UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 0-14120
Advanta Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-1462070
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
Welsh and McKean Roads, P.O. Box 844, Spring House, PA 19477
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(215) 657-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
Applicable only to issuers involved in bankruptcy proceedings during the preceding five
years:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to
be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes
o
No
o
Applicable only to corporate issuers:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 3, 2009
|
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
14,410,133 shares
|
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
29,984,029 shares
|
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
24,974
|
|
|
$
|
31,716
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
32,277
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,539,423
|
|
|
|
1,595,138
|
|
Investments available for sale
|
|
|
402,525
|
|
|
|
977,245
|
|
Receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held for sale
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
328,639
|
|
|
|
414,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables, net
|
|
|
328,639
|
|
|
|
414,844
|
|
Accounts receivable from securitizations
|
|
|
656,749
|
|
|
|
301,118
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,846
|
|
|
|
16,762
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
163,604
|
|
|
|
215,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,128,981
|
|
|
$
|
3,585,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,548,073
|
|
|
$
|
2,541,406
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
168,940
|
|
|
|
206,598
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Subordinated debt payable to preferred securities trust
|
|
|
92,290
|
|
|
|
103,093
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
222,460
|
|
|
|
176,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,031,763
|
|
|
|
3,077,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred stock, $1,000 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized, issued and outstanding – 1,010 shares in
2009 and 2008
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Class A voting common stock, $.01 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized – 200,000,000 shares; issued – 14,410,133
shares in 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Class B non-voting common stock, $.01 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized – 200,000,000 shares; issued – 32,330,069
shares in 2009 and 32,776,722 shares in 2008
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
248,581
|
|
|
|
250,042
|
|
Unearned ESOP shares
|
|
|
(8,195
|
)
|
|
|
(8,367
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(15,127
|
)
|
|
|
(13,447
|
)
|
(Accumulated
deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(92,040
|
)
|
|
|
315,072
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 1,661,780 Class B common shares
in 2009 and 1,563,736 Class B common shares in 2008
|
|
|
(37,478
|
)
|
|
|
(37,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
97,218
|
|
|
|
507,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
3,128,981
|
|
|
$
|
3,585,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
18,946
|
|
|
$
|
37,750
|
|
|
$
|
34,960
|
|
|
$
|
66,880
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,445
|
|
|
|
7,954
|
|
|
|
9,550
|
|
|
|
17,886
|
|
Other interest income
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
33,586
|
|
|
|
55,269
|
|
|
|
67,794
|
|
|
|
101,316
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
23,522
|
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
49,049
|
|
|
|
45,519
|
|
Debt and other borrowings
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
5,480
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
Subordinated debt payable to
preferred securities trust
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
28,316
|
|
|
|
30,037
|
|
|
|
59,128
|
|
|
|
58,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
|
25,232
|
|
|
|
8,666
|
|
|
|
43,135
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
35,335
|
|
|
|
30,327
|
|
|
|
76,612
|
|
|
|
58,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for
credit losses
|
|
|
(30,065
|
)
|
|
|
(5,095
|
)
|
|
|
(67,946
|
)
|
|
|
(15,574
|
)
|
Noninterest revenues (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization income (loss)
|
|
|
(179,017
|
)
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
(238,924
|
)
|
|
|
21,605
|
|
Servicing revenues
|
|
|
18,053
|
|
|
|
24,365
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
50,457
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other revenues, net
|
|
|
14,303
|
|
|
|
65,350
|
|
|
|
49,350
|
|
|
|
131,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest revenues (losses)
|
|
|
(138,104
|
)
|
|
|
94,323
|
|
|
|
(142,117
|
)
|
|
|
203,980
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
83,344
|
|
|
|
81,752
|
|
|
|
158,223
|
|
|
|
151,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(251,513
|
)
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
|
(368,286
|
)
|
|
|
37,166
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
78,556
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
37,688
|
|
|
|
14,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(330,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,015
|
|
|
$
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
13,424
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
|
|
27,142
|
|
|
|
27,160
|
|
|
|
27,082
|
|
Nonvested Class B
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
13,424
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
|
|
28,267
|
|
|
|
27,160
|
|
|
|
28,196
|
|
Nonvested Class B
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
238,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(43,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of investments,
net of tax benefit (expense) of $6,172
|
|
|
(11,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gain (loss), net of
tax benefit (expense) of $161
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(55,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and common cash dividends
declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Employee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
Nonemployee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Issuance of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Amortization of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,729
|
|
Forfeitures of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
ESOP shares committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
250,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses for
which a portion has been
recorded in earnings, net
of tax benefit (expense)
of $480
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments, net of
tax benefit (expense) $427
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(407,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and common cash dividends
declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
Excess tax benefits from ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Issuance of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,795
|
)
|
Forfeitures of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
Treasury stock acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
248,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited) – continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
ESOP Shares
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(8,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
393,795
|
|
|
$
|
(37,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
585,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,823
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of investments,
net of tax benefit (expense)
of $6,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,462
|
)
|
Actuarial gain (loss), net of
tax benefit (expense) of $161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and common cash
dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,900
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Employee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
Nonemployee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Issuance of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Amortization of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,729
|
|
Forfeitures of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
ESOP shares committed to be
released
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(8,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,072
|
|
|
$
|
(37,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
507,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405,974
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses for
which a portion has been
recorded in earnings,
net of tax benefit
(expense) of $480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
Other investments, net of
tax benefit (expense)
$427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and common cash
dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
Employee stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
Excess tax benefits from ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Issuance of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Amortization of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,795
|
)
|
Forfeitures of nonvested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Treasury stock acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
ESOP shares committed to be
released
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(8,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
97,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES – CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,377
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities losses (gains), net
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
(32,328
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(8,557
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Amortization of discount on investment securities
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities
|
|
|
6,593
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Stock-based compensation (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
76,612
|
|
|
|
58,709
|
|
Provision for interest and fee losses
|
|
|
20,270
|
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
Change in deferred origination costs, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
4,586
|
|
|
|
7,251
|
|
Change in receivables held for sale
|
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
|
|
(421,647
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables held for sale
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
318,025
|
|
Change in accounts receivable from securitizations
|
|
|
(355,631
|
)
|
|
|
(90,557
|
)
|
Change in amounts due to the securitization trust
|
|
|
38,576
|
|
|
|
(61,415
|
)
|
Tax deficiency from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Change in other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
59,235
|
|
|
|
174,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(558,440
|
)
|
|
|
(3,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES – CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in federal funds sold and interest-bearing Deposits
|
|
|
87,771
|
|
|
|
(188,163
|
)
|
Purchase of investments available for sale
|
|
|
(609,759
|
)
|
|
|
(766,585
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments available for sale
|
|
|
710,753
|
|
|
|
392,017
|
|
Proceeds from sales of other investments
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32,231
|
|
Proceeds from maturing investments available for sale
|
|
|
495,756
|
|
|
|
155,260
|
|
Change in receivables not held for sale
|
|
|
(15,263
|
)
|
|
|
(17,931
|
)
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(4,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
668,526
|
|
|
|
(397,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES – CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in demand and savings deposits
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
(1,934
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of time deposits
|
|
|
503,467
|
|
|
|
738,926
|
|
Payments for maturing time deposits
|
|
|
(527,208
|
)
|
|
|
(313,444
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
21,023
|
|
|
|
36,740
|
|
Payments on redemption of debt
|
|
|
(59,564
|
)
|
|
|
(32,629
|
)
|
Change in cash overdraft and other borrowings
|
|
|
(59,048
|
)
|
|
|
(10,433
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
(17,278
|
)
|
Tax deficiency from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
Treasury stock acquired
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(116,799
|
)
|
|
|
399,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash
|
|
|
(6,742
|
)
|
|
|
(2,998
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
31,716
|
|
|
|
90,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
24,974
|
|
|
$
|
87,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
5,951
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
18,800
|
|
|
|
17,625
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
June 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
In these notes to consolidated financial statements, “Advanta”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer
to Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Note 1) Basis of Presentation and Current Operating Environment
We have prepared the consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have condensed or
omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”) pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management,
the statements include all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) required
for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
interim periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and notes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form
10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results for the full year.
Advanta was founded in 1951 and has long been an innovator in the financial services
industry. Most recently, we have been one of the nation’s largest credit card issuers
(through Advanta Bank Corp.) in the small business market. At this time we are not
originating new business credit card accounts or funding new business credit card
receivables. Today, we are the servicer for business credit card receivables that we own on
our balance sheet and also the business credit card receivables that are owned by the
Advanta Business Card Master Trust. As servicer, we will continue to service and collect
the amounts owed on these receivables. In the future, we may pursue other business ventures
in the small business market, financial services industry or in other markets or industries.
Deterioration of the U.S. economy beginning in the latter half of 2007 and the negative
trends in economic conditions and disruption in the capital markets that have continued into
2009 have adversely affected our business. We, like many small business credit card issuers
and other small business lenders, have experienced increased delinquencies and charge-offs
due to the impact of the general economic downturn on small businesses. In response to the
current economic environment and its negative impact on our business, results of operations
and financial condition, in May 2009 we developed a plan that was designed to limit our
credit loss exposure and maximize our capital and our liquidity measures. The plan we
designed involved the following components: early amortization of our securitization
transactions and closing all of our customers’ accounts to future use; and the execution of
tender offers for the outstanding trust preferred securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust
I and a portion of the Class A senior securitization notes issued by our securitization
trust at prices below their par value. As discussed below, we have moved forward with all
aspects of our plan with the exception of the tender offer for the Class A senior
securitization notes.
8
Early amortization of the securitization transactions began in June 2009 and effective
May 30, 2009, we closed all of our customers’ business credit card accounts to future use.
We expect the combination of these events to allow us to realize our plan objective of
limiting our credit loss exposure. We also purchased approximately 10.8% of the $100
million outstanding trust preferred securities through our tender offer for the outstanding
trust preferred securities. However, on June 8, 2009, Advanta Bank Corp. terminated its
tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes because it was determined that a
regulatory condition to the tender offer would not be satisfied. As a result of terminating
the tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes, we now expect that we will not
be able to fully realize the plan objectives of maximizing our capital and our liquidity
measures. The degree to which we ultimately may realize these plan objectives will depend
on our ability to implement additional opportunities to strengthen our capital and our
liquidity measures. We have not announced any specific plans at this time and we are still
evaluating additional strategies to accomplish these objectives. Our ability to continue
as a going concern may depend on our ability to successfully implement a plan for new
business opportunities.
Effective June 30, 2009, our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Advanta Bank Corp., entered into
two regulatory agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), its
primary federal banking regulator. Advanta Bank Corp. did not admit any wrongdoing in
entering into the agreements and entered into the agreements in the interest of expediency
and to avoid litigation and the costs associated therewith. The agreements place
significant restrictions on Advanta Bank Corp.’s activities and operations, including its
deposit-taking operations, and require Advanta Bank Corp. to maintain a total risk-based
capital ratio of at least 10% and a tier I leverage capital ratio
of at least 5%. The
agreements require Advanta Bank Corp. to make certain restitution payments to eligible
customers and pay a civil money penalty of $150,000. We previously took a $14 million
pretax charge related to our estimate of cash back rewards program restitution in the third
quarter of 2008. We recorded an additional $19 million pretax charge, classified in
operating expenses, in the second quarter of 2009 related to our estimate of pricing
strategies restitution under the agreements. The agreements also have the impact of
requiring us to obtain the FDIC’s approval before we would be able to pursue new business
opportunities through Advanta Bank Corp., however the agreements do not limit our ability to
pursue future business opportunities outside of the bank. See further discussion of the
regulatory agreements in Note 12.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant changes in the near term relate to the accounting for the allowance for
receivable losses, securitization income, rewards programs and income taxes.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
We have evaluated subsequent events through August 10, 2009, which is the date these
financial statements were issued and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
9
Note 2) Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff
Position (“FSP”) No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
. The FSP concludes that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating
securities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128,
Earnings Per
Share,
and should be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class
method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula to determine earnings per
share for multiple classes of stock according to dividends declared and participation rights
in undistributed earnings. The nonvested shares of Class B Common Stock issued under our
stock-based incentive plan are participating securities with nonforfeitable rights to
dividends. Therefore, upon the adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, our nonvested Class B
Common Stock was included as a third class of stock for purposes of earnings per share
computations. This impacted our reported earnings per Class A and Class B share. We
adjusted all prior period earnings per share data presented to conform to the provisions of
this FSP. The adoption of this FSP did not impact our financial position or net income.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly.
This FSP provides guidance on how to determine the fair
value of assets and liabilities when the volume and level of activity for the
asset/liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also provides guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. In addition, the FSP requires
disclosure in interim and annual periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques. The adoption of
this FSP effective for Advanta for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 did not have a
significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
. This FSP amends the requirements for the recognition
and measurement of other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities by modifying the
pre-existing intent and ability indicator. Under the FSP, an other-than-temporary
impairment is triggered when there is an intent to sell the security, it is more likely than
not that the security will be required to be sold before recovery, or
the entity is not
expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Additionally, the FSP
changes the presentation of an other-than-temporary impairment in the income statement for
those impairments. The credit loss component will be recognized in earnings and the
remainder of the impairment will be recorded in other comprehensive income. This FSP was
effective for Advanta for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and as discussed further in Note
3, we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses as of June 30, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosure about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
. This FSP requires interim disclosures regarding the
fair values of financial instruments that are within the scope of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures
about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments
. Additionally, the FSP requires disclosure of
the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments on an interim basis as well as changes of the methods and significant
assumptions from prior periods. Our adoption of this FSP effective for the quarter ending
June 30, 2009 resulted in additional disclosures but did not impact our financial position
or results of operations. See Note 17 for the applicable disclosures.
10
In
June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,
and FASB Statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R)
. Statement No. 166 eliminates the concept of qualifying
special-purpose entities (“QSPE’s”), so all special-purpose entities must be analyzed for
consolidation. Statement No. 167 requires consolidation if an entity has both power to
direct the activities of the special-purpose entity that most significantly impact its
economic performance and receives benefits or absorbs losses that are potentially
significant to the special-purpose entity. These statements are effective for Advanta on
January 1, 2010. Management is currently evaluating any potential impact these statements
may have on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 3) Interest-Bearing Deposits and Investments Available for Sale
Interest-bearing deposits at June 30, 2009 include $6.3 million of deposits pledged as
collateral for payment obligations under contracts with certain third parties in the
ordinary course of business. There were no interest-bearing deposits pledged as collateral
as of December 31, 2008.
Investments available for sale consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government
agency securities
|
|
$
|
109,127
|
|
|
$
|
109,284
|
|
|
$
|
312,112
|
|
|
$
|
313,209
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
16,451
|
|
|
|
18,015
|
|
|
|
17,064
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
|
|
8,799
|
|
Asset-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card asset-backed securities
(1)
|
|
|
132,518
|
|
|
|
116,285
|
|
|
|
291,919
|
|
|
|
281,601
|
|
Mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed
securities
|
|
|
23,841
|
|
|
|
17,076
|
|
|
|
32,692
|
|
|
|
22,467
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8,116
|
|
|
|
8,122
|
|
|
|
8,245
|
|
|
|
8,191
|
|
Money market funds
(2)
|
|
|
129,943
|
|
|
|
129,943
|
|
|
|
325,548
|
|
|
|
325,548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments available for sale
|
|
$
|
425,564
|
|
|
$
|
402,525
|
|
|
$
|
997,694
|
|
|
$
|
977,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts represent AdvantaSeries Class A notes issued in our securitizations and
purchased by one of our bank subsidiaries.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Money market funds at June 30, 2009 include investments in Federated Prime Cash
Obligations Fund of $51.4 million, Dreyfus Cash Management Fund of $39.6 million, and
Blackrock Liquidity Funds TempFund of $34.3 million.
|
We evaluate the decline in the fair value of our investment securities to determine whether
the decline in value is other than temporary. For securities that we intend to sell or that
it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell before recovery of their
amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and
the difference between the security’s fair value and amortized cost is recognized in
earnings. At June 30, 2009, we determined there were no securities in a loss position that
we intended to sell or would be required to sell. For securities that we do not intend to
sell and for which it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell, we
separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related and the amount
due to all other factors. The credit component is recognized in earnings and is the
difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected
future cash flows. The remainder of the impairment is recorded in other comprehensive
income. In assessing these securities, we consider the length of time and extent to which
the market value has been less than cost, and the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer. In assessing the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer, we review the issuer’s ratings and any changes in its ratings and recent
performance. For securities that are rated below AA by Standard and Poor’s or Aa2 by
Moody’s Investor Service or the equivalent from other rating agencies or that have
demonstrated deteriorating performance in the form of ratings downgrades since the date the
security was acquired, we project expected future cash flows to assess whether we expect to
recover the amortized cost of the security. We estimate the credit component of the
expected future cash flow based on projections of future credit defaults of the underlying
collateral. The significant inputs we use to project the expected future collateral
defaults for mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed securities include published
rating agency projections of lifetime default percentages and loss severities for the
collateral type and the year of origination. The projections of future collateral defaults
are then compared to the level of credit enhancement available, including available
overcollateralization, subordination and insurance. If the level of credit enhancement
available was sufficient to absorb the projected collateral defaults, no credit impairment
was deemed to have occurred and the decline in fair value was not deemed to be
other-than-temporary. If the level of credit enhancement available was not sufficient to
absorb the projected collateral defaults, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses
for our proportionate interest in the projected defaults in excess of projected available
credit enhancement that would be allocated to our tranche. A similar methodology was used
to assess our credit card asset-backed securities that uses internal expectations of future
collateral defaults based on our experience with the underlying collateral, which is the
pool of securitized receivables in the Advanta Business Card Master Trust.
Our one credit card asset-backed security was in a loss position at June 30, 2009. The
$132.5 million par value of the AdvantaSeries 2008-A3 note had an unrealized loss of $16.2
million. The unrealized loss was due to the ongoing difficulties in the asset-backed
securities market that created turmoil in the capital markets, negative performance trends
of receivables in the Advanta Business Card Master Trust and the early amortization of our
securitization transactions in June 2009. In May 2009, the ratings on this security were
downgraded by Standard and Poor’s from AA to BBB- and by Moody’s Investor Service from Baa2 to Ba2. The unrealized loss on
our credit card asset-backed security was not deemed to be an other-than-temporary
impairment loss at June 30, 2009 based on results using the methodology described above.
