MELR Melrose Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Melrose Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in February 2014 under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Company’s activity consists of owning and supervising its subsidiary, Melrose Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank provides financial services to individuals, families and businesses through our full-service banking office. Our primary business activity consists of taking deposits from the general public in our market area and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations, in one- to- four family residential real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and to a much lesser extent consumer loans. The Bank is a Massachusetts-chartered cooperative bank headquartered in Melrose, Massachusetts. The Bank is subject to the regulations of, and periodic examination by, the Massachusetts Division of Banks (“DOB”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC subject to limitations.

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying unaudited interim, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Information included herein as of September 30, 2018 and for the interim periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and were of a normal recurring nature. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2018. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future periods, including the year ending December 31, 2018.

The significant accounting policies are summarized below to assist the reader in better understanding the condensed consolidated financial statements and other data contained herein.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, MCBSC, Inc., which is used to hold investment securities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

USE OF ESTIMATES:

In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash, amounts due from banks, money market funds and federal funds sold.

SECURITIES:

Investments in debt securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts computed so as to approximate the interest method. Gains or losses on sales of investment securities are computed on a specific identification basis.

The Company classifies all debt and equity securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses are not included in earnings, but are reported as a net amount (less expected tax) in a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. The security classification may be modified after acquisition only under certain specified conditions.

For any debt security with a fair value less than its amortized cost basis, the Company will determine whether it has the intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either condition is met, the Company will recognize a full impairment charge to earnings. For all other debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and do not meet either condition, the credit loss portion of impairment will be recognized in earnings as realized losses. The other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors will be recorded in other comprehensive loss.

Declines in marketable equity securities below their cost that are deemed other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK:

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB), the Bank is required to invest in $100 par value stock of the FHLB. The FHLB capital structure mandates that members must own stock as determined by their Total Stock Investment Requirement which is the sum of a member’s Membership Stock Investment Requirement and Activity-Based Stock Investment Requirement, as defined. Management evaluates the Company’s investment in FHLB stock for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Based on its most recent analysis of the FHLB as of September 30, 2018, management deems its investment in FHLB stock to be not other-than-temporarily impaired.

CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK AND SHARE INSURANCE FUND:

All Massachusetts-chartered co-operative banks are required to be members of the Co-operative Central Bank, which maintains the Share Insurance Fund that insures co-operative bank deposits in excess of federal deposit insurance coverage. The Co-operative Central Bank is authorized to charge co-operative banks an annual assessment fee on deposit balances in excess of amounts insured by the FDIC. Assessment rates are based on the institution’s risk category, similar to the method currently used to determine assessments by the FDIC.

LOANS:

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for amounts due to borrowers on outstanding home equity lines of credit, commercial lines of credit and construction loans, any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred, and the net amount amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield. The Company is amortizing these amounts over the expected lives of the related loans.

Residential real estate loans are generally placed on nonaccrual when reaching 90 days past due or are in the process of foreclosure. All closed-end consumer loans 90 days or more past due and any equity line in the process of foreclosure are placed on nonaccrual status. Secured consumer loans are written down to realizable value and unsecured consumer loans are charged off upon reaching 120 or 180 days past due depending on the type of loan. Commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans which are 90 days or more past due are generally placed on nonaccrual status, unless secured by sufficient cash or other assets immediately convertible to cash. When a loan has been placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed against interest on loans. A loan can be returned to accrual status when collectability of principal is reasonably assured and the loan has performed for a period of time, generally six months.

Cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans are credited to principal to the extent necessary to eliminate doubt as to the collectability of the net carrying amount of the loan. Some or all of the cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans are recognized as interest income if the remaining net carrying amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. When recognition of interest income on an impaired loan on a cash basis is appropriate, the amount of income that is recognized is limited to that which would have been accrued on the net carrying amount of the loan at the contractual interest rate. Any cash interest payments received in excess of the limit and not applied to reduce the net carrying amount of the loan are recorded as recoveries of charge-offs until the charge-offs are fully recovered.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:

Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Cost and related allowances for depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the respective accounts with any gain or loss included in income or expense.

Depreciation and amortization are calculated principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated lives are 15 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment.

