SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended
September 30,
2009
Commission file number 1-4673
WILSHIRE ENTERPRISES,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
84-0513668
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
1
Gateway Center, Newark, New Jersey
|
07102
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(201)
420-2796
(Registrant’s telephone
number, including area code)
|
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
Smaller reporting
|
|
Large accelerated filer
¨
|
Accelerated filer
¨
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
Company
|
x
|
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of November 13, 2009.
Common
Stock $1 Par Value —— 4,003,034
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
Page
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Part
I -Financial Information
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
September
30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2008
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
Three
months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity - Nine months
ended
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4T. Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II - Other Information
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
1.
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
25
|
|
2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
|
|
25
|
|
6.
Exhibits
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
27
|
PART I
- FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
(Note 1)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,023,000
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
Marketable
debt securities, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
174,000
|
|
|
|
173,000
|
|
Income
taxes receivable
|
|
|
954,000
|
|
|
|
773,000
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,509,000
|
|
|
|
1,133,000
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
7,358,000
|
|
|
|
17,297,000
|
|
Noncurrent
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
income tax asset
|
|
|
893,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
248,000
|
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
Property
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate properties
|
|
|
39,044,000
|
|
|
|
38,876,000
|
|
Real
estate properties - held for sale
|
|
|
4,691,000
|
|
|
|
4,638,000
|
|
|
|
|
43,735,000
|
|
|
|
43,514,000
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18,151,000
|
|
|
|
17,293,000
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization – property held for sale
|
|
|
371,000
|
|
|
|
371,000
|
|
|
|
|
25,213,000
|
|
|
|
25,850,000
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
33,712,000
|
|
|
$
|
43,343,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
564,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,378,000
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
1,472,000
|
|
|
|
1,342,000
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
937,000
|
|
|
|
1,066,000
|
|
Deferred
income
|
|
|
123,000
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
Current
liabilities associated with discontinued operations
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
264,000
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
3,379,000
|
|
|
|
7,214,000
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
|
|
27,587,000
|
|
|
|
23,467,000
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
527,000
|
|
|
|
597,000
|
|
Deferred
income
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
31,568,000
|
|
|
|
31,367,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $1 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock, $1 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued 5,966,164 shares
at September 30, 2009 and 10,013,544 shares at December 31,
2008
|
|
|
5,966,000
|
|
|
|
10,014,000
|
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
5,267,000
|
|
|
|
9,309,000
|
|
Treasury
stock, 1,963,130 shares at September 30, 2009 and 2,087,296 shares at
December 31, 2008, at cost
|
|
|
(9,743,000
|
)
|
|
|
(9,867,000
|
)
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
654,000
|
|
|
|
2,520,000
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,144,000
|
|
|
|
11,976,000
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
33,712,000
|
|
|
$
|
43,343,000
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,234,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,334,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
1,520,000
|
|
|
|
1,469,000
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
|
272,000
|
|
|
|
284,000
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
826,000
|
|
|
|
1,051,000
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,618,000
|
|
|
|
2,804,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(384,000
|
)
|
|
|
(470,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
and interest income
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(422,000
|
)
|
|
|
(443,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(801,000
|
)
|
|
|
(833,000
|
)
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(281,000
|
)
|
|
|
(380,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(520,000
|
)
|
|
|
(453,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations - Real Estate, Net of Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations - Oil & Gas, Net of Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
104,000
|
|
|
|
277,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(472,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate - loss from operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Oil
and gas - income from operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Diluted
net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate - loss from operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Oil
and gas - income from operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
WILSHIRE ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
6,774,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,908,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
4,303,000
|
|
|
|
4,373,000
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
|
858,000
|
|
|
|
902,000
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
2,991,000
|
|
|
|
2,848,000
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
8,152,000
|
|
|
|
8,123,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(1,378,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,215,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
and interest income
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
352,000
|
|
Loss
on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(553,000
|
)
|
Other
income
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(1,288,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,634,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,751,000
|
)
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(960,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,119,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(1,674,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,632,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations - Real Estate, Net of Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(309,000
|
)
|
|
|
(390,000
|
)
|
Gain
from sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
747,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations - Oil & Gas, Net of Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
117,000
|
|
|
|
187,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,088,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate - loss from operations
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Real
estate - gain on sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Oil
and gas - income from operations
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Diluted
net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate - loss from operations
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Real
estate - gain on sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Oil
and gas - income from operations
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Capital in
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders'
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Par
Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,013,544
|
|
|
$
|
10,014,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,309,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
(9,867,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,976,000
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
Grant
of 125,000 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization
of compensation associated with stock and stock option
awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
Purchase
of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,047,380
|
)
|
|
|
(4,048,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,047,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,095,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,966,164
|
|
|
$
|
5,966,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,267,000
|
|
|
$
|
654,000
|
|
|
$
|
(9,743,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,144,000
|
|
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,088,000
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
858,000
|
|
|
|
902,000
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
Amortization
of mortgage finance costs
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in deferred income
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
(67,000
|
)
|
Loss
on sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,000
|
|
Gain
on sales of real estate assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,244,000
|
)
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Increase
in income taxes receivable
|
|
|
(1,074,000
|
)
|
|
|
(725,000
|
)
|
Increase
in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(376,000
|
)
|
|
|
(89,000
|
)
|
Increase (decrease)
in accounts payable, accrued liabilities, income taxes payable and current
liabilities associated with discontinued operations
|
|
|
(57,000
|
)
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,387,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,494,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures - real estate
|
|
|
(221,000
|
)
|
|
|
(177,000
|
)
|
Proceeds
from sales of real estate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,044,000
|
|
Proceeds
from redemptions of marketable securities
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,142,000
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
1,773,000
|
|
|
|
8,054,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of debt
|
|
|
4,582,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(4,276,000
|
)
|
|
|
(976,000
|
)
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
|
|
(8,095,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Financing
costs
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(7,889,000
|
)
|
|
|
(976,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,503,000
|
)
|
|
|
5,584,000
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
13,023,000
|
|
|
|
4,843,000
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
4,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,427,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES TO THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
1,239,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,319,000
|
|
Income
taxes, net
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
WILSHIRE
ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been
prepared by the registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although Wilshire Enterprises, Inc.
(“registrant”, the “Company”, “Wilshire”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) believes that
the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading,
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Company's latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, as
amended. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2008 has been derived from the audited balance sheet as of that date
included in the Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, this condensed
consolidated financial information reflects all adjustments necessary to present
fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009 or any other
subsequent period.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
In
January 2008, the Company closed on the sale of a 1 bedroom condominium at
Jefferson Gardens, New Jersey for gross proceeds of approximately $150,000 and
net cash proceeds of approximately $137,000. After payments of closing costs and
providing for taxes, the Company realized a net gain, for reporting purposes,
during the first quarter of 2008 of approximately $61,000 from this
sale.
In May
2008, the Company closed on the sale of its Tamarac Office Plaza, Florida,
office complex for gross proceeds of $2 million. After payments of
closing costs and providing for taxes, the Company realized a net gain during
the second quarter of 2008 of approximately $686,000 from this
sale.
We
evaluated subsequent events through November 12, 2009, the date of financial
statement issuance, and concluded there were no subsequent events to
disclose.
Marketable
equity securities:
The
Company formerly held investments in certain marketable equity securities and
short-term marketable debt securities, including auction rate securities (“ARS”)
with interest rate resets ranging from every seven days to every 45
days. As of December 31, 2008, the Company held $2.0 million of
auction rate securities, classified as available-for-sale. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, the Company redeemed its remaining investment of $2.0
million of ARS at par.
During
June 2008, the Company sold its investment in marketable equity securities which
consisted of common shares in one real estate company for gross proceeds of $1.3
million. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a loss from
the sale of securities of $553,000.
Assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis:
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which
was primarily codified into Topic 820 – “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic
820”) in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). ASC Topic 820
provides a single definition of fair value and a common framework for measuring
fair value as well as new disclosure requirements for fair value measurements
used in financial statements. Under ASC Topic 820, fair value is determined
based upon the exit price that would be received by a company to sell an asset
or paid a company to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants, exclusive of any transaction costs. Fair value measurements
are determined by either the principal market or the most advantageous market.
The principal market is the market with the greatest level of activity and
volume for the asset or liability. Absent a principal market to measure fair
value, the Company has used the most advantageous market, which is the market
where the Company would receive the highest selling price for the asset or pay
the lowest price to settle the liability, after considering transaction costs.
However, when using the most advantageous market, transaction costs are only
considered to determine which market is the most advantageous and these costs
are then excluded when applying a fair value measurement. Adoption of ASC Topic
820 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASC Topic
820 creates a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in the
valuation techniques to derive fair values. The basis for fair value
measurements for each level within the hierarchy is described below, with Level
1 having the highest priority and Level 3 having the lowest.
Level 1:
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2:
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in
active markets.
Level 3:
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant
inputs are unobservable.
Following
are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 using quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs
(Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash
equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$
|
4,721,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,721,000
|
|
The
Company’s investment in cash equivalents consists of short-term (less than 90
days) investments in money market funds and is priced at fair value, thus
recorded in Level 1 above.
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation:
The
Company recorded charges of $17,000 and $23,000 during the three month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $51,000 and $67,000 during
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in
connection with the issuance of stock options to employees and non-employee
directors. The effect of the expense related to the issuance of stock options
issued to employees and non-employee directors on basic and diluted earnings per
share was $0.00 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and $0.01
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The fair
value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company recognizes the fair value of
each option as compensation expense ratably using the straight-line attribution
method over the service period, which is generally the vesting period. The
Black-Scholes model incorporates the following assumptions:
|
·
|
Expected
volatility - the Company estimates the volatility of common stock at the
date of grant using historical
volatility.
|
|
·
|
Expected
term - the Company estimates the expected term of options granted based on
a combination of vesting schedules, term of the option and historical
experience.
|
|
·
|
Risk-free
interest rate - the Company estimates the risk-free interest rate using
the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of
the options in effect at the time of
grant.
|
|
·
|
Dividends
- the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero despite the fact
that the Company paid a one-time distribution of $3.00 per share during
2006. The Company intends to retain any earnings to fund future operations
and potentially invest in additional real estate
activities.
|
Pursuant
to the provisions of the 2004 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, no stock
options were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 35,000
stock options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, to
non-employee directors. The fair value of stock options was estimated
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the variables presented in
the following table.
The
following table outlines the variables used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
2.41%
- 2.84
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
%Volatility
|
|
|
67.15%
- 68.03
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
Expected
option term
|
|
10
years
|
|
-
|
|
As of
September 30, 2009, the Company had total unrecognized compensation expense
related to options granted to non-employee directors of $122,000, which will be
recognized over a remaining average period of 3.5 years.
Reclassifications:
Certain
amounts in the 2008 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the September 30, 2009 presentation.
The
Company conducts real estate operations in the United States, principally
consisting of residential apartment and condominium complexes and commercial and
retail properties. Continuing real estate revenues, operating expenses, net
operating income (“NOI”) and recurring capital improvements for the reportable
segments are summarized below and reconciled to the consolidated net loss from
continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008. Asset information is not reported since Wilshire does not use this measure
to assess performance.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Real
estate revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,916,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,004,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
318,000
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
2,234,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,334,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,327,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,279,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
193,000
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
1,520,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,469,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating income (“NOI”):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
589,000
|
|
|
$
|
725,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
714,000
|
|
|
$
|
865,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
113,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of NOI to consolidated loss from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
NOI
|
|
$
|
714,000
|
|
|
$
|
865,000
|
|
Total
other income (loss), including net investment income
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
|
|
(272,000
|
)
|
|
|
(284,000
|
)
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
(826,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,051,000
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(422,000
|
)
|
|
|
(443,000
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
281,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(520,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(453,000
|
)
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Real
estate revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
5,757,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,815,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,017,000
|
|
|
|
1,093,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
6,774,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,908,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
3,769,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,854,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
534,000
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
4,303,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,373,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating income (“NOI”):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,988,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,961,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
483,000
|
|
|
|
574,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
2,471,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,535,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
146,000
|
|
|
$
|
122,000
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
71,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
217,000
|
|
|
$
|
177,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of NOI to consolidated loss from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
NOI
|
|
$
|
2,471,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,535,000
|
|
Total
other income (loss), including net investment income
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
Depreciation
expense
|
|
|
(858,000
|
)
|
|
|
(902,000
|
)
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
(2,991,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,848,000
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,288,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336,000
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
960,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,674,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,632,000
|
)
|
Comprehensive
loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,088,000
|
)
|
Reclassification
adjustment, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,000
|
|
Unrealized
loss arising during the period, net of taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(258,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,012,000
|
)
|
Comprehensive
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(472,000
|
)
|
$
|
(296,000
|
)
|
Unrealized
loss arising during the period, net of taxes
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(472,000
|
)
|
$
|
(296,000
|
)
|
4.
Earnings Per
Share:
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Numerator-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss – basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(472,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,866,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,088,000
|
)
|
Denominator-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
7,170,549
|
|
|
|
7,926,248
|
|
|
|
7,752,508
|
|
|
|
7,923,642
|
|
Incremental
shares from assumed conversions of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
|
7,170,549
|
|
|
|
7,926,248
|
|
|
|
7,752,508
|
|
|
|
7,923,642
|
|
Basic
loss per share:
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Diluted
loss per share:
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
For the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, 262,748 and 96,003,
respectively, of potentially dilutive securities have been excluded
from the calculation of net loss per share since the effects of such potentially
dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive because the Company incurred net
losses in each period presented. For the nine months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, 334,281 and 117,049, respectively, of potentially dilutive
securities have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per share since
the effects of such potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive
because the Company incurred net losses in each period presented.
5.
Commitments and
Contingencies:
On June
3, 2004, the Company announced a program to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares
of its common stock on the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or
otherwise. This purchasing activity may occur from time to time, in one or more
transactions. From the inception of the authorization through September 30,
2009, the Company had purchased 138,231 shares under this program at an
approximate cost of $1,017,000. No shares were purchased during the three months
ended September 30, 2009.
6.
Fair value of financial
instruments
The
following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management,
using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop
estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition
of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value
amounts.
Cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable reasonably approximate
their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.
Mortgage
notes payable have an estimated fair value based on discounted cash flow models
of approximately $30.8 million at September 30, 2009, which is greater than the
carrying value by $2.7 million.
Disclosure
about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information
available to management as of September 30, 2009.
7.
Stock Option
Plans:
Pursuant
to the provisions of the 2004 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, 10,000
stock options were granted to a newly appointed independent director on January
9, 2009 at an exercise price of $1.285 per share with a four year vesting period
and a ten year life. In addition, on April 20, 2009, the independent
members of the Company’s Board of Directors were granted 5,000 options each,
totaling 25,000 options at an exercise price of $1.50 per share with a four year
vesting period and a ten year life. No options were granted under the
2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 or 2008.
A summary
of option activity under the option plans as of September 30, 2009, and changes
during the period then ended, is presented below:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
terminated and expired
|
|
|
(22,500
|
)
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding and expected to vest at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
142,500
|
|
|
$
|
5.03
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
A summary
of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted shares as of September 30,
2009 and changes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, are
presented below:
Nonvested Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
shares at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
$
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
Granted
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
Shares
Vested
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
Shares
Forfeited
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
9.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
shares at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
129,755
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
8.
Income
Taxes:
The
Company accounts for income taxes in annual periods by applying the asset and
liability approach. The Company’s interim period income tax provisions
(benefits) are recognized based upon projected effective income tax rates for
the fiscal year in its entirety and, therefore, requires management of the
Company to make estimates of future income, expense and differences between
financial accounting and income tax requirements in the jurisdictions in which
the Company is taxed. Material differences between tax rates in the
jurisdictions in which the Company is taxed and the effective income tax rates
are attributable to fair value adjustments arising from the Company’s financial
instruments that are measured at fair values for reporting purposes, share-based
payment arrangements and non-deductible amortization of intangible assets. The
Company’s effective income tax rates are subject to ongoing evaluation and
adjustment based upon facts and circumstances surrounding our estimation of
future income and expense and differences between financial statement and
taxable income (loss).
The
amount of income taxes and related income tax positions taken is subject to
audits by federal and state tax authorities. The Company’s estimate of the
potential outcome of any uncertain tax position is subject to management’s
assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time,
pursuant to ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC Topic 740”) which requires a
more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
Company’s policy is to record a liability for the difference between the benefit
recognized and measured pursuant to ASC Topic 740 and tax position taken or
expected to be taken on the tax return. Then, to the extent that the assessment
of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period
in which the determination is made. During the periods reported, management of
the Company has concluded that no significant tax position requires recognition
under ASC Topic 740.
The
Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. The tax years 2006, 2007 and 2008 remain open to examination
by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a
valuation allowance against its state tax benefit in the amount of
$78,000.
9.
Other
Matters:
Issuer
Tender Offer
Pursuant
to a settlement agreement entered into by the Company with certain shareholders,
the Company completed an issuer tender offer on September 14,
2009. Pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, the Company agreed
to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.00 per
share. The Company purchased and retired 4,047,380 shares of its
common stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase
price of $8,094,760. The 4,047,380 shares purchased pursuant to the
tender offer are comprised of the 4,000,000 shares the Company offered to
purchase and 47,380 shares purchased pursuant to the Company’s right under
applicable securities laws to purchase up to an additional 2% of the Company’s
outstanding shares without extending the tender offer
.
Summercreek
Refinancing
On May
28, 2009, the Company refinanced the existing mortgage on its Summercreek
property for approximately $4.6 million at an interest rate of 5.55% for a ten
year period.
Legal
Matters
On or
about July 31, 2009, James Robert Soprito, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Josephine Soprito, as Decedent; Cindy Maguglin and
Donna Tryon (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a Complaint for Damages in the
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco
against numerous defendants, including the Company. Plaintiffs are
seeking damages based on claims of, among other things, wrongful
death, negligence, strict liability, enterprise liability, and premises
liability. These claims are based on the allegation that the decedent and
others suffered injuries as a result of exposure to asbestos materials at
certain unspecified times in the past. The Company sold its oil and gas
business in 2004 and does not believe it should be named as a party in the
case. The
Company has been granted an extension of time to
answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint pending the Plaintiff's
evaluation of materials submitted by the Company in support of its position that
it should not be named as a party. If the case were to proceed against the
Company, the Company intends to vigorously oppose the claims. In addition,
the purchase and sale agreement pursuant to which the Company sold its oil and
gas business requires the purchaser to idemnify the Company for certain
environmental liabilities relating to the properties sold. While the
purchaser has claimed that such indemnification is not applicable to this case,
the Company believes it is enforceable and plans to pursue its indemnification
claim if the case were to proceed against the Company.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The
following discussion addresses the Company’s results of operations for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and the Company’s consolidated financial condition as
of September 30, 2009. It is presumed that readers have read or have access to
Wilshire’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K which includes disclosures regarding
critical accounting policies as part of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements included herein other than
statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Although the
Company believes that the underlying assumptions and expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that
such expectations will prove to be correct. The Company’s business and prospects
are subject to a number of risks which could cause actual results to differ
materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements, including
environmental risks relating to the Company’s real estate properties,
competition, the substantial capital expenditures required to fund the Company’s
real estate operations, market and economic changes in areas where the Company
holds real estate properties, interest rate fluctuations, government regulation,
and the ability of the Company to implement its business strategy. For
additional information regarding risk factors impacting the Company and its
forward-looking statements, see Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Effects of Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to
the accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets.
This amendment requires greater transparency and additional disclosures for
transfers of financial assets and the entity’s continuing involvement with them
and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. In addition,
this amendment eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
(“QSPE”). This amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2009. This amendment will not have a material
effect on our financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
In June
2009, the FASB also issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure
requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The
elimination of the concept of a QSPE, as discussed above, removes the exception
from applying the consolidation guidance within this amendment. This amendment
requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining
whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an
enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE.
Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s
involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that
involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise’s
financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be required to disclose
significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to
consolidate a VIE. This amendment is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. This amendment will not have
a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
In June
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”
or “ASC”). The Codification has become the single source for all authoritative
Generally Accepted Accounting Principal (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be
applied for financial statements issued for periods ending after September 15,
2009. The Codification does not change GAAP and will not have an effect on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In May
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which was primarily
codified into Topic 855 – Subsequent Events in the ASC. This standard
establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued and shall be applied to subsequent events not
addressed in other applicable accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. ASC Topic 855, among other things, sets
forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management should
evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity
should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date
in its financial statements and the disclosures an entity should make about
events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet
date. ASC Topic 855 is effective for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2009. The Company’s adoption of ASC Topic 855 did not have a
material impact on the interim or annual consolidated financial statements or
the disclosures in those financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, which was primarily codified into
ASC 82-10-65-4. ASC 82-10-65-4 provides additional guidance for
estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased, and re-emphasizes that regardless of
market conditions the fair value measurement is an exit price
concept. The scope of this pronouncement does not include assets and
liabilities measured under Level 1 inputs (quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets). ASC 82-10-65-4 is applied prospectively to all
fair value measurements where appropriate and is effective for the Company’s
interim and annual periods beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year
2009. The Company’s adoption of ASC 82-10-65-4 did not have a
material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful
Life of Intangible Assets, which was primarily codified into ASC Topic 350 –
Intangibles. This guidance amends the factors that should be
considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and requires enhanced related
disclosures. ASC Topic 350 also requires expanded disclosure related
to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption
is not permitted. The adoption of ASC Topic 350 did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133
,
which was
primarily codified into ASC Topic 815 – Derivatives and Hedging. ASC
Topic 815 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for
using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains
and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. ASC Topic 815 was
effective beginning January 1, 2009. The Company does not have any
derivative instruments or utilize any hedging activities and therefore, ASC
Topic 815 is not applicable to the Company at this time.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141-R, Business Combinations, which was
primarily codified into ASC Topic 805 – Business Combinations. This
guidance changes the accounting for acquisitions specifically eliminating the
step acquisition model, changing the recognition of contingent consideration
from being recognized when it is probable to being recognized at the time of
acquisition, disallowing the capitalization of transaction costs and changes
when restructurings related to acquisition can be recognized. The
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008
and will only impact the accounting for acquisitions that are made after
adoption. The Company believes the adoption of ASC Topic 805 will not
have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations as there are no current acquisitions being contemplated.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51, which was
primarily codified into ASC Topic 810 – Consolidation Noncontrolling Interest.
ASC Topic 810 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008, with earlier adoption prohibited. This statement requires the
recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the
consolidated financial statements and separate from the Company’s
equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest will be included in the consolidated net income on the face of the
consolidated income statement. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51’s
consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of ASC Topic
805. ASC Topic 810 also includes expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling
interest. The Company believes the adoption of ASC Topic 810 will not
have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations as there are no non-controlling interests.
Overview
Net loss
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $472,000 or $0.07 per diluted
share as compared to a net loss of $296,000 or $0.04 per diluted share for the
three months ended September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, the Company recorded a net loss of $1,866,000 or $0.24 per diluted share
as compared to a net loss of $1,088,000 or $0.14 per diluted share for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Operations are shown as continuing
and discontinued, with discontinued operations comprised of the results of
operations from the Company’s real estate properties held for sale, the gain
from real estate properties held for sale that were sold during the period and
the wind down of the oil and gas businesses.
In
January 2008, the Company closed on the sale of a one bedroom condominium at
Jefferson Gardens, New Jersey for gross proceeds of approximately $150,000.
After payments of closing costs and providing for taxes, the Company realized a
net gain during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately
$61,000 from this sale.
In May
2008, the Company closed on the sale of its Tamarac Office Plaza, Florida,
office complex for gross proceeds of $2 million. After payments of
closing costs and providing for taxes, the Company realized a net gain during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $686,000 from this
sale.
The
following table presents the increases (decreases) in each major statements of
operations category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to 2008. The following discussion of “Results of Operations” references
these increases (decreases).
Increase
(Decrease) in Consolidated Statements of Income Categories for the
Periods:
|
|
For the three months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
For the nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
-4.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(134,000
|
)
|
|
|
-1.9
|
%
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
-1.6
|
%
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|
|
-4.2
|
%
|
|
|
(44,000
|
)
|
|
|
-4.9
|
%
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
|
|
-21.4
|
%
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
(186,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
and interest income
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
-93.8
|
%
|
|
|
(322,000
|
)
|
|
|
-91.48
|
%
|
Loss
on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
553,000
|
|
|
|
-100.0
|
%
|
Other
income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
-4.7
|
%
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Loss
before benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
99,000
|
|
|
|
-26.1
|
%
|
|
|
159,000
|
|
|
|
-14.2
|
%
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
|
(67,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations - real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
-53.3
|
%
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
|
-20.8
|
%
|
Gain
from sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(747,000
|
)
|
|
|
-100.0
|
%
|
Discontinued
operations - oil & gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(173,000
|
)
|
|
|
-62.5
|
%
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
-37.4
|
%
|
Gain
from sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(176,000
|
)
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(778,000
|
)
|
|
|
71.5
|
%
|
Basic
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
-100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
-128.6
|
%
|
Net
loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
Diluted
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
-100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
-128.6
|
%
|
Net
loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
Results of
Operations
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 as Compared with Three Months Ended September
30, 2008
Continuing
Operations:
Loss from
continuing operations amounted to $520,000 during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $453,000
during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Results per diluted share from
continuing operations amounted to $(0.07) during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $(0.06) during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The 2009 period reflects a decrease in general and
administrative expense of $225,000, which primarily relates to decreased
professional fees, which was partially offset by an in increase in operating
expenses of $51,000. The 2008 period included the following charges
to expense: an increase in general and administrative expense of $159,000, which
primarily relates to professional fees incurred in connection with the proposed
sale of the Company, as well as an increase in operating expenses of $34,000
partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense of $80,000 and an
increased income tax benefit of $205,000 resulting from an increased operating
loss for the period.
Segment
Information
Wilshire
presently conducts business in the residential (including condominiums that it
owns and rents) and commercial real estate segments. The following table sets
forth comparative data for Wilshire’s real estate segments in continuing
operations:
|
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
Three months
Ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Three months
Ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
2,334
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating income (“NOI”)
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
%
|
Reconciliation to
consolidated loss from continuing operations:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
operating income
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
Other
income (loss)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(520
|
)
|
|
$
|
(453
|
)
|
The above
table details the comparative net operating income (“NOI”) for Wilshire’s
residential and commercial real estate segments, and reconciles the combined NOI
to consolidated loss from continuing operations. NOI is based on operating
revenue and expenses directly associated with the operations of the real estate
properties, but excludes depreciation and interest expense. Wilshire assesses
and measures segment operating results based on NOI, which is a direct measure
of each property’s contribution to the results of the Company before considering
revenues from treasury activities, overhead expenses and other costs that are
not directly related to the performance of a property. The Company believes NOI
is a more descriptive measure of the Company’s performance than loss from
continuing operations. NOI is not a measure of operating results or cash flow as
measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs
and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of
liquidity.
Residential
Segment
The
residential segment is comprised of Sunrise Ridge Apartments and Van Buren
Apartments, both in Arizona, Wellington Estates and Summercreek Apartments, both
in Texas and Alpine Village Apartments in New Jersey. During the three months
ended September 30, 2009, NOI decreased by $136,000 or 18.8% to $589,000 as
compared to $725,000 during the same period in 2008.
Revenues
decreased $88,000 or 4.4% during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to
$1,916,000, compared to $2,004,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
Operating expenses increased $48,000 or 3.8% to $1,327,000. The decrease in
revenues was primarily attributable to increased vacancy rates at the Company’s
Sunrise Ridge apartment complex. The increase in operating expenses was
primarily attributable to increased maintenance costs and apartment preparation
costs resulting from occupancy turnover.
Commercial
Segment
The
commercial segment is comprised of Royal Mall Plaza in Mesa, Arizona and Tempe
Corporate Center in Tempe, Arizona. During the three months ended September 30,
2009, NOI decreased by $15,000 or 10.7% to $125,000 as compared to $140,000
during the same period in 2008. Revenues during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2008 decreased
$12,000 or 3.6% to $318,000 and operating expenses increased $3,000 or 1.6% to
$193,000. The revenue decrease was primarily attributable to decreased occupancy
at Tempe Corporate Center (Tempe, AZ) resulting in decreased rental revenues in
the amounts of $14,000, which was partially offset by an increase in
rental revenues at Royal Mall Plaza in the amount of
$2,000. The increased operating expenses were primarily attributable
to increased real estate taxes and maintenance costs in the amount of
$3,000.
Other
Operating Expenses
Depreciation and amortization
expense
amounted to $272,000 during the three months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $12,000 from $284,000 during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense
relates to the retirement of certain assets during the past year.
General and administrative
expense
decreased $225,000, or 21.4%, to $826,000 during the three months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1,051,000 during the same period in
2008. The decrease in general and administrative expense is primarily
attributable to decreased professional fees as a result of the termination of
the proposed merger of the Company during 2008, which was partially offset by
increased payroll and payroll related costs associated with the appointment of
the Company’s new President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2009 and the
costs associated with the Company’s tender offer which was completed in
September 2009.
Other income (loss)
decreased
from income of $80,000 in the 2008 quarter to income of $5,000 during the 2009
quarter, a decrease of $75,000. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease
in interest and dividend income of $75,000 during the 2009
period. The decrease in interest and dividend income during the three
months ended September 30, 2009 is a result of declining interest rates and the
redemption of the Company’s ARS held during 2008 and reduced dividend
income.
Interest expense
decreased to
$422,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to
$443,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease
primarily relates to the reduction in the Company’s mortgage liability and the
refinancing of the Summercreek property.
The
benefit for income taxes amounted to $281,000 and $380,000 during the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The change in the
benefit for income taxes is related to a decreased loss from continuing
operations before tax and a valuation allowance related to state taxes of
$78,000 during the 2009 quarter as compared to the 2008 quarter.
Discontinued
Operations, Net of Taxes:
Real
Estate
The after
tax loss from discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30,
2009 amounted to $56,000 as compared to an after tax loss of $120,000 during the
three months ended September 30, 2008. The after tax loss of $56,000 and
$120,000 for the 2009 and 2008 periods, respectively, reflects the loss from
operations.
Oil
and Gas
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a profit from the
wind down of its former oil and gas business, of $104,000 as compared to income
of $277,000 during the same period in 2008. The net profit from the wind down of
the oil and gas business during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 relates to
foreign currency gains during the period. The net income from the
wind down of the oil and gas business during the quarter ended September 30,
2008 relates to foreign currency gains during the period and a tax refund in the
amount of $85,000.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 as Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
Continuing
Operations:
Loss from
continuing operations amounted to $1,674,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to a loss from continuing operations of
$1,632,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Results per diluted
share from continuing operations amounted to $(0.22) during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $(0.21) during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The 2009 period included the following charges to expense:
an increase in general and administrative expense of $143,000, which primarily
relates to the increased payroll and payroll related costs associated with the
appointment of the Company’s new President and Chief Operating Officer in
January 2009 of $315,000, an increase in shareholder reports and solicitations
primarily related to the Company’s annual meeting and completed issuer tender
offer of $310,000, which was partially offset by a decrease in accounting fees
of $244,000 and consulting fees of $221,000 as a result of fees incurred in
connection with the proposed merger during the 2008 period.
Segment
Information
Wilshire
presently conducts business in the residential (including condominiums that it
owns and rents) and commercial real estate segments. The following table sets
forth comparative data for Wilshire’s real estate segments in continuing
operations:
|
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
Nine months
Ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
000's of $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
5,757
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
%
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
6,774
|
|
|
$
|
6,908
|
|
|
$
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating income (“NOI”)
|
|
$
|
1,988
|
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,471
|
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
%
|
Reconciliation to
consolidated loss from continuing operations:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
operating income
|
|
$
|
2,471
|
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
|
(902
|
)
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
(2,991
|
)
|
|
|
(2,848
|
)
|
Other
income (loss)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,632
|
)
|
The above
table details the comparative net operating income (“NOI”) for Wilshire’s
residential and commercial real estate segments, and reconciles the combined NOI
to consolidated loss from continuing operations. NOI is based on operating
revenue and expenses directly associated with the operations of the real estate
properties, but excludes depreciation and interest expense. Wilshire assesses
and measures segment operating results based on NOI, which is a direct measure
of each property’s contribution to the results of the Company before considering
revenues from treasury activities, overhead expenses and other costs that are
not directly related to the performance of a property. The Company believes NOI
is a more descriptive measure of the Company’s performance than loss from
continuing operations. NOI is not a measure of operating results or cash flow as
measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs
and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of
liquidity.
Residential
Segment
The
residential segment is comprised of Sunrise Ridge Apartments and Van Buren
Apartments, both in Arizona, Wellington Estates and Summercreek Apartments, both
in Texas and Alpine Village Apartments in New Jersey. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, NOI increased by $27,000 or 1.4% to $1,988,000 as
compared to $1,961,000 during the same period in 2008.
Revenues
decreased $58,000 or 1.0% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$5,757,000, compared to $5,815,000 during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Operating expenses decreased $85,000 or 2.2% to $3,769,000. The decrease
in revenues was primarily attributable to a decline in revenue at the Arizona
apartment complexes as a result of decreased occupancy at these properties
during the period. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable
to the implementation of greater cost controls at the Company’s Arizona and
Texas apartment complexes.
Commercial
Segment
The
commercial segment is comprised of Royal Mall Plaza in Mesa, Arizona and Tempe
Corporate Center in Tempe, Arizona. Revenues during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
decreased $76,000 or 7.0% to $1,017,000 and operating expenses increased $15,000
or 2.9% to $534,000. The revenue decrease was primarily attributable to
decreased occupancy at Royal Mall (Arizona) resulting in decreased rental
revenues in the amounts of $93,000, which was partially offset by an increase in
rental revenues at Tempe Corporate Center in the amount of
$17,000. The increase in operating expenses was primarily
attributable to increased maintenance costs at Temple Corporate Center in the
amount of $15,000.
Other
Operating Expenses
Depreciation and amortization
expense
amounted to $858,000 during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $44,000 from $902,000 during the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense relates to
the retirement of certain assets during the past year.
General and administrative
expense
increased $143,000, or 5.0%, to $2,991,000 during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $2,848,000 during the same period in
2008. The increase in general and administrative expense is primarily
attributable to the increased payroll and payroll related costs associated with
the appointment of the Company’s new President and Chief Operating Officer in
January 2009 of $315,000, an increase in shareholder reports and solicitations
primarily related to the Company’s annual meeting and completed issuer tender
offer of $310,000, which was partially offset by a decrease in accounting fees
of $244,000 and consulting fees of $221,000 which were incurred in connection
with the proposed merger during the 2008 period.
Other income (loss)
increased
from a loss of $200,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to
income of $32,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase
of $232,000. The increase is primarily related to the loss on the sale of
marketable securities of $553,000 during the nine months ended September 30,
2008, which was partially offset by interest and dividend income of $352,000
during the same period The decrease in interest and dividend income during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 is a result of declining interest rates and
the redemption of the Company’s ARS held during 2008 and reduced dividend
income.
Interest expense
decreased to
$1,288,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to
$1,336,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease
primarily relates to the reduction in the Company’s mortgage liability and the
refinance of the Summercreek mortgage.
The
benefit for income taxes amounted to $960,000 and $1,119,000 during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The change in the
benefit for income taxes is related to a decreased loss from continuing
operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
same period during 2008 and a valuation allowance related to state taxes of
$78,000 during the 2009 period.
Discontinued
Operations, Net of Taxes:
Real
Estate
The after
tax loss from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 amounted to $309,000 as compared to an after tax income of $357,000 during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The after tax loss of $309,000
reflects the loss from operations. The income during the 2008 period reflects
the sales of one condominium unit at Jefferson Gardens in January 2008 for an
after-tax gain of approximately $61,000 and the sale of the Tamarac Office Plaza
in May 2008 for an after-tax gain of approximately $686,000. The loss
from operating properties classified as discontinued operations was $390,000
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Oil
and Gas
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded net income from
the wind down of its former oil and gas business, of $117,000 as compared to net
income of $187,000 during the same period in 2008. The net income from the wind
down of the oil and gas business during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
relates to foreign currency gains during the period while the net income in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 relates to foreign currency gains in the
period and a tax refund in the amount of $85,000.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had working capital, including restricted cash,
of $4.0 million, compared to working capital of $10.0 million at December 31,
2008. The decrease in working capital during the period primarily
relates to the completed issuer tender offer during September 2009 which reduced
current assets by approximately $8.1 million. This was partially offset by the
refinancing of the existing Summercreek debt which was classified as a current
liability at December 31, 2008. As a result, current liabilities were
reduced by $3.8 million. As it relates to the completed issuer
tender offer, the Company purchased and retired 4,047,380 shares of its common
stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of
$8,094,760.
The
Company has $4.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at
September 30, 2009. This balance is comprised of working capital accounts for
its real estate properties and corporate needs. In the short-term, the Company
will continue to invest these funds in high quality investments that are
consistent with its investment policy which includes the following objectives:
a) To maintain liquidity which is sufficient to meet any reasonably forecasted
cash requirements; b) To preserve principal through investment in products and
entities that are consistent with the Company’s risk tolerance; and c) To
maximize income consistent with the Company’s liquidity and risk tolerance
criteria. Consistent with this investment policy, the Company only invests in
approved securities such as obligations of the U.S. Treasury, the U.S.
Government and agencies with obligations guaranteed by the U.S. Government and
highly rated municipal and corporate
issuers.
The
Company formerly held investments in certain marketable equity securities and
short-term marketable debt securities, including auction rate securities (“ARS”)
with interest rate resets ranging from every seven days to every 45
days. As of December 31, 2008, the Company held $2.0 million of
auction rate securities, classified as available-for-sale. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the Company redeemed its remaining investment
of $2.0 million of ARS at par.
The
Company continues to explore opportunities to invest in its real estate
properties to enhance value and is investigating corporate and real estate
property transactions, both as buyer and seller, as they arise. The timing of
such transactions, if any, will depend upon, among other criteria, economic
conditions and the favorable evaluation of specific opportunities presented to
the Company. As of the end of the first nine months of 2009, management
considers its liquidity position adequate to fulfill the Company’s current
business plans. The preceding statement constitutes a forward-looking
statement.
Net cash
used in operating activities amounted to $2,387,000 and $1,494,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the use of cash resulted from a net
loss of $1,866,000, the effect of depreciation of real estate properties and the
changes in receivables, prepaid expenses, payables and current and deferred tax
accounts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the use of cash
resulted from a net loss of $1,088,000, the effect of the sale and depreciation
of real estate properties, and the changes in receivables, prepaid expenses,
payables and current and deferred tax accounts.
Net cash
provided by investing activities amounted to $1,773,000 and $8,054,000 for the
nine months period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The cash
provided by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
primarily relates to the proceeds from the redemption and sale of marketable
securities in the amount of $2,000,000, an increase in restricted cash in the
amount of $6,000, which was partially offset by capital expenditures on real
estate properties of $221,000. The cash provided by investing
activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily relates to
the proceeds from the redemption and sale of marketable securities in the amount
of $6,142,000, proceeds from the sale of real estate properties of $2,044,000, a
decrease in restricted cash of $45,000 which was partially offset by capital
expenditures on real estate properties of $177,000.
Net cash
used in financing activities amounted to $7,889,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of
$976,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, the net cash used was primarily attributable to the
completed issuer tender offer in September 2009 in the amount of $8.1 million,
the repayment of the existing debt on the Summercreek property of $3.8 million
and the repayment of scheduled long-term debt in the amount of $406,000 during
the period, which was partially offset by the proceeds related to the
refinancing of the Summercreek property in the amount of $4.6
million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the use of
cash primarily reflects the repayment of long-term debt due to the normal
amortization of long-term debt from monthly debt service payments of $410,000
and the payoff of the debt related to the Tamarac Office Plaza in May 2008 in
the amount of $566,000.
The
Company does not have any sources of working capital outside of its business
operations. It does not have any bank lines of credit or contingently
available sources of funds. The Company is currently evaluating
various bank lines of credit and other financing alternatives. The
Company believes it has adequate capital resources to fund its operations for
the foreseeable future. The preceding sentence constitutes a
forward-looking statement.
The
Company is committed to investing in its properties to maintain their
competitiveness within their markets and for the purposes of upgrading and
repositioning where appropriate.
On June
3, 2004, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 1,000,000
shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market, in privately negotiated
transactions or otherwise. This purchasing activity may occur from time to time,
in one or more transactions. At September 30, 2009, the Company had purchased
138,231 shares at an aggregate cost of $1,017,000 under this
program. There were no shares repurchased by the Company during the
nine month period ended September 30, 2009.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
After the
sale of its Canadian oil and gas assets, the Company held cash and cash
equivalents at its Canadian subsidiary. The value is exposed to
fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar / U.S. dollar exchange rate.
During 2008 the Company began repatriating its cash held in its Canadian
subsidiary as it was determined that no additional tax liabilities would be
levied with respect to the Company’s tax examination by the Province of
Alberta. At September 30, 2009, the Company maintained no cash
balances in its Canadian subsidiary. It is intended that the
remaining assets, net of liabilities, of its Canadian subsidiary will be
repatriated during the remainder of 2009. However, no assurance can be given as
to the specific timing of any such repatriation.
Long-term
debt as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consists of the
following:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Mortgage
notes payable
|
|
$
|
28,151,000
|
|
|
$
|
27,845,000
|
|
Less-current
portion
|
|
|
564,000
|
|
|
|
4,378,000
|
|
Long-term
portion
|
|
$
|
27,587,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,467,000
|
|
The
aggregate maturities of the long-term debt in each of the five years subsequent
to September 30, 2009 and thereafter are:
Year Ended
|
|
Amount
|
|
September
30, 2010
|
|
$
|
564,000
|
|
September
30, 2011
|
|
|
597,000
|
|
September
30, 2012
|
|
|
628,000
|
|
September
30, 2013
|
|
|
22,053,000
|
|
September
30, 2014
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,235,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,151,000
|
|
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had $28,151,000 of mortgage debt outstanding
which bears interest at an average fixed rate of 5.64% and a weighted average
remaining life of approximately 3.69 years. The fixed rate mortgages are subject
to repayment (amortization) schedules that are longer than the term of the
mortgages. As such, the approximate amount of balloon payments for all mortgage
debt that will be required is as follows:
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
21,699,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,841,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,540,000
|
|
On May
28, 2009, the Company refinanced the existing mortgage on its Summercreek
property for approximately $4.6 million at an interest rate of 5.55% for a ten
year period. In addition, Wilshire expects to re-finance the
remaining individual mortgages with new mortgages when their terms expire. To
this extent, we have exposure to interest rate risk on our fixed rate mortgage
debt and note obligations. If interest rates, at the time any individual debt
instrument is due, are higher than the current fixed interest rate, higher debt
service may be required, and/or re-financing proceeds may be less than the
amount of mortgage debt or notes being retired.
We
believe that the values of our properties will be adequate to command
re-financing proceeds equal to, or higher than the mortgage debt to be
re-financed. This expectation represents a forward-looking statement. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s forward
looking statement include economic conditions in the markets where such
properties are located and the level of market interest rates at the time the
Company is seeking to re-finance the properties.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Disclosure
controls and procedures.
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) are designed only to provide reasonable
assurance that they will meet their objectives that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. As
of September 30, 2009, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the
foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
September 30, 2009.
(b)
Changes in
internal controls over financial reporting.
Management has
determined that, as of September 30, 2009, there were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter then
ended that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Other
Matters
On or
about July 31, 2009, James Robert Soprito, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Josephine Soprito, as Decedent; Cindy Maguglin and
Donna Tryon (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a Complaint for Damages in the
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco
against numerous defendants, including the Company. Plaintiffs are
seeking damages based on claims of, among other things, wrongful
death, negligence, strict liability, enterprise liability, and premises
liability. These claims are based on the allegation that the decedent and
others suffered injuries as a result of exposure to asbestos materials at
certain unspecified times in the past. The Company sold its oil and gas
business in 2004 and does not believe it should be named as a party in the
case. The Company has been granted an extension of time to answer, move or
otherwise respond to the Complaint pending the Plaintiff's evaluation of
materials submitted by the Company in support of its position that it should not
be named as a party. If the case were to proceed against the Company, the
Company intends to vigorously oppose the claims. In addition, the purchase
and sale agreement pursuant to which the Company sold its oil and gas business
requires the purchaser to idemnify the Company for certain environmental
liabilities relating to the properties sold. While the purchaser has
claimed that such indemnification is not applicable to this case, the Company
believes it is enforceable and plans to pursue its indemnification claim if the
case were to proceed against the Company.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Total Number
Of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
|
|
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
|
|
Month
ended July 31, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Month
ended August 31, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Month
ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,047,380
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
4,047,380
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,047,380
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
4,047,380
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
On August
10, 2009 the Company announced the commencement of a tender offer to purchase
shares of its common stock. The Company was offering to purchase up to 4,000,000
shares of its common stock at a price of $2.00 per share for a maximum aggregate
purchase price of $8,000,000. The tender offer expired at 12:00 midnight, New
York City time, on Friday, September 4, 2009. As a result of the
tender offer, the Company purchased and retired 4,047,380 shares of its common
stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of
$8,094,760. The 4,047,380 shares purchased pursuant to the tender
offer are comprised of the 4,000,000 shares the Company offered to purchase and
47,380 shares purchased pursuant to the Company’s right under applicable
securities laws to purchase up to an additional 2% of the Company’s outstanding
shares without extending the tender offer
.
Item 6.
Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
|
|
Exhibit
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
|
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer 6 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
WILSHIRE ENTERPRISES, INC.
(registrant)
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 16,
2009
|
|
/s/ S. Wilzig Izak
|
|
By:
|
S.
Wilzig Izak
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis J.
Elenio
|
|
By:
|
Francis
J. Elenio
|
|
Chief
Financial
Officer
|
Wilshire (AMEX:WOC)
過去 株価チャート
から 12 2024 まで 1 2025
Wilshire (AMEX:WOC)
過去 株価チャート
から 1 2024 まで 1 2025