CHRK Cherokee International Corp (MM)

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File No. 000-50593

Cherokee International Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (714) 544-6665

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o   No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.       NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Cherokee International Corporation (the “Company”) is a designer and manufacturer of power supplies for original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). Its advanced power supply products are typically custom designed into mid- to high-end commercial applications in the computing and storage, wireless infrastructure, enterprise networking, telecom, medical and industrial markets.

2.        BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Cherokee International Corporation have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include certain footnotes and financial presentations normally required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial reporting.  The interim financial information is unaudited, but reflects all normal adjustments and accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, considered necessary to provide a fair presentation for the interim periods presented.  The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 28, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-50593) filed on March 28, 2008.

Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.

On November 1, 2008, the $46.6 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under our 5.25% Senior Notes will become due and payable. We do not expect to have sufficient cash available at the time of maturity to repay this indebtedness and are currently working on a variety of possible alternatives to satisfy this obligation. We also cannot be certain that we will have sufficient assets or cash flow available to support refinancing these notes at current market rates or on terms that are satisfactory to us. If we are unable to refinance on terms satisfactory to us, we may be forced to refinance on terms that are materially less favorable, seek funds through other means such as a sale of some of our assets, or otherwise significantly alter our operating plan, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. These circumstances create substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates.

5

Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment , was issued. SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation , and supersedes APB 25. Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. The Company was required to adopt SFAS 123R effective on January 2, 2006. SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a “ modified prospective ” method, or a “ modified retrospective ” method. Under the “ modified prospective ” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the “ modified retrospective ” method, the requirements are the same as under the “ modified prospective ” method, but also permits entities to restate financial statements of previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in accordance with SFAS 123.

SFAS 123R permits the use of either the Black-Scholes model or a “lattice” model.  The Company used the Black-Scholes standard option-pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees and nonemployees prior to its adoption of SFAS123R and continued its use thereafter.

SFAS 123R requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under prior literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. These future amounts cannot be estimated, because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options.

The Company adopted SFAS 123R on January 2, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method as permitted by SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, stock compensation cost recognized beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to February 25, 2004 and prior to January 1, 2006 but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective method of adoption, the Company’s results of operations and financial position for prior periods have not been restated. At the date of the adoption, the unamortized expense for options issued prior to January 2, 2006 was $2.3 million, which will be amortized as stock compensation costs through December 2010. Stock based compensation costs expensed during the quarters ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, were $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, the costs recorded were $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

All grants are made at prices based on the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Outstanding options generally vest over periods ranging from two to four years from the grant date and generally expire up to ten years after the grant date.

The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula with the assumptions included in the table below. The Company uses historical data, among other factors, to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. For options granted prior to January 2, 2006, the Company used the expected option life of 5 years. For options granted following the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R, the expected life was increased to 6.25 years using the “simplified method” under SAB 107 (an expected term based on the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term). The use of the simplified method requires our option plan to be consistent with a “plain vanilla” plan and was originally permitted through December 31, 2007 under SAB 107. In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB 110, Share-Based Payment , to amend the SEC’s views discussed in SAB 107 regarding the use of the simplified method in developing an estimate of expected life of share options in accordance with SFAS 123R. SAB 110 was effective for the Company beginning December 31, 2007. The Company will continue to use the simplified method until it has the historical data necessary to provide a reasonable estimate of expected life, in accordance with SAB 107, as amended by SAB 110. The options have a maximum contractual term of 10 years and generally vest pro-rata over two to four years. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option.

6

Table of Contents

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the three and six-month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula.

The following table summarizes the Company’s activities with respect to its stock option plans for the six months ended June 29, 2008 as follows:

Since its inception on February 16, 2004, a total of 400,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), subject to annual increases as described under Note 11 below. Under the terms of the ESPP, the Company’s U.S. employees, nearly all of whom are eligible to participate, can choose to have up to a maximum of 15% of their eligible annual base earnings withheld, subject to an annual maximum of $25,000 or 2,100 shares per offering period, to purchase our common stock. The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the lower of the closing price at the beginning of each six-month offering period or at the end of each six-month offering period. The Company recognizes compensation cost for its ESPP under SFAS 123R.

In accordance with SFAS 148, and as required by SFAS 123R, the required pro forma disclosure for options granted in periods prior to adoption of SFAS 123R is shown below (in thousands except per share amounts):

(a)     During 2008 and 2007, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation for options granted prior to February 25, 2004, the date of our initial public offering, to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB 25 and adopted the disclosure-only alternative of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148 for these options.

7

Table of Contents

Translation of Foreign Currency

Foreign subsidiary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date. Revenues, costs and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Transaction gains and losses are included in results of operations and have not been significant for the periods presented. The functional currency of Cherokee Europe is the Euro. The functional currency of Cherokee India, Powertel and Cherokee China is the U.S. dollar, as the majority of transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. Translation adjustments related to Cherokee Europe are reflected as a component of stockholders’ equity in other comprehensive income (loss).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements . This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies to accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except for share-based payments transactions under FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) Share-Based Payment . This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for non-financial assets and liabilities, for which this Statement will be effective for years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS 157 on December 31, 2007, and the impact of this adoption on our financial position and results of operations was immaterial.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, although early application is allowed. The Company did not elect the fair value option for financial assets or liabilities existing on our adoption date of December 31, 2007. The Company will consider the applicability of the fair value option for assets acquired or liabilities incurred in future transactions.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations , and SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 . These pronouncements are required to be adopted concurrently and are effective for business combination transactions for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited; thus the provisions of these pronouncements will be effective for us in fiscal year 2009. We do not have any minority interests. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2007, the SEC published SAB 110, Share-Based Payment . The interpretations in SAB 110 express the SEC staff’s views regarding the acceptability of the use of a “simplified” method, as discussed in SAB 107, in developing an estimate of expected term of share options in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) Share-Based Payment . The use of the simplified method requires our option plan to be consistent with a “plain vanilla” plan and was originally permitted through December 31, 2007 under SAB 107. In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB 110, Share-Based Payment , to amend the SEC’s views discussed in SAB 107 regarding the use of the simplified method in developing an estimate of expected life of share options in accordance with FAS No. 123(R). SAB 110 was effective for the Company beginning December 31, 2007. The Company will continue to use the simplified method until it has the historical data necessary to provide a reasonable estimate of expected life, in accordance with SAB 107, as amended by SAB 110.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS 133. This Statement requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities within an entity by requiring the disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It provides more information about an entity’s liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related, and it requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 161 and believes there will be no material impact on our consolidated financial statements or financial operations.

8

Table of Contents

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles . SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.  It is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles . The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 .  SFAS 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. It also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities, and requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. SFAS 163 requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period beginning after issuance. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted.  The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of weighted average cost or market. Inventory costs include the costs of material, labor and manufacturing overhead and consist of the following, net of reserve for surplus and obsolescence (in thousands):

As of June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the reserve for excess inventory and obsolescence was $3.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively, including management’s assessment of reserves for surplus and obsolescence for non-compliant material related to the Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment directive.

The following are two European Economic Community (“EEC”) directives that are having an effect on the entire electronics industry, including the Company:

(1)   Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, more commonly known as RoHS. This European directive bans the use of certain elements that are commonly found in components used to manufacture electrical and electronic assemblies. This directive became effective on July 1, 2006. The Company began manufacturing compliant products in 2006 and continues to work actively with its customers to ensure compliance. The Company is focused on consuming all non-compliant material on-hand within a reasonable period. However, the Company may have to dispose of non-compliant materials in the future, which could adversely affect the financial performance of the Company. There is also a risk of fines associated with non-compliance with the RoHS directive; however, the Company is not aware of any specific potential fines, and the Company anticipates complying with all provisions of this legislation.

(2)   Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, also known as WEEE. This directive became effective August 13, 2005 and requires manufacturers and importers to properly recycle or dispose of such equipment at the end of its useful life. The Company believes it has limited exposure to the WEEE directive because its products are usually installed into another user’s system, but this directive may be interpreted and enforced differently in the future. If so, the Company may face significant risk of fines and costs associated with non-compliance with the existing laws and regulations in the European Union. The Company began manufacturing compliant products in 2005, and continues to work actively with its customers to ensure compliance.

As of June 29, 2008, the Company does not foresee any material estimated capital expenditures for environmental remediation or related costs to its manufacturing facilities in the future.

9

Table of Contents

3.       INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . In accordance with SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and their tax basis, and carry-forwards to the extent they are realizable.  A deferred tax provision or benefit results from the net change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.  A valuation allowance is recorded if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized.  As of December 30, 2007, deferred tax assets included $27.8 million relating to a tax basis step up from a re-capitalization transaction in 1999 and $22.8 million of net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards.  The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against a significant portion of its deferred tax assets.  As of December 30, 2007, deferred taxes included $1.6 million of tax benefits on the balance sheet generated by our European operations.  Cherokee Europe has a history of profits.  Recovery has been dependent upon achieving our forecast of future operating income over a protracted period of time.  During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, management revised the forecast of our European revenues based on changes made in the orders by our European customers and a valuation allowance was recorded against all of Europe’s deferred tax assets.  Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, and the comparable period of July 1, 2007, were a $ 1.7 million provision and a $1.0 million benefit, respectively.   Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the six months ended June 29, 2008 and the comparable period of July 1, 2007, were a $1.7 million provision and a $1.6 million benefit, respectively.  The provision for the six months ended June 29, 2008 is higher by $3.3 million than the comparable period of July 1, 2007 due to the recording of a valuation allowance against the Company’s European deferred tax assets in the quarter ended June 29, 2008 of $1.6 million.  Based on available evidence including changes to our forecasted revenues in Europe, management can no longer conclude it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realizable.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the quarter and six months ended June 29, 2008 was calculated using an effective tax rate of less than one percent for the full fiscal year in addition to the valuation allowance recorded as a discrete item in the quarter ended June 29, 2008.

The Company adopted FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007.  As a result of adoption, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of less than $0.1 million to the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance.  As of June 29, 2008, we have approximately $0.3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $0.3 million would reduce our effective tax rate if recognized.  The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

The tax years 1997 to 2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The Company is currently under examination in India for certain years between 2000 and 2005 and Belgium for years 2005 and 2006.  During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, the IRS completed its audit of the year 2005.  The Company does not believe the amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 29, 2008 will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.

United States income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries. Those earnings are considered to be permanently re-invested in accordance with the Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 23.

4.       NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

In accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings Per Share , basic income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. For the quarter ended and six months ended June 29, 2008, stock options to purchase 2,618,208 shares of our common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the periods. For the quarter ended and six months ended July 1, 2007, stock options to purchase 2,777,057 shares of our common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the periods.

10

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

5.       DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

The Company capitalizes costs directly related to financing agreements and certain qualified debt restructuring costs, and amortizes these costs as additional interest expense over the terms of the related debt.

Net deferred financing costs are comprised of the following as of June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007 (in thousands):

For the six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company capitalized $0.4 million of financing costs related to the refinancing of the senior notes due to mature on November 1, 2008.

6.       DEBT

Debt consists of the following at June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007 (in thousands):

The debt includes the Company’s senior notes, which mature on November 1, 2008. Interest on the senior notes is payable in cash on May 1 and November 1 of each year. On May 1, 2008, we paid $1.2 million of interest to the bondholders as required. The senior notes are secured by a second-priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s domestic assets and by a pledge of 65% of the equity of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. As of June 29, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants set forth in the principal agreements governing the 5.25% senior notes due in 2008. The Company does not currently have sufficient funds to repay these notes and is actively working to either refinance this obligation or to satisfy it through a number of strategic alternatives currently being explored. The Company acknowledges that if it does refinance the obligation, the interest rate may be substantially higher than the current interest rate of 5.25% and any refinancing may be on terms that are materially less favorable. In addition, if the Company is not able to obtain satisfactory financing, the Company may be forced to sell some of its assets or to otherwise significantly alter its operating plan.

The Company’s primary line of credit is its senior revolving credit facility with General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility expires on August 25, 2008. The company plans to renew this line with a new lender after our senior note obligations have been repaid or renegotiated. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company approached General Electric Capital Corporation about re-negotiating the Credit Facility in order to increase the borrowing capacity that had been lowered by the Company’s historical earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense (“EBITDA”) covenant.

11

Table of Contents

On November 1, 2007, the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation amended the credit agreement for the revolving line of credit dated February 24, 2004. The amended Credit Facility provides for borrowings of up to the lesser of $7.5 million or 85% of eligible domestic accounts receivable. As of June 29, 2008, our borrowing base was $7.5 million, and our eligible accounts receivable was $10.7 million. Prior to November 1, 2007, the borrowings bore interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.5% or the agent bank’s base rate plus 1.0%. Effective November 1, 2007, the borrowings bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% or the agent bank’s base rate plus 2.0%. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lender under the Credit Facility in respect of the average daily balance of unused loan commitments at a rate of 1.0% per annum effective November 1, 2007. Prior to November 1, 2007, the rate was 0.5% per annum. In lieu of a maximum senior leverage multiple covenant, the new amended Credit Facility effective November 1, 2007 includes a minimum EBITDA target for the trailing quarters starting with the fourth quarter of 2007, which the Company was in compliance with at June 29, 2008. Prior to November 1, 2007, the EBITDA covenant limited our borrowing to the lower of the borrowing base or two times our EBITDA as defined by the prior credit agreement. The Credit Facility is secured by a first-priority lien, subject to permitted encumbrances, on substantially all of the Company’s domestic assets and by a pledge of 65% of the equity of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants including the minimum EBITDA target. In March 2008, General Electric Capital Corporation modified the amended credit agreement effective as of December 30, 2007 for a balance sheet covenant issue resulting from the capitalization of intercompany debt with our Dutch holding company during 2007. As of June 29, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, and the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under the Credit Facility.

Cherokee Europe maintains a working capital line of credit of approximately $4.8 million, expressed as Euros 3.0 million, with Bank Brussels Lambert, a subsidiary of ING Belgie NV, a bank in Brussels, which is denominated in Euros, collateralized by a pledge in first and second rank over a specific amount of business assets, requires Cherokee Europe to maintain a certain specific minimum solvency ratio and is cancelable at any time. Our access to the line is limited to $4.2 million because $0.6 million is committed to minimum guarantees on specific collections and payments. In November 2007, ING Belgie NV restricted the Company from transferring funds from Europe to the U.S. in the form of management and dividend fees. During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Cherokee Europe borrowed $2.2 million from the line of credit with an interest rate of 6.02%, subject to change upon quarterly renewals, which remained outstanding as of June 29, 2008. The interest rate for the second quarter of 2008 was renewed at 6.08%.  On April 28, 2008, Cherokee Europe borrowed $0.8 million, with an interest rate of 5.65%, subject to change upon quarterly renewals, from its line of credit with ING Belgie NV. The outstanding balance on the line of credit as of June 29, 2008 was $3.0 million. As of June 29, 2008, Cherokee Europe was in compliance with all covenants.

In June 2008, ING Belgie NV restricted our borrowing capacity to $3.0 million, expressed as Euros 1.9 million. By the end of the third quarter in 2008, Cherokee Europe’s line of credit will be converted into a new factoring arrangement with ING Belgie NV.  The arrangement will be based on the factoring of 85% of the majority of Cherokee Europe’s current outstanding accounts receivable balances with an aging of 30 days or less at each borrowing date.  The 85% of accounts receivable balances will include sales generated by companies located in Belgium and bordering countries including Austria, Switzerland and Ireland, Europe, North America, and Canada. The remaining accounts receivable balances generated by companies located in the remaining countries will be factored at 10%.  The effective interest rate of the new factoring arrangement will be Euribor plus 1%. There will also be a 0.07% loan fee on the outstanding accounts receivable balance at each borrowing.

In January 2007, Cherokee China entered into a loan contract with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. (“ICBC”) for a working capital line of credit. Pursuant to the contract, ICBC agreed to make advances up to the equivalent of approximately $3.6 million, expressed as RMB 25.0 million. The line of credit is collateralized by the Company’s building in Shanghai, China. In April 2008, Cherokee China renegotiated the borrowing capacity on its line of credit with ICBC, from RMB 25 million to RMB 28 million to reflect the increased market value of the building, with the interest rate of LIBOR plus 12%, which is effective from April 21, 2008 through April 20, 2011.  As of June 29, 2008, RMB 28 million was equivalent to $4.1 million in US dollars. Interest is payable monthly at a fixed rate based on the transaction date of our borrowings, the rates vary according to the specific dates and are announced by the People’s Bank of China. Beginning with its initial borrowing under the contract, Cherokee China agreed to deposit in the ICBC Shanghai Branch at least 90% of the operating revenue it collects. The cash from these deposits made into our bank account are not restricted from our usage of these funds. During May 2008, Cherokee China borrowed $0.5 million on its line of credit with an interest rate of 6.8985% for the subsequent six-month period.

12

Table of Contents

As of June 29, 2008, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was $0.5 million, and Cherokee China was in compliance with all of the covenants.

In January 2008, Cherokee Europe borrowed short-term funds of $0.6 million from ING Belgie NV. The loan arrangement is over twelve months, with monthly payments of $54,000 to be repaid by December 26, 2008. The loan bears a 6.3% interest rate. The outstanding balance as of June 29, 2008 was $0.3 million.

7.                   OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS

Other long-term obligations consist of the following at June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007 (in thousands):

The Company has agreements with a local government agency in Belgium for funding in advances to Cherokee Europe for research and development expenses. These advances are interest free and expected to be repaid to the agency; either as a percentage of the revenues generated by the products developed or through a minimum fixed amount on an annual basis.

As of June 29, 2008, the Company has a recorded liability of $0.6 million, for employee and non-employee contributions and investment activity to date under the deferred compensation plan, the current portion of $0.4 million is recorded under accrued compensation and benefits and the long-term portion of $0.2 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

8.                   CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION

For the quarter ended June 29, 2008, one customer accounted for 11.4% of net sales, and another customer accounted for 10.5% of net sales. For the quarter ended July 1, 2007, one customer accounted for 11.8% of net sales, and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales. For the six months ended June 29, 2008, one customer accounted for 11.1% of net sales, and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales.  For the six months ended July 1, 2007, one customer accounted for 10.9% of net sales, and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales. A decision by a major customer to decrease the amount purchased from the Company or to cease purchasing the Company’s products could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

As of June 29, 2008, one customer accounted for 9.7% of net accounts receivable, and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of net accounts receivable.  As of December 30, 2007, one customer accounted for 10.6% of net accounts receivable.

9.                   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees and Indemnities

The Company has agreed to indemnify the former owners of Cherokee Europe for product liability, environmental hazard and employment practice claims relating solely to post-acquisition business. The Company also indemnifies its directors and officers, to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware, and various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease. The maximum amount of potential future payments under such indemnifications is not determinable.

The Company has not incurred significant amounts related to these guarantees and indemnifications, and no liability has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements for guarantees and indemnifications as of June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007.

13

Table of Contents

Cash Incentive Compensation Program and Severance Agreements

The Company adopted a cash incentive program for certain executives, which provides for cash incentive payments of up to 123% of base salary subject to attainment of corporate goals and objectives approved by the Company’s board of directors. In addition, the Company has entered into severance agreements with certain executives and managers, which provide payments to the executives or managers if they are terminated (i) other than for cause or (ii) because of a change in control, as defined in the applicable severance agreement. Certain of the severance agreements provide additional benefits, including acceleration of stock options, in the event of termination in connection with a change of control, as defined in the applicable severance agreement.

On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to the Company’s existing severance agreement with each of Jeffrey M. Frank, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Linster W. Fox, the Company’s Executive

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Mukesh Patel, the Company’s Executive Vice President of Global Operations. These executives’ severance agreements provide for certain severance payments to be made in the event that the Company terminates the executive’s employment without cause. The amendments provide that, if severance is triggered under the executive’s severance agreement, the executive’s severance benefit will consist of a cash payment equal to two times the executive’s current base salary at the time of termination and continued medical benefits for up to two years. In the case of Mr. Patel, the amendment further amends his severance agreement to provide that if he terminates his employment with the Company for good reason within one year following a change in control event, he will be entitled to the severance benefits described above. The amendments further amend Mr. Frank’s and Mr. Fox’s severance agreements to provide that each of them may terminate employment for any reason within two years following a change in control of the Company and, in such event, they will be entitled to: a cash payment equal to two times the executive’s current base salary at the time of termination; a prorata cash payment equal to the executive’s annual bonus at the time of termination (calculated as if the Company achieved financial performance equal to that set forth in the then-most current budget approved by the Company’s Board of Directors); immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options; continued medical benefits for up to two years; a cash payment equal to the amount forfeited by the executive under the Company’s 401(k) or similar plan; use of an executive outplacement service in an amount not to exceed $50,000 or a lump-sum cash payment in lieu thereof; and any additional benefits then due or earned under applicable plans or programs of the Company. The severance agreements also include certain confidentiality, non-solicitation and inventions covenants in favor of the Company.

On February 29, 2008, the Company also entered into a severance agreement with Alex Patel, the Company’s Vice President of Engineering. The severance agreement provides that, in the event Mr. Patel’s employment is terminated either by the Company without cause or by Mr. Patel for good reason within one year following a change in control event, Mr. Patel will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to one times his then current annual base salary and continued medical benefits for up to one year. Mr. Patel’s right to receive severance benefits under the severance agreement is subject to his execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company upon the termination of his employment. The severance agreement also includes certain confidentiality, non-solicitation and inventions covenants in favor of the Company.

Transaction Bonus Agreements

On April 14, 2008, the Company entered into transaction bonus agreements with each of Jeffrey M. Frank, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Linster W. Fox, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Mukesh Patel, the Company’s Executive Vice President of Global Operations (each, an “executive”).  The transaction bonus agreements provide that, in the event of a company sale (defined in the agreements as a sale in one or a series of related transactions of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, or of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding voting equity securities of the Company other than to the Company or certain major shareholders), the executive will be entitled to receive a transaction bonus, provided that the executive is either employed by the Company at the time of the company sale, the Company terminates the executive’s employment without cause (as defined in the agreements) within six months prior to the company sale, or the executive terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the agreements) within six months prior to the company sale.  If the executive terminates his employment with the Company voluntarily or is terminated by the Company for cause prior to the company sale, the executive is not eligible for a bonus under the transaction bonus agreement.  Further, the executive must execute a general release of claims in favor of the Company following the company sale in order to receive his transaction bonus.

The amount of the transaction bonus that each executive is eligible for pursuant to his agreement varies and is tied to the net proceeds from the company sale.  The maximum amount of the transaction bonus for each of Messrs. Frank, Fox and Patel is $5 million, $3 million and $450,000, respectively, based on a net sales price of $10.00 per share.  The agreements also contain a non-solicitation covenant in favor of the Company.

14

Table of Contents

SynQor

On November 16, 2007, SynQor announced that it had filed a lawsuit against several of its competitors, including the Company who was named in the complaint, for infringement of two patents relating to bus converters and/or non-isolated point of load converters used in intermediate bus architectures. The patents at issue are U.S. patents 7,072,190 and 7,272,021. The suit was filed in Federal Court in the Eastern District of Texas. The Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. Although the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact with respect to this lawsuit is subject to many uncertainties and is therefore not predictable with assurance, the final outcome of this lawsuit, if adverse, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

10.     RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES FOR CLOSURE OF GUADALAJARA, MEXICO FACILITY

During the quarter ended October 1, 2006, the Company announced the planned closure of its Mexican facilities and a related restructuring plan, which was accounted for in accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities . The Mexico Facility encompassed 35,000 square feet in one building and had been in operation since 1988, employing approximately 250 full-time and temporary employees in the production of power supplies.

The restructuring and closure of our Mexico Facility was completed by the end of the second quarter of 2007. The cumulative costs for the closure of the Mexico Facility were $1.5 million ($1.3 million of which were recorded in 2006). This was made up of $0.9 million restructuring, $0.3 million asset impairment and $0.3 million additional excess and obsolescence reserve. During the second quarter ended July 1, 2007, there was a reversal of $38,000 to severance costs due to the transfer and relocation of an employee from the Mexico Facility to our Tustin Facility. The remaining accrued balance for severance and stay bonuses was paid on July 1, 2007 to the remaining employees.

Assets held for sale—Mexico Facility building sold

The Company began actively searching for a buyer for the Mexico Facility building during the quarter ended October 1, 2006; however, in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , the related assets were not classified as assets held for sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheets prior to April 1, 2007, because the Company did not meet the criterion that “the asset (disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets”, due to our continued utilization of assets in our ongoing operations at our Mexico Facility.

The Company ceased operations in Mexico in March 2007, and reclassified the net book value of $0.7 million for the building and the related assets to assets held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 1, 2007, in accordance with SFAS 144. In addition, depreciation of the assets related to this sale was suspended as of April 1, 2007. There was no impairment charge to the related assets because management determined that the measurement value, the net book value, was lower than the estimated fair value less cost to sell.

On February 22, 2007, Cherokee Electronica, S.A. de C.V. (“Cherokee Mexico”), a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Inmobiliaria Hondarribia, S.A. de C.V. (the “Buyer”) for the sale of Cherokee Mexico’s 35,000-foot manufacturing facility in Guadalajara, Mexico. The Agreement provided that the Buyer pay Cherokee Mexico an aggregate purchase price of approximately US $1.2 million of which a 15% deposit, approximately US $182,000, was paid on February 22, 2007. On May 24, 2007, the sale of the building was completed, and the remaining 85% of the sales price was transferred into the Company’s bank account. The Company also collected the value added tax on the building in addition to the sales price and paid the taxes collected to the Mexican government in June 2007. The net gain of the sale recorded during the quarter ended July 1, 2007, was $0.4 million, net of $0.1 million related to the cost to sell the assets which was deducted from the gain.

Sale of Mexico Corporation

On December 12, 2007, the Company sold its ownership in the capital stock of Cherokee Mexico. The Company received the proceeds from the sale on December 13, 2007. The net gain of the sale was $0.4 million.

15

Table of Contents

Asset Impairment Charges related to Other Assets

During the quarter ended October 1, 2006, the Company performed an impairment review in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to determine whether any of its long-lived assets located at the Mexico Facility were impaired. The Company identified certain long-lived assets associated with the restructuring and closure of the Mexico Facility whose carrying value would not be recoverable from future cash flows and recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million for these assets. These assets consisted of machinery and equipment, computer technology and equipment, and office furniture and equipment. The majority of these assets were written off because the Company considered them to have no market value. None of the impairment charges included cash components.

Restructuring Costs

In accordance with SFAS 146, employee severance, contract termination and other exit costs are recorded at their estimated fair value when they are incurred. During the quarter ended July 1, 2007, there was a reversal of $38,000 to severance costs due to the transfer and relocation of an employee from the Mexico Facility to our Tustin Facility.

There were $0.2 million of employee severance and stay bonus costs during the first six months of 2007, which included a pro-rata portion from the commencement date of August 10, 2006 through July 1, 2007, of an estimated amount of statutorily required severance payments and management performance stay-on bonuses incurred for employees at the Mexico Facility. The Company paid $0.6 million of severance and related expenses to the remainder of employees terminated during the quarter ended July 1, 2007. All severance charges were settled with cash as of July 1, 2007.

11.             STOCK AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

2002 Stock Option Plan

In July 2003, the Company adopted the Cherokee International Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Stock Option Plan”) under which up to 1,410,256 shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options to the directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company and its subsidiaries. In connection with the adoption of the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the Company granted 1,087,327 stock options. The options typically vest over a four-year period, have a ten-year contractual life, range in exercise price from $5.85 to $10.34 per share and were granted with exercise prices at or above fair value as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors based on income and market valuation methodologies. In February 2004, the Company granted options to purchase 328,320 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $14.50 and terminated the 2002 Stock Option Plan. As of June 29, 2008, the Company had granted a total of 1,415,647 options to purchase shares of common stock under the 2002 Stock Option Plan, which includes options to purchase shares that were cancelled and subsequently re-granted.

2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

On February 16, 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), which provided for the issuance of 800,000 shares of common stock. The 2004 Plan also provides for an annual increase to be added on the first day of the Company’s fiscal year equal to the lesser of (i) 450,000 shares or (ii) 2% of the number of outstanding shares on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year. As of June 29, 2008, a total of 3,315,141 shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan. Any officer, director, employee, consultant or advisor of the Company is eligible to participate in the 2004 Plan. The 2004 Plan provides for the issuance of stock-based incentive awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock, and performance shares. As of June 29, 2008, the Company had granted options to purchase 2,399,489 shares of common stock under the 2004 Plan, which included 378,153 options issued as partial compensation to non-employee directors. During the quarter ended and six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 70,000 shares to non-employee directors.

2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 16, 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP provides for an annual increase to be added on the first day of the Company’s fiscal year equal to the lesser of (i) 250,000 shares or (ii) 1% of the number of outstanding shares on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year. As of June 29, 2008, a total of 914,220 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the plan. The ESPP, which is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, is implemented utilizing six-month offerings with purchases occurring at six-month intervals, with a new offering period commencing on the first trading day on or after May 15 and November 15 and ending on the last trading day on or before November 14 or May 14, respectively. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors oversees administration of the ESPP. Employees are eligible to participate if they are employed for at least 20 hours per week and more than 5 months in a calendar year by the Company, subject to certain restrictions.

16

Table of Contents

The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of an employee’s compensation. The price of common stock purchased under the ESPP is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of each six-month offering period or on the applicable purchase date. Employees may end their participation in an offering at any time during the offering period, and participation ends automatically upon termination of employment. The Compensation Committee may at any time amend or terminate the ESPP, except that no such amendment or termination may adversely affect shares previously issued under the ESPP. As of June 29, 2008, 258,351 shares of common stock had been issued under the ESPP.

Deferred Compensation Plan

On February 16, 2004, the Company adopted two executive deferred compensation plans for the benefit of certain designated employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The plans were amended on January 1, 2008 to comply with the regulations for nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 409A. The plans allow participating employees and non-employee directors to make pre-tax deferrals of up to 100% of their annual base salary and bonuses, and retainer fees and meeting fees, respectively. The plans allow the Company to make matching contributions and employer profit sharing credits at the sole discretion of the Company. A participant’s interest in each matching contribution and employer profit sharing credit, if any, vests in full no later than after 3 years.

As of June 29, 2008, the Company has a recorded liability of $0.6 million for employee and non-employee director contributions and investment activity to date; the current portion of $0.4 million is recorded under accrued compensation and benefits and the long-term portion of $0.2 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities. As of December 30, 2007, the Company had a recorded liability of $1.4 million, of which $1.1 million was recorded under accrued compensation and benefits and the long-term portion of $0.2 million was recorded in other long-term liabilities. The Company has not provided any matching contributions under the plans.

During the six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company paid $0.6 million of scheduled distributions to participants from the deferred compensation plan.  The Company also made partial surrenders on two policies during the first quarter of 2008 in the amount of $0.4 million.  The partial surrenders did not change the face amount of the policies. During July 2008, the Company paid $0.2 million of scheduled distributions to participants from the deferred compensation plan.  The Company anticipates making additional partial surrenders on the policies during the third quarter of 2008 for the reimbursement of these distributions.

12.             RETIREMENT PLANS

Cherokee Europe maintains a pension plan for certain levels of staff and management that include a defined benefit feature. The following represents the amounts related to this defined benefit plan for the quarter and six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively  (in thousands):

13.             GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT CHARGE

Based on our annual assessment of the fair value of our Cherokee Europe subsidiary in accordance with SFAS 142, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $5.2 million during the year ended December 30, 2007, to properly report goodwill at its fair value at that period in time.

Due to the decline in our European operation’s revenue volumes during the six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company performed a revised forecast for the remaining year of 2008 and the next three years.  Since our actual and future revenues were trending lower than anticipated revenues of our original business plan, the Company engaged a professional consulting firm to perform a SFAS 142 valuation and analysis study of our goodwill.  As a result of this study, an impairment charge of $1.1 million was recorded during the quarter ended June 29, 2008 due to the decrease in fair value of our Cherokee Europe subsidiary.  As of June 29, 2008 the Company no longer has any goodwill recorded.

17

Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations about future events. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions, or the negative of such words and expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words or expressions. These forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and include statements in this Quarterly Report regarding the following: our expectations that cash flows will be sufficient to meeting our operating requirements for at least the next twelve months; our expectations regarding our working capital and capital expenditure requirements; and our expectations regarding the refinancing or payment of our senior note obligations. However, these statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties affecting our business. You should read this Quarterly Report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect as a result of these risks and uncertainties and other factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the potential delisting of the Company’s common stock from the NASDAQ Global Market, (2) changes in general economic and business conditions, domestically and internationally, (3) reductions in sales to, or the loss of, any of the Company’s significant customers or in customer capacity generally, (4) changes in the Company’s sales mix to lower margin products, (5) increased competition in the Company’s industry, (6) disruptions of the Company’s established supply channels, (7) the Company’s level of debt and restrictions imposed by its debt agreements, and (8) the additional risk factors included in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, even though the Company’s situation may change in the future.

INTRODUCTION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement and notes of Cherokee International Corporation included above in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with the audited financial statements, footnotes and Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OVERVIEW

Business

We are a designer and manufacturer of power supplies for OEMs. Our advanced power supply products are typically custom designed into mid- to high-end commercial applications in the computing and storage, wireless infrastructure, enterprise networking, telecom, medical and industrial markets.

We operate worldwide and have facilities in Orange County, California; Bombay, India; Wavre, Belgium (Europe) and Shanghai, China. In March 2007, we closed our facility in Guadalajara, Mexico (the “Mexico Facility”). In May 2007, we sold our manufacturing facility in Guadalajara, Mexico and on December 12, 2007, we sold our subsidiary, Cherokee Electronica, S.A. de C.V. (“Cherokee Mexico”). We were founded in 1978 in Orange County, California. As we expanded our business and customer base, we opened facilities in Bombay, India, Guadalajara, Mexico, and Shanghai, China. In June 2000, we acquired Cherokee Europe SCA and related entities (“Cherokee Europe”), which added a manufacturing facility in Wavre, Belgium to our manufacturing capacity and enabled us to better serve the European market.

We generate the majority of our sales in four market sectors, datacom, telecom, industrial and medical. For the quarter ended June 29, 2008, our revenues by market sector consisted of 47% datacom, 24% telecom, and 29% for the industrial and medical sectors.

18

Table of Contents

Basis of Reporting

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Cherokee Europe, Cherokee India Pvt. Ltd. (“Cherokee India”), Powertel India Pvt. Ltd. (“Powertel”), and Cherokee International (China) Power Supply LLC (“Cherokee China”), and the financial statements of its formerly owned subsidiary Cherokee Mexico were included in the year ended December 30, 2007. Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Net Sales

See Revenue Recognition of Critical Accounting Policies section below for Company description.

Cost of Sales

The principal elements comprising cost of sales are raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. Raw materials account for a large majority of our costs of sales. Raw materials include magnetic sub-assemblies, sheet metal, electronic and other components, mechanical parts and electrical wires. Direct labor costs primarily include costs of hourly employees. Manufacturing overhead includes salaries, and the direct expense and allocation of costs attributable to manufacturing for lease costs, depreciation on property, plant and equipment, utilities, property taxes and repairs and maintenance.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses include engineering costs, selling and marketing costs and general and administrative expenses. Engineering costs primarily include salaries and benefits of engineering personnel, safety approval and quality certification fees, and depreciation on equipment and consulting and professional services. Selling and marketing expenses primarily include salaries and benefits to account managers and commissions to independent sales representatives. Administrative expenses primarily include salaries and benefits for certain management and administrative personnel, professional fees and information system costs. Operating expenses also include the direct expense and allocation of costs attributable to these departments for lease costs, depreciation on property, plant and equipment, utilities, property taxes and repairs and maintenance.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information currently available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Any future changes to these estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on our reported amounts of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities. The significant accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title transfer has occurred, the price is fixed or readily determinable, and collectability is probable. We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Sales are recorded net of discounts, which are estimated at the time of shipment based upon historical data. Changes in assumptions regarding the rate of sales discounts earned by our customers could impact our results.

We generally recognize revenue at the time of shipment because this is the point at which revenue is earned and realizable and the earnings process is complete. For most shipments, title to shipped goods transfers at the shipping point, so the risks and rewards of ownership transfer once the product leaves our facility or third-party hub. Revenue is only recognized when collectability is reasonably assured. Shipping and handling fees are included in revenue with related costs recorded to cost of sales.

The Company has entered into arrangements with certain customers whereby products are delivered to a third-party warehouse location for interim storage until subsequently shipped and accepted by our customers. Revenues from these sales are recognized upon shipment from the third-party warehouse location to the customers, when title has passed. The Company generally offers a one-year warranty for defective products. Warranty charges have been insignificant during the periods presented.

19

Table of Contents

Accounts Receivable

In our North American and European operations we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers, the customer’s current credit worthiness and various other factors, as determined by our review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we might not continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant portion of our accounts receivable are concentrated in a small number of customers. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the collectability of our accounts receivable, our liquidity and our future operating results.  As of June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, our top ten customers accounted for  42% and 50% of our accounts receivables, respectively.

Credit Risk

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for estimated credit losses. The Company generally does not charge interest on customer balances.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

Foreign subsidiary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date. Revenues, costs and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Transaction gains and losses are included in results of operations and have not been significant for the periods presented. The functional currency of Cherokee Europe is the Euro. The functional currency of Cherokee India, Powertel and Cherokee China is the U.S. dollar, as the majority of transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. Translation adjustments related to Cherokee Europe are reflected as a component of stockholders’ equity in other comprehensive income (loss).

Inventories

We value our inventory at the lower of the actual cost to purchase and/or manufacture the inventory and the current estimated market value of the inventory using the weighted average cost method. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our historical usage data and estimates of future demand. Since substantially all of our products are manufactured according to firm purchase orders and customer forecasts, we evaluate the potential of recovery from our customers when customized products approach end-of-life. Our customers are generally liable for inventory costs we incur for order cancellations that occur after we have committed resources to procure or manufacture product. We also regularly evaluate inventory that is non-compliant with the European Commission’s RoHS directive regarding hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment, to determine if additional reserves are needed to cover for potential obsolescence. We have not established a separate reserve for non-RoHS compliant inventory above what our normal calculations would require.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product development, and rapid product obsolescence that could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. As demonstrated during the past five years, demand for our products can fluctuate significantly. A significant increase in the demand for our products could result in a short-term increase in the cost of inventory purchases while a significant decrease in demand could result in an increase in the amount of excess inventory quantities on hand. In addition, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if our inventory were determined to be overvalued, we would be required to recognize additional expense in our cost of sales at the time of such determination. Likewise, if our inventory is determined to be undervalued, we may have over reported our costs of sales in previous periods and would be required to recognize additional operating income at the time such inventory is sold. Therefore, although we make every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy of our estimates of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a material effect on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.

Deferred Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences.

20

Table of Contents

If our future taxable income is significantly higher than expected and/or we are able to utilize our tax credits, we may be required to reverse all or a significant part of our valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets which could substantially reduce our effective tax rate for such period. Therefore, any significant changes in statutory tax rates or the amount of our valuation allowance could have a material effect on the value of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our reported financial results.  As of December 30, 2007, deferred taxes include $1.6 million of tax benefits on the balance sheet generated by our European operations.  Cherokee Europe has a history of profits.  Recovery has been dependent upon achieving our forecast of future operating income over a protracted period of time.  During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, management revised the forecast of our European revenues based on changes made in the orders by our European customers and a valuation allowance was recorded against all of Europe’s deferred tax assets.  Based on available evidence including changes to our forecasted revenues in Europe, management can no longer conclude it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realizable.

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of tax-related assets and liabilities and income tax provisions. The Company’s effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuations during the fiscal year as new information is obtained which may affect the assumptions Management uses to estimate the annual effective tax rate including mix of pre-tax earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which it operates.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes , by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under FIN 48, the financial statement effects of a tax position should initially be recognized when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. See Note 3, “Provision for Income Taxes” in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the impact of adoption.

United States income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries. Those earnings are considered to be permanently re-invested in accordance with the Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 23.

Other Comprehensive Income

Belgium taxes for unrealized foreign exchange gains on an intercompany loan considered permanently re-invested are provided for as a component of other comprehensive income or loss.

Goodwill and Long Lived Assets

We review the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill on an annual basis or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change to indicate that an impairment of goodwill has possibly occurred. The determination of whether any potential impairment of goodwill exists is based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the accounting value of its net assets.

We also review the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined based upon the forecasted undiscounted future net cash flows from the operations to which the assets relate, utilizing management’s best estimates, based on appropriate assumptions and current projections.

These projected future cash flows may vary significantly over time as a result of increased competition, changes in technology, fluctuations in demand, consolidation of our customers and reductions in average selling prices. If the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable from future operating cash flows, the asset would be deemed impaired and an impairment loss would be recognized on the date of determination to the extent the carrying value exceeded the estimated fair market value of the asset.

Based on our annual assessment of the fair value of our Cherokee Europe subsidiary in accordance with SFAS 142, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $5.2 million during the year ended December 30, 2007, to properly report goodwill at its fair value at that period in time.

21

Table of Contents

During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, the remaining balance of $1.1 million of goodwill was deemed impaired. An impairment charge was recorded due to the decrease in fair value of our Cherokee Europe subsidiary due to lower revenues than anticipated.  As of June 29, 2008 the Company no longer has any goodwill recorded.  Details are included under Note 13 to the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements.”

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company adopted SFAS 123R on January 2, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method as permitted by SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, stock compensation cost recognized beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to February 25, 2004 and prior to January 2, 2006 but not yet vested as of January 2, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective method of adoption, the Company’s results of operations and financial position for prior periods have not been restated. At the date of the adoption, the unamortized expense for options issued prior to January 2, 2006 was $2.3 million, which will be amortized as stock compensation costs through December 2010. All grants are made at prices based on the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Outstanding options generally vest four years from the grant date, with certain limited exceptions, and expire up to ten years after the grant date.

The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula with the assumptions included in the table under “Stock-Based Compensation” in Note 3 to the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company uses historical data, among other factors, to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. For options granted prior to January 2, 2006, the Company used the expected option life of 5 years. For options granted following the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R, the expected life was increased to 6.25 years using the “simplified method” under SAB 107 (an expected term based on the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term). The options have a maximum contractual term of 10 years and generally vest as to 25% of the underlying stock on each anniversary of the date of grant, subject to accelerated vesting in the event of a change in control of the Company. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 29, 2008 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 1, 2007

NET SALES

Net sales increased by approximately 37.1%, or $11.0 million, to $40.5 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 from $29.6 million for the quarter ended July 1, 2007. During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, net datacom sales were higher by $4.4 million, primarily driven by new programs from new designs awarded in prior years.  Telecom net sales were higher by $2.3 million, primarily driven by one large triple play customer. Industrial, medical and other net sales were higher by $4.3 million from the prior period due to new customers and new programs. Overall, revenues from all of our markets were higher for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 compared to the quarter ended July 1, 2007. Included in the above increases is a $1.7 million benefit related to the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operation.

GROSS PROFIT

Gross profit increased by approximately 104.2%, or $5.8 million, to $11.3 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 from $5.5 million for the quarter ended July 1, 2007. Gross margin for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 increased to 28.0% from 18.8% in the prior year period.  Gross profit was higher during the quarter ended June 29, 2008 due primarily to higher net sales from new programs with better gross margins which provided better absorption of fixed costs. Gross margins were better due to increased production volumes in China, the introduction of new models which represented a positive mix and better overall volumes of products.

For the quarter ended June 29, 2008, the increase in gross profit included $0.2 million of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our Cherokee Europe operation.

22

Table of Contents

OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 increased approximately 18.2%, or $1.5 million, to $9.5 million from $8.1 million for the quarter ended July 1, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased to 23.5% from 27.2% in the prior year period. The increase in operating expenses in 2008 from 2007are as follows:

Engineering and development costs increased by $0.1 million due to $0.2 million in foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operation, $0.1 million in bonuses, offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in overhead and development costs in Europe.

Selling and marketing expense increased by $0.2 million due to an increase of $0.1 million in bonuses and commissions and $0.1 million in foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operation.

General and administrative expense was the same for both quarters ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007.  Professional fees for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 compared to July 1, 2007 were lower by $0.3 million because the prior period in 2007 included professional fees from the additional work required to file our Form 10-K for fiscal year-end 2006.  Permits and taxes for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 were lower by $0.1 million compared to the quarter ended July 1, 2007.  Personnel expenses were lower by $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 compared to the quarter ended July 1, 2007 due to headcount related to the closure of the Mexico Facility completed in 2007.  During the quarter ended July 1, 2007 we incurred $0.1 million of costs related to the closure of the Mexico facility, compared to no expense during the quarter ended June 29, 2008. Offsetting the above decreases were higher expenses of $0.3 million in bonuses, $0.2 million in foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operations and $0.1 million in stock compensation expense for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 compared to the quarter ended July 1, 2007.

During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, the remaining balance of $1.1 million of goodwill was deemed impaired. An impairment charge was recorded due to the decrease in fair value of our Cherokee Europe subsidiary due to lower revenues than anticipated.  Details are included under Note 13 to the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements.”

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

As a result of the factors discussed above, operating income increased by $4.3 million to $1.8 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, compared to a loss of $2.5 million for the quarter ended July 1, 2007. Operating margin increased to 4.5% income from a 8.5% loss in the prior year period.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense for both quarters ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 was $0.7 million.  The interest expense is primarily related to interest payments on our $46.6 million of senior notes, which bear interest at 5.25% annually.

OTHER INCOME

For the quarter ended July 1, 2007, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million to other income related to the sale of the Mexico Facility building.  See Note 10 to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements” for additional information.

INCOME TAXES

Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 and the comparable period of July 1, 2007 was a $1.7 million provision and $1.0 million benefit, respectively. The provision for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 was higher by $2.7 million than the comparable period of July 1, 2007 due to the recording of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s European deferred tax assets in the quarter ended June 29, 2008.  The benefit from the comparable period of July 1, 2007 was primarily a result of the European operating loss.  Based on available evidence, including changes to our forecasted revenues in Europe, management can no longer conclude that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax assets.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 was calculated using an effective tax rate of less than one percent for the full fiscal year in addition to the valuation allowance of $1.6 million recorded as a discrete item in the quarter ended June 29, 2008.

23

Table of Contents

NET INCOME (LOSS)

As a result of the factors discussed above, we recorded a net loss of $0.6 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, compared to a $1.7 million net loss for the quarter ended July 1, 2007.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 29, 2008 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2007

NET SALES

Net sales increased by approximately 26.3%, or $15.7 million, to $75.3 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008 from $59.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.  During the six months ended June 29, 2008, net telecom sales were higher by $5.5 million, primarily driven by one large triple play customer, datacom sales were higher by $4.9 million, primarily driven by new programs from new designs awarded in prior years, and industrial, medical and other net sales were higher by $5.3 million due to new customers and new programs. Overall, revenues from all of our markets were higher for the six months ended June 29, 2008 compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007. Included in the above increases is a $3.3 million benefit related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operation.

GROSS PROFIT

Gross profit increased by approximately 77.3%, or $8.7 million, to $20.0 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008 from $11.3 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007. Gross margin for the six months ended June 29, 2008 increased to 26.5% from 18.9% in the prior year period.

The increase in gross profit for the six months ended June 29, 2008 compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007 was primarily related to overall higher revenues in the second quarter of this year which provided better absorption of fixed costs. Gross margins were better due to increased production volumes in China, the introduction of new models and better overall volumes of products.

Included in the increase in gross profit for the six months ended June 29, 2008 is $0.5 million of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our Cherokee Europe operation.

OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 29, 2008 increased by approximately 10.9%, or $1.7 million, to $17.6 million from $15.9 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.  As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased to 23.4% from 26.7% in the prior year period.

For the six months ended June 29, 2008, engineering and development expense increased by $0.2 million compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007, due to an increase of $0.1 million in bonuses, $0.1 million increase in China’s personnel expense related to additional headcount to support our increase in new product development, and an increase of $0.3 million of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our Cherokee Europe operation.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease of $0.3 million in personnel and development expenses in Europe.

Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of sales salaries and commissions, travel, advertising and marketing expenses. For the six months ended June 29, 2008, selling and marketing expense increased by $0.1 million compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007.  Bonuses and commissions were higher by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008 compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007 due to higher sales.  For the six months ended June 29, 2009, the increase in selling and marketing expense included $0.2 million of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our Cherokee Europe operation.  Offsetting these increases were a decrease of $0.1 million in customer promotional expenses and a decrease of $0.2 million in overhead and marketing expenses in Europe.

General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries and other expense for management, finance, human resources and information systems. For the six months ended June 29, 2008, general and administrative expense increased by $0.5 million compared to the six months ended July 1, 2007, due to an increase of $0.4 million in bonuses, an increase of $0.3 million in foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our Cherokee Europe operations and an increase of $0.1 million in stock compensation expense.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease of $0.3 million in the six months ended June 29, 2008 compared to the prior period in 2007 related to redundant general and administrative costs incurred in 2007 for the closure of the Mexico Facility and transition of its operations to China.

24

Table of Contents

During the six months ended July 1, 2007, professional fees were higher by $0.3 million due to the additional work required to file our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, compared to no additional work and expense in 2008 for the filing of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007. However, this savings for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was offset by an increase of $0.2 million in legal and professional expenses; $0.1 million was related to professional fees for the engagement of an investment banker to assist the Company in exploring strategic alternatives in resolving our senior notes debt, and $0.1 million of legal and professional fees to support and complete an IRS audit and our defense in the SynQor litigation.

For the six months ended July 1, 2007, there was $0.2 million of operating costs related to severance and facility closure costs for the Mexico Facility, compared to no expense in 2008.

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

As a result of the factors discussed above, operating income was $2.3 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008 compared to an operating loss of $4.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.  Operating margin increased to income of 3.1% from a loss of 7.8% in the prior year period.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was $1.5 million compared to $1.4 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.  The interest expense is mainly related to our 5.25% senior notes and commitment fees on our senior revolving credit line.

OTHER INCOME

For the six months ended July 1, 2007, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million to other income related to the sale of the Mexico Facility building.  See Note 10 to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements” for additional information.

INCOME TAXES

Provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 29, 2008 and the comparable period of July 1, 2007 was a $1.7 million expense and a $1.6 million benefit, respectively.  The expense for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was higher by $3.3 million than the comparable period of July 1, 2007 due to the recording of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s European deferred tax assets in the quarter ended June 29, 2008.  The benefit from the comparable period of July 1, 2007 was primarily the result of the European operating loss.  Based on available evidence, including changes to our forecasted revenues in Europe, management can no longer conclude that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax assets.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was calculated using an effective tax rate of less than 1% for the full fiscal year in addition to the valuation allowance of $1.6 million recorded as a discrete item in the quarter ended June 29, 2008.

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 As a result of the factors discussed above, we recorded a net loss of $0.6 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008, compared to the net loss of $3.7 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.

25

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 29, 2008 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2007

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was $1.2 million compared to net cash used in operating activities of $3.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 29, 2008 reflected a net loss of $0.6 million, $1.4 million in depreciation and amortization, $1.1 million in goodwill impairment, $0.5 million of stock-based compensation, a $1.7 million increase in the valuation allowance for deferred income taxes, a $0.4 million decrease in deposits and other assets, a $0.7 million increase in accounts payable, and a $0.9 million increase in accrued compensation and benefits.  This was offset by a $1.8 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $2.3 million increase in inventories, $0.1 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $0.4 million decrease in accrued liabilities and restructuring costs, and a $0.3 million decrease in other long-term obligations.

Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 reflected a net loss of $3.7 million which was primarily a result of $14.8 million lower revenues of $14.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006, offset by a $0.4 million gain in the sale of assets held for sale related to the sale of the Mexico Facility building, a $3.2 million increase in inventory, a $2.5 million decrease in accrued liabilities and restructuring costs, and a $0.9 million decrease in accrued compensation.  This was offset by $1.6 million in depreciation and amortization, $0.3 million of stock-based compensation related to SFAS 123R, a $4.0 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $0.6 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $0.4 million increase in accounts payable, and a $0.1 million increase in other long-term obligations.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was $0.2 million, which was related to capital expenditures.  Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 was $0.3 million, in which $1.5 million was related to capital expenditures.  We invested $1.4 million in our China facility. We received $1.2 million of proceeds from the sale of the Mexico Facility building.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 29, 2008 was less than $0.1 million, which included a $1.3 million payment with respect to Cherokee’s China’s line of credit with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. during the first quarter of 2008, or ICBC, $0.4 million of deferred financing costs incurred related to the senior notes, and payments of $0.3 million by Cherokee Europe on its short-term loan.  This was offset by Cherokee Europe’s borrowing of $0.6 million in a short-term loan and $0.8 million borrowings from its line of credit with ING Belgie NV, and $0.5 million borrowings by Cherokee China from its line of credit with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.

 Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 was $1.5 million. During the first three months of 2007, Cherokee China borrowed $1.3 million under the credit facility to support working capital requirements as our China subsidiary built inventory and incurred value-added tax on local purchases. As of July 1, 2007, the outstanding balance of $1.3 million due to ICBC remained due. During the six months ended July 1, 2007, $0.2 million of employee stock purchase plan proceeds were received.

LIQUIDITY

We expect our liquidity requirements will be primarily for working capital and capital expenditures, including repayment of our senior notes due November 1, 2008. As of June 29, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $9.3 million, negative working capital of $3.7 million due, in part, to the $46.6 million of senior notes due November 1, 2008 being classified as current liabilities, no outstanding borrowings under our main revolving credit facility and borrowing base availability of $7.5 million under the same facility. Our revolving line of credit with General Electric Capital Corporation matures on August 25, 2008. The Company plans to renew this line with a new lender after our senior note obligations have been repaid or renegotiated. Historically, we have financed our operations with cash from operations supplemented by borrowings from credit facilities and debt and equity issuances. Besides our credit line in the United States, Cherokee Europe also maintains a working capital line of credit of approximately $4.8 million, expressed as Euros 3.0 million, with Bank Brussels Lambert, a subsidiary of ING Belgie NV, a bank in Brussels, which is denominated in Euros, and is collateralized by a pledge in first and second rank over a specific amount of business assets. In June 2008, ING Belgie NV restricted our borrowing capacity to $3.0 million, expressed as Euros 1.9 million. The facility requires Cherokee Europe to maintain a certain solvency ratio and is cancelable at any time. The current revolving line of credit with ING Belgie NV prohibits the transfer of cash outside of Belgium to the U.S. in the form of management and dividend fees. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2007, Cherokee Europe borrowed $2.2 million from the line of credit which remained outstanding as of June 29, 2008. On April 28, 2008, Cherokee Europe borrowed $0.8 million from its line of credit with ING Belgie NV. The outstanding balance on the line of credit as of June 29, 2008 was $3.0 million. By the end of the third quarter in 2008, Cherokee Europe’s line of credit will be converted into a new factoring arrangement with ING Belgie NV, as described under Note 6 to the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements.”

26

Table of Contents

In January 2008, Cherokee Europe borrowed short-term funds of $0.6 million from ING Belgie NV; the outstanding balance was $0.3 million as of June 29, 2008.

In January 2007, we opened a credit facility with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd., or ICBC, as described under Note 6 to the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements.”  This facility is intended for working capital requirements in China, especially as our China subsidiary builds inventory for export to the United States and Europe and incurs value-added tax on local purchases that can only be recovered through in-country sales of our product. During the quarter ended June 29, 2008, Cherokee China borrowed $0.5 million from its line of credit.  As of June 29, 2008, Cherokee China had outstanding borrowings of $0.5 million under this line of credit.

Subject to the refinancing risk described below under Contractual Obligations, we believe our cash flow from operations and our credit lines in the United States, Europe and China are sufficient to meet our operating cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, this assumes that we are successful in securing refinancing or payment of our senior notes when they mature in November 2008.

Having completed the China plant construction and replacement of destroyed assets in Cherokee Europe, ongoing current and future liquidity needs are expected to arise primarily from working capital requirements and historical level capital expenditures, assuming we successfully repay or renegotiate our senior bonds obligation. Our capital expenditures in 2007 and 2006 were $2.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively. In 2008, we expect our capital expenditures to range between $1.7 million to $2.1 million.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of June 29, 2008, our borrowings consisted of approximately $46.6 million of senior notes, $3.0 million of outstanding borrowings on our Cherokee Europe line of credit, $0.3 million of outstanding borrowings of short-term funds, and $0.5 million of outstanding borrowings under Cherokee China’s credit facility and line of credit.  For a more detailed discussion related to the financial instruments and obligations, see Note 6, “Debt” to the accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements.”

We have operating lease obligations relating to our facilities in Tustin and Irvine, California and Bombay, India.

We have purchase commitments primarily with vendors and suppliers for the purchase of inventory and for other goods, services, and equipment as part of the normal course of business. These commitments are generally evidenced by purchase orders that may or may not include cancellation provisions. Based on current expectations, we do not believe that any cancellation penalties we incur under these obligations would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

The majority of the $0.3 million of scheduled deferred compensation distributions listed in the below table to be paid in the second half of 2008 were paid in July 2008. The funds for the remaining balance in this plan have been reserved and deposited into an investment account with funds that closely mirror investment funds similar to the participants’ investment selections.

27

Table of Contents

The maturities of our long-term debt, including capital leases, and future payments relating to our operating leases and other obligations as of June 29, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):

The long-term liability for accrued pension costs included on the condensed consolidated balance sheet is excluded from the table above. Cherokee is unable to estimate the timing of payments for these costs. During the six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company contributed approximately $0.2 million.  In 2008, the Company expects to contribute $0.4 million.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see the subsection entitled “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” contained in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1. “Financial Statements.”

Item 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk relating to our operations results primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and short-term interest rates. We did not have any derivative financial instruments at June 29, 2008.

We had no variable rate debt outstanding at June 29, 2008. However, any debt we incur under the Credit Facility and the Cherokee Europe line of credit will bear interest at a variable rate. We cannot predict market fluctuations in interest rates and their impact on any variable rate debt we may incur in the future, nor can there be any assurance that fixed rate long-term debt will be available to us at favorable rates, if at all.

The functional currency for our European operations is the Euro. We are, therefore, subject to a certain degree of market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This risk is mitigated by the fact that our revenues and expenses are generally both transacted in Euros, thereby reducing the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation on our European operations. The net effect on our operating income for foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations for the six months ended June 29, 2008, was a $0.3 million decrease in our income. Historically, we have not actively engaged in exchange rate-hedging activities.

Item 4T.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. The evaluation included certain control areas in which we have made, and are continuing to make, changes to improve and enhance controls. As described below, we have identified material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, and as of June 29, 2008, these material weaknesses and significant deficiencies have not been fully remediated.

28

Table of Contents

As a result, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 29, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Since the Company conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, our management has implemented some changes to its internal control over financial reporting in response to the following material weaknesses that were identified as of December 30, 2007, as described below:

Architecture of Company’s IT systems does not presently support the financial reporting requirements of the Company’s international operations

Our subsidiaries in India and China still maintain disparate financial accounting systems that do not completely interface with the Company’s primary ERP system, resulting in duplicate accounting entries on multiple systems. This causes a protracted reporting cycle which limits the oversight from corporate headquarters of transactional details at our international sites. Site level financial statements are delivered on spreadsheets to the corporate office for consolidation.

Our European operation has its own separate ERP system that is integrated into the local accounting system; however this system does not automatically interface financially with our corporate headquarters. Therefore, financial results are also delivered to our corporate office by means of spreadsheets, and the corporate office also has insufficient visibility to transactional details.

The consolidation of all these local results delivered on spreadsheets is in turn prepared on spreadsheets at our corporate office. Consolidations performed on spreadsheets are prone to human error and are difficult to review. As such, the existing consolidation process requires additional monitoring and oversight. Oversight and monitoring are discussed in more detail below.

The Company has completed its development and implementation of IT interface solutions for key activities in China. The company will now begin to focus on determining what IT solutions will be required for our other locations.  Until this is completed, the Company will continue to supplement these technical IT solutions with additional staffing and internal monitoring procedures.

The methodology and support for valuing and capitalizing inventory costs, and determining inventory reserves

As remediated in the second quarter of 2007, the Company now evaluates historical and projected labor and overhead costs to determine their reasonableness. This process is subject to finance management oversight and review. The Company still does not track labor by product model at most locations.

Oversight and monitoring controls

The lack of an integrated financial reporting system creates the need for significant manual intervention and staffing to prepare spreadsheets, create eliminating entries, make tax adjustments, and U.S. GAAP adjustments. Additionally, our remote locations, other than Europe, have one local controller with little more than clerical support to maintain the local accounting system, transport information from the ERP system to their local books, report financial statements to our headquarters in the U.S. and perform routine functions such as account reconciliations. As part of our Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) 404 compliance efforts, the Company is performing a detailed review of procedures and personnel at each site location. The Company is committed to resolving all deficiencies identified.

We have identified and have performed or are working on the following remediation to resolve the weakness in oversight and monitoring controls over international financial reporting:

·      The process of adding structure and uniformity of accounting standards and process among our site controllers continues through distribution of corporate policies and procedures, planned continued development and distribution of policies, reinforcement of management representations and corporate code of conduct, and regular visits by the corporate controller to various Company sites. We continue critical self-review of how accounting is performed worldwide.

29

Table of Contents

·      Due to personnel changes, the Company expects to rely on outside professionals for a significant portion of its SOX compliance review.  During the second quarter, we engaged Grant Thornton to assist the Company in its SOX compliance.  Initial planning has begun and preliminary fieldwork is now expected to begin in the third quarter of 2008.

·      An improved consolidated reporting package is now provided to corporate management and significant items are being reviewed with local management.

SOX Compliance

As a non-accelerated filer, 2007 marked the first year of SOX compliance for the Company. The Company completed an internal assessment of controls. While the vast majority of the Company’s controls were operating properly, the Company did identify control deficiencies for remediation. The corporate office worked closely with the site accounting personnel to remediate these deficiencies. The vast majority of the deficiencies were remediated during 2007, but some did remain at year end. While efforts to remediate these deficiencies have continued into 2008, management assessed the remaining deficiencies to determine if any additional material weakness existed. The Company concluded that none of the open deficiencies at 2007 fiscal year end could result in a material weakness, but did believe that one could be classified as a significant deficiency. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness; yet important enough to merit the attention of those responsible for oversight over the Company’s financial reporting. Since the Company conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, our management has implemented the following changes to its internal control over financial reporting in response to the significant deficiencies that were identified as of December 30, 2007, as described below:

1)    Inadequate fixed asset management systems and procedures

During the second quarter, the Company implemented new IT system controls that we believe will remediate the inadequate controls over shipping cutoffs which was identified as a significant deficiency during 2007 SOX compliance.  Remediation efforts on the fixed asset systems are expected to continue over several periods.  The issues of IT systems, people and process are interrelated and difficult to separate. Striking the optimum balance between improved process, better trained and supervised staff and mission critical IT improvements is essential for success.

The Company is committed to remediating all material weaknesses and significant deficiencies presently identified and any additional deficiencies that may be identified in the future.

In connection with the Company’s filing of its financial statements for its fiscal year ending December 28, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting will not be subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm due to the deferral of the effective date of these requirements. This date has been delayed for non-accelerated filers; the provision will now apply to fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except as described above, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our second fiscal quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

On November 16, 2007, SynQor announced that it had filed a lawsuit against several of its competitors, including Cherokee International Corporation who was named in the complaint, for infringement of two patents relating to bus converters and/or non-isolated point of load converters used in intermediate bus architectures. The patents at issue are U.S. patents 7,072,190 and 7,272,021. The suit was filed in Federal Court in the Eastern District of Texas. The Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. Although the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact with respect to this lawsuit is subject to many uncertainties and is therefore not predictable with assurance, the final outcome of this lawsuit, if adverse, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

30

Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 29, 2008, we were not a party to any other material legal proceedings. We are occasionally a party to lawsuits relating to routine matters incidental to our business. As with all litigation, we can provide no assurance as to the outcome of any particular lawsuit, and we note that litigation inherently involves significant costs.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

We have updated the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007, as set forth below. We do not believe any of the updates constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007.

The following risk factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ significantly from the goals, plans, objectives, intentions and expectations expressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If any of the following risks and uncertainties or other risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or not currently considered to be material actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be harmed substantially.

Risks Relating to Our Company and Industry

We are substantially dependent upon sales to a relatively small group of customers. The loss of one or more major customers, or the discontinuation or modification of these customers’ products, could materially and adversely affect the results of our operations.

Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 50% of our net sales for the six months ended June 29, 2008 and approximately 50% of our net sales for the year ended December 30, 2007. In addition, one customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in the six months ended June 29, 2008 and for the year ended December 30, 2007. The loss of any of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We do not have long-term contracts with our customers, and our customers use alternative power supply providers for some or all of their products. We may not be able to maintain our customer relationships, and our customers may reduce or cancel their purchase orders, purchase power supplies elsewhere or develop relationships with additional providers of power supplies, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any of these customers could also have a material adverse effect on the collectibility of our accounts receivables, our liquidity and our future operating results. Prior to, or at the end of, a product’s life cycle, any of our customers may decide to discontinue or modify any of its products. In that event, the customer may no longer have a need for our products or may choose to integrate a competitor’s power supply into the customer’s new or modified product. The resulting loss of revenues could also adversely affect our financial condition or results of our operations.

Failure by our customers or us to keep up with rapid technological change in the electronic equipment industries could result in reduced sales for us.

Many of our existing customers are in the electronic equipment industries, especially wireless infrastructure and networking, and produce products that are subject to rapid technological change, obsolescence and large fluctuations in world-wide product demand. These industries are characterized by intense competition and end-user demand for increased product performance at lower prices. We may not be able to properly assess developments in the electronic equipment industries or identify product groups or customers with the potential for continued and future growth. Factors affecting the electronic equipment industries, in general, or any of our major customers or their products, in particular, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For instance, as a provider of power supplies to OEMs in the electronic equipment industries, our sales are dependent upon the success of the underlying products of which our power supplies are a component. We have no control over the demand for or success of these products. If our customers’ products are not well received by, or if demand for their products fails to develop among end-users, our customers may discontinue or modify the product or reduce the production of the product. Any of these events could lead to the cancellation or reduction of orders for our power supplies that were previously made or anticipated, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operation. See “Cancellations, reductions or delays in customers’ orders or commitments, or an increase in the number of warranty product returns could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations” for more information. The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, increasing customer demands, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and shortening product life cycles. Generally, our customers purchase our power supplies for the life cycle of a product, which can range anywhere from two to fifteen years. The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation and cost, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. As the lifecycle of our customers’ products shorten, we will be required to bid on contracts for replacement or next generation products to replace revenues generated from discontinued products more frequently.

31

Table of Contents

These bids may not be successful. Even if we are successful, we may not be able to successfully develop, introduce or manage the transition of new products. Any failure or delay in anticipating technological advances or developing and marketing new products that respond to any significant technological change or significant changes in customer demand could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We face significant competition, including from some competitors with greater resources and geographic presence than us. Our failure to adequately compete could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The design, manufacture and sale of power supplies are highly competitive and characterized by increasing customer demands for product performance, shorter manufacturing cycles and lower prices. Our competition includes numerous companies throughout the world, some of which have advantages over us in terms of labor and component costs and technology. Our principal competitors are Emerson Network Power, Delta Electronics, TDK (Lambda), Power One, Lineage Power, Murata, Eltek-Valere, and Vicor. Some of our competitors have substantially greater net sales, resources and geographic presence than we do. Competition from existing competitors or new market entrants may increase at any time. We also face competition from current and prospective customers that may design and manufacture their own power supplies. In times of an economic downturn, or when dealing with high-volume orders, price may become a more important competitive factor, forcing us to reduce prices and thereby adversely affecting our financial results. Some of our major competitors have also consolidated through merger and acquisition transactions. Consolidation among our competitors is likely to create companies with increased market share, customer bases, proprietary technology and marketing expertise, and an expanded sales force. These developments may adversely affect our ability to compete.

Cancellations, reductions or delays in customers’ orders or commitments, or an increase in the number of warranty product returns could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We do not obtain long-term purchase orders or commitments from our customers and customers may generally cancel, reduce or postpone orders or commitments. A variety of conditions, both specific to the individual customer and generally affecting the customer’s industry, may cause customers to cancel, reduce or delay orders or commitments that were previously made or anticipated. At any time, a significant portion of our backlog may be subject to cancellation or postponement. For example, our entire $54.1 million backlog as of June 29, 2008 was subject to cancellation upon the payment by our customers of cancellation fees that vary depending on individual purchase orders. We also enter into certain warehousing arrangements with some of our customers, whereby we agree to bear the risk and cost of carrying inventory. Under these arrangements, we deliver the power supplies ordered by such customers to a third-party location, permit these customers to take delivery of the power supplies within a specified time period after our delivery of the products, and invoice these customers for the products only after they have taken ultimate delivery and title has passed. We may not be able to replace cancelled, delayed or reduced orders or commitments in a timely manner or at all and in some instances may need to write-off inventory. Significant or numerous cancellations, as well as reductions or delays in orders or commitments, including as a result of delays in or the failure to take delivery of products that are subject to such arrangements, by a customer or group of customers, could materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

We also offer our customers a warranty for products that do not function properly within a limited time after delivery. We regularly monitor and track warranty product returns and record a provision for the estimated amount of future warranty returns based on historical experience and any notification we receive of pending warranty returns. We may experience greater warranty return rates than we have in the past. Any significant increase in product failure rates and the resulting warranty credit returns could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for the period or periods in which those warranty returns occur.

Our international manufacturing operations and our international sales subject us to risks associated with foreign laws, policies, economies and exchange rate fluctuations.

We have manufacturing operations located in Europe, India, and China. We may expand our operations into other foreign countries in the future. In addition, international sales have been, and are expected to continue to be, an important component of our total sales. International sales represented 53% of our net sales for the year ended June 29, 2008 and 50% of our net sales for the year ended December 30, 2007. Our manufacturing operations and international sales are subject to inherent risks, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For example, our European Division (Cherokee Europe) has two restructuring plans in place. The first one (the 1999 Europe restructuring) was inherited by us in 2000 when we purchased this division from Panta Electronics, and the second (the 2003 Europe restructuring) was implemented in 2003 by us.

32

Table of Contents

Both of these plans were significantly impacted by local labor laws and union labor negotiations, and required termination benefits. When we acquired Cherokee Europe in 2000, we inherited a liability of approximately $2.2 million to be paid through 2010 as a result of the 1999 Europe restructuring. When we implemented the 2003 Europe restructuring, we recorded a $4.5 million expense to be paid through 2016. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.” Other risks affecting our international operations include:

·                   differences or unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

·                   political and economic instability;

·                   terrorism and civil unrest;

·                   work stoppages or strikes;

·                   interruptions in transportation;

·                   restrictions on the export or import of technology;

·                   difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;

·                   variations in tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers;

·                   longer payment cycles;

·                   problems in collecting accounts receivables;

·                   changes in economic conditions in the international markets in which our products are sold; and

·                   greater fluctuations in sales to customers in developing countries.

Although we transact business primarily in U.S. dollars, a portion of our sales and expenses, including labor costs, are denominated in the Indian rupee, the Chinese renminbi (“RMB”), the Euro and other European currencies. For the six months ended and the year ended June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, net sales in Europe accounted for 33% and 35% of our net sales, respectively. Declines in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro impacted our revenue, cost of goods sold and operating margins for these periods and resulted in foreign currency transaction gains and losses. Foreign currency translation gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income, a component of equity, for the six months ended June 29, 2008 and for the year ended December 30, 2007 were a gain of $0.7 million and a gain of $1.2 million, respectively. Historically, we have not actively engaged in substantial exchange rate hedging activities and do not intend to do so in the future.

An interruption in delivery of component supplies could lead to supply shortages or a significant increase in our cost of materials.

We are dependent on our suppliers for timely shipments of components, including components manufactured by us in our India facilities. We typically use a primary source of supply for each component used in our products. Changing suppliers or establishing alternate primary sources of supply, if needed, could take a significant period of time, which in turn could result in supply shortages and increased prices. In some cases, we source components from only one manufacturer. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the sale of products that include components that we source from only one manufacturer. In addition, many of our suppliers are located outside of the United States, and timely delivery from these suppliers may not occur due to interruptions in transportation, import-export controls, tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers, and political and economic stability in the country in which the components used in our products are produced or the surrounding region. An interruption in supply could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Any shortages of particular components could increase product delivery times and costs associated with manufacturing, thereby reducing gross margins. Additionally, these shortages could cause a substantial loss of business due to shipment delays. Any significant shortages or price increases of components could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

33

Table of Contents

Our quarterly sales may fluctuate while our expenditures remain relatively fixed, potentially resulting in lower gross margins and volatility in our stock price.

Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate in the future. Fluctuations in customer needs, cancellations, reductions and delays in orders and commitments may cause our quarterly results to fluctuate. See the risk factor above entitled “Cancellations, reductions or delays in customers’ orders or commitments or an increase in the number of warranty product returns could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.” Variations in volume production orders and in the mix of products sold by us have also significantly affected sales and gross profit. Sales are generally impacted by a combination of these items and may also be affected by other factors. These factors include:

·                   the receipt and shipment of large orders or reductions in these orders (including the impact of any customer warehousing arrangements);

·                   raw material availability and pricing;

·                   product and price competition; and

·                   the length of sales cycles.

Many of these factors are outside of our control. In addition, a substantial portion of our sales in a given quarter may depend on obtaining orders for products to be manufactured and shipped in the same quarter in which those orders are received. As a result of this and other factors described above, sales for future quarters are difficult to predict and our financial condition or results of operations in a given quarter may be below our expectations and our gross margins may decrease. Our expense levels are relatively fixed and are based, in part, on expectations of future revenues. If revenue levels are below expectations, the market price of our common stock could fall substantially, and our financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our ability to successfully implement our business strategy is dependent on our ability to retain and attract key personnel.

Our ability to successfully implement our business strategy depends to a significant degree on the efforts of Jeffrey M. Frank, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, Linster W. Fox, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Mukesh Patel, Executive Vice President, Global Operations, along with other members of our senior management team. We believe that the loss of service of any of these executives could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we depend on highly skilled engineers and other personnel with technical skills that are in high demand and are difficult to replace. As a result, our ability to maintain and enhance product and manufacturing technologies and to manage any future growth also depends on our success in attracting and retaining personnel with highly technical skills. The competition for these qualified technical personnel may be intense if the relatively limited number of qualified and available power engineers continues. We may not be able to attract and retain qualified technical personnel.

Changes in government regulations or product certification could result in delays in shipment or loss of sales.

Our operations are subject to general laws, regulations and government policies in the United States and abroad. Additionally, our product standards are certified by agencies in various countries, including, among others, the United States, Canada, Asia, Germany and the United Kingdom. Changes in these laws, regulations, policies or certification standards could negatively affect the demand for our products, result in the need to modify our existing products, increase time-to-production or affect the development of new products, each of which may involve substantial costs, or loss of or delayed sales, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental compliance could require significant expenditures and failure to so comply could result in fines or revocation of licenses or permits, any of which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations (in both the United States and abroad) that govern the handling, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, including into the air, water and soil. Environmental laws could become even more stringent in the future, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with their violation or the contamination of the environment.

34