false
0000875729
0000875729
2024-11-18
2024-11-18
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 19, 2024 (November
18, 2024)
BION
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Exact name of Registrant
as Specified in its Charter
Colorado |
|
000-19333 |
|
84-1176672 |
State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation |
|
Commission File Number |
|
IRS Employer Identification
Number |
9
East Park Court
Old
Bethpage, New
York 11804
Address of Principal
Executive Offices, Including Zip Code
516-586-5643
Registrant's Telephone
Number, Including Area Code
Not applicable
Former name or former
address, if changed since last report
Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
| ☐ | Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| ☐ | Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class |
|
Trading
Symbol(s) |
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is an emerging growth company as defined in in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth
company ¨ |
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On November 18, 2024, the Company issued
a press release entitled “Bion Issues Update and Outlook” which press release has been placed on the Investors page
of our website.
On November 18, 2024, the Company placed
on its website a Shareholder Update and Outlook Letter.
Item 9.01 Financial
Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
|
BION ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Stephen Craig Scott |
Date: November 19,
2024 |
Name: |
Stephen Craig Scott Interim CEO |
Exhibit 99.1
Bion Issues Update and Outlook
November 18, 2024. Billings, Montana. Bion Environmental
Technologies, Inc. (OTC QB: BNET), a leader in advanced livestock/organic waste treatment technology and sustainable livestock production,
issued an Update and Outlook.
The full update can be found on Bion’s website at Bion
Update and Outlook.
____________________________________________
Bion Environmental Technologies’ patented
Ammonia Recovery System produces organic and low-carbon nitrogen fertilizer products and clean water from animal manure waste and other
organic waste streams. It supports sustainable livestock production that will minimize environmental impacts from CAFO/ livestock waste.
Bion is focused on providing ammonia control and resource recovery for a state-of-the-art indoor cattle feeding operation in Montana and
providing solutions in the fast-growing renewable natural gas and clean fuels industry. See Bion’s website at https://bionenviro.com.
This material (and
the material it links to) include forward-looking statements based on management's current reasonable business expectations. In this document,
the words ‘will’, ‘think’, ‘believe’, ‘anticipate(s)’ and similar expressions identify
certain forward-looking statements. It should be noted it is difficult to accurately predict the startup and optimization of a first-of-its-kind
advanced waste treatment technology platform. The timelines discussed are estimates only. These statements are made in reliance on the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Section 27A of the Securities act of 1933, as amended. There are numerous risks and uncertainties
that could result in actual results differing materially from expected outcomes.
Contact Information:
Craig Scott, CEO
cscott@bionenviro.com
(406) 281-8178 (direct)
Exhibit 99.2
Shareholder Update and Outlook
November 18, 2024
Dear Shareholders (and others),
For those that don’t know me, I’m Craig Scott, Bion’s
interim CEO. I have been involved with Bion, in some capacity, since 1993. I used to write these Updates/Outlooks as Director of Communications.
They summarize information about our recent activities and future expectations (see forward-looking statements, below) that are presented
in much greater detail in our SEC filings: our recent Form 10-K (Annual Report) and Form 10-Q, that was filed last week. We urge investors
to read these documents carefully to understand the recent changes and how they impact Bion today and going forward. You are also encouraged
to reach out to me at cscott@bionenviro.com if you still have questions.
________________________________
It’s no secret we’ve had some setbacks, especially
recently. Technology development of our Ammonia Recovery System at Buflovak’s New York campus was almost complete in 2019/20, when
it was interrupted by Covid. Lingering supply chain issues delayed startup at the small commercial demonstration facility at Fair Oaks,
Indiana, by several months last year. The Fair Oaks’ delays created (unfounded) concerns about the technology and caused us to miss
our projected timelines – not a good look for a small, thinly-traded, and undercapitalized technology company.
About the time we did achieve startup, our management crises
peaked with the passing of Dominic Bassani in November. Dom was our long-time CEO (and recent COO) and the driving force behind Bion for
almost 25 years. Further, in May, we accepted the resignation of Bill O’Neill, who had been engaged two years prior to take over
for Dom when we learned he was sick. Mark Smith, our long-time CFO, President, and General Counsel, retired at the end of July, as anticipated.
Management turmoil indicates uncertainty. That uncertainty, right after missing timelines that hurt the Company’s credibility, also
hurt our share price and our ability to raise capital. These are NOT excuses, they are an explanation.
The silver lining in the dark clouds is that we DID get the
Ammonia Recovery System at Fair Oaks started up and then optimized. It has exceeded expectations in terms of performance and supporting
the economics in our business model. Further, we have installed a new core management team that includes me and Greg Schoener, interim
COO, and a prior large Bion investor and shareholder, and Turk Stovall, CEO of Stovall Ranching Companies and Yellowstone Cattle Feeders.
Turk will develop and operate the beef project in Shepherd, Montana. The three of us have also accepted positions on the Board, along
with another new Director, Bob Weerts, a successful serial entrepreneur from Winnebago, Minnesota, who was also a previous Bion investor.
In our opinion, the conditions that led to the share price decline and difficulties raising capital are behind us. Further, we believe
new management has the mindset and experience needed to move Bion out of ‘science project’ mode and into commercialization.
Share Price
First, the elephant in the room… NO one is happy about
our share price. As above, the combination of delays, management crises, and the financial challenges that resulted have hurt. Our share
price was already moving down from the Fair Oaks delays, but the selling activity and volumes picked up dramatically after Dom passed.
This selling was widely misunderstood. It was not Dom or his heirs. They are insiders. They are required to file an SEC report if they
sell stock – you (and I) would know. Most of the increased selling during that time were shares that had been ‘dormant’
for many years. I believe much of it was from Dom’s friends and acquaintances from way back. In my opinion, many of these shareholders
were not so much investors in Bion, as they were in Dom. Most of them invested between 2000, when Dom met Bion, and 2005. They held the
stock while he was alive; but when he passed, their reason to hold the stock passed with him. It is not unusual for this to happen. The
downward trend this fed was worsened by the continued financial and management difficulties. That said, it felt to me like the ‘panic
selling’ mostly finished up in September. Now we need to raise capital, make some progress, and show the world we’re still
here and moving forward.
BLG Loan Group Note
Now, for the smaller elephant in the room… this transaction
has been misunderstood by many of the shareholders I have spoken with recently. Some of you have expressed concerns that BLG is trying
to take advantage of our situation, in Wallstreet vulture fashion. In my opinion, nothing could be further from the truth.
Briefly (again, read the 10-Q for detail), five individuals
who believe in the future of Bion, four with significant prior investments in the Company, have been advancing money to us for the last
two and a half months. They had nothing more than a verbal agreement in place until recently. Without those advances, we would have been
out of business. Period. They could have demanded a significant discount to our already low market price (like the vultures mentioned
above). They didn’t, since that would have set a precedent for future financings and dilution. Instead, they accepted a secured
promissory note that will convert into shares based on the terms of a future offering or funding, which we hope will be at a higher price
than today. For that concession, they took a security interest in our Intellectual Property. In other words, our technology and patents
are their collateral in the worst-case scenario, which is default. Bion defaults if it is unable to raise $3 million between now and April
15, 2025, by way of investment offering, strategic investment, license payment, or other source of funding. The note and security agreements
are exhibits to our Form 8-K, dated 10/24/24. That said, here’s my response to shareholder concerns, both personally and as
CEO:
| - | See above (or our filings): our next step was bankruptcy.
In that case, Shareholders would lose all of the value of their investment and the $2M worth of creditors at Fair Oaks wouldn’t
get paid. BLG stepping in gave Bion and the shareholders a chance to continue, and the creditors a chance to get paid. |
| - | The $3 million funding threshold was determined by how much
it will take for Bion to clean up its creditors at Fair Oaks and provide six months of operating capital. |
| - | Three of the BLG members (a majority) are Turk Stovall,
Greg Schoener, and Bob Weerts, who are also members of Bion’s Board of Directors. Directors have a fiduciary duty to place the
best interests of the company and its shareholders above their own. The agreements were negotiated and executed in good faith and
clearly written to give Bion every chance to succeed. The Board of Directors voted unanimously to ratify the agreements (since they are
members of BLG, Stovall, Schoener, and Weerts abstained from the vote to ratify the agreements). |
| - | Moreover, the BLG loan group agreed to share the collateral
on a pro rata basis with investors in a note with very similar terms that is available to our previous investors and shareholders. |
Fertilizer
We achieved the OMRI Listing on our 10-0-0 nitrogen fertilizer
in late August. With both the listing AND production location, we could begin outreach to potential fertilizer partners or purchasers
in earnest. This is our focus at this time. Access to premium organic and low-carbon fertilizer markets underpins our patents and our
business model and opportunity.
We are very encouraged by our initial responses and
hope to have real news on this soon. We have learned from speaking with large stakeholders in the organic fertilizer sector that there
is clearly a demand for an OMRI Listed 10-0-0 liquid nitrogen fertilizer and there are very few products comparable to ours available
today. We also learned that others have promised similar products before but have been unable to deliver. We think our Fair Oaks success
will prove that we can.
We completed a preliminary evaluation of the Carbon Intensity
(CI) of the fertilizer that indicates its CI score is 96% lower than urea (UAN - the baseline). The CI score can be improved even more
if energy produced onsite with solar and/or biogas is used to power the process. We plan to do an independent CI evaluation of the fertilizer
and comprehensive Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of the system.
Technology
The ARS at Fair Oaks has been optimized for animal waste. As
we’ve said several times, it has exceeded expectations. We have been operating and collecting data to establish final design parameters
and support an independent engineering report being prepared by Buflovak/Hebeler Process Solutions. We believe the data runs completed
on Thursday, November 14 will be the last ones; however, we will know when the samples that were sent to the lab for analysis confirm
it. The report will provide third-party verification of the technology’s performance and economics that will be required for final
design, feasibility studies and financing, and preparation for commercial launch.
We have been especially impressed with just how robust the
ARS is. It has demonstrated performance under a wide range of less-than-ideal operating conditions. Further, the system has been tested
and proven on a dairy waste stream, which we consider to be the most difficult (and least economic) of all the animal waste streams to
target for ammonia control and recovery.
This is important: there have been a number of advancements
in digester (AD) and other technologies that will allow us to better optimize the waste stream coming into our ammonia recovery system.
These processes, coupled with improvements we believe can be made to the ARS, should further improve our treatment and fertilizer production
economics by significantly reducing both capital and operating costs. They should also allow us to recover much more water and in a cleaner
form.
Our Opportunities
It’s GO-TIME for the Stovall Ranching Company/YCF project.
As a lot of you know, my favorite saying about projects, partners, and JV’s is, “there are 46 ways the cat could be skinned.”
All of them are on the table in an effort to get construction started in time to qualify for the large biogas Investment Tax Credit (ITC)
that expires on December 31, 2024. Keep your fingers crossed and we’ll keep you posted as progress is made. It can’t be overemphasized:
the sooner this project moves forward, the sooner we get to revenues, and the sooner we prove the ARS at full commercial scale.
Which brings us to what REALLY has our attention… how
to best exploit our patented Ammonia Recovery System as a ‘standalone’ ammonia control solution – for other people’s/companies’
problems. Whenever anaerobic digestion (AD) is used to produce biogas from any organic waste stream, it frees up a tremendous amount of
ammonia in the effluent from the digester. That ammonia is volatile and highly-mobile. When it escapes to the environment it contributes
to small particulate air pollution, contaminates groundwater, and creates algae blooms and dead zones in our surface waters. It is under
increasing scrutiny by advocacy groups and regulatory agencies (more on that below).
At this time, we are focused on providing solutions for livestock
production – beef, poultry, swine, and dairy waste – that our technology was purpose-designed and -built for. There is NO
doubt that the livestock industry needs solutions: to enhance their image, improve their economics, and get ahead of all-but-certain looming
regulations. We think California may be our first and best opportunity in the U.S, with its ‘Perfect Storm’ of heavy livestock
concentration, a thriving biogas industry and a limited amount of land to spread waste on, an equally thriving organic industry, and ever-present
oversight of air and water quality.
We are also increasingly optimistic about the opportunity to
provide ammonia control for other biogas/ biomethane sources, besides animal waste. Last January, we announced our fifth patent, that
extends our IP to include municipal and industrial waste streams, such as food, food processing, and slaughter/packing waste. Industrial
and municipal waste streams are closely regulated, and nutrient control is an accepted cost of doing business. We are still learning about
these waste streams and our ARS’s economics to treat them. We believe our ‘sweet spot’, where volume and concentration
create favorable economics, may be broad. Further, while we think our cost to isolate the ammonia will be competitive with other technologies,
our organic AND low-carbon nitrogen fertilizer should create market advantages for both treatment (as a service) and premium fertilizer
pricing. We have seen interest in our ammonia control solution, both here in the U.S. and from EU biogas project developers.
As discussed in our January press release, the U.S. has a little
over 2,000 AD (digester) installations that produce biogas from organic waste, many treating animal waste and of a size large enough to
warrant our interest. In the EU, there are approximately 18,000 such facilities. With the EU’s increasing limits on nitrogen, and
the demand we see for eco-friendly organic fertilizers like ours, we believe there may be a robust market in the EU for ammonia control
solutions that produce such fertilizers. Further, the potential for renewable natural gas growth in the U.S. represents a lot of potential
projects. The American Biogas Council puts that potential at over 15,000 facilities (many will be small scale and not attractive to Bion).
We believe our third-generation technology may have broad applications in this opportunity and we look forward to participating in its
development.
Environmental Trends
Over the last few years, the environmental spotlight globally
and in the U.S. has been on climate change. We see a clear trend of that focus beginning to shift toward water quality. The last two COP
Climate Change Summits have paid increasing attention to water, and especially to agriculture’s impacts on it.
In the U.S. and EU, there is growing scrutiny of the impacts
of ammonia. Agriculture is the largest source of ammonia on the Planet. Biogas production from large dairies in California (and other
locations) is really under the microscope in the U.S. right now, and there is an ongoing multistate study of the impacts of ammonia and
nitrogen in the Midwest. You can learn more about ammonia, and why we are focused on it, in this document on our website.
Conclusion
The ARS technology works and works well. Moreover, we believe there
is a robust and growing market for it, in both the livestock and biogas/biomethane sectors. We have put a focused and motivated management
team in place now that is dedicated to moving the company to commercial operations. We are moving forward with the Stovall Project and
evaluating opportunities to deploy the technology as a standalone solution in an initial project. It is time to raise capital and put
Bion back on its path. We thank you for your support over the years and hope you will continue to do so.
Craig Scott, CEO
cscott@bionenviro.com
(406) 281-8178 (direct)
This material includes
forward-looking statements based on management's current reasonable business expectations. In this document, the words ‘believe’,
‘anticipate’, and similar expressions identify certain forward-looking statements. It should be noted it is difficult to accurately
predict the startup and optimization of a first-of-its-kind advanced waste treatment technology platform. The timelines discussed are
estimates only. These statements are made in reliance on the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Section 27A of the Securities act
of 1933, as amended. There are numerous risks and uncertainties that could result in actual results differing materially from expected
outcomes. Investors are urged to review the information on the Company’s website and in its SEC filings.
v3.24.3
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AmendmentFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFor the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:dateItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentType |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Definition
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCode for the postal or zip code
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionName of the state or province.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:stateOrProvinceItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCommission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityFileNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:fileNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTwo-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarStateCountryItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:employerIdItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionLocal phone number for entity.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_LocalPhoneNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 13e -Subsection 4c
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementIssuerTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 14d -Subsection 2b
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 14a -Subsection 12
+ Details
Name: |
dei_SolicitingMaterial |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230 -Section 425
+ Details
Name: |
dei_WrittenCommunications |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
Bion Environmental Techn... (QB) (USOTC:BNET)
過去 株価チャート
から 12 2024 まで 1 2025
Bion Environmental Techn... (QB) (USOTC:BNET)
過去 株価チャート
から 1 2024 まで 1 2025