PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GB&T BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks
|
|
$
|
22,864
|
|
$
|
25,876
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits in banks
|
|
11,391
|
|
1,848
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
2,147
|
|
1,445
|
|
Securities
available for sale, at fair value
|
|
213,564
|
|
210,249
|
|
Restricted
equity securities, at cost
|
|
10,294
|
|
9,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of
unearned income
|
|
1,529,013
|
|
1,497,701
|
|
Less allowance
for loan losses
|
|
32,346
|
|
24,676
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
1,496,667
|
|
1,473,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment, net
|
|
40,641
|
|
41,776
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
87,116
|
|
87,116
|
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
4,968
|
|
5,678
|
|
Other real
estate and repossessed assets
|
|
34,293
|
|
4,673
|
|
Other assets
|
|
39,971
|
|
38,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
1,963,916
|
|
$
|
1,900,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
143,157
|
|
$
|
151,529
|
|
Interest-bearing
demand and savings
|
|
454,586
|
|
447,994
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
930,357
|
|
880,645
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
1,528,100
|
|
1,480,168
|
|
Federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
48,765
|
|
41,061
|
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank advances
|
|
107,236
|
|
96,498
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
854
|
|
939
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
18,172
|
|
18,474
|
|
Subordinated
debt
|
|
29,898
|
|
29,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
1,733,025
|
|
1,667,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock,
no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 14,230,796 and 14,131,891 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively
|
|
187,533
|
|
186,539
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
44,694
|
|
48,148
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders equity
|
|
230,891
|
|
233,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,963,916
|
|
$
|
1,900,376
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
3
GB&T BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including
fees
|
|
$
|
31,666
|
|
$
|
31,504
|
|
$
|
96,264
|
|
$
|
84,565
|
|
Taxable
securities
|
|
2,348
|
|
2,168
|
|
6,927
|
|
6,058
|
|
Nontaxable
securities
|
|
328
|
|
142
|
|
899
|
|
392
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
137
|
|
294
|
|
352
|
|
490
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits in banks
|
|
105
|
|
39
|
|
169
|
|
84
|
|
Total interest
income
|
|
34,584
|
|
34,147
|
|
104,611
|
|
91,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
16,370
|
|
13,769
|
|
47,494
|
|
34,724
|
|
Federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
466
|
|
287
|
|
1,256
|
|
815
|
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank advances
|
|
1,333
|
|
1,050
|
|
3,755
|
|
3,002
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
655
|
|
710
|
|
1,944
|
|
1,944
|
|
Total interest
expense
|
|
18,824
|
|
15,816
|
|
54,449
|
|
40,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
15,760
|
|
18,331
|
|
50,162
|
|
51,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
14,056
|
|
1,789
|
|
15,881
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income after provision for loan losses
|
|
1,704
|
|
16,542
|
|
34,281
|
|
46,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges
on deposit accounts
|
|
2,010
|
|
1,588
|
|
5,255
|
|
4,714
|
|
Mortgage
origination fees
|
|
498
|
|
770
|
|
1,748
|
|
1,911
|
|
Insurance
commissions
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
Other operating
income
|
|
479
|
|
405
|
|
1,513
|
|
1,205
|
|
Total other
income
|
|
2,990
|
|
2,764
|
|
8,523
|
|
7,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
employee benefits
|
|
8,319
|
|
7,603
|
|
24,719
|
|
22,244
|
|
Occupancy and
equipment expenses, net
|
|
1,884
|
|
1,808
|
|
5,637
|
|
5,147
|
|
Other operating
expenses
|
|
5,264
|
|
3,449
|
|
13,087
|
|
9,791
|
|
Total other
expense
|
|
15,467
|
|
12,860
|
|
43,443
|
|
37,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
before income taxes
|
|
(10,773
|
)
|
6,446
|
|
(639
|
)
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense (benefit)
|
|
(4,475
|
)
|
2,231
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,298
|
)
|
$
|
4,215
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
14,202
|
|
13,970
|
|
14,179
|
|
13,501
|
|
Diluted
|
|
14,310
|
|
14,304
|
|
14,341
|
|
13,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
per common share
|
|
$
|
0.095
|
|
$
|
0.090
|
|
$
|
0.280
|
|
$
|
0.265
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
4
GB&T BANCSHARES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,298
|
)
|
$
|
4,215
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of tax
|
|
1,714
|
|
1,696
|
|
13
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
1,714
|
|
1,696
|
|
13
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,584
|
)
|
$
|
5,911
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
$
|
11,558
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements
of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Stock
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Loss
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
14,132
|
|
$
|
186,539
|
|
$
|
48,148
|
|
$
|
(1,349
|
)
|
$
|
233,338
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
99
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
Dividends declared
$0.28 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,969
|
)
|
|
|
(3,969
|
)
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
14,231
|
|
$
|
187,533
|
|
$
|
44,694
|
|
$
|
(1,336
|
)
|
$
|
230,891
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
5
GB&T BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
11,446
|
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash Provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
2,295
|
|
2,301
|
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
15,881
|
|
4,269
|
|
Provision for
other real estate losses
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
Amortization and
(accretion), net
|
|
690
|
|
763
|
|
Stock option
expense
|
|
230
|
|
183
|
|
Loss on sale of
other real estate
|
|
318
|
|
127
|
|
Net increase in
other assets
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
(4,113
|
)
|
Net increase
(decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
(302
|
)
|
2,541
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities
|
|
19,561
|
|
17,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
securities available for sale
|
|
(45,825
|
)
|
(26,993
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sales of securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
1,896
|
|
Proceeds from
maturities of securities available for sale
|
|
42,545
|
|
25,920
|
|
Net increase in
restricted equity securities
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
Net increase in
interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
(9,543
|
)
|
(2,774
|
)
|
Net increase in
federal funds sold
|
|
(702
|
)
|
(22,182
|
)
|
Net increase in
loans
|
|
(73,348
|
)
|
(122,811
|
)
|
Net cash paid in
business combinations
|
|
|
|
(3,291
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sale of other real estate owned
|
|
2,801
|
|
2,656
|
|
Purchase of
premises and equipment
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
(2,202
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sale of premises and equipment
|
|
89
|
|
12
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
(85,657
|
)
|
(149,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in
deposits
|
|
47,932
|
|
136,234
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase
agreements
|
|
7,704
|
|
(4,068
|
)
|
Proceeds from
other borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
58,975
|
|
25,318
|
|
Payments on
other borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
(48,322
|
)
|
(30,097
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
(3,969
|
)
|
(3,511
|
)
|
Payment for
fractional shares
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Payment for
stock repurchase
|
|
|
|
(5,586
|
)
|
Contributed
capital
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
exercise of stock options
|
|
761
|
|
3,475
|
|
Net cash
provided by financing activities
|
|
63,084
|
|
121,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in
cash and due from banks
|
|
(3,012
|
)
|
(10,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks at beginning of period
|
|
25,876
|
|
30,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks at end of period
|
|
$
|
22,864
|
|
$
|
20,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
53,816
|
|
$
|
37,813
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,211
|
|
$
|
8,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash
transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real
estate acquired in settlement of loans
|
|
$
|
35,022
|
|
$
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
issued
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
29,372
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
6
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks, net of cash paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(3,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
|
17,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted equity
securities
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
|
106,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment
|
|
|
|
5,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
25,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit
intangible
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
(123,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
29,372
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
7
GB&T BANCSHARES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GB&T
Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, Gainesville Bank
& Trust, United Bank & Trust, Community Trust Bank, HomeTown Bank of
Villa Rica, First National Bank of the South, First National Bank of Gwinnett
and Mountain State Bank. Significant intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
The results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the year ending December 31, 2007. These statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
NOTE 2. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
In May 2007, the stockholders of the Company approved the
2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2007 Incentive Plan). The 2007
Incentive Plan allows the Company to grant stock-based and performance-based
incentive awards to officers and others who provide substantial service to the
Company or any of its subsidiaries.
The 2007 Incentive Plan provides for the
granting of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted
stock awards, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, stock appreciation
rights (SARs), performance awards, performance-based cash awards, dividend
equivalents, and qualified stock based awards (collectively, the awards) to
officers, directors and key employees to purchase shares of common stock. The
2007 Incentive Plan allows the Company to issue up to 1,000,000 shares.
The
GB&T
Bancshares, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan (the 1997 Incentive Plan) also remains
in effect and all options previously issued under the 1997 Incentive Plan
continue to remain outstanding in accordance with their terms. The total number
of shares issuable under the 1997 Incentive Plan may not exceed 2,000,000
shares of the Companys common stock. As of May 2007, there were 174,218 unused
shares of common stock available under the 1997 Incentive Plan. Therefore, the
Company can grant options and other awards amounting to an aggregate of
1,174,218 shares of common stock.
In accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of
FASB Statement No. 123(R) (SFAS 123 (R)), Share-Based Payment the Company
recognized compensation cost (a) for all
share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1,
2006, based on the
grant date fair
value estimated in
accordance with the
original provisions of SFAS 123,
and (b) for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS 123(R).
SFAS
123(R) also requires that tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation
cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as operating cash flow.
At
September 30, 2007, there was approximately $627,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock-based payments, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.95 years.
8
A
summary of the status of the stock option plan at September 30, 2007 and
changes during the period is shown in the following table.
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
beginning of period
|
|
771,384
|
|
$
|
11.95
|
|
Granted
|
|
81,947
|
|
16.88
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(107,117
|
)
|
8.69
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(50,718
|
)
|
17.61
|
|
Outstanding at
end of period
|
|
695,496
|
|
$
|
12.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable at end of period
|
|
506,621
|
|
$
|
10.17
|
|
Weighted-average
fair value of options granted during period
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
Total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the period
|
|
|
|
$
|
487,000
|
|
Weighted average
remaining contractual term of exercisable options at end of period
|
|
|
|
4.18 years
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value of options outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,000
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value of exercisable options at end of period
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,555,000
|
|
A
further summary of the options outstanding at September 30, 2007 follows.
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
$5.88 - $8.65
|
|
367,883
|
|
4.78 years
|
|
$
|
8.06
|
|
367,883
|
|
$
|
8.06
|
|
$9.38 - $13.78
|
|
98,459
|
|
4.90 years
|
|
12.13
|
|
76,959
|
|
11.77
|
|
$14.15 - $21.18
|
|
122,038
|
|
8.25 years
|
|
18.30
|
|
27,088
|
|
18.22
|
|
$21.46 - $24.15
|
|
107,116
|
|
7.95 years
|
|
22.32
|
|
34,691
|
|
22.76
|
|
Total
|
|
695,496
|
|
5.90 years
|
|
12.63
|
|
506,621
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The
total fair value of options vested during the period was approximately $884,000.
The total amount expensed for options vested during the period was approximately
$230,000.
The
Company uses historical data to estimate volatility, option exercise, employee
terminations, forfeitures and expected dividends within the valuation model.
The
fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
1.50
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
5 years
|
|
3 years
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
32.03
|
%
|
20.40
|
%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
4.80
|
%
|
10
NOTE 3. EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE
Presented below is a summary of the components
used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
14,202
|
|
13,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,298
|
)
|
$
|
4,
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
14,202
|
|
13,970
|
|
Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options based on the
treasury stock method using average market prices for the period
|
|
108
|
|
334
|
|
Total weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents
outstanding
|
|
14,310
|
|
14,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,298
|
)
|
$
|
4,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
14,179
|
|
13,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
14,179
|
|
13,501
|
|
Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options based on the
treasury stock method using average market prices for the period
|
|
162
|
|
312
|
|
Total weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents
outstanding
|
|
14,341
|
|
13,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
11
NOTE 4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On
May 1, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Mountain Bancshares,
Inc., the parent company of Mountain State Bank in Dawsonville, Dawson County,
Georgia, which resulted in Mountain State Bank becoming a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company. The aggregate purchase price was $39.8 million,
including the issuance of 1,088,924 shares of GB&Ts capital stock to
Mountain Bancshares stockholders valued at $24.0 million, $10.3 million in
cash and stock options and warrants valued at $5.3 million, and $197,000 in
direct acquisition costs. The value of the capital stock issued was determined
based on the average market price of GB&Ts capital stock over a two-day
period before and after the terms of the acquisition were agreed upon and
announced. The fair value of the stock options and warrants was determined
based on the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The acquisition was
accounted for as a purchase resulting in estimated goodwill of approximately
$26.0 million. The goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes. Identifiable
intangible assets of $971,000 acquired consist of a core deposit premium with
an estimated weighted average useful life of five years. Mountain State Banks
results of operations from May 1, 2006, are included in the consolidated
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of the Mountain Bancshares acquisition. The
Company obtained third-party valuations of the core deposit intangible and fair
value adjustments for loans and deposits. In addition, the Company obtained
independent appraisals of acquired premises.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash and due
from banks, net of cash paid
|
|
$
|
(3,291
|
)
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
537
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
17,909
|
|
Restricted equity
securities
|
|
1,554
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
106,279
|
|
Premises and
equipment
|
|
5,628
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
25,952
|
|
Core deposit
intangible
|
|
971
|
|
Other assets
|
|
546
|
|
Total assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
156,085
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
123,708
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
2,000
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
1,005
|
|
Total
liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
126,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
29,372
|
|
Unaudited
pro forma consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 as though the companies had combined as of January
1, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
$
|
50,269
|
|
$
|
53,065
|
|
Net income
|
|
633
|
|
11,790
|
|
Basic earnings
per share
|
|
0.05
|
|
0.87
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
|
0.04
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTE 5. STOCK REPURCHASE
On
June 18, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up
to $10,000,000 of the Companys outstanding common stock, no par value per
share. The purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions at prevailing prices. The timing and volume of purchases under the
program will depend on market conditions. The purchases will be accomplished in
accordance with the volume and timing guidelines of Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange
Act applicable to the Company and Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. As of
September 30, 2007, no shares had been repurchased by the Company.
NOTE 6. RECENT ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. The
standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. It defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurement. Under the standard, fair value
refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market
in which the reporting entity transacts. It clarifies the principle that
fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, the
standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information
used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value
measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value
hierarchy. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on its
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 permits entities to make an
irrevocable election, at specified election dates, to measure eligible
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of this
statement are effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that
begins after November 15, 2007. The Company has not elected to early adopt this
statement and is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement
could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On November 2, 2007, the Company signed a
definitive agreement under which SunTrust Banks, Inc. will acquire GB&T
Bancshares, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, GB&T shareholders would
receive 0.1562 shares of SunTrust common stock for each share of GB&T
common stock held. Based on SunTrusts closing price of $69.13 on Nov. 1,
2007, and the 14,230,796 shares of GB&T outstanding as of October 31,
2007, the transaction value would be approximately $153.7 million. The
acquisition, which is subject to approval by regulatory authorities and
GB&T shareholders, is expected to close in the second quarter of 2008.
Item
2. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant
factors which have affected our financial position and operating results
including our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Gainesville Bank & Trust (GBT),
United Bank & Trust (UBT), Community Trust Bank (CTB), HomeTown Bank of
Villa Rica (HTB), First National Bank of the South (FNBS), First National
Bank of Gwinnett (FNBG) and Mountain State Bank (MSB) during the periods
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto and the consolidated financial statements,
related notes, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
13
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006
included in the Companys 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
Some
of the statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Report,
including, without limitation, matters discussed under the caption Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements about our outlook on
credit quality, the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential
regulatory obligations, our entrance and expansion into other markets, our
other business strategies and other statements that are not historical facts.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When
we use words like may, plan, contemplate, anticipate, believe, intend,
continue, expect, project, predict, estimate, could, should, would,
will, and similar expressions, you should consider them as identifying
forward-looking statements, although we may use other phrasing. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our
beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time
that these disclosures were prepared. Factors that may cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) competitive
pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase
significantly; (2) changes in the interest rate environment may reduce margins;
(3) general economic conditions may be less favorable than expected, resulting
in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduction in
demand for credit; (4) real estate values in our markets may decline; (5)
economic, governmental or other factors may prevent the projected population
and commercial growth in the counties in which we operate; (6) legislative or regulatory changes,
including changes in accounting standards, may adversely affect the businesses
in which we are engaged; (7) costs or
difficulties related to the integration of our businesses may be greater than
expected; (8) deposit attrition, customer loss or revenue loss following
acquisitions may be greater than expected; (9) competitors may have greater financial
resources and develop products that enable such competitors to compete more
successfully than we can; and (10) adverse changes may occur in the equity
markets. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict,
and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. We do not intend to, and assume no responsibility to update or
revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Report, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Critical Accounting Policies
We
have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and general
practices within the banking industry in the preparation of our financial
statements. Our significant accounting policies are reviewed and discussed
periodically by our Audit Committee and are described in the notes to our
audited financial statements as of December 31, 2006. Certain accounting
policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed
periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated
financial statements in the period they are determined to be necessary. Management
has discussed our critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses
.
We believe that our determination of the allowance for loan losses is our most
significant judgment and estimate used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is an amount that
management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses in the loan
portfolio. The calculation is an estimate of the amount of loss in the loan
portfolios of our subsidiary banks. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated
on a regular basis by management and is based upon managements periodic review
of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the
nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and
prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more
information becomes available. In addition, regulatory
14
agencies,
as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our
allowance for loan losses, and may require us to make additions to the
allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the
time of their examinations.
The
Company uses an 8 point rating system for its loans. Ratings of 1 to 4 are
considered pass ratings, 5 is special mention, 6 is substandard, 7 is
doubtful, and 8 is loss. The originating loan officer rates all loans based on
this system, and the ratings are adjusted as needed to reflect the current
status of the loan. The loan officers are trained to rate loans in a timely and
accurate manner based on current information. These ratings are reviewed
regularly by the loan committee of the respective bank subsidiary, an outside
independent loan review firm and by the applicable regulator for accuracy.
A
general allowance is maintained for all loans rated 1 to 4 and for all
homogeneous loan pools such as consumer, credit card and residential mortgage. Management
has developed a range of expected losses for each risk grade and for each pool.
This range of losses is managements best estimate based on actual loss
experience, industry loss experience, loan portfolio trends and characteristics
of the markets it serves. On a quarterly basis, management will evaluate each
of the loan categories and determine the expected loss levels from the range
previously established.
All
loans rated 5, 6, 7 and 8, as well as any other impaired loan of a significant
amount, are individually analyzed and a specific reserve assigned. This
analysis includes information from managements Problem Asset Review Committee
which meets quarterly and reviews credit relationships of $1 million and above
and rated 5 through 8. Management, considering current information and events
regarding a borrowers ability to repay its obligations, considers a loan to be
impaired when the ultimate collection of all amounts due, according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. When a loan is considered
to be impaired, the amount of impairment is measured based on the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate.
If the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the collateral less
estimated selling costs is used to determine the amount of impairment.
Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan losses through a
charge to the provision for loan losses. A majority of our impaired loans are
collateral dependent. The allowance for loan losses on these loans is
determined based on fair value estimates (net of selling costs) of the
respective collateral. The actual losses on these loans could differ
significantly if the fair value of the collateral is different from the
estimates used in determining the allocated allowance. Most of our collateral
dependent impaired loans are secured by real estate. The fair value of these
real estate properties is generally determined based upon appraisals performed
by a certified or licensed appraiser. Management also considers other factors
or recent developments which could result in adjustments to the collateral
value estimates indicated in the appraisals.
The
remainder of the balance in the reserve for loan losses represents managements
estimate of the probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio that have not
been fully provided for through the specific reserve calculations. Factors
considered in the reserve methodology are overall economic conditions, the
recent slowdown in real estate activity, the number of new and relatively
inexperienced banks and bankers entering our markets and offering aggressive terms
and pricing, our concentration in commercial and consumer real estate loans and
the experience and historic performance of our lenders.
Goodwill
.
Our growth over the past several years has been enhanced significantly by
mergers and acquisitions. Prior to July 2001, all of our acquisitions were
accounted for using the pooling-of-interests business combination method of
accounting. Effective July 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, which allows only the use of the purchase method of accounting.
For purchase acquisitions, we are required to record the assets acquired,
including identified intangible assets, and liabilities assumed at their fair
value, which in many instances involves estimates based on third party
valuations, such as appraisals, or external valuations based on discounted cash
flow analyses or other valuation techniques. The determination of the useful
lives of intangible assets is subjective as is the appropriate amortization
period for such intangible assets. In addition, purchase acquisitions typically
result in recording goodwill, which is subject to ongoing periodic impairment
tests based on the fair value of net assets acquired compared to the carrying
value of goodwill. As of July 31, 2007, the required impairment testing of
goodwill was performed and preliminary indications are that no impairment
existed as of the valuation date, as the fair value of our net assets exceeded
their carrying value. If the recent slowdown in real estate activity in our
newer markets continues, the
15
potential
for goodwill impairment may exist. If for any future period we determine that
there has been impairment in the carrying value of our goodwill balances, we
will record a charge to our earnings, which could have a material adverse
effect on our net income.
Summary
Net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $6.3 million, or $0.44
per diluted share, compared to net income of $4.2 million, or $0.30 per diluted
share, for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Net income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was $515,000, or $0.04 per diluted share,
compared with $11.4 million, or $0.83 per diluted share for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. The return on average assets was 0.04% and the return
on average equity was 0.29% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This
compares to a return on average assets of 0.88% and a return on average equity
of 7.01% for the same period a year ago. These results reflect a $14.1 million
loan loss provision taken in the third quarter of 2007 as discussed in detail
below.
Mountain
State Bank (MSB) became part of the Company effective May 1, 2006. The merger
was accounted for as a purchase transaction; therefore, results of operations
for MSB are included in the results of operations for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2006 from the acquisition date of May 1, 2006.
Total
revenue, defined as net interest income plus other income, was $18.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of $2.3 million, or
11.12%, from the $21.1 million reported for the same period a year ago. Other
expense was $15.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an
increase of $2.6 million, or 20.27%, compared to the $12.9 million reported for
the same period a year ago. Revenue growth has been offset by increased expense
growth as well as the additional loan loss provision discussed in more detail
below, resulting in an efficiency ratio for the three months ended September
30, 2007 of 81.23% compared to 59.84% for the three months ended September 30,
2006.
Total
revenue was $58.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a
decrease of $0.2 million, or 0.44%, from the $58.9 million reported for the
same period a year ago. Other expense was $43.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $6.2 million, or 16.84%, compared to
the $37.2 million reported for the same period a year ago. Revenue growth has
been offset by increased expense growth as well as the additional loan loss
provision discussed in more detail below, resulting in an efficiency ratio for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of 72.81% compared to 61.99% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Balance Sheets
Our
total assets increased $63.5 million to $2.0 billion at September 30, 2007, or
3.34%, compared to December 31, 2006. The increase consists primarily of an
increase in total loans of $31.3 million, or 2.09%, an increase in other real
estate owned of $29.6 million and an increase in interest-bearing deposits in
banks of $9.5 million.
Total
deposits increased $47.9 million to $1.5 billion at September 30, 2007, or
3.24%, compared to December 31, 2006. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased
$8.4 million to $143.2 million and interest-bearing deposits increased $56.3
million to $1.4 billion during the same period. Deposit growth outpaced loan
growth resulting in a loan to deposit ratio of 100.06% at September 30, 2007
compared to 101.18% at December 31, 2006.
Total
stockholders equity decreased $2.4 million to $230.9 million at September 30,
2007, or 1.05%, compared to December 31, 2006. This decrease consisted of net
income of $515,000 and $761,000 from options exercised and $230,000 in stock
option expense, which was more than offset by the payment of dividends of $4.0
million.
16
Asset Quality
The
allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2007 was $32.3 million, or 2.12%, of
total loans compared to $24.7 million, or 1.65%, at December 31, 2006 and $16.7
million, or 1.15% at September 30, 2006. The increase in the allowance from the
prior year period is due primarily to an additional $14.1 million loan loss
provision taken in the third quarter of 2007 to provide the Company with
options for the resolution of problem assets. Management has been diligent in
monitoring the portfolio and continues to aggressively work the problem assets.
In addition, management believes that the Companys business fundamentals have
been and will continue to be strengthened because of improvements to internal
controls, implementation of more stringent credit administration policies and
centralization of our loan approval and documentation processes. However, we
can make no assurances that the Company will not see a further deterioration in
credit quality before the benefits of these improvements are realized. The
allowance for loan losses is evaluated monthly at the subsidiary level and
adjusted to reflect the risk in the portfolio.
The
provision for loan losses was $15.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. Net charge-offs year-to-date have been $8.2 million. Management
believes the provision and net charge-off amounts recorded in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007, reflects the deterioration in credit
conditions we have experienced as a result of the continued slowing residential
real estate market. If real estate conditions continue to worsen, the Company
may experience additional charge-offs.
The
following table summarizes the allowance for loan losses for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Average amount of loans outstanding
|
|
$
|
1,531,334
|
|
$
|
1,347,891
|
|
Allowance for loan losses balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
24,676
|
|
$
|
12,773
|
|
Less charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
(354
|
)
|
(442
|
)
|
Real estate loans
|
|
(7,808
|
)
|
(856
|
)
|
Credit cards
|
|
(11
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
Consumer loans
|
|
(549
|
)
|
(351
|
)
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
(8,722
|
)
|
(1,668
|
)
|
Plus recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
243
|
|
17
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
35
|
|
29
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
5
|
|
2
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
228
|
|
210
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
511
|
|
258
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
(8,211
|
)
|
(1,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus provision for loan losses
|
|
15,881
|
|
4,269
|
|
Plus allowance for loan losses acquired in business combinations
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
Allowance for loan losses balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
32,346
|
|
$
|
16,720
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)
|
|
0.717
|
%
|
0.140
|
%
|
17
The
following table is a summary of the Companys nonaccrual, past due loans and restructured
loans at September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006. The numbers indicate an
increase of approximately $39.7 million in nonaccrual loans as of September 30,
2007 as compared to September 30, 2006. The majority of the nonaccrual balance
at September 30, 2007 resides at HTB with a balance of $31.3 million. This
balance represents several large loan relationships and multiple small
relationships identified in extensive loan reviews. The Company has assigned
all loans for which we have concerns to an experienced loan workout specialist
from within the Company, who has implemented an action plan for the remediation
of each loan. We continue to conduct loan review meetings and fully expect to
see progress from this effort. Although we believe we have put the right
processes in place to produce reductions in our nonperforming assets,
nonperforming assets may continue to increase if the real estate downturn
continues. In addition to nonaccrual loans, the Company also has other real
estate, which is considered a nonperforming asset. At September 30, 2007, the
balance in other real estate was $34.3 million compared to $4.7 million at
December 31, 2006. The Companys practice is to write down loan balances to
expected realizable value based on current appraisals prior to transfer to
other real estate. Included in the $89 million in total nonperforming assets at
September 30, 2007, were ten relationships ranging from $7.2 million to $2.9
million which accounted for 45% of total nonperforming assets. The breakdown of
total nonperforming assets includes $38.5 million related to residential
housing, $6.1 million related to commercial real estate, $35.3 million of
vacant lots and acreage and $9.1 million in other.
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
90 Days
|
|
Restructured
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Still Accruing
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
$
|
52,991
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
151
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,668
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
90 Days
|
|
Restructured
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Still Accruing
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
$
|
14,383
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
78
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,934
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Our
banking subsidiaries policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest income
when, in the opinion of management, collection of such interest becomes
doubtful. This status is determined when: (1) there is a significant deterioration
in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and
interest is not expected; and (2) the principal or interest is more than 90
days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of
collection. Accrual of interest on such loans is resumed when, in managements
judgment, the collection of interest and principal becomes probable.
Loans
classified for regulatory purposes as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special
mention that have not been included in the table above do not represent or
result from trends or uncertainties which management reasonably expects will
materially impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources. These
classified loans do not represent material credits about which
18
management
is aware of any information which causes management to have serious doubts as
to the ability of such borrowers to comply with their loan repayment terms,
except as noted above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers who
may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing
assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs
and our ability to meet those needs. We seek to meet liquidity requirements
primarily through management of short-term investments, monthly amortizing
loans, maturing single payment loans, and maturities and prepayments of
securities. Also, we maintain relationships with correspondent banks which
could provide funds on short notice.
Our
liquidity and capital resources are monitored on a periodic basis by management
and state and federal regulatory authorities. Our liquidity ratio was 11.26% at
September 30, 2007. Liquidity is measured by the ratio of net cash, Federal
funds sold and securities to net deposits and short-term liabilities. In the
event our subsidiary banks need to generate additional liquidity, funding plans
would be implemented as outlined in the liquidity policy of the subsidiary
banks. Our subsidiary banks have lines of credit available to meet any
unforeseen liquidity needs. Also, our subsidiary banks have relationships with
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, which provides funding for loan growth
on an as needed basis, however these amounts are subject to collateral pledging
and therefore the full amount might not be available. Management reviews
liquidity on a periodic basis to monitor and adjust liquidity as necessary. Management
has the ability to adjust liquidity by selling securities available for sale,
selling participations in loans we generate and accessing available funds
through various borrowing arrangements. At September 30, 2007, we had available
borrowing capacity totaling approximately $253.8 million through various
borrowing arrangements and available lines of credit. We believe our short-term
investments and available borrowing arrangements are adequate to cover any
reasonably anticipated immediate need for funds.
19
As
of September 30, 2007, each of our subsidiary banks was considered to be
well-capitalized as defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act and based on regulatory minimum capital requirements. The
Company and the subsidiary banks capital ratios are presented in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
FOR CAPITAL
|
|
TO BE
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
ADEQUACY
|
|
WELL
|
|
|
|
RATIOS
|
|
PURPOSES
|
|
CAPITALIZED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
11.52
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
NA
|
|
Gainesville Bank & Trust
|
|
10.90
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
United Bank & Trust
|
|
10.43
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
Community Trust Bank
|
|
10.03
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
HomeTown Bank of Villa Rica
|
|
10.04
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of the South
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of Gwinnett
|
|
10.37
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
Mountain State Bank
|
|
10.42
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
10.26
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
NA
|
|
Gainesville Bank & Trust
|
|
9.93
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
United Bank & Trust
|
|
9.27
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
Community Trust Bank
|
|
8.76
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
HomeTown Bank of Villa Rica
|
|
8.74
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of the South
|
|
10.77
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of Gwinnett
|
|
9.37
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
Mountain State Bank
|
|
9.15
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
8.95
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
NA
|
|
Gainesville Bank & Trust
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
United Bank & Trust
|
|
7.64
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
Community Trust Bank
|
|
7.72
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
HomeTown Bank of Villa Rica
|
|
6.88
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of the South
|
|
9.14
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
First National Bank of Gwinnett
|
|
8.64
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
Mountain State Bank
|
|
7.86
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
Our
subsidiary banks are subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends
that may be declared without prior regulatory approval. At September 30, 2007,
approximately $6.1 million of retained earnings at our subsidiary banks was
available for dividend declaration without regulatory approval.
Net Interest Income and Earning Assets
Our
profitability is determined by our ability to effectively manage interest
income and expense, to minimize loan and security losses, to generate
noninterest income, and to control operating expenses. Because interest rates
are determined by market forces and economic conditions beyond our control, our
ability to generate net interest income depends upon our ability to obtain an
adequate net interest spread between the rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities and the rate earned on interest-earning assets. The net interest
margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.90% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to 4.39% for the same period in 2006, a decrease
of 49 basis points. This decrease resulted from an increase in the yield on
earning assets of 25 basis points which was more than offset by an increase in
the effective cost of funds of 65 basis points. Also impacting the decreased
net interest margin was the reversal of interest income on loans placed on
nonaccrual during 2007 as well as a lower level of loan fees. The increased
yield on earning assets was primarily due to increased volumes and yields on
loans and the increased effective cost of funds was due to higher average rates
paid on time deposits and other
20
borrowings.
Due to the companys asset-sensitive position, management believes we will
continue to see further compression in the net interest margin as a result of
decreases in the prime rate.
The
following table sets forth the amount of our interest income or interest
expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities and the average interest yield/rate for total interest-earning
assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net
yield on average interest-earning assets.
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Yields
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Yields
|
|
|
|
Balances
|
|
Interest
|
|
/Rates
|
|
Balances
|
|
Interest
|
|
/Rates
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
securities
|
|
$
|
200,177
|
|
$
|
6,927
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
$
|
197,053
|
|
$
|
6,058
|
|
4.11
|
%
|
Nontaxable
securities*
|
|
28,333
|
|
1,322
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
11,067
|
|
576
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
9,042
|
|
352
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
15,760
|
|
490
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
Interest bearing
deposits in banks
|
|
5,168
|
|
169
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
1,937
|
|
84
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
Loans, net of
unearned income
|
|
1,491,114
|
|
96,264
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
1,336,904
|
|
84,565
|
|
8.46
|
%
|
Total interest
earning assets
|
|
1,733,834
|
|
105,034
|
|
8.10
|
%
|
1,562,721
|
|
91,773
|
|
7.85
|
%
|
Noninterest
earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
(losses) on securities
|
|
(2,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(4,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses
|
|
(24,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(14,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
40,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks
|
|
23,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
183,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
noninterest earning assets
|
|
219,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,953,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,734,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
& Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing
demand & savings
|
|
$
|
451,977
|
|
10,963
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
$
|
430,133
|
|
9,302
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
Time
|
|
915,188
|
|
36,531
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
745,537
|
|
25,422
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
Borrowings
|
|
176,969
|
|
6,955
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
157,785
|
|
5,761
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
Total interest
bearing liabilities
|
|
1,544,134
|
|
54,449
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
1,333,455
|
|
40,485
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
Noninterest
bearing liabilities & stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
bearing deposits
|
|
152,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity
|
|
235,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities & stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,953,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,734,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
Net interest
income*
|
|
|
|
50,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,288
|
|
|
|
Less: Tax
equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,104
|
|
|
|
Net interest
margin*
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Fully tax
equivalent
Net
interest income decreased $2.6 million, or 14.03%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. The net decrease
consists of an increase in interest income of $437,000, or 1.28%, less an
increase in interest expense of $3.0 million, or 19.02%, for the three-month
period. Net interest income decreased $942,000, or 1.84%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. The net decrease
consists of an increase in interest income of $13.0 million, or 14.22%, less an
increase in interest expense of $14.0 million, or 34.49%, for the nine-month
period. These changes reflect an increase of $171.1 million in average
interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September
21
30,
2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The change in net
interest income was negatively impacted by the reversal of interest income on
nonaccrual loans and the lower level of loan fees as mentioned above as well as
the normal increases in volume and interest rates.
Other Income
Other
income for the three months ended September 30, 2007, increased by $226,000,
compared to the same period in 2006. Service charges on deposit accounts
increased by $422,000, which was partially offset by a decrease in mortgage
origination fees of $272,000 for the three-month period. Other income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, increased by $685,000, compared to the
same period in 2006. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $541,000,
trust and investment services increased by $83,000 and gain on sale of loans
increased by $72,000. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
mortgage origination fees of $163,000 for the nine-month period.
Other Expense
Other
expense increased by approximately $2.6 million, or 20.27%, for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. The
increase is due primarily to a $1.4 million provision for potential other real
estate losses, in addition to a $217,000 increase in costs related to the
resolution of the problem loan portfolio and a $93,000 increase in the FDIC
insurance assessment over 2006. Increases are also noted in salaries and
employee benefits expense of $716,000 and net occupancy and equipment expenses
of $76,000. Other expense increased by approximately $6.3 million, or 16.84%,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in
2006. The increase is due primarily to an increase in salaries and employee
benefits expense of $2.5 million. Net occupancy and equipment expenses
increased $490,000. Included in the increase in other operating expenses for
the nine-month period was the $1.4 million provision for potential other real
estate losses taken in the third quarter of 2007 as mentioned above, as well as
professional fees of $374,000 that were paid to attorneys and consultants
related to the resolution of the Companys problem loan portfolio. Also
included in other operating expenses, was an increase in loss on sale of other
real estate of $241,000 related to the identified problem loan portfolio, as
well as an increase in other real estate expenses of $138,000. Increases were
also noted in marketing and public relations of $169,000, personnel
administration expense related to search fees for new employees of $109,000,
increased FDIC insurance assessments of $93,000 and a $39,000 increase in other
operating expense due to a charge-off at HTB during the first quarter of 2007.
Income Tax Expense
The
income tax benefit for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 was $4.5
million, compared to income tax expense of $2.2 million for the same period in
2006. The income tax benefit for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
was $1.2 million, compared to income tax expense of $6.0 million for the same
period in 2006. Both periods in 2007 were impacted by the additional loan loss
provision of $14.1 million taken in the third quarter of 2007 as well as the
reversal of interest income due to the increase in nonaccrual loans.
Net Income
The
net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $6.3 million,
compared to net income of $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $515,000,
compared to $11.4 million for the same period in 2006. These decreases are
directly related to the additional loan loss provision and reversal of interest
income on nonaccrual loans as discussed above.
We
are not aware of any other known trends, events or uncertainties, other than
the effect of events as described above, that will have or that are reasonably
likely to have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources or
operations. We are not
22
aware
of any current recommendations by the regulatory authorities, which, if they
were implemented, would have such an effect.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our
financial statements do not reflect various commitments and contingent
liabilities that arise in the normal course of business. These off-balance
sheet financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby
letters of credit and credit card commitments. Such financial instruments are
included in the financial statements when funds are distributed or the
instruments become payable. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments
to extend credit, standby letters of credit and credit card commitments is
represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same
credit policies in making commitments as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.
Although these amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, a
summary of our commitments as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are
as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to
extend credit
|
|
$
|
515,080
|
|
$
|
425,391
|
|
Financial
standby letters of credit
|
|
8,899
|
|
7,544
|
|
Other standby
letters of credit
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Credit card
commitments
|
|
7,767
|
|
6,595
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
531,746
|
|
$
|
440,659
|
|
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our
asset/liability mix is monitored on a regular basis and a report evaluating the
interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities is
prepared and presented to the Investment Committee of the holding companys
board of directors on a quarterly basis. The objective of this policy is to
monitor interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities so as to minimize the
impact of substantial movements in interest rates on earnings. An asset or
liability is considered to be interest rate sensitive if it will reprice or
mature within the time period analyzed, usually one year or less. The interest
rate sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time
period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive
assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is
considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities
exceeds the interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest
rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while
a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income.
Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would
tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap
would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and
liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any
increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
A
simple interest rate gap analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator
of how net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates.
Accordingly, we also evaluate how the repayment of particular assets and
liabilities is impacted by changes in interest rates. Income associated with
interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities
may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the
magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant
impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react
in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on
certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in
general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind
changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as
adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest
rate caps and floors) which limit the amount of changes in interest rates.
Prepayment
23
and
early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in
calculating the interest rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service
their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates.
Changes
in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price
deposits in response to market rates and it is managements intention to
continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a
loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity
position.
Management
believes that gap analysis is a useful tool for measuring interest rate risk
only when used in conjunction with its simulation model. As of September 30,
2007, the Company maintained an asset sensitive interest rate risk position
based on its simulation model results. This positioning would be expected to
result in an increase in net interest income in a rising rate environment and a
decrease in net interest income in a declining rate environment. This is
generally due to a greater proportion of interest earning assets repricing on a
variable rate basis as compared to variable rate funding sources. This asset
sensitivity is indicated by selected results of net interest income simulations.
The actual realized change in net interest income would depend on several
factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, actual realized growth
in asset and liability volumes, as well as the mix experienced over these time
horizons. Market conditions and their resulting impact on loan, deposit, and
funding pricing would also be a primary determinant in the realized level of
net interest income. The table below shows the impact on net interest margins
over a twelve-month period when subjected to an immediate 100 basis point
increase and decrease in rate.
Twelve-Month Net Interest Income Sensitivity
|
|
Change in Short-Term Interest
Rates (in basis points)
|
|
Estimated Change in Net
Interest Income
|
|
+100
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
Flat
|
|
|
|
-100
|
|
(7.45
|
)%
|
We
actively manage the mix of asset and liability maturities to control the
effects of changes in the general level of interest rates on net interest
income. Except for its effect on the general level of interest rates, inflation
does not have a material impact on us due to the rate variability and
short-term maturities of our earning assets.
Item 4. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As
of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out
under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report in alerting them
on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company required to
be included in the Companys reports filed or submitted under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During
the recent quarter, the Company has continued to relocate control functions
related to loan approval and disbursements from its bank affiliates to the
holding company. These functions include, but are not limited to, daily
balancing, reconciling and review of all lending activity. Otherwise, there
were no changes made in the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24