The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
Our portfolio securities
are restricted from public sale without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (hereafter, the “Securities Act”)
or other relevant regulatory authority. We negotiate certain aspects of the method and timing of the disposition of our investment in
each portfolio company, including registration rights and related costs.
As a business development
company (“BDC”), we may invest up to 30% of our assets in non-qualifying portfolio investments, as permitted by the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Specifically, we may invest up to 30% of our assets in entities that are not considered
“eligible portfolio companies” (as defined in the 1940 Act), including companies located outside of the United States, entities
that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions under the 1940 Act, and publicly-traded entities with a market capitalization exceeding
$250 million. As of September 30, 2022, we had invested 38.2% of our assets in securities of portfolio companies that constituted qualifying
investments under the 1940 Act. As of September 30, 2022, all of our investments are in enterprises that are considered eligible portfolio
companies under the 1940 Act. We provide significant managerial assistance to our sole remaining portfolio company that comprises 100%
of the total value of the investments in portfolio securities as of September 30, 2022.
We are classified as
a “non-diversified” investment company under the 1940 Act, which means we are not limited in the proportion of our assets
that may be invested in the securities of a single user. The value of one segment called “Energy” includes our sole remaining
portfolio company and was 42.8% of our net asset value, 38.2% of our total assets and 100% of our investments in portfolio company securities
(at fair value) as of September 30, 2022. Changes in business or industry trends or in the financial condition, results of operations,
or the market’s assessment of any single portfolio company will affect the net asset value and the market price of our common stock
to a greater extent than would be the case if we were a “diversified” company holding numerous investments.
Our investments in
portfolio securities consist of the following types of securities as of September 30, 2022 (in thousands):
The following is a
summary by industry of the Fund’s investments in portfolio securities as of September 30, 2022
(in thousands):
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
(Unaudited)
(1) Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business—Equus
Total Return, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Equus” the “Company” and the “Fund”),
a Delaware corporation, was formed by Equus Investments II, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on August 16, 1991. On July 1, 1992,
the Partnership was reorganized and all of the assets and liabilities of the Partnership were transferred to the Fund in exchange for
shares of common stock of the Fund. Our shares trade on the NYSE under the symbol ‘EQS’. On August 11, 2006, our shareholders
approved the change of the Fund’s investment strategy to a total return investment objective. This strategy seeks to provide the
highest total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income. In connection with this strategic investment change, the
shareholders also approved the change of name from Equus II Incorporated to Equus Total Return, Inc.
We attempt to maximize
the return to stockholders in the form of current investment income and long-term capital gains by investing in the debt and equity securities
of companies with a total enterprise value between $5.0 million and $75.0 million, although we may engage in transactions with smaller
or larger investee companies from time to time. We seek to invest primarily in companies pursuing growth either through acquisition or
organically, leveraged buyouts, management buyouts and recapitalizations of existing businesses or special situations. Our income-producing
investments consist principally of debt securities including subordinated debt, debt convertible into common or preferred stock, or debt
combined with warrants and common and preferred stock. Debt and preferred equity financing may also be used to create long-term capital
appreciation through the exercise and sale of warrants received in connection with the financing. If we remain a BDC, we will seek to
achieve capital appreciation by making investments in equity and equity-oriented securities issued by privately-owned companies in transactions
negotiated directly with such companies. Given market conditions over the past several years and the performance of our portfolio, our
Management and Board of Directors believe it prudent to continue to review alternatives to refine and further clarify the current strategies.
We elected to be treated
as a BDC under the 1940 Act, although our shareholders have previously authorized us to withdraw this election as part of our efforts
to transform Equus into an operating company, and may likely grant such an authorization in the future (see Note 6 “Conversion
to an Operating Company – Authorization to Withdraw BDC Election” below). We currently qualify as a regulated investment
company (“RIC”) for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, are not required to pay corporate income taxes on any income
or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries (“Taxable Subsidiaries”)
each of which holds one or more portfolio investments listed on our Schedules of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries
is to permit us to hold certain income- producing investments or portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs,
(or other forms of pass-through entities) and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income
tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of these income-producing
investments or of any LLC (or other pass-through entity) portfolio investment, as the case may be, would flow through directly to us for
the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC
and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs (or other pass-through entities) owned by Taxable
Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant
tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because
of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Statements of Operations.
Impact of Economic
and Geopolitical Events on the Oil and Gas Sector—The substantial volatility in world markets has been prominent in the oil
and gas sector, with crude prices falling to 18-year lows in mid-March 2020 as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, only to increase
to multi-year highs in the first half of 2022, largely as a result of high industrial and consumer demand, a reluctance of U.S. producers
and OPEC nations to generate additional supply, and the conflict in Ukraine. Recessionary headwinds, among other macroeconomic factors,
led to a decrease in oil prices during the third quarter of 2022, but nevertheless remained higher than at the end of 2021. Meanwhile,
gas prices have also experienced similar volatility and price appreciation. The increased prices for oil and gas, including the forward
pricing curves for these commodities, has improved the outlook and prospects for remaining small oil and gas firms such as Equus Energy
that hold development rights in low-cost production reservoirs such as those underlying the Permian Basin and the Eagle Ford Shale regions.
Basis of Presentation—In
accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange
Act”), we do not consolidate portfolio company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest. Our interim
unaudited financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”), for interim financial information and in accordance with the requirements of reporting on Form 10-Q and Article
10 of Regulation S-X, under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, they are unaudited and exclude some disclosures required for annual financial
statements. We believe that we have made all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation
of these interim financial statements.
The results of operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the remainder
of the year. The interim unaudited financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto included in the Fund’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the
SEC.
(2) Liquidity
and Financing Arrangements
Liquidity—There
are several factors that may materially affect our liquidity during the reasonably foreseeable future. We are evaluating the impact of
current market conditions on our portfolio company valuations and their ability to provide current income. We have followed valuation
techniques in a consistent manner; however, we are cognizant of current market conditions that might affect future valuations of portfolio
securities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—As
of September 30, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $20.1 million. We had $15.5 million of our net assets of $36.2 million invested
in portfolio securities.
