By Ryan Knutson, Drew FitzGerald and Dana Mattioli
This article is being republished as part of our daily
reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S.
print edition of The Wall Street Journal (November 6, 2017).
During months of merger talks with T-Mobile US Inc., Sprint
Corp. Chairman Masayoshi Son sought a way to merge the two wireless
rivals without really having to hand over the keys.
There was discussion over inserting a provision to buy the
combined company back after two years, two people familiar with the
matter said. They explored giving the Japanese billionaire the
right to increase his stake over time. He was offered the role of
co-chairman.
In the end, nothing worked. In a joint statement Saturday, the
companies called off the merger for good.
The abrupt turn of events derailed a deal that many on Wall
Street have anticipated for years, and that Mr. Son has long
desired. Before Mr. Son's SoftBank Group Corp. acquired control of
Sprint for $22 billion in 2013, he also held talks with Deutsche
Telekom AG about striking a three-way deal with its U.S.
subsidiary, T-Mobile. When that failed, he tried to merge the
companies again in 2014, only to back down in the face of
opposition from regulators.
The latest round of deal talks began to unravel in late October.
The transaction that was being contemplated was an all-stock merger
that would have given Deutsche Telekom control over the combined
company and made T-Mobile Chief Executive John Legere the new
firm's head, the people said. Beyond having a voice as a major
shareholder, Mr. Son wouldn't be able to dictate the combined
company's direction.
In recent weeks, disagreements over Sprint's valuation also came
to a head, the people familiar with the matter said. Deal makers
with Sprint were under the impression an exchange ratio for
Sprint's shares had been agreed to weeks ago. But, as Sprint's
stock price began to slide, T-Mobile began discussing a lower
valuation, they said.
Then, at an Oct. 27 board meeting in Tokyo, executives at
SoftBank started questioning the fundamental logic of the deal, the
people said. Mr. Son believes wireless connectivity is central to
major businesses of the future, including robots and millions of
devices. Sprint, therefore, is a strategically critical asset, they
argued, so why give up control at all?
For Deutsche Telekom, control was also a requirement. T-Mobile
is much larger than Sprint, and Deutsche Telekom would have to
control the combined company to include the U.S. results in the
German company's reported results.
Whether regulators would approve the deal was also a major
concern for SoftBank, the people said. U.S. regulators had
expressed opposition to the same combination under the Obama
administration and had also blocked AT&T Inc.'s attempt to buy
T-Mobile in 2011, arguing that reducing the market from four to
three competitors would harm consumers.
Even with a pro-business Trump administration, Sprint wasn't
sure the Justice Department would approve the merger. The SoftBank
board didn't want to leave Sprint in a limbo, the people said,
while antitrust regulators reviewed the process for a year -- a
time during which Sprint customers and employees might leave.
"The probability of approval by the DOJ was low, so why sit in
limbo and see Sprint go downward?" one of the people said.
When Mr. Son recently called Tim Höttges, chief executive of
Deutsche Telekom, to let him know he wanted to scrap the deal, Mr.
Höttges asked for a few more days, two of the people said.
T-Mobile's board met in New York on Wednesday and its bankers
scrambled to put together a better offer.
After the board meeting, T-Mobile's Mr. Legere spoke with
Sprint's chief executive, Marcelo Claure. Mr. Legere made it clear
T-Mobile didn't want the deal to die, two of the people said. The
executives agreed to meet and talk things over.
The meeting took place over dinner at Mr. Son's expansive home
in Tokyo, three of the people said. In attendance were Mr. Höttges,
Mr. Legere, Mr. Claure and Mr. Son, along with their advisers.
T-Mobile offered a more attractive exchange ratio, meaning it would
have required fewer Sprint shares to obtain a larger ownership
stake, the people said.
Mr. Son couldn't be swayed. Within hours, the executives were on
planes, headed home.
While significant progress had been made on many issues during
months of talks, valuation and control always lingered in the
background, said one person close to the deal. "The synergies that
this deal offered were bigger than the deal. Bigger than the market
cap of Sprint," the person said. "The synergies were massive, and
that's what keeps everybody going."
Combined, Sprint and T-Mobile would still trail Verizon
Communications Inc. and AT&T by monthly subscribers. But the
combination could yield billions of dollars in savings by sharing
management, stores, wireless spectrum and network equipment,
analysts at New Street Research estimated.
"Both management teams have failed their shareholders," said New
Street telecom analyst Jonathan Chaplin on Saturday. "There was $50
billion of value to be created out of this deal...Neither company
is going to create that magnitude of value in some alternative
way."
Sprint, which has struggled with annual losses, has a market
value of about $27 billion and more than $30 billion in debt.
T-Mobile, which eclipsed Sprint to become the No. 3 carrier by
subscribers, has a market value of nearly $50 billion.
On their own, things will be more difficult for Sprint than
T-Mobile, analysts say. Sprint has invested the least in its
network in recent years while only adding a modest amount of
subscribers. T-Mobile, meanwhile, has expanded its coverage
footprint and added millions of customers since the two broke off
the last round of merger talks in 2014.
Mr. Claure said Sprint plans to increase network investment, and
that it will benefit from its vast spectrum holdings. SoftBank
plans to buy shares of Sprint in the open market, a person familiar
with the matter said, though its ownership won't exceed 85%, which
would trigger a tender offer for the remaining shares. SoftBank
currently owns about 82% of Sprint.
The four major wireless carriers have been beating each other up
in recent years as the number of cellphones has surpassed the
number of Americans, making growth harder to come by. Much of that
competition has been driven by Sprint and T-Mobile, which have
slashed prices and aggressively marketed unlimited data plans.
Those moves forced AT&T and Verizon to bring back unlimited
data plans. The two industry giants are also moving into new
industries, such as television and digital advertising.
Investors believed that a Sprint merger with T-Mobile would have
eased competitive pressure, a feeling that was on display last
week: After news broke the deal was falling apart, Verizon and
AT&T shares fell a few percentage points.
As for Mr. Son? He recently boasted during an interview with
Bloomberg that, even without a merger, his investment in Sprint has
netted a big gain. "Our investment on Sprint, despite many people's
image, our return on equity investment is over 40%. Very good
profit, already," he said.
That gain actually came entirely from the strength of the U.S.
dollar against the Japanese yen. Had Mr. Son invested the same
amount in the S&P 500 index, he would have fared far better and
profited at least $15 billion as of October.
--Mayumi Negishi, Stu Woo and Liz Hoffman contributed to this
article.
Write to Ryan Knutson at ryan.knutson@wsj.com, Drew FitzGerald
at andrew.fitzgerald@wsj.com and Dana Mattioli at
dana.mattioli@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
November 06, 2017 02:48 ET (07:48 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.