Digital Turbine Inc (4MD)

But what about the mature CDMO? How’s it possible the company hasn’t even PR’d one new customer that could pull poor shareholders out of this dive? Or even mention the CDMO on their website? 🤷‍♀️

🤣 we'll talk soon.

Good find
It very well could be .

This is my biggest concern as it would place us right back to pre-RS valuations which means the company has gotten ZERO appreciation since the RS was done. Very sad to think about it that way but numbers mean more to me than words.

Downside case becomes more probable, not just possib

Becky Willoughby is a consultant of NWBO's and was acknowledged on the last slide of the BNOS slide deck. She posted this on LinkedIn about 2 weeks ago.

Any thoughts on whether her post has anything to do with her experience with NW, and with the Advent acquisition last fall? Could so

https://x.com/tylerehand/status/2075775265012154834?s=46&t=PY6cZdqw8iKtHPNq2RbYQw

https://x.com/tylerehand/status/2075775265012154834?s=46&t=PY6cZdqw8iKtHPNq2RbYQw

Appreciate your willingness to correct yourself, Goats. It’s something rarely seen here.

Greg Hopkins is a front for Brian Foote to allow this type of nonsense. Foote is the controlling shareholder of RWAX. It’s his show.

So I took a quick look at UMAV. I didn't have to go back very far to see that this 6 year old OTC Co. is on it's last breath. So now after all the other failures (HALO, Nano Lubes, Retacell, TF 600) Duffy signs a MOU with UMAV and 6 years ago they sold for about .20 with a SMALL OS of LESS than 5 mi

I'd doubt very seriously if the quarterlies are audited.

We hhpls are twice burned when you look at the shear volume of direct company DILUTION and INSIDER SELLS during each run up (using different tactics, motives and vehicles), just STAGGERING amount of personal wealth created for the GRIFTERS themselves WITHOUT any true success.
Some say pure S

And remind me the OS I think is 6 bil plus.
How fast anyone think the price will move unless they do a buy back which Brian Foote
Has may times hinted buy backs that never happened not in rwax but other tickers or he may have here can't remember. Or they cancel out shares WHICH Bria

You’re using someone aligned with NWBO as your one example. LOL.

“Because, dcvax methodology is elegant enough to convince the experts…”
I see…..

Yes he does. Feuerstein sometimes gets it wrong on regulator sentiment just like everyone else although his record is quite good compared to all the others. But I’ve never seen him get it wrong when it comes to biotech hanky-panky, PPHM and CYTR as examples.

The drug simply doesn’t work. That is the statement..   $.17 is he proof.

Saturday AM

Good morning Rocketeers, YES! as Boston posted, the Prez did not sign on to it, but as of 12:00:01AM it became Law
As for OTIS ROCKET same Old same Old actions

Have a great weekend people, Seya at the bell, GLTA-Ts🍻😎🇺🇸

Can't screw anyone over when the ticker isn't trading.

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c9ab1ece-6d5f-4c71-b4e2-de2b84400a17/gif

Wow - GREAT VIDEO. Yes - we're most definitely on our way to new highs now. This is exactly what we have all been waiting for. Watch the money come rolling in now and watch the stock price of HGRAF start to go up. HGRAF is now actually SELLING PRODUCTS and actually MAKING MONEY - LOTS of money. Huge

This is BS statement of the year. Looks like you are fascinated by AF. Hmmm.

When i think now, if the vaccine expert advisory group advises against dcvax, then that country is living in dark ages. Because, dcvax methodology is elegant enough to convince the experts. Moreover that country is already using it in specials on their folks and there are mostly no untoward effects.

Sounds good. I exited my small and midcaps 100% position COB on July 2, and moved it into 72% S&P500 and 28% large cap growth (US) as I was sensing smallcaps had already run 20% YTD and were vulnerable to a pullback, esp with large caps and Mag 7's underperforming and looking attractive. So far,