LANV Lanvin Group Holdings Limited

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price and value of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. This prospectus and any prospectus supplement or related free writing prospectus also contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this prospectus and any prospectus supplement or related free writing prospectus.

Throughout this prospectus, unless otherwise designated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Lanvin Group,” “the Company” and “our Company” refer to Fosun Fashion Group (Cayman) Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries, prior to the consummation of the Business Combination and to Lanvin Group Holdings Limited, or LGHL, and its consolidated subsidiaries following the Business Combination, as the context requires. The term “PCAC” refers to Primavera Capital Acquisition Corporation prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and is expected to continue to have, a significant adverse impact on us and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected, including due to supply chain disruptions, broad shutdowns, the impact on the businesses of our wholesale customers and other factors.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and is expected to continue to have, a significant impact on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operations. As a result of the pandemic, governments and authorities across the world implemented lockdowns and restrictions to prevent the spread of the virus. These restrictions have impacted our operations in a number of respects, including due to cancelations of or capacity restrictions on certain marketing and brand events and limitations on in-person meetings among our sales teams. In addition, the inability or unwillingness of customers to travel has had a significant impact on sales driven by tourism. Restrictive measures in certain regions also resulted in store closures which have prevented consumers from purchasing goods directly from stores. The extent of the impact of the pandemic on our business, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, will depend on future developments, including the duration, severity and locations of any resurgence of infections, the imposition or loosening of restrictions on store operations or travel, the availability and effectiveness of the vaccines, and other factors, none of which can be predicted with certainty.

Broad lockdowns under government orders, particularly in China and Europe, were put in place during the first quarter of 2020 and continued into 2022 for several regions in China including particularly the extended lockdown in Shanghai (where our headquarters are based) that was in effect through early June 2022. These shutdowns have negatively affected our business and those of our wholesale customers and our franchisees, and our business may continue to be impacted to the extent that shutdowns or other restrictive measures are continued or newly imposed in our operating markets. For example, the shutdowns in China have negatively affected our revenue from retail stores in the impacted areas. In places where stores are open, they generally are operating on reduced hours and at reduced occupancy levels and remain subject to closure due to health protocols or more limited governmental orders. The impact of the pandemic on some of our wholesale customers has resulted in them closing some of their stores. The pandemic has also impacted our supply chain partners, including third-party manufacturers, logistics providers and other vendors, as well as the supply chains of our wholesale customers, franchisees and licensees, due to factory closures, labor shortages, imposed restrictions on travel and import/export delays. At the same time, the extended lockdowns or reduced mobility of customers as a

20

result of the pandemic has reduced customers desire to shop and incur spending on personal luxury goods. In December 2022, China started to relax COVID-19 related restrictive measures. Higher COVID-19 infection rate ensuing such relaxation in China may continue to cause disruption to consumer spending and behavior, tourism and supply chains, which may in turn negatively affect our business and those of our wholesale customers and supply chain partners.

Consumers have been unable to purchase our products due to the unwillingness to shop in stores out of fear of exposure. Store closures, reduced store hours and occupancy levels, travel restrictions and concerns about the health risks of traveling adversely affect traffic in our stores and our wholesale customers’ and franchisees’ stores. Consumer spending behavior is also being negatively impacted by job losses and reduced incomes, changing needs due to remote working, reduced in-person social interaction, vacation time spent at home and other factors. This is exemplified by the impact on the formalwear segment of each of our brands, as not going to the office means fewer men are wearing dress shirts and ties and by the impact on our shoe business, as women are wearing and purchasing fewer high heeled shoes for the same reasons. All these factors have and are expected to continue to negatively impact our direct sales to consumers and our sales to our wholesale customers, due to lower sales of our products, and those of our licensees, through their sales channels.

If sales, which are more difficult to predict due to the uncertainties surrounding the pandemic, exceed or fall below our expectations, we may experience a shortage of products required to meet demand or excess inventory levels, respectively. Inventory levels in excess of consumer demand may result in inventory write-downs and the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, which could have a material adverse effect on the reputation of our brands and our profitability.

Any or all of the foregoing could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows from operations, as well as placing limitations on our ability to execute on our business strategies and initiatives.

We have incurred significant losses in the past and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the current year and upcoming future years.

We have incurred significant losses in the past and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in the current year and upcoming years. We incurred losses for the year of €135.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 and €76.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2021. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate profit in the future. We will need to generate and sustain increased revenue levels in future periods to achieve profitability, and even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to maintain or increase our level of profitability. Our efforts to grow our business may be more costly than we expect or may not result in the returns we anticipate, and we may not be able to increase our revenue enough to offset our higher operating expenses. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability, and we may continue to experience loss in the future.

The re-branding to Lanvin Group is being challenged by the minority shareholders of Arpège SAS. Arpège SAS, one of our subsidiaries, holds our Lanvin brand portfolio including the “Lanvin” brand name. We cannot predict the outcome of such challenge and may have to discontinue the use by us, at the group holding company level, of the Lanvin brand name.

In 2018, we acquired a controlling stake in Arpe`ge SAS and its subsidiary Jeanne Lanvin SA, which in turn owns the brand “Lanvin”. The shareholders’ agreement entered into by and between FIH and certain minority shareholders of Arpe`ge SAS (as subsequently acceded to by FFG Lily (Luxembourg) S.a`.r.l and then by FFG Lucky SAS, the “Lanvin SHA”) provides that certain matters require an affirmative vote of each member of the board of Arpe`ge SAS representing minority shareholders, including the entry into any related party transactions. The minority shareholders currently own, in the aggregate, 7.48% of the equity securities in Arpe`ge SAS.

21

In October 2021, after rounds of discussion and negotiation with the minority shareholders, we proposed to the members of the board of Arpe`ge SAS representing minority shareholders that an authorization letter permitting the rest of the Lanvin Group to use the “Lanvin” name and brand as part of an international re-branding of Fosun Fashion Group be approved by the board of Arpe`ge SAS. The re-branding was worldwide and well received by our investors and the press. At that time the minority shareholders did not object to the use of the “Lanvin” corporate name and merely suggested some changes to the terms of the authorization letter. We believed such terms were generally reasonable and would be quickly resolved in an amicable fashion. In March through May 2022, the parties continued discussions and negotiations in what appeared to us to be in an amicable and reasonable fashion. In September 2022, we received a letter (the “Minority Shareholder Letter of September 2022”) from one of the minority shareholders (the “Alleging Shareholder”) alleging that we had improperly used the “Lanvin” corporate name in connection with our re-branding initiative and that they had not given formal approval pursuant to the terms of the Lanvin SHA prior to our re-branding. The Alleging Shareholder had also stated in the same letter that other minority shareholders also object to our use of the “Lanvin” name in connection with our re-branding initiative.

We have sought preliminary legal advice and believe we have strong legal defense to such allegations. No formal legal proceedings have been brought by the minority shareholders to date, and we are actively negotiating with the minority shareholders regarding a settlement of these allegations. Any such proceedings or claims can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of resources and other factors, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in any legal proceeding that may be brought by the minority shareholders or that we will be able to settle these allegations on a timely basis or on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Accordingly, we might have to cease our use, at the group holding company level, of the “Lanvin” brand name, and change to another name (or revert to our previous name as Fosun Fashion Group) should we not prevail or settle these allegations. However, we do not expect that, even if we do not prevail or settle these allegations, the continued use of the Lanvin name by Arpe`ge SAS and its subsidiaries, which constitute our Lanvin brand portfolio, will be affected.

The success of our luxury fashion businesses depends on the value of our brands and, if the value of any of those brands were to diminish, our business could be adversely affected.

Our success depends on our brands and their value. The brand names such as Lanvin, Wolford and Sergio Rossi are integral to the existing businesses, as well as to our strategies for continuing to grow and expand the business. Our sales and our ability to achieve premium pricing depend on the perception, recognition and reputation of our brands, which, in turn, depend on factors such as product design, the distinctive character and the quality of our products and customer service, the image of our stores and those of our franchisees and other wholesale customers, the success of our advertising and communication activities and our general corporate profile.

The recognition, integrity and reputation of our brands are among our most valuable assets, which are influenced by several factors, some of which are outside of our control. Our brands’ values could diminish significantly due to a number of factors, including changing consumer attitudes regarding social issues and consumer perception that we have acted in an irresponsible manner. Negative claims or publicity regarding our brands or products, including licensed products, especially through social media, which accelerates and increases the potential scope of negative publicity, could adversely affect the reputation of the brands and sales even if the subject of such publicity is unverified or inaccurate and we seek to correct it. Other factors that may adversely affect our brands’ image include our inability to respond adequately to the needs and expectations of our customers with regard to the quality, style and design of our products, the dissemination by third parties of information that is untrue or defamatory, the commencement of litigation proceedings against us, as well as factors attributable to the parallel distribution and counterfeiting of our products. Each of these factors could harm the recognition, integrity and reputation of our brands, causing us to lose existing customers or fail to attract new customers, or otherwise having a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

22

Our reputation may also suffer as a result of facts depending on our suppliers. While we closely monitor our suppliers to ensure that they comply with all applicable laws and regulations by, among other things, reviewing any published violations and media reports relating to actual or alleged violations, as well as conducting internal due diligence, there can be no assurance that these measures will always be effective. If suppliers fail to comply with applicable law, including but not limited to those relating to labor, social security, health and safety, or if they deliver products that are defective or differ from our specifications or quality standards or do not comply with applicable law, this could have adverse effects on our production cycle and/or product quality and cause delays in product deliveries to our customers. Any of the foregoing in turn could damage our reputation, with possible adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The long-term growth of our business depends on the successful execution of our strategic initiatives and we may not be able to continue to develop and grow our businesses.

A significant portion of our business strategy involves growing our current brands, notwithstanding our intention to invest in new business lines and their development. Our achievement of revenue and profitability growth from these brands will depend largely upon our ability to:

As part of our long-term strategy, we intend to grow our market share and revenue through the following:

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully execute on these strategic initiatives. For example, we may not be able to successfully increase brand engagement due to the impact of COVID-19 and/or unsuccessful marketing campaigns, we may not be able to optimize the customer experience if we are unable to react quickly enough to customer needs and/or complains and our investments in technology may not succeed if we are unable to implement certain digitalization efforts or new technologies and systems do not work as expected. If we are unable to execute on our strategic initiatives, including for reasons due to the challenges we face as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Further, we believe that our success is largely dependent on the images of our brands and ability to anticipate and respond promptly to changing consumer demands and fashion trends in the design, styling, production, merchandising and pricing of products. If we do not correctly gauge consumer needs and fashion trends and respond appropriately, consumers may not purchase our products and our brand names and the images of our brands may be impaired. Even if we react appropriately to changes in fashion trends and consumer preferences, consumers may consider our brands to be outdated or associate our brands with styles that are no longer popular or trend-setting. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our brands, business, results of operations and financial condition.