As of December 31, 2021, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $23.5 million. We had $13.0 million of our net assets of $36.4 million invested in portfolio securities.
We exclude “Restricted
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments” used for purposes of complying with RIC requirements from cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
and Temporary Cash Investments—As of September 30, 2022, we had $4.0 million of restricted cash and temporary cash investments,
including primarily the proceeds of a quarter-end margin loan that we incurred to maintain the diversification requirements applicable
to a RIC. Of this amount, $4.0 million was invested in U.S. Treasury bills and $0.04 million represented a required 1% brokerage margin
deposit. These securities were held by a securities brokerage firm and pledged along with other assets to secure repayment of the margin
loan. The U.S. Treasury bills matured on October 4, 2022 and we subsequently repaid this margin loan, plus interest.
As of December 31,
2021, we had $2.5 million of restricted cash and of temporary cash investments, including primarily the proceeds of a quarter-end margin
loan that we incurred to maintain the diversification requirements applicable to a RIC. Of this amount, $2.5 million was invested in U.S.
Treasury bills and $0.03 million represented a required 1% brokerage margin deposit. These securities were held by a securities brokerage
firm and pledged along with other assets to secure repayment of the margin loan. The U.S. Treasury bills matured on January 5, 2022 and
we subsequently repaid this margin loan, plus interest.
Dividends—So
long as we remain a BDC, we will pay out net investment income and/or realized net capital gains, if any, on an annual basis as required
under the 1940 Act.
Investment Commitments—Under
certain circumstances, we may be called on to make follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies. If we do not have sufficient
funds to make follow-on investments, the portfolio company in need of the investment may be negatively impacted. Also, our equity interest
in the estimated fair value of the portfolio company could be reduced.
As of September 30, 2022, we had a follow-on commitment
of $150,000 to invest in additional equity of Equus Energy, LLC.
RIC Borrowings,
Restricted Cash and Temporary Cash Investments—We may periodically borrow sufficient funds to maintain the Fund’s RIC
status by utilizing a margin account with a securities brokerage firm. We cannot assure you that any such arrangement will be available
in the future. If we are unable to borrow funds to make qualifying investments, we may no longer qualify as a RIC. We would then be subject
to corporate income tax on the Fund’s net investment income and realized capital gains, and distributions to stockholders would
be subject to income tax as ordinary dividends. If we remain a BDC and do not become an operating company as described in Note 6 –
Conversion to an Operating Company below, our failure to continue to qualify as a RIC could be materially adverse to us and our
stockholders.
As of September 30,
2022, we borrowed $4.0 million to maintain our RIC status by utilizing a margin account with a securities brokerage firm. We collateralized
such borrowings with restricted cash and temporary cash investments in U.S. Treasury bills of $4.04 million.
As of December 31,
2021, we borrowed $2.5 million to maintain our RIC status by utilizing a margin account with a securities brokerage firm. We collateralized
such borrowings with restricted cash and temporary cash investments in U.S. Treasury bills of $2.53 million.
Asset Coverage
Ratio—Under the 1940 Act, BDCs are required to have an asset coverage ratio of 200%, meaning that the maximum debt that may
be incurred by a BDC is the BDC’s net asset value. Pursuant to amendments made to the 1940 Act in March 2018, BDCs may now, with
stockholder or board of directors approval, reduce this ratio to 150%, meaning that the maximum debt that may be incurred by a BDC is
two times the BDC’s net asset value. In November 2019, we obtained approval of our shareholders to reduce our asset coverage ratio
to 150%. This authorization permits Equus to borrow up to twice the value of the Fund’s net assets. Other than the margin loan obtained
by the Fund from time to time to acquire U.S. Treasury bills to maintain our RIC status as described above, we have not yet undertaken
any other additional borrowings.
Certain Risks and
Uncertainties—Market and economic volatility which has become endemic in the past few years, together with the economic dislocation
caused by the onset of the coronavirus, has constrained the availability of debt financing for small and medium-sized companies such as
Equus and its portfolio companies. Such debt financing generally has shorter maturities, higher interest rates and fees, and more restrictive
terms than debt facilities available in the past. In addition, during these years and continuing into the third quarter of 2021, the price
of our common stock remained well below our net asset value, thereby making it undesirable to issue additional shares of our common stock
below net asset value.
Because of these challenges,
our near-term strategies shifted from originating debt and equity investments to preserving liquidity necessary to meet our operational
needs. Key initiatives that we have previously undertaken to provide necessary liquidity include monetizations, the suspension of dividends
and the internalization of management. We are also evaluating potential opportunities that could enable us to effect a change to our business
and become an operating company as described in Note 6 – Conversion to an Operating Company. We believe we have sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating requirements for 12 months from the date of this filing.
|
(3) |
Significant Accounting Policies |
The following is a
summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of our financial statements:
Use of Estimates—The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. Although we believe the estimates and assumptions used in preparing these financial statements
and related notes are reasonable in light of known facts and circumstances, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Valuation of Investments—For
most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily
available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board has approved a multi-step valuation process
each quarter, as described below:
|
1. |
Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our investment professionals; |
|
2. |
With respect to investments with a fair value exceeding $2.5 million that have been held for more than one year, we engage independent valuation firms to assist our investment professionals. These independent valuation firms conduct independent valuations and make their own independent assessments; |
|
3. |
Our Management produces a report that summarizes each of our portfolio investments and recommends a fair value of each such investment as of the date of the report; |
|
4. |
The Audit Committee of our Board reviews and discusses the preliminary valuation of our portfolio investments as recommended by Management in their report and any reports or recommendations of the independent valuation firms, and then approves and recommends the fair values of our investments so determined to our Board for final approval; and |
|
5. |
The Board discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each portfolio investment in good faith based on the input of our Management, the respective independent valuation firm, as applicable, and the Audit Committee. |
During the first
twelve months after an investment is made, we rely on the original investment amount to determine the fair value unless significant developments
have occurred during this twelve-month period which would indicate a material effect on the portfolio company (such as results of operations
or changes in general market conditions).
