TROOPS Inc (SG5)

Hey Jay, did you see that idiot runt of semi-male DNA on that last YouTube video just posted ? I laughed at the CGI image of the little runt gurly man trying to impress the audience with his near death experiences

The gurly man quite the imagination about his almost death at 5 years

You may be able to get it at 130 if spcx is among the 70-80% bottom performing companies: Long-run data shows that the top-performing 10-20% of IPOs yield massive, market-beating returns (over 300%), but the bottom 70-80% fail completely or significantly lag behind the rest of the stock market

Hi Neo,

Lets see if there are any proposed changes to the ERCF proposed by the FHFA as required by the Reg Cap EO. We should know by July 11th - it is 120 Days correct?

The current ERCF requirements prohibits any dividends or buy backs but if the SPS is written off and

O/S more than quadrupling to over 47M.

https://x.com/BitImmortal/status/2065291261305847996?s=20

I know Hawks and called him and the CEO when the financials came out. It was simply not caught and I posted that in the past. It will be changed next financials.

1/14/26 M Hawks 1.5 Mill Commons .15 LoL Reg D was a misprint it should have stated .015.

My intiial pu

Trip zeros and HIRU are a great look, no?

Bigworld, Thanks for the updates. With the timing of Trump's latest 'peace is at hand' announcement, I doubt the Space-X IPO had too much to do with it, but you never know. With Trump's ego, there's obviously some jealousy with Musk, so if anything he would probably try to sabotage Elon's big day

Justice Department approves Paramount Skydance’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, source says
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/justice-department-approves-paramount-skydance-acquisition-warner-bros-rcna349862 https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/justice-department-approves-par

Got it…”Long and true diamond hands”.
PSRU is toast but it’s hard to keep up with PSRU sentiments, yes?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177651286

TY Menace for the Update

Jeff response to my question requesting an update about otc compliance before EOY,

‘We do hope to be public reporting and trading by EOY.

At the moment, that’s a hope. It is not only dependent on us. It is dependent on availabili

🌐$ 388,771 dollar vol 6/12
$ 711,981 dollar vol 6/11
$ 1,018,006 dollar vol 6/10
$ 1,004,838 dollar vol 6/9
$ 1,424,498 dollar vol 6/8
$ 903,484 dollar vol 6/5 1% loss for the week
$ 298,882 dollar vol 6/4
$ 641,423 dollar vol 6/3
$ 1,1

VSME, there it goes, maybe

Pee pee…the kids are waiting for you to teach the evening class…how to steal bikes   

Fair enough, I was talking about him.

He has a long history of believing every silly pump.

I know that because I've attempted (and failed) to set him straight on several boards in the past.

Fortunately for you there are plenty easy marks for you to use as

Interesting, neither IDCC or AMZN have filed an 8k yet 😶🤫

Thanks for proving my point!! Stupidity begats stupidity...must run in your line. OUCH! Yet another flat earther Imbecile, clueless about all things including markets.

Is the bottom in

TAL Education Group Files Its Annual Report on Form 20-FJune 12, 2026 4:48 PM
PR Newswire (US) class="legendSpanClass"BEIJING, class="legendSpanClass"June 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- TAL Education Group ("TAL" or the "Company") (NYSE: TAL),

Laser Photonics Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Periodic Filing RequirementJune 12, 2026 4:45 PM
ACCESS NewswireFiling of First Quarter 2026 Form 10-Q Restores Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1)ORLANDO, FL /

QYOU Media To Release FY 2025 & Q1 2026 Financial Results Pre-Market Open on June 15th, 2026June 12, 2026 4:57 PM
PR Newswire (Canada) Management call to discuss results to be held on June 15th, 2026 at 1:30 PM EST class="legendSpa

Why would you do some DD when you don’t own this stock? why…why…why…you must be pretty stupid to think everyone with shares here are as stupid as you😀😀😀no shares…paid by naked short brokers…wait for the knock…

This involves Case #1122 and Case # 00614 which were joined together. It was a breach of contract case and involved two Netlist patents - the '024 patent and the '319 patent. Netlist asked for an "Adverse Ruling" on both patents in this case - basically asking the court to

A short squeeze coming? That’s actually funny.