Premises and equipment are periodically evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE:

The Company has purchased insurance policies on the lives of certain directors, executive officers and employees. Bank-owned life insurance policies are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cash surrender value. Changes in net cash surrender value of the policies, as well as insurance proceeds received, are reflected in non-interest income on the consolidated statements of income and are not subject to income taxes.

ADVERTISING:

The Company directly expenses costs associated with advertising as they are incurred.

INCOME TAXES:

The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the temporary differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the amounts related to such temporary differences are realized or settled.

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN:

Compensation expense for the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) is recorded at an amount equal to the shares allocated by the ESOP multiplied by the average fair value of the shares during the period. Unearned compensation applicable to the ESOP is reflected as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the average fair value and the cost of shares allocated by the ESOP is recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in-capital.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Forfeitures will be recognized when they occur. The Company values share-based stock option awards granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recognizes compensation expense for its awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award (straight-line attribution method), ensuring that the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date at least equals the portion of the grant-date fair value of the award that is vested at that time.

EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS):

Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted to exclude the weighted average number of unallocated shares held by the ESOP and weighted average shares of unearned restricted stock. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings of the entity. For the purposes of computing diluted EPS, the treasury stock method is used.

The calculation of basic and diluted EPS (unaudited) is presented below.

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires that the Company disclose the estimated fair value for its financial instruments. Fair value methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures are as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.

Securities: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximate fair value.

Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Cooperative Central Bank deposits: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for Cooperative Central Bank deposits approximate fair value.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates fair value.

Deposit liabilities: The fair values for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificate accounts are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on certificate accounts.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances: Fair values for Federal Home Loan Bank advances are estimated using a discounted cash flow technique that applies interest rates currently being offered on advances to a schedule of aggregate expected monthly maturities on Federal Home Loan Bank advances.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

As an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Title 1 of Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, the Company has elected to use the extended transition period to delay adoption of new or reissued accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards. As of September 30, 2018, there is no significant difference in the comparability of the financial statements as a result of this extended transition period. The extended transition period for an emerging growth company is five years, and the Company’s emerging growth status will end on December 31, 2019.

In May 2014 and August 2015, respectively, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to clarify principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance in ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The core principal of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Under the extended transition period for an emerging growth company, the amendments in ASU 2015-14 defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within that period. Earlier application is permitted only as of an annual reporting period beginning after December 31, 2016, include interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company’s revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and financial liabilities, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09, and non-interest income. Based on the Company’s preliminary analysis of the effect of the new standard on its recurring revenue streams, the net quantitative impact of these presentation changes to noninterest income and noninterest expense is expected to be immaterial and will not affect net income. The Company is in the process of completing a full evaluation of the impact of the new standard, however, anticipates the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in this ASU address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments and makes targeted improvements to GAAP as follows:

Under the extended transition period for an emerging growth company, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of item 5 above is permitted as of the beginning of fiscal years or interim periods for which financial statements have not been issued. Early adoption of all other amendments in this ASU is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the amendments of ASU No. 2016-01 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring reporting entities to recognize all leases, including operating, as lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The ASU requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. This update will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the amendments of ASU No. 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This ASU shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. Today, entities generally amortize the premium over the contractual life of the security. The new guidance does not change the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. ASU No. 2017-08 is effective for annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein; early adoption is permitted. The guidance calls for a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. The Company anticipates the adoption of ASU No. 2017-08 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): “Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, or adding certain disclosures. The update is effective for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, an entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of the update and delay adoption of these additional disclosures until their effective date. The removed and modified disclosures will be adopted on a retrospective basis, and the new disclosures will be adopted on a prospective basis. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - INVESTMENTS IN AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES

Debt and equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets according to management’s intent. The amortized cost basis of securities and their approximate fair values are as follows as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017:

The scheduled maturities of debt securities were as follows as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited):

Not included in the maturity table above is preferred stock with no stated maturity of $950,000 at September 30, 2018 (unaudited).

There were no securities of issuers whose aggregate carrying amount exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale securities were $175,000 and $602,000, respectively, and gross realized gains on these sales amounted to $103,000 and $357,000, respectively. The tax expense on the realized gains during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $27,000 and $88,000, respectively. There were no realized losses on available for sale securities for the three months ended September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there was one security called prior to full amortization of the premium being taken, and the Company recognized a loss of $15,000 as a result. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 (unaudited) proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale securities were $718,000 and $2.3 million, respectively, and gross realized gains on these sales amounted to $388,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. The tax expense on the realized gains during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $136,000 and $420,000, respectively. There were no realized losses on available for sale securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company had no pledged securities as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017.

The aggregate fair value and unrealized losses of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more, and are not other-than-temporarily impaired, are as follows as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017:

The Company conducts periodic reviews of investment securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. The Company’s review for impairment generally includes a determination of the cause, severity and duration of the impairment; and an analysis of both positive and negative evidence available. The Company also determines if it has the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery to cost basis. In regard to corporate debt, the Company also considers the issuer’s current financial condition and its ability to make future scheduled interest and principal payments on a timely basis in assessing other-than-temporary impairment. A summary of the Company’s reviews of investment securities deemed to be temporarily impaired is as follows:

Unrealized losses on U.S. Government and federal agency obligations amounted to $114,000 and consisted of nine securities. The unrealized losses on six of these debt securities were individually less than 3.5% of amortized cost basis, with three of these U.S. government and federal agency obligations between 3.5% and 7.0% of amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on municipal bonds amounted to $68,000 and consisted of seven securities. The unrealized losses on five of these debt securities were individually less than 2.5% of amortized cost basis, with two of these municipal bonds between 5.0% and 6.2% of amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on corporate bonds amounted to $210,000 and consisted of twenty-four securities. The unrealized losses on twenty-two of these debt securities were individually less than 4.0% of amortized cost basis, with two of these corporate bonds between 4.0% and 5.5% of amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on preferred stock amounted to $50,000 and consisted of one security, the unrealized loss on this one security was 5.0% of amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on asset-backed securities amounted to $53,000 and consisted of four securities. Unrealized losses on one of these asset-backed securities was less than 1% of amortized cost basis, with three of these securities having unrealized losses between 5.2% and 6.4% of amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities amounted to $52,000 and consisted of five securities. The unrealized losses on these debt securities range from 1.8% to 6.5% of amortized cost basis. These unrealized losses relate principally to the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of debt securities and not to an increase in credit risk of the issuers. As the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2018.

Unrealized losses on marketable equity securities amounted to $10,000 and consisted of two securities. The unrealized losses on these marketable equity securities were less than 1.0% of amortized cost basis. These unrealized losses relate principally to the effect of fluctuations in market value and not to an increase in credit risk of the issuers.

The following tables set forth information on loans and the allowance for loan losses at and for the periods ending September 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited) and as of December 31, 2017:

The following tables set forth information regarding nonaccrual loans and past-due loans as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) there was one, one- to four-family residential loan, with an outstanding balance of $98,000 as of September 30, 2018, meeting the definition of an impaired loan in ASC 310-10-35. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 there was one, one- to four-family residential loan, with an outstanding balance of $100,000 as of September 30, 2017, meeting the definition of an impaired loan in ASC 310-10-35.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) there were no one- to four-family residential real estate loans modified that met the definition of a troubled debt restructured loan in ASC 310-40. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) there was one, one- to four-family residential real estate loan with a recorded balance of $98,000, modified that met the definition of a troubled debt restructured loan in ASC 310-40. The loan has had no defaults on payment, and no commitments to lend additional funds have been approved subsequent to the modification. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 (unaudited), there was one, one- to four-family residential real estate loan with a recorded balance of $100,000, modified that met the definition of a troubled debt restructured loan.

As of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017, there were no loans in the process of foreclosure.

Credit Quality Information

The Company has established an 11 point internal loan rating system for commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans. For residential real estate and consumer loans, the Company initially assesses credit quality based upon the borrower’s ability to pay and subsequently monitors these loans based on the borrower’s ability to pay. The risk rating system will assist the Company in better understanding the risk inherent in each loan. The loan ratings are as follows:

Loans rated 1: Secured by cash collateral or highly liquid diversified marketable securities.

Loans rated 2 – 3: Strongest quality loans in the portfolio not secured by cash. Defined by consistent, solid profits, strong cash flow and are well secured. Very little vulnerability to changing economic conditions and compare favorably to their industry.