Investments
are valued utilizing various methodologies and approaches, including a yield analysis, enterprise value (“EV”) analysis, net
asset value analysis, liquidation analysis, discounted cash flow analysis, or a combination of methods, as appropriate. The yield analysis
uses loan spreads and other relevant information implied by market data involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Under
the EV analysis, the EV of a portfolio company is first determined and allocated over the portfolio company’s securities in order
of their preference relative to one another (i.e., “waterfall” allocation). To determine the EV, we typically use a market
multiples approach that considers relevant and applicable market trading data of guideline public companies, transaction metrics from
precedent M&A transactions and/or a discounted cash flow analysis. The net asset value analysis is used to derive a value of an underlying
investment (such as real estate property) by dividing a relevant earnings stream by an appropriate capitalization rate. For this purpose,
we consider capitalization rates for similar properties as may be obtained from guideline public companies and/or relevant transactions.
The liquidation analysis is intended to approximate the net recovery value of an investment based on, among other things, assumptions
regarding liquidation proceeds based on a hypothetical liquidation of a portfolio company’s assets. The discounted cash flow analysis
uses valuation techniques to convert future cash flows or earnings to a range of fair values from which a single estimate may be derived
utilizing an appropriate discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by current market expectations about
those future amounts.
In estimating
the fair value of our interest in Equus Energy, we have given more emphasis to a market approach that examines developed and undeveloped
reserves and mineral acreage values, as well as a market approach that examines comparable industry transactions involving oil and gas
assets in proximity to the leasehold interests held by Equus Energy. Our management received advice and assistance from a third-party
valuation firm to support our determination of the fair value of this investment.
In applying these methodologies,
additional factors that we consider in fair value pricing our investments may include, as we deem relevant: security covenants, call protection
provisions, and information rights; the nature and realizable value of any collateral; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments;
the principal markets in which the portfolio company does business; publicly available financial ratios of peer companies; the principal
market; and enterprise values, among other factors. Also, any failure by a portfolio company to achieve its business plan or obtain and
maintain its financing arrangements could result in increased volatility and result in a significant and rapid change in its value.
Our general intent
is to hold our loans to maturity when appraising our privately held debt investments. As such, we believe that the fair value will not
exceed the cost of the investment. However, in addition to the previously described analysis involving allocation of value to the debt
instrument, we perform a yield analysis assuming a hypothetical current sale of the security to determine if a debt security has been
impaired. The yield analysis considers changes in interest rates and changes in leverage levels of the portfolio company as compared to
the market interest rates and leverage levels. Assuming the credit quality of the portfolio company remains stable, the Fund will use
the value determined by the yield analysis as the fair value for that security if less than the cost of the investment.
We record unrealized
depreciation on investments when we determine that the fair value of a security is less than its cost basis, and will record unrealized
appreciation when we determine that the fair value is greater than its cost basis.
Fair Value Measurement—Fair
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date and sets out a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Inputs are broadly defined
as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described
below:
Level 1—Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
Level 2—Inputs
other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and fair value
is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.
Level 3—Inputs
are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information under the circumstances and may require significant
management judgment or estimation.
In certain cases, the
inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level
within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific
to the investment.
Investments for which
prices are not observable are generally private investments in the debt and equity securities of operating companies. A primary valuation
method used to estimate the fair value of these Level 3 investments is the discounted cash flow method (although a liquidation analysis,
option theoretical, or other methodology may be used when more appropriate). The discounted cash flow approach to determine fair value
(or a range of fair values) involves applying an appropriate discount rate(s) to the estimated future cash flows using various relevant
factors depending on investment type, including comparing the latest arm’s length or market transactions involving the subject security
to the selected benchmark credit spread, assumed growth rate (in cash flows), and capitalization rates/multiples (for determining terminal
values of underlying portfolio companies). The valuation based on the inputs determined to be the most reasonable and probable is used
as the fair value of the investment. In the case of our investment in Equus Energy, we also examine acreage values in comparable transactions
and assess the impact upon the working interests held by Equus Energy. The determination of fair value using these methodologies may take
into consideration a range of factors including, but not limited to, the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the
investment, local market conditions, trading values on public exchanges for comparable securities, current and projected operating performance,
financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment and anticipated financing transactions after the valuation date.
To assess the reasonableness
of the discounted cash flow approach, the fair value of equity securities, including warrants, in portfolio companies may also consider
the market approach—that is, through analyzing and applying to the underlying portfolio companies, market valuation multiples of
publicly-traded firms engaged in businesses similar to those of the portfolio companies. The market approach to determining the fair value
of a portfolio company’s equity security (or securities) will typically involve: (1) applying to the portfolio company’s trailing
twelve months (or current year projected) EBITDA a low to high range of enterprise value to EBITDA multiples that are derived from an
analysis of publicly-traded comparable companies, in order to arrive at a range of enterprise values for the portfolio company; (2) subtracting
from the range of calculated enterprise values the outstanding balances of any debt or equity securities that would be senior in right
of payment to the equity securities we hold; and (3) multiplying the range of equity values derived therefrom by our ownership share of
such equity tranche in order to arrive at a range of fair values for our equity security (or securities). Application of these valuation
methodologies involves a significant degree of judgment by Management.
Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of Level 3 investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of
the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and
may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be received or settled. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal
and other restrictions or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded instruments. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment
in a forced or liquidation sale, we might realize significantly less than the value at which such investment had previously been recorded.
With respect to Level 3 investments, where sufficient market quotations are not readily available or for which no or an insufficient number
of indicative prices from pricing services or brokers or dealers have been received, we undertake, on a quarterly basis, our valuation
process as described above.
We assess the levels
of the investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the subsequent measurement date closest in
time to the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers among Level 1, 2 and
3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021.
