boston745
6時間前
Jan 20th, 2025. Ned Medical closes its Series A offering with its largest investor being Varian Medical Siemens Oncology subsidiary. Ned Medical raised 8.5m which values its portion of Ned Medical & Sintx tech around 30-40m. However Sintx and Ned Medical didnt announce this and Sintx was absent from the investment. This is the first indication that something was indeed up.
Think on this one for a minute. For years there have been posters on this board trying to convince you Sintx was a scam, that its management was only using the public markets to pay their salaries and enrich themselves. However, this non-release of information is a better example of the type of scam I have been saying has actually been going on with Sintx. The scam to scare people away to reduce potential legal ramifications for one, but truly to clear a path for management to do what they wish. Of course they cannot do what they want unless their main investors are on board with their actions...like Medtech.
I have claimed that Sintx management has purposefully held Sintx back to keep it undervalued. I now suspect they have kept Sintx undervalued so they can do what they will with little potential blow back and resistance. In fact Sintx management has no resistance sans for me. Which is precisely why I have been targeted.
An old lawyer adage says "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts...". There is of course more to this saying but that is exactly what I have been doing since 2015. Collect the facts and pound them in post after post fighting a conspiracy to keep Sintx undervalued and in a weak position. Of course I didnt believe nor did I want to believe this included management of Sintx. Not until the facts really pointed to them did I begin to turn my sights on them as well; which really began in 2024 when I called out how I believed they were purposefully keeping Sintx undervalued to sell the company to NP Aerospace. While I had evidence to suggest this, its never been as blatant as it is now.
That brings me to the subject of Varian Medical's investment into Ned Medical and thus Sintx. There is no more obvious attempt to purposefully keep Sintx undervalued for some agenda than this. Why do I say this?
First off, I now know that Sintx's CTO Dr. Ryan Bock, PHD, supposed theft of trade secrets occurred in the weeks leading up to his departure in March and the lawsuit late in that month. Meaning everything was technically ok between Sintx and Ned Medical in January when Varian Medical invested in Ned Medical. In fact I believe Sintx Chief Investment Officer loaded up on shares of Sintx in December knowing about this forthcoming investment (possible insider trading issue). However something changed in late December. Sintx went from something big was going to happen to a short by January 2nd; this is backed by steady decline in stockprice after that post.
Ned Medical initiated its Series A round and oddly Sintx did not participate. Had Sintx participated it would have had a nice asset on the books that would increase quickly over the coming years. Thats followed by Varian's investment but no disclosure by Varian, Ned, nor Sintx. All three companies mum on this investment which is very strange for an early stage company like Ned to not display prominently on their website. Varian's investment signals a significant validation for Ned & Sintx technology yet if you goto Ned Medical's website you will find no mention of this.
Thus as I've said, I believe the conspiracy was concocted back in December to do this. For Sintx not to participate in the Series A round, for the three companies to keep this investment quite, for the transfer of manufacturing know how to Ned Medical illegally, and for Sintx management to weaken Sintx further which they have done so far.
The only way to stop them is to contact the SEC & FBI as well as kick off a large lawsuit against Sintx management and board past and present. I cannot fight them on my own, try as I might. They believe they can do whatever they want and thats obvious in how brazen they are behaving even if they tried to hide it. The biggest consequence of that is technology that could do alot of good for humanity to help shield us from things to come, like another pandemic, are being purposefully held back so they can get away with this.
This is a work in progress like all my posts and I'll further refine it over time. Check my profile for links to my various research if interested in reading more about this and other subjects.
boston745
2日前
Conspiracy to Steal Trade Secrets and its Estimated Timeframe as well as potential insider trading.
SINTX Technologies and NED Medical Partner to Advance Cutting-Edge Ceramic Microsphere Medical Devices for Cancer Treatment
This post is a work in progress. It contains information that I believe indicates that there was knowledge that Varian Medical was planning on investing in Ned Medical and Sintx's Combisphere tech as early as September 2025 (maybe even in July), that this was the plan until December 2025, and that sometime in December the conspiracy to transfer trade secrets illegally to Ned Medical was concocted.
Specifically, an account posting on Stocktwits called SnoopyDog gives us an idea of timeframe of when the decision was made to give Ned Medical the know how. I say this because of the accounts bullish post on December 21st, 2025 and followup bearish post on January 2nd, 2025. Subsequently, Sintx stock broke downward and began trending down just days later. How did this account know both of these things? Answer is the account is connected to someone intimate with the comings and goings at Sintx.
The bullish post on the 21st indicated SOMETHING BIG was coming, reinforcing that Varian Medical's investment was believed to be something significant if indeed this account was aware. This was reinforced by CIO's large purchases about two weeks earlier. Both of these counter the claim that the loss to shareholders due to the theft of trade secrets did not require disclosure. Incidentally the Chief Investment Officer's acquisition of shares looks to be insider trading as I highly doubt he was unaware that Varian was examining Sintx/Ned Medicals technology by this time.
Chain of Events
September 2025, an account claiming to be Arthur Karl Kipke, the managing member of Medtech and Sintx largest investor both pre-IPO and post said the following: "In 6- and 12-months, throngs of people will be pining, "I could have bought all I wanted at a $15 million enterprise value in September 2025!"
At the time I had no reason to associate that comment with Ned Medical, however its entirely possible that Mr Kipke, or a representative, posted that because they had knowledge that Varian Medical was examining the technology Sintx and Ned Medical were developing. That also means that he got a great deal, or would have, acquiring those additional warrants around that time. Now of course Sintx has issued Medtech new warrants at a much lower price coupled with full ratchet provision.
October 2025, Sintx filed an ATM offering where they indicated they may use the funds to invest in complementary technology. I pretty much immediately associated that with plans to invest in Ned Medical.
December 8th & 9th 2025: SEC fillings: Sintx Chief Investment Officer and member of Sintx board acquired over 100k shares more than doubling his position.
December 12, 2025: Account SnoopyDog posted "today it will be a good day to add. Everything below 3.5 is good imo"
December 21st, 2025: Account SnoopyDog posted "I assume I know something big is coming here! "
Jan 2nd 2025 that same account said: "So is this a short now?" For which Sintx stock began to drop thereafter.
Jan 20th, 2025. Ned Medical closes its Series A offering with its largest investor being Varian Medical Siemens Oncology subsidiary. Ned Medical raised 8.5m which values its portion of Ned Medical & Sintx tech around 30-40m. However Sintx and Ned Medical didnt announce this and Sintx was absent from the investment. This is the first indication that something was indeed up.
Feb 6th: Ryan Elmore, now Sintx president, signed his employment contract this day. In that contract additional indemnity above and beyond that of what Sintx provides its other executives was specified & required. "This benefit shall be in addition to the provisions of any Indemnity Agreement entered into between Executive and Company. "
Weeks leading up to March 2026 was when the supposed data theft occurred. While sometime in March 2026, Dr Bock left or was let go from Sintx according to his LinkedIn page.
SINTX claims Dr. Bock misappropriated this protected data by secretly transferring, downloading, or disclosing SINTX’s underlying technical trade secrets directly to NED Medical. SINTX alleges this was done to advance NED Medical's independent commercial position, bypassing the restrictive bounds and financial arrangements of the initial JDA
Thus this indicates that sometime around the last two weeks of December, that a conspiracy was concocted to give Ned Medical the manufacturing know how at the cost of Sintx and Sintx was no longer a long investment, but a short as indicated by SnoopyDog ST post. Its interesting that account seems to have foreknowledge of Sintx business.
I now have a better idea of when the supposed theft of IP occurred. According to Google AI in regards to the lawsuit against Dr. Bock, the transfer of trade secrets occurred in the weeks leading up to his firing in March. That means the supposed theft occurred AFTER Varian Medical’s investment in Ned Medical despite my belief that the plan to transfer the tech was concocted in December. This leads me to suspect that Varian did not want Sintx to be a part of this if it was going to invest in Ned Medical. Thus the conspiracy was hatched to transfer IP to Ned Medical so Varian would make said investment. What should have been done, was Sintx should have sold the rights to Ned or come up with a licensing deal.
Mr Ryan Elmore, who is now president of Sintx, signed his employment contract on February 6th, 2026 requiring additional Indemnity coverage above and beyond what Sintx already provides. That tells us that Mr. Elmore knew of things ongoing within Sintx that he believed he needed additional protection from. That suggests that the conspiracy was already underway by this point and that Mr. Elmore knew about it which is why he insisted on said additional coverage, understandably.
Potential SEC Violations
Obviously the biggest violation is the violation of Fiduciary Duty by giving Ned Medical trade secrets costing Shareholders tens of millions in valuation now and more into the future.
However I want to spend this section going over other violations. First and foremost was the possible trading on inside information by Sintx CIO Greg Honigblum. His purchases of more than 100k shares represents more than double the shares he already had. The fact he did this so close to when Varian took a stake in Ned Medical suggests he had foreknowledge of said transaction and believed it would financially benefit him enough to purchase so many shares. At least had this information been released to the public.
Then there was the non-disclosure of Varian Medical’s investment in Ned Medical. Because Sintx & Ned Medical are jointly developing this technology, this represented a significant increase in value for Sintx as evidenced by Mr. Honigblum’s purchases, SnoopyDog’s posts on ST, and likely Mr. Kipke’s claim of people wishing they had bought all the shares they could when Sintx had a marketcap below $15m in September 2025.
Incidentally if Sintx would have invested in Ned Medical, like it intended, then it would have immediately saw that investment value increase representing a potentially significant asset for Sintx on the books; less so upfront but over time. An investment asset that could have grown quickly.
Next would have been the departure of a prominent executive in its CTO Dr. Ryan Bock, PHD. Im pretty certain a depature of this level requires a SEC filing at the least if not a press release.
Next was the theft of IP and lawsuit against Dr Bock. I do not know if these represents 2 separate violations or would be just one but they should have disclosed the theft and lawsuit due to the scope of the value lost due to that theft.
Sintx board/management are hiding information, why?
Why didn’t Sintx disclose Varian Medical’s investment in Ned Medical when it stood to benefit from such disclosure? The only reason I can come up with, as this information is publicly available via pitchbook, is it was necessary for them to hide the future “theft” of IP, the departure of Dr Bock, and lawsuit. All which they would have had to disclose otherwise. Also it could be to weaken Sintx financial position so it is unable to recoup damages via the courts. Lawsuits are expensive. This could also lead to a lowball acquisition of Sintx in its weakened position.
Why wouldnt they want to disclose the departure of Dr Bock? One reason is to protect his reputation. An odd thing to do if Dr Bock really betrayed their trust after 18 years working at Sintx. Not an odd thing if he was doing what they asked of him of course.
Why didn’t they disclose the lawsuit? As I already indicated, its possible they are trying to protect Dr Bock’s reputation. However, there could be a legal strategy to this. Still, as this represents significant loss to Sintx shareholders, im not sure avoiding disclosure is a good legal strategy.
Why isnt Sintx suing Ned Medical as well as Dr Bock? This has been my main question. First possibility is again, legal strategy. First they want to establish precedence with Dr Bock and then they could choose to add Ned Medical later. As well as they could be wary of the cost if they went after Ned Medical right away...even more reason to have disclosed Varian Medicals investment as they could have raised a lot of money; about $14m between outstanding warrants and ATM offering. So there lack of disclosure of Varian’s investment cost Sintx significantly.
Alternatively, if this lawsuit is a farce, a cover to establish an attempt to recover damages, they would have every reason to not sue Ned Medical...especially if mgmt/board plan to invest in Ned Medicals future financing rounds. A lawsuit including Ned Medical could trigger FBI involvement and personally I do not think Sintx wants their involvement. If the FBI were to investigate Sintx it could stumble onto a slew of illegal activity connected to it directly and indirectly.. Obviously if there is a conspiracy within Sintx to steal the trade secrets that would be a reason. Still the illegal activity surrounding Sintx could be the main reason. Like the harassment Ive experienced for the last 8 years by individuals connected to Sintx; this is minor compared to what the previous CEO may have been tied to. Then theres the possibility of money laundering being involved here and that its previous CEO was compensated with said funds. So there could be multiple reasons Sintx doesn’t want to attract this sort of attention even if mgmt/board wanted to sue Ned Medical on shareholder behalf.
Is Sintx management/board purposefully trying to weaken Sintx position?
I’ve established Sintx mgmt/board did not disclose Varian Medical’s investment which directly prevented Sintx from being able to raise funds. That in turn led to two things. First was a warning from NASDAQ about Sintx having insufficient shareholder equity, and secondly it led to an offering that should not have happened.
That offering has me questioning whether Sintx is returning to its previous ways of cost basis harvesting. I asked this simply because the most recent offering issued the same Class A & B warrants I acquired back in 2022 with very similar terms. Warrants that price adjust with lower priced offerings. The only difference is Sintx can force the exercising of the Class B warrants with $2m in quarterly revenue. Still those price adjustment encourage the shorting of its stock to reduce the exercise price. However reducing exercise price does not change the original cost bases of over 2 per warrant. Thus if Sintx returns to doing large reverse splits, those warrant holders will see large increases in that original cost basis offsetting future taxable income...
In addition to that, on July 2nd, Sintx filed with the SEC where it issued Medtech, its largest investor, whom should be very upset about this IP theft, new warrants with a lower exercise price and full ratchet terms.
Remember, because I held through the 100:1 and 200:1 RS in 2022 and 2024, my cost basis skyrocked into the tens of millions when i only invested 11k in that offering.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I say contact the SEC & FBI, as they are the only ones I believe that can stop those running Sintx. Its also time for a class action lawsuit against management/board current and past, but I cannot start said suit. They have me under watch and have already gotten to my previous attorney. They will do it again. While Sintx does not seem worth according to the markets, the IP is worth alot. The market potential is in the hundreds of billions between Ortho, PPE, Wound Care, various Antipathogenic products including Air and Water filtration (Solventem kept its water filtration line in its deal with Thermal Fisher for a reason), Catheters, neural implants, and so much more.
I want to see the technology in the hands of a company with management that will actually do something with its technology and not just look out for their own and a specific fews interest.
If you found this information informative and would like to see more, check my profile for my expanded coverage on this and other subjects.
Lawsuit:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/63801444/SINTX_Technologies,_Inc_v_Bock
Quote Sources:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sintx-technologies-ned-medical-partner-110000929.html
https://stocktwits.com/FactBased78746/message/627830306
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/638976131
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/639811853
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/640663882
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315226007271/ex10-1.htm
CIO's Form 4's
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225026528/xslF345X05/ownership.xml
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225026777/xslF345X05/ownership.xml
boston745
2日前
According to Google AI, the discovery of theft of trade secrets did not occur until the weeks leading up to Dr Bock's termination & the emergency lawsuit sometime in March 2026; Google did not give me a specific date. Thus we have to ask ourselves, if everything was ok between Sintx and Ned Medical in January, as in nothing illegal was discovered and no IP stolen, why then didnt Sintx & Ned Medical announce Varian's investment together? Why was this investment hidden from the public; Ned Medical nor Varian even disclose this investment that I can find? Though the investment was into Ned Medical specifically, Combisphere product is 100% dependent on Sintx material. Thus Varian was indirectly investing in Sintx and providing validation for their material. My guess is Varian Medical did not want Sintx to be a part of this after its due diligence.
Secondly, why didnt Sintx invest in Ned Medical like it planned to back in October? The answer to this is likely because they did not announce Varian's investment which should have shot the stock up enough for them to raise funds via the ATM to then participate.
Again this all supports my theory that sometime between December 21st 2025 & January 2nd, 2026, the plan to give Ned Medical the manufacturing know how was concocted and this conspiracy involves multiple people inside Sintx. It also counters the idea that Sintx did not have to disclose the theft to the public.
SINTX claims Dr. Bock misappropriated this protected data by secretly transferring, downloading, or disclosing SINTX’s underlying technical trade secrets directly to NED Medical. SINTX alleges this was done to advance NED Medical's independent commercial position, bypassing the restrictive bounds and financial arrangements of the initial JDA
Dr Bock's countering this by saying all information he shared was covered under the scope of the JDA. In the end, Ned Medical will be able to manufacture the Combisphere beads without Sintx and thats a big deal as the market is in the billions.
This whole thing seems like a B movie script.
boston745
3日前
Conspiracy to Steal Trade Secrets and its Estimated Timeframe as well as potential insider trading.
SINTX Technologies and NED Medical Partner to Advance Cutting-Edge Ceramic Microsphere Medical Devices for Cancer Treatment
This post is a work in progress. It contains information that I believe indicates that there was knowledge that Varian Medical was planning on investing in Ned Medical and Sintx's Combisphere tech as early as September 2025 (maybe even in July), that this was the plan until December 2025, and that sometime in December the conspiracy to transfer trade secrets illegally to Ned Medical was concocted. Specifically, an account posting on Stocktwits called SnoopyDog gives us an idea of timeframe of when the decision was made to give Ned Medical the know how. This account posted bullish on December 21st, 2025, and then its next post was bearish on January 2nd, 2025. Subsequently, Sintx stock broke downward and began trending down just days later. How did this account know both of these things?
The bullish post on the 21st indicates SOMETHING BIG was coming, reinforcing that Varian Medical's investment was believed to be something significant. This was reinforced by CIO's large purchases. Both of these counter the claim that the loss to shareholders due to the theft of trade secrets did not require disclosure. Incidentally the Chief Investment Officer's acquisition of shares look to be insider trading as I doubt he was not aware that Varian was examining Sintx/Ned Medicals technology.
September 2025, an account claiming to be Arthur Karl Kipke, the managing member of Sintx largest investor both pre-IPO and post said the following: "In 6- and 12-months, throngs of people will be pining, "I could have bought all I wanted at a $15 million enterprise value in September 2025!"
At the time I had no reason to associate that comment with Ned Medical, however its entirely possible that Mr Kipke, or a respresentative, posted that because they had knowledge that Varian Medical was examining the technology Sintx and Ned Medical were developing. That also means that he got a great deal, or would have, acquiring those additional warrants around that time. Now of course Sintx has issued Medtech new warrants at a much lower price coupled with full ratchet provision.
October 2025, Sintx filed an ATM offering where they indicated they may use the funds to invest in complementary technology. I pretty much immediately associated that with plans to invest in Ned Medical.
December 8th & 9th 2025: SEC fillings: Sintx Chief Investment Officer and member of Sintx board acquired over 100k shares more than doubling his position.
December 12, 2025: Account SnoopyDog posted "today it will be a good day to add. Everything below 3.5 is good imo"
December 21st, 2025: Account SnoopyDog posted "I assume I know something big is coming here! "
Jan 2nd 2025 that same account said: "So is this a short now?" For which Sintx stock began to drop thereafter.
Jan 20th, 2025. Ned Medical closes its Series A offering with its largest investor being Varian Medical Siemens Oncology subsidiary. Ned Medical raised 8.5m which values its portion of Ned Medical & Sintx tech around 30-40m. However Sintx and Ned Medical didnt announce this and Sintx wasnt involved in the investment.
Feb 6th: Ryan Elmore, now Sintx president, signed his employment contract this day. In that contract additional indemnity above and beyond that of what Sintx provides its executives was specified & required. "This benefit shall be in addition to the provisions of any Indemnity Agreement entered into between Executive and Company. "
Thus this indicates that sometime around the last two weeks of December, that a conspiracy was concocted to give Ned Medical the manufacturing know how at the cost of Sintx and Sintx was no longer a long investment, but a short as indicated by SnoopyDog ST post. Its interesting that account seems to have foreknowledge of Sintx business.
I have no idea when Dr Bock, Sintx CTO in December, supposedly took the manufacturing know how to Ned Medical but Sintx lawsuit against Dr Bock was not until March 26th, 2026. I do not have access to the lawsuit to know when this transfer supposedly occurred. What I do know is that Sintx new President, Ryan Elmore, contract insisted on additional Indemnity coverage back on February 6th 2026. Suggesting he knew about the conspiracy to steal trade secrets from Sintx investors and give it to Ned Medical. As in he needed additional protection for a reason.
There are some key indicators that Sintx believed Varians investment in Ned Medical would cause a significant increase in Sintx stock,. First and most obvious was the CIO's more than doubling his share count. Yet Sintx did not disclose Varian's investment in the tech in January. Just as it did not disclose the IP theft, whenever that may have occurred. Nor did it disclose the lawsuit against Dr Bock; still hasnt as of writing this.
Sintx lawsuit against Dr Bock does not include Ned Medical. Why is that? One reason could be they did not want to trigger FBI investigation as stolen trade secrets crossing state lines could trigger. Ned Medical is practically in Boston on the other side of the country from Sintx.
Thus one can only conclude that Sintx mgmt does not want FBI involvement, it doesnt want to stop Ned Medical from utilizing trade secrets it illegally obtained, nor does it truly want to seek/recover damages to its investors which includes members of management and board. Very odd no?
In addition to that, Sintx mgmt did not disclose anything which the SEC requires. It seems that Sintx managed to not even disclose the lawsuit on its 10Q because it deems the loss to be inconsequential to it and thus its investors. That doesnt add up with the enthusiasm that Mr Kipke showed in September or Sintx CIO showed when he more than doubled his open market share count. All of this indicates that Sintx mgmt wants to hide the lawsuit from the public. Even after ive posted about the lawsuit on multiple forums, Sintx mgmt still has not addressed the issue. All signs point to them not wanting people to know. But why? The likely answer is because they are involved.
Now, Sintx seems to be back to its old self and is shooting for cost basis harvesting via warrants and reverse splits. Sintx most recent offering issued the same Class A & B warrants I acquired back in 2022 with the same terms. Warrants that price adjust with lower priced offerings. The only difference is Sintx can force the exercising of the Class B warrants with 2m in quarterly revenue. Still those price adjustment encourage the shorting of its stock to reduce the exercise price. However reducing exercise price does not change the original cost bases of over 2 per warrant. Thus is Sintx returns to doing large reverse splits, those warrant holders will see large increases in that original cost basis offsetting future taxable income...
In addition to that, on July 2nd, Sintx filed with the SEC where it issued Medtech, its largest investor whom should be very upset about this IP theft, new warrants with a lower exercise price and full ratchet terms.
Remember, because I held through the 100:1 and 200:1 RS in 2022 and 2024, my cost basis skyrocked into the tens of millions when i only invested 11k in that offering.
Contact the SEC & FBI, its the only thing that can stop them. Its also time for a class action lawsuit for which I cannot start. They have me under watch and have already gotten to my previous attorney. They will do it again. While Sintx is not worth alot on paper, the IP is worth alot. The market potential is in the hundreds of billions between Ortho, PPE, Wound Care, various Antipathogenic products including Air and Water filtration (Solventem kept its water filtration line in its deal with Thermal Fisher for a reason), Catheters, neural implants, and so much more.
Quote Sources:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sintx-technologies-ned-medical-partner-110000929.html
https://stocktwits.com/FactBased78746/message/627830306
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/638976131
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/639811853
https://stocktwits.com/SnoopyDog/message/640663882
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315226007271/ex10-1.htm
CIO's Form 4's
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225026528/xslF345X05/ownership.xml
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225026777/xslF345X05/ownership.xml
boston745
4日前
As far as finding you saying that specific quote, I will not find it. Thats something mainly found with Atlanta and I believe Madg. The part that says essentially derisk is me paraphrasing.
you guys warned me that Mgmt intended to use the public markets to essentially derisk the IP and then take the company private for the benefit of a few.
Here are some quotes that align with what I am saying.
As Atlanta points out repeatedly, i am also worried about they taking this company private when time comes for growth. What stops him from going with that option when he no longer need money from market. They sure has navigated perfectly so far with so many things looking corrupt.
What is Sintx2014 saying? Sintx2014 is saying that he's worried Sonny would take Sintx private because he no longer needs public funds. Thats basically what I said you guys were warning about. Based on some things Atlanta said back in 2017, that may have been the original plan. However by 2020, Im pretty sure the plan was to get Sintx ready for a merger with NP Aerospace. Its possible NP could have acquired Sintx and take it private but it felt like maintaining NASDAQ listing was important. That led me to suspect a reverse merger scenario that would lead to NP going public. After a little time I expected Zimmer Biomet to step from behind the curtain and then acquire Sintx tech. Before this little IP theft issue, I was expecting some three way with Zimmer Biomet and Solventum with Sintx helping those two merge into a larger conglomerate.
Here's a good quote from Atlanta aligning with what I was claiming has been said. Its possible that was the plan at this time and I would have ruined it by posting Sintx connections to Zimmer & Biomet so much back then. "When you have the facts, pound the facts", which is exactly what I did and do. Incidentally this could be why I was doxxed in 2018...if I ruined the plan to take Sintx private back then. Incidentally a similar thing happened in 2024 when I was exposing the intention to merge with NP Aerospace. Except they took it up a fair bit with a death threat and subsequent harassment of my wife a week later.
If Sonny threw a $3 offer on the table tomorrow, how many shares do you think he would be able to buy? I'm betting easily 51% - probably many more than that.
and then 2-3 years down the road when CsC has been approved, the Chinese distribution deal is effective, and Sonny has Zimmer to provide worldwide sales, manufacturing & distribution assistance, he sells to them at $15-20 and rides off into the sunset.
it's close now - so close that he can smell it. and NASDAQ (and all the shareholders who have been slaughtered) be damned, as his current actions are apparently saying.
maybe funding Sonny in taking it private would buy Zimmer some time to work out some legal or regulatory issues that may exist that we don't know about.
who the heck knows?????
I think it's possible that Sonny wants to take this private, and all this stalling is a ploy to give him time to put his financing together.
Atlanta's second quote does not add up even if it could have been true. How does taking Sintx private help while Zimmer was working through regulatory issues? No reason Sintx couldnt stay public while Zimmer was doing that. Taking Sintx private only benefits private investors.
Zimmer would not have to purchase AMDA directly ..... it could be one of their affiliated Private Equity companies in a taking private BO. There is also the possibility that a straight opportunistic medical focused P/E would try and make a quick buck on a BO --- thinking Sonny lacks the ability (or neutrality) to maximize value....
Quote Sources:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=156462851
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134304037
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134304608
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134303178
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132333079
boston745
5日前
Defendants are members of a shadowy gang of short sellers who conspired to perpetrate a “short-and-distort” scheme of breathtaking scope, involving the securities of more than a dozen different public companies over a five-year span, which devastated the markets for securities of the targeted companies.
2. The participants in the scheme short sold securities in each targeted company, and once those short positions were established, they coordinated with a third-party, public-facing frontman who published false negative news about the targets via social media and traditional news media, appearances on cable news programs, interviews, and mainstream news articles. The negative news coordinated via each attack was designed to cause the market price of each target company’s securities to rapidly decline, at which point the conspirators covered their short positions. The scheme generated millions of dollars in illicit profits for its perpetrators, while inflicting billions of dollars in losses upon the targeted companies and those companies’ innocent shareholders.
Anson and its other funds did not even have to publish false news about Sintx online and the scheme they carried out against Sintx was different. That lawsuit that Im quoting has little detail in how Anson and its conspiracy of funds work..
I found a good article years ago detailing how these funds actually work together which i'll add to this post in a minute. But first let me list the family of funds known to be associated with Anson's fund. Intracoastal was involved in the 2025 offering.
Plaintiff further asserts that many of the potential investors that it contacted on behalf of Defendant operate as a family of hedge funds, all managed by the same investment advisor.
List named the following:
Anson Funds Management LP and its affiliates
Ayrton Capital, Altos Opportunity Fund and their
affiliates
Crede Capital Group, Acquitas Capital and its affiliates
CVI Investment, Heights Management, SIG and their
affiliates
Connective Capital and its affiliates
Empery Asset Management and its affiliates
Intracoastal Capital LP and its affiliates
Hudson Bay Capital Management and its affiliates
Ionic Venture LLC and its affiliates
Lind Partners and its affiliates
Li Capital Global Opportunities Master Fund and their
affiliates
Sabby Management LLC and its affiliates
Quote Sources:
https://marketfrauds.to/storage/2026/04/file.pdf
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20251029192104/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
Here is a trade that is almost guaranteed to make money, though it is also double super illegal.
These companies -- there were 13 of them, all pretty small -- raised money through what the SEC calls "confidentially marketed public offerings." A company would engage an investment bank, which would call up potential investors and ask if they wanted to buy shares in the company. The bank would do this before the company publicly announced the offering, and would "wall-cross" the potential investors, making them agree to keep the information about the offering secret until it was announced publicly.
So here's a predictable stock-market pattern and an easy way to exploit it: If a company calls you up to ask you to invest in its upcoming public offering, you should (1) say yes, (2) sell the company's stock short before the public announcement, and then (3) buy the stock back in the public offering, generally at a 10+ percent discount, a few days later.
This is of course not legal advice! It is a great trade, but it is also double super illegal, insofar as:
There is a specific SEC rule against short selling stock just before a public offering and then buying back the stock in the offering, 5 and
There is a general, and much more important, rule against trading on purloined material nonpublic information, and this is that.
trading in breach of that agreement, you are clearly violating not just the contract, but also insider trading laws, which make it illegal to trade "in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security."
But, you know, who will check?
Some of the funds would get wall-crossed, and then they'd tip each other and trade in the other funds to try to obscure what was going on:
When they were successful in obtaining such information, Fishoff shorted the issuer’s stock in advance of the offerings, directed trading by Chernin and Costantin in those instances when he did not place the trades on his own, and tipped Petrello, who then also shorted the stock through Brielle and Oceanview.
In many instances, the Fishoff-controlled entities for which Chernin and Costantin were fronting also participated in the offering, with the stock going to Featherwood’s account and often being used to cover the short sales.
This right here is most likely how this family of funds worked. 1+ of them would get information of a forthcoming offering which it would later participate in, and tip the others off so they can pre-short. Not sure why the author says pre-short, wouldnt this be naked shorting? They then used the shares from the offering that Fund #1 received to cover those naked short positions?
By cheating on their wall-cross agreements and shorting the stock, these guys had the effect of driving down the stock price, which probably reduced the price in the offering. These companies probably got less money for their stock because their nonpublic information was (allegedly) used against them.
Though you could have a more cynical view of this sort of thing. A company needs to sell stock, but worries that announcing a public offering will drive down its stock price and not produce any takers. So it calls some investors up privately and tells them it's doing a deal. Those investors agree to invest in the deal, but before the deal is announced they lay off their risk by shorting the company's stock. Then the deal is announced and the investors buy shares from the company to (illegally) cover their shorts. The investors get their 10 percent, or whatever, discount to the market price as a commission; their real function is not to invest in the deal but to intermediate between the company (which can't sell stock without a publicly disclosed offering) and the unsuspecting public (which buys from the "investors" before the public disclosure). The wall-cross agreement creates deniability for the company. No one's stealing from the company; they're helping the company get a deal done that would otherwise be much harder to achieve. The victims are the public who buy from the insider traders at the inflated, pre-announcement price.
There is definitely evidence supporting this, especially between 2022 RS & 2024 RS. For instance, Lind Group participated in the offering, these funds naked shorted from as high as .50s before Lind used their shares to cover those shorts at .15. Thus this group of funds "laid off their risk", making millions in a few days, and did in fact work as an intermediary between the company and the public as they dumped shares. Lind Group sold off its shares in a matter of days. This group of investors gets a hell of alot more than 10% off these offerings. After factoring in the 200:1 split theyve been shorting since 100 with a hell of a pump and dump between .04 to .22 pre-split (8-44 post split).
You short 16 million, knowing once the offering price is announced, the stock will take a hit. Voila, in 24 to 48 hours you just made 1.6 million by buying back at .15 +
Fund A would be the one that bought the offering, in this case Lind Group. Funds B, etc.. (theres like 9 funds identified so far) would be the ones naked shorting like described here by Joev2. For which i replied:
Its the hfunds that made the $1.6m you describe. Also they NAKED shorted on news of the R&D contract with the army, thus they NAKED shorted from .25-.50 range making alot more than the $1.6m you mentioned. If every .1 represents $1.6m profit then if they have an average Naked short position of .35 then that translates to $3.2m in 24 to 48 hours. Essentially funding the offering in 1-2 day period.
They announced the news on Jan 30th when these funds pre-naked shorted the offering and the offering closed on Feb 2nd. This is exactly the scenario depicted in the above and its accomplished by trading inside information and using multiple hedge funds to bypass the sec rule that prevents funds from shorting before an offering they participate in. Then these funds can wash trade the stock price lower trading back and forth between each other, to make even more money shorting the stock. You can see how many naked shares that remained uncovered by the 2nd of Feb.
20240202|829392604|SINT|5,939,951|SINTX TECHNOLOGIES INC COM COM|0.15
Something posted by XenaLives years ago and it seems to correlate with all this, especially post split as theyve been walking the price down.
The 10000 can be wash traded back and forth freely between colluding computers. Tons of money is made so they can now walk the stock down even lower because risk has been reduced.
Instead of thinking of this as simply colluding computers, think of it as Fund A & Fund B colluding to trade back n forth to walk the price down. Anson and the other funds in the family are well known for this sort of behavior and they couldnt have been more obvious about it after the Feb 2023 offering.
Quote Sources:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190331202955/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2015-06-03/insider-traders-made-some-easy-money-on-stock-offerings
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173751723
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=173751723
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139777542
joev2
1週前
My focus from my first post here was that this might be a scam, so be careful. I had already traded stocks for years and recognized the best cause of action was to either not invest or pull out when things didn't seem on the up and up, rather than wait for the sec etc, to come down on the companies. After years of having posts deleted, and being accused of this and that etc on this one, this is what you come up with? In case you haven't figured it out yet, the sec, fbi etc rarely do anything and even when they do, the penalty is far, far less than the crime. You act like Sint was the first gamer on the planet. The fact that after banks and others pay billions in fines, the sec still claims to be undermanned, tells you the intent was never there. Now, that's not to say there aren't any in the sec etc who care, I'm sure they do, but the overall effect of it all is pretty nil....and so the games continue and will continue....as does Sint. Now, maybe you'll get lucky in your one man crusade against the evil Sint network. I guess it will be somewhat rewarding if you can achieve that. In any event, the sec (like many others) are designed to give an appearance of law and order, but in reality the sec, cia, fbi and so on, are mostly a show, with few exceptions. Imagine, if they all did their jobs honestly? I guess we could, sorta like believing politicians are here for the people, rather than their own greed and personal interests.
boston745
2週前
The situation here has been toxic for years and seems to have only gotten more so.
In 2015 I saw something special in Sintx tech so I invested. However I saw what was supposed to be a case of investing in technology that could truly benefit society turn against me. The stock was being attacked and, though I didnt realize it at the time, Mgmt was helping this along. Thus I responded by doing more research and sharing that research online with anyone and everyone. The research showed, over and over again that Sintx was developing something special and that mgmt was expanding the market potential. Meanwhile the stock kept going down and reverse splits followed.
Then I really found something, that Sintx was tied to Zimmer, and had been for over a decade. That had to mean something and so I shared that research repeatedly. Yet even with a press release showing Sintx and Zimmer Biomet developing a hip implant together (early stage research). The stock kept going down and I responded by continuing to dig.
Meanwhile on social media forums where I shared my research, I was told over and over again how wrong I was and that management was corrupt. I certainly didnt want to believe the latter, especially as evidence was lacking of mgmt working with Ansons family of funds to continue shorting the stock. With knowing that Sintx stock was being manipulated and the belief that others on social media were trying to con me, I persisted. I continued the research and continued posting that Sintx material is worth alot, badly needed, and has a significant backer behind it in Zimmer Biomet. Why, because thats what the evidence showed. I mean real evidence. Market pricing can do whatever those manipulating a stock want it to do, as shown by Tesla the biggest fake it until it makes it scam in the world.
Fast forward and this same basic scenario is still playing out. I defend Sintx and its technology by those attacking it and attacking me which I obviously now believes includes its board and management. The more they attack on both fronts the harder I fight. The more they drive the price down, the harder I fight. You'd think you guys would have caught onto this by now. But no, you continue to manipulate the price for the gain of certain investors now including management who I believe will make money investing in Ned Medical in the future. If you or any funds connected to Sintx has already invested in Ned Medical, you guys would have to be idiots. As such I assume you wouldnt expose yourselves like that but who knows?
Basically what I am saying most of what I do, is actually in response to the illegal activity going on in regards to Sintx (action - reaction). You commit an illegal act, I defend, you commit another illegal act, I defend again. When not defending I have been pleading with mgmt to do the right thing. To bring PPE products to market as we have another pandemic barreling down toward us. But no, you keep attacking me and keep manipulating the stock.
Thats precisely why I didnt respond to the Ihub message I got from, supposedly, Mr. Eric Olson. Because I thought it was just another con, another ploy to manipulate me. Looking back, especially in light of Varian Medical's involvement with Ned Medical, I now think that was a somewhat legit reach out. However I still doubt the person reaching out was in fact Mr Olson. My guess, is if I would have called Mr Olson as this person suggested I do, he would have confirmed but future correspondence would have been with someone else through unofficial means. How could I conclude anything else when you contacted me via Ihub and used my avatar name when you had my real name and email address? How could I conclude anything else when a fake or email forwarding address was used? The way i see it is if the attempt was legit in its intent, a more official method would have been used.
Now I have every reason to believe that Sintx mgmt/board stole Sintx IP and gave it to Ned Medical and that it intends to return to the cost basis harvesting methods of the past decade. That coupled with Sintx's ability to defend its board/mgmt through things like poison pills, I have had no choice but to respond and advocate for your removal, advocate for SEC/FBI involvement to prevent poison pills, and class action lawsuit against all of those found to be involved in the current conspiracy but the past ones to keep Sintx undervalued, cost basis harvest, and attempt to sell the company cheaply to NP Aerospace. A merger I would have been fine with if SINT been allowed to increase in value appropriately and it was the one acquiring NP Aerospace. That could have been easily achieved if it was made public that Sintx had been working with Zimmer Biomet and/or 3m/Solventum. But no, you guys had to keep driving the stock down and here we are in a never ending cycle of toxic fighting doing no one any good.
Remember, when the SEC comes, its because you guys brought this on yourselves. You've continually violated the roles you've been entrusted with and have been piss poor stewards of technology that could truly benefit mankind to help shield us from what is coming. Next pandemic, some of the lives lost, especially those like nurses, doctors, police, firefighters, EMT, soldiers, etc will be on you hands because you could have helped protect them...
Here again It looks like someone has cut wiring which has been their MO. This wiring is connected to a minisplit in a trailer on the south side of the property. While on one hand it looks as if the wiring could have been chewed, the cuts in the wire covering looks to be cut in a left to right motion like someone slowly shaved down to the wire. In fact, though you cannot see it in this pic, there are several cut marks on the largest area of exposed wiring. Also this wiring was exposed in an area that is wide open instead of where rodents typical chew in less exposed areas.
boston745
4週前
The following will show there has in fact been a conspiracy of funds, shorting and distorting SINT & Sintx for the past 9 years profiting immensely via shorting, pump and dumps, and cost basis harvesting via reverse splits. It will also show that one of the family of funds acquired shares and disposed of them for SINT price pump that occurred Q2, 2020. Sabby acquired its ~19k shares between Jan-March and likely sold them in June as fintel shows those shares disposed of on its Q2 13F filing.
For the longest time I thought I was defending Sintx against this conspiracy when it seems this conspiracy was working in the interests of Sintx previous management. Which explains why it was able to trade on inside information for the COVID pump and why this conspiracy stopped hammering SINT until it was done acquiring certain industrial assets in 2022. Then they returned and hammered the stock hard from 2022-2024 causing the largest reverse splits in company history of 100:1 and 200:1 ballooning the cost basis of my warrants acquired during the shareholders rights offering in 2022 from $11,000 per class to ~$30m per class.
The Conspiracy of Funds
First off lets establish the conspiracy of funds working together. Fortunately, in another unrelated lawsuit, the list has been provided:
Plaintiff further asserts that many of the potential investors that it contacted on behalf of Defendant operate as a family of hedge funds, all managed by the same investment advisor.
List of potential investors the Plaintiff was referencing. All the funds that seem to be connected are in red.
List named the following:
Anson Funds Management LP and its affiliates
Ayrton Capital, Altos Opportunity Fund and their
affiliates
Crede Capital Group, Acquitas Capital and its affiliates
CVI Investment, Heights Management, SIG and their
affiliates
Connective Capital and its affiliates
Empery Asset Management and its affiliates
Intracoastal Capital LP and its affiliates
Hudson Bay Capital Management and its affiliates
Ionic Venture LLC and its affiliates
Lind Partners and its affiliates
Li Capital Global Opportunities Master Fund and their
affiliates
Sabby Management LLC and its affiliates
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20251029192104/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
History of those Funds stake in AMDA/SINT since 2015
List of Funds that have had stakes in AMDA/SINT at one time or another. The first three listed could be accumulating positions in SINT like what was done to NANO. These three funds are connected.
3/19/2025
3i, LP (1) 289,856
Alto Opportunity Master Fund, SPC - Segregated Master Portfolio B (2) 144,928
CVI Investments, Inc. (3) 144,928 - -
Intracoastal Capital LLC (4) 147,410
(3i also appears connected to this family of funds)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225010936/forms-3.htm
4/01/2024 L1 Capital Global Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000107997324000472/0001079973-24-000472-index.htm
2024-05-14 13F Anson Funds Management LP 959,297 47
https://fintel.io/so/us/sint
2/07/24 Lind Global Fund II LP
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000092963824000396/0000929638-24-000396-index.htm
2/16/2023 INTRACOASTAL CAPITAL, LLC
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000121390023012455/0001213900-23-012455-index.htm
2/14/2023 Lind Global Fund II LP
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000092963823000614/0000929638-23-000614-index.htm
2020-05-15 13F Sabby Management, Llc 18,272 (Acquired at a value of around .383 based on value of 7k)
2020-08-14 13F Sabby Management, Llc 0 -100.00
https://archive.ph/iU60k
https://archive.ph/S56I1
05/18/2018 CVI Investments, Inc.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000110465918034362/0001104659-18-034362-index.htm
01/19/2017 SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000153561017000068/0001535610-17-000068-index.htm
07/14/2016 ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000121390016014963/0001213900-16-014963-index.htm
9/14/2015 Frigate Ventures LP = Anson Group
This Schedule 13G (this “Schedule 13G”) is being filed on behalf of Frigate Ventures LP (d/b/a Anson Group), a Texas limited partnership (“Frigate”), Admiralty Advisors LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Admiralty”), Mr. Bruce R. Winson, the principal of Frigate and Admiralty, M5V Advisors Inc. (d/b/a Anson Group Canada), an Ontario, Canada corporation (“M5V”), Mr. Adam Spears, a director of M5V, and Mr. Moez Kassam, a director of M5V, relating to Common Stock, $.01 par value (the “Common Stock”), of Amedica Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”).
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000119312515319457/0001193125-15-319457-index.htm
Hudson Bay Capital Management LP 2,789,867 2.16 870,438 Sep 30, 2015
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118775462
XenaLives connecting CVI to ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143618825
Lawsuit Sources:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1491072/000119312523131774/d264274dex993.htm
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
This case connects additional funds to Anson that have not had a stake in SINT in the past like Empery Asset Management.
https://casetext.com/case/augenbaum-v-anson-invs-master-fund-8
boston745
4週前
Bird flu can already get inside human cells. So why hasn’t it sparked a pandemic?
Conventional wisdom holds that zoonotic spillover—when a virus jumps from an animal to a human—only occurs when the virus mutates enough so that it can enter the cell by binding to receptors on the cell surface. In other words, its molecular “key” needs to fit the human cell's “lock.” But in recent years, research has complicated that picture. Several bat coronaviruses and some avian influenza viruses have already evolved the ability to enter human cells and hijack their machinery to replicate. Yet despite these viruses gaining entry into the cell, they rarely spread from person to person. It seems that something inside the cell is still stopping them.
A recent study found just such a mechanism. An immune-sensing system that originally evolved to detect foreign DNA of the sort found in DNA viruses turns out to also act as a barrier against avian flu. At the center of this system is a protein called STING, which triggers antiviral responses during infection. The findings, published in Science, reveal an unexpected twist: a DNA-sensing pathway doing double duty against RNA viruses. Normally, this pathway detects stray DNA and sets off an immune response, but this research shows that it also helps restrict avian influenza, even though the virus carries RNA, not DNA. The findings hint at another line of defense against a spillover.
The results show that “even if avian influenza viruses enter human cells, they still face another layer of defense inside,” says Runxin Ye, a biologist at Zhejiang University in China and first author of the study. “The STING pathway acts as an antiviral barrier that restricts their replication.”
Avian influenza seems capable of disabling the main RNA-sensing alarm system inside the cell via a viral protein called NS1. This should give the virus an advantage in replicating in human cells. Yet, it doesn’t. This phenomenon led Ye to suspect that another immune signaling system was involved. One candidate was the STING pathway, a major antiviral signaling system found in many cell types. Although it was not known as an RNA-sensing system, Ye investigated anyway. When Ye and his team knocked out STING in both lab mice and human lung cells, viral levels surged, indicating that STING was indeed an important player.
Seems human to human transmission is already occurring with avian flus. Incidentally this could be how vaccines are causing auto immune problems in people. Many vaccines use foreign DNA in them that end up triggering the body's immune response against other benign things and itself. It could be the Sting pathway that is being triggered by the vaccine potentially causing it to be over reactive.
So the question is, what shuts down the Sting pathway to allow these viruses to truly replicate and spread? Im curious if EM radiation is what triggers it. Supposedly it can inactivate viruses so it could, frequency dependent, activate it. This would explain why COVID came in predictable waves and regionally dependent.
Pathogenic viral infections have become a serious public health issue worldwide. Viruses can infect all cell-based organisms and cause varying injuries and damage, resulting in diseases or even death. With the prevalence of highly pathogenic viruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it is urgent to develop efficient and safe approaches to inactivate pathogenic viruses.
This study about using EM radiation to inactivate viruses points to something important, we need methods to inactivate viruses especially with another pandemic possibly forthcoming. Sintx Si3N4 is one thing shown to inactivate SS-RNA viruses so why management chooses to hold back this product is beyond me and another reason shareholders need to replace them and sell the tech to a company that will bring these products to market!
DNA can be a concern related to vaccines in two ways — because it is the vaccine’s active ingredient, such as in adenovirus-based vaccines, or as a manufacturing byproduct following growth of vaccine virus cells (animal or human fetal cells) or in organisms, like bacteria or yeast, using plasmids.
https://www.pnas.org/post/journal-club/bird-flu-can-already-get-inside-human-cells-so-why-hasn-t-sparked-pandemic
boston745
1月前
The comments about money laundering came, which I posted at the following post, out of the blue with these accounts but one thing i've learned here, is they often mix truth and deception together. This means SEC/FBI investigations could span Sonny's mgmt team/board as well as Olson's team and board.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177638750
They especially like to use truth to mislead. Thats why when Madg first mentioned Sintx and 3M together i thought he was trying to mislead, build up hype for this teamup, only for Sintx to partner with someone tiny. Which was true. However, evidence suggest that Madg did not just randomly pick 3M's name for this con. No, Sintx was likely already in discussions with 3M but used O2 to help de-risk the tech before 3M or any of its subsidiaries partnered with it in late 2021 after O2 deal fell apart...I believe as planned. As was claimed back then, there was little chance they did not know the FDA would stop them from selling consumer grade masks. Im very confident they counted on it for this con. The con not being the underlying tech, but to make it seem like the tech wasnt going anywhere even though Sintx was working with, I believe, Solventum (3M medical devision) from 2021 onward. This would have, if not partially uncovered, allowed Sintx to merge with NP Aerospace at very very low valuation for the benefit of its investors. I believe Sintx success would have come post merger. IE, suddenly Solventum and Zimmer Biomet would come out of the shadows.
Anyways, back to money laundering subject. Thus for these accounts, that all work on behalf of the same interests, to drop hints of money laundering, its because they were doing the same thing Madg did. Using a truth to mislead their audience. Thus Dr Bal was likely involved in and/or paid with laundered money that Anson's family of funds helped clean via Sintx offerings with Maxim aiding.
These accounts will use these truths, almost like bragging, to scare investors away so no one is really the wiser and they can get away with the actions. But by doing this, they leave an evidence trail if the SEC/FBI were to ever get involved.
Over on my research board I added additional posts with evidence of harassment I've suffered at the hands of the parties involved in the above. You can see why theyve been targeting me for years with the corruption i have uncovered with the help of some of the posters here. I mean they just confess to the illegal behavior. Of course it was being done to try to scare me away so management could get away with it.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177648215
Meanwhile, on another board I maintain, another Tesla has gone out of control and killed a person with Autopilot driving the occupants into a pond; fortunate for them they didnt drown the way Mitch McConnel's sister in law did.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
boston745
1月前
One thing I thought pretty interesting at the time and definitely more so now. What is it you might wonder? Its Mr. Elmore's employment contract. You see all executives sign indemnity agreements as shown in Sintx 10k as follows:
Indemnification Agreements: We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors that require us to indemnify such persons against any and all expenses, including judgments, fines or penalties, attorney’s fees, witness fees or other professional fees and related disbursements and other out-of-pocket costs incurred, in connection with any action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry or administrative hearing, whether threatened, pending or completed, to which any such person may be made a party by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of our company, provided that such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner that the director or officer reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests.
However Mr. Elmore's contract adds to this per clause 6 of his employment contract: Indemnification; D&O Insurance.
Indemnification. If Executive is made a party, is threatened to be made a party, or reasonably anticipates being made a party, to any Proceeding (as hereinafter defined) by reason of the fact that Executive is or was a director, officer, shareholder, employee, agent, trustee, consultant, or representative of the Company or any of its Affiliates or is or was serving at the request of the Company or any of its Affiliates, or in connection with his service hereunder as a director, officer, shareholder, employee, agent, trustee, consultant, or representative of another Person, or if any Claim (as hereinafter defined) is made, is threatened to be made, or is reasonably anticipated to be made, that arises out of or relates to Executive’s service in any of the foregoing capacities, then Executive shall promptly be indemnified and held harmless to the fullest extent permitted or authorized by any Company arrangement, or if greater, by applicable law, against any and all costs, expenses, liabilities, and losses (including, without limitation, advancement and payment of attorney’s and other professional fees and charges, judgments, interest, expenses of investigation, penalties, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties, and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement, with such legal fees advanced to the maximum extent permitted by law) incurred or suffered by Executive in connection therewith or in connection with seeking to enforce his rights under this Section 6(a), and such indemnification shall continue even if Executive has ceased to be a director, officer, shareholder, employee, agent, trustee, consultant, or representative of the Company or other Person and shall inure to the benefit of his heirs, executors, and administrators. This benefit shall be in addition to the provisions of any Indemnity Agreement entered into between Executive and Company.
I have to ask myself why Mr Elmore needed additional assurances in addition to what Sintx already has setup. It could be the issues I bring up and the threat it has of such lawsuits arising. However the real threat or meat of my claim comes before current mgmt/board. More than likely its connected to whats going on with Dr Bock. While the lawsuit was filed in March after Mr Elmore began, the knowledge of the action would have already been known; in fact Mr Elmore's contract was signed Feb 6th. We would know more if we would have been informed of Dr Bock's termination or quitting Sintx. However would Dr Bock's illegal activity really be such a threat to other mgmt? Im not sure about that. Meaning its more likely the threat that Mr Elmore needed additional assurance from, is some sort of conspiracy concocted before he began at Sintx in mid March.
Anyways, my point is, that Mr Elmore knew of this issue and wanted additional assurances as to not get caught up in it. However as this happened before Mr Elmore's employ, there is little reason he should be named on any civil or criminal lawsuit.
There is also a possibility, that Sintx mgmt maybe conspiring to either take Sintx private or bankrupt it and this too would help explain why Mr. Elmore would need additional assurances. However it does mean hes aware of these possible conspiracies which is a problem in of itself.
Quote Sources:
pg 42: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315226011924/form10-k.htm
pg 9: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315226007271/ex10-1.htm
boston745
1月前
Something they havent disclosed that i found out about, is Sintx is taking its former CTO Dr. Ryan Bock to court over him revealing trade secrets. My guess is that he gave information to Ned Medical as he was on their scientific board with Dr. Luke Higgins who I believe is the son of Zimmer Biomet's Arthur Higgins. Sintx and NedMedical were working on the cancer technology using Sintx material for the beads.
This maybe a ruse in that Dr. Bock was directed to this unofficially and they lawsuit is cover for that...
SINTX Technologies, Inc. v. Bock (2:26-cv-00247), Utah District Court
Varian Medical Systems’s most recent deal was a Early Stage VC with NED Medical for . The deal was made on 20-Jan-2026.
Now this is very interesting. According to google, Varian Medical and Sintx were investors of Ned Medical's series A round early this year. Theres been no disclosure of this by Sintx. However I can confirm Varian did in fact invest in Ned Medical. Varian is owned by Siemens. Based on Sintx 2025 ATM filing, it intended on investing in complimentary technology. However all I have been able to find is a lawsuit, quoted above, by Sintx against Dr Bock who is not listed as being on Ned Medical's scientific board. Which suggests to me that the lawsuit by Sintx against Dr Bock is because Dr Bock gave that information to Ned Medical. I believe he did this at the beheast of Sintx despite the lawsuit and that the lawsuit is a ruse to cover this up. The timing of this leak is around when Sintx was supposed to invest in Ned Medical is suspect.
According to pitchbook, only Varian is listed as an actual investor. I can only assume Sintx was going to be an investor and that fell through for some reason...like the reason I already suggested.
https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/534753-37#investors
We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to invest in or acquire businesses or technologies that we believe are complementary to ourown, although we have no current plans,
Investors: Backers include strategic partners like Varian Medical Systems and SINTX Technologies.
Richard Yazbeck
President & CEO at NED Medical, Inc. | Interventional Oncology | MedTech
1h
You can strategize and plan and execute all you want, but every so often it just comes down to being in the right place at the right time.
Early in the life of NED Medical, Inc. we had developed our own glass microsphere. But, we realized that ceramic may offer some very unique properties that are especially suited for radioembolic applications. The only problem is that we didn't know who could make it for us the way we had envisioned. Enter SINTX Technologies and the incredible Ryan Bock! Ryan is affectionately known in our household as the "Michael Jordan of Ceramics." We loved working with Ryan so much that we invited him to join our world-class Scientific Advisory Board and executed a collaboration agreement with SINTX for our next phase of work.
I am thrilled with our collaboration with SINTX and I look forward to accelerating our technology towards our clinical trials.
Quote Sources:
https://www.cafepharma.com/boards/threads/zimmer-looking-at-sintx-for-spine-and-total-joints.697445/page-22#post-7040052
https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/41271-40#signals
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315225016902/form424b5.htm#me_006 pg S-6
Google AI
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175420443
Lawsuit:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/63801444/SINTX_Technologies,_Inc_v_Bock
boston745
1月前
Sintx could easily do a shareholder rights offering to get above the levels if it needs. Or sign a commercialization deal and the current warrants will get exercised. Be interesting to see what they do or dont do. Whatever it does will be good for specific shareholders Joe just not for people like me if they are trying to go private. Seems like a good time to get SEC involved.
Sintx mgmt could, if it so wanted to, re-capture the hype around the current outbreaks but it has yet to do so... Remember this from last year? Sintx mgmt hasnt said crap about it since:
“With method claims, we can now defend and license the manufacturing and application pathways that unlock silicon nitride’s antipathogenic performance in textiles and surfaces. This is crucial as we engage with potential wound-care, filtration, and medical-textile partners.”
“Non-woven fabrics containing optimized Si3N4 powder have also provided significant viral reduction, demonstrating again that our silicon nitride platform is suitable for unlocking antipathogenic properties in a wide range of products.”
Why the Ebola and Hantavirus Outbreaks Have Confounded Scientists
his month, a pair of viruses seized the headlines. First came a hantavirus outbreak aboard a cruise ship, which caused as many as 13 infections, three of which were fatal. Then an Ebola outbreak flared in Africa, so far leading to more than 900 infections and 220 deaths.
In both cases, the news has been not only frightening but also confusing, even to scientists. The hantaviruses didn’t seem to be acting like hantaviruses, and the Ebola viruses weren’t behaving like Ebola viruses.
Hantaviruses are carried by rodents and other animals, and typically infect people who inhale dried animal urine and saliva. But aboard the cruise ship M.V. Hondius, hantaviruses were moving from person to person.
As for the African outbreak, scientists have made huge strides in fighting Ebola in recent years. They’ve created vaccines that can slow the spread of the disease and antiviral drugs that can cure infections.
But these treatments are probably going to be weak or useless. This is a very different Ebola virus.
Quote Sources:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/10/14/3166011/30038/en/sintx-technologies-strengthens-ip-portfolio-with-new-u-s-patent-notice-of-allowance-covering-antipathogenic-fabrics.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/science/ebola-hantavirus-species-strains.html
boston745
1月前
Seems it is highly likely that Sintx was used for money laundering via Maxim. If so that would be another reason why they keep funding the harassment of me. Turns out they have been using man in the middle attack via an Evil Twin. As I posted on my research board, i changed my security setup so its more fluid. Still evil twins are difficult to avoid.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
Ummm... the current OS is about four million.
Lots of elbow room for the Big Boys to manoever. Note multiples of OS traded recently while the stock went up.
Why should 2x OS keep them from doing anything but laundering their dirty shorts?
The point is the value of the enterprise.....
I could say the same about Bal. No one could be that stupid or unaware that whatever route he takes (misleading releases, going to the well etc) it's always a complete screw to shareholders. Maybe he's part of the dump scheme and gets paid with laundered money from nefarious forces....
SEC investigation into money laundering next !
SINTX is over. Assets are worthless. CEO has moved from Florida to Cayman Islands.
SEC Charges Maxim with Failing to File Suspicious Activity Reports and Violations of Regulation SHO
According to the SEC’s order, from at least January 2018 through January 2019, Maxim facilitated order flow from other broker-dealers engaged in the sale of large volumes of shares of low-priced over-the-counter microcap securities but did not adequately design or implement its anti-money laundering policies and procedures so as to reasonably address the risks associated with this business. The order further finds that due to these deficiencies, and Maxim’s failure to sufficiently investigate red flags, Maxim failed to file SARs for numerous suspicious transactions.
Also, according to the order, Maxim routinely facilitated “not held” long sale orders in low-priced securities from its broker-dealer customers by executing a series of principal short sales throughout the day and covering its short positions by purchasing the stock from the broker-dealer customer at a lower price. The order finds that Maxim did not, however, “locate” shares of the stock to borrow prior to effecting its short sales as required by the short-selling provisions of Regulation SHO.
https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/administrative-proceedings/34-98605-s
Maxim Group parent company under fire for alleged sanctions busting, money laundering
Kazakhstan and New York-based Freedom Holdings denies charges from activist short-selling fund Hindenberg Research
The new owner of New York-based investment bank the Maxim Group — which has been controversial for its deal-making practices in shipping — is now fending off explosive allegations over its own activities.
Kazakhstan and New York-based Freedom Holding Corp (FHC) — a $4.6bn online brokerage founded in Moscow — has been accused of money laundering and helping Russian oligarchs evade sanctions over the war in Ukraine.
Conspiracy of Funds Maxim likes to use and were active in shorting and distorting Sintx since 2015...except for when Sintx needed to raise funds to acquire military/industrial assets...
The Conspiracy of Funds
First off lets establish the conspiracy of funds working together. Fortunately, in another unrelated lawsuit, the list has been provided:
Plaintiff further asserts that many of the potential investors that it contacted on behalf of Defendant operate as a family of hedge funds, all managed by the same investment advisor.
List of potential investors the Plaintiff was referencing. All the funds that seem to be connected are in red.
List named the following:
Anson Funds Management LP and its affiliates
Ayrton Capital, Altos Opportunity Fund and their
affiliates
Crede Capital Group, Acquitas Capital and its affiliates
CVI Investment, Heights Management, SIG and their
affiliates
Connective Capital and its affiliates
Empery Asset Management and its affiliates
Intracoastal Capital LP and its affiliates
Hudson Bay Capital Management and its affiliates
Ionic Venture LLC and its affiliates
Lind Partners and its affiliates
Li Capital Global Opportunities Master Fund and their
affiliates
Sabby Management LLC and its affiliates
Quote Sources:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140670802
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=167380926
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170342045
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174722133
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20251029192104/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/140289/51-2023-08-31-043-Order-Denying-SJMotion.pdf
boston745
2月前
On Zimmer Biomet's Cafepharma board, someone said that Zimmer Biomet was looking to sell itself. This led me to a theory that if ZB was indeed looking to sell itself, that it might be planning a large merger with Solventum. The theory stems from the fact that ZB's former CEO Bryan Hanson left ZB to take over Solventum. What some may not know is Hanson was part of the mgmt that spun Covidein off and merged it into Medtronic. Hanson is sort of known, according to articles ive read, for transforming companies for M&A. Also it seems he's assembled a team for just that at Solventum after it spun off from 3M.
What exactly does this have to do with Sintx you might wonder if you are newer to this board? Well, I believe Sintx has had a long standing relationship with Zimmer since its founding with someone connected to it on its board since founding. While Zimmer was not a standalone company at this time, a future subsidiary of it, was tied to Sintx in Centerpulse (merged with Zimmer 2003). Someone tied to Centerpulse-Zimmer has been on Sintx board even to today. Dr Hofmann, MD (Co-Founder) worked for Centerpulse and then Zimmer post merger as Designer Surgeon while on Sintx board. Dr Link, PHD was former CEO of Centerpulse, joining Sintx a month post merger between it and Zimmer as Chairman. Then Dr Sonny Bal, MD took the reigns as Chairman & CEO in 2014. Dr Bal worked on Zimmer's surgeon panel from 2002 up to at least 2013 while also being on Sintx board. After Dr Bal stepped down from the board, Chris Lyons took a board seat. He aided in selling of Orthogrid to Zimmer Biomet in 2024 before joining Sintx April 2025.
Since 2021 I believe its had a partnership with 3M's medical division now known as Solventum. A partnership I believe tied to woundcare, sutures, & other soft tissue products as well as Masks, filtrations, and possibly water filtration as Solventum suddenly opted to keep its water filtration business in its deal with Thermal Fisher. This after I said that Sintx Si3N4 should be tested for uses in water filtration as it deactivates multiple viruses & kills bacteria/fungi.
If Zimmer Biomet and Solventum partner/ or one of them acquire Sintx, it would lead to a natural merger between Zimmer Biomet & Solventum with Sintx working as the bridge connecting the businesses.
For posting this and other things like an attempt by Dr Bal and the previous board attempt to sell Sintx cheap to NP Aerospace, I have been and continue to be harassed at my home. This is something I have exposed repeatedly, with evidence, of the operation that completely encircles the property where I live. I have been asked not to post that here and so all future evidence will be posted at my research board for potential review by federal agencies. I suspect Dr Bal and previous board had knowledge of this and that may have been part of what led to them ALL to stepping down suddenly.
With that said, I do not believe the operation is directly connected to Sintx and instead is being ran by people connected to investors/funds of Sintx. For more information on this subject matter, you can find it here or my research where I expose this Cartel and other things like 911 being an inside job so the US could leave the 1972 ABM treaty to bring about Golden Dome, Flying Saucers are in fact man made, vaccines are likely damaging GLP production in the body via inflammation of the pancreas which is why this medication is so effective; gene therapy in the works to offset this near Boston. Earths weakening magnetic field and what its going to lead to like the next Ice Age, how its weakening is helping lead to technology malfunctioning and metals to spontaneously fracture, as well as how this weakening will lead to more pandemics which is why Sintx technology is so crucial for PPE in addition to ortho due to the aforementioned spontaneous fracturing of metal implants. A great example of some of the subjects I cover and warn about is seen in Netflix's movie 'Leave the World Behind'.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bostons-research-43724
Best example of technology malfunctioning due to increasing radiation is how Teslas go out of control, spontaneously combust, and suffer Whompy Wheel issue (spontaneous fracturing of suspension components). You can find article after article of Teslas appearing to malfunction here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Tesla-Out-of-Control-Accidents-46016
boston745
2月前
Covid vaccine did in fact cause inflammation of the pancreas in some, if it can, that means other vaccines could as well. Since the pancreas plays a significant role in GLP hormone production, that means vaccines could be causing the dysfunction GLP medications are effectively filling in for. Thats the basic theory I am working on.