We own seventeen floating rate mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities in
our investment portfolio are that are backed by subprime residential mortgage loans or
subprime home equity loans. The fair values of these investments declined in the second
half of 2007, in 2008 and again in 2009 due to the difficulties in the subprime mortgage
industry that created turmoil in the capital markets.
In June 2009, we recognized $6.6 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses on five
of the seventeen mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed securities due to the
expectation that we will not recover the total amount of amortized cost based on results
using the methodology described above. These five securities have had significant
unrealized losses for approximately 28 months associated with the disruption in the market
for these types of securities. The other-than-temporary impairment losses are classified in
other revenues on the consolidated income statement. At June 30, 2009, these securities
represent 36% of the fair value of our mortgage and home equity line of
credit-backed securities backed by subprime residential mortgage
loans or subprime home equity loans. These securities were rated from AAA to BBB- by Standard & Poor’s, from Ba1 to
Caa2 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the equivalent from other rating agencies, after taking
into account the downgrade of four of these investments by at least one rating agency in the
second quarter of 2009.
Based on the methodology described above, the unrealized losses of the remaining twelve of
the seventeen mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed securities were not deemed to be
other-than-temporary impairment losses. The amounts of unrealized losses per individual
mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed security at June 30, 2009 were as follows:
one security with a loss of $1.9 million, three securities with a loss between $500
thousand and $1.0 million, five securities with a loss between $100 thousand and $499
thousand and three securities with losses less than $100 thousand. At June 30, 2009, these
securities represent 64% of the fair value of our mortgage and home equity line
of credit-backed securities backed by subprime residential mortgage
loans or subprime home equity loans. Six of these securities were rated from AAA to AA by Standard
& Poor’s, from Aaa to Aa2 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the equivalent from other rating
agencies, and their ratings are unchanged since they were acquired, and six were rated
from AAA to BB by Standard & Poor’s, from Aa2 to B3 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the
equivalent from other rating agencies, after taking into account the downgrade of two of
these investments by at least one rating agency in the second quarter of 2009.
11
The following table represents other-than-temporary impairment losses on available for sale debt
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses (unrealized and realized)
|
|
$
|
(7,963
|
)
|
Portion of pretax (gain) loss recognized in other comprehensive
income
(1)
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in income
(2)
|
|
$
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the non credit component impact of the other-than-temporary impairment losses on
available for sale debt securities.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment losses on
available for sale debt securities.
|
The
following table presents a rollforward of the credit component of
other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale debt securities held as
of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Additions for credit impairments recognized on
securities not previously impaired
|
|
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no other declines in the fair value of investments available for sale below their
cost that were deemed to be other-than-temporary at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
The fair value of investments available for sale in an unrealized loss position and the related
unrealized losses at June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months in
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an Unrealized Loss
|
|
|
an Unrealized Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government
agency securities
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,254
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,254
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
7,346
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
8,745
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
Credit card asset-backed security
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(16,233
|
)
|
|
|
116,285
|
|
|
|
(16,233
|
)
|
|
|
116,285
|
|
Mortgage and home equity line of
credit-backed securities
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
(8,384
|
)
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
(8,389
|
)
|
|
|
13,396
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,456
|
|
|
$
|
(24,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,256
|
|
|
$
|
(24,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
146,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Note 4) Receivables
Receivables on the consolidated balance sheet consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Business credit card receivables
|
|
$
|
403,215
|
|
|
$
|
505,578
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
8,179
|
|
|
|
8,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables
|
|
|
411,394
|
|
|
|
514,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Deferred origination costs, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,586
|
|
Less: Allowance for receivable losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
|
|
|
(81,536
|
)
|
|
|
(102,700
|
)
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for receivable losses
|
|
|
(82,755
|
)
|
|
|
(103,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
328,639
|
|
|
$
|
414,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, approximately 17% of our owned business credit card receivables were
concentrated in the state of California and approximately 9% were concentrated in the state
of Florida. This compares to U.S. Census population estimates of the U.S. population
residing in these states of 12% for California and 6% for Florida. Approximately 15% of
U.S. small businesses are domiciled in California and approximately 7% of U.S. small
businesses are domiciled in Florida based on a 2008 Small Business Administration report of
2007 data. We had no other concentrations in a single state of 9% or more of total owned
business credit card receivables.
See Note 6 for statistical information on owned receivables 30 days or more delinquent, 90
days or more delinquent, on nonaccrual status, accruing receivables past due 90 days or
more, and net principal charge-offs.
13
Note 5) Allowance for Receivable Losses
The following table presents activity in the allowance for receivable losses for the six
months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
103,903
|
|
|
$
|
68,540
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
76,612
|
|
|
|
58,709
|
|
Provision for interest and fee losses
|
|
|
20,270
|
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
Gross principal charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
|
|
|
(97,412
|
)
|
|
|
(43,272
|
)
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross principal charge-offs
|
|
|
(97,419
|
)
|
|
|
(43,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net principal charge-offs
|
|
|
(95,538
|
)
|
|
|
(42,127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
|
|
|
(22,492
|
)
|
|
|
(9,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30
|
|
$
|
82,755
|
|
|
$
|
85,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective June 2009, due to the closure of customers’ accounts to future use, our charge-off
policy for contractually delinquent business credit card accounts changed to charge-off an
unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in which it becomes and remains past
due 120 cumulative days from the contractual due date. Our previous policy was to
charge-off an unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in which it became and
remained past due 180 cumulative days from the contractual due date. There was no change to
our charge-off policy for bankrupt business credit card accounts, which is to charge-off an
unpaid receivable within 60 days of receipt of notification of filing from the bankruptcy
court or within the timeframes adopted in the
Uniform Retail Credit Classification and
Account Management Policy
, whichever is shorter. We had $25.1 million of additional net
principal charge-offs in June 2009 associated with the change in charge-off policy.
Note 6) Securitization Activities
We sold business credit card receivables through securitizations accounted for as sales
under GAAP. We continue to own and service the accounts that generated the securitized
receivables. We used one securitization trust for all of our securitizations. The
securitization trust was created to hold the collateral (the business credit card
receivables) and issue notes primarily to institutional investors. The securitization
trust, Advanta Business Card Master Trust, is a qualified special purpose entity, has no
equity and is financed through notes issued primarily to institutional investors, our
subordinated trust assets and our seller’s interest. Only principal receivables were sold
to noteholders. Accrued interest and fees on securitized receivables remain on-balance
sheet and are classified as accounts receivable from securitizations on the consolidated
balance sheets. Our seller’s interest is an undivided interest in the principal
receivables in the trust and represents the amount of receivables in the trust not
allocated to investors. The seller’s interest does not meet the GAAP criteria for sale
accounting and is classified as receivables on the consolidated balance sheets. The
seller’s interest does not provide credit enhancement to the securitized receivables.
As of June 30, 2009, we had $3.3 billion of securitized receivables, $3.2 billion of which
were off-balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, we had $4.5 billion of securitized
receivables, $4.1 billion of which were off-balance sheet. We hold certain securitized
receivables on-balance sheet in the form of subordinated trust assets that are a component
of retained interests in securitizations and certain AdvantaSeries Class A notes issued in
our 2008 securitizations that were purchased by one of our bank subsidiaries and are
classified as investments available for
14
sale. Our investments available for sale included AdvantaSeries Class A notes with a fair
value of $116.3 million as of June 30, 2009 and $281.6 million as of December 31, 2008. We
had $656.7 million of accounts receivable from securitizations on our balance sheet as of
June 30, 2009 and $301.1 million as of December 31, 2008. Accounts receivable from
securitizations include amounts due from the securitization trust, accrued interest and fees
on securitized receivables and retained interests in securitizations. Our business credit
card receivables on the consolidated balance sheet include our undivided interest in the
principal receivables in the trust (seller’s interest) of $290 million as of June 30, 2009
and $377 million as of December 31, 2008.
Our recourse or credit risk in off-balance sheet securitized receivables is limited to the
amount of our retained interests in securitizations. We have no liquidity arrangements,
guarantees and/or other arrangements that could require us to provide financial support to
the securitization trust. However, we did voluntarily choose to provide financial support
to the trust in April 2009 by buying charged-off receivables that were previously part of
the trust portfolio for $7.6 million, which increased the trust’s excess spread. The
securitization transactions began early amortization in June 2009, as discussed below, and
we do not intend to voluntarily provide financial support to the trust in the future. There
are no liquidity arrangements, guarantees and/or other commitments by third parties that
would provide financial support to the trust.
Early amortization for our securitization transactions began in June 2009 after the
AdvantaSeries three-month average excess spread amount was not maintained at a level greater
than $0, which was a trigger for early amortization. The early amortization resulted in the
end of the revolving periods prior to the expected dates. In an early amortization, the
noteholders are paid as payments on the securitized receivables are received from customers.
In order to eliminate the potential negative liquidity impact of early amortization, we
closed our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009. The early amortization
of our securitization transactions and closing our customers’ accounts had a negative impact
on the value of our retained interests in securitizations and accrued interest and fees on
securitized receivables.
We have historically retained an interest in securitized receivables in the form of
subordinated trust assets, cash collateral accounts and retained interest-only strips, each
of which served as credit enhancement to the noteholders’ interests in the securitized
receivables. The fair values of retained interests in securitizations are dependent upon
the performance of the underlying securitized receivables, market-driven interest rates and
market credit spreads. Excess spread represents income-related cash flows on securitized
receivables (interest, interchange, recoveries and fees) net of noteholders’ interest,
servicing fees and credit losses. Due to the closure of customers’ accounts to future use
effective May 30, 2009, there will be no future cash flows or income for interchange in
future periods. Income-related cash flows on securitized receivables did not exceed the
other components of the excess spread in recent months, and we expect the negative excess
spread levels to continue. Due to the negative excess spread levels, our par values of cash
collateral and subordinated trust assets were reduced by an aggregate of $139 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as the balances were used as credit enhancement for
securitization noteholders. The cash collateral account had no balance and no fair value as
of June 30, 2009. The remaining par value of subordinated trust assets was $8.5 million as
of June 30, 2009 and the estimated fair value was $5.5 million. The retained interest-only
strip’s fair value was estimated as zero at December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009. The aggregate reduction in estimated fair value of retained interests in
securitizations, including both realized losses and changes in
unrealized losses, was $74.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and $103.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009. Securitization loss for the three
15
and six months ended June 30, 2009 also includes an unfavorable valuation adjustment to
accrued interest and fees on securitized receivables of $72.8 million as a result of the
early amortization of our securitization transactions and closure of our customers’ accounts
to future use. Securitization loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes $31.5 million of loss
related to interchange cash flows used as credit enhancement. However, this has no net impact on
pretax loss since interchange income on the consolidated income statements includes interchange
fees on both owned and securitized business credit cards. Securitization income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 included a
favorable valuation adjustment to retained interests in securitizations of $4.0 million.
The following disclosures represent the aggregate data for our business credit card
securitizations.
Accounts receivable from securitizations consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Amounts due from the securitization trust
|
|
$
|
633,820
|
|
|
$
|
65,041
|
|
Accrued interest and fees on securitized
receivables, net
(1)
|
|
|
17,436
|
|
|
|
110,476
|
|
Retained interests in securitizations
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
125,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable from securitizations
|
|
$
|
656,749
|
|
|
$
|
301,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reduced by an estimate for uncollectible interest and fees of $81.6 million at June
30, 2009 and $31.0 million at December 31, 2008.
|
16
Quoted market prices were not available for our retained interests in securitizations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 or for the same period of 2008. The following
represents securitization data and the key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of
retained interests in securitizations at the time of each new securitization or
replenishment sale. There were no new securitizations or replenishment sales after May
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Average securitized
receivables
|
|
$
|
3,852,397
|
|
|
$
|
5,063,349
|
|
|
$
|
4,101,319
|
|
|
$
|
5,206,692
|
|
Securitization income (loss)
|
|
|
(179,017
|
)
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
(238,924
|
)
|
|
|
21,605
|
|
Discount accretion
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
Interchange income
|
|
|
31,499
|
|
|
|
57,799
|
|
|
|
78,682
|
|
|
|
113,244
|
|
Servicing revenues
|
|
|
18,053
|
|
|
|
24,365
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
50,457
|
|
Proceeds from new
securitizations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
193,325
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
318,025
|
|
Proceeds from
collections reinvested in
revolving- period
securitizations
|
|
|
1,042,159
|
|
|
|
2,581,177
|
|
|
|
2,867,245
|
|
|
|
5,133,254
|
|
Cash flows received on
retained
interests
(1)
|
|
|
60,914
|
|
|
|
112,651
|
|
|
|
112,496
|
|
|
|
192,586
|
|
Key assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
63.67% – 66.60
|
%
|
|
|
17.20% – 18.70
|
%
|
|
|
39.33% – 66.60
|
%
|
|
|
12.21% – 18.70
|
%
|
Monthly payment rate
|
|
|
19.17% – 19.96
|
%
|
|
|
18.79% – 20.46
|
%
|
|
|
19.17% – 22.20
|
%
|
|
|
18.79% – 20.46
|
%
|
Loss rate
|
|
|
21.32% – 21.96
|
%
|
|
|
7.85% – 10.12
|
%
|
|
|
14.54% – 21.96
|
%
|
|
|
6.20% – 10.12
|
%
|
Interest yield, net
of interest earned by
noteholders
|
|
|
13.62% – 13.87
|
%
|
|
|
11.36% – 12.29
|
%
|
|
|
13.62% – 15.06
|
%
|
|
|
8.79% – 12.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts reported for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 exclude interest
on AdvantaSeries Class A notes that is classified as interest income on the
consolidated income statements.
|
There were no purchases of delinquent accounts from the securitization trust during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008.
17
Managed business credit card receivable data
We
service both the receivables owned on our balance sheet and
the securitized receivables in the Advanta Business
Card Master Trust, collectively referred to as “managed receivables.” Credit quality data
on managed business credit card receivables was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Owned business credit card receivables
|
|
$
|
403,215
|
|
|
$
|
505,578
|
|
|
$
|
850,925
|
|
Securitized business credit card receivables
|
|
|
3,322,078
|
|
|
|
4,511,650
|
|
|
|
5,225,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed receivables
|
|
$
|
3,725,293
|
|
|
$
|
5,017,228
|
|
|
$
|
6,076,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables 30 days or more delinquent
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
$
|
34,723
|
|
|
$
|
52,997
|
|
|
$
|
49,894
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
274,960
|
|
|
|
425,271
|
|
|
|
294,432
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
309,683
|
|
|
|
478,268
|
|
|
|
344,326
|
|
Receivables 90 days or more delinquent
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
9,373
|
|
|
|
24,132
|
|
|
|
25,001
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
74,888
|
|
|
|
188,424
|
|
|
|
145,715
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
84,261
|
|
|
|
212,556
|
|
|
|
170,716
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
9,688
|
|
|
|
10,670
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
87,951
|
|
|
|
85,277
|
|
|
|
68,719
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
98,123
|
|
|
|
94,965
|
|
|
|
79,389
|
|
Accruing receivables past due 90 days or
more
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
8,172
|
|
|
|
22,166
|
|
|
|
22,684
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
64,541
|
|
|
|
170,876
|
|
|
|
131,977
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
72,713
|
|
|
|
193,042
|
|
|
|
154,661
|
|
Net principal charge-offs for the year-to-date
period ended June 30 and December 31
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
95,531
|
|
|
|
89,056
|
|
|
|
42,125
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
477,896
|
|
|
|
449,964
|
|
|
|
190,391
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
573,427
|
|
|
|
539,020
|
|
|
|
232,516
|
|
Net principal charge-offs for the three months ended
June 30 and December 31
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
68,898
|
|
|
|
24,092
|
|
|
|
25,819
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
310,934
|
|
|
|
135,270
|
|
|
|
104,638
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
379,832
|
|
|
|
159,362
|
|
|
|
130,457
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Effective June 2009, due to the closure of customers’ accounts to future use, our
charge-off policy for contractually delinquent business credit card accounts changed to
charge-off an unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in which it becomes
and remains past due 120 cumulative days from the contractual due date. Our previous
policy was to charge-off an unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in
which it became and remained past due 180 cumulative days from the contractual due
date. We had additional net principal charge-offs associated with the change in
charge-off policy in June 2009 of $25.1 million on owned receivables and $110.2 million
on securitized receivables, for an aggregate of $135.3 million of additional net
principal charge-offs on managed receivables.
|
18
Note 7) Other Assets and Liabilities
Other assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Investment in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P.
|
|
$
|
32,095
|
|
|
$
|
32,095
|
|
Current income taxes receivable
|
|
|
31,837
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
71,219
|
|
Investment in preferred securities trust
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
Securities sold receivable
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
33,620
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86,096
|
|
|
|
70,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
163,604
|
|
|
$
|
215,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, we had a $2.3 million receivable in other assets related to September 2008
redemption orders submitted to The Reserve Primary Fund, a money market fund investment.
The net asset value of The Reserve Primary Fund declined below $1.00 per share on September
16, 2008, the day following our redemption request. Due to a large number of redemption
requests, the fund received an SEC order suspending redemptions and postponing payment for
shares that had already been submitted for redemption. The fund made partial distributions
to shareholders in 2008 and 2009. We received $37.3 million of our redemption proceeds
through June 30, 2009. The timing of the receipt of the remaining $2.3 million of estimated
proceeds from the Reserve Primary Fund is uncertain and is subject to the orderly
disposition of the fund’s securities and the resolution of pending and threatened claims
that may affect the fund’s assets. There is uncertainty as to whether the fund’s loss will
be allocated to shareholders that redeemed on September 15, 2008 and there is also
uncertainty as to the level of fund assets that will be used to satisfy ongoing costs and
expenses, legal fees, and pending or threatened claims against the fund or the fund’s
assets. Since our proceeds from the redemption may be less than the redemption price of
$1.00 per share, we recorded an estimated loss on the redemption of $1.0 million in 2008.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we updated our estimate based on additional
disclosures by the fund’s management and recorded an additional $860 thousand loss on the
redemption.
We had a $14.2 million realized gain in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $18.8
million realized gain in the six months ended June 30, 2008 on the sale of MasterCard
Incorporated shares. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had a $13.4 million realized
gain on the redemption of Visa Inc. shares. The gain on Visa Inc. shares was related to
Visa’s initial public offering and share redemption in March 2008. As of June 30, 2009, we
own 497 thousand Visa Inc. Class B common shares that have zero cost basis and no book
value. We have no remaining MasterCard Incorporated shares as of June 30, 2009.
19
Other liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
47,183
|
|
|
$
|
31,781
|
|
Amounts due to the securitization trust
|
|
|
44,019
|
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
37,552
|
|
|
|
38,659
|
|
Cash back rewards liability
|
|
|
23,096
|
|
|
|
23,174
|
|
Business rewards liability
|
|
|
18,073
|
|
|
|
30,563
|
|
Cash overdraft
|
|
|
3,236
|
|
|
|
12,284
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
Current income taxes payable
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
Other
|
|
|
46,968
|
|
|
|
32,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities
|
|
$
|
222,460
|
|
|
$
|
176,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2008, we commenced a reduction of workforce in connection with initiatives to
outsource business processes within the areas of information technology, customer service,
collections, and accounting and finance. In the first quarter of 2009, we reduced our
workforce by approximately 300 employees, or 35%, in order to reduce staffing to a level
more commensurate with the portfolio size and scale of business activities that we
anticipated at that time for 2009. Both of these reductions were substantially complete by
March 31, 2009 and we expect to pay the severance and related costs within twelve months of
the severance dates. The severance and related costs were included in salaries and employee
benefits expense. The accrued severance and costs related to these initiatives were
included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. A rollforward of the
liabilities associated with these workforce reductions and the cumulative costs incurred are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
June 30,2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Incurred
|
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
as of June
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Incurred
(1)
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
30, 2009
|
|
Outsourcing of
business processes
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
2,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,947
|
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
First quarter of
2009 reduction in
workforce
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,012
|
|
|
|
7,720
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
10,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
12,283
|
|
|
$
|
9,667
|
|
|
$
|
3,034
|
|
|
$
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Costs incurred are net of reductions in cost estimates in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 of $311 thousand for the outsourcing of business processes and $277
thousand for the first quarter of 2009 workforce reduction.
|
In July 2009, we announced plans to further reduce our workforce by approximately 200
employees, or 50%, in order to reduce staffing to a level more commensurate with our current
activities. In connection with this reduction of workforce, we expect to incur expenses of
approximately $8.5 million to $9.5 million related to severance and related costs. We
expect this reduction of workforce to be substantially complete in the third quarter of
2009.
20
Note 8) Debt and Other Borrowings
The composition of debt was as follows at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
RediReserve variable rate demand certificates (4.60%-4.65%)
|
|
$
|
7,774
|
|
|
$
|
10,769
|
|
91 day retail notes, fixed (7.23%)
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
6 month retail notes, fixed (6.30%-7.70%)
|
|
|
4,212
|
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
12 month retail notes, fixed (5.83%-8.16%)
|
|
|
29,291
|
|
|
|
40,117
|
|
14 month retail notes, fixed (10.44%)
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
18 month retail notes, fixed (5.40%-8.39%)
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
6,620
|
|
24 month retail notes, fixed (5.45%-9.53%)
|
|
|
20,552
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
30 month retail notes, fixed (5.50%-8.85%)
|
|
|
4,097
|
|
|
|
4,929
|
|
36 month retail notes, fixed (5.59%-9.08%)
|
|
|
9,598
|
|
|
|
11,257
|
|
48 month retail notes, fixed (5.12%-9.35%)
|
|
|
6,436
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
60 month retail notes, fixed (5.59%-9.53%)
|
|
|
46,105
|
|
|
|
63,902
|
|
84 month retail notes, fixed (6.30%-9.99%)
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
120 month retail notes, fixed (6.77%-10.44%)
|
|
|
25,721
|
|
|
|
27,075
|
|
Other retail notes, fixed (5.12%-9.53%)
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
168,940
|
|
|
$
|
206,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates shown in the table above represent the range of rates on debt outstanding at
June 30, 2009.
The annual contractual maturities of debt were as follows at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
48,085
|
|
2010
|
|
|
39,350
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,026
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,507
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
44,972
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we had a $50 million borrowing in connection with a secured borrowing
agreement that used business credit card receivables at a nonbank subsidiary as collateral.
The borrowing was repaid and the agreement was terminated in March 2009.
Note 9) Commitments and Contingencies
Advanta Corp. is a member of Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa USA”) and owns shares of Visa Inc.
Class B common stock. Our membership in Visa USA and our ownership interest in Visa Inc.
(“Visa”) are related primarily to our former consumer credit card business, which we exited
in 1998. Visa completed its initial public offering in March 2008 and set aside $3 billion
of the proceeds in a litigation escrow account to fund litigation judgments or settlements
that have occurred or may occur related to specified litigation matters between Visa and
third parties. Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries are not named as defendants in the
specified litigation matters. However, to the extent Visa’s litigation escrow is not
sufficient to satisfy the specified litigation matters, the members of Visa USA to varying
extents may be required to fund certain losses incurred by Visa in connection with those
matters due to member indemnification provisions within Visa USA’s bylaws. In 2007, we
recorded a $12.0 million reserve associated with our contingent obligation to Visa USA
related to the specified litigation matters between Visa and third parties. In March 2008,
we increased the reserve by $577 thousand based on increases in litigation reserves
disclosed by Visa. Also in March 2008, we reduced the liability by $6.1 million for our
proportionate share of the amounts funded by Visa
21
in the litigation escrow account. We classified the $5.5 million net reduction in
indemnification reserves as a benefit to operating expenses for the six months ended June
30, 2008. There were no changes associated with our contingent obligation to Visa USA in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The indemnification reserve for our
contingent obligation to Visa USA was $5.9 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Pretax income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 includes a $13.4 million gain on the
redemption of Visa shares in other revenues.
As of March 31, 2009, we had interest-bearing deposits pledged as collateral for payment
obligations under contracts with certain third parties in the ordinary course of business.
In June 2009, one of the third parties withdrew $29.2 million from the interest-bearing
deposit account asserting that our decision to close our customers’ accounts to future use
effective May 30, 2009 triggered an automatic termination provision and that a termination
fee in that amount was due. We do not believe that an automatic termination was triggered
or that a termination fee was due under the terms of the contract and we have recorded a
$29.2 million receivable from the third party as of June 30, 2009. The receivable is
classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. While we expect to fully
recover this receivable, there can be no assurance of this and any unrecoverable amount
cannot be reasonably estimated.
In addition to the matters discussed above, Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries are subject
to class action lawsuits and other litigation as well as legal, regulatory, administrative
and other claims, investigations or proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business
or discontinued operations. Management believes that the aggregate loss, if any, resulting
from these additional matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations based on our current expectations regarding the ultimate
resolutions of the matters after consultation with our attorneys.
Note 10) Capital Stock
Cash dividends per share of common stock declared and paid were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
$
|
0.0000
|
|
|
$
|
0.1771
|
|
|
$
|
0.0200
|
|
|
$
|
0.3542
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
0.0000
|
|
|
|
0.2125
|
|
|
|
0.0250
|
|
|
$
|
0.4250
|
|
In April 2009, we elected to defer the $4.6 million semi-annual interest payments on the
subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust issued by Advanta Corp. and as a
consequence, interest payments on the trust preferred securities issued by Advanta Capital
Trust I will also be deferred. The terms of the trust preferred securities provide that no
dividends can be declared or paid on Advanta Corp.’s common or preferred stocks during the
deferral period. We have suspended payment of dividends on our common and preferred stocks.
In the first quarter of 2009, we purchased 98 thousand shares of Class B Common Stock from
employees in connection with severance agreements at an average price of $0.58 per share.
22
Note 11) Stock-Based Compensation
All nonvested shares and stock options outstanding in the reported periods were for Class B
Common Stock.
Nonvested shares activity was as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
$
|
9.95
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
9.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
$
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, there was $10.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to nonvested shares and we expect to recognize the expense over a weighted average
period of 7.9 years.
Compensation expense and related tax effects recognized in connection with nonvested shares
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Compensation expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,398
|
|
|
$
|
(3,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,480
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
Stock option activity was as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
$
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
17.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
$
|
12.27
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
6.9 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30
|
|
|
6,581
|
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no stock options exercised in the three or six months ended June 30, 2009. As
of June 30, 2009, there was $7.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related
to outstanding stock options and we expect to recognize the expense over a weighted average
period of 1.5 years.
23
Compensation expense and related tax effects recognized in connection with employee stock
options and the weighted average fair value of options granted were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Compensation expense
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
2,406
|
|
|
$
|
2,922
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
Weighted average fair
value of options
granted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
Note 12) Regulatory Developments
Advanta Bank Corp. entered into two regulatory agreements with its primary federal banking
regulator, the FDIC, that became effective on June 30, 2009. Advanta Bank Corp. did not
admit any wrongdoing in entering into the agreements and entered into the agreements in the
interest of expediency and to avoid litigation and the costs associated therewith. The
first agreement, which was a stipulation and consent to the issuance of an order to cease
and desist, places restrictions on the bank’s use of its cash assets, payments of dividends,
entering into transactions that would materially alter the bank’s balance sheet composition
and taking of brokered deposits, and it requires the maintenance of a total risk-based
capital ratio of at least 10% and a tier I leverage capital ratio
of at least 5%. In the
three months ended June 30, 2009, Advanta Corp. contributed $17.5 million of capital to
Advanta Bank Corp. At June 30, 2009, Advanta Bank Corp.’s total risk-based capital ratio
was 19.74% and its tier I leverage capital ratio was slightly over 5%. We have submitted to
the FDIC, as required by the regulatory agreement, a strategic plan related to the bank’s
deposit-taking operations and deposit insurance that provides for the termination of the
bank’s deposit-taking operations and deposit insurance after the bank’s deposits are repaid
in full, which is anticipated to take a few years. We intend to submit an additional plan
in the future that, if approved by the FDIC, would allow the bank to continue its
deposit-taking operations and deposit insurance. The agreement does not in any way restrict
Advanta Bank Corp. from continuing to service its credit card accounts and managed
receivables, including those that are owned by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust.
Specifically, under the agreement, Advanta Bank Corp. must continue to perform its
obligations as servicer for the business credit card receivables that we own on our balance
sheet and those that are owned by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. In addition, all
customer bank deposits remain fully insured to the fullest extent permissible by law.
Advanta Bank Corp.’s second agreement with the FDIC, which was also a stipulation and
consent to the issuance of an order to cease and desist, relates to alleged unsafe or
unsound banking practices associated with alleged violations of consumer protection and
banking laws. The FDIC alleged, among other things, that some of Advanta Bank Corp.’s
marketing of certain cash back reward programs for its business credit cards and practices
related to the pricing strategies of certain of its business credit card accounts violated
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and that Advanta Bank Corp. also violated
certain adverse action notification requirements in connection with the pricing strategies
of certain of its business credit card accounts. Under the agreement, Advanta Bank Corp.
must make certain restitution payments to eligible customers and pay a civil money penalty
of $150,000. We previously took a $14 million pretax charge related to our estimate of cash
back rewards program restitution in the third quarter of 2008. We recorded an additional
$19 million pretax charge, classified in operating expenses,
24
in the second quarter of 2009 related to our estimate of pricing strategies restitution
under the agreement.
Note 13) Segment Information
We have historically had only one operating business segment, Advanta Business Cards, and we
separately reported results from investment and other activities not attributable to the
Advanta Business Cards segment. As a result of the early amortization of our securitization
transactions and closing our customers’ business credit card accounts to future use
effective May 30, 2009, we are no longer marketing or issuing business credit cards or
providing revolving credit lines to customers. We are continuing to
service the managed
business credit card receivables. In connection with these business changes, we are now
managing our business based on the consolidated financial results and are no longer
separately reporting results of investment or other activities. As a result, beginning with
the second quarter of 2009, we have no reportable segments.
Note 14) Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
In June 2009, we purchased $10.8 million of the $100 million outstanding trust preferred
securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust I through a tender offer that expired on June 15,
2009. The purchase price was $2.2 million and holders who tendered will not receive any
accrued and unpaid distributions. The purchased trust preferred securities were exchanged
for a like amount of the related subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust
issued by Advanta Corp. and we retired such trust preferred securities and the related
subordinated debt in June 2009. We recognized a gain on the extinguishment of the
subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust of $8.6 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. The gain is net of $571 thousand of costs associated with the
tender offer.
Note 15) Income Taxes
Income tax expense consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(10,875
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,678
|
|
|
$
|
(26,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,274
|
|
State
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
(10,115
|
)
|
|
|
8,059
|
|
|
|
(26,374
|
)
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
85,090
|
|
|
|
(4,587
|
)
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
State
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
88,671
|
|
|
|
(4,598
|
)
|
|
|
64,062
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
78,556
|
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
37,688
|
|
|
$
|
14,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax to income tax expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Statutory federal income tax
|
|
$
|
(88,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,616
|
|
|
$
|
(128,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,008
|
|
State income taxes, net of
federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
167,749
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
167,749
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Difference in estimated
full year rate and
year-to-date actual rate
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Compensation limitation
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
78,556
|
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
37,688
|
|
|
$
|
14,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax expense rate was 31.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
46.3% for the same period of 2008 and 10.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
39.8% for the same period of 2008.
We provide deferred taxes to reflect the estimated future tax effects of the differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and currently
enacted tax laws. The net deferred tax asset is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
219,886
|
|
|
$
|
90,373
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(44,073
|
)
|
|
|
(19,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance
|
|
|
175,813
|
|
|
|
71,219
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(167,749
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
8,064
|
|
|
$
|
71,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax asset were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Receivable losses
|
|
$
|
50,537
|
|
|
$
|
6,892
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
42,279
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Rewards programs
|
|
|
14,409
|
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
Federal tax benefit of state tax positions
|
|
|
10,517
|
|
|
|
10,982
|
|
Incentive and deferred compensation
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
|
|
8,388
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(8,385
|
)
|
|
|
(14,519
|
)
|
Unrealized investment losses
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
Cancellation of indebtedness income, net
|
|
|
(6,821
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Pricing
strategies restitution
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Visa indemnification
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
Securitization income
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
21,590
|
|
Deferred origination costs, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1,652
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
25,886
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance
|
|
|
175,813
|
|
|
|
71,219
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(167,749
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
8,064
|
|
|
$
|
71,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive
and negative evidence including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable
income. In estimating future taxable income, we develop assumptions including the amount of future
pre-tax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible
and prudent tax planning strategies. In prior periods, we determined that a valuation allowance
was not necessary, in part due to our expectation that Advanta would generate sufficient taxable
income in future years. Forecasts for future income considered our plan to limit our credit loss
exposure and maximize our capital and our liquidity measures. However, as a result of terminating
the tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes, we now expect that we will not be
able to fully realize the plan objectives of maximizing our capital and our liquidity measures.
The degree to which we ultimately may realize these plan objectives will depend on our ability to
implement additional opportunities to strengthen our capital and our liquidity measures. We have
not announced any specific plans at this time and we are still evaluating additional strategies to
accomplish these objectives. As part of these additional strategies,
we have developed prudent tax planning strategies that we believe
should permit the recovery of our deferred tax
assets. However, we concluded that a valuation allowance of $167.7 million was required as of June
30, 2009 as there was some level of uncertainty regarding the
implementation of the additional
strategies. Our future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent of decreases in our
valuation allowance. A valuation allowance was not deemed necessary for the deferred tax asset
related to the unrealized investment losses as the realization of this component of the deferred
tax asset is not dependent on future taxable income.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding
accrued interest and penalties, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
16,106
|
|
|
$
|
17,732
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the
current year
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(1,989
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
$
|
15,086
|
|
|
$
|
16,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2009, excluding accrued interest and penalties,
were $15.1 million, of which $9.8 million, if recognized, would favorably affect our
effective tax rate. The remaining $5.3 million represents the federal tax benefits of
unrecognized state tax benefits that were recognized as a deferred tax asset.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the income tax benefit included an increase of
interest of $123 thousand and an increase in penalties of $85 thousand. At June 30, 2009,
the liability for unrecognized tax benefits included $15.2 million accrued for potential
payment of interest and $7.3 million accrued for potential payment of penalties. Of the
$22.5 million total of accrued interest and penalties included in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2009, $17.3 million would favorably affect our
effective tax rate to the extent the interest and penalties were not assessed. The
remaining $5.2 million represents the federal tax benefits on accrued interest that were
recognized as a deferred tax asset.
The liability for unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2009 included $2.6 million related
to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could
significantly change in the twelve months ending June 30, 2010. This amount represents a
potential decrease in unrecognized tax benefits related to state tax settlements that may
occur in that period and expiring state statutes of limitations.
We have an ownership interest in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. related to our exit from
the consumer card business in 1998. The gain associated with the original transfer of
assets to Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. was not subject to income tax. As of June 30,
2009, the cumulative gain on transfer of consumer credit card business and our deficit
capital account in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. on a tax basis for which no deferred
taxes have been provided is approximately $650 million, as the transaction structure remains
nontaxable under current tax law.
27
Note 16) Calculation of Earnings Per Share
The following table shows the calculation of basic earnings per common share and diluted
earnings per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(330,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,015
|
|
|
$
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,377
|
|
Less: Preferred A dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocable to common
stockholders
|
|
|
(330,069
|
)
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
(406,115
|
)
|
|
|
22,236
|
|
Less: Class A dividends declared
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(2,369
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(4,737
|
)
|
Less: Class B dividends declared
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(5,789
|
)
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
(11,532
|
)
|
Less: Nonvested Class B
dividends declared
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(330,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,762
|
)
|
|
$
|
(407,112
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
13,424
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
|
|
27,142
|
|
|
|
27,160
|
|
|
|
27,082
|
|
Nonvested Class B
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
Dilutive effect of
Options Class B
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
13,424
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
|
|
28,267
|
|
|
|
27,160
|
|
|
|
28,196
|
|
Nonvested Class B
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
Antidilutive shares
Options Class B
|
|
|
8,583
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
8,812
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
28
Note 17) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values and related carrying amounts of our financial instruments were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
24,974
|
|
|
$
|
24,974
|
|
|
$
|
31,716
|
|
|
$
|
31,716
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
32,277
|
|
|
|
32,277
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,539,423
|
|
|
|
1,539,423
|
|
|
|
1,595,138
|
|
|
|
1,595,138
|
|
Investments available for sale
|
|
|
402,525
|
|
|
|
402,525
|
|
|
|
977,245
|
|
|
|
977,245
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
328,639
|
|
|
|
330,237
|
|
|
|
414,844
|
|
|
|
498,468
|
|
Accounts receivable from
securitizations
|
|
|
656,749
|
|
|
|
656,749
|
|
|
|
301,118
|
|
|
|
301,118
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and savings deposits
|
|
$
|
91,103
|
|
|
$
|
91,103
|
|
|
$
|
85,378
|
|
|
$
|
85,378
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
2,456,970
|
|
|
|
2,512,488
|
|
|
|
2,456,028
|
|
|
|
2,493,258
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
168,940
|
|
|
|
161,622
|
|
|
|
206,598
|
|
|
|
203,077
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Subordinated debt payable to
preferred securities trust
|
|
|
92,290
|
|
|
|
17,904
|
|
|
|
103,093
|
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
15,472
|
|
|
|
15,472
|
|
We own 497 thousand Visa Inc. Class B common shares that have zero cost basis and no
carrying value at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. We estimate the fair value of the
Visa shares to be $13.6 million at June 30, 2009 and $10.5 million at December 31, 2008.
The Visa shares are not transferable until at least three years from the date of Visa’s
March 2008 initial public offering, with the exception of transfers to other Class B common
shareholders. We own a cost method investment in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P with a
$32.1 million carrying value at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. It is not practicable
to estimate the fair value of the investment in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. at either
reporting date.
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to
those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market
data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market
assumptions. The level within the fair value hierarchy to measure the financial instrument
is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are as follows:
|
•
|
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets accessible at
the measurement date.
|
|
•
|
|
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and valuations
in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Inputs are
observable for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
|
|
•
|
|
Level 3 – Valuations derived from one or more significant inputs that are unobservable.
|
29
Determination of Fair Value
When available, we generally use quoted market prices to determine fair value and classify the
financial instrument in Level 1. In cases where quoted market prices for similar financial
instruments are available, we utilize these inputs for valuation techniques and classify the
financial instrument in Level 2. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
values are based on estimates using discounted cash flows, present value or other valuation
techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not
be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument and we classify the financial instrument
in Level 3.
We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating fair values of financial instruments:
Cash, Federal Funds Sold, Interest-Bearing Deposits, Accrued Interest Receivable, Other Borrowings
and Accrued Interest Payable
For cash and these short-term financial instruments, the carrying amount approximates the fair
value.
Investments Available for Sale
Investments available for sale are valued using quoted market prices in active markets, when
available, and classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investments available
for sale include investments such as U.S. Treasury securities, certain equity securities and money
market funds. Investments available for sale are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
if quoted market prices are not available and fair values are estimated using quoted prices of
similar securities or recently executed transactions for the securities. Level 2 investments
available for sale include investments such as government agency securities, state and municipal
securities, commercial paper, corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities issued by Federal
National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Credit card asset-backed
securities and the remaining mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities are valued
based on external prices or spread data and are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy
because of the lack of observable data due to market inactivity as of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008. Pricing services are used for valuation of all investments available for sale.
Cost Method Investments
The fair value estimate of Visa Inc. Class B common shares at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
is classified as Level 3 and is based on the quoted market price of Visa’s Class A common shares,
the most recent Class B conversion ratio and an estimate of a market discount for future reductions
in the conversion ratio related to Visa’s membership indemnification provisions.
Receivables, Net
The fair values of receivables are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that
incorporates estimates of the interest yield, cost of funds, servicing costs, future credit losses
over the life of the receivables, and interest rates expected for a static pool of closed-end
loans. The fair value estimates of receivables are classified as Level 3 since the majority of the
inputs are unobservable.
30
Accounts Receivable from Securitizations
Retained interests in securitizations are carried at fair value. If quoted market prices are not
available, we estimate the fair values of retained interests in securitizations based on discounted
cash flow analyses. Quoted market prices were not available at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
See Note 6 for further discussion of the valuation of retained interests in securitizations.
Since the majority of the inputs for determining the fair value of the retained interests are
unobservable, we classify these financial instruments as Level 3.
The carrying amount of other components of accounts receivable from securitizations approximates
the fair value based on the short-term nature of the assets.
Demand and Savings Deposits
The fair value of demand and money market savings deposits is the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date. This fair value does not include any benefit that may result from the low cost of
funding provided by these deposits compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.
Time Deposits
The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses based on the currently offered rates for certificates of deposit with similar remaining
maturities. The fair value estimates of time deposits are classified as Level 2 since quoted
market prices are not available, but observable inputs are used in the valuation.
Debt
The fair value of our debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on our current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The fair value estimates
of debt are classified as Level 2 since quoted market prices are not available, but observable
inputs are used in the valuation.
Subordinated Debt Payable to Preferred Securities Trust
We estimate the fair value of our subordinated debt payable to preferred securities trust based on
quoted market prices for our trust preferred securities and classify those estimates as Level 2
since quoted market prices for similar instruments are used in the valuation.
31
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
are categorized in the tables below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the
valuations. We had no liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2009 or December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Investments available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government
agency securities
|
|
$
|
109,284
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
109,284
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,451
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,451
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
Asset-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card asset-backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
116,285
|
|
|
|
116,285
|
|
Mortgage and home equity line of
credit-backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
17,076
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
8,122
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
129,943
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
129,943
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Retained interests in securitizations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
247,303
|
|
|
$
|
26,266
|
|
|
$
|
134,449
|
|
|
$
|
408,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Investments available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government
agency securities
|
|
$
|
306,309
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
313,209
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
17,064
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
17,064
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,799
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,799
|
|
Asset-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card asset-backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
281,601
|
|
|
|
281,601
|
|
Mortgage and home equity line of
credit-backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
17,402
|
|
|
|
22,467
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8,068
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
8,191
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
325,548
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
325,548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
Retained interests in securitizations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
125,601
|
|
|
|
125,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
639,925
|
|
|
$
|
38,194
|
|
|
$
|
424,727
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Changes in Level 3 Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity Line
|
|
|
Credit Card
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Credit-Backed
|
|
|
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Interests in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securitizations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair value at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
17,402
|
|
|
$
|
281,601
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
125,601
|
|
|
$
|
424,727
|
|
Discount accretion
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
Realized loss
(1)(2)
|
|
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(139,197
|
)
|
|
|
(145,790
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
35,392
|
|
|
|
35,392
|
|
Unrealized loss in other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
(5,916
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(2,511
|
)
|
Purchases, sales, issuances,
settlements, net
|
|
|
(1,642
|
)
|
|
|
(159,400
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(39,587
|
)
|
|
|
(200,653
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
12,625
|
|
|
$
|
116,285
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
5,493
|
|
|
$
|
134,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Realized loss includes $6.6 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses on
mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Realized or unrealized gains or losses on retained interests in securitizations
are included in securitization income (loss) on the consolidated income statements.
|
We also have assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis, such as cost method investments and capitalized costs associated
with the acquisition or development of internal-use software. For such assets, measurement
at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition is applicable if one or
more is determined to be impaired. As a result of the closure of our business credit card
accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009 and the cessation of our business credit card
marketing activities, we determined that deferred origination costs, certain prepaid
expenses and certain capitalized software costs used for business credit card marketing
activities or that we do not plan to use for ongoing servicing were impaired with no fair
value. Accordingly, the balances of these assets were written off resulting in $5.3 million
of asset impairment charges in the three months ended June 30, 2009. The fair value
estimates were Level 3 estimates since they were based on judgmental estimates of cash flows
associated with these assets. The asset impairment charges are classified in operating
expenses on the consolidated income statement.
33
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, this discussion
and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, such as those set forth in the “Cautionary Statement Pursuant to the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,” which can be found at the end of this Item, in
“Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part II of this report and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” found in
Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Our
actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements.
“Advanta”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries, unless the
context otherwise requires.
OVERVIEW
Advanta was founded in 1951 and has long been an innovator in the financial services
industry. Most recently, we have been one of the nation’s largest credit card issuers
(through Advanta Bank Corp.) in the small business market. At this time we are not
originating new business credit card accounts or funding new business credit card
receivables. Today, we are the servicer for the business credit card receivables that we own on
our balance sheet and also the business credit card receivables that are owned by the
Advanta Business Card Master Trust. As servicer, we will continue to service and collect
the amounts owed on these receivables. In the future, we may pursue other business ventures
in the small business market, financial services industry or in other markets or industries.
The following table summarizes our financial results for each of the reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
($ in thousands, except per
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(251,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,476
|
|
|
$
|
(368,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,166
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
78,556
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
37,688
|
|
|
|
14,789
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(330,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,015
|
|
|
$
|
(405,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,377
|
|
Diluted net income (loss)
per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Class B
|
|
$
|
(8.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(10.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Deterioration of the U.S. economy beginning in the latter half of 2007 and the negative
trends in economic conditions and disruption in the capital markets that have continued into
2009 have adversely affected our business. We, like many small business credit card issuers
and other small business lenders, have experienced increased delinquencies and charge-offs
due to the impact of the general economic downturn on small businesses. In response to the
current economic environment and its negative impact on our business, results of operations
and financial condition, in May 2009 we developed a plan that was designed to limit our
credit loss exposure and maximize our capital and our liquidity measures. The plan we
designed involved the following components: early amortization of our securitization
transactions and closing all of our customers’ accounts to future use; and the execution of
tender offers for the outstanding trust preferred securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust
I and a portion of the Class A senior securitization notes issued by our securitization
trust at prices below their par value. As discussed below, we have
34
moved forward with all aspects of our plan with the exception of the tender offer for the
Class A senior securitization notes.
Early amortization of the securitization transactions began in June 2009 and effective
May 30, 2009, we closed all of our customers’ business credit card accounts to future use.
We expect the combination of these events to allow us to realize our plan objective of
limiting our credit loss exposure. We also purchased approximately 10.8% of the $100
million outstanding trust preferred securities through our tender offer for the outstanding
trust preferred securities. However, on June 8, 2009, Advanta Bank Corp. terminated its
tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes because it was determined that a
regulatory condition to the tender offer would not be satisfied. As a result of terminating
the tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes, we now expect that we will not
be able to fully realize the plan objectives of maximizing our capital and our liquidity
measures. The degree to which we ultimately may realize these plan objectives will depend
on our ability to implement additional opportunities to strengthen our capital and our
liquidity measures. We have not announced any specific plans at this time and we are still
evaluating additional strategies to accomplish these objectives. Our ability to continue
as a going concern may depend on our ability to successfully implement a plan for new
business opportunities.
As part
of the additional strategies discussed above, we have developed
prudent tax planning strategies that we believe should permit the
recovery of our deferred tax assets. However, we concluded that a
valuation allowance was required as of June 30, 2009, as there
was some level of uncertainty regarding the implementation of the
additional strategies. Our income tax expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 includes $167.7 million of
expense related to the
establishment of the valuation allowance.
Effective June 30, 2009, our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Advanta Bank Corp., entered into
two regulatory agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), its
primary federal banking regulator. Advanta Bank Corp. did not admit any wrongdoing in
entering into the agreements and entered into the agreements in the interest of expediency
and to avoid litigation and the costs associated therewith. The agreements place
significant restrictions on Advanta Bank Corp.’s activities and operations, including its
deposit-taking operations, and require Advanta Bank Corp. to maintain a total risk-based
capital ratio of at least 10% and a tier I leverage capital ratio
of at least 5%. The
agreements require Advanta Bank Corp. to make certain restitution payments to eligible
customers and pay a civil money penalty of $150,000. We previously took a $14 million
pretax charge related to our estimate of cash back rewards program restitution in the third
quarter of 2008. We recorded an additional $19 million pretax charge, classified in
operating expenses, in the second quarter of 2009 related to our estimate of pricing
strategies restitution under the agreements. The agreements also have the impact of
requiring us to obtain the FDIC’s approval before we would be able to pursue new business
opportunities through Advanta Bank Corp., however the agreements do not limit our ability to
pursue future business opportunities outside of the bank. See further discussion of the
regulatory agreements in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff
Position (“FSP”) No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
. The FSP concludes that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating
securities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128,
Earnings Per
Share,
and should be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class
method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula to determine earnings per
share for multiple classes of stock according to dividends declared and participation rights
in undistributed earnings. The nonvested shares of Class B Common Stock issued under our
stock-based incentive plan are participating securities with nonforfeitable rights to
dividends. Therefore, upon the adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, our nonvested Class B
Common Stock was included as a third class of stock for purposes of earnings per share
computations. This impacted our reported earnings per Class A and Class B share. We
adjusted all prior period earnings per share data presented to conform to the provisions of
this FSP. The adoption of this FSP did not impact our financial position or net income.
35
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. We have identified accounting for allowance for
receivable losses, securitization income, rewards programs and income taxes as our most
critical accounting policies and estimates because they require management’s most difficult,
subjective or complex judgments as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect
of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are inherently subjective and are
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Changes in
estimates could have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
These accounting policies and estimates are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The components of pretax (loss) income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
5,270
|
|
|
$
|
25,232
|
|
|
$
|
8,666
|
|
|
$
|
43,135
|
|
Noninterest revenues (losses)
|
|
|
(138,104
|
)
|
|
|
94,323
|
|
|
|
(142,117
|
)
|
|
|
203,980
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(35,335
|
)
|
|
|
(30,327
|
)
|
|
|
(76,612
|
)
|
|
|
(58,709
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(83,344
|
)
|
|
|
(81,752
|
)
|
|
|
(158,223
|
)
|
|
|
(151,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(251,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,476
|
|
|
$
|
(368,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decreases in net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008 were due primarily to decreases in average owned
receivables, decreases in the average yields earned on receivables and investments, and
increases in average deposits outstanding. These impacts were partially offset by increases
in average investment balances and decreases in the average cost of funds on
interest-bearing liabilities.
Noninterest
revenues (losses) include securitization income (loss), servicing revenues,
interchange income, investment gains or losses and other revenues, and are reduced by
rewards costs. Noninterest revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
decreased as compared to the same periods of 2008 due primarily to securitization losses
resulting from increasing delinquencies and charge-offs on securitized receivables, the
early amortization of our securitization transactions and the closure of our customers’
accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009. We also had lower interchange income, fee
revenues, servicing revenues and lower rewards costs for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 as compared to the same periods of 2008. Noninterest revenues in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 include an $8.6 million gain on extinguishment of debt and $6.6
million of other-than-temporary losses recognized on certain of our investment securities.
Noninterest revenues in 2008 include investment gains on sales of MasterCard Incorporated
shares of $14.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $18.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, and a $13.4 million gain on the redemption of Visa Inc.
shares for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The increases in provision for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 as compared to the same periods of 2008 were due primarily to increases in delinquency
and net principal charge-off rate trends, partially offset by a decrease in average owned
business credit card receivables. See “Provision
36
and Allowance for Receivable Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more detailed discussion and a table of
credit quality data.
Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 include a $19 million estimate
of pricing strategies restitution associated with Advanta Bank Corp.’s regulatory agreement
with the FDIC, and $5.3 million of asset impairment charges resulting from the closure of
our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009 and the cessation of our
business credit card marketing activities. In addition, operating expenses for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 included $12.3 million of severance and related costs associated
with workforce reductions. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008
include the benefit of a $5.5 million decrease in Visa indemnification reserves. See
“Contingencies” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations for further discussion.
The following table provides key statistical information on our business credit card
receivables. Credit quality statistics for the business credit card receivables are
included in the “Provision and Allowance for Receivable Losses”
section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Average owned receivables
|
|
$
|
705,710
|
|
|
$
|
1,164,748
|
|
|
$
|
618,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,081,939
|
|
Average securitized receivables
|
|
$
|
3,852,397
|
|
|
$
|
5,063,349
|
|
|
$
|
4,101,319
|
|
|
$
|
5,206,692
|
|
Customer transaction volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise sales
|
|
$
|
1,586,985
|
|
|
$
|
3,055,484
|
|
|
$
|
3,847,796
|
|
|
$
|
5,894,978
|
|
Balance transfers
|
|
|
43,392
|
|
|
|
121,752
|
|
|
|
108,647
|
|
|
|
360,089
|
|
Cash usage
|
|
|
200,152
|
|
|
|
294,475
|
|
|
|
409,741
|
|
|
|
654,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer transaction
volume
|
|
$
|
1,830,529
|
|
|
$
|
3,471,711
|
|
|
$
|
4,366,184
|
|
|
$
|
6,909,824
|
|
New account originations
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
26,269
|
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
|
|
93,363
|
|
Average number of active
accounts
(1)
|
|
|
686,007
|
|
|
|
939,700
|
|
|
|
730,515
|
|
|
|
947,042
|
|
Ending number of accounts at
June 30
|
|
|
535,281
|
|
|
|
1,305,288
|
|
|
|
535,281
|
|
|
|
1,305,288
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Active accounts are defined as accounts with a balance at month-end. Active account
statistics do not include charged-off accounts. The statistics reported above are the
average number of active accounts for the three and six months ended June 30.
|
The decreases in average owned and securitized receivables, transaction volume, new account
originations, average active accounts and the ending number of accounts in 2009 as compared
to the same periods of 2008 are the result of the closure of our customers’ accounts to
future use effective May 30, 2009. In addition, prior to the closure of our customers’
accounts in May 2009, we had reduced mail volume in direct mail account acquisition
campaigns and tightened underwriting criteria, reduced credit line assignments to amounts
near outstanding balances where appropriate, and closed inactive accounts, each in response
to economic conditions.
37
INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
33,586
|
|
|
$
|
55,269
|
|
|
$
|
67,794
|
|
|
$
|
101,316
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,316
|
|
|
|
30,037
|
|
|
|
59,128
|
|
|
|
58,181
|
|
The decreases in interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008 were due primarily to decreases in average business
credit card receivables, decreases in the average yields earned on business credit card
receivables due primarily to increases in interest charge-off and delinquency rates that
resulted in increased provisions for interest losses and reduced interest yields, and
decreases in the average yields earned on investments due to the interest rate environment.
The decrease in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
same period of 2008 was due primarily to a decrease in average debt balances and a decrease
in the average cost of funds on deposits resulting from the interest rate environment,
partially offset by an increase in our average deposits outstanding. The increase in
interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period of
2008 was due primarily to an increase in our average deposits outstanding, partially offset
by a decrease in the average cost of funds on deposits resulting from the interest rate
environment and a decrease in average debt balances. We increased our level of deposit
funding throughout 2008 to generate additional liquidity in response to continued turmoil in
the economy and capital markets. Average deposits increased $433 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and $561 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008.
The following tables provide an analysis of interest income and expense data, average
balance sheet data, net interest spread and net interest margin. The net interest spread
represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the average rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin represents net interest
earnings divided by total interest-earning assets. Interest income includes late fees on
business credit card receivables.
38
INTEREST RATE ANALYSIS AND AVERAGE BALANCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
(1)
|
|
$
|
705,710
|
|
|
$
|
18,872
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,164,748
|
|
|
$
|
37,662
|
|
|
|
13.01
|
%
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
7,910
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
713,620
|
|
|
|
18,946
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
|
1,172,487
|
|
|
|
37,750
|
|
|
|
12.95
|
|
Investments
(2)
|
|
|
1,997,662
|
|
|
|
3,445
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
1,361,904
|
|
|
|
7,956
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Retained interests in
securitizations
|
|
|
68,142
|
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
65.72
|
|
|
|
217,629
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning
assets
(3)
|
|
|
2,779,424
|
|
|
$
|
33,586
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
|
|
2,752,020
|
|
|
$
|
55,271
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
541,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,320,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,215,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,491,526
|
|
|
$
|
23,522
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,058,064
|
|
|
$
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
Debt
|
|
|
177,802
|
|
|
|
2,511
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
220,235
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
Subordinated debt
payable to preferred
securities trust
|
|
|
101,550
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
103,093
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
2,771,896
|
|
|
$
|
28,316
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
2,407,935
|
|
|
$
|
30,037
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
227,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,999,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
321,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
3,320,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,215,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Interest income includes late fees for owned business credit card receivables of
$1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $2.1 million for the same
period of 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and investments available for
sale. Interest and average rate for tax-free securities are computed on a tax
equivalent basis using a statutory rate of 35%.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes assets held and available for sale and nonaccrual receivables.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business credit cards
(1)
|
|
$
|
618,798
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
|
|
11.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,081,939
|
|
|
$
|
66,693
|
|
|
|
12.40
|
%
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
8,180
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
7,535
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
626,978
|
|
|
|
34,960
|
|
|
|
11.24
|
|
|
|
1,089,474
|
|
|
|
66,880
|
|
|
|
12.34
|
|
Investments
(2)
|
|
|
2,159,091
|
|
|
|
9,550
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
1,283,034
|
|
|
|
17,890
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Retained interests in
securitizations
|
|
|
94,931
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
|
|
49.06
|
|
|
|
219,315
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
|
|
15.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning
assets
(3)
|
|
|
2,881,000
|
|
|
$
|
67,794
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
|
|
2,591,823
|
|
|
$
|
101,320
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
%
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
534,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,415,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,476,066
|
|
|
$
|
49,049
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,914,739
|
|
|
$
|
45,519
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
Debt
|
|
|
185,452
|
|
|
|
4,926
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
217,955
|
|
|
|
6,923
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
|
Subordinated debt
payable to preferred
securities trust
|
|
|
102,317
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
103,093
|
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
31,611
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
25,881
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
8.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
2,795,446
|
|
|
$
|
59,128
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
2,261,668
|
|
|
$
|
58,181
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
226,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,022,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
393,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
3,415,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Interest income includes late fees for owned business credit card receivables of
$2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and $3.9 million for the same
period of 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Interest and average rate for tax-free securities are computed on a tax equivalent
basis using a statutory rate of 35%.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes assets held and available for sale and nonaccrual receivables.
|
40
PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR RECEIVABLE LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
35,335
|
|
|
$
|
30,327
|
|
|
$
|
76,612
|
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
Provision for interest and fee losses
|
|
|
12,505
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
20,270
|
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
The increases in the provision for credit losses and the provision for interest and fee
losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods of
2008 were due primarily to increases in delinquency and net principal charge-off rate
trends, partially offset by a decrease in average owned business credit card receivables of
$459 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $463 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, each as compared to the same period of 2008. The deterioration in
credit performance has been broad-based across industries, geographic regions and
origination vintages in our receivable portfolio. The increasing delinquency and charge-off
rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods of
2008 reflected deterioration in the U.S. economy. Additional deterioration in the U.S.
economy could cause these trends to worsen. In addition, our credit losses could increase
if certain customers become unwilling to continue to make payments as a result of the
closure of our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009.
The allowance for receivable losses on business credit card receivables was $81.5 million as
of June 30, 2009 as compared to an allowance of $102.7 million as of December 31, 2008. Due
to the closure of our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009, the
allowance at June 30, 2009 reflects an estimate of losses inherent in a static pool of
closed-end loans. The decrease in the allowance for receivable losses reflects a decrease
in the dollar amount of delinquent receivables that resulted from the acceleration of net
principal charge-offs associated with a change in charge-off policy that is discussed below,
and a decrease in the balance of owned receivables. These impacts were partially offset by
an increase in the estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio based on trends in net
principal charge-off rates, the closure of our customers’ accounts to future use, and the
current composition of the portfolio. The allowance was 20.22% as a percentage of owned
receivables at June 30, 2009, which was relatively consistent with the allowance of 20.31%
of owned receivables at December 31, 2008.
Our charge-off and re-age policies for business credit card accounts conform to the
Uniform
Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy
, as well as the
Credit Card
Lending Guidance
, issued by the federal financial institutions regulatory agencies.
Effective June 2009, due to the closure of our customers’ accounts to future use, our
charge-off policy for contractually delinquent business credit card accounts changed to
charge-off an unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in which it becomes and
remains past due 120 cumulative days from the contractual due date. Our previous policy was
to charge-off an unpaid receivable no later than the end of the month in which it became and
remained past due 180 cumulative days from the contractual due date. There was no change to
our charge-off policy for bankrupt business credit card accounts, which is to charge-off an
unpaid receivable within 60 days of receipt of notification of filing from the bankruptcy
court or within the timeframes adopted in the
Uniform Retail Credit Classification and
Account Management Policy
, whichever is shorter. We had $25.1 million of additional net
principal charge-offs in June 2009 associated with the change in charge-off policy.
The following table provides credit quality data as of and for the periods indicated for our
owned business credit card receivable portfolio, including a summary of allowances for
receivable losses, delinquencies, nonaccrual receivables,
41
accruing receivables past due 90 days or more, and net principal charge-offs. Due to the
closure of our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009, we believe that our
asset quality statistics are no longer comparable to the same statistics for prior periods
or to the similar statistics of other small business or consumer credit card issuers. In
addition, the credit quality data as of and for the period ended June 30, 2009 reflects the
impact of the change in charge-off policy discussed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Allowance for receivable losses
|
|
$
|
81,536
|
|
|
$
|
102,700
|
|
|
$
|
84,611
|
|
Receivables 30 days or more delinquent
|
|
|
34,723
|
|
|
|
52,997
|
|
|
|
49,894
|
|
Receivables 90 days or more delinquent
|
|
|
9,373
|
|
|
|
24,132
|
|
|
|
25,001
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
9,688
|
|
|
|
10,670
|
|
Accruing receivables past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
8,172
|
|
|
|
22,166
|
|
|
|
22,684
|
|
As a percentage of receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for receivable losses
|
|
|
20.22
|
%
|
|
|
20.31
|
%
|
|
|
9.94
|
%
|
Receivables 30 days or more delinquent
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
Receivables 90 days or more delinquent
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
Accruing receivables past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
Net principal charge-offs for the year-to-date
period ended June 30 and December 31
|
|
$
|
95,531
|
|
|
$
|
89,056
|
|
|
$
|
42,125
|
|
As a percentage of average receivables
(annualized)
|
|
|
30.88
|
%
|
|
|
9.62
|
%
|
|
|
7.79
|
%
|
Net principal charge-offs for the three months
ended June 30 and December 31
|
|
$
|
68,898
|
|
|
$
|
24,092
|
|
|
$
|
25,819
|
|
As a percentage of average receivables
(annualized)
|
|
|
39.05
|
%
|
|
|
14.09
|
%
|
|
|
8.87
|
%
|
SECURITIZATION INCOME (LOSS)
We sold business credit card receivables through securitizations accounted for as sales
under GAAP. We continue to own and service the accounts that generated the securitized
receivables. Our retained interests in securitizations entitle us to the excess spread on
the securitized receivables, if any. Excess spread represents income-related cash flows on
securitized receivables net of noteholders’ interest, servicing fees and credit losses.
Fair value estimates used in the recognition of securitization income (loss) include
estimates of future cash flows of interest income on securitized receivables in excess of
interest expense (interest earned by noteholders), servicing fees and credit losses over the
life of the existing securitized receivables. We discount estimated cash flows using an
interest rate that management believes a third party purchaser would demand. See discussion
of our determination of the discount rate assumption used in the valuation of retained
interests in securitizations in the “Valuation of Financial Instruments” section of
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
42
Monthly excess spread percentages on all series of noteholder principal balances for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr. 2009
|
|
|
May 2009
|
|
|
Jun. 2009
|
|
|
Apr. 2008
|
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
Jun. 2008
|
|
Monthly excess
spread percentages
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.09
|
)%
|
|
|
(44.42
|
)%
(1)
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the impact of the change in charge-off policy discussed in the
“Provision and Allowance for Receivable Losses” section of Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
Early amortization for our securitization transactions began in June 2009 after the
AdvantaSeries three-month average excess spread amount was not maintained at a level greater
than $0, which was a trigger for early amortization. See the “Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations for further discussion.
Securitization
income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Three months ended June 30
|
|
$
|
(179,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,608
|
|
Six months ended June 30
|
|
|
(238,924
|
)
|
|
|
21,605
|
|
The decreases in securitization income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same periods of 2008 were due primarily to increases in net principal
charge-off and delinquency rates on securitized receivables and the closure of our
customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009 that reduced our cash flows on
retained interests in securitizations in the 2009 reporting periods and reduced our
estimates of future cash flows. The trends in net principal charge-off and delinquency
rates on securitized receivables are similar to those on owned receivables described in the
“Provision and Allowance for Receivable Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Income-related cash flows on
securitized receivables did not exceed the other components of the excess spread in recent
months, and we expect the negative excess spread levels to continue. Due to the negative
excess spread levels, our par values of cash collateral and subordinated trust assets were
reduced by an aggregate of $139 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009 as the
balances were used as credit enhancement for securitization noteholders. The cash
collateral account had no balance and no fair value as of June 30, 2009. The remaining par
value of subordinated trust assets was $8.5 million as of June 30, 2009 and the estimated
fair value was $5.5 million. The retained interest-only strip’s fair value was estimated as
zero at December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The aggregate reduction in
estimated fair value of retained interests in securitizations, including both realized
losses and changes in unrealized losses, was $74.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and $103.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Securitization loss for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 also includes an unfavorable valuation adjustment to
accrued interest and fees on securitized receivables of $72.8 million as a result of the
early amortization of our securitization transactions and closure of our customers’ accounts
to future use. Securitization loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes $31.5 million of loss
related to interchange cash flows used as credit enhancement. However, this has no net impact on
pretax loss since interchange income on the consolidated income statements includes interchange
fees on both owned and securitized business credit cards. Securitization income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 included a
favorable valuation adjustment to retained interests in securitizations of $4.0 million.
43
SERVICING REVENUES
Servicing revenues were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Three months ended June 30
|
|
$
|
18,053
|
|
|
$
|
24,365
|
|
Six months ended June 30
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
50,457
|
|
The decreases in servicing revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008 were due to decreased volume of securitized business
credit card receivables.
GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
In June 2009, we purchased $10.8 million of the $100 million outstanding trust preferred
securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust I through a tender offer that expired on June 15,
2009. The purchase price was $2.2 million and holders who tendered will not receive any
accrued and unpaid distributions. The purchased trust preferred securities were exchanged
for a like amount of the related subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust
issued by Advanta Corp. and we retired such trust preferred securities and the related
subordinated debt in June 2009. We recognized a gain on the extinguishment of the
subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust of $8.6 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. The gain is net of $571 thousand of costs associated with the
tender offer.
OTHER REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interchange income
|
|
$
|
36,478
|
|
|
$
|
70,627
|
|
|
$
|
89,004
|
|
|
$
|
136,275
|
|
Cash back rewards
|
|
|
(10,950
|
)
|
|
|
(16,082
|
)
|
|
|
(22,391
|
)
|
|
|
(30,665
|
)
|
Business rewards
|
|
|
(7,393
|
)
|
|
|
(6,944
|
)
|
|
|
(13,891
|
)
|
|
|
(13,526
|
)
|
Investment
securities gains (losses), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses
|
|
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(6,593
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
The Reserve Primary Fund
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(860
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Visa Inc.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13,408
|
|
MasterCard Incorporated
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14,216
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18,823
|
|
Venture capital investments
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
(6,646
|
)
|
|
|
14,315
|
|
|
|
(7,506
|
)
|
|
|
32,328
|
|
Customer referral fees
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Balance transfer and cash
usage fees
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
Other business credit card fees
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues, net
|
|
$
|
14,303
|
|
|
$
|
65,350
|
|
|
$
|
49,350
|
|
|
$
|
131,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decreases in interchange income, rewards costs, balance transfer, cash usage and other
business credit card fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
the same periods of 2008 were due primarily to the closure of customers’ accounts to future
use effective May 30, 2009. In addition, we had lower transaction volume and a lower number
of active accounts through May 2009 as compared to prior periods. The lower transaction
volume and lower number of active
44
accounts resulted from our initiatives designed to manage risk exposure, including
fewer new account originations and lower promotional activities prior to our decision to
close the customers’ accounts.
In connection with the closure of customers’ accounts to future use, we are discontinuing
our cash back and business reward programs in the third quarter of 2009 and redeeming all
customers for the outstanding point balances at the date of discontinuance. The rewards
costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 include the impact of the changes in
estimate of the rates and costs of redemptions associated with the discontinuance of the
programs. Changes in estimates decreased other revenues $2.8 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 as compared to an increase in other revenues of $400 thousand for the
three months ended June 30, 2008, and decreased other revenues $2.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to an increase in other revenues of $700 thousand for
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
We do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of certain of our investment
securities based on our projections of future cash flows and accordingly have recorded $6.6
million of the impairment related to credit as other-than-temporary impairment losses as of
June 30, 2009. See discussion in “Valuation of Financial Instruments” section of
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
At June 30, 2009, we had a $2.3 million receivable in other assets related to September 2008
redemption orders submitted to The Reserve Primary Fund, a money market fund investment.
The net asset value of The Reserve Primary Fund declined below $1.00 per share on September
16, 2008, the day following our redemption request. Due to a large number of redemption
requests, the fund received an SEC order suspending redemptions and postponing payment for
shares that had already been submitted for redemption. The fund made partial distributions
to shareholders in 2008 and 2009. We received $37.3 million of our redemption proceeds
through June 30, 2009. The timing of the receipt of the remaining $2.3 million of estimated
proceeds from the Reserve Primary Fund is uncertain and is subject to the orderly
disposition of the fund’s securities and the resolution of pending and threatened claims
that may affect the fund’s assets. There is uncertainty as to whether the fund’s loss will
be allocated to shareholders that redeemed on September 15, 2008 and there is also
uncertainty as to the level of fund assets that will be used to satisfy ongoing costs and
expenses, legal fees, and pending or threatened claims against the fund or the fund’s
assets. Since our proceeds from the redemption may be less than the redemption price of
$1.00 per share, we recorded an estimated loss on the redemption of $1.0 million in 2008.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we updated our estimate based on additional
disclosures by the fund’s management and recorded an additional $860 thousand loss on the
redemption.
Investment securities gains for the three months ended June 30, 2008 included a $14.2
million realized gain on the sale of MasterCard Incorporated shares. Investment securities
gains for the six months ended June 30, 2008 include $18.8 million of realized gains on
sales of MasterCard Incorporated shares and a $13.4 million realized gain on the redemption
of Visa Inc. shares. The gain on Visa Inc. shares was related to Visa’s initial public
offering and share redemption in March 2008. As of June 30, 2009, we own 497 thousand Visa
Inc. Class B common shares that have zero cost basis and no book value. We have no
remaining MasterCard Incorporated shares as of June 30, 2009.
As part of our efforts to assist customers during the account closure process, on June 4,
2009, we entered into an agreement with American Express Travel Related Services Company,
Inc. to extend an invitation for certain of our customers to
45
apply for an American Express card account. We are generally entitled to payment
of a fee for each account opened by American Express for the specified customers, subject to
the satisfaction of certain conditions. We earned $1.1 million of customer referral fees
associated with this agreement in June 2009.
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
17,487
|
|
|
$
|
31,118
|
|
|
$
|
47,270
|
|
|
$
|
59,646
|
|
External processing
|
|
|
9,051
|
|
|
|
9,220
|
|
|
|
17,972
|
|
|
|
17,465
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
|
|
12,440
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
5,140
|
|
|
|
8,165
|
|
|
|
11,714
|
|
|
|
13,401
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
7,796
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
5,049
|
|
Fraud
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
Postage
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
Amortization of deferred
origination costs, net
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
20,191
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
Visa indemnification
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(5,501
|
)
|
Restitution associated with
pricing strategies
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
83,344
|
|
|
$
|
81,752
|
|
|
$
|
158,223
|
|
|
$
|
151,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2008, we commenced a reduction of workforce in connection with initiatives to
outsource business processes within the areas of information technology, customer service,
collections, and accounting and finance. In the first quarter of 2009, we reduced our
workforce by approximately 300 employees, or 35%, in order to reduce staffing to a level
more commensurate with the portfolio size and scale of business activities that we
anticipated at that time for 2009. Both of these reductions were substantially complete by
March 31, 2009 and we expect to pay the severance and related costs within twelve months of
the severance dates.
In July 2009, we announced plans to further reduce our workforce by approximately 200
employees, or 50%, in order to reduce staffing to a level more commensurate with our current
activities. In connection with this reduction of workforce, we expect to incur expenses of
approximately $8.5 million to $9.5 million related to severance and related costs. We
expect this reduction of workforce to be substantially complete in the third quarter of
2009.
Salaries and employee benefits decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008 due primarily to cost reduction measures implemented in
the first quarter of 2009 resulting in lower headcount, and lower incentive compensation
expense that resulted from a change in estimate of incentives related to the 2008
performance year. Salaries and employee benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2009
include $12.3 million of severance and related costs as described above.
Credit expense increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
same periods of 2008 due primarily to the increased use of third parties as part of our
receivable collection initiatives.
46
As a result of the closure of our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009
and the cessation of our business credit card marketing activities, we determined that
deferred origination costs, certain prepaid expenses and certain capitalized software costs
used for business credit card marketing activities or that we do not plan to use for ongoing
servicing were impaired with no fair value. Accordingly, the balances of these assets were
written off resulting in $5.3 million of asset impairment charges in the three months ended
June 30, 2009.
Marketing expense decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
the same periods of 2008 due to reduced business credit card marketing activities through
May 2009 in response to economic conditions, and the cessation of business credit card
marketing activities in May 2009. The decreases in business credit card marketing expenses
were partially offset by increased sponsorship activities relating to cultural and sporting
events and activities relating to the retail investment note program.
The increases in insurance expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same periods of 2008 are due primarily to an increase in FDIC deposit
insurance costs. Our deposit insurance costs increased due to the higher levels of deposits
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods of 2008, an
increase in the insurance assessment rate in 2009 and a $1.4 million special assessment as
of June 30, 2009 that was applicable to all depository institutions. The FDIC may impose an
additional special assessment to all financial institutions later in 2009.
Professional fees decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
the same periods of 2008 due primarily to the decreased use of external consultants for
profitability and marketing initiatives.
Fraud expense increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
same periods of 2008 due primarily to a data breach at a third party processor that affected
some of our customers’ accounts.
We discontinued amortization of deferred origination costs effective June 1, 2009 and wrote
off the remaining balance as part of the asset impairment charge described above.
Amortization of deferred origination costs, net, decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods of 2008 since there was no amortization
in June 2009 and due to the lower number of new account originations through May 2009 as
compared to prior periods.
In the six months ended June 30, 2008, we released a net amount of $5.5 million from our
Visa indemnification reserve as a result of litigation escrow amounts funded by Visa in
connection with their initial public offering. See “Contingencies” section of Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for discussion of
expenses and benefits related to our Visa indemnification obligation.
We recorded a $19 million expense in the three months ended June 30, 2009 for an estimate of
pricing strategies restitution associated with Advanta Bank Corp.’s regulatory agreement
with the FDIC. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
discussion of Advanta Bank Corp.’s regulatory agreements.
CONTINGENCIES
Advanta Corp. is a member of Visa USA and owns shares of Visa Inc. Class B common stock.
Our membership in Visa USA and our ownership interest in Visa Inc. (“Visa”) are related
primarily to our former consumer credit card business, which we exited in 1998. Visa
completed its initial public offering in March 2008 and set aside $3 billion of the proceeds
in a litigation escrow account to fund litigation judgments
47
or settlements that have occurred or may occur related to specified litigation matters
between Visa and third parties. Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries are not named as
defendants in the specified litigation matters. However, to the extent Visa’s litigation
escrow is not sufficient to satisfy the specified litigation matters, the members of Visa
USA to varying extents may be required to fund certain losses incurred by Visa in connection
with those matters due to member indemnification provisions within Visa USA’s bylaws. In
2007, we recorded a $12.0 million reserve associated with our contingent obligation to Visa
USA related to the specified litigation matters between Visa and third parties. In March
2008, we increased the reserve by $577 thousand based on increases in litigation reserves
disclosed by Visa. Also in March 2008, we reduced the liability by $6.1 million for our
proportionate share of the amounts funded by Visa in the litigation escrow account. We
classified the $5.5 million net reduction in indemnification reserves as a benefit to
operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008. There were no changes associated
with our contingent obligation to Visa USA in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
The indemnification reserve for our contingent obligation to Visa USA was $5.9 million at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Pretax income for the six months ended June 30, 2008
includes a $13.4 million gain on the redemption of Visa shares in other revenues.
As of March 31, 2009, we had interest-bearing deposits pledged as collateral for payment
obligations under contracts with certain third parties in the ordinary course of business.
In June 2009, one of the third parties withdrew $29.2 million from the interest-bearing
deposit account asserting that our decision to close our customers’ accounts to future use
effective May 30, 2009 triggered an automatic termination provision and that a termination
fee in that amount was due. We do not believe that an automatic termination was triggered
or that a termination fee was due under the terms of the contract and we have recorded a
$29.2 million receivable from the third party as of June 30, 2009. The receivable is
classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. While we expect to fully
recover this receivable, there can be no assurance of this and any unrecoverable amount
cannot be reasonably estimated.
In addition to the matters discussed above, Advanta Corp. and its subsidiaries are subject
to class action lawsuits and other litigation as well as legal, regulatory, administrative
and other claims, investigations or proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business
or discontinued operations. Management believes that the aggregate loss, if any, resulting
from these additional matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations based on our current expectations regarding the ultimate
resolutions of the matters after consultation with our attorneys.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
78,556
|
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
37,688
|
|
|
$
|
14,789
|
|
Effective tax expense rate
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
Income tax expense and the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
reflects the impact of establishing a valuation allowance of $167.7 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2009 as discussed below. Included in the expense for the six months ended June 30,
2009 is a 0.3% benefit due to favorable settlements and changes in judgment associated with prior
period uncertain tax positions as compared to a 9.9% benefit for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 3.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. In the three months ended June 30, 2009
there was no benefit to the effective tax rate associated with settlements and changes in judgment
related to prior period uncertain tax positions.
48
In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive
and negative evidence including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable
income. In estimating future taxable income, we develop assumptions including the amount of future
pre-tax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible
and prudent tax planning strategies. In prior periods, we determined that a valuation allowance
was not necessary, in part due to our expectation that Advanta would generate sufficient taxable
income in future years. Forecasts for future income considered our plan to limit our credit loss
exposure and maximize our capital and our liquidity measures. However, as a result of terminating
the tender offer for the Class A senior securitization notes, we now expect that we will not be
able to fully realize the plan objectives of maximizing our capital and our liquidity measures.
The degree to which we ultimately may realize these plan objectives will depend on our ability to
implement additional opportunities to strengthen our capital and our liquidity measures. We have
not announced any specific plans at this time and we are still evaluating additional strategies to
accomplish these objectives. As part of these additional strategies,
we have developed prudent tax planning strategies that we believe
should permit the recovery of our deferred tax
assets. However, we concluded that a valuation allowance of $167.7 million was required as of June
30, 2009 as there was some level of uncertainty regarding the
implementation of the additional
strategies. Our future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent of decreases in our
valuation allowance. A valuation allowance was not deemed necessary for the deferred tax asset
related to the unrealized investment losses as the realization of this component of the deferred
tax asset is not dependent on future taxable income.
We have an ownership interest in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. related to our exit from
the consumer credit card business in 1998. The gain associated with the original transfer
of assets to Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. was not subject to income tax. As of June 30,
2009, the cumulative gain on transfer of consumer credit card business and our deficit
capital account in Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. on a tax basis for which no deferred
taxes have been provided is approximately $650 million, as the transaction structure remains
nontaxable under current tax law.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of June 30, 2009, we had $3.3 billion of securitized receivables, $3.2 billion of which
were off-balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, we had $4.5 billion of securitized
receivables, $4.1 billion of which were off-balance sheet. We hold certain securitized
receivables on-balance sheet in the form of subordinated trust assets that are a component
of retained interests in securitizations and certain AdvantaSeries Class A notes issued in
our 2008 securitizations that were purchased by one of our bank subsidiaries and are
classified as investments available for sale. Our investments available for sale included
AdvantaSeries Class A notes with a fair value of $116.3 million as of June 30, 2009 and
$281.6 million as of December 31, 2008. We had $656.7 million of accounts receivable from
securitizations on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and $301.1 million as of December
31, 2008. Accounts receivable from securitizations include amounts due from the
securitization trust, accrued interest and fees on securitized receivables and retained
interests in securitizations. Our business credit card receivables on the consolidated
balance sheet include our undivided interest in the principal receivables in the trust
(seller’s interest) of $290 million as of June 30, 2009 and $377 million as of December 31,
2008.
Early amortization for our securitization transactions began in June 2009 after the
AdvantaSeries three-month average excess spread amount was not maintained at a
49
level greater than $0, which was a trigger for early amortization. The early amortization
resulted in the end of the revolving periods prior to the expected dates. In an early
amortization, the noteholders are paid as payments on the securitized receivables are
received from customers. In order to eliminate the potential negative liquidity impact of
early amortization, we closed our customers’ accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009.
The early amortization of our securitization transactions and closing our customers’
accounts had a negative impact on the value of our retained interests in securitizations and
accrued interest and fees on securitized receivables. Due to the closure of our customers’
accounts, we do not expect to need replacement funding for any securitizations. In May
2009, Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investor Service lowered the ratings of the
AdvantaSeries notes issued by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. These changes have no
impact on our funding or funding plans.
Our recourse or credit risk in off-balance sheet securitized receivables is limited to the
amount of our retained interests in securitizations. We generally retain an interest in
securitized receivables in the form of subordinated trust assets, cash collateral accounts
and retained interest-only strips. Retained interests in securitizations serve as credit
enhancement to the noteholders’ interests in the securitized receivables. We had $5.5
million of retained interests in securitizations at June 30, 2009 and $125.6 million at
December 31, 2008. The fair values of retained interests in securitizations are dependent
upon the performance of the underlying securitized receivables, market-driven interest rates
and market credit spreads. Our retained interests in securitizations entitle us to the
excess spread on the receivables, if any. Excess spread represents income-related cash
flows on securitized receivables (interest, interchange, recoveries and fees) net of
noteholders’ interest, servicing fees and credit losses. Due to the closure of customers’
accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009, there will be no future cash flows or income
from interchange in future periods. Income-related cash flows on securitized receivables
did not exceed the other components of the excess spread in recent months, and we expect the
negative excess spread levels to continue. As a result, the fair value of our retained
interest-only strip and cash collateral accounts were estimated as zero at June 30, 2009 and
the estimated fair value of our subordinated trust assets was reduced to $5.5 million.
See “Securitization Income” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for discussion of income (loss) related to securitizations.
See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for the key assumptions used in
estimating the fair value of retained interests in securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table summarizes securitization data including income and cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Average securitized receivables
|
|
$
|
3,852,397
|
|
|
$
|
5,063,349
|
|
|
$
|
4,101,319
|
|
|
$
|
5,206,692
|
|
Securitization income (loss)
|
|
|
(179,017
|
)
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
(238,924
|
)
|
|
|
21,605
|
|
Discount accretion
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
23,284
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
Interchange income
|
|
|
31,499
|
|
|
|
57,799
|
|
|
|
78,682
|
|
|
|
113,244
|
|
Servicing revenues
|
|
|
18,053
|
|
|
|
24,365
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
50,457
|
|
Proceeds from new securitizations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
193,325
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
318,025
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested
in revolving-period securitizations
|
|
|
1,042,159
|
|
|
|
2,581,177
|
|
|
|
2,867,245
|
|
|
|
5,133,254
|
|
Cash flows received on retained
interests
|
|
|
60,914
|
|
|
|
112,651
|
|
|
|
112,496
|
|
|
|
192,586
|
|
50
In
June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,
and FASB Statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R)
. Statement No. 166 eliminates the concept of qualifying
special-purpose entities (“QSPE’s”), so all special-purpose entities must be analyzed for
consolidation. Statement No. 167 requires consolidation if an entity has both power to direct
the activities of the special-purpose entity that most significantly impact its economic
performance and receives benefits or absorbs losses that are potentially significant to the
special-purpose entity. These statements are effective for Advanta on January 1, 2010.
Management is currently evaluating any potential impact these statements may have on our
financial position or results of operations.
See “Contingencies” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations for a discussion of our contingent indemnification obligation
related to Advanta Corp.’s membership in Visa USA.
MARKET RISK SENSITIVITY
We measure our interest rate risk using a rising rate scenario and a declining rate
scenario. We estimate net interest income using a third party software model that uses
standard income modeling techniques. Both increasing and decreasing rate scenarios assume
an instantaneous shift in interest rates and measure the corresponding change in expected
net interest income as compared to a base case scenario that includes management’s current
expectations of future interest rate movements. The scenarios assume that interest rates
cannot be less than zero. We estimated that our net interest income would change as follows
over a twelve-month period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Estimated percentage increase in net interest
income on owned assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming 200 basis point increase
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
334
|
%
|
Assuming 200 basis point decrease
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Our net interest income increases in a rising rate scenario at both reporting dates because
of the asset sensitive position of our balance sheet in that the yields earned on our
federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and investment portfolio adjust more quickly
than the rates paid on our deposits and debt based on their relative maturity dates and
because our interest-earning assets exceed our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net
interest income decreases in a decreasing rate scenario at June 30, 2009 because our
investment yields are more variable than our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the
composition of our balance sheet have also impacted the results of the net interest income
sensitivity analyses as of June 30, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.
The above estimates of net interest income sensitivity alone do not provide a comprehensive
view of our exposure to interest rate risk and are not necessarily indicative of potential
changes in our net interest income. Additional factors such as changes in the economic
environment, the composition of the receivables portfolio and funding strategies also affect
net interest income and accordingly, actual results may differ from these estimates. The
quantitative risk information is limited by the parameters and assumptions utilized in
generating the results. These analyses are useful only when viewed within the context of
the parameters and assumptions used. The above rate scenarios do not reflect management’s
expectation regarding the future direction of interest rates, and they depict only two
possibilities out of a large set of possible scenarios.
51
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Due to the early amortization of our securitization transactions and closure of customers’
accounts to future use effective May 30, 2009, we project our future liquidity to be
adequate. However, depending on future events, there can be no assurance that we will have
adequate liquidity in all circumstances in the future. We increased our levels of liquidity
in 2008 in response to continued turmoil in the economy and capital markets. At June 30,
2009, our liquid assets included $25.0 million of cash and $1.5 billion of unrestricted
interest-bearing deposits. At June 30, 2009, we also had $269 million of investments
available for sale that could be sold or borrowed against to generate additional liquidity.
Although we are incurring lower net interest income in connection with holding a higher
level of liquid assets, management believes our strong levels of liquidity are prudent in
the current economic environment.
As shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows, our operating activities used $558.4
million of cash in the six months ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to an increase in the
balance of amounts due from the securitization trust, as well as operating expenses,
interest expense and costs of rewards programs, partially offset by servicing revenues
related to securitized receivables, interchange income, and interest and fee income on owned
receivables. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, our operating activities used $3.6
million of cash due primarily to the increase in receivables held for sale in excess of
proceeds from receivables sold in the period, cash used to fund growth in accounts
receivable in securitizations related to securitizations in accumulation periods, operating
expenses, interest expense and costs of rewards programs. These cash outflows were
partially offset by excess spread and servicing revenues related to securitized receivables,
interchange income, and interest and fee income on owned receivables. As discussed above,
we expect to fund continuing operations with existing liquidity.
In May 2009, Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investor Service lowered the ratings of the
AdvantaSeries notes issued by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust.
In the second quarter of 2009, Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s
Investor Service and Fitch
Ratings lowered their ratings on Advanta Corp. In July 2009, Standard and Poor’s withdrew
their ratings on Advanta Corp. We do not expect to access the unsecured institutional debt
markets or the securitization markets and these changes have no impact on our funding or
funding plans.
Our components of funding were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,548,073
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
2,541,406
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
168,940
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
206,598
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Subordinated debt
payable to
preferred
securities trust
|
|
|
92,290
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
103,093
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
97,218
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
507,361
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,906,521
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,408,458
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanta Bank Corp. entered into two regulatory agreements with its primary federal banking
regulator, the FDIC, that became effective on June 30, 2009. Advanta Bank Corp. did not
admit any wrongdoing in entering into the agreements and entered into the agreements in the
interest of expediency and to avoid litigation and the costs associated therewith. The
first agreement, which was a stipulation and consent to the issuance of an order to cease
and desist, places restrictions on the bank’s use of its cash assets, payments of dividends,
entering into transactions that would materially alter the bank’s balance sheet composition
and taking of brokered deposits, and it requires the maintenance of a total risk-based
capital ratio of at
52
least
10% and a tier I leverage capital ratio of at least 5%. In the three months ended
June 30, 2009, Advanta Corp. contributed $17.5 million of capital to Advanta Bank Corp. At
June 30, 2009, Advanta Bank Corp.’s total risk-based capital ratio was 19.74% and its tier I
leverage capital ratio was slightly over 5%. We have submitted to the FDIC, as required by
the first regulatory agreement, a strategic plan related to the bank’s deposit-taking operations
and deposit insurance that provides for the termination of the bank’s deposit-taking
operations and deposit insurance after the bank’s deposits are repaid in full, which is
anticipated to take a few years. We intend to submit an additional plan in the future that,
if approved by the FDIC, would allow the bank to continue its deposit-taking operations and
deposit insurance. The agreement does not in any way restrict Advanta Bank Corp. from
continuing to service its credit card accounts and managed receivables, including those that
are owned by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. Specifically, under the agreement,
Advanta Bank Corp. must continue to perform its obligations as servicer for the business
credit card receivables that we own on our balance sheet and those that are owned by the
Advanta Business Card Master Trust. In addition, all customer bank deposits remain fully
insured to the fullest extent permissible by law. The regulatory agreements, regulatory
capital requirements and other regulatory provisions restrict our bank subsidiaries’ ability
to lend and/or pay dividends to Advanta Corp. and its affiliates. However, based on
management’s current projections, we do not believe that these restrictions will have an
adverse effect on Advanta Corp.’s ability to meet its cash obligations.
Advanta Bank Corp.’s second agreement with the FDIC, which was also a stipulation and
consent to the issuance of an order to cease and desist, relates to alleged unsafe or
unsound banking practices associated with alleged violations of consumer protection and
banking laws. The FDIC alleged, among other things, that some of Advanta Bank Corp.’s
marketing of certain cash back reward programs for its business credit cards and practices
related to the pricing strategies of certain of its business credit card accounts violated
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and that Advanta Bank Corp. also violated
certain adverse action notification requirements in connection with the pricing strategies
of certain of its business credit card accounts. Under the agreement, Advanta Bank Corp.
must make certain restitution payments to eligible customers and pay a civil money penalty
of $150,000. We previously took a $14 million pretax charge related to our estimate of cash
back rewards program restitution in the third quarter of 2008. We recorded an additional
$19 million pretax charge, classified in operating expenses, in the second quarter of 2009
related to our estimate of pricing strategies restitution under the agreement. We expect to
fund both the rewards and repricing strategy restitution payments with existing liquidity.
Our debt balances, which represent retail investment notes, decreased $37.7 million from
December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease in
retention rates. It is possible that retention rates could continue to decline in the
future.
At December 31, 2008, we had a $50 million borrowing in connection with a secured borrowing
agreement that used business credit card receivables at a nonbank subsidiary as collateral.
The borrowing was repaid and the agreement was terminated in March 2009.
Our bank subsidiaries are eligible to borrow from the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window.
Such borrowings would be overnight borrowings and would be secured by receivables or
investments. We may choose to use Discount Window borrowings at Advanta Bank Corp. as an
alternative short-term funding source in future periods.
In June 2009, we purchased $10.8 million of the $100 million outstanding trust preferred
securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust I through a tender offer that
53
expired on June 15, 2009. The purchase price was $2.2 million and holders who tendered will
not receive any accrued and unpaid distributions. The purchased trust preferred securities
were exchanged for a like amount of the related subordinated debt payable to the preferred
securities trust issued by Advanta Corp. and we retired such trust preferred securities and
the related subordinated debt in June 2009. We recognized a gain on the extinguishment of
the subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust of $8.6 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. The gain is net of $571 thousand of costs associated with the
tender offer.
In April 2009, we elected to defer the $4.6 million semi-annual interest payments on the
subordinated debt payable to the preferred securities trust issued by Advanta Corp. and as a
consequence, interest payments on the trust preferred securities issued by Advanta Capital
Trust I will also be deferred. The terms of the trust preferred securities provide that no
dividends can be declared or paid on Advanta Corp.’s common or preferred stocks during the
deferral period. We have suspended payment of dividends on our common and preferred stocks.
VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, for all
financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. The statement defines fair value as the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. The statement also establishes a
framework for measuring fair value by creating a three-level fair value hierarchy that ranks
the quality and reliability of information used to determine fair value based on whether the
inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable, and requires new
disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the
hierarchy. The initial adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations. There are no material assets or liabilities
recognized or disclosed at fair value for which we have not applied the provisions of SFAS
No. 157. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the
fair value hierarchy.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly.
This FSP provides guidance on how to determine the fair
value of assets and liabilities when the volume and level of activity for the
asset/liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also provides guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. In addition, the FSP requires
disclosure in interim and annual periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques. The adoption of
this FSP effective for Advanta for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 did not have a
significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
. This FSP amends the requirements for the recognition
and measurement of other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities by modifying the
pre-existing intent and ability indicator. Under the FSP, an other-than-temporary
impairment is triggered when there is an intent to sell the security, it is more likely than
not that the security will be required to be sold before recovery, or the entity is not
expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Additionally, the FSP
changes the presentation of an other-than-temporary impairment in the income statement for
those impairments. The credit loss component will be recognized in earnings and the
remainder of the impairment will be recorded in other comprehensive income.
54
This FSP was effective for Advanta for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and as discussed
further below, we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses as of June 30, 2009.
When available, we generally use quoted market prices to determine fair value and classify
the financial instrument in Level 1. In cases where quoted market prices for similar
financial instruments are available, we utilize these inputs for valuation techniques and
classify the financial instrument in Level 2. We use pricing services for valuation of all
investments available for sale. Fair values for retained interests in securitizations are
based on estimates using discounted cash flows, if quoted market prices are not available.
Quoted market prices were not available for retained interests in securitizations at the
reporting dates. Fair value estimates of retained interests in securitizations are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates
of future cash flows. Financial instruments for which unobservable inputs are significant
to their fair value measurement are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Level 3 assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 include credit card asset-backed
securities, certain mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities and retained
interests in securitizations.
We incorporate lack of liquidity into our fair value measurement based on the type of asset
measured and the valuation methodology used. For example, for retained interests in
securitizations where the significant inputs are unobservable, we use a discounted cash flow
analysis to estimate fair value. This analysis incorporates forecasting of expected cash
flows discounted at a risk-adjusted discount rate that incorporates market data which
reflects the lack of liquidity in the market that we believe a market participant would
consider. For other securities, we use unadjusted prices provided by pricing services to
measure fair value, which we believe inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market.
We validated the prices obtained from our primary pricing service as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 for credit card asset-backed securities and mortgage and home equity line
of credit-backed securities classified as Level 3. For our mortgage and home equity line of
credit-backed securities classified as Level 3, we obtained a second price from an alternate
pricing service, or non-binding quotes from one or more brokers if the alternate pricing
service did not provide a price for a given security. If the alternate pricing service did
not provide a price for a given security and more than one broker price was obtained for
that security, the average of the broker prices obtained was used to validate the price
obtained from the pricing service. For our credit card asset-backed securities classified
as Level 3, we obtained a second price from an alternate pricing service and obtained a
non-binding quote from one broker. Based on the results of these analyses, we concluded
that the Level 3 valuations were reasonable estimates and no adjustments were made to the
prices provided by the pricing service.
We had one credit card asset-backed security at June 30, 2009, which was purchased in 2008
and was issued in our AdvantaSeries Class A 2008-A3 securitization. Our credit card
asset-backed security is classified as a Level 3 asset at June 30, 2009. This asset had a
fair value of $116.3 million at June 30, 2009 and it represented 29% of investments
available for sale and 29% of total assets measured at fair value. The credit card
asset-backed security was in a loss position at June 30, 2009 and has been in a loss
position since the third quarter of 2008. The $132.5 million par value of AdvantaSeries
2008-A3 note had an unrealized loss of $16.2 million. The unrealized loss was due to the
ongoing difficulties in the asset-backed securities market that created turmoil in the
capital markets, negative performance trends of receivables in the Advanta Business Card
Master Trust and the early amortization of our securitization transactions in June 2009. In
May 2009, the ratings on this security were downgraded by Standard and Poor’s from AA to
BBB- and by Moody’s Investor Service from Baa2 to Ba2. The unrealized
55
loss on this credit card asset-backed security was not deemed to be an other-than-temporary
impairment loss at June 30, 2009 since based on the amount of credit enhancement in the form
of subordinated tranches, we expect to collect all amounts due according to the contractual
terms. We do not intend to sell this security and it is more likely than not that we will
not be required to sell this security before recovery of its amortized cost, which may be
maturity. Therefore, the unrealized loss was reported in other comprehensive income, net of
income taxes, but did not impact reported earnings.
We own seventeen mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities totaling $12.6
million that are classified as Level 3 assets at June 30, 2009. Level 3 mortgage and home
equity line of credit-backed securities represented 3% of investments available for sale and
3% of total assets measured at fair value as of June 30, 2009. Substantially all of the
mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed securities in our investment portfolio are
floating rate and are backed by subprime residential mortgage loans or subprime home equity
loans. The fair values of our investments in mortgage and home equity line of credit-backed
securities declined in the second half of 2007, in 2008 and again in 2009 due to the
difficulties in the subprime mortgage industry that created turmoil in the capital markets.
We evaluate the decline in the fair value of our investment securities to determine whether
the decline in value is other than temporary. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements for a description of our evaluation process.
In June 2009, we recognized $6.6 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses on five
of the seventeen mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed securities due to the
expectation that we will not recover the total amount of amortized cost. These five
securities have had significant unrealized losses for approximately 28 months associated
with the disruption in the market for these types of securities. The other-than-temporary
impairment losses are classified in other revenues on the consolidated income statement. At
June 30, 2009, these securities represent 36% of the fair value
of our mortgage
and home equity line of credit-backed securities backed by subprime
residential mortgage loans or subprime home equity loans. These
securities were rated from AAA to BBB- by Standard
& Poor’s, from Ba1 to Caa2 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the equivalent from other rating
agencies, after taking into account the downgrade of four of these investments by at least
one rating agency in the second quarter of 2009.
The unrealized losses of the remaining twelve of the seventeen mortgage or home equity line
of credit-backed securities were not deemed to be other-than-temporary impairment losses.
Therefore, the unrealized losses were reported in other comprehensive income, net of income
taxes, but did not impact reported earnings. The amounts of unrealized losses per
individual mortgage or home equity line of credit-backed security at June 30, 2009 were as
follows: one security with a loss of $1.9 million, three securities with a loss between
$500 thousand and $1.0 million, five securities with a loss between $100 thousand and $499
thousand and three securities with losses less than $100 thousand. At June 30, 2009, these
securities represent 64% of the fair value of our mortgage and home equity line
of credit-backed securities backed by subprime
residential mortgage loans or subprime home equity loans. Six of these securities were rated from AAA to AA by Standard
& Poor’s, from Aaa to Aa2 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the equivalent from other rating
agencies, and their ratings are unchanged since they were acquired, and six were rated
from AAA to BB by Standard & Poor’s, from Aa2 to B3 by Moody’s Investor Service, or the
equivalent from other rating agencies, after taking into account the downgrade of two of
these investments by at least one rating agency in the second quarter of 2009.
Our retained interests in securitizations are classified as Level 3 assets at June 30, 2009.
Retained interests in securitizations had a fair value of $5.5 million at June 30, 2009 and
represented 1% of total assets measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
retained interests in securitizations are classified as securitization income (loss) on the
consolidated income statements. Due to the
56
materiality to our financial results, management considers securitization income (loss) to
be one of our most critical accounting policies and estimates. See our 2008 Form 10-K for
further discussion of securitization income (loss) accounting policies and estimates. Also
see “Securitization Income (Loss)” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-Q for discussion of realized
losses and changes in unrealized losses on retained interests in securitizations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, the market for subordinated tranches of credit card asset-backed securities
was disrupted and inactive, limiting the number of observable market transactions available
to us to benchmark appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate assumptions for our retained
interest valuations. At June 30, 2009, we determined the risk-adjusted discount rate by
reference to available market data for securities considered to have similar or higher risk
profiles.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
We have included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). In
addition, other written or oral communications provided by Advanta from time to time may
contain “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements are not historical facts
but instead are based on certain assumptions by management and represent only our belief
regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and
outside our control. These statements include statements other than historical information
or statements of current condition and among other things may relate to: our future business
plans and prospects, including our plan designed to limit our credit
loss exposure and to maximize our capital and our liquidity
measures; anticipated earnings (loss) per share; anticipated delinquencies and charge-offs;
anticipated interest yields; expected cost of funds; anticipated payment rates of
outstanding loans; anticipated operating expenses; estimated values of and anticipated cash
flows from our retained interests in securitizations; compliance with regulatory agreements
and requirements; the value of the investments that we hold; income tax uncertainties;
realizability of our net deferred tax asset; expected levels of liquidity and capital;
anticipated outcome and effects of litigation and contingencies; and other future
expectations of Advanta. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words or
phrases such as “is anticipated,” “are expected to,” “are estimated to be,” “intend to,”
“designed to,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “projected,” “may,” “we envision,” or other
similar words or phrases.
57
Forward-looking statements are subject to various assumptions, risks and uncertainties which
change over time, and speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation
to update any forward-looking information. However, any further disclosures made on related
subjects in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC, including our Reports on Forms 10-K,
10-Q and 8-K, should be consulted. We caution readers that any forward-looking statement
provided by us is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results may be
materially different from those in the forward-looking information. In addition, future
results could be materially different from historical performance. We have identified below
some important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
forward-looking statements:
|
(1)
|
|
our ability to comply with the cease and desist orders and regulatory
agreements;
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
our ability to implement new business opportunities and become
profitable and, if applicable, obtain regulatory approval for future
business activities and opportunities;
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
political conditions, social conditions, monetary and fiscal policies
and general economic and other environmental conditions, including
the impact of the ongoing disruption in the capital markets and
deterioration of the U.S. economy, as well as the potential for
further deterioration and disruption, and the impact of these factors
on delinquencies, charge-offs, the value of and ability to realize
expected returns on our investments, our future business
opportunities and other results of operations;
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
the impact of early amortization and closing of our customers’
accounts on delinquencies, charge-offs and cash flows from receivables;
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
interest rate and credit spread fluctuations;
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
our ability to achieve our expected level of operating cost
reductions;
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
factors affecting our level of liquidity, including our ability to
access adequate sources of funding and our ability to monetize our
investments;
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
factors affecting our plan to limit our credit loss exposure and
maximize our capital and our liquidity measures;
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
government regulation of banking and finance businesses, including
the effects of and changes in the level of scrutiny, regulatory
requirements and regulatory initiatives, certain mandatory and
possibly discretionary actions by state and federal regulators,
restrictions and limitations imposed by banking laws, regulators,
examinations and reviews, and the effects of, and changes in,
regulatory policies, guidance, interpretations and initiatives and
agreements between us and our regulators;
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
effect of, and changes in, tax laws, rates, regulations and policies;
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
effect of legal and regulatory developments relating to the
|
58
|
|
|
legality of certain business methods, practices and policies of credit card
issuers and the ultimate resolution of industry-related judicial
proceedings relating to the legality of certain interchange rates;
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
relationships with customers, significant vendors and business
partners;
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
our ability to identify, develop and implement new business
opportunities and activities, including difficulties or delays in the
development, acquisition, production, testing and marketing of
products and services, the ability and cost to obtain intellectual
property rights or a failure to implement new products or services
when anticipated;
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
factors affecting our net interest income;
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
the amount and cost of financing available to us;
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
the effects of changes in accounting policies or practices as may be
required by changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
the impact of litigation and legal, regulatory, administrative or
other claims, investigations or proceedings including judgments,
settlements and actual or anticipated insurance recoveries for costs
or judgments; and
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
the proper design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures.
|
The cautionary statements provided above are being made pursuant to the provisions of the
Act and with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the
Act for any such forward-looking information. Also see, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II
of this report, certain risks discussed elsewhere in this report and “Item 1A. Risk Factors”
found in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 for further discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ
from those in the forward-looking statements.
59
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in
this report under the heading “Market Risk Sensitivity.”
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, management recognized that any disclosure controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, rather than absolute,
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures.
An evaluation was performed by management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules
and forms.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
During the first quarter of 2009, we reduced our workforce by approximately 300 employees,
or 35%. During the second quarter of 2009, we announced plans to close all of our
customers’ accounts to future use resulting in our current operations being solely focused
on servicing the business credit card receivables that we own on our
balance sheet and those that are owned by the Advanta Business Card
Master Trust. In connection with
this shift in our business operations and strategy, in July 2009 we announced plans to
reduce our workforce by an additional 200 employees and we expect this will be substantially
complete by the end of the third quarter of 2009. It is possible that these actions will
require us to make changes to our internal control processes in the future that could
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
We are subject to class action lawsuits and other litigation as well as legal, regulatory,
administrative and other claims, investigations or proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business or discontinued operations. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements set forth in “Item 1. Financial Statements” in Part I of this report which is
incorporated herein by reference. For a discussion of previously reported legal proceedings,
see Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008.
60
Information regarding risks that may affect our future performance is discussed in “Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation –
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995” in
Part I of this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Except for the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk
factors from those disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Our ability to continue as a going concern may depend on our ability to develop and
successfully implement a plan for new business opportunities and become profitable in the
future.
Currently, our business consists of the servicing of the
business credit card receivables we own on our balance sheet and
those that are owned by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. In order to continue as a going concern we may need to
successfully implement a new business plan for new business opportunities that will generate
revenues and profits in the future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to do
that. In this connection, our bank subsidiary, Advanta Bank Corp., is subject to the
requirements of two agreements with the FDIC. Our continued operations may depend on Advanta
Bank Corp.’s ability to comply with the requirements of the regulatory agreements. In
addition, one of the regulatory agreements provides that Advanta Bank Corp. terminate its
deposit-taking activities and deposit insurance after payment of its existing deposits,
unless it submits a plan for the continuation of its deposit-taking operations and deposit
insurance that is approved by the FDIC. If Advanta Bank Corp. is unable to obtain approval
from the FDIC to continue its deposit-taking operations it could reduce new business
opportunities it might want to pursue. Also, while we do not anticipate funding our
operations through increasing Advanta Bank Corp. deposits in the immediate future, if Advanta Bank
Corp. is unable to obtain approval from the FDIC to continue its deposit taking operations,
we may need to find alternative sources of funding at some point in the future. If we are
unable to develop and implement new business opportunities that will generate sufficient
revenues and profits or if we are unable to access sufficient funding for new business
opportunities, we may not be able to continue as a going concern. For further discussion of
the regulatory agreements, see the risk factor immediately following this one and Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements.
Advanta Bank Corp. recently entered into two agreements with the FDIC that place
restrictions on its operations and activities and may limit our ability to pursue new business
opportunities through Advanta Bank Corp.
Advanta Bank Corp. recently entered
into two agreements with its primary federal banking regulator, the FDIC. The agreements
became effective on June 30, 2009. Pursuant to the agreements, Advanta Bank Corp. is subject
to two cease and desist orders.
The first cease and desist order (the “First Order”) places a number of restrictions on
Advanta Bank Corp.’s current operations and activities, and may also limit Advanta Bank
Corp.’s ability to pursue new business opportunities in the future. Pursuant to the First
Order, Advanta Bank Corp. must continue to perform its obligations as servicer for the
business credit card receivables that we own on our balance sheet and those that are owned
by the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. In addition, Advanta Bank Corp. is
required to submit to the FDIC a strategic plan related to its deposit-taking operations and
deposit insurance that provides for the termination of Advanta Bank Corp.’s deposit-taking
operations and deposit insurance after Advanta Bank Corp.’s deposits are repaid in full,
which is anticipated to take a few years. The First Order also provides that during this
time period, Advanta Bank Corp. may submit an additional plan that, if approved by the FDIC,
would allow Advanta Bank Corp. to continue its deposit-taking operations and deposit
insurance. Advanta Bank Corp. intends to submit such additional plan in
61
the future, however, there can be no assurance that, if submitted, such plan will be
approved by the FDIC.
The second cease and desist order (the “Second Order”) alleges, among other things,
that some of Advanta Bank Corp.’s marketing of certain cash back reward programs for its
business credit cards and practices related to the pricing strategies of certain of its
business credit card accounts violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and
that Advanta Bank Corp. also violated certain adverse action notification requirements in
connection with the pricing strategies of certain of its business credit card accounts.
Under the Second Order, Advanta Bank Corp. must pay restitution to Eligible Customers (as
defined in the Second Order) and a civil money penalty of $150,000. Total restitution for
the alleged violations relating to marketing of the cash back reward programs will not
exceed $14 million and total restitution for the alleged violations relating to the pricing
strategies will not exceed $21 million. We previously took a $14 million pretax charge
related to our estimate of cash back rewards program restitution in the third quarter of
2008. We recorded an additional pretax charge of $19 million in the second quarter of 2009
related to the pricing strategies restitution.
We have incurred net losses in recent quarterly periods and expect to incur losses in future
periods.
Our recent results reflect the deterioration in the United States economy
beginning in the latter half of 2007 and the negative trends in economic conditions and
disruption in the capital markets that have continued into 2009. The continued deterioration
of the economic environment has negatively impacted our small business customers and has
adversely affected our business results. We reported net losses of
$330.1 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, $75.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, $46.9 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 and $19.3 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2008. These results compare to net income of $4.0 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 and $18.4 million for the quarter ended March 30, 2008. We may continue to incur losses
in future periods and we may not become profitable in the future.
Negative trends and developments in economic conditions and the financial markets have
adversely impacted our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Deterioration of the U.S. economy beginning in the latter half of 2007 and the negative
trends in economic conditions and disruption in the capital markets that have continued into
2009 have adversely affected our business. We, like many small business credit card issuers
and other small business lenders, have experienced increased delinquencies and charge-offs
due to the impact of the general economic downturn on small businesses. Our business credit
card portfolio has shown deterioration in credit performance.
In response to the current economic situation and its negative impact on our business
and results of operations and financial condition, in May 2009 we adopted and disclosed a
plan that was designed to limit our credit loss exposure and to maximize our capital and our
liquidity measures. The plan we designed involved the following components: early
amortization of our securitization transactions and closing all of
our customers’ accounts to
future use; and the execution of tender offers for the $100 million outstanding trust
preferred securities issued by Advanta Capital Trust I (the “Capital Securities”) and a
portion of the Class A securitization notes issued by our securitization trust (the
“Securitization Notes”) at prices below their par value. We have moved forward with all
aspects of our plan with the exception of the tender offer for the
Securitization Notes. Early amortization of the securitization
transactions began in June 2009 and effective May 30, 2009, we closed all of our customers’ business credit card accounts to
future use. We expect the combination of these events to allow us to realize our plan
objective of limiting our credit loss exposure. We also purchased approximately 10.8% of the
$100 million outstanding Capital
62
Securities through our tender offer for the outstanding Capital Securities. However, on
June 8, 2009, Advanta Bank Corp. terminated its tender offer for the Securitization Notes
because it was determined that a regulatory condition to the tender offer would not be
satisfied. As a result of terminating the tender offer for the Securitization Notes, we now
expect that we will not be able to fully realize the plan objectives of maximizing our
capital and our liquidity measures. The degree to which we ultimately may realize these plan
objectives will depend on our ability to implement additional opportunities to strengthen
our capital and our liquidity measures. We have not announced any specific plans at this
time and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing any additional
strategies to accomplish these objectives.
Legislative, regulatory and other legal developments may affect our business operations and
our results of operations.
Banking, finance and insurance businesses, in general, and
banks, including industrial banks such as Advanta Bank Corp., are the subject of extensive
regulation at the state and federal levels. Numerous legislative and regulatory proposals
are advanced each year which, if adopted, could affect our profitability or the manner in
which we conduct our activities. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of
any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any of the state
or federal proposals will become law.
The credit card industry is also highly regulated by federal and state laws. These laws
affect how loans are made, enforced and collected. The federal and state legislatures may
pass new laws, or may amend existing laws, to regulate further the credit card industry or
to reduce finance charges or other fees applicable to credit card accounts. The current
economic environment and its impact on the banking and financial services industries has
resulted in new laws and regulatory changes and initiatives that could impact, among other
things, lending and funding practices and liquidity and capital
requirements, or could lead
to restrictions on certain business practices, methods and policies of credit card issuers.
Changes in laws or regulations, as well as changes in the marketplace, economic and
political environments and prudent business practices, could make it more difficult for us
to enforce the terms of our existing business credit card accounts or to collect business
credit card receivables and could negatively affect our results of operations.
In
addition, as discussed in this Form 10-Q, Advanta Bank Corp. recently
entered into two agreements with the FDIC pursuant to which Advanta
Bank Corp. is subject to two cease and desist orders. The First
Order has the impact of requiring us to obtain the FDIC’s approval before we would be
able to continue deposit-taking operations at some point in the future and the failure to
obtain that approval could reduce new business opportunities Advanta Bank Corp. might want
to pursue. The regulatory agreements with the FDIC do not apply to activities outside of
Advanta Bank Corp. For a more detailed discussion of the regulatory agreements in this Form
10-Q, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
We have procedures to comply with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations
applicable to us and to our business and we believe that we comply in all material respects
with these requirements. We incur substantial costs and expenses in connection with our
compliance programs and efforts. If, it were alleged or determined that we were not in compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements it could lead to: economic remedies such as penalties, fines and other
payments; litigation exposure, including, class action lawsuits; and administrative
enforcement actions. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, guidance or
interpretations or the outcomes of regulatory reviews or examinations could adversely affect
us, including by limiting the types of products and services we may offer and the amounts of
finance charge rates or other fees we may charge.
63
We are subject to regulation by a number of different regulatory agencies and authorities,
including bank regulatory authorities, which have broad discretion to take actions that
could affect the manner in which we conduct our business, and could adversely affect our
results of operations and our financial condition.
We are subject to oversight, regulation
and examination by a number of regulatory agencies and authorities, including federal and
state bank regulators, the SEC and the NASDAQ stock market. We have conducted our business
credit card business and we will continue to conduct our servicing of
business credit card receivables through Advanta Bank Corp., a Utah chartered industrial bank that is subject to regulatory
oversight and examination by both the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial
Institutions. We also own Advanta Bank, a bank chartered under the laws of the State of
Delaware that is subject to regulatory oversight and examination by the FDIC and the
Delaware Office of the State Bank Commissioner.
Both banks are subject to provisions of federal law that regulate their activities,
including regulatory capital requirements, and require them to operate in a safe and sound
manner. Also, as discussed in this Form 10-Q, Advanta Bank Corp. has entered into two
agreements with the FDIC pursuant to which it consented to the issuance of the First Order and the Second
Order. The First Order places significant restrictions on Advanta Bank Corp.’s activities
and operations, including its deposit-taking operations, and requires Advanta Bank Corp. to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a tier I leverage capital
ratio of at least 5%. The Second Order requires Advanta Bank Corp. to make significant
payments as restitution for alleged violations of law. At June 30, 2009, Advanta Bank
Corp.’s total risk-based capital ratio was 19.74% and its tier I leverage capital ratio was
slightly over 5%. Although Advanta Bank’s operations are currently not material to our
operating results, at June 30, 2009 it had a total risk-based capital ratio of 108.42%.
The federal and state bank regulators may seek to apply both existing and proposed laws
and regulations and to impose changes, restrictions and limitations on our banks, including
our business and business practices, which could adversely affect the manner in which we
conduct our business, our results of operations and our financial condition. The effects of,
and changes in, the level of regulatory scrutiny, regulatory requirements, regulatory
guidance and initiatives, including mandatory and possible discretionary actions by federal
and state regulators, restrictions and limitations imposed by laws applicable to industrial
banks, examinations, audits and agreements between a bank and its regulators may
affect the operations of our banks and our financial condition.
We have recently stopped originating new business credit card accounts and receivables.
We
have been one of the nation’s largest credit card issuers (through Advanta Bank Corp.) in
the small business market. In response to the current economic environment and its negative
impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, we developed a plan
that was designed to, among other things, limit our credit loss exposure. As part of our
efforts to limit our credit loss exposure, in connection with early amortization of our
securitization transactions we closed all of our customers’ accounts to future use effective
May 30, 2009. At this time we are not originating new business credit card accounts or
receivables. We continue to be the servicer of the business credit card receivables that we
own on our balance sheet and the business credit card receivables that are owned by the
Advanta Business Card Master Trust. As servicer, we will continue to service and collect the
amounts owed on these receivables. In the future, we may pursue other business ventures in
the small business market, financial services industry or in other markets or industries,
however we are not obligated to do so and there is no guarantee we will be successful in any
new business ventures in the future.
64
Market conditions and other factors beyond our control could negatively impact the
availability and cost of funding for our operations.
Historically, we have funded our
operations through a number of sources, including securitizations, deposits at our bank
subsidiaries and sales of senior unsecured debt securities in the form of RediReserve
Variable Rate Certificates and Investment Notes, through our retail investment note programs
(the “Debt Securities”).
Our ability to use deposits to fund our business in the future may depend on whether
Advanta Bank Corp. obtains approval from the FDIC to continue its deposit-taking operations.
As described in more detail in this Form 10-Q in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, Advanta Bank Corp. is subject to the requirements of two agreements with the
FDIC pursuant to which Advanta Bank Corp. consented to the issuance of the First Order and the Second Order. Among other things, the First Order provides that
Advanta Bank Corp. terminate its deposit-taking activities and deposit insurance after
payment of its existing deposits, unless it submits a plan for the continuation of its
deposit-taking operations and deposit insurance that is approved by the FDIC. If Advanta
Bank Corp. is unable to obtain approval from the FDIC to continue its deposit-taking
operations, it could reduce new business opportunities Advanta Bank Corp. might want to
pursue. Also, while we do not anticipate funding our operations
through increasing Advanta Bank Corp.
deposits in the immediate future, if Advanta Bank Corp. is unable to obtain approval from
the FDIC to continue its deposit taking operations, we may need to find alternative sources
of funding at some point in the future.
We have historically also relied on our ability to combine and sell business credit
card receivables as asset-backed securities through transactions known as securitizations as
a significant source of funding for our operations. The disruption in the credit and
financial markets has negatively impacted the securitization markets, the value of certain
of our investments and the value of our retained interests in securitizations, which has
impacted our funding decisions and our ability to realize expected levels of return on
certain of our assets. In February 2009, Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investor Service
both downgraded their ratings on certain of the AdvantaSeries securitization notes issued by
the Advanta Business Card Master Trust. In May 2009, both of these rating agencies further downgraded
their ratings on certain of the AdvantaSeries securitization notes issued by the Advanta
Business Card Master Trust. As discussed in this Form 10-Q, early amortization of our outstanding business credit card securitization
transactions began in June 2009. Due to the disruption in the capital markets, since the second
quarter of 2008 we have not accessed the public securitization markets which have
historically been a significant source of our funding and we do not expect to have access to
the public securitization markets as a source of funding at this time.
65
Certain rules adopted by federal bank regulators could, if applicable to us, impact our
business practices and have a negative impact on our business and our results of operations.
In December 2008, federal bank regulators in the United States promulgated joint final
rules addressing unfair or deceptive acts or practices (“UDAP”) and disclosures relating to
consumer credit cards. The final rules amend Regulation AA (Unfair or Deceptive Acts or
Practices) and Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act) and become effective July 1, 2010. The
final rules modify certain consumer credit card practices related to, among other things,
interest rate increases on new and existing balances, payment allocation methods, assessment
of late fees and related charges, two-cycle billing and disclosures to consumers. In
particular, the rules will prohibit an increase in the interest rates applied to existing
credit card balances except in limited circumstances. In addition, on May 22, 2009, the
Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “Credit CARD Act”)
was signed into law. The Credit CARD Act makes many of the same changes as the UDAP rules
discussed above, including prohibiting most increases in the interest rates applied to
existing balances, but includes a number of additional provisions, such as a requirement
that penalty fees and charges be “reasonable and proportional” to the event that triggers
them. Most of the Credit CARD Act’s rules will be effective in February 2010, but certain of
its provisions will be effective in August 2009 and others in August 2010. Because the final
rules and the legislation described above govern consumer credit card practices, they are
not applicable by their terms to our business credit card business. However, if these rules
and legislation were applicable to our lending activities, or if we were to choose to
implement any changes to our business practices that may be similar to the requirements
established by the new rules and legislation, it could have a negative impact on our
business and our results of operations. In addition, there are currently several bills
pending and proposed before Congress, including proposed legislation that would extend the
application of consumer regulations to business purpose credit, that could impact credit
card pricing and other terms and, if adopted in their current form, would require
significant changes to business practices that are generally standard in the credit card
industry today. It is possible that if versions of these or other proposals were to be
enacted in the future, they could impact our business practices and negatively impact our
business and our results of operations.
Our earnings may not be sufficient to cover our fixed charges which may impact our ability
to make future principal and interest payments on our indebtedness.
Our earnings were not
sufficient to cover our fixed charges for the three months ended June 30, 2009, the three
months ended March 31, 2009 or for the year ended December 31, 2008. We do not expect our
earnings to be sufficient to cover our fixed charges for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009. We currently generate sufficient cash flow from investing and other financing
activities to service our debt. However, our ability to make future principal and interest
payments on our debt depends upon our future performance, which is subject to general
economic and other environmental conditions affecting our operations, many of which are
beyond our control, and to our ability to identify, develop and implement new business
opportunities. The continued deterioration of the economic environment has adversely
affected our business results. If our future performance does not improve, it may negatively
impact our ability to make future principal and interest payments on our debt.
Our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock could be delisted if we fail to satisfy
the NASDAQ listing rules and requirements. If our stock is delisted from
66
NASDAQ, our ability to fund our operations by selling our registered Debt Securities may be
more difficult in the future.
Our Class A voting common stock (primary security) and our
Class B non-voting common stock (secondary security) are currently listed on the Global
Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). To maintain a listing on the Global
Market, a company’s primary and secondary securities must maintain a daily closing bid price
per share of $1.00 and the market value of publicly held shares must be greater than $5
million for a primary security and greater than $1 million for a secondary security. If the
closing bid price per share of a listed security stays below $1.00 or the market value of
publicly held shares stays below $5 million for a primary security or $1 million for a
secondary security for 30 consecutive trading days, a company will have a certain period of
time to regain compliance or the listed security will be subject to delisting. For the
closing bid price requirement, a company has 180 days to regain compliance and for the
minimum market value of publicly held shares requirement, a company has 90 days to regain
compliance.
In connection with the current economic downturn, NASDAQ implemented a temporary
suspension of the rules requiring, among other things, a minimum $1.00 closing bid price and
a $5 million/$1 million minimum market value of publicly held shares. This temporary
suspension expired on July 31, 2009. If we do not meet these minimum requirements now that
the temporary suspension has been lifted, our Class A voting common stock and our Class B
non-voting common stock may be delisted from NASDAQ if we are unable to regain compliance
within the time period referenced above. Delisting of our common stock could negatively
impact us by reducing the liquidity and market price of our common stock, and reducing the
number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock.
As of
August 6, 2009, the current market value of our Class A voting common stock and
our Class B non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (“non-affiliate float”) was
$21,336,845. If our non-affiliate float remains at or below $75 million on each day during
the 60 day period on or before the filing of our Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”), which we expect will be in March 2010, and both
our Class A voting common stock and our Class B non-voting common stock are no longer listed
on NASDAQ or any other stock exchange on the date that we file our 2009 Form 10-K, we will
no longer be permitted to sell our Debt Securities under a registration statement on Form
S-3 until such time that our non-affiliate float is at or above $75 million.
If, however, our non-affiliate float remains at or below $75 million on each day during
the 60 day period on or before the filing of our 2009 Form 10-K but either of our Class A
voting common stock or Class B non-voting common stock remains on NASDAQ or another stock
exchange as of the date we file our 2009 Form 10-K, then we will be permitted to continue to
sell a limited number of Debt Securities. We will be permitted to sell Debt Securities with
an aggregate principal amount equal to one-third of our non-affiliate float during any
rolling 12 calendar month period. This will materially impact the number of new Debt
Securities we can sell, including extensions of certain maturing Debt Securities and monthly
principal additions to certain Debt Securities. This limitation will be lifted at such time
that our non-affiliate float is at or above $75 million.
Recent changes in our organization, including a significant reduction in our workforce, could
impact the effectiveness of our internal control system
. Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), we are required to evaluate the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each year, and to include in our Annual
Reports on Form 10-K (“Annual Reports”) a report by
67
management assessing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In
connection with our Annual Reports, Section 404 also requires that our independent registered
public accounting firm attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(the “2008 Form 10-K”), we provided a report by our management that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008. In addition, in connection with our
2008 Form 10-K, our independent registered public accounting firm audited our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 and opined that we maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.
Our internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. In any control system, there are inherent limitations,
including resource constraints and the risk of human error, so that there can be no assurance that
any control system will prevent or detect all errors or fraud. Since the beginning of 2009, we have experienced a significant reduction in workforce in all
functional areas of our business. As indicated above, we believe that
our internal controls are effective but there can be no assurance that the reduction in workforce
described above will not impact the effectiveness of our internal
control system in the future.
68
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
(a)
|
|
Advanta Corp. held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 11, 2009.
|
(c)
|
|
The following proposals were submitted to a vote of stockholders.
|
|
|
The election of three directors to hold office until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES
|
|
VOTES FOR
|
|
|
VOTES WITHHELD
|
|
Olaf Olafsson
|
|
|
9,070,160
|
|
|
|
2,569,596
|
|
William A. Rosoff
|
|
|
9,040,108
|
|
|
|
2,599,648
|
|
Michael A. Stolper
|
|
|
9,099,438
|
|
|
|
2,540,318
|
|
|
|
The proposal to ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of KPMG LLP as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER NON-VOTES
|
11,106,234
|
|
231,264
|
|
302,258
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
Effective August 7, 2009, Olaf Olafsson resigned as a member of our Board of Directors. Mr.
Olafsson’s decision to resign was not as a result of any disagreement with us or our management.
In addition, our Board of Directors approved the actions described below related to Mr. Olafsson’s
stock options, all of which are currently out-of-the-money. The actions described are effective
upon the date of Mr. Olafsson’s resignation.
|
•
|
|
The Board of Directors approved the pro rata vesting of a portion of Mr. Olafsson’s
unvested options. With respect to each stock option, the portion that will vest upon
the effective date of resignation will be calculated based on an amount equal to
1/12
th
of the option shares that would have become vested on the next
anniversary of the date of grant of the option, for each full 30 day period which
elapsed between the most recent anniversary of the date of grant and the effective
date of Mr. Olafsson’s resignation.
|
|
•
|
|
The Board of Directors approved extending the exercise period for Mr. Olafsson’s
vested stock options for a period that will expire on the earlier of the
expiration date of each such option and two years from the effective date of
resignation.
|
69
Exhibits – The following exhibits are being filed with this report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Agreement, effective June 4, 2009, between American Express Travel Related Services
Company, Inc. and Advanta Bank Corp., as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Stipulation and Consent to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, effective
June 30, 2009, between the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank
Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Order to Cease and Desist, effective June 30, 2009 between the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Stipulation and Consent to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, Order for
Restitution and Order to Pay, effective June 30, 2009, between the Federal Insurance
Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
Order to Cease and Desist, Order for Restitution and Order to Pay, effective June
30, 2009 between the Federal Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Advanta Corp.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Philip M. Browne
|
|
|
|
Philip M. Browne
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ David B. Weinstock
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Weinstock
|
|
|
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
August 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
71
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manner of
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
Filing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Agreement, effective June 4, 2009, between American Express
Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and Advanta Bank Corp., as
amended
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Stipulation and Consent to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, effective
June 30, 2009, between the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Order to Cease and Desist, effective June 30, 2009 between the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Stipulation and Consent to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, Order for
Restitution and Order to Pay, effective June 30, 2009, between the Federal Insurance
Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
Order to Cease and Desist, Order for Restitution and Order to Pay, effective June 30,
2009 between the Federal Insurance Corporation and Advanta Bank Corp. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1,
2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Filed electronically herewith.
|
72
Advanta Corp Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:ADVNA)
過去 株価チャート
から 2 2025 まで 3 2025
Advanta Corp Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:ADVNA)
過去 株価チャート
から 3 2024 まで 3 2025