Loans rated 4 – 5: These loans are pass rated. Borrower will show average to strong cash flow, strong to adequate collateral coverage, and will have a generally sound balance sheet. Inclusive in the 5 rating are all open and closed – end residential and retail loans which are paying as agreed.

Loans rated 6: Loans with above average risk but still considered pass. Generally this rating is reserved for projects currently under construction or borrowers with modest cash flow, although still meeting all loan covenants.

Loans rated 6W: Contain all the risks of a 6 rated credit but have an inherent weakness that requires close monitoring. This rating also generally includes open and closed-end residential and retail loans which are greater than 30 days past due but display no other inherent weakness.

Loans rated 7: Potential weaknesses which warrant management’s close attention. If weaknesses are uncorrected, repayment prospects may be weakened. This is typically a transitional rating.

Loans rated 8: Considered substandard. There is a likelihood of loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Generally, open and closed – end retail loans, as well as automotive and other consumer loans past 90 cumulative days from the contractual due date should be classified as an 8.

Loans rated 9: Borrower has a pronounced weakness and all current information indicates collection or liquidation of all debts in full is improbable and highly questionable.

Loans rated 10: Uncollectable and a loss will be taken. Open and closed – end loans secured by residential real estate that are beyond 180 days past due will be assessed for value and any outstanding loan balance in excess of said value, less cost to sell, will be classified as a 10.

On an annual basis, or more often if needed, the Company formally reviews the ratings on all commercial real estate and construction loans over $350,000.

As of September 30, 2018 (unaudited), there was one, one- to four- family residential real estate loan with a total balance of $98,000 with a risk rating of “7 – special mention.” There were three, one- to four- family residential real estate loans with a total balance of $455,000 with a risk rating of “6W – Pass Watch,” and all other loans outstanding had a risk rating of “1 to 6 - pass.”

As of December 31, 2017, there were no one- to four- family residential real estate loans that had a risk rating of “8 – substandard.” There were three, one- to four- family residential real estate loans with a total balance of $472,000 with a risk rating of “6W – Pass Watch,” and one special mention one- to four- family residential real estate loan with a total balance of $99,000. All other outstanding loans had a risk rating of “1 to 6 – pass.”

NOTE 6 - DEPOSITS

The aggregate amount of time deposit amounts in denominations that meet or exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limit of $250,000 as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017 amounted to $28,945,000 and $27,781,000, respectively.

For time deposits as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) the scheduled maturities for each of the following periods ending September 30 are as follows:

Deposits from related parties held by the Bank as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017 amounted to $6,155,000 and $3,603,000, respectively.

NOTE 7 - BORROWED FUNDS

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB). Borrowings from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral, consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages secured by one-to-four family properties, certain unencumbered investment securities and other qualified assets. The remaining maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB at September 30, 2018 (unaudited) was approximately $69.7 million subject to the purchase of additional FHLB stock. The Bank had outstanding FHLB borrowings of $36.0 million at September 30, 2018, (unaudited) consisting of eight advances all with three year terms and interest rates ranging from 1.42% to 2.78%. Additionally, at September 30, 2018, (unaudited) the Bank had the ability to borrow up to $5.0 million on a Federal Funds line of credit with the Co-Operative Central Bank.

Maturities of advances from the FHLB for the periods ending after September 30, 2018 (unaudited) are summarized as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 8 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to originate loans and unadvanced funds on loans. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for loan commitments is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to originate loans are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include secured interests in mortgages, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing properties.

Amounts of financial instrument liabilities with off-balance sheet credit risk are as follows as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017:

NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurement - Overall,” provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. This guidance also allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis.

In accordance with ASC 820-10, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1 - Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value for September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017. The Company did not have any significant transfers of assets between levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Company’s investments in preferred stock and marketable equity securities are generally classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.

The Company’s investment in debt securities available-for-sale is generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For these securities, we obtain fair value measurements from independent pricing services. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, trading levels, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument’s terms and conditions.

Level 3 is for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Subsequent to inception, management only changes level 3 inputs and assumptions when corroborated by evidence such as transactions in similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalization and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt markets, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows.

The following summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017: