| Item 7.01 | Regulation FD Disclosure |
As
Mullen Automotive Inc. (the “Company”) previously has disclosed, a putative stockholder class action was filed in the
Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”), styled as Robbins v.
Michery, et al., C.A. No. 2022-1131-LWW (the “Robbins Action”). On December 13, 2022, a second putative
stockholder class action was filed in the Court of Chancery, styled as Foley v. Michery, et al., C.A. No. 2022-1147-LWW
(the “Foley Action” and, together with the Robbins Action, the “Stockholder Actions”).
The plaintiffs in the Stockholder Actions (the “Plaintiffs”) filed complaints alleging, among other things, that the
number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the record date (the “Annual Meeting Record Date”) for
the Annual Meeting of stockholders held on July 26, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Meeting”) was 477,510,822 and that,
based on this eligible share total, a majority of shares of Common Stock, when considered separately as a class, did not vote in favor
of the increase in authorized shares at the 2022 Annual Meeting, and therefore the amendment to
the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which was then filed with the Office of the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware on July 26, 2022 (the “2022 Amendment”), was invalid. The Plaintiffs sought
to enjoin the December 23, 2022, special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”). On December 16, 2022, the
Company filed revised proxy materials with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to provide certain
supplemental information about the Special Meeting. The Special Meeting was adjourned on December 23, 2022 and reconvened on January 19,
2023, and then partially adjourned on January 19, 2023 and reconvened on January 25, 2023, at which certain matters were approved as reported
in the Company’s Form 8-Ks filed with the SEC on December 23, 2022, January 23, 2023 and January 31, 2023.
Moreover,
as the Company previously disclosed in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2023, the Company filed a
validation proceeding with the Court pursuant to Section 205 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 205”).
Section 205 permits the Court, in its discretion, to ratify and validate potentially defective acts or failures of authorization.
The Company did not believe that the filing and effectiveness of the 2022 Certificate Amendment was either invalid or ineffective. However,
to resolve any uncertainty, the Company pursued the validation proceeding. On January 25, 2023, the Court issued an order pursuant
to Section 205 validating and declaring effective, as of the time each act was originally taken, the 2022 Amendment and shares
of Common Stock and Preferred Stock, including securities exercisable for, convertible into or settleable in Common Stock, that were issued
by the Company in reliance on the 2022 Amendment.
On February 3, 2023, the Court entered a stipulated
order pursuant to which Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Stockholder Actions with prejudice as to themselves only. The Court retained
jurisdiction solely for the purpose of deciding any application of Plaintiffs’ counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and
expenses. On March 3, 2023, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed their motion for an award of attorneys’ fee and expenses for benefits
they contend were conferred on the Company and its stockholders in connection with the Stockholder Actions (the “Fee Application”),
seeking an award of attorneys’ fee and expenses in the amount of $3 million. The Company and the defendants in the Stockholder Actions
oppose such relief, and will file any brief in opposition to the Fee Application on or before April 11, 2023. Plaintiffs shall file a
reply brief in further support of any Fee Application on or before May 12, 2023. The Court has scheduled a hearing to consider the Fee
Application at 11:00 a.m. EDT on May 25, 2023 before the Honorable Lori W. Will, Vice Chancellor, in person at the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, located at 500 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (the “Hearing”).
Any current Company stockholder may object to the
Fee Application (“Objector”); provided, however, that no Objector shall be heard or entitled to object unless, on or
before May 4, 2023, such person: (1) files his, her, or its written objection, together with copies of all other papers and briefs
supporting the objection, with the Register in Chancery at the address set forth below; (2) serves such papers (electronically by
File & ServeXpress, by hand, by first-class U.S. mail, or by express service) on Plaintiffs’ counsel and Defendants’
counsel at the addresses set forth below; and (3) emails a copy of the written objection to MarkL@blbglaw.com, ckupka@fksfirm.com,
DTeklits@morrisnichols.com, and BMiller@KSLAW.com.
Register in Chancery |
Register in Chancery
Court of Chancery of the State
of Delaware
New Castle County
Leonard L. Williams Justice Center
500 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 |
Plaintiffs’ Counsel |
Mark Lebovitch
BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER &
GROSSMANN LLP
1251 Avenue of the Americas
44th Floor
New York, New York 10020 |
Christopher J. Kupka
FIELDS KUPKA &
SHUKUROV LLP
1441 Broadway
6th Floor #6161
New York, New York 10018 |
Defendants’ Counsel |
David J. Teklits
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
1201 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 |
Brian P. Miller
KING & SPALDING LLP
200 South Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 4700
Miami, FL 33131 |
Any objections must: (i) identify the case
name and civil action number, “In re Mullen Automotive, Inc., Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 2022-1131-LWW”; (ii) state
the name, address, and telephone number of the Objector and, if represented by counsel, the name, address, and telephone number of the
Objector’s counsel; (iii) be signed by the Objector; (iv) contain a specific, written statement of the objection(s) and
the specific reason(s) for the objection(s), including any legal and evidentiary support the Objector wishes to bring to the Court’s
attention, and if the Objector has indicated that he, she, or it intends to appear at the Hearing, the identity of any witnesses the Objector
may call to testify and any exhibits the Objector intends to introduce into evidence at the hearing; and (v) include documentation
sufficient to prove that the Objector is a current Company stockholder. Documentation establishing that an Objector is a current Company
stockholder must consist of copies of monthly brokerage account statements, a screen shot of an official brokerage account, or an authorized
statement from the Objector’s broker containing the transactional and holding information found in an account statement. Plaintiffs’
counsel may request that the Objector submit additional information or documentation sufficient to prove that the Objector is a current
Company stockholder.
An Objector may file a written objection without
having to appear at the Hearing. An Objector may not, however, appear at the Hearing to present his, her, or its objection unless the
Objector first files and serves a written objection in accordance with the procedures described above, unless the Court orders otherwise.
If an Objector wishes to be heard orally at the
Hearing in opposition to the approval of the Fee Application (assuming the Objector timely files and serves a written objection as described
above), the Objector must also file a written notice of his, her, or its intention to appear with the Register in Chancery and serve it
on Plaintiffs’ counsel and on Defendants’ counsel at the mailing and email addresses set forth above so that the notice is
received on or before May 4, 2023. Persons who intend to object and desire to present evidence at the Hearing must include in their written
objection or notice of appearance the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence
at the hearing. Such persons may be heard orally at the discretion of the Court.
Objectors are not required to hire an attorney
to represent them in making written objections or in appearing at the Hearing. However, if an Objector decides to hire an attorney, it
will be at the Objector’s own expense, and that attorney must file a notice of appearance with the Court and serve it on Plaintiffs’
counsel and Defendants’ counsel at the mailing and email addresses set forth above so that the notice is received on or before May
4, 2023.
The Hearing may be adjourned by the Court without
further written notice to Company stockholders. If an Objector intends to attend the Hearing, the Objector should confirm the date and
time with Plaintiffs’ counsel.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, any Company
stockholder who does not object in the manner described above will be deemed to have waived any objection (including the right to appeal)
and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the Fee Application.
Company stockholders who do
not wish to object do not need to appear at the Hearing or take any other action.
The information in this
Item 7.01 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing.