Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN)

NSAV and BCDS are connected whether you like it ot not. Get a new accountant and a new lead programmer and then there is no connection. Both worked for both companies and the connection is there along with being in crypto and doing many of the same things. If NSAV was allowed to continue many of

Pls define “soon”.
As in the second Tuesday of never?
PSRU is lost money.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2018/3/20/picfxToilet_.png

No problem BOB, we all are grown ups, we agree to disagree. AI doesn't know about these cases unless you present the facts and feed its brain. It might take an year for me to go thru 7th amended plan and understand, or 10 years. For AI it might take less than a minute to parse thru, thats the beauty

I think he's more interested in SpongeTech, going forward. That judge told me that he thought I had a case, and Judge Cote acted on my input in regards to defendants in one of her cases.

I agree, and, I think this data analysis likely moves us beyond a conditional approval to an (expected) approval with some minor conditions. So instead of sausage making after an approval, it looks like it was done before that. This then presents a better window of time to speak with “interested pa

happy sunday, we pray

....SO....losers...........WE SOLVED NAOMI.........next task............PEDDLE FCNCA FOR TOP DOLLAR.................???...............

.....FDIC is in charge of this, which worries us..........FDIC made some BIZARRE payola side deal with UBS, imo.........completely released UBS from a

GL!

comeback rory, not enough

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50923VUWYOo&t=58s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50923VUWYOo&t=58s

Formal:  you overstate your point. In many persuasion event contexts it is tactical to add “more” evidence prior to a decision issuance. So here. That this was material expense to NWBO emphasizes that the company weighed the benefit and acted on this opportunity. I am confident that MHRA collaborate

Exactly 👍 

Newflow
PLEASE do not take my comments as a SLAM on you OR THE MASSIVE WORKS YOU HAVE DONE HERE it is certainly not meant that way at all.
Keep up the work I love reading it but understand it then makes all that read it have questions about it.
Thanks again

P.S. T

SCTH , SEGG , TRWD

It would require an 8K

LG, 4) Not sure how the court could cancel all preferred and common stock prospectuses and all associated documents on the (ED) Effective Date of March 19, 2012 and leave some of the same documents in play for the Safe Harbor assets as this would create dual ownership of assets it would seem.

newflow THANKS

It seems like novascotiaSTS ( and Speaker :-) ) can hardly wait for the massive payouts coming their way :-)

newflow

THANK you as you just confirmed that WE PEONS have NO REAL IDEA what was negotiated

""" what were the terms and parties involved, no clue to public."""

And so with this being a FACT then in short AI doesn't know either correct? As it can only glea

Well, not on Roku and Droid app not loading.  Anyone seeing it on Roku or App or is it just me?

Yes, my only point is that AI is sometimes 100% correct, but sometimes, only partially correct. So AI is learning but a long ways from perfect. So we just need to keep double and triple checking what it's telling us... but as always, I appreciate NewFlow and everybody else who posts their thoug

My guess is Nasrat is holding out for a reputable pharmaceutical company to buy us with shares / stock. He doesn’t get hit with a big tax bill. He spends / sells what he needs and leave the rest to family. When he passes, the family get to take advantage of a loop hole (step up) and will owe ze

They used several vehicles BOB, we dont have any clues.

I'm in; 12-22-9-7

Thanks Gold, I missed that!