We cannot assure you that we can execute successfully any of these actions or our growth strategy for these businesses, nor can we assure you that the launch of any additional product lines or businesses by us or that the

23

continued offering of these lines will achieve the degree of consistent success necessary to generate profits or positive cash flow. Our ability to carry out our growth strategy successfully may be affected by, among other things, our ability to enhance our relationships with existing customers, our ability to attract retail customers to our DTC channels, our ability to develop new relationships with retailers, economic and competitive conditions, changes in consumer spending patterns and changes in consumer tastes and style trends. If we fail to continue to develop and grow the brands’ businesses, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our growth depends, in part, on our continued retail expansion, and we may not be successful in undertaking such expansion.

We believe that our future growth depends not only on serving existing customers, but also on continuing to get new customers and expanding our distribution base internationally, including but not limited to opening of new retail stores. When expanding into new locations and markets, we may face challenges that are different from those we currently encounter, including competitive, merchandising, distribution, hiring, legal and regulatory, and other difficulties. Although we continue to evaluate sales and marketing efforts and other strategies to expand our supplier, customer and distribution bases, there is no assurance that we will be successful. If we are not successful, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is heavily dependent on the ability and desire of consumers to shop.

Reduced consumer traffic and purchasing, whether in our own retail stores or in the stores of our wholesale customers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Reductions could result from economic conditions, fuel shortages, increased fuel prices and other circumstances, including adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, war, terrorist attacks or the perceived threat of war or terrorist attacks. Disease epidemics and other health-related concerns, also could result in (and, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, has resulted in) closed stores, reduced consumer traffic and purchasing, as consumers become ill or limit or cease shopping in order to avoid exposure, or governments impose mandatory business closures, travel restrictions or the like to prevent the spread of disease. Additionally, political or civil unrests and demonstrations also could affect consumer traffic and purchasing, as was the case with the protests in Hong Kong SAR in 2019.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and is expected to continue to have, an impact on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operations. As a result of the pandemic, governments and authorities across the world implemented lockdowns and restrictions to prevent the spread of the virus. These restrictions have impacted our operations in a number of respects, including due to cancelations of or capacity restrictions on certain marketing and brand events and limitations on in-person meetings among our sales teams. In addition, the inability or unwillingness of customers to travel has had a significant impact on sales driven by tourism. Restrictive measures in certain regions also resulted in store closures which have prevented consumers from purchasing goods directly from stores.

Consumers also are being affected, resulting in additional adverse impacts on us. Consumers have been unable to purchase our products due to the unwillingness to shop in stores out of fear of exposure. Store closures, reduced store hours and occupancy levels, travel restrictions and concerns about the health risks of traveling adversely affect traffic in our stores and our wholesale customers’ and franchisees’ stores. Consumer spending behavior is also being negatively impacted by job losses and reduced incomes, changing needs due to remote working, reduced in-person social interaction, vacation time spent at home and other factors.

In addition to the factors discussed above, international tourism could be reduced, as could the extent to which international tourists shop at our retail stores or the stores of our wholesale customers. A reduction in international tourist traffic or spending as a result of the ongoing pandemic therefore could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

24

Other factors that could affect the success of our stores include:

Our inability to effectively execute our e-commerce strategy could materially adversely affect the reputation of our brands and our revenue and our operating results may be harmed.

E-commerce is the one of the fastest growing areas of our business both with respect to our direct-to-consumer businesses and the wholesale business (i.e., sales to pure play and e-commerce businesses of traditional retailers). The success of our e-commerce businesses depends, in part, on third parties and factors over which we have limited control, including changing consumer preferences and buying trends relating to e-commerce usage and promotional or other advertising initiatives employed by our wholesale customers or other third parties on their e-commerce sites. Any failure on our part, or on the part of our third party digital partners, to provide e-commerce platforms that attract consumers, build our brands and drive repeat consumer purchases could result in diminished brand image, relevance and loyalty and lost revenue. Additionally, as consumers shift purchasing preferences to online channels, the failure of our e-commerce channels to attract consumers who previously made purchases in our stores and those operated by our wholesale partners and franchisees, will adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our operation of e-commerce sites pose risks and uncertainties including:

Keeping current with technology, competitive trends and the like may increase our costs and may not succeed in increasing sales or attracting consumers. Our failure to respond successfully to these risks and uncertainties might adversely affect the reputation of our brands and our revenue and results of operations.

The success of our e-commerce businesses depends, in part, on consumer satisfaction, including timely receipt of orders. Fulfillment of these orders requires comprehensive fulfillment infrastructure and different logistics operations than for our retail store and wholesale customer operations. We need adequate capacity, systems and operations to support the anticipated growth in our e-commerce businesses. If we encounter difficulties with our distribution facilities or in our relationships with the third parties who operate the facilities, or if any such facilities were to shut down or be limited in capacity for any reason, including as a result of fire, natural disasters, systems disruptions (including as a result of attacks on computer systems, such as ransomware attacks), or labor interruptions, including as a result of disease epidemics and health related concerns (such as the current COVID-19 pandemic), we could experience longer lead times or disruption or delay in distributing our

25

products to our consumers, which could result in consumer dissatisfaction and lost sales. Additionally, we might need to incur significantly higher costs than anticipated to ensure smooth and timely operation. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect on the reputation of our brands and our revenue and results of operations.

We utilize a range of marketing, advertising, and other initiatives to increase existing customers’ spending and to acquire new customers; if the costs of advertising or marketing increase, or if our initiatives fail to achieve their desired impact, we may be unable to grow the business profitably.

We utilize a range of marketing, advertising and other initiatives to drive customers from awareness to consideration to conversion, and promoting awareness of our brands and products is important to our ability to grow our business, drive customer engagement, and attract new customers. We invest significant resources in advertising communication and marketing, which include activities ranging from pure digital and social media marketing initiatives to events like fashion shows, product collaborations and co-marketing projects. We adopt a strategy with a dual-focus on both local and broader international audience. For details, see “Business—Marketing and Advertising.”

If our marketing and advertising efforts are not appropriately tailored to and accepted by our target customers, we may fail to attract customers, and our brands and reputation may be harmed. In addition, our marketing initiatives may become increasingly expensive as competition increases, and generating a meaningful return on those initiatives may be difficult. Our future growth and profitability and the success of our brands will depend in part upon the effectiveness and efficiency of these marketing efforts. Additionally, as the channels through which we conduct our marketing and advertising activities continue to rapidly evolve, we must continue to establish relationships with these channels and may be unable to develop or maintain these relationships on acceptable economic and other terms. Furthermore, we currently receive a significant number of visits to our digital platform via search engine results. Search engines frequently change the algorithms that determine the ranking and display of results of a user’s search, which could reduce the number of visits to our digital platform, in turn reducing new customer acquisition and adversely affecting our results of operations. If we are unable to cost-effectively drive traffic to our digital platform, our ability to acquire new customers and our financial condition would suffer. Email marketing efforts are also important to our marketing efforts. If we are unable to successfully deliver emails to our customers or if customers do not engage with our emails, whether out of choice, because those emails are marked as low priority or spam, or for other reasons, our business could be adversely affected.

Our marketing initiatives may become increasingly expensive, and generating a meaningful return on those initiatives may be difficult or unpredictable. Even if we successfully increase net revenue as a result of our marketing efforts, it may not offset the additional marketing expenses we incur. If our marketing efforts are not successful in promoting awareness of our brands or products, driving customer engagement, or attracting new customers, or if we are not able to cost-effectively manage our marketing expenses, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Failure to accurately forecast consumer demand could lead to excess inventories or inventory shortages, which could result in decreased operating margins, reduced cash flows, and harm to our business.

To meet anticipated demand for our products, we must forecast inventory needs and arrange manufacturing activities based on our estimates of future demand for particular products. Our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products could be affected by many factors, including an increase or decrease in customer demand for our products or for products of our competitors, changing consumer preferences, changing product trends, our failure to accurately forecast consumer acceptance of new products, product introductions by competitors, unanticipated changes in general market conditions, store closures (including, for example, due to the COVID-19 pandemic), and weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. If we fail to accurately forecast consumer demand, we may experience excess inventory levels or a shortage of products available for sale in our stores or for delivery to customers.

26

Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in inventory write-offs, donations by us of our unsold products, inventory write-downs, and/or the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, any of which could cause our gross margin to suffer, impair the strength and exclusivity of our brands, and have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand for our products and fail to arrange sufficient manufacturing capacities in advance, then we may not be able to deliver products to meet our requirements and we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages in our stores or third-party distribution centers could result in delayed shipments to customers, lost sales, a negative customer experience, lower brand loyalty, and damage to our reputation and customer relationships, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Counterfeit or “knock-off” products, as well as products that are “inspired by” our brands may siphon off demand for our brands’ products and may result in customer confusion, harm to our brands, a loss of our market share and/or a decrease in our results of operations.

We face competition from counterfeit or “knock-off” products manufactured and sold by third parties in violation of our intellectual property rights, as well as from products that are inspired by our brands’ products, including private label offerings by e-commerce retailers. In the past, third parties have targeted users on Facebook or other social media platforms intending to target individuals interested in our products and sell such individuals products that look like our brands’ products, often at steep discounts.

These activities of third parties may result in customer confusion, require us to incur additional administrative costs to manage customer complaints related to counterfeit goods, divert customers from us, cause us to miss out on sales opportunities, and result in a loss of our market share. We could also be required to increase our marketing and advertising spend. If consumers are confused by these other products and believe them to be actual products from our brands, we could be forced to deal with dissatisfied customers who mistakenly blame us for poor service or poor-quality goods.

In addressing these or similar issues in the future, we may also be required to incur substantial expense to protect our brands and enforce our intellectual property rights, including through legal action in the United States and the EU or other countries in which we and our brands operate, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

These and similar issues related to these or similar counterfeit products or products “inspired by” our brands could reoccur and could again result in customer confusion, harm to our brand, a loss of our market share and/or a decrease in our results of operations.

We are dependent on suppliers for our products and raw materials, which poses risks to our business operations.

Although no single supplier is or is expected to become critical to our production needs, any of the following could materially and adversely affect our ability to produce or deliver our products and, as a result, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:

27

We face intense competition in the personal luxury goods industry.

Competition is intense in the luxury consumer goods industry. We compete with numerous luxury fashion designers (whether domestically or globally), brand owners, manufacturers and retailers of apparel, accessories and footwear, some of which have greater resources than we do. In addition, in certain instances, we compete directly with our wholesale customers, as they also sell their own private label products in their stores and online. We compete within the personal luxury goods industry primarily on the basis of:

Our customer relationships and sales have been and may be negatively impacted if we do not anticipate and respond to consumer preferences and fashion trends or manage inventory levels appropriately.

Our ability to predict or respond to constantly changing fashion trends, demographics, consumer preferences and spending patterns significantly impacts our sales and operating results. If we do not identify and respond to emerging trends in consumer spending and preferences quickly enough, identify the right partners that align with

28

our customer strategy, broaden or expand our product portfolio fast enough or in the right areas or develop, evolve, and retain our team’s talent, mindset and technical skills to support changing operating models, we may harm our ability to retain our existing customers or attract new customers. Ensuring we optimize our inventory and improve the planning and management of inventory through use of data and analytics is critical to serving our customers, driving growth and maximizing profitability. If we maintain too much inventory, we may be forced to sell our merchandise at lower average margins, which could harm our business. Conversely, if we fail to purchase enough merchandise, or inventory does not arrive fast enough or as expected, we may lose opportunities for additional sales and potentially harm relationships with our customers.

We are subject to certain risks related to the sale of our products through our direct to consumer (“DTC”) channel and in particular our directly operated stores

In our distribution model, the DTC channel primarily consists of directly operated stores (“DOSs”) and e- commerce platforms through which we sell directly to our customers. For details, see “Business—Sales Channels.” The risks related to managing currently existing DOSs mainly relate to possible difficulties in renewing the existing lease agreements, an increase in rental charges and a decline in sales.

Our DOSs are all located in properties that we lease from third parties. There is significant competition among retail operators in our industry to obtain commercial spaces in prestigious locations in major cities, towns and resort destinations worldwide. Accordingly, to renew our lease agreements, we may have to compete with other operators, including those in our same industry, some of which have greater economic and financial resources than ours or otherwise more bargaining power. If we are unable to renew our lease agreements on economic terms consistent with or more beneficial than those currently applicable, or if we are forced to accept rental charges which are substantially higher than the existing ones, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our DOSs have a high level of fixed costs, which affect profits from the retail channel. A reduction in sales or a decrease in revenues from the retail channel could, in light of the high level of fixed costs, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We analyze the performance of each of our DOSs and market trends in order to assess whether to open new DOSs (or move DOSs to a different location), renew existing leases, or close DOSs that are underperforming. If our analysis is inadequate or based on the wrong assumptions, we could select sub-optimal locations for our stores, or keep or open underperforming stores, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, although we have adopted internal policies and training initiatives to ensure that the staff in our DOSs operate in a manner consistent with the image and prestige of our brands, there can be no assurance that such staff will abide by such policies or that inappropriate or illicit behavior by certain employees will not occur. If there is any allegation brought against us as a result of negligence or other impermissible conduct by our DOS staff, we may be exposed to legal or other proceedings or increased public scrutiny, which may result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and management’s attention and potential harm to our reputation.

The operations of our retail channel and DOSs are also subject to risks such as information technology system failure, work stoppage, civil unrest, natural disasters, fire and government imposed shutdowns. Any interruption of activity in our retail channel and DOSs due to these or other similar events out of our control could result in disruption to our operations and a reduction in sales, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

A data security or privacy breach could damage our reputation and our relationships with our customers or employees, expose us to litigation risk, and adversely affect our business.

We are dependent on information technology systems and networks, including the Internet, for a significant portion of our direct-to-consumer sales, including our e-commerce operations. We are also responsible for

29

storing data relating to our customers and employees and rely on third parties for the operation of our e-commerce sites and for the various social media tools and websites that we use as part of our marketing strategy. In our normal course of business, we often collect, transmit, and/or retain certain sensitive and confidential customer information, including credit card information. There is significant concern by consumers, employees, and lawmakers alike over the security of personal information transmitted over the Internet, consumer identity theft, and user privacy, as cyber-criminals are becoming increasingly more sophisticated in their attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and confidential or sensitive data.

We have been and may in future be subject to cyber-attacks and other attempted security breaches. Despite the security measures we currently have in place, our facilities and systems and those of our third-party service providers may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, phishing attacks, computer viruses, malware, ransomware, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other Internet or email events. The increased use of smartphones, tablets, and other wireless devices, as well as the need for a substantial portion of our corporate employees to work remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, may also heighten these and other operational risks. The retail industry, in particular, continues to be the target of many cyber-attacks, which are becoming increasingly more difficult to anticipate and prevent due to their rapidly evolving nature.

The technology we use to protect our systems from being breached or compromised could become outdated as a result of advances in computer capabilities or other technological developments. Further, measures we implement to protect our computer systems against cyber-attacks may make them harder to use or reduce the speed at which they operate, which in turn could negatively impact our customers’ shopping experience resulting in reduced online traffic, diminished loyalty to our brands, and lost sales.

Any perceived or actual electronic or physical security breach involving the misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information, including penetration of our network security, whether by us or by a third party, could disrupt our business, severely damage our reputation and our relationships with our customers or employees, expose us to risks of litigation, significant fines and penalties, and liability, and result in deterioration in our customers’ and employees’ confidence in us, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Since we do not control third-party service providers and cannot guarantee that no electronic or physical computer break-ins and security breaches will occur in the future, any perceived or actual unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information regarding our employees, customers, or website visitors could harm our reputation and credibility, result in lost sales, impair our ability to attract website visitors, and/or reduce our ability to attract and retain employees and customers. As these threats develop and grow, we may find it necessary to make significant further investments to protect data and our infrastructure, including the implementation of new computer systems or upgrades to existing systems, deployment of additional personnel and protection-related technologies, engagement of third-party consultants, and training of employees.

In addition, the regulatory environment relating to information security and privacy is becoming increasingly more demanding with frequent new requirements surrounding the handling, protection, and use of personal and sensitive information. We may incur significant costs in complying with the various applicable state, federal, and foreign laws regarding protection of, and unauthorized disclosure of, personal information. Additionally, failing to comply with such laws and regulations could damage the reputation of our brands and lead to adverse consumer actions, as well as expose us to government enforcement action and/or private litigation, any of which could adversely affect our business.

We are exposed to the risk that personal information of our customers, employees and other parties collected in the course of our operations may be damaged, lost, stolen, divulged or processed for unauthorized purposes.

In carrying out our business, we collect, store and process personal data of our customers, employees and other parties with whom we deal, including data we gather for product development and marketing purposes. Therefore we are subject to a variety of strict and ever-changing data protection and privacy laws on a global basis, including the EU General Data Protection Regulation and the PRC Personal Information Protection Law.

30

We collect customer data and personal information such as name, age, address, gender and contact number, in order to process sales and ensure product delivery as well as to register customers as brand members or VIP customers.

We are exposed to the risk that personal data we store and use may be damaged or lost, stolen, divulged or processed for unauthorized purposes by the individuals responsible for data management or by unauthorized individuals (including third parties and our employees). The destruction, damage to or loss of personal data, as well as its theft, unauthorized processing or dissemination, could significantly impair our reputation and impact our operations; it could also lead to governmental investigations and the imposition of fines by competent authorities, with possible adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Future economic conditions, including volatility in the financial and credit markets, may adversely affect our business.

Economic conditions in the past have adversely affected, and in the future may adversely affect, our business, our customers and licensees and their businesses, and our financing and other contractual arrangements, including, for example, as a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Such conditions, among other things, have resulted, and in the future may result, in financial difficulties leading to restructurings, bankruptcies, liquidations and other unfavorable events for our customers and licensees, may cause such customers to reduce or discontinue orders of our products and licensed products sold by our licensees, and may result in customers being unable to pay us for products they have purchased from us and licensees being unable to pay us for royalties owed to us. Financial difficulties of customers and licensees may also affect the ability of our customers and licensees to access credit markets or lead to higher credit risk relating to receivables from customers and licensees.

Significant inflation could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Economies around the world have generally seen significant inflationary pressures since 2021, which may persist in 2023. If inflation continues to increase or stays above levels seen in recent years, we could face further increases in costs for raw materials, energy costs, labor costs or other production costs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations if we are not able to pass on the increased costs to our customers, or successfully implement other mitigating actions. While we plan to respond to increases in costs through pricing increases for our brands, the foregoing could reduce our profit margins, with a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, many central banks have increased, or are considering increasing, interest rates as a result of the recent inflation, which in turn may increase our borrowing costs.

In addition, significant increases in the costs of other products required by consumers, as well as a raise in interest rates may affect consumer spending power and result in overall reduced spending. The direct impact of inflation will be reflected in pricing increases for our brands.

We are dependent on a limited number of distribution facilities operated by us as well as those of our distribution partners. If one or more of our distribution facilities or those of our distribution partners experience operational difficulties or becomes inoperable, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We operate a limited number of distribution facilities, and our portfolio brands work with licensees for distribution of specific products, including but not limited to Marchon as Lanvin’s exclusive eyewear licensee and distributor, CWF as Lanvin’s exclusive childrenswear licensee and distributor, and Delta as Wolford’s exclusive lingerie licensee and distributor Our ability to meet the needs of our own retail stores and e-commerce channels, as well as our wholesale customers, depends on the proper and uninterrupted operation of distribution facilities, such as warehouses and/or distribution centers, we operate as well as those operated by third parties. If any of these distribution facilities were to shut down or otherwise become inoperable or inaccessible for any

31

reason (including as a result of a government mandate or order due to COVID-19), we could suffer a substantial loss of inventory and/or disruptions of deliveries to our retail and wholesale customers. In addition, we could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with the distribution of our products during the time it takes to reopen or replace the affected facility. Any of the foregoing factors could result in decreased sales and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, we continue to look for new and larger facilities as and when needed to further support our efforts to operate with increased efficiency and flexibility. There are risks inherent in operating in new distribution environments and implementing new warehouse management systems, including technological and operational difficulties that may arise with such transitions. We may experience shipping delays should there be any disruptions in our new warehouse management systems or warehouses themselves.

Our revenues and operating results are affected by the seasonal nature of our business and cyclical trends in consumer spending.

Apparel business is subject to seasonal fluctuations and cyclical trends in consumer spending. Our sales are typically higher in the last quarter of the year, driven by the holiday shopping season and in January and February, driven by Chinese New Year celebrations. To provide shareholders a better understanding of management’s expectations surrounding results, we may provide financial outlook on our expected operating and financial results for future periods comprised of forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Any factor that negatively impacts these selling seasons could have an adverse and disproportionate effect on our results of operations for the entire year.

Additionally, factors such as results differing from guidance, changes in sales and operating income in the peak seasons, changes in our market valuations, performance results for the general retail industry, announcements by us or our industry peers or changes in analysts’ recommendations may cause volatility in the price of our common stock and our shareholder returns.

If our suppliers, licensees, or other business partners, or the suppliers used by our licensees fail to use legal and ethical business practices, our business could suffer.

We require our suppliers, licensees and other business partners, and the suppliers used by our licensees, to operate in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations regarding working conditions, employment practices and environmental compliance. Additionally, we impose upon our business partners operating guidelines that require additional obligations in those areas in order to promote ethical business practices. We audit, or have third parties audit, the operations of these independent parties to determine compliance, through onsite inspections, reviewing certification and sustainability reports, and reviewing whether suppliers are observing compliance standards. This process also includes ad hoc on-site visits from our sourcing and product development department, factory tours and on-site due diligence of new suppliers. We also collaborate with factories, suppliers, industry participants and other stakeholders to improve the lives of the workers and others in our sourcing communities. However, we do not control our business partners, or the suppliers used by our licensees, including with respect to their labor, manufacturing and other business practices.

If any of these suppliers or business partners violates labor, environmental, building and fire safety, or other laws or implements labor, manufacturing or other business practices that are generally regarded as unethical, the shipment of finished products to us or our customers could be interrupted, orders could be canceled and relationships could be terminated. Further, we could be prohibited from importing goods by governmental authorities. In addition, we could be the focus of adverse publicity and our reputation and the reputation of our brands could be damaged. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and, consequently, our results of operations.

32

Our potential inability to find suitable new targets to drive inorganic business growth and the risk that any acquisitions we do complete may not be successful in achieving intended benefits, cost savings and synergies.

Acquisitions have been a consistent part of our growth. Prior to completing any acquisition, our management team identifies expected synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities but, due to legal and business limitations, we may not have access to all necessary information. The integration process may be complex, costly and time-consuming. The potential difficulties of integrating the operations of an acquired business and realizing our expectations for an acquisition, including the benefits that may be realized, include, among other things:

Any future acquisitions may not be successful, may not benefit our business strategy, may not generate sufficient revenues to offset the associated acquisition costs or may not otherwise result in the intended benefits.

We could be adversely affected if we are unable to negotiate, maintain or renew our license agreements.

We are a party to various strategic alliances. If we were to fail to comply with our obligations in relation to those strategic alliances (including with respect to required quality standards and timeliness of deliveries), our strategic alliance partners may terminate, fail to renew or amend in a manner adverse to us the existing arrangements, which may have material adverse consequences on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are also party to certain license agreements, as licensor, whereby we grant, for a certain period of time, the use of our brands to third parties.

If any of these licensees were not to perform their obligations to us (including by failing to ensure the required quality standards and failing to comply with our directions with respect to distribution channels and after sale services), we may be unable in a commercially reasonable time, to replace such licensee with another licensee capable of ensuring equivalent quality and production standards, or procure our services upon the same or substantially the same financial terms. Our inability to maintain a presence in these adjacent luxury sectors or to provide products in these sectors, such as eyewear, childrenswear and lingerie, of a quality comparable to that of our other products may reflect negatively on the reputation and integrity of our brands.

If any of the foregoing licensing agreements or strategic alliances are terminated for any reason, not renewed upon their expiration or renewed but with less favorable terms and conditions, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

33

If our trademarks and intellectual property or other proprietary rights are not adequately protected to prevent use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, and our business may be adversely affected.

Our trademarks and other intellectual property rights are important to our success and our competitive position. We are susceptible to others imitating our products and infringing on our intellectual property rights, especially with respect to our brands, as they enjoy significant worldwide consumer recognition and the generally premium pricing of our brands and products creates additional incentive for counterfeiters and infringers. Imitation or counterfeiting of our products or infringement of our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our brands, undermine our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our revenue and profitability. We cannot assure you that the actions we take to establish and protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others. We cannot assure you that other third parties will not seek to invalidate our trademarks or block sales of our products as a violation of their own trademarks and intellectual property rights. In addition, we cannot assure you that others will not assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of ours or in marks that are similar to ours or marks that we license or market or that we will be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. In some cases, there may be trademark owners who have prior rights to our marks because the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In other cases, there may be holders who have prior rights to similar trademarks. Other than certain trademark disputes described below, the management team is not aware of other trademark or IP disputes of sort, we have in the past and may in the future become involved in proceedings relating to a company’s claim of prior rights to some of our trademarks or marks similar to some of our brands, and any future proceeding (whether actual, potential, or threatened) may have an impact on our business and the financial position of the Group. There is an ongoing trademark dispute between Sergio Rossi and Stefano Ricci, which challenges the trademark registrations for “sr,” “sr 1,” “sr Milano,” and “sr twenty,” as well as challenges the use of “SR (rectangle)” and “SR (oval)”. We do not believe this is material to our brands as the use of such logos is minimal.

We are subject to certain laws, litigation, regulatory matters and ethical standards, and compliance or our failure to comply with or adequately address developments as they arise could adversely affect our reputation and operations.

Our policies, procedures and practices and the technology we implement are intended to comply with applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, tariffs, rules and regulations, including those imposed by jurisdictions that our businesses have presence in, consumer protection and other regulatory agencies, the marketplace, as well as responsible business, social and environmental practices, all of which may change from time to time. Compliance with these requirements and/or changes to them may cause our business to be adversely impacted, or even limit or restrict the activities of our business. In addition, if we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations or implement responsible business, social, environmental and supply chain practices, we could be subject to damage to our reputation, class action lawsuits, regulatory investigations, legal and settlement costs, charges and payments, civil and criminal liability, increased cost of regulatory compliance, losing our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our customers, restatements of our financial statements, disruption of our business and loss of customers. New and emerging privacy and data protection laws may increase compliance expenses and limit business opportunities and strategic initiatives, including customer engagement. Any required changes to our employment practices could result in the loss of employees, reduced sales, increased employment costs, potential labor disputes, low employee morale and harm to our business and results of operations. In addition, political and economic factors could lead to unfavorable changes in tax laws, which may affect our tax assets or liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations. We are also regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. In addition, our directors, officers, employees, affiliates and other third-parties associated with us may be subject to investigations, litigation or other legal proceedings, including those that are unrelated to their relationships and dealings with us.

Any such litigation, legal proceedings or regulatory developments could adversely affect our business, financial condition or reputation.

34

We are subject to legal and regulatory risk.

We are required to comply with the laws and regulations applying to our products and operations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, particularly in relation to the protection of intellectual property rights, competition, product safety, packaging and labeling, import and processing of certain raw materials and finished goods, data protection, limits on cash payments, worker health and safety and the environment. New legislation (or amendments to existing legislation) may require us to adopt stricter standards, which could lead to increased costs for production or limit our operations, and this may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and other anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities. We and our distribution partners may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state owned or affiliated entities and other third parties where we may be held liable for corrupt or other illegal activities, with or without our explicit authorization. We are also subject to sanctions and export control laws and regulations, which may lead to commercial and economic sanctions and export control, prohibitions and other restrictive measures imposed by the different authorities and governments involved, including the European Union, the United States, the United Nations and other countries and international organizations. From time to time, we may conduct some limited activities in countries subject to sanctions, export control or other restrictive measures. While we believe that our activities are in compliance with the applicable laws and sanctions legislation, including embargoes, we cannot exclude the possibility that we or our distribution partners may violate such laws. Any violation of the foregoing laws could lead to regulatory and/or judicial proceedings and sanctions (including civil penalties, denial of export privileges, injunctions, asset seizures and revocations or restrictions of licenses, as well as criminal fines and imprisonment), which may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes to taxation or the interpretation or application of tax laws could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is subject to various taxes in different jurisdictions, which include, among others, value added tax, excise duty, registration tax and other indirect taxes. We are exposed to the risk that our overall tax burden may increase in the future.

Changes in tax laws or regulations, or in the position of the relevant authorities regarding the application, administration or interpretation of these laws or regulations, particularly if applied retrospectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. These changes include the introduction of a global minimum tax at a rate of 15% under the Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy, agreed upon by over 130 jurisdictions under the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting and implemented from 2023.

In addition, tax laws are complex and subject to subjective valuations and interpretive decisions, and we periodically may be subject to tax audits aimed at assessing our compliance with direct and indirect taxes. The tax authorities may not agree with our interpretations of, or the positions we have taken or intend to take on, tax laws applicable to our ordinary activities and extraordinary transactions. In case of challenges by the tax authorities to our interpretations, we could face long tax proceedings that could result in the payment of additional tax and penalties, with potential material adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to risks associated with climate change and other environmental impacts and increased focus by stakeholders on environment, social and governance (“ESG”) matters.

Our business is subject to risks associated with climate change, including in particular disruption to our supply chain, which may impact the production and distribution of our products and availability and price of raw

35

materials. Increased frequency and intensity of weather events (including storms and floods) due to climate change could also lead to more frequent store closures and/or lost sales as customers prioritize basic needs.

There is also increased focus from our stakeholders, including consumers, employees and investors, on corporate responsibility (including ESG matters. We plan to announce in the near future our sustainability strategy and ESG goals. There can be no assurance that our stakeholders will agree with our strategy or will be satisfied with our disclosure, or that we will be successful in achieving our goals. If our ESG practices do not meet our stakeholders’ expectations and standards, or if we fail (or are perceived to fail) to implement our strategy or achieve our goals, our reputation could be damaged, causing our investors or consumers to lose confidence in us and our brands, negatively impacting our employee retention and our business, or having a negative effect on our sales and results of operations. In addition, implementing our ESG strategy and pursuing our ESG goals might involve higher than expected costs and investments which might adversely affect our results of operations.

We may lose key employees or may be unable to hire qualified employees.

We depend on the services and management experience of our executive officers, who have substantial experience and expertise in our business. We also depend on other key employees involved in our design, merchandising and marketing operations. Competition for qualified personnel in the apparel industry is intense and competitors may use aggressive tactics to recruit our key employees. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on us.

We depend on highly specialized craftsmanship and skills.

One of the distinguishing features of certain of our products is the highly specialized craftsmanship involved in their manufacturing, which is also a result of the experience that our specialized employees have acquired over the course of the years.

Although we try to preserve these craftsmanship skills and ensure that they are passed on to the next generations, the number of our specialized employees may decrease in the future and their craftsmanship skills may no longer be readily available. If this were to occur, it could affect our ability to ensure the distinctive quality of certain of our products in the future, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

We operate in multiple jurisdictions, which exposes us to the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates with respect to both revenues and costs related to the production and supply and material procurement processes. We earn revenue denominated in a number of currencies with the substantial majority of our revenue denominated in U.S. Dollars and Euro. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will affect FFG’s financial results, which FFG reports in Euro. In particular, depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Euro would generally have a negative impact on our results of operations as this would result in a decrease in the results of our U.S. business (which are generally denominated in U.S. dollars) when translated into Euro for financial reporting purposes. On the other hand, the appreciation of U.S. dollar against the Euro would generally have a positive impact on our business given the revenue contribution from our U.S. businesses.

We cannot assure you that movements in foreign currency exchange rates will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods. Furthermore, foreign exchange markets have recently experienced significant volatility, and there can be no assurance that our results of operations will not be adversely affected by such volatility.

36

We are subject to risks related to the complexity and uncertainty in interpretation of transfer pricing rules.

We operate in multiple countries worldwide with integrated industrial, commercial, design and communication functions, trademarks used in different jurisdictions and are subject to taxation in countries in which our subsidiaries are located. Within our Group, transactions between related parties located in different countries are carried out in the ordinary course of business and are mainly related to the purchase and sale of goods and the provision of services.

These transactions are subject to transfer pricing rules defined globally by the Organization for Economic and Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) and local tax laws. In this respect, our intercompany prices are set up consistently with the guidance provided by the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and we and our subsidiaries prepare specific transfer pricing documentation with respect to such transactions. Although we believe that our transfer pricing is correct, due to the complexity of these rules and the uncertainties in their interpretation, the tax authorities might challenge the prices of certain of our intercompany transactions and propose transfer pricing adjustments. Consequently, such adjustments may increase the related taxes and impose penalties and late payment interests, which may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We operate in many countries around the world and, accordingly, we are exposed to various international business, regulatory, social and political risks.

We operate in multiple countries worldwide through a direct and indirect distribution network. Our operations in various international markets expose us to various risks, including those arising from: competition with local competitors (which may have greater resources and/or more favorable market positions); the diversity of consumers’ tastes and preferences and our ability to anticipate or respond to such tastes and preferences; changes in the political and economic environments in the countries where we operate; changes in regulations, including tax regulations, and the imposition of new duties or other protectionist measures; strict regulations affecting the import and processing of certain raw materials and finished goods; the occurrence of acts of terrorism or similar events, conflicts, civil unrest or situations of political instability; parallel imports of goods at terms inconsistent with our guidelines and distribution of our products, in violation of exclusive territorial rights granted to other importers and licensees (the so-called “gray market”). These or other factors may harm our business in international markets or cause us to incur significant costs in these markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in global economic, political or social conditions or government policies could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

We place significant focus and reliance on developing global consumer markets. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by global political, economic and social conditions. While the global economy has experienced significant growth over past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economies in EMEA, North America, Greater China and Other Asia. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in our key geographical segments —EMEA, North America, Greater China and Other Asia—and the policies of these governments or in the laws and regulations of these governments could have a material adverse effect on global overall economic growth. Such developments could adversely affect our business and operating results, lead to a reduction in demand for our services and adversely affect our competitive position.

Given our intention to develop global consumer markets including China, we may also be affected significantly by political, regulatory, economic and social conditions in China. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the level of government involvement, development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. Although the Chinese government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic

37

reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets, and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in the PRC is still owned by the government. In addition, the Chinese government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The Chinese government also exercises significant discretion over the PRC’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Additionally, the PRC government also has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of China-based companies (as measured by the location of our company headquarters, and the nationality and location of our executive officers and certain of our directors and shareholders) and our PRC subsidiaries, to conduct their businesses. The PRC government may intervene or influence the operations of such subsidiaries at any time, which could result in a material change in such subsidiaries’ operations and/or the value of our securities. In particular, there has been recent legislation and statements by the PRC government indicating an intent to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas by China-based issuers. Any such regulatory oversight or control could significantly limit, or completely hinder, our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline.

There are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws, rules and regulations. In addition, rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice.

A portion of our operations are conducted (through our subsidiaries) in the PRC, and are governed by PRC laws, rules and regulations. The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

Legislative efforts over the past three decades have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investment in China. However, China’s legal system remains evolving, and recently enacted laws, rules and regulations, which involve uncertainties and can be inconsistent and unpredictable, may be subject to significant degrees of interpretation and enforcement by PRC regulatory agencies.

Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy as compared to more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into and/or our intellectual property rights.

If we were to become subject to the oversight, discretion or control of PRC government authorities over overseas offerings of securities and/or foreign investments, it may result in a material adverse change in our operations, significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline, which would materially affect the interests of the investors.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rules”), adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, include, among other things, provisions that purport to require any offshore special purpose vehicle that is controlled by PRC companies or individuals and formed for the purpose of seeking a public listing on an overseas stock exchange through acquisition of PRC domestic companies to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of its securities on an overseas stock exchange. On September 21, 2006, the CSRC published on its official website procedures specifying documents and materials required to be submitted to it by any such special purpose vehicle seeking CSRC’s approval of overseas listings. We believe that under the PRC laws, regulations and rules currently in effect, the CSRC’s approval under the M&A Rules is not required for the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, including but not limited to the listing of our securities on the NYSE, given that our PRC subsidiaries were incorporated as foreign-invested enterprises by means of foreign direct investments rather than by acquisitions of any PRC domestic companies owned by PRC companies or individuals

38

as defined under the M&A Rules. However, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the scope and applicability of the M&A Rules and the CSRC approval requirement. Therefore, it is uncertain whether we will be required to obtain permission from the PRC government to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchanges in the future, and even when such permission is obtained, whether it will be later denied or rescinded. In addition, we may be required to receive approval under anti-monopoly and competition laws for our past and future acquisitions. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such regulatory approval when needed in a timely manner, or at all, failure of which will subject us to anti-monopoly regulatory actions.

The Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities According to Law (the “Opinions”) jointly issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council, which were made available to the public on July 6, 2021, call for strengthened regulation over illegal securities activities and supervision of overseas listings by China-based companies and propose to take effective measures to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies. The Opinions also provide that the State Council will revise provisions regarding the overseas issuance and listing of shares by companies limited by shares and will clarify the duties of domestic regulatory authorities. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial Measures, which will come into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Trial Measures:

On the same day, the CSRC also held a press conference for the release of the Trial Measures and issued the Notice on Administration for the Filing of Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, which, among others, clarifies that: (i) on or prior to the effective date of the Trial Measures, domestic companies that have already submitted valid applications for overseas offering and listing but have not obtained approval from overseas regulatory authorities or stock exchanges may reasonably arrange the timing for submitting their filing applications with the CSRC, and should complete the filing before the completion of their overseas offering and listing; (ii) a six-month transition period will be granted to PRC domestic companies which, prior to the effective date of the Trial Measures, have already obtained the approval from overseas regulatory authorities or stock exchanges (such as the completion of registration in the market of the United States), but have not completed the indirect overseas listing; and follow-on offerings of such companies will need to comply with the Trial Measures.

39

Furthermore, on April 2, 2022, the CSRC released the Provisions on Strengthening the Confidentiality and Archives Administration Related to the Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises (Drafts for Comments) (the “Confidentiality and Archives Administration Provisions”), which were open for public comments until April 17, 2022. The Confidentiality and Archives Administration Provisions require, among others, that PRC domestic enterprises seeking to offer and list securities in overseas markets, either directly or indirectly, shall establish the confidentiality and archives system, and shall complete approval and filing procedures with competent authorities, if such PRC domestic enterprises or their overseas listing entities provide or publicly disclose documents or materials involving state secrets and work secrets of PRC government agencies to relevant securities companies, securities service institutions, overseas regulatory agencies and other entities and individuals. It further stipulates that providing or publicly disclosing documents and materials which may adversely affect national security or public interests, and accounting files or copies of important preservation value to the state and society shall be subject to corresponding procedures in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. As of the date of this prospectus, the Confidentiality and Archives Administration Provisions had been released for public comments only and the final version and effective date of such regulations are subject to change with substantial uncertainty.

Our PRC subsidiaries accounted for less than 50% of our consolidated revenues, profit, total assets and net assets in 2021 and 2022. However, the interpretation, application and enforcement of the Trial Measures are still evolving and it remains uncertain whether the requirements under the Trial Measures are applicable to an equity securities offering by us.

The resale by the Selling Securityholders pursuant to this registration statement will not be subject to the Trial Measures, as it is not an offering conducted by us. However, if the offering by us pursuant to this registration statement is deemed an indirect offering by the CSRC, we will need to fulfill filing obligations pursuant to the Trial Measures.

Any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining such approval, filing or completing such procedures for the Business Combination, the offering conducted by us under this registration statement or any other capital raising activities, or a rescission of any such approval or filing obtained by us, would subject us to sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities. These regulatory authorities may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operating privileges in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of cash or future capital raising activities into China, or take other actions that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as limit our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline.

Corresponding to the proposed new rules on overseas listing, the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access (2021 Edition) (the “2021 National Negative List”) and the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access in Pilot Free Trade Zones (2021 Edition) (the “2021 FTZ Negative List”) (collectively the “2021 Negative Lists”) promulgated on December 27, 2021 provide that any domestic enterprise engaged in businesses prohibited by the 2021 Negative Lists that intends to issue and list shares overseas shall obtain pre-approval from relevant authorities, the foreign investors shall not participate in the management of the enterprise, and that the shareholding percentage of foreign investors shall comply with the relevant measures applicable to foreign investors’ domestic securities investments by reference. We believe we are not currently engaged in any business that falls into the 2021 Negative Lists.

On December 28, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China, together with certain other government authorities, promulgated the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures that took effect from February 15, 2022, pursuant to which online platform operator holding over one million users’ information must apply for a cybersecurity review before listing abroad, and operators of “critical information infrastructure” that intend to purchase internet products and services that will or may affect national security must apply for a cybersecurity

40

review. Furthermore, the competent government authorities may also initiate a cybersecurity review against the relevant operators where the authorities believe that the network product or service or data processing activities affect or may affect national security. However, the scope of potential operators of “critical information infrastructure” remains unclear. In addition, the scope of network product or service or data processing activities that will or may affect national security is also unclear and subject to regulatory interpretation. As of the date of this prospectus (i) we had not been informed by any PRC governmental authority of any requirement that we were required to apply for a cybersecurity review; (ii) we did not hold or process personal information of over one million users; and (iii) we had not received any investigation, notice, warning, or sanctions from applicable government authorities in relation to national security. Nonetheless, the interpretation and implementation of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures is subject to uncertainties, and the relevant laws and regulations may also change in the future. As a result of such regulatory development, government authorities in China could conduct a cybersecurity review over our PRC subsidiaries, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in tax laws, regulations and policies in jurisdictions in which we operate may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We operate our business in multiple jurisdictions across EMEA, North America and Asia, and we are subject to income taxes in these jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdictions may change our tax obligations. Furthermore, interpretations and enforcement policies with respect to existing tax laws and regulations may also evolve over time. Any of the above developments could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

For example, under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to the enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, issued a circular, known as SAT Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC- controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in the PRC. Although this circular applies only to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, rather than those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT’s general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in the PRC, and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the places where the senior management personnel responsible for the execution of the daily management and operation of production and business of our offshore enterprises and the relevant senior personnel departments performing such duties are mainly located within China; (ii) the decisions of our offshore enterprises over finance (e.g. borrowing, lending, financing, financial risk controls, etc.) and personnel (e.g. appointment, dismissal and remuneration, etc.) matters are made by organization(s) or individual(s) located in China or subject to approval of organization(s) or individual(s) located in China; (iii) the main properties, accounting ledger, corporate seal, minutes of the board meetings and shareholders’ meetings, etc. of our offshore enterprises are situated or kept in China; and (iv) 50% (inclusive) or above of directors with voting rights or senior management personnel of our offshore enterprises ordinarily reside in China.

We believe our company is not a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that our company is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we would be subject to PRC enterprise income on our worldwide income at the rate of 25%. In the event of such regulatory development, we

41

would seek to claim deductions in other relevant jurisdictions, but there can be no assurance that such efforts would effectively mitigate the incremental tax burdens on us. Furthermore, we would be required to withhold a 10% tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders (including the common stockholders) may be subject to PRC tax on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of the common stock, if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders (including the common stockholders) and any gain realized on the transfer of the common stock or ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% (which, in the case of dividends, may be withheld at source by us). These rates may be reduced by an applicable tax treaty, but it is unclear whether non- PRC shareholders of our company would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in our common stock.

Because of the costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations, our results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Managing a business, operations, personnel or assets in another country is challenging and costly. Any management that we may have may be inexperienced in cross-border business practices and unaware of significant differences in accounting rules, legal regimes and labor practices. Even with a seasoned and experienced management team, the costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations, personnel and assets can be significant (and much higher than in a purely domestic business) and may negatively impact our financial and operational performance.

The conflict in Ukraine and sanctions and export controls imposed in response to the conflict, including on Russia and Belarus, may adversely affect our business and other escalating global trade tensions, wars and conflicts, and the adoption or expansion of economic sanctions, export controls, or other trade restrictions could negatively affect us.