“GLP-1 medicines have changed what is possible in obesity and type 2 diabetes, but they require chronic, high-dose systemic exposure that many patients cannot or do not sustain,” Dr. Harith Rajagopalan, CEO of Fractyl Health, said. “RJVA-001 takes a different path: a potential one-time, pancreas-targeted gene therapy designed to enable the body to produce GLP-1 in response to meals: physiology, not pharmacology.”
If this is successful then this further supports my theory that vaccines are damaging the pancreas leading to the issues GLP medications are trying to address. If this gene therapy worked, it would be effectively turning back on what vaccines seemed to have turned off via damage to the pancreas caused by an inflammatory state. Vaccine leads to excessive immune response, leading to cortisol release and inflammatory state, that inflammatory state leads to inflammation of the pancreas and subsequent GLP production issue. Something like this is my current believed chain of events.
https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/glp-1-gene-therapy-trial-green-light/
US Market News
2月前
SINTX Technologies to Present at the LD Micro Invitational XVI ConferenceMay 17, 2026 3:30 PM
NewsfileSalt Lake City, Utah--(Newsfile Corp. - May 17, 2026) - SINTX Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SINT) ("SINTX" or the "Company"), a medical technology company focused on advanced ceramics and silicon nitride biomaterials, today announced that management will present at the LD Micro Invitational XVI Conference in Los Angeles, California, at the Luxe Sunset Blvd Hotel.During the presentation, management expects to discuss recent progress in commercialization, product development, and manufacturing initiatives supporting the Company's silicon nitride biomaterials platform, including applications in orthopedics, spine, foot and ankle, and patient-specific implant markets."We are pleased to participate in the LD Micro Invitational and look forward to sharing recent developments across our business," said Ryan Elmore, President of SINTX Technologies. "Our focus remains on advancing our biomaterials platform and executing on opportunities that support long-term value creation."Management will also be available for one-on-one meetings with investors, subject to scheduling availability.Management will also be available for one-on-one meetings with institutional investors, family offices, and strategic partners throughout the conference.Investors and interested parties may access the live webcast using the information below:LD MICRO Invitational XVI Investor Conference
Presentation Date and Time: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 9:30 A.M. P.T.
Webcast: https://ldmicroevents.com To schedule a one-on-one meeting with SINTX Technologies' management team, please email SINTX Technologies at ir@sintx.com To be added to the Sintx Technologies email distribution list, please email ir@sintx.com with SINT in the subject line.About SINTX Technologies, Inc.Headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, SINTX Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SINT) is an advanced ceramics company that develops, manufactures, and commercializes silicon nitride biomaterials, composites, devices, and related technologies for medical and other high-value applications. SINTX Contacts:SINTX Technologies, Inc.
801.839.3502
IR@sintx.comTo view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/297763 Original: SINTX Technologies to Present at the LD Micro Invitational XVI Conference
boston745
2月前
I suspect RFK is doing what hes doing because vaccine prevented diseases are on the uptick and they need cover for why.
When they talk about the measles outbreaks they say how its mostly unvaccinated people its spreading between. However they classify anyone's vaccine status as unvaccinated if their status could not be verified or only given say 1 of their 2 doses.
The following article illustrates my points in the above two quotes.
Andy Larsen: Utah’s vaccine foolishness has spread and looks impossible to fix
The state has become the country’s measles epicenter as vaccine skepticism grows.
First of all, the culprit is clear: Utah’s increased vaccine reluctance is allowing a once-eliminated disease to spread.
Here’s the percentage of kindergarteners who were missing proof of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination as of the 2025-26 school year in each health district.
Simply put, 90% of the people with confirmed measles cases in Utah were not vaccinated.
The bulk of the article can be boiled down to these three statements outside the graphical representation. First off, the author tells you the problem, then they tailor the information to back that ignoring stats that do not back their claim nor other factors like sanitation, hygiene, and diet issues found in poorer areas of Utah. I'll get back to this in a minute.
Quote 2 indicates one of the graphs show the percent of kindergartners who simply do not have proof of full MMR vaccine status. Which ties to my point how they doctor the numbers in support of vaccinating. This gives us quote 3 where the author indicates 90% of the people getting measles cannot verify they have been vaccinated.
Quotes 2 and 3 support my point how they skew the statistics by simply calling everyone not in possession of proof of their full vaccination status unvaccinated. That means someone like myself who no longer has evidence of their vaccinated status or a child who only received one dose of the vaccine, would be considered unvaccinated artificially inflating that statistic. Therefore the number is not 90%, its alot lower. This depends on how many adults are getting measles as modern health records are more digital and therefore more freely available than what Boomers, Xers, or even Millennials would have access to.
Now let me get to something i already brought up, the counties which the outbreaks are the worst are some of the poorest areas in Utah where sanitation, hygiene, and diet are significantly worse than your urban areas. One thing not often discussed about vaccines is the diseases that these vaccines were supposed to prevent, most of them at least, were in significant decline before the vaccine was pushed on the public. Why? The increase in sanitation, the improved hygiene, and access to good whole foods was the main reason. One of the upsides to the industrial revolution. Funny enough, both those things are in decline now as industrial revolution is no longer providing a better living standard for all. Now modern civilization is in decline with wealth accumulating at the top and little making it down to the bottom widening the gap; while middle class is being squeezed in every direction. With gas prices being what they are, this will accelerate reducing the poor's access to good food and cleaner living as they do all they can to make it day to day. Thus it is not surprising that diseases that vaccines were supposed to prevent, are on the rise. Hence the need for RFK to push anti-vaccine rhetoric and then take blamed for the increasing disease. Because see, its the lack of vaccination thats causing the rise of these diseases not anything else.
To back this, lets look at a few of the stats provided by the article starting with three sections of the map. Southwest Utah shows 90.4 measles cases per 100k people but has the highest no proof vaccine report status of 26.7% of students. Meanwhile Tricounty area of Utah has the highest measles ratio of 121.4 cases per 100k people but has a significantly lower no proof vaccine report status of 16.1%. If there was a correlation between no proof of vaccine and measles cases, these numbers should be reversed no?
I'll also point out that these regions of Utah have significantly lower population making percentage of no proof of vaccine status higher than the urban areas of Utah. That means that Utah county, with its 14% of its Kindergartners unable to prove their vaccine status represents significantly more students than SouthWest nor Tricounty areas. Yet despite having more children that appear to be unvaccinated than the other two, in close proximity mind you, this county has significantly fewer incidents of the measles per 100k people at only 13.1 cases. What do you think is the difference between these regions? Water, Sanitation, better hygiene, and diet are a few because Utah County has more money than the tricounty area for services.
There really isnt much difference between Tricounty's area 16% and Utah County's 14% yet Tricounty area has the worst outbreak in the state. Therefore, vaccine status is not what is driving these outbreaks because there is no direct correlation between percent unvaccinated/unknown to measles cases being documented.
What could protect these lower income areas of Utah is deploying Si3n4 based masks and air filtration to the area. However a good portion of the people in these areas will not mask up and they definitely cannot afford the air ventilation needed for the hvac filters to help much. Thus, unfortunately, there is little that can be done to help these regions. Still this is something we could try to do instead of injecting them with vaccines that only make their lives more miserable with the potential complications that come with them.
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/05/02/utahs-measles-outbreak-explained/
boston745
2月前
The fact that GLP medications are so effective is proof something is off in so many peoples bodies. The fact that medical issues return faster than weight gain once you stop taking GLP meds, further supports the idea that there is a massive dysfunction in peoples bodies.
Covid vaccine did in fact cause inflammation of the pancreas in some, if it can, that means other vaccines could as well. Since the pancreas plays a significant role in GLP hormone production, that means vaccines could be causing the dysfunction GLP medications are effectively filling in for. Thats the basic theory I am working on. Mine and my eldest son's visceral fat issues around the midsection are two possible cases of just that as visceral fat is usually linked to higher levels of cortisol. Im trying to figure out how to restore balance for him.
Cortisol, a hormone released by the adrenal glands during stress, significantly impacts the pancreas by regulating glucose metabolism and inhibiting insulin secretion
If vaccines are indeed causing sugar processing dysfunction in so many peoples bodies as I suspect, then we need something else to help defend against future pandemics and Sintx Si3N4 is just that. Masks, air filtration, water filtration (i hope), etc..
Im fine with replacing Olson and the board again if thats what required to get things moving; i remain cautiously optimistic that things are moving and thats why the stock is being accumulated. However, Mr. Elmore only just joined so give him a chance.
I suspect RFK is doing what hes doing because vaccine prevented diseases are on the uptick and they need cover for why. The vaccines were supposed to protect us and they arent. So when he pushes against people vaccinating, the public can blame him and those not vaccinating as the diseases spread more frequently. Its information warfare and giving people something to blame that isnt the real cause (scapegoat).
When they talk about the measles outbreaks they say how its mostly unvaccinated people its spreading between. However they classify anyone's vaccine status as unvaccinated if their status could not be verified or only given say 1 of their 2 doses. I was given all my doses but i cannot prove that therefore i am unvaccinated according to government statistics. I wonder if they classify someone as unvaccinated due to changes in vaccine protocols over the decades? Gen Alpha are vaccinated sooo much more than what say the baby boomers had to receive.
Hot Features
プレミアム
ブラジル証券取引所、NASDAQ、NYSE、AMEX、LSEなどの主要取引所からの複数のリアルタイム株価を監視します。
メールアドレスで登録