As of September 30, 2022, investments measured
at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based on the lowest level of significant input to the valuations:
| |
| |
Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2022 |
(in thousands) | |
Total | |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1) | |
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | |
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
Assets | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Investments: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Control investments | |
$ | 15,500 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 15,500 | |
Total investments | |
| 15,500 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 15,500 | |
Temporary cash investments | |
| 3,999 | | |
| 3,999 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Total investments and temporary cash investments | |
$ | 19,499 | | |
$ | 3,999 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 15,500 | |
As of December 31,
2021, investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based on the lowest level of significant
input to the valuations:
| |
| |
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021 |
(in thousands) | |
Total | |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1) | |
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | |
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
Assets | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Investments: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Control investments | |
$ | 13,000 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 13,000 | |
Total investments | |
| 13,000 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 13,000 | |
Temporary cash investments | |
| 2,500 | | |
| 2,500 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Total investments and temporary cash investments | |
$ | 15,500 | | |
$ | 2,500 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 13,000 | |
The following table
provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 for all investments for which we determine
fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
| |
| |
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
(in thousands) | |
Control Investments | |
Affiliate Investments | |
Non-affiliate Investments | |
Total |
Fair value as of January 1, 2022 | |
| | | |
$ | 13,000 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$13,000 |
Change in unrealized appreciation | |
| | | |
| 2,500 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
2,500 |
Fair value as of September 30, 2022 | |
| | | |
$ | 15,500 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$15,500 |
The following table provides
a reconciliation of fair value changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 for all investments for which we determine fair
value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
| |
| |
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
(in thousands) | |
Control Investments | |
Affiliate Investments | |
Non-affiliate Investments | |
Total |
Fair value as of January 1, 2021 | |
| | | |
$ | 7,000 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$7,000 |
Change in unrealized appreciation | |
| | | |
| 4,650 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
4,650 |
Purchases of portfolio securities | |
| | | |
| 350 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
350 |
Fair value as of September 30, 2021 | |
| | | |
$ | 12,000 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$12,000 |
Our investment portfolio
is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our
investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation
of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including historical and forecasted
financial and operational performance of the portfolio company, project cash flows, market multiples comparable market transactions, the
priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and
other inputs.
The following table summarizes
the significant non-observable inputs in the fair value measurements of our Level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation
technique as of September 30, 2022 (fair value expressed in thousands; acreage range expressed in dollars and not rounded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Valuation Techniques |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Weighted Average |
Limited liability company investments |
|
$ 15,500 |
|
Guideline Transaction Method |
|
Acreage Value (per acre) |
|
$ 1,500 |
|
$ 11,000 |
|
$ 4,062 |
|
|
|
Proved Reserve Multiple |
|
3.8x |
|
9.3x |
|
7.4x |
|
|
|
Daily Production Multiple |
|
29,466.6x |
|
45,285.2x |
|
44,850.1x |
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow |
|
Discount Rate |
|
11.0% |
|
11.0% |
|
11.0% |
The following table summarizes
the significant non-observable inputs in the fair value measurements of our Level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation
technique as of December 31, 2021 (fair value expressed in thousands; acreage range expressed in dollars and not rounded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Valuation Techniques |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Weighted Average |
Limited liability company investments |
|
$ 13,000 |
|
Guideline Transaction Method |
|
Acreage Value (per acre) |
|
$ 1,500 |
|
$ 10,000 |
|
$ 5,750 |
|
|
|
Proved Reserve Multiple |
|
3.6x |
|
7.3x |
|
7.2x |
|
|
|
Daily Production Multiple |
|
15,425.3x |
|
37,215.1x |
|
36,393.7x |
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow |
|
Discount Rate |
|
11.0% |
|
11.0% |
|
11.0% |
Because of the inherent uncertainty
of the valuation of portfolio securities which do not have readily ascertainable market values, amounting to $15.5 million and $13.0 million
as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, our fair value determinations may materially differ from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for these securities.
We adjust our net asset
value for the changes in the value of our publicly held securities, if applicable, and material changes in the value of private securities,
generally determined on a quarterly basis or as announced in a press release, and report those amounts to Lipper Analytical Services,
Inc. Our net asset value appears in various publications, including Barron’s and The Wall Street Journal.
Investment Transactions—Investment
transactions are recorded on the accrual method. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are computed on a specific identification
basis.
We classify our investments
in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments
in companies in which the Fund owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliate Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which we own between
5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither
Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments. See also Note 4 for discussion of related party investment transactions.
Interest and Dividend
Income Recognition—We record interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, on an accrual
basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts. We accrete or amortize discounts and premiums on securities purchased over
the life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted
for the accretion of discount and/or amortization of premium on debt securities. We stop accruing interest on investments when we determine
that interest is no longer collectible. We may also impair the accrued interest when we determine that all or a portion of the current
accrual is uncollectible. If we receive any cash after determining that interest is no longer collectible, we treat such cash as payment
on the principal balance until the entire principal balance has been repaid, before we recognize any additional interest income. We will
write off uncollectible interest upon the occurrence of a definitive event such as a sale, bankruptcy, or reorganization of the relevant
portfolio interest. Dividend income is recorded as dividends are declared by the portfolio company
or at the point an obligation exists for the portfolio company to make a distribution.
Net Realized Gains
or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation—Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference
between the net proceeds from the sale or redemption of an investment or a financial instrument and the cost basis of the investment or
financial instrument, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off
during the period net of recoveries and realized gains or losses from in-kind redemptions. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
reflects the net change in the fair value of the portfolio company investments and financial instruments and the reclassification of any
prior period unrealized appreciation or depreciation on exited investments and financial instruments to realized gains or losses.
Payment in Kind
Interest (PIK)—From time to time, we have loans in our portfolio that may pay PIK interest. We add PIK interest, if any, computed
at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain
our status as a RIC, we must pay out to stockholders this non-cash source of income in the form of dividends even if we have not yet collected
any cash in respect of such investments. To the extent we remain BDC and a RIC, we will continue to pay out net investment income and/or
realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis as required under the 1940 Act.
Earnings Per Share—Basic
and diluted per share calculations are computed utilizing the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.
In accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, the unvested shares of restricted stock awarded pursuant to our equity compensation plans
are participating securities and, therefore, are included in the basic earnings per share calculation. As a result, for all periods presented,
there is no difference between diluted earnings per share and basic earnings per share amounts.
Distributable Earnings—The
components that make up distributable earnings (accumulated undistributed deficit) on the Condensed Balance Sheet as of September
30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 are as follows:
​ | |
As of
September 30, 2022 | |
As of
December 31, 2021 |
Accumulated undistributed net investment losses | |
$ | (46,436 | ) | |
$ | (43,801 | ) |
Unrealized appreciation of portfolio securities, net | |
| 7,539 | | |
| 5,039 | |
Accumulated undistributed net capital gains | |
| 429 | | |
| 429 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
$ | (38,468 | ) | |
$ | (38,333 | ) |
Taxes—So
long as we remain a BDC, we intend to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code necessary to qualify as a RIC and, as
such, will not be subject to federal income taxes on otherwise taxable income (including net realized capital gains) which is distributed
to stockholders. As of December 31, 2021, we accrued a $0.04 million in corporate level income and excise tax in lieu of making a distribution
of the net capital gain for the sale of PalletOne, Inc. We borrow money from time to time to maintain our tax status under the Internal
Revenue Code as a RIC. See Note 1 for discussion of Taxable Subsidiaries and see Note 2 for further discussion of the Fund’s RIC
borrowings.
Texas margin tax applies
to legal entities conducting business in Texas. The margin tax is based on our Texas sourced taxable margin. The tax is calculated by
applying a tax rate to a base that considers both revenue and expenses and therefore has the characteristics of an income tax. As a result,
we have no provision for margin tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2022, and we expect no in state income tax for the
year ended December 31, 2022.
Cash Flows—For
purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, we consider all highly liquid temporary cash investments purchased with an original maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We exclude “Restricted Cash and Temporary Cash Investments” used for purposes
of complying with RIC requirements from cash equivalents.
The following table
provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as reported within the consolidated balance sheet that sums
to the total of the same amounts shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
| |
As of
September 30, 2022 | |
As of
December 31, 2021 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 20,094 | | |
$ | 23,465 | |
Restricted cash at end of period | |
| 40 | | |
| 25 | |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | |
$ | 20,134 | | |
$ | 23,490 | |
Recent Accounting Standards—We
consider the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal
impact on our financial statements.
Accounting Standards Not
Yet Adopted— In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Fair Value Measurement of
Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions”, which was issued to (1) clarify the guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurement, when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity
security, (2) to amend a related illustrative example, and (3) to introduce new disclosure requirements for equity securities subject
to contractual sale restrictions that are measured at fair value in accordance with Topic 820. The new guidance is effective for interim
and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2023. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on the Company's
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Accounting Standards Recently
Adopted— In May 2020, the SEC adopted rule amendments that will impact the requirement of investment companies, including BDCs,
to disclose the financial statements of certain of their portfolio companies or acquired funds (the “Final Rules”). The Final
Rules adopted a new definition of “significant subsidiary” set forth in Rule 1-02(w)(2) of Regulation S-X under the Securities
Act. Rules 3-09 and 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X require investment companies to include separate financial statements or summary financial
information, respectively, in such investment company’s periodic reports for any portfolio company that meets the definition of
“significant subsidiary.” The Final Rules amend the definition of “significant subsidiary” in a manner that is
intended to more accurately capture those portfolio companies that are more likely to materially impact the financial condition of an
investment company. The Final Rules became effective on January 1, 2021, but voluntary compliance was permitted in advance of the effective
date. The Company elected to comply with the Final Rules effective June 30, 2020 which reduced the requirement for the Company to provide
separate audited financial statements and summarized financial information for its controlled portfolio companies going forward.
|
(4) |
Related Party Transactions and Agreements |
Except as noted below,
as compensation for services to the Fund, each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $40,000 paid quarterly in arrears, a fee
of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or committee thereof attended in person, a fee of $1,000 for participation in each
telephonic meeting of the Board or committee thereof, and reimbursement of all out-of-pocket expenses relating to attendance at such meetings.
The chair of each of our standing committees (audit, compensation, and nominating and governance) also receives an annual fee of $50,000,
payable quarterly in arrears. We may also pay other one-time or recurring fees to members of our Board of Directors in special circumstances.
None of our interested directors receive annual fees for their service on the Board of Directors.
In respect of services
provided to the Fund by members of the Board not in connection with their roles and duties as directors, the Fund pays a rate of $300
per hour for such services.
(5) Portfolio
Securities
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2022, with respect to our holding in Equus Energy, LLC, we recorded an increase in the fair value
of this investment by $2.5 million. Such change in fair value was principally due to increases in mineral acreage prices and a substantial
increase in short-and long-term prices for crude oil and natural gas.
During the nine months
ended September 30, 2021, we made a follow-on investment of $0.35 million in Equus Energy, LLC.
During the nine months
ended September 30, 2021, we recognized a capital gain of $0.5 million due to the change in the estimated fair value of our escrow receivable
related to PalletOne, Inc.
During the nine
months ended September 30, 2021, with respect to our holding in Equus Energy, LLC, we recorded an increase in the fair value of $5.0 million
and an increase in our cost basis of $0.35 million, resulting in a net change in unrealized appreciation of $4.65 million. Such change
in fair value was principally due to increases in mineral acreage prices and a substantial increase in short-and long-term prices for
crude oil and natural gas.
(6) Conversion
to an Operating Company
Authorization to Withdraw BDC Election—
On November 3, 2022, holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Fund approved our cessation as a BDC under the 1940
Act and authorized our Board to cause the Fund’s withdrawal of its election to be classified as a BDC, effective as of a date designated
by the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, but no later than February 28, 2023. This authorization and others which preceded it are
a consequence of our expressed intent to transform Equus into an operating company. Notwithstanding any such authorization to withdraw
our BDC election, we will not submit any such withdrawal unless and until Equus has entered into a definitive agreement to effect a transformative
transaction. Further, even if we are again authorized to withdraw our election as a BDC, we will require a subsequent affirmative vote
from holders of a majority of our outstanding voting shares to enter into any such definitive agreement or change the nature of our business.
While we are presently evaluating various opportunities that could enable us to accomplish this transformation, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to do so within any particular time period or at all, and, although we expect that our shareholders will extend our current
authorization, if necessary, we do not expect to cause the Fund to withdraw its election to be classified as BDC by December 31, 2022.
Moreover, we cannot assure you that the terms of any such transformative transaction would be acceptable to us.
Increase in Authorized
Shares—On January 20, 2021, holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Fund approved the restatement of our
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of our authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000, and the number
of our authorized shares of preferred stock from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000. The increase is intended to help facilitate the transformation
of Equus into an operating company and provide sufficient authorized shares to evaluate larger business concerns as possible acquisition
or merger candidates.
|
(7) |
2016 Equity Incentive Plan |
Share-Based Incentive
Compensation—On June 13, 2016, our shareholders approved the adoption of our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”).
On January 10, 2017, the SEC issued an order approving the Incentive Plan and certain awards intended to be made thereunder. The Incentive
Plan is intended to promote the interests of the Fund by encouraging officers, employees, and directors of the Fund and its affiliates
to acquire or increase their equity interest in the Fund and to provide a means whereby they may develop a proprietary interest in the
development and financial success of the Fund, to encourage them to remain with and devote their best efforts to the business of the Fund,
thereby advancing the interests of the Fund and its stockholders. The Incentive Plan is also intended to enhance the ability of the Fund
and its affiliates to attract and retain the services of individuals who are essential for the growth and profitability of the Fund. The
Incentive Plan permits the award of restricted stock as well as common stock purchase options. The maximum number of shares of common
stock that are subject to awards granted under the Incentive Plan is 2,434,728 shares. The term of the Incentive Plan will expire on June
13, 2026. On March 17, 2017, we granted awards of restricted stock under the Incentive Plan to certain of our directors and executive
officers in the aggregate amount of 844,500 shares. The awards are each subject to a vesting requirement over a 3-year period unless the
recipient thereof is terminated or removed from their position as a director or executive officer without “cause”, or as a
result of constructive termination, as such terms are defined in the respective award agreements entered into by each of the recipients
and the Fund. As of March 31, 2020, all awards granted under the Incentive Plan were fully vested. We account for share-based compensation
using the fair value method, as prescribed by ASC 718. Accordingly, for restricted stock awards, we measure the grant date fair value
based upon the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant and amortize the fair value of the awards as share-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term.
Equus Energy, LLC (“Equus
Energy”) was formed in November 2011 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund to make investments in companies in the energy sector,
with particular emphasis on income-producing oil & gas properties. In December 2011, we contributed $250,000 to the capital of Equus
Energy. On December 27, 2012, we invested an additional $6.8 million in Equus Energy for the purpose of additional working capital and
to fund the purchase of $6.6 million in working interests presently consisting of 136 producing and non- producing oil and gas wells.
On September 30, 2020, the Fund provided an additional $0.6 million in capital to Equus Energy for the purpose of additional working capital.
On June 30, 2021, the Fund provided an additional $0.3 million in capital to Equus Energy for the purpose of additional working capital.
The working interests include associated development rights of approximately 21,320 acres situated on 9 separate properties in Texas and
Oklahoma. The working interests range from a de minimus amount to 50% of the leasehold that includes these wells.
The wells are operated
by a number of operators, including Burk Royalty, which has operating responsibility for all of Equus Energy’s 22 producing well
interests located in the Conger Field, a productive oil and gas field on the edge of the Permian Basin that has experienced successful
gas and hydrocarbon extraction in multiple formations. Equus Energy, which holds a 50% working interest in each of these Conger Field
wells, is seeking to effect a recompletion program of existing Conger Field wells to the Wolfcamp formation, a zone containing oil as
well as gas and natural gas liquids. A substantial part of Equus Energy’s acreage rights described above also includes a 50% working
interest in possible new drilling to the base of the Canyon formation (appx. 8,500 feet) on 2,400 acres in the Conger Field. Also included
in the interests acquired by Equus Energy are working interests of 7.5% and 2.5% in the Burnell and North Pettus Units, respectively,
which collectively comprise approximately 13,000 acres located in the area known as the “Eagle Ford Shale” play.
The gradual
recovery of the world economy, largely buoyed by fiscal and monetary stimulus, resulted in a strong recovery in energy prices
through to the end of 2021. The buildup and subsequent invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces in February 2022 added additional
impetus to short-term commodity prices, with oil increasing 40.4% in the first half of 2022 and natural gas increasing 71.2% during
the same period. Given such price volatility, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (UEIA) has changed its 2022 WTI and gas
price forecasts substantially throughout the year, starting with an estimated year-long average of $75.00 for WTI in January 2022, a
revised estimate of $113.00 in March 2022, and a most recent estimate in June 2022 of $98.79. The UEIA’s estimate for average
gas prices continued to climb throughout 2022, starting with an estimate of $3.79 per MMBTU in January, increasing to $6.02 per
MMBTU in its most recent revised forecast in June 2022.
The Impact of COVID-19
and Other Events—Recent years have witnessed unprecedented systemic events, such as Covid-19, government-induced consumer demand,
and, most recently, armed conflict, that had a material effect on oil prices globally. Crude and natural gas prices each reached multi-year
highs in the first half of 2022 and, despite decreasing during the third quarter of 2022, still remain above year-end 2021 levels.
Notwithstanding present
pricing conditions and forecasts for the remainder of 2022, operators of the leasehold interests held by Equus Energy have not yet undertaken
significant capital expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect upon the operations and long-term financial condition of
Equus Energy. To conserve existing cash resources or create additional cash resources during the next year, Equus Energy intends to either:
(i) attempt to secure equity or debt financing from one or more institutional sources, which sources may include the Fund, a commercial
lender, or other investors, (ii) request that its operators shut-in additional wells, (iii) sell certain of its oil and gas holdings,
or (iv) undertake a combination of the foregoing. However, we cannot assure you that Equus Energy will be able to implement these plans
successfully, or that such plans will generate sufficient liquidity to continue as a going concern. The factors discussed above, therefore,
raise substantial doubt about Equus Energy’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Going-Concern—The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Equus Energy have been prepared on a going concern basis, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business. As
such, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification
of assets and their carrying amount, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should Equus Energy be unable to
continue as a going concern.
Revenue and Income—During
the three months ended September 30, 2022, Equus Energy’s revenue, operating revenue less direct operating expenses, and net loss
were $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and ($0.1) million, respectively, as compared to revenue, operating revenue less direct operating expenses,
and net loss which were $0.2 million, $0.08 million, and ($0.03) million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2021.
During the nine months
ended September 30, 2022, Equus Energy’s revenue, operating revenue less direct operating expenses, and net loss were $0.9 million,
$0.7 million, and ($0.09) million, respectively, as compared to revenue, operating revenue less direct operating expenses, and net loss
which were $0.6 million, $0.1 million, and ($0.07) million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.
Capital Expenditures—During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021, Equus Energy’s
investment, respectively, in capital expenditures for small repairs and improvements was not significant.
We do not consolidate
Equus Energy or its wholly-owned subsidiaries and accordingly only the value of our investment in Equus Energy is included on our balance
sheets. Our investment in Equus Energy is valued in accordance with our normal valuation procedures and is based in part on a reserve
report prepared for Equus Energy by Lee Keeling & Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum engineering firm, the transactions and
values of comparable companies in this sector, and the estimated value of leasehold mineral interests associated with the acreage held
by Equus Energy. A valuation of Equus Energy was performed by a third-party valuation firm, who recommended a value range of Equus Energy
consistent with the fair value determined by our Management (See Schedule of Investments).
Below is summarized
unaudited condensed consolidated financial information for Equus Energy as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 and for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively (in thousands):
EQUUS ENERGY, LLC
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| |
September 30, | |
December 31, |
| |
2022 | |
2021 |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Assets | |
| |
|
Current assets: | |
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 351 | | |
$ | 640 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 417 | | |
| 215 | |
Total current assets | |
| 768 | | |
| 855 | |
Oil and gas properties | |
| 8,097 | | |
| 8,097 | |
Less: accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| (8,094 | ) | |
| (8,093 | ) |
Net oil and gas properties | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | |
Total assets | $ |
771 | | | $ |
859 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and member's deficit | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and other | |
$ | 101 | | |
$ | 103 | |
Due to affiliate | |
| 350 | | |
| 350 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 451 | | |
| 453 | |
Asset retirement obligations | |
| 216 | | |
| 214 | |
Total liabilities | |
667 | | | |
667 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total member's equity (deficit) | |
| 104 | | |
| 192 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total liabilities and member'sequity (deficit) | $ |
771 | | | $ |
859 | | |
Revenue and direct
operating expenses for the various oil and gas assets included in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations below
represent the net collective working and revenue interests acquired by Equus Energy.
EQUUS ENERGY, LLC
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
| |
Three months ended September 30, | |
Nine months ended September 30, |
| |
2022 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
2021 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Operating revenue | |
$ | 277 | | |
$ | 237 | | |
$ | 898 | | |
$ | 623 | |
Operating expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Direct operating expenses | |
| 77 | | |
| 155 | | |
| 206 | | |
| 482 | |
General and administrative | |
| 310 | | |
| 53 | | |
| 778 | | |
| 178 | |
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion | |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 5 | |
Impairment of oil and gas properties | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 32 | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 388 | | |
| 210 | | |
| 986 | | |
| 697 | |
Net income (loss) | |
| (111 | ) | |
| 27 | | |
| (88 | ) | |
| (74 | ) |
EQUUS ENERGY, LLC
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
| |
2022 | |
2021 |
| |
| |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Net income (loss) | |
$ | (88 | ) | |
$ | (74 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to | |
| | | |
| | |
net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| 2 | | |
| 5 | |
Accretion expense | |
| 1 | | |
| — | |
Impairment | |
| — | | |
| 32 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilites: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (202 | ) | |
| (79 | ) |
Accounts payable and other | |
| (2 | ) | |
| (129 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (289 | ) | |
| (245 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Investment in oil & gas properties | |
| — | | |
| (32 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | |
| — | | |
| (32 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Due to Parent | |
| — | | |
| 350 | |
Net cash provided by investing activities | |
| — | | |
| 350 | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash | |
| (289 | ) | |
| 73 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 640 | | |
| 621 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 351 | | |
$ | 694 | |
Critical Accounting Policies for Equus Energy
Oil & Gas Properties—Equus
Energy and its wholly-owned subsidiary EQS Energy Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “the Company”) follow the Full Cost Method
of Accounting for oil and gas properties. Under the full cost method, all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration, and
development activities are capitalized. Capitalized costs include lease acquisitions, geological and geophysical work, delay rentals,
costs of drilling, completing and equipping successful and unsuccessful oil and gas wells and related costs. Gains or losses are normally
not recognized on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties. Gains or losses are normally reflected as an adjustment to
the full cost pool. Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected
as additional impairment in the accompanying statements of operations.
The capitalized costs
of oil and gas properties, plus estimated future development costs relating to proved reserves and estimated cost of dismantlement and
abandonment, net of salvage value, are amortized on a unit-of-production method over the estimated productive life of the proved oil and
gas reserves. Unevaluated oil and gas properties are excluded from this calculation. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion
expense for the Company’s oil and gas properties totaled $2 thousand and $5 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2022
and 2021, respectively.
Capitalized oil and gas property costs are limited
to an amount (the ceiling limitation) equal to the sum of the following:
|
(a) |
As of September 30, 2022, the present value of estimated future net revenue from the projected production of proved oil and gas reserves, calculated at the simple arithmetic average, first-day-of-the-month prices during the twelve-month period before the balance sheet date (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) and a discount factor of 10%; |
|
(b) |
The cost of investments in unproved and unevaluated properties excluded from the costs being amortized; and |
|
(c) |
The lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized. |
When it is determined
that oil and gas property costs exceed the ceiling limitation, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce its carrying value to the ceiling
limitation. The Company recognized an impairment loss on its oil and gas properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and
2021 of $0 and $32 thousand, respectively.
The costs of certain
unevaluated leasehold acreage and certain wells being drilled are not amortized. The Company excludes all costs until proved reserves
are found or until it is determined that the costs are impaired. Costs not amortized are periodically assessed for possible impairment
or reduction in value. If a reduction in value has occurred, costs being amortized are increased accordingly.
Revenue Recognition—The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers.
The Company’s
revenue is generated primarily from the sale of oil, gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) produced from working interests and
to a lesser extent from royalty interests in oil and gas properties owned by the Company. As a working interest owner, the Company is
responsible for the incurred production expenses proportionate to the interest stipulated in the operating agreement. As a non-operator,
the Company does not manage the daily well operations, which are borne by the well operator. Sales of oil, gas and NGLs are recognized
at the time control of the product is transferred to the customer.
Various
arrangements amongst the nine different oil and gas properties all differ in some respects, although they do share the commonality
that, as a non-operating working interest holder, the Company does not engage in the selling process, but instead relies on the
operator, as their selling agent, for negotiating and determining pricing, volume, and delivery terms. Such pricing terms are often
a function of a specified discount from the daily/monthly NYMEX or Henry Hub average. The discount is usually based on differentials
such as distance of the field/wells from the distribution node or the buyer’s storage facility, as well as the quality of the
product itself (i.e., in the case of oil, its gravity).
Revenue is measured
based on consideration specified in the contract with the customer, and excludes any amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The
Company recognizes revenue in the amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange for transferring control
of those goods to the customer. The contract consideration is typically allocated to specific performance obligations in the contract
according to the terms of the contract. Each unit of oil or gas is considered a separate performance obligation under the contract. Wells
are spot measured once a month to determine production and the composition of each of the products (i.e. oil, gas, NGLs) from the well.
Each month the consideration obtained by the operator is allocated to the related performance obligations.
Performance Obligations
A performance obligation
is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASC 606. A contract’s
transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation
is satisfied. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied in accordance with contractual terms, in an amount that
reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for services rendered.
Depending on the contract
and commodity, there are various means by which upstream entities can transfer control (i.e., at the wellhead, inlet, tailgate of the
processing plant, or a location where the product is delivered to a third party). The Company has control of the commodity before it is
extracted, therefore consideration must be given to whether the transfer of control of the commodity is to the operator or to the end
customer at the point of sale.
Unless special arrangements
are entered into, the Company’s performance obligations are generally considered performed when control of the extracted commodity
transfers when it is delivered to the end customer at the agreed-upon market or index price. At the end of each month, when the performance
obligation is satisfied, the variable consideration can be reasonably estimated. Variances between the Company’s estimated revenue
and actual payments are recorded in the month the payment is received.
Principal vs. Agent
While the guidance
on principal versus agent considerations is similar to legacy GAAP, the key difference is that ASC 606 focuses on control of the specified
goods and services as the overarching principle for entities to consider when determining whether they are acting as a principal or an
agent. This could result in entities reaching different conclusions than they did under legacy GAAP.
An
entity acting as a principal records revenue on a gross basis if it controls a promised good or service before transferring that good
or service to the customer. An entity is an agent if it does not control the promised good or service before transfer to the customer.
If the entity is an agent, it records as revenue the net amount it retains for its agency services. However, due to the uncertainty of
the variable pricing component and the separation of expenses billed to the Company from the consideration processed and paid by the operator,
the revenue is recorded at net.
Under the Company’s normal
operating activity arrangements, the operator is responsible for negotiating, fulfilling and collecting the agreed-upon amount from the
sale with the end customer and is, therefore, determined to be acting as agent on behalf of the Company. The principal versus agent consideration
will continue to be assessed for new contracts, both within and outside the company’s normal operating activities.
Income
Taxes—A limited liability company is not subject to the payment of federal income taxes as components of its income and expenses
flow through directly to the members. However, the Company is subject to certain state income taxes. Texas margin tax applies to legal
entities conducting business in Texas. The margin tax is based on our Texas sourced taxable margin. The tax is calculated by applying
a tax rate to a base that considers both revenue and expenses and therefore has the characteristics of an income tax. Taxable Subsidiaries
may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income
tax expense on our Statements of Operations. The Company had no federal income tax expense for the nine months ending September 30, 2022
and 2021, respectively.
Asset Retirement Obligations—The
fair value of asset retirement obligations are recorded in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value
can be made, and the corresponding cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The fair value
of the asset retirement obligation is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at the Company’s credit- adjusted
risk-free interest rate. Fair value, to the extent possible, should include a market risk premium for unforeseeable circumstances. No
market risk premium was included in the Company’s asset retirement obligation fair value estimate since a reasonable estimate could
not be made. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depleted or amortized over the
estimated recoverable reserves using the units-of-production method.
Management performed
an evaluation of the Fund’s activity through the date the financial statements were issued, noting the following subsequent events:
On October 4, 2022,
our holding in $4.0 million in U.S. Treasury Bills matured and we repaid our margin loan.
As described more fully under Note 6 – Conversion
to an Operating Company, on November 3, 2022, holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Fund approved our cessation
as a BDC under the 1940 Act and authorized our Board to cause the Fund’s withdrawal of its election to be classified as a BDC, effective
as of a date designated by the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, but no later than February 28, 2023.