Due to ongoing conflict in Ukraine and resulting geopolitical tensions, many governments around the world, including those of the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions, have imposed sanctions on Russia, Belarus, and the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk as well as on certain persons, entities from and industries within those regions, as well as export controls on exports or reexports to Russia or Belarus and involving certain industries and products and the exclusion of certain Russian financial institutions from the SWIFT system. On March 11, 2022, the President of the United States issued an executive order prohibiting exports to Russia and Belarus of luxury goods (including, inter alia, apparel, footwear and certain accessories with a per unit wholesale price of $1,000 or more). Shortly thereafter, on March 15, 2022, the Council of the European Union imposed new sanctions on Russia prohibiting the export of luxury goods having a value in excess of €300 per item (including clothing, footwear, leather and fashion accessories). On April 14, 2022, the United Kingdom implemented a prohibition on the export of luxury goods, which includes specifically defined goods generally in excess of £250 in value, to or for use in Russia. These and any additional sanctions or export controls, as well as any counter responses by the governments of Russia or other countries, are adversely affecting, and will continue to adversely affect, directly or indirectly, our supply chain and customers, as well as the global financial markets and financial services industry.

In light of the current crisis there is also no assurance that we will be able to collect from our franchisees and distributors in Russia certain outstanding receivable amounts for completed sales of the Spring/Summer 2022 collection; as of the date of this prospectus, such amounts were not material. Finally, several of the agreements with our wholesale customers in Russia are due to expire during the course of 2023. It is uncertain whether, when and at what terms and conditions such agreements will be renewed. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In general, the banking, economic and monetary crisis triggered by the conflict may reduce customers’ interest for, and financial ability to buy, luxury products. An expansion of the conflict to other European

42

countries, the United States or other parts of the world, or the worsening of the world economic situation in terms of inflation, energy costs and purchase power, is likely to translate into a lower propensity to spend on luxury good products and potentially impact our business.

We will rely to a significant extent on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our principal operating subsidiaries to fund offshore cash and financing requirements. Any limitation on the ability of our operating subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We are a holding company, and to a significant extent, rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our principal operating subsidiaries for the funds necessary to fund inter-company loans, service any debt we may incur, pay our expenses, including our expenses as a publicly traded company, and to pay any dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders. The earnings from, or other available assets of, our principal operating subsidiaries may not be sufficient to make distributions or pay dividends, pay expenses or satisfy our other financial obligations.

In addition, when our principal operating subsidiaries incur additional debt, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions or remittances to us. Further, the laws, rules and regulations applicable to most of our subsidiaries permit payments of dividends only out of their retained earnings, if any, determined in accordance with applicable local accounting standards and regulations. In addition, under the laws and regulations applicable to certain of our subsidiaries, statutory reserves for employees and pensions are required to be maintained. There are also other limitations under applicable local rules and regulations that may limit the portion of the available capital in our operating subsidiaries which may be transferred to shareholders as dividends. Any such limitations on the ability of our operating subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We expect to incur negative operating cash flows in the next few years and may need to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, scale back or discontinue some of our businesses, operations, investments, acquisitions or other growth initiatives.

We expect to incur negative operating cash flows over the next few years and accordingly may require additional funding in the future to support our operations and growth strategies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient capital from the capital markets or through borrowings or other fundings sources on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funding on a timely basis and on acceptable terms and continue as a going concern, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of our product development programs, investments, acquisitions or other growth initiatives or to otherwise reduce or discontinue our operations. In general, we may be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on business opportunities, and defend against and prosecute litigation necessary to commercialize our product candidates as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are ultimately unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to seek the protection of bankruptcy laws or liquidate our assets and may receive less than the value at which those assets are carried on our audited financial statements, and it is likely that our securityholders will lose all or a part of their investment. In particular, various investments in the pipeline, including our incubator project dedicated to minority investments in fast-growing companies with strengths in creativity, digitalization, as well as sustainable and intelligent supply chains may be put on hold.

Risks Relating to Our Securities

Sales of a substantial number of our securities in the public market by the Selling Securityholders and/or by our existing securityholders could cause the price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants to fall.

The Selling Securityholders can resell, under this prospectus, up to (a) 153,735,526 Ordinary Shares (on a post-exercise and post-conversion basis) constituting approximately 86.4% of our total issued and outstanding

43

Ordinary Shares on a fully diluted basis (assuming and after giving effect to the issuance of Ordinary Shares upon exercise of all outstanding Warrants and conversion of one Convertible Preference Share into 15,000,000 Ordinary Shares) and (b) 11,280,000 Warrants constituting approximately 35.3% of our issued and outstanding Warrants as of the date of this prospectus. The securities being offered in this prospectus represent a substantial percentage of our issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares and Warrants, and the sale of such securities in the public market by the Selling Securityholders, or the perception that those sales might occur, could depress the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants and could depress the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that such sales may have on the prevailing market price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants. See also “—Future resales of our Ordinary Shares issued to Fosun and its affiliates may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.”

In addition, the Selling Securityholders acquired the Ordinary Shares covered by this prospectus at prices ranging from $0.005 per share to $10.00 per share. By comparison, the offering price to public shareholders in PCAC’s initial public offering was $10.00 per unit, which consisted of one share and one-half of one warrant. Consequently, certain Selling Securityholders may realize a positive rate of return on the sale of their shares covered by this prospectus even if the market price of Ordinary Share is below $10.00 per share, in which case the public shareholders may experience a negative rate of return on their investment. For example, based on the closing price of our Ordinary Shares on March 23, 2023, (i) FFG Selling Securityholders may experience weighted average profit of $0.86 per share, or approximately $83.7 million in the aggregate for selling the 97,628,302 Ordinary Shares they received and (ii) the Sponsor may experience profit of $6.095 per share, or approximately $30.5 million in the aggregate for selling the 5,000,000 Ordinary Shares it received.

A certain number of our Warrants will become exercisable for our Ordinary Shares, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our shareholders.

Our Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 31,979,969 Ordinary Shares will become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement and the Existing Warrant Agreement governing those securities. These Warrants will become exercisable on January 13, 2023. The exercise price of these Warrants will be $11.50 per share. To the extent such Warrants are exercised, additional Ordinary Shares will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of our Ordinary Share and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such Warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares.

Assuming the exercise of all outstanding Warrants for cash, we would receive aggregate proceeds of approximately $367.8 million. However, we will only receive such proceeds if all Warrant holders fully exercise their Warrants. The exercise price of our Warrants is $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment. We believe that the likelihood that Warrant holders determine to exercise their Warrants, and therefore the amount of cash proceeds that we would receive, is dependent upon the market price of our Ordinary Shares. If the market price for our Ordinary Shares is less than the exercise price of the Warrants (on a per share basis), we believe that Warrant holders will be very unlikely to exercise any of their Warrants, and accordingly, we will not receive any such proceeds. There is no assurance that the Warrants will be “in the money” prior to their expiration or that the Warrant holders will exercise their Warrants. As of March 23, 2023, the closing price of our Ordinary Shares was $6.10 per share. Warrant holders have the option to exercise the Warrants on a cashless basis in accordance with the Existing Warrant Agreement. To the extent that any Warrants are exercised on a cashless basis, the amount of cash we would receive from the exercise of the Warrants will decrease.

The trading price of our securities has been and is likely to continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to holders of our securities.

The trading price of our securities has been and is likely to continue to be volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below

44

could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline. Factors affecting the trading price of our securities may include:

Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general, and the NYSE in particular, have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for retail stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us could depress the trading price if our securities regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or cease publishing research about us, our share price and trading volume could decline significantly.

The trading market for our securities will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We may be unable to sustain coverage by well-regarded securities and industry analysts. If either none or only a limited number of securities or industry analysts maintain coverage, or if these securities or industry analysts are not widely respected within the general investment community, the demand for our Ordinary Shares could decrease, which might cause our share price and trading volume to decline significantly. In the event that we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade their assessment or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price and liquidity for our Ordinary Shares could be negatively impacted.

45

Future resales of our Ordinary Shares issued to Fosun and its affiliates may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

In connection with the Business Combination, Fosun and its affiliates received, among other things, a significant amount of Ordinary Shares. Fosun and its affiliates are subject to certain lock-up arrangement and have certain registration rights with respect to their Ordinary Shares.

In addition, subject to a lock-up agreement signed by Fosun Fashion Holdings (Cayman) Limited, Fosun may cause its affiliates to sell Ordinary Shares pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), if available. In such event, the resales must meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of that rule, including, because we are currently a shell company, waiting until one year after our filing with the SEC of a shell company report on Form 20-F containing Form 10 type information reflecting the Business Combination on December 20, 2022.

Once this registration statement is declared effective or upon satisfaction of the requirements of Rule 144, or another applicable exemption from registration, Fosun and its affiliates may sell (subject to the lock-up agreement applicable to Fosun and its affiliates) large amounts of Ordinary Shares in the in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, which could have the effect of increasing the volatility in our Ordinary Shares price or putting significant downward pressure on the price of our securities.

The Existing Warrant Agreement, which has been assigned to us pursuant to Warrant Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement, designates the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by Warrant holders, which could limit the ability of Warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us in connection with such Warrants.

Under the terms of the Warrant Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement, PCAC’s Existing Warrant Agreement was assigned by PCAC to us at the closing of our Business Combination. In connection with this assignment, each PCAC warrant was converted into one Warrant of us at such time and all of the terms of the Existing Warrant Agreement not amended by the Warrant Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement remain in effect and applicable to each Warrant holder and to us after such Closing.

The Existing Warrant Agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the Existing Warrant Agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We have waived any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the Existing Warrant Agreement do not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any Warrants under the Existing Warrant Agreement shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions of the Existing Warrant Agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions of the Existing Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of the Warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such Warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such Warrant holder.

Since the provisions of the Existing Warrant Agreement continue to apply unless amended by the Warrant Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement and the conversion of each Warrant from a PCAC warrant

46

into a Warrant, and since the choice-of-forum and related provisions have not been amended by the Warrant Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement, the choice-of-forum provision limits a Warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of the Existing Warrant Agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert our management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, NYSE listing requirements and other applicable securities rules and regulations. As such, we incur relevant legal, accounting and other expenses, and these expenses may increase even more if we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We may need to hire more employees or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We expect these laws and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to render some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty.

Many members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage the transition to being a public company subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and regulations and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. The need to establish the corporate infrastructure demanded of a public company may divert the management’s attention from implementing our growth strategy, which could prevent us from improving our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and consequently we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These additional obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee, and qualified executive officers.

As a result of disclosure of information in this prospectus and in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition will become more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be adversely affected, and, even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could cause an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.

47

Our ability to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE may be dependent on the PCAOB’s continued access to inspect our independent auditors.

Pursuant to the HFCA Act, if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspection by the PCAOB for two consecutive years, the SEC shall prohibit our securities from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the U.S. Our independent auditor, Grant Thornton Zhitong Certified Public Accountants LLP, is an independent registered accounting firm based in mainland China.

The SEC and the PCAOB have adopted rules to implement the HFCA Act. Specifically, on November 5, 2021, the SEC announced the approval of the PCAOB’s new rule related to the PCAOB’s responsibilities under the HFCA Act, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to use when determining, as contemplated under the HFCA Act, whether it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 2, 2021, the SEC announced the adoption of final amendments to implement the submission and disclosure requirement of the HFCA Act following its interim final amendments announced in March 2021. The adopting release establishes the SEC’s procedures for identifying covered issuers and for prohibiting the trading of covered issuers’ securities. Pursuant to the HFCA Act, the PCAOB issued determinations on December 16, 2021 notifying the SEC that it was unable to inspect or investigate completely accounting firms headquartered in mainland China or Hong Kong, including our auditor as an independent registered public accounting firm. In March 2022, the SEC issued its first “conclusive list of issuers identified under the HFCAA” indicating that those companies are formally subject to the delisting provisions if they remain on the list for the number of consecutive years provided in the HFCA Act, and the SEC subsequently updated such list.

On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with relevant PRC authorities governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in China, pursuant to which the PCAOB determined that it has secured complete access to inspect and investigate audit firms based in mainland China or Hong Kong in December 2022 and vacated its December 16, 2021, determinations to the contrary. However, there can be no assurance that the PCAOB will continue to have such access. Should PRC authorities fail to facilitate the PCAOB’s access in the future, the PCAOB may consider the need to issue a new determination, which may affect our ability to maintain the listing of our securities on the U.S. national securities exchanges, including the NYSE, and the trading of them in the over-the-counter trading market. A delisting would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our securities when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with a potential delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our securities.

We qualify as a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including: (i) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC; (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (iii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and (iv) the selective disclosure rules by issuers of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD.

We will be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the NYSE. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic

48

issuers. Accordingly, you may receive less or different information about us than you would receive about a U.S. domestic public company.

We could lose our status as a foreign private issuer under current SEC rules and regulations if more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities become directly or indirectly held of record by U.S. holders and any one of the following is true: (i) the majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents; (ii) more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States; or (iii) our business is administered principally in the United States. If we lose our status as a foreign private issuer in the future, we will no longer be exempt from the rules described above and, among other things, will be required to file periodic reports and annual and quarterly financial statements as if we were a company incorporated in the United States. If this were to happen, we would likely incur substantial costs in fulfilling these additional regulatory requirements and members of our management would likely have to divert time and resources from other responsibilities to ensuring these additional regulatory requirements are fulfilled. See “Management—Foreign Private Issuer Status.”

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from NYSE corporate governance listing standards applicable to domestic U.S. companies; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

We are a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and are listed on the NYSE. NYSE market rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of our home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from NYSE corporate governance listing standards applicable to domestic U.S. companies.

Among other things, we are not required to have: (i) a majority-independent board of directors; (ii) a compensation committee consisting of independent directors; (iii) a nominating and corporate governance committee consisting of independent directors; or (iv) regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors each year.

Although not required and as may be changed from time to time, we have a majority-independent board of directors, a majority-independent compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Subject to the foregoing, we rely on the exemptions listed above. As a result, you may not be provided with the benefits of certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE applicable to U.S. domestic public companies. See “Management—Foreign Private Issuer Status.”

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, we conduct substantially all of our operations, and a majority of our directors and executive officers reside, outside of the United States. The ability of U.S. authorities to bring actions for violations of U.S. securities laws and regulations against us and our directors and executive officers may be limited, and accordingly you may not be afforded the same protection as provided to investors in U.S. domestic companies.

We are an exempted company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and conduct a majority of our operations through our subsidiary, FFG, outside the United States. A majority of our assets are located outside the United States. A majority of our officers and directors reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of the assets of those persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it could be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals outside of the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed upon under the applicable securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and jurisdictions of our subsidiaries could render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

49

Our management has been advised that jurisdictions where we are operating such as the PRC, do not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United States. Further, it is unclear if extradition treaties now in effect between the United States and these jurisdictions would permit effective enforcement of criminal penalties for violations of U.S. federal securities laws. In addition, our corporate affairs are governed by the Amended Articles, the Cayman Companies Act and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law may not be as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (other than the memorandum and articles of association, special resolutions and register of mortgages and charges) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors will have discretion under the Amended Articles to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but we are not obliged to make them available to the shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest. See “Description of Share Capital—General Meetings and Shareholder Proposals—Inspection of Books and Records.”

The courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. See “Management— Foreign Private Issuer Status.”

As a result of all of the above, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

50

Additionally, the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the DOJ, and other U.S. authorities often have substantial difficulties in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons. Due to jurisdictional limitations, matters of comity and various other factors, the SEC, the DOJ and other U.S. authorities may be limited in their ability to pursue bad actors, including in instances of fraud, in emerging markets such as China. A portion of our operations and assets are located in China. In addition, a majority of our directors and executive officers reside within China. There will be significant legal and other obstacles for U.S. authorities to obtain information needed for investigations or litigation against us or our directors and executive officers if we or any of these individuals engage in fraud or other wrongdoing. In addition, local authorities in China may be constrained in their ability to assist U.S. authorities and overseas investors in connection with legal proceedings. As a result, if we or our directors or executive officers commit any securities law violation, fraud or other financial misconduct, the U.S. authorities may not be able to conduct effective investigations or bring and enforce actions against such parties. Therefore, you may not be able to enjoy the same protection provided by various U.S. authorities as it is provided to investors in U.S. domestic companies.

We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

The market price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants may be volatile and, in the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation and investigations. For example, as a result of the historical material weaknesses PCAC identified, we may face potential litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the material weaknesses in PCAC’s internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of PCAC’s financial statements. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

We may or may not pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, applicable law, regulations, restrictions, our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual restrictions, our future projects and plans and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends depends significantly on the extent to which we receive dividends from FFG and there can be no assurance that FFG will pay dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our Ordinary Shares may be an investor’s sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

The exercise price of our Warrants can fluctuate under certain circumstances which, if triggered, can potentially result in material dilution of our then existing shareholders.

As of the date of this prospectus, we have a total of 31,979,969 Warrants outstanding, which are exercisable to purchase up to 31,979,969 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. The price at which such Ordinary Shares may be purchased upon exercise of the Warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, when (i) we undertake certain share capitalizations, share subdivisions, rights offerings or other similar events, or (ii) we pay certain dividends or makes certain distributions in cash, securities or other assets to the holders of Ordinary Shares on account of such Ordinary Shares. These adjustments are intended to provide the investors in our Warrants with partial protection from the effects of actions that dilute their interests in us on a fully-exercised basis. These provisions could result in substantial dilution to investors in our Ordinary Shares.

Certain rights granted to Meritz in the Meritz Relationship Agreement could limit the funds available to us or potentially result in dilution of our then existing shareholders.

On October 16, 2022, FFG and LGHL entered into the Meritz Private Placement Subscription Agreement with Meritz, pursuant to which, among other things, Meritz agreed to subscribe for 18,569,282 FFG Private

51

Placement Subscription Shares and the FFG Collateral Share at an aggregate subscription price of $50 million, and FFG and LGHL granted certain rights to Meritz in connection therewith, which are governed by the Meritz Relationship Agreement. Under these agreements, the FFG Collateral Share was automatically converted into our Convertible Preference Share and the FFG Private Placement Subscription Shares were automatically exchanged into our Ordinary Shares upon the consummation of the Business Combination. Half of the Meritz Investment in the amount of $25 million was funded on October 20, 2022, with the remaining $25 million being withheld by Meritz and to be released when Meritz may sell all of the Ordinary Shares it holds pursuant to an effective resale registration statement or under Rule 144 and no event of default has occurred. If the conditions are not fulfilled, Meritz will surrender half of the Ordinary Shares converted from FFG Private Placement Subscription Shares to us at nil consideration.

Furthermore, Meritz is entitled to a cash dividend payable by us in the amount of $2.0 million per annum for three years following the closing of the Meritz Investment. Meritz has a right to put, upon the occurrence of certain credit events (including among other things, the current controlling shareholder of Fosun ceases to have control of Fosun or us, any occurrence of insolvency, bankruptcy, liquidation or winding up of Fosun, Fosun Tourism Group (“FTG”), FFG or us, delisting or suspension of trading of shares of FTG or Fosun for 15 trading days, delisting or suspension of trading of shares of us for 5 trading days, non-payment or events of default by us, FFG, Fosun and FTG with respect to borrowings over certain specified amount, and failure to pay Meritz any annual cash dividend), the lapse of certain our call option (on the date that is 90 days after the end of the 18 month period after completion of the Business Combination) or the third anniversary of Meritz’s investment, all of the Ordinary Shares (including those exchanged from the FFG Private Placement Subscription Shares) then held by it to us at an agreed return, which is the higher of (i) 11.5% internal rate, compounded annually, of return on Meritz’s investment in FFG Private Placement Subscription Shares and (ii) 1.115 times the sum of $50 million, in each case minus any interim return that Meritz has realized from its investment (including the cash dividends, sale proceeds from disposal of the shares and any indemnity and damages payment received by Meritz). Following the date when Meritz may sell all of the Ordinary Shares it holds pursuant to an effective resale registration statement, such as this registration statement, or under Rule 144, if we fail to fulfill its obligations with respect Meritz’s put right described above, among other things, Meritz may convert the Convertible Preference Shares into an aggregate number of up to 15,000,000 Non-Voting Ordinary Shares and/or Ordinary Shares (subject to any adjustment as a result of any share subdivision or consolidation of the shares of us), with the actual number to be calculated based on factors including average closing share price of us. Meritz is entitled to indemnity in connection with its investment. Meritz’s rights described above are secured by shares of FTG, and if the market value of FTG’s shares declines below a certain level, we may be required to provide cash security. For additional details, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—Meritz Private Placement.”

We may be required to use a substantial portion of our cash to pay the cash dividends to Meritz, indemnify Meritz for losses incurred, provide cash security and/or purchase Ordinary Shares held by Meritz if Meritz exercises its put right. Such payment s will reduce the funds available to us for working capital, capital expenditures, and other corporate purposes, which may in turn limit our ability to implement our business strategy. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future financing will be available to us in amounts sufficient to enable us to make required and timely payments on Meritz’s investment, and to fund its operations. If we fail to fulfill its obligations, Meritz may elect to convert the Convertible Preference Share into an aggregate number of up to 15,000,000 Non-Voting Ordinary Shares and/or Ordinary Shares (subject to any adjustment as a result of any share subdivision or consolidation of the shares of LGHL). The conversion will result in substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders.

52

As a “foreign private issuer” under the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are permitted to, and will, file less or different information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the United States or otherwise subject to these rules, and will follow certain home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain NYSE requirements applicable to U.S. issuers.

We qualify as a “foreign private issuer” under the Exchange Act and is therefore exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act, including the proxy rules, which impose certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations for domestic issuers. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or within the same time frames as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. We are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which imposes restrictions on the selective disclosure of material information to shareholders. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities.

In addition, as a “foreign private issuer,” we are permitted to follow certain home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain NYSE requirements. A foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the SEC each NYSE requirement with which it does not comply followed by a description of its applicable home country practice. We currently intend to follow some, but not all of the corporate governance requirements of NYSE for U.S. domestic issuers. With respect to the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE that we do follow, we cannot make any assurances that we will continue to follow such corporate governance requirements in the future, and may therefore in the future, rely on available NYSE exemptions that would allow us to follow our home country practice. Unlike the requirements of the NYSE for U.S. domestic issuers, we are not required to, under the corporate governance practice and requirements in the Cayman Islands, have a board consisting of a majority of independent directors, nor are we required to have a compensation committee or a nomination or corporate governance committee consisting entirely of independent directors, obtain shareholders’ approval for issuance of securities in certain situations or have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors each year. Such Cayman home country practices may afford less protection to holders of our Ordinary Shares. For additional information regarding the home country practices we intend to follow in lieu of the NYSE requirements, see the section entitled “Management—Foreign Private Issuer Status.”

We would lose our status as a “foreign private issuer” under current SEC rules and regulations if more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities become directly or indirectly held of record by U.S. holders and one of the following is true: (i) the majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents; (ii) more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States; or (iii) our business is administered principally in the United States. If we lose our status as a foreign private issuer in the future, we will no longer be exempt from the rules described above and, among other things, will be required to file periodic and current reports and annual and quarterly financial statements as if we were a company incorporated in the United States. If this were to happen, we would likely incur substantial costs in fulfilling these additional regulatory requirements and members of our management would likely have to divert time and resources from other responsibilities to ensuring these additional regulatory requirements are fulfilled.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

53

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In particular, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”) will require us to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We are required to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting commencing with our second annual report on Form 20-F, which we expect to file in 2024 with respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed or operating. Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, PCAC’s principal executive and financial officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. Based upon such evaluation, PCAC’s chief executive officer concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective as of December 31, 2021, due solely to the material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting related to complex financial instruments. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

PCAC implemented remediation during the quarter end December 31, 2021, such that PCAC enhanced its system of evaluating and implementing the accounting standards that apply to its financial statements, including through enhanced analyses by its personnel and third-party professionals with whom it consults regarding complex accounting applications. There were no other material weaknesses noted in subsequent quarters as a result of the December 31, 2021 audit and March 31, 2022 review. PCAC has appropriately recorded and maintained the accounting for complex financial instruments through the quarter ended June 30, 2022. As a result, PCAC concluded that controls over the accounting for complex financial instruments were operating effectively for two consecutive quarters and therefore, the material weakness is remediated as of June 30, 2022.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. We continue to evaluate steps to remediate the material weakness. These remediation measures may be time consuming and costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. If we identify any new material weaknesses in the future, any such newly identified material weakness could limit our ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting and our stock price may decline as a result. There can be no assurance that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.

54

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and as we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, it could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance to the performance of other public companies.

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we will be eligible for and intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, including the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements with respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) becoming a “large accelerated filer,” with at least $700 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year (as indexed for inflation), (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in the prior three-year period or (iv) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the closing date of our Business Combination. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as long as we are an emerging growth company. An emerging growth company can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period and, therefore, we may not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Investors may find our Securities less attractive because we rely on these exemptions, which may result in a less active trading market for our Securities and the price of our Securities may be more volatile.

As a foreign private issuer, we also intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. See “—As a ‘foreign private issuer’ under the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are permitted to, and will, file less or different information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the United States or otherwise subject to these rules, and will follow certain home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain NYSE requirements applicable to U.S. issuers.”

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE listing rules and, as a result, can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE listing rules as Fosun International owns more than 50% of our voting power as of the date of this prospectus. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group, or another company is a “controlled company” and will be permitted to elect to not comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, the requirement that the nominating and corporate governance committee is composed entirely of independent directors, and the requirement that the compensation committee is composed entirely of independent directors. Currently, we do not plan to utilize the exemptions available for controlled companies, but will rely on the exemption available for foreign private issuers to follow our home country governance practices instead. See “—As a ‘foreign private issuer’ under the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are permitted to, and will, file less or different information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the United States or otherwise subject to these rules, and will follow certain home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain NYSE requirements applicable to U.S. issuers.” If we cease to be a foreign private issuer or if we cannot rely on the home country governance practice exemption for any reason, we may decide to invoke the exemptions available for a controlled company as long as we remain a controlled company. As a result, you will not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

55

Fosun, being our controlling shareholder, has substantial influence over us and Fosun’s interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders, and Fosun losing control of us may materially and adversely impact us and our Securities.

Fosun (through its subsidiaries) holds a significant percentage of our voting equity. As such, Fosun will have substantial influence over our business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors, declaration of dividends and other significant corporate actions. As the controlling shareholder, Fosun may take actions that are not in the best interests of our other shareholders.

Separately, if, among other things, the current controlling shareholder of Fosun ceases to have control of Fosun or us, Meritz will have the right to put all the Ordinary Shares it holds back to us at a premium, which would negatively impact our liquidity, financial condition and operations. See “—Certain rights granted to Meritz in the Meritz Relationship Agreement could limit the funds available to us or potentially result in dilution of our then existing shareholders” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—Meritz Private Placement” for further details.

Furthermore, pursuant to the Lanvin SHA, if Fosun loses its control over us (i.e., the possession, directly or indirectly, of the ability to direct or cause the direction of our policies and management), we may be obligated to cause the equity interest we hold indirectly in Arpège SAS to be transferred back to Fosun or its controlled affiliates. FFG Lucky SAS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of LGHL, acquired certain equity securities in Arpège SAS in a series of permitted transfers by virtue of being an affiliate of Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited, the original shareholder of such equity securities. In the Minority Shareholder Letter of September 2022, the Alleging Shareholder stated that, if FFG Lucky SAS ceases to be an affiliate of Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited and/or Fosun, FFG Lucky SAS may be obligated to transfer the relevant equity securities in Arpège SAS back to Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited and/or Fosun. Fosun losing control over us will likely result in FFG Lucky SAS ceasing to be an affiliate of Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited and/or Fosun, and may result in FFG Lucky SAS being obligated to transfer the relevant equity securities in Arpège SAS back to Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited and/or Fosun.

We believe that the possibility of Fosun losing control over us in the foreseeable future is remote because: (1) Fosun and its affiliates holds in the aggregate hold approximately 64.9% of our voting power as of the date of this prospectus; (2) Fosun and its affiliates are subject to 12-month lock-up arrangements prohibiting their disposal of Ordinary Shares following the closing date of our Business Combination, subject to limited exceptions (see “Plan of Distribution—Lock-Up Agreements” for additional information); (3) Fosun has confirmed to us that there is no current commercial intention for Fosun to lose control of us in the foreseeable future; and (4) Fosun has delivered an undertaking to us in which it will undertake not to take, or permit to be taken, any action that could result in FFG Lucky SAS ceasing to be an affiliate of Fosun or Fosun Industrial Holdings Limited, or any other action that could result in FFG Lucky SAS being obligated under the Lanvin SHA to transfer the relevant equity securities in Arpège SAS to any person who is not us or our subsidiaries. Further, even if Fosun were to cease control of us and, in turn, FFG Lucky SAS, we believe there are valid defenses to the request by the minority shareholders of Arpège SAS that FFG Lucky SAS should transfer the relevant equity securities of Arpège SAS back to Fosun. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that Arpège SAS will remain as our subsidiary at all times. If the relevant equity securities in Arpège SAS were to be transferred to Fosun or its controlled affiliates other than the Lanvin Group, Lanvin Group will lose a substantial part of its revenue and operations, and we would likely lose all rights to use of the Lanvin name and Lanvin brand. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in substantial decline in the trading price of our securities.

We have granted in the past, and we will also grant in the future, share incentives and economic beneficiary rights scheme, which may result in increased share-based compensation expenses.

On September 23, 2020, we adopted a restricted share units scheme (“RSU Scheme”) for the issuance of up to 32,129,493 shares for the purpose of recognizing the contribution of participants including our senior

56

management members and consultants to the growth of the then Fosun Fashion Group. As a result of the restricted share units (“RSUs”) granted under the RSU Scheme, we incurred share-based compensation of €7.2 million and €5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. In December 2021, we adopted a share economic beneficial interest right scheme that modifies all RSUs granted under the RSU Scheme into share economic beneficial interest rights under the share economic beneficial interest rights scheme (“SEBIRs scheme” or “BF Plan”) administered by Brilliant Fashion Holdings Limited. For more information on the SEBIRs scheme, see “Management—Share Incentive Plan.” We believe the granting of share-based compensation (including the SEBIRs scheme) is of significant importance to our ability to attract and retain key personnel and employees, and as such, we may also grant additional share-based compensation and incur share-based compensation expenses. As a result, expenses associated with share-based compensation may increase, which may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We may be or become a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders.

If we or any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC for any taxable year, or portion thereof, that is included in the holding period of a beneficial owner of our Ordinary Shares or Warrants that is a U.S. Holder (as defined below), such U.S. Holder may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. We and our subsidiaries do not presently expect to be classified as PFICs for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the current taxable year or foreseeable future taxable years. However, this conclusion is a factual determination that must be made annually at the close of each taxable year and, thus, is subject to change. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year. We do not expect to provide a PFIC annual information statement for 2022 or future taxable years. Please see the section entitled “Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S. Holders—Passive Foreign Investment Company Status” for a more detailed discussion with respect to our PFIC status. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules to holders of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants.

We may be subject to U.S. foreign investment regulations which may limit certain investors’ ability to purchase our securities. Our existing and future investments in U.S. companies may also be subject to U.S. foreign investment regulations.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) has authority to review direct or indirect foreign investments in U.S. companies. Among other things, CFIUS is empowered to require certain foreign investors to make mandatory filings, to charge filing fees related to such filings and to self-initiate national security reviews of foreign direct and indirect investments in U.S. companies if the parties to that investment choose not to file voluntarily. In the case that CFIUS determines an investment to be a threat to national security, CFIUS has the power to unwind or place restrictions on the investment. Whether CFIUS has jurisdiction to review an acquisition or investment transaction depends on, among other factors, the nature and structure of the transaction, including the level of beneficial ownership interest and the nature of any information or governance rights involved.

The Sponsor is a “foreign person” pursuant to CFIUS’ rules and regulations. In addition, certain other entities involved in the transaction, including LGHL, Merger Sub 1, Merger Sub 2, Aspex, the PIPE Investors and certain existing shareholders of Lanvin Group, are, or are believed to be, “foreign persons” under such rules and regulations. If CFIUS considers Lanvin Group (or its business in the U.S.) a U.S. business that may affect national security, we could be subject to such foreign ownership restrictions. We do not believe that the Business Combination or the related transactions would be a threat to national security of the United States, or that a mandatory filing with CFIUS is required or a voluntary notice to CFIUS is warranted, for the Business Combination and the related transactions. However, if CFIUS takes a different view, it may order us to divest all or a portion of our U.S. business. In addition, the restrictions on the ability of foreign persons to invest in us or of our ability to invest in U.S. businesses could limit our ability to engage in strategic transactions that could benefit our shareholders, including a change of control of us and our strategic acquisitions and investments, and could also affect the price that an investor may be willing to pay for our securities.

57