval
which would require shareholder approval under the laws of most US jurisdictions. The directors of a BVI corporation,
subject in certain cases to court approval but without shareholder approval, may implement a reorganization, merger or consolidation,
the sale of any assets, property, part of the business, or securities of the corporation. The ability of our board
of directors to create new classes or series of shares and the rights attached by amending our memorandum of association and articles
of association without shareholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in our control
without any further action by the shareholders, including a tender offer to purchase our ordinary shares at a premium over then
current market prices. Thus, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests in the face of actions by our
board of directors or our controlling shareholders than they would have as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in another
jurisdiction.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION
ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the Company
We were incorporated in Delaware on August
16, 2006 as Alyst Acquisition Corp. in order to serve as a vehicle for the acquisition of an operating business in any industry,
with a focus on the telecommunications industry, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination. Our initial shareholders purchased 1,750,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share
in a private placement. On July 5, 2007, Alyst consummated its initial public offering, or IPO, of 8,044,400 of its
units, or Units. Each Unit consisted of one share of Common Stock and one warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock
at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. Simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, Alyst (i) consummated a private
placement of 1,820,000 warrants to the original sponsors, officers and directors, and certain of their affiliates of Alyst, each
warrant entitled upon exercise to one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share, and (ii) issued to the representatives
of the underwriters in the IPO an option to purchase 300,000 of its units, or the UPO, at an exercise price of $10.00 per unit. The
units issuable upon exercise of the UPO were identical to the Units, except that the exercise price of the underlying warrants
is $7.50 per share.
On June 25, 2009, we completed a business
combination pursuant to which Alyst merged with and into CNIH, its wholly-owned subsidiary, to effect its redomestication to the
British Virgin Islands. On June 26, 2009, China Networks Merger Co., Ltd., our wholly-owned British Virgin Islands
subsidiary, merged with and into China Networks, resulting in China Networks becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. We
refer to the foregoing transactions herein as the Business Combination, and the merger agreement pursuant to which the Business
Combination was consummated as the Merger Agreement. CNIH and its subsidiary, China Networks, are the surviving entities
of the Business Combination.
Upon consummation of the Business Combination,
CNIH had outstanding 12,927,888 ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, 9,864,400 warrants, and the UPO for 300,000 units,
each unit containing one ordinary share and one warrant.
As of the effective time of the Business
Combination, there were 8,044,400 public warrants outstanding. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one ordinary
share. In order to obtain the shares, the holders of the warrants must pay an exercise price of $5.00 per share. We
may redeem the warrants at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption if,
and only if, the last sale price of our ordinary shares equals or exceeds $11.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30
trading day period ending three business days before we send the notice of redemption.
The 1,820,000 insider warrants outstanding
at the effective time of the Business Combination became exercisable into ordinary shares after September 27, 2009, the date that
was 90 days after consummation of the Business Combination. The insider warrants have terms and provisions that are
identical to the public warrants, except that they may be exercised on a cashless basis if the warrants are redeemed at our option
under the same conditions applicable to the public warrant holders and, at such time, are held by the initial holders.
In connection with the consummation of
the Business Combination: (i) the former class A preferred shareholders of China Networks received one ordinary share of CNIH
for each class A preferred share of China Networks for an aggregate of 980,000 ordinary shares; and (ii) the representatives of
the underwriters in Alyst’s IPO received an aggregate of 253,488 ordinary shares in lieu of payment of certain fees. The
1,750,000 ordinary shares held by the former Alyst insiders are subject to a stock escrow agreement entered into at the time of
issuance in 2006 and, unless such restrictions are modified or waived, such shares are not transferrable until the earlier or
June 19, 2010, the date that is 12 months following the consummation of the Business Combination, or the consummation of a merger,
business combination, liquidation or similar transaction (subsequent to the Business Combination) which results in all of our
shareholders having the right to exchange their ordinary shares for cash, securities or other property.
Following the Business Combination we,
through our subsidiaries and variable interest entities, provided broadcast television advertising services in the PRC and operated
joint-venture partnerships with PRC televisions stations in regional areas of the country. We managed these regional
businesses through a series of joint ventures and contractual arrangements to sell broadcast television advertising time slots
and so-called “soft” advertising opportunities to local advertisers directly and through advertising agencies and
brokers, and also assisted the PRC television stations in selling advertising time slots and “soft” advertising opportunities
to national advertisers, specifically by offering multi-region campaigns to maximize value and cut costs these national advertisers
would otherwise face when dealing with individual stations on a station-by-station basis.
In September 2010, we entered into an
equity transfer agreement whereby ANT sold all of its equity ownership in Kunming Taishi Information Cartoon Co., Ltd., a PRC
company, or Kunming JV, to Kunming TV Station our 50% joint venture partner, upon approval of the Chinese authorities. This discussion
was initiated due to the recent restructuring of Kunming TV station, and the PRC government’s intent to integrate its television
advertising assets. As a result of the agreement, the total transfer price for the equity stake exchange was RMB 150,000,000
with the first installment of RMB 75,000,000 paid by Kunming TV in January 2011. The Company gave notice in January 2011 of the
redemption of its convertible debentures issued in April 13, 2010. The aggregate amount of the Debentures being redeemed represented
the entire outstanding principal of the Debentures. In addition, the Company gave notice to pay all outstanding interest
owed on the debentures in ordinary shares of the Company. In May 2011, the remaining funds from the first installment were utilized
for the redemption of an aggregate of 4,028,690 of the Company’s Preferred Shares. Upon receipt of the second
installment of RMB 30,000,000 paid by Kunming TV, the Company redeemed an aggregate of 4,706,807 of its Preferred Shares on November
31, 2011, and upon receipt of the third installment of RMB 30,000,000 paid by Kunming TV in April 2012, the Company redeemed an
aggregate of 1,575,000 of its Preferred Shares. The fourth installment of RMB 10,000,000 was paid by Kunming TV in March, 2012.
The remaining RMB 5,000,000 due from Kunming TV was received by the Company in June 2012, and the funds will be partially used
to redeem all remaining outstanding Preferred Shares.
In January 2011, China Yellow River Television
Station, the Company’s joint venture partner in Shanxi Yellow River and Advertising Networks Cartoon Technology Co., Ltd.,
or Yellow River JV, was consolidated by merger into Shanxi Radio and TV Station, or Shanxi TV, a PRC state-owned entity, and Shanxi
TV was the successor to all of China Yellow River Television Station’s obligations under the joint venture agreements. Upon
consummation of the merger, Shanxi TV immediately and unilaterally terminated the cooperation agreement that established the Yellow
River JV and transferred the advertising business of the Yellow River JV to its own internal advertising department. The Company
believes that Shanxi TV’s actions constituted a direct violation of the cooperation agreement which granted to the Yellow
River JV the exclusive and irrevocable right to operate China Yellow River Television Station’s advertising business.
In connection with the termination of
the cooperation agreement and the transfer of the advertising business, Shanxi TV has also taken, as its own, the RMB 45,000,000
of registered capital contributed by the Company to the Yellow River JV. While the Company acknowledges the right of
the PRC government to change policies and rules with respect to agreements with state-owned entities, such as Shanxi TV, however
the Company believes that the RMB 45,000,000 contributed to the Yellow River JV by the Company must be returned to the Company.
In addition to attempts at negotiations
directly with Shanxi TV, Yellow River JV filed an application for arbitration with the China International Economic Trade Arbitration
Commission, or CIETAC, in October 2011. Shanxi TV filed its response in January 2012, and has since challenged CIETAC’s
jurisdiction over the dispute, though in March 2012, subsequently withdrew the application. Since the submission of the application
for arbitration, two hearings have been held, and CEITAC initially indicated that it would render a decision by August 21, 2102.
However, this deadline has been extended on three separate occasions. For strategic purposes, Yellow River JV submitted
a withdrawal application to CERTAC on February 17, 2013 and CEITAC rendered a withdrawal decision on March 18, 2013. On
January 20, 2014, Yellow River JV filed two applications for arbitration with CIETAC in an attempt to resolve the aforementioned
disputes.
On March 15,
2016, CIETAC issued two final arbitral awards with the amount of RMB 90 million in total. Among others, the arbitral tribunal
found that because Shanxi TV unilaterally terminated the cooperation agreement, it must pay RMB 45 million for damages as claimed
by Yellow River JV. In addition, Shanxi TV’s termination of the cooperation agreement essentially resulted in its material
breach of the asset transfer agreement with Yellow River JV and as a result, Shanxi TV is responsible to return RMB 45 million
to Yellow River JV that it paid to Shanxi TV. CIETAC further ruled that Shanxi TV shall bear the RMB 0.8 million attorney fee
and RMB115,084.3 of arbitration fee. The payment of the above fees was ordered to be made by Shanxi TV within 30 days after the
issuance of the arbitral awards. Shanxi TV did not make such payment, and enforcement actions were filed with a local Shanxi court
in May 2016. Shanxi TV subsequently applied to the court to withdraw the arbitral awards, but the court rejected such applications
in August 2016. In September 2016, Yellow River JV applied to continue the enforcement procedure. On May 8, 2017, Taiyuan Intermediate
People’s Court rendered a ruling rejecting to enforce the arbitral awards and thus the enforcement of the arbitral awards
has been suspended. Yellow River JV subsequently submitted applications to the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s
Republic of China, the Shanxi High Court and the local Shanxi Procuratorate to supervise the enforcement proceeding and correct
the local Shanxi Court’s ruling. Yellow River JV has not received a formal reply or decision from the aforementioned authorities.
We intend to make every effort to collect the awards.
If the Company is successful in enforcing
the arbitral awards and receiving all of the RMB 90 million from Shanxi TV, a portion of the funds will be used to redeem all
or a portion of the Class A Preferred Shares that remain outstanding at such time. However there is no guarantee that we will
be able to secure the payment of part or all of the RMB 90 million by Shanxi TV.
The Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC, maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
B. Business Overview
We are currently a shell company in the
British Virgin Islands with non-operating subsidiaries ANT, a Hong Kong company, WFOE, a PRC company, and Hetong, a PRC company
and a variable interest entity. At present, in addition to pursuing a remedy to the dispute with Shanxi TV as described above,
the Company is exploring options with respect to future business operations. The Company may decide to seek a potential business
combination with one or more yet to be identified privately held companies, or may determine that it is in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders to attempt to engage in another business through its subsidiaries and variable interest entities
in China.
If management determines that it is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to enter into a business combination, we will not be restricted in our
search for business combination candidates to any particular geographical area, industry or industry segment, and may enter into
a combination with a private business engaged in any line of business. Management’s discretion is, as a practical matter,
unlimited in the selection of a combination candidate.
If we effect a business combination with
any entity unaffiliated with our current management, our current officers and directors probably will resign their directorship
and officer positions with us in connection with our consummation of a business combination. In such an instance, our current
management will not have any control over the conduct of our business following the completion of a business combination.
It is anticipated that prospective business
opportunities will come to our attention from various sources, including our management, our other stockholders, professional
advisors such as attorneys and accountants, securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial community,
and others who may present unsolicited proposals. We do not have any plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any
individual or entity to act as a finder of or as a business consultant in regard to any business opportunities for us. There are
no plans to use advertisements, notices or any general solicitation in the search for combination candidates.
C. Organizational Structure
We do not directly or indirectly have
an equity interest in Hetong, however ANT, our wholly owned subsidiary, has entered into a series of contractual arrangements
with Hetong and its shareholders. As a result of the following contractual arrangements, we control and are considered the primary
beneficiary of Hetong. These arrangements include the following:
|
●
|
The shareholders
of Hetong have jointly granted ANT an exclusive and irrevocable option to purchase all or part of their equity interests in
Hetong at any time, and this option may only be terminated by mutual consent or at the direction of ANT.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Without ANT’s
consent, the shareholders of Hetong may not (i) transfer or pledge their equity interests in Hetong, (ii) receive any dividends,
loan interest or other benefits from Hetong, or (iii) make any material adjustment or change to Hetong’s business or
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The shareholders
of Hetong agreed to (i) accept the policies and guidelines furnished by ANT with respect to the hiring and dismissal of employees,
or the operational management and financial system of Hetong, and (ii) appoint the candidates recommended by ANT as directors
of Hetong.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Each shareholder
of Hetong has appointed ANT’s designee as their attorneys-in-fact to exercise all its voting rights as shareholders
of Hetong, until 2037.
|
Each shareholder of Hetong has pledged
all of its respective equity interests in Hetong to WFOE, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ANT in the PRC, to secure the payment obligations
of Hetong under certain contractual arrangements between Hetong and WFOE. This pledge is effective until the later of the (i)
date on which the last surviving of the Exclusive Service Agreements, the Loan Agreement and the Equity Option Agreement terminates
and (ii) date on which all outstanding secured obligations are paid in full or otherwise satisfied. Each of these agreements are
subject to customary termination provisions; however, the WFOE may terminate the Exclusive Services Agreement at any time upon
30 days’ notice to Hetong.
D. Property, Plants and Equipment
We do not currently maintain any executive
office space. Our registered address is 801, 29F Block C, Central International Trade Center, 6A Jian Guo Men Wai Avenue, Chao
Yang District, Beijing, PRC.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the following discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated and unconsolidated financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. This discussion may contain
forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results
may differ materially from those
anticipated
in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including
those set forth under “Item 3, Key Information — Risk Factors” or in other parts of this annual report on Form
20-F.
A. Operating Results
Overview and Plan of Operation
Following our Business Combination with
Alyst on June 25, 2009 until January 2011, we, through our subsidiaries and variable interest entities, provided broadcast television
advertising services in the PRC and operated joint-venture partnerships with PRC televisions stations in regional areas of the
country. We managed these regional businesses through a series of joint ventures and contractual arrangements to sell broadcast
television advertising time slots and so-called “soft” advertising opportunities to local advertisers directly and
through advertising agencies and brokers, and also assisted the PRC television stations in selling advertising time slots and
“soft” advertising opportunities to national advertisers, specifically by offering multi-region campaigns to maximize
value and cut costs these national advertisers would otherwise face when dealing with individual stations on a station-by-station
basis.
Since January 2011, we have been a shell
company in the BVI with non-operating subsidiaries ANT, a Hong Kong company, WFOE, a PRC company, and Hetong, a PRC company and
a variable interest entity. At present, in addition to pursuing a remedy to the dispute with Shanxi TV as discussed elsewhere
in this Report, we are exploring options with respect to future business operations. Management may decide to seek a potential
business combination with one or more yet to be identified privately held companies, or may determine that it is in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders to attempt to engage in another business through its subsidiaries and variable interest entities
in China.
As discussed above, in October 2011 Yellow
River JV filed an application for arbitration with CIETAC. Shanxi TV filed its response in January 2012, and has since challenged
CIETAC’s jurisdiction over the dispute, though in March 2012, subsequently withdrew the application. Since the submission
of the application for arbitration, two hearings have been held, and CEITAC initially indicated that it would render a decision
by August 21, 2102. However, this deadline has been extended on three separate occasions. For strategic purposes,
Yellow River JV submitted a withdrawal application to CERTAC on February 17, 2013 and CEITAC rendered a withdrawal decision on
March 18, 2013. On January 20, 2014, Yellow River JV filed two applications for arbitration with CIETAC in an attempt to resolve
the aforementioned disputes.
On March 15,
2016, CIETAC issued two final arbitral awards with the amount of RMB 90 million in total. Among others, the arbitral tribunal
found that because Shanxi TV unilaterally terminated the cooperation agreement, it must pay RMB 45 million for damages as claimed
by Yellow River JV. In addition, Shanxi TV’s termination of the cooperation agreement essentially resulted in its material
breach of the asset transfer agreement with Yellow River JV and as a result, Shanxi TV is responsible to return RMB 45 million
to Yellow River JV that it paid to Shanxi TV. CIETAC further ruled that Shanxi TV shall bear the RMB 0.8 million attorney fee
and RMB115,084.3 of arbitration fee. The payment of the above fees was ordered to be made by Shanxi TV within 30 days after the
issuance of the arbitral awards. Shanxi TV did not make such payment, and enforcement actions were filed with a local Shanxi court
in May 2016. Shanxi TV subsequently applied to the court to withdraw the arbitral awards, but the court rejected such applications
in August 2016. In September 2016, Yellow River JV applied to continue the enforcement procedure. On May 8, 2017, Taiyuan Intermediate
People’s Court rendered a ruling rejecting to enforce the arbitral awards and thus the enforcement of the arbitral awards
has been suspended. Yellow River JV subsequently submitted applications to the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s
Republic of China, the Shanxi High Court and the local Shanxi Procuratorate to supervise the enforcement proceeding and correct
the local Shanxi Court’s ruling. Yellow River JV has not received a formal reply or decision from the aforementioned authorities.
We intend to make every effort to collect the awards.
Taxation
BVI
CNIH is incorporated in the BVI. Under
the current law of the BVI, CNIH is not subject to income or capital gains tax. In addition, dividend payments are not subject
to withholding tax in the BVI.
Hong Kong
We did not have any assessable profits
subject to the Hong Kong profits tax from 2008 to 2018. We do not anticipate having any income subject to income taxes in Hong
Kong in the foreseeable future.
PRC
Our PRC entities are subject to PRC enterprise
income tax at the statutory tax rate of 25%. We did not have any assessable profits subject to the PRC enterprise income tax from
our PRC subsidiaries.
Our future effective income tax rate depends
on various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic composition of our pre-tax income and non-tax deductible expenses
incurred. Our management carefully monitors these legal developments and will timely adjust our effective income tax rate when
necessary.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December
31, 2018 and 2017
The following table sets forth key components
of our results of operations for the periods indicated, in dollars and as a percentage of revenue.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(52,661
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(52,579
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from operations
|
|
|
(52,661
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(52,579
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(Loss) before income tax and non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(52,619
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses
.
General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits for our employees, as well as costs and expenses associated
with office, utilities, transportation, travel and other costs and expenses related to legal, accounting and other costs associated
with regulatory filings. The general and administrative expense for 2018 was $52,661, an increase of $82 or 0.16%, as compared
to $52,579 in 2017. The increase is primarily as a result of change in exchange rate. The Company has no operation in 2018.
Interest Income. Interest income
in 2018 was $42 compared with $167 in 2017. The decrease in interest income is due to the lower average daily balance of the bank
deposit in 2018.
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December
31, 2017 and 2016
The following table sets forth key components
of our results of operations for the periods indicated, in dollars and as a percentage of revenue.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(52,579
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59,322
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from operations
|
|
|
(52,579
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59,322
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(Loss) before income tax and non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59,047
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses
.
General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits for our employees, as well as costs and expenses associated
with office, utilities, transportation, travel and other costs and expenses related to legal, accounting and other costs associated
with regulatory filings. The general and administrative expense for 2017 was $52,579, a decrease of $6,743 or 11.4%, as compared
to $59,322 in 2016. The decrease is primarily as a result of no operation in 2017.
Interest Income. Interest income
in 2017 was $167 compared with $275 in 2016. The decrease in interest income is due to the lower average daily balance of the
bank deposit in 2017.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements and
related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management
to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. Our management evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis based on historical experience and on various other assumptions
it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
We believe the following critical accounting
policies affect our significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements.
Variable Interest Entities
–
The Company account for entities qualifying as variable interest entities (VIEs) in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Boards (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidation. For our consolidated
VIE, management has made evaluations of the relationships between our VIE and the economic benefit flow of contractual arrangement
with VIE. In connection with such evaluation, management also took into account the fact that, as a result of such contractual
arrangements, we control the legal shareholders’ voting interests and have power of attorney in the VIE, and therefore we
are able to direct all business activities of the VIE. As a result of such evaluation, management concluded that we are the primary
beneficiary of our consolidated VIE. We have consulted our PRC legal counsel in assessing our ability to control our PRC VIE.
Any changes in PRC laws and regulations that affect our ability to control our PRC VIE may preclude us from consolidating these
companies in the future.
Income Taxes
– The Company
accounts for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method. Deferred taxes are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement
purposes and income tax purposes using enacted rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect
on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is established, as needed to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions
only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest
amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in
which the change in judgment occurs.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), to make leasing activities more transparent and comparable, requiring
most leases to be recognized by lessees on their balance sheets as right-of-use assets, along with corresponding lease liabilities.
ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2018 and interim periods within that year, with early
adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements as the Company does not have any lease commitments at the reporting date.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company did not generate any revenue
and had net cash used in operating activities, which have had a significant adverse impact on its business and continue to negatively
impact its projected future liquidity. The Company plans to settle the accrued dividend by issuance of pay-in-kind shares to preferred
shareholders. If the Company is successful in enforcing the arbitral awards and receiving all of the RMB 90 million (approximately
$13,859,800) from Shanxi TV, a portion of the funds will be used to redeem all or a portion of the Class A Preferred Shares that
remain outstanding at such time.
In addition, the Company expects that
it will need to raise substantial additional capital to accomplish its business plan over the next several years. The Company
may also wish to selectively pursue possible acquisitions of businesses complementary to those of the Company in the future in
order to expand its presence in the market place and achieve operating efficiencies. The Company expects to seek to obtain additional
funding through a bank credit facility or private equity. There can be no assurance as to the availability or terms upon which
such financing and capital might be available.
As of December 31, 2018, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $18,463. The decrease in cash primarily as a result of the reduction of business activities resulted from
the disposal of investment projects, thus no cash been generated from the business.
The following table provides detailed
information about our net cash flow for all financial statement periods presented in this report. To date, we have financed our
operations primarily through cash flows from operations, augmented by short-term bank borrowings and equity contributions by our
shareholders.
(All amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net cash (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(52,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,047
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(52,619
|
)
|
|
|
(52,412
|
)
|
|
|
(59,047
|
)
|
Effects of Exchange Rate Change in Cash
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalent at Beginning of the Year
|
|
|
71,109
|
|
|
|
123,464
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalent at End of the Year
|
|
|
18,463
|
|
|
|
71,109
|
|
|
|
123,464
|
|
Operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities
was $52,619 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to $52,412 used in operating activities during 2017. The amount
is insignificant because there were limited operations during the year.
Net cash used in operating activities
was $52,412 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $59,047 used in operating activities during 2016. The amount
is insignificant because there were limited operations during the year.
Investing activities
Net cash provided by investing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0, as compared to $0 net cash provided by investing activities in 2017. Due to the disposal
of the investment projects and limited operations, there was no investing activities been carried out during 2018.
Net cash provided by investing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0, as compared to $0 net cash provided by investing activities in 2016. Due to the disposal
of the investment projects and limited operations, there was no investing activities been carried out during 2017.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0 as compared to $0 net cash used in financing activities in 2017. There was no redemption
of preferred stock in 2018.
Net cash used in financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0 as compared to $0 net cash used in financing activities in 2016. There was no redemption
of preferred stock in 2017 and 2016.
C. Research and Development, Patents
and Licenses, Etc.
We do not engage in any significant research
and development activities, nor do we own any intellectual property.
D. Trend Information
Other than as disclosed in the foregoing
disclosures and elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events
during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our
net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause our disclosed financial information to
be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into, nor do we expect
to enter into, any off-balance sheet arrangements. We also have not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments
to guarantee the payment obligations of third parties. In addition, we have not entered into any derivative contracts that are
indexed to our equity interests and classified as shareholders’ equity. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent
interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity.
We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support
to us or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations
in respect of operating leases as of December 31, 2018.
|
|
Payments
Due By Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1 year
|
|
|
1-3
years
|
|
|
3-5
years
|
|
|
More than
5 years
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
G. Safe Harbor
See the section headed “Forward-Looking Information.”
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT
AND EMPLOYEES
Directors and Senior Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
our directors and senior management as of the date of this annual report.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITION
|
Li Shuangqing
|
|
65
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
|
Jian Ping Huang
|
|
59
|
|
Director
|
May Huang
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
Kerry Propper
|
|
45
|
|
Director
|
George Kaufman
|
|
44
|
|
Director
|
Li Shuangqing
. Mr. Li Shuangqing
has been our chairman and chief executive officer and director since our merger with China Networks. Prior to the merger, Mr.
Li had served as the chairman and chief executive officer and a director of China Networks since May 2008. From 2006 to 2007,
Mr. Li was the chairman of Shandong Huashi Media & Technology, a leading Electronic Program Guide provider in China. Prior
to that, he was from 2001 to 2006 the general manager of Huicong Advertising, a leading Chinese internet and TV advertising company
and director of advertising department of Qilu TV Station from 1997 to 2001. Mr. Li had various management and TV production roles
with Shandong and Qilu TV Stations from 1980 to 1997. Mr. Li completed EMBA course from Guanghua School of Management, Peking
University.
Jian Ping Huang
. Dr. Jian
Ping Huang has been our director since our merger with China Networks. He is the Chairman Emeritus and Chief Strategic Adviser
of Jpigroup Inc., a company he founded in 1988. Under Dr. Huang’s advisory guidance, Jpigroup has become one of China’s
major private investment and development companies that has invested and advised in the areas of manufacturing, human capital
development, technologies and financial services. From 1985 and prior to founding Jpigroup, Dr. Huang worked for the Government
of China in the former Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade and during this time, he was very active and instrumental
in helping formulate some of China’s first open door strategies and reform plans, especially in the area of international
investment and trade. Dr. Huang is also a director of China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Limited, and a member of that company’s
audit committee. Dr. Huang holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing,
where he now concurrently holds a Professorship in Finance.
May Huang
. Ms. May Huang
has been our director since our merger with China Networks. Ms. Huang has been the Chief Operating Officer of Jpigroup Inc. since
2006. She is responsible for coordinating the business activities and objectives of Jpigroup’s two major divisions: investment
banking services and principal investments. Jpigroup is one of China’s major private investment and development companies
that has invested and advised in the areas of manufacturing, human capital development, technologies and financial services. Before
2006, Ms. Huang was Jpigroup’s Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Huang holds a Bachelor’s degree in economics from Sun
Yatsen University at Zhongshan. Ms. Huang is the sister of Dr. Huang.
Kerry Propper
. Mr. Kerry
Propper has been our director since our merger with China Networks and a director of China Networks Media since May 2008. Mr.
Propper has been the owner and chief executive officer of Chardan Capital Markets LLC, a New York based broker/dealer, since July
2003. He has also been a managing director of SUJG, Inc., an investment company, since April 2005. From its inception in December
2003 until November 2005, Mr. Propper served as a member of the board of directors of each of Chardan China Acquisition Corp.,
Chardan North China Acquisition Corporation and Chardan South China Acquisition Corporation, each an OTC Bulletin Board listed
blank check company. In November 2005, Chardan China Acquisition Corp. completed its business combination with State Harvest Holdings
Ltd. and changed its name to Origin Agritech Ltd., in September 2007, Chardan North completed its business combination with Gifted
Time Holdings, Limited and changed its name to HLS Systems International, Ltd. and in January 2008 Chardan South completed its
business combination with Head Dragon Holdings, Limited and changed its name to A-Power Energy Generation Systems, Ltd. Mr. Propper
has continued to serve as a member of the board of directors of Origin Agritech and HLS Systems International Ltd. since their
mergers. Mr. Propper also sits on the board of directors of China Cablecom Holdings, Ltd., a joint-venture provider of cable TV
services in China. Mr. Propper was a founder, and from February 1999 to July 2003 owner and managing director of Windsor Capital
Advisors, a full service brokerage firm also based in New York. Mr. Propper was also a founder of The Private Capital Group LLC,
a small private investment firm specializing in hard money loans and convertible preferred debt and equity offerings for small
companies, in May 2000 and was affiliated with it until December 2003. From July 1997 until February 1999, Mr. Propper worked
at Aegis Capital Corp., a broker dealer and member firm of FINRA. Mr. Propper received his B.A. (with honors) in Economics and
International Studies from Colby College and studied at the London School of Economics.
George B. Kaufman
. Mr. George
B. Kaufman has been our director since our merger with China Networks. Mr. Kaufman has served as the Vice President of Investment
Banking for Chardan Capital Markets LLC, a New York based broker/dealer, since January 2006 and served as an Investment Banking
Associate for Chardan from November 2004, when he joined the firm, to December 2005. As one of the seven original members of Chardan,
Mr. Kaufman established the investment banking, brokerage and marketing protocols and standards. He has extensive experience with
operating and development stage companies, particularly those in the China and Greater Asian region, having lead and/or managed
over 30 public and private transactions. In addition, Mr. Kaufman founded Detroit Coffee Company, a national roaster, wholesaler
and retail distributor of high-end specialty coffees, in January 2002 and currently serves as its chief executive officer. Mr.
Kaufman received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of Vermont in 1999.
Other than described above, no family
relationship exists between any of our directors and executive officers. There are no arrangements or understandings with major
shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member
of senior management.
Compensation
In 2018, we paid an aggregate of $0 in
salary to our directors and senior management as a group. None of our directors or senior management received any equity awards,
including options, restricted stock or other equity incentives in 2018. We do not set aside or accrue any amounts for pension,
retirement or other benefits for our directors and senior management. However, we reimburse our directors for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with their services in such capacity.
Our board of directors conducts reviews
informally, and compensation is not being typically changed on a regimented time-frame. Our board of directors bases the salaries
of our executive officers on the amounts similarly-situated companies pay their executive officers for similar performance. In
general, if an executive performs exceptionally well, the performance and, if applicable, the increase in responsibilities would
also merit a salary increase.
Board Practices
Independence of Directors
We have elected to follow the rules of
NYSE MKT to determine whether a director is independent. Our board will also consult with counsel to ensure that our board’s
determinations are consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence
of directors. Consistent with these considerations, our board has affirmatively determined that Dr. J.P. Huang, Ms. Huang and
Mr. Kaufman are our independent directors.
Board Committees
Audit Committee
We established an audit committee of the
board of directors, which consists of Dr. J.P. Huang (Chairman) and Ms. Huang. We have determined that each of these individuals
is an independent director under the NYSE MKT listing standards. Our board has also determined that Ms. Huang possesses the accounting
or related financial management experience that qualifies her as financially sophisticated within the meaning of the NYSE MKT
listing standards and that he is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of
the SEC.
The audit committee is mainly responsible for, among other
things:
|
●
|
reviewing and discussing
with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
discussing with
management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation
of financial statements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
discussing with
management major risk assessment and risk management policies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
monitoring the independence
of the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
verifying the rotation
of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible
for reviewing the audit as required by law;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing and approving
all related-party transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
inquiring and discussing
with management compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pre-approving all
audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor, including the fees and terms
of the services to be performed;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
appointing or replacing
the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
determining the
compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management
and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related
work; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
establishing procedures
for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
reports which raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies.
|
Compensation Committee
We established a compensation committee
of the board of directors, which consists of Mr. Kaufman (Chairman) and Dr. J.P. Huang, each of whom is an independent director
under the NYSE MKT’s listing standards. Our compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and approving corporate
goals and objectives relevant to the compensation for executive officers, evaluating the performance of executive officers in
light of those goals and objectives, and determining and approving the compensation level of executive officers based on this
evaluation. In addition, our compensation committee is responsible for administering our incentive-compensation plans
and equity-based plans, including our 2008 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, and for making recommendations to the board
of directors with respect to the adoption, amendment, termination or replacement of such plans.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We established a nominating and corporate
governance committee of the board of directors, which currently consists solely of Dr. J.P. Huang, who is an independent
director under the NYSE MKT’s listing standards. The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for overseeing
the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors.
The nominating and corporate governance
committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity
and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The nominating and corporate
governance committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board
needs that arise from time to time. The nominating and corporate governance committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended
by shareholders and other persons and will consider persons identified by its members, management, shareholders, investment bankers
and others. We do not have any restrictions on shareholder nominations under our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association. The only restrictions are those applicable generally under British Virgin Islands law and the federal proxy rules,
if applicable. Currently, we will consider suggestions from individual shareholders, subject to evaluation of the person’s
merits. Shareholders may communicate nominee suggestions directly to the board, accompanied by biographical details and a statement
of support for the nominees, subject to certain timing restrictions in connection with our annual meetings. The suggested nominee
must also provide a statement of consent to being considered for nomination. Although there are no formal criteria for nominees,
our board of directors believes that persons should be actively engaged in business endeavors, have a financial background, and
be familiar with acquisition strategies and money management.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018, we had no employee.
As required by PRC regulations, we participate in various employee benefit plans that are organized by municipal and provincial
governments, including housing, pension, medical and unemployment benefit plans. We are required under PRC law to make contributions
to the employee benefit plans at specified percentages of the salaries, bonuses and certain allowances of employees, up to a maximum
amount specified by the local government from time to time. Members of the retirement plan are entitled to a pension equal to
a fixed proportion of the salary prevailing at the member’s retirement date. In the past, we entered into a standard employment
agreement and a confidentiality agreement with our employees and we believe our relationship with our employees was good. Our
employee is not represented by any collective bargaining agreements or labor unions.
E. Share Ownership
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information
with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of August 9, 2019, by (i) each person who is known by us to
beneficially own more than 5% of our ordinary shares; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers
and directors as a group. The address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company, 9 Dong San
Huan Zhong Lu, Suite 1101, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China.
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Office, if any
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
% of Class(2)
|
|
Officers and Directors
|
Li Shuangqing
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Jian Ping Huang
|
|
Director
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
May Huang
|
|
Director
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Kerry Propper (3)
|
|
Director
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
3,606,942
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
George Kaufman
|
|
Director
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
All officers and directors as a group (5 persons named above)
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
3,606,942
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
5% Security Holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum Partners Value
152 W 57th St 54th Floor
New York, NY 10019
(4)
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
7,618,954
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
South Ferry #2 LP
One State Street
New York, NY 10004 (5)
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
11,119,969
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Atlas Master Fund
135 E 57th Street
New York, NY 10022
(6)
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
4,571,382
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
AQR Capital Management LLC
233 E 69th Street #6J(7)
New York, NY
10021
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares,
$0.0001 par value
|
|
|
6,099,409
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
* Less than 1%.
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except
as otherwise indicated, each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership
of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to our ordinary shares.
|
|
(2)
|
As
of August 9, 2019, a total of 83,158,778 of our ordinary shares are outstanding pursuant
to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1). Ordinary shares that may be acquired by an individual
or group within 60 days, pursuant to the exercise of warrants or options, are deemed
to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual
or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person shown in the above table.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
3,186,007 Ordinary Shares held by Chardan Capital Markets LLC. Mr. Propper
is the CEO of Chardan Capital Markets LLC and holds voting and dispositive over such
Ordinary Shares.
|
|
(4)
|
Not
includes 919,510 Ordinary Shares underlying Preferred Shares held by Platinum Partners
Value.
|
|
(5)
|
Not
includes 928,705 Ordinary Shares underlying Preferred Shares held by South Ferry #2 LP.
|
|
(6)
|
Not
includes 551,706 Ordinary Shares underlying Preferred Shares held by Atlas Master Fund.
|
|
(7)
|
Based
on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2017, by AQR Capital Management, LLC, AQR Capital
Management Holdings, LLC and CNH Partners, LLC, in which the reporting persons disclosed
that AQR Capital Management, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of AQR Capital Management
Holdings, LLC. CNH Partners is deemed to be controlled by AQR Capital Management, LLC.
|
None of our major shareholders have different
voting rights from other shareholders. We are not aware of any arrangement that may, at a subsequent date, result in
a change of control of our company.
2008 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan
We adopted the 2008 Omnibus Securities
and Incentive Plan, or the Share Incentive Plan, in connection with the Business Combination. The Share Incentive Plan provides
for the grant of distribution equivalent rights, incentive share options, non-qualified share options, performance share awards,
performance unit awards, restricted share awards, share appreciation rights, tandem share appreciation rights and unrestricted
share awards for an aggregate of not more than 2,500,000 shares of our ordinary shares, to directors, officers, employees and
consultants of the Company or its affiliates. If any award expires, is cancelled, or terminates unexercised or is forfeited, the
number of shares subject thereto, if any, is again available for grant under the Share Incentive Plan. The number of ordinary
shares with respect to which share options or share appreciation rights may be granted to an employee under the Share Incentive
Plan in any calendar year cannot exceed 500,000.
The following description of the Share Incentive Plan is a
summary of the material terms of the Share Incentive Plan.
Plan Administration
The Share Incentive Plan is administered
by our compensation committee, or the Committee. Among other things, the Committee has complete discretion, subject to the express
limits of the Share Incentive Plan, to determine the employees, directors and consultants to be granted awards, the types of awards
to be granted, the number of our ordinary shares to be subject to each award, if any, the exercise price under each option, the
base price of each share appreciation right, the term of each award, the vesting schedule and/or performance goals for each award
that utilizes such a schedule or provides for performance goals, whether to accelerate vesting, the value of the ordinary shares,
and any required withholdings. Either our board of directors or the Committee may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding award,
provided that the participant’s consent to such action is required if the action would materially and adversely affect the
participant. The Committee is also authorized to construe the award agreements and may prescribe rules relating to the operation
of the Share Incentive Plan.
Share Options
The Share Incentive Plan provides for
the grant of share options, which may be either “incentive share options” (ISOs), which are intended to meet the requirements
for special U.S. federal income tax treatment under the Code, or “nonqualified share options” (NQSOs). Options may
be granted on such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine; provided, however, that the per share exercise price under
an option may not be less than the fair market value of an underlying ordinary share on the date of grant, and the term of an
ISO may not exceed ten years (110% of such value and five years in the case of an ISO granted to an employee who owns (or is deemed
to own) more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our capital or a parent or subsidiary). ISOs may only
be granted to employees. In addition, the aggregate fair market value of the ordinary shares underlying one or more ISOs (determined
at the time of grant) which are exercisable for the first time by any one employee during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.
Share Awards
A restricted share award under the Share
Incentive Plan is a grant or sale of our ordinary shares to the participant, subject to such transfer, forfeiture and/or other restrictions
specified by the Committee in the award. Dividends, if any, declared by us will be paid on the shares, even during the
period of restriction.
An unrestricted share award under the
Share Incentive Plan is a grant or sale of our ordinary shares to the participant that is not subject to transfer, forfeiture
or other restrictions, in consideration for past services rendered thereby to us or an affiliate or for other valid consideration.
Performance Awards
Performance unit awards under the Share
Incentive Plan entitle the participant to receive a specified payment in cash upon the attainment of specified individual or company
performance goals.
Performance share awards under the Share
Incentive Plan entitle the participant to receive a specified number of our ordinary shares upon the attainment of specified individual
or company performance goals.
Share Appreciation Rights
The award of a share appreciation right,
or SAR, under the Share Incentive Plan entitles the participant, upon exercise, to receive an amount in cash, our ordinary shares
or a combination thereof, equal to the increase in the fair market value of the underlying ordinary shares between the date of
grant and the date of exercise. SARs may be granted in tandem with, or independently of, options granted under the Share Incentive
Plan. A SAR granted in tandem with an option under the Share Incentive Plan is granted at the same time as the related option
and is exercisable only at such times, and to the extent, that the related option is exercisable and expires upon termination
or exercise of the related option. In addition, the related option may be exercised only when the value of our ordinary
shares subject to the option exceeds the exercise price under the option. A SAR that is not granted in tandem with an option is
exercisable at such times as the Committee may specify.
Distribution Equivalent Rights
A distribution equivalent right award
under the Share Incentive Plan entitles the participant to receive bookkeeping credits, cash payments and/or our ordinary share
distributions equal in amount to the distributions that would have been made to the participant had the participant held a specified
number of our ordinary shares during the period the participant held the distribution equivalent right. A distribution equivalent
right may be awarded under the Share Incentive Plan as a component of another award, where, if so awarded, such distribution equivalent
right will expire, terminate or be forfeited by the participant under the same conditions as under such other award.
Other Terms
The Share Incentive Plan prohibits the
issuance of an award with terms and conditions that would cause the award to be considered nonqualified deferred compensation
under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Except as provided in the Share Incentive Plan, awards granted under the Share
Incentive Plan are not transferable and may be exercised only by the participant or by the participant’s guardian or legal
representative. Each award agreement will specify, among other things, the effect on an award of the disability, death, retirement,
authorized leave of absence or other termination of employment of the participant. We may require a participant to pay us the
amount of any required withholding in connection with the grant, vesting, exercise or disposition of an award. A participant is
not considered a shareholder with respect to our ordinary shares underlying an award until the shares are issued to the participant.
Our board of directors may at any time
terminate the Share Incentive Plan with respect to any awards that have not theretofore been granted, provided that no such termination
may be effected if it would materially and adversely affect the rights of a participant with respect to any award theretofore
granted without the participant’s consent. Our board of directors may at any time amend or alter the Share Incentive Plan,
provided that no change in any award theretofore granted may be made which would materially and adversely impair the rights of
a participant with respect to such award without that participant’s consent
ITEM
7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
Please refer to Item 6, “Directors,
Senior Management and Employees — Share Ownership.”
B. Related Party Transactions
A related party transaction is any transaction
between the Company and (a) enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled
by, or are under common control with, the Company; (b) associates; (c) individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest
in the voting power of the Company that gives them significant influence over the Company, and close members of any such individual’s
family; (d) key management personnel, that is, those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling
the activities of the Company, including directors and senior management and close members of such individuals’ families;
and (e) enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described
in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence.
There were no such related party transactions
throughout the fiscal year 2018, and until the date of this annual report, except for the following:
Amounts due to related parties consist
of advances made to the Company or payments made behalf on the Company to finance development stage activities and other costs.
The amounts due to related parties for such advances were non-interest bearing and had no stated repayment terms. Amounts due
to related parties for such advances totaled $59,750 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated Statements and Other
Financial Information
Financial Statements
We have appended consolidated financial
statements filed as part of this annual report. See Item 18, “Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
We may be subject to legal proceedings,
investigations and claims incidental to the conduct of our business from time to time. Other than as set forth below,
we are currently not a party to any litigation or other legal proceedings brought against us and we are also not aware of any
legal proceeding, investigation or claim, or other legal exposure that has a more than remote possibility of having a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations:
In January 2011, China Yellow River Television
Station, the Company’s joint venture partner in Shanxi Yellow River and Advertising Networks Cartoon Technology Co., Ltd.,
or Yellow River JV, was consolidated by merger into Shanxi Radio and TV Station, or Shanxi TV, a PRC state-owned entity, and Shanxi
TV was the successor to all of China Yellow River Television Station’s obligations under the joint venture agreements. Upon
consummation of the merger, Shanxi TV immediately and unilaterally terminated the cooperation agreement that established the Yellow
River JV and transferred the advertising business of the Yellow River JV to its own internal advertising department. The Company
believes that Shanxi’s actions constituted a direct violation of the cooperation agreement which granted to the Yellow River
JV the exclusive and irrevocable right to operate China Yellow River Television Station’s advertising business.
In connection with the termination of
the cooperation agreement and the transfer of the advertising business, Shanxi TV has also taken, as its own, the RMB 45,000,000
of registered capital contributed by the Company to the Yellow River JV. While the Company acknowledges the right of the PRC government
to change policies and rules with respect to agreements with state-owned entities, such as Shanxi TV, however the Company believes
that the RMB 45,000,000 contributed to the Yellow River JV by the Company must be returned to the Company. The Company has attempted,
in good faith, to negotiate a settlement with respect to the funds, however, to date Shanxi TV has refused to return the funds
to the Company or enter into any settlement agreement.
In addition to attempts at negotiations
directly with Shanxi TV, Yellow River JV filed an application for arbitration with CIETAC in October 2011. Shanxi TV filed its
response in January 2012, and has since challenged CIETAC’s jurisdiction over the dispute, though in March 2012, subsequently
withdrew the application. Since the submission of the application for arbitration, two hearings have been held, and CEITAC initially
indicated that it would render a decision by August 21, 2102. However, this deadline has been extended on three separate occasions.
For strategic purposes, Yellow River JV submitted a withdrawal application to CERTAC on February 17, 2013 and CEITAC rendered
a withdrawal decision on March 18, 2013. On January 20, 2014, Yellow River JV filed two applications for arbitration with CIETAC
in an attempt to resolve the aforementioned disputes.
On March 15, 2016, CIETAC issued two final
arbitral awards with the amount of RMB 90 million in total. Among others, the arbitral tribunal found that because Shanxi TV unilaterally
terminated the cooperation agreement, it must pay RMB 45 million for damages as claimed by Yellow River JV. In addition, Shanxi
TV’s termination of the cooperation agreement essentially resulted in its material breach of the asset transfer agreement
with Yellow River JV and as a result, Shanxi TV is responsible to return RMB 45 million to Yellow River JV that it paid to Shanxi
TV. CIETAC further ruled that Shanxi TV shall bear the RMB 0.8 million attorney fee and RMB115,084.3 of arbitration fee. The payment
of the above fees was ordered to be made by Shanxi TV within 30 days after the issuance of the arbitral awards. Shanxi TV did
not make such payment, and enforcement actions were filed with a local Shanxi court in May 2016. Shanxi TV subsequently applied
to the court to withdraw the arbitral awards, but the court rejected such applications in August 2016. In September 2016, Yellow
River JV applied to continue the enforcement procedure. On May 8, 2017, Taiyuan Intermediate People’s Court rendered a ruling
rejecting to enforce the arbitral awards and thus the enforcement of the arbitral awards has been suspended. Yellow River JV subsequently
submitted applications to the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China, the Shanxi High Court and
the local Shanxi Procuratorate to supervise the enforcement proceeding and correct the local Shanxi Court’s ruling. Yellow
River JV has not received a formal reply or decision from the aforementioned authorities. We intend to make every effort to collect
the awards.
If the Company is successful in enforcing
the arbitral awards and receiving all of the RMB 90 million from Shanxi TV, a portion of the funds will be used to redeem all
or a portion of the Class A Preferred Shares that remain outstanding at such time. However there is no guarantee that we will
be able to secure the payment of part or all of the RMB 90 million by Shanxi TV.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash
dividends on our ordinary shares. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in the operations and expansion
of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as
to the declaration and payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on factors
our directors deem relevant, including among others, our results of operations, financial condition and cash requirements, business
prospects, and the terms of our credit facilities, if any, and any other financing arrangements. Accordingly, realization of a
gain on our investments will depend on the appreciation of the price of our ordinary shares. There is no guarantee that our ordinary
shares will appreciate in value.
B. Significant Changes
No significant change has occurred since
the date of our consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report.
ITEM
9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. Offer and Listing Details
On July 24, 2009, our ordinary shares
began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “CNWHF”. The over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer
prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
See our disclosures above under “Offer and Listing Details.”
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
The following represents a summary of
certain key provisions of the Company’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. The summary
does not purport to be a summary of all of the provisions of our memorandum and articles of association and of all relevant provisions
of BVI law governing the management and regulation of BVI companies.
Register
We were incorporated in the BVI on April
17, 2008 under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004, or the Act. Our amended and restated memorandum of association
authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 550,000,000 shares with a par value of US$0.0001 each divided into the following classes
of shares: (a) 500,000,000 ordinary shares of US$0.0001 par value each (the “Ordinary Shares”); and (b) 50,000,000
preferred shares of US$0.0001 par value each, of which 16,000,000 (the “Class A Preferred Shares”) shall be designated
as Class A Preferred Shares of US$0.0001 par value each. Our board of directors or shareholders may from time to time by the consent
of the majority of our board of directors or the consent of the majority of our shareholders increase the maximum number of shares
we are authorized to issue, by amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association.
Objects and Purposes
Clause 5 of our amended and restated memorandum
of association sets forth the objects and powers of our company. Section 5.1 provides that, subject to certain provisions
set forth in our amended and restated memorandum of association, the objects for which we are established are unrestricted and
we shall have the full power and authority to carry out any object not prohibited by the Act or any other law of the British Virgin
Islands. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Section 5.2 provides that we have no power to: (i) carry on banking or trust business,
unless licensed to do so under the Banks and Trust Companies Act, 1990; (ii) carry on business as an insurance or as a reinsurance
company, insurance agent or insurance broker, unless licensed or authorized to do so under the Insurance Act, 1994; (iii) carry
on the business of company management unless licensed to do so under the Companies Management Act, 1990; (iv) carry on the business
of providing the registered office or the registered agent for companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands unless licensed
to do so under the Banks and Trust Companies Act, 1990; and (v) carry on the business as a mutual fund, mutual fund manager or
mutual fund administrator unless licensed to do so under the Mutual Funds Act, 1996.
Directors
BVI law requires that the board of directors
of a company consist of one or more members and that the number of directors shall be fixed by the company’s articles of
association. Our amended and restated articles of association provide for no maximum number of directors, subject to any subsequent
amendment to change the number of directors. The power to determine the number of directors is vested in the board of directors
and the shareholders. The power to fill vacancies, whether occurring by reason of an increase in the number of directors or by
resignation, is vested in the board of directors in the interim period between annual or special meetings of members called for
the election of directors and/or the removal of one or more directors and the filling of any vacancy in that connection. Directors
may be removed by the members for cause or without cause on a vote of a majority of the shareholders passed at a meeting called
for the purpose of removing the director or by written resolution or with cause by a resolution of directors passed at a meeting
or by written resolution.
Under BVI law, there is no cumulative
voting by shareholders for the election of the directors. The absence of cumulative voting rights effectively means that the holders
of a majority of the shares voted at a shareholders meeting may, if they so choose, elect all of our directors, thus precluding
a small group of shareholders from controlling the election of one or more representatives to the board of directors
Our amended and restated articles of association
provide that a director who is interested in a transaction entered into or to be entered into by us may: (i) vote on a matter
relating to the transaction; attend a meeting of directors at which a matter relating to the transaction arises and be included
among the directors present at the meeting for the purposes of a quorum; and (iii) sign a document on our behalf, or do any other
thing in his capacity as a director, that relates to the transaction. Additionally, our amended and restated articles of association
provide that no director shall be disqualified by his office from contracting with us either as a buyer, seller or otherwise,
nor shall any such contract or arrangement entered into by or on our behalf in which any director shall be in any way interested
be voided, nor shall any director so contracting or being so interested be liable to account to us for any profit realized by
any such contract or arrangement, by reason of such director holding that office or by reason of the fiduciary relationship thereby
established, provided such director shall, immediately after becoming aware of the fact that he is interested in a transaction
entered into or to be entered into by us, disclose such interest to our board of directors. For the purposes of the articles
of association:
|
(a).
|
A director
is not required to make such a disclosure if: (i) the transaction or proposed transaction
is between us and the director, and (ii) the transaction or proposed transaction is or
is to be entered into in the ordinary course of our business and on usual terms and conditions.
|
|
(b).
|
A disclosure
to our board of directors to the effect that a director is a member, director, officer
or trustee of another named company or other person and is to be regarded as interested
in any transaction which may, after the date of the entry or disclosure, be entered into
with that company or person, is a sufficient disclosure of interest in relation to that
transaction. Such a disclosure is not made to our board of directors unless it
is made or brought to the attention of every director on the board.
|
|
(c).
|
Subject to
Section 125(1) of the Act, the failure by a director to comply with this provision does
not affect the validity of a transaction entered into by the director or the Company.
|
Pursuant to our amended and restated articles
of association, a director shall not require a share qualification, but nevertheless shall be entitled to attend and speak at
any meeting of the directors and meeting of the members and at any separate meeting of the holders of any class of our shares.
In addition, the remuneration of directors (whether by way of salary, commission, participation in profits or otherwise) in respect
of services rendered or to be rendered in any capacity to us (including to any company in which we may be interested) shall be
fixed by Resolution of Directors or Resolution of Members. The directors may also be paid such travelling, hotel and other
expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from meetings of the directors, or any committee of the directors
or meetings of the members, or in connection with our business as shall be approved by Resolution of Directors or Resolution of
Members.
Rights and Obligations of Shareholders
Dividends
Subject to the Act, the directors may,
by resolution of directors, authorize a distribution (including a dividend) by us to members at such time and of such an amount
as they think fit if they are satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that immediately after the distribution, the value of our assets
exceeds our liabilities and we are able to pay our debts as they fall due. Any distribution payable in respect of a
share which has remained unclaimed for three years from the date when it became due for payment shall, if the board of the directors
so resolves, be forfeited and cease to remain owing by us. The directors may, before authorizing any distribution,
set aside out of our profits such sum as they think proper as a reserve fund, and may invest the sum so set apart as a reserve
fund upon such securities as they may select.
The holder of each share has the right to an equal share in
any distribution paid by us.
We do not intend to pay any dividends to our shareholders in
the foreseeable future.
Voting Rights
Each share confers on the shareholder the right to one vote
at a meeting of the members or on any resolution of members on all matters before our shareholders.
Rights in the event of winding up
The holder of each share is entitled to an equal share in the
distribution of the surplus assets of us on a winding up.
Redemption
The directors may, on behalf of the Company,
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire and hold our own shares for such consideration as the directors consider fit, and either
cancel or hold such shares as treasury shares. We may only offer to acquire shares if at the relevant time the directors
determine by resolution of directors that immediately after the acquisition the value of our assets exceeds our liabilities and
we are able to pay our debts as they fall due.
Changes in the rights of shareholders
If at any time the Company is authorized
to issue shares of more than one class the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the
shares of that class) may, whether or not the Company is being wound up, be varied only with the consent in writing of the holders
of not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that class and the holders of not less than three-fourths of the issued
shares of any other class of shares which may be affected by such variation.
Meetings
Under the Act, there is no requirement
for an annual meeting of shareholders. Under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, an annual meeting
of members must be held each year at such date and time as may be determined by the directors. The directors shall
call a meeting of the members if requested in writing to do so by members entitled to exercise at least 30% of the voting rights
in respect of the matter for which the meeting is being held. No less than ten days and not more than sixty days notice
of meetings are required to be given to members.
No business will be transacted at any
meeting of members unless a quorum of members is present at the time when the meeting proceeds to business. A quorum
consists of the holder or holders present in person or by proxy entitled to exercise at least 50 percent of the voting rights
of the shares of each class or series of shares entitled to vote as a class or series thereon and the same proportion of the votes
of the remaining shares entitled to vote thereon.
A member of the Company shall be deemed to be present at a
meeting of members if:
|
●
|
he
or his proxy participates by telephone or other electronic means; and
|
|
●
|
all
members and proxies participating in the meeting are able to hear each other.
|
The inadvertent failure of the directors
to give notice of a meeting to a member or the fact that a member has not received a notice that has been properly given, shall
not invalidate the meeting.
Limitations on Ownership of Securities
There are no limitations on the right
of non-residents or foreign persons to own our securities imposed by BVI law or by our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association.
Change in Control of Company
The board of directors is empowered to
issue preferred shares with such rights attaching to them as they decide and such power could be used in a manner that would delay,
defer or prevent a change of control of our company.
Ownership Threshold
There are no provisions governing the
ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed imposed by BVI law or by our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association.
Differences in Corporate Law
BVI law differs from laws applicable to
U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the significant differences between the provisions of
BVI law applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.
Protection for Minority Shareholders
Under the laws of most U.S. jurisdictions,
majority and controlling shareholders of a company generally have certain “fiduciary” responsibilities to the minority
shareholders. Corporate actions taken by majority and controlling shareholders which are unreasonable and materially detrimental
to the interests of minority shareholders may be declared null and void. Minority shareholders may have less protection for their
rights under BVI law than they would have under U.S. law.
Powers of Directors
Unlike most U.S. jurisdictions, the directors
of a BVI company, subject in certain cases to court approval but without shareholders’ approval, may implement the sale,
transfer, exchange or disposition of any Company asset, property, part of the business, or securities, with the exception that
shareholder approval is required for the disposition of over 50% in the value of our total assets.
Conflict of Interests
Similar to the laws of most U.S. jurisdictions,
when a director becomes aware of the fact that he has an interest in a transaction which we are to enter into, he must disclose
it to our Board. However, with sufficient disclosure of interest in relation to that transaction, the director who is interested
in a transaction entered into or to be entered into by us may (i) vote on a matter relating to the transaction; (ii) attend a
meeting of directors at which a matter relating to the transaction arises and be included in the quorum; and (iii) sign a document
on behalf of us, or do any other thing in his capacity as a director, that relates to the transaction.
Written Consent and Cumulative Voting
Similar to the laws of most U.S. jurisdictions,
under BVI law, shareholders are permitted to approve matters by way of written resolution in place of a formal meeting. BVI law
does not make a specific reference to cumulative voting, and our current articles of association have no provisions authorizing
cumulative voting.
Takeover Provisions
Some provisions of our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or management that
shareholders may consider favorable. For instance, our directors are empowered to amend the relevant provisions of
the memorandum of association for the purposes of creating new classes or series of shares and the rights attached thereto and
may amend the articles of association to take into account any ancillary changes required, provided that the directors do not,
however, have the power to amend the memorandum and articles of Association to (a) restrict the rights or powers of the members
to amend the memorandum or articles of association, (b) to change the percentage of members required to pass a resolution to amend
the memorandum and articles of association, or (c) in circumstances where the memorandum or articles of association cannot be
amended by the members.
Shareholder’s Access to Corporate
Records
Under the Act, a member of a business
company may, on giving written notice to a company, inspect the company’s memorandum and articles, the register of shareholders,
the register of directors and the minutes of meetings and resolutions of shareholders and of those classes of shareholders of
which he is a member.
The directors may, if they are satisfied
that it would be contrary to our interests to allow a member to inspect any document listed above (or any part thereof), deny
or limit the inspection of the document.
Indemnification
BVI law does not limit the extent to which
a company’s articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any
such provision may be held by the BVI courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil
fraud or the consequences of committing a crime.
We shall indemnify against all expenses,
including legal fees, and against all judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement and reasonably incurred in connection with
legal, administrative or investigative proceedings any person who (i) is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to
any threatened, pending or completed proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact
that the person is or was a director, an officer or a liquidator of us; or (ii) is or was, at our request, serving as a director,
officer or liquidator of, or in any other capacity is or was acting for, another body corporate or a partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise. To be entitled to indemnification, these persons must have acted honestly and in good faith
and in what they believe to be our best interest, and in the case of criminal proceedings, they must have had no reasonable cause
to believe their conduct was unlawful.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us under the foregoing provisions,
we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Mergers and Similar Arrangements
Under the laws of the BVI, two or more
companies may merge or consolidate in accordance with Section 170 of the Act. A merger means the merging of two or more constituent
companies into one of the constituent companies, and a consolidation means the uniting of two or more constituent companies into
a new company. In order to merge or consolidate, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger
or consolidation which must be authorized by a resolution of shareholders.
While a director may vote on the plan
even if he has a financial interest in the plan, in order for the resolution to be valid, the material facts of the interest and
the director’s relationship to any party to the transaction must be disclosed and the resolution approved (1) without counting
the vote or consent of any interested director, or (2) by the unanimous vote or consent of all disinterested directors if the
votes or consents of all disinterested directors is insufficient to approve a resolution of directors.
Shareholders not otherwise entitled to
vote on the merger or consolidation may still acquire the right to vote if the plan of merger or consolidation contains any provision
which, if proposed as an amendment to the memorandum or articles of association, would entitle them to vote as a class or series
on the proposed amendment. In any event, all shareholders must be given a copy of the plan of merger or consolidation irrespective
of whether they are entitled to vote at the meeting or consent to the written resolution to approve the plan of merger or consolidation.
The shareholders of the constituent companies
are not required to receive shares of the surviving or consolidated company but may receive debt obligations or other securities
of the surviving or consolidated company, or other assets, or a combination thereof. Further, some or all of the shares of a class
or series may be converted into a kind of asset while the other shares of the same class or series may receive a different kind
of asset. As such, not all the shares of a class or series must receive the same kind of consideration.
After the plan of merger or consolidation
has been approved by the directors and authorized by a resolution of the shareholders, articles of merger or consolidation are
executed by each company and filed with the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the BVI.
Dissenter Rights
A shareholder may dissent from a mandatory
redemption of his shares, an arrangement (if permitted by the court), a merger (unless the shareholder was a shareholder of the
surviving company prior to the merger and continues to hold the same or similar shares after the merger) and a consolidation.
A shareholder properly exercising his dissent rights is entitled to payment in cash of the fair value of his shares.
A shareholder dissenting from a merger
or consolidation must object in writing to the merger or consolidation before the vote by the shareholders on the merger or consolidation,
unless notice of the meeting was not given to the shareholder. If the merger or consolidation is approved by the shareholders,
the company must within 20 days give notice of this fact to each shareholder who gave written objection, and to each shareholder
who did not receive notice of the meeting. Such shareholders then have 20 days to give their written election in the form specified
by the Act to dissent from the merger or consolidation, provided that in the case of a merger, the 20 days starts when the plan
of merger is delivered to the shareholder.
Upon giving notice of his election to
dissent, a shareholder ceases to have any rights of a shareholder except the right to be paid the fair value of his shares. As
such, the merger or consolidation may proceed in the ordinary course notwithstanding the dissent.
Within seven days of the later of the
delivery of the notice of election to dissent and the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the company must make a written
offer to each dissenting shareholder to purchase his shares at a specified price that the company determines to be their fair
value. The company and the shareholder then have 30 days to agree upon the price. If the company and a shareholder fail to agree
on the price within the 30 days, then the company and the shareholder shall each designate an appraiser and these two appraisers
shall designate a third appraiser. These three appraisers shall fix the fair value of the shares as of the close of business on
the day before the shareholders approved the transaction without taking into account any change in value as a result of the transaction.
Under BVI law, shareholders are not entitled
to dissenters’ rights in relation to a liquidation.
Shareholders’ Suits
Similar to the laws of most U.S. jurisdictions,
BVI law permits derivative actions against its directors. However, the circumstances under which such actions may be brought,
and the procedures and defenses available may result in the rights of shareholders of a BVI company being more limited than those
of shareholders of a company incorporated and/or existing in the United States.
The courts of the BVI may, on the application
of a shareholder of a company, grant leave to that shareholder to bring proceedings in the name and on behalf of that company,
or intervene in proceedings to which the company is a party for the purpose of continuing, defending or discontinuing the proceedings
on behalf of the company. In determining whether to grant leave, the courts must take into account (1) whether the shareholder
is acting in good faith; (2) whether the derivative action is in the interests of the company taking account of the views of the
company’s directors on commercial matters; (3) whether the proceedings are likely to succeed; (4) the costs of the proceedings
in relation to the relief likely to be obtained; and (5) whether an alternative remedy to the derivative claim is available.
Leave to bring or intervene in proceedings
may be granted only if the court is satisfied that (1) the company does not intend to bring, diligently continue or defend, or
discontinue the proceedings, as the case may be; or (2) it is in the interests of the company that the conduct of the proceedings
should not be left to the directors or to the determination of the shareholders as a whole.
Changes in Capital
Subject to the provisions of the amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association and the Act, our unissued shares shall be at the disposal of the directors who may, without prejudice
to any rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares or class or series of shares, offer, allot, grant options
over or otherwise dispose of the shares to such persons, at such times and upon such terms and conditions as we may by resolution
of directors determine.
Subject to the provisions of the amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association relating to changes in the rights of shareholders and the powers of directors in relation to preferred
shareholders, we may, by a resolution of members or a resolution of directors, amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association to increase or decrease the number of ordinary shares authorized to be issued.
C. Material Contracts
We have not entered into any material
contracts other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in Item 4, “Information on the Company,”
Item 7, “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions,” or Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects – Contractual Obligations,” or filed (or incorporated by reference) as exhibits to this annual report or
otherwise described or referenced in this annual report.
D. Exchange Controls
BVI Exchange Controls
There are no material exchange controls
restrictions on payment of dividends, interest or other payments to the holders of our ordinary shares or on the conduct of our
operations in the BVI, where we were incorporated. There are no material BVI laws that impose any material exchange controls on
us or that affect the payment of dividends, interest or other payments to nonresident holders of our ordinary shares. BVI law
and our memorandum and articles of association do not impose any material limitations on the right of non-residents or foreign
owners to hold or vote our ordinary shares.
PRC Exchange Controls
Under the PRC Foreign Currency Administration
Rules promulgated on January 29, 1996 and last amended on August 5, 2008 and various regulations issued by SAFE and other relevant
PRC government authorities, payment of current account items in foreign currencies, such as trade and service payments, payment
of interest and dividends can be made without prior approval from SAFE by following the appropriate procedural requirements. By
contrast, the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies and remittance of the converted foreign currency outside the PRC for the
purpose of capital account items, such as direct equity investments, loans and repatriation of investment, requires prior approval
from SAFE or its local office.
On February 13, 2015, SAFE promulgated
the Circular on Simplifying and Improving the Foreign Currency Management Policy on Direct Investment, effective from June 1,
2015, which cancels the requirement for obtaining approvals of foreign exchange registration of foreign direct investment and
overseas direct investment from SAFE. The application for the registration of foreign exchange for the purpose of foreign direct
investment and overseas direct investment may be filed with qualified banks, which, under the supervision of SAFE, may review
the application and process the registration.
The Circular of the SAFE on Reforming
the Management Approach regarding the Settlement of Foreign Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprise, or SAFE Circular 19, was promulgated
on March 30, 2015 and became effective on June 1, 2015. According to SAFE Circular 19, a foreign-invested enterprise may, according
to its actual business needs, settle with a bank the portion of the foreign exchange capital in its capital account for which
the relevant foreign exchange bureau has confirmed monetary contribution rights and interests (or for which the bank has registered
the account-crediting of monetary contribution). For the time being, foreign-invested enterprises are allowed to settle 100% of
their foreign exchange capitals on a discretionary basis; a foreign-invested enterprise shall truthfully use its capital for its
own operational purposes within the scope of business; where an ordinary foreign-invested enterprise makes domestic equity investment
with the amount of foreign exchanges settled, the invested enterprise shall first go through domestic re-investment registration
and open a corresponding Account for Foreign Exchange Settlement Pending Payment with the foreign exchange bureau (bank) at the
place of registration. The Circular of the SAFE on Reforming and Regulating Policies on the Control over Foreign Exchange Settlement
of Capital Accounts, or SAFE Circular 16, was promulgated and became effective on June 9, 2016. According to SAFE Circular 16,
enterprises registered in PRC may also convert their foreign debts from foreign currency into Renminbi on self-discretionary basis.
SAFE Circular 16 provides an integrated standard for conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but
not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on self—discretionary basis, which applies to all enterprises
registered in the PRC. SAFE Circular 16 reiterates the principle that Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital
of a company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope and may not be used for investments
in securities or other investment with the exception of bank financial products that can guarantee the principal within the PRC
unless otherwise specifically provided. Besides, the converted Renminbi shall not be used to make loans for related enterprises
unless it is within the business scope or to build or to purchase any real estate that is not for the enterprise own use with
the exception for the real estate enterprise.
On January 26, 2017, SAFE promulgated
the Circular on Further Improving Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Optimizing Genuineness and Compliance Verification,
or SAFE Circular 3, which stipulates several capital control measures with respect to the outbound remittance of profits from
domestic entities to offshore entities, including (i) banks must check whether the transaction is genuine by reviewing board resolutions
regarding profit distribution, original copies of tax filing records and audited financial statements, and (ii) domestic entities
must retain income to account for previous years’ losses before remitting any profits. Moreover, pursuant to SAFE Circular
3, domestic entities must explain in detail the sources of capital and how the capital will be used, and provide board resolutions,
contracts and other proof as a part of the registration procedure for outbound investment.
E. Taxation
The following is a general summary
of certain material BVI and U.S. federal income tax considerations. The discussion is not intended to be, nor should it be construed
as, legal or tax advice to any particular shareholder or prospective shareholder. The discussion is based on laws and relevant
interpretations thereof in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change or different interpretations, possibly
with retroactive effect.
BVI Taxation
The BVI does not impose a withholding
tax on dividends paid to holders of our ordinary or preferred shares, nor does the BVI levy any capital gains or income taxes
on us. Further, a holder of our ordinary or preferred shares who is not a resident of the BVI is exempt from the BVI income tax
on dividends paid with respect to the ordinary or preferred shares. Holders of ordinary or preferred shares are not subject to
the BVI income tax on gains realized on the sale or disposition of the ordinary or preferred shares.
Our ordinary or preferred shares are not
subject to transfer taxes, stamp duties or similar charges in the BVI. However, as a company incorporated under the BVI Act, we
are required to pay the BVI government an annual license fee based on the number of shares we are authorized to issue.
There is no income tax treaty or convention
currently in effect between the United States and the BVI.
Taxation in China
We are a holding company incorporated
in the BVI, which indirectly holds our equity interests in our PRC operating subsidiaries. The EIT Law and its implementation
rules, both of which became effective as of January 1, 2008, provide that a PRC enterprise is subject to a standard income tax
rate of 25% and China-sourced income of foreign enterprises, such as dividends paid by a PRC subsidiary to its overseas parent,
will normally be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of 10%, unless there are applicable treaties between the overseas parent’s
jurisdiction of incorporation and China to reduce such rate.
Under the Arrangement between the Mainland
and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with
respect to Taxes on Income, or the Double Taxation Arrangement, effective as of January 1, 2007, such dividend withholding tax
rate is reduced to 5% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns over 25% of the PRC company distributing the dividends. Under the
aforesaid arrangement, any dividends that our PRC operating subsidiaries pay to their Hong Kong holding company may be subject
to a withholding tax at the rate of 5% if they are not considered to be a PRC “resident enterprise” as described below.
However, if the Hong Kong holdings company is not considered to be the “beneficial owner” of such dividends under
the Notice Regarding Interpretation and Recognition of Beneficial Owners under Tax Treaties promulgated by the State Administration
of Taxation on October 27, 2009 (and not a PRC “resident enterprise”), such dividends would be subject to the withholding
tax rate of 10%. The withholding tax rate of 5% or 10% applicable will have a significant impact on the amount of dividends to
be received by us and ultimately by shareholders.
According to the Notice Regarding Interpretation
and Recognition of Beneficial Owners under Tax Treaties, the term “beneficial owner” refers to a person who has the
right to own and dispose of the income and the rights or properties generated from the said income. The “beneficial owner”
may be an individual, a company or any other organization which is usually engaged in substantial business operations. A conduit
company is not a “beneficial owner.” The term “conduit company” refers to a company which is usually established
for purposes of dodging or reducing taxes, and transferring or accumulating profits. Such a company is only registered in the
country of domicile to satisfy the organizational form as required by law, but it does not engage in such substantial business
operations as manufacturing, distribution and management. As our Hong Kong holding company is a controlling company and is not
engaged in substantial business operations, it could be considered as a conduit company by tax authorities and we do not expect
it to be a beneficial owner.
In addition to the changes to the current
tax structure, under the EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management bodies” within
China is considered a resident enterprise and will normally be subject to an EIT of 25% on its global income. The implementing
rules define the term “de facto management bodies” as “an establishment that exercises, in substance, overall
management and control over the production, business, personnel, accounting, etc., of a Chinese enterprise.”
It remains unclear whether the PRC tax
authorities would require or permit our overseas registered entities to be treated as PRC resident enterprises. We do not currently
consider our company to be a PRC resident enterprise. However, if the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a “resident
enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we
may be subject to the enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income
tax reporting obligations. In our case, this would mean that income such as interest on offering proceeds and non-China source
income would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%. Second, although under the EIT Law and its implementing
rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiaries would qualify as “tax-exempt income,” we cannot guarantee that
such dividends will not be subject to a 10% withholding tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the
withholding tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect to the processing of outbound remittances to entities that are treated
as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Finally, it is possible that future guidance issued with respect
to the new “resident enterprise” classification could result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax is imposed
on dividends we pay to our non-PRC shareholders and with respect to gains derived by our non-PRC shareholders from transferring
our shares.
Taxation in Hong Kong
On 21 March 2018, the Hong Kong Legislative
Council passed the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No.7) Bill 2017 (the ‘Bill’) which introduces the two-tiered profit
tax rate regime. The Bill was signed into law on 28 March 2018 and was gazetted on the following day.
Under the two-tiered profit tax rate regime,
the first HK$2 million of profit qualifying corporations will be taxed at 8.25%, and profit above HK$2 million will taxed at 16.5%.
The two-tiered tax rate regime will be
applicable to the Hong Kong subsidiary for its annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 April 2018. Our Hong Kong subsidiary
has not carried out any business operation in Hong Kong and no profits tax is chargeable to our subsidiary.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
The following is a discussion of certain
material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. It does not
purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s
situation. The discussion applies only to holders that hold their ordinary shares as capital assets (generally property held for
investment) within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. This discussion
is based on the Code, income tax regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial positions, published positions of the Internal Revenue
Service, or the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to
change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion is general in nature and is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations,
nor does the discussion address any state, local or foreign tax considerations or any U.S. tax considerations (e.g., estate or
gift tax) other than U.S. federal income tax considerations, that may be applicable to particular holders.
This discussion does not address all aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant in light of particular circumstances, nor does it address the U.S. federal
income tax consequences to persons who are subject to special rules under U.S. federal income tax law, including:
|
●
|
banks,
insurance companies or other financial institutions;
|
|
●
|
persons
subject to the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
●
|
tax-exempt
organizations;
|
|
●
|
controlled
foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies and corporations that accumulate
earnings to avoid United States federal income tax;
|
|
●
|
certain
former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;
|
|
●
|
dealers
in securities or currencies;
|
|
●
|
traders
in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities
holdings;
|
|
●
|
persons
that own, or are deemed to own, more than five percent of our capital stock;
|
|
●
|
holders
who acquired our stock as compensation or pursuant to the exercise of a stock option;
or
|
|
●
|
persons
who hold our shares as a position in a hedging transaction, “straddle,” or
other risk reduction transaction.
|
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S.
holder is (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (ii) a corporation,
or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States (or treated as such under applicable U.S. tax laws), any state thereof, or the District of Columbia; (iii) an estate
the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust if (a) a U.S. court is able
to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control
all substantial decisions of the trust, or (b) it has a valid election in effect under applicable law and regulations to be treated
as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A non-U.S. holder is a holder that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership
or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In the case of a partnership or entity
classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally
will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships should consult their
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to them of the merger or of the ownership and disposition of our
ordinary shares.
Distributions
We do not currently anticipate paying
distributions on our ordinary shares. In the event that distributions are paid, however, the gross amount of such distributions
will be included in the gross income of the U.S. holder as dividend income on the date of receipt to the extent that the distribution
is paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Such dividends
will be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S.
corporations. Dividends received by non-corporate U.S. holders, including individuals, may be subject to reduced rates of taxation
under current law. A U.S. holder may be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any PRC withholding tax imposed
on dividends paid by us. However, the foreign tax credit rules are complex, and their application in connection with Section 7874
of the Code and the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the People’s
Republic of China for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Tax Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, or the
U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty, is not entirely clear at this time. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to any
benefits they may be entitled to under the foreign tax credit rules and the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty.
To the extent that dividends paid on our
ordinary shares exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distributions will be treated first as a tax-free return
of tax basis on our ordinary shares, and to the extent that the amount of the distribution exceeds tax basis, the excess will
be treated as gain from the disposition of those ordinary shares.
Sale or Other Disposition
U.S. holders of our ordinary shares will
recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition of ordinary shares equal to the difference
between the amount realized for the ordinary shares and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares. This gain or
loss generally will be capital gain or loss. Under current law, non-corporate U.S. holders, including individuals, are eligible
for reduced tax rates if the ordinary shares have been held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject
to limitations. A U.S. holder may be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any PRC withholding tax imposed on
gain from the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares. However, the foreign tax credit rules are complex, and their application
in connection with Section 7874 of the Code and the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty is not entirely clear at this time. U.S. holders should
consult their own tax advisors with respect to any benefits they may be entitled to under the foreign tax credit rules and the
U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty.
Unearned Income Medicare Contribution
Certain U.S. holders who are individuals,
trusts or estates are required to pay an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on, among other things, dividends on and capital gains from
the sale or other disposition of shares of stock. U.S. holders should consult their own advisors regarding the effect, if any,
of this legislation on their ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance provisions
of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (generally referred to as “FATCA”), when applicable, will impose
a U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% on payments of dividends on, and (for dispositions after December 31, 2018) gross proceeds
from dispositions of, our ordinary shares that are held through ’‘foreign financial institutions’’ (which
is broadly defined for this purpose and in general includes investment vehicles) and certain other non-U.S. entities unless various
U.S. information reporting and due diligence requirements (generally relating to ownership by U.S. persons of certain interests
in or accounts with those entities) have been satisfied or an exemption applies. An intergovernmental agreement between the United
States and an applicable foreign country may modify these requirements. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding
the effect, if any, of the FATCA provisions on their particular circumstances.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
Payments of dividends or of proceeds on
the disposition of stock made to a holder of our ordinary shares may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding
at a current rate of 24% unless such holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number on IRS Form W-9 (or other appropriate
withholding form) or establishes an exemption from backup withholding, for example by properly certifying the holder’s non-U.S.
status on a Form W-8BEN, Form W-8BEN-E or another appropriate version of IRS Form W-8. Payments of dividends to holders must generally
be reported annually to the IRS, along with the name and address of the holder and the amount of tax withheld, if any. A similar
report is sent to the holder. Pursuant to applicable income tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make these reports available
to tax authorities in the holder’s country of residence.
Backup withholding is not an additional
tax; rather, the U.S. income tax liability of persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld.
If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund or credit may generally be obtained from the IRS, provided that the
required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Expert
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
We have filed this Annual Report on Form
20-F with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Statements made in this Annual Report as to the contents of any document
referred to are not necessarily complete. With respect to each such document filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report,
reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete description of the matter involved, and each such statement shall be deemed
qualified in its entirety by such reference.
We are subject to the informational requirements
of the Exchange Act as a foreign private issuer and file reports and other information with the SEC. Reports and other information
filed by us with the SEC, including this report, may be inspected and copied at the public reference room of the SEC at 100 F
Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. You can also obtain copies of this report by mail from the Public Reference Section of the
SEC, 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Additionally, copies of this material may be obtained from
the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. The SEC’s telephone number is 1-800-SEC-0330.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt
from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers,
directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section
16 of the Exchange Act.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We are not exposed to significant interest
rate risk as we do not have any significant bank loans which bear interest at a variable prime rate.
Foreign Exchange Risk
While our reporting currency is the U.S.
Dollar, substantially all of our consolidated revenues and consolidated costs and expenses are denominated in RMB. All of our
assets are denominated in RMB except for cash. As a result, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk as our revenues and results
of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and RMB. If the RMB depreciates against
the U.S. Dollar, the value of our RMB revenues, earnings and assets as expressed in our U.S. Dollar financial statements will
decline. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses are translated
at the average exchange rates and shareholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Any resulting translation
adjustments are not included in determining net income but are included in determining other comprehensive income, a component
of shareholders’ equity. We have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign
exchange risk.
Very limited hedging transactions are
available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions
in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may enter into hedging transactions in the future,
the availability and effectiveness of these transactions may be limited, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure
at all. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our
ability to convert RMB into foreign currencies.
Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases
in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation
has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a high rate of inflation in the future may
have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses
as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Debt Securities
Not applicable.
Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
Other Securities
Not applicable.
American Depositary Shares
The Company does not have any American
Depositary Receipts.